HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977 07-20 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNtPIN
AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA M
REGULAR SESSION
JULY 20, 1977
CITY HALL
Reconvene June 23 Meeting The Planning Commission of June. 23, 1977 was reconvened
by Chairman Cecilia Scott at 7:30 p.m.
Adjourn June 23 Meeting Motion by Commissioner Pierce seconded by Commissioner
Engdahl to adjourn the June 23, 1977 meeting. Voting
in favor: Chairman Scott, Commissioner Pierce, and
Commissioner Pierce and Commissioner Engdahl . Not
voting: Commissioner Horan who was not present at that
meeting. Motion passed.
Call to Order: Chairman Scott then called to order the regular meeting
of the Planning Commission at 7:40 p.m.
Administer Oath of Office The Secretary administered the Oath of Office to Mr.
James Book who was appointed by the City Council to
fill the seat vacated by Robert Foreman.
. Roll Call : Chairman Scott, Commissioners Engdahl , Book, Pierce
and Horan. Also present were Interim City Manager and
Director of Public Works James Merila, Director of
Planning and Inspection Blair Tremere and Planning
Aide Laurie Thompson.
Approve Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Engdahl seconded by Comissioner
6-23-77 fierce to approve the minutes of the June 23 meeting
as submitted. Voting in favor were: Chairman Scott,
Commissioners Engdahl and Pierce. Not voting: Com-
missioners Horan and Book who were not present at that
meeting. Motion passed.
Application No. 77031 Following the Chairman's Explanation the first item
(Theresia Dunn) of business was consideration of Application No. 77031
submitted by Theresia Dunn. The item was introduced
by the Secretary who stated the applicant requests a
variance from Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances (Sub-
division) to permit subdivision of a residential lot
at 5835 Camden Avenue North by metes and bounds de-
scription. He stated the proposed division would
create a new lot facing Aldrich Avenue North which_
would be 118.36 feet wide and 135.30 feet deep.
Chairman Scott announced the Commission was sitting
as the Advisory Board of Adjustments and Appeals.
The Secretary stated the Subdivision Ordinance pro-
vides that variances may be authorized when, in the
Council 's opinion, undue hardship may result from
strict compliance. He reviewed the ordinance stand
aids for granting a subdivision variance.
Public Hearing Chairman Scott stated that a public hearing had been
scheduled and recognized Mr. Peterson of 5835 Aldrich
Avenue North who inquired as to the minimum lot width
standards and the zoning of the land.
Close Public Hearing Motion by Pierce seconded by Engdahl to close the
public hearing. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Scott stated that the request was similar
in nature to others approved in this area, barticularly
for lots which are already platted. The Secretary
explained that the resulting legal description would
not be complicated by the metes and bounds description
because the property had been platted and the division
split the lot in half.
_1- 7-20-77
Following a brief discussion, there was a motion by Recommend Approval of
Commissioner Engdahl seconded by Commiss )ner Horan Application No. 77031
to recommend approval of Application No. 77031 submitted (Theresia Dunn)
by Theresia Dunn authorizing a division of Lot 25,
Lyndale Riverside Acres Addition creating .two resi-
dential lots of 135.30 depth; noting that the request
satisfies the ordinance standards for granting a sub-
division variance, and further that no other variances
are granted or implied. The motion passed unanimously.
The next item of business was consideration of Appli- Application No. 77023 and.
cation No. 77023 and Application No. 77030 submitted Application No. 77030
by Cepco, Incorporated. The items were introduced by (Cepco, Inc.)
the Secretary who stated Application No. 77023 consisted
of a Preliminary Plat proposing a resubdivision of Lot
1 , Block 2, Ewing Lane Addition. He stated the property
is bounded by 63rd Avenue on the north, Ewing Lane on
the east and France Avenue North on the west. He stated _
the south 160 feet of the property is zoned R-2 (One
and Two Family Residential ) whereas the remainder is
zoned R-4. He explained the replatting would establish
a formal lot line at the present zoning line and would
also create two 80 foot wide lots within the R-2 zone.
The Secretary also explained that there is a deficiency
for each of the proposed R-2 lot areas caused by the
zoning line which was established by the City in 1968.
He stated the deficiency per lot is approximately 215
square feet for R-2 uses, and this could be viewed as
neglibible since the lots exceed the ordinance with
respect to width and depth.
The Secretary commented on Application No. 77030 which
consists of site and building plans for the construction
of R-3 townhouse units on the R-4 zoned land. He re-
viewed the site layout which also indicated the con-
figuration of the proposed duplex dwellings on the R-2
portion.
The Secretary and Director of Public Works stated that
there were a number of items regarding the site layout
which required further review and that recent changes
made to the plans by the applicant had not been fully.
evaluated with respect to applicable ordinance and
code standards . The Secretary recommended that,
following the Commission's review of the concept,
Application No. 77030 be tabled.
Chairman Scott then recognized Mr. Warren Carlson,
President of Cepco, Incorporated, who commented that
the proposed plat was submitted to conform with City
Ordinance requirements regarding individual lots for
one and two family dwellings. He stated it was the
applicant's intent to retain common ownership of the
entire property. He stated all the units would be
rented.
Chairman Scott stated that a notice of public hearing Public Hearing
had been published relative to the Preliminary Plat
and that no one was present.
An extensive discussion ensued regarding the Pre-
liminary Plat and Commissioner Horan inquired, as to
the R-2 area deficiency. The Secretary stated that
the zoning line had been established by the City in
1968, and apparently had been located following an
approximate calculation of the necessary footage for
two family dwellings . He stated the ordinance re-
quired a minimum 6,200 sq.' ft per dwelling unit, or
12,400 sq. ft. per lot. He stated the technical
variance recognizing the area deficiency could be
inherent in the subdivision approval and there had
been similar situations in the past regarding single
. family and two family subdivisions. He also stated
that the minimum width and depth exceeded the ordi-
nance minimum standards for single family lots, and
that it was apparent from the applicant's conceptual
layout that two family dwellings could be located
on the properties without the need for any setback
variances.
7-20-77 -2-
Commissioner Pierce commented on the conceptual plan
which showed a common driveway and parking area for
the duplex lots and the Secretary responded that .it
may be necessary prior to the issuance of building
permits to resolve the questions of whether a formal
cross easement would be necessary to accommodate that
design.
Further discussion ensued as to the zoning of the area,
and the Secretary explained that the R-2 zoning had
apparently been provided as an intermediate land use
from the R-4 to the adjacent R-1 to the south. He
explained that this was a common technique used in
the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning.
Further review ensued relative to the conceptual plans
and the Secretary reiterated the recommendation that
the Site and Building Plan approval application be
tabled to allow further review of the site plan
relative to density and layout.
Relative to the proposed landscaping plan, Commissioner
Horan stated that the proposed trees consisting of
. Green Ash, Linden and Red Maple species were 1 3/4
inch diameter. He stated this seemed relatively
small , particularly for the Red Maple trees, and sug-
gested that a larger size planting be provided. The
Secretary commented that the Zoning Ordinance re-
quired a minimum of three 6" in diameter long-lived
hardwood trees for the project, and the plans in-
dicated there were several trees existing on the
property which satisfied that ordinance requirement.
In further discussion, it was the consensus of the
Commission that the landscape and planting schecule
be more specific as to the distribution of the pro-
posed trees and plantings by -type; and that the pro-
posed Red Maple variety be of 2 to 22 in. diameter.
In further discussion the Director of Public Works
recommended that the Preliminary Plat application
also be deferred so it could be presented to the City
Council with the Site and Building Plans. Mr.
Carlson stated he had no objection.
Table Application No. 77023 Motion by Commissioner Engdahl seconded by Commis-
(Cepco, Inc.) sioner Pierce to table Application No. 77023 pending
further review and dispostion of Application No.
77030. The motion passed unanimously.
Table Application No. 77030 Following a brief discussion there was a motion by
(Cepco, Inc. ) Commissioner Pierce seconded by Commissioner Horan
to table Application No. 77030 submitted by Cepco,
Incorporated to permit further review of the Site
and Building Plans with respect to applicable codes
and ordinances; and to permit the revision of the
landscape schedule to indicate a more specific
distribution, of the proposed trees and to amend the
minimum diameter of the Red Maple to 2 - 22 in.
. diameter. The motion passed unanimously.
Application No. 77024 The next item of business was review of Application
(John Sheehan, Jr, for No. 77024 submitted by John Sheehan, Jr. for Holiday
Holiday Inn) Inn. The item was introduced by the Secretary who
stated the applicant was seeking Special Use Site
and Building Plan approval for a 68 room addition to
the Holiday Inn; 1501 Freeway Boulevard. He ex-
plained the transient lodging was a special use in
the C-2 and I-1 districts. He stated the expansion
area to the west involves the use of land contained
in the adjacent tract.
-3- 7-20-77
The Secretary reviewed the proposed plans Ind presented
slides of the site. He stated the plans )mprehend the
provision for large vehicle parking, since the experience
with the Holiday Inn indicates a need for such facilities.
He stated it is common that large vehicles such as semi-
trailer trucks and recreational vehicle motor homes'
utilize the motel facilities and occupy up to 8 or 9
automubile parking spaces. He stated no provision for
the special parking was made in the original approval '
and the proposed plans indicate five such spaces at- the
southwest corner of the site.
The Secretary also stated the parking plans reflect 374
spaces versus the ordinance requirement of 409, or a
variation of 35 spaces. He explained the 'plans indicate
the 35 spaces represent a 24% factor of the 145 spaces
allocated to the restaurant and lounge uses within the
motel . He stated this appears to be a reasonable joint-
use factor since a definite element of the restaurant
trade is composed of motel guests for whom parking has
been provided by a separate calculation for the motel
units .
Chairman Scott recognized Mr. John Sheehan, Jr. and Mr.
Janis Blumentals and an extensive discussion ensued
relative to the parking layout and parking space pro-
visions . Commissioners Horan and Pierce suggested
that the Holiday Inn install appropriate signery and
adopt appropriate policies for customers when they
register and are seeking parking spaces which would
direct them to the special vehicle parking area.
Chairman Scott stated that her experience indicated a
severe parking problem at the Holiday Inn when the
banquet rooms were in use and specifically when they
were being used for local oriented functions not in-
volving motel residents. She inquired whether banquet
room facilities had been specifically accounted for in
the parking calcualtion and the Secretary responded in
the negative. He stated the original approval had
apparently presumed there would be adequate parking
because normally the banquet facilities were used by
persons staying at the motel . He agreed that local use
of the facilities could generate a problem. Chairman
recounted instances where she and others had been re-
quired to park some distance from the property in order
to attend functions at the Holiday Inn.
In further discussion it was estimated that the capacity
of the banquet facilities was 300 persons and the
Secretary stated the ordinance provision for places of
public assembly, such as auditoriums, theaters and
schools was one parking space for every three seats or
approximately 100 spaces .
Mr. Blumentals commented that there was no expansion of
the banquet facilities in the proposed plans, but rather
j.ust an addition of rooms. He stated, however, that
with the additional land being acquired approximately
40 additional parking spaces were provided in excess of
those needed for the additional units.
Chairman Scott stated however that, with the future
development of the land to the west as well as the up-
grading of the freeway whereby Freeway Boulevard would
become a highly used major thoroughfare, there would be
little expansion opportunity for the Holiday Inn if that
was not enough parking.
7-20-77 -4-
The Secretary commented that much of the overflow
parking by Holiday Inn patrons was now on Freeway
Boulevard and that, as Chairman Scott suggested, when
I-94 is upgraded, no parking would be permitted on
Freeway Boulevard. Commissioner Book inquired as to
the status of the land south of Holiday Inn since the
Humboldt Interchange was to be eliminated. He asked
the Director of Public Works whether that land would
become available for use by the Holiday Inn. The
Director of Public Works stated 'that it was not clear
at this time whether the property not needed for high-
way purposes would revert to the Holiday Inn or
whether it would revert to some other owner.
During further discussion the Secretary commented that
there was indicated on the plan an open area for a
putting green and a shuffleboard court. He verified
the dimensions and indicated that that area could be
converted to parking within ordinance standards there-
by providing approximately 25 parking stalls. He
said that combined with the approximate 40 stall in-
crease with the propoosed plan, there would be a total
potential for approximately 65 stalls beyond what
exists at this time. The Director of Public Works
and the Secretary also stated that it appeared there
were certain greenstrip areas on the site which could
be redesigned to expand parking spaces if they were
needed.Chairman Scott stated. that it appeared that that
amount of additional parking would be satisfactory for
the banquet use and suggested that the approval recom-
mendation contained specific language referring to
the deferrment of the parking in the area now occupied
by the putting green and the shuffleboard court.
The Secretary explained that this would be in order
since this was a special use and furthermore, if ex-
perience indicated a need for the additional parking
the special use permit could be reviewed and parking
installed according to the amended plan.
Jacobson Arrives: Commissioner Jacobson arrived at 9:00 p.m.
During further review in the plans, Chairman Scott
inquired whether the required underground irrigation
system had been installed throughout the green areas
of the existing site and if it had, whether it was
operable.. Mr. Sheehan stated that such a system had
been installed, and to his knowledge it was operable.
Chairman Scott stated that the condition of the land-
scaping around the site indicated that perhaps it was
not functioning properly, and the Secretary stated
that the status of the system would be verified prior
to the City Council meeting. He stated that since
the present plans required underground irrigation for
all landscaped areas, corrections or modifications
could be made to the existing site at that time.
Public Hearing Chairman Scott noted that a public hearing had been
scheduled and that none of the notified property
owners was present. The Secretary stated a letter
had been received from B.C.I .P. , Inc. stating no ob-
jection to the request.
In further discussion the Secretary stated the re-
quired automatic fire extinguishing system was to be
installed throughout the addition including sprinkler
heads in the individual units. He also stated the
building code required smoke detectors in each of the
individual units and furthermore, the code by State
law would require retro-fitting existing units with
smoke detectors by approximately January 1 , 1980. He
suggested that the retro-fitting be accomplished at
this time, and that would represent a cost savings in
labor and materials to the applicant. Mr. Sheehan
stated that it was the intent of the applicant to in-
stall the smoke detectors in all units at this time.
-5- 7-20-77
Additional discussion ensued as to compliance. with the
State Handicapped Regulations and Mr. Sheehan and Mr.
Bl umental s indicated the plans :reflected for provi'sio n. `
for 9 handicapped units in the new addition, -and th at
there were two existing handicapped units.
The Secretary also stated that a resubdivision would
be required involving the Holiday Inn parcel and the
adjaceni' one from which the additional land would be
taken. He stated no application had been submitted
at this time, and this requirement should be specified
in the recommendation.
Motion by Commissioner Horan seconded by Commissioner Recommend Approval of
Engdahl to recommend approval of Application No. 77024 Application No. 77024
submitted by Mr. John Sheehan, Jr,. for Holiday Inn (John Sheehan for Holiday
subject to the following conditions: Inn)
1 . Building plans are subject to approval
by the Building Official with respect
to applicable codes and ordinances prior
to the issuance of permits.
2. Grading, drainage, utility and berming
plans are subject to approval by the
City Engineer prior to the issuance of
permits.
3. A Performance Agreement and Financial
Guarantee (in a form and amount ap-
proved by the City Manager) shall be
submitted to assure completion of
approved site improvements . .
l
4. The site shall be combined through i
platting or registered land survey
which shall be filed and made of
record prior to occupancy. -
5. All rooftop mechanical equipment and
outside trash disposal facilities shall
be appropriately screened.
6. Plan approval comprehends the potential
use of the designated recreational
area indicated on the plan and of
certain green areas on the site for
parking; and at such time that the City
deems additional parking necessary,
the special use permit shall be reviewed
by the City and the additional parking
shall be installed according to approved
plans and existing ordinance requirements.
The motion passed unanimously.
The meeting recessed at 9:30 p.m. and resumed at 9:40 Recess
p.m.
The next item of business was Application No. 77025 Application No. 77025
submitted by Kurth Survey, Incorporated for Car-X (Kurth Surveying, Inc.
Service Systems, Incorporated. The item was intro- for Car-X Service Systems,
duced by the Secretary who stated the applicant was Inc.)
seeking approval of a preliminary registered land
survey for property at 6810 Brooklyn Boulevard. He
stated the proposed registered land survey would
combine the subject property from two Tracts into
one Tract. He stated the combination was required
by the Zoning Ordinance and was classified as a
condition of approval in Application No. 76067 and
in Application No. 77020.
3
-6
1-20-7i
3
The Secretary stated that a letter had been received
from the owner, as required by the City Council under
Application No. 77020, stating an understanding of the
need for the combination and that property would not
be subject to future subdivision as long as it was
used for the commercial purposes approved under the
above applications.
Public Hearing Chairman Scott stated that the public hearing had been
published and that no one was present.
Chairman Scott recognized Mr. Kurth and a brief dis-
cussion ensued.
Recommend Approval of Motion by Commissioner Engdahl seconded by Commissioner
Application No. 77025 Book .to recommend approval of Application No. 77025
(Car-X Service Systems) submitted by Kurth Surveying, Incorporated for Car-X
Service Systems, Incorporated subject to the following
conditions:
1 . Final R.L.S. is subject to review by the
City Engineer.
2. Final R.L.S. is subject to the require-
ments of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
The motion passed unanimously.
Application No. 77026 The next item of business was consideration of Appli-
(Real Estate 10, Inc.) cation No. 77026 submitted by Real Estate 10, In-
corporated. The item was introduced by the Secretary
who stated the applicant proposed a rezoning from R-1
(Single Family Residential ) to C-1 (Service/Office
Commercial ) of the triangular. parcel on the east side
of Trunk Highway 152 bounded by the highway, and on
the north by the municipal boundary, and on the south-
east by the Shingle Creek greenstrip easement. He ex-
plained that the applicant proposed to construct an
office building and intended to remove the existing
single family structure. He further stated there are
no public utilities to this property, but that it is
possible to construct the necessary utility lines.
The Secretary stated that the Comprehensive Plan pro-
vides for future maximum development along Brooklyn
Boulevard of Service/Office versus retail type uses,
and that the specific parcel was not classified by
the Comprehensive Plan other than as the existing
single family use. He explained that one of the
considerations for leaving the property zoned R-1 in
1968 was the lack of sewer and water, and that no
development other than single family use could be
permitted until the utility services connection was
provided. He stated that construction would be
costly; and it appeared to be virtually prohibitive
for single family development.
The Secretary also stated that the applicant had pre-
pared an Environmental Assessment work sheet patterned
after the form used by the Environmental Quality Board
of the State Planning Agency. He said this inform-
ation was being reviewed by staff with particular
respect to flood plain considerations and to the
sensitivity of Shingle Creek and the Shingle Creek
greenstrip. He stated the greenstrip at this time
consisted of a 100 foot easement overlying the Creek,
and that the Public Works Department was reviewing
the terms of that easement as to its use and design.
The Secretary explained that long range plans call for
a walkway along the Creek, and that assurance could
be made for that at the time of development and re-
platting. The Director of Public Works responded to
several questions regarding t-he utilities and stated
that there were several alternative means of providing
water and sower to the property. He stated the
various alternatives had been discussed with the ap-
plicant.
..7w 7-20-77
The Secretary also stated that inquiries 3d been re-
ceived from the owner of the R-3 zoned pr..per-ty im-
mediately across from this parcel regarding rezoning
possibilities there. He stated that consideration of
this application should account for area wide concerns.
In response to a question by Commissioner Engdahl , the
Director of Public Works described, the type of access
to the property from Trunk Highway 152`. He stated
that a single access would be appropriate for this
property.
Commissioner Scott announced that a public hearing had Public Hearing
been scheduled and she recognized Mrs. Schutt, 7301
Noble Avenue North. Mrs . Schutt stated that, because
of the general residential development in the area and
the commercial development in Brooklyn Park, it would
be preferable to leave the property zoned R-1 . She
indicated that she lives in Brooklyn Park but owns a
small piece of property in Brooklyn Center to the
east of the subject. parcel . She commented that due to
the high traffic in the area and the need to preserve
the natural environment along the Shingle Creek green-
strip, as well as that which bounded her property,
residential development should be preserved. In
response to a question regarding traffic raised' by
Mrs . Schutt, the Director of Public Works commented'
that the proposed zoning was a Service/Office Com-
mercial that did not comprehend retail uses, whereas
much of the development in Brooklyn Park to which
Mrs. Schutt had referred, was of the retail type.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Close Public Hearing
Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner Pierce
to close the public hearing. The motion passed
unanimously.
In further discussion Commissioners Engdahl and Horan
inquired about the use of the easement for parking.
It was explained that the conceptual plan indicated
a portion of the easement on the northwest side would
be used for parking. The Secretary explained that
easements could not be built upon and Chairman Scott
inquired as to the relationship of this easement along
Shingle Creek and the greenstrip in -the Brooklyn Center
Industrial Park which had not been used for parking or
density purposes . The Director of Public Works stated
that the difference between the Shingle Creek greenstrip
at the subject location and that in the Brooklyn Center
Industrial Park was that the Industrial Park greenstrip
was a dedicated right-of-way owned by the City, whereas
the greenstrip along the Real Estate 10 property con-
sisted of an easement which belongs to the owner.
During further discussion Commissioner Horan stated
that the request should be reviewed within the context
of the Comprehensive Plan and specifically with respect
to area wide impact and area land uses . Chairman Scott
stated that she felt the parcel had unique character-
istics and could be treated on its merits within the
general zoning concerns of the Comprehensive Plan, and
that further input should be obtained from the staff
regarding the environmental concerns as well as the
input from the Northwest Neighborhood'Group.
Motion by Commissioner Engdahl seconded by Commissioner Table Application No. 77026
Jacobson to table Application No. 77026 and to refer (Real Estate 10)
the request to the Northwest Neighborhood Advisory
Group for review and comment. The motion passed
unanimously.
He stated that the common area in the north-south phase
would also be a separate block rather than a lot. He ,F
commented that this was for purposes of clarity and
consistency with the subdivision ordinance, and cited
the Creek Villas Townhouse Addition as an example of
that layout. Mr. Levy responded that their surveyor
had expressed some concern about that format since he
Am ication No. 77027 The next item of business was review of Application
( oy J. Hansen for Wetterau No. 77027 submitted by Roy J. Hansen for Wetterau
Builders and B.C.I.P. , Inc.) Builders and B.C.I .P. , Incorporated. The Secretary
stated the application consisted of a preliminary
registered land survey for property at 6000 Earle
Brown Drive which is bounded by Trunk Highway 100,
Earle Brown Drive and Summit Drive. He stated the sub-
division was a stipulation of Application No. 77021
submitted by Wetterau Builders for a retail sales
facility which was under construction.
Public Hearing Chairman Scott stated that a notice of public hearing
had been published and that no one was present. The
Secretary stated that a letter had been received from
B.C.I .P. , Incorporated stating their support of the
application.
Recommend Approval of Following a brief discussion there was a motion by Com-
Application No. 77027 missioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner Pierce to
(Roy J. Hansen for Wetterau recommend approval of Application No. 77027 submitted
Builders and B.C.I .P. , Inc.) by Roy J. Hansen for Wetterau Builders and B.C.I .P. ,
Incorporated subject to the following:
1 . Final R.L.S. is subject to review by
the City Engineer.
2. Final R.L.S. is subject to the require-
ments of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances.
Application No. 77028 The next item of business was review of.AApplication
(Bruce Ranney for IDS, Inc.) No. 77028 submitted by Bruce Ranney for IDS, In-
corporated. The item was introduced by the Secretary
who stated the request was for a Preliminary Plat
approval for property known as the Riverbrooke Town-
house Addition at 66th Avenue North at Camden Drive.
He stated the request was a replat of the subdivision
which was approved approximately 5 years ago when
site and building plans were approved. He stated the
present subdivision consists of 38 lots for the town-
houses and one lot representing the entire common
area.
He explained also that the proposed replat involves
a name change to Riverwood Townhomes Addition and that
it comprehends the 20 existing lots in the north-south
phase which would not be separate from the east-west
phase which is proposed as an Outlot with no in-
dividual lots indicated. The Secretary stated that
the division line between the east-west phase and the
north-south phase allows for adequate density for the
portion which has been constructed. He stated that
if the Outlot would be subdivided and developed
separately in the future, there would be less total
units than if it were combined with the constructed
portion.
The Director of Public Works stated the Preliminary
Plat was being reviewed by the State Highway Depart-
ment and that there was indication on plans for up-
grading Trunk Highway 169 that a certain amount of
land would be needed for street or walkway purposes
along the east side of the proposed Outlot.
Public Hearing Chairman Scott stated that notice of a public hearing
had been published and that no one was present.
She then recognized Mr. Levy, the attorney for the
applicant, and Mr. Ranney who commented on the design
for the proposed subdivision.
The Secretary r+commended that the Preliminary Plat
be amended t-- designate each cluster of townhouses as
a block, with. each townhouse as a lot within that
block.
-9- 7-20-77
t
He stated that the common area in the north-south phase
would also be a separate block rather than a lot. He j
commented that this was for purposes of clarity and
consistency with the subdivision ordinance, and cited
the Creek Villas Townhouse Addition as an example of
that layout. Mr. Levy responded that their surveyor
had expressed some concern about that format since he
questioned whether Hennepin County would find it
acceptable. The Director of Public Wcrks stated that
the County had expressed no objection to previous
townhouse subdivisions where that format had been used.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Recommend Approval of
Commissioner Engdahl seconded by Commissioner Horan Application No. 77028
to recommend approval of Application No. 77028 sub (I .D.S. , Inc.)
mitted by IDS, Incorporated subject to the following
conditions:
1 . Final plat is subject to approval by
the City Engineer.
2. Final plat is subject to the require-
ments of Chapter 15 of the City
Ordinances.
3. The ownership, management and main-
tenance of all outside common areas
and common facilities, including
roadways, utilities, and street
lighting, shall be under the juris-
diction of one Homeowners Association.
4. Homeowners Association Agreements and
By-laws shall be submitted to the City;
shall be submitted to review and approval
by the City Attorney; and shall include:
a. Provisions for the City to
provide maintenance and revi tal
ization of roadways,. utilities
and other common use facilities,
in the event the City deems such
maintenance and revitalization
necessary, with the cost of such
expense which might be incurred
to be assessed to the property
owner;
b. Provisions for water and sewer
main and fire hydrant maintenance
and inspection agreements pursuant
-o Section 35-410 (5) of the City
Ordinances.
5. The final plat shall be amended to reflect
a format consisting of blocks and lots con-
sistent with the City Ordinance provided
such format is acceptable to Hennepin
County as verified by the City Engineer.
The motion passed unanimously.
The next item of business was consideration of Application Application No. 77029
No. 77029 submitted by Steel Seal , Inc. The item was intro- (Steel Seal , Inc.)
duced by the Secretary who stated the applicant seeks a
Special Use Permit to conduct an automotive repair and
treatment activity in the new Speculative Building No. 7
at 1600 67th Avenue North. He reviewed a letter sub-
mitted to the file by the applicant describing the nature
of the use which consists of automobile rustproofing.
Chairman Scott recognized Mr. R. L. Pothen who represented
the applicant and a brief discussion ensued as to the
nature of the proposed activity. Mr. Pothen stated it
would be the intent of the applicant to contain all of the
activity within the building and that the service is
primarily for new cars prior to delivery to the customer.
He stated that it was the intent of the applicant to
install an overhead door opening on the east side of ,
the buildinq so that vehicles could pass through the
facility during the treatment process.
Chairman Scott stated concern with respect to the pro-
hibition of outside storage or outside activities in
the Industrial Park district. Mr. Pothen stated there
would be no outside storage of vehicles on the premises.
Public Hearing Commissioner Scott stated that a public hearing had
been scheduled and recognized Mr. Janis Blumentals who
represented B.C.I .P. , Inc. and who expressed no ob-
jection to the application. The Secretary stated that
a letter had been submitted to the file by B.C.I .P. ,
Inc. stating no objection to the application.
le Public Nearing Motion by Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner
Pierce to close the public hearing. The motion passed
unanimously.
Recommend Approval of Following a brief discussion there was a motion by
Application No. 77029 Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner Engdahl
(Steel Seal , Inc.) to recommend approval of Application No. 77029 submitted
by Steel Seal , Inc. subject to the following:
1 . The permit is issued to the applicant as
owner and is not transferable.
2. The permit is subject to all applicable
ordinances, codes and regulations and
violation thereof shall constitute
grounds for revocation.
. 3. Building plans and certificate of oc-
cupancy are subject to approval by
the Building Official with respect to
applicable codes .
4. Outside parking of vehicles other than
those belonging to the establishment or
to employees shall be limited to business
hours, and outside parking of vehicles in
process at any other time is prohibited.
The next item of business was consideration of Appli-
Application No. 77032 cation of No. 77032 submitted by Brooklyn Center Baptist
(Brooklyn Center Baptist Church, 5840 Humboldt Avenue North. The item was in-
Church) troduced by the Secretary who stated the application
represents a proposal for the construction of an ac-
cessory building which would serve as a garage for church-
owned vehicles and equipment. He stated the applicant
has also submitted a site plan which indicates several
improvements necessary for upgrading the existing parking
lot and bringing certain areas into conformance with City
Ordinance standards.
j Chairman Scott announced that a public hearing had been
Public Hearing scheduled and that none of the notified property owners
was present. Motion by Commissioner Pierce seconded by
i Commissioner Engdahl to close the public hearing. The
motion passed unanimously.
Chairman Scott recognized Mr. Ron Bloom who represented
the applicant and a brief discussion ensued as to the
use of the garage. A brief discussion also ensued as to
provision for handicapped access to the church. Chair-
man Scott suggested that the Church should take that
into consideration as future plans are developed for
possible expansion.
The Secretary stoned t hat the church made use of the
Earle Brown Grade School facilities when overflow parking
was necessary. Mr. Bloom presented a letter from a
representative from the Brooklyn School District stating
they had no objection to the church periodically using
the school 's lot.
}
-11- 7-20-77
The Secretary stated that the Church had additional
land which could be used for oarkina and that the church
was arouosina to defer installation of.additional park-
ing until plans had been developed for expansion of
church facilities . The Secretary stated there were
certain areas of the parking lot which did not have
curbinu at this time and that that would also be
deferred until future development.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Recommend Approval of
Commissioner Pierce seconded by Commissioner Book to Application No. 77032
recommend approval of Application No. 77032 submitted (Brooklyn Center Baptist
by Brooklyn Center Baptist Church at 5840 Humboldt Church)
Avenue North subject to the following conditions:
1 . The Building Plans are subject to approval
by the Building Official with respect to
applicable codes prior to the issuance of
permits.
2. Site drainage, grading, and curbing are
subject to review by the City Engineer.
3. A Performance Agreement and Supporting
Financial Guarantee (in .an amount to be
determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted to assure completion of site
improvements.
4. Specific site improvements comprehended
by the approval include the correction
of the greenstrip and curbing require-
ments along 59th Avenue North and along
Humboldt Avenue North. The installation
-involving curbing, paving and greenstrip
materials will be according to standards.
The motion passed unanimously.
In other business the Secretary stated the Rezoning Other Business
Evaluation Criteria would be sent to the Commissioners
prior to the next meeting.
In other business the Secretary stated that a joint
meeting had been scheduled by the City Council for
August 15 at 7:30 p.m. which involved all of the
Advisory Commissions.
Regarding the Aug{ast meetings, the Secretary stated
the Planning Commission meetings were scheduled for
August 11 and August 25.'
In other business the Secretary reviewed the number
of pending items and suggested that the Commissioners
Familiarize themselves with the sites Grid with various
Ordinance requirements applicable to those proposals .
Motion by Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner Adjournment
Book to adjourn the meeting. The Planning Commission
adjourned at 12:10 a.m.
Chairman
7-20-77 -12-