The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1976 07-08 PCP _ Planning C(.:.,mffd..,Sfor .'g(--'nos; Regular Meeting July 8, 1976 1 . Call to Order: 8:00 p.m. 2. Roll Call.: 3. Approval of Minutes: June 24, 1976 4. Chairman's Explanation: The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold Public Hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings the Commission makes recom- mendations to the City Council. The City Cox-incil maces all final decisions on these ~ matters. BOARD OF ADjuS`L'M.ENTS AND APPEARS S. Stanley Westrom 76042 Variance to permit enlargement of dwelling which is nonconforming as to yard setback at 5312 Irving Avenue North. • PU NNINC CGL? IS lOr3_ 6. Douglas Peterson 76035 Rezone, from R-1 to R-2, property at 7212 Lyndale (Tabled Item). 7. Titus, I'nc,, 76040 Site and Building Plan Approval for Commercial Center in east Srookdale perimeter of southeast corner of Shingle Creek Parkway and County Road 10. 8. Meadow Corp. 76041 Special Use site and building plans for an R-3 Planned Residential Development at 69th and Unity Avenues Borth. 9. W. J. Dale 76009 ldm� Rezone, from I-2 to C-2, property south of ;t akebreeze Avenue and vivre:-t of `i'�IT a 100 (Tabled item). 1 s • t piaj-jjjIj f:t r,oinr,)--,sIo-a Agenda July 8.. 1976 page 2 10. City of Brooklyn Center 76020 Rezone, from I-2 to C-2, property north of Lake and west of T.H. 100 (companion to Application No. 76009, Tabled Item). 11 . Review of Application No. 76011 (Dr. Robert Schell) which was tabled by the City Council on June 28, 1976. 12. Discussion Items: a. Ordinance Standards Relative to Single Family Attached Dwellings b. Ordinance Standards Relative to Flashing Signs c. Status of Tabled Items d. Pending Applications 13� Other Business: 14. Adjournment ,;, ., r~ � • �� T�, Y�tT�'t„3�i�11�,�a'�'iC�'��' des t�.�' Application No. 76042 Applicant: Stanley a'Vestrom Location: 5312 Irving Aventie North Request: Variance The request is for permission to construct a major addition onto a dwelling which is nonconforming as to yard setback. Section 35-311 provides that nonconforming structures may not be enlarged or structurally altered. The structure sets on a 5o foot wide lot and was built in 1940. There is an approximate 6 foot side yard setback deficiency. The applicant intends to add a living area addition, a deck, and to redo the exterior finish. Given the size of the addition, the entire structure must be brought into compliance with the Buiiding Code. A public hearing has been scheduled. The applicant is the owner/occupant and feels the structure merits the investment of a -major addition and upgrading. A substantial renovation and improvement to the structure would result in an enhancement of the neighborhood. This application is virtually identical to Application No. 750:16 which was approved • by the Council on June 2, 3975 for the property at 5322 Irving Avenue North. Approval would be subject to the following: a. The proposed addition shall conform with existing setback -requirements. b. The exterior finish of the existing structure shall be rejuvenated so to be compatible with the finish of the new construction. ca The entire structure shall be brought into compliance with applicable building codes, as determined by the Building Official o M 1 111 ION J � P: i p C• �, '' 3333Y '•, � Ap 1j A cl`� it x LANNING CC11Aanl.SO"fO a I'4FOR[yaAT1G'1 SHEL " Application No. 76035 Applicant: Douglas Peterson Location; 7212 Lyndale Avenue North Request: Rezone The request was considered at public hearing on June 10, and referred to the N.E. Neighborhood Advisory Group. The applicant seeks rezoning, from R-1 to R-2, of the 15,495 sq. ft. lot on Lyndale Avenue, to permit construction of a duplex. The Advisory Group has recommended approval, including concurrence with the Commission's suggestion that the adjacent lot, of comparable size, be included in the action. Both parcels were included in the 1973 approved rezoning to R-4, but which were not developed by the then applicant, Mr. Boone, who of+,ins the parcel adjacent to this one. The rezoning was not finalized by ordinance amendment, therefore, and thus the land is R-1 . The proposed zoning would permit either a single family or two family dwelling on each lot, and represents a lower density than the previously approved R-4. 73rd - -- AVE I-T - T7 4 R zi I�t I R - 4 . __.. I 01 IAC( 1 LR -4 cc ,wl , N 72 nd AVE NO. 4_1 Application, Hi% 7603-., "/er " , a I W • PL-A�M-NINIG C01VIMISSION 114FORNMATION SHEET Application No. 76040 Applicant: Titus, Inc. (with Dayton Development Co.) Location: S.E. comer of Shingle Creek Parkway and County Road 10 - Request: Site and Building Plan Approval The request comprehends a 9,800 sq. foot retail center on the approximate 46,000 sq. foot site immediately north of Dayton-Bachman's Garden Store. We will review the site and building plans in detail, especially regarding the landscaping and grading. This development represents the culmination of the east perimeter development of Brookdale - an area once comprehended as parking lot expansion. There are several details which must be clarified in this area: finalization of certain improvements, such as curbing, which were installed as "temporary"; replatting the area to establish distinct tracts, including this site which Dayton Development proposes to sell; and resolution of necessary joint parking agreements between the applicant and the theater. This development has a 19-stall parking deficiency which the applicant proposes to accommodate through a joint parking agreement with Dayton Development Co. which retains a 150 ft. wide strip between this site and the theater. The strip is essential for parking purposes, and Is encumbered to -the theater property via private easement. The theater has a 108 stall deficiency which was recognized by the Council in the approval (Application No. 68069 and Resolution No. 69-34). No formal joint parking agreement was approved then, pending future Brookdale development. We have reviewed the earlier files, private agreements, plans and swveys, and we find there is enough surplus parking for this proposed use, the theater and the Garden Store (30 stall "deficiency" - however, property is owned by Daytons). Joint parking agreements should be required for both this development and the theater; and a parking layout should be submitted to support them - as a separate application. Approval of these documents should be a condition of this application. The applicant has submitted a preliminary registered land survey for the area; it is being .reviewed. Approval would be subject to the following: I Building plans are-subject to approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes. 2. Grading, drainage, utility, and berming plans are subject to approval by the City Engineer. 3, A Performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee (in an amount determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to assure completion of approved site improve- ments. 4. The property shall be subdivided, through plat or registered land survey, prior to occupancy. 5. The parking space deficiency shall be resolved thrwgh am approved ;hint Parking Agreement, per Section 35-720, with Dayton Development Company who owns the adjacent land designated as parking; the use of said adjacent parking area by the theater shall also be approved through joint parking agreement, as required by Council Resolution No. 69-34; and said agreements shall be approved prior to the issuance of permits, 6. Any outside trash disposal facilities shall be appropriately screened. S '��, � �''�, �. K• � t � '��''may. Y• s � � r a Nr HOF IN i u , r [1-100n HLIO.SUI PropeMes Nicol le! Mail - Mirtneapoits, Minnesota 55402 July 7, 1976 Mr. 41hir Tromert Director of Planning Cit,i of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brot.,'Klyn Center, MN 55430 ..ar tly.. Tremere: -;s to advise that relative t,3 Titus' application No. 76040 rrr and buildil-Irl plan approval , Day-ton Development Company as uwnere of the property, understands that additional parking must be �rayided an adjacent property to support the Proposed develop"nt. Accordingly, we wish to request Approvals by Smoklyn Center of a CM% parking agreement between the property prvposed for Titus and adJacent • t. Cr -1y, tr.d_ :esently used by owned by Dayton U*?y9iopmr), jmpa, p 'ti tt 'theaters for parking purposes. This parking proposal will include "Chp --,irkina needs of both the theater and the Titus project and it Is r,ur belief -hat there will be wire than enough parking stalls for both de einpmcnts as called for in the Brooklyn Center ordinance. -1 ,ur proposal will require amending P.n existing temporary parking easemnt an to date this new aareement has nolt been full approved by the theater I Y no( revi-wed by the Brooklyn Center City Attorney. We have, however. dis- cu-P;,-d tr;Is rtew arrangement with Plitt TAeater's representative and they ei!-e currently reviewing a draft agrei;_4rent. y�- I ierefore, pending agreenw-nt on the langvage, we request that the Planning C-o7rlss-�un review the cross parking proposal together with the review of 7 :,:- ' site and building plans, and sobvOt a recondition subject to ar-pf-oval by the City Attorney. ijt -Ii---GE T, S TRIL TT Al I'OR PIA,111NING COMMUSS'10.Ki INFORh1ATTON SHE , Application No, 76041 Applicant: Meadow Corporation Location: 69th Avenue North at Unity Avenue North Request: Special Use Permit Site and Building Plan Approval The applicant is proposing a multi-phase, Planned Residential Development as comprehended by Section 35-312 (special use in the R-3 district). The project is known as "Fox Run III' and proposes an ultimate 320 units on 64.4 acres in eight separate phases. We have reviewed the plans which generally conform with the P.R.D. require- ments and e=eed the R-3 density requirements; there is an apparent deficiency in Phase 6 as to rninimum percentage of townhouse units (16% vs. the required 20% per ohase). We will be prepared to discuss this. The application Is actually comprised of two parts: the total conceptual plan for the development; and the site and building plans for the first phase. Each subsequent phase would be subject to review and approval as separate items. 'Experience with comparable (townhouse) developments suggests that subsequent phases be contingent upon substantial completion of site and buildings of the first phases. The applicant has filed a preliminary plat (hearing scheduled for July 22) and approval of the plat should be a condition of this application. The proposed units consist of two and three unit dwellings. There are no multiple dwellings (apartments). The platting reflects condominium type owner- ship, similar to several, established townhouse projects. The applicant has incidentally requested that,;the Commission consider an ordinance amendment which would permit "single family attached" units, rather "Chan "R-3 townhouse" type units In such developments In satisfying the minimum P.R.D. requirements. The result would be to allow all two family dwellings rather than requiring some dwellings of three or more units. IvVe will comment on this later. The first phase is at the south end, at 69th Avenue, and consists of 20 units, slz,of which are "townhouses". Substantial site engineering will be necessary, and the Director of Public Works wilt be prepared to comment further on this. We will be prepared to discuss the application in detail, and to offer recom- mended conditions of approval. Separate actions are In order for the master plan and for Phase I. } e 1 • a V, V r' �1 I' d ... ' ' t..w. a -yi's•.ate-. ,j+ B ..t ° 0.�~.. 1111� � n ',.P..• , � .79•'+I '� r f�v T •ry' ! yt1 le.rj ti in r �t.. µ .- , �• `. `� ' u toms •y 3A+f {�� h1!► _J y 1 O "" I IL a { °Y Hof j0 _. t 6. r- -A ' 'aIv+�13N :Utv1rJli��` IC IN INFORMATION SHEET Application No. 76009 Applicant: W- J. Dale Location: South of Lakebreeze avenue and west of T.H. 100 Request: Rezone from I-2 to C-2 This item, and companion Application No. 76020, were tabled on April 15, 1976 to permit the applicant time to prepare a conceptual layout and preliminary plat. A preliminary plat has been submitted for review, and we will be meeting with the applicant soon to discuss the Highway Dept. response and the general layout - prior to filing the preliminary plat application. We have also pursued the suggestion that the adjacent property be included in any platting (File No. 76020, initiated by the Commission, comprehends rezoning), and the owner apparently is unable to afford participation. We will be prepared to review the data developed so far. i t t t� 4 .+ vA s Y , { � �,: -�--.�3•'°�......� ''-.�':`-ATM , '�F`k u^,.^ a¢4.'L�%x.ZiY.� .< f$ G1 :.+3A8'9 .Scegi=tlKAff+,R et, !� Si•�2'-'�"�° i�,�9'd8' Sw �A /�® ® �� N p i1 i AVE j . ps Ewl It ti T� e a � + ti t 1 � t� a t i {c