HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 10-28 PCM ~- MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
OCTOBER 28, 1976
CITY HALL
Call to Order: The Planning Commission met in study session and was
called to order at 8:10 p.m. by Chairman Robert Foreman.
Roll Call: Chairman Foreman, Commissioners Engdahl , Scott, Jacobson,
Horan and Kohrt. Also present was Director of Planning
and Inspection Blair Tremere.
Approve Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner
10-14-76 Jacobson to approve the minutes of the October 14, 1976
meeting as submitted. Voting in favor: Chairman Foreman,
Commissioners Jacobson, Scott, and Horan. Not voting:
Commissioners Kohrt and Engdahl . It was stated that they
were not present for that meeting. The motion passed.
Application No. 76056 Following the Chairman's explanation the first item of
(T. L. Willard) business was consideration of Application No. 76.056
submitted by T. -L. Willard. It was introduced by the
Secretary who stated the applicant seeks a special use
permit for a gainful home occupation involving the use
of a unique accessory structure and related equipment at
6825 Drew Avenue Forth. The Secretary referred to a
letter submitted to the file by the applicant as well as
descriptive literature relative to the type of equipment
which would be used.
He briefly explained the use involved greenhouse-like
structure which would contain the year-round gardening
activity known as hydroponic gardening. He stated this
system involved the use of liquid nutrients rather than
soil . He stated the tubular steel and plastic greenhouse
structure involved the use of two-18 inch diameter
exhaust fans at one end of the building. He also noted
the area of the proposed 16' x 32' greenhouse was within
the ordinance area limitations for accessory buildings
and that it would be located in the rear yard.
Chairman Foreman then recognized Mr. Willard who elabo-
rated upon the nature of the proposed use stating that
it was family-oriented and would involve no person out-
side of the resident family. He stated that while no
retail sales would occur on the premises it was the
expectation that produce grown in the facility in excess
of what was consumed by his family would be wholesaled
to produce retailers in the area.
A brief discussion ensued between the applicant and
Commissioner Horan as to the nature of the lights used
in the facility and the type of fans which would be used.
Commissioner Scott also inquired as to the nature of
the pickup of the excess produce by the retailers. i•lr.
Willard stated the lights were minimal , but could be
shut off if necessary, and that the fans produced a low
level of noise. He said he had discussed the proposed
use with his neighbors and especially the neighbor next
door closest to the location of the fans, and that he
' had assured the neighbor proper steps would be taken to
minimize and eliminate the noise if it should be a
problem.
Pierce Arrives Commissioner Pierce arrived at 8:35 p.m.
-1- 10-28-76
Commissioner Horan inquired how the applicant proposed to
resolve possible noise problems and Mr. Willard responded
that several corrective steps were possible, if needed:
shielding the fan with a hood-type deflector; lowering
the speed of the fan; or, ultimately, erecting a fence or
screen wall in such a' matter as to effectively contain
any noise from the fans within the property as per the
zoning ordinance requirements
Commissioner Jacobson inquired as to the structural
nature of the proposed greenhouse, specifically, refer-
ring to building code snow load requirements. The
Secretary explained that the Building Official had con-
sulted with the State Building Division and that the
proposed greenhouse structure was permitted within the
building code as a nonhabitable building and Mr. Willard
also explained that the constant air movement and heat
dissipation from the building would minimize any effects
of snow or ice.
Chairman Foreman opened the public hearing stating that Public Hearing
neighboring property owners ,within 150 feet of the
applicant's premises had been notified. He recognized
the resident of 6812 Ewing Avenue North. He stated
concern as to an inoperable vehicle .stored in the
applicant's yard as well as several other areas in the
neighborhood and suggested that the proposed use and
equipment could generate a less than desirable situation.
Chairman Foreman also recognized the resident of 6818
Ewing Avenue North. He commented that the applicant
had pursued other hobbies over the years which some
neighbors considered nuisances. He also stated concern
as to the applicant's use of his yard and presented
photographs he had taken of the applicant's property.
He noted particular concern with an unlicensed and
allegedly inoperable vehicle stored in the applicant's
rear yard.
Motion by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner Close Public Hearing
Pierce to close the public hearing. Motion passed
unanimously.
Chairman Foreman inquired as to the foundation for
the concerns of the neighbors, and the applicant
responded that he was aware of the objections of the
two neighbors who were recognized. He stated that he
had made an effort to inform all of the immediate
neighbors of the proposed use and he also acknow-
ledged that his son owned an unlicensed truck for
which he was seeking an engine so that it could be
rebuilt as a classic or antique vehicle.
The Secretary stated that the matter of possible junk
vehicle could be pursued under the appropriate ordi-
nance, but that it in itself did not have direct
bearing on the merits of the proposed special use.
The Secretary explained that the ordinance required
a determination that the proposed special use was
clearly secondary and incidental to the residential
character of the premises and would not have a
detrimental effect on the neighborhood.
Following further discussion, there was a motion by Recommend Approval ,
Commissioner Horan, seconded by Commissioner Kohrt, of Application Pao.
to recommend approval of Application No. 76056 76056
submitted by T. L. Willard, 6825 Drew Avenue North. (T. L. Willard)
Voting in favor: Chairman Foreman, Commissioners
Jacobson, Scott, Pierce, Horan and Kohrt. Voting
against: Commissioner Engdahl . The motion passed.
Chairman Foreman explained to the applicant that
the special use permit was subject to review by the
City should any problems develop with respect to
maintenance of the use or un esirable external
effects such as noise or li- t.
10-28-76 -2-
Application No. 74012 The next item of business was review of building plan
(Coachman Diversified) amendment to Application No. 74012 as submitted by
Coachman Diversified, Inc. The Secretary stated that
the applicant owned the speculative building at 6660
Shingle Creek Parkway and proposed a tenancy which
involves the parking of vehicles inside the building
and the installation of several overhead garage doors
on the east side of the building.
The Secretary reviewed the amended elevation plan as
well as the proposed floor layout for the proposed
use. He also referred to correspondence submitted to
the file detailing the nature of the proposed use and
the.concept of recycling the waste water from the vehicle
washing which would then be used in the mixing of
chemicals carried by the. vehicles to lawns which-were
serviced by the tenant, Chemlawn, Inc.
Chairman Foreman recognized Mr. Jay Wick, who repre-
sented the applicant, and a brief discussion ensued.
Recommend Approval of Following further discussion, there was a motion by
Application No. 74012 Commissioner Engdahl , seconded by Commissioner
(Coachman. Diversified) Jacobson to recommend approval of the amended building
plan to Application No. 74012 submitted by Coachman
Diversified as well as the proposed tenancy by
Chemlawn, Inc. subject to the condition that building
plans are approved by the Building Official prior to
the issuance of permits. The motion passed unanimously.
Other Business: In other business the Secretary briefly reviewed the
proposed site plan comprehending the expansion of
parking for the Group Health Clinic at 69th and Lee
Avenues North. The Secretary stated the original plan
approval comprehended future parking expansion. He
stated the City Engineer was working with the engineer
on the project as to details involving the parking lot
delineators and traffic flow.
In other business the Secretary reminded the Commission
that a tour of the City had been scheduled for 9:00
a.m. Saturday, November 6, 1976, and that a joint
meeting with the City Council had been scheduled for
7:30 p.m. on Wednesday, November 10, 1976.
Adjournment: Motion by Commissioner Engdahl , seconded by Commissioner
Jacobson to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed
unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 10:30 p.m.
Chairman
-3- 10-28-76
� � .
}:
i
I
II
��
�I
i
i
1