Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2013 05-30 PCP
City of BROOKL f N CENTER PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER May 30,2013 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes—May 16, 2013 Meeting 4. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. Planning Application Items a) Panda Restaurant Group Inc./HSB Architects Planning App. No. 2013-001 Property Address: 1520 Shingle Creek Crossing Site and Building Plan of a new Panda Express restaurant facility for the Building-C site, as illustrated and planned under the 2012 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Master Development Plan. (No Public Hearing) b) MBC II, LLC (Paul Hyde) Planning App. No. 2013-003 Property Address: 4821 Xerxes Avenue North PUBLIC HEARING- Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment to a previously approved PUD of the former Howe Fertilizer Site, by enlarging a pre- approved office/warehouse building from 51,000 sq. ft. to 60,000 sq. ft.; allowing a minor relocation of the new building on the subject parcel; reducing certain boundary setbacks; and allowing a small expansion of new driveway/parking areas, which would impact the required buffer areas required under the established PUD/I-1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park) District. X ry,�r KL t N TER PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA May 30,2013 Page 2 C) Surly Brewing Co./Omar Ansari Planning App. No. 2013-004 Property Address: 4811 Dusharme Drive PUBLIC HEARING - Special Use Permit to authorize the establishment of a new "Taproom" (pursuant to City Ordinance No. 2013-01 Minnesota Statutes 340A.301, Subdivision 6(c), (i), or (g).) which would also approve the retail sales of products manufactured or processed at a facility located in the I-2 (General Industry) District. d) City of Brooklyn Center, MN Ordinance Amendment PUBLIC HEARING - Reconsideration of a Proposed Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 34 (Signs) and Chapter 35 (Zoning) of the City Code of Ordinances regarding the allowance of dynamic message signs (DMS) to public places and uses, and adding new definitions of"Public Uses"to the City Code. 6. Discussion Items a. Review of the PUD/C1A zoning for the Embassy Suites Project and Conceptual Development Plans for a 4 story— 81 room Candlewood Extended Stay Hotel on the Phase II Lot. b. Conceptual development plans for the redevelopment of 6801-6837 Brooklyn Boulevard (former Brookdale Honda Site). C. Items related to the PUD/C2 Development Plans and Agreement for the Brookdale Honda and Brookdale Toyota Sites: i. A request to extend the completion deadline for the eastern landscaping and replacement of the screening fence from 7-15-2013 to 7-15-2014. ii. Conceptual plans and tentative schedule associated with a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Platting, and Site Plan approval to expand the Honda site to include 3 residential zoned lots, 3955, 4001 & 4007 - 691h Ave. N. 7. Adjournment MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA May 16, 2013 CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Burfeind at 7:04 p.m. ROLL CALL Chair Burfeind, Commissioners Randall Christensen, Benjamin Freedman, Carlos Morgan, and Stephen Schonning were present. Also present were Assistant City Engineer Steve Jankowski, Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development Gary Eitel, and Planning Commission Recording Secretary Rebecca Crass. Commissioner Michael Parks was absent and excused. APPROVAL OF MINUTES —April 25, 2013 There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Christensen, to approve the minutes of the April 25, 2013 meeting as submitted. The motion passed. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Burfeind explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. DISCUSSION ITEMS REVIEW OF A DRAFT COMPLETE STREET POLICY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Mr. Benetti explained that staff is requesting a review by the Planning Commission on the Complete Streets Policy in order to provide a recommendation to the City Council. He introduced Steve Jankowski, Assistant City Engineer to the Commission, who provided a presentation on a draft Complete Street Policy. Mr. Jankowski stated he is excited to meet with the Planning Commission and explained the Complete Street Policy commits the City to work closely with Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County to recognize the connection between various transportation modes and providers to provide safety in transit whether by vehicle or by pedestrian. He pointed out 40% of Minnesotans do not drive. Mr. Jankowski added Complete Streets is a term used to describe transportation planning and design policies that emphasize safety and accessibility needs for all users. Complete Street policies provide transportation alternatives, integrate physical activity into daily routines and promote improved health, reduced transportation costs and pollution, improve air quality and Page 1 5-16-13 paths. He added he feels the area around County Road 10 and Xerxes Avenue would be a good area to identify to incorporate access and make it more of a destination. Mr. Jankowski replied some of the things that would benefit the community beyond bike paths include trees and other things that make it a more comfortable area to travel. He added the Policy is meant to develop a complete street type philosophy and establish guidelines. Chair Burfeind noted there are several studies available Mr. Jankowski stated he appreciated the Commission comments and this will go to the City Council at an upcoming work sessions for their review. HENNEPIN COUNTY'S ACTIVE LIVING PROGRAM — DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW GENERAL LAND USE POLICY AND REVIEW OF THE GENERAL LAND USE POLICY FOR REDEVELOPMENT, ARCHITECTURAL GUIDELINES AND PEDESTRIAN PLANS Mr. Benetti explained the Active Living program developed by Hennepin County and is a way of life that integrates physical activity into daily routines through things such as biking, walking and taking transit. He added the main goal is to engage cities in a more active lifestyle through the development of programs and policies to assist with implementing and sustaining active living principles and concepts. Mr. Benetti further explained that Staff met with Hennepin County and they were provided with a copy of standards that could be incorporated into new policies. He stated Staff would like the Planning Commission to review and consider guidelines to establish architectural guidelines and pedestrian plans. Mr. Benetti next reviewed a Policy for Implementing Architectural Design Guidelines for the City of Brooklyn Center and explained the architectural design guidelines are provided to encourage a high standard of design of buildings proposed for new commercial, office, multi- family residential, civic and industrial development. Mr. Benetti reviewed the following items: • Building Orientation • Building Mass • Fagade Design • Building Materials • Doors and Windows • Screening • Franchise Design • Landscape and Site Treatment • Lighting • Pedestrian Connections • Bicycle Connections Page 3 5-16-13 BASICS OF PLANNING AND ZONING SEMINAR UPDATE Chair Burfeind stated he and Commissioner Christensen attended the Basics of Planning and Zoning seminar with Gary Eitel. Chair Burfeind stated he felt the seminar was very beneficial and he appreciates the opportunity to attend and be informed. There were no other discussion items. SELECTION OF NEW VICE-CHAIRPERSON FOR 2013 Chair Burfeind stated that he would like to appoint Commissioner Christensen as Vice Chair of the 2013 Planning Commission. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Morgan, seconded by Commissioner Schonning,to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. Chair Recorded and transcribed by: Rebecca Crass Page 5 5-16-13 rYR n of ti L}V TER Planning Commission Report Application Filed 12/18/12 Meeting Date: May 30, 2013 % Application Deemed Complete: 05/15/13 • Review Period(60-day)Deadline:07/14/13 • Extension Declared:N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline:N/A Application No. 2013-001 Applicant: HSB Architects, on behalf of Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. Gatlin Development Company(Owner) Location: 1520 Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Site& Building Plan—Building C (Panda Express Restaurant) INTRODUCTION HSB Architects, on behalf of Panda Restaurant Group, Inc. and Gatlin Development Company, is requesting review and consideration of a Site and Building Plan approval of a new 2,210 sf. Panda Restaurant facility, located at 1520 Shingle Creek Crossing. This site plan is being considered as part of the proposed "Building C" pad site, which was previously approved under the August 2012 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development(PUD) Master Plan Update. This site plan does not require a public hearing, but can be considered under a standard public meeting review, whereby comments from the general public may be allowed or noted for the record. BACKGROUND On May 23, 2011 the City Council approved the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD for the redevelopment of the former Brookdale Mall properties. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD included an overall Master [Development] Plan, which guides the future development planned for this site, and included a number of approved variations from the zoning ordinance. This master plan included the development of a 182,000 sf. Wal-Mart retail store,the remodeling of the old Brookdale Mall food court building, and fifteen new building pad sites for retail and service uses, three of which were identified as restaurant sites. Construction of the new Wal- Mart store is complete and other site/utility improvements are nearing completion. Building sites G, H, K, and L have been approved and nearing shell build-out, and LA Fitness (to the west of this site) is approximately 50%complete. The subject site was originally targeted for a "bank" or similar financial institution with a drive- thru service lane. Last September 2012, an HSB Architect representative met with city staff to discuss potential development of this Bldg. C pad site with a new Panda Express restaurant. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD site was originally zoned as PUD/C-2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) district. This zoning remains in place and is not subject to any changes or modifications at this time. As part of the PUD Agreement, any new building within this PUD must be reviewed under separate site and building plan review. App.No.2012-021 Page I of 8 PC 10/25/12 ❖ SITE & BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS Building C was originally identified under the 2011 SCC-PUD plans as Building B, which was planned to be 9,100 sf. building on a 1.2 acre pad site with 41 parking spaces (assigned to the lot). This pad site was platted as Lot 8, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing. As part of the recent amendments No. 2 and 3 approved by the City Council, this original Bldg. B site was re-labeled to Building C. The new Bldg. C (lower right) is shown as a significantly smaller building of approximately 2,200 sf. _-- 00 -M 000 0 � ;.j �. QQQc • COUNTY ROAD ©OOOC�_000 0000 ...... .. .. - _ COUNTY ROAD N PROPOSED PYLON IGN PROPOSED1 SIGN �+� i ♦�. ..♦ .. ) �r i r r PYLON SIGN MONUMENT SIGN ^•• PROPOSED MOMENT - `~~ - °"• �" SIGN.._.',`: _tt.zaer a- n nxvei 4 sum+ rteix twx ORIGINAL PUD PLAN AMENDED PUD E (SEPTEMBER 2011) (SEPTEMBER 2012) The original Bldg. B site was platted as a 1.2 acre lot. Gatlin Company submitted a separate application to replat this and other areas of the PUD site, which resulted in the reduction of this particular building pad site 0.85 acres, and 27 parking spaces. This replat was approved by the City Council as Shingle Creek Crossing 3rd Additioin. This plat has not yet been recorded and the lot still remains as it was platted under the original Shingle Creek Crossing Addition. The new Panda Express building is shown as 38' x 56' footprint, or 2,210 sq. ft. GFA. Parking is located along her front, back and side areas, with a drive-thru lane located on the east side of the building. The interior is broken up between a typical restaurant facility, with approximately one-half dedicated to dining and the other for kitchen/service areas. The outside front area will accommodate outdoor seating area, which is acceptable provide no alcohol is served in this area. The new site plan layout for this new Panda restaurant facility matches closely with the approved PUD planned layout. The site incorporates a new one-way drive-thru service lane along the east and north sides of the building. The specifics of this drive-thru will be addressed later in this report. App.No.2012-021 Page 2 of 8 PC 10/25/12 ... T : 2} : ! S .:::•:•:: \• ` - 1 111 x �: ��*-, ,�1 The building is connected to the existing interior walkway systems provided by Gatlin Development as part of the Shingle Creek Crossing"pedestrian friendly"plans for this area. The site is interconnected to the LA Fitness site to the west, and the new Building H site to the east. A walkway located between this Panda and Bldg. H will provide a nice connection for pedestrians up to the walkway/trail system along County Road 10. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved with an overall "Architectural Design Guideline" plan to provide examples of approved architecture and building materials. The key element of this plan was that all new buildings would need to provide 4-sided architecture in their designs, meaning all four elevations must provide a nice, consistent use of material on all four sides of the buildings, including rear elevations. The new building appears to match most of these approved building materials. Although the building does not entirely match the overall "architectural theme"that is present or planned for in the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, it has been generally accepted by Planning Staff and Gatlin Development that some development sites would need to meet certain"franchise" motif s or standards of their own. As is required in all new development sites not being built by Gatlin, all new buildings must be previewed and approved prior to city submittal, whereby then layout, design, and architectural standards must be met and approved by Gatlin Company. Gatlin has indicated to city planning staff that this building is acceptable. App.No.2012-021 Page 3 of 8 PC 10/25/12 r p� > IF- 1 Z4 3 ru a.xi.x.mw...aae The new building bu d n is i x g designed to accept a large, interior mural inside the upper glass window bo above the main entryway. The Architectural/Site Plans had a detail note of "Panda Mural on Interior Behind Glass", as shown on the illustration below left. t L°I Staff had some concerns that this "Panda" mural was too consistent with the Panda branding and logo, and would need to be treated as signage. As such, the large scale panda mural would exceed the signage allotment prescribed by the Shingle Creek PUD Sign Plan, and needed to be revised. HSB Architects came up with a reasonable solution by replacing the panda mural with a "Great Wall of China"mural design(above right), which staff felt was acceptable. App.No.2012-021 Page 4 of 8 PC 10/25/12 ❖ ACCESS & PARKING The new Site and Building Plan for Building C (Lot 4, Block 1, SCC 3rd Addn) is noted in the diagram below. Plans call for 27 parking spaces on this development lot, which calculates to a 10.85 parking ratio. All restaurant uses were required to provide a minimum of 10 spaces per 1,000 sf. of gross floor space. __ DRIVE-THRU ` r 20' BUILDING SETBACK s _— P y H 11,20Gsf q i CK sMAi 38,000sf / RETP � T � 1 • Access into these parking areas is made from the main east/west access road serving this PUD site. Visitor parking is located along the front, side (west) and rear portion of the building. The access on the right side (east) of the building provides an entryway into the drive-thru lane and rear parking area. This entry was recommended to be designed to accept only one vehicle at a time, with vehicles having the choice to move over to the left into the drive-thru lane or proceed straight to the rear parking area. to — _ 4 20 „ 22 to 20 1 6. 25 ,�--•-x, ,,• 10 f,. { 23 .. STY515 TYPE V-B CONSTRUCTION -7 a 4 ,re 27 iM1'RAN'E C i 1 Even though this access point was illustrated as a dual access point on the PUD Master Plan App.No.2012-021 Page 5 of 8 PC 10/25/12 (Aug. 2012), city staff determined this single lane access provides a much safer design for pedestrians to cross between this Panda Express and adjacent Bldg. H site. ❖ LANDSCAPING The Applicant has submitted a landscape plan which appears to be consistent with the approved PUD Master Plan. Plans call for the installation of various deciduous trees (maples and Quaker aspens) in and around the green space areas to the rear and the various parking islands of this building site. Other smaller (ornamental) trees and shrubs will be placed in and around the building and parking islands, and used to screen the rear area of the trash enclosure. All landscaped and turf areas must be irrigated per City Code and the SCC-PUD requirements. ❖ LIGHTING/TRASH The photometric plan indicates the parking areas will be provided with appropriately spaced, down-cast luminaires on 22-ft. high light poles. The plan indicates some spill-over of lighting from the this site across adjacent property lines, but is fairly minimal and acceptable in this case, due to the overall "shared" nature this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was intended to serve. There does not appear to be any wall-mounted lights on the building, except for one small overhead light above a service door. Staff assumes Panda designers have taken into account that enough lighting or source from the overhead standards will provide adequate on-site lighting around the building. The photo elevations provided in this report of other Panda restaurants, indicate evidence of some accent lighting around the buildings, specifically the faux bamboo pole decorative features near the entry-ways, and the bollard style lighting around the outdoor patio seating areas. Staff would recommend Panda provide additional (similar) decorative lighting along the building and patio areas, in order to highlight (no pun intended) the nice architectural features and designs of the building; to provide nice, ambient lighting for the outdoor sitting/eating area, and additional safety lighting for pedestrians maneuvering in and around this restaurant site. The plans illustrate one outdoor trash enclosure, with two, front-end loading dumpster type receptacles. As noted in previous site plan reviews, the original SCC Master Plan did not illustrate or indicate the placement of any trash enclosure areas within this PUD site. The plans did not provide a "typical trash enclosure" detail; however, as the City did in previous site plan approvals, these accessory structures shall be approved contingent upon their construction shall match the same materials and colors with the main buildings. Metal, wood or composite material fences or doors are allowed, but must be opaque or completely screen the receptacles inside the enclosure. These enclosures will be required to be well maintained and gates closed at all times (except during unloading times). CITY ENGINEER REVIEW The City Engineer has provided his review and comments regarding this application, which is noted in the attached May 24, 2013 City Engineer's Review Memorandum to planning staff. Most of these comments and conditions reflect the improvements approved under the PUD Plan amendment. Some of these conditions may be applicable at time of future building permit review and approvals. App.No.2012-021 Page 6 of 8 PC 10/25/12 RECOMMENDATION Since the original submittal of this site plan application last December, Panda Express representatives, Gatlin Development (and their consultants), along with city staff have gone back and forth tweaking, re-designing and revising certain features and elements of this proposed restaurant site. Staff is confident this new restaurant meets the overall design, spirit and intent of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, and should provide a nice new amenity to this PUD development and the community. With that said, Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2013-05, which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2013-001, the Site and Building Plan for proposed Panda Express Restaurant, located at 1520 Shingle Creek Crossing, and also identified as "Building C" - Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated May 24, 2013. 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing s stems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. The new trash enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the principal building. 5. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 6. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs and any individual monument sign, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved (or amended) Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement. 7. Applicant shall provide a final lighting plan with accent lighting on the new restaurant building, and incorporate pedestrian or bollard style lighting for the outdoor patio and pedestrian walkways. Final approval of this plan and light standards shall be made by the City's Business and Development Director. 8. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. App.No.2012-021 Page 7 of 8 PC 10/25/12 9. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 10. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. Attachments • Planning Commission Resolution No.2013-05 • City Engineer's Review Memo—dated May 24,2013 • Panda Express—Civil/Architectural and Interior Plans • Shingle Creek Crossing Master PUD Plan(Aug.2012) • Panda Express Photos-Elevations(Mural Designs) App.No.2012-021 Page 8 of 8 PC 10/25/12 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 24, 2013 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Steven J. Jankowski, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works Review—Panda Express Preliminary Site Plan Review Public Works Department staff has reviewed the submissions enumerated below for the above project prepared by Michael A. Jackson, PE of Hengst Streff Bajko Architect& Engineers: C1.0 Cover Grading and Drainage Plan Sheet 1 of 9 Certified 11-9-2013 C 1.1 Grading and Drainage Plan Sheet 2 of 9 No date C1.2 Details Sheet 3 of 9 No date C2.0 Utility Plan Sheet 2 of 2 No date C2.1 Details Sheet 5 of 9 No date C2.2 Details Sheet 6 of 9 No date C3.0 Erosion Protection Plan Sheet 7 of 9 No date C3.1 Erosion Protection Details Sheet 8 of 9 No date C4.0 Horizontal Control plan Sheet 9 of 9 No date The following comments and recommendations are offered: General Sheet Items 1. All recommendations and requirements approved as part of previous actions pertaining to all prior PUD/PUD amendment approvals, Preliminary Plan approvals and Final Plat approvals relative to this development and/or portions thereof are withstanding and must be incorporated into the final plans. 2. All sheets should note the original date of preparation along with subsequent revision dates noting changes. 3. Sheet C2.0 is labeled as Sheet 2 of 2. Revise and label as Sheet 4 of 9. Public Works Review Memo—Panda Express Preliminary Site Plan Page 2 May 24, 2013 Sheet C1.1 4. The trash enclosure must be better separated and protected from traffic and parking spaces(e.g. curb and gutter). 5. The curb tie-in location on the east side of the site appears to require the removal of existing curb. The details of the modification from existing to proposed needs to be clarified and include restoration and sidewalk tie-in requirements. 6. A low point of 853.85P exists in the north curb line of the site parking lot. Revise plans to show adequate drainage details for this low point. 7. A low point of 845.00P exists in the curb line west of the restaurant. Revise plans to show adequate drainage details for this low point. Sheet C2.0 8. A water service has been stubbed to a location southwest of the building. If this service is not used, it needs to be removed and plugged at the tee connecting to the main.Add a 6" gate valve after the tee at the connection point into the existing water main.A wet tap of the main should be considered in lieu of sleeved connection. 9. Provide water shutoff and valve details before entering the building so that domestic service can continue should the fire line need to be serviced. 10. The developer is responsible to ensure that the 6"water main is adequate to prove the required fire flow demand. 11. The domestic and kitchen sanitary sewer lines should be reevaluated to minimize distance and number of bends between the building and the grease trap. Manholes are recommended to be used at the proposed cleanout locations and at the sanitary sewer connection point. Sheet C3.0 12. Inlet protection must also be provided for the existing catch basin located in the southwest corner of the site. General Items: 13.Provide detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles and garbage trucks demonstrating specific and actual routes. 14.The final construction plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota and submitted to the City Engineer for approval prior to a land disturbance permit being issued. 15.This development is required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission. All current City and Watershed storm drainage,treatment and infiltration standards are required to be met. 16. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details. The City's standard details must be included in the final site plans. 17.A general project phasing and sequencing plan must be provided for the development. 18.A development agreement is required that includes all conditions contained herein. 19. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings Public Works Review Memo— Panda Express Preliminary Site Plan Page 3 May 24, 2013 20. are established,the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. 21. Upon project completion,the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 22. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer's design/project engineer. Upon project completion,the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings. 23. Irrigation is required for the site.A copy of the irrigation plan needs to be provided. 24. The proposed site is located adjacent to Hennepin County right-of-way. Any work within the County right-of-way will require a permit from Hennepin County. Prior to the issuance of a land alteration permit the following conditions must be met: 25.A copy of the recorded development agreement must be submitted. 26.A copy of the approved final construction plans and specifications must be submitted to the City Engineer. 27.A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of 125%of the estimated cost as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. 28.A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions,traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions,tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. A$5,000 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. 29. Private site appurtenances(e.g. light poles, signs, etc.)must not encroach on public easement areas. If such an encroachment exists and is determined by the City to be not adverse to the public interest, such encroachments will require an Encroachment Agreement. Anticipated Permittine: 1. A City of Brooklyn Center sewer and water permit is required. 2. A City of Brooklyn Center land disturbance permit is required. 3. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 4. A Hennepin County permit is required for work within Hennepin County right-of-way. 5. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission(SCWMC)plan review and approval are required. Public Works Review Memo—Panda Express Preliminary Site Plan Page 4 May 24, 2013 6. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warranted. 7. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. The aforementioned comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City prior to issuance of permits. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-03 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2013-001 SUBMITTED BY PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP, INC. & HSB ARCHITECTS REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL OF THE NEW PANDA EXPRESS RESTAURANT IN THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(1520 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING) WHEREAS, Planning Application No. 2013-001 submitted by Panda Restaurant Group, Inc., ("Applicant") and their consultants HSB Architects, and in cooperation with Gatlin Development Company, owners of Shingle Creek Crossing, are requesting approval of a new Site and Building Plan of a proposed Panda Express Restaurant, to be sited on the new Building C pad site inside the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, located at 1520 Shingle Creek Crossing ("Subject Property"), and which approval is in conjunction with the ongoing improvements constructed under the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on May 30, 2013 to fully consider Planning Application No. 2013-001, and reviewed and received a planning report on the proposed new Site and Building Plans for the proposed Panda Express Restaurant and other related site improvements; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Site and Building plans are consistent with the General Development Plans of the overall Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council,that the Site and Building Plan of the proposed Panda Express Restaurant, also identified as Building Site C of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and as comprehended under Planning Application No. 2013- 001, be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; 2. The Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site, will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; 3. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-23 property and will conform with ordinance standards; 4. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city; 5. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and 6. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is,therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2013-001 be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated May 24, 2013. 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing systems to meet NFPA standards and connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the city ordinances. 4. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on ground mechanical equipment sh ll bea PP r o P ri appropriately screened from view. The new trash enclosure with same building materials as those used to construct the principal building. 5. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 6. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new wall (building) signs and any individual monument sign, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city ordinances, and subject to the approved (or amended) Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement. 7. Applicant shall provide a final lighting plan with accent lighting on the 2 of 3 PC RESOLUTION NO. 2012-23 new restaurant building, and incorporate pedestrian or bollard style lighting for the outdoor patio and pedestrian walkways. Final approval of this plan and light standards shall be made by the City's Business and Development Director. 8. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 9. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 10. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect. May 30,2013 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member, and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof- Chair, Commissioners , , , and . and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 3 of 3 ��� LL r { ,lf•!!s 'r - � 'I'"rR�1 f ' "t tl i�N II n. . t �r Ojni_\ OOO , ..__,i:�.. .. ,. rr-rt)•lr^rr••1 R; ` �' )I' �}�•� t + Ab W ,•�! 000 _�.� y/ � 1 A (1 \ �sRI/.'.I!!i US\41 f'I •N �{q � /, � Y4 �i' � ,1 l�\ `M\M fl+rt•,tN1 � ' �r)1fJ♦ 01 ilit,t iT�� O' � 000 µ +- u� I} ,�, n, HL• .'' COUNTY ROAD �------ O ,U' PYLON SIGN yI aff�=y - PYLO SIG MONUMENT SIGN MONUMENT SIGN r 'MONUMENT SIGN ante r,.. I �w / Ir � 1/; - I�a af_. s s.aor _ .•6• _ a u.000d) �, } )/l/� •�� a ''� _ P I VIII. V.i EXISTING ) « « KOHLS Cr a O PROPOSED SHINGLE s NA IL lop CREEKREGIO CT DIRECTI. N J�/ / a a a \ ♦ SIGN- SHINTINE�PaYIGHTED .. A ♦ V� y l � 1, li LE - e / a a e "s O • ; z _�T/yq'•-•�� � �'� � " " r .WO'. TRAIL CONNECTION ti� TO EXISTING BRIDGE - G • r PYLO SIG , r�l a EXISTING BUILDING .•, `` 'f 769,555 S.F. h (APPROX.) Li a XISTING SHINQLE Y REEK BOX CU _KT r as FREEWAY PYLON SIGN j, 'EXISTING FILTRATION i l c REA TYP. Seam Searps ►= -~ �;�� , Po ,AL SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SEPARATION �� '111r ', {'�Tf ..+ ST U.1 ORM WA UTLOT - �,�, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN w MASTER PLAN y `� R\ FREEWAY PYLON SIGN `�� AUGUST 2012 J, jilgo 551 H AVEN_ o 60 120 zao FT r ' i * p ♦ FF 40 Kimley-Horn `'�wr"' * ►a, GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY and Associates, Inc. 101 South Main Street 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST, SUITE *1► , \`, Dickson,Tennessee 37055 TEL.PNOL(651J) 645-4197 55114 Tel:Fax 615-446-7104 ( ) :615-446-7105 FAX. N0, 651 645-5116 Fax CIVIL SITE PLAN THIS PROJECT LEGAL DESCRIPTION 2 E)(p PANDA EXPRESS - Q (Co Lake Rd) �pP ,per (PER FIRST AMERICAN TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE COMMITMENT Co Rd No 10 __ NO. NCS-570404-MPLS, COMMITMENT DATE OCTOBER 8, 2012) BASS LAKE ROAD -- (P BROOKLYN CENTER,MN �° / 1377 0 0 (n PARCEL 1: m 56th •0 LOT 8, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING. ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF, HENNEPIN g ve p C, o COUNTY, MINNESOTA. '� �o 1p O� �p BASS LAKE ROAD 3 (TORRENS PROPERTY-CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NO. 1337874) ED 55t ��i PT CH I NESS Ave o`�° PARCEL 2: fi. � '" '?..E�''7 . ��`�e� rya. II e ti.Y PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. NONEXCLUSIVE APPURTENANT EASEMENTS OVER LOTS 1-17, INCLUSIVE, BLOCK 1, SHINGLE CREEK >' ,...a \ CROSSING, CREATED IN DOCUMENT ENTITLED 'EASEMENTS NTH COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS 1683 Walnut Grove Ave. AFFECTING LAND"DATED JUNE 28, 2011, RECORDED JUNE 30, 2011, AS DOCUMENT NO. 4868197. 11 - Rosemead,California ,,° 91770 (ALL TORRENS PROPERTY) O _ Telephone:626.799.9898 Facsimile:626.372.8288 (SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 SHEETS FOR PARCEL 2] � 4. VICINITY MAP NTS M d-aemgm;a<mN-1e 1pWba lea m r,p,..nmd b,Ihim d i g dre Paaaa DRAINAGE STATEMENT /' EWe mc.and.ereueamdmmftspedkW*a. None of dress ideas,designs,-g-kNam'may be THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN DESIGNED TO CONFORM TO THE DRAINAGE DESIGN OF THE OVERALL CENTER bV ARCHITECT J by mw many ofPEm.Ewpw _ AS PREPARED BY KIMLEY HORN. THE DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THE OVERALL CENTER ALLOWS FOR s - aemk�mnaPanaaE, amd. RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE TO DISCHARGE VIA SURFACE FLOW TO THE EXISTING STORM DRAIN INLETS HENGST STREFF BAJKO ON AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE. THE RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE IS CONVEYED THROUGH THE STORM 2777 E. CAMELBACK RD., SUITE 110 DRAIN NETWORK AND TREATED WITH THE RUNOFF FROM THE OVERALL CENTER. q PHOENIX, AZ 85016 REVISIONS: PHONE: 602-635-6409 b / FAX: 602-314-7550 / CONTACT: CHRIS POPE Q / FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION / CIVIL ENGINEER 1.) THE SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS TO LIE WITHIN ZONE X, (AREAS DETERMINED 70 BE OUTSIDE NTS TMAD TAYLOR&GAINES 4300 N. MILLER ROAD, SUITE 122 THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN), ZONE X - SHADED (AREAS OF 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE SCOTTS. MI AZ 85251 FLOOD; AREAS OF 1% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD WITH AVERAGE DEPTHS OF LESS THAN 1 FOOT OR LEGEND PHONE: ALE. AZ5251 WITH DRAINAGE AREAS LESS THAN 1 SQUARE MILE; AND AREAS PROTECTED BY LEVEES FROM 17. FAX: E: 602-371-1333 ISSUE DATE ANNUAL CHANCE FLOOD) AND ZONE AE (BASE FLOOD ELEVATIONS DETERMINED TO BE AT 843 �\ 80.60 C SPOT ELEVATION NEW CONCRETE C = SPOT ELEVATION NEW CONCRETE CONTACT: MIKE JACKSON, PE FEET) PER THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 27D1510212E, DATED SEPTEMBER 2, 2004. THIS INFORMATION WAS OBTAINED FROM _1-0 7 PROPOSED SLOPE GR = GRATE THE FEMA MAP SERVICE CENTER WEB SITE. FLOW ARROW INV = INVERT SHEET INDEX 2.) THE FLOOD ZONE DEMARCATION LINE SHOWN HEREON IS APPROXIMATE ONLY PER SCALED MAP LOCATION AND/OR GRAPHIC PLOTTING. FEMA MAPS ARE NOT PRECISELY DRAWN AND DO NOT - - - - PROPOSED FLOW LINE/ IE = INVERT ELEVATION SCALE UNIFORMLY. CONTACT FEMA FOR FINAL DETERMINATION. SWALE C-1.0 COVER LF = LINEAL FEET C-1.1 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN - - - - - GRADE BREAK C-1.2 DETAILS S = SLOPE C-2.0 UTILITY PLAN BENCHMARK EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR FT = FOOT C-2.1 DETAILS DRAWN BY AB EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR C-2.2 DETAILS (BASED ON 1929 DATUM) N = NORTH C-3.0 EROSION PROTECTION PLAN ^ WATER E = C-3.1 EROSION PROTECTION DETAILS EAST 1.) TOP OF TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT; WEST SIDE OF XERXES AVE AT SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. - _= SANITARY SEWER C-4.0 HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN PANDA PROJECT* 58.13-03396 ELEVATION = 853.13 FEET W = WEST ARCH PROJECT#: 12143 2.) TOP OF BOLT; NORTHEAST SIDE OF TRANSMISSION TOWER, 2ND TOWER EAST OF XERXES AVE. -1581 MINOR CONTOUR ELEVATION = 851.40 FEET S = SOUTH 3.) TOP OF BOLT; NORTHEAST SIDE OF TRANSMISSION TOWER, NORTHWEST OF PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE. -1580 MAJOR CONTOUR ELEVATION = 846.96 FEET SAWCUT FG = FINISHED GRADE 4.) TOP OF TOP NUT OF FIRE HYDRANT; NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE. � SIGN P = PAVEMENT ELEVATION = 851.58 FEET TC = TOP CURB ks Hengst Streff Bajko SITE DATA Architect+Engineers AREA LOT 8, BLOCK 1 = 52,516 SQ. FT. OR 1.206 ACRES GENERAL NOTES: 2777E SUITE 110 110 cAMELBA01<RO. PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL LIMIT OPERATIONS TO MONDAY THRU SUNDAY, FROM 6 A.M. Tel:(602)635-6409 TO 10 P.M. Fa x602)314-7550 2. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR NOTIFYING DIGGER'S HOTLINE AND FOR LOCATING EXISTING UTILITIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR JOB SITE SAFETY AND FOR COMPLIANCE STAMP' PE4-A••J�p¢�. WITH OSHA AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER CERTIFICATION •' EMMEO 4. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR LOCATING AND PROTECTING ANY AND vnoressaNK HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR _ @xdavEEn ALL INFILTRATION AND SEPTIC FIELDS FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC. REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ,N 5002`6] 5. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING EARTHWORK AND SOIL SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL COMPACTION IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING REPORT. ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. p11NN`� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND PRINT NAME: MICHAEL A. JACKSON Slu07J KEEP A COPY ON-SITE AT ALL TIMES. 6. THE INTENT OF THE DESIGN IS TO PROVIDE A ZERO-SUM EARTHWORK BALANCE. SIGNATURE: THE CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING HIS OWN EARTHWORK CALCULATIONS AND FOR PROVIDING A ZERO-SUM EARTHWORK BALANCE. SHOULD DATE: 11-9-2012 LICENSE#50261 PANDA EXPRESS THE CONTRACTOR DETERMINE THIS TO BE UNACHIEVABLE, HE SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY AND ALLOW TWO FULL WORKING DAYS FOR A RESPONSE. 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTROL AS-BUILT CERTIFICATION 1100 BASS LAKE ROAD MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS REQUIREMENTS AND BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 56001 RECOMMENDATIONS. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE "RECORDED DRAWING" MEASUREMENTS AS 8. REFERENCE THE LEGEND FOR ALL ABBREVIATIONS / DEFINITIONS. SHOWN HEREON WERE MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION OR AS NOTED AND 9. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING, INSPECTING, MAINTAINING, ARE CORRECT TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. AND RECORDING EROSION / SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES. 10. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMEDYING REJECTED MATERIALS, REGISTERED ENGINEER/LAND SURVEYOR DATE (`/\♦eo REJECTED WORK, AND PUNCH LIST ITEMS. I 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL SITE SAFETY, SITE SECURITY, TRAFFIC CONTROL, EROSION CONTROL, LABOR COMPLIANCE, NUISANCE ABATEMENT. REGISTRATION NUMBER COVER SHEET 1 OF 9 PROTOTYPE#S3-2443-12R1 01-1512 CONSTRUCTION KEYNOTES EX '' ew.ii eITUYINOUS '- .. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY ELEVATION OF EXISTING CURB, AC PVMT OR CONCRETE PVMT P p •�• �_• 'd'ih °S1° •a27 'r"IaI BASS LAKE ROAD - "�"'0 •�° OO TIE-IN LOCATIONS AND MATCH EXISTING. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DESCREPENCIES. Q �� BITUMINOUS I \ CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER STD. PLATE N0. 402 oc � CP \\ ' O TYPE 8612 SEE SHEET C1.2. \l \ O CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK ACCESS RAMP PER DETAIL 3 ON SHEET C1.2 DO NOT oc •o �` • —_ _ + _—z _— — _ __ ——_ EXCEED 1:50 CROSS SLOPE AND 1:12 LONGITUDINAL SLOPE. c o r _ — _,.__ •��_ —�+-_,� — �+� O SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ALL STRIPING AND SIGNAGE. ALL DISABLED ACCESS STRIPING TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT ADA STANDARDS SEE DETAIL 2 SHEET C1.2. FIRE LANE MARKING AND SIGNAGE PER ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. SEE DETAIL 1 SHEET ��r C H 1 14E5� -,� C1.2 FOR PARKING STANDARDS. w$'.�.°w„ O LANDSCAPE AREA SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ALL DETAILS PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. '- .. .. •CAHC:•.•:v}:• •'r:•:•:•r:• :• ::%i'Y r ..... ..'''•+•'+�':-:'J: 1683 Walnut Grove Ave. REQUIREMENTS....... TPGF.. •••••.___•_••••••__, 4T,KpcE}.•••••••.•.•...•.... -- O CONSTRUCT SIDEWALK PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQU E ., •.•.•.•:.•.•.'�.y"....... .•.•.�:.'.•:.....a........... ',. •S :•..� Rosemead.Cagfomia ———— F!..•.. �....may.. ...: .... :'rC*S.•.•. / e �S„ 4n .. Y"S.... 91770 •• ,•,=•,-y•" 0' "'+' \ O7 TRASH ENCLOSURE SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ALL DETAILS �, •:::• -.asr.�•..�;... Tal.vno"e:626 799.9848 SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ALL SITE LIGHTING REMOVE/RELOCATION AND NEW Facslmkazs.37z.azae F — — .•`' .'rMa'.•... ..•�. a""e.5-n .-r ✓••T ••••+• T�N \ O SITE LIGHTING AND DETAILS. COORDINATE CONDUIT PRIOR TO PAVING START. OVERALL \• %'•� :•U I \ \ CIRCUIT IS TO REMAIN INTACT. RECIRCUIT AS NECESSARY. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL. .s ••'••.•.•••.••• M,9,9,designs,a,rawing lha plans ilM Pa a �• rt\ �" .•,25••• Jy 5 .0.•P••. a25"' 12 \ O CONSTRUCT ADA PARKING SPACES NOT TO EXCEED 2% IN ANY DIRECTION. rape I....aer,niaa,aw�dI.,au,aatapa Paoea ¢,.press lac.and we,e uealee a,oae m w5-spedAc aorett CONSTRUCT 7" PCCP OVER 4" CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE FOR TRASH ENCLOSURE AREA NNE°maaa aaega^,a„a°gama"esc Pa.-Yna a I"S0 PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. aWaf'y' N.°°.. L.I. \ . 053 50 P - wpwul the wane"permBM°n of P.A.a mss Inc. 854.75 eP y.;•. .F. . \ �'___ EXISTING CATCH BASIN TO REMAIN. SITE DRAINAGE DISCHARGE LOCATION. .wa •• e5. c 4' =p,5-= b.85 RI - �l , ° ^�" O CONSTRUCT 4" ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER 8" CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE FOR DRIVE AISLES \ 0 854.5 P'\ I I _ \ 12 1 - '_��`0 p �\ PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. REVISIONS: • `ry y> � 1,. •• cn4e__e `-T TCH:= i \\ CONSTRUCT 3.5"ASPHALT PAVEMENT OVER 6" CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE FOR PARKING AREA r�,� --- Ytl „z. 13 • a .... ;• = PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. wig '•$, _ < \ 14 CONSTRUCT 6" PCCP OVER 4" CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE FOR DRIVE-THRU AREA, PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. 12 .a.. 4 O .;• °, CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT A NEAT LINE PER PLANS, REMOVE EXISTING AC WITHIN SAWCUT LINE. 854. 51( .e6.:•: y.' 15 SAWCUT LIMITS ARE APPROXIMATE. s. r osF 4 3 3g PE e�„a NST 13 a, 5 654. N V B CO RUCTION p \ 8 855.00 FFE •� .<•.° \ _ 2 ISSUE DATE: 13 85.00' cv:r r •rl. .40 ° 54.4 P a P • - ro _ 3 s• - \P 4 �•2 V •�� 15 DRAWN BY AB \ a. / \0"s i •1 � rc \ + �•• +n,/ • 'c \\ \\ _• ---\.\ PANDA PROJECT fk. 58.13-03396 L, "v=°a. •.� f a,�,/ \ �• ARCH PROJECT R: 12143 NM. •rtiF 5 ' la 9.Y*° i,J„ '�„ m•. °"' �� m:.Nt _° .M_ � ADDITIONAL NOTES = r =a 1. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR UNDERGROUND PIPING INFORMATION. Hengst tt E gine es ' m v_J 2. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ANY LANDSCAPE REMOVAL / RELOCATION. Architect+Engineers a�• Tc / �+��'' mi 3. ALL EARTHWORK, COMPACTION, CONCRETE AND PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2777 EAST CAM ElBACK RD. +� /"'' °1• RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT PREPARED BY TERRACON SUITE 110 / c ess c % ^ •B5;1 1 CONSULTANTS, INC., DATED 12-3-2012. IMa o• PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 •, 4. ALL BOUNDARY AND EASEMENT INFORMATION DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS ARE Tel:(602)635-6409 W.4'o•e"` 61 « /' "v ,uw^ „ _•of BASED UPON INFORMATION PROVIDED BY THE OWNER AND DEVELOPER. IT IS THE Fax:(602)314-7550 / - c, ` :.s CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO OBTAIN A COPY OF THE OWNER'S ALTA SURVEY r. _ e OR FINAL PLAT AND VERIFY THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY (OR LEASE LINE IF �asr/ •°1A APPLICABLE) OF THIS PAD SITE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF STAMP: �E��`•4p'•, /� / - / /+/ 5-i. '\ _ iT a,..• a ANY DISCREPANCIES AND AWAIT A RESPONSE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. �•''"••....�\vf�"s- ;Zijjr - / BINYIN 5 _: X .a .ol.• .m+.x rc ♦N 5026 ,�r_ / ,tea \ ,\ \ BITUMINOUS 5 14L2013 or�x \ / a PANDA EXPRESS so 1100 BASS LAKE ROAD // ///y/ / \"x\/ `\• \ BROOKLYN CENTER,MN 56001 C1.1 GRAPHIC SCALE z0' 0 10' n. 40' eo' GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN (IN FEET) SFIEET 2 OF 9 i inch-20 /E PROTOTYPE#SB-2448-12RI 01-15-12 WATER KEYNOTES I v V - - CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION AND SIZE OF WATER LINE PRIOR n H.AWNO S OO TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. �Ot^ '�A,p� ainMwws I O NEW 2" WATER SERVICE PER DTL 2 ON SHEET C2.2, LENGTH PER PLAN. __ oc SEE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER STANDARD PLATE NO. 220 ON SHEET C2.1 FOR Q cP TRENCH DETAIL. 0 N BASS LAKE ROAD 3 SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION OF WATER SERVICE. WATER METER AND 0 _ oc CONSTRUCT PTAP SERVICE INSIDE BUILDING. c� o — ——————————————- - CONSTRUCT TAP SERVICE PER DTL. 2 ON SHEET C2.2 9 � CONSTRUCT 6" WATER LINE PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUIREMENTS. AFT �gE LENGTH PER PLAN. ' I e•.rn vHS CHI N coRC^ �� -" —T. ,,,,. i _moo �� ' u1aY•• O PERLAN.SP 6 " FIRE LINE PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUIREMENTS. LENGTH PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. r :..:...: ::' :::': ::: zi. '91t:7fFJ1GC,•••,•:.•....•.. _ 4acF+ ':'..•.•:.'. ' INSTALL 6" 22.5' BEND PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUIREMENTS. 1683 Walnut Grove Ave. • ` Rosemead.California ———— s'• :•: :ta'.....•:•:•:•:•..•..•.••. ....•:.:•.: u •� 1770 ••'`T•• • . .�. •' _ '�. \ 8 INSTALL 6" 90' BEND PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER REQUIREMENTS. 9 �. O Telephone:626.799.9898 i Facsimile:626.372.8288 ce is ma. SEWER KEYNOTES ,.•. ....•...:. ... . .. %.��� \ \ 1 CONTRACTOR TO POTHOLE AND VERIFY LOCATION, SIZE AND INVERT OF EXISTING SEWER • •.•.'..••• •••.•.. f v. -'•A'•'•'•-•'•'-':•'•'•''''' \ MAIN PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES. wiaea'.+asyns.anayemem ambbI-rr aka repasenME by Ihrs Orarri�p are the pop^ly of Parka \ LFt 2 LF \ INSTALL 6" PVC SEWER PIPE. LENGTH AND SLOPE PER PLAN. SEE CITY OF eaa in=.aaa"areuealeal«vaou�pavaaa =0.020 F7 S= .034 FT 5 7'•: 4 -5 L.F* \ BROOKLYN CENTER STD. PLATE NO. 220 ON SHEET C2.1 FOR TRENCH DETAIL. ^.Dime=a�aaaa.ee.yn:.array rennorga�maym -wk by or aMeo:ea m am pabv,.tm,a wrpWa�n 5 7 2 5=0.020 FT «w.allna.mlanpwmnorPamaewrasalz • " 7 L t - RIM=853.00 CONSTRUCT 1000-GALLON JENSEN PRE-CAST (OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT) GREASE S= 020 FT Fi 2 I \ INTERCEPTOR PER MANUFACTURER RECOMMENDATIONS. SEE DTL 1 ON SHEET C2.1 IE IE OU 8 8371 m :05 6 " = 9. F A CALCULATION. I 1 � 46 � } .... � o a• � INSTALL 90 SWEEPING WYE-TEE OR DETAIL AND SIZING C LCULAT _ 5 INSTALL 45' SWEEPING WYE-TEE 3 .'9. 3 TERMINATE SEWER SERVICE 5' FROM BUILDING. SEE PLUMBING PLANS FOR CONTINUATION ;.; © OF SEWER SERVICE INSIDE BUILDING. ®16 LFt 2 ;}— ` i ❑7 CONSTRUCT CLEANOUTIN FROST SLEEVE WITH HS-20 TRAFFIC RATED COVER, s APPLICABLE. FROST SLEEVE TO TERMINATE I A AP L xse -z,z10 � MODIFIED FOR PIPE AND WYE SIZE S u cno - \ T{pEV-B CONS rn 1 X839.16 6" TO 12" FROM TOP OF PIPE. PROVIDE A 4" THICK CONCRETE COLLAR EXTENDING •y 9" FROM COVER. RIM TO MATCH FINISHED GRADE. SEE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER STD. PLATE NO. 213 SHEET C2.1. ISSUE DATE: \ _ ,moo ° '• � � Sao DRY UTILITIES KEYNOTES CONCEPTUAL TRANSFORMER LOCATION AND ELECTRICAL SERVICE ROUTE. COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL PROVIDER FOR REQUIREMENTS AND TRANSFORMER PLACEMENT AND DETAILS. (.'•• e 2 \ �� 5 O CONCEPTUAL ELECTRICAL SERVICE. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH ELECTRICAL \ \ F enuMl s PROVIDER FOR SPECIFICATIONS AND ANY OTHER REQUIREMENTS. DRAWN BY.AB CONCEPTUAL GAS ALIGNMENT. EXISTING GAS LOCATION TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH GAS PROVIDER FOR REQUIREMENTS AND DETAILS. • aes+ \ YY —,\. PANDA PROJECT#: 58-13-03396 wv"u,.'b.... \Y Y ARCH PROJECT#: 12143 ENGINEERS NOTES 1 K ' • 1. THE LOCATION OF ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITIES IS BASED ON INFORMATION u�IS qy PROVIDED TO THE ENGINEER BY THE DEVELOPER, UTILITY COMPANIES, AND THE TOWN. re IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO LOCATE ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND Hengst ine ers N s \ UTILITIES, TELEPHONE AND ELECTRIC CONDUITS AND STRUCTURES IN ADVANCE OF ANY Architect t+t Engineers CONSTRUCTION AND TO OBSERVE ALL POSSIBLE PRECAUTIONS TO AVOID ANY DAMAGE 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD. / TO SUCH THE ENGINEER AND/OR OWNER CANNOT GUARANTEE ANY LOCATIONS SHOWN PHOENIX.ARIZONA. / ^ PHOENIX.ARIZONA 85016 ON THESE PLANS OR THOSE OMITTED FROM SAME. Tel:(602)6366409 w Faa:(802)3147550 / • 2. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM ALL GRADES SHOWN AS EXISTING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES AND AWAIT A RESPONSE PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. STAMP: J�1�p;F 3. IT IS THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO PROVIDE, VERIFY, AND ACCEPT ALL - ���,,,,\\v¢, 3T i CONSTRUCTION STAKES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ®TUMIN s \ \ ENMEM / 4. ANY AND ALL ITEMS EXISTING SHALL BE PROTECTED BY CONTRACTOR AND IF ANY :N 5026 ,��; //� /• \ �•'Aa ITEMS) MUST BE REMOVED IN ORDER TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION, CONTRACTOR // / / aITUMINWS SHALL REPLACE THE ITEM(S) TO THE SAME OR BETTER CONDITION THAN IT WAS BEFORE REMOVAL. s7L�Fa 5. ALL CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM TO STATE AND LOCAL CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. PANDA EXPRESS LEGEND: 1100 BASS LAER,MN 56001 WATER SANITARY SEWER /.s ` Y � + / v"6+°O • SEWER CLEAN OUT STORM DRAIN OAS C2.0 GRAPHIC SCALE UTILITY PLAN 20' 0 10' 20' 40' or imiminj SHEET 2 OF 2 (IN FEET) I inch=20 R. PROTOTYPE#S8-2448-1287 01.15.12 - - - EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SOP EX,o� 1. A COPY OF THE APPROVED GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AND AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW. Q N \ 2. THE OPERATOR SHALL PERFORM, AT A MINIMUM, A VISUAL INSPECTION OF THE 0 _ CONSTRUCTION SITE ONCE EVERY WEEK AND WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RAINFALL GREATER •o —___— ------------------------------------------ ------------------- R MORE. THE OPERATOR SHAL PREPARE A C, o ------ 1 J �--- -—————— --- PROBLEM CONDITIONS OF REPORT S � THAN OR EQUAL TO A HALF OF AN INCH 0 L ---_ REPORT DOCUMENTING HIS/HER FINDINGS 0 � --- — PROTECTION PLAN AND NOTE ANY EROSION OB E I S --_s ---- -- ssj ------- -�-- TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT PROJECT ENGINEERING NES DIVISION CONSTRUCTION INSPECTOR FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL. FACILITIES SHALL BE CH I 1 1 \ O s>4.o S MAINTAINED AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE THEIR CONTINUED FUNCTIONING. IN ADDITION, ALL -------'-+-------masse------ ------- _ _ _ _— _ TEMPORARY SILTATION CONTROLS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A SATISFACTORY CONDITION --- PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT CLEARING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETED, PERMANENT :'.= '.....:.:.;.:...:.:..:......................................... 1663 Walnut Grove Ave. v;•..•.'.-.'.•.'.'.•.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.-•'.'.".'.'•'•'•'•'•'•'•'•-•••••••'-• DRAINAGE FACILITIES ARE OPERATIONAL, AND THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS PASSED. Rosemead,Cal'rfomia .... .............................. 3. THE OPERATOR SHALL AMEND THIS PLAN AS NECESSARY DURING THE COURSE OF 91770 CONSTRUCTION TO RESOLVE ANY PROBLEM AREAS, WHICH BECOME EVIDENT DURING THE Ta.om�.:626.799.9898 3 2.288 --- _ — — _ - ���,.e... CONSTRUCTION AND/OR DURING RAINFALLS. Facsimile:626.372.8288 . - •--•-'' / ;•: `�\ 4. THE PERMITTEE SHALL SAVE ALL RECORDS, INCLUDING INSPECTION REPORTS AND •;{;•;•;-;•:;•;•;• -• ••�'�'( i '. EROSION PROTECTION PLAN ON FILE FORA MINIMUM OF THREE YEARS. 1 �•••••••::: - _ M d—de gns arra qy to d pmnsmdFand« \ 5. THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THESE PLANS AND THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, reWe I- hr lhs dramv9 are mepW«lYd Panda OF THE E+a ass 1n<.and.«.«eared�use�n mk scea�m were 1 I THE RESPONSIBILITY � FA I ITI S S E �► A P RADING OF THESE FACILITIES E n« n. Ij/lll REPLACEMENT, AND UPGRADING n«,em ma se meaedespns.a.anya Ir gareA \ a m an am« aun used o a dkmse r va � �v« r PERMITTEE/CONTRACTOR UNTIL ALL CONSTRUCTION IS APPROVED. „p,«❑m.»rinen��norP.naze.pesslnc i 1 CONJUNCTION WITH I NJUNC 0 CONSTRUCTED IN THIS PLAN MUST BE CONS UC _ THE FACILITIES SHOWN ON S _ 6. E 3' � 1 \ ° � � `\ ALL CLEARING AND GRADING ACTIVITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO INSURE THAT 1 — `\ "► I r \\� �� �e, SEDIMENT—LADEN WATER DOES NOT ENTER THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR VIOLATE APPLICABLE REVISIONS: WATER STANDARDS, AND MUST BE INSTALLED AND IN OPERATION PRIOR TO ANY GRADING OR LAND CLEARING. WHEREVER POSSIBLE, MAINTAIN NATURAL VEGETATION FOR SILT CONTROL. ._ . �`� 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES HAVE TERMINATED AND AFTER THE SITE'S SURFACE HAS BEEN SUCCESSFULLY STABILIZED. 66F 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EROSION PROTECTION MEASURES IN ACCORDANCE WITH 3 Nr.SH' STRtKT10N STATE (MINNESOTA POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY) AND LOCAL REQUIREMENTS. PE V-8 7 - SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION ISSUE DATE: ---r PRELIM SUBMITTAL 07.31-2012 2 1. INSTALL SILT FENCING AND INLET PROTECTION ZONING SUBMITTAL 10-02-2012 `\ o 0 0 o •../. — •�• 2. SAWCUT AND REMOVE CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT, THEN INSTALL OWNER REVISION 12-06.2012 y TRACKING PAD FINALIZE SITE DEMO o .•:•I I / 3. SITE GRADING AND BUILDING PAD PREPARATION ,�' -� •••'i•: ';- / \ `� 4. INSTALL UTILITIES AND STORM DRAINAGE Q ® i 5. CONSTRUCT CURB AND GUTTER 6. PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING ;.;{'•' ( ms 7. PAVE SITE 1 I 8. COMPLETE GRADING AND PERMANENT PLANTING / SEEDING 9. REMOVE TEMPORARY CONTROL DEVICES (ONCE SITE IS STABILIZED) DRAWN BY AB / I � \a�'xa 1 \\` 7x`'•``v PANDA PROJECT#: S8.13-03396 ARCH PROJECT#: 12143 LEGEND O1 SILT FENCE BMP SEE DETAIL -0 —0 OLTF91LE Cl a / ^/ 1 / \\•._ \\ L SHEET C3.1 L. �. g5 •\\• \ Hengst Streff Sajko Architect+Engineers STONE TRACKING MAT BIC1E1f1AC14106YS 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD. SEE DETAIL SHEET C3.1 SUITE 110 PHO T ARIZONA el:(602)635649 e50t6 \ F—(602)314-7550 n -- O3 CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA ooNCrETew�a4aAFEw / STAMP: ,r�c1 A''!'�G}.'•. STAGING AREA �#A#p AFEA (}°R :NIA\.-r 502,p i / ® T YiC� /�9� O INLET PROTECTION KEf PFIOTEG'IION M1NH. n-6-zaiz / i r \ ■ PROPOSED FLOW DIRECTION � PROPOSED FLOW LINE / SWALE - - - - - PANDA EXPRESS GRADE BREAK ---- 1810 MADISON AVENUE MANKATO,MN 56001 GRAPHIC SCALE 20' 0 10' 20' 40• M' N ,, C3.0 I inch=20 ff. EROSION PROTECTION PLAN SHEET 7 OF 9 PROTOTYPE#S8-2448.1287 01.15.12 Y�va b.s Ao b.o b.a a.v b4 Av by S..o b.o b.o $A-.- Schedule • ro.e bo Av Ao bo b.o A+ Ar A+ b.r ro.• b.o ro.o Av,bo- - 1 •'Av bA b.o A9 Av b.r \r bz bz A) Ai b.+ bP Ao b.o b.P Ao by by Av bo -------------- 4,Ao Av ha ho A• b.+ b.r br bz b.• h• As bz A+ Av Av Av •49 A9 b.o - b.o S..o b.o ho ha Ar ro.o ba`- i b.4 b.o b.o b.• A+ b.z bz bz hs br Ar Ar As roz hr S. Av by AP b.o Aa Av Av b,a b.o Ar h+ b.r ba b.o bb..� 4ao b.o b.o b3 hr hr bz \• bA \f hz rz c+ hf S. z ro.r .o .v o Ii, `Ao r Av by Ar b. bz b.• \• h3 h.r h.r h3 Za Aa b.• b.r b.r bi ro.r ro.r hr hr ba bz Ar b.a hr bA Ar b.o � `.-. `•o.d bs b.v A+ bz b 5.s 5.• 1.• � Ze 2• v +.r b.e by bz bz \a b.a \s bA \s b.s he •y \r b.� b.o Ao Ao bo o A+ Ar b 53 5A 1A 4 Zo Zv Zr Ar 5 1A Y• 4.0 � h.r \r A• bz Ar Ao b.o \o io Aa ro+ bz b •vi 5.r Aaf 4 5 4 5.r�.s 5A S. 4 4f bA \• A: \i br by Av C 3 DSXI LED 2 309)00/40 A9 b.+ bz 5A 4Y 'is Yr0 Ye 1.• r 5. 4: 4s 4 4A Y9 Yf 4+ 4f 4•c hi \• 'v hr b.r Ao �� A• b.v A� bA b. .>C . 4r L 5 53 47 'u Q'�5.s 4a 4. Yr 4• 4a h.s b. b.a b.+ Ar 'a.r by ! f 285.6 �a 4• b.9 by bz • y. .o Yv L L �• 4x 4r _ 4 4 b.z Ar rou b. ,gib.• bo A• Ar bz A roC Y+ 4r 4• Yr r 5a 1A T 1+ Y.z ro.+ by hP C AIMED DOWN POS. r bA Av bA h+ 5A YA Yr 5 1z 1.r Y.• Ya h h \+ A. roa Ao � � b4 h0 bA \+ bz \ .v[ 5A L 5.r 5:• 5.r Y.> 4.• Y b• b., b4 b.o a1 Ao Ao Ao \• \+ SA L L 5.s L 5a Y b• h, A, b0 b.v ashv by Av bA Ar Az As L SA L 'Vz 4 4.0 4 Z s Ae Ai Ai rov Av [ _ h0 roa ro.4 \+ bz Sz S.r 4• 4r Ya 'u 5i�. Yz L h.• A• \ \r \r Ao Ao a be b? hr Ar Aa 'vA C 5.z t\4.s�f.r 1a _ 5e 5• m s a ®5. c• `u 4s tia 4+�s4.xj 4� .s \ tr ba 'v.o b.• b.o Ar bz � tIU 4. 4+ 4• Yn 4• 'u L 5• 5 4r Sr he 1 roi by � be Ar Ar b L L r 1. 4. �.:d b Yr 4> 4• 4• 4z L 4• 4r 4r hA roA A• A. b ho ba L U hz 4+ L L L L 4z 4: 1r L Sr So Z• h.f hf hz L \• \• -. Ar \• 4 •aA Yr 4+ L L L h.r h r h r rof hA hz \a \s ti 1r L \ [ �[ Zr lr L 3 Z hr L h3 1+ h L 4�• L hr \r L A• roA by hz 1+ L 5 h hA \r L C n�\ [ C \> U b t+ hr L L L ,C hP b+ \a \s L \• \> M. roa C \r Q \r hr t, A+ v- [ - b z ha hr \r _ A bA r_is_ [ C - - [ Av b. 'AZ bz b a by ba ba C C c C C Plan Vlew scab-I-=30' Luminafre Locations t«aeon ain, rebel x I I MH Orlentat on ' Note 1.Readings shown are based an a total LLF of.95 at grade. 2.Please refer to the"luminaire locations"table for mounting heights. 3.Product information can be obtained at www.Lithonia.corn or through your local agency. 4.Please contact Villa Lighting for pricing: ]eff dau5s 314-633-0442 Jeff.clauss @villalighting.com Luminalre Schedule 1 DSXI LED 2 300)00/90N DSXI LED WDH 2lIGHT FNlaXES,)00 ONE 142.8-WATT IED, 1 831).106 0.95 142.0 Sm M-1 HS DRIVER,-OK LEDS,HOUSE SIDE AIMED DDWN P.S. SHIELD,TYPE 4 OPTICS Plex:m mod 3 DSXI LED 2 309)00/40 DSXI LED WIM 2 LIGHT ENGINES,)DO ONE 142.8-WATT LED, 1 11723.83 0.95 285.6 SNSMVOLT DNIVER,4000KLEDS,'TYPE 5OPDOS AIMED DOWN POS. ❑ a 1� Mex:5904W I DS XI LED 2 300700/40X 05X1 MOST AM FTXIIIRE WETH 2LIGHT ONE 142.)-WATTLED, 1 11661.)3 0.95 142.7 FT MVOLT MA ENGIXE5,700m4 DRIVER 4000K LEDS, TYPE FT OMU AIMED OOWN POS. C Max9252cd LIGHTING DESIGN SERVICES 01- 019UMONIAZ Ot91hGf.6Am0 0 W +j w U CL X W Y no Z L. Q m CL Designer Jim Eads,LC Date May 13,2013 Scale As Shown Drawing No. 80016813A3 DEMOLITION NOTE: G.C.TO REMOVE ALL EXISTING ABOVE/UNDER GROUND STRUCTURAL WALLS,FOUNDATION, ASPHALT,CONC.CURBS AND DEBRIS PRIOR TO NEW CONSTRUCTION. GENERAL NOTE: 1. G.C.TO VERIFY FROM TRANSFORMER T UNDERGROUND WIR SWITC GEAR.CONOUIT(INSTALLED ME U LOCAL BOARD,By Op EJr% COMPANV)FROMTRANSFORMER TO ELECTRICAL MAIN SWRCHGFAR.DRNE THRU.MENU BOARD,BY G.C..VERIFY WITH PANDA PM. 2. WATER METER FOR IRRIGATION SHALL BE A SEPARATE METER THAN MAIN WATER METER G.C.TO .w COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPEIIRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A SEPARATE METER 3. PROVIDE&INSTALL CAGE AND COVER FOR THE BACK-FLOW PREVENTER AT 4'CONCRETE CURB IN 4 O 0 :• LANDSCAPE AREA'GORILLA CAGE,MANUFACTURED BY HOUSTON IRRIGATION SERVICES SPRING TEXAS(281-7059701).PROVIDE INSULATED COVER'AQUA SHIELD MODEL#SFP1S FOR COLDER REGIDNSOF US.COORDINATE WITH PANDA PM.REFERTO DETAIL 111A407 ^ T 4. FOR HORIZONTAL CONTROL PLAN REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS VO OLIMIT OF CONSTRUCTION `RMET CND `I OPROPERTY LINE PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. 1663 Walnut Grove Ave. O NoT usEV Rosemead,California 91770 Telephone:626.799 9898 ONEW SWRCHGEAR Facsimile:626.372.8288 O ASPHALT PAVING-BEE CIVIL PLAN. All Ideas,designs.enangement and plans#Idkated or represented by Oils draping are the property of Panda O IRRIGATED LANDSCAPING,REFER TO LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS Express Inc.and ware created be use on this specific phot_ None of these Ideas.designs,anangemenls a plans may be osed by or disdosed Io any p ha..firm,or corpwadon wimoet the wmren permission m Panda Ex as mrn O7 CONIC.APRON IF ASPHALT PAVING IS USED. 1p 1 2 O TRASH ENCLOSURE,CONFIRM BIN SIZE WITH LOCAL WASTE MANAGEMENT COMPANY. y (TYP.B YARD BIN) ® REVISIONS: (D SIGNAGEPROYMEORYOTHERS 70 DRIVETHRUTANESENSORLOOPSEEDE— 20 O Js i DRNE THROUGH MENU BOARDINBTALLED BY SIGN COMPANY.VERIFY WRH PANDA PM "•4 "�� • " •.•.•.•.• • • • • • • •.•.•.•.•.•." . . . . . . • 2 O(SEEGENERAL NOTE ABOVE) .'�.-•• •.'.'.-._.i'",;�.•B: "••••.y/.• 72 OIRECTN)NPL ARROW .• .'. •.-. .. .'.'. � �" ." ISSUE DATE: ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL .----f ` PLANNING COMMISION 05/1412(113 / Ar07 24 A \\ J & 19 ACCESSBLE PARXING POLE SIGN 11 16 17 15 INTERNATIONAL ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL @ PAOUNG SPACE ¢ 4 20 \ 22 25 ACCESSIBLE—IINGSPACE—LOADINGZONEPAINTLOADINGZIX+E114- (C��/ 12 /�,r 18 WIDE STRIPES®ru O.C. DRAWN BY:AB `1 17 PAINT 4'WIDE SOLID PARKING STRIPPING WI TWO(2)COATS HIG3HWAY WHITE PAINT \x O 1D 5 Y� 28 1e DESIGNATED LNNDICAP PARKING SPACE PANDA PROJECT k: SB-13-03417 • - _ 33 ARCH PROJECT#: 12250 " O ROOF DRAIN AND OVERFLOW DRAIN FROM ROOF UNDER CONCRETE FLATWORK TO FACE ti o� ••• ••• f.11 1Yar 19 OF CURB OR TIE TO STORM SEWER.ARCHITECT TO VERIFY WITH LOCAL JURISDICTION. I \ •••O ', '" •-• ••- , O STEEL PIPE GUAR6PAINT TO MATCH SAFETY YELLOW 16 ♦` 1 221 SF J\ 21 DRAWINGS DGREASE INTERCEPTOR SEE RUMBINGICIVIL Hengst Streff Bajko Ngr1l'� Architect+Engineers g�x58` �tftUGTION � •�•�•�� AIX L&4CK RD UNDERGROUN - E 2777 EAST CAME _CSS T2 CONIC.DRIVEWAY(GRAY COLOR,LIGHT BROOM FINISH). SUITE 110 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 p T..!, 635-6409 EDGE OF SIDEWALKAT PLANTER Fax:(6021314-7550 23 o O •• DRIVE MR 27 O • ENTRANCE 24 CONCRETE CURBAT PLANTER \ C 1 t7 I nereey eerbrr Lost IM plan,_111flcem�,o<.<POrt O EXPANSION JOINT Q 2V-T O.C.MAX.® wAZ.Tenured M me a under mY dtrea sucervisbn roil 0 toot i em•Hair UcensM Arcneert unaar the laws ei Memrsota. _ 26 5 jJ 2B TOOLED 10INTS@SS-0xs.Ir O.C. i6 si—d re 15 13 31 17 \ 30 5 EXPANSION JOINT 2V-V O.C. D •" NAme: Kevin Hen6t 16 Me:II?1}9DIY Lkeme Np 25949 24 18 16 14 O ACCESSIBLERAMP ® I\vn!i'NON•NG_NJ14 - _ 28 FUNRE PRE-VIEW BOMD.GG.TDPIaTPLL 180X AND PoWER FOR FUTURE USE. 29 ORDER`°NF"&"TID"— PANDA EXPRESS 3B WHEEL STOP SEE Osf BRIGHT AND FRESH ``� ?I BASS LAKE RD&XERXES AVE BROOKLYN CENTER,HENNEPIN,MN 55430 31 OUTDOOR COVERED PATIO AND SEATING BROOM TEXTURE ONC SIOEINISH.AO VI E UNDER TREATMENT PER SOIL TOTE LIGHT BROOM ME DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BLDG.ER SIAB TREATMENT PER SOIL REPORT.PROVIDE \ i CLEARANCE BARINSTAEW,G.C.TO VENDOR SEE ELECTRICAL DRAWWG FOR P \ ELECTRICAL REWIREMEN T,GC.T000ORDINATE A-1 00 SPRINKLER-FIRE RISER ROOM 1 35 PLANTER BOX WITH LIVE PUNKS,USE POTTING SOIL AND PROVIDE DRIP IRRIGATKN, SEE DETAIL azlvaaol SITE PLAN -- SITE PLAN 1 KEY NOTES A ARCHITECTURAL - - Scale=1)16°=1'-D" A-100 Scale=NTS A-100 =rmpb- O •: . Ic 118 t P3 141 '01 P2 �- 6OFT 6.0 FT .9.......,,..............s..............,..., +® 1 �, I(l`ai�lb' QUl1i]I I 3o g� Tc OFT 5.FT■■� 0� p S- 46A � , �✓ � I � �1111 l ■ p , „ I X11 0 1 15C '21E CId MI 0g . 1 �Oi• � I 1A F- It j 94 , �1�, 191,31 %1A F7h III mm" EENE9§MME9WkEA EQUIPMENT __ ®a�__� + -� - �� m vim____ ®�� � ��aos __ :+'..5.�________ ®'© ©__�1. "....!J��`:1LL'�ILf_•L'i�/Il ©��m _mz ®____ M 03 �___r�:' alp.® rt�® ______�:i'i�l!��r.T'- 'I-3r���� Emma ®® ® ®______����* __ma ®Fly ®F7�___E__ mm -mm WE _7___________E_____■ � v ____________■ _7_______________�����__� mmm E]_________ ®�o__�__■__ ■__■_� ®� ® ® ® �� � NEW IM =17 ® ■ - m EQUIPMENT 1 PLAN VVITH- ■LILS • 00 c�GRMEr PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. 1683 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead,California 91770 Telepnprre:626.799.9898 Facsimile:626.372.8288 Allbeas,designs arrangemenlardplwslndketee w represenlee by Nls erewing are the pmpeny of Panda E.�ress me ane we:a�realed m.ase on mi:apedfic proles None d me:e seas deslgna.anangemenls a pan:may� usetl ny or MSClssetl to any perssn firm or corp.xamn wiNaut Ne rvntten permiss on sf Pantla Ergess Inc. REVISIONS: ISSUE DATE: s* PLANNING COMMISION 05114/2013 DRAWN BY:AB PANDA PROJECT P. S8-13-03477 ARCH PROJECT#: 12250 Hsi Hengst Streff Bajko Architect+Engineers 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD. SUITE 110 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 Tel:1602)635 -6409 Fax:(602)314-7550 I hereby e *Nrl 4/4 PIM gk Aceln v rc wu frePa.M�y IM a Wld.r ny Eext wplM.bn a4/ mm I nm.awy I.icamdC McNbq e•Idx row 4.a a t4/ clear of MITe.ot.. 91pnvNrr:�_.. N M.HM•t low II Y)3019 lkww Ng 25369 tCI IIHIM Gry.Yl-4/4 PANDA EXPRESS BRIGHT AND FRESH BASS LAKE RD&XERXES AVE BROOKLYN CENTER,HENNEPIN,MN 55430 A-101 KITCHEN PLAN WITH VESTIBULE FINISH SCHEDULE WALL LEGEND ROOM NAME FLOOR BASE WALL CEILING p1U1,P102P1m PIZ PANT NEW EXTERIOR WALL P98 PANT C1 TX2 ARMSTRONG,SEPN Ow � 100 DINING ROOM 1101 21'x 24'TILE 196 6-X24'DLE T105 I-X I-MOSAIC TILE '91311 r 7109 TILE NEW EXTERIOR WALL WN,WF5,WPB WALL PANEL M GYP BOARD WI PMT P101 FRAMED WITH OSERVING Or 6•X 6 CONT.QUARRY TILE OT2 6-X 6 COW, W.MIN STRUCTURAL STEEL STUDS .w 1Q1 IKITCHENEQUIPMENTON6' TIN TILE C3 GYP BOARD WI YI AREA OTT IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS NSFAPPROVEDLEGS) SMOOTH WASHABLE PMT rw NEW INTERIOR WALL 3y�1 • O O :• 102 DRIVE-THRU DT 6'X6"CONT.OIIMfIY TILE 012 6'%6EN EQUI-BAD.MIN C2 WASHABLE VIN L GRID "2 (KITCHEN EQUIPMENT ON 6- WPi FRP PANEL WASHABLE VINYL COATED STATION CIA IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS NSF APPROVED LEGS) GYP BOARD PANELS FURRED WALL 6L r"ITUEITROOF 01 OT 6'X 6'CONT.QUARRY TILE OT2 6 X T CONY.K•RAD.MIN WP3 S.S.BEHIND COOK LINE C2 T%4'SUSPENDED GRID W HATCH BLADDER SLIGHRV 300 KITCHEN (KITCHEN EQUIPMENT ON F WASHABLE VINYL COATED rrTTTTT3�r3TrrTTTT}}TT�T�T3 QT1 IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS NSF APPROVED LEGS) WPt FRP PANEL GYP BOARDPANELS MSi1L1LxLxL)�WALK-N BOX PANEL ADJUST TO EXACT TRUSS LOCATION KITCHEN OT 6'X6'CCNT.QUARRYTILE Q12 VX6"CONT.M"RAO.MIN C2 ZX4'SU$PENDEDGRID 4Y 10'•10' 3'4' 2 3'-0' T-2' 4Y' 104 PREP. (KITCHEN EQUIPMENTONF WPt FRP PANEL WASHABLE VINYL COATED - EXTERIOR MASONRY VENEER ,'-0• ET CND 3 OT1 IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS NSF APPROVED LEGS) GYP BOARD PANELS QT 6X6'CONT.QUARRY TILE EXT SS GALVANIZED STAINLESS os-- W1 PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. 105 WALK-IN S.S.I ALUMINUM WITH)6'RADIUS NOTE:THE FOLLOWING STAINLESS - COOLER OT1 IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS INT ALUMINUM GALVANIZED S.S. STEEL STEEL PROVIDED BY PX-NSTAILED BY r y 1683 Walnut Grove Ave. G Rosemead California S T EAT S.S. T R GALVANIZED STNNLES STEEL 5 'HIGH CONCRETE B WALK-IN ALUMINUM GALVANIZED STAINLESS 1.ppNEL DIVI0ER5 AT WP3 I w1 OS 105 DT 6'X6'WIFSUBPRRYTILE S.S.IALUMNJM WITH 6('RADID$ SS WALL CAP BY GC W1 ' WS 111 91770 FREEZER creel 2.NASHINGRNFA AT F BASE WP2 UNDER WIF SUBFLOUR INT ALUMINUM GALVANIZED S.S. ?p 1 TiOB TILE I.FUASHIECE AT LENGTH OF e / 0 106 MEN'S C3 GYB BOARD WI Pi01 4.WP2 PIECE AT LENGTII OF WALL _ __ FIRE RISER I � 1 TrA6ph9ne:6267999898 ROOM TIN 17X 24'TILE SCHLUTER T109 TILE SMOOTH WASHABLE PAINT - I i ac5lml e. 1110 TILE NOTE:THE FMOWM STAINLESS 3 F 1'626372 TIN TILE STEEL PROVIDED BY G.C.-INSTALLED BY p5 107 WOMEN'S TIT 1TX24-TILE SCHLUTER 1109 TILE C3 GYB BOARD WIP101 3 Y SMOOTH WASHABLE PAINT G.C.: 106 E 1 1 ROOM x110 TILE A W9 MENS I T 1 alldeas,designs,ertangemenl and plans lndkaled or S.INSTALL 18 GA STAINLESS STEEL �O4 19 09 W'S ttl0 Uhls drawln the d I Panda P100 PANT GYB BOARD M GYB BOARD WI PI01 \y502/ OOM H F reMesene y gAra props yo 108 VESTIBULE 1101 I4'X24'TILE 196 6•x24'nE CORNER GUARD&WAIL CAP INSIDE n V O A-503 J Express lnc.and were sealed to use on mid spedk project 1109 8'X 24'TILE SMOOTH WASHABLEPMT KITCHEN VVVV 10S 4 Y w4 1'-71' WS None oflNese Ideas,designs.artangemenls a plans may Ge STORAGE c3 GYB BQARO WI P10t KITCHEN PREP c ypersm, orpaa 109 ROOM T101 M•X 24-TILE T% 6•%24'nE WALL TREATED FRP SMOOTH WASHABLE PANT ALL OTHER STAINLESS STEEL BY G.C. Td, TA, 8'-1' 4'-y I 10] a Mfl we t e wri setl ermi firm or c 8m ENTRY C3 GYB BOARD WI P101 Wore WOMEN'S vdlAaut the wdnen of Pence Express Inc. ��-" permission 11Q 1101 24'X21'TLE 196 6'%24'RE - SMOOTH WASHABLE PANT 17 10 ROOM VESTIBULE -GC.TO INSTALL MIN INER" O111 FIRERISER SEALED CONCRETE 4'VNYL WE IBWCKI PIN PAINTGYBBOARD EXPOSED STRUCTURE NONCOMSS BATTSM ONDI W7 r / -50 aSDZ T A FIBERGLASS BATTS SOUND INSULATION I A ATAU.RESrROOM PARTITIONS AND \ mop SINK D U� g � REVISIONS: DOOR SCHEDULE W41E0NOFUMISEBBY.GCMIESSNOTFDOTINMBE CEILINGS. L _ �15"HIGH 0 OS B O N0. DOOR MATERIAL S� FAME FACEEDGE THC CORE 111E RATE HOW 'ALL INTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE CONCRETE O `A3 W 109 pl ALUMINUM FINISHEDTO FINISHED 105A CUR 7d / O STORAGE STOREFRONT (2)3d XSd ALUMINUM ANODIZEDALLIMNUM 1r HOLLOW GLASS HW-1 WALK-IN C ALUM STOREFRONT 'EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS ARE SHOWN ��,. 106 ROOM D3 IN 3'd X6d ALUMNLM ANODIZEDALUMNUM I HOLLOW GLASS NW-2 TO EXTERIOR FACE OF PLYWOOD FREEZER VESTOBULE -VESTfiUIE SHEATHING.ADOLVFTOFACE OF WALK-IN FREEZER OALUMWUM S'dXfid ALUMNUM Af10DIZEUALUMNUM 1K' HOLLOW GLASS MW-1 CONCRETE FOUNDATION WALL ROVIDED BY OWNER, OS -- .:..,v- 3TCREFRONT - INSTALLED BY G.C. 17 12 13'1'HOLD DIM(SETEE) 3 ` L-2W SEE SPECIAL HrvJ FDI25NGLE000.REST RM. 'EXTERIOR DIMENSIONS AT ENTRY 3-S• 'L 3;• 2 r D3 S.C.WOOD - 3'd XTd H.METAL SUIFALE SCHEDULE I K' SOLID - HW4 FOR MULWOCC.BEST RM. PORTAL ARE FACE TO FACE OF , UNDERCUT DOOR BOTTOM I'AT FNISHEDWS. q' RESTROOM .....OB 105 LOU O -v 01-woo,. Td%Td K METAL SURFACE 9CHEOULE I K- SOLID HW6 WALK-IN W W ISSUE DATE: O Nouan METAL - 3dxrd HMETAL MErAL PAINTED 1K• Houow - HWS COOLER §� PLANNING COMMISION W1412013 WALK-IN COOLER HARDWARE SCHEDULE 'BALL°"°"°®""""�"°®0e PROVIDED BY OWNER I 7 ' EC roPRDYpE 4LElTEwORI XIDiSMYEOxJEANp sJPRYIONnSTOOMet INSTALLED BY G.C. OFFSET 11' SET HINGES CLOSERS RISIYPULL Ll1CKRET STOPS THREE ADA SIGNAGE KICKPLATE SILENCERS TP R -1 YALE McKINNEY EXIT DEVICE:ADAMS RITE B60t38628 W4 t qF-1 LAGER YMDC2501 CP9014X ESCUTCHEON(1)8E50428 Mc(WNEY PEMKO _ z 1SO1121ID 0530626 168A - KC 0JI%689 1MDfi2d YPLF CYLNDER 11)1191x1160.x628 1 HALER MdIINNEY DSW62EY PEMKO Z-111. 3 72 3B b YBOCYAI OP612 x 12N0 IOCilMOB4%(2141NM362& 9'-1P HOLD CLR 01 01 780.112110 Jx689 16H0628 YALE CYLINDER 1191%1160.628 0530626 684 VERIFY WIKE.L. —YALE MNUHNEY 4 LAGER YMOL25 i M12 IND 408SXW89y2)IB44047828 MBLIMNEY PEMKO A D3 0 - T&D.11210 AM IWDM YALE CYLINDER 11NX1160.626 0330626 ISIA DRAWN BY:AB AHLC W19MIEY, YALE _ ` c MdUNNEY PE..O MEUNNEY KIM 12NDX CL UNM/10%689 WSO2630 168. Io7Cr LDW830 ZZ LOW REC 3 MEKNNEY. YALE x,xA�uvn M"NEY PEMKO - McKNNEY KFS 121IDXCL UNM410X6N- '�"A0^"'aEmaY WS02M 19A IBTw UVW630 - 01 r McKNNEY, YALE My LOCK �Mra MWNNEY MrNNNEY McKINNEY 201 .W4..,.,4 „�.., PANDA PROJECT W. $8-13-03477 HW-0 MM794.541.5 YMDC2501 XCIAWt4A 1D'XT LDW 630 DP 260 x689 YALE Au YMCL 4703N x 693X491626 Wsoz6JO HCAAVm-ry (BQTH SIDES! s1M BLACK PREF�RK:ATED ARCH PROJECT#: 12250 IftNNEY. YALE MtlNNNEY M,BUNNEY M,IUNNEY4LACK Y McYJNNEY COIINIERLOWWALL - 02 -s MPS 194.5X4.5 YMOC2501 PUSH:PIM X SA 830 HCL Y, (6X2 LDW 630 02 260 %689 PUMPULL:D M6 W502M HCIAVOt-w BOTH SIDES) S1 BLACK x3110 (PROVIDED BY OWNER. M�KNNEY, IvAINNEY 103 101 INSTALLED BY G CJ HWL MPBi84.5%4.5 - YALE AU YMCl9105LNX BM%4N 626 10'X1 lOW 6.10 - w502630 NLSIDEI KITCHEN SERVING WALL SCHEDULE WB 01 AREA FINSHEDULE D H JL NSTNLED40 PAN9ED BV.CL L4LESSN3TEDOTIE1HWIff SCHEDULE P'i0 SEE SHEET X104 2X8 WOOD 5TU05�16'O.C.WI)f'TYPE'1('GYP.BAWD Wn Hengst Streff Bajko No SLRIPTICN UNDER 100 W Architect+Engineers ROW DINING 14-x 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD. GLAZING SYSTEM SEE 31 A-200 % 02 a ROOM L 7 4' SUITE 110 2XGWOODSWDSP12A WOODS TUDS lO;Rn .C.W1)$'TYPE'%'GYP BOARD ON INTERIOR SIDE PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 3&B'20GA METAL STUD WALL WI K'TYPE'%'GYP.BOARD BOTH SIDES(SEE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS&ELEVATIONS) Tel:(802)635-6409 3 F20 ME HUDW LW1)r KYWOWONNICHN4WALLPANEL M'DttK'x'GYP.S0 MTHEOTHERSDEISEEARCHRECTWALOET &ELEVATONS) rya Fax:(602)314-7550 6'20GA.METAL STUD WALL WI)j'TYPE'X'GYP.BOARD ONE SINS(SEE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS B ELEVATIONS) '. 3y8'20GA METAL STUD WALL WI 3'I•TYPE-X-GYP.BOARD ON INTERIOR SIDE(SEE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS&ELEVATIONS) -L ;,� 3'd 3 8.2064 METAL STUD WALL Wl Xs'TYPE'X-GYP.BOARD ON RESTROOM VESTIBULE SIDE.%A'KYW00D M DINING ROOM SIDE 4• 3q• r-7Z` 6.1664 METAL STUD WALL WI WP3 FINISH OVER W TYPE'%'GYP BOARD ON INTERIM SIDE AND E.LF.S.ON EXTERIOR SIDE(SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS) I hm a 4 y U MrM iN1 DWI,t IeIw 1 N rMNL 1. LOW wm PreONM M rA N Mrr81r NY arNt 4MP4rrL4I40 Artl 4 ..,9'dZ HOLD v Nat I Am,awy LxNMaE/vc1rll4p MroN HIM Iaw4 a 1M 2.1I7 METAL STUD WALL WI)'A'GYP BOARD(FURRING) - — -w4 Mews Mime»t�. ' 6.20GA.METAL STUD WALL WI K'TYPE OV GYP.BOARD BOTH SIDES(SEE ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS&ELEVATIONS) ¢. 9C T NOTE:PORTAL Slero WALL PANEL SCHEDULE MSTNMMDFIWi5HE08Y.G.LULESSNOHDOTHERMSE b a? BB 50 E m ` ALIGN DI DIMENSIONS ARE TO NAma: Mvn..,d 6 b 9ERVICECOUNTER 8, / Y _ OUTSIDE FINISHED NO MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION MFG COLOR FINISH REMARK _ ;:. - FACE OF EIF$ OMs:I1/MJ-AiIY Lkema Nn 25949 rn \ EXPIRES.C&30L10N WPt CRWELOMPOSRES INC. F.R.P.THICKNESS.075 LBCS.14 NM(LIGHT GRAY),SMSM 4 § Z 2 1r 0 13 f R rvFZ - S.S.PANEL 122GA) - BRUSHED FINISH FURNISHED BY PX.INSTALLED BY G.G. ' WP3 - S.S.PANEL 122 GA) - RIBBON FINS” FURNISHED BY P%,INSTgl1Ep BY G.C. 2' NOTE:PORTPL W2 j VESULE -1 OIMENSIONSARETO OPa NIGHIHq FIBER CEMENT WALL PANEL HARMONY NO PAINT FINISH USE X-TRIM.SATIN NICKEL. 5'-2' 1 DUTSIOF FINISHED CONTACT:TIM SHIMS 425495.IN0 FACE OF EIFS WP5 MODULARARTS INTERLOCONGROCK PANELS BIG DCTS PNNTREF.ELEVATIONS CONTACT:206.T88.4210 _�ORIVE-THRU wP6 - 3.$.PMIEL - POLISHED FINISH FURNISHED BYG.C.INSTALLED BYG.C. ^ 1 PANDA EXPRESS SPECIAL SURFACE SCHEDULE NsTwEDnND FUMIXI)BY.G.O.UMESS40m)DTIONNE STATION LLI W2 1 BRIGHT AND FRESH NO MANUFACTURER PRODUCT MFGp STAINICOUOR FINISH REMARK �? I , -- - -- _ - -- OZ-2 COLORQUARTZ ARTIFICIAL QUARTZ CG706 STARLIGHT POUSHED p DEO BY PX INSTALLED BY G x J R _ p1 m BASS LAKE R,H NNEPIN,MN 1B 13 __. J BROOKLYN CENTER,HENNEPIN,MN 55430 QZ-3 LOLORQUARTZ ARTIFICIAL QUARTZ CP906 RED JEWEL POLISHED PR YDEDBYP%INST LED BYGC ` W3 Oza COLOROUARTZ ARTIFICIAL QUARTZ CO-M MOSSY GOLD POLISHED II 1'-3' 1'A' LOW 6' LOW HIGH O PROVIDED BY PX INSTALLED BY GC SCHLUTER DLE KCOVE TILE TRIM AHKIS100AE ANODVEDALUMINUM SATIN REF.SHEETA=—ORMOREINFO d M'd 8'S' 14'd o SCHLUTER RCNDEC EDGE TILE TRIM RO100AE ANODIZEDALUMINUM SATIN REF.SHEET&INFORMOREMFO L-2W FORMICA ARTISAN COLLECTION LAMINATE 621043 COUTURE WOOD INTERIOR RESTROOM DOORS 23d' 1TAT 8' INTERIOR PAINT SCHEDULE NS4IDA O FIM4545HHY)P,G.c AM MM mlelwN NO MANUFACTURER MFG COLOR FINISH REMARK 3SS 4?7 A 1 0 3 ® SHERWIN-WIUUAMS SW Wrn HERON PLUME(WHITE) PROMAR 200,ZERO VOC.LATE%SEMLGLOSS REAR SERVICE DOOR ® SHERWIN-WILUAMS Sw TM SHOWSTOPPER(RED) PROMAR 200.ZERO VOC,IATEX EGGSHELL ENTRY SOFFITI SIDE WALLS 7}�J'MGM CONCRETE CURB-/ O1 B 01 A Q SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SW 6252 ICE CUBE PRO&W1200,ZERO VOC.LATEX EGGSHELL DROPPED SOFFITS&RESTROOM CEILING -200 01A� SHERWIN-WILLIAMS SW6710 MELANGE GREEN PROMAR 200,ZERO VOC.LATEX EGGSHELL DINING ROOM ACCENT WALL v1OQ FLOOR PLAN SHERWIN-WILLNM3 SW6155 RICE GRAIN O N PROMAR 2ND,ZERVOL.IATEX EGGSHELL MENU BOARD SOFFITI MODULAR ARTS PANELS DINNING RM.WAILS,RESTROOM VESTIBULE WALLS WITH VESTIBULE SCUFFMgSTER 5walm SILVER - STEEL COLUMN AT ENTRY FLOOR PLAN WITH VESTIBULE 1 Q SHERWIN-WILLNMS SW 1020 MACK FOX ON ACRYLIC GLOSS.LOW VOC RESTROOM ODOR FRAMES&NICIIHA LCD BOARDER A-103 Scale=l/4"=1'D" TILE SCHEDULE(SEE SHEET A-104) EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE IIBTALEOMDRURNTHECP GC KMWTEDGTFEWASE NO MANUFACTURER MFGS COLOR FINISH NOTES IF51 STO STOTHERM 93330 CHAMPAGNE SAND PEBBLE FINE BUILDING BODY ESSENCE SYSTEM �p IFS STO STOTHERM 11401 BRUSHED PEWTER SAND PEBBLE FINE BUILDING BODY ESSENCE SYSTEM IFS- STO STOTHERM SW 7588 SHOW STOPPER ULTRA SMOOTH METALLIC FINISH ENTRY PORTAL METALLIC SYSTEM O O IFS STO STOTHERM SW7073 NETWORK GREY ULTRA SMOOTH METALLIC FINISH DRIVE TNd18 REAR ELEVATION METALLIC SYSTEM PM11 SHERWIN-WILLAMIS SW 6919 FUSION(GREEN) SATIN,LATEX BUILDING TRIM ^^ ~ p� P9B SHERWIN WILLAMLS SW 7588 SHOW STOPPER SATIN LATEX ENTRY,WALL ACCENTS V V P114 SHERWIN-WILLIAM$ SW 6081 COBBLE BROWN SATIN LATEX ALUM.AWNINGSICANOPY 01 Oj• P115 SHERWIN WILLAUS SW 6/33 HARNESS SATIN.LATEX A-YIt V gMET CNV� ST1S ADVANCED CAST STONE SAND DRIFT DRY TAMP POINTER STONE CAP l ST-1 DAL-TILE M57g TIDEWATER MESA LEDGESTACK RANTERS -\ TOP OF CORNICE ST12 AMCON 17M GLACAI WHITE BUILDING BODY —A UNDERSIDE 01 03 m PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. STJ GLEN GREY MARSEILLES RED EXTRUDED FACEBRICK BUILDING BODY Pi12 AJ01 I-381 IFS A.301 1683 Walnut Grove Ave NOTE:INSTALL ECT I MT M GROUT-MFG.MODEL 0 PBG9525 BY CUSTOM BUILDING PRODUCTS,COLOR SABLE BROWN GC 1 ROSerread,Cal110TnQ TO VERIFY SURABILITY OF GROUT WITH CERAMIC TILE APPLICATION AND NOTIFY PANDA PM Of ANY ISSUES — - -\ TOP O PARAPET 91770 WINDOW SCHEDULE WILL.ID1URM ED by 6 E LNES<NUEO OTBIVS. NOTES 2FU nT Teiep ne 6267999898 1. INSULATING GLASS PPG SOLARBAN 60 LOW E F.—O 626 372 8288 SYM WIDTH I HEIGHT GLASS FRAME REMARKS WINTER U=0.25 SHGC 0.39 VIS TRANS.83%W BOTTOM O PARAPET O SEE ELEVATION BUTT GLAZIN SEE DETAIL DO ENERGY 46% -" BUTT GLAZE GLASS THICKNESS.CHANNEL FRAMING.CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURE 273 AF F SHALL BE DESIGNED AND SEALED BY REGISTERED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EMIPLOYED Z DOORS,FULL GLAZED DOORS W7IP NICK BASE. INSULATING BRUSHED SATN FINISH W INVOT HINGES AND PANDA MURAL ON INTERIOH GLASS WITH BY CLA7NGLONTFAC?OR(IyEET LOADING OF APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE. CLOSER AL geasC mxe aM pansxHKateEa SEE ELEVATION SEE DETAIL BUTT GLAZE GLASS THICKNESS.CHANNEL FRAMING.CONNECTIONS TO STRUCTURE aby LN1 anage OALUMINUM J WINWYl DIMENSIONS ARE FOR BIDDING RIP➢OSE$ ''—By OWNS INS reprpsen'ea 6Y lSis AraMq ae me aoperlyd PaMa (VERIFY) STOREFRONT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND SEAL ED BY REGISTERED STRUCTURAL ENGINEER EMPLOYED OILY G C TO VERIFY ACTUAL WINDOW BYOWNERINSTALLED BYC I: ExGress Arc aMwere cr..alotl br usem Ors sl.ficG�gM (LOW) BYGLAZINGLONTRAC?OR.(MEET LOADING CRITERIA OF APPLICABLE BUILDING CODE, DIMENSIONS PRIOR TOFABRICATIONINSTA11AT10N. —b,.—ozN:o an 4ma lion Vale al(New�Ceas.Besgns anangemeMS cr plans mry 4. GLASS FACADE AND ENTRY DOORS TO BE Y rson. <apaa "INSULATED ALUMINUM 1'MSULATEDGLAZNG.IN4.5"X2 NCLFARANODIZEO BUTT GLAZING wtlfoul the witMn peml' dPanbt ENOess lrw. © 17-0' B-0' GLASS STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAME DESIGNED.DETAILED.FACTORY FABRICATED AND S1TE ASSEMBLED AND ERECTED. O0 LSE' 10'-0' INSULATED ALUMINUM ,'I NSUILATEDGLAZING.MN4.5'X2'NCLEARANTDOIZED 5. MANUFACTURER'.WIKSERV.MDDELSST4N0E POLISHEDSTAINLESSSTEDI GU55 STOREFRONT ALUMINUM FRAME WITH THIN OEM PHOTOELECTRIC BAR. BREAK METAL TEMPERED CLEM AN00. OUIKEERV,ROUGH OPENING 48 X 67 SEE ADDITIONAL NOTE F 5 REGKJNAL —TT ON WITH CIF NON IEATED OE 175' 595' AIL CURTAIN OR CW-E HEATED AIR CURTAIN. REVISIONS: GLASS ALUM CONTACT.STEVE BERT,900.3868307 TOP OFENiRY /� SINGLE ALUMINUM SINGLE PANE VESTIBULE GLAZING REOIIREMENTPAN FOR POWER O BJ' 17-0' PANE GLASS STOREFRONT 11'-0'AF F. ' 6. WINDOW SYSTEM SHALL COMPLY WITH APPLICABLE GO 9'.9' 17-0" SINGLE ALUMINUM SINGLE PANE VESTIBULE GLAZING SECTION AND CHAPTER OF BUILDING WOE. -_- _ ------_--� PANE GLASS STOREFRONT T TEMPERED GLASS iFS. -..-- -- ' H'.GH IMPACT EIFS INSULATING GLASS A IN ALUMINUM STOREFRONT 09 1' �\/ Aa00 177`VERIFY 13'101VERIFY A ED EO ED FA EO ED TOP OF ENTRY TOP OF ENTRY I -_--- ISSUE DATE 177"AFf 47-7"AFF fY 6" PLANNING COMMISION 051142013 FNISN FLOOR A.402 TL'AF F HICA1 ST3 ST-3 AJC2 WEST ELEVATION 2 B HG" ---1/4-1--o-IA-200 SIM Q TO OT TOP OF ENTRY 0 O TOP OF EN-P DRAWN BY:AS I TIT AF F ITC ALFT B A�07 � -T °1 IFS 03 PANDA PROJECT#: S&13-D3477 OW ao3 Aaa ARCH PROJECT#: 12250 l ■ Y L TOP OF CORNICE !- �' UNDERSIDE 97-A F F. o =* N' P112 (D NSA 0 0 0 __ 1 O TOP OF PARAPET A�00 a ED ED. EO-- _ ED O O O 72-0'Af F � Hengs[Slreft BalkO LOW 19 REF.WOR TYPES Architect*Engineers BDOORSCHEME _ —Z BOTTOM OF PARAPET A�1 TYP. N'-0'VERiY 7-3' 1'E' 64' t'E' 7'T 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD. as .v.m�' aexw � � - 207TAf2 - SUITE t10 n. PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 ER111 VE RM `p - _ Tel.(602)635-6409 O © Faz:(602)314-7550 _. rewx AAA -' Av +axa AIR CURTAIN UILTI e r A408 b_ lul 1 1 FULLHEIGHT SPRINKLER . , ®..._ E IOR LIGHT w1 h+ H,1 Pn 4.rcr a Pen k n w—ar�4 t ROOM CENTER ABOVE DOOR my . Mat em a Day L:erKM Mcrulecl u'Mer Lk Marva of tM aYO . slate e1 A1'� MOt F P� Name Nevn Hs+Lgst O p M { No.3AA9 1�\VIHIti ..,x':21111 O �(D y' E0. EO ED. 17-TYERIFY CHI" PANDA EXPRESS © 10 O O W i "00 TYP - �. - BRIGHT AND FRESH BASS LAKE RD 6 XERXES AVE FI+I A FLOOR BROOKLYN CENTER.HENNEPIN,MN 55430 U-0'A 8I � FF. \ ST.1 ST3 -- \ / V PAINTTOMATCH BRICK VENEER a 5#L 0_ §e A-200 � \. T \. AM 1 § '2 b T \b 0 44 7 EXTERIOR WINDOW AND DOOR ELEVATIONS 3 EAST ELEVATION 1 EI E RATIONS Scel"NT$A-200.. . _... . _. SGaIe=1,4•=,-0•A-200 w C 03 0: �OP Exp�t EIfS- A-303 A30P $IAt TOP OF CORNICE A 36'3'AF F. Y- UNDERSIDE M301 A'3a P112 O O D r __.__ TOPO FfRAPET _ J CO y�{/ BOTTOIA OF PARAF�- GRti1ET CN���" 20'3'AFF, / .. PANDA MURAL ON INTERIOR PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. BEHIND GLASS BY OWNER INSTALLED BY G.C. 1663 Walnut GrOYe Ave. Rosemead,Califomia POLISHED STAINLESS STEEL 91770 BREAM METAL 02 ST3 T,1,ph"e:626.799.9098 A402 Facsimile:626 372 8288 /k TOPOF BEAM _._.__.... NNe gns.arrange eland PlansiM_I.a ENCLOSURE represenm0 M:IIS tlrarAg ae lfie PWedy d Panda II'-0'AF.F. --_-. _.—_ --.... -____� Evpiess lrc and aere oealm foruum dxs speFdc prajed --- 6Or-OM CF A7itiNG N—If ft.peas tlem-anaigemeds w Wns may De TOP OF BEAM '.i __ _ M a ds79sed many Pwson.firm.a c9ryaafien 1DASe'AF F. II _ __ � wttgW Itte a'rden pem¢snr d Parch Evaas Inc. Ij 03 \ A-0 REVISIONS: IFS � I HIGH IMPACT \ / EIFS — .._ 60—A '0.FF KS Pf to ST-1 ST15 ST3 BT-1 ST.IS ST-2 DOUBLE FACE HIGH NUPACT PRE ENGINEERED ADHERED STONE VENEER. PRE NGNEERED INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL EIFS ALUMINUM AWNING INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES ALUMINIRAAWNING OF ACCESSIBILITY W"AFF SPECIFICATIONS j -SEE SHEET A-200 FOR EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE ISSGE DATE. PLANNING COMMISION 050412013 SOUTH ELEVATION F22 scale=114-=1-ur A-201 DRAWN BY'.AB PANDA PROJECT#: S8-13-03477 pI ARCH PROJECT#: 12250 A 303 03 U.SIDE A}32 ST.3 A-302 T TOP OF PARAI'E' He angst Streff Bajko 22-0'A F F AfChiteCt+Engineers 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD BOTTOM OF PARPPET SUITE 110 - 20JAFF PHOENIX.ARIZONA 85016 Tel(602)635-6409 F..A-(602)314-7550 INSIDE fACE BT.Y I St 2 I keeey ce.xry eMt tnN qsn,sPanP:atm�,a report n Pealed by me a under my d,s9;unlsi9n aril DRIVE-THRU CANOPY t., Am a 09Iy li;emM Mct�kcl umv fne la.a of;M WITH LIGHTING slate a N1imaWi. SUPPLIED BY PANDA 9d'vture.� INSTALLED BY G.C. Name: uew+rwgst BOTTOM OF AWNING 10-0'A11 - F.\I'INF.S_iti:+.1H1 I Piid b PANDA EXPRESS E BRIGHT AND FRESH BASS LAKE RD 8 XERXES AVE ---- ------- --- I § BROOKLYN CENTER,HENNEPIN,MN 55430 — e — _ sTJ Brd sT.ts PNt st-2 ADHERED STONE VENEER. PRE ENGIN ED INSTALL PER MANUFACTURES ALUMINUM AWNING SPECIFICATIONS 'SEE SHEET A-200 FOR EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULE A-201 EXTERIOR NORTH ELEVATIONI 1 ELEVATIONS - ---- Brace=,!4•=,•-D.A-201 .. �O A �A `RMET O J PANDA RESTAURANT GROUP INC. 1683 Walnut Grove Ave. Rosemead,California 91770 Talephofre:626.799.9898 ^^ Facsimtle:626.72.8288 `^ V All Meas.designs,emangany,nl.nd phns lndicatad or \ a ant"by INs drawing are me pmpeny of P-a Express Inc.and were crealetl fw use on to s speafic prhlea rvAne of mere Me as desl w Is a a a I,,e g ,artange mea dnAmy f . PLANTING SCHEDULE. edwtffi,WoAedb any pe eon.Arm vcmryo Im. wHhaul me miller pemission of Panda Express Inc. l 1 TY. SIZE MATURE HEIGHT REMARKS - . . . . COMMON NAME D _ - KEY i SCIENTIFIC NAME TREES AUTUMN REVISIONS: r', 22�10SF , 1 38'x58' AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 06 2.5"CAL. 60' SINGLE STEM TYPE C l � ACER FREEMANII \ QUAKER ASPEN OB 1.75"CAL. 40' SINGLE STEM POPULUS TREMULOIDES o OR IVE THR SHRUBS ISSUE DATE ENTRANCE O HEMEROCALUS 19 1 GALLON 3' FULL & HEALTHY m PLANNING COMMISION 05/142013 DAYLILY UTDOOR PATIO '�r AND SEATING AREA U O HONEYSUCKLE 'CtAVEYS DWARF' 07 1 GALLON 3' FULL & HEALTHY LONICERA XYLOSTEUM 'CLAVEYI' e4 RUSSIAN CYPRESS 17 1 GALLON 3' FULL & HEALTHY MICROBIOTA DECUSSATA VIBURNUM CHIQUITA 06 1 GALLON 3' FULL & HEALTHY DRAWN BY:AB VIBURNUM SARGENTII 'CHIQUITA' PANDA PROJECT#: S 8-13-03477 KENTUCKY BLUEGRASS 10,520 SQ. FT SOD ARCH PROJECT#: 12250 NOTE: {-••j CONDITIONS:ALL TREES B BAND ALL SHRUBS IN CONTAINERS SHADE L (� \ SHADE TREES A MINIMUM OF F 2.5" IN DIAMETER AS MEASURED 6"ABOVE THE l3TABUSHED GROUND LEVEL AND/OR EVERGREEN TREES A MINIMUM OF 6'-0"IN HEIGHT Architect Streff Engineers ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO (2)YEARS. 2T7T EAST Engineers 2777 EAST CAMELBACK RD. •< SUITE 110 PHOENIX,ARIZONA 85016 Tel:(602)635-6409 Fax:(602)314-7550 j ♦ LANDSCAPING NOTES: J , \ 1. ALL LANDSCAPE'NOOK ON BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE BE I ITALLEDY STANDARDS. 2. ALL AREAS CALLED OUT ON THE PLAN AS'SOD'SWILL BE INSTALLED AND FERTILIZED AS FOLLOWS: SOD-KENTUCKY BLUE GRASS SOD,FERTILIZER-16-20-6 RATIO,41/1,000 SQ.FT. l horny�-ufy MM—of ,v�Onlon,w rcoArt 3. TREES WITH BROKEN LEADERS DR NO CENTRAL LEADER WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. waz P�enarM M U A.under my as«t waeMabn ar,a 4. A PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE SUCH AS TREFIAN(5x)(OR EQUAL)SHALL BE APPLIED PER LIBEL DIRECTIONS.ALL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 2.ORGANIC MATTER(SUCH AS COTTON BUR trot I em•daH L,censcd Arcnlwr anger the Ia.+A a:no MULCH,COMPOST,MUSHROOM COMPOSITE,OR HUMUS)AND SHALL BE ROTOTIU.ED IN TO A DEPTH OF 10-12, 5. MULCH ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH MIN.3.OF MULCH.MULCH ALL TREE SAUCER WELLS WITH MIN.3'OF MULCH.MULCH MATEIM TO BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH OF UNIFORM Sixnatura: l `"A'/✓1 CONSISTENCY. name: 0...—t 6. BLACK COBRA LAWN EDGING SHALL BE USED TO SEPARATE ALL TURF AREAS FROM PLATING BEDS,EDGING SHALL BE COMMERCIAL GRADE,OR APPROVED EQUAL 7. GENERAL.CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY AND PLACE AT A DEPTH OF 4-,ALL TOPSOIL ON SITE Dale:I IOk/-?DI'_' L�ceme Ng 25909 8. TOPSOIL HAULED ONTO SITE SILL BE FERTILE,FRAME.NATURAL LOAM TOPSOIL,OF UNIFORM QUALITY CHARACTERISTIC OF REPRESENTATIVE LOCAL SOILS WHICH PRODUCE HEAVY GROWTH e-ttnxtis.ai-'w_>nu OF CROPS.CROPS,GRASS,OR OTHER VEGETATION.TI SHALL BE FREE OF TRASH,OR OTHER MATTER TOXIC TO PI M GROWTH. \\ , 9. TOPSOIL SHALL BE DELIVERED IN AN UNFROZEN AND NON-MUDDY CONDITION AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 10. PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION FOR LANDSCAPING PURPOSES THE LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTUIES SHALL BE DETERMINED BY CALLING 811.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR AM DAMAGE DONE TO EXISTING UTILITIES. 11. REPORT ANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE PLANTING PLAN TO THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT,PRIOR TO STARTING CDNSIRUCTON. 12. THE LANDSCAPE CONTACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE G.C.TO CAN SITE ACCESS TO INSTALL THE PLANTS AND MAINTAIN GROUNDS,UNTIL FOAL ACCEPTANCE FROM OWNER.UPON PANDA EXPRESS FINAL ACCEPTANCE,THE TWO(2)YEAR GUARANTEE PERIOD MILL BEON. 13. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE G.C.TO INSTALL THE PLANTS AND MAINTAIN GROUNDS,UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE FROM OWNER. 14. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT BID WITH UNIT PRICES FOR ALL PANTS,INCLUDING MULCH,INSTALLATION,TWO(2)YEAR GUARANTEE,BED PREPARATION,FERTILIZER ETC. BRIGHT AND FRESH 15. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY D/VAACE DONE TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING OR ANY PART OF THE PARKING LOT WHEN INSTALLED OR MAINTAINING THE BASS LAKE RD 8 XERXES AVE PLANTINGS BEFORE FINAL ACCEPTANCE BROOKLYN CENTER,HENNEPIN,MN 55430 16. GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE LOCAL CITY OFFICML TO REMOVE/TRANSPLANT EXIST TREES. 17. FALL PLANTING SEASON SWELL BE SEPTEMBER 1 THRU OCTOBER 31.SPRING PLANTING SEASON SHALL BE APRIL 1 THRU JUNE 30.FOR GRASS SEEDING FALL SEASON SHALL BE SEPTEMBER 1 THRU MID OCTOBER.SPRING SEASON FOR SEEDING SHALL BE FROM MARCH 15 THRU MID MAY. 18, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE MAINTENANCE UNTIL FINAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE INCLUDING LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE AND WATERING. L-100 LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE PLANI 1 PLANTING SCHEDULE A scale=1116-=1'-0"1 L-100 Scale=NTS L-100 3 rBR OKL YN TER Planning Commission Report • Application Filed: 03/28/13 !i Meeting Date• May 30, 2013 • Review Period(60-day)Deadline: 05/27/13 • Extension Declared: 05/16/13 • Extended Review Period Deadline: 07/26/13 Application No. 2013-003 Applicant: MBC II, LLC (Paul Hyde) Location: 4821 Xerxes Avenue North(former Howe Fertilizer site) Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment to Enlarge Planned Building Area and Reduce Certain Setbacks INTRODUCTION Mr. Paul Hyde, acting on behalf of MBC II, LLC is requesting a planned unit development (PUD) amendment to a previously approved Howe Fertilizer Site PUD redevelopment plan. The requested amendments consist of a number of changes or additions, which are noted as follows: a. enlarging a pre-approved office/warehouse building from 51,000 sq. ft. to 60,000 sq. ft.; b. allowing a minor relocation of the new building on the subject parcel; c. reducing certain boundary setbacks for the parking area; and d. allowing a small expansion of new driveway/parking areas, which would impact the required buffer areas required under the established PUD/I-1 District. This site was originally approved for a PUD on February 25, 2008, to be known as "Minneapolis Building Center II". The MBC II plans called for smaller 51,000 sq. ft. spec office/warehouse facility with on-site parking and loading areas. An updated development plan set, dated March 26, 2013 (city stamped 03/28/13) are included as part of this report and provides a general illustration of these proposed amendments. BACKGROUND The former Howe Fertilizer site was originally developed with a number of different buildings used for the manufacturing, storage and distribution of various fertilizers, insecticides, and agricultural related chemicals from 1940 to approximately 2001. The site also contained a full- service gas station from 1946 to 1970. The manufacturing of chemical fertilizers at this site officially ceased in 1994, while use of the site for distribution of agricultural chemicals continued. The subject site today contains three commercial grade buildings, which are functionally obsolete, vacant and awaiting future demolition. The site was subject to a major industrial accident when one of the storage/manufacturing buildings caught fire, and the resulting fire suppression caused a massive contamination of the site from water runoff of the site. Mr. Hyde is currently working with MPCA and US Department of Agriculture in obtaining funds and clearance to clean and mitigate the site, a practice Mr. Hyde is very well versed and experienced App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 1 in this community and other metro cities. Mr. Hyde has undertaken a number of these clean-up and redevelopment projects, most notably the clean-up and redevelopment of the old Joslyn Pole Yard located off Lakebreeze and Azelia Avenues; the Minneapolis Business Center located directly across (east) from the subject site; and most recently the former Lifetime Fitness site, which was redeveloped with a new 90,000 sf. office/warehouse facility. The original 2008 PUD Plan called for a 51,000 sf. office/warehouse facility with parking to accommodate 120 vehicles. This site was originally zoned I-2 (General Industry), but approved for rezoning in 2008 to PUD/I-1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park). This PUD allowed certain modifications to the 100-ft. and 50-ft. buffer requirements where industrial uses abut residential zoned properties, either at the property line or the street lines. The 2008 PUD approvals included an allowance to reduce the 100-foot buffer along a portion of the west side of the site to 50-ft. in order to provide a drive-lane for accessing the rear loading areas of the building and additional parking area. The other allowance was a reduced buffer on the north side of the site from 50-ft. to a 25-ft. setback, also for a secondary drive lane accessing vehicle parking on the north and east sides of the proposed building site. The impacts created by these reduced buffer areas were planned to be offset by additional screening by means of landscaping, berming and fencing. The 2008 plan also indicated that all parking and building locations would meet all required setbacks, which are noted as follows: Building *:Front Yard= 50-ft. Side Yard= 10 ft. Rear Yard=25-ft. Comer--50-ft. Parking: 15-ft. from any street right-of-way line (*Building setbacks based on I-1 Zone standards) Since 2008, the project has been stalled due to Mr. Hyde attempting to secure all approvals necessary to begin clean-up of this contaminated site. Mr. Hyde has indicated that MPCA has signed off on his remediation plans for the site; and is still attempting to work with and secure the US Department of Agriculture's approval, which have proven to be very arduous and difficult up to this point. Mr. Hyde remains confident that these approvals will be forthcoming, and he can begin the work of redeveloping this site very soon. After the 2008 PUD approval, Mr. Hyde was informed by prospective tenants and other office/warehouse providers in this market, that larger buildings of this nature (office/warehouse) may be warranted due to the increased needs and demands throughout the Twin Cities region. Mr. Hyde approached city staff almost two years ago with a plan to expand this PUD site by enlarging the building with 9,000 sf. of additional area. This enlargement would require the building to be shifted slightly more to the east towards Brooklyn Boulevard (Osseo Road), in order to maintain as much of the 50-foot reduced buffer area to the west. The shift would also create the need to request a reduction from the 15-foot setbacks to a proposed (revised) 10-ft. setback. This PUD Amendment addresses this request to enlarge the original proposed building by 9,000 sq. ft.; reaffirms or allows the reduced buffers, and approve the reduced parking setbacks for this redevelopment site. App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 2 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROCESS A Planned Unit Development proposal involves the rezoning of land with a PUD designation followed by an alpha numeric designation of the underlying zoning district. This underlying zoning district provides the regulations governing uses and structures within the Planned Unit Development. Rules and regulations governing that district (in this case, I-1- Industrial Park) would apply to the development proposal. One of the purposes of the PUD district is to give the City the needed flexibility in addressing development and/or redevelopment problems that may be associated when presenting the site for review. Regulations governing uses and structures may be modified by conditions ultimately imposed by the City Council on the development plans. As mentioned in this case, the Applicant is seeking to increase the previous 2008 PUD approved building size; allow for the minor relocation of said building; allow for a reduced parking boundary setback; and allow for a slight increase to the buffer areas previously approved in this site. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (AMENDMENTS) 1. Enlarge a pre-approved office/warehouse building from 51,000 sq.ft. to 60,000 sq.ft. The original 2008 plan approved a new office/warehouse facility of 51,000 sq. ft. The layout is virtually similar to the new layout as noted on the diagram insert below, but more visible and detailed in the attached(updated) PUD Site Plan set. 2008 Site Plan *OM WES e � •r_sr°_a r _._•tom uNC� M#i are Al 1 App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 3 2013 Site Plan _ ..__.... ® os Or Kq M.Myyi "3M — aJE '.:tom" _ � I I '� t::ses:W:aas:•ac,• � iu:net;�srie:. The current PUD Ordinance contained in the City Code regarding PUD standards and requirements, allows for buildings to be increased by no more than 5% after official city approvals have been given. The request from 51,000 sf. to 60,000 sf enlargement represents a 17.5% increase, which is somewhat considerable, but easily addressed or approved in this PUD Amendment process. The additional building area and the need to shift it slightly more towards Brooklyn Boulevard, does not negatively affect the general layout or intended scope, nature and operations this 2008 PUD called for on this site. The increased building size should be viewed as a reasonable request and positive impact, due to the potential increased tax base the larger building would generate for the betterment of the community. Staff has no concerns or objections to this building size increase. 2. Allowing a minor relocation of the new building on the subject parcel; The original 2008 Plan indicated the new 51 000 sf. building would be setback 179 feet from � g the westerly lot line (shown below). App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 4 OR VE-.I OOR 1 RROW M CREEN ; LANDSCAPE BUFFER .— NO PROPOSED GREEN •~- <NOSC,APE BUFFER 1 `6 1 h I I 1 The new 2013 Plan calls for a setback of approximately 167-feet from this same line. _________ E.e' C C"SCPEE4w.wALI C \ ¢ - ECAR FENCE UPNE , i 4 CCOPS�� - DSCM[0... _-. PROPOSED GREEN LWDSG BUFFER uNDEGYE RUfiEV S ...... - _ MFENCE �- CNYE I,. —"----�-- The impact of this shift is that the parking areas along the west side of the building are reduced form 15-feet to 10-feet, which will be addressed later in this report. Even with this building shift, the setbacks are still easily met and impact remains very minor. Staff has no concerns or objections to this building shift request. 3. Reducing certain boundary setbacks for the parking area. As noted previously, the minor shift of the new building impacts the required parking areas along the easterly edge of the site. The original 2008 Plans called for a 15-ft. setback, which would have met City Code. The new 2013 Plan calls for a 10-ft. setback, which encroaches 5-feet into this setback area from the street right-of-way. This impacted area is only in the 11-space parking area near the northeast corner of the building site. This area of the site is also where the grades along this Brooklyn Blvd./Osseo Road right-of-way edge begin to develop upwards due to the roadway bridge overpass over the adjacent railroads to the south. This 5-foot parking encroachment in this area appears minor, and with the added screening measures to be provided by the retaining wall and landscaping, this area should be well protected and screened from any headlight wash onto Brooklyn Blvd./Osseo Road, Staff has App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 5 no concerns or objections to this reduced parking boundary setback. The 2013 site plan calls for a retaining wall at this location, along with some landscaping, both of which would provide adequate and reasonable screening of these vehicles in this area. However, planning staff noticed on the new grading plans that a small berm is planned, with no retaining wall. The City Engineers noticed the same and made similar comment in their own review that this wall versus berm matter must be resolved to eliminate this inconsistency. As part of our ongoing(but not official)policy addressing Active Living Programming in our community, city staff would suggest the Applicant forgo the retaining wall (if not needed) and make a pedestrian walkway connection from his parking lot area to the sidewalk located along Osseo Road. Furthermore, we would request the Applicant provide a bicycle parking/rack area located near the front entryway of the building. City staff will work with the Applicant in reducing parking spaces (if needed) as part of this walkway and bicycle parking area and adjusting the landscaping plan accordingly to accommodate this walkway. 4. Allowing a small expansion of new driveway/parking areas, which would impact the required buffer areas required under the established PUDII--I District. As also noted previously, the 2008 PUD Plans approved the required 100-foot buffer area along the westerly boundary lines to be reduced to 50-feet. This approval was established based on the Applicant's proposal to provide adequate screening measures in this area through means of landscaping and an 8-foot high cedar-wood fence. The original 2008 plan called for a drive lane that had a slight curve inward towards the building, along with a "bulge" where the parking area and loading area separate. This new 2013 PUD Plan removes this curved roadway and now comes straight into the site from 49th Avenue. The bulge is also eliminated and the parking area is slightly extended into the 50-foot buffer area to accommodate a parking edge line. This small hard-surfaced area is to provide enough movement to and from the loading dock space shown directly across from this new encroachment area. The 2008 and 2013 Plans call for an 8-foot high cedar wood fence within this buffer area to provide protection and screening from the adjacent residential neighbors. This new fence would begin just south of the intersection of this 49 th Avenue access, extending down into the site by approximately 120-feet, then tie into an existing boundary line fence on this property. The Plans call for this "existing fence to remain". Staff has inspected this fence and feels it is in poor shape, near the end of its life expectancy and should be replaced. As part of our recommendations, the City is requesting the entire westerly boundary fence be replaced with an opaque, 8-foot high cedar wood fence. Staff would suggest the Applicant move the designated "*-foot high" fence as shown on these plans form the outside edge of the parking to the far west edge of the site, and next to the abutting property line boundary. Because this buffer encroachment is again minor in scope and impact, Staff has no concerns or objections to this slight increase into the approved parking buffer area, provided the Applicant agrees to install the landscaping as illustrated on these 2013 Plans, and modifies the fence and locations per the recommendations of city planning staff. App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 6 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2013-04, which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2013-003,the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Amendment to the 2008 Minneapolis Building Center II Planned Unit Development Project, subject to the following conditions and allowances: 1. Allow a revision from the 2008 MBC II PUD Plans to increase the proposed office/warehouse building from 51,000 sq. ft. to 60,000 sq. ft.; 2. Allow the minor relocation of the new building on the subject parcel as shown or indicated on the 2013 MBC II PUD Plan set; 3. Allowing the reduced boundary setbacks of the parking area from 15-feet to 10-feet in certain locations; 4. Allowing a small expansion of new driveway/parking areas, which would impact the required buffer areas required under the established PUD/I-I District. 5. The Applicant shall provide a paved pedestrian/bicycle connection between the parking lot area near the front entryway leading out to the existing sidewalk along Osseo Road. 6. All previous conditions memorialized in City Resolution No. 2008-23, including those not affected by these new allowances, shall remain in effect and complied with as part of this 2013 PUD Amendment approvals; 7. All conditions or requirements as noted in the City Engineer's Review Memorandum, dated May 23, 2013 and referenced herein shall be complied with as part of this 2013 PUD Amendment approvals 8. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. Attachments ■ 2013 MBC II Planned Unit Development Plan Set ■ PC Resolution No. 2013-04 ■ City Resolution No. 2008-23 App.No.2013-003 05/30/13/Page 7 MEMORANDUM DATE: May 23, 2013 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Steven J Jankowski, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works—PUD Review for HOWE PUD Public Works Department staff has reviewed the submissions enumerated below for a PUD application, prepared by Opus Architects & Engineers Inc.: CS Cover sheet 1/17/08 A 1.1 Architectural Site Plan 3/26/13 A2.1 Architectural Floor Plan 3/26/13 A3.1 Building Elevations 3/26/13 L1.0 Landscape Concept Plan 3/26/13 ES 1.0 Photometric Site Plan 3/26/13 C1.0 Existing Conditions Plan 3/16/13 C4.0 Preliminary Grading , Drainage Plan 3/16/13 C5.0 Phase 1 SWPPP 3/16/13 C5.1 Phase 2 SWPPP 3/16/13 C5.2 SWPPP Notes and Details 3/16/13 C6.0 Utility Plan 3/16/13 C8.0 Detail Sheet 3/16/13 PUD Public Works Review Memo — Howe Property Page 2 May 23, 2013 We are also in receipt of a Storm Water Management Plan for Minneapolis Business Center II prepared by Jared Jones PE of MRFA dated March 26, 2013. We offer the following comments: Sheet CS • The drawing index needs to be revised to be consistent with the plan sheets submitted as noted above. Sheet L 1.0 • A retaining wall is proposed along the north side of the eastern drive entrance; however, a berm is shown along this area on sheet C4.0. The plans shall be modified to eliminate this inconsistency. Sheet C4.0 • The sizes of the storm sewer and structure inverts need to be added to the plan. • A review of city documents indicates that a storm sewer may exist draining from the rear yard of 3135 49th Avenue(two lots west of the site)easterly through the southern portion of the site.An effort should be made to verify the existence of this line and if its existence is confirmed to redirect the discharge into the storm pond. • Typical cross section of the storm pond basins need to be provided showing side slopes and safety benches. • The location of the silt fence identified on sheet C5.0 is in nearly the identical location of the proposed storm sewer along the southern boundary of the site. Redesign or explain how this installation will be p ossible. • Plans and specifications for any retaining wall greater than 4 feet shall be designed by a registered professional engineer. • Slopes along turfed area shall be no greater than the 3:1 proposed on the plan. Sheet C6.0 • The area of the site immediately west of the drive access contains a hydrant, hydrant valve and a water meter manhole which are not shown on the plan. In addition there is a 12"gate valve located in 49th Avenue which is not shown. These features should be located and added to the plan.The hydrant, valve and meter manhole shall be removed as part of the site redevelopment. The existing service line will need to be removed back to the 12"main and plugged at the service tee. • Storm water treatment from the site consists of on-site ponding along with an infiltration basin. The rules of the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission regarding abstraction(infiltration) for storm water are contained in Section 3 (h) (2) (vi)(e) of Rule D of Appendix C of the Third generation plan and state as follows: "(vi) Constructed bio retention and infiltration practices such as rain gardens, infiltration trenches and infiltration benches shall not be used when(e) sites contain contaminated soils or groundwater" PUD Public Works Review Memo— Howe Property Page 3 May 23,2013 This site is known to have a number of contaminations issues and the proposed infiltration basin may not be acceptable. A summary of the known commination issues need to be documented along with an assessment of the degree of remediation which the developer anticipates to achieve.This data will be utilized by the Watershed in their review to determine whether infiltration is appropriate for this project. • As mentioned above there will need to be removals of existing water main and appurtenances.A new hydrant should be added on the 8"service main near the western site entrance to provide fire coverage for the northwest quadrant of the site. Below are additional requirements for the redevelopment of this site: General Items: 1. The proposed plat is located adjacent to Hennepin County right-of-way. Minnesota Statutes require that the City submit the PUD to Hennepin County Transportation for written comments and recommendations. All Hennepin County comments will be conditions of approval. 2. The final construction plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the state of Minnesota to the City Engineer for approval. 3. This development is required to be reviewed by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission.All City and Watershed storm drainage,treatment and infiltration(if applicable) standards are required to be met. 4. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center's standard specifications and details.The City's standard details must be included in the final site plans. 5. A general project phasing and sequencing plan must be provided for the development. 6. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings are established,the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. 7. Upon project completion,the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures, and provide certified record drawings for any associated private and/or public improvements prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 8. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer's design/project engineer. Upon project completion,the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer's immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings. 9. Irrigation is required for the site.A copy of the irrigation plan needs to be provided. 10. Vehicle turning movement diagrams need to be submitted documenting the adequacy the paved area in front of the loading area. PUD Public Works Review Memo— Howe Property Page 4 May 23,2013 Easements.Agreements and Plat: 1. Legal descriptions and easement vacation documents must be obtained for all existing easements. Existing public easements as determined by the City must be vacated and proposed easements must be dedicated. 2. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions,traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions,tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions,temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. A $5,000 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. 3. A PUD Development Agreement is required that includes all conditions of the project approval, subject to the final site plan approval by the City Engineer. 4. An overall easement agreement is required that will provide the City perpetual accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement also includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building and land alteration permits. 5. A 10-ft drainage and utility easement must be dedicated around the entire perimeter of the site. 6. The applicant shall be responsible for coordinating site development plans with all private utility companies(Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications, etc. . Easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development should be dedicated as necessary. 7. Private site appurtenances(e.g. light poles, signs, etc.)must not encroach on public easement areas. If such an encroachment exists and is determined by the City to be not adverse to the public interest, such encroachments will require an Encroachment Agreement. Anticipated Permitting: 1. A City of Brooklyn Center sewer and water disconnect permit is required. 2. A City of Brooklyn Center land disturbance permit is required. 3. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 4. A Minnesota Department of Health department permit is required for the watermain extension. 5. A Hennepin County permit is required for work within Hennepin County right-of-way. 6. Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission(SCWMC)plan review and approval are required. 7. A portion of this project will require construction on the adjacent railroad property. Documentation must be submitted showing authorization for this activity. 8. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warranted. 9. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-04 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING APPLICATION NO. 2013-003 SUBMITTED BY MBC II, LLC/ PAUL HYDE FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE 2008 MINNEAPOLIS BUILDING CENTER II PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (FORMER HOWE FERTILIZER SITE—4821 XERXES AVENUE N.) WHEREAS, the City Council for the City of Brooklyn Center previously considered Planning Commission Application No. 2008-001 submitted by Real Estate Recycling Acquisitions, LLC, which approved the rezoning from I-2 (General Industry) to PUD/1-1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park) of a 5.03 acre site located at the southwest corner of 49h Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard, commonly known as the former Howe Fertilizer Site and addressed as 4821 Xerxes Avenue North("Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, the 2008 Planned Unit Development rezoning also considered the acceptance and approval of a new PUD development plan for a 51,000 sq. ft. office/industrial/warehouse facility on the subject property; and WHEREAS, the City Council, upon favorable recommendation from the Planning Commission, did adopt City Resolution No. 2008-23, which in effect approved the original 2008 Planned Unit Development of the Minneapolis Business Center II Project for the for the Subject Property ; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission also considered Planning Application No. 2013-003, submitted by MBC II, LLC (the successors and assigns of Real Estate Recycling Acquisitions, LLC of the Subject Property), which application comprehends the approval of an Amendment to the 2008 Planned Unit Development, whereby requesting certain and additional modifications and allowances from the 2008 PUD approvals, including: 1. enlarging a pre-approved office/warehouse building from 51,000 sq. ft. to 60,000 sq. ft.; 2. allowing a minor relocation of the new building on the subject parcel; 3. reducing certain boundary setbacks; and 4. allowing a small expansion of new driveway/parking areas, which would impact the required buffer areas required under the established PUD/I-1 District. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 30, 2013,whereby this item was given due consideration, a staff report was presented, and a public hearing was opened to allow for public testimony regarding this planning application, all of which were received and noted for the record. AND WHEREAS, , upon due and proper consideration of this matter, and in light of all testimony received, utilizing the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35- 208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Advisory Commission did formulate a recommendation to be forwarded to the City Council NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED , the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, recommends to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2013- 003 as submitted by MBC 11, LLC, requesting approval of an Amendment to a Planned Unit Development, specifically the 2008 Minneapolis Building Center II Project, be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Amendment to the 2008 Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Amendment to the 2008 Planned Unit Development proposal keeps and maintains for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the 2008 Planned Unit Development Rezoning remains a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards, including those allowed under City Resolution No. 2008-23, which remain in effect or modified herein by this approval. These modifications and standards are contained in the updated 2013 Minneapolis Business Center II Project development/site plans. 4. The Amendment to the 2008 Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Amendment to the 2008 Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, recommends to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2013-003 as submitted by MBC II, LLC, requesting approval of an Amendment to a Planned Unit Development, specifically the 2008 Minneapolis Building Center 11 Project, be approved based upon the following additional allowances and conditions: 1. All previous conditions memorialized in City Resolution No. 2008-23, including those not affected by these new allowances, shall remain in effect and complied with as part of this 2013 PUD Amendment approvals, which are noted as follows: a) The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. b) Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. C) A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all required site improvements. d) B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. e) Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. f) The buildings shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. g) Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. h) Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. i) The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. j) The owner of the property shall enter into an easement and agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems as approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. k) The existing water and sanitary sewer services shall be properly disconnected from city systems in a manner approved by the City Engineer prior to the demolition of existing buildings on the site. 1) Driveway entrance construction is subject to the issuance of permits from the City Engineering Department and compliance with city standards and specifications. m) All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. n) The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion control during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. o) Storm water drainage systems and the detention pond plan shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of permits. P) Approval of this Planned Unit Development acknowledges the I-1 underlying zoning district as authorizing allowable used generally within this development site. This site, however, may not be used as an "adult establishment' as indicated in Section 35-330, Subdivision la, 13. Such uses are specifically prohibited within this Planned Unit Development. q) The owner shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific modifications to the I-1 underlying zoning district as well as all other conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. r) The owner of the property shall execute a deed restriction, as approved by the City Attorney, requiring a small parcel of land lying easterly of this site in the City of Minneapolis and identified as Parcel 2 on the land survey submitted with this proposal binding it to Lot 1, Block 1, Howe, Inc. 2nd Addition so that it shall not be used, sold or conveyed as a separate parcel. Said deed restriction shall be filed with the titles to the properties prior to the issuance of building permits for this project. S) The applicant shall provide the City with assurance that their plan to remediate hazardous substances and petroleum products that present a threat to public health or the environment is acceptable with Mi nnesota Department ment of Agriculture and/or Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards prior to the issuance of building permits. 2 II PUD Plans to increase the Allow a revision from the 2008 MBC proposed office/warehouse building from 51,000 sq. ft. to 60,000 sq. ft.; 3. Allow the minor relocation of the new building on the subject parcel as shown or indicated on the 2013 MBC II PUD Plan set; 4. Allowing the reduced boundary setbacks of the parking area from 15-feet to 10-feet in certain locations; 5. Allowing a small expansion of new driveway/parking areas which would impact the required buffer areas required under the established PUD/I-1 District. 6. The Applicant shall provide a paved pedestrian/bicycle connection between the parking lot area near the front entryway leading out to the existing sidewalk along Osseo Road. 7. All conditions or requirements as noted in the City Engineer's Review q tY Memorandum, dated May 23, 2013 and referenced herein shall be complied with as part of this 2013 PUD Amendment approvals 8. Execution of a PUD Amendment agreement as prepared by the City Attorney. May 30. 2013 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners , , and and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Member Kay Lasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2008-23 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2008-001 SUBMITTED BY REAL ESTATE RECYCLING ACQUISITIONS,LLC WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2008-001 submitted by Real Estate Recycling Acquisitions, LLC proposes rezoning from I-2 (General Industry) to PUD/I-1 (Planned Unit Development/Industrial Park) of a 5.03 acre site located at the southwest corner of 49th Avenue North and Brooklyn Boulevard and currently addressed as 4821 Xerxes Avenue North; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the above mentioned property and development plan approval for a 51,000 sq. ft. office/industrial/warehouse facility on that lot;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on February 14, 2008 when a staff report and public testimony regarding the rezoning and development plan were received;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2008-001 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2008-01 on February 14,2008;and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 2008-001 at its February 25,2008 meeting;and WHEREAS,the City Council considered this Planned Unit Development request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development ordinance contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2008-001 submitted by Real Estate Recycling Acquisitions, LLC. be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. I RESOLUTION NO. 2008-23 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards except for allowing drive lane encroachments into the 100 ft. and 50 ft. buffer requirements where industrial uses abut R-1 zoned property at a property line and a street line respectively. These modifications from the I-1 standards are justified on the basis of the development being an appropriate redevelopment of this area and that they are offset or mitigated by various factors contained in the approved site plan. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 6. Based upon the above considerations,it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating rezonings as contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is,therefore,in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2008-001 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all required site improvements. 4. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. 6. The buildings shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. i RESOLUTION NO.- 2008-23 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property,improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance guarantee. 10. The owner of the property shall enter into an easement and agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems as approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of building permits. 11. The existing water and sanitary sewer services shall be properly disconnected from city systems in a manner approved by the City Engineer prior to the demolition of existing buildings on the site. 12. Driveway entrance construction is subject to the issuance of permits from the City Engineering Department and compliance with city standards and specifications. 13. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 14. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion control during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 15. Storm water drainage systems and the detention pond plan shall be approved by the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of permits. 16. Approval of this Planned Unit Development acknowledges the I-1 underlying zoning district as authorizing allowable used generally within this development site. This site,however,may not be used as an"adult establishment"as indicated in Section 35-330,Subdivision la, 13. Such uses are specifically prohibited within this Planned Unit Development. 17. The owner shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific modifications to the I-1 underlying zoning district as well as all other conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 18. The owner of the property shall execute a deed restriction,as approved by the City Attorney,requiring a small parcel of land lying easterly of this site in the City of Minneapolis and identified as Parcel 2 on the land survey submitted with this I . RESOLUTION NO. 2008-23 proposal binding it to Lot 1,Block 1,Howe,Inc. 2nd Addition so that it shall not be used,sold or conveyed as a separate parcel. Said deed restriction shall be filed with the titles to the properties prior to the issuance of building permits for this project. 19. The applicant shall provide the City with assurance that their plan to remediate hazardous substances and petroleum products that present a threat to public health or the environment is acceptable with Minnesota Department of Agriculture and/or Minnesota Pollution Control Agency standards prior to the issuance of building permits. February 25,2008 Date Mayor ATTEST: ZK City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member P g g Y Dan Ryan and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Tim Willson, Kay lasman, Mary O'Connor, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. OPUS® Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. MI[NN is _ EAPCL Tv-7 C BUSIN aS CEN R 11 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN M31 7410 01/17/08 L DJz x Dv+m n R.11EMERS K.MOORE LOCATION MAP DRAWING INDEX —aacaralhre-, •trek�a-at ,I. .I., op,•.rot reap°-sihk for any cI s,damage or upmio odsmg aM of ina u,wuara.a�. CS COVER SHEET of tM i-brmak-co-m�n•a.n Nectronic like. CIVIL .C-1c rlx.may-a accumtMy r.rka m. 1-b.ilt co-daio-s.It is t4 C7.0 SITE SURVEY nzp IbilBy of Ihx u xr to—ify all C1.1 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS layout dimmskm a-d other rxlmxa �O O C7.2 PRELI MINARY m RY GRADING PLAN 'mormatlon C2.1 SAN.SEWER&WATER •mlz d«u t may-ot be used o `D C3.1 STORM SEWER PLAN cupid xith°at p,m,—ittx-co-se-t� 13.2 EXISTING DRAINGAGE CONDTIONS 0 it rigMS reserved C3.3 DRAINAGE DESIGN C14 PRE—DEVELOPMENT DRANAGE CALCULATIONS 49th Ave. N. C3.5 POST—DEVELOPMENT DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS OIMm AND DEVELOPED BY, LANDSCAPING SITE L7 CONCEPT LANDSCAPE PLAN Real Estateing EXISTING MEG 1 ARCHITECTURAL AI.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A7.2 NOT USED rwxcf AA I ARCHITECTURAL E SITE PLAN SITE SECTIONS MINNEAPOLIS A3.1 BUILDING ELEVATIONS 45th qve. N. BUSINESS ELECTRICAL CENTER II ES10 PHOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN N BROOKLYN CENTER,MN BROOKLYN CENTER, MN �::,�r COVER SHEET ���� CS SITE DATA ZONING: CRISPING:1-2(I DTSTN PaOPOO D(PLANNED AT DEVELOPMENT) /♦1 OPUS. SITE AREA s.o5 a "N.-E.1. WILDING AREA so.oOO GS.E. Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. PARKING REQUIREMENTS: zoc orTTC'E'a RER CROSS FLOOR AREA(TA)- I1.-EFA O 1/100 Sf.TOTAL STRUS REQUIRED 60 CN ROE:Ft RENC"`AREA PER GROSS FLOOR AISA(GEA)- 1$000 G.EA 0 I/BOO SE.TOTAL SCALES REWIRED- NO GAS w uaa.a-Otto PARKING REQUIRED: 1zo - Im 49th Ave. North PARKING PROVIDED E�51 ON SUMMARY: srARDam sraLS: 114 - - �d' b; 1waDICOP AccE5slelf sraLS: B -_ ToTI 1-0: 120 1'2" R�gS'0 PROPOSED --- / LANDSCAPE WILDING SETBACK REQUIREMENTS: i tflAl BUFFER \ 50' BUFFER REQUIREMENT a��'e Hmnr raro: 10' •\ 1. (PROPOSED NO PARKING RESTRICTION) v , 1 2n S1DE ram,INTERCA t0' �V_POY o M R INRD. 50' 74- � EAR WE ram,coaNEa- so' 1 ---_-__ � 0 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS: C lP NEW e' ay° 10'-0"SCREENING WALL PUBLIC wart❑wnr, 15 CEDAR FENCE e 12 -----_ SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS ABUTNG RESIDENTIAL \1/� Whte o p,,t 1-1 a 1-1&1bkprtrent 001 any resge bi dM10(RI thraugn RI)NIA,OI o Q or a pubic—Im burl.pronsrons11 be N d' M ocrortl rg tP tM kbt.i g A)Wham 1-1 0,1-2 b,t,R1 Rz or R.t,t o- ,,,tr ht,the p—,atop ffi 11 be.o es, DRIVE-IN I a o PNZONCK fl" mon 100 fmt.eft TN. .deabm Nrp an t be d fl,PI-9,dIn-Y Of Nrmt 1 DOORS \ SE Imdnq or alPr.q.and shol pa.rN.mped Park g or b pemiltM n tM bull.,atnp.hare on �s j 1 w z uae abut.pn FLORA.l umJ t RNNt not.Rand to elhn 15 reel of Ixa ,open,r my .d b-t mo e-tat.on opaR ft..w.tll,h'n 0,11 1 ..1 d.nxa 10 j I N of . 1 t ynl N..r me r ig re d Vn dmb ba tl b 1 clr cpaaa oa bang. h am M Inc reewemgl mW e1hrood d p qht,R p b rq 1 t 0 I I NG. Ouslrip p a..Ith,th.a a slap be egm 1 1 hcgM.IDe rolaUre slr'p sxa canldn no �� sbonpr�olx.r uov Ix.oppr e I a o<• 1 - - I B)ep a 1 or 1 ob 1 1 z R3 a p b so- I Im w 1 Mix sVR sna --_--- be . 50.0e A 1 IM1e IM "rig h.Kas sxo rrol -4 g oil N 1 ood ng.forage Nrm"d 1 I M M be ROPOSED GREEN "'as wraROpea.a 'm y m mrml ed-n UN bN 1' M a z wls oe DS CAPE BUFFER .. I I I ;-0 NarNl w ced n am t artand m TM1 s.N t e wopeny .xUwy orma j t,' a el cil tt�naa from ro.d the re.itlrA'1 dalricl ro V.W 10, oppro.M q j19,0 Na C�tY Counc CHAPTER 3: USE/OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION PROPOSED GREEN 3 J — I I NON-SEPARATED USES mR ExnRE WImINC(sECrroN Y)2.31)LANDSCAPE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5 r -------- - — 11 aLawpac aLOwAA1R ALLawAEEE coxsrxucnox i EXISTING FENCE -ENCROACHMENT 9 USE GROUP AR(A/EEOOR HEmxr sTOx¢s PYPE TO REMAIN `&. I � \ s_I __ \ al1..wP(wT.>I b. I j P w.wPDP,d' I \ B 1..rlm 1NI.R t 1a j 31 \\ NE MOST STRINGENT TYPE Q CONSTRUCTION USED 11-B _ I 26 SE➢a\ RRE ONS BETWEEN USES NOT REQUIRED,E EPT AS REQUIRED BY OTHER MR SIGNS r___-----_ DRIVE-1N CHAPTER 6:CONSTRUCTION TYPES/REQUIREMENTS 1 - I I \ 1 DOORS 1 SECTION TYPE REQUIREMENTS(TABLE 6-A) IBC REQUIREMENT W EXCEPTION 01117108 PLANNING/PUD SUBMITTAL ( I 1 p rAac al E-e 1. sTaOCnAME m c o las 08/23/IO REVISED OLD SUBMITTAL ----- 1 03/26//1 I o 3 PUD AMENDMENT I I 1 rAgf eo1 4. Now-8,,m wens-EXNERbOR o Na a I 1 s n0t-eMm1G PMRDNs-motor O IWa B. FLOORS t FLOOR/_ D N5 S z4'-0• 1. woofs a REED,/au1GS o Nn I I 1 UC 41 A 1.1 t 9E4RT ENCLOSIFES 0 NR 4'-0' 1 ns B. urNaDR DOORS a mN—S GREATER Taw x'-o' 0HNS HATCHING INDICATES N I 11 M / HEAVY BITUMINOUS 11 PAVEMENT, j I w i H.C. 11 ow N'.. Pond e I 1 PaDA xM,1ER 1 M37_7410 --__—_ I H.C. 11 / I I 1 03p�/26/1�a3 �_—_ W L�WM0.5 / - I 1 E YARD FRONT G.HAWKINS / a occl®ar ROW SETBACK=10' G.HAWKINS 11 .b-,t m Deco, tM U.n.ma.lon N _ opw carom as of / - r pansble ror FLY 1bin'dompges / - I I 1 Natroma ixa.m. _ 1 eyrenma 9 out cool Em orwMRnm ua. 1 � files / 18'-0' - I I �- I 1 4 •Dectroric res mq not ur to reflect 1 Ihep(nol a bull cond do Il a the es ons b'I'ty or Ixe t.user to ver Cy all Ipyouls dmena'rona pntl other re sled / 167 _ •nmmo Thpdm e may 1 41'-3 z4'-0• Ahol Et..u.ed o content. L - DRIVE-IN DOORS �� - ---41'-3--_ --a-y 11,-• o0 0 ; ®dl,gds ramr.aa -`\`• �,1``` 10 I ---a - 1 j 1 ; owxm AND DEVfmttD Br: I 1 \ I 4'-C' ,- Real Esti Recycling \`• `\\ .. -- H.C. I PwucT 103.6•I MINNEAPOLIS H.C. BUSINESS CENTERII \-` BROOKLYN�Rf(gArE � I (LYN CENTER,MN ARCHITECTURAL \ - ----- SITE PLAN SIDE YARD BUILDING SETBACK L A CROSS SECTION 2.5'CAL W,SWAMP WHITE' /SPRUCE,'BUCK HILLS" ces2.51 B CROSS SECTION (—,'\CROSS SECTION IN OPUS® Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. 01117109 PLANNING/PUD SUBMITTAL 03/26/13 PUD ADMENDMENT M37-7410 03/26/13 L DUMAS as W R.SIEMERS K.MOORE .Ermra mq oc m the—emms W elect-fU,I,The opua coop .m not rwponaiEle to ony cl s,Eamagea or upmaea—.,wl of IM viwtM1Orizetl sae of tM inlormNion contained in electronic •Elec4onic tiles mq na cwmMIt i,th, —rmety ftcoo 11,Dsthe rcsponai duly of IM1e u er to verily all IayoWa.dimenYnna and other rNaled inlomgtbn. •Thiz document may not Mused o copied eith-Drw mitten conacMr ®DII rigMa reterrN o.w AVD DEYFlOCN V, Real Estate Recycling MINNEAPOLIS BUSINESS CENTERII BROOKLYN CENTER MN ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN SITE SECTIONS �w.�e A1 .3 i� OPUS® Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. I I I 366'-9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ———— -----------------F------------- A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ———— --------------————----------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1------- --------- —— I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I - - I I I I I I I I I — I I I I I I I I I --- -------- ---- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------i------ ------- -- i — ----------- -- -----;- ------ ---�--------� -------------T --------T --------fi------------T----------- -----; I I I I I I I I I M37_7410 I I I I I 03/26/13 I I I I I I I I I I �BNB e R.SIEMERS —r-- K.MOORS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •�may is the wmmisapa of I I I I I I I I I I resPas��a"'en°p�b�mare.w I I I I I I I I I 1 e-a. we:p as oo the.bmpHb m W tl,e T(omMion nloinetl i NMranc k. •ElecboNC Yes^bY nol ptturolNY ellect the foal-s-buAl c ndtions.M Me layounsibility-t the u er to verity dl ts,dimensions and other related intwmolion. s document may not be usetl o -pied xdh-ut prior written consent 0 all dgMZ rezenetl anrvm rao oeic�opcb ar: Z® ��FIRST FLOOR PLAN ®_ Estate i;;c mg MINNEAPOLIS BUSINESS CENTER II BROOKLYN CENTER,MN ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN I N-IR A2.1 PARTED STEEL SUPPORT BRACKET PANTED METµCANOPY GOTH TENSION ROD SUPPORTS ■ I „ SOUTH ELEVATION t/ta.t•-0• L RAKED FINISH 3 PA 16"HIGH PARTED BANDS AT HAEED FINISH PAMELS- ANT. !1► I=1■1= OVERFLOW SCUPPER I BUILDING MOUNTED UGHT. I PRECAST PANEL LOCATION,tYP. .vo PANTED 12'A 14' / 1 INSULATED,O.H.OWVE-IN DOOR 42"HIGH$AFE11'RAUNC,� LINE INDICATES NN. BOOR LEVEL-0 PANT COLOR BELOW THUS LINE. m � NORTH ELEVATION 10 COPING NETµ 1N2"LATER f1NI5H—ED I I coPlNC � I svAUITTED croNC.vANELS � \. n— PANTED 8'+9'INSULATED 12'K 14'INSULATED O.H. PANTED METµSTAR O.H.DOOR W/DOCK ORNS-N—1 BUMPERS I—)LEVELER PANTED H.M.MR AND BY OTHERS. FRAME C-) %1 WEST ELEVATION 1/fa-t'-0' MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE BUILT-lIP SYNTHETIC OISCRIFF. IUILi-UP SYNHETIC UNFOLDED a 4 STUCCO(I I.F.S.)CORNICE BY STUCCO CONTRACTOR iTUCCO(E I GS.)CORNICE IY STUCCO CONTRACTOR ( {j ) \Y�/ C PANTED STEEL PLATE TO MATCH SUPPORT BRACKETS /\ 2"SMOOTH FINISH ACCENT PANT SMOOTH FINISH MONTGOMERY WHITE ,EONC E INSULATED :ANC.PANELS-PANiO On RE REVERSE INSULATED, CONC.PANELS-PAM - ANTED STEEL TO LATCH iUPPORT BRACKET e o BENJAMIN-MOORE PANTED STEEL SUPPORT © Ll O BRACKET CLEAR ANODIZED OR EOUN- 'aNTEU METµCANOPY STUCCO CONTRACTOR BENJAMIN-MOORS 01102-BD,MDWµK BUILDI SUPPORTS HM,p00R5 IC "'TIED WSUUTED BOGY-PANT n -AT BASE :LASS N CLEAR AVW. V_UM.THERMO-WR FAMES MOUNTED INSULATED <0> DOCK DOORS - TBD - OMETA FINER NA-CLAD GRINER RtCTOR - - -IS. - OVISION G1,SS VNACON VE14-21II/CARIBM HIS OR E011µ " —RAW D.9k CA401 —IN •«. ������������������� fin\ WITH TENS ON • GLASS ENTRY DOOR I—) Pm 0 DoWN CUTOFF 1.TINTED.—GLASS THERBIO-ORM FRAMES OVERFLOW SCUPPER I BUILDING MOUNTED UGHT. I PRECAST PANEL LOCATION,tYP. .vo PANTED 12'A 14' / 1 INSULATED,O.H.OWVE-IN DOOR 42"HIGH$AFE11'RAUNC,� LINE INDICATES NN. BOOR LEVEL-0 PANT COLOR BELOW THUS LINE. m � NORTH ELEVATION 10 COPING NETµ 1N2"LATER f1NI5H—ED I I coPlNC � I svAUITTED croNC.vANELS � \. n— PANTED 8'+9'INSULATED 12'K 14'INSULATED O.H. PANTED METµSTAR O.H.DOOR W/DOCK ORNS-N—1 BUMPERS I—)LEVELER PANTED H.M.MR AND BY OTHERS. FRAME C-) %1 WEST ELEVATION 1/fa-t'-0' MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE BUILT-lIP SYNTHETIC OISCRIFF. IUILi-UP SYNHETIC NUM ER COLDR FINISH STUCCO(I I.F.S.)CORNICE BY STUCCO CONTRACTOR iTUCCO(E I GS.)CORNICE IY STUCCO CONTRACTOR ( {j ) \Y�/ C PANTED STEEL PLATE TO MATCH SUPPORT BRACKETS /\ 2"SMOOTH FINISH ACCENT PANT SMOOTH FINISH MONTGOMERY WHITE ,EONC E INSULATED :ANC.PANELS-PANiO On RE REVERSE INSULATED, CONC.PANELS-PAM - ANTED STEEL TO LATCH iUPPORT BRACKET e o BENJAMIN-MOORE PANTED STEEL SUPPORT Ll WNTED StEE2 SUPPORT IPACKET BRACKET CLEAR ANODIZED OR EOUN- 'aNTEU METµCANOPY PANTED METAL CANOPY TH TENSION ROD BENJAMIN-MOORS 01102-BD,MDWµK Y I1H TENS ON ROD II TI S SUPPORTS HM,p00R5 "'TIED WSUUTED BOGY-PANT n -AT BASE :LASS N CLEAR AVW. V_UM.THERMO-WR FAMES #105-VETO BEACH TAN ACCENT BAMOS-PANT n <0> OVERFLOW SCUPPER I BUILDING MOUNTED UGHT. I PRECAST PANEL LOCATION,tYP. .vo PANTED 12'A 14' / 1 INSULATED,O.H.OWVE-IN DOOR 42"HIGH$AFE11'RAUNC,� LINE INDICATES NN. BOOR LEVEL-0 PANT COLOR BELOW THUS LINE. m � NORTH ELEVATION 10 COPING NETµ 1N2"LATER f1NI5H—ED I I coPlNC � I svAUITTED croNC.vANELS � \. n— PANTED 8'+9'INSULATED 12'K 14'INSULATED O.H. PANTED METµSTAR O.H.DOOR W/DOCK ORNS-N—1 BUMPERS I—)LEVELER PANTED H.M.MR AND BY OTHERS. FRAME C-) %1 WEST ELEVATION 1/fa-t'-0' MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE KEY OISCRIFF. MANUFACTURER NUM ER COLDR FINISH COMMENTS ACCENT PANT BENJAMIN-MOORE MONTGOMERY WHITE On SPANDREL GLASS - - OR E"" PA BENJAMIN-MOORE #1101-FENNEL SEED O µUINUY FRAMES DECO CLEAR ANODIZED OR EOUN- PAM BENJAMIN-MOORS 01102-BD,MDWµK O HM,p00R5 TBD OPAM -AT BASE BENJAMIN-MOORS #105-VETO BEACH TAN <0> DOCK DOORS - TBD - OMETA FINER NA-CLAD KYxAR 5O0/SILVER METALLIC O - - - - OVISION G1,SS VNACON VE14-21II/CARIBM HIS OR E011µ i� OPUS® Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. 01/17/08 PLANNING/PUO SUBMITTAL 03/26/13 PUD ADMENDMENT rullMn M37-74108 03/26/13 L Olu 1p R�SSIIEMERS K.LMOORE •Er—moy Dc n the lruna—w.of ekclronic LAS.1M Opue cmgar�in m not evw.smM Iw o.y oa aaRlagx o OtI U.mwisroiy ooW cM o o.i e Iwmolina uu m MecLrvAt NMS. D l o e agN-W n om ottly relk l the Final fit.! —Pitions.H i.the responsibility W the user Lo-rAy RI 'f y,0,,ailNema.o P.a om.r r.mWa aor.—P.ropy col a osae o< coDiN without prior wrttm consent. ®oll ngMS reserrM OWNED AND DEVELOPED BY: Real EstatefRecyc_ MINNEAPOLIS BUSINESS CENTER II BROOKLYN CENTER,MN BUILDING ELEVATIONS D IAa�K A3.1 GenExAL nmFS. OPUS -DwDSCAPE CUnTRA eecSNco�sTYLEixir PanuAa 58 DAYLILY'STELLA-DE-ORO" r Wm1 SIBS COGDmons. O POT. 24"O.C. ROUGH AN FINISH GRADING TO BE DONE BY 9 FEATHER REED GRASS C Opus Architects 8 orxERS. 6"DIA. POT. 24.O.C. CALBB. Engineers,Inc. GRaUNTING WpL RE wSTALIBD uH1'11,aLL DD 0 CONSTRUCTION HAB BEEN GOMPIETE� ,4NER cAe�S X Eg511NG TREES to I4 coxDOTls.WIRES,EO..ory r1¢PR1P1.10. 'N BE RENOYED pt# r-a N. V THERE IS A DIECREPNANCT BNEIWEeN THE _1 11 PUNTS x Ye.ER O,au s sx._w TR E Purr_.ME + + N�TRW I¢mlY.m, PRECSOEBF OSR ON wnl POLY cotrtAwER a xlEx wTarAIe TYOxrxspo.x w ) RUG METAL PHI FENCE on or rxa nYE_RI—Y—THE uresr PATCH PH I PROJECT AND MEIJ.R SSiIOCK,A11 1 assocunon of RD FOR NDRRERY R�T NA Cr.1/ALL AND 91RUB5 ROCK REf.W NONUYENT SIGN TO PROPERTY FWON PUNTIRG MULCH IACA170N OP�E oNtU NEF PLANT oTEBAL THROUGH ONE 3"DEEP ROCK MULCH 0-t/z"CAL re�.(uRC 11 POLY EDGER ® �D 11�IRRIGATION J T i.¢.A6RS rn"n'o:EirGNeD oaRF"aeo°vlsio�Riai'r cGEP'PTAncue. `__Y -ALL ROP��PUNTS c BUN¢ GCATEU a OUCH SEEDDC APPROVED�BY uNDSCAPE aRCH11ECl'BEFORE THEME 10'SCREENING 4 DOGWOOD ISANTT 6 FEATHER REED GRASS 1 D' 1 30"HT. CONT.5'O.C. 6"DIA, POT. 24"O.C. x can suBSmmE NACxwe MOVED 12 DWARF WINGED EUONYNO 8 BLACK CHOKEBERRY 1A11-1111C a A B wrrx unosC�ee AAxxPIReeCls�Pxov.U1 fvx PROPERTY LINE 30"HT. CONT.5'O.C. 24"HT. CONT.3'O.C. 12 YEW 'TAUNTON SPREADI 36 5 VIA 7fAY T G �'R TB&'.'OVED ONTO TNT SIIZ ARE UDC FBo4 som.AR 24"DIA. CONT.5'O.C. S"DIA. EXISTING FENCE 22 NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM 27 RAM TOOs (NEASBm T s�V 1.—_roueN.e¢avr TO REMAIN 30"HT. CONT. B'O.C. B`CONT.CONT.2'O.C. IJGN Do.). 6 ARCADIA JUNIPER roNO .IF REQ.—To�PR�vIDE 24'DIA. CON75 O.C. tr ROLnAND REBATED BYEME THIS 3`DEEP ROCK MULCH PRO BE nA�L PmsPECnoN APPROVAL Has BEEN cfVEN POLY EDGER 3"ROOD MULCH POLY EDGER BY UNDSCAPE ARCHITECTS. -11MPPING YATERUL SIIaIJ.BE CORRUCATeD TREE 9 SP UCE 'BLACK HILLS' TORE I'Du. 5'HT. B. 27 DOGWOOD CONT.5'O.C. r 3 SERVICEBERRY 2 RIVER BIRCH MULTI-STEM) SPRUCE,'BUCK HILI$ 11 1— PRIOR l0 12/1 AND sxa 8'NT. BB. 12'HT. BB, 5'HT. Be. TUBES BELIES SPECIFIED OlT6R1rISE.SHAD. 191 ARCTIC WILLOW S 30"HT. CONT.6'O.C. 5 RSUcK ia1cHT"m EDGErs oR uuTL.I.— 2 WEEPING WILLOW ER ZS"CAL. BB. I�NN)OCR RIVER ROCK IMM WE®CHEK C/10TH-Ou W PROPERTY LB4E NEED S'DEEP WOOD IIIILCN SELL BE wSIADEU UNDER AIJ,TEERE AN O SHR eaouNG7—AREAS AND GENERAL BNN-NAINES. POND LANDSCAPE FABRIC(FILTER NAT)TO NAYS A COIwIXED TOR EY OF SHOTUI BE U.Y.STABUZED AND HAVE A FrvE YEAR FABRIC TO BE PNIIL DUON IS PROW EGIRV SUNNID,GHT Re9UwD Po -AU TB665 R R_RECEVEIRRILATTON 411 SAL "PAY NICHT" -AIL PUNTING RHAD.RECEIVE FERnuZER AS 8"DIA. POT. 24"O.C. TB DAYWLT Rmo SNaYrI rERAND FAD.PLANING-BNANUTAROPS RIMIER _ B`CONT.CONT.2'O.C. outro PuN'Ar TxE RAre or 1-2 Oz cAN PE P 1EHITE" 7 CADIA NN PER S-S,C_irP�Rx TIIESS.I AMOUNT or Sl op tOx 2 1/2-CALBB. 24"DIA. CON75'O.C. 01/17/08 PLANNING/PUD SUBMITTAL rxe ro I IT sME DB/23/10 REVISED PUD SUBMITTAL 03/26/13 PUD AMENDMENT PRSOD RRED WHERE TIPPULABIEO TO Be UFO NPARARA.— POLY EDGER E.I.xAU B I SwmBE".=Oaox SEC ,O."E IB"MAINT.EDG ME EItISriNOEGRADES WrtH`E!D M1_V.TOR ro. 3'DEEP ROCK MULCH MIN rwlRH OF AND To PULING SOOD,TCON==`R SHNL APPLY 17-6.4 FERN.IZER AT THE RATE OF 10 POUNDS PER 1000 SO.FI. 8 TR ARCADW JUNIPER -CALP D,ER Or AEE TRUN16 uP To AND 24"DIA. CONTS'O.C. ..DUN. STOEI.AND 12 ABOYEeBEDGEDU ISVe1.FOR LINGER 3663. PROPERTY LINE 3`DEEP ROCK YULC 4881 YWEP IB"MAIDG EDG sP1 -HAIL HaYE YINWON OF EIFE NO xIN AT SP.. xncN uxuss OTxsRmSE POLY EDGER NOTED w PLANT DST. M37_7410 AD.PUNTING A 9 RECgYING GxOUNDCOYeR,_ B"DEPTH OF PLUTIa1GNSOLL(4Rx TOPSOR.45xAPEAT 03/26/13 ON NANDRI lox BAND). 14 HONEYLOCUST 'IMPERIAL Ivma NNYCn 2 1/2'CAL.BB. L.DUMAS PeRENRW3 ARE PLANTED. n _TFR NAT RBl BE IN 3 RIVER BH2CH MULTI-STEM) SMWR TIDW 2". All Ofl�p PERENNIAL BEDS Z EIPI% By 12'HT. BH. FABRIC arro A O DEPrx OF NuLCx. GFE ME conrRACroR F_AN ExROa xas esEx 21 SALVIA 'MAY MIGHT' tlaOE ME REGARDING SPNACING OR IBEGMEER OF A 8 W SPIR B"DIA. POT. 24"O.C. •Errm may oca<m IM NmameaP.d NOTIFY T16 LwDRCAPEaRLHflecl'APRIOPNro 1'He COFIX O.C. A.W.SPIR n;<Na 1 0p mrpo ws TION or PUNT NATENLV. 12"HT. CON7.30'O.C. n,pon<LY Ia O <mi eamageao .pxnsm—,..N.<uw�tlrtttl ur -AD.xEWLr wsrauED PLwr NAreaBtl.sxul BE UR U - Y) 0 BR'mfam ., n m r.. sxAU,avow w _. Purci oiLNSTERw.�x 10'HT. BB fla. DRAINAGE�s�W�WROn WSr�o-Poour DRTUxm AREAS. 'th.ism a: t—M—S.aIt 'th.SAM LBO./AC.ATH 2N MIR SHREDDEDAAND PAN YFI�RD I N y w,' O nldmot on lY of Me user fa wrefyo all IN E AC�CBPPER ALT.HYDIEOSEEDING G PLANT LIST E Ceminen i Debn,aal Namla Slaa Cent Ramarka 1 I-1../'11\ BAP 1 0 on tl Vumant may not In uons o w/ISeut Im E-,/Y UI. !• ,a<r Oat ayml'GUpI .r.\ten c ant. a oa a«.owmr:.r�. nn• :,rz m. n e,ght ,a.. 000 AND OVIEDO Be a Pn IWNK arms ,r n,. eta ViDE " TE 12 WM,.A.n-111".ul0 Srml ,0 hr a0 unwsTU coNPACr so - r >: Pm. �h�p n + Real Estate Re�cycl n . ,"'.;; W. ...III a.<:r.. / m..v�..o..nwna.a W IN C-4 Y�..s<. h,. nnerv. 1a r.®>a Wn Dx P.nwG.D ZN ol�w.ea W.N. w m c<.r. Y.s<...®ao h, ros°9zLsBB°Gr zz am�..m�m >Dh, r..><. 2 DECnuousarnss �,_Tj;=Z.„�,Ysf�.nD MINNEAPOLIS ••a>o KD 9D1E P.M.—N.E LANDSCAPE POINT SYSTEM CALCULATIONS L R�ro, "'”" / Y BUSINESS .. ° xEN CENTER II REQUIRED. , z.-ht u., r...><....®z.w< w.co c — n.xnnc Y,xvONS / \ 5.03Ares/LI ht lndusuiel••Ares @/5 Ius3ALres @60- 330 n ♦w.s�lr ,r m. c<m. o A.amN. 9 P Credn nor eAisun 70 -r^' san soa acv. wrsm'`R 9 ao A>°<..I.„�,'�a...•' • z.a... c<.,. Fla s�ASas°'.' ` IT OF IauTGI, REOUIRED POINTS 260 P DRracE oR uWn BROOKLYN CENTER,MN SHOWN. uxo xw.I2 Pu Roc r •> a e yxry NypWns 29 Shede Trees 10 290 CONCEPT axx a ovlN 22 ConAert 6 132 M 0.WIIIW WYlrae' a an vd ® 0� .Dt�ALIDD>DIL LANDSCAPE PLAN 17 Ornamental Trees @ 1.5 25.5 ',Eµy n pK' COhFEFTOIS 131f1UB CONFEROU9 THEE DECDUOU9 TREE �\DECDUOU9 TREE 254 Shrubs®0.5 127 ,n sr�.,w».Ya xrP..,hr a al. nw 3 q TOTAL POINTS SHOWN 574.5 ,s on..W..an.R..s r I. Pa ID 901E NO SINE �5 IEN191END 9CxE sOAD 91E 1p Sf/1E a _. _ c.'..w�o,na.rw..:•.x.n�o,or«mw c.o, L1.0 L LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE /b ilG DESOM"ON — DSTRBURDH WWUFMIIRER GThOG MNBTR F•PWI MOB - BUNDINC MOUNTED AREA D)AbbW w R• Luhrx 'vNHR-Fr-•m-x-M-Ir%• aADK 1 Opus Architects& SO HEAD DOWIILKRR Engineers,Inc. B9t BUILDING MOUNTED TAU (1)17M MX RD LLY.VM 'YJbm-R}1]5-%-M-BUt' BMf I BUILDING MOUNTED MEA GLI GROUND MOUNTED SIGN (1)17M MN NOFIMJL UWIM YIHMS-K NF-175-%-115/1' MN]( FLOODUGM W/WSOR of-w-•539 roe W.11 BUILDING MOUNTED WALL (1)mW MX RO LU]NnE -ePD-H70-X• Bu01 I PACK NOTES' 1. GOORDINATE LOCATION WITH ME ITECTUNAL DRAWINGS. 1. COORDINATE LOCkPON WITH I DSCME DRAWINGS. I i j GENERAL NOTES IIar-aao abo hm'•aw oar-; - `rmoPERTY cALCUUTrox ar¢ IDX1D t aW/m5 aai i[a'1Fr1-arr!n$ an n _._....._. _.___._ i ygalllf°"nW aaR oo➢b. . . /h n BD UaNw DV Rtrr H'r:N h{r n,r fifr.a m PMKING-FAST PPo(nc/ODI NC DOCK- ' f! WST ➢Y M DW na bn-aT m n oz}tell o3tl rOr bz b] ILLUMRNCE VALUES(FC)AVERAGE 1.sr LLUMINANCE VS(FC)AERGE 2.21 6. n n aul w, av o vR °..a vo 00 0o vo t "a,.d m w"ar OD as'bA""°.f oa bs os o♦ a• aL_rd_0.•-,?.• am�,m . avx f MX M 11.1 111 NIIMUM= 10.5 MINIMUM 0.0 AVG/MIN MTIO I05 da hx v.ot nmo.m _.... ......... YA%/MIN RATIO.105 b.m no ° t w )oa la to :v y. t. t t R• aJ w_� PROPERTY b.W no ov as by o0 0o t al ,J ]a ]] s Pa P• vJ !! xo ,v tv to t• la la\ at aw oo ALL PATMING LOT MD E%IERIIXi LUMINAIRES,UNLESS NOTED GMERNISE, m ax'm a.A 1> !• v.b • SIWL HAVE A 90 DECREE CUT-OFF MCLE. ROUNDMY ,W a / _ 0°t 'm .R t 'm �• h> ! h m P m x ♦ .> m al �m o_oI • ALL LUMINAIRES SHALL HAYS TEMPERED GlA OPTICS MD LENSES. i`t 05 hw 'a0 'oo ➢° ➢o b.o 0 v at.as d{b L ,• b.z S.• as to•tla G • xv ].e z.a S.z 's5 ,.a 'eP bJ 'a.Yw m °J b.Yb, ti.t °m • THESE ME SCHEMATIC TYPE IXUMNGS ONLY TO BE COORDINATED WISH ME PERFM—E SPECVICATQNS FOR THE PURPOSES BF BIDDING FGR aao oa ➢ v of wj a 1 - 0 Q ]..>.• 5, z.R z.v zl s♦ ro Y b• "J bM bA j. hl am SUBCONTRACTORS ONLY am v p BB1 BB1 .'. THE FINOL DES S THE SOLE 1R5PoNSBIUTY O THE SUBCONTRACTORS m .o a , .] •] ta5 3 3 I`b• \ ooz ENGINEER WIIO SHALL BE REGISTERED IN THE STATE OF MIS PROTECT. E. 4\j SUBMIT FNAL DESIGN DOCUMENTS TO OPUS Y➢ S ME FOR REW Me MPROVAL PROR TO COMMENCEMENT OF WORK,SUBMIT ALL CHANGES AND m a t a n ♦ ]J +ajy om FNAL AS-BOLT DOCUMENTS FOR RENEW MO MP k. 0. oR m m a m at at ax a,,_11 bJ ,J t ama 0] n 0. LI \hW BR, Be,Sda Fm].> ., a.' em 01/17/08 PUMNING/PUD SUBMITTAL aW m a.W ym ° �- 03/26/13 PUD AMENDMENT om hm e• oo a.v D.R v.v v.R v.o 00 0.0 R.o no tla v.e °. °., DA •a •3 L 1> IJ v o, a °m aw a as 'a• , r a.w ° 0. 1. o.o v. o av .o o.o 3 • , x e x o om D.oi aW m v.v v tla bo e.e o.o m m a° as ao wl a .:y •n u W ] a hMM aw w o.o b.o o m av Ra av o0 0o m ao ao ao ao at x;0.1 a ,a S.o 5, •tl a• ee, Be,�v♦0.v sa a ,a m m o m 0.t ht o.p1 •� b.a, 'a.m o0 o m ntI T� -RO DAO L bm hm.m m o...o o a 11,."m m..o o o ➢bo..a a Dm. ➢b'm 0 o oo o b. h➢a o° ➢ o °.n,o t 1 t t t aa.j JJ P _ m ,a..'bu u,.,.t•`, ba >mN v 5•' HB, Q Y _]1v a.•. -la aJ as a°o,r-.- am m b bpW bm'W.m 9 0UN0aRo o _D.wRm P M E77M4'M10 ERIY ]a4.1 mBwN E BoUrvom DWS it a t m m W.LUD G S ER ➢.b m o a ba aJ bJ O4 m �.b a ao DL h A _ I A $. Y 1 �] . I ] ht m IIo y ba o.o o..bJ m m bb ba b. oa a mm -b 5'h N tJ ). > a] a, aI ba Da 'm 1p11 `C f GREFF h. bb r t a bo ao bJ bo as m m a m n D o Otl D n• m -.t ♦ b 7 ] a BBt 1 • h, ht m m 'm •E i iMt hW ao b.v v.o J m m m m m •D m. 9 m. b.t z a• 1.7 }J ,v, �o e2 -...- , h, m 0.1 ��y,e r P .Th OgnM ° tJ b. 6- PePo format t r d n° ..m -m at at-o.x a•'m ,J.la L •a •w a.v t II\\ n mcona eec4onc �m L 1J • D t m m m � m m oa ao o.o m m m m m'm ao av W_m-m -m ht o, o] ow' 7 -ab ♦n m of he' ,., -1a • °. at m m m m Pa •Ekc q 1--y t bao res _R ubo om a m a° aas b m°.° oo..b o •°..b° m ao m m m m m m ym r-'m m a° °.a° n➢-m-:h• m at of a.] D.• m t.t a 'm as ].o •.5 az.v] ax v ra---u m xa oa.z,.ab.a x nn,t a-nt t -m m m m m m m m �•x°:00 It 1 11. 1 .f O . ether-.— 21 11 a ° v v° ab ➢a ba ao'm b.v oa bb o.o hR na DD ba -at 0.t o2 a• h] .] L L hJ •5 E;bGB x.z aR iz an to e.s m hl IIO m as m m -m ap e0 wThoul Pr Y w�titen consenlr. W dm c n m om az .] h z o.l nt Dv ba m m m h• ` ®OII ight,rexvreA het bW. °° ➢a ➢.b m m as vv m ho"b• hb -al b.♦ At )a lw e.t e.f bbb . 3.> a >e � _ .v I x °. at m m m m • � ,•� GINNED AND VLOPED n:°] a• tt J 1> m II°°y et'•q m m ba ho at z o.♦ m 1; It a !° Bel gtae 11 1. 1. .. m�rb�au at o.t oz o.♦ 0.x "tJ J m m A♦ - b�- °"h 1s ?6 Be' BB2 s-- 4rwEfu PRaPEWTY hJ•.aY ,., ve ,. � » y', WW ; �5Y �m v ..... -,,. ,.♦ ,a 't.. � a• 1 -ul� ,a. '1' ny�aA n-a--� m m IS a, a J m ba afm m MINNEAPO �. L m ad II ]5 e: BUSINESS b••tiaM PROPFRn CENTER II BOUNDMY BR -....._` BROOOO KLYN CENTER,MN &P ,tm HOTOMETRIC SITE PLAN D 15' 30• B0' PHOTOMETRIC a' Ammm6mommJ SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" Nu-RES 1 .0 LEGEND /% OPUS® •-F CRIONUMERR-.---¢WATEII N -----EASEMENTLINE Opus Architects& I ' STORM M.H. / R SETMONUMENT�»SANRARY SEWER --- SETBACK IN Engineers,Inc. RIM=862.38 , ELECTRIC METED otr»�STORM SEWED -A- RIGHT OF ACCESS �NV,=855.2 I SAN_M.H. UGHa fi}-»-Q FUIRED END SECTION CONCRETE CURB / S INV.=8552` TRIM=862.34 C.B. I / y' I N INV.=850.5 ®AIR CONDITIONER�u-m ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER-BUILDING LINE RIM 86049�, SAN_. - / �` ,S INV=B50.4 F-GUYANCHOR TELEPHONE PEDESTAL--------- BUILDING CANOPY INmIwIN Ix fSNYaU4 r RIM=8461 12 1 ' HANDICAP INV 85]9 �1 1 r W INV.=653.0 / / yloterro�` �•� 62.0 G c a+ i-F30-ba rm G_9.___ E IN 52.I Ei,s'd psi Sew a _ \ \ B6f.24 :GUARD POSE °^�OVERHENAD WIRE O CONCRIETE SURFACE EE .. RIM=860.56 , 4 et •SIGN WIRE FEINCEFENCE DECIDUOUSTRFE INV.=857.6 ` r O LANDSCAPE SURFACE ROLLARD �'�j certih maa me Plan,ace�xuy / -99 \\ NV.=84926 -a- WOOD FENCE alY- CONIFEROUSTREE .e Nam.a -861-a c C B. �9I1?? mia�aaw. n CIE R a` . Er,I..,.,. JQ362.6 X861.9 E�ist�1Q1-0' X61.3 2° C _ _ Nass ayncl � d X361.8 m 2.2 \ RIM=862 B] k862.91` \�� T- NW INV.=853.6 .- Ih �-- 1, a' i XB61.6W \ SE IN V.=853.4 _ S NV-853.3 Mark Antlerson -�2 --V- ---a62� - ,_\ 6' bF (� -'g, xo.23450 W-30/26/2013 o =SURVEY NOTE 86 60 I EXISTING CONDITIONS SURVEY PROVIDED BY HARRY S.IOHN5DNCO,INC .1k86 8-1..fi0- / J 9 YYY 1 F.F EL=865.79-�` / I %B6S9 efi5;�4�-/ 6}.0\\ }�N6-',�6t:7 /// X864--kR8a-2643 ✓ DS�S. /Y _ '1� 2 ��\ �/ fy864.3 - I\ 861.1 C.B. X639.... \, ., \ \ _ - fra �G6ao I Xs65D - \� \90 \ Nv.8542 -86506 x \\\ \ �6zp 1 \' -,I 3B -1_ �1-O g -- r \\ \ �\ \ ----- II JL"6jJ /,d� \ ` 1 2C 99C,/ \ 3.71G\ \� \ RIM861.51 62.9 I �- / ! °8C ? k861.3 'Sb \\ \� INV-857.6 }r/ F.F EL�862.79J \ ' ! m I // T86a-•0-_ e\ \ e� -561- � .2'tom \ - Y 0 6 \ .�-• 861- a X860.8 )�1 )®60.5 '\ . X860.] \1 ---"880-- �" \y�----- ----- S.A 0. e' RIM= _61.3 60.2 \.59.2OG X0r )123595 )18 0 860.3 F.F EL=860.79'860! -800- 8°is� X059.0 X8596 X8591 �sss �sss asa3X u ] X859.]59 / „y S 'X \-886 648..21 0 / \8 --`'----- / X858.7 \\F.F EL=859.40 X859.2 \1�\ \ 1 6� X858.2 X858.6 1 11 x'9SS'J9x \ _- _ X859.4 / XE 58.7 / \' \,\\ ` \\ X058 1 15.9 \ % --/ BPS °9 °s - \ X858.1 s9.o 9° £s� \\ 9 >a35z9 sss - `` se* \ / \`\\ \\ 58.8PSB' ,PS 1 'O '29y.--- F.F EL=859.00y 1\1\ 69.46G �96� >ms7s \ ,,� -. �ss� ' \ \ / m � X 1 \ �\ ms]s \\ use /ol \/ I /� It \\!\ \\��\A\ ",\\ X®57.0 \ \ r- \ \ - \\ \\\',\\\>�PE\\ 73.B2G- >2ss6.7 1 'A \, \ o \\ --874_ 1 X858. \ 1 6`o I \\ \ \ 66 \ 1 X856.7`'� \l\\` ` `, \ Y gl\\', LEVVI NBIEG Mp.PN.ER 5\\ �/ mszz / 4b / �s6.a ' 3 �e56�,60 \\\;\n\\\�\\\�\1\\' BR 9616 bh`x x\6.3 _ m� \\ X857.4\ -e56- -$"P \\ \"'\ -M377'41 0 \ \\ ,\ `838\ X856.8 )mss.r3 �y\\` / >35e.4 \\ \\ F.F EL=860.11--_ ` \,+" \\e \\\\\\\ 1\l/ J._�'�'6'A3s`5` \\\\�\\\\1\,;C\i 77.14G \ DJDANZL013 BY _858/X357.9 5].0 M.ANDERSON // I n55.s s \\ \�\\\ \\m \ •F ra ma ar in me bammissro r / 9.3sc Nemm a fiRI mF ooN mw�IN•�N� S O \\ X856 9 X55.2 \\ \\\ \\\\\\\ pemn gam d ma unv ,Rl or pmaibN fa clPima,dam O / dz \\ \\'\\\\ \\\\ \\\\\ N RM wm,Rr,, Ima.MRI iI Ne trRIc 54.6 �Es.•\\ \\ \\A;\\\3�\ Exmmae rIa R bb uns and oNer r.lat R 6 \\ ue26nal as bmn�ndi6ma.t i,tNe sibilRy of Ua user to wrRy oll X854.2 .0 \ !nfomwtionimerrs b Ten.do�Nmmt may not ba„am w \ Mp 656 \ .i Prior. m )18592 V�1 539$ \ ®a1I dgNI reamed S \ \ � H, PPRO.X.L T pN-EXIBT.tb54�•R .Po 54I,.�]� DO e IE=847.04\ oRxFD«D DEVELOPED BY: X8550 X8546>054 7 \\\ \ --855__ Rim 0%3.46 e l.848.8.8 A 4UD \ \ S \\\ la T 40p B 0007 y I i - d�E 55.0 or ED, aUo.- M° MINNEAPOLIS 208 BUSINESS 'J R \\\ \ CENTER II \\ BROOKLYN CENTER,MN EXISTING eR \\ CONDITIONS PLAN NORTH Simw,u.ruuamuarn,wunewnm�ararunauim„n m •mmann 0 30 60 xu.e[x rr,ra.,orruruuanran.n.rrmawanura.a.vwa,rm,ou,a,r,w„xoa,,,a,c.n„uaw SCALE I® c1.0 I I 1 — A/ l ` '861 ----_�'—�% < l ^> I / � ,Y, r:I�86 � ► � 1.:\ > 861 - ` 1 \I I baps �/1 I , t_ ---x_865- I 1 \ _661 IN PRETREAT E -$Iry \ a /� \ � rvWL-&5BP �8\ $a.x f 41'.11\�\\\: --- \ \ 1 X859— \ I r �\• \\ \ \ I PROPOSED-ntLDING I 111',1 \'•1`,qt\I �°_ D7 �� FFE=862.0 .� 1 11\�1`\:'`\\\\: ---67D---- g o —� r— I NWL EILTIUTI \\`\'• \ •\I -fin el --- 1 \\ \\\'•� \' 1 \\•';1\ — / 1\\\ \\%� \ y�\\�\'• ---fin---� _ a-656 — `\\�\aP\\\\''\' —e76— _ �%-1 31� asa.P �\ 1 'x59 \\�\\\\•\\\\'•\\\\�\'•,y L \\,\\\'•,—\�°'�' \\\ �a MH � a �'N .� I d �`,``»'. s\\\\�\\\\�\\\�•\\ewe,\ O 1: o Mph \\\ _ _`_���' \jo V \\ \BS3 p � M�, \\\\\\\\ Tpq�� \\\ 4 \ \\ # - 85 S/1 lwz 8 \\ ( -- 5-_ ` E� 4Ua,0a2 0.•. I J LU , .�-•-'x-80.1, sus'No, r A'E al to, \ qto SUB.ry0.708 R '\ \ ,P8 LEGEND PRocos6D PROPERTY LIMIT CURB&GUTTER STORM SEWER ♦—»� ?—w--C DRAIMx1E BUILDING RETAINING WALL WETUWD LIMITS �l- TREEUNE SPOT ELLVATION ssx's w CONTOU0. - RIP RAP OVERFLOW ELEV. )a E6 XRLBORINGS Po3.6 V- GRADING NOTESaa<EELLYAT�:ooTELLxanos R.an.o:En�xaxffn mas Fx lxL anoamax mum C-111dzoax oxwal Tx swaxoml Raaa rvc nUU NS<dxraxn ae-rwE.xrx[eww[rvxr lxlnl[rl[LO rcasusrx[o[slcn eaap[nT. rx[[ncnt[R mmtparty rtxexe sa o. n��wu .ma oA« �n6�oxl r ITT nEOoR M na E:E o: mIII a11lox1IT11 Im.aoEmEnT,wnwn�r»�,ax,EQ�r°x�;rol M,o<A,Im,lw=I�n�un�naawx�x�a�w�,~.xo.owDw .xo..xr��.w»DOUxIxDrxl<DI,sTaxc TlDn.xa�aoF���°�,� �.°�P,a�":.o:«�ro•«»xE IT1111�1�— 11.1 N. nTnr. E. IT"EIT— 11 DDDxL�.TRx.axxIBEDEP.TIn»o.»rDTDw»wx, o.xDwDxwr a «w� Maa .m o. ENOE•DA A a LE EDa.T.E aTnxX� .o T.xITaLLm rEma-TxEm — SDI sxnLLBEeonsrRUCrtoofmmuvax,oertme eRTIA rxoeonnnerov soauwemnio Txx xeyluEFnuro Alryssx aUDxIDX OO DERCN VLCUUTlalSaNO SOiEeoRlnGS.VEmENT,AIOAImEa ar»[ cxnnnlnc TxEl aunox� Ewaysl was caxsraucrxolx cvxronmaxa wnrLLi THE alnnzanosvE_ffLs. o��d avvx'�eul.o:c�s>una o�`T�drI raoaEO,1nRETMnon RaVMx sxaux auvaEOro nnrwEDOMtt. ownM xEx<..Et.Ul.awxxx T»EC«rtrnlcroa ro m[rxcm wlu nxoulaE_mxOMTlox Max ccwsrRUrnan :RaroosEn BTNl ccrvnwcra5 Txas[ar[ananw 21 iL=,IEmumrulTOw ASTnma2 3 O9 YTMxroeao s MElNOO"=NIT PATFaSOi hxiExiDxuvnc IV—R T.EnE T«TDamwA-Ua MnxnTRxPEmDnMTE�nmER1.TA,�xx•n,drDmTEa-TE-lo,Iar� o sill w ITEannc a,9E.TTR TmU ll I n. M � ,`IT- »BT x OEO wx.xmTI x I ER T. D 3D 6D sulE®IN FEET OeN� OPUS® Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. Yxiw-YW-Dlla ma�•6Yrimsa�h n Rmuey •olana ur wE� Mark a Antl2M sv . e:30/26/2013 'P 023450«u' �2ownr.r msru,M. 'infra M37_7410a 00/11/2013 J.JONES OPdxx m D.DDAANZL M.ANDERSON •Ewan moy occur' lM irammissun cI elclronic Nn 1M Dpu mmpmin o raapo vida for ny ft domo s o wvi»9 wI Pr m.x»wmekea u# w In.�Imxwr x�olrm�lwa m o«v.oi< 6m.. Fbct'ma alas nmoy m occuMd/raellect pansibility of th.u ,I verity byoula,Ainxrmb�.—d acne,—t. �IOrwmr n. d--t rw oy»ot ee w uo cope0 wilM1OW Dri written nir ®DII rpltla rexr 1 O"D AID DEYELOFED BY MINNEAPOLIS BUSINESS CENTERII BROOKLYN CENTER.MN PRELIMINARY GRADING, DRAINAGE wr x�vme C4x0 I OPUS. mm LEGEND OPUS Architects& I `"DPO fD EKSnNG CURB&GUITER Engineers,Inc. I I STORMSEWER ♦—N�C—Po—� DIGUNTILIF CONTOUR —wz— - ...................... I RIP RAP nwm&n w SN-pUo 0/ OVERFLOW ELEV. y�y -SSL-4S1L rar. 51LT FENCE —-—.g———— SILT DIKE ----SV�---I— 1 — UMITSOFDISTUR6IN(E r- IF" .1L BOBINGS \ %ST-9 i6PA-10 I.reIµQnirtw<mi.vl, y DIRECTIONOF t161�—_-- � ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE \ °Te�EM"PORAmo EuloN DITCH Tess�m.Lnq y w CHECK DAM � r, i -- \ UMITSOFDRAINAGf SUB-BA51 ark .An 862 - ——.— _ INLET NIOTECTON DEVIL 3 t /\ � ,. I � � BRYPOLLN ®v tlZ� z�v/d�e, INLET PROTECTK)N DEVICE 2 @2 N..n.mx Grce m I 50 1 I TEMPORARY STONE CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE infra TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN ,SB -865--------- .......�.�. \ I 1 MPORARY STORAGE AND PARK NG AREA TS ——863 \\\ \\ \ �, TE �riw TEMPORARY STABILIZATION MEASURES (SEED,MULCH,MATS OR BLANKETSAS SM I u / I I \ \I \\ \ OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP( =SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION T--BE1— 1.HA1111 STABILQED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. i� �/ ' I _ / \ \\ I \\ \ 2. CONS UCTTHE RAT HYPARRING FENCESONTH STORAGE AREA —861— `j 3. CONSTRUCT THE SEDIMECESONTANDISEDIMENT E. \\I \° \ 5. HALT UCT THE SE AND CONTACT THE IVIL TRARING CO. -- _ --- _ \iinn S. WILT ALLNOF ACTIVITTES EMft.GE ERALCO TTRCITO SHAD SCHEDULE AND CONDI STORM SILT FENCE�? , %� �862_J L4�' 660--_ F \ NSPCOT UFB MEENERALCONERACTORSHNDAS GD NDDITURBIW STOW �'6BD_ 1 \``1,L�• \ PRE-CONSINUCTION MEETING WITH ENGINEER ANDALLGRWND DISTURBING CONTRACTORS (TYP.)--- -- ` '_ °\ \\ \ 6 CTEAARRAHDGRUBTHESITECONSTRU XN. Z. BEGIN GRADING THE 51TE. 8. —CONSTRUCTION OFBUEDINGPADANDSTRUCTURES NOTE TO CONTRACTOR 866—\ THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT ONSITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MPCA,THE CONTRACTOR MUST UPDATE THE SWPPP,INCLUDING THE ER0510N CONTROL PLAN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS,SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED.AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OFTERMINATION,THE SWPPP,INCLUDING THE \ 1 2 EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS,AND ALL REVISIONS TO IT MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE OWNER TO SE KEPT ON FILE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE. — I PROPOSED- N FFE=862 1 \'`1�1\ ----- \ �P . -Q� 1 11 \`\11 11', --- - � _ I a w✓ \ ; R \ \\;\. (^' �� � 111\\�\\;\ . --- — I— \ / \ \\ �\ \ \ \\,1\ —875— / ``\a --- _X814 \\ \,\\'4 --656—_' `——— —B,6-=_.— M37_7410 F.F EL.860.11___- 1 I `� ,{\X`\ \\\�•\\\\,,\' 03/r116/201�3 x\855—� \00\\\\ \\\`„d V J.JONES �_ —I / \ -ass— 4'' \\\\\\,\\`,�\a✓ \`\ —D D 5- I�\` \\\,\m\\\;\ M.ANDERSON ,, °\°\ .Ermre me o cur tM romm ba a1 \\\\;\y'\�\ \ \\\`\ McNm's Nn iM1e 0."cm -w M SOO nfwmobon wntammtl in ebclron \\ \ y\ m. n mfIa<t. v� aw mpr ro oTa•aM'PofNn a float atiooe. tIw R J Ke t.ei di of Ma user to r T II uroote.aio».eio.e ooe ome.er<IUtee SILT FENCE �3• I°m°- \ •—pi a«Proem m>or.ot-�o e r p 14 `_� ` \ copietl«itM1Om Pri «ritlen c aunt. \\ M \ (TYP.) `-" I J a ®pu ngme reN.etl 0 \\ J \ T \\\ d .. �Po--_.pP \ ORNED OND DMLOPFD BY --- y --655-_ \ _A ` I• STAO sue NCO I �_ / . 7pq __ \L LOI F NmRn SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE Al \\\\ '"`�.-%ja Jro MINNEAPOLIS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY I JUN JUL AUG I SEP I OCT INOV I DEC I JAN I FEB I MAR I APR I MAY JUN \\ BUSINESS TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP&STOCKPILE TOPSOIL \ \ CENTER II ROUGH GRADE/SEDIMENT CONTROL \\ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS 1-77 \ BROOKLYN CENTER,MN FOUNDATION/BUILDING CONSTRUCTION L r I I I I I I I I 1 11 \\ SITE CONSTRUCTION F 4EFT PRE PERMANENT CONTROL STRUCTURES �R,q \\ PHASE 1 FINISH GRADING LANDSCAPING/SEED/FINAL STABILIZATION SW--P"-rprp STORM FACILITIES NORTH S0 30 6D -.MF.wa,flFR /.� NOTE:CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE ICAIF®IN / X5.0 OPUS. I mm LEGEND HIN(KED Opus Architects 8 F105TING BE EE Engineers Inc. I :J4 STORM 5EWER -M�t�w—� —rrr—rN- ' / I C NITOUR —sm— -___._.�......... —_ IP350 Bm brE R-R RIP MP F6 YSI w rSNYPUa I / OVERFLOW ELEV. µ' I SILTFENCE ==__3�__ -- Fu-uF-4sEF I— y SILT DIKE -_�___ LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE SOIL BORINGS f ST-9 PA-30nln �-1— ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE j I \ DIRECTION \}' Q \ � � OVERLAND FLOW ® J \\ 1 TEMPORARY DIVERSION llar; -Z'`rT X /eb'L•e. I < _ — -: I l� r, CHEIX DAM ® Fess iw[ Y \ UMITSOFDRAINAGE / —--——T SU6B ASI N BIOROLL Mrk C �� 62 — ao .23450 Oa 30/26/2013 INLET PROTECTIONDEVICEI 0v1 �pP nn svee�nln. INLET PROTECTION DEVICE 2 ®v-2 Iymwl EROSION CONTROL BLANKET K/ \ ,\ _ TEMPOMRY STONE infra BH `\ � KW I .' ,-.\ \@ \ CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE TEMPORgRYSEDIMENT BASIN SB RETWMXGW - /J � \ ` \ TEMPOMRYSTOMGEANDPARI(INGAREA TS I \ \\ 1 I \.- ✓• / \ TEMPORARY STMATSON LANKASURES i l - �. g / 'I /\ —— _ �, \ (SEED,MULCH,MAIM OR RN LANKETS AS S OUTLINED IN THE SWPPP) I / =SEQUENCE OF CONSTRUCTION PHASE II: I. 1£MPORAPHYSEED DENUDEDAREAS. —_� I Ir I I r I k 2. INSTALL UTILITIES,UNDERDPAINS,STOP.SEWERS,CURBS AND GUTTERS SILT FENCE BBj _; j I B \ \ 3. INSTALL RIP RAP AROUND OUTLLT STRUCTURES. INS A PBTALLINLET PROTECTION AROUND ALL STORM SEWER STRUCTURES (TYP.) BBO I \ S %SPARES EFORPAVING. -- '� -`860. \ `\\ \ \ B VAVE SITE. STALL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. p� B COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALL PERMANENT SEEDING AND PUNTING. 14 / 4��44 I«` , `44 �O� —\ \ 9 REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES(ONLY IF SITE IS J i STABILIZED),IF REQUIRED BY THE CONTRACT 1 \ / PRETRENTMEN1 CONCRETE WASHOUT— \B68� =m NOTE TO CONTRACTOR THE EROSION CONTROL PLAN SHEETS ALONG WITH THE REST OF THE SWPPP MUST BE KEPT N CA SITE UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION IS FILED WITH THE MP ,THE CONTRACT OR MUST \ FnP 1 11, 1 \ (�j5 UPDATE THE SWPPP,INCLUDING THE EROSION CONTROL PUN SHEETS AS NECESSARY TO INCLUDE \ ` I PROPOSE6gU1•LDING I 11 1,"M 11 Y ADDITIONAL REQUIRE MENrS SUCH AS ADDITIONAL OR MODI FIE D BMPS DESIGNED TO CORRECT Tipp \ I FFE=862.0 1 1'tlt`�` 1\r, ---870---_- PROBLEMSIDENTHED.AFTER FILING THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION,THE SWPPP,INCLUDING THE 9 �O/REOW )) '11: ,\ EROSION CONTRIX PUN SHEETS,AND ALL REVISIONS TO ITMUST Bf SUBMIREDTO THE OWNER ACCORDANCE WITH THE RECORD RETENTION REQUIRE MFNiS DESCRIBE IN THE SWPPP NARRATIVE ----19'- w —672— _B51 Y \\id B75 0�1AA� VA� 968 1 ... c`�\i —878——L—— M37_7410 \\\ \ \ —B56 \ \ \ 4 o\r\ _ \\\ 03/16/2013 . _ 859— r 1\ �\l —S 'B66— \\\ DWK 9R D.DANZL M.ANDERSON / C I \ \\'_\\"�\\\\\'r\\\.row M \ �H ~ \~\ / /I $ $ r \�\\\\\r\\V\r\\ .Sin HNA F ow.o-P rmssP P1 SO \\ \\ \ 5 \\\\ \\ \\�\g\ n pdy CIO—° e\\\�\\\\I Pr IIN r 6 c t e I a� •EkcHP- t L R ', _ _ \ \ -g- i¢i `4. \�\\•�3 \ byo L dily.soy P.a in.= ify.11 SILT FENCE do m..L moy= PE w ,HP P �p.d ls� \\� \ `R/ --a °k w--rw�'w�n \ aR /a OOBUm Br. � S � a \ d,- s # I --] /1 v� S "41), 4u C 4(JO OP Or I r HDm M xk. I NCO,T. �SOIL EROSION/SEDIMENTATION CONTROL OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE 40asuepo MINNEAPOLIS CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCE JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OR NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN I �� 2pg BUSINESS TEMPORARY CONTROL MEASURES STRIP B STOCKPILE TOPSOIL CENTER II ROUGH GRADE/SEDIMENT CONTROL � IMATNK \ MN TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ROADS BROOKLYN CENTER,\ FOUNDATION/BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SITE CONSTE-11 \\ PHASE Z c./ PERMANENT CONTXOLSIRUCTUPES �/j.R �� FINNHGRADING LANDSCAPING/SEED/FINAL STABILIZATION S••V�/ PPP STORM FACILITIES z NORTH D » fio KwBER NOTE:CONTRACTOR OR GENERAL CONTRACTOR TO COMPLETE TABLE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC PROJECT SCHEDULE SCALE IN FEET C5.1 EROSION&SEDIMENTATION CONTROL NOTES&DETAILS/"SITE MAP" DEVELOPER/OWNER: �l d a. L'tii i 5 tl i• 5 r t % e w. ti- •3 y� f• °,,i=s R •'�ti r �L MI.YNF.>RGI.I, –'111 SITE SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE �6 O� o o MEEET.Ppn;� iM1 r i __ w.oOOD .T IF TIE III TIE INT-1 1.1 lR- ROCK ENTRANCE DRIVE NOT TO S ME z f '1 A �.r Ijr 'I l Y �f I I b Q L l l 7 11 f — vII. li I N E / z � SITE # EF r "I USGS MAP NOTTOSCALE xnnrSruR.m sox SILT FENCE DETAIL NOT TO SCALE •��1 fL.l" SITEOPERATOR GENERALCONTRACTOR: OPUS DESIGN BUILD,EST 10350 ROAD WEST MINNETON ONKq MINNESOTA 55303 SUPERINTENDENT: TED ElEl mATEaia1�vJ a`nloNCRETE"n`� ROE:LOFEs LWIF CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA NOT TO SCALE ROAD DRAIN INLET PROTECTION(IP-2) NOT TO SCALE AREA SUMMARY IN ACRES PAVEMENT AREA 1.89 ACE BUILDING AREA 1.E— SEEDED AREA I 1.61 ACE TOTAL DISLRBED 0.87ACE PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS 2.01ACE POSE-CONSTRUCRONIMPERMOUS 1326AOd AvLEp rEaMSUrR_._.A.ELV"'z^ar.nT.TxEw"eorroM pF IL w1.AROW orn E`V°Es�A1ED°M`�`Ro ATELl T,,�>PFFTU 1TIEWm IF 3 I,s IAI oowx oR IeJ xoRaomAUracROSST«E xoFE.aaRm wIU On.OUwx« AE�iusTONSI�<Povnu.E ouno ra'uFEwm�E�vA�CCr�wE:rREcomm�.m Ir oXwR.a eEETm'�'RirA.EmsRinnwlo ory".oEl�wn wl•x wRU.sT..0 TIRw�xovlRwNOMNN wPROxF.R,IEE:z"APAM1.1 WmnRE R 1 NITEl RFORTE wvRwRIATI SROPI.E�np A.POED EROSION CONTROL BLANKET NOT TO SCALE Om «IOHERrwn 010-ROLLS NOT TO SCALE GENERAL EROSION NOTES: x. A"w OR E"ATb"S of ul.nrvA OTID,IE.A.s«pwry IN THEE FIArvsARE NDFOOry RECOROSI THE ITUFF «Iv a n 12.DRT;�o'STANIII E`"r;�I.IRI.CT'A- oN AnooE o oE.THE I vx...T.W arD lTSAFFExoATS,PIUSTirt FiRm rl.npauweeIU.ENra"s"exlEROSan esEwT.<xranm crnTaa w.nasc vwxl.rxE STAxowopnals Txl N�RI;�E.°;lµo.o E." °'R" �x,Exrs"Es P rvp m " a Ewo«mEx .1 FEIFT AT TIE lRUCT- >. —l'E"T.M'MSa�OEMEnT PR IF cxsNmvsNm REDO RED.rTI E.WFFP.RE-l`.THECpxTRACTORixA"ow"uI THE nsNCrwna .,ATE,11T=n ATICslAmo" IIIFLEDw THE mrcaar I-IR TIE D ROR IFlRAr .—FOWDOn FIRMT..TOxAL.r.PSxsrwENmvrEVINTE.as AL It R E.NWN. LlI ....M'E.w.1-� FE,I.,I;"" E-)INTIEO1aFFmEI:;R;1r�IORIIINI,�I1oon-11 " s a.lq,E Pv I"x.nO AREq oaaEAFr,RLaat rvO nmmrre�rx uMn ssa.r uOTwIERS,Arorala'[T�EM"�iESEOUr«E Eau rmxrvrmA xrErvancxaxoclrax nc PnoNRLr TRU*EocO"cRE,ITRUC.sEVE«nl cNAry xD,Ew Pm.m cUAx ns,ETC.I MUSTNUnxTmroa OEF x.DARMaFTxE Srrtano"w3amnran.OarvO I,T FTF THE OxM„ OIEEm°E.._ o.IT I= ':1'"I�'.n "EM.Om'N�'u.`I�o::° =METHOD nD mx,DOr IIF�nOx.NTxN,s TEm FrMDEeH Ha..E PnIDIx TORO x�w"x mx,DOr=FE.Il.TID"sECna„ D,,,,,. TERxanvELr.«rOR D"c OR„DIDxERI.AETOF-11 WIT.V.-T Ol-IS—.NAT,E..DI.-0FTEmFORRR. x AaORO E`ZTHT.'IMETAeu EWH. ONwmA Pwxa oippElEUn"Aew�E.EUrE�FOx rEaET.n Llano>R.ESEARIU SHa..I STAAIDZxDIx C. ' -1TO.THEUww.Irvu-TNOncI1TTIE OEV"E.EE�ITO PP.e1E�"n 111 c rRac,OR S«a.x F-MI.0 FAR w,"sn,�TxE IF—.ry M1� 1'.Er FZU IN ' LE — n 1111—111 OE TIE.EwaID roIxNNax.pEP.MIIr....D IwOTIE aTITlorva TIE . woCpx Ew ST E A T1 NOTEaMEA:„RESSHAU.EaE.NID.nD«waxED Na<eoRwxaw,IrxE T«.owno. EvExTpREaTFa,»a,,...rvCHE.n REPaR.M" elMw"«Irv..Hp eDFw�pwR..pR A.nE�eDnpmOrv.a.Ow ttLss E EwMEnrR H.3ApFTMEHn.TOFTHEFI—TIE.I M El 3Ix TME OEx !P,.,L ll_poRA'nASE AND REmovu M TEl cpmNlr.D WITHI.xx-11pF wxpvaY,ORASSpon AsHEEDconwrlOnsrupw ACCESZ IzEE Paar�ivD.pF uca�nEau a.oz`on v«�T'SF_` Ev TpNA�INn•a :PxTo:s Aw ssA° 'ASSOn�FeDPEwoirs o ONerWa"Nlullml rsssPUE:LUIEF D T.E. En IYI raU s Nsvonvea FpR conTAn"O Au LOUL TE I ,rrz.mE .u. I+n', oT.l R�PE.mm'eE •. .crs¢sTMw�I.InsEuM.n urnl�wM �E"T i� auUNE I E'.. ro.M " ro _IISn I n EETZIIm PERMANENT STORMWATER SYSTEM MAINTENANCE: FOLLOWING CONSTRUCTION,THE OWNER SHALL MAINTAIN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING GUIDELINES: 1, THEPROPERTY OWNER SHALL INSPECT THE PRE-TREATMENT RETENTION BASIN AT A MINIMUM OF ONCE A YEAR TO DETERMINE IF THE BASIN'S RETENTION AND TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS ARE ADEQUATE.A STORAGE TREATMENT BASIN WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT Ex HASDECREASED THE WETSTORAGE VOLUME BY%OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME,W EDONTHISIN5PE MON,IFTHESTORMWATERBASINIS IDENTIFIED FOR SEDIMENT CLEANOUT,THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL RESTORE THE BASIN TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN CONTOURS WITHIN ONE YEAR OFT E INSPECTION DATE. 2, THE INFILTRATION BASIN MUST BE KEPT CLEAN OF EJtCESS SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS.HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH MUST BE MAINTAINED IN THE REE INFILTRARON BASIN,AND THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL REMOVE DEAD VEGETATION AND DEBRIS IN THE SPRING OF EACH YEAR. NI T 3. THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL INSPECT THE,SUMP CATCH BASINS,SUMP MANHOLES,OUTLET STRUCTURES,CULVERTS,OUTFAUL STRUCTURES AND OTHER STORMWATER FAOUTIES FOR THE PROJECT IN THE SPRING AND FALL OF EACH YEAR.THE PROPERTY OWNER SHALL REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS DURING ME INSPECTIONS SUCH THAT THE STORMWATER FACILITIES OPERATE AS DESIGNED AND PERMITTED. amm DIVERSION DITCH NOT To SCALE OPUS® Opus Architects& Engineers,Inc. M1431RaDN y yy m'mevx.N r;�seRYe�[ iQRR���N��lw! Mark Antl n zBASD e3D/zb/z01B mnfra =1111 Bnc nEwm �"�� 19616 c roue FROIBT NurIBA M37_7410 03/16/2013 J.JONES m DD;NZL M.ANDERSON •E T,I m.y A in IM tTaamhalon If acbae Nm TNR o-IWINniNa a.mt TemmelLl.la any Wime,ADmOgn or If ON,n a�aR d IN.IwI.EE IFd Iez If Ule nfamDlion mnbirled in ekcbmic •EkcbWO Ile ift..pccOT.It q.HI lxe MDI a–b.itt E,u.ons.tt. Me 11,14, i pf the user H III a byoula.dimenaipna pna om•T..Imea nfomgtion. •TNia document may not be usetl or coped wi1NON p or wrRlm wnsenl. O.II ryNh reared ._......_. m AND DEY0.0EED BY: MINNEAPOLIS BUSINESS CENTERII BROOKLYN CENTER.MN SWPPP NOTES AND DETAILS Mrr n xRER C5.2_ OPUS® LEGEND Opus Architects& I I STORM M.H. PROPOSED EXISTING Engineers,INC. RIM=862.36 CURB BGUTTER SAN_M.H. STORM SEWER 0-M /ITV.855.3s RIM=862.34 SANITARY SEWER *-����H� _ C.B. I / / 5 INV.=855 , N INV.=850.5 RIM=86049-I, SAN_M,H. _ ' �� a$INV.•850.4 FORCEMAIN RAN.)O--010-Q�FNF� yyM_9Uo INV=857.4 , ' .RIM=861.12 WATERMAIN WaH-I W INV.-853.0 / WD\eT0`� EASEMENT ~ C_B. " E INV.=852 D RIM=860.56`, I a / �I EKML.T2 O',� _ I DRAT NTIIE -• N- -H ••- - _. INV.=857.6 1 - /I p FYI p GAS LINE - i- _ _ y /4, F. n \ 1 S.A ERRIC �ih Mn Nn nlan sx Ruy -BRIM=861.86 TELEPHONE 1 -INV.849.2 12'+8'WETTAP '1 IxE e• Vel,e su,e V REPIAlC{ M :� E L 12 D i p.II'at vin R 35011•6 a/, RIM 862 1 e gem EN6 `1 NW INV 853.6 =CITY UTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES �Z -HIV SE INV. 853.4 A. pLL UTIVtt CONNECTION TO CITY UTILITIES MUST BE INSPECTED BY CITY STAFF. r -¢- - S INV. 8533 Mark Antlerson B. INSTALL NEW GATE VALVESAND PACKAGED MAGNESIUM ANODES ATALL WATERMAIN CONNECTION - - No.23450 Oate:30/26/2013 ° I POINTS. Hapq ,mua, a< C. REMOVE ANY UNUSED EXISTING WATER OR SANITARY SERVICES TO SIR AT THE CITY TRUNK LINE. v�ia,"oN,mnorr«. HmFMeei F.F EL=865.79.-�. E. 0 \ D.ALL PROPOSED&EXISTING UTILITIES CONTAINED C.B. WITHIN THIS PROPERTY ARE PRIVATE. �Imf ra IN lu vFwFll \ 3t LF rsTCP K-asT \\ I _ RIM 861.60 INV 854.2 0. s eIDEK „'�.' I \ / I \\ \ c_B. _- FUTILITY CONSTRUCTION NOTES RETAIN NR WAIL RIM=8fi1.51 A. THE UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL BE CO-CTEDINACC00.DANCEWITH b- \ INV.=857.6 THE-STANDARD UTIUTIES SPECIFICATIONS'AS PUBLISHED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS J C 'PVCCO1.00% \ \ ABTAINACOP,1MINNESUFAICEAMI,EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN,CONTRACTOR SHALL F.F EL-862.79) I. 3- / CIF ANOUTECTEMCANERpH / \ \ OBTAINA COPY OF THESE SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILRIES SHALT BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE TO CITY REQUIREMENTS. J RE•K1.1 \ ` \ 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTOPEN,TURNOFF,INTERFERE WITH,OR ATTACH ANY PIPE OR r I AA r1-T-r1 _ IF•K450 \ ° HOSE TO OR TAP WARRMAIN BELONGING TO THE CITY UNLESS DULY AUTHORIZED TO CEI THE CITY,MY ADVERSE CONSEQUENCES OF ANY SCHEDULED OR S.A UNSCHEDULED DISRUPTIONS OF SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC ARE THE IIABIUTf OF THE ROOF DRAIN ---RI M=848.1 CONTRACTOR INV.=646.1 TTTjjj 3. ADS MINIMUM EWER VERTICAL UILDING,STORM INCHES 15 ALL WS NOTED 125 LF-12' IIE•K9V m \\ \ \ \ AND LSE FOR STORM SEWER CROSSINGS UNLESS NOTED I _ STM @S.OD% --= IO�ERIONn / � \E\ , (� OTHERWISE POET STORM SEWER CROS SINGS. 44 44��44W44 - 1W B. ALL MATERIALSSHALL BE AS SPECIFIED IN CEAM SPECIFICATIONS EXCEPT AS MODIFIED HEREIN.BEND I53U s _50 7 I I I I I IFIDWANT �O ALL MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE C CITY. 1040% / IORF=B .L1-LJ_U VALVE !� , \' 2. ALL SANITARY SEWER TO BE PVC SDK-26,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, PPETRFAT NEWLB450 I/ IF•8_40 I MYORIINT Bx6T @0-12' \y` 3. ALIWATERMAIN TOBE DUCTILE IRON CWS 52,WITH 7.5 FEET MINIMUM COVER. 6•VALVE N-0B \ 4. ALL RD SEWER PIPE TO BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PI PE WITH R-4 JOINTS AND RUBBER GASKETS,CORRUGATED HOPE PIPE,OR AS NOTED ON PLAN. i 2a LF-14' I OTL _ IN•K9.0 \ 5. RIP RAP SHALL BE Mn/DOT CLASS 3. \ I I STm @040% I K•E•JB.vALVE I 1 \ \\ I F•W.10 B'WATERSE \ \ G CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHRERURAL PLAINS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND \ I / ae•TEE SERVICE ` \ \ DIMENSION5 OF VESTIBULE,EJOTPORCHES,RAMPS,TRUCK DOCKS,PRECISE BUILDING nnruJwRRrsEAI _ ` \ \ . DIMENSIMACTOEXAR BUILDING CAUTIONED THE LOTIDrvO. O. THE CONTRACIOp 15 SPECIFICALLY C AUTIONED THAI THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF \ ^ EXISTING UT1UTIESASSHDWNONTHESEPL-SISRASEDON RECORDSOFTHEVARIOUSUMITY FLIN v COMPANIES AND,WHERE POSSIBLE,MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD.THE INFORMATION \\ \ IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE.THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE _ APPROPPIAT E UTILITY COMPANY AT LEAST 48 HOURS BEFORE MY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST CXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTIUTIES.IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO / 1 ■•M42 159U 15• \ RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS,THE LOCATIONS OF SMALL UTILITIES SHALL BE OBTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR,BY CALLING GOPHER STAR ONE CALL AT 454-0002 / IFIFILTPATION BA SIN I __ N\ - ( ` \ \ E. THECONTRAROR SHALL TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TO / /BID HW-848.OIDRYJ -- N �..-:.F�_,..n ml \ ADJACENT PROPERTIES WRING THE CONSTRUCTION PH-OF THIS PROJECT.THE =8520 I = , \ \ CONTRACTORWILL BEHELDSOLELYRESPON SIBLEFORANYDAMAGESTOMEAD ENT PROPERTIES OCCURRING DURING THE CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THIS PROJECT. 1ECNNE -- F. SAFETY NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS:IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERALLY ACCEPTED xNESo - I O CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES,THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE SOLELY AND COMPLETELY RESMN518LE IE=85190 I 1 \\ \ �a FORCONDITIONS ON THE JOB SITE,INCLUDING SAFETY OF ALL PERSONS AND PROPERTY DURING 1 1 % SDDU-tg'eX -- -. �� / I •SBB / � \ \ \ G PERFORMANCE M LWORKIN THIS REQUIREMENT FTHEENGINEE OR THE PER BE IS.RE, \ LIO DU TO NORMAL WORKING HOOF THE NTT OF THE ENGINEER OR THE NOT DEVELOPER ER ED \ / I COINLUDE CONSTRUCTION THE ADEQUACY OFT HE CONTONTORSP SAPEANCEAURES IN,ON/ \ 6R.0.106T ` d TOINCLUDEMILTRU 10 SIR. Of THE CONTPACTOR'SSAFETY MEASURES IN,ON OR / RF�.0 ` 1 \; \` Om O HEAR THE COrvSJRIJRIDN SRE. IL�AerX 19fit6 Lr xUx \ = IE•K1AO T - i 1 \\\ \ N G. ALL AREUCTION OUTSIDE THE E PROPERTY BOUNDA.SODDATAREDISTURBED BY UTILITY ® INCHES FTOONSNALL BED BENEATH SO SODDEDAREASSMALL Bf RESTORED WITH M37_7410 INCHES OF TOPSOIL PUKED BENEATH THE SOD. RMl0.2 S•` N\ \ I \ H. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFIC 03162013 I. STMLi15' �� FWFLT B•NGTR N lF !_ \ CONTROL DEVICES SUCH MBARRICADES,TRAFFIC WHERE SIGNS,DIFECTIONIA]. NECESSARY.TRAFFIC CONTROL AND \ 15' LIGHTS ICES SHALL CONTROLTHE MOVEMENTOFTRAFFICWHEREEPART ENTRAFFICCONTROL \\ S1MKl N\ \N�M501Q6l1.It. y `� \` /44 STANDARDS. CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION D'JONES OR\\\ - ,� N � n0 g11WT \/`K STANDARDS. -! \ IF=8M.92 N \f VALVE \ I. ALL ORS TESTING SHALL REMOVING UNSTABLE LEAN INDEPENDENT II-SSH LL B ENGINEER.EXCAVATION UEORO�!L \\ Q N\ 6'TEE FOR TIRED BYTHE QIBENGVINGUNSrgBLEOR ACKFILABLESTRUCTIIDN BE COMPLETED WITH M.ANDERSON REQUIRED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER.THE UTILITY BACONT CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY W ITN \\\ �N\ N\ a t $ \ THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPON516LE FOR COORDI NATING ALL REQUIRED SOILS TESTS AND SOIL INSPECTIONS WITH THE SDI IS ENGINEER. •Ewan mq occur in l6e Iransmx-of N \ OTNF•H306] HTOIIIINT y OMM4p m• \ elecVa f9ea IM OPn pan \\ N N\/ tl VAjCK _ OT0 0.3K)W \A J. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF AGGREGATE BASE,ARST ROIL WILT BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET reW N far any ck d g o SOO / / \ \\\\\\ 3mU 15• \N \ • _Y FSSM \ AND PARKING AREA SUBGRAOE.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM ABLE r N %T _. a. U g6P gin, Ua SrM @0.30% S7 w SDR26l093% S TRUCK WITHGINEER NDSHLL BE COMP THE ED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED AT THE DIRECTION OF \ N \r \M� \ THE NGtNEES ENGINEER ANDSHALLHLL DETERMINE AREAS SECTIONS O BYESTREET THE WILLS \ ENGINEE AREA SOILUNSTABLER CORRECTION Of THE SUBG SECTIONS OF THE BE COMPLETED •E.h:6-1-mq-occur It riled.THE ACCORDANCE ARE UHEREQEREMEN REQUIREMENTS THE SOI ENGINE SOILS SHALL BE COMPERED IN Ide final FL, ft coedilw 1..It.s the K ACCORDANCE WITH THE RFUUIREMFNTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER IayouLs51 d1i tryiemions and tbar°,eloled THE TROTS AND OTHER NATURAL VEGETATION WITHIN THE PROJECT AND/OR ADJACENT TO THE Tnlis Jol�aument L be \ L-/ B•N \ PRCLECTMEOFFRIMECONCERNTOTHECONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS,HE WILL BE REQUIRED ac ma •setl o" \ p \ I TOPRORRTHETREESWHICHARETOB ESAVEDTOBESURETRATEQUIPMEN SNOT coped•itHoul p6-e�itlen mnsent. \A• 14 VALVE $ NEEDLESSLY OPERATED UNDER NEARBY TREES AND SHALL EXERCISE EXTREME CAUTION IN °0 411 d961T rturrcJ APPROX. MH \ WORKINGADJACENT TO TREES.SHOULD ANY PORTION OF THE TREE BRANCHES REQUIRE \ \\\ '{uwt0 W--p 7IpN EXIST.S4•R= IRE-84].04\ REMOVAL TO PERMIT OPERATION OF THE CONTRACTOR'S EQUIPMENT,HE SHALL OBTAIN THE T FF SERVICES OFAPROFESSIONAL TREE TRIMMING SERVICE TO TRIM THE TREES PRIOR TO THE �� ���ET \\\\ S ^ \\ /qPG:R-l7W I @ Al BEGINNING OF THE OPERATION.SHOULD THE CONTRACTORS'OPERATIONS RESULT IN THE \ \ /(')� \ R NRBFp'z5 BREAKING OF ANY LIMBS,THE BROKEN UMBS SHOULD BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY AND CUTS C�1Ttt�� 1xN�A I ® \ �_N_T SHALLBEPROPERLY PROTECTED TO MINIMIZE ANY DAMAGE.COSTS FOR TRIMMING SERVICES \ \ OYFRIFP ON BINVFRT SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONSTRUCTION AND NO SPECIAL ((JJ EMS Exist, b- PAYMENT WILL BE MADE. \\\\\ r(r PMOR TO mFI�,ournOFUl1 \ Riv.e1�848.8� �''CC.. 4 v� GAR \ T R�L.r COI \\ I -STORM SEWER STRUCTURE SCHEDULE S D S B S0. NUMBER' TYPE CARING- or y CBMH 01 ATCH BASIN MANHOLE R-30fi) PRPRT SO8 CBMH02 CATCH B451N MANHOLE R-3DR MINNEAPOLIS No. CBMH03 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE R-3067 BUSINESS C CBMH04 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE R-3067-V CBMH 05 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE R-3067 \\ CBMH06 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE R-3067-V CENTER II \\ oG CB 0) CATCH BASIN R-3067-v \\ CBMH OB CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 83067 BROOKLYN CENTER,MN \\ _C CB 09 I PATCH BASIN 1 R-30fi7 t L OF/ta STMH 10 STORM SEWER MANHOLE RS)330 UTILITY STMH 11 STORM SEWER MANHOLE W1133-8 N •INDICATES NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTING NO.,ORIIPPROVED EQUAL •e PROVIDE 2)INCH ROUND OPENING IN MANHOLE SLAB COVER. NOTE:THE CONTRACTOR AND THEIR SUPPLIER SHALL DETERMINE THE MINIMUM DIAMETER NORTH REQUIRED FOR EACH STORM SEWER STRUCTURE. C_ 0 60 muRR 30 ® HALE IN PER C6.0 T.xlz,w c. xcwAn R-,> sauDwl ^ Ir< K TO h'GS WIG FDR xo x i4FD ME 11-1 ANN x F;.11. ro to vA<.cs %zGNro x4"a ow -,�xcs�w 5 Kcw°T. N w a P N ED __A, ^M` = µo w T Opus Architects&AID -GNEG E a P ADA Ea M o roT roM MEN1 POLDER ExE P.xM A �AG�-1 To MxINI:a Engineers.Inc. z NMAME PGP xAnwAL s,ANDARO 5z. N t N, nx R /-oPLx.nxa NUT rxas,DNA.[ AND c,snxD. �'<tox M AD.MS c Rtcs �,at p - .x'PwxR caNECna � ® 2r MP.s.s,Axo.nD mREAn1 tx' 2'I-'xy T DEcnax A-A Bsz ase-RS2e a AM TO aL Gxxx[p I.ocAnox a vw.LC v�uL � .. '... OoxtxtE,C D B' PLUG R[ i? PExi,rAx xurz w cAPS BERw ME Bn+Mxws -•:.. ••. tMgS�NRBED"E RM PGGEN— -1 xcv Ecna(x.cr.1 �rmsx2O BNwNaVS 1-si5 CO+g8:1E ro K '' ' S,oPlx sxER A D -- ry �yyyy!PEI AD[ vrsA r L M+ov uD p uas,lxmEn eARM xw�p a M n lu� E RLSMRr. .uy Rs otailw:t•t: AND Bo•BEw \ NEER'm IpI. G rcM Mx_P = RM �I L AN ,,.• N D�D Mark Anderson "[ =--.Tr toe ran urt vuLC [ND,yp Ix varCMnar wwP ^ __ , a u no 23450 te:30/26/2013 NATEN.1. PINE SEE 3Ais"sOArtA POLY,MAPEx,FPFO r—..D r HIS �Mm�,�tn lmn an ml.!.n•cc..,n mrn0.ln... aow f ela0. WOOL£SECnw p IT AS SnONN IT ANE.NS e' 0 5 _-... - --A-2""x]00-30 10' 12• R 0 50 rt A111 �r��EaM rt (_UAL)NEDrRm nG r` 0LE TO HAVE fra 4�xM M,Ap YLENE DDn o sD n .-SSPUBDEw G 7G _ xaE _ a F "�ri * ie I .s S MEGA�smID��wA FP x. II—ANT WgRS B arc.Fa En,KE .w.D Rn gD N D M Dw. 1�T E MIINGVED D:" � m�ED �w RA a Ba wA�AW. �D Ew P PI �M �! wAT Lam D ALL. x p M,GaroT T PLUS Ga_ RDMD oo;off R V ME—CAL TM`G�°°�� �mNA:xw N 55 w<RRI. T HYDRANT AND GATE VALVE Ev.D2/201t GATE VALVE AND BO% REV.02/2311 a BLOCKING AND JOINT RESTRAINT FOR WATER MAIN Rfv.02/2011 TY WATER MAIN-STORM SEWER CROSSING INSULATION REV.02/2011 CITY MANHOLE(SANITARY SEWER) REV.2/2011 y BFDDI(L'M 3BREDNM R - li"ZT.ET RDIN R p A iT * Sp N0ARTx« a E Cw.L f�,2,�,.. LnTE a...Z ftu•L-Y . c2ER DEPAR'119-- . , LATE OEPAR,MENi - S SAYE LIC'IwTR"5 STVH SRO 102 103 DEPARTMENT 104 DEPARTMENT 201 siunup c,S1MC cs CUNE_______ waRw lCwlt xoLFS AxO wa wNEn,O x•.tC R®AR RDO x-Brow flNNtm c><AOE,.oA,s,G.snxc,D z•ro BAGN a GUNN ....... --- T+HCAL IGN Au cAS,NO _........... . N PAREMENT. xaT� Iu IFla� x' cuw swTrtn -- OO -- C .1. O m.+BlussR°�/�"�um�wrurE rein so A P .gw a O mI NB�Dne M ALL AMAND INSTALLED Z.AND CASING. uNCnOn NM AD.usmW mxGS "GF-TAN wSBE s,MC _- O __ 'EOr aOl xoF "IED Ax: : II '1; �oiWT.x ou*sui DE t2 oP . TE' It crm `"w y�LOAmxG STEPS Dr AS IN AD AA NG VED MATEmAi PLVS OEAO LoAO m LASTI T 1 Ca1M T�0`�eE o N325O`-AAA w AL I - 4wAlAAAR SExE AASN,o xs LL xI e . e0.t +uO+CO n a 5 R Cl Eau .11.T1111GINNE tx'I-_ wuttM �OONwsm[w sDE IsD wArIHUE.EO Fcmxlmc Ix aaa xan S •= xsrAU,nox I a4B �/IT T111 NINE - - 1 SPPNa ulF vBAyS V[nn -� -- EE- ® —A- T AE.ulnxom PwE Nxes LESS risen xx ..`' _ P K oNro PREC,sT A—I sends wnorurTE nlruv.t Aaoru[I• Innlne, wm,T[x APPnov,L v IN, 1. AA.,wrz iNA x n. IHLR PES?n,BLOC+raP wCN. MuLnm wElcNr tEss rwx rotes.raw B u•Ir�w "' 4 a01Y0 A-0 P""LDAp2a A` - MP/oO,STAxD - en.sc,IOns ux.xlzs An.orcn TOPa rune. BETRmt ions HALE stew A Lro A•ev.+O. sSTU[�o0r_vwF xemes RA sAK ANINGANmxre[xx ATGNS K' ND.,o A °f sR P xc g wRIT,EN APPRDVAL o<ENGN� RB TD 22 L. J I PREC,s,SDNE-L E a PI I^%-o °= s„aD~rsDw T.G°�: 1 IDE TO T D MF vFanc,nas w. -1 a s O i�c�. xulemt Rrw PwECr ruM S 1 a gG ro 2.^E TAx 1 `oMOB'+y a-I a NM ,� xoT.PGAL'AA.E Ar�ER=.T= r.ES M37_7410 GET. f-ow rune.11 1.GUTLET mwc LLVE e x e�N�w�lrcs�tRlroR 03/16/2013 To 3CITT DE PIPE BEDDING CLASSIFICATION B V 02/x01 CITY aF STANDARD STORM MANHOLE REV.Dd/2ooB CITY a CATCH BASIry MArvHOI.E 02/201, CITY D" SINGLE PIPE CATCH BASIN TYRE A ROUND v.02/2011 BRODKLa - 3BROwcLYN 36RoacLYN TA 36ROOnLTx sso6 fra J.JONES COITS RESip NDARO C F S,ANDRO CExIER Pu6uc HORNS •S.••A"t t LATE .Meuc NORMS -S'•"'A t f- .J P'-" Pueuc eoRNS Ste'"f f- .J PLATED Puetic—D .S'rA"`t>! RES PLACED NosuLE D.DANZL DEPARTMENT 220 DEPARTMENT 10/D6 FLARED END SECTION 301 DEPARTMENT 304 OEPAR TMENT 306 M.GANDERSON •Errors moy occur In 11. m e-e -a a a,PO n cMTTEP o pOss1U .I—r Rke,r o Dp a— mrs—Iw` 5 x'R e'Ols wcMTaROMry o �L nt ba` °g wiypr me Ma moH:a Its. 'Vq,*ry �ti pv`�[et`L or the Inror G,contolmd In ekdrpmc tikz. C JMN od' •ElectmnK Ines mq trot G11-y relkcl TOa BIT W K' NOTE:ANY SIGN the 6no1 Rs-blult rondlKOns.11 ie the FREE STANDING IM vLtsia \ responsibility of the user la.aril,all x•R ASPHALT PKIN ARG V .x vne byouls.dlmensuns and other.elated I-_ LOT SHALL eE DNOITS`o°[Pniv ,Y idomwtbn. Hp.R I x MOUNTED/S - p`OIF•_ .x document m " =I DRAG[ SHOWN. y atg9``ryr ,Opald nithout I,-,.�D I,consent —I= CAP.PLUG ,?Y �< TqM,r xN a OPTIONAL PANT ASS RAMP N\ Up all (FOR NARROW SIDEWALKS AD CFMTO NRB) Mry. >.tl e[E - e PVC RISP vrD, IsoMEmlc vl DINED AND DEVELOPED M. o3,[.^wa,A xON-RDNroR¢o �xW r SPCnD[D BELOW SDaMwxr,eLE cuRB M cur,EP w REND E° sxlr GTEEL-1 _ A1—k eExD � �•.', axe PAC wrL Y' _ I•E.xMnRxLVN � Or cuR � �•s. x' Fr � .e a '...;�% s wrt MrcA PARALLEL RAMP 20 RMMS ON COMMERCIAL DN.EWAmCAT amn/naE PREFCRREO PUW WEW R 5 PApUS CW RE5ICEN!AA CA KwA+S N 20• [xG,s ry^CS+CRE,F .Wn/FlS E Ex END PPws BE DND tD MMM M w[v UPON NPFGnGN ENDxE w N M DECD ,. MINNEAPOLIS _ _ MINNEAPOL Ix xGONMGHOUSGNVEN AV:NEMTENDTMNEIG-RETEAPAGNOID D'GURB BUSINESS xsnxc DDN .'� nej - - n�cunel mNOTES. R wAV.1.B NNOUS ATIRAI OIECTED B+ C .5P x TTELD - ELE—EN O.a nwPnexnRm[a rvxttlNe. CENTER II DR I a 5a . „10 11 Ix TIANST.THE nFln. E.ISTNC DmvEw,v NM uAretnxG MATEmAL oP As DIPECP, By wcIxEER ze x- eA' h' _- ar u,r Mxlutr a OiuR¢n>e'.Spr i I"Ex¢ss a wo sxAU a A D p� P ReanO LI _ I of<cenT cROMxO nL O BROOKLYN CENTER,AN 11 l"TIl M INNPE oExn "�D". .—MUST BF B 1.INAAERMN-VEWAY AND � ` B n TD M.T Dxw GNAO wD xD LEM NIn L.A.MFx �� � an a,E w w xlBa R/ �U"T".roR.I G `" DETAIL I P SECTIOI RAMP M sErnox AAanNts rNA,ARF N., SHEET E LM TYPICAL DRIVEWAY 2/2011 9a1i00 L 8-618/8-618 8 SURMOUNTABLE CONCRET NRB h GDTTER REV 02/2011 CLEAN OUT STRUCTURE 02/2011 M-OZ MFRA OmcunREnr wnECxun PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP fr� 3B<E R NEV ST LNDARD C N ER 3"E CR = .5— I.LA�, PLATE StI...A,( srP.ATE D STBA•i[✓! sTVLn,[D No sCA E ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ,x/xt OPTION 11.3Ex PUEV RTMENT� PUBUC wCRKS PDBLIC WORMS - J 406 DEPARTMENT 402 DEPARTMENT 213 C8.0 X reKL}N TER Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: May 30,2013 • Application Filed:04/17/13 • Review Period(60-day)Deadline:06/16/13 • Extension Declared:N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline:N/A Application No.2013-004 Applicant: Surly Brewing Co./Omar Ansari Location: 4811 Dusharme Drive Request: Special Use Permit to Allow the Retail Sales of Products Manufactured or Processed at a Use Site Located in the I-2(General Industry)District INTRODUCTION Mr. Omar Ansari, owner and operator of Surly Brewing Company, is requesting a Special Use Permit, which would authorize and approve the retail sales of products manufactured or processed at the approved use site, specifically hand-crafted beers and malt-liquor products. This Special Use Permit is being requested under allowances granted under a Brewer Taproom License standards, established under City Ordinance No. 2013-01 and to those holders of a brewer's license under Minnesota Statutes 340A.301, Subdivision 6(c), (i), or (g). Mr. Ansari has provided a narrative that identifies the needs and limitations of the proposed taproom facility, along with some interior diagrams which illustrate the interior layout of the taproom area and interior perspectives. This report will provide background information, an analysis, and suggested recommendations to this special use permit request. This item is being presented under a public hearing, with proper notice published in the local newspaper and mailed to the surrounding property owners. ZONING The subject property is zoned 1-2 (General Industry) District. The I-2 District is established to provide for manufacturing and wholesaling uses, along with some high intensive service uses and truck terminals. Surly Brewing is operating as a Beverage (beer, wine and distilled alcohol) Manufacturer, which is a permitted use. A special use permit is required to sell any products manufactured or wholesaled on an approved 1-2 site. This special use permit would allow Surly to offer to the general public beer samples, with some limited snacks and non-alcoholic beverages. Prior to the recent adoption of State legislation ("Brewer Taproom License" - per Minnesota Statutes 340A.301, Subdivision 6(c), (i), or (g)), brewers and micro-breweries similar to Surly Brewing were prohibited from selling their beer products on their own brewery or manufacturing sites. This taproom license now allows brewers such as Surly to sell their products on-site, instead of shipping to off-site retail uses, such as liquor stores, restaurants, bars and other facilities. This special use permit would also not be possible without adoption of this legislation, since the retail sell of the products must comply with all other applicable laws. Surly Brewing SUP Page 1 05/30/13 TAPROOM LAYOUT & OPERATION The brewery facility consists of 23,380 gross sf. floor area, most of which is dedicated to beer manufacturing and storage; a separate 1,140 sq. ft. office area near the southwest corner of the building; and a larger 2,242 sf. area dedicated for offices, restrooms, merchandise room, and common area, which is slated to become the future taproom. Mr. Ansari's diagram indicates the taproom occupies a space of 45' x 30', or 1,350 sf. of this southeast corner of the brewery. The interior diagrams illustrate nine, 24-inch cafe style tables, with a stainless steel drink rail along the perimeter of the interior wall. Assuming that 3 to 4 chairs (seats) could be accommodated at each table, and approximately 10-12 seats along the drink rail, the taproom could safely seat approximately 37 to 48 patrons. As indicated by the diagram, some patrons may stand and simply mingle within the space, or they may filter in and out of the main brewery/manufacturing area for an up-close tour of the facility (according to Mr. Ansari's narrative). The narrative further indicates the taproom will only be open from Wednesday to Friday, 3:00 to 10:00 PM; and on Saturdays/Sundays from 12:00 Noon to 10:00 PM. The taproom is intended to be open after the larger, regular beer manufacturing employees complete their shift, which is 3:00 PM Daily. The taproom will be professionally staffed and serve only beer (no liquor or wine), and other non-alcoholic beverages and pre-packaged snacks. City records indicate the building site was constructed in 1961. The brewery currently has a large parking area to the south of the main building, which is served by an access from Dusharme Drive. The cul-de-sac (right-of-way) portion of Dusharme extends almost to the front edge of the brewery building, which means this building encroaches into the required 35-foot front yard setbacks and creates an obvious non-conforming situation for the subject property. Staff was unable to determine why or how this building was ever allowed or approved to be built in such a manner. The current parking lot is trapezoidal in shape, which makes a standard parking design somewhat difficult to stripe or lay out. Most of the main employee parking is confined to the outer (southern and western) lot lines, consisting of approximately 26-28 parking spaces, with 6 vehicle spaces near the main front entryway. The central part of the parking lot is unstriped, due to the need for truck deliveries and movements inside the site. As part of a cooperative working relationship with Mr. Ansari on this issue cit y planning staff prepared a mock illustration of a proposed parking plan layout, which includes keeping and expanding the outer parking areas, and creating new 60-degree angled parking area in the main center portion of the lot. This layout is based on a one-way movement through the parking lot. The new layout provides up to 50 on-site parking spaces. Because Dusharme does not have any parking restrictions, there is room (potentially) for an additional 19 spaces. With the 50 on-site and 19 off-site, this property up to a total of 69 potential spaces. Surly Brewing SUP Page 2 05/30/13 COMPLIANCE FOR STANDARDS FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS A Special Use Permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the following are met: a. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. b. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. C. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. d. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. e. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. The existing lot is located within an area of the city that was developed and guided for general or heavy industrial type users. The subject site is surrounded by Allied Blacktop Materials to the east; Sela Roofing, Midwest Screw Company and Bergman Machine Works to the south; the now vacant Allied Building Products to the west; and the Canadian-Pacific railroad to the north. Staff is of the opinion that this taproom approval would essentially be similar to what they were operating as before; the only difference is they are now able to charge or sell their beer on the brewery site. This use as a brewery and allowances for tours and free samples has been demonstrated for a number of years not to be an issue with the surrounding uses, and the City has not received any complaints or issues related to the general operation of the Surly brewery. Staff further believes the operation of the taproom and selling of beer on this site will be limited (as per the wishes of the owner), and this limitation should lessen any impacts to the surrounding uses, especially during normal working hours. The establishment of this use will not impact this normal and orderly development of this area. As for parking, the owner has indicated in his narrative that this taproom will be limited to certain days and times, which would not impose on the current regular production work shifts that typically end at 3:00 PM each day. By the time patrons begin to arrive for the tours or taproom facility, the parking areas located along the south and west edge should be available. The parking area in the central part will also be available, as trucks will no longer need to load/unload at this time of the day. The taproom appears to have 37 to 48 seats available for patron seating. Based on its size, the taproom is slated to have an occupancy load of 100 persons. City Parking Code requires at least 1 space for every 2 seats, plus 1 for every 2 Surly Brewing SUP Page 3 05/30/13 employees. This would require or 24 spaces plus another 3-4 spaces for employees (assuming 6-10 employees), or 28 spaces total. It appears the site will be able to accommodate these numbers, however, the City must also recognize or acknowledge that parking would still be allowed on Dusharme Drive if the site needs overflow parking. The end portion of this cul-de- sac is virtually an extension of the Surly property; and parking along both sides of the street leading up to this area is used daily by employee vehicles for the Sela Siding company next door. Once these employees leave their employment base,this frees up 18-19 on-street spaces. The new taproom will ultimately comply with the local City Ordinance No. 2013-01, once the taproom provision created under Minnesota Statutes 340A.301, Subdivision 6(c), (i), or (g) is officially adopted. This statute is slated to be official at the end of August 2013. This special use permit will allow the selling of beer to Surly patrons in conjunction with this new taproom law. SUMMARY& RECOMMENDATION With that brief summary, Planning Staff recommends approval of the special use permit based on the grounds that the new standards for granting special use permit have been or will be met; and the special use permit appears to be an appropriate and fitting use with the general purposes and intent of the ordinance. If the Planning Commission accepts this recommendation, the Commission should elect to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2013-03, which memorializes the findings in granting this special use permit, and provides for the conditions of approval as follows: 1. The taproom facility must be posted with the maximum occupancy load as determined by the City Building Official and City Fire Chief. The Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining and complying with this occupancy level during operations of this taproom and brewery. 2. The taproom is only allowed to operate Wednesday through Friday, 3:00 to 10:00 PM; and on Saturdays and Sundays from 12:00 Noon to 10:00 PM. 3. The Applicant must demonstrate or optimize off-street parking for visitors and employees on the subject property site, similar to what is illustrated on the "Surly Brewing Co. — Proposed Parking Plan Layout" (dated May 30, 2013). Parking for visitors and employees in the Dusharme Drive right-of-way should be discouraged. However, in the event the on-site parking area is full or at capacity due to a special event occasionally sponsored by Surly Brewing Co., the City will allow on-street parking within the Dusharme Drive right-of-way. The Applicant shall be responsible for making sure all access points, drive lanes and fire hydrants remain open and accessible to any emergency vehicles. Surly Brewing SUP Page 4 05/30/13 5. Should the Applicant arrange for any shared, off-site parking arrangement with other adjacent properties of the subject site, relevant information including the number of parking spaces, type of agreement or arrangements (hours, numbers, availability, etc.), and owner contact information must be provided to the City. 6. This Special Use Permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. Any violation, thereof, may be grounds for revocation. 7. Any taproom improvement plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes through the building permit process. 8. If required, necessary permits for any beer servicing and food servicing must be received from Hennepin County Health Department prior to the issuance of permits. 9. This Special Use Permit approval is exclusive of all new signage requests, which are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. ATTACHMENTS • Surly Brewing Co.Narrative • Interior Diagrams of the Taproom Facility • Surly Brewing Co.—Proposed Parking Plan Layout'—dated May 30,2013 • Photos of the Property Surly Brewing SUP Page 5 05/30/13 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2013-05 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2013-004 SUBMITTED BY OMAR ANSARI OF SURLY BREWING COMPANY FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE RETAIL SALES OF PRODUCTS MANUFACTURED OR PROCESSED AT A USE SITE LOCATED IN THE I-2 GENERAL INDUSTRY DISTRICT(4811 DUSHARME DRIVE) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2013-004 submitted by Omar Ansari with Surly Brewing Company ("Applicant"), requesting a Special Use Permit approval for the property located at 4811 Dusharme Drive ("Subject Property"); and WHEREAS, the proposed special use permit would allow the Applicant to sell at retail products manufactured or processed at the Subject Property, specifically hand-crafted beer products and as part of a Taproom license; and WHEREAS, this Special Use Permit is being requested under allowances granted under a Brewer Taproom License standards, established under City Ordinance No. 2013-01 and to those holders of a brewer's license under Minnesota Statutes 340A.301, Subdivision 6(c), (i), or (g).; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 30, 2013, whereby a staff report and public testimony regarding the special use permit were received and noted for the record; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Special Use Permit request, and in light of all testimony received, and reviewing and considering the guidelines and standards for evaluating this special use permit as contained in City Zoning Code Section 35-220, that this special use permit meets the general standards for issuing or approving said permits, and complies with the goals and objectives of the City's 2030 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2013-004, a special use permit submitted by Omar Ansari with Surly Brewing Company be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the 1 neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. 4. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. 5. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that Application No. 2011-007 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. The taproom facility must be posted with the maximum occupancy load as determined b the City Building Official and City Fire Chief. The Y Y g Applicant shall be responsible for maintaining and complying with this occupancy level during operations of this taproom and brewery. 2. The taproom is only allowed to operate Wednesday through Friday, 3:00 to 10:00 PM; and on Saturdays and Sundays from 12:00 Noon to 10:00 PM. 3. The Applicant must demonstrate or optimize off-street parking for visitors and employees on the subject property site, similar to what is illustrated on the "Surly Brewing Co. — Proposed Parking Plan Layout" (dated May 30, 2013). Parking for visitors and employees in the Dusharme Drive right- of-way should be discouraged. However, in the event the on-site parking area is full or at capacity due to a special event occasionally sponsored by Surly Brewing Co., the City will allow on-street parking within the Dusharme Drive right-of-way. The Applicant shall be responsible for making sure all access points, drive lanes and fire hydrants remain open and accessible to any emergency vehicles. 4. Should the Applicant arrange for any shared, off-site parking arrangement with other adjacent properties of the subject site, relevant information including the number of parking spaces, type of agreement or arrangements (hours, numbers, availability, etc.), and owner contact information must be provided to the City. 5. This Special Use Permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and regulations. Any violation, thereof, may be grounds for revocation. 6. Any taproom improvement plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes through the building permit process. 7. If required, necessary permits for any beer servicing and food servicing must be received from Hennepin County Health Department prior to the issuance of permits. 8. This Special Use Permit approval is exclusive of all new signage requests, which are subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances. May 30,2013 Date Chair ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member g g and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners , , , , , and and the followin g voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. kwk Surly Brewing Company is excited to have the opportunity to open a taproom in our Brooklyn Center brewery location! I hope to show below what are plans are for our new taproom and how that differs from what we have being doing for the last seven years. We went to get our first permit for brewery and tasting room construction in 2005. The plan was to change our old industrial manufacturing facility into a microbrewery that would have public tours and tastings. We quickly realized that our facility was not up to code in accessibility into the brewery, restroom ADA code and fire exits. Because we always planned on having the public in our brewery and a tasting room, we made these changes at that time. Currently,the brewery does have wheelchair accesability, ADA restrooms, and proper emergency exit doors and markings per the Brooklyn Center zoning department. In 2012, our fire alarm system was upgraded to the entire facility and is monitored 24/7 by Armour Security. Since 2007, we have been offering tours 2-4 times per week.The tours would occur on Friday and Saturday and would average between 100-150 people per tour. Individuals would not be charged for their tour registration. In other words,the beer they consumed was free. Each tour goer had their ID verified to ensure they were over 21.The only individuals under 21 would have to be accompanied by their parent.Those of drinking age would receive a wristband with 5 tabs that entitled them to 5—seven ounce beers.All our staffing was done by volunteers; id checker and door person, merchandise salesperson, beer pouring, cleaning staff and tour leader. In the six years that we have been doing tours, we have only needed to ask one person to be removed due to behavior, no parking issues with our neighbors, no complaints from neighbors, no complaints or issues from city or police. The biggest difference between our old tour set up and the new plan, is that we will finally be able to charge visitors for beer. Our plan is to have the taproom open form Wednesday to Friday, 3:00-10:00, Saturday and Sunday noon—10:00.The taproom will no longer be staffed by volunteers, but by paid servers that have industry experience.All servers will be TIPS (Training for Intervention ProcedureS) trained. We plan on checking IDs and age when individuals enter the building.They will be wrist banded to ensure to pouring staff they are of legal drinking age. Under 21 will not be allowed to enter unless accompanied by a parent. We will sell glasses of beer at the current bar area. Beers will be offered in 16, 10 and 8 ounce sizes. We will allow patrons to enter the brewery after 7:00 and look around. The work areas will be taped off and we will have an employee stationed in the brewery area to answer brewing questions and monitor guests. 481 1 Dusharme Drive Brooklyn Center,MN 55429 763.535.3330 fax 763.535.2708 www.surlybrewing.com Linda Haug will be our taproom manager. She has owned Cafe Twenty-Eight, a neighborhood bistro, in Linden Hills for ten years. She managed a staff of 15 and we feel her experience in the food and alcohol serving will be a great asset to the taproom team. In addition to beer, we will also offer non-alcoholic drinks for sale; sodas,jucies, root beer, water. All packages will be kept in a separate refrigerated unit for sale in the taproom. Packaged snacks will also be available for sale, chips, pretzels, etc. We have looked into a food truck on-site during weekends if the demand warrants them. We will also be installing a drink rail in the taproom, a new coat rack and additional bike parking outside. We believe that the parking demands for this taproom will be less that our existing tour needs. Being that we are open only 4 hours a week for tours, we have a crush of people and cars at those times. We feel that spreading out our open hours will spread out that demand for parking.The majority of parking demand for our taproom will be in the evening and weekend. Those are the times when the businesses in the industrial park are not operating. As stated previously, we have never had a problem with parking spaces during our tour. I feel that the situation would be the same for our taproom. If the parking demand for parking exceeds the available on-site and on-street parking we can handle it in one of two ways: -Secure additional parking spaces from a neighboring business -limit the number of guests that can enter the taproom, effectively"turning away" customers and cars Please contact Omar Ansari with any additional questions or concerns about the taproom. G B revue A x r - Amp Entran Surly Brewing Co. - - - -- oklyn Center Tap Room ], vr�r►al Men's office Merchandise Area Brewery Entrance �5,hk it Fx►� E 2 9--24" Round Tables Women's BAR 3d� 19 Chairs � � r r Drink Rail r � Main Entrance �,. ��I r l' x A 1 ` - lot �i. r &i AMJ pill i i Report Name: Images City of Brooklyn Center Printed: 5/17/2013 PID: 10-118-21-42-0021 Page: 1 Property Images 215' in �n First Floor 23380' N 55' 3' 19' M Office 2242' °a 15'm 352' in Office 34' 80' m Office F, ° 62' ry 788' 4' < 40' 30' Sketch by Apex MedinaTM 75 _ sa two ,a r zoo _ 05.30.13 a r t.—. City Of Business and Development XBrooLfyn Center— Department www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway,Brooklyn Center,Minnesota 55430-2199 Phone 763.569.3300 TTYNoice 711 Fax 763.569.3494 MEMORANDUM TO: Brooklyn Center Planning Commission FROM: Gary Eitel, Business & Development Director Tim Benetti, Planning & Zoning Specialist DATE: May 31, 2013 RE: 2n, PUBLIC HEARING—Proposed Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 34 (Signs) and Chapter 35 (Zoning) of the City Code regarding Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) Introduction At the April 11th and 25th meetings, the Commission conducted a public hearing of a proposed ordinance amendment related to dynamic message signs (DMS). Upon due consideration, a motion was made to recommend approval of a proposed ordinance to the City Council. At the May 13, 2013 regular City Council meeting, the Council received this favorable recommendation and draft ordinance. Upon presentation of this ordinance, the Council accepted most of the recommended standards, such as the sign size, intensity and frequency (timing) of messages. The Council however, was concerned with allowing DMS' in residential areas and felt added measures should be incorporated to provide notification to adjacent residents or neighborhoods. The Council elected to pull the ordinance from their agenda and send back to the Planning Commission for further consideration, specifically to address incorporating a special use permit review into the DMS approval process. This matter has been scheduled for a new public hearing at this May 30th Planning Commission meeting. Undated Information For the most part, the City Council was generally receptive to the favorable recommendation and findings made by the Commission on this proposed sign ordinance amendment, but felt additional safeguards or measures were needed to protect residential areas where these new DMS could potentially be placed. The Council questioned how a neighboring resident or neighborhood would be notified if a DMS were to be installed in or near their neighborhood; and if they objected to such a sign how would they best be heard. The proposed ordinance amendment only considered allowing a DMS for a public use as a permitted use and without special means or requirement of notification built into the approval process. This approval is essentially made by approving a sign application permit, which is handled internally by city staff. Since most of these public uses are located in residential districts, the Council felt it was important to be able to have the adjacent residents or neighborhoods know if a new sign of this capacity or ability to change messages should be made known. A suggestion was given by city staff that the only truly effective way of notification is by means of a special use permit. Zoning Code specifies that most of these newly defined "public uses" (churches, schools, public building) are only allowed by means of a special use permit, and the City assumes most, if not all have been approved with a SUP. If a public use with a documented or previously approved SUP were to seek a DMS on their site, then an amended special use permit would be an appropriate mechanism for approving the DMS. Conversely, if it were determined a public use is unable to produce or document an approved SUP on the subject site, the City may require that said public use apply for a new special use permit to cover this existing use, and include the DMS request as part of the overall approvals. It was the general consensus of the Council that any DMS for a public use in a residential district should be approved under a special use permit process, and requested this ordinance amendment with this requirement be sent back to the Planning Commission for additional consideration and recommendations. Direction was also given that the PC should conduct this additional consideration under a public hearing process, similar to what was done at the April l ltn and 25th meetings. Special Use Permit Process The special use permit process is identified and noted under Zoning Code Section 35-220. This SUP process contains a very detailed procedures list, which includes a public hearing process before the Planning Commission and follow-up consideration by the City Council. For any properties located in the R1 and R2 Districts, all properties within 150-feet of the subject property receive notification of the public hearing. Attached to this report are two map examples (of Evergreen School and St. Alphonsus Church) of what a 150-ft. mailing notice would cover and how many properties would be personally notified under the SUP process. The standards for granting a special use permit are as follows: Sect. 35-220.2.: A special use permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the following are met: a. The establishment, maintenance or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort. b. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. C. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. d. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. e. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. If the City were to adopt this SUP process into the proposed ordinance, a property owner or sign vendor seeking to install a DMS on a public use site, would be required to submit a general city planning application; pay a $200.00 fee; and provide a narrative or response that addresses the standards noted above. Assuming a favorable recommendation from the PC and approval by Council, a sign permit could be issued within 45 to 60 days. Staff Comments & Analysis As noted in previous planning updates on this item, most of these public uses such as churches, schools and public buildings are all permitted by special use permit in the residential R1 and R2 Districts. Interestingly, churches are allowed as a permitted use in the C 1, C 1-A and C2 districts, but not traditional schools such as public elementary,junior or senior high schools. This new original ordinance amendment was primarily focused on those public uses in residential districts. It is believed that Staff previously mentioned [for example] if a church were located in a C2 Zone, that the sign allowances granted under the C2 would apply; meaning a church (or other public use) could possibly have a larger standard or dynamic message type sign than those uses located in a typical residential zone, and without going through the special use permit process. This may no longer be the case. Staff also discovered in our follow-up review that a public use located in a C 1 or C 1-A Zone, could have a DMS, while all other office/service uses would be prohibited. This is due to the ambiguous language contained in the original ordinance, which indicated: "[a DMS] is permitted in the C2, I4 I-2 and with Public Uses in all districts where they are allowed." By leaving this statement alone, one might interpret that a church in a CI Zone (hence all districts) could potentially have a full sized 72 sq. ft., 20-ft. tall freestanding DMS sign, or possibly a 108 sq. ft. sign if located on a double frontage lot. The current Sign Code contains the heading "Public and Semi-Public Places (All Districts) which provides limited and reduced standards for these uses. An interpretation of this heading would mean that all public uses are subject to these limited sign requirements, regardless of the zoning district in which they are located. The proposed ordinance that was presented to the Planning Commission kept this additional "All Districts" labeling in the new heading, and Staff is attempting to avoid any ambiguity or confusion in this new ordinance by adding specific new language. Staff feels it was the City Council's wish to see that all public uses in all districts seeking a DMS in all districts should obtain a special use permit prior to any approval. Staff felt this was needed to be addressed and is noted it the new Proposed Ordinance - Draft# 7. Staff also has added brand new language under Section 34-140. PERMITTED SIGNS 3.D: Subpart 3; by adding a new standard, whereby any DMS with a Public Use would only be allowed on a freestanding sign, which sign must be perpendicular and located along a collector or arterial road system. No DMS wall signs would be allowed. Most of these public uses are required to be situated on a collector or arterial roadway, and Staff felt DMS' in these neighborhoods should be limited to these roadways as well. Proposed Lanaune Modifications Staff determined the original (and current) subheading "k" subheading under Sect. 34-140.1 General Requirements and Standards for Permitted Signs shall remain as is, followed by a new sub-category"1"noted below by yellow highlighted text: Current Ordinance Language (to remain): k. A dynamic messages sign "DMS," is permitted only in the C2, I-1 and I-2 Districts. A DMS is also subject to the requirements of Section 34-140.3.A of this ordinance. A DMS message must remain constant for at least two seconds when such sign is in use. Original Proposed Ordinance Language: k. A dynamic messages sign "DMS," is permitted in the C2, I-1 and I-2 Districts., and with Public Uses in all districts where they are allowed. A DMS is also subject to the requirements of Section 34-140.3.A and Section 34-140.3.D of this ordinance. A DMS message in the C2, I-1 and 1-2 Districts must remain constant for at least two seconds when such sign is in use. New Proposed Ordinance Language: 1 A dynamic messages sign "DMS." with a Public Use in all districts where they are allowed shall be approved by a special use permit, which procedure for approving said permit shall be the same as set forth in Section 35-220 of the Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center. A DMS is also subject to the requirements of Section 34-140.3.D of this ordinance. Original Proposed Ordinance Language: 3. Dynamic Message Signs (DMS) A DMS owned or operated by a Public Use located in a residential zoned district shall meet the following additional standards: New Proposed Ordinance Language: 3. Dynamic Message Signs (DM A DMS owned or operated by a Public Use located in all districts where they are allowed shall be approved by a special use permit or-by--amendment to a previously approved special use permit, which procedure for approving said permit shall be same as set forth in Section 35-220 of the Ordinances of the Citv of Brooklyn Center, and shall meet the following additional standards: a. the DMS shall only be allowed on a freestanding sign aligned p=endicular to the adjacent roadway system. This roadway must either be a collector or arterial street, as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. b. the area of a DMS sign is limited to an area equal to 50% of the maximum allowable size of the freestanding sign. Recommendation Staff supports the concerns raised by the City Council and feels that extra notifications or protection can be made through the special use permit process when approving these signs in residential areas. Therefore, Staff recommends the Commission accepts and adopts the additional special use permit standard into the proposed ordinance. The Planning Commission should make a motion to open and conduct the additional public hearing; allow for comments or concerns from the stakeholders or citizens of the community; discuss this matter and the new standards noted in this memorandum report, and provide an amended recommendation back to the City Council on this item. Attachments - Draft No. 7-Ordinance Amendment - Example Map- 150-ft.Notification of SUP CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DRAFT#8 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the day of , 2013, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an Ordinance Amending Chapter 34 and Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances Regarding the allowance of dynamic message signs (DMS) to public places and uses, and adding new definitions of public uses. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at(763) 569-3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 34 AND CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE OF DYNAMIC MESSAGE SIGNS (DMS) TO PUBLIC PLACES AND USES AND ADDING NEW DEFINITIONS OF PUBLIC USES THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended in the following manner (stx-ikeetA +°°+ indicates matter to be deleted, while double underline text indicates new matter): Section 34-110. DEFINITIONS. The language set forth in the text of this ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the following definitions. Words used in the present tense shall include the future; words used in the singular shall include the plural and the plural includes the singular. Public Uses—uses, facilities and properties owned or operated by a school district, a municipality, county, state, or other governmental units, and any religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, synagogues and mosques. Section 34-140. PERMITTED SIGNS. 1. General Requirements and Standards for Permitted Signs 1. A dynamic messages sign "DMS." with a Public Use in all districts where they are allowed shall be approved by a special use permit, which procedure for approving said permit shall be the same as forth in Section 35-220 of the Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center. A DMS is also subiect to the requirements of Section 34-140.3.1) of this ordinance. 1 3. Permitted Signs Requiring a Permit D. Public and Semi D.,L.': Peres Uses (All Districts Where Thev Are Allowed) 1. Freestanding Signs rhur-ehes synagogues and temples may have the felle a. One freestanding sign with the sign area not to exceed 36 square feet. The sign shall not extend more than 10 feet above the ground level. There may be a second such sign if the use abuts two or more streets. Properties entitled to a second freestanding sign may elect to erect a single freestanding sign not exceeding 72 square feet in area or 15 feet in height. 2. Wall Signs a.b-. One wall sign not to exceed 36 square feet. b.c—. One wall sign immediately above or beside each public entrance to that part of the building which is used as a school and meets the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Education, or as a day care facility and is licensed by the Minnesota Department of Public Welfare. The sign area shall not exceed 10 square feet. 2Oth r ubli eltibs and ledges. a. Freestanding signs as--specified--above-der b. One wall sign, the maximuffi afea not to exeeed 3. Dynamic Message Signs (DMSI A DMS owned or operated by a Public Use located in all districts where they are allowed shall be approved by a special use permit or by amendment to a previously approved special use permit, which 2 procedure for approving said permit shall be same as set forth in Section 35-220 of the Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center, and the DMS shall meet the following additional standards: a. the DMS shall only be allowed on a freestanding sign aligned perpendicular to the adjacent roadway system. This roadway must either be a collector or arterial street as identified in the City's Comprehensive Plan. b the area of a DMS sign is limited to an area equal to 509/o of the maximum allowable size of the freestanding sign, c the DMS message must remain stationary or static for up to 8-seconds or more: d. the DMS shall be located no closer than 50-feet from any residential dwelling. e. the DMS must have dimming technology that automatically adjusts its brightness in direct correlation with ambient light conditions. and said brightness shall not exceed 0.3 foot-candles above ambient light as measured from a preset distance depending on the sign size: as indicated in the table below: DMS Sign MeasuremenlD-IAa= AREA of SIGN MEASUREMENT (sg. ft.1 (Distance—ft.l 10 32 15 39 20 45 25 50 30 55 35 59 40 63 45 67 50 71 55 74 60 77 65 81 3 70 84 75 87 80 89 85 92 90 95 95 97 100 100 Measurement Calculation= (Sign Area x 1"0 Section 35-900. DEFINITIONS. The language set forth in the text of this ordinance shall be interpreted in accordance with the following definitions. Words used in the present tense shall include the future; words used in the singular shall include the plural and the plural includes the singular. Public Uses—uses, facilities and properties owned or operated by a school district, a municipality, county, state, or other governmental units, and any religious institutions such as churches, chapels, temples, synagogues and mosques. Section 2. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty days following its legal publication. Adopted this day of , 2013. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (stfikeeut tex4 indicates matter to be deleted, while double underline text indicates new matter) 4 EVERGREEN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Legend Selected Features Municipal Boundary Lakes&Streams nParks Parcels d �m Mau �� fl MvcaaMn-.�M1 CNS C.nr'9e:C'_ r.tt EXAMPLE- 150-FT. MAILING/NOTIFICATION MAP ` f t? L, v I' PID: 2511921340001 a(s,of e r 7 7020 Dupont Ave N BROOKL Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 CENTER F 1 St. Alphonsus Catholic Church 7213 1218 7215 7218 7219 1218 7219 1218 _1119 7212 7213 1212 7213 Legend 7218 7212 7207 7111 7213 — 7211 7211 721] t201 7206 7111) Selected Features 7206 7207 R Street Name Labels 7106 720, y1 7201 7207 .1 1206 /207 72W 1301 1D 7200 710, t $ House Number Points z 7X%7 7131 7200 7101 7200 720' 1200 73,1 ,0 7220] )'43 T2NL)AbE N 11/ Municipal Boundary 22ND AVE N C / 7124 1125 71]0 7131 7131 7111 71X1 7111 � 7130 P37 7142 •100' O Lakes g Streams 7116 7125 I,lD 7119 7124 7125 7124 7125 7134 1125 � 7,14 1!}1 7136 7137 E] Parks 719 1 ❑ Parcels 1,12 7!?3 ]118 1119 7112 7,30 711! 7118 1119 7,18 7'•D 1125 7111 j 1112 1111 7112 7113 , 7112 7111 71.1 7119 "L4 7101 )'J 4505 45!'/J i 22 $W _ 6 t TIOt 700 4405 1101 1 7100 72306 4300 4112 4X16 4200 JtOp 721,2 :4106 1113 Sy 1 4513 4317 -0301 M19 71STAVEN -- 7"Gt'i M00 4113- M01 4101 4319 7313.U07 4X11 4219 421)476):004 7119. 4001 4av' 4111 7100 j2 1037 7031 MI5 f MtS j/f j �� jf M,3 -"Ji2i�jyj/�jiJ;�i:.,�.¢i, �rc%f.<< i;"i'" 79iN AVE N l f/- iii;%y�fi not 04' 6%42 6945 NAVEN / /89723 0 4101 6936 6931 91511020 LJi19..Patrk 8916 69M �� /% :6910 6931 8930 6931 6911, 693! 031 6930 6931 6933 6924 8925 6927 6924 6921 m 6927 am O 6924 6925 D F > 6920 6921 691 69 6918 69'9 18 18 63.9 6911 < 6918 692' m 6912 6413 f'N,5 6913 8915 6915 8100 59'4 6915 69C1t 6906 6907 69D1 6406 64JV 6906 6901 4793 690D Mtb MOB 4101 690' ,1+� 4•fV 40'4 4600 45W 45!*+ SSTH A%?N _6633 6819 MmaemW�rnhe145-C�t+:gs!C1lOG,S 416'-0:45 6 35lilf 150-ft. Mailing Notification Ma (Example Onl Qr o;' a PID: 2711921330069 C;Q of e 7025 Halifax Ave N BROOKLYN i Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 CENTER 1 To: Members of the Planning Commission and City Council From: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development Date: May 30,2013 Subject: Review of the PUD/C1A zoning for the Embassy Suites Project and Conceptual Development Plans for a 4 story — 81 room Candlewood Extended Stay Hotel on the Phase II parcel. (Lot 2, Block 2 Brooklyn Farm 2nd Addition) The focus of this discussion item is to reacquaint the Planning Commission with the existing zoning and General Development Plan for the Embassy Suites PUD; review the site conditions relating to access, the unique features of the pond, trail, and relationship to the historic Earle Brown Farm; and to identify a meeting schedule that would facilitate the necessary actions to enable construction in 2013. Background: Attached is an outline which retraces the actions of this PUD and development plans for the Embassy Hotel Project which lead up to the EDA's remarketing of the phase II lot of the Embassy Hotel Project. On May 13, 2013,the EDA adopted Resolution No. 2013-03, A Resolution accepting MINNESOTA HOSPITALITY INC'S LETTER OF INTENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, BROOKLYN FARM 2ND ADDITION AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (PHASE II EMBASSY PUD SITE). Attached for reference is a copy of this resolution and May 13th staff memorandum on this item. Amendment to the 2005 PUD/C1A Development Plans: The process involves a public hearing before the Planning Commission, review and approval of the development plans and is finalized with a City Council Resolution and Development Agreement. A Planning Commission Public Hearing is tentatively scheduled for the June 27th, which would enable City Council action at their July 8th Meeting on the PUD amendment. The following plans and architectural renderings will be reviewed at the May 30th Meeting in preparation for the future consideration of this PUD amendment: - A copy of the 2007 PUD/C1A Development plans for the Embassy Suites Hotel and conceptually illustrates the phase II hotel development on this site; - A concept plan illustrating the development of the buildable portion of this lot, approximately 1.5 acres of this 2.18 acre lot; - An aerial photograph of the site and relationship to the Earle Brown Farm Site; and - Exterior elevations illustrating the architectural treatment of the building to achieve the Class I and Class 11 material requirement. This scheduled public hearing will also be coordinated with the completion of a draft development agreement for the City Council and EDA's consideration on July Stn The approval of the Development Agreement will set in motion the scheduling of a public hearing by the City Council on approving a business subsidy agreement and establishing a Tax Abatement Plan. (Tentative Date: August 12tH ) Additionally, on August 12th, the EDA will provide for the required public notice/input and consider the necessary findings for the sales of this EDA owned property. Site Plan Approval and Land Division An ATLA survey with topography is tentative scheduled to be completed by June 151H Assuming 30 days for the architect and civil engineer to prepare the plans required for a site plan review application; the Planning Commission could be reviewing the site development and building exterior plans at the August 15th meeting with City Council consideration and action at their August 26th meeting. Note: The developer will be advised to coordinate their site plan submittal with the Watershed deadlines for their August meeting At this time, it is the opinion of Planning Staff that the separation of the pond and trail area from Lot 2, Block 1, Brooklyn Farm 2nd Addition can be accomplished by a simple metes and bounds division in lieu of a formal replatting of this lot. Planning has been reviewing options to enhance the pond and trail with lighting, seating areas, and a lighted fountain and is considering options to include those concepts with the Phase II development. Photographs illustrating an example of a passive recreation setting with ponds, fountain, and seating areas will be provided at this meeting. Land Closing and Commencing Construction: Once the City and EDA have accomplished the above actions, it is then the developer's responsibility to complete the construction plans for the issuance of a building permit and complete their franchise & financing packages. The Letter of Intent identifies the following actions required prior to the Closing of the property: a) The buyer/developer has been issued approval by IHG, InterContinential Hotels Group; b) The City has been issued a building permit for a hotel approved by the IHG which will be built to the quality of having a minimum tax assessed valuation of$3.0 Million; and c) The buyer/developer has provided the City with a copy of its financial commitments. Following this schedule, it is feasible that these actions can be coordinated for an October, 2013 construction start. Recommendation: This is an informational item for discussion purposes and no action is required at this time. 2005 Rezoning of the 6.2 acre parcel from C1A to PUD/CIA for the development of a 250 room hotel, 100 seat restaurant, and 32,000 sq.ft. water park. 2006 Development agreement and 10 year tax abatement plan. 2007 Amendment to the PUD Development Plans for 15t phase of a two building hotel complex consisting of an 8 story - 175 room Embassy Suites Hotel, 100 seat restaurant, and physical connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center.A second phase hotel was illustrated on the remaining 2.18 acres 2007 The plat of Brooklyn Farm 2nd Addition created a 4. 02 acre lot and a 2.18 acre lot for the 2nd phase. The project started construction in late 2007 and was completed in early 2009. 2009 The developer completed the Phase I improvements with the exception of a physical link to the EBHC 2010 The Fourth Amendment to the Development and Certain Related Agreements were approved. - developer's forfeiture of any rights to the Phase II development; - confirmed the D-Barn Lease Agreement and easements for the EDA's construction of the link; - approved adjustments to the payment of tax abatements for the Phase I development, including the right of set off to secure the D-Barn Lease and Link Maintenance Agreement; and - conveyed the development rights for Phase II to the EDA and the obligation to construct the link to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. 2011 The EDA completed the link to Earle Brown Heritage Center. Letter of Intent for Development of Phase II site • 4 story 81 room Candlewood Extended Stay Hotel 0 Purchase Amount$500,000 • Tax Abatement Plan similar to the 2006 agreement • Architectural standards identical to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD ( Class I and Class 11 materials) • City and EDA approvals include Public Hearings and actions necessary to: - Amend the PUD Development Plans - Re-plat or Land Division to separate the pond and trail - Establishment of a Tax Abatement Plan, - Approval of a Business Subsidy Agreement, - Resolution with economic findings for the conveyance of EDA owned land Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: (. . EDA RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING MINNESOTA HOSPITALITY INC'S LETTER OF INTENT FOR DEVELOPMENT OF LOT 2,BLOCK 1,BROOKLYN FARM 2ND ADDITION AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(PHASE H EMBASSY PUD SITE) WHEREAS, on June 27, 2005, the City Council adopted Resolution No.2005-97, which approved the rezoning of a 6.2 acre parcel from C 1 A to PUD/C 1 A for the development of a 250 room hotel containing a 100 seat restaurant and a 32,000 sq. ft.water park facility; and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2006,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2006- 121,which approved a Property Tax Abatement Plan and Development Agreement with Brooklyn Hotel Partners in connection with two full service hotels and related facilities;and WHEREAS, on October 23, 2006, the EDA adopted Resolution 2006-12, which deleted this 6.2 acre parcel from Tax Increment Financing District No. 2 and Approved and Authorized the Execution of a Development Agreement; and WHEREAS,on May 14,2007,the City Council adopted Resolution 2007-70,which approved an amendment to the PUD/Cl A Development Plans for the 1"phase of a two building hotel complex,consisting of an eight story, 175 room Embassy Suites Hotel and 100 seat restaurant with a physical connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center; and WHEREAS, on July 9, 2007,the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2007-100, approving the Final Plat of Brooklyn Farm 2°a Addition, which created a 4.02 acre lot for the I" phase development of an Embassy Suites Hotel and a 2.18 acre lot for the 2°a phased as conceptually illustrated on the approved PUD Development Plans; and WHEREAS, on July 23,2007, October 8,2007, and December 27,2007,the EDA adopted Resolution 2007-12, Resolution No.2007-19,and Resolution No.2007-23 which approved minor amendments to the Development Agreement Between the Economic Development Authority and Brooklyn Hotel Partners; and WHEREAS,the Brooklyn Hotel Partners completed the 175 room hotel and 100 seat restaurant in 2009, but were unable to complete the pedestrian link to the Earle Brown Heritage Center and were in default to-the terms of Development Agreement;and WHEREAS,on June 28,2010,the EDA adopted Resolution No.2010-14,the Fourth Amendment to the Development Agreement and Certain Related Agreement which modified and amended the following: 1. The rights and obligations of the Authority,the City,and the Developers as it related to the construction of the connection and development of the Phase II site, 2. Amended the Parking,Access and Pedestrian Link Agreement relating to the location of the link to be constructed by the EDA, 3. Revised the Lease Agreements for the D-Barn; and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2011 the EDA adopted Resolution No. 2011-08, which approved a Spending Plan authorized under the 2010 Minnesota Jobs Act,which enabled$3 60,000 from Tax Increment District No.2,to Rind the construction of the portion of the link relating to the D-Barn Lease and the EDA advanced the funds projected from the future sales of the Phase II site to complete the pedestrian link to the Earle Brown Heritage Center; and WHEREAS,on October 10,2011,the EDA adopted Resolution No.2011-22,which approved the termination of the Cement Pond/Fountain Easement, accepted a new trail easement from Wings Financial, and conceptualized the future trail, lighting, and placement of a fountain within the pond; and WHEREAS,Minnesota Hospitality Inc.has expressed an interest in the development of the Phase H site for the construction of a 4 story, 81 room extended stay hotel consistent with the conceptual development plans of the approved PUD plans and with similar provisions for a Tax Abatement Plan as approved for the initial Phase II development,and Whereas,Minnesota Hospitality Inc.has provided a letter of intent for the purchase of Lot 2, Block 1, Brooklyn Farm Second Addition, excludes the area of the pond and trail, for the amount of$500,000 with terms and conditions to be formalized in a development agreement. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center that the Executive Director is hereby authorized to execute the Letter of Intent with Minnesota Hospitality Inc,and to proceed with the negotiations and preparation of the appropriate development agreement and actions necessary for the conveyance and development of Lot 2, Block 1 Brooklyn Farms 2nd Addition. (Phase II Embassy PUD Site) MU 13, 2013 Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. i EDA ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: May 13,2013 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business&Development . SUBJECT: Letter of Intent by Minnesota Hospitality Inc. for the Purchase and Hotel Development of Lot 2,Block 1, Brooklyn Farm 2"d Addition(Phase II Embassy PUD) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority consider approval/adoption of the Resolution Authorizing the Executive Director to execute the Letter of Intent with Minnesota Hospitality Inc. and to proceed with the negotiations and preparation of the- appropriate development agreement and actions necessary for the conveyance and development of Lot 2, Block 1, Brooklyn Farm 2"d Addition. (Phase II Embassy PUD) Background: On June 27, 2005, the City Council approved the rezoning of a 6.2 acre parcel from ClA PUD/C1A for the development of a 250 room hotel containing a 100 seat restaurant and a 32,000 sq. ft.water park facility. The development plans were revised by the City Council on May 14, 2007 to provide for the phased development of two hotels: - Phase I was an eight story, 175 room Embassy Suites Hotel on a 4.02 acre lot that included a 100 seat restaurant and a physical connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. - Phase II conceptually illustrated the location of a second hotel and the agreement identified the following Hotel Flags: Holiday Inn Express,Marriot Courtyard,Hilton Garden Inn, Indigo,Cambria, Staybridge,Homewood, Hampton, Comfort,or another equivalent hotel flag acceptable to the Authority with no less than 75 rooms,which hotel need not be a full service hotel. Attached for your reference is a copy of conceptual development plans and City Council Resolution No.2007-70,which approved the amendment to the PUD Development Plans. In 2006,the City Council and EDA conducted the necessary public hearings to remove this property from Tax Increment District No. 2,establish a Tax Abatement Plan, and execution of a Development Agreement which included the authorization for the phased conveyance of the property to Brooklyn Hotel Partners. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clear,safe,inclusive comnutnity that enhances the tjrrality of life for all people and preserves the public trust EDA ITEM MEMORANDUM In 2007,the City Council approved the final plat of Brooklyn Farm 2nd Addition which created a 4.02 acre lot for the Embassy Hotel project and a 2.18 acre lot for the Phase II site. The eastern 1/3 of the Phase II site included the existing pond, a portion of a cement pond, and the majority of the trail which connected to the Earle Brown Farm site. Attached is an aerial photograph of the Phase II site which illustrates the location of an access easement for the use of the main drive which enters the Embassy Hotel and the buildable area of approximately 1.5 acres. In 2009, the developer completed the Embassy Suite Hotel and informed the EDA that he was not in a position to complete the link to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. After months of negotiations on the developer's default in the terms of the Development Agreement by not completing the required Minimum Improvements, the EDA adopted Resolution No. 2010-14, an amendment to the Development Agreement which amended the rights and obligations of the Authority, the City, and Developer relating to the developer's forfeiture of any rights to the Phase II development; confirmed the D-Barn Lease Agreement and easements for the EDA's construction of the link; approved adjustments to the payment of tax abatements for the Phase I development, including the right of set off to secure the D-Barry Lease and Link Maintenance Agreement; and conveyed the development rights for Phase II to the EDA and the obligation to construct the link to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. Letter of Intent for Sales and Development of Phase II Embassy PUD Site: The attached Letter of Intent by Minnesota Hospitality Inc. provides for the purchase of the Phase II site for the development of a 4 story, 81 room Candlewood Extended Stay Hotel. P Y� Y The purchase amount is $500,000 with a closing date scheduled to occur in 2013 after the developer has been issued approval from the InterContinental Hotels Group; received the necessary approvals from the EDA and City Council and a building permit; and has provided the City with a copy of its Financing Commitment. The terms also include the following which will be incorporated into the Development Agreement: a. The provision of a 10 year tax abatement program similar in structure to the prior tax abatement agreement for the Phase II development as approved in 2006. b. The City and EDA approvals will include the necessary public hearings and actions necessary to amend the PUD Plans; a Re-Plat or Land Division to separate the portion of the lot occupied by the pond &trail; establish a Tax Abatement Plan; approval of a Business Subsidy Agreement; and resolution with economic findings for the conveyance of EDA owned land. c. Architectural development standards identical to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, • At least 50% of all four sides of wall surfaces of the hotel will be constructed of Class I materials and the remainder of Class II materials. Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive community that enhances the palitp of life for all people and preserves the public trust I, 4 EDA ITEM MEMORANDUM • Class I materials include: brick or acceptable brick-type material, natural looking stone,textured cement stucco,copper, architectural panels or masonry units with enhanced detailing such as patterns, textures color, dimension, banding, brick inlay or glass. • Class H materials include: EFIS, pre-fmished metal, concrete block, fiber- reinforced cement board siding,canvas or vinyl awnings. Budget Issues: The sales of the Phase II is sufficient to repay the EDA's advancement of funds used to complete the construction of the link connecting the Embassy Suites Hotel to the Earle Brown Heritage Center. The tax abatement of the local share of property taxes is a factor of the assessed valuation of the completed project, the City's tax rate, and the percent of contribution required for the fiscal disparity fund and is projected to be in the range of approximately$30,000- $40,000 annually. As an example, a property with an assessed valuation of$3,000,000 would have a tax capacity of approximately $60,000 of which the application of the 2012 fiscal disparity contribution rate of 35.1835% would leave 64.8165% for local taxation or a tax capacity of$38,890 times the local tax rate (2013) 0.72.202 equals approximately $28,079 that would be available for a tax abatement. Council Goals: 1. We will proceed aggressively with implementation of City's redevelopment plans 2. We will improve the city's image Mission:Ensuring an attractive,clean,safe,inclusive conanuatitp that enhances the qualh>>of life for all people and preseri,es the public trust �- M U L) 1 1 1-I 11J 1� J1 DIY gal 17 � o f 00�r jo C8 El 09 - f a� \�1T�I�P I I LU1 Member Kay Tasman introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: ' RESOLUTION NO. 2007-70 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2007-008 SUBMITTED BY SETH OLIVER (BROOKLYN HOTEL PARTNERS,LLC) WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 2005-97 adopted on June 27, 2005 approved a rezoning from CIA (Service-Office, no height limit) to PUD/CIA (Planned Unit Development/Service- Office,no height limit)of a 6.2 acre site located on the east side of the west leg of Earle Brown Drive(to be addressed as 6300 Earle Brown'Drive);and WHEREAS, that proposal comprehended the rezoning of the above mentioned property and development plan approval for a 250 room hotel containing a 100 seat restaurant and a . 32,000 sq.ft.water park facility on the above mentioned site;and WHEREAS, that specific development plan is no longer being considered for implementation;and; WHEREAS,Planning Commission Application No. 2007-008 consisting of a PUD amendment to allow construction of the first phase of a two building hotel complex consisting of an eight story, 175 room Embassy Suites hotel and 100 seat restaurant with a physical connection to the Earle Brown Heritage Center has been proposed by Seth Oliver (Brooklyn JHotel'Partners, LLC); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called.public hearing on April 26, 2007'when a staff report and .public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development amendment were received;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2007-008 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No.2007-02 on April 26,2007;and WHEREAS, the City Council considered Application No. 2007-008 at its May 14, 2007 meeting;and WHEREAS, the City Council considered this Planned Unit Development amendment request in light of all testimony received, the Guidelines for Evaluating Rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the provisions of the Planned Unit Development Ordinance contained in Section 35-355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the City's Comprehensive Plan, City Council Resolution No. 2005-97 and the Planning Commission's recommendations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2007-008 submitted by Seth Oliver (Brooklyn Hotel Partners,LLC)be approved in light of the following considerations: RESOLUTION NO. 2007-70 1. The Planned Unit Development is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the Planned Unit Development section of the City's Zoning Ordinance. 2. The Planned Unit Development proposal will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land. i 3. The utilization of the property as proposed under the Planned Unit Development Rezoning is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with the ordinance standards except for allowing a green strip along the Earl Brown Drive right of-way that is less than 15 ft. This modification from the CIA ordinance standard is justified on the basis of the development plan being an appropriate.plan for this area and that it is off set or mitigated by various factors contained in the approved site plan. 4. The Planned Unit Development proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area of the city. 5. The Planned Unit Development proposal appears.to be a good long range use of the . existing land and this development can be considered an asset to the community. 6. In light of the above considerations,it is believed that the Guidelines for Evaluating Rezonings as contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the proposal is,therefore,in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No.2007-008 be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations. 1. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 2. Grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 3. A site performance agreement and supporting financial guarantee in an amount to be determined based on cost estimates shall be submitted prior to the issuance of building permits to assure completion of all required site improvements. 4. B-612 curb and gutter shall be provided around all parking and driving areas. 5. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or on grotmd mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. i i r RESOLUTION N0. 2007-70 6. The building shall be equipped with an automatic fire extinguishing system to meet NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. 7. Underground irrigation shall be installed in all landscaped areas to facilitate site maintenance. 8. Plan approval is exclusive of all signery which is subject-to Chapter 34 of the City Ordinances, 9. The applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property,improvements and utility service lines prior to the release of the performance guarantee. 10. All work.performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 11. The applicant shall provide appropriate erosion control during construction as approved by the City Engineering Department and obtain an NPDES construction site erosion control permit from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site. 12. The applicant's storm water management plan shall be approved by.the Shingle Creek Watershed Management Commission prior to the issuance of building permits for this project. 13. The applicant shall enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. Said agreement shall be filed with the title to the property and shall acknowledge the specific modifications to the CIA underlying zoning district as well as other conditions of approval. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. 14. The development plans shall be modified in the following manner. a. To provide a lighting plan consistent-with the requirements of Section 35-712 of the City Ordinances regarding lighting. b. To provide a parking plan consistent with the parking requirements for a hotel and restaurant complex or an appropriate off site parking arrangement that will accommodate the two phase proposal. c. To provide the elimination of all parking lot encroachments into the public right of way. RESOLUTION NO. 200770 15. Approval of the 75 room hotel indicated as future development on the site is subject to the Planned Unit Development amendment process prior to the issuance of building permits for that project. 16. The property owner shall enter into an agreement for maintenance and inspection of utility and storm drainage systems,as approved by the City Engineer,to insure continued maintenance of on site utilities and storm water facilities. 17. The property owner shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement over all portions of the storm water detention pond within the hotel property as approved by the City Engineer. May 14,2007 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Mark Yelich and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof: Tim Willson, Kay Lasman, Dan Ryan, and Mark Yelich; and the following voted against the same:Mary 'O'Connor; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. l l �URE 75 -r rr- - I I ` � � - � ��! � HG X91 1 -._ \ � _�- - �• t"AIE 11) -- I i HFEAMN ( C I• w t I � � � t ( �� C--1\_;1 � it IT MPP'JCRCAIC TIT ffT[TT VC 2007 PUD Development Plan -e QI 1111 O r � lin MMI r �_ � d 0 tJd � r 311.4AREe DRIVE I rR 87 PARKING SPACES r__ i DROP OFF Ii _ .T.*-, �rtS tQEWAL K TO STwccr HOTELry 4 STORY 81 ROOMS y`c . GAZEBO t=- TRASH rrrr BROOKLYN CENTER � SITE P � '"° 40 $0 t.ANJDLEWOOD SUITES PROJECT DESCRIPTION; The Motel(Candlevrood Suites)-Will be an B1 morn Itctet of 4 stony construction.]I is lowed adjacent to the exlstina Embassy Suites Hotel And Earl Brown Contcrcnce center. I:%,All be designed and constmaect o meet Candlevrood Sul!.es as Well as requirements as states in the LOI letter dated 9 April 2D13. SITE FEATURES INCLUDE: • Shared sntrance drives a the north and soutin property lanes. • Includes the standard gazebo at the scxrth side el the hotel • Hotel will bR a side e»trance as shovm an the plan. The hotel will prrNice esnnections to the sAevralk at Earl Brown Drive as well as conneCting the trail system at the exlsung pond. I HERE@Y CERTIY•;'THA71N v FLAN.^SI'£CIFICATI[a'V Un REmnT WAS pH(flAYtr;@ IIV MF.{w•UNULIY We DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I A'•1 A OLD Y REGISTERED ARCHITECT +'U`MVER TPT LWOS_OF THE STATE Or%.M'KfSi)TA M11 vel_b'Er:_ALA n@.^.IsinT.oN 0 archltacta A.plannem ..D IAatA cwa rtoo.Lma Lake,MN 55358.3414 R52.476,"34• FRt£152.476.5803•R'N�Y'AMaGMlrch'fectz.cnm l�� F '1I •iI {(j� I'A I FOUNTAIN 7 I II 0 archltacta A.plannem ..D IAatA cwa rtoo.Lma Lake,MN 55358.3414 R52.476,"34• FRt£152.476.5803•R'N�Y'AMaGMlrch'fectz.cnm LOGISMap Output Page �b` Page 1 of 1 1� M ry i 4 I"dig + @ i t ip e 4 x.47# TAY' 3 e qa 1111 � ��'.!I 111.71 T � # ■■�f�9 � w 4i•=, � E!' �� __s_! 1, . ��. Wo �► �iln!-,�ea1�1 'ti �,�'�,-I��i,a °fie vo 4R a _ � � �1 }•# .ids+� '1,�' a'`, _ _ �+?�� �+ "'� _ nm http://gis.logis.org/LOGIS_ArcIMS/ims?ServiceName=be_logismap_ovsde&ClientVersio... 5/24/2013 BA BAI EI2 ASSOCIATES,INC. ARCHITECTS 150 S Fifth Street,Suite 1425 hfiii-spalh,NIN 55402-1200 Phone:612.339.8601 Fox:612.339.5668 F ' VOLKSWAGEN Brooklyn Center,MN New Facility Issued Luther8rookdale _ — I I ill I hereby teddy that this plan,specif"tion or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duty licensed ARCHITECT under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA Nguyen T.HwV A Date: License No xx/xx/xxxx X0034 Sheet Title Proposed Exterior Sheet Number Scale NS. Date 0522.13 IM-1 Comm No 2540 02013 t � 2 II —11-1122�07 L 2 68TH rVEZrR—NO';rTfl----- ---------------------- X AF -71J I N N X V, .4 ------ -------- X, I PAMINGS- 9. Know"d"Below. Call wwo you dig. 0 NORTN 30 60 To: Members of the Planning Commission and City Council From: Gary Eitel, Director of Business and Development Date: May 30, 2013 Subject: Items related to PUD/C-2 Zoning for Luther's Honda and Toyota Dealerships ( 6700 and 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard): a) Request by The Luther Company, LLP for an amendment to the Development Agreement for Bri Mar 2"d Addition to extend the deadline for the completion of the Private Improvements from July 15, 2013 to July 15,2014. b) Review of Conceptual plans and tentative schedule associated with a minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Platting, and Site Plan approval to enlarge the Honda Dealership site to include 3 residentially zoned lots at 4007, 4001, and 3955 691h Avenue North. The focus of this discussion item is to review with the existing PUD zoning and General Development Plan for the Luther Honda and Toyota Dealerships; review the site conditions and options for fencing, landscaping, and screening to the adjacent residential properties; and to identify a meeting schedule that would facilitate the necessary Planning and Zoning actions to enable construction in 2013. Background: On July 28, 2008, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2008-81, a resolution which accepted the Planning Commission's recommendation on a request by Luther Company LLLP to rezone 5 contiguous lots from C-2 (Commerce) and R-3 (Multiple Family) to PUD/C-2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) and approved the General Development Plans for a Honda and Toyota Dealerships. On June 13, 2011, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 2011-92, a resolution which accepted the Planning Commission's recommendation and approved the preliminary plat of Bri Mar 2"d Addition and the Site and Building Development Plans for the construction of the Honda and Toyota Dealerships, consistent with the 2008 PUD/C-2 approved General Development Plans. The Development Agreement for the Honda and Toyota Dealerships included the posting of a Letter of Credit in the amount of$670,000 to assure that the private improvements would be completed by July 15, 2013. Attached for your reference is a copy of the landscape plan included in the Development Agreement. After construction had started the developer informed the City that it had reached an agreement with the adjacent property owner at 4007 691h Ave. and planned to talk with the property owners at 4001 691h Ave. and 3955 69th Ave. about their interests in selling. On July 30, 2012, The Luther Company, LLP closed on the property at 4007 69th Ave. N., a 19,400 sq.ft. R-3 zoned lot with a single family residence. On November 5, 2012 , a certificate of occupancy permits were issued to the Honda Dealership, 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard and to the Toyota Dealership, 6700 Brooklyn Boulevard with the understanding that final landscaping and fencing along the eastern lot line and portions along 69th Ave. would be completed in 2013. On November 20, 2012 a demolition permit was issued for the removal of the buildings at 4007 691h Ave. N. On May 2, 2013, the Luther Company, LLP closed on the property at 4001 69th Ave., a 19,400 sq.ft. R-3 zoned lot with a single family residence. During the latter part of May, 2013, the Luther Company, LLP is scheduled to close on 3955 69th Ave., a vacant R-3 zoned lot having an area of 38,800 sq.ft. that is adjacent to the City's water tower lot. I would also note, that throughout the last 2-3 years, Planning Staff has had continuous discussions with the Luther Group regarding options to enhance the screening along the eastern side of their dealerships, future development plans for the Luther Dealership, including the 5 acres occupied by the previous Honda Dealership; the area west of the current Chevrolet & GMC dealerships (Atlantis Pool and Bus Company site); and the 2 single family homes and vacant lot zoned R-3. Request by The Luther Company, LLP for an amendment to the Development Agreement for Bri Mar 2"d Addition to extend the deadline for the completion of the Private Improvements from July 15,2013 to July 15, 2014. Prior to November 5, 2012, (issuance of occupancy permits), the developer had completed all of the private improvements identified in the approved development plans with the exception of the following: - Replacement of approximately 960 feet of the existing fence along the common rear lot lines of 4 single family lots and the Victoria Townhome Development; - The construction of a new fence along the side lot line of 4007 69th Ave.; - Replacement of approximately 580' of decorative fence along 69th Ave.; and - The landscaping along the eastern lot line, adjacent to the residentially zoned properties. The delay in completing these improvements specifically related to an option that the developer was working with the Planning Staff on: - The upgrading of a proposed 8 foot cedar fence, which met the requirements of the ordinance, to a 8— 10 foot masonry wall. This the consent of the adjacent residential property owners and approval by the City Council/EDA it is feasible that this eligible Tax Increment Housing Improvement could be funded within two years by the Tax Increment Housing Funds generated by the Honda and Toyota Dealerships. The applicant will be available at the meeting to discuss the extension of time to coordinate with the current PUD amendment. Additionally, photographs of a masonry panel constructed wall used in a project in Eden Prairie will be available at the meeting to illustrate the potential upgrading of a wood screening fence. Review of Conceptual plans and tentative schedule associated with a minor Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Platting, and Site Plan approval to enlarge the Honda Dealership site to include 3 residentially zoned lots at 4007, 4001, and 3955 69th Avenue North. Attached is a listing identifying the deadlines and actions dates necessary to complete a land use change to the Comprehensive Plan to change these 3 lots from their current Single Family designation to Commercial; a tandem processing of a rezoning application to change the current R-3 (townhome zoning designation)to PUD/C-2 to enlarge the Honda Dealership; and coordinating a Site Plan approval and preliminary plat process that would enable the construction of this expanded auto storage lot by mid-late September, 2013. The developer has provided the attached concept plan which includes considerations to maximize the vehicle storage within this area and a rationale for adjusting the 35 foot buffer setback from the R-3 zoned Water Tower site and a more effective screening within a reduced setback for the portion adjacent to the Victoria Townhomes. The concept plan is proposed to be used for the comprehensive plan submittal. The development standards of the PUD ordinance (Section 35-355, Subd. 3, para c.) enables adjustments to setbacks, providing the developer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that a lesser standard should be permitted with the addition of a screening treatment or other mitigative measures. The purpose of this item is to review the coordinated processing of multiple Planning & Zoning applications to meet a 2013 construction schedule and to discuss how to achieve the most effective screening and buffering of the adjacent residential neighborhood. Recommendation: This is an informational item for discussion purposes and no action is required at this time. As a result of these discussions, there will be further consideration on establishing a new completion date for the Developer's private improvements. This action will placed on a future City Council agenda for their approval. Luther Auto Tentative Schedule to amend PUD May 10th information for PC memo to extend the completion date &add 3 res. Lots May 30th Planning Commission Meeting (resolution—conceptual approval) June 10th City Council (resolution on PUD amendment and authorization to proceed). June 11th Application &submittals for Rezoning & PUD amendment June 12th Public Hearing Notice deadline to newspaper June 17th Publication date (comp plan amendment) June 19th Public Hearing Notice deadline to newspaper—Rezoning Application June 24th Publication date ( PUD Ord. amendment/rezoning) June 27th Planning Commission conducts Public Hearing July 8th City Council authorizes submittal to Metro Council (Resolution) July 911h Submittal of Comp Plan Resolution to Metro Council - 30 day admin. review process July 11th Planning Commission conducts public hearing on PUD ordinance amendment July 22nd City Council 1" reading and setting public hearing July 24th Public Hearing notice to newspaper July 29th Publication date ( City Council PUD amendment/rezoning) July 30th Application &Submittals for Site Plan and Pre. Plat. Submittal to Watershed August 7th Public Hearing Notice deadline to newspaper August 9th Metro Council's notice to proceed with amendment August 12th Publication date (preliminary plat) August 12th City Council conducts public hearing, 2 d reading &adoption of ordinance August 14th Publication of ordinance to newspaper August 19th Publication date of Ordinance - begins 30 day period August 29th Planning Commission Public Hearing on Pre. Plat & site plan approval Sept. 91h City Council approval of Pre. Plat and Site Plan Sept. 18th Effective date of the ordinance Luther Auto PUD Amendment 2013 — Proposed Application Schedule MAY JUNE 1 JULY AUGUST =1 = 3 4 2 1 3 1 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 11 12 13 14 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 23 24 25 26 28 29 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 26 27 28 29 30 31 30 28 29 30 31 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SEPTEMBER OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 1 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 18 19 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 COMP PLAN AMENDMENT REZONING SITE PLAN PLATTING (PUD AMENDMENT) Applicant presents concept plan to PC at 05/30/13 mtg. and CC at 06/10/13 mtg. _... PLANNING C 06/27/13 08/15/13 Public Hearing of Comp.Plan Amendment Public Hearing of PUD Amendment Site Plan review Preliminary Plat review CITY COUNCIL MTG. CITY COUNCIL MTG. CITY COUNCIL MTG. CITY COUNCIL MTG. 07/08/13 08/26/13 08/26/13 08/26/13 -CC receives recommendation from PC; -CC receives recommendation from PC; -CC receives recommendation from PC; Preliminary Plat approval -CC adopts resolution TO FORWARD TO Met -First reading of PUD Zoning; -authorizes an Amendment to PUD Council for authorization -CC sets Public Hearing for 10/14/13 Agreement 07/09/13 to-08/08/13 CITY COUNCIL MTG. CITY COUNCIL MTG. PLANNING CO` SION -30-day expected period of review by Met 09/23/13 09/23/13 10117/13 Council -Public Hrg.&2nd reading of Zoning -Final Development/Site Plan consideration Final Plat Amendment. CITY COUNCIL MTG. -PUD Ord.sent to BC Sun Post 09/25/13 CITY COUNCIL MTG. 08/12/13 -Published 10/02/13 ed.; 11/12/13 -CC adopts resolution to accept land use -10/02/13 to 11/01/13(30-Day Appeal Period Final Plat amendment -Rezoning becomes valid after 11/01/13) D 0T J 3 CD Z E• C CCD \V t� V ] yy �Z t ¢]�Y♦' LOT 1 d ®� a HONDA .,:sr FOM.PJNT it T>f0. I !sn},rti>Y Ybrtti:nrlrt rt/NIK' KOf Iui�St f BECIIILIDU3 nww M.saM�OJ,i.Lt9}NU CocwwF eeU4Lw4x1 Mtn Glr!}u EARRR AFEWIMATGf.r.Vn. uDrr. aPaaa %aau}swu cnian>.xr r•i afsrw♦]]i>nLli},R i i�fGCFJ 114DIVN uD!w4!6 rMaDY 3tK;ie!i°Q�GEfJdi, ® �a rVN '21.Gi1D Il MI)TRYtx'1'R iR1tRT CONIFFRDUS TREES 11l'1'Kl® YLxifiFNl]el}Lx YYL1. Dr.}o K uYFOrt•t2Y:f iy� mow,,,,-- � •.rl. Du ]°r>rav 1•iiL}Dto �l NQ4-a Cw.iJD 1@ TSkS tar tK.M N K`l R9 L(f.t NliAJi WILD p•L¢'2L. D, naer to R f-ezr w.•aDa n.inl k w wfu ea.ees DRNAXENTAL TREES G. �Lm..sio m�µv a-.P•swum wverow em runs r it. mfr O p;N wiAe XRL'>tf.' e. awr Wtawl a to et wuso e�nn nI ca-rs n•w rYmial RD DMM.UOUS Si1RUBS .nris w wf]IaTm P,w...n Gwiaue ut rorw awmrt�iw arOD9t'SiPCGTt°il[1lti°l.ID4ffD]rO•tYE]iKNCr P N Re lIY1 mfw Aw.wnniro Dit'A OYwen a Hoer]yrnls ' �(� Lather !/'4Y a LG.:LCa.eua. r ,wwr Dolenlip• tl W eN NCA:•et la IaCTLR 6}M AM pe•Ir a N)1HL �rca:t°nun:c w>mm aarv�,nw e u cra:nwrz v� R I a1K45 1,E>Df w:•I!_La 1♦IFDIIbt�KrI CONIFEROUS SHRUBS l Ma xf2D W IwiY iuAta IQJa WN R faa'.ND.nik r, uGKN Lrtf:.,n,]i51t T.AaI Swu R De1'RD n rle u.tT,>. nw GP•.iG.De a.e}<AI>w • w TY'1! GLLbY.4 ]LLI. rJ, n.fx ( ' } Lfn L,�A[[wiG9CnDUA 1 La MT n.L� ♦ ;�x �n:4 L i6M T rr. rot �.]r Luther mb 0 Q319 •=r �, t•' per,. / /---) N i, Si r I C� i� in is i w a]n.. a>� Df .wT T•}a a=f®.TG Ha +�E Ml YLIfg�D NLIIEJ LMnC�tx�.���G�t.MY4l M.saM�OJ,i.Lt9}NU CocwwF eeU4Lw4x1 Mtn Glr!}u EARRR AFEWIMATGf.r.Vn. ARCer]7Kl1'N %aau}swu cnian>.xr r•i afsrw♦]]i>nLli},R i i�fGCFJ 114DIVN uD!w4!6 rMaDY 3tK;ie!i°Q�GEfJdi, C+nttr ua Lek. Ttat i a)e w 1:<GVRUCr Rtytn,11E tYR>e R A.•i]a,-.6f na tKWisIfFG}WN M 1W rtw,k R41 >MLL GPT01 Il MI)TRYtx'1'R iR1tRT ] LJ•va,e R9f lr.,L R tliC>O NIr L->L]r ttLR N<K IDf.K IRLP 11l'1'Kl® YLxifiFNl]el}Lx YYL1. Dr.}o K uYFOrt•t2Y:f TMJ2a1Rt!Lp flfiiRJlm4 1. N1 TR>J iaf 0.Kt°YTR,A TC:e NJDnG lm?rr1D rLN A�-iDP AcmtM ens. tO�DSn IerH119 YIC4D l.D tFM i:SRt flS3Le}M 1•iiL}Dto �l NQ4-a Cw.iJD 1@ TSkS tar tK.M N K`l R9 L(f.t NliAJi WILD p•L¢'2L. D, naer to R f-ezr w.•aDa n.inl k w wfu ea.ees G. �Lm..sio m�µv a-.P•swum wverow em runs r it. mfr p]m u:.Di auis Deru>et}K«>ara�nDlt utass are]NC w+,m. e. awr Wtawl a to et wuso e�nn nI ca-rs n•w rYmial RD .nris w wf]IaTm P,w...n Gwiaue ut rorw awmrt�iw arOD9t'SiPCGTt°il[1lti°l.ID4ffD]rO•tYE]iKNCr P N Re lIY1 mfw Aw.wnniro Dit'A OYwen a Hoer]yrnls ' �(� Lather !/'4Y • sTUeir]fs iw D•PAYC AliliD m]}uu mwr w Lass ra Brookl yn Center aw'Oae itfv A a axnnau.rxTlse}a vs,.m a ie.r Ana vie Dolenlip• tl W eN NCA:•et la IaCTLR 6}M AM pe•Ir a N)1HL �rca:t°nun:c w>mm aarv�,nw e u cra:nwrz v� R I a1K45 1,E>Df w:•I!_La 1♦IFDIIbt�KrI PLPL MAt�tJ tet utWl l Ma xf2D W IwiY iuAta IQJa WN R faa'.ND.nik r, uGKN Lrtf:.,n,]i51t T.AaI Swu R De1'RD n rle u.tT,>. nw GP•.iG.De a.e}<AI>w LMher w:TSs R feurol tia�l inD L mo wi na'..t L..w.re Hrookdalc To7o!>< 6700 Brooklyn WVd.. iH G0.•ta. � Center, Brooklyn MN P LAGIRAr t°llf Y[Y Li ad>ltlll:nM6]if. Luther Brookdale Honda 6800 Brooklyn Bt"L i G x tLrD�A•Prt]Y]tt rt.n L mr9e>b Tta_1 µL0;M Brooklyn Center,MN s�,m ax hRWf `R �clLt eee> u a]u iowi �—I f.ti+C]L 17 ICf[4 ib+9.}S i3RLOtD acre rAL a.+DVt nDl CxA►eltnAL Y�F A s arr tsnTrx wT:m as tne:D�]e xr a luT xt an unnx u uie 1f1 _ OA epetTrL 2:LF T, Lme te¢� I:y uNrasm na4>T.L T A}F n r.m.m Horn e Aue#.l esxn4 e: =1 wR lne,'f 2)G to(i.P.l awtiGle nla �}r tofu rLe w(Axj sun n:ex Dos n•Ui a ' CKlPw'Ih'Cfd Ae{u la'G) •imDlW MNDCT 5U6MITfAL AUGUST 9.2011 i � -- •- F O R N NibflflRffl 1R RIiWe uro elKa roaeor erl�rt,e}Irra frfl.Aarf iloeSre•M'lIRYI! Gp 0 lam LAMDSCAPE PLAN S/ NOii'iFi o.. si►�id 1_7r1'I Luther Brookdale Honda/Toyota I I *'+,-R r"' `•�1 Brooklyn Center,MN -----J •. � � 1 emu euau�•rua.wwue nat. ll �� ® M .} �.l II I --�- �e wv rye �orn�onau:eeuu wm®p o aruu.e,n.0 we u HIM 1111111v 4_ � I HONDA (� A '�J I g 0 1 lli 0 t TOYOTA u� .o \ i NORTH 4 \ D w 100 \\ t \ Q Q L A N D F O R M � Fmm Site b Finhh � • O PAGE No.1 d2 L ,........•�_.�.�,..,..�.......� L AA"1927%J 0 ENLARGED PLAN AT EXPANSION AREA SECTION A-A SECTION 6-6 a cue 0 Luther Brookidale Honda/Toyota Brooklyn Center,MN 0 uoaTM 0 20 40 L A N D F 0 R M Fm Site to Finish " • 0