Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 05-06 PCP r r PLANNING CWHISSION AND WSARD CAF APPEALS AND ADJUSTM-ENTS .AGE,14 7, Regular Meeting Slay 6,, 1971. Call, to order. 8,00 P.H. 2. Roll Call 3.., A'provai of Minutes:: 4. Chairman' s Explanation:, The Planning commission and Board of .Appeals and Adjustments is an advisory body„ 'in the matters con- -d in these hearings, the Boar Makes a recommendati-on to the City Council.. The City Council makes all final decisions on these matters. 5,, -Old Business'.- Application No. Village Builders Site and building plan approval 70067 • 6,. New Business g A. 241AC North.. American Site and building plan approval. 7A%y09 )E%m Jesse Joh..vson (Board of Appeal.s� side yarn �setback variance and ground coverage ge variance 71010 C- •l2 yton!. ) e)..2-c Site and building plan approval. 71011 Da Estelle Filkens (Board of Appe,a'll s Variance from Subdivision regulations 71012 E. Gene Graham (Board of Appeals Sideyard variance 71013 F,. Dunn Machine &_ Re pair (Board of :Appeals) S deyard. variance '71014 G. Dunn Machiric_ &. repair Site G�n.�'� building plan approval 71015 PL&A ING CC MISSION IMMATION 69SET Applidation Noe 71009 • Applicants MIAG North American, Inc Description of Requests Site and building plan approval BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting site and building plan approval for a proposed 1,950 square foot addition and site. improvements on a parcel located at 3515 - 48th Avenue Forth. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMEMATIONa The site, as it exists, consists of a 6,000 square foot building which is utilized as an office, machine repair, and warehousing facility. The property is partially paved, uncured, and partially landscaped. The site plan, in addition to the 1,950 square foot expansion, proposes to complete the parking and driveway areas by adding additional bituminous surfacing and placing concrete • curbing around the periphery of the driving and parking areas. The remaining areas is to be sodded. Plan .approval is recommended subject to the usual conditions, • e • SWEINT Application go. 71010 • Applicants Jesse Johnson Description of Re-cpiest s Side yard setback variance and building ground coverage variance The applicant is proposing to construct a 910 square foot garage ten feet from the side property line. The Zoning ordinance requires a 25 foot sine yard setback one the street side of corner parcels and further, that acresso.ry buildings not exceed 75% of the ground coverage- area of the dwelling building. (Refer to Sgcti.on 35-310. 1(b) (3) of the Zonina Ordinance) . The applicant in requesting a l5 foot side yard setback variance and a 216* square foot lot coverage area variance. Dwelling structures 925 square feet %75 694 Proposed garage 910 square feet maximum side allowed 694, square feet Variance required 216 square feet AFIAL' SIS AND RECOMENDATIONs If a 10 foot setback is granted, it would pose a problem, in that vehicles parking in the driveway would be encroaching G to 10 feet into the existing street right-Hof- way adjacent. . to Lakeside Avenue. (Average ear length - 20 feet minus '. 10 foot setback would be espial, to 10 feet on right-►of-mty) This problem becomes even more critical because Lakeside Avenue, are it exists, bas a narrow right-of-way width. (50 feet at the subject property and 30 feet at the ad j anent property to the west) 1% factor of� considerable importance relative to this request is that adjacent o, and nest of, the subject property, is a large parcel (261' x 2001) in which these is 30 feet of right-of-way for street purposes. Because of the size of that lot and a poszlbl.e future platting of it. it is anticipated ithat the sufficient right-of-,way could be obtained through dedication to provide for construction of a street of sufficient wi at.h on Lakeside Avenue. Plonni g commission Information sheet Page 2 Application No. 71030 • Consequently, granting of a minimal 10 woot setback vrtsuld be a detriment and not be in the Wiest interest of traffic safety if and when a roadway of sufficient width can be cca.stcruCted an Lakeside Avenue North. It is therefore recommended that the sideyard setbacX variance be denied because of the aforementioned factors, and further, be-�.-ause the applicant has failed to show ha dahi.p consistent with ordinance provisions. Relative to the building got area coverage, it should be noted that this ordinance provision is established to prohibits 1) Construction ..)f accessory buildings as large as or larger in square footage than the principal building (IiTjinq dwelling) t 2) Proliferation of a :number of accessory buildings as large as or larger than the principal building. The existing Isome on the property in question has 925 square feet of floor area and the proposed accessory building (,<.arage) would contain 910 square feet of floor area. Research of previous applications of a simi.lear nature irdicat(.f that sufficient precedent has been established by the Planning Coma-Assion and Council that mi.tigat6 against granting the request variance. X t is therefore recommended that the variance be denied because it w,:)u .d establish an unwise precedent and burther, th;A the applicant has failed to show sufficient hardship relative to ordinance requirements. • .+ ..r, • "_'�� iL".�i.may, :�t��::�"`, �;.9 ��°�.�v�p•,<'�;�{��y,,�r}.�i.��([ .�^��.^? � :rd�y�1.!s .���,€-yi ���-'�`a lCi"'..: .. .s >� ►•1�y i���4j���}�;� µ1 la�p3Tp. �./SS,M .�?n�.���Yd�'i..3�.1pyF?,''r•� Ins tort ,,=, !,I j�.,•,L at Pi X` <a eta N� 6J iii ? 'z'l �`..�,' ! :a #" �Jv p'. ` "�' _:<.�: ."_��:•li<.�„�" �M'".i '�#►���'�" c3�?.:,� �'� '��A.��::°:!'far. =�w>",5 /94"'3� '��: e• �'� , „t C'{$�is+w+�:�4'.,t.Y�' YV��II® •�W�.fes.�. .(°,+!!'7a �.lA.i A''',�Mf ��t.:�,�.�„�,`. !°..'+tii��wn try toy rinni Z", T.I.P"'' ell � knlvv',�:� ���il.?.�t,�;�'+•.'.i,y a t.}'$ '.r. z -*s-mow: QW y..> k53�rt., •� =a,1® �*y1�.��€,«iAC�� '�".�t9'a��3.'�. .. .-`�� .#. 't"`;'�,z a,, , �+�.•;s' ^ �.hf�,.`'-�;�+,�,"�':'� ,yy�rT.j, ..:i1a#rii, '^!R,?�1�°F� p?i°. ".� ::".. �u":` n' f"►.�. :' ,:-.�� � ;.�ply9 y��t,�` '3. .y'� gA�°�.t3p a� c��1i �a � f: •.,.'�'�`"�:�1:s�,��:t"''� %. M. +n�wom.e �y ♦ Je �p } a �"',•�. ,-,� .i"�A�.�, t.�.,'r�=�I �t'�`•l '�: r`£��T. :3�:l,8 ':mn"..�.ti� �}.." �p+;" r'+�::a�{ ,s',.!„ *.-t y ,.4� l .�i �"v...9 Urmom iv r`�> acs,°.{..,{" w•� �g .,'�E".,�,�" ^s s 'yam,' in- � beau .,<�''r�..�.�►'"� .'�;: ?'. !.. ,.,F • • � _;;�''�'PAS i� ', "'� 'fir.'+� � 4101 LAP(gWo4w APP t. I C^T ION ' CCffiIW, aAR�sk{i96d07R:A�tOOVl tR�+...,�N.'�riK•Aa!t.>a�s?P.:!�9'+c7swac L.J -1 'J �'•Y3�"�•1RA&.�.T.*S:bVP.Sti';Y`>ihl s6l`1:v!1t}.'.;,::.i^G2�iEA2:!F`k"�MpG•fL97FT'VESPStitOQde� _�WdGI.�:P91$M'4��i1t7�''l4SYI d zR� F JtlFCAE:�?Ci,`ft�.R1E.e'..ii:d!tti,'f16MFtCr£?^r�:r.K51t�ST�'Jkx67P,:a' r'�1F�? �ertkl¢a5r :vk:. �u¢ Ei97i�.Y.4hYa"t:'#fn►'ChL7+C�r�LSn�+iWJaRt.;svKalt7+ee�u+mismnaa.�ssrrcrxu,w+ze.enar. i y 3 • tuut�.'xswcc itel rr�xten.casx!eamwv„ae.as�uunssMU�.w�e�nasxxisa r,�w+w.vo. a :.f., 4 t4_N+• X77 � ¢• �� ,,l a?mnx.'s:.nYna».sl m�:^:rtv+!7:xeeee�xxACae,'7.-rarrvu`t�::w�:r�u.'v:;�:decum�w.w;a'�.vorral� .� w:.rzesurttt���••• flb a'!+Har`Ci'/Y:FSi4'(fA�!"�`)�;7.7RSE6B4�•YRCWRI QSQYa2✓T^.�:A'Ft!.2`•.YPY4"'Yi'955s^ifN. •• , § ` `rt.1 ,fi n"�` x y -...'+"'• p r'�.R -arwraa a �� ��'�`?� ?#a .,�K.y,x�a�.�,� ftyt,: ,r ,��� .p WI gig�p •. r �„�;xtiv�+svevnx=Srt+*w•�ti+►,�rs.. x^�..r�:e.�scara�:aea�x rr�..•• 7�' a..:rR x�r«a;�•�.ssx lrun,ae•l.�ssnscA'�Wita+haYY�y rr+-•.it ....`".x> ,, t` i PLANNING COM ION 29901IM UOU .1WOT Application Bo. 11011 ALbplic=to Dayton's Department Store ',hype of Requests Site and building plan approval The applicant is requesting site and building plan approval for 5.400 square foot garden store to be located in the Brookdale Shopping Center east of DaytOn's D parZ:3rtent Store, east of the perimeter road, and adjacent to the roadway connecting the ABC Theater and Dayton's Department Store parking areas. AM, 1,YtSZS AM RECO)WNDATIONs �t is reconmiended that they site plan be approved s4bject to the %2suawl-conditions and the following special. conditions: 1) That the building setback be 35 feet in lieu of the 24 feet as shown on the site plan. • 3' That the trees identified on the plan be a minimum of 4 inches in diameter four feet above the ground line. 3) That the additional landscaping inclusi-ve of trees or shrubs be provided an the east and southerly portion of the parcel.. 4) That approval of the site plan depicting an outdoor sales area is not intended to preclude the applicant from obtaiAing administrative permits relative to ,existing ordinance requirements for outdoor sales and display of merchandise. • �.�`f.I".'.•�'v` tl L et� �� ..��"�.j R�.��Fes'�. • :.. �.: :- .>ii fix,*4. o- +:� .FA�:��:iti�i ■31'��xt ��.,.f;.' ":iF.w'= �$° "�„r^. ., �. ',.Jc'� � `+!� ..�'�"«.'"'"�, '.+�P.��yy+47�vtk,#E. .�g,Ai�+� 'r�4 �.'�� ��wk��s+r•v��:�:i";»`t �gA. '�' Mb`�6'.. sIM U,.°b 't,'NA.. .>'•J ��.11. �`�b'#� �wi ��14'Nw��i d�",*,rr.�'�" .�;,,...1,f. ''C-�':i�`R,w ..,, #.�..3ry=w .�.,.. .x}.�. ,"'_';;�� r�+ "*���� #.•x�ta ��'��=w�?a�S.Sa� '�'�, .:i .� �.gdM'rw. �arks � , t;" ,�§�... Via f)d AUC4 as. LP i.:.5' Ou Id- f.,&rg ti rte. i m, --ittf ,:fly. , • .1"0033"T ed 20 , 1„ �� '37�N �✓.7� ��.} fis� TF�S.�.f�#«�,B'.�:N-� ,Paa�i�.'y �ix^ fKws#.� 4'� '�i".•�� �} ..�.•''�. *.,. �..71io �P'i4t1�6d+al,�'.� �r'.iMm {{,�,f'1.�'��1��.��.��4.�.1/11+Y~�i.y�9��.•+.SS:.�S•}.: t,'�.i iJ #i.�,�:`R`YiJ'b.� ' • i • Application No. 71012 Applicants Estelle Filkens, Agent for Tom Hammer Type of Request x Pletting variance BACKG D a Section 15--104.A. (1) provides that normal platting procedure can be waived by variance. The applicant has submitted a Certificate of Survey and requests t,*u^.t a variance be granted to allow a metes and bound division of a property located at 5531 Halifax avenue 16:)rth. The requested division is a simple metes and bounds description and meets the criteria for granting such a variance .request. it is therefore recommended that the variance be granted • because it meets the criteria for such a variance, and further, that previous variances of a similar nature have been granted in the past. • ++���._:"w+'a ....;;�� k E`stse�:�:`sl9l :�'gri"i p��a (��.a�e .�"''.it�;.ry.�y?�y '�, x ..�'•,.y�S t;". .r . i.•, '.;�3 .. d.4S4 q9�Jn��S vi•#.. bat^Nr. sS�uRJ 9 s,k• � yr�.:-.�rJy"`Y TM.. r. .:A j-3. .T-�A�7bi... L_ •Yb• 'r. '��.( 121,o, C'.1, j ".iW >x + hoe, 53'h<i 'x.'k s.£� $3�3►. . .: r9; xs, °, is ° .+i?.�s.�+3. °�'t 4!' � i I�.d;3�.�i.+k,L'sa«y ar..'�s�L w�P S�'$.;�'!�'"�1�`.i-+. �i�.,: a#�`.fi.•�y aF.4:�: al riot-aIvib Vv t.':Sol c !x s� • pLAMS; CORM SSION INVOMATION SWRT Application Igo. 71013 Applicants dene Graham .carpe of Request; Sideyard variance The applicant is requesting a 21611 gideyard variance for an existing* partially remodeled, garage and breezeway that is being converted into a living a"ea. `�'`3le garage and breezeway are 7 feet a inches from the scale property line and the ordinance setback require- ments for a living area is 10 feet. AMALy a$S AM MMMUEN 7.ATION s The applicant has been remodeling a breezeway and garage into a living area over the past two years .-oithout obtaiainr the necessary building permits. The Building 'Inspector,, while making a routine inspection of a garage 'wing • constructed on the parcel, discovered the remodeling operation taking place and ordered the applicant to cease: construction until proper approvals for a variance were granted and a building permit could be issued. jibe applicant is now requesting the sideyard variance after the fact. Xt is noted that sufficient precedent has been set in previous applications that would indicate approval of this variances however, the justification for datermi.naing hardship would be weak at best. • �}'d2�v�- .L ��SI'i'+, �.�1. +f:.t ii'"r�Jf��'Y. � +.,f�c tr `�`�y.,' a�.� � � 'a"S��d ' �t.4.a?.::' ?"iPL2•"�M C. \ .Ss�` Iw 1'•. �d4 f"f.s,3 I rPR.l�1.._'a.. „7 t"'li 3.0 f- 7,e�.Y `-I:ej • PLA UNG COMMISSION TIMPSATION S*MWC • Application No. 71014 Applicaaty Dunn Machine aLd RTpaiL Type of bequest: Sideyard sctbaC�: variance. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a+ 5 foot si.deya,rd variance 'Co allow construction of an zaddition, within 4 feet of the vaest property line for a building located at 3615 a- 50th Avenue North. The existing building was previously granted a Acsar foot sideyard n AnALYSIS AND REt ENDATION% The applicant, in essence, is proposing an incidental extension to a building that has already been granted a variance on a previous ocassi.on. • The lot in question has a rather peculiar shape in that it is narrow in width (75 feet) with a total overall depth of some 200 feet. Because of this shape and property Nines which do not run coincident %lith the building, it appeara that there may be merit for granting a variance. PLANNING CONKISSION 14VORKATION SHEET Application Noe 71015 Applicants Dunn Machine and Repair Type of Requests Site and building plan approval. BAC ?�Ot9�D s e applicant is requestlaq site and building plan approval, for a 3,100 square foot addition to be added North. existing building located at 3515 - 50th Avenue No 1L6ha ANALI I S AND PECUKKENUATIONs The existing site consists of a 3,SOO square foot building utilized for machine repair. The 'remainder of the parcel consists of an unpaved driv_„ng and parking area with the exception b ing a bituminous surface in the front yard setback of the building that is utlized for parking area. • The site plan, as submitted, proposes a 3,100 square Poor addition, curbing and surfacing of all driveways and patkitag areas, and further, eliminate parking in the front yard setback by replacing the bitum1nous surfacing with a landscape treatment. it is recommended that the site plan be approved subject to the usual conditions and the special condition that the applicant augment the sodded l.aadscape areas with deciduous trees and shrubs. • •`A,� ar .1;.�. "p r.� tYG."J.--:� .•�FM i"sy.�ff�w`Y+1�� Nti� 'G.t.LA' S#'`. LAs'e:�r.'.LV+ti 6! �„Y i'�: 11A��'... �v_.��w '4r°�. 3'``�a`T./�U,Mari c�/� tv�rf.wr.�.S ,�.r'V Gi!.r`f }4 �.W"'► at:_43 v :xf,, ,/.q�m t..nx"7 'JY'd4,-.f fit L. N. Aw; 'is J , na .y,�fix..�.�«: .�.�.� .'�'� �.�'!` �'��;}��"�?. ,pp k��� ,f+..�... .. �;� t��i-,», ��,x: • x • ,,,.s .®s w.s aumtf o—^^ <-amroazfz[er_n+..nuamusw �.L'M.'1},�kTi1:rL6.'181:e9;Ci:t1.VtN7.�Ne.��.m:HanmRrnw�e�-.R'�.v... w.n .�.. w .�. F 1 a Y Ywuh 'YJ1.YM�J4xmUVb]!�. ..s. wm, u mama. m...y fyt.,erzatt�'M�iv:�:,AR7�e2;1iY3�F9f�C?.k,'�O�IiS:?W�R.*d2Yb'V¢8aJY9't� - H@itir�nma:zvrc+sv�.wcatam,serer+7ik31efw�assea.�:twra-rav�afn'es,pi�mw�t�S. .,sr.� .s� v m�f.cs,rar.wfama 'Li+^fd4'A.i-:'MM•++ t;..,.,:.Jury;:,.�e'7�/Yt+.':4°F:1'etdtAd'_'.W fpill .. Me1NpYtt .. +z�-w:�k eaiffesk�RFaM.xfStlFa�t�aertrs;7 ', y�, � �aYi!.RV•vafNti:M'A?:�fMfi- +am'n'o.v1�f::uwfn.:e I II `k y�