HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012-22 PCR Commissioner Leino introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2012-22
RESOLUTION PROVIDING THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF
THE CITY'S PLANNING ADVISORY COMMISSION REGARDING THE 2012
BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR STUDY AND PRELIMINARY LAYOUT
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center's 2030 Comprehensive Plan includes a goal
and objective of making major street corridors and other public spaces highly attractive, including
Brooklyn Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center's Comprehensive Plan indicates that reaching
consensus on a vision for the section of Brooklyn Boulevard south of 1-694/I-94 that would then be
translated into design parameters should precede redevelopment of land area along Brooklyn
Boulevard; and
WHEREAS,performing a corridor study for Brooklyn Boulevard will provide guidance
for future transportation, redevelopment and streetscaping improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City Council authorized an agreement for professional services with
SRF Consulting Group, Inc. to provide professional services and prepare said study and plans for the
Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission was provided periodic updates by city
planning staff on September 29, 2011; October 13 and 29, 2011; December 15, 2011; March 1, 15 and
29, 2012; and September 27, 2012; and
WHEREAS, the City, in conjunction with SRF Consulting Group, Inc. staff, conducted
two (2) separate open houses for the affected property owners and general public to review the study
plans, including proposed roadway layouts, new trails and sidewalks; right-of-way impacts;
streetscaping and landscaping improvements; lighting; and other corridor amenities.
WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission has determined or formulated the
following goals and vision statements for the City Council to consider as part of their overall general
consensus and support of this Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor area, which includes:
1. Preserve and enhance the adjacent residential neighborhoods; and
Provide entry treatments and neighborhood identifiers where applicable
2. Protect adjoining residential properties; and
Provide minimum setbacks and buffer widths to enable a combination berms
with landscaping and fencing or decorative walls.
3. Identify necessary right-of-way impacts and corridor widths to accomplish:
A) Boulevard treatments and setbacks for trails and sidewalks; and
B) Placement of landscape medians to enable the vision and goals for the
corridor to be accomplished.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of
the City of Brooklyn Center supports the draft design concepts for the 2012 Brooklyn Boulevard
Corridor Study and hereby provides its input for the various segments of the corridor study as
illustrated on the attached exhibits:
Exhibit A Segment from 49th Avenue to 51St Avenue
Exhibit B Segment from 51St Avenue to HWY 100
Exhibit C Segment from HWY 100 to 59th Avenue/Bass Lake Road
Exhibit D Segment from 59th Avenue/Bass Lake Road to 65th Avenue
Exhibit E Segment from 65th Avenue to I-694
Exhibit F Future Land Use and Redevelopment Considerations
November 29, 2012
Date Chair
ATTEST:
Secretary
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Burfeind
and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof-
Commissioners Burfeind, Leino, Parks, and Schonning.
and the following voted against the same: None
Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
Exhibit A
Segment from 49th Avenue to 51St Avenue
Typical Streetscape Cross Section 16
Interchen ge rea
A (�OECOMT Ea
J ATIMfRS CC Ut i:YU
(WtMW Bike E apes! I �ROU%WD CMFDFr Ti F!
Setpnent C Between 5 lst AVe.and
TH 100-Looking North '
k
t �
= 10' 10• a• tr sY n• a• ra a•
Pf510EN1MLNFICARORN00D TPAtt TURF SNLD INRU COMlAgUSUFT iMU SVlO TURF vmL, PlSIOfN1W NCIfiF18ORFF000
BIM TVRN LANE BLVD
90'
MOPOSEDRgNTOF WU
POTENTM EXI$TIFiG RIGM OF WAV POTENTUL 0 S
A*W OF RGNi OF
WAT IMRrt WAY—rT
W�,I Streetscape Cross Sections
(nmuilin5 Group,im
Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report Figure 7
7589 t 121112 City of Brooklyn Center
The Commission supports the following concepts:
1. Converting the existing 4-lane roadway to a 3-lane roadway with a center-left turn lane.
2. The designation of the east side of the right-of-way as a sidewalk corridor.
3. The designation of the west side of the right-of-way as a trail corridor.
4. The changes to the west side of the current 51St Avenue intersection.
5. The use of a 6-ft. wide shoulder area for emergency stops and other infrequent stops/deliveries,
which will help provide greater separation from the traffic lane to the sidewalk and trail, and
provide better sight lines at private driveways.
The Commission recommends that consideration be given to the following:
1. That the street layout, sidewalks and trail locations for this portion of the corridor be coordinated
with the City of Minneapolis' trail plans to Victory Memorial Parkway.
2. Consider options to compliment and expand the theme of the existing City's Entrance Sign in this
area.
3. Consider opportunities for property owners to install driveway turn around areas to avoid backing
into the Brooklyn Boulevard.
Exhibit B
Segment from 51" Avenue to HWY 100
1 y BROOKDALL COVENANT
.! -
CHURCH
T � .
li
r i -
----
..._-
�y
EIMNXTOTO B
DETERMINED
Revised Cross-Section Pending
The Commission supports the following concepts:
1. The new intersection with HWY 100 interchange and its extension of Lilac Drive.
2. The elimination of the de-acceleration lane for Brooklyn Boulevard traffic entering onto the
northbound HWY 100 ramp.
3. The removal of the ramp acceleration lane entering onto Brooklyn Boulevard.
4. The placement of a 10-ft. wide trail (regional trail standard) on the west side and a 6-ft.
sidewalk on the east side.
5. The relocation of the 51St Avenue transit stop (west side).
The Commission recommends that consideration be given to the following:
1. Work with MnDOT identifying an architectural theme for the HWY 100 bridge, including
lighting,railings, flag standards and concrete design patterns.
2. Maintain an ADA accessible crosswalk to address the east/west pedestrian movements at the
north side of the HWY 100 interchange/intersections.
3. Encourage establishing as part of the median design, the installation of pedestrian refuge islands,
in or around the HWY 100 ramp/interchange areas.
Exhibit B
Segment from 51"Avenue to the north side of BWY 100
(continued)
4. The extension of the public street across the Brookdale Covenant Church and Malmborg's
Nursery sites to connect to the existing Lilac Drive (diagram noted below).
MALM50RII
GREENHOUSE
'�► Lilac Drive extension
► y
Tv;
BROOKOALE SOVERANT
CHURCH
.o
Exhibit C
Segment from HWY 100 to 59th Avenue/Bass Lake Road
Typical Streetscape Cross Section 3a r �
Adjacent City Center,Stormwater
Treatment Alternative I o .D ,RIA.-
Segment 8 Between THIOO and 59th I—TI.wIii BANNERS
AV -Looking Norrh - MEDIAN UNOPY TPECS� '� BOVLEVARp CANOPVTREES
Aw
~ CONCRETE PUINIER CURB gyp° 1'PMm MGIN
y CONCRE TE MAINTENANCE STRIP IONS
ALTERNATIVE MEDIAN SY.Att pySt CIE.
Y a
q
1V.l VAN[5 t fff 10' its I.�a'/ ]l' I IT _ 11 IT 11' ID la
iRONTAGE/TURF STORM WATER TpEATMENi TRAIL TURF BLVD III--- TNRU TNRU MEDIAN T.I. TNRU L TURF WALK
ROAD BD IV ���"""��`
T05'•/.
EXTENDS TO RESIDENTIAL FRONTAGE EXISTING RNiNi OF WAY BLDG SETBACKS VARY TO
COMMERCIAL PROPERTY
Typical Streetscape Cross Section 3b
Adjacent City Center,Median Berm
Alternative
Segment B Between THIOO and 59th MCEIMTNE ROADWAY
Ave.-Looking North mING WRN BANNERS
I
t[YARDCANOPY TREES
MCI--ROADWAY
q IIGNTING WITN MNx[RS
CONCRETE BOLLARDS h .
w.
CONCRETE MAINTENANCE STRIP CT
ARIL VAMES Itl VMNS 11' it' 17' ltl 13' 11' ltl B'
FRONTAGE TURF BERM ANDlANDSC.vING TRAM tURF BlVO TNRU TNRU LEFTNRN MEDIAN TNRU TNRU TURF WALK
ROAD BLVD EANE BLVD
705'./-
EXTENDSt0 RESIDENTIAL FRONTAGE EXISTINGRIGNTOF I BLDG-IT-A VMY TO
COMMEAC14l PROPERTY
ILION I Streetscape Cross Sections
I:oAeBlingIlp,In. Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report Figure 9
75891121112 City of Brooklyn Center Utilize existing
REVISED EXHIBIT PENDING medians of 13 14 feet
The Commission supports the following concepts:
1. The design concept of a 4-lane roadway with landscaped medians and opportunities for
pedestrian refuge islands at intersections.
2. The design of a 10-ft. boulevard area as a separation/green area from the 6-ft. sidewalk.
3. The removal of the free right-hand turn movement on the eastern side of the Bass Lake
Road/Brooklyn Boulevard intersection.
4. The development of entrance nodes within right-of-way used for these free right-hand turn
movements.
5. The on-grade regional trail street crossing at the 55th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard
intersection.
Exhibit C
Segment from HWY 100 to 59th Avenue/Bass Lake Road
(continued)
6. The design concept for the 55th Avenue intersection(diagram noted below)with the frontage
road and the entrance to the Northport Elementary School.
SEE INSET E FOR ALTER�NAT�IVE �
.`TWIN LAKLS r.ICMAL -FAIL
i
`!
z
I tv
r
7. The consideration of regional trail crossing alternatives as depicted in Figure 10 of the
Brooklyn Boulevard Concept Report (below), in which alternatives shall be considered as part
of any future redevelopment proposal of the commercial area(s) south of 55th Avenue.
n
J • !! r pw w yr• - _ ..r,/^--1 ..�.��_
• iJl.
Legend • " - -. ,
y � � � Enaen9lvnn lak sPCg aral lrar •••S!-a•i I!."R ♦• .•• _.....
•••••Wlerrvt ae Cres rg ROUrew �' k=•act >Aa1F••P••FV�I..;,... ""
•••••Msemahw(mtsirg ParteP � +kw.:_„� .
P••.!rlhernxNeCros.hg RwweC -. Yp
P'10;Twin Lakes Reg i orwl Tail Grade Seamed Crosse"Options L iquir•1
..PrmtlM BOabrnd Caridw SlWy.Rtr �rmnd.1Care(I Atryn
rvrn demYUynCmM
Exhibit C
Segment from HWY 100 to 59`h Avenue/Bass Lake Road
(continued)
i
The Commission recommends that consideration be given to the following:
1. Consider options that could expedite the replacement of the existing wood light poles and
removal of the overhead utility service lines.
2. Extend the western entrance treatment along Bass Lake Road to include improvements to CVS
Pharmacy's entrance.
Exhibit D
Segment from 59th Avenue/Bass Lake Road to 65th Avenue
Typical Streemape Cross SeYtion Ab
(Without 9ike L-0S)
Segment A Between 59thAve end r–o¢DRAnVt—LIGHTING
65th Ara-Looking North k j• EWIEVARDCANORVTR
l�
I
Ns<enurtUedeasemem e.al EIDGHTMCR Y it, ;10' }' yl• l2' E' 3Z' iJ :d ;E' 1' -f-OVARY
ebrV CroTe.ry Rmfagn xvoM CDMMEIC4E PRORRTY TRAIF TURF THRU TNRU IFFT TURN CON[RETE iHRU TNMI TIIRG
o
rte ynt cf rq AM.m Rae hWD MEDNN OlVO ATAI% fh.TUTRf1Al PiflRialy
lRY
RRO,o,rn RIfA1T nr WAY
VAM ZI(D..M1 E5" VMES
1 ENDAL kW or WAV E%KTiNu'EIGHT OF WAY NAMES 15'9S't OOTENTML
iMrACT RIGHT Or EfJ.I�D
WAYIFARACT
Wk\■� Streetscape Cross Sections
ComulUng Group,Inc
Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor Study-Recommended Concept Report Figure 8
75891 121112 City of Brooklyn Center
The Commission supports the following concepts:
1. The design concept of a 4-lane roadway with medians to limit left-hand turn movements,
except at city cross-street intersections.
2. The continuation of a 10-ft.trail along the west side of the right-of-way with a 10-ft. boulevard
area.
3. The continuation of the 6-ft. sidewalk on the east side of the right-of-way with a 10-ft.
boulevard area.
4. The alignment of Admiral Lane and 60th Avenue roadways into a common intersection.
5. The option of extending the eastern leg of the 61 St Avenue intersection into the commercial
properties on the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard (BP Service Station to American Legion
Site).
6. The use of a surmountable median that would allow full access movement to the Fire
Department(southbound access onto Brooklyn Boulevard).
Exhibit D
Segment from 59th Avenue/Bass Lake Road to 65th Avenue
(continued)
The Commission recommends that consideration be given to the following:
1. The option of an Admiral Lane and 60th Avenue intersection that preserves the vacant
commercial lot and provides opportunities to enhance the entrance to the Admiral Lane
Neighborhood and improved access for the future redevelopment of the residential properties
between 60th Avenue and 61St Avenue.
_', . ?V _
4.
rAl
► L ,RD -c �
2. Consider options that could expedite the replacement of the existing wood light poles and
removal of the overhead utility service lines.
3. The study reaffirms a minimum front-yard parking setback of 15 feet.
Exhibit E
Segment from 65th Avenue to I-694
The Commission supports the following concepts:
1. The tightening of the free-right movement from the east bound off ramp to reduce the speed of
vehicles entering Brooklyn Boulevard.
2. The planning for future acquisition of the residential homes on the west side of Brooklyn
Boulevard located north of 63rd Avenue.
3. The placement of a median from the Max Sun shopping center northern drive to 65th Avenue
4. The continuation of the 6-ft. sidewalk on the east side of the right of way with a 10-ft.
boulevard area.
5. The continuation of a 10-ft. trail along the west side of the right-of-way with a 10-ft. boulevard
area design until it connects to off-road trail improvements at the Metro Transit site.
The Commission recommends that consideration be given to the following:
1. Consider improvements to the landscaped buffer for the 3 single family residential properties
located in the southeast corner of the I-694/Brooklyn Boulevard interchange.
Exhibit F
Future Land Use and Redevelopment Considerations
The Commission encourages and recommends the continued planning and analysis of this corridor,
specifically addressing future land use and redevelopment opportunities in select areas,noted as follows:
1. The conceptual planning for the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard be expanded to include the 3
existing residential properties south of the fire station and the 2 residential properties south of the
62nd Avenue (identified as A & A Chiropractic and PBC Medical/Dental) and the Iman Husain
Islamic Center.
Q
-
2. Develop a conceptual plan for a revised parking layout and access drive for the commercial
properties between 62' Avenue and 63rd Avenue to accommodate the boulevard treatment and
trail system — AND — the EDA considers the acquisition of the vacant commercial lot in the
southeast quadrant of 63`d and Brooklyn Boulevard to promote the redevelopment of these 3
commercial properties, comprising 3.85 acres in area into a unified PUD.
1 �
11114
,7 f ' EHTERPP ISE -
RENTAL CAR
I! ' DOLLAR r
CASH
�E%PRESS 7, I/r ,•'
t ^"� + HERTZ yy ♦� -
. r IEP NAM
0 4 DELI Z y� Ot i ��--
r
�f ---�
974 /.«
4U70ZONE
3. That conceptual development alternatives for the single family properties between Admiral
Avenue and 61 St Avenue include:
a. alternative types of senior housing and assisted care housing options;
b. limited use office condominiums; and
c. temporary open space with future plans for redevelopment with the remaining adjacent
properties to the west(those fronting onto Ewing Avenue).
;rl. xr
w �
J Q
GLOFlYSCH�CN
iv-
Flo aer siati"
\ # x q
4. That conceptual development alternatives for the properties between 61St Avenue and 62°d
Avenue include:
d. the option of a large scale senior housing project; and
e. a commercial concept for all properties from 61St Avenue to 63' Avenue that would
provide opportunities to relocate existing Brooklyn Boulevard businesses into an overall
PUD.
A`TIVE
r
ill
Q a° �I�,aAfiNN
" r
WTI
ho
v
a r,
a, ,
{ v mAr
{ .
AM
5. Consider alternate development concepts for the 6 single family residential lots north of 63rd
Avenue that would include the following:
a. limited use office condominiums; and
b. temporary open space with future plans for redevelopment with the adjacent
properties to the west (Note: this concept should include the alignment of the France
Avenue intersection with 63rd Avenue).
y
7 .a
ti y
4'
r ARENA EARLY
40 t rLEARNING CENTER
d
> .
IL
r �=-- -
IV
6. Consider a development concept for the 4 commercially zoned properties in the Northeast
quadrant of Brooklyn Boulevard and 65th Avenue.
CENTER ' )
Ali ss ,
�y
9L
F
7. Consider options to replace the current Brooklyn Boulevard access to the existing Arena
Learning Center lot.
jl 11,
f
0
k
i
PARK f
q'
8. Consider options to redevelop the residential lots between Northport Elementary School entry
drive and Northport Drive.
SEE INSET B FOR ALTERNATIVE
c'
i
rfortrxiywf"foniu r.
a
00 •••ffffff�.t�' ocEi I!!e
11t
n°�ci°
� �4�R
9. Consider identifying the single-family residential units located south of 57th Avenue and those
between 57th Avenue and 58th Avenue/Bass Lake Road for potential acquisition, and further
identifying said units as"primary"vs. "secondary". Options for redevelopment may include:
a. redevelop the primary areas only with low-density, multiple family residential
development, such as senior townhomes or similar; or
b. redevelop the primary and secondary areas together with mid-density, multiple-family
residential developments, such as owner-occupied condominiums, market-rate rentals
and/or workforce housing; or
c. a 3-story, mixed-use, low intensity commercial/office development (first floor) with 1-2
upper floors reserved for multiple-family residential.
NDRTNP
DRT DR
J
w
FAPCO 7
s 1>
POTENTIAL PARCEL ACQUISITION (PRIMARY) `--
POTENTIAL PARCEL ACQUISITION (SECONDARY)