HomeMy WebLinkAbout69-109 PCR Member j ob n Le&i ry introduced the following rosolution and moved
• its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 69-109 . I
RESOLUTICN, APPROVING PLANNING COMMMSION APPIJCATION
NO, 68018 ASEEM-SED
WHEREAS, on April 15, 19G8 Glad and Miller Construction Company
filed Planning Commission Applioatton No. 68018 requestitiq rezoning from
0-2 ito R-5 that property generally located south of Lake-side Avenue, north and
west of T.R, 100, and eatst of Lower Twin Lake; and
%rT-M-REAS, on May 2, 1968 and June 6, 11968 the application was considered
by t"-,v Planning Commission and recommended for denial on the general basis of
xn&14-11quate and unsafe traffic access; and
WYEREAS, Pppllirnition No. 68018 was mnmldered by the City Council
on T,ine 17, 1968 and. subsequently -Itabled to kw;yumt 5, 1968 and again to
August 19, 1968; and
WHEMEAS, an August 19, ISE8 then matter was tabled with the concurrence
of the applicant for the purpose of obtaining additional infomation from -Outside
consultants; and
WHEREAB, on November- 18, 1968 the City Council enac%ed Resolution
No. 68-251 delerring action oil Application No. 68018 for an additional ninety
days to perynit the gathering of additional data; and
W-'.4T,R L- PtS, the City Manager commissioned evaluation appraisals related
to the s.ubjeat pm�party and he also commissioned Mr. Howard Dahlgren of Midwest
Planning and Re5etk•ch, Inc. to perform a land use analysis of the subject property; and
Wj-jERfj,S, in a report dated January 14, i960 Hovravd Dah1grenes ubmitted
such a report which generally recommended a iand use consisting of multiple
dwellings toward th(.,,- easterly portion, of the subjeect proterty, with a parkway
c0r&Tl,,j(.tjM into TWir, Ds,ke Avenue and with the '?,,itin TAks beach property lying
westerly thereof to be dedicaxted k7y tho devekoper for pa -k &M parkway purposes
in c.-rmsideration of appropriate deasiLy CmUtS, tnd
WMEAS, valuation appraisals indicated a valu ; of $135,000.00 for
the S.5 acres if iased for R-5 pkarposes and $66,1100.00 14 ua&d for R-1 purposes; and
on January 20, 1969 a petition calling for 0-6 Purlave of the
"'Inkct was p_,er-.&;Aed to the CA,q' %`.0uuC0.' W-4
vq5
• WqZREM, also on January 20, 1969.Application No. 68018 was again
considered by the City Council and remanded back to the Planning Commission
for review and recommendation based upon the concepts proposed in the Midwest
PI&nning report and upor. staff infoirmafAon, including (1) a preliminary layout
illustrating how a neighborhood park might be developed consistent with the
provisions of the Midwest prop(,",sfal, (2) an indication from the Minnesota Highway
Department regarding City use of a portion of excess T,H3 100 right-of-way
d
for park purposes, and (3) a traffic analysis of the existing and the proponc
traffic volumes; and
WHEREAS, the matter was heard by and Wonnation was presented to the
planning Commission on Fabruaxy 6, 1968 and February 10, 1968 with the resultin;
recommendation that the application be denied "because it amounts to a repudiation
of the Comprehensive Plan for a single family cornmunit'/ In. this area, 'And therefore
r, study should be made to consider the dlecirability of changing the entire neigh-
borhood to R-5 zoningl; and
WHEREAS., three of soven Planning Cotural2siL-norz went on moord as being
in favor of amended Appi'tcation No. 68018 along the concept outllmw in the
Midwest PlarjiiiV and Research, Inc. report; and
WHERL4,1B. , on February 24, 1969 Application No. 68018 was again considered
• by the City Council along with a presentation of the lWarmation developed by
the City staff; and
V4"hMRUS, after hea.ri-Aa ftm�im the audiex°,t,ca, insmbersp, of the Council
individually stated theLr observn'ti#.vnz, and opW.ona, with a ganeral consensut
that the facts which tsvrxe gatheevre43 over a nine month peziod would rKt,,t legally
support a denial o-A" the applicailon es InfomallY &nrmnded a�ong the lines of the
Dah1gren re.por• ; and
W1 3, the applicant offered a mearis of J&ple imtritt— the park and
poarkway roovi3fons of the Da hlgren repoM and
Wlilr.�, the (4"ity Mar*gor was ftected 0 prepws i dxaft resolution
wldch wou 2, rezoning ft-om 0-2 to R-5 ttLe app=-Uniate 5.35
acres of the applicant's property vrith the urderstrundinq t'hi'l the dpplicant will
drr�emnd his appXICZtion az-'0Orf2- AWlY:
riOW, THLREF ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City CCuncil of the City Of
Brmklyn Center to approve Application No. 68018 (as, revised) and to thereby
proceed -with rezoning from 0-2 to R-5 the ea'3terly approximate 5.35 acres of that
property generally h_)cated south of Lakesido. Avenus, wrth arvJ wept of T. H. 100,
and east of Lower lNtv,in Lake.
March 10, 1969
Da ke ?4 r
Resolution No �
• They motion for the adoption of tho twvsqQUW regal can was duly sec otuled by
ber rl RydbeUV* and ulxan VC" ba p � " rA# following voted
in favor thereolt P'hifip Cohos, 10M ; My# jul Wes, Rowjwj Hack and
erodore WIU&M; auad the folOWW VOW agelWt t No ,4=ft zww., wher®upOA
.. r*scIution was declared duly pa S*Sd aaad &dcPtsd ,
L