HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972 07-06 PCM Minutes of the Proceedings of the
Planning Commission of the City of
Brooklyn Center in the County of
Hennepin and State of Minnesota__._
July 5, 1972
Chairman Jensen reconvened the meeting of June 22, 1972, noting
what the meeting had recessed due to the lack, of a quorum and that a
quorum was now present.
Motion by Commissioner Engdahl, seconded by Commissioner Scott,
to adjourn the June 22nd, 1972, study meeting. Voting in favor were:
Chairman Jensen, Commissioners Grosshans, Bogucki, Scott, and Engdahl.
Voting against: none. The motion passed. The meeting adjourned at
5:05 P.M.
Chairman Jensen then called to order the regular meeting of the
Planning Commission at 6:05 P.M.
Roll Call: Chairman Jensen, Commissioners Grosshans, Bogucki,
Scott and Engdahl.
Following the Chairman's explanation, the first item of business
was consideration of Planning Commission Application No. 72042 sub-
mitted by B.C.I.P. , Inc. The item was introduced by the Secretary
who stated the applicant proposes to build a 7,500 square foot
structure for a Bob's Produce Market at the northeast corner of
Summit Drive and Earle Brown Drive.
The Secretary further noted that there was indication that the
retail sales operation would entail the outside display and sale of
certain seasonal produce and noted the staff recommendation that
such activity should be restricted to the 12 foot walkway area adjacen
to the building.
He further noted the staff recommendation that the indicated
fencing should be extended approximately 20 feet on the northwesterly
side of the site to afford maximum screening from the loading area.
Chairman Jensen then recognized Mr. Steven Krogness and Mr.
Bob Schroer who discussed the proposed plans.
Considerable discussion ensued relative to the indicated
bituminous area near the southeast corner of the proposed structure
and the Secretary coz .men_ted that the staff was concerned that this
area would be used for additional display and retail sale of produce
beyond that permitted in the 12 foot walkway are He noted that
the bituminous area was not intended for parking or driveway use.
Chairman Jensen recognized Mr. Schroer who stated that it was
probable that the bituminous area would be utilized periodically
for the display and sale of produce such as pumpkins. He noted it
was his intent to park a display wagon on the site.
The Director of Public Works further commented relative to the
staff objection to the large bituminous area stating maintenance
problems would result with the blacktop since it would not be used
regularly for vehicular or pedestrian traffic, with aesthetically
undesirable results.
Commissioner Grosshans agreed stating that the bituminous would
tend to break up and disintegrate and inquired whether other material
had been considered. The Secretary noted further that the staff
recommendation was that the area be designated as green area.
1
1
Mr. Schroer responded that bituminous was selected primarily
for the ease of maintenance as well as providing a hard surface
upon which to park a display wagon and to sell merchandise.
Further discussion ensued relative to the outside display of
seasonal merchandise.
Motion by Commissioner Bogucki, seconded by commissioner Engdahl
to recommend approval of Planning Commission Application No. 72042
subject to the following conditions:
1. Drainage and utility plans are subject to the approval
of the City Engineer
2. Building plans are subject to the approval of the
Building Inspector with respect to applicable building
codes;
3. Performance agreement and performance bond (in an amount
to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted
to the City to guarantee the installation of site
improvements;
4. Outdoor storage and sale of merchandise shall be limited
.to the walkway area contiguous to the building with
additional display and sale of merchandise being subject
to the administrative permit provisions of the ordinance;
S. All driving and parking areas will be paved and curbed
utilizing B-612 type curbing.
The motion passed unanimously.
The Secretary introduced the next item of business, Planning
Commission Application No. 72044 submitted by Harlan Nyberg. The
Secretary explained the applicant was requesting a variance from
the platting ordinance to permit subdivision by metes and bounds
description. He noted the subject parcel was 158 feet by 128.5
feet with a residential structure and a detached garage on the
northerly portion. He explained the new lot would be 71 feet by
128.5 feet with 9, 123k square feet of area.
Chairman Jensen noted the Commission was meeting as a Board
of Appeals and Adjustments.
The Secretary explained the applicant's contended hardship
that subdivision by platting would be unduly restrictive. He further
noted that the new parcel would be substandard in size but the use
could be permitted in that the 70% requirement of Section 35-500
appeared to be met.
Chairman Jensen noted that none of the notified property owners
was present and he recognized the applicant and brief discussion
ensued.
Motion by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Commissioner Engdahl,
to recommend approval of Planning Commission Application No. 72044
submitted by Harlan Nyberg, noting that precedent for such subdivision
has been established and that the neighboring parcel to the west,
for example, was only slightly larger. The motion passed unanimously.
Commissioner Gross arrived at 8:45 P.M.
1
1
1
-3-
The Secretary introduced the next item, Planning Commission
Application No. 72048, submitted by American Oil Company. Chairman
Jensen announced that the Commission was meeting as a Board of
Adjustments and Appeals.
The Secretary stated the applicant was requesting a rear yard
setback variance to permit construction of a proposed car wash bay
approximately 14'h feet from the rear lot line. He stated the rear
yard setback requirement in a C2 district was 40 feet.
Chairman Jensen recognized W. G. Housenga, representing American
Oil Company, who stated the variance as well as companion applications
for a special use permit and site and building plans were for Wes's
Standard Service at 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard.
The Secretary commented that, though not indicated on the
initial plans submitted, there was an enclosed extension of the
service station which was situated approximately where the car wash
bay would be built. He stated that the required setback was thus
currently encroached upon. He further noted that there was an R5
apartment dwelling to the east of the service station site.
An extensive discussion ensued relative to the status of the
present extension of the gas station on the easterly side, as a
non-conforming use, and whether, as a matter of policy, such a sub-
stantial setback variance could be issued since the use was being
changed.
Further discussion ensued relative to Commissioner Bogucki 's
comment that it appeared substantial noise would be generated by the
car wash operation. The owner, Mr. Wes Reavely, stated that noise
would be minimal in that the operation would be hydraulic in nature,
rather than air operated, consequently, there would be no sudden
release of air and encumbant noise as is the case with many car
washing operations.
Chairman Jensen inquired what the hardship was as a basis for
requesting the variance and noted the conditions set forth in the
ordinance. Mr. Reavely responded that in his opinion the car wash
was essential to maintain his business and that it was physically
impossible to construct such a facility elsewhere on the site.
Commissioner Bogucki asked Mr. Housenga whether another location
on the site had been considered, and Mr. Housenga responded that
American Oil Company had not constructed any detached car washing
facilities in that they were not considered feasible.
The Secretary commented that if the car wash operation were
to be located elsewhere on the site, a significant portion of the
required parking area would be removed from the site and thus the
parking standard requirement would not be met. Commissioner Bogucki
noted that this appeared to be the primary grounds for possibly
granting a variance.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Commissioner
Gross, seconded by Commissioner Grosshans, to recommend approval of
Planning Commission Application No. 72048 submitted by American
Oil Company, subject to appropriate screening and fencing require-
ments of the revised site plan, and noting that the required parking
on the site would be substantially reduced if the building were
located elsewhere on the site. The motion passed unanimously.
1
1
i
1
_-4
The next item of business was Planning Coni ission Application
No. 72046 submitted by American Oil Company for site and building
plan approval for a car wash bay at Wes Reavely's Standard Station,
6044 Brooklyn Boulevard. The Secretary noted disposition of the
application was contingent upon action on the prior application,
No. 72043.
fie stated the applicant seeks approval of site and building
plans for a car wash bay addition and that the proposed structure
would be constructed east of the service station and attached thereto
replacing a smaller existing enclosed extension of the building.
The Secretary stated that relative to fencing and screening,
the service station site abuts an R5 apartment development to the
east. He noted the present fencing along the east lot line was of
the open slat type and that an entire section of the fence had been
broken out. He further noted that there were no substantial trees
or shrubs along that line.
Relative to landscaping, the Secretary stated particular
concern of the staff was rclativc to the asphalt paving areas
adjacent to each of the Brooklyn Boulevard entrances. He noted that
although the areas are not needed for parking density purposes,
vehicles were regularly parked there, creating a situation which
was undesirable from safety (traffic sighting) and aesthetic points.
With regard to parking, the Secretary stated that submitted
plans appear to indicate 12 spaces and that these would meet the
ordinance requirements. He stated, however, the two spaces noted
at the southerly end of the proposed car wash bay are currently
occupied by two metal utility structures which were not indicated
on the plans submitted.
Chairman Jensen then inquired whether the intent was to
retain the two metal buildings and the applicant responded that the
buildings would be removed.
The Secretary stated that a properly screened adequate trash
disposal facility was not indicated on the plans. He noted that
used tires are randomly piled to the rear southerly of the proposed
bay. Mr. Reavely responded that the tires were regularly picked
up by a tire dealer and Mr. Housenga stated that the recommended
trash facility would be provided.
An extensive discussion ensued relative to the exterior
finish of the building.
The Secretary noted that a decorative "Ambrico" brick was
indicated in addition to an exposed concrete block for the rear side.
Commissioner Scott stated her concern that the landscaping
should be detailed and indicated on the final plans submitted.
Chairman Jensen stated in that regard that the specific type of
fencing should be included on the final plans.
Following further discussion, there was a motion by Commissioner
Scott, seconded by Commissioner Grosshans, to recommend approval of
Planning Commission Application No. 72046 submitted by American Oil
Company, subject to the following conditions:
1. Drainage and utility provisions are subject to the
approval of the City Engineer;
1
1 ''�
5--
2. Building plans are subject to the approval of the
City Building Inspector with respect to applicable
building codes;
3. A performance agreement and performance bond (in an
amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted to the City to guarantee the installation
of the site improvements;
4. Adequate trash disposal facilities will be provided
and properly screened;
5. All driving and parking areas will be paved utilizing
B7612 type curbing;
6. All areas not designated parking or driving areas will
be sodded or appropriately landscaped, with said land-
scaping to be indicated on the final plans;
7. Fencing will be indicated on the final plans, and
installed as follows: continuous vertical board
fencing, five feet in height, along the northerly and
southerly property lines; and, continuous vertical board
fencing, 6 feet in height, along the east property line;
8. All exterior masonry surfaces shall be either decorative
block or have a painted finish and will be indicated as
such on the final plans submitted.
The motion passed unanimously.
The next item of business was consideration of Application
No. 72047 submitted by American Oil Company requesting a special use
permit. The item was introduced by the Secretary who stated the
permit was required by Section 35-322 (3a) for a car wash facility
at an existing service station. He noted the proposed facility was
similar in operation to the recently approved car washer for the
Shell Oil Company (Application No. 72035) .
A brief discussion ensued relative to the use of the car wash
and the applicant explained that it was intended to be only a
promotional device for the purchase of gasoline. The Secretary
noted that should the car wash be constructed as indicated on the
site plan, there appeared to be sufficient "stacking area" for
cars between the pump islands and the entrance to the washing
facility.
Following further discussion there was a motion by Commissioner
Bogucki, seconded by Commissioner Scott, to recommend approval of
Planning Commission Application No. 72047 submitted by American Oil
Company subject to the site improvements noted under Application
No. 72046, and the condition that the permit will be subject to
review on an annual basis commencing from the date of issue. Motion
passed unanimously.
The meeting recessed at 10:15 P.M. and reconvened at 10:40 P.M.
The Secretary introduced the next item of business, Planning
Commission Application No. 72051, submitted by Carl Graffunda, an
architect representing the Dale Tile Company. He stated the request
was for approval of site and building plans for a proposed warehouse
addition to the present Dale Tile Company building.
--6-
He noted the proposed structure is comprised of a warehouse
area and office area. He further noted that removal of the
unoccupied drive-in restaurant building at the southeast corner of
the property was indicated on the submitted site plans.
Chairman Jensen then recognized the applicant and Mr. William
Dale, the owner, and a discussion ensued relative to the proposed
upgrading of the site. Relative to the exterior finish of the
building, Mr. Graffunda indicated that a light weight block would be
used similar to that used on the existing structure. He noted the
intent of the owner to eventually install a ceramic block on that
portion of the exterior facing Lakebreeze Avenue.
The Director of Public Works noted that he had been in consul-
tation with the applicant relative to landscaping and that it had
been determined that the green areas along the periphery would be
bermed. Commissioner Scott stated that she felt shrubbery should
also be included in the green areas to provide variety from the
rather monotonous appearing green strips adjacent to large areas of
bituminous.
Further discussion ensued relative to the landscaping and it
was the consensus of the Commission that shrubbery should be
included in the green areas.
Motion by Commissioner Gross, seconded by Commissioner Scott
to recommend approval of Planning Commission Application No. 72051
submitted by Carl Graffunda for Dale Tile Company, subject to the
following conditions :
1. Drainage and utility plans are subject to the approval
of the City Engineer;
2. Building plans are subject to the approval of the
Building Inspector with respect to applicable building
codes;
3. A performance agreement and performance bond (in an
amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be
submitted to the City to guarantee the site improvements
as designated on the plans submitted;
4. All parking and driving areas will be paved and
curbed utilizing B-612 type curbing;
5. A revised landscaping plan to include shrubbery and
berming shall be submitted and subject to review by the
staff;
6. The exterior finish of the addition shall be similar
to that of the existing building.
Motion passed uanimously.
The Secretary noted that he had received a letter from the
current developer of the 62 acre parcel of land at the northwest
corner of the City requesting that previously submitted Applications
No. 72026 and 72027, submitted by :.Rudy Peterson, requesting
rezoning and site and building plan approval, respectively, be
withdrawn. ne noted that a new application for site and building
plans had been submitted and would come before the Commission at
the next meeting.
i
1
Motion by Commissioner Scott, seconded by Coraiiissioner Bogucki,
to cknowledge the letter of June 1, 1972, from Mr. Richard Walsh,
withdrawing Planning Commission Applications No. 72026 and 72027.
Motion passed unanimously.
Motion by Commissioner Engdahl, seconded by Commissioner Scott
to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously. The Planning
Commissioner meeting adjourned at 11:45 P.M.
Ar'
Chai
7
n
1
1
1