Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1979 09-13 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA REGULAR SESSION SEPTEMBER 13, 1979 1. Call to Order: 7:30 p.m. 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes: August 30, 1979 4 Chairman's Explanation: The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council . The City Council makes all final decisions on these matters. 5. Edwin Kauffmann/Village Builders 79055 Request to rezone from Cl to R3 an approximate .9 acre tract of land at the corner of Logan and 58th Avenues North,. opposite of,:the Northbrook Shopping Center. 6. Edwin Kauffmann/Village Builders 79056 Site and Building Plan approval for 8 townhouses (four buildings) at the corner of 58th Avenue and Logan Avenue, across from Northbrook Shopping Center. 7. Construction Analysis and Management 79057 Site and Building Plan approval of a two story 53,000 square foot addition to the existing Medtronic facility at 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway. 8. Construction Analysis and Management 79058 Combination of Tracts C and ,D, R.L.S. 1360 into one parcel -i.for use by the expanded Medtronic fadility at,- 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway. 9. Michlitsch Builders 79059 Site and Building Plan approval of a four-plex located just west of the new 7 Eleven Store at the corner of 69th and Humboldt Avenues. 10. Standard Oil (Quick Six Station) 79060 Site and Building Plan and Special Use Permit approval of a combination gas station, convenience food shop and car wash at the northeast corner of 66th Avenue and West River Road. The new structure will replace an existing gas station. 11 . DeWitt Enterprises 79061 Site and Building Plan approval of an 8 unit townhouse complex to be known as Humboldt Square Estates, located at roughly 6800 Humboldt Avenue North across from Humboldt Square Shopping Center. 12. Discussion Items a. Change date of October 18 Planning Commission meeting to October 11 . i • I • • Page 2 13. Other Business 14. Adjournment Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79055 Applicant: Edwin Kauffmann Location: Logan Avenue south of 58th Avenue Request: Rezoning The applicant is seeking rezoning from Cl (Service/Office) to R3 (Townhouse Garden Apartments) of a tract of land, slightly less than an acre in size, located at the southeast corner of Logan and 58th Avenues North. The land in question comprises roughly the northeast one quarter of the 5700 block of Logan Avenue and is bounded on the west by Northbrook Shopping Center, on the north by an apartment complex, on the east by single-family homes and on the south by a 75' wide private utility easement. The applicant has submitted a site plan of the area (Application No. 79056) and is proposing to replat the area to provide for four two-unit buildings with individual lots of 34' x 96 ' and the remainder for common area. The land is presently described as Lot 1 , Block 1 , Northbrook Center Addition and measures roughly 134' x 295' for a total land area of 39,643 square feet. At a •density of eight units per acre, the parcel can accommodate 7.34 R3 type units . However, the applicant proposes to utilize tuck-under garages which, under Section 35-410 of the Zoning Ordinance, entitle the builder to a credit of 500 square feet per garage space. With one or two garage spaces per unit, the density allowable is at least 8 units. The applicant has submitted a letter outlining how he feels the proposal meets the Rezoning Evaluation Policy and Review Guidelines . (attached) The preliminary recommendation of the Planning Consultant for this parcel is down zoning to R1 . (The parcel was considered too small for an R3 development which generally requires a development of 15 units to break even. Apparently the applicant .considers an eight unit complex sufficiently profitable) . The present Comprehensive Plan, however, encourages one to one and one-half storey "apartment buildings as a transition between Northbrook Shopping Center and nearby single family housing to the east. (p. 58) Staff consider the present C1 zoning to be inappropriate and a down zoning of the property to a residential use to be more suitable to this location. There does not seem to be any major conflict with the guidelines for evaluating rezonings which are attached for the Commission's review. As with all rezoning applications, it is recommended that the' Commission, following review and discussion of the proposal and the holding of a public hearing, table the application and refer it to the Southeast Neighborhood Advisory Group for further review and comment. 9-13-79 Lj i l olljrrfil U.l". /6111 b1c r-1 w, ti. 7201 -36TH AVE. NO. Minneapolis,Minn. 55427 Phone: 535-3361 September 12 , 1979 Mr . Ron Warren Director of Planning and Inspection City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center , MN 55430 Re : Rezoning Application for Lot 1 , Block 1 , Northbrook Center Addition ( Proposed Northbrook Estates Development ) Dear Mr . Warren : We are requesting rezoning of the 39 , 643 sq . ft . parcel of land lying on the southeast quadrant of Logan Avenue North and 58th Avenue North from C-1 to R- 3 . We are proposing to develop the land with 8 condominium single family attached dwelling units , utilizing the 500 sq . ft , reduction in required land area for each required parking stall in or under a multiple residence as provided for by -Section 35-400-1 ( c ) of the City Zoning Ordinance . This reduction would allow developing the parcel with nine total uni.ts rather than our proposed eight units . The eight proposed units will consist of four buildings with two dwelling units in each building . We proposed to subdivide the parcel into eight individual lots and one large common area so that all of the units can be privately owned single family homes . Response to the rezoning guideline questions are as follows : a ) Is there a clear and public need or benefit? Yes . The proposed rezoning will provide the availability of additional housing units in the City of Brooklyn Center and the Earle Brown 'School District . The dwelling units will be available at a cost lower than traditional single family homes because of the density and construction cost savings . Mr . Ron Warren Re ; Proposed Northbrook Estates Page 2 b) Is the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with surrounding land use classifications ? Yes . The proposed zoning is consistent with and compatible with the surrounding land use classification because the area to the south is zoned R-4 , the area to the north is zoned R-5 , the area to the west is zoned C-2 , and the area to the east is zoned R-1 . The proposed R- 3 zoning provides for an excellent transitional zoning and buffering of the existing R-1 zoned properties east of the subject parcel from the C-2 zoned Northbrook Shopping Center property lying west of the parcel . c ) Can all permitted uses in the proposed zoning district be contemplated for development of the subject property? Yes . It is our opinion that all permitted uses in the . proposed R- 3 zoning district can be contemplated for development of the subject property with no detrimental effect to surrounding properties . d ) Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned? No . It - is our understanding that there has not been' any physical or zoning classification changes in the area since the subject property was zoned . e ) In the case of City- initiated rezoning proposals , is there a broad public purpose evident? Not applicable. f) Willthe subject property bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the proposed zoning districts ? Yes . g) Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district , with respect to size , config- uration , topography or location ? This parcel is one of a few parcels of commercial property in the City of Brooklyn Center which does not abut or have exposure to a major thoroughfare street . This is perhaps the major reason the subject parcel has not been previously. developed and therefore seems to be more suitable for residential development than commercial . ._� i I ��. Mr . Ron Warren Re : Proposed Northbrook Estates Page 3 h ) Willthe rezoning result in the expansion of a zoning district , warranted by : 1 ) Comprehensive Planning ; 2 ) the lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district ; or 3) the best interests of the community? Yes . It is our understanding the City ' s Planning Consultant is recommending this property to be reclassified as residential in the City ' s current comprehensive plan study . It is our opinion the property is better suited as an R-3 zoning than an R-1 zoning . The R-3 zoning allows the single family attached homes at a greater density and thereby provides transitional zoning and buffering for the existing single family homes easterly of the subject site . The proposed zoning is also warranted because it is to the best interests of the community to provide additional lower cost housing and additional dwelling units in the Earle Brown School District . This development will help -replace some of the dwelling units lost to the City and Earle Brown' School District due to freeway construction . i ) Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel ?. Yes . for the various above stated reasons . Sincerely , Edwin Kauffmann , resident VILLAGE BUILDERS , INC . Section 35-208. REZONING EVALUATION POLICY AND REVIEW GUIDELI;.ES. 1. Purpose, The City Council finds that effective maintenance of the comprehensive planning and land use classifications is enhanced through uniform and equitable evaluation of periodic proposed changes to this Zoning C dinance; and for this purpose, by the adoption of Resolution No. 77-167, the City Council has establishes a rezoning evaluation policy and review guidelines. 2. Poles I't is -the policy of the City that: a) zoning classifications must be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan, and b) rezoning propcsals shall not constitute 11sF7t zoning," defined as a zoning.decision which O1SCri?^i^2-tc5 i fa-t or of a particular landowner, and does not relate to the Comprehensive Plat, . or to accepted planning principles. 3. Procedure Each rezoning proposal will be considered on its merits, measured against the above policy and against these guidelines which may be weighed collectively or individually as deemed by the City. : 4. Guidelines. (a) Is there a clear and public need,or benefit? _. (b) Is -the proposed zoning consistent with and compatible with . surrounding land use classifications? (c) Can all permitted uses i.n -the proposed zoning district be • contemplated for development of the subject property? (d) Have there been substantial physical or zoning classification changes in -the area since -the subject property was zoned? (e) In the case of City-initiated rezoning proposals, is there a • llroad public purpose evident? : • (f) Will -the subject property bear fully -the ordinance development restrictions for.the proposed zoning districts? •(g) Is the subject property generally unsuited for uses permitted in the present zoning district, with respect to size, configuration, topography or location? (h) 'Will the rezoning result'in 'the expansion of a zoning district, warranted by: 1) Comprehensive Planning; 2) 'the lack of developable land in the proposed zoning district; or 3)_ the best interests of the community? ' !) Does the proposal demonstrate merit beyond the interests of an owner or owners of an individual parcel? - ........- K, Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79056 Applicant: Edwin Kauffmann/Village Builders Location: 58th and Logan Avenues North Request: Site and Building Plan The applicant requests site and building plan approval for an 8 unit townhouse complex at the corner of 58th and Logan Avenues North, across from Northbrook Shopping Center (the property is that described in Application No. 79057) . The application is being submitted for two purposes. First of all as a conceptual plan to show that an R3 development can be contemplated on the property. Second, if the rezoning under Application No. 79057 is recommended, the applicant desires to request site and building plan approval . Each individual unit will be 24' x 46' . The interior lots are proposed to be 34' x 96' , the corner lots 29 ' x 96 ' . Individual driveways off Logan Avenue are proposed. The east portion of the site is designated for common area. A mini - mum four feet high opaque screening device (fence or shrub row) will be placed along the east property line. All setback requirements are met. There is at this time some unclarity regarding the exact location of the east property line since recent surveys indicate that fences for two. single-family homes to the east are located on the Northbrook Estates property. In most other respects, the development resembles a single-family home sub- division. Utilities for each unit are connected at the street. As with the rezoning application, it is recommended that Application No. 79056 be tabled until the rezoning question is resolved. 9-13-79 =Mimi! EARL BROW MIMI WIN NO Mm IM IM IM MIM mm IM mm IM ow IN IM 111.-111 � .�� - .� ■�i� . IM Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79057 Applicant: Construction Analysis and Management, Inc. (for Medtronic) Location: 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway Request: Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant is seeking site and building plan approval for a two-storey, 53,135 square foot addition to its existing facility at 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway. The site includes Tracts C and D, R.L .S. 1360 and is bounded by Speculative Building No. 6 on the north, by Shingle Creek Parkway on the west, by 67th Avenue on the south, and by Hiawatha Rubber and the Earle Brown Farm Apartments on the east. The site is zoned I-1 and the research and development use proposed for the addition is consistent with the existing use approved by the City Council . Although that use is not specifically listed as a permitted use in the Zoning Ordinance, it does fall into the general category of "other uses similar in nature" allowed under Section 35-330 (F) . The site is roughly 9 acres in area and is divided from east to west by a 40' utility easement located in the area of the existing property line. Access to the site is gained via a curb cut off 67th Avenue North and a single curb cut (without median cut) off Shingle Creek Parkway. The new building addition will utilize the area between the existing Medtronic building and the utility easement which presently used for parking. The east half of, Tract C will be used for parking with the west half deferred for possible future development. No external alterations are proposed for the south portion of the existing site. Required parking for the site is 221 spaces based on 32,993 square feet of office space (165 spaces @ one per 200 square feet) and 45,140 square feet of industrial space (56 spaces @ one per 800 square feet) . The proposed site plan provides 248 parking spaces. Access to the new parking lot will be via a newly constructed driving lane located along the east side of the property between the building and a recently constructed lithium storage building. A 50 ' buffer strip is being provided where the site abuts the R5 zoned Earle Brown Farm Apartments. The buffer is in keeping with a recently recommended Zoning Ordinance Amendment which has had a first reading by ' the City Council . The new structure will add space for two additional loading berths in accord- ance with ordinance requirements. The plan also provides for two storage tanks Jo contain Argonne and Nitrogen. The storage tanks will be wholly enclosed and are located on the north side of the building. The storage area extends the full height of the building. Volatile storage is designated in a separate reinforced room on the north side of the first floor of the new building, adjacent to the shipping and receiving area . The Fire Chief is in the process of reviewing the proposed list of chemicals and will certify that the building plans provide proper storage of chemicals prior to the issuance of building permits. The landscaping plan provides a 6' high berm at the northeast corner of the site to shield the parking lot from the residential use to the east. A 4' high undulating berm is proposed along Shingle Creek Parkway. Plantings include three 22" to 3" diameter Honeylocust and seven 5' to 6' Honeylocust at the main entrance to the north building. Seven 22" to 3" Green Ash are proposed for the landscaped area along Shingle Creek Parkway, consistent with the treat- ment in front of the existing building. Fourteen 6 ' to 8' Amur Maple are in- dicated for the 50' buffer area at the northeast corner of the site. Parking islands immediately opposite the north building face are proposed to be land- scaped with Littleleaf Lindens . 9-13-79 -1- ' 1 I Application No. 79057 All unpaved areas are proposed to be sodded and sprinklered with the exception of the future building site which is to be seeded only. The applicant is requesting deferral of landscaping in this area for a period of two years. Drainage from the site is generally to the south and west. The contractor proposes to salvage and reuse existing storm and sanitary sewer utilities presently under the new building site. The plans seem to be in order and approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits . 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements . 4. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire ex- tinguishing system to meet NFPA Standard No. 13 ,and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances . 5. All outside trash disposal equipment and/or rooftop mechanical p equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. B-612 concrete curb and gutter shall be provided around all driving and parking areas. 7. An underground irrigation system shall be provided in all sodded and planting areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to the requirements of Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 9. The two parcels comprehended for this development shall be combined into a single parcel through platting or registered land survey. A final plat shall be approved by the City Council prior to the issuance of occupancy permits for the addition. 10. Landscaping improvements for the area designated as a potential building site at the northwest corner of the property shall be deferred (other than seeding the area) for a period of up to 2 years. After 2 years, if there is no development plan forth- coming, the potential building iste shall be sodded, sprinklered and landscaped consistent with other green areas on the site. The performance bond will not be released in its entirety until this is accomplished. 11 . The applicant will enter into a standard utility maintenance agreement with the City as approved by the City Engineer. 12. Storage of chemicals on the site is subject to the review and . approval of the Fire Chief prior to the issuance of building permits . 9-13-79 -2- Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79058 Applicant: Constructing Analysis and Management Location: 6700 Shingle Creek Parkway Request: Preliminary Plat Approval The applicant is seeking preliminary plat approval to combine- two Tracts, C and D, of R.L.S. 1360 into a single parcel for use by Medtronic in conjunction with the expansion of the existing site comprehended under Application No. 79057. Section 35-540 of the Zoning Ordinance requires that multiple parcels of land which are contiguous and adjacent and which are proposed to serve a single development use and which are under common ownership shall be combined into a single parcel through platting or registered land survey. This appli- cation is in response to that requirement. A -40' wide utility easement runs east to west over the middle of the property. Access to the parcel is provided off of Shingle Creek Parkway and 67th Avenue North. The lot dimensions are not substandard in any respect. The zoning of the entire tract is I-1 and the proposed use for the site is permitted under the City's Ordinances. We have not received any data as to the area of the parcel , but estimate that it is about 9 acres. The proposed R.L.S. seems to be in order and the City Engineer will be prepared to comment on it further at Thursday evening's meeting. Approval is recommended subject to the following conditions: 1 . The final R.L.S. is subject to the approval of the City Engineer. 2. The final R.L.S. is subject to the provisions of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. A public hearing has been scheduled and notices sent. 9-13-79 -. –r ----- t — 70 TH AV 74 TH Av AV IPVINC LANE N R9 s — f E ME 69 TH AV[ COUNTY C2 7 APPLICATION NOS. R 5 79057 & 79058 C ANCE I ............ SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY I 67 OPEN SPACE z 67TH AVE T ' l z BROOKLYN HIGH c cr- ul ° Q Y 5 LU Ld cc V I1 FREEWAY BLVD. 6 C2 cc CENTRAL/ --- PROPOSED ROADWAYS �� 941 DO PROPOSED BRIDGES CITY ••1 a I / Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79059 Applicant,: Michlitsch Builders Location: 1510 - 69th Avenue North Request: Site and Building Plan The applicant seeks site and building plan approval for a four-unit apartment building on Lot 1 , Block 1 , Horbal Addition. The property is located on the north side of 69th Avenue North, westerly of Humboldt Avenue North. The site is bounded on the east by a new 7 Eleven Store, on the north by the Brookdale Towers apartment complex, on the west by single family residential homes, and on the south by existing R5 multiple-family development. The parcel is zoned R4 and the proposed use is permitted in that zone. The lot in question measures 120' by 170' or 20,400 square feet. Under Section 35-400, the land area used for calculating density is exclusive of the setback area abutting streets . In this case, the remaining area is 14,400 square feet, precisely the amount required for four R4 type units . Eight parking spaces are provided as required by the Zoning Ordinance. Proposed setbacks are all in excess of the ordinance requirements including a required 15' buffer strip between R1 and R4. The City recently vacated a street easement over the west 30 feet of the property, formerly designated as part of Irving Avenue North. The City will retain a 30 foot easement over the same area for public utility and walkway purposes . Parking is permitted up to the easement line, but no structures are allowed to be built over it. The parking area is to be screened by a 6 foot high wood fence along the west property line and by four foot high berms adjacent to 69th Avenue North right-of-way. A trash enclosure is proposed on the west side of the parking lot. It is felt that a better location for the trash enclosure would be on the east side of the parking lot to avoid any conflict with the utility and walkway easement. Although no handicapped parking stalls are .required for the site, handicapped accessibility is provided by a ramp and striped dead space extending from the front sidewalk. Plantings proposed for the site are minimal . Three small existing elms will remain on the site. New plantings include four 3' to 4' Spirea and four 30" to 36" Maney Junipers. A 6" diameter Green Ash is proposed in front of the building per ordinance requirements . The Commission may well want to review landscaping with the applicant in more detail . It is felt that additional trees and/or shrubs should be provided. Drainage on the site is primarily toward a drainage ditch running along the north side of 69th Avenue. Some water will drain toward the northeast corner of the property. Water and sewer connections are proposed to be made from the utility easement on the west side of the property rather than from the street. Generally the plans seem to be in order with the possible exception of land- sacping. Approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 9-13-79 -1- Application No. 79059 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits . 3. The applicant shall enter into a standard utility maintenance agreement with the City as approved by the City Engineer. 4. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements. 5. All outside trash disposal equipment and/or rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided throughout all driving and parking areas. 7. The applicant shall acquire title to the property vacated by the City for street purposes prior to the issuance of permits. �..., 9-13-79 -2- • • , w I i • � � r a mill son MAIM son .iii ANN A CITY - MAINT EQ ,K PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER HIGH SCHOOL NOW,, q. Owl M 94 Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79060 Applicant: Standard Oil (Quick 6) Location: 6600 West River Road Request: Site and Building Plan and Special Use Permit Approval The applicant is seeking a special use permit and site and building plan approval to develop and operate a combined gas station, convenience store, and car wash on a 23,838 square foot site at the northwest corner of West River Road and 66th Avenue North. The site is bounded by undeveloped R5 property on the east, a nonconforming single family home on the north (land zoned R5) , by a Texaco Station on the west and the proposed Atkins Plumbing Contractors office ,on the south. The property is zoned C2 and gas stations and car washes are special uses within that zone. The site is almost square with one 30' access drive onto 66th Avenue North and another onto West River Road. The proposed structure is 31 ' x 36 ' with a 40' x 59' canopy to shelter four pump islands to the west of the building. The canopy is to be set back 39' from Highway 169 right-of-way and the pump islands roughly 50 feet. There is no setback requirement for either canopies or pump islands, however, staff considers any additional gas pumps to be inappropriate for an already crowded site. The principle structure is split evenly between the convenience store on the west side and the car wash on the 'east side. An 8' x 12' fenced trash enclosure is to be situated on the east side of the building. All relevant setbacks appear to be met. The plan proposes eleven parking stalls as required by the ordinance, eight on the south side of the site, two adjacent to the trash enclosure, and one along -the north driving lane. Handicapped accessibility is provided by two ramps on the north and west sides of the convenience store. The applicant has submitted a letter of application (attached) in which he states that the proposed use will not be detrimental to or impede the develop- ment of surrounding property, but will improve property values. The hours of operation, with "normal product availability," would be 24 hours a day. Since the vast majority of business transacted is the purchase of gasoline, there does not seem to be any conflict with similar uses . If complaints should arise over the round-the-clock service, some restriction on hours of operation could be made through the yearly special use permit review process. The building itself will have a split level roof, with the car wash extending roughly 3 feet above the convenience store. The convenience store will receive a full mansard treatment which will also serve to screen rooftop mechanical equipment. The car wash will have an 18" deck treatment around the top. The exterior of the building faces will be precast concrete with exposed aggregate carried uniformly around the entire building. Windows will be a dark bronze color. As to proposed landscaping: the applicant intends to relocate, or replace, an existing 6 ' high redwood fence to shield driving and parking areas from neighboring residential property. Sod is proposed in all green areas except the east side of the site where steep slopes will be treated with Class 11 Minnesota State Highway Seed Mix. Two large existing trees at the northeast corner of the site will be preserved. Other plantings include 10 Redtwig Dogwood, 15 Smooth Sumac, 2 Marshall Ash, and 5 Broadmoor Junipers . The applicant proposes 4" of crushed rock and 2" of decorative rock on top of reinforced "poly" in the planting areas. An underground sprinkler system is designated in all landscaped areas. 9-13-79 -1- i Application No. 79060 Drainage from the site is primarily toward a drainage ditch on the south edge of the site. The underground storage tanks are proposed for the west side of the site to allow fuel trucks to refill the tanks with minimum disruption to traffic flow. B-612 curb and gutter are indicated around all parking and driving areas. The plans have only recently been modified with certain changes red-lined in. With these changes the plans seem to meet the City's standards. Approval as submitted would be subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Drainage, grading, utility and landscaping plans are subject to approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A Performance Agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements prior to the issuance of permits. 4. All outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 5. The Special Use Permit is issued to the operator of the facility and is nontransferable. 6. The Special Use Permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations, including special licensing requirements, and violation thereof shall be grounds for revocation. 7. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 8, The applicant shall submit a complete set of revised drawings prior to consideration by the City Council . 9. The applicant will enter into a standard utility maintenance agreement with the City as approved by the City Engineer. 9-13-79 -2- n, STA Standard Oil Division Amoco Oil Company Twin Cities District 4640 W.77th Street, Suite 328 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55435 612-831-3464 S. C. Hinkle District Manager September 11, 1979 City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, M. 55430 Attention: Mr. R. Warren Dear Mr. Warren: RE: U. S. HIGHWAY 169 & 66TH AVE. NO. BROOKLYN CENTER, MN. We propose to replace our existing, special use permitted service station at the above location with self serve, full serve, gasoline dispensing, a car wash and a convenience store. The convenience store would basically have snacks , candy, pop, beer, milk and cigarettes. The hours of operation, with normal product availability, would be 24 hours. These services would serve and be convenient for the general public in the area. The facility would be a new attractive pre-cast concrete structure, improving property values. This new facility will not impede the normal and orderly development of surrounding property. The ingress, egress and parking have been reviewed by your Planning Committee and approved as shown. All applicable regulations shall be conformed to. Your consideration and approval would be appreciated. Yours trul , �Tdt R. A. Duggan r. Senior Proj,' EngiW er / I RAD/cg (/ `Ferns;a t';€; Conditions 1. Pricae Un!css othe:)rr ise sr)ocitied on thr fade hereo he f.) ce for each t ouctive product, Jf 01 be Anuxu s ist.,NiMed t`r!.r' for Boye,r's don of ut)dn £txs.l,iswe of taXat at it eff;xa on d'Ite ), dfr!i ery at th;=sat h%.f#iy point des:rt imed by S:t_uon €f of then' Mum and CUtt6fion- Alf plicles ave saatiect to C h2?r'.f":".vith'.ltt n0ti( i!I!OSS _Pek ifi+d Cn the ;o.br,t' ,cl#' brat uf, 2. 3 3%a: Any Mn ti'kt.r>`.? I or other iM, ills d:a.tOn fee, duty irrripai of t ''i), irw(ansr' fee iinipf"ot at'. ;r1 .� tr,onnii9e is .atitC,uS�r;JSST E rlt, f,;r o0wr like t h Ir'ge 1-tC kh b jt uiul a .wd ter Arr ed ay faCjt.`r%i, . .aW or to(, f avi.?,mity tf Nmi tho 1);<)Cf wts andiot tt 2ansJt-Ins C r, unq #?zed h Lmnor finGluding fdl, oc.l:vely, alt'a' £so tat U'Y'f?!IElrYof thi' ptoducts of ,i:j a! iicting arry of sand,wid v:Wh 0 Mij nd on or n)";.xSa;t't_I by the priCC of �1 On , uducts at tho t)wi_a3b da of 00 he;;:o`der, shall fat;added to tho P6'-z, Set forth hcr' n "N A`shill he Buyer t n&w sAd pV or , rives Sfzc tafiC)I.y ,.tat:,that thoy include d-ly M CltaWe or di uta9n 31 Fame ta'ajetiS'e and MoGa£row ;it'3S AM he t:);C.tmed Omni delay or "onivoortrance A Se1;.1 is unable to meet the tonind for its proMM at &H','WS larn-t2.! and ust.Mi ..:.1iN-Ce p0irris fc)r siij Tiyrt;rj .sf,� �i ,tia?'t{`._,)a�e"V-i, „tt�r�•.Ji not Mar nail' i..;bE h"n;i>t"Aud to divina co vin suf)a)ii ;,71i such souk= r)t.ints in oru" `? ,o„i oviat@. i1i1 tc,C,t:>aL other :;,,. f#4: C?.l,l! "lE. t.g in the evna of rta,;C]Ce. 0) ti May tt} d'ac4,_"y! (ii#'' to ,R;.?_`. .f� �dd`.t'� t< .....�iility( O��t e. ,tcic1 < s)( i; vrtpo tl!rii i} fv �-r�! in �i,he viv .ah t+..�..� ti { t it.i t'... 'f:.l-`i'.?:����,.) r�10 1 ir.t ,,. i (:, ti.�S �L, All be Nato dye �v nNwerANMaace in we la of any ConLfmon ti;W 't d_. v i rat.°�`. S..•a.x,3ci y`' ...aS..tPaW cmitrol ll.,Jz ..t.it"-Oo t"'O l sw tyr a A Hro or May o*trzinn as O;on:AN, q Cod;d; Ibow:1; At r Is; ik dam: . 01 any 014 t C(Pl i ti:,aid co-inphance 1119`Xly in ivyf iam, <O poonwr 3,'.: c .t.,ir Mummy ol .:i`d+. .# ,) ...7 Ay io :r th , , t =E`-C. ,„ V) I Q0 awU Sol We tili. Tin 10 ,#u""q �z or qWv&kQ ,')01J M=0 v.'Sl}t,i: ;f).f7; ,.r _,. . B?� i,r�r)"ati , Own t .,.L,i_YTi�-C '. -:. OK, At annyho x .r, (-(o e'$ .:'r!<__ 0p..r €�s -.'=c s...i;.�_ .tr;.i4 Cria �.�� tf�.. � ,. ,c,.7, C ,.. -JL�I �.) 13 __. v. 0( it eii_ Wax— P,•e r 0. .cat S=CE's MAC .. .s z'_J,.N.t _£C itit:ly _ ,., F t,C :.c 11 rtj t t ;t i �r tz it =1� t i r F° tri t ad „ Jtf t t ) . .�1r .. .cis .ht - - _ - lt- i - E r!. r � ., ,._, ':i�,� r; ?..., �: 5.: ... t n., ", MA-a', ' '.h oxxv M4 ;<'.,. ;: dlCait..aid toy MM 1 ..`iz, in 'it' c+.hav pma to r,... not ,W v",..k,,'...F+~.6j.,as } s , u of _ r ",: zo noke nayanor . , ar it .,i i0 wuvw vvyd .01 ,r c VA TO L)A ) c }r j; -flw Ono if ..n Vic.. .,.. ) tim . .�.. # .y ..'•i rte. .,, fr_ct f) t Q - c0 d bv cc .�. [k':� .. L(e ,tuUwmm wy not & yvwd!'Jr r;F.i C MOW 4 V.Own iW and f. ,., ;€ .;i bg t, Djx. oq . ,i,j r i, woo m'. voi(". 8 LJ H r n y; 010650d On lie m AaH Go, eympt ♦ £d ( 4 .i 4 aw num &nUTQ:!%,at F. >. 8. qwww& Poo Bola 1 (4t ,i t vd Waya. 140%q%J ,ta[i, dond fug d Mw! lm an F% ._ v il(')t% thin tirolv4d MY ally .. fIl .'.i amatllli rf rth m 0 ri in ,,,t}i ,,;nY r',i'nent: {& wal j)fCJl"45" , .Jr,'W MS or ad-;rr':3n., S Shoo fk. #:it'.,M:(; a p0apavoi ro, 401 any MtiESIn or :.:rT :i'?fJrT'If'ItF hitroot, .)r ,'t;vi'r of.-,jn!of i..., �nt 43'vi-5aw-., f}r, hinding upon nahn 00>) f:i�r o unfa,,,so t;,n,= be in ,.1`,tM(! 4, fk r,_g,ni - 2. Standards for Special Use Permits A special use permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the following are met: (a) The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comf ort. (b) The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property.in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. (c) The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. (d) Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion In the public streets: (e) The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the appli- cable regulations of the district in which it is located.. 3. Conditions and Restrictions The Planning ommission may recommend and the City Council Y Y may impose such conditions and restrictions upon the establishment, location, construction, maintenance and operation of the special use as deemed necessary for the pro- tection of the public interest and to secure compliance with requirements. specified in this ordinance. In all cases in which special use permits are granted, the City Council may require such evidence.and guarantees as it may . deem necessary as part of the conditions stipulated in connection therewith. 4. Resubmission No application for a special use permit which has been denied by the City Council shall be resubmitted for a period of twelve (12) months from the date of the final determination by the City Council; except that the applicant may set forth in writing newly discovered evidence of'change of condition upon which he relies to gain the consent of the City Council for resubmission at an earlier time. 5.. Revocation and Extension of Special Use Permits When a special use permit has been issued pursuant.to the provisions of this ordinance, such permit shall expire without further action by the Planning Commission or the City. Council unless the applicant or his assignee or . successor commences work upon the subject property within one year of the date the special use permit is granted, or unless before the expiration of the �- one year period the applicant shall apply for an extension thereof by filling out and submitting to the Secretary of the Planning Commission a "Special Use Permit" application requesting such extension and paying an additional fee of Std nn I i I II� �I f �■� ■■ ci ■ ■ UINTENANCE ATER TOWER idol 1/� 1 ��■ i■�■ ■■�■ Ma ■ ■■ • BOAT LANOING e � � { r . . r r` • Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 79061 Applicant: Richard DeWitt Location: 6801 Humboldt Avenue North Request: Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant is seeking site and building plan approval for an eight unit townhouse complex to be located on a .9 acre tract of land across from Humboldt Square Shopping Center at roughly 6801 Humboldt Avenue North. The parcel is bound by the Humboldt Courts Apartments on the north, by the Spec. 7 Industrial Building on the west, by the Bardel Apartments on the south, and by Humboldt Square Shopping Center on the east. The land is zoned R5 and R3 uses, such as townhouses and single-family attached condominiums, are a permitted use in the R5 zone provided they meet R3 district requirements. The applicant seeks to put 8 townhouse .units (two quadrahomes) on a 39,307 square foot parcel . Each unit will have a two-car tuck-under garage which under Section 35-410, entitles the builder to a density credit of 500 square feet per enclosed stall , or a total density credit of 8,000 square feet over the entire site. At 4,400 square feet per unit, the allowable density is 8.9 units. Total parking provided on the site will be 32 spaces or double the required amount. Access to all units is provided by a driveway running along the north side of the property. the applicant proposes that each unit will have its own platted yard area and the drives, and the front and rear yards will be designated as common area. Each lot will be approximately 44' x 44' . The applicant will be submitting replatting of the area.which will be before the Commission at a future date. The structures are to be set back 10 feet from the south property line as required by the ordinance. The setback off Humboldt Avenue is roughly 721 , well in excess of the 50' ordinance requirement. The landscape plan intends to make generous use of large existing trees on the site with additional plantings scheduled for the front and rear portions of the site for appropriate screening purposes . o-„� .� -All common driving areas will be surrounded by B-612 curb and gutter. The site will generally drain toward the rear. The plans generally seem to be in order and approval is recommended subject to at least the following conditions: 1 . Building plans are subject to review and approval by the `Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage and utility plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A Performance Agreement' and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improvements. 4. All outside trash disposal facilities and/or rooftop mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. -5; B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all common driving areas. 6. The prop ty is subject to replatting in accordance with Chapter 7 of the City Ordinances. EVERGREEN CITY MAINTENANCE ANNEX WATER TOWER 0 Kmh 5 APPLICATION NO. ■ SCHOOL BROOKLYN CENTER HIGH •ate ■ c 2 j r ....... . . .