HomeMy WebLinkAbout1976 03-25 PCP PLANNIJING, 4`10HRISSION AGErRIDA
01-UDY SESSION
tiai.-ch 25, 1976
1. Ca'11 to Oreler.- 8: 00 v-m-
Rall
A-pprc A
. -va 1 of 11, 1976
4 . Cladriman"S The Planni-nq Uwamission is an advisory
body. One of vie Covamission' s function
is to hold Public ifear-5-rigs. In the
:natters concerned in these hearingu,
the Comimission ii.iakes recormi.endat-Ams to
the City Co-1nc-,;.I.. The City Council
makes -all final decisions on these
matters.
y
N.V1. 1 "lone. Cc ?-a. 75043
11101
6" Draft Resolution t,,Iodi ficat ions i.q.
thtt 1-11
Rt,-.-view Draft QuestionnaJ.-e for Prr;T ed CO3MUMU
pos' t-Y
111,ttitutAe Survev.
.t
3a Discussion, Items:
on
pplici.it i s
,..,)Aed b-v C-3tv
U,
Neigiiborhood G10
6ir;cussio.:Is.
c
Px
:fit FOP'-HATION SHIEET
_Ap p 1 4
75043
Applicarit.: IN.W. Bell Telephama- Conipany
Location 11011 - 65th Avenue Nor-th
Review Proposed Site Improvertments
Vh2is application vas heard- lazt fall, m-id consisted of an amendment tC.0
the paxking lot (empansion) tide office sapac(:-, at the switching facility
could be increased. I
The zDecial use hearing ix•yolved input front the neighboring property
owners to the extent that screani-n.g ai:xd landscaping were not 's atis factory.
Probler,,,ov-, noise anet jjfc,-,,ro e-r lot liqhting were also discussed.
P
51ia applicant was ;a3ble to --aego-tiate a Joint parking aqreem-,---nt with the
High Sclioolf -`md. tllc-, lot t",.e fa-cil-ity was not expancled.
the applicant a -IandsC:ape and site up
gradi-aq plan Jn
-7-,0 the neighborhood concerns. Capies of the plan and an ex--
I-ory 1,:ztter werc-�� pe.n.sonally do-JAve-redi by a representative of t-he
plaliat - -t-
app l-Icaint. the;
13:11e purl--jOse� th-is, hearing "U.-, to -revie-w the sill)f3tz)Lntj.e.1 landsca-pa
upigzadiing proposal, and to 1--f-1,Eord parties the opportun-0-ty
to ex-,--mmeat. Neighboring h,,,).*ve; been not-i -Ued- Th G
Yndorsed
plar. 1-1J.1-1 be a mat"'cr of and shoulel re-,solve any que'stions in
:h e 'IEuI-..uj,_-e a-s to wlvit a-re matile.
i
i_ •
`C
t t
0
U ; o^�� S ror�Y ccrvca,� rC 2,LOCV_ r
fb o r
a `� I ►
1 r.
r r
o �
r t+
o
I �
1
I J
R-3�fdEaGrtE�tis :`
< t a d
' n
�� W F
PLANNING COM41SSION INFORMATION SHEET
AGL,.'NDA ITMA
G. T,'-J',e will have- a 'reso-lution c,�,iaprehendincj inodifications
OF the 1-1. Zoning as discussed at the 14arch 11, 1976
1 "^' '
tt on will include expansion of the special
meeting. the
confaercial uses, addit-ionall C-2 retail, and the rezoning
aZ C-2 parcels in *��11,.�".I.?i . to -1-1.
7. We hay.,re prepared 6. (2---oft questionnaire for use in the proposed
copZ-1111nity Aittitude S".'Z.":VeY which wl.11 be coordinated by the
Jaycees. It .41.s iikii.--ended that the survey will be screened by
the Corari.lissio.- and ot-hers to assure proper design and effect.
We will be prepares`'' to. 31sc-ass the content and procedures of
the SUrVeV effort.
8a.U'he Cbimicil recently -rev-Jewed each of the variance applications
now table,-" and con3idered the "community impact" of each re-
quest. It- was thn cta.nsensus that the matter o-f sideyard set-backs
should be deferred lxl'.ttil the attitude survey is complete. The
inatters of rear '-,ard setback-s; constru.ction or. SWbaltandand lots;
and side cor-ner in he R-2 distr.-Lct were deemed to lbe
of Ineighborhood impac-1-- or of lesser overall impact tTian the side
yard issue.
The Council has d-i.rev.�ed us to p-,_-epare possible ordinance amend-
xcl -1 0.*C -4
e,nts for the lath- Pla-nning Commission Review of those
proposals is des?ro� I.t is expected the draft a-mendments will
be on the aganda.
ne application stilac,".1-t-ed i-11 1974 by Douglas Quady in 1974 and
denied by the Counc:1-3-, was also discussed. The:L Council has re-
ques-41--ed a reconside �'4-ion of the request im light of two items
;r�'nich were not (Iiscussedl originally: 11 the ordiriance
the garag,(--� ---o encroach in-to -the front
langecage which pe_riii
yard, and wa.,,�! el_,.minated in the 1963 compre.hens-ILve rezoning,
thus, Proh.�'U)iting a-•i an to"o of the g A
arage; 21 t-he in-
st---j".1ation cif; rjRq-A,]j Ava,.-ine whiicT'i may have involved a right-
s'ubject property.
02:-'�."Nay S1,11-t -
e C_jre, -1-a.rl of - I e r u t ti-le
th '.jMS L. ce" L I ea es and i
backgroun-1 informaC%c:,-ei; it is expected •this wili". be available
at the
sh-o--,A10 q`vert 1-o a schad,11le of discussion sessions
a i -0 114. The C 0 LLV-1 C.
a the 17,eigborhor C, ups on the set.back questioL
(,-F general qubl4c hearings also be
ha-s asked '.'hat th,,,'I
Bc.'The:_ Dixrect+?_r of Works be prepared to discuss, the
• YNC Environi"Ieiltal ofr` which were dis-
tribut-ed earlier.
'I