Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1971 06-03 PCP PI-AnVI-11K.7 Crj,-fflISST0I,71 AND BOARD OF APPEALS AGYe7t0A Regular Meeting june 1, Call to Ordert 800 P,,W, 2 Roll Call- 3. Apk:Lqy��! of Hi.-vatess April 1., 1971 April 1.5, 1971 Hay 6,; 1971 4 Chairman s. ri r,a . s The Planning Commission and the Zc,ard of Appeals and Adjustments is car. advisory body., in the matters concerned in. these hearings, the Board makes a recommendation to the Citv Council.. The Cj.t�; Coiincil makes all final decisions an these matters. .)Id Business Application No A, V 1 ey c o n rite and buildiag plan approval 70011! B. Ron Fleissaer Wxild medal lior. Nursing ;icme) S) I . r.ecial 7:se sermlt 70010 Cu Po Fleissner 'C&ald Medallion Nursing ;iome` Preliminary plat approval 70030 D. 'Ron Fleissner 'Cxold M—Pda,Ilion Nursing .:-Homell lzezoning 70033 E Jesse Johnson 'Board of Appeals) fAde yard se-back variance and ground coverage VZZ7:Lapace 7' I 6. 'rIew S--Isir ess A� BrockIvn CeWCer E,,2.jL)Kis: t r-burcb, :;pedal rise ,, se Parmit 71.01-LE B. Rane,:all Lane Eite and building plar. approval 73.017 • Planning Commission and hoard of Appeals Agenda June 3, 1971 Paw; 2 C Randall L''an z, Site and b-cilding plan app-rOW-A. "71018 V Standard Sp:)-vqrft-,� Si,,,--e and buIlding plan approval 171)19 Ceo-er IndxIstrial Park Site� and building, plan appr0v-z3"'. 71120 7 2e I.LtLzj-S: A Sout.Iywest l�eighborhood Shady *,o.jbm.-r,t.ted !,,,,y �,Ijdwest planning and ResearCh 13, Revizw of Amended Landscaping FlaV,, subritted b, B:arrett Col:.s-rtctiop Cwpai, ftX multlple development located at 69th and Lynd-ale Avemxe Korth (Pet. ik ior. 70053'1 pplic.at S.:)i0A 1. B Application b70. 70012 • , Viewcon, In^4 'Darrel. Far'ri A�pl..:_carat� Description of Request: Site and building plan approval y ROUND *Zhe applicant is requesting site and building plan approval for a 142 unit condomiai atz townhouse development for a parcel located at 56th and Major Avenues biorth east of the `Twin Lake Worth: Apartment's. The Planning conmiiss:ion initially reviewed this application on April 2, 1970, at w li.ch time a re mua►endat:ion for conceptual approval of the site plan was made to the City Council with- the pro-vision that any change in the plan should be referred back to the Planning Ccxmission if deemed appropriate by the staff for the Planning comm,issior; Chairman., with. the understanding that legal c?ocum,�nits required for the development would have to be approved by the City Council. • The C1t.y council reviewed the applicati.on on April 13, 19100; at which time concept: playas were approved virh the 6irection that the City Manager develop and recoirmend methods for resolving ing inconsi,stenc es and conflict between tj,e subject proposal and the p=resent ordinance structure. On May 24 1971, the city Council reconsidered the appli-- catien anci it wags their action at that time to remand it to the Plvnning Commission for review and recommendation. ANALYSIS AND W.,"CaKKE&DATION The applicant is requesting site and building play: approva; for a two p:hase 102 units, three and four bedroom clustered co.adomin;ivm towahl ouses o The first phase proposes 44 unit: consistinc of a four unit, cluster node: to bfz, located on the south portaon of the property adjacent. ttu County Read 10 with, tom'a Oil remaining units, tennis co?lrt:; pool, basketball court s2ai,.ffl.e boards court, and tat lc3t be cnxastruc°i:ed • Appileation No, 70012 Page 2 40 when the units are pre-sold. When the phase One is completed, each individual unit would then be surveyed and a plat submitted for approval. Phase T"a consists of 58 cluster units and two tot lots to be developed utilizing the same procedure as set forth in Phase one. Review of 1:he site plan indicates that it is in order relative to general site considerations, landscaping, and setback requirements, however, general information in regard to drainage, elevations and general construction techniques may be required by the City Engineer and Building inspector prior to the issuance of any buildin-.7 permits At previouo bearings related to this application, there has been discussion in regard to the feasibility of placing a snow fence on the west side of the property to protect the residences on June Avenue from potential debris and materials that may be blown into the properties during the period of constructiun and a question in regard to the associatiop agreement for the townhouse development. Review of these matters we uldindicate that it way be well as part of a requirement of the plan approval for the Commission to consider the merits of requiring such a fence during construction. in regard to the Association Agreement, it should be noted that it hao been forwarded to the City Attorney for his review who will in turn, background the Commission on Me matter at the meeting on June 3, 1971. in summary, it is recommended that the site and building plan be approved subject to the following conditions% 1. That '.he total site plan be approved with the provinions that Phase Two be reviewed by the Vlannnng Comnission and/or Council upon completion of Phase One to determine if there are any necesra:o.y adjustments to the total development plan prior to enterLng into phase Two 41 Viewe(�ni, page 3 • 2. That a model four unit cluster be allowed to commence prior tc) t?,je cons truct3.oj-,, of the 40 remaininq units in Phase one of the development. .3. That a snow fence be erected to prohibit blowing of debris and earth materials on to the properties on June Avenue during the construction period� 4. That utility,, drainage and elevation, plans are subJect to the approval of the City Engineer prior to the issuance of a building permit,. 5. I'Mat additional screening be provided in areas adjacent to single family residence where berms ar,� not indicated on the site plan. 6. That the Home Owner ;.ssociation Agreement is consi-3tent with stake and/or local laws governing such igreements. 7. Ltuilding plans are subject to the approval of the Building inspector with respect. to applicable • building codes. a. That a perfomaance agreement and performance bond (in a amount to be determined by the City Manager) shall be submitted to the City to cRiarantee the site impro•iements as designated an the plans submitted. 9. That 4he platting requirement be waived until such 'Ame, as a phase of the development is completed,. WTIE3 It is an:icipated that an amendment to the subdivisioa regulations will be forthcoming to permit condominium townhouse Platting, • . t KYLAWA air PA R K �� a� �• WAR ttro��asw,ryrz..�.,.an„ryave v�,J.a;t�rern�can� arnat�etrxvM1i Asa-.�.�etirvr crY:w�.mw ,m n�.,,,e�,,.s.� � ' °° as rrr rus ass R�r aaao f 1 T t � '2 1 r _. .. m "4sKFr -svieexc+�xromcER`�k' yy y I, 9 � p, •::rw�zyt.�srwnn.>n .arum-�a.ua.c�-ms7�nsaaa�:.r;WMwma.-nae:..-z-,:ana.m:,c+uw�rm:a»,�� �.i' y^r+Mniaxaztaf�ssvati:ma+w;lri::wR�Yti.JdFG3kiQ+L.A:,Rrt 24";`Ti6Ti.:Ytir'RSF(:�`7u..:u:`.;s5'i75 fLY+Tkf:^.:i�:"ui.Yl,'k.T.E7i9�F..��l..:rz�r„i1l[AF;A.S.�ae�aF.6.a`Ya#@1'ib�itiyC�l:4sCw: .,> a.00 Application No. 70018 AppliCaPtg Ron Fleissner Description of Request:- Special V'se Permit BACKGROUM-. The applicant is requesting a special use permit to facilitate the construction of a 165 bed nursing home to be constructed east of the Georgetown Apartment complex and north of 66th Avenue North. The proposed facility would be a propriatary nursing and convalescent home licensed and regulated by the State Board of Health and local municipal nursing home ordinance. ANALYSIS AM. RVCOMMMDATIOV° The application meets the requirements of the standards for a special use permit providing the property is rezoned as reflected in Planning Commission Applicati0l) • No. 70031 with the exception of Section 35220 2. (d) which wiI.I. be established upon submission of the site plan for the proposed nursing home facility. Based upon the aforementioned considerations, it is therefore recommended that the application be approved, Application? No. 70030 • Appli.cant� Ron F'leissner Description of Request.- Subdivision BACKGROUNDt The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for a Registered Land Survey for a property located east of the Georgetown Apartment Complex, north of 66th Avenue North. Tract B of the proposed Registered Land Survey is a site for a: proposed nursing home facility and the plat: as submitted, is the result of a requested by the Planning C,.-.3 mission A14ALYS`i S AM .RE CIVMNI 3A'1[''I(M Review of the Registered Land Survey in comparison with the existing plat of the DEMA C Addition indicates that certain utility and drainage easements should be shown on • the proposed Registered Land Survey it is reca-nmmended that the prelx mi.nazy Registered Land Survey be .approved subject to the coed it ic.i-k that exist-i.ag utility an: drainage easements are shown on the Registered Land Survey. Application No. 70031 Applicantg Ron Pleissner Description of Request: Rezoning MCKGROUND t The applicant is requesting rezoning from R3 and C2 to R4 to permit construction of a 165 bed nursing home facility to be located east of the Georgetown Apartment complex and north of 66th Avenue North. The application was previously tabled on June 4, 1970, to al'-ow time to develop standards and criteria for the construction, licensing and operation of nursing home facilities within the City . AbT,'J,VSIS AMID RECOM.EIMW',_,TI0F ,, The City Council bas recently adopted a nursing home ordinance establishing criteria, licensing and regulations • for such facilities and the applicant is now requesting the rezoning to R4 which permits nursing home facilities tv� be constructed as a special Use in that district. The existing .R3 and C2 zoning districts do not allow nursing homes as either a permitted Cori a special use. The property in question is bounded on the east by C2 (commercial) , on the north by R3 (multiple) OYI the west by R3 (mul,'Aple) al-id on the south by C2 (corimercial) . Given the nature and character of the uses in the proximity to the sit,,, it would appear that an R4 zoning is an appropriat,.} use and is therefore recommended that the applicatioll be app-roved. ! f. OL DWI a 1 � 0 1 kk C3 i . F W �= VO.3sodOVd L 9F h t 1 AplAicatiOn MO? 71010 • Applicant.- Jesse -,;ohnson. Description of Request: Sideyard set'-lack variance an6 building ground c*verage arez! variance,-, The applicant is proposing to construct a 910 square foot garage 10 feet from the side property lIne. The zoning ordinance requires a 25 foot side yard setback. on t'he street side of a corner parcel. and farther, that accessory buildings not exceed 75% of the gr-.und covert3ge area of the dwelling building (Refer to section 35 •310 1,, ,'b) (3) of the zoning Ordinance'� , The applif',!ant is X-equesting a 15 foot side yard setbaclh, variance and a 21.6 square foot lot coverage area varia:lce: The Bppli(�ati,,)n was previously conssidered by the Planning • Cormi.ssion on jay 6, 1971, and tabled to zallow additional time for review -,)f t.'..Ie application by, the commission., kNAUMS AND W'3CCVAEMM-TIOF-- Ref er to p fanning jnfoxr:zaton 91j et under cover of the IMay 1.971 , agenda. e.AlT ION VARIA )"- tit. R -NT I nX S X ZL `7 Application No. 71016 • Applicant2 Brooklyn Center Baptist Church Description of Request-. Special Use Permit BA O<G ROUND u The applicant is requesting a special use rermit to opera-:e a children' s day care center at the Brooklyn Center Ba.pti:3t Church located at 5840 Humboldt Avenue North. ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONt An R4 district is the lowest zoning classification that makes specific reference to day care centers as a special use, Brooklyn Center Baptist Church is located ir an R1 residential district which requires a special use permit for 1) Public and private elementary and secondary schools offering a regular course of study accredited by the Minnesota Department of Education provided primiry • vehicular access shall be gained to the uses by a collector or arterial street; and 2) Other non-commercial uses required for t4%e public welfare in an RI district, as determined by the City Council. The day care center requested by the Baptist Church could not be construed as a public or private elementary or secondary school offering a regalar course ouf study, however, -the proposed use is one that can probably be associated with such a use and therefore brought to the attention of the Planning Commission. It may, however, be associated with non-comatercial uses required for the public welfare as determined by the City Council and it is therefore recommended that the special use permit be approved subject to the speciel consition t'.'Iat the State of Minnesota license required for the operation of such a day care center is procured, and a copy of which i3 submitted to the City and placed on file prior to the commencement of the operation. • Tk AP 7 O.L fi AppIicantn Randall Lane of Request-. site and N'jj'jdiPi4; Plan. approval The a?plicaat is requesting site and building plan approval for a three st,.ory, 26 unit, a-paztnient building for a property located at the northeast intersection of Emerson and 67th Avenues North.., The 1property is zoned R5, contains 73,500 square feet of lot area, and Alias a naxinium allowed density of 26 units. XNArYSIS AIM PECONMENDATION,! Revie�-,, of the site plan indicates that the follaWiAg adjustlia- ents should be made-. 1) Curb cuts op rmerson Avenue Horth and G>th Avenues Morth be adjusted +-_o meet existing in place clarbinq and those respective roaduays rather than at the property line as shown on the plzn, • 2� The internal n:)adway at the northeast corner of the ,prQpc:i-acd building sbould be adiusted tt� reflect a 24 f­aot rotadway in lieu cif the 20 foot roadway as shown on t�ie plan. 3) Drainage and elevation plans have not been submitted for revie$v by the City Engine:.: find muit be submitted for review prier to final actiOn by the City Council,- 4'it ,"he landscaping req:uirezents 0:_ the ordinance are however, it appears that the pla;as IVOr said landscar ping are minivaun. at best,.. it is strongly suggested that the annlicant be encourage to avigraent. the site -plan :Vjith a6ditional trees and shinabs. • �i • • • CC-44MISET011 1111FOr"AATTOF MEET Application no. 71018 • Applicantz Randell Lane Type of Request: Site and building plan approval BACKER OUNW, The applicant is requesting site and building plan approval for a 22 unit an ,,.artza-ent building to be located at the northwest intersection of Emerson Avenue North and 67th Avenue North. The property is zoned R5 and has a max:;IMUM allowed density of 22 units. ANALYSIS AND RECOFMNDA'",JON-. The site plan is in order and approval is recommended subject to the usual conditions and the foliowing special conditionss 1) That the parking lot south of the proposed building be adjusted to allow construction of concrete T's in the pa.-eking area. • 2) That; drainage and elevations be submitted to the City for approval prior to City council action on the Application. 3; That, the curb cut on Emerson Avenue be adjusted to coiiicide w.".th the existing in-place curing on tho roadway. 49 Thai. the applicant be encouraged to augment the site with additional landscaping consisting of trees and sb rubs. inMMING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHM Application, mo, 71LO19 A .PPIiCaI!t -- Standard Solvents Type of Request Site and biiilding plan approval The applicant is requesting site and building plan approvaJ for a 2,900 square foot addition to be added ,no an existinc- 1,900 square foot building for a property -1,.ocated at 4906 France Avenue North. The application transits of two parts-, one of which is a pro- posed construction of a 2,900 scpaare foot building, land- scaping and bituminaus surfacing for certain areas of the parcel; and the secand -,portion of the proposal consists of rem,n.vinq abkave grade st-tareige tanks and placing them urdor ground and surfacing of the remainder of the driving and p,jrkjrfqj areas at a Future date. AunVISIS ,rh(s proposal, as submitted, indicates it is in order relative to ordinance requirements and is rec,-Mmended for approval w.`,.th the foileming special condition3� 1) That the shrubbery noted in. the green strip area at the weste.-ly portion of the parcel be identified by nwie and species. 2) fltlat 1;.he areas ncted for future construction (placomerti: of storage tanks underground and placi,ng of biturkinouc surfacing) be accompl-ised within a reasonable period of tiiie, and frlrthe,,:- that. those future driving and parking areas be curbed with concrete curbing in accordance with ordinance requireire-mts. fx. PLANNING C'.MKISSION IMPORUMON SHEET Application No. 71020 Apps icant� Brooklyn center industrial Park (Spec buildings 3 and 4) Description of Request< Site and building plan- approval BACKGMUM.- The applicant is requesting site and building plan approval for two warehousing facilities on property located at the intersections of Shingle Creek Parkway and 65th .Avenue North. The buildings are 43,680 square feet and 51,292 square feet respectively. AIV-,LYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Review of the site plan indicates that it is in order subject to the following modifications.. 1) That. the berm .area depicted at the southwest corner of the parcel be moved 50 feet ii, an easterly direction to permit proper sight distance • at the intersection of Shingle Creek Patkway and 65th ,-kvep-ue North. 2) That all other berms as depicted on the site plan be at grade level a minimum of 10 feet from existing or future curb lines to allow for the construction of fu'--ure sidewalks, •