The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1972 02-17 PCP CITY OF BROOKLYN CE14TER • PLANNING C01,014ISSION AGENDA Study Meeting February 17, 1972 1� Call to order: 8-.00 P.Yla 2. Roll Call: 3. appr(:�val o February 3, 1972 4. Chairman's The Planning cox-timission and the Board of Appeals and Adjustments is an advisory body. in the matters concerned in these 'hearings, the Commission and Board makes a recommendation to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions on these matters. 5. Maryin Gordon 71052 Resolution 71053 G. Bud Schlee 72003 • Variance yTabled 2-3-72) 7. Super Va1uatores,,T ac: 72008 Revised site plan 8o Dietrich Co. 72010 Site and building plan Discussion items.- 1. policy on bcceptance of applications on study meetings. 2. Procedure Ifor townhouse plats. PLA"i ING CQT,1MXSSTON RESOLUTION NO. 72-1 • RESOLUTION REC i ENDING 33MAL OF PLANNING COMMXSION APPLICATION NO, 71052 - _ -- WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application Noe 71052 submitted by Marvin Gordon requesting rezoning from R1 to R3 of the property described as Plat 89360, Parcel 2000, 'located on the south sine of 194 and Lee avenue North has been considered by the Brooklyn Center Planning Commission on December 2, 1971, and January 27, 1972; and WEB S, the proposed rezoning was duly presented at a public hearing on December 2, 1971, at which, time neighborhood residents submitted for the file a petition opposing the proposed rezoning; and WHERFAS• the application was submitted to the went Central Neighborhood ,advisory Group and a report of the findings dated Januaty 5, 1972, has been reviewed and placed on files and WHEREAS, a memoraFR ut dater 3anuary 27, 1972, from the Director of Public Works, regarding the feasibility rag developing the property in question into residential rots has been reviewed and placed on files • NOW, TIOREFORE, BE IT PXSOLVED BY T11E P1,A£v-I1tTG COMMISSION OF THE CI'T'Y OF BROOX L,`N (M-1 1ER to recommend to the City Council denial of Planning Commission Application No. 71052 submitted by Marvin Gordon requesting rezoning from Rl to R3, noting that: 1. The subject property has been consistently conceived as Pa in nature and that there has been no significant change in the property since the last zoning review; 2. The proposed rezoning constit6tes "spot zoning"; 3. The cast of developing the land for R1 purposes is not substantially different from R3 development costs; 4. With respellt to non-economic factors, no reliable testimony has been introduced to indicate that it is not feasible to develop the laud for Rl use; 5. The size of the tract is not viable for sound R3 residential development.. • • PLAMNG CU-M, ISSZON Y1VMRMhTION SHEET Applications no. 72003 Applicants Bud Schlee Description of Request: Subdivision variance B.CKGND The public hearing for this application was held on. February 3, 1972. The Ccmmission tabled the application for further study. ANALYSIS AM RRC :IWATI0 3o The staff recommendation is that the application should be denied. m^he reason for granting of a variance for this application does not satisfy the conditions for granting of a subdivision variance as set forth. in Section 15-112 of the Platting • Ordinance (See attached sheet) . The city Council has required Registered Land Surveys or recorded plats for similar land subdivisions during the past four years H am in the case of Application mo. 68063 Mrs. Mildred Grosser, and Application No. 71070, Pars. Pearl Lynch. Section 15--1112. 'VARt & ,Ta) The council may authorize a variance from these regulations when • in its opinion, undue hardship may result front strict complia=nce. in granting any variance, the Council shall prescribe only con- ditions3 that it deems necessary to or desirable for the public interest. in mak=ing its findings as required herein below, the Council shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of land, the existing use of land in the vicinity, the nwnber of persons to reside or work in the proposed subdivision and the probable effect of the proposed subdivision upon traffic conditions in the vicinity. To grant a variance, the Council shall finds I. That there art special circumstances or conditions affecting said property such that the strict agpl.tcation of the provi- sions of this ordinance would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of his land. 2. That the variance is necessary for the Preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the petitioner. 3. That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property in the • territory in which said property is sit=uated. (b) Application for any such variance shall be made in writing by the subdivider at the time when the preliminary plat is filed for the consideration of: the Council, stating fully and clearly all faat~s relied upon by the petitioner and shal=l be supplemented with maps, plans or other additional data which may aid the Council in the analysis of the proposed project. The plans for such development shall include such covenants, restrictions or other legal prov=isions necessary to guarantee the full achievement of the plan. Section 5-31 V.--�Llmm, if any 6ection, subsection, sentence, clause, or phrase of thi:e� ordinance 4.8 for any reason held to be invalid, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this ordinance. Section 3.5-13.4. MLATION PENALTY. Any person vialtiating any pro- vision of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not more than Three Mindred ;Z$300.00) Dollars and by imprisoa went. not to exceed ninety (90) days. • Section 15-115. RRPEAL� Vie provisions of Chapteg 15 of the City Ordinances are hereby repealed and the provisions of this ordinance shall be hereafter designated as Chapter 15 and the sections hereof number as designated. • PLANNING COKKISSION INFORMATION SHEET Application No. 72008 Applicantt Super Valu Store description of Request; Revised site plan BACKGROUNDt The plan was approved FeNvary 3, 1972, with the facilities located in the Southeast part of the parking lot. The Commission aske4 the applicant to take a look at some alternate locatioAs, which their have done. The proposed now location is described in the attached letter dated rebruary 10, W72. • • • February 14, 1972 104 JUPPER&ON AVENUE SOUTH MOPAINS, MIMP49MOTA 56343 rCLEPP"CNC 93R-68.4/AREA 61-P Mr. Jean Murphey Cbief Building Inspector City of Brooklyr. Center {301 Shingle Greer Parkway � Brooklyn "enter, 14inneaota 55430 RE: Planning commission Application no. 72008 • ear Mr. Kurpheys &a ift discussed during our tovftrl ftl :satti,ons over Afta *mot f@W says, gsr iC f the Fl� - -ng comission t f * wietingon 'e ,y 3, 1971,,. in commotion with the elect Application Fey 720(0s, asked whether our octVany had considered possible altm ate lmatime for the prcaosed fueling & ti.o-i for which wo re-gaastesd$ plan a9pWwal. In addition, the la inn Cosmission env&aaed as a con"Uan°'of the gramt of the ZPWial Use Pax-mit , licett* No. 72007) that than traffic .r tik .al f 0 an 04 plaim. VvillowiUv the meeting, w* reammiderad emv bits Plan and the traffic flaw within the parking lot, As a result,, vvj! have a nd*rtakaan to relocate than fueling stab c one parking bay f-anther south thm was 1a3ittially is the Plans presented, to the Planning Co®miss►iono In m tiora,v we are prapv i ng to elizinate eight (8) parking► stalls in the area where ,ire had initially proposed to situate the fueling sttat3,nn. "his portion of the lot would be us,.,kd as a stacking area for customers utilizing the fueling station. bus, there uld be oliminated a total of di xteen (16) parklaq -orb t %V pra Gently hava, but area would at-,III Im pmv-1AL-ag *T 43r& parMn mta!ls in the • Mize lot. than is presently required by yowr CvOina3neat. r J Mr s Joan jawphey Y Mbruary 14® 197 2 You will also not* that re have added the traffic: directicr.al flew indicators as the Ocxmission required. We appreciated they cons idoization at the k'.Y.t3muning Comission menting end believed that tho shift of l.ocavtiane together with the a t&ck,.ng area, producss a plan Ali pzxi,or to our original propobal. we think it, : il!A tend tea ca than least amount of change in traffic direc;tton within our 'eklnq lot and perr-it the orderly operation o,f than fueling station. closed are two (2) cepieras of the .ivi.ae d Site Plan, together • with three (3) copies of the elevation t%o i lighting„ During our telsTphone conversation of today it wan augge4ted that the ro,,°Asion may not be sufti.cientl.y nat rlfzl to requirz re--- uixa.ission to the Plaming Camissioa and that. we could proceed directly to the Council me ating on Tebruary 28th. it is my undaratanding Vhat you wil.1 :x rise wo on the appropriate manner in which to proce—;d from this •z.oirit. Pars 4 y truly, SUPER X.V SAM, M-C. W.U I ROU r-111 Nuant • • February 1Q® 1972 ° "PER V;yyy'U INC. lei" . Y 60048 tN4lPhlON9[tl0 /ARQA WS Planning Commission City of Brooklyn Centa 6303. Shingle Creek parkea y Brooklyn Center, mirLnesota 55430 RZF Special Vve Permit Appli otif- W5 7200' C� �tl s xn accordance with tho rasolution of the F*CJ' X43 CxlmiaziOn • adopted at its meatLng ar, Febreary 34, 1972,, with respect, to tll +e subject Special Vaa Permit APPIicati0n, thIS is to advise you that Super: V lu 'E Mores' Inc, . °nt"1t-'1d:b Tlcat the approval of the su j t ppli.cat.ion, and y viequez:�t stinting of the Sped*l Use permit, by t7he City council of Brooklyn Center is without prejudice to the p sttm of the City of Brooklyn Center with respect to tb,&- & aixt fr park3xg got. to Xerxes Avenue by the City C3 cil ar"ew A ing itz Pile ga. 70023, In t",1ter wordn. , Sx or Valu Sto;fe & inc. does not row, and will not in the futuro, r=,ntend that t nie granting of the Speci*1 Una peraIt chimes Z:he ��. hte° one pos.itionr-c f the City of Brooklyn center wa t set at -to the curb cut. This le*ter ig writterz Jal Wit% true requixament of the pleprz:.n; C} Td 1, y�ipps X11 its ��€ �`�-u��.o�:� cif" ��6bruaxy 3, x.972, t trmlyl. • Application No. 72010 Applicant: 'the•Dietrich Co. Description of Request. Site and building plan BA.CKGRtJ',+`M s The applicant is approval of a 95 unit townhouse complex to be located at Brooklyn Boulevard and Wingard Lane. The site contains about 14 ages with the proposed density being 6+ units per acre. Eight units per acre is permitted in R.3 zones. ANFALeYS I S AND REC01W. RATION a This application is recommended for approval subject to the following conditions: 1. The detailed plans for utilities, site grading, • and drainage shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of any building permit; 2. The final building plans are subject to the approval of the Building inspector with respect to applicable building codes; 3. A performance agreement and performance bond (in an amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to the City to guarantee site improvements as designated on the plans submitted, • any: .. •.d /v�M/��A 14 L +�.'sta0e�l►..�z..:.x+Ttcsrerom'as�:mr,.aaoaae+w,vcre3•:a.. �� _� l� �R Nj ice y 7 �}4ydy� ' i ts�� 5 'f•��(fee � f i � ��s LVr • 4 j 5 T 6 �li � n awe'nssavv �� •�� r • it