HomeMy WebLinkAbout1973 01-04 PCP a ioj.
.14, 3,972
�j --I-aa n s ":I-i 0 p
I-PI COMMA-ISSIOCI IS an Avisory
bo6y un,� o.1,7 the Cowivissiji,
is to hold rublic fic-irin-Is.
I.k L-he ri,:,i!-tLers con-cerned in tLc�se
L. Conircission rftakes
recf:.-,xwrendatioii:s to the City council.
T'ne Coy ncil makes aft fin ai
c i.- theso matters.
S
rec"i'll. 72070
7 coq),
Bu s i i
Ad �}o A- -j,I a nt
40
• PLAWUNG C0.7411'SSiON T+.NFORMATION MEET
A nDl ica t ion No , 720970
Applicants Shell Oil Company
Location: 69th and Humboldt Avenues North
Remieste Special Use Permit for proposed
Car Wash Operation
BACKGROUND-t.
The applicant seeks a special use permit to operate an
automobile washer in an existinq bay of the Shell Service
Station located on the southwest corner of 69th and
Humboldt Avenue: iqorth.
Auto washers are special uses per Section 35-322 (3a) .
AITAL'YS1S AND RECOMMENDATION
• The applicant has yet to complete the site work for the
service station; the completion date was June I, 1971.
Also, site improvetnent.s for the Shell Service station at
66th and Lyndal.e Avenues North have yet to be completed;
the completion date wads August. 5< 1972. These were con-
ditions of a speci=1 use permit for a car .usher there
approved by the Council on May S., 1972.
The Building inspector made numerous attempts to communicate
with the applicant and finally in late November -the applicant
expressed regret at the failure to complet-;� the site -work;` it
was requested that the completion date for both stationsa' be
postponed ufr til early spring.
The City's response was an extension of the completion dates
to no later than June 1, 1973. The applicant wash reminded
of the possible rnwi"ications of non-compliance. upon the
special use permit and licenses at the subjec stations.
In Light of the past non-performance by tr,, applicant, the
recommendation is to defer further cons:%de.-ation until. the
June, 1973 requiar mehting. An evaluation, of the site work
can be made at that time.
• A pnl ica Lion No. 72070
page 2
Note should be made of the subject recluest and the approved
site work for that station; a portion of the recruired curbing
would be removed, if installed and if the special use permit
were approved.
A tentative amendment to the original plans could be
acknowledged at this, time pending final disposition of
the application.
•
• PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHEET
Application No. 72086
Applicant: Schramm' s Brookdale Toyota
Location; 6121 Brooklyn Boulevard
RPnuest: Special Use Permit to operate
Retail. Automobile Dealership
BACKGROUND:
Section 35--322 (3c) of the Ordinances lists retail car
sales as a special ltse in the C-2 ei strict .
The applicant' s dealership is on the premises formerly
occupied by Brookda!Le Chrysler-Plymouth
ANALYSIS AYv7D RECO.24E 3!?ATT017
The applicant has coliducted business at this location since
• the Council apnrovr4 an Automobile Dealer' s License on
October 2. 1872
Through aftiniCtray ,:�._ve oversight. the special use permit
application was no then processes' and thus the reru.i rec
public hearing was s�.ot held
Terms of an a rz =an€i;t of operation between the City a-ae the
Chrysler Corporet_3.ci were made a condition of approval For
the licensF for t.h Toyota dealership .
Recommendation is for approval with the attachment of the
agreement between th.e City and the Chrysler Corporati,:)n .
•
PLANKING CGPtUSSION INFORMATION SHEET
Application No. 72087
Applicant: B.C. Development Corp.
Location: 69th Avenue north at Shingle
Creek Parkway
RerUesta Preliminary Plat Approval
BACKGROUNDS
The applicant seeks approval for a preliminary plat of
the Earle Brown Farm Townhouse project consisting of 28-units
plus common area.
ANAL"Y"SIS AND RECODLMENDATTONs
The Director of pub is Works will be prepared to discuss
the layout of the proposed plat, including a suggested
dedication of a 7 root wide strip along 69th Avenue North
• (Couinty Road 130) for roadway purposes.
This dedication is recommended in :light of the 15-foot
greenst.rip rermirenic nt, the building set back recVuirements
and the ramifications of the proposed upgrading of County
Road 130 and the installation of sidewalk.
The dedication of 7 feet would necessitate the shifting of
some of the proposed buildings to the south.
Approval would be subject to the following conditions:
1. A severe foot strap along County Road 130 shell
be dedicete5 to the City for roadway purposes;
2 . Final alat shall be subject to review by the
City Engi;seer;
3. Final plat shall be subject to the recmirements
of the Platting Ordinance.
Y '
P+�Prtto: Amendments to Chapter 34 (Sign Ordinance)
To: planning Corm?.ssi.on
From: Blair Tremere, Secretary
Date: January 3 . 3.973
With the advent of "high rise" commercial office buildings,
it has become apparent- that certain portions of the sign ordinance
ree-uire revision to effectively comprehend such structures and
related signery.
Efforts to apply eXisting provisions, which are directed at
buildings three stories or less in height and clustered establishments
in a "shopping center complex" hove accentuated this need.
Results have been less than desirable for example in determin--
ini the relation hip between clustered establishments in a shopping
center and those in a speculative industrial building or in a high
rise office bui lcgii1q .
The conclusions are even ludicrous for instance in envisioning
• thF potential wall signery for a hi.ah rise office builc'ing.
anplyi ng the 3g�/-of-the-enpporting-wall.-areb formula.
The need, then, is to amend pertinent sections of t!hapter 34
so to effectively and reasonably provide for multi-tenant commercial
and industrial buildings and particularly those which are multi-
storey struettres.
Propbsed draft amendments will be presented which relate to
Section 34-140 (? A and 3.B) --- PPrmi.tecl STn, Re-uiri.nei b
Perm4 for the C2, 11 , 12, Cl, and CIA Districts.
Basic congieerati.ons supporting these amendments include*
1) Specific reference to ri.niti--storey structures?
2) Reference to clustered establishments in circum-
stances other than "shopping center corrplex469";
3) Rc*--fetenae to wall signery for multi-storey structures
n variou•-� districts (vs . only single level build
-
i nc€s which. have domi.nateO past experience) ;
4) Reference ",.o assurance o! uniformity or aesthetic
compat'.bi'?ity as a ratter of rlanning ane
adre?.n�istrati.ve policy, in issuing permits for wall
s7 '.ne'?"y
,r
AmPneMC,.S to Chapter 34 (Sign Ordinance)
Pa�fp 2
Demi.nation should be made Initially as to the maximum
hP.ght� wall signs on multi-storey buildings. A related
ruQGti.os what portion of the wall of a multi-storey structure
should oervJ tteel for use as support for wall or projecting
si.qnerN R the wall of the first and second floors .
7
�i
i
y
i.
rl