Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1975 09-11 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION CITY HALL SEPTEMBER 11 , 1975 Call to Order: The Planning Commission met in regular session and was called to order at 8:05 P.M. by Chairman Carl Gross. Roll Call : Chairman Gross , Commissioners Engdahl , Foreman, Scott, Jacobson, and Horan. Also present were Director of Public Works James Merila and Director of Planning and Inspection Blair Tremere. Approve Minutes: Motion by Commissioner Foreman seconded by 8-28-75 Commissioner Scott to recommend approval of the minutes of the August 28, 1975 meeting as sub- mitted. Voting in favor were: Chairman Gross, Commissioners Scott, Foreman and Jacobson. Not voting: Commissioners Engdahl and Horan who stated they were not present at that meeting. The motion passed. Application No, 75028 Following the Chairman's explanation, the first (B.C.I.P. , Inc. ) item of business was consideration of Application No. 75028, submitted by Brooklyn Center Industrial Park. The item was introduced by the Secretary who stated the request consists of a preliminary Registered Land Survey, which was the result of a condition of approval of Application No. 75021 , comprehending the Rauenhorst speculative building at the westerly termination of Shingle Creek Parkway. The Secretary explained the proposed R.L.S. consisted of two tracts of 15.5 acres and 39.91 acres respectfully. He stated the larger tract was subject to future subdivision as it is developed. A brief discussion ensued with respect to future access across Shingle Creek, south of the Municipal Maintenance Building, as well as a tentative Master Plan for the area which had been prepared by the developer. Chairman Gross recognized Mr. Phil Johnson, who represented the applicant and further discussion ensued. Close Hearing Motion by Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Com- missioner Scott to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. Action Recommending Motion by Commissioner Scott seconded by Com- Approval of Application missioner Horan to recommend approval of Applica- No. 75028 tion No. 75028 submitted by B.C. I.P. , subject to (B.C. 1 ,P, , Inc. ) the following conditions: 1 . Final Registered Land Survey is subject to review by the City Engineer. 2. The final Registered Land Survey is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. The motion passed unanimously. Application No, 75032 The next item of business was consideration of (James Gilbertson) Planning Commission Application No. 75032, sub- -1- 9/11/75 mitted by James Gilbertson. The item was intro- duced by the Secretary who stated that the re- quest was a replat of the vacant river front parcel now designated as Lot 1 , Block 1 , Farr Addition. He stated the developer's intent was to create five buildable lots and that a new house had been constructed on what is pro- posed as the northerly lot. The Secretary further explained that all the lots substantially exceed the ordinance area and depth requirements and had been reviewed extensively by the Engineering Department. The Secretary noted on the County half-section map that both Blocks 1 and 2 of the Farr Addi- tion were intersected by the boundary between Anoka-Hennepin and Brooklyn Center School Districts, He stated that this had possible ramifications on the design of the proposed plat since the Subdivision Ordinance provides that no lot shall extend over a political boundary or school district line. The Secretary and Director of Public Works re- viewed the matter and it was suggested that further research into the ramifications of the location of the school district boundary be undertaken prior to the City Council review of the proposed plat. It was noted that in effect, the existing lots (Lot 1 , Block 1 , Farr Addition and Lot 1 , Block 2, Farr Addition) already ex- tend over the boundaries and furthermore, to accommodate the boundaries on the proposed plat would not result in a desirable design. Chairman Gross recognized Mr. Jim Gilbertson and further discussion ensued as to the layout of the proposed plat and the location of the school boundaries. Following further discussion there was a motion Close Hearing by Commissioner Foreman seconded by Commissioner Horan to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. Motion by Commissioner Foreman seconded by Com- Action Recommending missioner Engdahl to recommend approval of Approval of Application Application No. 75032 submitted by James No. 75032 Gilbertson subject to the following conditions: (James Gilbertson) le The final Plat is subject to review by the City Engineer. 20 The final Plat is subject to the require- ments of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. 3. Prior to review by the City Council , the matter of the location of the Anoka- Hennepin/Brooklyn Center School Districts boundary shall be researched to determine what steps are necessary to resolve the potential conflict with the Subdivision Ordinance and other regulations. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting recessed at 9:00 p.m. and resumed Recess at 9:10 p.m. -2- 9/11/75 Application No. 75033 The next item of business was consideration of (Richard Rockstad) Planning Commission Application Noe 75033, sub- mitted by Mr. Richard Rockstad for Lowry Con- dominium and Townhouses, Inc. The item was in- troduced by the Secretary who stated the request was for preliminary plat approval involving the property westerly of Irving Avenue North (pro- posed) ; easterly of 692 Avenue North termination; and northerly of 69th Avenue North. Pierce Arrives: Commissioner Pierce arrived at 9:15 P.M. Chairman Gross recognized Mr. Jorgenson who re- presented the applicant and an extensive dis- cussion ensued as to the proposed layout involv- ing nine R-1 lots. The Secretary noted that 69%Z Avenue North would intersect with Irving, but that proposed Irving Avenue would not extend all the way to 69th Avenue North as earlier comprehended. He noted therefore that a 30-foot wide dedication for Irving Avenue, from the Horbal Addition east of the subject plat, would eventually revert back to the Horbal Addition. The Secretary continued that a portion of the Horbal Addition was occupied by the Brookdale Towers Apartments , and that after the vacation of Lhe 30-foot strip, there would be a direct abut- ment of the R-5 property to the R-1 lot. He sug- gested that a condition of the subdivision improve- ment agreement comprehend appropriate opaque screen- ing along the east property line of the proposed R-1 lot adjacent to the apartment site. The Director of Public Works indicated on the pro- posed plat a recommended dedication of a sliver of land adjacent to 69th Avenue North which was approxi- mately 4-feet wide at the east end and 2-feet wide at the west end. He stated this was recommended in consideration of the imminent widening and upgrading of 69th Avenue North , and he recalled how a substan- tial amount of land had been dedicated on the southerly side of 69th Avenue North for the same purpose. Further discussion ensued as to the eventual vacation of that land dedicated for Irving Avenue North and Mr. Jorgenson inquired as to the type of opaque screening which would be required. The Secretary stated the ordinance required a minimum 4-foot high opaque fence or other screening device approved by the City, which was compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Commissioner Foreman stated that he agreed screening should be provided but he felt that the eventual owner of the property should partici- pate in the decision as to the specific type of materials used. Close Hearing Following further discussion there was a motion by Commissioner Scott seconded by Commissioner Jacobson to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. Action Recommending Approval Motion by Commissioner Scott seconded by Com- of Application No. 75033 missioner Engdahl to recommend approval of Planning (Richard Rockstad) Commission Application No. 75033, submitted by Richard Rockstad subject to the following conditions: 1 . Final Plat is subject to review by the City Engineer. 2. Final Plat is subject to the requirements of Chapter 15 of the City Ordinances. -3- 9/11/75 3. The subdivision agreement shall comprehend provision for opaque screening along the easterly portion of the subdivision ad- jacent to proposed Lot 1 , which is con- sistent with ordinance requirements and is approved by the City. 4. Dedication of a sliver of land for the 69th Avenue right-of-way, approximately 4-feet in width at the east end of the property and 2-feet in width at the west end, as verified by the City Engineer, shall be indicated on the proposed plat. The motion passed unanimously. The next item of business was consideration of Application No. 75034 Planning Commission Application No. 75034, sub- (Patrick Steeber) mitted by Patrick Steeber. The item was introduced by the Secretary who stated the applicant proposes to operate a gymnasium for classes in the speculative industrial building at 1800 - 65th Avenue North (Spec. III) . He stated the tenant area in that structure met the relatively specialized needs of the proposed use. The Secretary stated the use is classified as a special C-2 use and is included in those limited commercial uses which are permitted, by special permission, in the I-1 District (Section 35-300(3f) ). Chairman Gross then recognized Mr. Steeber and an extensive discussion ensued as to the nature of the operation, As to hours of operation, the applicant stated that he tentatively proposed to be open Monday through Friday, from 3:30 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. , and from 9:00 a.m. to 1 :00 p.m. on Saturday. Dis- cussion ensued as to whether there was a need to specify hours of operation as a condition of the permit, given the nature of the operation and the location which did not impact on any residential uses. Chairman Gross stated that it was customary for the City to specify the hours as a control measure. In further discussion Mr. Steeber explained that he was the instructor and would possibly employ one or two assistants, He stated the student ratio was seven or eight students per instructor and that the students were comprised primarily of younger people, although the classes were designed to include adults as well . Commissioner Foreman commented with respect to the hours of operation as a condition of the permit, that since younger people were involved, he was concerned that the hours be consistent with the prevailing curfew hours in the City. Further discussion ensued as to the insurance pro- tection carried by the applicant and it was the con- sensus of the Commission that a current copy of the applicant°s liability and health insurance be kept on file with the City. Chairman Gross noted that a public hearing had been Close Hearing scheduled and that none of the notified property owners was present. Motion by Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner Scott to close the public hearing. The motion passed unanimously. -4- 9/11/75 Action Recommending Approval Following further discussion there was a motion of Application No. 75034 by Commissioner Foreman seconded by Commissioner (Patrick Steeber) Engdahl to recommend approval of Planning Com- mission Application No. 75034 submitted by Patrick Steeber subject to the following condi- tions: 1 . The permit is issued to the applicant as operator of the facility and is non- transferable. 2. The permit is subject to all applicable code requirements and violation thereof will be grounds for revocation. 3. Hours of operation shall be: Monday through Friday - 3:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m. , Saturday - 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m, , Sunday - 1 :00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m, 4. The permit comprehends a gymnasium, to be used for instructional purposes , and is not intended for public assembly. 5. A copy of the current health and liability insurance for the operation shall be on file with the City. The motion passed unanimously. Other Business: In other business discussion ensued as to the members on the various Neighborhood Groups. Chairman Gross recommended that each Commissioner should contact his respective group and determine the status: The Secretary briefly commented as to the relationship of the Planning Commission Advisory Groups to the Housing Advisory Commission, which had an attached liaison in each neighborhood.. Adjournment: Motion by Commissioner Jacobson seconded by Commissioner Engdahl to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The Planning Commission meeting adjourned at 10:55 p.m. Chairman -5- 9/11/75