Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972 01-06 PCP Cin' OF DRIDOKLYW CENTER PYJANrifS� CONXISSIOIN AfGEADh Regular -Meeting january 6, 1972 Call to Order; 300 P.M. Roll :;gal of December 1.6, 10,71 4, chaipman' s Explanation_ The Planning Commission and the Board of Appeals and Adjustments is an ad-136-sory body, in the matters con- cerned in these hearings, the Commission and Board makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council -makes all final decis.L.cns on these matters. Ne'w Busin'e'sq, a, I.Ireside Real-tLy 7 10 7 6 i-�.e and Bu.ilding plan app.roval h- Chester Ortan, Jr 710,77 special Use P,--rlqit C� ;ZA:, ffaugland 71078 Subd vis ion Approval G, Adjournment MANXIE,G COD ISSION IN7,)IMATIODI SHEW • Application No. 71076 Applicant Fireside Realty Description of Request- Site and building plan approval Locatiorl 5960 Brooklyn Boulevard Tile aoPlicant is requesting approval to construct an office building to 'house their real ,estate offices. 11%e building will have two floors with the upper Level. fronting on nrooklyn Boulevard and the lower level a *walk out to the xear on Beard Avenue. This is the same request as that contained in Planning Conn fission Application No. 69027 which was withdrawn by the applicant. S-,MALYSXSO AND _RMCOW-I*ENDXZIIOM�? one of the reasons for withdrawal of Application NO. 69027 was j,,e location of the proposed driveways. Access front Brooklyn Bou.".evard to cormnercial uses is difficult • at certain times of day and reduces the capacit-y and effectiveness of Brooklyn Boulevard as a carrier of through traffic. .very effort should be made to facilitate traffic and reduce congestion. Access from residen-,.J-al streets to commercial uses is not in the best inte_�e:!--l-, cif the city and is inconsistent with the goals of the contpr-ehensive Plan. Also such accesses establishes some precedent which, if Continued along one side of a residential street facing single family dwellings, would create an intolerable situation for the single family -.esidents , Recovmendalcion of this application is difficult and strict adherence to planning principles would interfere with the owners rightful vse n7F_ his property, This applicat-s.on slkqoilld be reviewed carefully and all prassible alternat",vas should be carefully invest-igated b, -y th I application. .e CorLu_4ssion belore action is taken on. ta 0 0 r �tt waw,.awymcs�o�,o...s•�.e�xxwr�.,.:cwas— ' � t � 9 N 1Y g s40��ol tY i �•..,`., �� {yam °"". .w +rY ♦ ! ^+�x,s, s.., m a I". "'z- 'K .i. 4/ — ,f p ---ced 30 Pua UT:Tap atl-4 '42 MZTA@,;r Olr xoj- PapUaWIIIOOa.;� ST TeAO:7ddV ---'1,6T se,t-� voTtIA 69C IL -OR Gi? ��'Mes all'� sr LICTIC-DIT-Ide ZI'41 -Omoq S-rul ;o :-,-aaluarseq a 'uT dol;s 5u-clr 1-3 ""es e aqe.7,=-)do 04 4Tv.U;sld a n Te-paefs e -FJUT-4SatQb0.X ST. q4.xojm anuo&v aoq 5�69 does 5uT'[y,7, mes ao3 jpaad asn jz2To;j:ds ,.If -luevio LLn-!(L -(RA P,C YL D ff?,.0 Ta -u O-r 4 e a oq U p 0 VF alsfails Roli-AzOdoilkil Moissr xwoz) Dolf; y1d E • • PLANNINCY' COMMISS103N_ 11";'FORMATION, SHEET A pq, I i c a t.lon Won 71078 • ApplAcaat G,, H-Laugland fox Bernice Sizer Descrip'Cion of Request'- Subdivision variance Location� 1.5-1406 Fremont Avenue N-ort.;A 13 A C 9,G�ROT TAD r, in 1962 Lots 2.9 and 2"0, Block 2, !4 a E Perkins Addition, ,acre ccarbined into one 801 -?r 1237 parcel by Alfred j. Fisher, owner. '1966,, the owner so]'..d to Anne Nelson. April 6, X July 2, 1966, request for division of Lots 19 and 20 by Bernice Size, Exec-,11C.rix of Alfred Fishe-N-Is est-ate. Ass.-J.stant County, kuditor, Plot. ris FaIden, states that application was made on July 2, 1966, to ser,-crate the lots, however,, on Auglist 9, 1966, the reguest was refused ';ay • the City of Brooklyn Center and has been in the ta:c books as a single parcel since that time. October 1, 196%. Anoe Nelson was issued a perwIt to .:)Uild a garage on Lots 19 and 20, ind4 A.cating by her signature on, the Dermit she was the owner of both lots. The C,--_ty Assesor -records :show Lots 19 and .20 as a single descript.-Lon with honmestead exemption on bot-.1h lot's. ,he aipplicant contends that tine sale to Anne Nelson AM 1966 ',as fox Lot 20 only and that -Bernice Sizer retained title to Lot 19� ARA,LI,'SjIS AND The staff recowar.iendat.ion on this applicatio-n is for denial because to create 40 ' 3c 128' substandard would be inconsistent 'with c,?Ltr comprehensive plan. Any deeds k'-,ransfe_rcj'_:,',g tie to raither or Yjo't-- 20 that may 'have been viJq-4-Iioul-� appro-val of City council • would no-I.- 35e va'.Lij should not be accept-ed for recording.