Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 08-16 PCP �4 4- 'I'll'ali vn, Ord�-"Y? plan el rg" E, 6 Xt� I d 3 0 1 f z v, e m a 11 i f-�,d C ni n I I ed Cm,,,.�( 0 pnl-p a I f "El l,,e i ? 3, 0 P g:%n prem va c,c, r'o IN l 6,. Lan,,,l Application loo. 73018 Applicants B.C.I.P. Locations Speculative Building No. 5, 6820 Shingle Creek Parkway Requests Amend Site and Building plans. The applicant has requested approval of an "optional" building design, which could be exercised to suit a prospective tenant. The alteration would be a widening of the south wing approximately 34 feet.. Space allocation and parking ramifications t2pon the site and building, which is under cons=truction ares Present Proposed Option Office space area 13,000 sq, ft. 15,000 sq. ft. • Warehouse area 317, 140 sq. ft. 132,868 sqe ft. Total area 130,140 sq. ft. 146,868 sq. ft. Parkl,a,q Spaces required 208 245 Spaces provided 347 333 Excess spaces 139 83 It appears the primary effect would be a reduction in the amount Of excess parking,, and the relocation of the southerly curb3 ine so to allow for the minimum (15') greenstrip area at Shingle Creek Parkway Approval of this optional plan would be subject to the same • conditions stipulated under .!':pplication. No. 73018. sraroen�awwwr� �� .. "' � * f� f � V o6p," dl J� J��"��w�a ��°r+'�•cf P ,. mode a 9` a ay 4 `� ��YMaaw.m�bsa0�,4fMVN's�xt1'C(�rw �ak:Wn6a++V:i ��}ti'� Ntl ,J.�.. wnra� ,✓�' ;s XNFOI,�MATXCQ-T SME'Iff Application DTo. 73021 Applicant: Orville Wilda Locations 6732 Lyndale Avenue North Request: Revised Preliminary Plat Approval as Remanded by City Council , The applicant presented his argument, concerning the need for "back up space" from his garage, to the Council, and asked that a variation in the proposed lot line be allowed. Staff response was that the line might be adjusted in such a manner to meet the applicant's needs, and still retain the minimum average lot depth of 110 feet as required by ordinance. The Council remanded the application to the Commission for further review. The point of tangent of the new lot line would be 115 feet on the north and 105 feet on the south.,, -- - an average lot depth of 110 feet is provided. • The setback to the existing house is approximately IS feet -- consequently the required varianQe for the rear yard setback would be about 22 feet. However, the position of the new lot line will allow a maximum depth of 30 feet at the south end of any structure built on the new lot. This should be noted in the action, since any greater dimension for the new structure would necessitate a rear yard setback variance. Recommendation is for approval subject to the following conditionsz 1 . F-11.nal plat is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City ordinance; J- 2. Filaal plat is subject to review by the City Engineer, Prior to council approval. • r r,�„,..m,�,rw�awyaanx!w.�ra.m.cwr ....=��.ri.m. �: r �..r..�...�. .� �” �� r �+ �6a��niprnu+��ML�Y1o�isvara�nw� �� �i � � � � � � � � ,� �� ��� � , � �, � �� � � `����� �� pLANNING M14MERSION INBVMIATXON SHEET • Application No. 73023 APPlicatItt. Ladder of Leaning Day Care Center. L ►catic"t 4201 .4'207 Lakeside Avenue North Request;-. Special Use Permit The ft I cilitY was kaspected on August 13, 1973 by the Director of planning and InspectiOn, the Building inspector, the city Sanit'i'rian, the city Fire Marshall and an Administrative Assist-.ant who were accompanied by the apartment manager. A report of this investigation 'will be presented at the meeting in conjunction wiL-.h a recommendation for action. This app'l.ica-L-ion represents a pxoposal involving one apartment unit onl!'O z, separzite action %,,jjjj be required for any additional • units,. As of tjoi--,day, August 13th, we have not received 1) a report from any StF,-e or county authority as to an alleged inspection which was tr, be held; 2," a statement from the owner authorizing the use �?ad noting willingaes6 to comply with necessary code, fire or aafety standards. • PLAKWING COAM-I&SION INr4tIRMATION SPEEIII Application No. 73026 Applicant-. Faith Academy, Inc. Locationt 6625 Humboldt Avenue North Request: Special Use Permit The applicant seeks special use permission to operate a formal "elementary school" .- kindergarten through ninth on the premises of the Berean Free Church. A letter from the applicant indicates the facility is intended for 75 to 100 children, and the operation is to commence September 4, 1973. As of Monday, August 13th, we have not received the following: 1) A letter from the church authorizing this facility will be brought into compliance with all applicable building code, fire, health, and safety requirements prior to the commencement of classes-, • 2) A report of juvestigal"lion by appropriate state or county authorities. On August 13, 1973, the physical facilities were inspected by the Director of Planning and inspection, the Building inspector, the City Sanitarian, the City Fire Marshall and an Administrative Assistant. A report of that investigation will be presented at the meeting. Based on our findings so far, we cannot recommend approval of this request. Despite the applicant' s insistence that classes must start on September 4th (applications are being solicited in the daily press) , the use of this facility cannot be condoned until necessary alterations and improvements have been made Ilkto bring it up to minimum code and safety standards. • l Application No. 73013 Applicant: mike Harrer LocatiOng 6521 Brooklyn Boulevard Request: Variance This item was tabled at the May 24, 1973 meeting for the reasons outlined its the memorandum included in the August 2, 1973 agenda A possible ordinance amendment which would apparently resolve the applicant's question is noted in the memo and appears on page 9 or the August 2nd minutes. Recowmend ati.on for action on the subject application is for denial, in that the standards for a variance are not met. Should the Commission decide to recommead the ordinance change, that decision could be conveyed to the Council in conjunction with the application. of course` the applicant could withdraw • the recruest and await council disposition of the proposed amend- ment. if the ordinance change is not recommended, the application will be processed as usual. • H W y, N 0. .s �>.. a. OFW i' �i � , ° � PA R K ��, � ; �►�Q ►tea_... -7 ,0 1.-5 I I