HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 06-10 PCM T�1, FRC.CEFDTF,",,ac:o OF THE PLANNING
FOR THE VITTY OF BROCKIMN CENTER
HK &CUNTY OF THE STATE (DIF
RESULAR SESSION
QW 10 , 1076
C UY HALL
Call to (Dr Oz 1;r o Plarrinq Commi,62w -met in rngkar smsion a '
R011 Call, MSr,
4r 0 tin onn �,;z o ypn-on 1 Mnotar V Public W-17F
ird Dipwiry T.nnrinw- and KPOPOUnn
AppHcaUnr No. M 110 . 'pl rho ChwirrvW" v77;dyW!vn, this first .t ..•.
(Lund- _r, w"- !a,iynw, , F Aqwh nt&n W.
MCK iabnkwed 1p; Uri- M=W �nywnv. 74m A"-�
W15 Who"UUM 11 Quo MCI AtY7 who MW Me
"Iwaj � 0.1t r'sl-v�"Lt 110EIQ to W;
WCQ�41 an W P7 Yv �- " W 77th Bud SAO 40_;
rupre2ont,
AM nw,
of
-40 sown VIM, ;wood tow , 10-Ir 1-V71wo ?'Y)%ro A to Q
KOM, wil -h, in Ac -10, Van, SW City"�; OXP07V V
Win 6710 � aw., >4011 V- Mtw'
a 71001nd, very 10"
Mnn7pv�yp mv 1 �f n.0 anOwwo hor SUMMUna -:1
h
Ty,&�q�2 MU nr: sv5t�-!
: Muhl P:qtq piann as bng in
s
�o tated ta hat tho
Could bc
i t
jacobson jorobson <j,A Kohrt. arrived at 8:05
Kohrt Arrivri
6-10-76
The Secretary continued to review the .-,ite layout and
stated the provided parking exceeds the r.rdinance
requirements for an industrial facility and that the
applicant had taken into account the possibility of
two shifts where there would be an overlap in parking.
He stated the off-street loading would be at an entrance
on the east side of the building, where access was
provided from 67th Avenue North, rather than frcm
Shingle Creek Parkway.
The Secretary mentioned one concern as to the
aesthetics of the building involving three Ft-ainleH:3
steel ventilation stack-, wh",-,,h, -icccrding to the
elevations on the Gul)zr, ,tt, were tee b,
mately twelve feet In
recommended that thiS. be
:W£' t t n
aesthetic impact.
Commissioner Pierce arrived p.m.
Chairman Foreman recoanlz ,.d Mr. Tack Brong;!,an of
Ellerbe Architects who repre:3entedl the applic,,alnt.
Mr. Brengman reviewed the J,ayout -)f th,,
the production procedure��. Hi staterl,
the application for a variance frozi-,' fir<,
system requiremerit fer ,J"ie tw(-, d.-y
".ot
meeting would be held with a
the Fire Underwriter,,,, the, cwno , t'—a
adjuster, and the
Lithium and emergenc,; jlicc �durez . He 5tat,,-�'d i:K
meeting would then be establ-i'l-hec! w Vh the Dardrt r eras
of Planning and Inspection -3,nd City Fire
representatives tj�7--,
measures which could be taken, for this
Mr. Brengman introduced Mr. Br'c�wn who repre.,7,,o,',1,tef1
Medtronic, Inc. and who w., ,'J[d be the manager of ti -
facility and an ext,�.,nsive E"ins-u C��a 4-C, tf
nature of the product-l"oni.
o
fn� response to a
Ir. Nil .
Brengman reviewed the
the site aesthetics. in r t a
Commissioner Engdahi, 1illf. Bj ng,.-,,in
.hipping and receiving a.nd it jl,-,�,'--itiOn 01 6-Jhll
-.cast side of the b,.�iildl'ng.
(:3ommissioner a� tc" t.r.°: J ..-i(-r -'f th,-'
three stainless nqe(,?J -1;Irl Mr. rc;FPpon-'Ted
they were venting stacks for wh'-�re furrre4 would be
ge,nerated and the "n( ''7"A Was to the
exhaust above the a.ir whiz-i,( were
rcof level.
Mr. Brengman also stay=d ir'nat, on ttih< t, pr.
mechanical equipment wh.-Lc"h., the -aVpJ,'-""-ant Wo"'Jid ultimately
'i.ise, there could be an rocf design where a
portion of the roof, now shr.wn as being elevrated and
screened, could be lowered. He stated, in that case, the
height of the stainless ��teel stacks could --.'--o 10-c lowered
so to be in line with that mechanical area. Chairman
Foreman suggested that the applicant prepare an alternative
roof elevation sho�ving that design and be prepared to
present it at the time the variance m2atter regarding fire
extinguishing systems cc)nGidere'tl, He stated then the
6-10-76 -2-
--rmynissicn wcuiL revit
I w it as an alternative design.
-d-'scussion ensued as to nature of the odors
be emitted frorn the ventilation entilation stacks
L -�3viewed the ordinance criteria
wii-Ich P�,-°.dbit emission of oric;s in such concentration
perceptible beyond the limits of the
prop-erty . Mr. B.rengirjan stated that that would not be
pfobler- brit that the h rit ci the vents was to
the c)(""ors a'n' far Is S ible from the air in',-akq
• tc� the
ar' --n-man explaine.�
t.{ 't it '-"-'ltn !-rr),r)e.r venti.,,iq and
C1 r,!' 'Z t.,_. (i perming p I a n s
stated they w,�,-e
f(,-.r a walk-way
zalong tbt). nort." line, the Director
PI t!)'i'r' W,1 4,
-walkway netT'w'-)rk
ex'sting uti].",N,'-
t-W "d t!
north O'f
For( mn i r!qui a V-.e activitie ,
a f t e S ti, t and the disDosal
Of .Aaterj that the
'Le offf- site and that
pns��J' of thm-� wast, s -wioulo
T)� tampoi-al.-y :Itorac;e wit.'In the. buildir CT
in
DTuri-na 'Piither Ur
an r dtcrat i�
that 'Lh& a,,A'cn w,,_'-uld corn.prehend full
nn,� tl,�at trjF� variaii-,
j U,
D� I."Oin at a subsemient meeting
4- f'V
' t
aooroval of
f A p,
7 6,G, 6 r 'by Lund-Martin.
rrjaru°;-,_-turinio at 6700 Shin jl ..
kvv_i Y UtbI c' t) "Ije 'oliowinq conditions:
i%Lr ."ub)-ct to approval by the
"<yO'd'ng nc ry) A -nt�C-, t to applicable
prlo, issuance. of permits.
"-I�.-,rmin and.utility plans
r,-arli-ria , 6rc Inj 111, 11 � q
_I apz ro�,al by the City Engineer.
-inc -ee.mE nt and supporting
A pe,forrn, -i aq(
f"ran cl a) qua J'ant E�e, In am amount to be
cj tFrm,'ne by t'i e City h/1-anager) shall be
S'tIibrnitt---.,d tc:• assure completion of approved
site improvements.
P11-n approval cnrrpre iends compliance with
the ofdinance. automatic fire extinguishing
systHrn requirements per Chapter 5 , throughout
building; no variance is granted or implied
by this, action. The. request for any such
variance shall be treated under a separate
applicati,on
-3- 6-10-76
S. Any rooftop mechanical equipment and outside
trash disposal facilities shall be appropriately
screened,
6. A five foot wide walkway ease lent along the
northerly boundary of the property, as approved
by the City Engineer ,-,hall be provided.
The motion passed „unanimously.
The next item of business was consideration of App3ica-l-,on No. '76034
Application No. 76034 submitted by Brooklyn Center
Industrial Park, Inc. The item was introduced by
Secretary who state-i applikc�ant
from R-3 (Townh �i n r-,- 'd
n.1,_,.-4e, Ap�zirtri"nt�;
Residential Developrr,,�r.t) to Indu 7--trid J, early
of the approximate 20 acr tract 'Located we�at of (liew)
Xerxes Avenue, north of 1-94, and south cf Shingle
Creek Parkway.
Chairman Foreman announcad thr,, format cf t'� ! pa blic
hearing: the staff would present, the appliciatioy.-I, the
applicant wculd .bc: af.`ford�-,,d ari, opportuillty It) con),m-ont
On the application, and t�_,.stirriony would b tdk,7.m, fren!,
the notified neighboring property owns rs. He stlat d
the public hearing would, then be closed aria t',he,
Commission would proceed witl,, th-e-ir preliminary
deliberation of the rratter.
The Secretary contin-ued h, revrie�w P
—�7,tatirg th c
” �_ ar I C ,
was approximately 20 acres and that no specific site
and building plans were cc,,mprehended by the n quest.
H.-, r�)viewed the P,,,n-dttf,,d in the R-3 D!,,-tri t and
in the I-1 District, and in response to a question, by
Commissioner For(-.-,_,man stated that the Comprehensive
F,;dn recommended sIngle attached housing
",`ownhousps) for Err]'_!, iu-,ict TJ--_, t(l, tn.s� general, lack of
itaWe sites, fo,, �-,,uch x in tha� CA-, and also,
becau,:,,e of the stated goal to provide -a wide range of
:sing choice at different P r j,c e l e "s
Se�cretary st<ite'l -h at or 4' 4, 11)
be (-.)re the Commirsion 1,,s wh, tf�ler th,3L, a
z a! s , Al E
ssment, g`ven act_ial
-in-1 econnmic con-.�.-..'deratj`,3ns over the last te)n year��,,
I-Ance the Compr hers,,,-i-,ie Flan was adopted. He stated
tndt star"U"arC1 rt,Zonir'C,-� ilnc[uded whether
--.�de whi-�tl,f_,r
d c and t j
land represe�itl the h�,ghte t and bolt, use, c-,,nd
w'_'neth.e�r preliminary d�'ve oprr.ent from ceft 7, lndicat",�,� +111-1-i
T,,,arcel, could be prc pfn'y with II uses.
He cilso reviewed -H
for 1-1,
-1-ev,elc-pments when; thero, w,,i,,,, to
zo.nj.na di tricts . He that depending on whether
tfl).ere war3 abutment at ia try It line or direct abutment
at d property line, the ctdlhaance required a fifty foot
and one hundred toot b-affer respectively.
Chairman Foreman recognized Mr. Roger lNewstrom
who represented the applicant and who presented a
brief discussion, of the history of the zoning in the
B'r ,)c, klyn Center IndurArial Park and the extent of
de%relopment which had occurred during the last ten
years. He stated that much (-,)f the original zoning for
6-10-76 -4-
the Wdustrial Park had been based on speculation as
to Mw the former Me Brnwo Farms might be developed,
ar',d that w,:,Ile Twich Of thEi 6WIEderient was consistent
with that Tyvxijected zoninj , �)cc;Tiornic trends and
marketing deniands had vari,, d stibstantially.
He noted, ft, example, ' lie do-v,vnward trend in
construction clue primarily to economic
consideratjvnW and t at while there had been a downturn
in land d-.,:Nrelopmart for and industrial
P I,r Pc s e-; , the=re w a��, o vv a (jr a&-,a I upswing.
He stat !d t%-d appAnant "ad the industrial
Var'l, de-, arvl +-hat c� had been strr�ng
, r C
g ocnst u tion
Axuayawi Se deveIrper'n wiptotaticna. He statwi
c"f' tnq Id ri�l S as to
avaHablo land for dvveKp!n .--,t i:iy.-,d. tndt, in partic('Aar,
a vvho was interested W
a 20 act i tact such a- ttV which MAIM allow fee
He stated a vanav w factonE 6:6 U. the rezonina
th-: a c:-d 1- lard which
remained i.n ith'e" Fai-rn nortl-i. (A
J:r
t�`-,at the Wigs arya i;� th n, portion of
the Farm shocid b i "of rnajor
AvAPPInont aDd that A- pra--cel represent&'.
which could serve
z w1irvir, Ar Oman Wi rumt�er of curlert
intefested partiooi in parcA, and Mr. Newstrom
responded that at this Erie .fir ory was one who had
irdicated an. interest t--, rezr.)ning. Chairman
Wronan J.7,
, ( r ted party pro-
,it � eF t
`Y 1 i i et-30 0SM and W, . ..N,;,-,vstrom re:3ponded ir,
the negative.
then
Kowing conc- pd s of iayout for the
and jp-�)� L
n" -% ;7nci -' j,-,dscape treatments
for tWq Site.
f4--'� thut the apphroban wao based an the
,ippil cant'n determination tlrat there? was an increase
in-; """'; -.' At V I Ond in tho Wdustrial Park and
that thwiry wax a fcr a parcel of this
� ize which accommodaN industrial park type uses.
K response to a question by Chairman Foreman, the
Via: re'
ary affirmed that th J-1 District comprehended
a hroa,-i rf,ety of co.nirriercial and retail uses as special
vi a
uses.
Ch"iirman ;'ore'rnar, ther, announced that a public hearing
had j);-yen scheduled and t1hat neighboring property
owners within 350 feet of the subject property had been
natifie d. fie read the names of the notified property
owners and recognized the following residents: 3000,
3 00 1 , a r,d 3 013 68th Aventi e North;th; 3 0 01 , 3006, 3 012,
3019, 3101 , and 3118 Thurber Road; :3106, 3119, 3012 ,
and 3025 67th Avenue North; and 6833 York Place.
-5- 6-10-76
One resident inquired as to the completion of the
Earle Brown Farm patio homes and Mr. Newstroam
responded it would be a function of economics which
at the present times did not look favorably '✓aeon
immediate completion of the project.
Another resident :u tated that if the land were rezoned his
primary concern wcould be for proper landscaping and
buffering between the site and the single family homes.
Another resident utated his concern as to types of uses
permitted in the 1-1 District, the type of signery
permitted in the 1-1 D= trict, and the, type of buffering i
which would be r< q ,red between 1-1 and R.-1 Properties.
The balance of th r :conni7n owner>:r t° 'eyed their
(_-;pp(,-", it1.on to th ? r ;7i act3,.:, their preferenc4,! to havc, the
.'.:and remain R-3 , co,; terns as to impact upon. thy:
residential neighborhood and the Palmer Lake open
space area, and wh,,EAher additional 1-1 land w
needed in light of existing vacant 1-1 land in the
Industrial Parr.
In further discussrC, .'. several que<,tlon,,.s were asked as to
.access to the site sin:a t`tEe Secretary responded that
primary access wr,_tiId be from 1'nu ,,W Xerxes Avenge North
or from Shingle ('r� K. Parkway and not frc.TMm. "o;id '--rxe7-
Avenue on the wee,`",. He noted, ,hx-nm ever, that co—risidera-
t."on would be give 1. r.- g site and b u11.ding plan review
for and project as,' the use of "old" Xerxes Avenue
North for emerges cv �rehjlcl.e acre «. to, the site.
in response to se`�'-,er°al quip:-ticns , Mr. Newstrorr ,tated
A, in the + pin c ,f the apphc%ant this partial was the
is t single devele able piece of thl,s ize in thr;
trr �:-,trial Park and th„ applicant would prefer to
that land a a..lablp ire the central area for major
"` l,C� YyfryY£? { C,r, T4.s. a `. it 9 a matter of sound
that they , too, as a matter
tl .. a �qure pn�perty and iarring, had , g
;e-t�.if on the bas:u . --h,,ice t�e, la.g,. tract was zoned resi-
,ri ntial and stated ILheir or'.mary concerns were based on
y.x.,k of a ,spat-A,4T:++- acr the Fitt'.
he Secretary that rezoning actic.',n involved
larCd us a� for the property ar
% , : , .. r car:r. 1 . .., , :'rud that rezoning
land co,,.ld not. ,).9 .'CnntiJ"`.gent on a r,pac if1c develop-
or, plan an - her word;,, hey! , tated if th , land
were rezoned tc 1 it would 1,.e �5,,.Tbject to ali permitted
and special in t[lat district.
Mc tr.on by JaC oi,C r n, seconded by Close Public
"� imm.,, sicner Ho ,:, tF i ,C� txE. p' blic hearing. Tl Heaving
rr,.r _ n pa,-,-s d
Foliowing a brief discussion as to the conceptual
layouts presented by the applicant and the concerns
voiced by the residents present at the hearing,
Chairman Foreman noted the established procedure was
to refer all rezoning matters to the appropriate neigh-
borhood advisory gr�u,p fnr further input.
6-10-76 -6-
Table Application No. Mot-'.on by Commissioner Jacobson, seconded by
76034 (B.C.I.P.) and Gonurdssioner Scott to table Application No. 76034
Refer to Neighbr-rhood.
-TTbmitted by B.G_T: P, and' tc, the matter to the
Advisory Group Northwe-,,t Neighborhood Advisory Group for a review
and curri-ment. The, -mo-tion passed unanimously.
Recess e,t 1,n g r e ces s e d a t 1 " 30 p.m. and resumed
P.In.
nl,t 10 e It 0
Application No. 76037 The next lte:rr cf busJiness was f;--on:3ideration of
(North Suburban Y.W.G.A.) Application %Vo. 760,'3y, by the North Suburban
Y.W.C.A. Thie waF intr,)ddvce,,-,' by the Secretari
who stat4-,,d th,4e a special use permit
to operate a nurs ry dIC, t,�ie Bronkdale Covenaxat
r(:,tJ ") Bn-�o`.1- - ard
3
Fie stated the
\Aio,uAdi ,I)e for thr-,-, to Old children
S� nte3mber through
May.
Tht-,, stat-e-d have been inspected
,)-v th�i BuJ16inq ()fffi+ i,al lia i i.,,iformed the applicant
XIF n--!cessary impfovemen,t . 1-1c; iurther stated that the
of eight unlez an
Mary Finnegan,
(,t the I\Iortb Y �W.C.A. , whn oitated
the" actual m'lxjnlu l,,i of w�,-)uld be
be h- ;d-.�d withl,-
te-I o-2rc�-�s A)f tne app!jca.--A',, p.-oara.m..
Public Hearsn�� Fon�rian nt t,-�)d
� th�-it a public hearing had been
L
and that- roTjl L-11 tirr :-tz.,rifit3d pr�,,?petty ov✓n;-3r,1:�
,,ViLl .--, pro,�;ent. WH'o-n by Jacobson,
Fierce to Close the publ. ,
fi,-Winq. Die radios,, 'pa d n i T r)o Tut-31,y.
A Dr,,'A df!�;cus ic-xri en,,;"ueri a, to th-, improvements
b -,r(l m',ade or the
f rni as the hours of
c,r a 'n. w i c I ar-,c n n, 1,ri,Y to tI �Y-)Pficant, wouAd be
a raotion by
of on,, Id by Commissioner
apil of Application No.
76037 fa f) i r p ova
Y.W.C A �ubmitte-d
fie Jortfi `o,' urban Y.W.C.A.
1,,�icr to the 011c-,�[f jq-
to t.hel applicant as
E,f trek: an,' is not transferable.
I !— permit J - to all applicable
codes, and r,t-.,qulations, and
vix.Adtion ther-e-of shall be grounds for
re7�?()ccltiun.
• 5. A copy of the current State license shall be
tt
I h,- City.
Sept on fife W-Lt'h
4. she permit is subject to annual review.
The motion passed unanimously.
-7- 6-10-76
The next item of business was consideration of Application No. 76035
Application No. 76035 submitted by Mr. Douglas (Douglas Peterson)
Peterson. The item was introduced by the Secretary
who stated the applicant was seeking rezoning, from
R-1 to R-2, of the 15 , 495 square foot lot at 7212
Lyndale Avenue North to permit construction. of a
duplex.
The Secretary referred to the minutes of the May 13 ,
1,976 meeting wherein reconsideration was given to
Application No. 73004 which had been approved for
Steven L. Boone Construction Company in 1973. He
stated that application involved this parcel and the
adjacent one to the north and the request had involved
two things. rezoning of both parcels from R-1 to -4
and approval of a five-unit townhouse project on the
site. He stated that one of the conditions of the
rezoning had been that the two parcels be combined
through platting, since neither parcel alone cc:,.1d
support an R-4 or even R-3 type of development.
He explained that the applicant had not proceeded with
the development of the property and because it had not
been combined, the ordinance had not been formally
amended to rezone the property from R-1 to R-4. The
Secretary stated that for all intents and purposes the
property remained R-1 .
Relative to the subj(--ct application, the Secretary
stated there would be merit in including the adjacent
parcel to the north in this rezoning so that both would
be R-2 and that, .since the R-2 zoning district com-
prehended single family or two family dwellings, the
owner of the adjacent parcel, Mr. Boone, would be
able to develop it either way. He stated that each
parcel was large enough to support a duplex.
Chairman Foreman recognized Mr. Peterson who
explained that he personally had purchased the property
and intended to construct a duplex on it.
Chairman Foreman rioted that a public hearing had been Public. Baring
;scheduled and that none of the notified property owners
wasi present. Motion by Cornrnissioner Scott,
:seconded by Commissioner Jacobscn to close the public
hearing. The motion passed unanimously.
Fuirther discussion e$ sued ass to the cF:.ampatiDility of
R-2 zoning with 'the e,-st,abli,shed rnultipl:� family zoning
in the area as well as with fhe single tamily develop-
ment to the east.
Motion by Commi �sioner facob-on, seconded by Table Application No,
Commissioner Engdahl to table Application No. 76035 76035 (Douglas
and refer the matter to tho Northeast Neighborho ad Peterson) and Refer to
Advisory Group for review and comments and to convey Neighborhood Advisory
to the Advisory Group that the Commission sees merit Group
in including both parcels in the rezoning proposal.
The motion passed unanimously.
6-10-76 -8-
Applicati,o),-,, No. 76038 The next item of busines was cons.-Weration of
Store,) No. 76038 stibiiii,tted by Dayton's Home
Store, 5701 Xerxes Avenue Nort.',hi. The Secretary
introducod she ,w,tatinj tht, applicant, who is
r presented in this matter by Gjabbert and Beck,
developer,,-; of the Westbrook Mall, proposes a
,ink between tILe Dayton's Home Store and
th,e We—,,I]brook Mali". He stated the connection would
-,--o cn the west of t,ic, Honte Store and the east
sid s of the Mail.
Ph e S,- CP'z!tdr,7 tl:rer submitted site plan,
a aener,,Q upqra6--ii.- ,)f t Horn St ore
e
1d."Idsca'p,�'- trealtr,,ent including under-
-)jcf- "I'd
I the perimeter of
thIc-', rxirkin' lot, TI,111f
Ti,,- Di ;tor of Pubitc, ',4Vct^,K-, Line Secretary
d G 1, 1.r Fo e m T
1,e. d e plat! <',t�,ta.-I,I, 3 r, -a man r a
rAro vv,�,,,,, commented as to
t th-,- I in
IvIi . B j f"r c)f he "T.-I wo-uld
-- —) ,� - 11 71 J.i. K
tx,,at ("A', tPie We3thr(-,,-,k M:xA ind that the corridor
-�q-,JJpprI-i,,J tjrj 4(_:-,,atiC
fire cxtincruishing
V en SV S tc rrie
vl L
to the pro
of
that area between
76038 ]A--o:., axed the 71--r-:et line, there wao a
Home motion by Com missiioner seconded by
o rri rr Scott tc; recommend approval of
Appllic- ,,- )n No. Y603`, by Hom�=
Store, subje�t tr th7!
BF;!Winq l.arc are. tr-i approval by
gilt.., ,_,? ()ff .1
r,�!ct C.,
appj,.cabj'.k_;
-7`111,11,rf, and uAility
a a r,::
hj to th-? City
ar"d -,U.pp(,,rt-irg
qII-Inante'l On are amount determined
Manauer) be submitted to
00mpletion o,-, aproroved site improve-
bt, eq W 4 uipped Ith
ei-xti.-irpii- hinq system per
City ordj,nance�..
b . The underground, irrigation system shall include
f"ll'u ,added batilcvard area between the property
and ,`treet line.
The motion passed un-anirrously.
Appro-ve 'The next item of business was approval of the minutes
,5-27-76 for the May 27, 1976 meeting. Commissioner Kohrt
stated relative to the vote reflected on page 6 of those
minutes, involving Application No. 76011 , that he had
voted against the motion directing the preparation of
a resclutIon to deny that application.
6-10-76
Motion by Commissioner Kohrt, seconded by
Commissioner Scott to approve the minutes of the
May 27, 1976 meeting as corrected. Voting in favor
were Chairman Foreman, Commissioners Engdahl,
Scott, Pierce, Horan, and Kohrt. Not voting:
Commissioner Jacobson who explained that she was
not at that meeting. The motion passed.
In other business it was the consen�sus of the Other Business
Commissioners to consider Application No. 76039
submitted by Lund-Martin Company seeking a variance
from the automatic fire extinguishing system ordinance
requirements at the June 24 study session so that it
could be considered by the Council in conjunction with
the site and building plans for the proposed facility
comprehended under Application No. 76036.
In other business the Secretary reviewed a number of
pending applications and stated that the
involving Application No. 76011 submitted by Dr.
Robert Schell for John Horbal would be presented at
the study meeting.
Motion by Commissioner Engdahl, seconded by Adjournrment
Commissioner Horan, to adjourn the. meeting. The
motion passed unanimously. The Planning Cuin.-Idsu ion
meeting adjourned at 11 050 p.
Chairman
6-10-76 -10-