Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 07-22 PCP p q` p STUDY MEETING July 22, 1976 1 . Call 't-o Order: 2. Rol°I (:a.l I 3. Approval of Minutes: Ju_4,,� 1976 4. Chasrrmn's Explanation: 1,1e icmnirg Coiwdssion is are advisory body , One of the Comission's functions to hold Public Hearings. In the matter's concerned 'in these hearings, the Commission mkes recommendations to the Cate Council . The City Council makes all final decisions on these matters. BOARD ADJUSTMIENlS AND AP'PEALS 5. Dayton Development Co, 76043 Prellminafy R� 1— S. Approtia'i for: easterly portion o`; Br•ookdale Center. 6. Days--m izevelopimnt Co. 764346 Joint Parking Agreements Pr°elative to Brookdale . East Perimeter- Area, 7. Vleadr r? Corporation 76044 Preliminary P a•- Approval for Fox Run Addition at Unity Avenue North, noi� th o3,' 69th Avenue North. S. Red } `4 Stores, Inc. rj6072 Review proposed amends gent to ow i gi na l sit.- plan r=elative to rc:mpaclLer erclosure at 9-425 Xerxes Avenue 9. Rev la,,, ror0ng Matters ret•erreo b,,.r Cit;- C'ouncil relative to Application 10. Discussion items: a -i -nonce Standards Relative Ito S 5 g l e l=anni l y Attached) 1111ei i ;ngs Via. Ordinance Standards Relative to Flashing Sims c. :to us of Tablet' 3 term s d. +eon Eng ,-kpplications PLANNING CON-MYSSIt'IN Application No. 76043 . Applicant: Dayton Development Company Location: Easterly perimeter area of Brookdale Center Request: Preliminary Registered Land Survey Approval This item re=at.es to Application No. 76040 (Titus, inc.) which was reccirmended for approval at the July B, 1976 meeting. One of the conditions of that Application is that the area be re-subdivided prior to occupancy of the proposed Titus retail center. The proposed R.L.S. will consolidate a rennapt parcel (unplatted) and portions of a larger R. L. S. which includes much of Brookdale site. We have received a review from the County, and we will be prepared to discuss the matter in detail . Approval wfould be subject to the -Following: a. Final R. L. S. is subject to review by the City Engineer. b. f=inal R. L. S. is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. c. Me RI. L. S. shall be finalized and filed with the County prior to occupancy of the development comprehended under ;Pp1 xcafion �No. 75040. i PLANNING COMMISSION 114FORKATION SHEET Application No. 76044 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: Unity Avenue North north of 69th Ave. North Request: Preliminary Plat Approval This relates to the special use request application No. 76041 which was heard on July 8, 1976 and tabled. it is for the Fox Run 11 Development. lie have not received a response from the County, which is expected; or from Brooklyn Park. We have not reached a final determination, from the State agencies involved with enforcE llen' of Environmental IRIegulations, as to whether an Environmental Impact Assessment or Statement is izndated for this project-.. ' The hearing for this ftem was scheduled several weeks ago, and notice has been published. We recoli-xiiend i6his item be tabled, concurrent wit-h Application No. 76041 , since it is equailY Subject to possible Environmental Assessment requirements. Application itlo. 66072 (Amendment) Applicant: Red Owl Stores, Inc. Location: 5425 Xerxes Avenue North Request: Approval of design .1 car proposed waste compacter storage facility The applicant has submitted plans for an accessory structure which would screen a storage box that is part of a waste compacter system. The structure would be at the northwest corner of the building near t e existing dumpster enclosure. The screened area would be 13 ft. aide and .%rould project 22 ft. from the building. The coiapacter would be inside the building and would be used to compress the substantial paper board was-e material generated by the "Country' Store" operation. The store currently uses a small baler, and the bales are being stacked outside the bu,"Idinig. The amount of material has increased markedly since the bulk sale .,Country Store" foriiikit was established recent=ly. There `rave hien oncoing concerns since the store opened about outside storage and re'euse problems. A concrete block, screen wall was erected in the late 1960's on the west s-17de to provide screening for soc* of the "temporary" storage of cases .-,i-nd racks. Furl r V-ris Ye,-,ir, the applicant erecl-ed screening anclosures around two large duirt-psters outside the south and northwas• walls. Tile orilginal plans called for all disposal t-0 be inside. 'dais propcjsed compacter-storage facility is an additional encroachment of the wasta disposall syst-ern upon the outside. The store reanagemant contends 1-.1he volume of material is such that inside storage (pending pickup) is not feasible. The propost--d for screening is redhvood or cedar boards. approximately 8 r., ft. hi""I -- slimi'la-'r 1.-0 the dumuster screening. It 44S non opinion the structure should be r­iasonry, of coi,.ipatlible design and aesthet-lcs to the rairt building since: 1) the size (lenath) of the area is substantially larger than a standar.-I trasil enclosure; 2) the facill-ty involves production (coi-iipacting) and storage of arterial which passes aie-chani ca?ly from the store In io the ou-Itside box; 3; the loca-il-ion is pr oxii atte to the masonry screeriwall on the •,,'E.st`- side Of the, buildirtri. 1e t,, be pre-Pared to the r,.kitter in detail . PLANNING COM-USSTION INFORMATION SHEET i"o W1 i 0 Location. B ookdale Last Perimp-ter Area Request: Approval of Joint Parking A- greei.%vi-L's Section 36•-720 provides for joint parking agreerents between properties (and among properties as in this c,-se) where one property has available eltcess parking. The afire`,,lentsisrivolve the Plitt Theater and 1-,,ie proposed Titus retail center. The theater has a de-.Ficifency which has beell acconwodated via private easement with the applicant since 1969. The Council recognized that in the theater approval (Applica-itior, No. 68069) , and pnovided through Resolution No.69-34 that a forbazal joint agreement would lbe necessary when Broorkdale expansion warranted -it, Application No. 76040 comprehends the new retail development which also has a deficiency. Dayton Development has Jrtnc!, a(ijacent to both si,,?.,es (now used by Oe ".*heater) which can Provide the needed parking. 11-le will be prepared to review the parking 11& GUts and draft agreements in detail . • It is Blost '19nMcant thalt forii,,al legal encum-Orance of the Dayton property is necessary (a� provided by Sec, 35-720) since both developments credit the available p,?,rking to thelir -inin, mnuin requirew-nts. Approval IWOuld, bc- Subject CO the follow-gria: L The agreements are subject to rev-,,ehr, approval and 1c,gal encumbrance require-meq-ts of Sec. 35-720. 2. The agreement relative to the rota ili development ceim,prehended by Application No. 76040 shall be finalized • and filed prior to Issuance of per.-mits (or that development). PLANNING COMISSIOrJ INFORMATION SHEET The main discussion item is review of the zoning matters relative to Application No. 76311 . The Attorney's memoranda should serve as guidelines for the "spot zoning' questions and we will offer cormient on the other issue regarding the use of Cal .Land uses as "buffering" interchangeably with higher residential zones.