Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 02-25 PCP PXA1SQ1T1iqG CUNR41SSION AGENDA STtMY KBETING • February 25, 1971 CITY OF BROOKK;YNT CENTER JOINT PLAN1,71UG COMMISSION, IZ-ARK AND RECREATION CM141ISSION AM CONSERVATION COMMUSSION METING 1. Call to order of Planning Cownissiont 7:30 P.M. 2. Roll Call: 3. App-roval of Minutes.- February 4, 1971 4. Discussion items: 1) Resolution recommending denial of Applications mo. 70066 and 70067. 2k 7.-35 PQmir - Discussion of Southwest Neighborhood Advisory Counittee Report. 5. Adjournment of Planning Commission: 8:10 p.-pil., 6. Call to ordor of Joint Planning Cozmlission, Park. and • Recreation Conmission and Conservation r-onwnission special st-ady meeting (8:15 P. -4.) 1) Mayor Phi Lip Cohen 2) Bugane Hagel - Don Reich- el 3) Robert ,I:en-sen 4) --,,.udre Mossberg b) General discussion of Park and Recreation philosophias 7. Adjournment • ., • • i • • LADTIMING COR"92,11GSION RESOWTION NO. 71-1 • RESOLUTTON RECOMENDING DENTIAL OF PLAMM COMMISSI-ONT APPLICATTOWS NO. 70066 and 70067 SUBVIXTTED BY VILLAGER, BUILDERS a INC, MEREAS, Richard Ctirry, representing Village Builders, Inc. , has submitted Applications No. 70066 and 70067 -requesting rezoning froul R! to 11141 classification and site and building plan approval for a 36 unit apartment coii�plex to be located at 53rd and Russell Avenues North-; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has rev.-Lewed the request for rezoning and site and building plan approval at a public hearing, held pursuant to published and mailed notices, on January 21st, 1971, and further reviewed said applications on February 4th, 1971; and WEEREAS,, the City Council did adopt, in Nmovci-nber of 1966, a Comprehensive Plan, relating to the uses of land in the CiLY of Broo]Uyn Center, and recorqaendl-ng that the property inclUeed in this application be reserved for open space pur- poses to serve the residents of the Southeast- Neighborhood; and WBEREAS, it is ascertained by the Commission that because of its location, rezoning and plan aWroval of the aforemezntioneJ parcel i,tould set an unwise precedent of ailowing multiple rezidential development to encroach into designated open space-9 areas- 'an-33 W-HTRBASp the Conmiss.ion has ascer-t-wined that the proposed multiple developmelat ioould be itriconsistent wiltlh the. goals off. the corklprehens-ive plaill NOW, THERE-FORE, BE IT HESOLVED 99 TM, PLANzJING con-,LTSS1()N OF THE CITY OF DROOKLITINT CIENVER to recorcmend denial Olt: Appli-- cations kTo. 70066 and 70067 because said applica�tions are inconsistent with the a0als of the Comprelhensi-ve Plan, and 1--'Urther, that such development would serve as a detriment for f1Utu-,,-,o- park planing in the Southeast m eighbox•hood. •