HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014 02-10 CCP Regular SessionAGENDA
CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION
February 10, 2014
6:00 p.m.
City Council Chambers
A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is
located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
1.City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions
2.Miscellaneous
a. Request from Sara Scholl, 3307 Poe Road, to Reschedule the Dangerous Dog
Hearing
3.Discussion of Work Session Agenda Items as Time Permits
4.Adjourn
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
City of Brooklyn Center
February 10, 2014
AGENDA
1.Informal Open Forum with City Council — 6:45 p.m.
—provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on
the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not
be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political
endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a
dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open
Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made
but, rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only.
2.Invocation — 7 p.m.
3.Call to Order Regular Business Meeting
—The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the
meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet
ring binder is located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
4.Roll Call
5.Pledge of Allegiance
6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
—The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be
enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a
Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent
agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
1.January 27, 2014 — Study Session
2.January 27, 2014 — Regular Session
b. Licenses
c.Resolution Opting Not to Waive Limited Tort Liability for 2014
d.Resolution Calling Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for Diseased
Tree Removal Costs and Delinquent Weed Removal Costs
e. Resolution Approving the Labor Agreement for Law Enforcement Labor Services
(LELS) Local 86 (Police Commanders and Sergeants) and the City of Brooklyn
Center for the Calendar Years 2014-2015
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- February 10, 2014
f. Receive Hennepin County HRA Notice of Suburban HRA and EDA Activities
7.Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations
—None.
8.Public Hearings
a. An Ordinance Prohibiting Sampling in Tobacco Products Shops; Adding New
Brooklyn Center City Code, Section 23-110
—This item was first read on January 13, 2014; published in the official newspaper
on January 23, 2014; and is offered this evening for Public Hearing.
Requested Council Action:
—Motion to open Public Hearing.
—Take public input.
—Motion to close Public Hearing.
—Motion to adopt ordinance.
b. Proposed Use of 2014 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds
—This item was first read on January 13, 2014; published in the official newspaper
on January 23, 2014; and is offered this evening for Public Hearing.
Requested Council Action:
—Motion to open Public Hearing.
—Take public input.
—Motion to close Public Hearing.
—Motion to direct staff regarding allocation of the CDBG Funds.
9.Planning Commission Items
—None.
10.Council Consideration Items
—None.
11.Council Report
12.Adjournment
City Council Agenda Item No. 6a
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
STUDY SESSION
JANUARY 27, 2014
CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Pro Tem Dan
Ryan at 6:05 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tern Dan Ryan and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and
Lin Myszkowski. Mayor Tim Willson was absent and excused. Also present were City
Manager Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of
Business and Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and
Community Standards Vickie Schleuning, and Mary Mullen, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial,
Inc.
CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS
Councilmember Myszkowski requested clarification regarding Revised Regular Session Agenda
Item 6g, 2013 Pay Equity Compliance Report. City Manager Curt Boganey stated the annual
report is a State requirement. He added the City must meet a set of standards to assure its
compliance with pay rates that are relatively comparable regardless of gender.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson requested the following correction to the Study Session
minutes of December 9, 2013:
Page 4, 3rd paragraph:
Replace "concept" with "nicotine transmission"
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the correction to the December 9,
2013, Study Session minutes.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson requested the following correction to the Regular Session
minutes of January 13, 2014:
Page 12, last paragraph, last line:
Replace "tobacco use" with "nicotine addiction"
01/27/14 -1- DRAFT
Mr. Boganey stated the comment was made by City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and reflects
what he intended to say. He added perhaps the statement should not be amended.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson agreed.
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan requested the following correction to the Study Session minutes of
January 13, 2014:
Page 1, 4 th paragraph, 1 st sentence:
Replace "ARM" with "Crystal Legislative Breakfast," and remove "to the Association"
It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the corrections to the January 13,
2014, Study Session minutes.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson requested clarification regarding Regular Session Agenda
Item 6b, Licenses, specifically two properties owned by Chad Johnson at 5209 and 5211 Xerxes
Avenue North, both renewal licenses that moved down from Type I to Type III. Mr. Boganey
agreed to have City staff research that issue and provide more information.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson requested clarification regarding photographs included in
the Council packet pertaining to Regular Session Agenda Item 10a, Dangerous Dog Declaration
Hearing. Councilmember Myszkowski stated she attended the Animal Control Review Panel
Hearing on January 7, 2014, and the photographs show latticework attached to the top of the
resident's fence. She added there were questions during the Review Panel Hearing regarding the
fence.
Mr. Boganey stated there would be someone from City staff available during the Hearing to
address the Council's questions regarding this issue. Assistant City Manager/Director of
Building and Community Standards Vickie Schleuning stated one of the Police Officers familiar
with the details of this case would be present.
Mr. Boganey stated the dog owner has requested the opportunity to appeal the decision of the
Animal Control Review Panel. He added the burden would be upon the appellant to provide
sufficient information and evidence to the City Council.
Councilmember Kleven stated, according to the documents included in the meeting packet, this
appears to have been going on for some time. Councilmember Myszkowski stated she lives in
the neighborhood and has been hearing about it for years.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson requested clarification regarding the dog owner's insurance
policy, which may have exclusions prohibiting renewal. Mr. Boganey stated the appellant
submitted a copy of her insurance policy, which was reviewed by the City Attorney as well as a
representative of the Minnesota League of Cities' Insurance Trust, and the policy meets the
City's insurance requirements.
01/27/14 -2- DRAFT
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan asked, with regard to Agenda Item 6B, Consent Agenda, Licenses,
whether "Boulevard Enterprises" is the corporate owner of Christy's Auto Service. Mr. Boganey
confirmed this.
MISCELLANEOUS
Water Treatment Plant Tour Discussion
Mr. Boganey requested that the City Council provide possible dates that they are available to
schedule a tour of the Andover water treatment plant. He added City staff would contact Mayor
Willson to determine possible dates that work for him. He noted the facility will be open for a
visit by the City Council any time between 7:30 a.m.-3:00 p.m. on the following dates:
February 3-7, 11, or 14, and March 3, 11-14, or 17-21.
Councilmember Kleven stated she is unavailable on February 4, 6, and 11. Councilmember
Lawrence-Anderson stated she is unavailable on February 7 and 14. The City Council agreed
that a morning visit is preferable. Councilmember Kleven asked whether the meeting could be
postponed in case of inclement weather. Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug
stated the plant is an indoor facility.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson expressed her support of the proposed water treatment
plant tour. Mayor Pro Tern Ryan thanked City staff for recommending and arranging the tour.
Mr. Boganey stated City staff would provide a scheduled tour date after consultation with Mayor
Willson.
Visit with Legislators Regarding Federal Funding for Block Grants
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan stated he met with a representative of Senator Amy Klobuchar on
January 15, 2014, to discuss the importance of continued federal funding for the City's block
grant program. He added the grant money is used to support the City's crime prevention
initiatives. He noted the federal government reduces the rate of funding when a city's crime rate
improves, which penalizes cities for their success.
DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS
There were no Work Session discussion items.
ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan adjourned the Study Session to Informal Open Forum at 6:35 p.m.
RECONVENE STUDY SESSION
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan reconvened the Study Session at 6:49 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT
-3- DRAFT01/27/14
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan adjourned the Study Session at 6:50 p.m.
01/27/14 -4- DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY
OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JANUARY 27, 2014
CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Pro
Tern Ryan at 6:45 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tern Dan Ryan and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and
Lin Myszkowski. Mayor Tim Willson was absent and excused. Also present were City Manager
Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and
Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community
Standards Vickie Schleuning, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Mary Mullen, TimeSaver Off
Site Secretarial, Inc.
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum.
No one wished to address the City Council.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to close
the Informal Open Forum at 6:48 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
2.INVOCATION
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson gave a reflection on the legacy of Dr. Martin Luther King,
Jr. She recalled his famous speech on August 28, 1963, at the "March on Washington," and read
Dr. King's closing paragraph.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the City of Brooklyn Center is a diverse community
that strives to be mindful of the varied and rich cultures of its residents, regardless of color, race,
or religion.
3.CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING
01/2714 -1- DRAFT
The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Pro Tern
Ryan at 7:00 p.m.
4.ROLL CALL
Mayor Pro Tern Dan Ryan and Councilmembers Carol Kleven, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and
Lin Myszkowski. Mayor Tim Willson was absent and excused. Also present were City Manager
Curt Boganey, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and
Development Gary Eitel, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community
Standards Vickie Sehleuning, City Attorney Charlie LeFevere, and Mary Mullen, TimeSaver Off
Site Secretarial, Inc.
5.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
The Pledge of Allegiance was recited.
6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Kleven seconded to approve the
Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended in the Study Session, with amendments to the Study
Session minutes of December 9, 2013, and January 13, 2014, and the following consent items
were approved:
6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1.December 9, 2013 — Study Session
2.January 13, 2014— Study Session
3.January 13, 2014 — Regular Session
4.January 13, 2014 — Work Session
6b. LICENSES
GASOLINE SERVICE STATION
Boulevard Enterprises Inc.
dba Christy's Auto Service
MECHANICAL
General Heating and Cooling LLC
Weld & Sons Plumbing
Westar Corporation
RENTAL
INITIAL (TYPE III— one-year license)
5556 Emerson Avenue N
5300 Dupont Avenue N
13788 Kensington Avenue, Prior Lake
3410 Kilmer Lane, Plymouth
11184 River Road NE, Hanover
Lisa Ellison
INITIAL (TYPE — two-year license)
3808 61 st Avenue N Adedamola Ogundipe
01/2714 -2- DRAFT
3312 65 th Avenue N
(Passed w/Weather Deferral)
4619 66 th Avenue N
5325 Camden Avenue N
RENEWAL (TYPE III— one-year license)
5209 Xerxes Avenue N
(Passed w/ Weather Deferral)
5211 Xerxes Avenue N
5436 Logan Avenue N
RENEWAL (TYPE II-- two-year license)
5834 Aldrich Avenue N
6418 Colfax Avenue N
4201 Lakeside Avenue #201
4207 Lakeside Avenue #335
RENEWAL (TYPE I— three-year license)
3328 49 th Avenue N
6801 Emerson Avenue N
4207 Lakeside Avenue #329
6206 Scott Avenue N
Charles Kaatz
Yee Leong
Adrian Jiminez
Chad Johnson
Chad Johnson
Shane Mclean
(Missing all Action Plan requirements)
Paul Scully
Shawn Cha & Manny Phothirath
Justin Frederick
Vicki Nagel
Sherman Kho
Anita Landry
Rebecca Jones
Mark & Cathy Cocker
SIGNHANGER
Albrecht Sign Company 7775 Main Street, Fridley
Serigraphics 2401 Nevada Avenue N, Golden Valley
TOBACCO RELATED PRODUCT
Royal Tobacco 5625 Xerxes Avenue N
6c.APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR
LICENSE SUBMITTED BY ST. ALPHONSUS CHURCH, 7025 HALIFAX
AVENUE NORTH, FOR A SOCIAL EVENT TO BE HELD MARCH 15,
2014
6d.APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR TEMPORARY ON-SALE LIQUOR
LICENSE SUBMITTED BY MIRACLE EMPOWERMENT CENTER, 5801
JOHN MARTIN DRIVE, FOR A SOCIAL EVENT TO BE HELD
MARCH 7 AND 8, 2014
6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-22 AUTHORIZING A LOAN APPLICATION TO
THE MINNESOTA PUBLIC FACILITIES AUTHORITY FOR THE CITY
OF BROOKLYN CENTER'S WATER TREATMENT PLANT PROJECT
NO. 2014-05
01/2714 -3- DRAFT
6f.RESOLUTION NO. 2014-23 ESTABLISHING PARKING RESTRICTIONS
ON JUNE AVENUE NORTH FROM 61 ST AVENUE NORTH TO 63"
AVENUE NORTH
6g.ACCEPTANCE OF PAY EQUITY COMPLIANCE REPORT - 2013
Motion passed unanimously.
7.PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS
7a. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-24 EXPRESSING RECOGNITION AND
APPRECIATION OF PATRICIA GLENN FOR HER DEDICATED PUBLIC
SERVICE ON THE FINANCIAL COMMISSION
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan read in full a Resolution expressing the City's appreciation of Ms. Glenn's
significant contributions as a member of the Financial Commission from January 14, 2013,
through December 31, 2013. He presented the award to Ms. Glenn and thanked her for her
service to Brooklyn Center.
Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-24 Expressing Recognition and Appreciation of Patricia Glenn for her
Dedicated Public Service on the Financial Commission.
Motion passed unanimously.
8.PUBLIC HEARINGS
—None.
9.PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS
—None.
10.COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS
10a. HEARING FOR SARA SCHOLL, 3307 POE ROAD, REGARDING DANGEROUS
DOG DECLARATION
Mr. Boganey stated this item is a result of an appeal to the hearing held on January 7, 2014, by
the City's Animal Control Review Panel. He added the dog owner has the right to request a
hearing before the City Council to appeal the findings of the Review Panel.
City Attorney Charlie LeFevere summarized the appeal procedure, as defined in the Brooklyn
Center City Code Sections 1-250 through 1-300, relating to the regulation of dangerous dogs.
He stated the City Council is not bound by the findings of the Animal Control Review Panel. He
added further evidence or testimony might be sought from the Police Officers, City staff, or the
appellant in this case.
01/2714 -4- DRAFT
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to open
the Hearing.
Motion passed unanimously.
Mr. LeFevere stated the record should show that the appellant was not present at the time of the
Public Hearing.
Mr. LeFevere stated the City Council is not compelled to receive testimony in the absence of the
appellant. He added the City Council could choose to continue the hearing to another City
Council meeting, or rule by default to support the decision of the panel. He noted the issue could
also be held open on the agenda to see if the appellant arrives at the meeting.
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan stated, in his opinion, the record is complete, and he would support a
finding on the basis of evidence already provided to the Animal Control Review Panel.
Councilmember Myszkowski agreed, adding a notification letter dated January 17, 2014, sent to
the appellant by City staff, clearly stated the date and time of tonight's meeting. She added the
appellant has, therefore forfeited the opportunity to appeal the Review Panel's decision.
A member of the audience stated he lives in this neighborhood, and he and other neighbors
would like to address the City Council regarding this case. Mr. LeFevere stated it is unnecessary
to take testimony in the absence of the appellant. He added the burden of providing evidence is
upon the appellant. Mr. Boganey concurred.
Councilmember Kleven stated the City Council has received information and reports concerning
this case and the record appears to be complete. Mayor Pro Tem Ryan agreed.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated it is unfortunate that the appellant was not present,
but documentation received by the City Council is conclusive. She added she supports
upholding the findings of the Animal Control Review Panel.
Councilmember Myszkowski stated the City Council could remain in the Council Chambers
after the conclusion of the Regular Session to talk with neighbors who were present and had
hoped to provide testimony. The City Council agreed.
Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to uphold the
decision and findings of the Animal Control Review Panel.
Motion passed unanimously.
10b. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 5444 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH
01/2714 -5- DRAFT
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tem Ryan
called for a motion.
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to
approve the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for
5444 Dupont Avenue North, with the requirement that the mitigation plan and all applicable
ordinances must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered.
Motion passed unanimously.
10c.CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 6316 QUAIL AVENUE NORTH
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan
called for a motion.
Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve
the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 6316
Quail Avenue North, with the requirement that the mitigation plan and all applicable ordinances
must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered.
Motion passed unanimously.
10d.CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 7208 DALLAS ROAD
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tem Ryan
called for a motion.
Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to approve the
issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 7208 Dallas
Road, with the requirement that the mitigation plan and all applicable ordinances must be strictly
adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered.
Motion passed unanimously.
10e. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 6607 DREW AVENUE NORTH
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tem Ryan
called for a motion.
01/2714 -6- DRAFT
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Kleven seconded to approve the
issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for 6607 Drew
Avenue North, with the requirement that the mitigation plan and all applicable ordinances must
be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered.
Motion passed unanimously.
10f.CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 3019 MUMFORD ROAD
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan
called for a motion.
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to
approve the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for
3019 Mumford Road, with the requirement that the mitigation plan and all applicable ordinances
must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered.
Motion passed unanimously.
10g.CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 4204 LAKEBREEZE AVENUE
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan
called for a motion.
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to
approve the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for
4204 Lakebreeze Avenue, with the requirement that the mitigation plan and all applicable
ordinances must be strictly adhered to before a renewal rental license would be considered.
Motion passed unanimously.
10h. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 6724 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tem Ryan
called for a motion.
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-25 APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 6724 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH
01/2714 -7- DRAFT
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to
adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2014-25 Approving a Type IV Rental License for 6724 France
Avenue North.
Motion passed unanimously.
10i. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 5301 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to
provide testimony on this rental license. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Pro Tern Ryan
called for a motion.
1. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-26 APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE
FOR 5301 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH
Councilmember Kleven moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-26 Approving a Type IV Rental License for 5301 Dupont Avenue
North.
Motion passed unanimously.
11. COUNCIL REPORT
Councilmember Kleven reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on
the following upcoming events:
OJanuary 16, 2014, grand opening of Schlotzky's in Shingle Creek Crossing
O January 16, 2014, Planning Commission meeting
O January 21, 2014, Housing Commission meeting
O January 22, 2014, informational meeting on recycling at Brooklyn Center Senior Housing,
featuring a presentation by Carolyn Collopy, Hennepin County Environmentalist and
Coordinator of Master Recycler/Composter Program
O January 23, 2014, Brooklyn Center Business Association luncheon, featuring guest speaker
Commander Tim Gannon
O February 2, 2014, Lions Club Waffle Breakfast at Brooklyn Center High School from 8:00
a.m. to noon
Couneilmember Myszkowski reported on her attendance at the following and provided
information on the following upcoming events:
O January 14, 2014, itinerary meeting with Liberia trip delegation
O January 18-26, 2014, visited Sister City Voinjama, Liberia with Mayor Tim Willson, City
Manager Curt Boganey, Community Liaison Monique Drier and her son, Trey.
Councilmember Myszkowski stated the trip participants plan to give a presentation about
their experiences on this life-changing journey. She added the delegation's goal was to forge
a dynamic relationship with the people of Voinjama. She thanked and commended Mayor
Willson, who was a gracious visitor, speaking eloquently on many occasions on behalf of the
01/2714 -8- DRAFT
delegation; Mr. Boganey, for his fierce professionalism and legislative knowledge; Ms.
Drier, for conducting community-based policing seminars that were extremely well-received;
and Trey Drier, who visited schools and met with the local youth council.
Mayor Pro Tem Ryan added, with regard to the Liberia trip, the members of the delegation paid
for their own travel expenses and other related costs. He stated Sister City relationships are
common for municipalities across the United States. He added the Voinjama partnership seeks
to establish relationships with Liberian residents here in Brooklyn Center as well as in West
Africa. He noted the citizens of Voinjama are involved in rebuilding their infrastructure as a
result of losses suffered during the 14-year long Liberian Civil War, and much can be learned
from a partnership with the City of Voinjama.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reported on her attendance at the following:
•January 15-26, 2014, visited family in Anchorage, Alaska, and enjoyed better weather than
Minnesota's current extreme cold temperatures
Mayor Pro Tern Ryan reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on
the following upcoming events:
•January 15, 2014, met with a representative of U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar to discuss the
importance of federal funding for local community development and law enforcement block
grants programs
•January 16, 2014, communication with a representative of U.S. Representative Keith Ellison
regarding continued funding for block grants programs
•January 16, 2014, non-partisan workshop on precinct caucuses, at Brookdale Library;
sponsored by the League of Women Voters; all citizens who will be over 18 years of age on
Election Day (November 4) can participate in the precinct caucuses, to be held on
February 4, 2014, at Brookdale Library
•January 30, 2014, Metro Cities Water Forum, at New Brighton Community Center; on the
topic of Emerging Trends, Challenges, Responses
•June 2014, Brooklyn Center Crime Prevention Association's annual book drive; proceeds
benefit local crime prevention programs
12. ADJOURNMENT
Councilmember Myszkowski moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded
adjournment of the City Council meeting at 7:35 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
0 1/27 14 -9- DRAFT
City Council Agenda Item No. 6b
COUNCIL ITEM MEMO A NDUM
DATE: February 4, 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Maria Rosenbaum, Deputy City Cler14
SUBJECT: Licenses for City Council Approval
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the following licenses on February
10, 2014.
Background:
The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person
has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted
appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in
compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances, unless comments are noted below
the property address on the attached rental report.
RENTAL
See attached report.
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quail()) of life
for all people and preserves the public trust
0-1Type I — 3 Year 1-2 units
3+ units 0-0.75
Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria
License Category
(Based on Property
Code Only)
Number of Units Property Code Violations per
Inspected Unit
Type 11-2 Year 1-2 units
3+ units
Greater than 1 but not morc than 4
Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5
Type III — 1 Year
Type IV —6 Months
1-2 units
3+ units
1-2 units
3+ units
roger than 4
Greater than
than 8
Greater than
but not more than. 8
but not more than 3
0-0.35
Greater than 1 but not more than 3
Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct
Service & Part I Crimes
(Calls Per Unit/Year)
License
Category
Number of Units
No Category
Impact
Decrease 1
Category
1-2
3-4 units
5 or more units
1-2
3-4 units
0-1
0-0.25
Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1
5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50
41111■6111011161P
Decrease 2
Categories
1-2
3 units Greater than
Greater than 3
5 or more units Greater than 0.50
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
Rental License Category Criteria Policy — Adopted by City Council 03-08-10
Budget Issues:
There are no budget issues to consider.
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life
for all people and preserves the public trust
(I) *=0 fr)•C 0)a) O.UCL
=---===-===
CU *v) *(73 (7) a)c u ›..ir. D I--
=======---==-=-=
a.) .i.
0 LLa. u
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z
<
Z 00 1-1 000 0 00
CUV)c a)a) o.L) )..========----=-=-=
r-1
CO=1....
oc0a) +.1
a (1) co0 ti T:is- 0CL U 5
00 0 .1-o oo cr h o o H 0 0 M M 0 CV c-I N
St
OJ
1...O.
'-.wc30
V)cl)E
C
.+7,Co:4'5c
0 0 0iii
000
V)CUE
C
47,m
c
VIa)E
C
'4=m.4-'»c
v)a)E 0iaoZ.-,co5c
!....- i
v,=
=
4"12ir,
-JO(Dim
V)a)E
C
+7+Co..4"5
0 000
V)a)E0
c
+7,Co>c
cca)
L9
-+S.-61'
cu -
C
+al
L7)
a)45a<
0(1)0
ct4
0
cn
E
Tco+'..1co:I"5c
......„
>oc 4 - 'vz 2202o --> i)(1).c .-V' ."-0 2,2 v)
(Y,
aw
.4:"'.P....,u
E,,--<
* 5'e.a)0.
CO)-co,..._ E,,-- a)c.) z- L.),_a . 2
T) cr•c coi° o
3a,
-t4-,as2_oECo0_
0.6.0U
cwEa)cccocCoac.)21-
4.-.
zCo
so0o
L)_1..-I
>.4-,
4-.)a.2a.v)=2a)0.u,2o_
U.-.1.--I
>•4-,i..a)o.
a .
us=2a)c)_.-,20_
2E
U)0
r,=
00
4,c(I)
a)asaco2u21-
=
0
U
Co 7.6
.4":+.a., a
c -CU ",E
Co.47-,.c
Co;0,E
co•.4:3 coV.Z.EcEE
CoFj Co•.47-,._c
Co
3a)aCDCL
co
3CUaa)CG
co
3CDaCUCL
73.3a)aa)cc
CO
(1)3
aa)cc
CO3a)aCUcc
CO3CI)aa)cc
To
(1)aCUcc
Co
0.)aCUcc
co
CUaalcc
U)
OJrJ)
C
a)
Ca)
a) a'3fl-c0 I-
>.•.
.E.coLL
(1)To
i.7-)
> ..•.
CoU-
To
i.7)
0)0)
cc
>...._EcoLi.
lb
17)
>.._
coLI-
a)liociii
EE -E
>._
coLL.
(1)
-67o
i7)cc
>.•.
coLI-
0.)71)
7-)
>.•.
CoLI.
CUlibcV)
> • .._EcoLL.
a)IIci7)
CoLI.
a)lib
i7)cc
>.•.=tCoLI.
a)"fib
7)
> .:-
coLL
CUtoci7)
> •.•7-
CoL.L.
a)tociii
> • ..
CoLL
CUtoci7)
>...=tCoLI.
a)TOci7)
. >.•_ECoLL.
CUtocrii
> •._ECoLI.
CDof)cii)
>.•._ECoLI-
CUtoci7-)
>..=tCoLl.
a)tocii-')
>.•.
-EcoU-
a)toci.7)
>-.
CoLL
a.)tocV)
i-'010<›...t0..)cl.
Q.
Z
CU><_c4-.,1*
Lo
m
00e-10s-r-IMM
Z
cy><_c4-.`c)toa)
m
Za)><
LPcco"u_
0
LI)
ro
-jm6>,
0-,
C31
0'It
lONN4:k
Za)_,..>'''''a)
72,a),,
m.-.1
N
`Zr
Li
to_2-t0
Z
M
Ln
HON-400.1'M
1:3=>.
a).1„.O
N
mNMOHr-101
za)
.tr,.4 ,,D
,-1
r--.
Za)».ct,4:--,ED
U1
r-...
Z_5<..c:5_3-.Al
vi
Ln
Za)><-o)-
CO
14•tt0cr)
zw><..c4-.ulL n
,I
IDM
0O
Zc
..c4-,co(.0LI)
1.0r-I
Za)>
...u' LCTs
;CZ00r-Ir,1.0
<C
CoI-
1:134...ill
Z 0
o, tr.,>..„. _c-, 4-.(t1a)2,_ ---..,a)E sLu -i.:a0.1u-) v.,U1 cnct CoUl O..
za,><
ClluacoLN
,-IM1.0
Z
0)>_.'4.4.,C0E2u_
0Cr1.0Lil
Z
CI)
.g..,a)4
coT-INr•-•
Z
cij>
<
-a
CO-cu,-00
001.0
ON
Z
a,
>
<
a)x)....a)X
M
NUl
Co
>-ff)I I
CL)0.
City Council Agenda Item No. 6c
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director K.
SUBJECT: Statutory Tort Liability Limits
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of the attached resolution
adopting the no waiver option for statutory tort liability insurance.
Background:
Each year the City must chose whether to waive tort liability limit protections of Minnesota
Statutes 466.04 as part of the insurance policy renewal application process. M.S. 466.04 states
that the maximum liability for a city for any claim arising after January 1, 2010 is $500,000 with
an aggregate maximum of $1,500,000 per incident. In past years the City Council has chosen
not to waive the liability limits and the regular premium for insurance has covered all claims.
If the City were to waive the limits set by statute, it would be prudent to purchase additional
insurance coverage to cover possible higher awards in liability claims. Premiums for such
insurance would be approximately $9,000 per year.
Budget Issues:
The 2014 budget anticipates leaving the no waiver option in place for 2014 and has anticipated
insurance premiums based on that no waiver option. Waiving the statutory limits would require
that at approximately $9,000 in additional premium costs be allocated for 2014 and in each
succeeding year.
Strategic Priorities:
0 Financial Stability
—
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality °pile and preserves the public trust
Member introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OPTING NOT TO WAIVE LIMITED TORT LIABILITY FOR 2014
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has an option to waive its protection under
the tort liability limitation contained in Minnesota Statutes 466.04; and
WHEREAS, the statutory tort limit for 2014 is $500,000 per individual with an
aggregate of $1,500,000 per incident; and
WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has not opted to waive its rights to limited
tort liability in past years and is required to make a declaration of its intention every year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the City does not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort
liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04 for 2014.
February 10, 2014
Date Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
SECTION LIABILITY COVERAGE WAIVER FORM
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects:
o If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no
more than $500,000. on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be
limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city
purchases the optional excess liability coverage.
•If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $1,500,000, on a single occurrence. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to $1,500,000., regardless of the number of claimants.
o If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and
return this form to LIVICIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact
LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
City of Brooklyn Center accepts liability coverage limits of $ 500,000/$1,500,000 from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
Check one:
The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by
Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
Ej The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04,
to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of city council meeting
Signature Position
Return this completed form to LMCIT, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103-2044
City Council Agenda Item No. 6d
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Vickie Schleuning, `A 7ssistant City Manager/Director of Building & Community
Standards
SUBJECT: Resolution Calling for a Public Hearing on Proposed Special Assessments for
Diseased Tree Removal Costs and Delinquent Weed Removal Costs.
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of the resolution ordering a
public hearing for Monday, March 10, 2014 at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be
heard, to hear and pass upon any objections to the proposed special assessments for diseased tree
removal costs and delinquent weed removal accounts.
Background:
The attached resolution calls for a public hearing to receive public testimony and comments
regarding the proposed special assessments for diseased tree removal and weed removal
accounts. The special assessment amounts are specified in the attached preliminary assessment
rolls.
•All trees have been declared a public nuisance in past City Council resolutions, and the
trees have been removed by the City's tree contractor in accordance with established
policy.
•Property owners with delinquent accounts for weed destruction have received notice of
delinquent accounts in accordance with the established collection policy, and payments
have not been made.
At the scheduled public hearing, the City Council would consider adoption of the resolution to
certify the special assessment levy rolls with Hennepin County. The 2014 interest rate for
special assessments is six percent, as previously established by the Council. A copy of the
special assessment pending levy roll is attached.
Budget Issues:
The proposed levy roll for diseased tree removal totals $17,057.39. The proposed levy roll for
delinquent weed removal costs totals $20,139.11. An updated levy roll will be provided at the
public hearing to reflect any payments made on these accounts.
Strategic Priorities:
•Financial Stability
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
Vibrant Neighborhoods
Attachments:
- Proposed levy roll
- Notice of Public Hearing for publication
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
Member introduced the following resolution and moves its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION CALLING FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED
SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS AND
DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL COSTS.
WHEREAS, the City performs and incurs costs for certain neighborhood
maintenance services to protect public health, safety and welfare; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429, provides for a public hearing
process to recover the costs through special assessments; and
WHEREAS, the City has performed neighborhood maintenance services, billed
the property owners, and has not been reimbursed by certain property owners; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that:
1. A hearing shall be held on the 10th day of March, 2014, in City Hall at 7 p.m. or as
soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to pass upon the proposed assessments for
the following charges:
ODiseased Tree Removal Costs
ODelinquent Weed Removal Costs
2. The City Clerk with the assistance of the Director of Building and Community
Standards shall forthwith prepare assessment rolls for the above charges, and shall
keep them on file and open to inspection by any interested persons.
3.The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment
to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing.
4.The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel
described in such assessment rolls not less than two weeks prior to the hearing.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED BY THE City Council of the City of Brooklyn
Center that this resolution shall be effective immediately.
March 10, 2014
Date Mayor
RESOLUTION NO.
ATTEST:
City Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
Notice is hereby given that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, will
meet in the Council Chambers of Brooklyn Center City Hall at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, on
Monday, March 10, 2014 at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, to hear and
pass upon any objections to the proposed assessments for the following:
DISEASED TREE REMOVAL COSTS
It is proposed to assess the cost of diseased tree removal to those tracts or parcels where trees
were removed by written agreement with the property owner or by order of the City Council
pursuant to City Ordinances, Section 20-301 through 20-305 and in accordance with MS 429.
DELINQUENT WEED REMOVAL ACCOUNTS
It is proposed to assess the cost of noxious weed destruction to those tracts or parcels where,
pursuant to City Ordinance Section 19-1601 through 19-1604 and in accordance with MS 429,
noxious weeds were destroyed by order of the City Weed Inspector and the cost for such
destruction remains unpaid.
PROCEDURAL INFORMATION FOR OBJECTIONS TO SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section
429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or City Clerk within 30 days after the
adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after
service upon the Mayor or City Clerk. No such appeal as to the amount of an assessment for a
specific parcel of land may be made unless the owner has filed a written objection to that
objection to that assessment, signed by the affected property owner, with the City Clerk prior to
the hearing or has presented such a written objection to the presiding officer at the hearing.
These assessments are now on file at City Hall and open to public inspection. Written or oral
objections to the proposed assessments will be considered at this meeting, but the City Council
may consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned
meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
AUXILIARY AIDS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours (4 days)
in advance of the hearing. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements.
Sharon Knutson, City Clerk
By order of the City Council
Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Grass/Weeds)
2013 Weed Destruction
Printed February 10, 2014
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property Address Property ID Amount
18764 6023 Lyndale Ave N 01-118-21-12-0031 636.65
18764 6018 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-12-0038 100.00
18764 6028 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-21-0087 552.49
18764 6012 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-21-0098 318.33
18764 5951 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-22-0001 246.19
18764 5848 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-24-0093 100.00
18764 5525 Colfax Ave N 01-118-21-31-0072 516.42
18764 5606 Aldrich Ave N 01-118-21-31-0113 282.26
18764 5441 Dupont Ave N 01-118-21-33-0076 100.00
18764 5404 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-33-0083 100.00
18764 5455 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-33-0091 100.00
18764 5355 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-33-0111 246.19
18764 5307 Emerson Ave N 01-118-21-33-0121 100.00
18764 5424 Fremont Ave N 01-118-21-33-0169 270.23
18764 5305 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-34-0078 270.23
18764 5421 4th St N 01-118-21-43-0058 564.51
18764 5400 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-43-0084 588.56
18764 401 Bellvue La 01-118-21-43-0110 462.61
18764 5815 Humboldt Ave N 02-118-21-14-0065 246.19
18764 5937 Vincent Ave N 02-118-21-22-0037 100.00
18764 5631 Hillsview Rd 02-118-21-31-0002 270.23
18764 5533 Irving Ave N 02-118-21-41-0030 100.00
18764 5632 James Ave N 02-118-21-41-0048 282.26
18764 5508 Morgan Ave N 02-118-21-42-0016 246.19
18764 2106 Ericon Dr 02-118-21-42-0101 576.54
18764 5500 Oliver Ave N 02-118-21-42-0122 294.28
18764 5321 Humboldt Ave N 02-118-21-44-0036 100.00
18764 5316 Logan Ave N 02-118-21-44-0073 246.19
18764 6101 Xerxes Ave N 03-118-21-11-0017 246.19
18764 6006 Ewing Ave N 03-118-21-12-0022 624.63
18764 5801 Drew Ave N 03-118-21-13-0029 100.00
18764 5713 Halifax Ave N 03-118-21-24-0005 576.54
18764 5319 Northport Dr 03-118-21-43-0047 100.00
18764 5201 Ewing Ave N 10-118-21-12-0063 258.21
18764 4908 Abbott Ave N 10-118-21-14-0039 100.00
18764 5127 Twin Lake Blvd E 10-118-21-21-0004 708.79
18764 4821 Xerxes Ave N 10-118-21-41-0020 100.00
18764 1411 72nd Ave N 25-119-21-32-0060 100.00
18764 6942 Newton Ave N 26-119-21-43-0068 342.38
18764 1707 70th Ave N 26-119-21-44-0040 246.19
City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 1 of 2
Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Grass/Weeds)
2013 Weed Destruction
Printed February 10, 2014
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs One Year
Levy No.Property Address Property ID Amount
18764 7137 France Ave N 27-119-21-31-0050 516.42
18764 7015 Brooklyn Blvd 27-119-21-33-0010 306.30
18764 6940 Brooklyn Blvd 27-119-21-33-0102 973.32
18764 6930 Halifax Ave N 27-119-21-34-0039 282.26
18764 3806 Urban Ave 27-119-21-43-0049 100.00
18764 6924 Scott Ave N 28-119-21-43-0012 100.00
18764 5200 70th Ave N 28-119-21-43-0035 100.00
18764 7001 Quail Ave N 28-119-21-44-0047 366.42
18764 6803 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-11-0044 506.30
18764 6703 Perry Ave N 33-119-21-11-0060 930.94
18764 5000 Howe La 33-119-21-14-0053 100.00
18764 6424 Scott Ave N 33-119-21-42-0012 100.00
18764 6319 Scott Ave N 33-119-21-42-0073 576.54
18764 6142 Scott Ave N 33-119-21-43-0021 100.00
18764 5330 62nd Ave N 33-119-21-43-0080 426.54
18764 3112 67th Ave N 34-119-21-14-0004 306.30
18764 6341 Halifax Dr 34-119-21-31-0006 282.26
18764 6400 Noble Ave N 34-119-21-32-0026 100.00
18764 3912 Janet La 34-119-21-34-0012 306.30
18764 3200 63rd Ave N 34-119-21-41-0009 318.33
18764 3013 62nd Ave N 34-119-21-44-0103 246.19
18764 6201 Brooklyn Dr 35-119-21-33-0059 246.19
18764 6807 Dupont Ave N 36-119-21-22-0008 406.30
18764 6614 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-24-0018 100.00
18764 6400 Fremont Ave N 36-119-21-32-0028 282.26
18764 6125 Emerson Ave N 36-119-21-33-0033 270.23
18764 6127 Lyndale Ave N 36-119-21-43-0021 270.23
Total: 20,139.11
City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 2 of 2
Special Assessment Pending Levy Roll (Trees)
2013 Tree Removal
Printed February 10, 2014
Municipal Code No. 22 Levy Runs Five Years
Levy No.Property Address Property ID Amount
18763 6001 Camden Ave N 01-118-21-21-0069 1,546.25
18763 6035 Bryant Ave N 01-118-21-21-0093 2,000.47
18763 6006 Humboldt Ave N 01-118-21-22-0086 798.13
18763 5406 Girard Ave N 01-118-21-33-0045 1,653.13
18763 2407 Ericon Dr 02-118-21-31-0046 1,198.91
18763 5301 Northport Dr 03-118-21-43-0050 4,752.50
18763 4913 Beard Ave N 10-118-21-13-0023 883.63
18763 1606 Amy La 26-119-21-41-0051 250.00
18763 1612 69th Ave N 26-119-21-44-0104 664.53
18763 7124 Indiana Ave N 27-119-21-31-0094 714.53
18763 3713 72nd Ave N 27-119-21-42-0090 375.00
18763 4313 66th Ave N 34-119-21-23-0037 300.00
18763 6237 Bryant Ave N 36-119-21-34-0047 1,920.31
Total:17,057.39
City of Brooklyn Center - 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 Page 1 of 1
City Council Agenda Item No. 6e
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 4, 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Kelli Wick, Human Resources Director pO
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE LABOR AGREEMENT FOR LAW
ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES (LELS) LOCAL 86 (POLICE
COMMANDERS AND SERGEANTS) AND THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER FOR THE CALENDAR YEARS 2014-2015
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council adopt resolution approving the labor agreement between
the City of Brooklyn Center and Law Enforcement Labor Services (LELS) Local 86 for the
period January 1, 2014 — December 31, 2015.
Background:
The current contract with LELS 86 (Police Commanders and Sergeants) expired on December
31, 2013. The City and the Union have met and negotiated in good faith to reach a settlement on
all issues of concern. This labor agreement covers police commanders and police sergeants for a
total of nine employees.
The attached agreement has been approved by a vote of the members and upon adoption by the
City Council will establish wages and working conditions for calendar years 2014-2015.
The Articles affected by these negotiations include the following:
Article 28 — Insurance
For 2014 increase the insurance contribution by $58 to $852. Also, continue to provide an
incentive of $150 for those employees participating in a high deductible health plan. For 2015
the City will offer the best of any agreement that we have for any other group for 2015.
Article 29 — Wage Rates
Two (2%) increase effective January 1, 2014. Two (2%) increase effective January 1, 2015 plus
$.28/hour market for Sergeant and $.32/hour market for Commander.
Article 36 — Duration
Two year labor agreement effective January 1, 2014 — December 31, 2015.
Budget Issues:
The increase in the City's insurance contribution equals $6,804. The cost of the 2% increase for
2014 is approximately $21,669. The approved 2014 budget appropriates sufficient funds to
cover this expense. The cost of the 2% increase for 2015 is approximately $25,537 and the
market adjustment is approximately $7,503.
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life
for all people and preserves the public trust
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
Council Goals:
Ongoing:
1. We will provide streamlined, cost effective, quality services with limited resources
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life
for ailpeople and preserves the public trust
City of Brooklyn Center
A Millennium Community
January 27, 2014
Adam Burnside, Business Agent
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Inc.
327 York Avenue
St. Paul, MN 55130
Dear Mr. Burnside:
Listed below are the changes we've discussed for the 2014-2015 tentative labor agreement.
Article 36, Duration
Agree to two year agreement for 2014-2015
Article 29 — Wage Rates
Two (2%) increase January 1, 2014
Two (2%) increase plus $.28/market for Sergeant and $.32/market for Commander
Article 28, Insurance
Effective 1/1/14, the City will contribute payment of one thousand two dollars ($1,002) per
month per employee for use in participating in the City's insurance benefits for those employees
who elect to participate in a high deductible health plan.
Effective 1/1/14, the City will contribute payment of eight hundred fifty-two dollars ($852) per
month per employee for use in participating in the City's insurance benefits for those employees
who elect to participate in a non-high deductible health plan.
For 2015 the city will offer the best of any agreement that we have for any other group for 2015.
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
e 11 Wick
Human Resources Director
cc: Steve Pastor, Union Steward Tony Gruenig, Union Steward
Kevin Benner, Police Chief Curt Boganey, City Manager
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199
City Hall & TDD Number (763) 569-3300
Fax (763) 569-3494
www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org
Recreation and Community Center Phone & TDD Number
(763) 569-3400
Fax (763) 569-3434
Master Labor Agreement
Between
City of Brooklyn Center
And
Law Enforcement Labor Services, Local Number 86
January 1, 2014 - December 31, 2015
ARTICLE 1 - Purpose of Agreement
This Agreement is entered into between the City of Brooklyn Center, hereinafter called the
Employer, and Law Enforcement Labor Services, "Local No. 86", hereinafter called the Union.
It is the intent and purpose of this Agreement to:
1.1 Establish procedures for the resolution of disputes concerning this Agreement's interpretation
and/or application; and
1.2 Place in written form the parties' Agreement upon terms and conditions of employment for the
duration of this Agreement.
ARTICLE 2- Recognition
2.1 The Employer recognizes the Union as the exclusive representative, under Minnesota Statues,
Section 179A.03, Subdivision 6, for all police personnel in the following job classifications:
Sergeant; Commander
2.2 In the event the Employer and the Union are unable to agree as to the inclusion or exclusion of
a new or modified job class, the issue shall be submitted to the Bureau of Mediation Services
for determination.
ARTICLE 3- Definitions
3.1 Union: Law Enforcement Labor Services, "Local No. 86."
3.2 Union Member: A member of Law Enforcement Labor Services, "Local No. 86."
3.3 Department: The City of Brooklyn Center Police Department.
3.4 Employee: A member of the exclusively recognized bargaining unit.
3.5 Employer: The City of Brooklyn Center.
3.6 Chief: The Chief of the Brooklyn Center Police Department.
3.7 Union Officer: Officer elected or appointed by Law Enforcement Labor Services, "Local No.
86."
3.8 Overtime: Work performed at the express authorization of the Employer in excess of the
employee's scheduled shift.
3.9 Scheduled Shift: A consecutive work period including rest breaks and a lunch break.
3.10 Rest Breaks: Period during the Scheduled Shift during which the employee remains on
continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties.
3.11 Lunch Breaks: A period during the Scheduled Shift during which the employee remains on
continual duty and is responsible for assigned duties.
3.12 Regular Base Pay Rate: The employee's hourly or monthly base pay rate.
3.13 Strike: Concerned action in failing to report for duty, the willful absence from one's position,
the stoppage of work, slowdown, or abstinence in whole or in part from the full, faithful, and
proper performance of the duties of employment for the purposes of inducing, influencing, or
coercing a change in the conditions or compensation or the rights, privileges, or obligations of
employment.
ARTICLE 4- Employer Security
The Union agrees that during the life of this Agreement the Union will not cause, encourage,
participate in, or support any strike, slowdown, or other interruption of or interference with the
normal functions of the Employer.
1
ARTICLE 5- Employer Authority
5.1 The Employer retains the full and unrestricted right to operate and manage all personnel,
facilities, and equipment; to establish functions and programs; to set and amend budgets; to
determine the utilization of technology; to establish and modify the organizational structure; to
select, direct, and determine the number of personnel, to establish work schedules, and to
perform any inherent managerial function not specifically limited by this Agreement.
5.2 Any term and condition of employment not specifically established or modified by this
Agreement shall remain solely within the discretion of the Employer to modify, establish, or
eliminate.
ARTICLE 6- Union Security
6.1 The Employer shall deduct the wages of employees who authorize such a deduction in writing
an amount necessary to cover monthly Union dues. Such monies shall be remitted as directed
by the Union.
6.2 The Union may designate employees from the bargaining unit to act as a steward and an
alternate and shall inform the Employer in writing of such choice and changes in the position of
steward and/or alternate.
6.3 The Employer shall make space available on the employee bulletin board for posting Union
notice(s) and announcement(s).
6.4 The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the Employer harmless against any and all claims,
suits, orders, or judgments brought or issued against the Employer as a result of any action
taken or not taken by the Employer under the provisions of this Article.
ARTICLE 7- Savings Clause
This Agreement is subject to the laws of the United States, the State of Minnesota, and the City of
Brooklyn Center. In the event any provision of the Agreement shall be held to be contrary to law by
a court of competent jurisdiction from whose final judgment or decree no appeal has been taken
within the time provided, such provisions shall be voided. All other provisions of this Agreement
shall continue in full force and effect. The voided provision may be renegotiated at the written
request of either party.
ARTICLE 8 - Constitutional Protection
Employees shall have the rights granted to all citizens by the United States and Minnesota
Constitutions.
ARTICLE 9- Seniority
9.1 Seniority shall be determined by continuous length of service in the job classification covered
by this Agreement. Employees promoted from the classification covered by this Agreement to
a position outside the bargaining unit will continue to accrue seniority under this Agreement
until the completion of their promotional probationary period or for no longer than twelve (12)
months. The seniority roster shall be based on length of service in the job classification
covered by this Agreement. Employees lose seniority under this Agreement under the
following circumstances: resignation, discharge for cause, or transfer or promotion to a
-2-
classification not covered by this Agreement after completion of the promotional probationary
period or for no longer than twelve (12) months after transfer or promotion.
9.2 There shall be an initial probationary period for new employees of twelve (12) months. During
the probationary period, a newly hired or rehired employee may be discharged at the sole
discretion of the Employer. During the probationary period a promoted or reassigned employee
may be replaced in their previous position at the sole discretion of the Employer.
9.3 A reduction of work force will be accomplished on the basis of seniority. The Employer shall
give the Union and the employees at least two (2) weeks written notice in advance of any
layoff. Employees shall be recalled from layoff on the basis of seniority. An employee on
layoff shall have an opportunity to return to work within two (2) years of the time of the layoff
before any new employee is hired.
9.4 Senior qualified employees shall be given shift assignment preference after twelve (12) months
of continuous full-time employment. Except as noted in the preceding sentence, shift
assignments shall be bid on the basis of seniority at least annually in January and within 30
days of any permanent change in the work schedule. Employees will not be subject to shift
rotation more often than every four (4) months. If a special assignment's position is created,
assignment to such position shall be opened for bidding on the basis of seniority for up to a
two-year assignment in such position. A person shall not be eligible to bid or be assigned to
such special assignment position more often than two years out of any four continuous year
periods. In the event that no one bids a special assignment position, an employee who is
otherwise ineligible to bid it because they have already held it for two years within a four year
continuous period, shall then be eligible to bid for the position. If an employee is assigned to a
special assignment position, they shall be eligible to bid for any other position at the next bid.
[A special assignment position is one out of the normal shift rotation with primary emphasis on
patrol management.]
9.5 One continuous vacation period shall be selected on the basis of seniority until January 31 of
each calendar year.
9.6 The Employer shall recognize seniority as the primary factor when authorizing holiday leave
and compensatory time leave.
9.7 No time shall be deducted from an employee's seniority accumulation due to absences
occasioned by an authorized leave with pay, any military draft or government call-up to
Reserves or National Guard, or for layoffs of less than two (2) years in duration.
ARTICLE 10 - Work Schedules
10.1 The normal work year is two thousand and eighty (2,080) hours to be accounted for by each
employee through:
a.hours worked on assigned shifts,
b.holidays,
c.assigned training, and
d.authorized leave time.
3
10.2 Authorized leave time (including holiday hours) is to be calculated on the basis of the actual
hours used for such leave based on the time that the employee would otherwise have been
scheduled to work.
10.3 Nothing contained in this or any other Article shall be interpreted to be a guarantee of a
minimum or maximum number of hours the Employer may assign employees.
ARTICLE 11 - Discipline
11.1 The Employer will discipline employees for just cause only. Discipline will be in one or more
of the following forms:
a.oral reprimand;
b.written reprimand;
c.suspension;
d.demotion; or
e. discharge.
11.2 Suspension, demotions, and discharges will be in written form.
11.3 Written reprimands, notices of suspension, and notices of discharge which are to become part
of an employee's personnel file shall be read and acknowledged by signature of the employee.
Employees and the Union will receive a copy of such reprimands and/or notices.
11.4 Employees may examine their own individual personnel files at reasonable times under direct
supervision of the Employer.
11.5 A single disciplinary action for failure to attend training, court or tardiness will be removed
from the personnel file after 18 months if, during that time, the single incident of discipline for
failure to attend training, court or tardiness, is the only occurrence of discipline during that 18
month period.
11.6 Discharges will be preceded by a five (5) day suspension without pay.
11.7 For purposes of discipline, a day will mean eight (8) hours.
11.8 Employees will not be questioned concerning an investigation of proposed disciplinary action
against the employee being questioned unless the employee has been given an opportunity to
have a Union representative present at such questioning.
11.9 Grievances relating to this Article shall be initiated by the Union in Step 3 of the grievance
procedure under Article 12.
ARTICLE 12 - Employee Rights — Grievance Procedure
12.1 Definition of a Grievance - A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the
interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement.
12.2 Union Representatives - The Employer will recognize Representatives designated by the Union
as the grievance representatives of the bargaining unit having the duties and responsibilities
-4-
established by this Article. The Union shall notify the Employer in writing of the names of
such Union Representatives and of their successors when so designated as provided by 6.2 of
this Agreement.
12.3 Processing of a Grievance - It is recognized and accepted by the Union and the Employer that
the processing of grievances as hereinafter provided is limited by the job duties and
responsibilities of the Employees and shall therefore be accomplished during normal working
hours only when consistent with such Employee duties and responsibilities. The aggrieved
Employee and a Union Representative shall be allowed a reasonable amount of time without
loss in pay when a grievance is investigated and presented to the Employer during normal
working hours provided that the Employee and the Union Representative have notified and
received the approval of the designated supervisor who has determined that such absence is
reasonable and would not be detrimental to the work programs of the Employer.
12.4 Procedure - Grievances, as defined by Section 12.1, shall be resolved in conformance with the
following procedure:
Step 1. An Employee claiming a violation concerning the interpretation or application of this
Agreement shall, within twenty-one (21) calendar days after such alleged violation has
occurred, present such grievance to the Employee's supervisor as designated by the Employer.
The Employer-designated representative will discuss and give an answer to such Step 1
grievance within ten (10) calendar days after receipt. A grievance not resolved in Step 1 and
appealed to Step 2 shall be placed in writing setting forth the nature of the grievance, the facts
on which it is based, the provision or provisions of the Agreement allegedly violated, the
remedy requested, and shall be appealed to Step 2 within ten (10) calendar days after the
Employer-designated representative's final answer in Step 1. Any grievance not appealed in
writing to Step 2 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days shall be considered waived.
Step/. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with
the Employer-designated Step 2 representative. The Employer-designated representative shall
give the Union the Employer's Step 2 answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after
receipt of such Step 2 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 2 may be appealed to Step 3
within ten (10) calendar days following the Employer-designated representative's final Step 2
answer. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 3 by the Union within ten (10) calendar
days shall be considered waive.
Step 3. If appealed, the written grievance shall be presented by the Union and discussed with
the Employer-designated Step 3 representative. The Employer-designated representative shall
give the Union the Employer's answer in writing within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of
such Step 3 grievance. A grievance not resolved in Step 3 may be appealed to Step 4 within
ten (10) calendar days following the Employer-designated representative's final answer to Step
3. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Union within ten (10) calendar days
shall be considered waived.
Step 3a. If the grievance is not resolved at Step 3 of the grievance procedure, the parties, by
mutual Agreement, may submit the matter to mediation with the Bureau of Mediation Services.
Submitting the grievance to mediation preserves timeliness for Step 4 of the grievance
-5-
procedure. Any grievance not appealed in writing to Step 4 by the Union within ten (10)
calendar days of mediation shall be considered waived.
Step 4. A grievance unresolved in Step 3 or Step 3a and appealed to Step 4 by the Union shall
be submitted to arbitration subject to the provisions of the Public Employment Labor Relations
Act of 1971 as amended. The selection of an arbitrator shall be made in accordance with the
"Rules Governing the Arbitration of Grievances" as established by the Bureau of Mediation
Services.
12.5 Arbitrator's Authority
a.The arbitrator shall have no right to amend, modify, nullify, ignore, add to, or subtract
from the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The arbitrator shall consider and
decide only the specific issue(s) submitted in writing by the Employer and the Union,
and shall have no authority to make a decision on any other issue not so submitted.
b.The arbitrator shall be without power to make decisions contrary to, or inconsistent
with, or modifying or varying in any way the application of laws, rules, or regulations
having the force and effect of law. The arbitrator's decision shall be submitted in
writing within thirty (30) days following close of the hearing or the submission of briefs
by the parties, whichever be later, unless the parties agree to an extension. The decision
shall be binding on both the Employer and the Union and shall be based solely on the
arbitrator's interpretation or application of the express terms of this Agreement and to
the facts of the grievance presented.
c. The fees and expenses for the arbitrator's services and proceedings shall be borne
equally by the Employer and the Union provided that each party shall be responsible for
compensating its own representatives and witnesses. If either party desires a verbatim
record of the proceedings, it may cause such a record to be made, providing it pays for
the record. If both parties desire a verbatim record of the proceedings,' the cost shall be
shared equally.
12.6 Waiver
If a grievance is not presented within the time limits set forth above, it shall be considered
"waived." If a grievance is not appealed to the next step within the specified time limit or any
agreed extension thereof, it shall be considered settled on the basis of the Employer's last
answer. If the Employer does not answer a grievance or an appeal thereof within the specified
time limits, the Union may elect to treat the grievance as denied at that step and immediately
appeal the grievance to the next step. The time limit in each step may be extended by mutual
written Agreement of the Employer and the Union in each step.
ARTICLE 13 — Overtime (Sergeant Classification)
13.1 Employees will be compensated at one and one-half (1 1/2) times the employee's regular base pay
rate for hours worked in excess of the employee's regularly scheduled shift. Changes of shift
do not qualify an employee for overtime under this Article.
13.2 Overtime will be distributed as equally as practicable.
6
13.3 Overtime refused by employees will for record purposes under Article 13.2 be considered as
unpaid overtime worked.
13.4 For the purpose of computing overtime compensation, overtime hours worked shall not be
pyramided, compounded, or paid twice for the same hours worked.
13.5 Overtime will be calculated to the nearest six (6) minutes.
13.6 Employees have the obligation to work overtime or call backs if requested by the Employer
unless unusual circumstances prevent the employee from so working.
13.7 When employees have less than twelve (12) hours of duty-free time between assigned shifts,
they will be compensated at a rate of one and one-half (11/2) times the employee's regular base
pay rate for the next shift. For purposes of this Article, shift extensions, elected overtime,
voluntary changes of shifts, City-contracted work, training, and court time are considered as
duty-free time. The twelve (12) hour requirement may be waived by mutual Agreement
between the Employee and the Police Administration.
13.8 As an option to monetary compensation for overtime, an employee may annually elect
compensatory time off at a rate of one and one-half (1 1/2) time. An employee's compensatory
time bank shall not exceed forty (40) hours at any time during a calendar year. On or about
December 1 of each year, the City will pay off by check the balance of compensatory time
accumulated by each sergeant. No compensatory time will be accumulated or used during the
month of December. Special overtime duty assignments made available to all employees by
the Chief of Police at the employee's rate of compensation will not be eligible for
compensatory time. Compensatory time off shall be granted only at the convenience of the
Employer with prior approval of the Employer-designated supervisor.
13.9 Employees given less than sixteen (16) hours notice of a scheduled duty change other than their
regularly scheduled work period shall be compensated at one and one-half (11/2) times the
employee's regular pay rate for hours worked outside of the scheduled work period.
13.10Police Commanders are only eligible for overtime pay for privately funded and grant funded
projects (Safe and Sober, etc.) and are otherwise ineligible for overtime.
ARTICLE 14- Court Time
An employee who is required to appear in court during their scheduled off-duty time shall receive a
minimum of three (3) hours pay at one and one-half (PA) times the employee's base pay rate. An
extension or early report to a regularly scheduled shift for court appearance does not qualify the
employee for the three (3) hour minimum. Employees shall not be required to work office or street
duty to qualify for the court time minimum. An employee who is required to appear in court during
their scheduled off-duty time shall be given 12 hours prior notification of cancellation of the court
appearance. If the notification is not given 12 hours prior to the scheduled court time, the employee
will receive the three (3) hour court time minimum.
14.1 Any employee, who is on their scheduled days off and is canceled from a court appearance
with less than twelve hours notice, shall receive the short notice provision of Article 14.
-7-
14.2 Any employee, who is canceled from a court appearance with less than twelve hours notice
during their scheduled work week, shall not be eligible for the short notice provision of
Article 14.
14.3 Any employee who appears in court during their scheduled work week shall be paid the
Article 14 minimum or the actual time spent, whichever is greater.
14.4 Any employee who is placed on stand-by for court should retain a copy of the notice placing
them on stand-by, or obtain the name of the person placing them on stand-by. The employee
will be paid the Article 14 minimum or Article 17 pay, whichever is greater.
ARTICLE 15- Call Back Time
An employee who is called to duty during their scheduled off-duty time shall receive a minimum of
two (2) hours pay at one and one-half (11/2) times the employee's base pay rate. An extension or early
report to a regularly scheduled shift for duty does not qualify the employee for the two (2) hours
minimum.
ARTICLE 16 - Working Out of Classification
Employees assigned by the Employer to assume the full responsibilities and authority of a higher job
classification shall receive the salary schedule of the higher classification for the duration of the
assignment.
ARTICLE 17- Standby Pay
Employees required by the Employer to standby shall be paid for such standby time at the rate of one
hour's pay for each hour on standby.
ARTICLE 18 - Leaves of Absence
18.1 In cases of demonstrated need and where sick leave has not been abused, the Employer shall
grant to employees a leave of absence without pay for extended personal illness after the
accumulative sick leave has expired. Such leaves of absence shall not exceed ninety (90)
calendar days. Upon granting such unpaid leave of absence, the Employer will not
permanently fill the employee's position and the employee's benefits and rights shall be
retained.
18.2 An employee called to serve on a jury shall be reimbursed the difference between the amount
paid for such service (exclusive of travel and expense pay) and compensation for regularly
scheduled working hours lost because of jury service.
18.3 Employees ordered by proper authority to National Guard or Reserve Military Service not
exceeding fifteen (15) working days in any calendar year shall be entitled to leave of absence
without loss of status. Such employees shall receive compensation from the Employer equal to
the difference between his/her regular pay and the lesser military pay.
18.4 Employees called and ordered by proper authority to active military service in time of war or
other properly declared emergency shall be entitled to leave of absence without pay during such
service. Upon completion of such service, employees shall be entitled to the same or similar
employment of like seniority, status, and pay as if such leave had not been taken, subject to the
specific provisions of Chapter 192 of the MN Statutes.
-8-
18.5 Members of the bargaining unit will receive such additional leaves as provided for under State
or Federal law, as the same laws may be amended from time to time.
18.6 Additional leaves of absence may be granted in the City Manager's discretion upon the same
terms and conditions as then applicable to non-Union employees pursuant to the City's
Personnel policy applicable to non-Union employees at the time of application for a leave of
absence.
ARTICLE 19 - Severance
19.1 An employee shall give the Employer two (2) weeks notice in writing before terminating his
employment.
19.2 Severance pay in the amount of one-third (1/3) the accumulated sick leave employees have to
their credit at the time of resignation or retirement, times their respective regular pay rate, shall
be paid to employees who have been employed for at least five (5) consecutive years. If
discharged for just cause, severance pay shall not be allowed.
19.3 Employees electing to participate in a Health Care Savings Plan will receive 40% of sick leave
severance paid into the Health Care Savings Plan. Employees not eligible to participate in the
Health Care Savings Plan will receive one-third of sick leave severance.
ARTICLE 20- Injury on Duty
Employees injured during the performance of their duties for the Employer and thereby rendered
unable to work for the Employer will be paid the difference between the employee's regular pay and
Workers' Compensation insurance payments for a period not to exceed 720 hours per injury, not
charged to the employee's vacation, sick leave, or other accumulated paid benefits, after a three (3)
working day initial waiting period per injury. The three (3) working day waiting period shall be
charged to the employee's sick leave account less Workers' Compensation insurance payments.
ARTICLE 21 - False Arrest Insurance
The City of Brooklyn Center shall maintain liability insurance that includes a provision for
unlawfully detaining an individual when an employee is acting within the scope of their duties on
behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center.
ARTICLE 22— Training
22.1 The Employer shall reimburse each employee who is required to maintain a license as a law
enforcement officer under Minnesota Statutes, Section 626.84, et seq., for actual expenses of
tuition, meals, travel, and lodging incurred in meeting the continuing education requirements of
the Minnesota Police Officers Standards and Training Board, not to exceed 48 hours of such
training every three (3) years. The Employer need not make such reimbursement for
attendance at a course located less than sixty (60) miles from the City of Brooklyn Center and
such reimbursement shall not exceed similar allowances for state employees. If the Employer
provides in-service training to its employees which meets the continuing education
requirements of the Minnesota Police Officers Standards and Training Board, and if the
Employer provides its employees with an opportunity to attend such in-service training courses,
to the extent that such opportunity is provided to each employee, the obligation of the
Employer to reimburse such employee for expenses incurred in attending continuing education
courses shall be reduced.
9
22.2 The Employer shall pay each employee their regular salary while attending continuing
education courses whether or not such courses attended are in-service training courses or
courses given by instructors other than the Employer. The obligation of the Employer to pay
such salaries shall not exceed a total of forty-eight (48) hours every three (3) years.
ARTICLE 23 - Post License Fees
The Employer shall pay up to $90 for the cost of POST license fees for all employees requiring such
license during each licensing period.
ARTICLE 24 - Uniforms
The Employer shall provide required uniform and equipment items. In addition, the Employer shall
pay to the uniformed officers a maintenance allowance of $155 per year. Plainclothes officer(s) shall
be paid a clothing allowance of $590 per year.
ARTICLE 25 - Holiday Leave
25.1 Employees shall receive eight (8) hours of holiday leave per month. Ninety-six (96) hours of
holiday leave shall be advanced to employees on January 1 st of each calendar year beginning
on January 1 st 2002. In the event an employee is not employed for the entire calendar year,
the employee's holiday leave shall be reduced by eight (8) hours for each full month that the
employee will not have worked in that calendar year.
25.2 Employees may use holiday leave with the approval of the Employer.
25.3 An employee who works on Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Memorial Day, Independence Day,
or Labor Day shall receive time and one-half (1%2) employee's regular pay rate for all hours
actually worked during the named holiday.
25.4 An employee who works on New Year's Day, Thanksgiving Day, or Christmas Day shall
receive two times the employee's regular pay rate for all hours actually worked during the
named holiday.
25.5 Except as provided in 25.3, overtime pay shall not be authorized for employees for hours
worked on holidays when such work is part of the planned schedule.
25.6 An employee may request a holiday off, which he/she is required to work, prior to fourteen
calendar days before the holiday. The Employer shall post the open holiday shift to be filled
by another employee at the holiday rate of pay. The employee making the request for the
holiday off is responsible for working the holiday if the posting is not filled five (5) days
prior to the holiday.
25.7 Employees beginning employment after January 1 st of a calendar year shall receive eight (8)
hours of holiday leave per month beginning on the first month in which they are working as
of the first day of that month. Such employees shall receive an advance of holiday leave
hours equal to eight (8) hours multiplied by the number of whole months they will work
, through December of the year in which they were first employed.
25.8 Any holiday leave not used on or before December 31 st of each year will be deemed forfeited
and shall not carry over into the next calendar year.
- 10-
ARTICLE 26— Vacation Leave
26.1 Permanent full-time employees shall earn vacation leave with pay as per the following
schedule:
0 through 10 years of service - one hundred twenty (120) hours per year
(accrued at 4.62 hours per pay period)
Eight (8) additional hours per year of service to a maximum of one hundred
sixty (160) hours after fifteen (15) years of service
11 years - 4.92 hours per pay period
12 years - 5.23 hours per pay period
13 years - 5.54 hours per pay period
14 years - 5.85 hours per pay period
15 years - 6.15 hours per pay period
26.2 Employees using earned vacation leave or sick leave shall be considered working for the
purpose of accumulating additional vacation leave.
26.3 Vacation may be used as earned, except that the Employer shall approve the time at which
the vacation leave may be taken. Employees shall not be permitted to waive vacation leave
and receive double pay.
26.4 Employees may accrue a maximum of two hundred thirty (230) hours of vacation leave.
Employees may not carry forward more than two hundred thirty (230) hours of vacation
leave from year to year.
26.5 Employees leaving the service of the Employer in good standing, after having given the
Employer fourteen (14) day notice of termination of employment, shall be compensated for
vacation leave accrued and unused.
ARTICLE 27 - Sick Leave
27.1 Sick leave with pay shall be granted to probationary and permanent employees at the rate of
eight (8) hours per month or 96 hours per year (computed at 3.69 hours per pay period) of
full-time service or major fraction thereof, except that sick leave granted probationary
employees shall not be available for use during the first six (6) months of service.
27.2 Sick leave shall be used normally for absence from duty because of personal illness or legal
quarantine of the employee, or because of serious illness in the immediate family.
Immediate family shall mean brother, sister, parents, parents-in-law, spouse, or children of
the employee. Sick leave may be used for the purpose of attending the funeral of
immediate family members plus brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, grandparents,
grandparents-in-law, and grandchildren of the employee.
27.3 Sick leave shall accrue at the rate of eight (8) hours per month or ninety-six (96) hours per
year until nine hundred sixty (960) hours have been accumulated (shall be computed at 3.69
hours per pay period). Effective January 1, 1994, after nine hundred sixty (960) hours have
been accumulated, sick leave shall accrue at the rate of four (4) hours per month or forty-
eight (48) hours per year (computed at 1.85 hours per pay period), and simultaneously
vacation leave, in addition to regular vacation leave accrual, shall accrue at the rate of two
(2) hours per month or twenty-four (24) hours per year (computed at .925 hours per pay
period). Employees using earned vacation or sick leave shall be considered to be working
for the purpose of accumulating additional sick leave. Workers' Compensation benefits
shall be credited against the compensation due employees utilizing sick leave.
27.4 In order to be eligible for sick leave with pay, an employee must:
a.notify the Employer prior to the time set for the beginning of their normal scheduled
shift;
b.keep the Employer informed of their condition if the absence is of more than three (3)
days duration;
c. submit medical certificates for absences exceeding three (3) days, if required by the
Employer.
27.5 Employees abusing sick leave shall be subject to disciplinary action.
27.6 An employee who accumulated 960 hours of sick leave and who uses not more than the
equivalent of two regularly scheduled shift's worth of sick leave hours in a calendar year
shall receive a wellness incentive equal to one of the employee's regularly scheduled shifts'
compensation at the employee's regular rate of compensation.
ARTICLE 28 - Insurance
28.1 2014 Full-time Employees
Effective 1/1/14, the City will contribute payment of one thousand two dollars ($1,002) per
month per employee for use in participating in the City's insurance benefits for those
employees who elect to participate in a high deductible health plan.
Effective 1/1/14, the City will contribute payment of eight hundred fifty-two dollars ($852)
per month per employee for use in participating in the City's insurance benefits for those
employees who elect to participate in a non-high deductible health plan.
2015 Full-time Employees
For 2015 the City will offer the best of any agreement that we have for any other group for
2015.
28.2 Life Insurance and Balance of Cafeteria Funds: The City of Brooklyn Center will provide
payment for premium of basic life insurance in the amount of $10,000. The employee may
use the remainder of the contribution (limits as stated above) for use as provided in the
Employer's Cafeteria Benefit Plan. The Employer will make a good faith effort to provide
the following options for employee selection: group dental, supplemental life, long-term
disability, deferred compensation or cash benefits. The Employer will be excused from the
requirement of offering a particular option where such becomes unfeasible because of
conditions imposed by an insurance carrier or because of other circumstances beyond the
City's control.
ARTICLE 29 - Wage Rates
Ser eant -
Date Sergeant Rate
1/1/14 —2%$42.33/hour
1/1/15 — 2% + $.28/hour $43.46/hour
Commander —
Date Commander Rate
1/1/14 — 2%$8,046 - $8,409/month
1/1/15 — 2% + $.32/hour $8,262 - $8,633/month
New hires in the Commander classification will be paid at minimum starting wage, be on probation
for one year and after successful completion of probation will receive a pay increase to the maximum
pay.
ARTICLE 30 - Benefits for Retirees
Retirees at the time of retirement shall receive the same options and level of City contribution for
insurance coverage upon retirement as are provided by the City's Personnel Policy covering non-
Union employees as such options and contributions may be changed by the City from time to time.
ARTICLE 31 - Mileage and Expense Reimbursement
Employees shall receive the same mileage and expense reimbursement rates upon the same terms
and conditions as generally provided in the City's Personnel Policy covering non-Union employees
as such policy may be changed by the City from time to time.
ARTICLE 32- Light Duty
Members of the bargaining unit will be eligible for temporary light duty assignment upon approval of
the City Manager upon such terms and conditions as would apply to non-Union employees of the
City as set forth in the City's personnel policy, as the same may be amended from time to time by the
City.
ARTICLE 33— Retiree Health Sayings Plan (RHSP)
The Retiree Health Savings Plan (RHSP) is established to help defray the cost of medical expenses
and health insurance premiums for employees, spouses and dependents after the employee leaves
employment with the City of Brooklyn Center.
1. Participation Eligibility
Regular full-time benefit earning employees may have contributions made on their behalf
into the RHSP.
Participants must be 21 years of age or older. Unless noted otherwise in this policy, the
minimum period of service required to participate in the plan is 60 days.
Every eligible employee in an employee group is required to participate in the RHSP for their
group as outlined in this applicable labor agreement.
2.RHSP Contributions
When appropriate, each employee will have an account established in his or her name.
Unless specifically noted otherwise, contributions (and earnings) to an employee's RHSP
account are not taxable income.
3.Accessing Funds
a.Employees may access the funds in their RHSP account when they are eligible to
retire under the Public Employees Retirement Association's (PERA) rules.
b.Unless prohibited by the IRS, employees leaving employment with the City prior to
being eligible for retirement through PERA, for the reasons noted below, may make
withdrawals on a tax-free basis for eligible health-related expenses.
•Upon termination of employment.
El If employee is collecting a disability.
o If employee is on a medical leave (six months or longer)
•If employee is on a leave of absence (one year or longer)
If the employee returns to work and is earning medical benefits, they are no longer
eligible to make withdrawals from their RHSP account.
The IRS does not allow these funds to be rolled into any other type of plan, including
an IRA.
c. Access following death. The surviving spouse and eligible dependents continue to
access the account for eligible expense reimbursements until the RHSP account is
exhausted. Such reimbursements are not taxable. Unless prohibited by the IRS,
reimbursements may also be made to a beneficiary other than a surviving spouse or
eligible dependent. However, such reimbursements would be taxable to the recipient.
4. Eligible Expenses Reimbursed by Plan
Funds in a RHSP account may be used to reimburse:
1.Insurance premiums (health insurance premiums, Medicare supplemental insurance
premiums, Medicare Part B insurance premiums, COBRA and Chapter 488 insurance
premiums, long term care insurance premiums (not long term care expenses), and
dental insurance premiums.
2.Most qualifying medical expenses as defined in Internal Revenue Code Section 213
(i.e. medical costs that would otherwise be deductible to the employee on his or her
individual income tax return).
A third-party claims administrator hired by ICMA-RC will handle claims administration.
5. No Opt-out
Employees and retirees in groups covered by the RHSP program are not permitted to opt-out
of the program. Participation is mandatory.
- 14-
6.Program Administration
Along with the Human Resources Division, the ICMA Retirement Corporation will
administer the RHSP program. The employee controls how the money is invested similar to
his or her Section 457 deferred compensation program. The employee receives an account
statement each quarter from ICMA for his or her RHSP account.
7.Administrative Fees
Please contact ICMA for current administrative and mutual fund fees.
8.Plan Modifications
The details of ICMA-RC' s administration of the RHSP as well as other features of the plan
are set forth in the RHSP materials provided by ICMA-RC. These details and IRS
regulations regarding the RHSP may be revised, necessitating the revision to this policy or
other agreements between employee groups and the City.
The City reserves the right to modify its policy to comply with any other regulations
regarding the plan and to add contribution requirements.
9.Contribution Formulas
1.Election for Pre-Tax Contributions from Compensation.
Employees may elect to contribute up to 25% of their compensation.
This is a one-time, irrevocable election. Employees must make this decision during
the open enrollment period.
2.Severance Pay.
Employees who qualify to receive severance pay and vacation pay upon retiring or
leaving the city in good standing, as defined by the current Labor Agreement, will
designate from 0% to 100% (in 10% increments) to be placed in their individual
RHSP accounts at the time of retirement or resignation.
This is an irrevocable election. Employees must make this decision during the open
enrollment period prior to the beginning of the year in which they will retire.
ARTICLE 34 - Agreement Implementation
Employer shall implement the terms of this Agreement in the form of a resolution. If the
implementation of the terms of this Agreement require the adoption of a law, ordinance, or charter
amendment, the Employer shall make every reasonable effort to propose and secure the enactment of
such law, ordinance, resolution, or charter amendment.
ARTICLE 35- Waiver
35.1 Any and all prior Agreements, resolutions, practices, policies, rules, and regulations
regarding terms and conditions of employment, to the extent inconsistent with the
provisions of this Agreement, are hereby superseded.
35.2 The parties mutually acknowledge that during the negotiations which resulted in this
Agreement, each had the unlimited right and opportunity to make demands and proposals
with respect to any term or condition of employment not removed by law from bargaining.
- 15 -
All Agreements and understandings arrived at by the parties are set forth in writing in this
Agreement for the stipulated duration of this Agreement. The Employer and the Union
each voluntarily and unqualifiedly waives the right to meet and negotiate regarding any and
all terms and conditions of employment referred to or covered in this Agreement or with
respect to any term or condition of employment not specifically referred to or covered by
this Agreement, even though such terms or conditions may not have been within the
knowledge or contemplation of either or both of the parties at the time this contract was
negotiated or executed.
ARTICLE 36 - Duration
This Agreement shall be effective as of January 1, 2014 and shall remain in full force and effect until
the thirty-first (31) day of December 2015, as noted in the contract.
IN WITNESS THERETO, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed this day of
, 2014.
FOR LAW ENFORCEMENT LABOR SERVICES NO. 86
Business Agent
Union Steward
Union President
FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Mayor
City Manager
City Council Agenda Item No. 6f
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 2014
TO: City Council
FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manag0--)
SUBJECT: Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority Notice
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City• Council receive the notice from Hennepin County HRA or
identify programs the City would not like to have operate within the City of Brooklyn Center by
Hennepin County
Background:
Minnesota Statutes Section 383B .77 which authorizes the creation of the Hennepin County
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA) requires the HCHRA to annually notify the
City Of Brooklyn Center of the activities the HCHRA may administer/facilitate within the City.
Each city has 45 days from notice to advise the County of any programs that it does not wish to
have administered in the City by the HCHRA. At the staff level we have no objections to the
County administrating any of the listed programs and believe that these programs support the
Vibrant Neighborhood Strategic Priority of the City Council
Unless the Council objects we recommend that the Council receives the report and takes no
further action.
Budget Issues:
There are no budget issues to consider.
Strategic Priorities:
• Vibrant Neighborhoods
hchra.couniy.02.06.14 •
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, sq/c, inclusive conununity that enhances the quality of life
for people and preserves the public trust
HRA
HENNEPIN COUNTY HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55415-1842 612-348-9260
January 28, 2014
Mr. Tim Willson
Mayor
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430
Dear Mayor Willson:
Minnesota Statutes Section 383B.77, which authorized the creation of the Hennepin County
Housing and Redevelopment Authority (EICHRA), requires the HCHRA to annually notify a
municipal authority of activities the HCHRA may administer/facilitate within their communities.
The HCHRA has identified several suburban Hennepin County activities in the year 2014.
Communities may exercise their option to not have the HCHRA administer one or more of the
activities within their community by notifying the HCHRA in writing to that effect, within 45
days of the date of this notice:
•Minnesota Cities Participation Program, First-Time Homebuyer Mortgages — provides
below-market interest rate home mortgage loans for low and moderate-income first-time
homebuyers; homebuyers apply directly to Minnesota Housing on a first come, first serve
basis — Valerie Hutchinson (612-348-4969).
•Minnesota Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program — assists low-income homeowners in
financing basic home improvements that directly affect the safety, habitability, energy
efficiency or accessibility of their homes — Jim Graham (612-348-2235).
O Minnesota Housing Emergency and Accessibility Loan Program — assists low-income,
single family homeowners in addressing emergency conditions in the home or essential
accessibility needs for a disabled resident (limited funding available) — Jim Graham (612-
348-2235).
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
Gail Dorfman Jan Callison Mike Opat Linda Higgins Peter McLaughlin Randy Johnson Jeff Johnson
Chair Vice-Chair
Mayor Willson
January 28, 2014
Page 2
•Home Accessibility Ramp Program — assists in the construction of accessibility ramps
and/or low-riser steps for low- and moderate-income disabled homeowners — Carol Stinar
(612-348-2670).
•Affordable Housing Incentive Fund Program (AHIF) — provides capital funding to assist
municipalities, other government and nonprofit agencies, private and nonprofit housing
developers, and lenders in the development of long-term affordable housing units. Projects
are selected through a competitive Request for Proposals process and require a supporting
city council resolution before receiving assistance — Carol Stinar (612-348-2670).
•Lead-Safe Rehabilitation Assistance Program — provides financial assistance to property
owners for lead-based paint hazard remediation in housing units serving low- and
moderate-income households — Mike Jensen (612-348-2114).
•Transit Oriented Development Program (TOD) — provides capital funding to assist
development proximate to priority transit corridors and hubs. Projects are selected through
a competitive Request for Proposals process and must be in a recognized redevelopment
area and receive a supporting City council resolution before receiving assistance — Thatcher
Imboden (612-348-4191).
•Common Bond Fund Loan Program — provides long-term, low-interest, fixed asset revenue
bond financing for suburban Hennepin County manufacturing and production businesses —
Patricia Fitzgerald (612-543-0864).
•Open to Business —provides matching funds to cities to offer small business technical
assistance to their entrepreneur community through the nonprofit Metropolitan Consortium
of Community Developers — Patricia Fitzgerald (612-543-0864).
•Economic Gardening — in collaboration with the Hennepin-Carver Workforce Investment
Board, provides high-end technical assistance to companies that have grown beyond the
startup phase and need access to information and decision-making tools typically only
available to larger companies — Ron White (952-881-6577).
•Shelter Plus Care Rental Assistance — provides tenant-based rental assistance to low-
income households through a third party provider (Hearth Connection) — Melisa Blies (612-
348-2020).
Mayor Willson
January 28, 2014
Page 3
We look forward to continuing to work with you in implementing these programs and to develop
additional innovative approaches to address housing and community development needs. Please
feel .free to contact the staff person listed at the end of each program description for further
details on the programs or specific funding allocations.
Debra R. Bris
Deputy Executive Director
cc: Commissioner Mike Opat
Commissioner Gail Dorfman
Commissioner Randy Johnson
Commissioner Jeff Johnson
Commissioner Linda Higgins
Commissioner Peter McLaughlin
Commissioner Jan Callison
Curt Boganey, City Manager
City Council Agenda Item No. 8a
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 6, 2014
TO: City Council
FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manag4C------71/
SUBJECT: Ordinance prohibiting sampling in tobacco product shops
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of an ordinance prohibiting
sampling in Tobacco Products Shops.
Background:
On December 9 th the City Council asked the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance that would
close the loop hole in our current tobacco licensing ordinance that allowed sampling of tobacco
products on site.
The subject ordinance was prepared, adopted on first reading and published in the local
newspaper. A hearing on the ordinance has been set for February 10 th at the City Council
Meeting.
Following the hearing the Council may consider , adoption of the subject ordinance which
prohibits inhaling or exhaling of smoke from tobacco products as defined in Minnesota Statutes,
section 144.4167, subdivision 4. This ordinance does not apply to other products.
Budget Issues:
There are no budget issues to consider.
Strategic Priorities:
0 Community Image
. .
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, sa:le, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life
for all people and preserves the public trust
1 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 144.4167
144.4167 PERMITTED SMOKING.
Subdivision 1. Scientific study participants. Smoking by participants in peer reviewed
scientific studies related to the health effects of smoking may be allowed in a separated room
ventilated at a rate of 60 cubic feet per minute per person pursuant to a policy that is approved by
the commissioner and is established by the administrator of the program to minimize exposure
of nonsmokers to smoke.
Subd. 2. Traditional Native American ceremonies. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not
prohibit smoking by a Native American as part of a traditional Native American spiritual or
cultural ceremony. For purposes of this section, a Native American is a person who is a member
of an Indian tribe as defined in section 260.755, subdivision 12.
Subd. 3. Private places. Except as provided in section 144.414, subdivision 2, nothing in
sections 144.411 to 144.417 prohibits smoking in:
(1)private homes, private residences, or private automobiles when they are not in use as a
place of employment, as defined in section 144.413, subdivision lb; or
(2)a hotel or motel sleeping room rented to one or more guests.
Subd. 4. Tobacco products shop. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit the lighting
of tobacco in a tobacco products shop by a customer or potential customer for the specific purpose
of sampling tobacco products. For the purposes of this subdivision, a tobacco products shop is a
retail establishment with an entrance door opening directly to the outside that derives more
than 90 percent of its gross revenue from the sale of loose tobacco, plants, or herbs and cigars,
cigarettes, pipes, and other smoking devices for burning tobacco and related smoking accessories
and in which the sale of other products is merely incidental. "Tobacco products shop" does not
include a tobacco department or section of any individual business establishment with any type of
liquor, food, or restaurant license.
Subd. 5. Heavy commercial vehicles. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking
in the cabs of motor vehicles registered under section 168.013, subdivision le, with a total gross
weight of 26,001 pounds or greater.
Subd. 6. Farm vehicles and construction equipment. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do
not prohibit smoking in farm trucks, as defined in section 168.002, subdivision 8; implements
of husbandry, as defined in section 168A.01, subdivision 8; and special mobile equipment, as
defined in section 168.002, subdivision 31. This subdivision applies to farm trucks, implements of
husbandry, and special mobile equipment, when being used for their intended purposes.
Subd. 7. Family farms. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking in the house,
garage, barns, and other buildings on a family farm that meet the following criteria: (1) the family
farm is engaged in farming, as defined in section 500.24, subdivision 2, paragraph (a); (2) the
family farm meets the definition of family farm under section 500.24, subdivision 2, paragraph (b),
(c), (j), or (1); and (3) the family farm employs two or fewer persons who are not family members.
Subd. 8. Disabled veterans rest camp. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking
in the disabled veterans rest camp located in Washington County, established as of January 1,
2007.
Subd. 9. Theatrical productions. Sections 144.414 to 144.417 do not prohibit smoking by
actors and actresses as part of a theatrical performance conducted in compliance with section
Copyright 0 2013 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved.
2 MINNESOTA STATUTES 2013 144.4167
366.01. Notice of smoking in a performance shall be given to theater patrons in advance and
shall be included in performance programs.
History: 2007 c 82 s 10
Copyright 0 2013 by the Office of the Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved.
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 8, 2014
TO: City Council
FROM: Curt Boganey, City Manag#3
SUBJECT: Tobacco Products Shop
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of resolution establishing a
moratorium and adoption of an ordinance prohibiting sampling in Tobacco products shops.
Background:
At the December 9 th Study Session there was discussion regarding "vaping" and "vaping"
lounges (excerpt enclosed). Attorney LeFevere explained that with respect to hookah lounges the
Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act there is an exception for sampling in licensed tobacco retailers,
but there is no definition of sampling. He explained that the City Council could close this
particular loop hole by the adoption of an ordinance prohibiting sampling. In addition he stated
the Council could adopt a moratorium resolution that would take effect immediately. This would
prohibit the establishment of hookah lounges during the ordinance adoption time frame.
In the mean time staff will be reviewing the e-cigarette issue and will provide the City Council
with a report of its findings.
Budget Issues:
There are no budget issues to consider.
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive conununity that enhances the quality of life
for people and preserves the public trust
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the 10th day of February 2014 at 7
p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek
Parkway, to consider an ordinance prohibiting sampling in tobacco products shops; adding new
Brooklyn Center City Code, Section 23410.
Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in
advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PROHIBITING SAMPLING IN TOBACCO PRODUCTS
SHOPS; ADDING NEW BROOKLYN CENTER CITY CODE, SECTION 23-
110
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS
FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Brooklyn Center City Code is amended by adding new Section 23-110 as
follows:
Section 23-110. SAMPLING PROHIBITED. The inhaling or exhaling of smoke from
an lighted ar, cigarette,y__pipe,_olaiLi other lighted tobacco oi.tollnco
products shop, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, section 144.4167, subdivision 4, is prohibited.
Section 2. This ordinance shall be effective after adoption and thirty days following its
legal publication.
Adopted this day of 2014.
Mayor
ATTEST:
City Clerk
Date of Publication:
Effective Date:
(Strikeout indicates matter to be deleted, underline indicates new matter.)
December 9 th Study Session Excerpt
MISCELLANEOUS
Review of "Vaping" Lounges Regulatory Issues
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she met with Emily Anderson of the Association of
Non-Smokers of Minnesota, along with Councilmember Myszkowski and Officer Kris Knodle,
to review the issue of "vaping," or non-smoking cigarettes, and vaping lounges. She added Ms.
Anderson provided very valuable information regarding this alarming trend, which is targeted at
youth. She stressed the importance of placing a moratorium on such businesses until the City
Council can discuss this issue and make the necessary ordinance changes to provide control and
restriction at the City level.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson expressed concern that because of redevelopment in
Brooklyn Center, specifically Shingle Creek Crossing, the City's older strip malls will attract
these new types of businesses that are not desirable in terms of quality and image. She added she
submitted a sample ordinance from the League of Minnesota Cities to Mr. Boganey for staff
review. Mayor Willson stated he would support directing staff to research this issue and provide
more information to the City Council at a study session, including staff report and possible
solutions. The City Council agreed.
Mayor Willson asked whether a moratorium could be placed on development of this type of
business while the City Council reviews this issue. Mr. LeFevere confirmed this. Mayor
Willson stated the City Council should consider what type of designation could be used to
differentiate it from other businesses. Mr. LeFevere stated, with regard to hookah lounges, the
Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act includes an exception for sampling in licensed tobacco retailers,
but there is no definition of sampling. He added this is an easy fix, as the sampling of tobacco
could be strictly prohibited in the City ordinance pertaining to licensure.
Mr. LeFevere stated the City Council could consider a moratorium on this entire kind of
business, which would not affect existing businesses, and a study could be conducted. He added
it is within the Council's aegis to impose licensing and regulation, which can be done without a
moratorium, and unless the ordinance is changed, hookah lounges are a permitted use.
Mayor Willson stated applicants could come through for approval before the ordinance
amendment process is complete and the ordinance takes effect. Mr. LeFevere stated the City
Council could adopt a moratorium resolution at the same time that a moratorium ordinance goes
into effect. He added there is legal precedent for that process, and it is a defensible case. He
noted this could be addressed by the City Council at its next Regular Session. The City Council
agreed.
ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL
Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to close the Study
Session at 6:45 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
RECONVENE STUDY SESSION
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Myszkowski seconded to
reconvene the Study Session at 6:47 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
Review of "Vaping" Lounges Regulatory Issues - continued
The discussion continued on the issue of an amendment to City ordinance related to regulation of
non-smoking lounges.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson thanked Mayor Willson and the City Council for their
consideration of this issue and its implications for the community. Councilmember Myszkowski
agreed, adding the meeting with Emily Anderson was very informative, and she was horrified to
understand the extent that big tobacco corporations are involved in promoting vaping to youth.
She noted the #1 flavor for non-smoking devices is gummi bear.
Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson expressed concern that a new generation of non-smokers is
now being exposed to this concept, which appears harmless and safe due to lack of education.
Councilmember Ryan stated he appreciates the efforts of Councilmembers Lawrence-Anderson
and Myszkowski for bringing this issue forward for the Council's attention and action.
Councilmember Kleven also thanked Councilmembers Myszkowski and Lawrence-Anderson for
bringing up this issue so the Council could address it with some urgency.
Member Kris Lawrence-Andersonintroduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-18
RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A MORATORIUM ON ESTABLISHMENT
OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS SHOPS
WHEREAS, the purpose of the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, Minnesota
Statutes, Sections 144.411 to 144.417 (the "Act") is to protect the public from the hazards of
secondhand smoke in public places; and
WHEREAS, the Act generally prohibits smoking of tobacco products in public
places but allows sampling of tobacco products in tobacco products shops; and
WHEREAS, the Act authorizes any statutory or home rule charter city to enact
and enforce more stringent measures to protect individuals from secondhand smoke; and
WHEREAS, the Council has under consideration an ordinance that would
prohibit sampling in tobacco products shops; and
WHEREAS, the Council has determined that it is necessary and in the public
interest to impose a moratorium on the licensing and development of new tobacco products
shops during consideration of the ordinance prohibiting sampling in tobacco products shops to
protect the public from the hazards of secondhand smoke and the establishment of new tobacco
products shops prior to the effective date of the proposed ordinance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, as follows:
1.The moratorium established by this resolution shall apply throughout the City.
2.The moratorium applies to the following types of applications: new tobacco sales
license applications for tobacco product shops and building permit applications
for new tobacco products shops or expansions or alteration of existing tobacco
product shops.
3. The moratorium applies to any application pending as of, or after, the date of this
resolution. During the period of this moratorium, no new tobacco products
licenses for tobacco products shops and no building permits for the construction,
expansion or alteration of tobacco products shops will be issued. For purposes of
this resolution, tobacco products shops shall have the meaning given in Minnesota
Statutes, Section 144.4167, subdivision 4.
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-18
4.The moratorium shall remain in effect for 90 days or until the effective date of an
ordinance prohibiting sampling in tobacco products shops, whichever occurs first.
5.This Resolution is effective upon adoption.
January 13, 2014
Date
ATTEST:
City Clerk
6-(
Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Lin Myszkowski
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Tim Willson, Carol Kleven, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Lin Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan;
and the following voted against the same: none;
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
City Council Agenda Item No. 8b
COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February 10, 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Vickie Schleuning, Assistant City Manager/Director of Building and Community
Standards
SUBJECT: Public Hearing Regarding Proposed Use of 2014 Community Development Block
Grant Funds
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council conduct the Public Hearing and accept input from the
public regarding Use of Funds for 2014 Urban Hennepin County Community Development
Block Grant Program. Staff requests direction from the Council regarding allocation of the
CDBG funds. Based on the feedback, staff will prepare resolutions for approval at the February
24, 2014 City Council Meeting.
Background:
Brooklyn Center is one of 40 Hennepin County cities participating in the Urban Hennepin
County Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program. With the CDBG program,
federal dollars from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) are awarded to
Hennepin County and are allocated to participating cities on a formula basis. Therefore, the
City of Brooklyn Center is considered a Subrecipient of CDBG funding. This Public Hearing
meets the requirements of the Hennepin County Citizen Participation Plan and HUD
requirements. -
CDBG Statutory and Administrative Requirements
Federal CDBG Statutory Requirements
The federal authorizing statute for the CDBG program requires that each funded CDBG activity
meet one of three national objectives:
1.Benefiting low income persons
2.Preventing or eliminating slums and/or blight
3. Meeting urgent community needs.
The federal statute also specifies that each recipient receiving funds must insure at least 70
percent of the CDBG expenditures during the program year be used for activities benefiting low
and/or very low income persons. Each city must meet this requirement at the local level.
We have been advised to use the 2013 CDBG allocation of $239,249 for the allocation amount in
2014. However, this allocation amount could be adjusted. Based on this amount, $167,474.30
of the total allocation must be expended on programs and services directly benefiting low income
persons in order to meet the 70 percent requirement. Low income persons are defined as persons
with incomes ranging from 30 to 50 percent (very low income) to 80 percent (low income) of the
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe comnutnity that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
COUNCI IlT EM M ORANDU Y
median household income in the Minneapolis/St. Paul metropolitan area as defined by HUD.
Currently, the 80% median household income level is $63,900 for a family of four.
If a city chooses to allocate CDBG funds to eligible public service activities, the amount is
limited to a maximum of 15% of CDBG funding. A city is not obligated to provide any funding
to public service agencies.
Hennepin County Administrative Requirements for Public Service Activities
Pursuant to federal program requirements, each city receiving a CDBG allocation from the
Urban Hennepin County CDBG program is limited to a 15% cap on public service projects if the
city chooses to allocate funds to public service agencies. Based on the estimated allocation for
2014, the maximum amount of CDBG funds that can be allocated to public service activities is
$35,887.35, which is 15% of the City's 2013 CDBG allocation. Other guidance provided by
Hennepin County for the disbursement of CDBG funds follows:
O No more than three public service activities should be undertaken in each city receiving
CDBG funds.
O Each Public Service activity should have a budget of at least $7,500. If funds are
committed by other cities to carry out a single activity of mutual interest, this limit does
not apply. CEAP, H.O.M.E. Program (Senior Community Services) and HOME Line are
considered multi-city activities or county-wide activities at this time.
O CDBG activities must address a high priority need according to the County's
Consolidated Plan for affordable housing, community development and human services.
Cities funding activities that are not high priorities under the consolidated plan must
explain why the project is needed in their city.
The H.O.M.E. Program (Senior Community Services), Senior Services Program (CEAP), the
HOME Line Tenant Advocacy Program, Early Childhood Education Improvements, and Job
readiness and Computer training are categorized as public service projects.
The CDBG Funding History Chart, Appendix 1, shows the City's funding allocation for CDBG
funds from the years 2003-2013.
2014 CDBG Applicants
The following agencies submitted for CDBG Public Service Agency activities/program funding.
o Avenues for Homeless Youth 2014 request is $5,000 to fund Shelter and transitional
housing programs with support services serving homeless youth in the northwest suburbs.
Details of Avenues for Homeless Youth request for funding are provided in their attached
"2014 CDBG Request for Funding" form. Avenues for Homeless Youth has not received
previous funding from the City's CDBG program.
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe C0111111111111.1 , that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public (lust
COUNCIL ITEM MEMO NDUM
o Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP) 2014 request is $15,000 to
continue the Senior Services Program in Brooklyn Center, including Meals on Wheels.
Details on the CEAP Senior Services Program are provided in their attached "2014
CDBG Request for Funding" form. This program has been part of the City's CDBG
program for 13 years.
o HOME Line Tenant Advocacy Services request is for $9,167 to provide funding for
HOME Line's Tenant Advocacy Services Program. Details on HOME Line's request are
provided in their attached "2014 CDBG Request for Funding" form. This program has
been part of the City's CDBG program for 6 years.
o PRO USA, 2014 request is $10,000 to fund Youth Financial Literacy Training. This
would be a new program. Details of PRO USA's request are provided in their attached
"2014 CDBG Request for Funding" form. PRO USA has not received previous funding
from the City's CDBG program. Please note the application was not submitted by the
deadline and was incomplete.
o Senior Community Services' Household outside Maintenance for the Elderly
(H.O.M.E.) program 2014 request is $14,500 to continue the H.O.M.E. Program in
Brooklyn Center. Details of Senior Community Services H.O.M.E. Program are
provided in their attached "2014 CDBG Request for Funding" form. This program has
been part of the City's CDBG program for 19 years.
The following programs are proposed to receive CDBG funding categorized as Non-Public
Service Projects.
o City of Brooklyn Center Neighborhood Stabilization/ Code Enforcement Program
request is $150,000 to address foreclosed and vacant properties and arrest the decline of
neighborhoods in the City. This program provides services throughout the city, including
all low and moderate income levels. Details on the CDBG Code Enforcement activity
are provided in the attached "2014 Request for Funding" form. This would be the fifth
year of funding for the neighborhood stabilization code enforcement activity.
o Home Rehabilitation Program (Rehabilitation of Private Property). If the
Neighborhood Stabilization/City Code Enforcement Program is approved and the
maximum public service amount of 15% is awarded to any or all of the public service
requests, there would be $53,362 available to allocate to this program from the 2014
preliminary CDBG allocation. This amount would be used to address emergency items
such as furnace replacement, water and sewer service repair, etc. for individual
properties. The Home Rehabilitation program has been part of the City's CDBG program
since CDBG was first created in the mid 1970's.
Public Hearing
The attached Public Hearing notice was published in the January 23, 2014 edition of the
Brooklyn Center Sun Post newspaper. Hennepin County requires a Public Hearing be held
regarding the use of CDBG funds. Further, the 2014 CDBG programs must be submitted to
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
COUNC M MORANDUIV
Hennepin County by February 28, 2014. Funding for the 2014 CDBG program would be made
available by July 1, 2014 and CDBG funds must be spent no later than December 31, 2015
(within 18 months). Representatives of the public service agencies that applied for CDBG
funding have been notified of the Public Hearing.
Options for 2014 CDBG Allocations
The total preliminary 2014 City Allocation for CDBG Program Year 2014 (July 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2015) is $239,249. Staff has prepared four options for consideration for CDBG
Program Year 2014. After Council feedback, a resolution will be prepared for the February 24,
2014 City Council meeting.
CDBG Activity Requested
Amount Option I Option 2 Option 3
Public Services
Senior Community
rogr
Services
H.O.M.E. Pam $14,500$12,800 $14,500$12,500
CEAP Senior Service Program $15,000 $11,500 $13,064$12,500
HOME Line Tenant Advocacy
Program $9,167 $8,087 $8,323 $7,387
Youth Financial Literacy
Training
(Incomplete/late submission)
$10,000 ---
Avenues for Homeless Youth $5,000 $3,500 -$3,500
Total Public Services $44,500 $35,887 $35,887 $35,887
Non-Public Services
City of Brooklyn Center
Neighborhood Stabilization/
Code Enforcement
$150,000 $150,000$150,000 $150,000
Home Rehabilitation Program $53,362 $53,362$53,362 $53,362
Total CDBG Funds $247,862$239,249 $239,249 $239,249
Options #1 and #2 are based on a new rating system. Option #3 is based on the 2013 allocations,
with adjustment for an estimated CDBG fund increase, and adding a minimum allocation for an
additional public service program.
A new rating system for Public Service activities has been developed and implemented for 2014.
The following criteria were used for rating the public service programs based on their
applications:
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
Adjusted Amount
Based on Rating
COUNC If , M EP/ ORANDUY
1.Does the program meet the CDBG requirements (federal and county)?
2.Does the program fulfill community needs?
3.How does the program align with City goals?
4.Has the organization demonstrated the ability to successfully implement a program using
CDBG funds?
5.What is the overall budget for the program and does it have other funding sources to
ensure sustainability?
6.Are there similar services already provided by existing agencies within the community?
7.What is the ease of access of its services to the community? I.e. Location of agency,
methods of contact, etc.
8.Is the application submittal complete and submitted by the deadline?
The following i s a breakdown of the scoring summ ary.
Agency 1 [Application Percent of Requested
(115 Points Total Points Amount_Available)
115 100%$ 14,500.00 $ 14,500.00
105 91%$ 9,147.00 $ 8,323.00
95 83%$ 15,000.00 $ 12,450.00
78 67%$ 5,000.00 $ 3,350.00
42 37%$ 10,000.00 $ 3,700.00
$ 53,647.00 $ 42,323.00
HOME
Homelinerc EAP
Avenues for
Youth
ProUSA
Total:
Budget Issues:
CDBG funds are exclusively federal dollars.
Strategic Priorities:
0 Vibrant Neighborhoods
Attachments:
Attachment I —
Attachment II —
Attachment III —
Attachment IV —
Attachment V —
Attachment VI —
Attachment VII —
Attachment VIII —
Attachment IX --
Funding History
Home Line Application and Request for Funding
CEAP Application and Request for Funding
Avenues for Youth Application and Request for Funding
PRO USA Application and Request for Funding
Senior Community Services
Neighborhood Stabilization/Code Enforcement Request for Funding
Hennepin County CDBG Fund Memo
Affidavit of Publication of Public Hearing Notice
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe connintnilv that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
.Y
Wa)L.. U)C.) ,,,j'-
G.)
11 oc I-
...E(/)
00
6.ocp
L.6N.rtip-
C cnD "C)0 C
(....) 7LLC
Ca) )c rea)I
00
OD0LO
h:1069
00
6CT)CO
05"NCo
00
6•,--CO
,-Co
0)
0CD
6
N(.0
',-Co
00
6
CO0`..'r69-
o0
6,1
CV_
COLor
Co
>,
co -0
2 -0 —6a.) ,c0- -0 n
0 C 0.-. (t) 069- E<
o0
1--:co<-0
d--co=69
o0
a;cor••••
L6co=69
o0.
.,t-.,,-0)
0;corCo69-
o0
RI
LO
0';oN69-
0
0cc;
Lo
-'4.N
73 - ..... 4.,o c c00 a, cr)
-E '4;74 ,,,a) ?0 N `-' `. .47
-CI = (2' 12 E5..c,,, 1E 0 o .1..--:- co 4--'T) .-1-. c -z W III
oo
crg
0
6Lor(n-
0o
60
0
6LorCo
0o
N.4
71-
6N
N—.Co
0o
NC6
CL)
'4-CO
.N.Co
0o
06
oLo
N—Co
0
>•,13c) _CD -0 zC) Cl) c
(3 c oLo co
b' E (-)<
a)
C
D"
a)Eo
i
o0
6a-1-----
6Co
C)0
CO(.0CD
6-Co
C)CD
6CO1-
6-69-
0CD
6COr---•
COCo
CD0
60LC)
c6Co
I
a.<
ow
0
p6
C)
N.-
S--co-
0
Cp.co
N.-
0
‘--.69-
00
4CDco
CO-69-
0C:)
6ra.
CT;69-
C)0
uiCO
N
6.69-
00
4
CD
6-
69-
00
6=,-.
,---
69-
CD0
6c•-•N-
r
69-
CD0
6d-c0
r
69-
0CI
60LC)
co
69-
0CD
600
CO
e9
s')
- u)C.)d 0)
T
00
6oLC)
(•\,--
Co
00
COoCD
4-
Co
CD0
6,--r•-•
. ---
Co
CD0
6upr
(0-
Co
00
6uPr
L.6
69
00
CO
CO
I-
Co
C)0
N-:"crCT)
r
Co
0CD
6co-r
COr
Co
0CD
6cod-
COr
Co
00
6oCD
(-4N69
00
6oCD
cv-ClCo
'V11-1w=.-..73<
00
64N
05coNCo
00
.-4CO
==Cl69
00
4.a)N
6I"-
*L-Co
C)0
COcoto
COCD
N69
CD0
uicoa)
CO -CO
=Co
00
6
(NI
6CO
,-Co
< <ZZ < <ZZ <Z
4.,
To 6)E =- CO
0
-,4_.-
.,-.NCo
_
pp
(ON
0
4CC)
ci.I"-rCo
CD0
COcoCD
COCDNCo
00
6co(3)
COCO
rUr}
006<-04
6CO
‘-'Co
00
c6coOD
6-COr
Co
0 00 0
oi 64 .-r--- 0
05- 60) 0)r N.-
Co 69
0 CD0 CD
4 0)(.9 Nr----• 0
6 6-CT) COr N69- Co
00
cd,-LO
.7i-COClCo
'al(jj .0
a) Ece mZ
co
Cilco-c)N
o
CO_I .".-,0N
is-)
Cil-.,--0N
.-
1-o.-c)N
1---
('?0)00N
LC)-r.,
0c)N
1"-- CDN =6 th0 0c) oN N
CO 0)CO N4') a-CD 0CD 0N N
LOCO
c,'-)00N
0)
C I.-- COIC wC >_MLI.
COV'0N
Nr-
C.N
r.r."0N
0rC/N
OD0CDN
000C)N
I"- CO0 00 0N N
LO It0 CI0 0N N
CO00N
Attachment Il — HOME Line Application and Request for Funding
HOME r1=3rTn 3455 Bloomington Ave
Minneapolis. MN 55407
Office Phone: 6121728-5770
Hotline: 6121728-5767
Fax: 612/728-5761
www.homelinernn.org
Jesse Anderson
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Boulevalfd
Brooklyn Center, MIg 55430
January 10, 2014
Dear Mr. Anderson,
This letter i8 to request funding in the amount of $9,167 from the City of Brooklyn Center's Community
Development Block Grant Program to support HOME Line's services for renters.
A copy of the 2014 CDBG Program Request for Funding is enclosed. Along with the CDBG Request
Form, I am enclosing a summary of our hotline's service to Brooklyn Center residents. In 2013, in
Brooklyn Center, HOME Line served 237 families, prevented 24 evictions, and saved tenants over
$35,261 in returned damage deposits and rent abatements.
HOME Line is building upon our depth of experience in serving Brooklyn Center. We are working to
meet current challenges facing low-income renters and would like the City of Brooklyn Center to
continue as our partner in meeting these needs.
We. thank you for the opportunity to submit this application. If you have any questions or need
additional information, please call me at 612/728-5770, extension 107 or Mike Vraa, our managing
attorney at extension 113.
Sincerely,
Beth Kodluboy
Executive Director
enclosures as noted
CITY orI CENTER
A GREAT PLACE TO START, A GREAT PLACE TO STAY www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org
Urban Hennepin County Community DCNTIOpment Block Grant Program (CDBG)
FY2014 (July 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2014)
Application Request for City of Brooklyn Center Funds
Supplemental Application Due: Tuesday January 21, 2014 by 4:30 PM
Public Hearing: February 10, 2014
YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM
TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN APPLICANT
Organization Name:HOME, Line
Program Name:Tenant Hotline Services
Purpose:HOME, Line will provide a tenant hotline that provides free legal advice to tenants about
landlord/tenant law. These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness to illness from unsafe
living conditions, and result in reducing the use of the city's emergency resources.
Does your Organization have a 501 (e)(3) status?
2.Do the activities benefit at least 51% low- and moderate-income households with less
than 80% Area Median Income (AMI) as stated by HUD and are you able to provide
Income-eligible certification for all clients?
3.Does your organization have the staff capacity to administer the program?
4. Do you understand and are capable of providing all required documentation to obtain EX)
reimbursement?
LI
LI
LI
LI
5. Which of the following Eligible Public Service Activates will the program provide?
(Choose Al! that apply)
•Employment services
•Crime Prevention and public services
•Health Services LI I-
0 Substance abuse services LI E
* Housing Counseling ■■C
•Education programs
•Energy Conservation
•Services for senior citizens
•Services for homeless persons
LILI
Page 1 of 7
,:, ...7. V -?,:51, ow dr , 5.-z,-9. MA- '''' . -" v-‘ 1,04,.. .9 • :'4 t-.,T .ia '4 Vt, ' `•'''''4. • ,t.14,;.-. - fitigtok- ti , ogok_ ,4t sTP.,'W k •1'—= Ato- -4,% - -N,„ :1 v00,1,:t -=',6_ 4pm-4i, 1 ‘,:,..:,-:F't "t40.17 - 1..'
.1' 03 01,--:kt
9.:TE6 . e-;78, ..07,..;`1,-
6. Proposed program description. Be concise, yet thorough in describing the activity
10 i 0of only the program for which funding is being sought, and in only as much detail as
needed. Include Brooklyn Center local need(s) and population served. CDBG funds
cannot be used to replace current program funds. If this is an existing program and
your organization did not receive Brooklyn Center CDBG funds last year, the funds
must be used to expand the program.
Renters make up nearly 4,016 households in Brooklyn Center, and many of these
families have low incomes. When renters have problems involving their homes,
those who don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in
housing that is unsafe, lose security deposits that are rightfully theirs, or make
decisions that cost them their home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools
necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable.
HOME Line's Tenant Hotline provides free legal advice to tenants about
landlord/tenant law. These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness
to illness from unsafe living conditions, and result in reducing the use of the city's
emergency resources.
The Tenant Hotline Services began in 1992 as a service to Suburban Hennepin
County residents. Today we serve the entire state and have recently taken our
159,000th call, Five full time and one part time staff attorneys work full time on
the hotline along with 50-75 law student volunteers each year. Brooklyn Center
has accounted for 4,936 hotline calls since 1992.
Our Tenant Hotline Services to Brooklyn Center have helped save tenants at least
$35,261 in 2013. We have also helped to prevent the eviction of 24 Brooklyn
Center families in 2013. Last year alone we advised 237 renter households from
Brooklyn Center. The most common reasons Brooklyn Center residents call our
hotline are: evictions,repairs, notice to vacate, and security deposits. The need for
this service in Brooklyn Center is apparent -- Brooklyn Center residents already
rely on this valuable service.
By offering free tenant hotline services, HOME Line has been providing needed
services for those most vulnerable.
While our services are available to all renters free of charge, 99% of our Brooklyn
Center callers have low incomes; (71%) of these callers are women; 76% are
racial minorities. Our programs are aimed at low-income renters. We identify the
key demographics at the beginning of each call.
. Describe the anticipated results and accomplishments for your proposed program.
We anticipate assisting approximately 230 Brooklyn Center renter households over the
hotline during the program year, preventing 20 evictions, and saving tenants over $20,000
dollars in rent abatements and security deposits.
8. If you have previously been funded through CDBG funds, please provide a
brealcdown of the services that have been provided to Brooklyn Center residents and
the accomplishments.
10
In 2013, 237 Brooklyn Center renter households contacted HOME Line for Tenant
Page 2 o17
Hotline Services. This represents service to approximately 593 residents when all family
members have been counted. The cost to serve Brooklyn Center in 2014 is $9,167.
In 2013, HOME Line helped renters from Brooklyn Center:
o Recover and/or save an estimated $35,261.
o Prevent an estimated 24 evictions.
o Renters with repair issues who follow our advice are 37% more likely to get their
problem fixed than those who don't.
In landlord foreclosure, the average amount of days stayed after the sheriff's sale
by renters we have helped is 180 days, and the amount of money saved by renters in
landlord foreclosure is $11,870 in 2013.
INCOME BREAKDOWN
The vast majority (99%) of these callers are extremely-low, very-low or low-income.
These income categories are those used by the U. S. Department of H.U.D.:
Extremely Low: Incomes below 30% of metro median.
o Very Low: Incomes between 30% and 50% of metro median
Low: Incomes between 50% and 80% of metro median.
. Moderate: Incomes above 80% of metro median.
RACIAL BREAKDOWN
70% African American
24% Caucasian
3% Asian
3% Hispanic
GENDER BREAKDOWN
71% Female
29% Male
9.Have you ever been approved for CDBG funding and not met the reimbursement
requirements?
10 /
No
10.Please describe how you plan to record and report accomplishments and monitor
the results.
10 / 0
HOME Line records and documents all calls to our tenant hotline. We maintain these
records in a database. In addition to basic demographic information, HOME Line record
types of calls and follow up information and results when obtained. HOME Line analyzes
the overall information to monitor trends and challenges facing families in rental housing,
as well our overall impact in each community. HOME Line does and will continue to
provide reports to the city of Brooklyn Center.
11. Please describe your experience administering federal/public funds and how you
have been able to meet the compliance requirements. (please provide a copy of
previous annual and quarterly reports)
20 2. 0
HOME Line throughout its history has had a wide variety of local, state, and Federal
programs that provide funding for our services. This includes city, CDBG, County, State
and Federal funding. HOME Line has always complied with the various requirements of
all of these programs.
We have attached a copy of HOME Line's 2013 4 th quarter report. This report is
Page 3 o17
primarily for private foundations who support all of HOME Line's programs.
10 i 012.Do other entities provide Brooklyn Center residents the same, or similar, services
for which you are requesting funding? Briefly describe why your program is unique in
the service activity you are proposing to fund.
The only other organizations providing similar services for tenants in Brooklyn Park are
the Minnesota Attorney General's office and Legal Aid. The AG's office refers tenants
with questions to our hotline, but does not give tenants specific advice. We often confer
with colleagues at Legal Aid on litigation and court issues and on legislative matters.
However, our hotline, while providing a service similar to that of Legal Aid, does not
have the extremely low income requirements of Legal Aid. We are able to serve the
working poor. We will also advise renters on any issue that renters face as part of their
rental agreement.
13.Please describe how this program is ready for implementation and what steps
would need to be taken before this program can be started.
20
Program is ongoing
14. Please describe how your program meets one or more of the City's priorities
listed below. (Check all that apply)
20
0 Civic Engagement I
Community Image 1 11:
0 Focused Redevelopment
Financial Stability I
• Vibrant Neighborhoods
Describe:When renters have problems involving their homes, those who don't know their
rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that is unsafe, lose security
deposits that are rightfully theirs, or make decisions that cost them their home. HOME
Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable.
Renter families become civicly engaged in resolving their rental issues, giving their
families more financial stability and contributing to the health and safety, as well as the
good repair of their rental housing. Engaged tenants, involved in their communities and
proactively dealing with tenant issues, increase their families financial stability, and
improve the quality of housing, helping to create Vibrant Neighborhoods.
By signing the statement below you are certifying your organization has the capacity to participate in the
CDBG process and can provide the required documentation in the implementation schedule.
I certify that all answers to the above questions are true and accurate. I understand that any false
information on or omission of information from this supplemental application will be cause for rejection
of this application or termination funding
Page 4 o17
Applicant's Signature -‘t,_.k.k--\t :■Lz_ 'it le:Executive Director Date: 1/14/14
Received by: C 4/e( v ./A Date:Time:
Page 5 of 7
3455 Bloomington Ave
Minneapolis, MN 55407
Office Phone: 612/728-5770
Hotline: 612/728-5767
Fax: 612/728-5761
MEMO TO: HOME Line Funders and Supporters
FROM: Beth Kodluboy, Executive Director
SUBJECT: Quarterly report (October 1 — December 31, 2013)
DATE: January 10, 2014
Executive Summary
Tenant Hotline
u In 2013, HOME Line served 11302 renter families through the Tenant Hotline, prevented
approximately 915 evictions, and saved renter households over $1,902,663 in security deposits and
rent abatements.
▪Over 12,746 different visitors viewed over 32,256 pages of legal and advocacy resources on the
HOME Line website. In 2013, 40,791 different visitors accessed HOME Line's website for
information, downloading legal forms and learning about our programs.
▪11,702 is the highest call volume in HOME Line's 21 year history.
Organizing
•HOME Line organizers and interns continued efforts in our volunteer outreach campaign. Interns
conducted outreach to local non-profit organizations and institutions; particularly strong
connections were made with those serving members of the Hmong American Community. One
intern organized and facilitated a rich discussion with staff fiom the Hmong American Mutual
Assistance Association (HAMAA), the Hennepin County Library and Twin Cities Arc, asking
for insights into ways HOME Line can better serve the Hmong American Community, make our
services more visible within the community, and how might we leverage our resources to serve
individuals with language barriers. This conversation led to additional meetings and outreach
opportunities with HAMAA.
Public Policy
▪HOME Line staff continued our efforts behind the 2014 Tenant Bill of Rights—a broad selection of
state tenant/landlord law changes that would further protect and empower M8innesota tenants.
Organizers confirmed legislative authors for a number of the proposals and will be working until the
beginning of the 2014 legislative session to strengthen support of this effort.
mi Interns and organizers conducted outreach to stakeholders that range from tenants to CAP agencies
and county homeless prevention programs.
HOME Line
January 10, 2014
Page 2
Tenant Hotline Quarterly Report
October 1 —December 31, 2013
HOME Line's Tenant Hotline provides renters with legal information about their tenant rights. The
hotline has grown from serving suburban Hennepin County in 1992 to serving the whole state except
Minneapolis (which HOME Line does cover for a low-cost attorney consultation). Minneapolis
Housing Services discontinued their service on 12/31/2011.
Calls Received:
Evictions Prevented:
*Total Money:
Volunteer Hours:
Quarter
2,728
201
$359,688
232.5
Year to Date
11,702
915
$1,902,663
1,879.5
Opening to Date
159,703
11,792
$21,067,436
40,458.5
Tenant/LL Law Trainings 12
67 1,767
Attendees 385 1,655 49,347
Type of Training's this quarter
College Students
High School Students
Landlords
Social Workers
Trainings
1
4
6
1
Total Trained
7
140
213
25
Top Ten Caller Issues Race
1.Repairs 573 African American:18.2%
2.Evictions 333 Asian/Pacific Island:2.2 %
3.Security Deposits 313 Caucasian 70.6%
4.Break Lease Questions 210 Hispanic 2.8 %
5.Notice to Vacate 194 Native American 1.0%
6.Bedbug/Infestation 115 Other 1.0%
7.Landlord Foreclosures 106 Declined 4.2 %
8.Lack of Heat 104
9.Privacy/Intrusion 102
10.Lease Questions 95
Total money saved is based on amount of money tenants recovered after calling HOME Line in Rent abatements, security
deposits and returned fees. This research was completed by a University of Minnesota School of Statistics Ph.D. Candidate.
Milestone
HOME Line's tenant hotline took a record number of calls in 2013. The previous record number was in
2010 (11,695 calls). This year, we took 11,702. Calls came in from all but one county in Minnesota in
the last calendar year.
HOME Line
January 10, 2014
Page 3
Senior Housing Attorney Paul Birnberg worked with tenants in Kellogg Square, a large apartment
complex in St. Paul. The Landlord didn't comply with state law and improperly charged tenants for a
shared utility meter. We estimate that HOME Line's work saved over $36,000 in improper fees.
Policy Advocacy
O During this quarter we held initial lobbying meetings for the proposed 2014 Tenant Bill of Rights—a
broad selection of possible state tenant/landlord law changes that would further protect and empower
Minnesota tenants. We have confirmed legislative authors for a number of the proposals and will be
working until the beginning of the 2014 legislative session to strengthen support of this effort.
•Interns and organizers conducted outreach to stakeholders that range from tenants to CAP agencies
and county homeless prevention programs. Of particular note, an intern and organizer met with
education staff at Hubbs Education Center, an adult learning center that is part of St. Paul Public
Schools. An instructor is partnering with HOME Line to engage ELL students on basic renters'
rights and how their experiences relate to our Bill of Rights proposals.
•Interns contributed over 239 hours in organizing and policy advocacy this quarter.
Organizing
•HOME Line continued work under our Tenant Resource Network HUD grant, engaging tenants in
several at-risk Project Based Section 8 properties across the state. Most notably, we have been
organizing tenants in Willmar where their homes are threatened by disrepair and owner bankruptcy.
We also learned that a local nonprofit has a purchase agreement pending for Hickory Ridge in
Plymouth, a property where we have been organizing residents for years.
Organizing Quarterly Report
October 1 — December 31, 2013
Issue-oriented Building Organizing & Subsidized Housing Preservation
HOME Line organizers are monitoring preservation status and interacting with tenants in many
buildings that can be considered at risk. Below is a sample of buildings which we consider most at-risk.
& J / Four Seasons Marshall 3 properties, 24 units each, 37 RA units total RD
The owner of these three properties applied to prepay last year and have been going through the USDA
process since then. USDA found that the prepayment would have a negative effect on minorities in the
community, and will be requiring the owner to offer the apartments for sale. A local nonprofit is
interested and is awaiting the sale postings. Last quarter organizers doorknocked the buildings to inform
tenants about this process, and spoke to the owner about his decision. We continue to monitor the
property and advise tenants as the USDA-required sale process approaches.
HickiLyizikePlymotAkI 8 units ITUDNIIIFY A
HOME Line has been actively working with tenants at this property for years following reports of poor
conditions and bad management practices. We learned this quarter that a well-established local nonprofit
developer purchased the property as part of a preservation effort to keep Hickory Ridge affordable. The
tenants who have been active in standing up for their rights and publicizing the need for preservation of
the Section 8 deserve credit for making this property a key target for local and state preservation efforts.
We will continue to assist the tenants here to ensure the ownership/management transition is smooth and
HOME Line
January 10, 2014
Page 4
the longstanding capital needs are addressed.
Oklee Rentals Oklee 9 Section 8 units HUD/MHFA
The owner of this property gave notice of a Section 8 opt-out effective 4/25/14. HUD recently approved
the property as TRN eligible. Original information from MHEA was that the owner was considering
incentives to preserve the property, however the owner has now become unresponsive. This quarter we
sent information to tenants to initiate communication and engage residents in the process.
Phillips Towers Ants Minneapolis 88 Section 8 units (out of 107 total) HUD/MHFA
This TRN-eligible property is facing a mortgage maturity within the next year that will affect the tenants
who are not covered under the Section 8 contract. We contacted the owner to request that they prepay
the mortgage to protect tenants via vouchers. We continue to work with affected tenants who we
doorknocked earlier in the year to contact the owner directly with their concerns about possibly not
being protected on the mortgage maturity date.
Riverview Apts Elk River 7 Section 8 units (out of 24 total) HUD/MHFA
The owner gave notice to opt-out of the 7 Section 8 units effective August 2014. The property is owned
by a nonprofit. We are attempting to communicate with the ownership and management about the
proposed opt-out.
Willow Run II Wilhnar 42 Section 8 units (out of 84 total) ILUD/MITF'A
This apartment complex was in financial default over the past year and a HUD foreclosure sale was
scheduled in June. Negotiations between HUD, MHFA, and SWMHP prior to the sale meant the
property was likely to be preserved long-term under nonprofit ownership. Instead, a day before the
foreclosure sale the owner declared bankruptcy. The owner requested permission in the bankruptcy court
to sell the property to a proposed buyer, without retaining any meaningful rent restrictions or tenant
protections. HOME Line doorknocked during the summer and has held numerous meetings with
residents since then. Residents formed a tenant association and were represented in the bankruptcy
hearing in November. The bankruptcy judge took HUD's approval of the sale as adequate evidence for
his approval—meaning the unrestricted sale can go through. We are working with HPP and residents to
file a court case to stop the sale and require that preservation of the affordable rents and tenant
protections remain in place.
Top Ten Reasons For Calls (2013)
1.Evictions 44
2.Repairs 33
S. Notice to Vacate 25
4. Security Deposit 22
5 Break Lease 16
6.Bed Bugs/Infestation 14
7.Foreclosure 10
8.Leases 10
9.Privacy Intrusion 8
i0. Heat 6
Callers' Income 2013
HOME Line's Tenant Hotline in Brooklyn Center: 2013
O vERvLew
In 2013, 237 Brooklyn Center renter households contacted HOME Line for Tenant Hotline Services.
This represents service to approximately 593 residents when all family members have been counted. The
cost to serve Brooklyn Center in 2014 is $9,167.
HIGnuca-rs
In 2013, HOME Line helped renters from Brooklyn Center:
•Recover and/or save an estimated $35,261.
•Prevent an estimated 24 evictions.
•Renters with repair issues who follow our advice are 37%
more likely to get their problem fixed than those who
don't.
•In landlord foreclosure, the average amount of days
stayed after the sheriffs sale by renters we have helped is
180 days, and the amount of money saved by renters in
landlord foreclosure is $11,870 in 2013.
INCOMI RREALTOWN
The vast majority (99%) of these callers are extremely-
low, very-low or low-income. These income categories
are those used by the U. S. Department of H. U. D.:
•Extremely Low: Incomes below 30% of metro
median_
•Very Low: Incomes between 30% and 50% of
metro median
c Low: Incomes between 50% and 80% °inlet°
median_
•Moderate: Incomes above. 80% of metro median.
RACIAL BREAIDOWN
GENDER BREALT OWN
70% African American
71% Female24% Caucasian
29% Male3% Asian
3% Hispanic
REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUB“C
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014
General Information:
City: Brooklyn Center
Co-Applicant: HOME tine
Type of Entity: Private Subrecipient
Project Name: Tenant Hotline Services
Contact: Beth Kodluboy
Phone; 612-728-5770 x107
Activity Data: (par council rosolutlen, l(applicable)
CMG Funding Request: $ 9,167,00 Resolution:
Is this an existing CDBG-funded project? Yes
Project Location: 3455 Bloomington Ave, Minneapolis, MN 55407
Describe below the activity in detail, including priority need(s) it meets within the 2010-2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click link below.
2010-2014 liennenin County Consolidated Plan Chanter
Renters make up nearly 4,016 households In Brooklyn Center, and many of these families have low incomes. When renters have problems involving their homes, those who
don't know their rights and responsibilities can end up living in housing that is unsafe, lose security deposits that are rightfully theirs, or make decisions that cost them their
home. HOME Line provides renters with the tools necessary to keep their homes safe and affordable.
HOME Line's Tenant Hotline provides free legal advice to tenants about landlord/tenant law, These services prevent problems ranging from homelessness to illness from
unsafe living conditions, and result In reducing the use of the city's emergency resources.
The county has specified Family Services / Housing Counseling as a high priority. Specifically, the county has a five-year goal to "Support tenant advocacy and tenant hotline
s ervices to 5,000 persons."
We anticipate assisting approximately 230 Brooklyn Center renter households over the tenant hotline during the program year, preventing 20 evictions, and saving tenants
over $20,000 dollars In rent abatements and security deposits.
Please choose the activity, and national objective that this project will meet from the drop down lists below. The activity priority level Is noted next to each dropdm,
item as: it (High), M (Medium), I. (Low).
Activity: Housing Services-I-I
National Objective:
If the proposed project Is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority in your community.
Please describe anticipated results/accomplishments the project will have:
We anticipate assisting approximately 230 Brooklyn Center renter households over the tenant hotline during the program year, preventing 20 evictions, and saving tenants
over $20,000 dollars In rent abatements and security deposits.
Approximate number of persons to receive services: 230
implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/within the first 12 months.
Task: Maintain existing hotline service program levels for Brooklyn Center residents Date: 1-Jul-13
Task: Date:
Task: Date:
Task: Date:
Task: Date:
Task: Date:
Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate,
FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE
CMG 9,167.00 Brooklyn Center CDFIG Program Year 2014
Prior Year COBG Funding -This Project 6,666.00 Brooklyn Center CDBG Program Year 2013
Other (..,pticilA
Other (5pectfy)
Other (suecim
Other (specifyj
Other (1)L.!-:11),)
Project Total $ 15,833.00
. •
Signature: 1 j.41 Date: V30/2.014
Printed Name: ,Beth Kodluboy Title: Executive Director
L/M income Area Benefit
Attachment III — CEAP Application and Request for Funding
CITY OFBROCEE3WR ,UHPIVEM
A GREAT PLACE 10 START, A GREAT PLACE TO STAY WWW.cityafbrooklyncentenorg
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
FY2014 (July 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2014)
Application Request for City of Brooklyn Center Funds
Supplemental Application Due: Tuesday January 21, 2014 by 4:30 PM
Public Hearing: February 10, 2014
YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM
TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN APPLICANT
Organization Name:CEAP
Program Name:Meals on Wheels
Purpose:Expansion of hot meal delivery to homebound seniors and adults with disabilities.
Nlinitnum Requirements
*in order to be considered for these program you must 'met the Minimum requirements.
Yes No
1.Does your Organization have a 501 (c)(3) status?M 0
2.Do the activities benefit at least 51% low- and moderate-income households with less
than 80% Area Median Income (AMI) as stated by HUD and are you able to provide
Income-eligible certification for all clients?
M I I
3.Does your organization have the staff capacity to administer the program?IXI
4.Do you understand and are capable of providing all required documentation to obtain
reimbursement?
M I I
5. Which of the following Eligible Public Service Activates will the program provide?
(Choose All that apply)
0 Employment services
0 Crime Prevention and public services 0 n
0 Health Services LI
0 Substance abuse services II II
0 Housing Counseling I I
c Education programs Li
0 Energy Conservation II II
o Services for senior citizens N.LI
0 Services for homeless persons I I
Page 1 of 6
Dcsigned Qualifications:
(Each question has a maximum score and will be scored as part of the
i ccommendatiou process.)
Max
Points
Scurf:
(Office
use
only)
6.Proposed program description. Be concise, yet thorough in describing the activity
10 I 0of only the program for which funding is being sought, and in only as much detail as
needed. Include Brooklyn Center local need(s) and population served. CDBG funds
cannot be used to replace current program funds. If this is an existing program and
your organization did not receive Brooldyn Center CDBG funds last year, the funds
must be used to expand the program.
Meals On Wheels is a vital program in our community. Over 100(over 25,000 annually)
hot meals are distributed each day,Monday through Friday through trusted, reliable
volunteers from our community. Members of our aging population or adults with
disabilities need a hot meal daily that they are unable to provide for themselves. Meals On
Wheels is unique in that it also provides daily contact with a caring individual in the
community and that vital "check in" and follow up if needed. The requested funds will
allow us to expand this program through communication, outreach, and volunteer
development within our diverse community by offering African, Hispanic and Asian
meals. We know we have many elders and homebound residents in our community who
would appreciate culturally appropriate meals and would take this option if offered.
CEAP piloted this program to success in 2011 and the meals are now available to order
through our commercial froviders to ex sand this program.
7.Describe the anticipated results and accomplishments for your proposed program.
CEAP serves a diverse population (11%African,15% Hispanic,5% Asian) and many
seniors who do not take advantage of hot meal programs because they are unfamiliar with
the concept and with the food offered. This expansion will bridge that gap and provide
another community connection for individuals that usually do not have resources or
supportive relationships. We will also use our valuable partnership with Hennepin County
Human Service and Public Health to communicate and refer clients into this program.Our
goal for expansion of services is 15% per day by the end of 2014 specifically to our
Asian, African, and Hispanic neighbors in need of meals.(15 clients per day)
8. If you have previously been funded through CDBG funds, please provide a
breakdown of the services that have been provided to Brooklyn Center residents and
the accomplishments.
10
CEAP's Meals on Wheels and Senior Chore Services provides seniors and adults with
disabilities in Brooklyn Center the help they need that allows them to stay in their own
homes. Last year CEAP served 12,600 hot meals in Brooklyn Center though our Meals on
Wheels Program and performed 612 chores. Since our move to the Northwest Family
Service Center in the fall of 2012, we have seen a 15% increase in request for services for
our seniors.
CEAP will transition our Senior Chore Program to H.O.M.R (Senior Community
Services in the Spring of 2014 and partner to provide referrals for those vital services and
continue our focus on building the capacity of our Meals On Wheels program. These
services serve the community in the following ways:
. Provides 4 link for the resident to other social services and to identify
residents who may have other special needs.
Page 2 of 6
Fosters independence and supports social and mental health.
. Creates savings because of the the utilization of volunteers.
Fosters vital community connections of residents, businesses, Faith
communities, students and seniors.
9.Have you ever been approved for CDBG funding and not met the reimbursement
requirements?
10 / 0
CEAP has always met the reporting and reimbursement requirements.
10.Please describe how you plan to record and report accomplishments and monitor
the results.
10
CEAP tracks all client activity and information on Senior Express database system.We
monitor our outcomes and expectations using this information and report accordingly.
11.Please describe your experience administering federal/public funds and how you
have been able to meet the compliance requirements. (please provide a copy of
previous annual and quarterly reports)
20 2-0
CEAP has 25+ years submitting required reports. CEAP is diligent in the tracking of
program outcomes, financial reports /accounting and progamming data (Family Services
and Senior Services)
12.Do other entities provide Brooklyn Center residents the same, or similar, services
for which you are requesting funding? Briefly describe why your program is unique in
the service activity you are proposing to fund.
10
No. CEAP Meals on Wheels not only provides tangible services that meet basic needs
but also provide critical connections and a daily touch base for health, wellness and
safety.
13.Please describe how this program is ready for implementation and what steps
would need to be taken before this program can be started.
20 2. a
Meals On Wheels is a core program of CEAP. Expansion of this program to meet the
needs of our diverse community would include the following initiatives. 1) Development
of a communication plan that is appropriate for the audience (on-line and printed
materials in multiple langauges) 2)Recruitment of volunteers who are trained and able to
communicate and develop relationships with the residents receiving meals.3)Work with
our vendor to endure the availability of these meals as we expand the program.
14.Please describe how your program meets one or more of the City's priorities
listed below. (Check all that apply)
20
•Civic Engagement
, Community Image NI
o Focused Redevelopment I
•Financial Stability
o Vibrant Neighborhoods IXI
Describe:
By signing the statement below you are certifying your organization has the capacity to participate in the
CDBG process and can provide the required documentation in the implementation schedule.
Page 3 of 6
I certify that all answers to the above questions are true and accurate. I understand that any false
information on or omission of information from this supplemental application will be cause for rejection
of this application or termination funding
Applicant's Signatur -Title:President Date:January 14,2014
Received by: Date: 1 1 - I LI Time:
, 0 p
Page 4 of 6
REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CMG PROGRAM YEAR 2014
General Information:
City:
Co-Applicant;
Type of Entity:
Project Name:
Contact:
Phone:
Brooklyn Center
Community Emergency Assistance Programs (CRAP)
Private Subrecipient
Meals On Wheels expansion to our culturally diverse community.
Clare Brumback
763-450-3666
Activity Data: (per council resolution, if appliceb14
CDBG Funding Request: $15,000 Resolution:
Is this an existing CDBG-funded pro)ect? Yes
Project Location: 7051 Brooklyn Blvd, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429
Describe below:the activity In detail, Including priority need(s) It meets within the 2010-2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click link below.
2010-2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan Chapter 5
Meals 0-n Wheels is a vital program in our community. Over 100(over 25,000 annually) hot meals are distributed Monday through Friday through trusted, reliable volunteers
Irons our community. Members of our aging population or adults with disabilities need a hot meal daily that they are unable to provide for themselves. Meals On Wheels is
unique in that it also provides daily contact with a caring individual in the community and that vital "check in" and follow up if needed. The funds will allow us to expand this
program through communication, outreach, and volunteer development to expand our program to our diverse community by offering African, Hispanic and Asian meals. We
know we have many elders and homebound residents in our community who would appreciate culturally appropriate meals and would take this option if offered. CEAP piloted
this program to success in 2011 and the meals are now available to order through our commercial providers to expand this program.
Please choose the activity, and national objective that thls project will meet from the drop down lists below. The activity priority level is noted next to each dropdown item
as: H (High), M (Medium), L (Low).
Activity: Senior-H
National Objective: L/M Income Limited Clientele
If the proposed project is a love urban county priority, you must explain below why It has a higher priority in your community.
Please describe anticipated results/accomplishments the project will have:
CRAP serves a diverse population (11%African,15% Hispanic,5% Asian) and many seniors who do not take advantage of hot meal programs because they are unfamiliar with the
concept and with the food offered. This expansion will bridge that gap and provide another community connection for individuals that usually do not have resources or
supportive relationships. We will also use our valuable partnership with Hennepin County Human Service and Public Health to communicate and refer clients into this program.
Because the daily connections are through community volunteers, this program initiates and strengthens relationships that might not otherwise exist and follow our core value
of "Growing a Stronger Community"-
Approximate number of personals receive services: 20/ approx 4500 meal
Implementation Schedule: Identify Major project tasks to occur during/within the first 12 months.
Task: Intake a assessment of clients
Task: Outreach For Senior Servies (MOW) with all community partners
Task: Recruitment and training of volunteers
Task; Evaluation and client surveys
Task:
Task:
Budges Specify total project budget by major funding
SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE
CDBG
•
CDBG Brooklyn Park and MMA
Program Fees
Other (.sparifyi
Other (specify)
10,000.00
24,845.00
80,000.00
Attachment IV — Avenues for Youth Application and Request for Funding
::C■?:000).)) ig,101)
A GREAT PLACE TO START, A GREAT PLACE TO STAY www.oilyothroohlyilootitorang
urbmi 11ennepiti Comity Community Development Block I'vogram :WIG)
reV701 ,1 (July 1, 2013 thin June 30, 201 ,1)
Application Request mi(Ity 11rooltlyn Center Om&
!PPLC-:1,11 ()RCA /ROE tt1li [1 1 Yaio;apif 20:1141 4:3C vb‘li
Public Hearing: February 10, 2014
YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM
TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN APPLICANT
Organization Name:Avenues for Homeless Youth
Program Name:Brooklyn Avenues
Purpose:Shelter and transitional housing pro tam with intensive su ort services serving homeless youth
in the northwest suburbs
Miuimum idequiremenis
*in order to he considered for these propram you must meet the Mininium requirements.
Yes
_
No
I. Does your Organization have a 501 (c)(3) status?IA El
2, Do the activities benefit at least 51% low- and moderate-income households with less
than 80% Area Median Income (AMI) as stated by HUD and are you able to provide
Income-eligible certification for all Clients?
Fq
3.Does your organization have the staff capacity to administer the program?151 IX)4.Do you understand and are capable of providing all required documentation to obtain
reimbursement?
5. Which of the following Eligible Public Service Activates will the program provide?
(Choose All that apply)
0 Employment services El 0
o Crime Prevention and public services 0 0
0 Health Services X
0 Substance abuse services CI
o Housing Counseling 0 LI
O Education programs igl
0 . Energy Conservation 0
_ 0 Services for senior citizens
o Services for homeless persons E1 I I
Paget of 7
iPesigacti Qualifications;
(Each question has a maximum SCOM and wilt he stored as pari Of the
recontmeada(ioa proctss.)
Max
Points
Score
(Office
usr(»4)•
6. Proposed program description. Be concise, yet thorough in describing the activity
of only the program for which funding is being sought, and in only as much detail as
needed. Include Brooklyn Center local need(s) and population served. CDBG funds
cannot be used to replace current program funds. If this is an existing program and
your organization did not receive Brooklyn Center CDBG funds last year, the funds
must be used to expand the program.
"Brooklyn Avenues" will be 10-bed shelter and transitional housing program with
intensive support services for homeless youth from the northwest suburbs, ages 16 to 21.
It will be modeled after Avenues for Homeless Youth's successful North Minneapolis
Shelter and Transitional Housing program. The population of homeless youth is rapidly
escalating in the nothwest suburbs. The Brooklyn Centel' School District identified 27
homeless youth in 2010-11 and 37 in 2012.-13. This is just the youth in school and does
not account for homeless youth who are not in school. Making matters worse, area police
departments have been combatting a large sex trafficking ring that preys upon homeless
young people.
Youth will be referred to Brooklyn Avenues by -school counselors, police, street and
school outreach workers, faith-based organizations and other partners. At Brooklyn
Avenues, youth will first find safety and stability. Youth counselors and case managers
will provide direct care and guidance for the youth 24 hours per day. Upon arrival, youth
will first work with staff to address their immediate, crisis needs. We will provide:
Bedroom and bathroom facilities
- Three nutritious meals per day
Personal hygiene supplies
-Laundry facilities
- Clothing
- Transportation assistance
- Computer lab and study space
Once youth feel safe and stable, they can access intensive supportive services designed to
help them identify and pursue long-term goals and successfully transition into young
adulthood. Supportive services will include:
Case management
Family counseling
Nursing consultation, health education and medical referrals
- Mental health assessments, therapy and referrals
- Education and employment support
- Legal and immigration support
- Life skills training
- Long-tenn housing search support
- Empowerment and engagement activities, including service learning projects
Community volunteers will be involved in program delivery (e.g., tutors, youth
engagement), as well as fundraising, facility maintenance and collecting clothing and
youth supplies.
10 IZ
Page 2 of 7
.„..,..D esertb efifeanticipated results iin 'ac.COthr s e ts for your poposed progia m, ::•',:., ... i;.. .:;1•!:.
The overall goal of Brooklyn Avenues will be to support 30 to 40 homeless youth every
year so they move from "surviving the streets to thriving young adults." To that end,
Brooklyn Avenues will focus on having a lasting impact on youth supported so they
achieve the youth outcomes, both objective and subjective, listed below.
Attitude: Youth have more hope and a positive future orientation; youth have an
increased positive attitude; youth feel more motivated; youth build trust among their
peers, and youth show pride in progress they have made.
Skills: Youth build life skills; youth pursue their personal interests; youth have improved
self-worth; youth engage in self-care and physical activity; youth improve nutrition; youth
seek medical and mental health care; youth avoid destructive behaviors, and youth follow
through on commitments.
Connections: Youth have connections with caring adults; youth make connections with
community resources; youth are more willing to let people help, and youth are interested
in helping others.
Stability: Youth gain and maintain employment or public benefits, as needed; youth learn
and manage financial responsibilities; youth secure and manage long-term, stable
housing; youth pursue training and educational goals, and youth pursue personal health
and wellness
In addition, the program will have 1 or 2 "emergency shelter beds" each night, providing
youth with a safe place to sleep on an emergency basis and the ability to start making
supportive connections.
..,,...
If ii-ti , a% e.- rOtetittS. .6. pi ri e. • it - BGI'. ' ‘v. 6iS'O: 1. -i .i,f ..,..4i ..,.,i:.... ,...----,..-:::•V:S'S'0".* ,Z•7---zfA,'.• " -•'.:- :
•
..e CIWA.X! 4,061-409.0, 41 : ha 'e 99.1V‘raY1 9 V. i 0 .e. et. wi en s
'::?:' 'P ,':':.:'•'.'-'•• ,:; . '•=vi•*•:-!' . • ',.-.,:•-• , ; ,
e accomplisbni ens•
Avenues has not been previously funded through CDBG funds.
.k...A04': o6iii .6ti3i&: for. -,.._ ., .. and110 met thePIII1 lySe A' - • ''• =:.;linemen. . .... ..,A+, . . .
No
6Aie.i-41 e:.14ii.'lii an. o:i!:4031'. report 00111 is otifslin' O
0:Yesu..
., .
:
Avenues' evaluation efforts will include statistical data collection through our intake and
exit forms, case management evaluations, and an online self-assessment survey youth will
take multiple -dines during their time with Avenues. This information will be reported as
required for receiving CDBG funding and will be shared with partners and the community
through Advisory Council meetings made up of key leaders and partners from the
communities served, through Avenues' e-newsletter and in annual report.
.:.-.:.*P-,c100,126- 0.1*6 410.0400.'40*1000 „ .0011.P01i0::.,.. ow you
have 'b een 'able-16'4m the,6i.ckilitirid.d!-ie-kiiiiiirliii.th:. eas'eliiimiides 6,:oopy,
•20
Page 3 of 7
previous annual and quarterly reports)I
Avenues has significant experience, previous and current, administering public funds.
Currently, we have grants and contracts with the US Department of Human Services,
Federal Youth Services Bureau (FYSB); MN Department of Human Services, Office of
Economic Opportunity; Hennepin County Human Services; Department of Education
Food & Nutrition, and Group Residential Housing. We have met and will continue to
meet all compliance requirements. See attached sample reports.
12.Do other entities provide Brooklyn Center residents the same, or similar, services
for which you are requesting funding? Briefly describe why your program is unique in
the service activity you are proposing to fund.
10 5—
There are no youth-specific, site-based shelter and transitional housing beds for homeless
youth in ciisis in the northwest suburbs. The YMCA's Youth Intervention Services has
some scattered site transitional apartments for youth stable enough to be earning an
income. But most homeless youth do not have adequate income or the skills to live
independently. They need the support of a program like Brooklyn Avenues to get them
on their feet and headed toward successful independent living. Today, their only option is
to leave their home community and head to the city for shelter and services. , But the city
shelters are full 100% of the time and turn many youth away every day, leaving the
suburbs' young people literal' on the streets.
13.Please describe how this program is ready for implementation and what steps
would need to be taken before this program can be started.
20 I 0
This program is slated to open in September 2014. Timeline, parties responsible/involved
and steps to be taken include:
January 2014: Avenues and the Brooklyn Park EDA - Memorandum of Understanding
signed 1/13/14, the EDA is moving to purchase property.
January 2014: Community - Fundraising Committee formed 1/9/14 and community
fundraising campaign has kicked off.
December 2013-January 2014: Avenues - SHIP grant request submitted to Hennepin
County, meetings with Heading Home Hennepin, FYSB TLP grant submitted, CDBG
grants requests submitted to northwest suburb cities now in process.
February 2014: Avenues - Licensing application submitted to MN DHS.
February - June 2014: Avenues and EDA - Facility acquired and renovated by the EDA,
long-term, no cost lease signed to operate Brooklyn Avenues, Avenues begins to set up
facility for program.
July - August 2014: Avenues - Facility set up continues, furnishings acquired, staff hired
and trained, outreach to community partners continues.
September 2014: Avenues opens!
14. Please describe how your program meets one or more of the City's priorities
listed below, (Check all that apply)
20 1 0
o Civic Engagement VI
Page 4 of 7
o Community Image
o Focused Redevelopment L
o Financial Stability
o Vibrant Neighborhoods
Describe:This program clearly aligns with Brooklyn Center's priorities around Civic
Engagement, Community huage and Vibrant Neighborhoods.
1, Many mnembeis of the Brooklyn Center community arc involved in planning and
fundraising for this new program. Community volunteers will be integral to program
delivery and support going forward. A Community Advisory Council will be created to
ensure the program is connected to the larger community.
2.The program will help the community's homeless youth move from 'surviving the
streets to thriving young adults.' As a m'esult youth will be able to become positive,
contributing members of the community, boosting the community's image and ensurin g
neighborhoods arc vibrant.
3.This new program also will help area police combat the growth in sex trafficking,
which Ineys upon homeless youth, especially immigrant youth. Again, this will help
Brooklyn Center achieve its goals for a positive community image and vibrant
mieigliborhoods.
By signing the statement below you are certifying your organization has the capacity to participate in the
CDBG process and can provide the required documentation in the implementation schedule.
I certify that all answers to the above questions are true and accurate. I understand that any false
information on or omission of information from this supplemental application will be cause for rejection
of this application or termination funding
Applicants signatllre/' Ytxecutive Director Date:O 1/21/14
Received by: /ji(crso. Date: 2 \ 1 Time: ;: (2cJ p
Pageof7
REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014
GeneraI Information:
City: Brooklyn Center
Co-Applicant: Avenues for Homeless Youth
Type of Entity: Public Subrecipient
Project Name: Brooklyn Avenues Shelter & Transitional Housing Program
Contact: Terry Velasquez, Director of Development
Phone: 612-522-1690 Ext. 112
Activity Data:
CDBG Funding Request: $ 5,000.00 Resolution:
Is this an existing COBG-funded project? No
Project Location: Brooklyn Park, MN
Describe below the activity in detail, including priority need(s) it meets tvithin the 2010-2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click link below.
2010-2014 Fiennenin County Consolidated Plan Chanter 5
Avenues will hire and seek reimbursement for staff time of an Overnight Youth Counselor. Youth counselors ensure the safety and security of the youth, create a positive
community environment, support youth as they heal from the trauma they have experienced and prepare to secure and maintain stable housing.Youth Counselors ensure youth
experience Avenues as a safe, respectful, clean and well-organized environment by:
1)Fostering trusting relationships.
2)Meeting basic needs (etc., distributing personal care supplies and clothing, preparing meals, etc.).
3)Supervising youth and establishing routines.
4)Coaching independent living skills.
5)Addressing conflict and responding to crisis situations.
6)Managing house activities (e.g., answering phone and door, cleaning, conducting intakes, supervising chores, etc.).
7) Ensuring activities are communicated and documented.
This activity meets the High Priority Need, Youth Services and Homeless Prevention and Housing Services. This is an area of particular priority as it provides outreach and
intervention services to homeless youth. In addition, it provides support services addressing the needs of immigrant youth - many of unborn are from African nations and
homeless.
Please choose the activity, and national objective that this project will meet from the drop down lists below. The activity priority level is noted next to each dropdown itern
as: .. (High), M (Medium), (Low).
Activity: Youth-H
National Objective: L/M Income Limited Clientele
If the proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why it has a higher priority in your community.
Please describe anticipated results/accomplishments the project trill have:
The overall goal of Brooklyn Avenues will he to support 30 to 40 homeless youth every year so they move from "surviving the streets to thriving young adults." To that end,
Brooklyn Avenues will focus on having a lasting impact on youth supported so they achieve the youth outcomes, both objective and subjective, listed below.
Attitude: Youth have more hope and a positive future orientation; youth have an increased positive attitude; youth feel more motivated; youth build trust among their peers,
and youth show pride in progress they have made.
Skills: Youth build life skills; youth pursue their personal interests; youth have Improved self-worth; youth engage in self-care and physical activity; youth improve nutrition;
youth seek medical and mental health care; youth avoid destructive behaviors, and youth follow through on commitments.
Approximate number of persons to receive services: 30 to 40 per year .
Implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/within the first 12 months.
Task: Program operation
Task: Provide safe, stable living environment
Task: Meet youths' crisis needs
Task: Provide intensive supportive services
Task:
Task:
Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings where appropriate.
FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE
COBG 25,000.00 !Brooklyn Park, Brooklyn Center, New Hope, Chrystal
Prior Year CDBG Funding -This Project -
Federal 100,000.00 1FY56 Transitional living Grant Program
State 152,000.00 Group Residential Housing, MN Homeless Youth Act
County 150,000.00 'Hennepin Co Supportive Housing Initiative Fund & County Services contract
City 30,000.00 City of Brooklyn Park Econ. Due. Authority In-kind rent
Foundations, Corps, Civic & Faith Orgs & Individuals 133,000.00
Project Total $ 590,000.00
4 6(44J
Date: 7/01/14 — 06/30/15
Date: 7/01/14 —06/30/15
Date: 7/01/14 —06/30/15
Date: 7/01/14-06/30/15
Date:
Date:
Signature:
Printed Name:
Date: 2-1 04_
Title: 04kA,-e)
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESG/RHYA)(611)
7/1/12 to 7/1/13 run date '7/31/13
VI. Number Assisted(unduplicated count)
. . _:a. Households : :Child 20 Total Adults t 116r
136 ;Men 51:i
Transgender 2::,Women , 63
! .
Total Individuals:! 136
5. Gender—Complete for All Persons
'Don't Know • 1
Female 76'
;Male 56
Transgender 1 3,
Total Individuals:1 136
:6. Age—Complete for All Persons
:Under 18 20
18-24 121'
Over 24 0• :
'Don't Know/refused 0
:Missing information
Total Individuals:; 136
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESG/RHYA)(611)
711/12 to :7/1/13 ;run date 7/31/13
VIII. Number Assisted by Race and Ethnicity
lAmerican Indian or Alaska Native (HUD)2
Asian (HUD)1
Black or African American (HUD)j 83
Don't Know (HUD)2
'Other 3
Refused (HUD)1
White (HUD)29
!American Indian and White 2
-!American Indian and Black 4
• ;Black and White 5,
!Other 4
Sum!136
Don't Know (HUD) 3.
Hispanic/Latino (HUD) 8.
Not Hispanic/Latino 122
Refused (HUD) 3
Sum: 136.
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESG/RHYA)(611)
-7/1/12 to 17/1/13 ;run date i7/31/13
IX Population served (by household type)
•Transgender
!Female to
,Transgender
:Male to
Sum:
Single person household ,Don't Know ,:Female ; Male ;Male ;Female •;
:a Single adults, no children
b Single youth, no children
:
1,:
63:
13!!
51:
5 1
2;
!
116,
20.
Sum:1 76 56 1!2:136:
Two-person household
Sum:
20
113
3
1
57
87_
1
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESG/RHYA)(611)
7/1/12 to ;7/1/13 run date 7/31/13
X. Homeless subpopulations
disabilities
'Chronic Health Condition
;Mental Health Problem (HUD 40118)
a.Domestic violence victim/survivor
Don't Know (HUD) 2
.No (HUD) 101
Yes (HUD) 38
;Missing
b.Runaway/throwaway Youth
!VS
h. Elderly (62+)
ages
i.Ever served on active duty?
No (HUD)
.;Yes (HUD)
Missing
j.Chronically Homeless?
No
Yes
*1Missing
k. Leave any of these in the last 3 months?
Active Duty Military
Adoptive home (from foster care system) 2
Client does not know 2
County Jail or Workhouse 16
Drug or Alcohol Treatment Facility
•Foster home (youth only) 4
Group Home
Juvenile Detention Center 4
Mental Health Treatment Facility or Hospital 5
No 112
Residence for people with physical disabilities 1
•Missing
Leave any of these 3 to 6 months ago?
!Active Duty Military
!Client does not know 50
!County Jail or Workhouse 8
!Drug or Alcohol Treatment Facility 2
!Foster home (youth only) 8•
!Group Home 4
!Juvenile Detention Center
!Mental Health Treatment Facility or Hospital 2. .
No 75
!Missing 2
How long since client had
permanent place to live?
!O (Prevention/Current Residence)
11 - 2 Years
11 - 3 Months
3-5 Years
-6 Months
6- 12 Months
l9 Years or More 1'
1 -
!Less than i Month 22..._
1Missing 1
35
29
16
24
25
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESG/RHYA)(611)
711/12 Ito 16/30/13 ;run date j7/31/13
XI. Number Persons housed by type of Residential housing
IFamily Members IFamily Members : I Households iFamily Members iH------------------: ;Missing:i 1
Barracks : 136 : Mobile home/trailer 0 ; I
Group Home 0 Other 0
Hotel I Motel 0 Scattered site apartment 0
Single.family house 0
Single Room 0
Multiple types 0
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESGIRHYA)(611)
7/1112 to .7/1/13 run date 7/31/13
XII. Assessment data for All Clients
Housing Status is required for all clients, regardless of age, as of June 1,
2010. This table includes only clients who are required to complete the
*question.
Housing Status at Entry 1clients , Percentage
1Don't Know (HUD)2:1.33%
'Imminently being their !housing (HUD)5 3.33%,
Literally Homeless (HUD)1001 66.67%
1 Missing 11 0.67%, .
IStably housed (HUD)1-0.67%.
-1Unstably housed and at-
risk of losing their housing
(HUD)41!27.33%:
Sum:150 :
Does client have a disability of long duration has always been required
for all adults; as of June 1, 2010, ills required for all clients, regardless
of age. This table Includes only clients who are required to complete
the question.
Does client have a
disability of long duration?,;clients i11,'Don't Know (HUD)5-
11 Nlo (HUD)-.•;:.•
101,
iRefused (HUD).1:!
1Yes (HUD).39
■ 2!1Sun.-, 148:,
ESGP Report
Avenues for Homeless Youth - Shelter (0E0 ESG/RHYA)(611)
-7/1/12 to 17/1/13 ;run date 7131113
Clients Avg LOS
136 4,566 33.57,
11131INPARK
POLICE DEPARTMENT
5.403 851h Ave. N.. Brooklyn Park, MN tit443•1698 None 763 493-822 -2 • Fax 763493-8393
7DD 783.493.8066
January 13,2014
To Whom It May Concern,
The Brooklyn Park Police Departnent emphatically supports the proposed Brook137n Avenues
Shelter and transitional housing program for homeless youth. The proposed 10-bed facility and
its supporting programs will provide our vulnerable homeless teens a safe place to sleep, and a
respite from their inevitable victimization by predators. It is the painful experience of our
department that homeless teens in Brooklyn Park are the most likely of all populations to be at
risk for physical and sexual assault. This is not acceptable.
As you read this letter, there are teens that are homeless and frightened. By partnering with
Avenues for Homeless Youth, you can bring hope, peace, and safety to hundreds of homeless
teens. The Avenues for Homeless Youth has proven itself as an effective organization and we
feel fortunate to be a partner with them.
Please support the Brooklyn Avenues Shelter and Transitional Housing Program. When you
do, you will save lives.
Respectfully,
Craig Enevoldsen
Chief of Police
FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT
FOR HEALTHY LIVING
FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
January 15,2014
To Whom It May Concern,
I am writing to urge your strong consideration and support of the proposal submitted by
Avenues for Homeless Youth seeking funding for "Brooklyn Avenues", a 10-bed shelter
and transitional housing program for homeless youth to be located in the City of
Brooklyn Park. The program will provide safe and stable shelter and transitional
housing with intensive support services for homeless youth, ages 16 to 21, from the
northwestern suburbs.
On any night in Minnesota, over 4,000 young people, age 21 and under, are homeless -
they are on their own and don't have a safe, stable place to sleep. They are literally
"surviving the streets." And Minnesota's population of homeless youth continues to
grow at an alarming rate.
Youth homelessness is rapidly escalating in the northwestern suburbs. Park Center High
School already identified 21 young people this school year who are homeless and the
Osseo School District has identified 245 homeless youth this year. Homeless youth are
at great risk of exploitation and harm, easily falling prey to sex-trafficking rings, and
oftentimes trading sex for food and shelter just to survive.
This is not an urban, suburban or even a rural problem - this is a statewide problem and
it's our problem. There are no youth-specific shelter and transitional housing beds for
homeless youth in crisis in the northwestern suburbs. When the police pick up a homeless
youth in the area and cannot bring them home, they have to bring them into Minneapolis for
shelter, most often to Avenues for Homeless Youth or Hope Street.
So community leaders asked Avenues for Homeless Youth to partner with the community
and open a shelter and transitional housing program in the northwest suburbs similar to
their North Minneapolis Shelter and Transitional Housing Program.
The community is very supportive of this effort and we hope you will give it your
support. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at
ipangPymcatwincities.org or 612.432.5129.
Lsa Pung)
Program Executive
YMCA Greater Twin Cities Youth Intervention Services
YMCA OF METROPOLITAN MINNEAPOLISEMMA B. HOWE FAMILY YMCA
8950 Springbrook Drive, Coon Rapids, MN 55433-5848
P 763 785 7882 F 763 725 9133 W yrncatwincites.org
_11
Office of the Mayor
I 131(1.1fil 5200 85th Ave. N., Brooklyn Park, MN 55443-4301 • Phone 763-424-8000 • Fax 763-493-8391
PARK TDD 763-493-8392
Mike Sable
Acting Director of Community Development
763-493-8005
December 18, 2013
To whom it may concern:
I am eager to express support for Brooklyn Avenues, a 10 bed homeless youth shelter and transitional
housing program, planned to open in the City of Brooklyn Park in 2014. Brooklyn Park is the second
largest and most diverse suburb in the metro area. We have a unique role in the region and it is our
city's mission to create a thriving community where opportunities exist for all. In that spirit, we believe
this project is essential to fill a large gap and meet critical needs for struggling youth in our community.
We have a growing population of homeless youth who, with the kind of support this project will provide,
can become full participants and contributors to our community. Without such support, these young
people are being preyed upon by sex traffickers we know are active in this area. As a community, it is
our responsibility to care for and support these young people.
On August 12, 2013, the City of Brooklyn Park's Economic Development Authority (EDA) heard from over
40 community members who expressed a deep desire to help homeless youth in need of temporary
housing and services. The EDA motioned unanimously to direct staff to establish a working partnership
with Avenues for Homeless Youth and to identify the steps needed to open a facility in Brooklyn Park.
The EDA discussed its desire to provide resources to acquire and rehabilitate a facility, which could be
leased at no cost to Avenues for Homeless Youth. The EDA anticipates funding the purchase of the
facility with existing Tax Increment funds that, by state statute, must be dedicated to affordable
housing. The EDA already owns a similar facility where it partners with Simpson Housing Services to
provide four units of transitional housing to single parents with children.
In addition to the support shown by the community and the EDA board, I am personally committed to
seeing Brooklyn Avenues open its door to serve our young people in need. At a recent special meeting
of the Brooklyn Area Ministerial Alliance, pledging started in support of this new program. I was proud
that the 2013 Brooklyn Park Mayor's prayer breakfast raised $1000 to demonstrate the commitment of
the local faith community and jump-start local fundraising efforts.
We look forward to working with you and other project partners to ensure Brooklyn Avenues serves the
needs of our community for years to come.
Sincerely,
r\,()••te:..!% ,Vs,
Mayor Jeffrey Lunde
City of Brooklyn Park
ww.brook lynpark .org
Park Center Senior High27° International Baccalaureate Weald School
January 11, 201.4
De h Ioon
Executive Director
Avenues for Homeless S'ciath
1708 Park Avenue N.
Minneputtc FAN 5S4
Dear ra:-_,b;
'Pk artr pleViai to write this letter of support for the establishenont of the new Hrooldyn Avenues! We he long
been concerned and aware uf tho high need for a safe r lorel shelter nr horne ,,ef's youth in the Northwest
suburbs and are gratnfu land extded riot tho needs of- our students are Ell.'l rig 8thiTtssed.
Over the years ; Park Center Sonln 1110 has had a consistently high ri umber of huniCiess students, partir.ula riv
Unncompo ified trill -lc -7's, who have no ncidts in the;t lives providin3 them with their hasic rweds. They a:c
Luttempting to finish the i7 Ifgh cIruil education vhiIa hoinp-, hungry Find honc ICS:1 Ond without emotional
support. There are very knitted shelter spaces avaVabla in the Mratnni are and ail have been located in the inner
city area. 'I hese shelters ern mos: often [oh wihi waiting lists, but even if they have an °pelf rig, the 6Istance
that can sttidents have In towel to slay In school is often overwhetrninE to the paint of students dropping out of
school,
Pa ri:r Center has a staff that is torurnitted to continuing the efforts to support a -id advocate for the basic needs
of our twiny students who struEle alone to get their education and '.'itiprove OKI' ves, We are proud to work
in partnership with the or8anz.atior5 and individuals V..110 folrOn.E,IY shaleour ternm'trunnf, such as Averwes for
Homeless. Youth cud YMCA Point Northwest.
Thank you foi all that you do for our kids."
wjrtu itegards, e
Kolli Parrairl
it\
idMi1 Heath
Student Assistance Counselor
Attachment V — Pro USA, Inc Application and Request for Funding
CITY OFIBIROOKLYN 1„.;,NTE1131.
A GREAT PLACE TO START, A GREAT PLACE TO STAY www,cityotbrooklyncenterorg
Urban Hennepin County Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG)
FY2014 (July 1, 2013 thru June 30, 2014)
Application Request for City of Brooklyn Center Funds
Supplemental Application Due: Thesday January 7-_A, 2M.4 by 4:30 PM
Public Hearing: February 10, 2014
YOU MUST COMPLETE AND RETURN THIS FORM
TO BE CONSIDERED AS AN APPLICANT
Organization Name: PRO USA. INC
Program Name: YOUTH FINANCIAL LITERACY TRAINING
Purpose: PRO USA's goal for the term oldie 2014 CDBG grant is to deliver financial literacy training to
50 secondary-school students residing in the Brooklyn Center. Minnesota.
Minimum Requirements
*in order to be considered for these program you must meet the Minimum requirements.
Yes
X
No
1 Does your Organization have a 501 (c)(3) status?
2.Do the activities benefit at least 51% low- and moderate-income households with less
than 80% Area Median Income (AMI) as stated by HUD and are you able to provide
Income-eligible certification for all clients?
LI Li
3.Does your organization have the staff capacity to administer the program?E.ri LiLi4.Do you understand and are capable of providing all required documentation to obtain
reimbursement?
5.Which of the following Eligible Public Service Activates will the program provide?
(Choose All that apply)
P Employment services
•Crime Prevention and public services Li U
0 Health Services 0 LI
•Substance abuse services 1 1 Li
4 Housing Counseling U
0 —
Li
01rEducation programs
•Energy Conservation • _______ _ .ID
0 Services for senior citizens ii] El
LIIIT1•0 Services for homeless persons
Poge I of7
Designed Qualifications:
(Each question has a maximum score and will be scored as part of the
recommendation process.)
Max
Points
Score
(Office
MC
only)
6.Proposed program description. Be concise, vet thorough in describing the activity
10 5.--of only the program for which funding is being sought, and in only as much detail as
needed. Include Brooklyn Center local need(s) and population served. CDBG funds
cannot be used to replace current program funds. If this is an existing program and
your organization did not receive Brooklyn Center CDBG funds last year, the funds
must be used to expand the program.
PRO USA seeks to give Northwest Metro youth an early positive start to avoid
wrong decisions that result in years or a lifetime of financial pain. This project is
intended to enable youth the ability to speak the language of and function well in
the culture of the mainstream financial world of the United States. Many low-
income families are routed by default into a second tier of financial services, and
the overall goal of our financial education efforts is to help them prevent this
financial apartheid early on in their lives.
PRO USA's financial education program will enable youth to improve technical
skills while learning about the four cornerstones of financial literacy: a) budgeting
to create savings, b) debt reduction and asset building, c) building a good credit
rating, and d) consumer protection and financial institutions. This will include
knowledge about the credit system of fees and interests, accessing and managing
student loans, balancing a checkbook, checking the accuracy of a bank statement,
and the implications of consumer debt.
The program would be delivered at PRO USA's Learning Center within each of
the trimesters of the high schools serving Brooklyn Center. The training uses
scenario-based elearning modules to expose secondary-school students to real-
life financial decisions that they'll face as adults. They'll learn the skills 'needed to
navigate the basics of the financial system and the importance to their futures of
making sound financial decisions. They will also be encouraged to co-evaluate the
scenarios with their parents or other adults in their home or family.
7.Describe the anticipated results and accomplishments for your proposed program.
PRO USA's goal for the term of the Brooklyn Center 2014 CDBG grant is to deliver
financial literacy training to 50 secondary-school students residing in the Northwest
Metro. While the proposed program is new, previous efforts by our specialists have
produced significant economic returns.
Since 2010, PRO USA has offered Tax Help Service Day in Northwest Hennepin
suburbs. This free tax preparation service has averaged more than 150 returns annually
for low-income area families (average FAG1 was just above $20,000 for clients served).
Last year alone, this effort generated more than $400,000 in state and federal refunds
going back into local communities.
PRO USA's new executive director was formerly a founding staff member and the
Page 2 o f 7
financial education director of African Development Center in Minneapolis. In this
capacity he designed and delivered financial literacy programs for nearly 3,000
Minnesota households, leading to more than 200 new business starts and 1,000 first-time
home purchases.
This program will train/compensate two financial educators to facilitate learning. Work
with these trainers/coaches to design program Objectives to meet stated needs, educational
materials and lesson plans to achieve learning objectives, delivery method to facilitate
students' access to educational materials, and evaluation plan and data-collecting
instruments. Ti will also acquire program equipment and conduct community outreach. E-
learning coursework subscriptions and large format LCD display will be integral parts of
the program. Outreach and publicity are also needed for the project. Finally, we look
forward to providing scholarships at subsidized cost to train each student during the
project period.
8.If you have previously been funded through CDBG funds, please provide a
breakdown of the services that have been provided to Brooklyn Center residents and
the accomplishments.
10 0
N/A
9.Have you ever been approved for CDBG funding and not met the reimbursement
requirements?
10
N/A
10.Please describe how you plan to record and report accomplishments and monitor
the results.
10 ---5
PRO USA proposes to provide basic financial literacy training to Brooklyn Center high-
school students from low- and moderate-income households. The tailored curriculum,
delivered in a classroom setting in our Learning Center with the use of e-learning tools,
will result in certification of students by the National Foundation for Financial Education
(NFFE), University of Minnesota Extension Services, and Lutheran Soacial Service..
PRO USA will seek to track the progress of students completing the program in order to
measure the long-term benefit.
The proposed time period on our grant application is from 10/14 (mo/yr) to 10/15
(mo/yr).
11.Please describe your experience administering federal/public funds and how you
have been able to meet the compliance requirements. (please provide a copy of
previous annual and quarterly reports)
20 .5---
PRO USA has 4 years of administering IRS and Foundation funding. See documents
attached.
1.2013 Report to Minnesota Revenue
2.Supoort Letter From Minnesota Revenue
3. Support Letter froin US Department of the Treasury
12. Do other entities provide Brooklyn Center residents the same, or similar, services
for which you are requesting funding? Briefly describe why your program is unique in
the service activity N'OU are proposing to fund.
10 0
Page 3 01-7
PRO USA is unaware of any other provider of youth-oriented financial literacy education
serving Brooklyn Park. Filling this niche was our motivation for developing this program
and coordinating its delivery with local government, civic, educational and financial
institutions.
13. Please describe how this program is ready for implementation and what steps
would need to be taken before this program can be started.
20 / (3
1.Facility remodeling: We recently moved into new offices located centrally in
Brooklyn Park!
2.Partnership development: Recruitment of additional financial and program
resources
3.Community Outreach: Promote the program via high schools and other relevant
community organizations serving the Northwest Metro.
4.Customize curriculum: We have access to several national financial literacy
training programs, and we are tailoring the content to meet the needs of local
youth.
14. Please describe how your program mee1s one or more of the City's priorities
listed below. (Check all that apply)
20
0 Civic Engagement erl
0 Community Image
0 Focused Redevelopment
0 Financial Stability
0 Vibrant Neighborhoods
Describe:
Brooklyn Centers mission of "a place to start, a place to stay' hinges in large part on the
personal and community-facing financial decisions made by its residents. Financial
literacy is a long-term process requiring the assistance of institutions outside the home.
PRO USA's Learning Center, accessibly located along Brooklyn Boulevard, is being
developed as a community resource for teaching key life skills, including basic personal
financial management, to youth residing in the Northwest Metro. A block grant from
Brooklyn Park is a sound investment in helping the city's low- and moderate- income
yOtith to start positive financial habits early: prepare for college, adopt an entrepreneurial
mindset, set saving goals, and budget for the future, and realize that it all started in the
place they will eventually decide to stay.
By signing the statement below you are certifying your organization has the capacity to participate in the
CDBG process and can provide the required documentation in the implementation schedule.
Page 4 of 7
I certify that all answers to the above questions are true and accurate. I understand that any false
information on or omission of information from this supplemental application will be cause for rejection
of this application or termination funding
Applicant's Signature:Title:Executive Director Date:01/21/2014
Received by: Ji 55c.. Date: - Time: s': 00 p
Page 5 of 7
Date: 10/16/2014-6/30/2015
Date: 7/1/2015-9/30/2015
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date: 1/21/2014
Title: Executive Director
Signature:
Printed Name: Stephen Wreh-Wilson
REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014
City: BROOKLYN CENTER
Co-Applicant:
Type of Entity: Private Subreciplent
Project Name: YOUTH FINANCIAL LITERACY TRAINING
Contact: STEPHEN WREN-WILSON
Phone: 1-800-765-8104 or 763-443-5914
••••ActivItvDdta •-
•• - •t-.• •- • • • • ••,.. • • • • • . .. . , .
CDBG Funding Request: $ 10,000.00 Resolution:
Is this an existing COBG-funded project? No
Project Location: Enter Street Address (Preferable) - Block Group(s)/Census Tract(s)/Neighborhood Location
Describe below the activity In detaIl including priority iseed(s) It regain militia the 2010 2024 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan Click link below
2010 2014 Henneplri CountYConsoirdated Plan Chanter S
This description of each activity shall estimate the number and type of families that will benefit from the proposed activities, the specific local objectives and priority needs and a
target date for completion of the activity. Please describe services provided thoroughly. Example: Senior Services: Dally transportation services to nearby stores for
approximately 100 seniors residing at Shady Manor Public Housing on Main and Elm Streets completed byluly 1, 2015. Transportation Is identified as a high priority in the
Consolidated Plan and is also a local objective for the City of Mapleville, The Brooklyn Center CDBG will be applied entirely to the scholarship fund lowering or defraying the
enrollment cost for 50 students in the Financial Literacy training. We estimate our cost to deliver this program at $400.00 per student at full enrollment. Thus a $10,000.00
grant award would cover 50 percent of participant costs for our targeted SO students In the grant period.
Brooklyn Center's mission of "a place to start, a place to stay" hinges in large part on the personal and community-facing financial decisions made by Its residents. Financial
literacy is a long-term process requiring the assistance of institutions outside the home. PRO USA's Learning Center, accessibly located along Brooklyn Boulevard, Is being
developed as a community resource for teaching key life skills, Including basic personal financial management, to youth residing la the Northwest Metro. A block grant from
Brooklyn Park Is a sound investment In helping the city's low- and moderate-Income youth to start positive financial habits early: prepare for college, adopt an
Please diicribiinilcifieted:i*Iilts/acteinfilistirnents -
PRO USA's goal for the term of the Brooklyn Center 2014 CDBG grant Is to deliver financial literacy training to 50 secondary-school students residing in the Northwest Metro.
While the proposed program Is new, previous efforts by our specialists have produced significant economic returns.
Since 2010, PRO USA has offered Tax Help Service Day in Northwest Hennepin suburbs. This free tax preparation service has averaged more than 150 returns annually for low-
Income area families (average FAGI was just above $20,000 for clients served). Last year alone, this effort generated more than $400,000 in state and federal refunds going back
into local communities.
PRO USA's new executive director was formerly a founding staff member and the financial education director of African Development Center In Minneapolis. In this capacity he
Approximate number of persons to receive services:
irnplenientation Schedule: 'Identify Major project tanks to occur during/wIthIn the first 12 monlhu. - ........
Task: New licensed staff and students's orientation Date: 10/1/2014-10/11/2014
i s 19,000.00
Other (specify) I 7,500.00 ]Minnesota Revenue -
Other (specify) 2,800.00 1TCF National Bank
Task: Program Implementation
Task: Program evaluation and reporting
Task:
Task:
Task:
Other(sp city) 200000 fMoneystrarn -
Other (specify) I 2,600.00 lIndividual Contributions
Project Total : $ 40900 ho
1Prc,,, I ;RA,
Ann
Fr
tv
7 4:0
svc,leg 7,7•777,2:1.77,- /: s. 010
As, a r4s1
Pre. USA_ Lare_ 11.:a kJ's:\
ht.t:,;_taa tht=7 11.L
£1'.,2 2012 filtd.a L-57).... 77.a iI. IC: _LT,: aild.
ti21 - amount 0:1-.7[■31-1P:!.
prrpareT Iota. tts -;,-;is:f. :FTC ik'W, I 11 ,1 :1-rL1AS
r,,uLefs, er
Th1r
aim
Evmilanz .;szekk.,as- =Le& :f7red our slTiaik
yfr cnidr Fra,125.A_ 17:1,2
Stnetrriy.
ea _i-Aatfitt-
Trent Wells
Gi.eawx-h and Fain
Income Tax 2,: Witithor
Mforicsota D4Farian:mt cf
//.72,7477,f 7-14:c
Nora, Roh,tft Ra-ct4
Mail Station 7701
Si px1t, MN 55101-7701
x,7 v...La t,-,= 572=r; -171:1-11-i
rc:! 051.556-3052
651-556-31.50
Call 711 for Minr,esolaRctav
Ai eqt. ,,Ippar74117(7-127 1 11:191 12 r
DEPARTMENT Or '1 r TREASURY
INTERNAL REVF,NNEE 51.,7HVICT.
ATLANTA.
December 17, 2013
Pro USA, inc.
Mn: Mr. Stephen Wreh-Wilson,
Executive Director, Pro USA : Inc.
7240 Unity Ave. N. Suite 101
Brooklyn Park, MN 55443
Dear Mr. Wrell-lAtilson:
As the Territory Manager for the arm of Internal Revenue Service that assists this
country's poor to middle income taxpayers with filing and meeting their federal
income tax obligations, I would like to express my appreciation to you for outstandino
work as a Partner with IRS. Our volunteers that are recruited each year become part
of the IRS' Volunteer Income Tax Assistance (VITA) program. We are proud of the
over 40 years that volunteers all over the country have given to help their fellow
citizens.
As a Partner since 2011, Pro USA has shown outstanding commitment to the
community of Brooklyn Park, not only to African, but all other immigrant and ethnic
backgrounds. Your volunteer site has steadily increased numbers of federal income
tax returns prepared in your Brooklyn Park site. Mr Duannah Siryon has been
enthusiastic about fostering a spirit of collaboration among other partners in the Twin
Cities through his participation as a charter member of the "Coalition for Multicultural
Taxes and Financial Education."
We in the Stakeholder Partnerships, Education and Communication (SPEC)
organization of IRS fully endorse your operations. We extend our ongoing support in
your efforts to reach the Twin Cities' multicultural inhabitants with your free income
tax and financial education services.
I would like to thank you and Mr. Duannah Siryon for allowing us to have established
a partnership with your organization, Pro USA. We are honored to work hand in hand
with you to help taxpayers most in need of assistance, such as determining their
income tax obligations and refund amounts they have due as 2 result of overpaymentof taxes. All of this is done free of charge. As an added benefit, many of the
taxpayers you serve qualify for additional tax credits that provide extra money for
their own houshold budgets,
Pro USA. Inc.
My representative, Tax Consultant Lorona Mardian (att.-351-7'26-1502) is also happy
to assist you in providing materials, training and other support to ensure sUCCesS in
your programs and site Please feel free to call on us at any time. We aie availubto
speak to anyone on your staff as well. We look forward to an exciting new year and
season,
Sincerely,
4-e-tra-So'l t
Territory Manager, Stakeholder Partnerships, Education, Communications (SPEC)
St, Paul, MN - covering all of Minnesota, North and South Dakota
Address:
IRS/Stop 6010KM, Suite 708/ 1550 American Blvd. E / Bioornington, MN 55425
Attachment VI — Senior Community Application and Request for Funding
gR41131.310LAPIST. CENTER
A (REM PLAOE TO TART.A ORM PLACE 10 !flAY www.tily.iiibiziplOnveriter.org
-Urban Hennepin County Community Development -Bloch Grant ['mum (CDBG)
FV2014 (July 1, 2013 thin June 30, 2014)•
Application Roc) tics( for City of Brooklyn Center Funds
Supplemental Application Due: Tuesday January 21, 2014 by 430 PM
Public Waring: February W, 2014
YOU MUST COMPLETE. AND RETURN THIS FORM
TO BE COINTS11 )l IH) AS AN APKACANT
Organization Natne:S enjoy COMMIIRS SenieeS
Pvt.:1gram NionellouRehold & Outside Maintenarrat for Elderly aroma .'
Purposelllio:IIOME Proprain started i tt 19S13 with the aoel te imalatain oldur adults in effirdahrx tura:4110
of thcir choosing — the!r OVell 110MCS t them to remain indcnendent
(lion ity ktid Naretyfor lnir pomrilik.
AlYk —1 q9 01 .-qt1 ' ' 0 1,-. - .c•,. -0, • ',..-:).-4. .. ,. , 4:,,, -r. ,k zifitie; -. .. .,17-C- 0
6- 61 :) 'ir I In, i6,1:,0 10 AUL N 4,6_, ki 11": I Wig ' (1.. iialt
, d)ots your Orga11i7Ation have F., 50J (e)(3) status?
Sr.s'vn ;
s
_
El2.Do the activities Lenefit at least 51% low- grid iii rat 1.1.D11SehOldR with tu.5
titan SO% Ana Mediati Ltooare (AM) as. f:hAted by IR3D and aro you nble to pnwide.
incomc-ctble eertifieo,tion fix all acrits?
Ea
3.Doos your organizat ion have the staff capacity to adin'tnister the program?N
Vi
LJLi4: Do you understand and am capable of providing all requircd documentation to obtain
5. Which urthecolowing Eligible Public Service Activates Will tlie. progrum provide?- (Choose. AU that apply)
Employment services Un.
1:1
ud public servito_. _ ., entionn•.eitue Prve _ C
ii•Health Service-a
•Substance abuse scryiecs
4 Housing Counsuling nE
UER
n
Eli—
liiirii
4 Edlinal.111 programs
•Energy Conservation
4 8 ervices for snnior oil inns.__. 4 Sorviees for homules_s pur.sor n
Piv:c cRi;
6. Proposcd pyci,gmra description, Bo concise, vet thorouirb in deseribliig the Iletivity
.of unly the pnwriau for which funding is being sonthl, and in only as much detail as
needed, Maude Brooklyn Center Ina, need() and pnpulntiort serval. CDB0 ands
e-airtra be used to replace en Hent Frog! ani funds, lithis is fiti existing pograin Nal
yam: mgettization did not nmDiv.2.- Tivnoklya Center CD)10 fon(13 I nst year, the funds
inust be used to expand the pil3gtfittl.
Tho Household & Outside iMahr.ennue for Elderly program know] as }-10kIE is
IVETFAErt by Seri ioy Com if ss,nun.,y —CIV.A3S. a NVEM -ICSINCICCI 1)011-prOlii
501(0(3) orgartizrition, now in Rs 640t. year. The misRioa of Household &
Outside Maintenance for Elderly (11(J,1vilh) is to assist olikr adults to maintain
their dignity and live trulepQadenlly by providing, accessible, iiia5le , and
affordable homemaker, home tuaintenance and chore servieQs.
Provided on a slicliug fee tienie, services ineltale;
1)1 -Kunentatting hous.c.eleani rig, laundry,. and gravely shopping;
2)home 1W11.1tEr% in1erleefixter1117 i i RD, minor home
minor carpenuy, and installing safety grab hats; and,
3)eiaire strviees, consisting of 10.vvn mowing ; snow rourot-ii, raking, yard
elcanup, arid window washing.
11,0,M,E, has been serving the community since 19&I and partlaeri ng with the city
of Brooklyn Center for 19 years,
These servkcs help seniors stay in their horac-s and [apartments ht dignity and
1-1.0.1\4,E. services imei cns $14;c1111 MC* Incmiso H 0.10,E, is a
trusted provider and because our services am- avaiiable, flfi ii fair and nffbidimhle
slirli iip FCC, KO; While at the same Jme, preserving Brooklyn Center's housi»g
stock.
i7. Describe the anticipated mresults and aceoo! :Anneals fur yotr prop ostd p•ogitru.Ls-
we i[ieJp;'I serving 100 Brooklyn Center residents, age OM-.
R. if you have previously been fiindM through CMG hinds, piease pyovide a 10
lueaktImvn of the that have been in-ovided In Broohlyn Center rcsidcnts and •
IIi accomplishments, -We pA coed scrti rig 44 Brooklyn Center residznts in 2013, age 60 4 and we-nearly
double that mnabtr, serving 84 Brouldyn Center reAidems. We. pH:1 ,A clvd 277 jot.; totaling
1,038 bouts of Sel vice, 'The breakdown of the jobs irtzlnki!ed:
- Minor RAT A rs:
liontemaklng: 21
- PaintilKt 3
- tylowing: 137
- Snow Removal: 38
- Spring nal Yard Cleanup: 12
10
I 0
Pen 2 d-6
Sen!Of COMMIA61.1y &TO.Ca 1.1102. 21 id. 3eplail On 1.11 following autumn•t..1.; for the HOW
prOgral” ainnigh On AO:TRW SUrvey.
8•3 of clients i,vill report being srdislit.‘d with the HOME program, (96')/0 in 2 ,013)
85% of clientr.. will remain independent as a result of getting timely help 'Aid) physiently
demand iurl task.s, (85% in
85% of clients with -era-la thai HOME' ser ,dces helped tliern to continue Hying
hbdcpendently at home, (96% in 2013)
9, Haw !ion ever been approved for CD13ti flouting iiifl. no: met Ile reimburseMill
reqU5reltierkta
1 11
No
110, Ji cc descabc how you Om to rceoid a»d report acemnplishments and Monitar
the results.
1(1, • -(:)
The IIOME PErugruan stall-lc:inducts En cinnual sup...ey in )cectubu of program
participants to gain fCC(.11181± 0.11 Kew ViCii file service or experierue meets their needs and
to militate our room outeornM Ti1C Sureg re.loonses are compiled in January. Staff
olso review client reCilAiti. Tlik ittiZranittiOn i .:. listA to tunke continuous improvement in
41C1 i VC ly, ThC: HOME Program Ids° mairttaill3 a coni preltensive Chore database
that enable staff to tualyze program effraivtness And rrini;D adj1151111MIS AS niX1CO:
Rep kr 5Ltt:: ViSi LS UM ttorductied by hinders, Ftvgiterrtl Cugularly Neb?duled Ma Li iluetings
plovide continuous quality imprnvement by me IFICAS SITAI OS community rc.:souree up dote-s
and in.servicc education_ The in oponli. 0 i Lccioy ntid en ordinal un-; illilin professional
development pl am; thnt focus In5rninc on inissior4 sow icc, and best wakes,... _It. Pi tzEsc desct ale your expNicnce nd mi Ili so.eling federal/public funds mot how you
have, been able to meet the cumptionce relniyements. (plc asv provide s copy of
previous mutual and quark:Fly re)orts)
20 2-0
We hare 211 , ycms. of experience adn•Anistering federa'a funds. We administer federal
hinds (C11130) in nine suburban Hennepin County cities. We also receive federal
fu WILT. (01dcY Americans /sot Funding Title BID. Through our comprehensive CI tore
database, we, ru .e: able to meet the compllianne traeldiv, requirements. Attachtd is a
tialter0V report and a 2013 year end report.
\
12.. Do other ern Ries povide lhoeldyn Centee resideitt the same, or similar, services
fOr willich you gra requesting funding? 13)-lefly describe why your plograin is unique in.
the service oetivitv you are proposing to fund,
10
.1
CEAP plc:vides some of the services provided by f he 1 i(NvIE program, but not all the
;ervices. For UTIMPIC, HOME. provides interior and exterior paining services. We kiVi:j
`,,VO•ked elilSUly %VIII] CPAP tO wellid duplit-ation of Eervice, The CEO of CRAP and flu"
030 a Senior Community Services alc in discussions to inerge. CRAI"s chore provelta
'kvillt Senior C411111ir.Ellity Servic& HOME Imrp,rarn.
13. Plet;tia ,(11.1tigifibk: IVOW this promun is ready for implementation am! what stops
would need to be token before this pyog-..ota cart be started.
1 2(1 ;2.
-0 PON113 was originally a pi vain crf:-... anat. II co ricpin 'holm Services 4.drich matted in
1980, toLt wus tronslimcd tu 8 CS in I 9 IX). At thgt time, lit MJ served the ettics of
BlooittEngton, Eiden Paairie, Edina, Richfield and Si. Look Park. 11 .01.4 -R expanded in
0992. to include lilt. e i ties. of Minixdonka and Brook112,11 Center In I 999, the Robbinsdate
&hoot District 2g1 Community Eduention appmached Senior C:,:nromunity Sew ices ',vitt;
Ike oppartmity Co ittapc theii program with our progent, In 20 00, the merger went
11norTh nod HOMP, expanded to the citics of Clysimi, tiolden Volley, New Hope
Pi?,,,II10111.th and Robbins:1de. In 2(.)0., I t01%,..113 expanded once witt, this time to the city of
pomit 3 4)1'6
110pkil). Din in Ow nircilirf ofVALLS frnall iior living the (ilk* of Maple (..irove and
Wayzata for 11010 P.- services, in 9-011, HOME eXplinded t a,•11]-2 Grove and Wayzata ta
timot RCA HUME has a solid histmy tif incremental expansion in Suburban
flottnepin (Minty tlo meet theEnowing neds and Trulbwilces for affordable homemaking,
home mainlename and chore suviees,
1 ,1. Please describe. haw your proom 1-rwcIS one or m•-re of the City's prim-hit:1; 20
listed belro,v, (Cheek Mr that npply)
Civk 17Ingitp,cmcni
•Cotimmily Imuge
•Poetised Redevelopment
•Financial Stability
•Vibuint Neighborhoods
Describe: It seems. iikc every day we hear abont paiple loi ug their homes to
10k:closure. It is fruMralinp, tll'xt there redly isn't anything we enti do tu help thc.se
folks. 'Meru is another gaup of our iluigitbOrs tht cnnlakne ilia 1101105 this
ye-zr, not to foreclosure but to the inability to ellie for their homes, This is a gr o u p
wn CPA help slay in their twines through suj -pcuiinr tLe I-10.1E program. Market-
rate ill-5MM pro fussion;1 lidp is simply out of rva.;.11 for the low- Or ninderg,tn-
IMO= MAWS. 110M1':- fisn ,kUs M provided on u slLdkg COnititeliCitt Sede..
I IONTE is 41e to oar it services to seniors regardless ufubility to pay, But this
is only possible with Cairn unil.y support, (Vim:R.7,1A -stability)
We also believit the city' s supprirl of the aroa's ddorly population through the
WW1 of the HOME ptogicon is a worthwhile cumponcrit JO ast overall strategy of
improving rout preservinu Brooklyn Center's housing stock, Com1iiiini ty ) 'mug &
VThroul Nei ehbarhoods,) - See breakdown of serykesin Question
By signing the. statement below you Eric ma ifyi -ng your organization has the capncily in prtiCipl'a in the
CDTiCi pr0s end can piovide. the icquired do:mut:rotation in the hrj -lcnieiitatkm sthedule.
cOrtify that at] answers to the above questions in true and accurate. understand that any fhlse
inhumation nn rn Ornis3inil of nfonnoion from this supplemerrtal application will be came for rejection
of This applicotion or termination funding.
Appiliciinfs Signal]]0AilkpfiAle:CEO Dote:110/M
Received by " A f. i)alo Ii 1"
PAT 4
Ti me ;
Signature:
Printed Name: Deb Taylor
Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sOtirtes, Attach additional fistingstuhere appropriate.
ZSPECIFy:FtitIDINSQ1YRC .0
CDEG
Other (,evcrupient)
OtheiltInited W ay) •
Other (Individual Donations)
0i11'.eri8rog re
Other fin-l(inci Volunteer Service Hours) .. _ 91,200.00 f
Date: 1/15/2014
Title: CEO
REQUEST FOR FUNDING - PUBLIC SERVICE
City:
Co-Applicant:
Type of Entity:
Project Name:
Contact:
Phone:
Activity Data:
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014
Brooklyn Center
Senior Community Services
Public Subrecipient
Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly
Deb Taylor
952-767-7897
per council resolution, If applicable
. CDBG Funding Request: $ 14,500.00
Is this an existing CDBG-funded project?
Project Location;
Describe beloiaithe activity Mill Including
HennePin
Resolution:
Yes
10201. Wayzata Blvd., Suite 335, Minnetonka, MN 55305
It ii4et's.-wit.hin the 2010•.:2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan Click link below
,
Let's reimagine aging! By working together, we are creating a new vision for Independence, keeping the passion, purpose and potential of our older adults In our communities.
As family, friends and neighbors age, we all have a shared responsibility to strengthen their connection to community. We join together open-hearted people who are ready to
stop and listen, stand by and support the caregiver, and champion the senior's pursuit to lead an engaging life. Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) services
will enable older adults in need of a little help with home maintenance, homemaking and chore services to lead a vital and engaging life in the place they call home.
Services are provided to Brooklyn Center residents, age 60+, on a sliding fee basis. Over 80% of HOME clients are unable to pay the full cost of services. For them, HOME Is a
lifesaver that helps them age with dignity In their own homes and communities. Some services are provided at no-cost by volunteer groups. With our partners, we seek to build
innovative systems that create new opportunities for care and community connection.
Household and Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) helps seniors remain in their homes In dignity and safety by providing reliable and affordable homemaking, grab bars &
other safety installations, minor repairs, exterior home maintenance, Interior and exterior painting, yard work, lawn mowing, and snow removal. Senior Services is identified as a
high priority in the Consolidated Plan.
PIW.P Oflee.th4 P.Ctiv,4Yr d national objective that this project 'will Meet from thelhoP ildtV.nfist.S. below. The aCtivIty:nrierIty !etre! Is noted pea to each drniidoWn iteM
Activity: Senior-H
National Objective: Income Limited Clientele
If the proposedproja c tlsa IPIXO:if.!,!an.ea-unty prjorlty, you must explain beiow why it has a higher priority In yourcommunity.
We anticipate serving 100 Brooklyn Center residents, age 60+. Here is a sample of the Impact our Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly (HOME) program has on the
people we serve.
"NI always remember your kindness." - Elaine
Senior community Services loves getting feedback from the seniors and families we serve. Elaine, who Is 86 and has lived in her own home for 59 years, found Senior
Community services' HOME program to be very helpful. "My thank-you seems so small compared to what you folks did for me. I was overwhelmed and so appreciative. Your
volunteers raked, cut, bundled and bagged my yard waste. HOME is a fabulous program to help seniors remain In their own homes."
Approximate number of persons to receive services: 100
Implementation Schedule: Identify major project tasks to occur during/within the first 12 months.• • • . • . . . . . .
Task: Homemaking
Task: Home Maintenance & Painting
Task: Mowing
Task: Snow Removal
Task: Yard Clean Up (raking, weeding, trimming, etc)
Date: Year Around
Date: Year Around
Date: Summer
Date: Winter
Date: Spring & Fall
Date: Task:
Hennepin County COBO Program
Client Benefit Fteportiug Form _
,Agency Name: Senior CoMfrum:ty -tiervtos
Prgran Name: H.O.M.E. Brooklyn C4iftlor
Repo ng Period: 0110112013- 12/31/2013
-
Income Categories
New Individuals Served this
__. 11por1Jng Period
1
Year-to-Date
For OfrICC USD cull
0-30% "Extremely Lae_
31..50% "1 ori'17
pi-sca "Mortorate"12
Subtotal 30
Gres er Trwi BD %0
UNKNOViiar • ,•,* ,5 4
Totals 34
R eciEthn a egories ' Non-l-lisparl flu-us an c # Non-Hispanio # flisparlio
1 - While 82
2-Black/Africa-n AmaTican 2
3-Asian
14-Amkrita n Mien
15-Native HawaliarrlOther
Pacific islander
le- American Indian/Alaskan
Nalive & WhIte
7.- A210:1 White
14- Elack/African American
White
'Ill-American IndianiAlaskan
Nauve & Mack/African
American
Ar 0 IMulti-redat
Totals 84
Female Head_of Household 57
Describe accomplishments (laving Oita vivri peried (attach additional pages as need):
Iii the vont of 2013 we were able to provide 1,03826 houte, at servItes to 44 Brooklyn Center seniors
residing In 57 homes. Wo provided 43.75 hours of cleaning service, 307 hours of lawn mowing sordloo,
304M hours of screw removal service, 325 ilOitrE: OlValk.104)(it service, 13.50 hours of minor repair service, and
45 hours at painting !.:crvices. FLO,M,E. continuos to work with the Brooklyn Center Fire Popartment on the
free smoke detector program. We are also continuing to market end build partnerships within the
community.
I hfurntolien provided by:
A:faio Ktinsel azi,,,... A.-../..0...4 A ESS Meet)! (Date} O1IO3lZt4
Hennepin County CDB G Program
Client Menefit Reporting Form_
Agency Name: seitior Community Sorvkes
'Program Name: Home Norrri , fbeeltim Cviter
11Torting Period: 0,1101,2013-0ev3012015
IiicomoCatogories
New Individuals Served this
Reporting Period
Year-to-Date
Per dffiG USE` only
0-30% "Extfsma4 Lov•.-0
31,50V, le '2
13 -1-11 /.,' _ rate"7
_Subtote3 19
Greater! - –0—
Totals 0
RacelEthni ity Categories # Non-Hispanic # Hispanic;It Non-Hi5panic It Hispanic
11- While 19
,12- Matt:African American
.13- Asian
14-American Indian
15-Native 1-lawaFent011ier
Pacific Islander
American IndiantAlaskon
Native & White
Vt.:Asian & While .
18-El2ack/African American &
While
19-American ladiartrAlaskan
Native & Blacit/Africen
Aflieric an
- OtlicriMulti-rae,a1
Totals 20
,Female Head of Household 13
-
Describe atcemplishinents during II& report Krim! (attach additional pages as next!):
In the first quarter of 201a we were able to provide 303 hours of services to 20 Brooklyn Center Sbniors
residing In 16 bootee. Wa provided 0 hours of cleaning service, 40 liourS of Snow removal service, 24
hours of volunteer service, 4 hours of minor repair service,
11.011.E, continues (9 work with the Brooklyn Center Fire Deparbileril on the free smoke detector prograre-
We aro also continuing to market and build partnerships within the contra unity.
,
Information provided by:
Alyim Kriot,W A•4 rli,a Alvssa Kriesel Date) oiiemo ia_
Attachment VII — Code Enforcement Request for Funding
REQUEST FOR FUNDING - NON PUBLIC SERVICE
URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM YEAR 2014
General Information:
City: City of Brooklyn Center
Co-Applicant:
Type of Entity: Local Government
Project Name: Nieghborhood Pe.italiation and Code Enfrocement
Contact: Jesse Anderson
Phone: 763-569-3420
Activity Data: (pu coundt tezokrtion, jq 11pp:cable)
CDB $ 150,COO.00 Resolution:
Is this an existing CDBG-funded pit Yes
Pro, Enter Street Address (Preferable) Block Group(s)/Census Tract(s)/Neighborhood Location
Describe below the activity in detail, including priority need(s) it meets within the 2010-2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan. Click links below.
2010-2014 Hennepin County Consolidated Plan Chapter 4 2010-2014 Hennepin County consolidated Plan Chapter 5
Consistent with National, 5tate and County trends, the City of Brooklyn Center has experienced high rates of residential property foreclosures resulting in significant numbers of
vacant and abandoned properties. Brooklyn Center is one of six Hennepin County cities experiencing the greatest number of foreclosures. Only Brooklyn Park and Minneapolis
have more foreclosed and vacant residential properties than Brooklyn Center. On a percent basis, Brooklyn center had the highest percentage of foreclosures of all cities in
suburban Hennepin County from 2007 through 2010. Based on current market conditions and projections by governmental and financial institutions, Brooklyn Center will continue
to experience high rates of foreclosures for several years to come.
Vacant and abandoned properties can create costly problems for cities in general and potentially severe problems for specific neighborhoods hardest hit by clusters of foreclosed
or vacant properties. Vacant properties detract from the quality of life in cities and can severely drain municipal budgets. These properties negatively affect homeowners who
struggle to maintain their properties in an environment where property values may continue to decline.
The number of vacant properties fluctuates, but is expected to he high for the next few years. The status of the property, ownership, responsible parties and numbers can
change daily. Some properties were vacant for two years.
•The majority of vacant properties in the city have one or more code violations, everything from healthflife safety hazards to general nuisances.
•Significant city resources and costs are being spent to deal with problems associated with vacant properties, often shifting resources from other programs areas.
•Early intervention with vacant properties helps to ensure minimum community standards, while increasing citizen satisfaction.
•The presence of vacant homes and foreclosures on a block is impacting the sale prices of open market transactions. Some properties are being listed below or near land values.
•Long term vacant properties create potential for increased levels of vandalism and more serious criminal activity.
Please use the below drop down lists to choose the applicable activity and national objective that this project will meet.
Activity: Code Enforcement
National Objective: Addressing Slums or Blight on an Area Basis
If the proposed project is a low urban county priority, you must explain below why it has a higher priority in your community.
The goals for 2014 are to accomplish the following:
Verify anti update existing inventor}, of all foreclosed and vacant residential properties in the city.
•Continue to quickly recognize vacant properties quicker by combining information on bank owned property and low wate.r consumption.
* Monitor foreclosures and associated problems such as vacant properties.
Work with mortgage companies and servicing companies for vacant properties for a timely response and resale of vacant properties.
* Identify and prioritize property code violations with health and safety issues addressed and resolved first so that properties are safe and secured.
* Address and resolve secondary housinglbuilding code and public nuisance violations of vacant and foreclosed properties.
* Continue to implement and administer the requirements of the city's vacant Building Ordinance.
* Assure that residents in areas affected by foreclosed and vacant properties are informed about code enforcement activities and that resident information regarding foreclosed
and vacant properties is incorporated into property monitoring and information activities.
I In addition to COBG assisted code enforcement activities, it is the city's goal to provide staff and financial resources to assure that at minimum, 100 of the current number of
vacant and foreclosed properties are re-occupied with a focus on safe, decent affordable owner occupied housing. Between March 2039 and January 2013 one hundred and
thirteen (113) Renew Loans had closed on vacant/foreclosed properties in the city, providing homes for new homeowners in the city and contributing to the stability of city
neighborhoods.
CDBG activities assisted are part of a larger strategy to arrest the decline of City neighborhoods. Other non CDBG activities being deployed to arrest neighborhood decline include:
•Renew loan Program
*Neighborhood Stabilization Program (NSP) Program
* Remove and Rebuild Program
•Street and Utility Improvement Program
Expanded Neighborhood Watch Program
Crime Reduction Strategy
* Strategic Plan to Improve Neighborhoods
* City Foreclosure Strategy
Number of affordable housing
Implementation Schedule:
units to be rehabilitated or built:
Date:Ongoing
Identify major project tasks to occur during/ within the first 12 months,
Task:
Task:
Task:
Task:
Task:
Task:
Monthly Monitoring of vacant properties
Decrease negative impact of current vacant properties Date:Ongoing
Neighborhood Sweep inspections Date:10/15/2014
Date:
Date:
Date:
Date: 1/21/2014
Title: Deputy Director of Building;
c
Printed Name: Jesse Anderson
Please dcribe anticipated results/accomplishments the project will have.
Budget: Specify total project budget by major funding sources. Attach additional listings v.iftere appropriate.
FUNDING SOURCES AMOUNT SPECIFY FUNDING SOURCE
CNC
Prior Year CDBG Funding. This Project
Other federal Funds (specify)
Low Income Housing Tax Credits
State (specify)
Municipal
Metropolitan Council
Private (spari5]
Program Income
Other (specify)
150,000.03
Project Total S 150,000.00
Attachment VIII— County CDIIG Fund Memo
Hennepin County Memo
DATE: January 8, 2014
TO: Urban Hennepin County Direct Allocation Communities
FROM: Tonja West-Hafner, Principal Planning Analyst
Abby Shafer, Planning Analyst
Cathy Gold, Administrative Assistant
SUBJECT: 2014 Urban Hennepin County CDBG Program
Accompanying is the CDBG Program planning packet. A hardcopy of the packet will only be mailed if
requested. Project funding proposals must be submitted by February 27, 2014. Please schedule your
public hearing to meet this deadline. Contact us as soon as possible if you are not able to meet the
submission deadline. The following items are provided:
Planning Allocation by Community (preliminary)
Sample Notice of Public Hearing
Sample Resolution
Request for Funding Forms ''*REVISED for 2014" Finable excel (.xlsx) format
Consolidated Plan Schedule
PRELIMINARY FY 2014 FUNDING:
Both the House and Senate approved a two-year budget agreement ending years of chaos in the
budget and appropriations process. The agreement will likely allow the Transportation and Housing
and Urban Development Appropriations Subcommittee to fund Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) program and HOME Investment Partnerships Program (HOME) at least at their FY 2013 level.
The House and Senate Appropriations Committees are scheduled to produce a bill that can be voted on
in early January ahead of expiration of the current "Continuing Resolution" that is funding the federal
government through January 15, 2014. Until that is finalized and the HUD budget is approved and the
County is notified of its' 2014 CDBG grant amount, the FY2013 planning allocations will be used as the
preliminary funding level for 2014. Please prepare for both an increase and a decrease in the funding.
Under the funding formula contained in the current Joint Cooperation Agreement, communities that
receive a funding allocation of 3.5% or more of the County's grant will receive a direct planning
allocation. Communities that receive less than 3.5% will not receive a planning allocation. Instead,
these communities will be included in the Consolidated Pool. Only cities oontributing funding to the
Consolidated Pool are eligible to submit funding applications.
HENNEF1N Courrrv HOUSING, CONIMLINTrY WORKS AND TR xd4srr
701FouRTH AVENUE METH, SurrE 400, MetraeAFouf...,, MN 55415
PHONE: (612) 545-S260 - Pax: (61 2) 546-2 S120 - TDDITTy% (612) 506-5115,5
Timely implementation of CDBG funded projects. As a condition of HUD entitlement grant funding,
the county's unexpended CDBG grant funds cannot exceed 1.5 times the annual grant amount This is
calculated 90 days prior to the start of the new program year. To help ensure continued CDBG funding,
each city must commit CDBG funds within six months and expend the funds within 18 months of the
start of a new program year. However, communities are strongly encouraged to make every effort to
expend funds within 12 months. To aid in this effort, the county will continue using expenditure goals
to help cities monitor project implementation and expenditures.
•CONSOLIDATED PLAN: PRIORITIES STRATEGIES
Use of CDBG funds to address local needs must be consistent with priorities identified in the
Consolidated Plan. The relationship of proposed projects to countywide priorities will be evaluated
during the proposal review process. CDBG funds must be used to address a high priority, or in some
cases a medium priority. If you propose a project that does not address one of these priorities (see
priorities below), you must clearly explain why the project is a priority in your community. The
explanation should be included in the project description section of the application form.
Priorities for the S-year Consolidated Plan period 2010-14 are generally the same as the prior period.
High Priority Housing Activities:
1 Rental housing for families, elderly, physically disabled persons, anti homeless persons with low-
income (below 50 percent of median income) with a priority for extremely low-income persons
(below 30 percent of median income) .
1 Supportive housing for persons with mental illness with income below 50 percent of median
income.
•Rehabilitation of owner-occupied housing with income below 50 percent of median income
•Homeownership assistance to households with income below 80 percent of median income
•Foreclosure recovery activities
Eligible activities include acquisition of property, development related infrastructure, development
soft-costs, downpayment assistance for first-time homebuyers and rehabilitation of existing units.
High Priority Public Services/Facilities
•Public services and/or facilities to assist families and seniors to maintain and/or increase self-
sufficiency and independent living, and to assist youth and their families with counseling and
crisis intervention services; and related activities. Emergency services in response to the
foreclosure problem and unemployment will also be considered high priorities.•
High Priority Neighborhood Revitalization:
1 Neighborhood revitalization activities that address issues of substandard/blighted property in
scattered site or defined area redevelopments that designate 20 percent of the units as
affordable.
Planning and Removal of Architectural Barriers:
General planning activities and project for the removal of architectural barriers are considered a low
CDRG funding priority, unless the activity or project is directly related to an otherwise eligible high
priority housing or community development activity.
CDBG REGULUIONS AND ADDITIONAL CROSSCUTTING REGULATIONS
The updated federal regulations at 24 CFR Part .570, are available by request from the County or by
going to www.hud.gov . HUD's website also contains several resources to aid in CDBG administration,
two of which we are highly recommending: "Basically CDBG" Entitlement Course Training Manual and
"Community Development Block Grant Program - Guide to National Objectives and Eligible Activities
for Entitlement Communities".
Additional crosscutting federal regulations will be triggered by the use of CDBG funds depending upon
the type of activity funded and the items CDBG is funding.. All applicable requirements associated with
the federal regulation(s) must be met. Information provided in the application should account for the
impact the federal regulations will have on budgets and timelines The following is intended only as a
summary list:
•Environmental Regulations
•Lead Based Paint Regulations
•Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
•Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisitions Policies Act (Uniform Act or
URA)
•Financial Management
▪Affirmatively Further Fair Housing -- As a recipient of HUD funds, Hennepin County and each
subrecipient community must affirmatively further fair housing. Hennepin County encourages
all communities to be proactive by addressing impediments to fair housing choice in your
community. As a potential condition to receiving future funds, HUD annually evaluates efforts
to affirmatively further fair housing choice. To continue its support of countywide fair housing
efforts, Hennepin County will allocate funds from its administrative budget for fair housing
services, Services identified in the Regional Analysis of Impediments and Fair Housing Action
Guide including outreach, counseling and referral services, training and education programs
and enforcement of fair housing laws and ordinances, will be prioritized. Communities are
strongly encouraged to support similar efforts within their community using CDBG and/or local
funds.
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREMENTS
As a guideline, no more than three activities should be undertaken in each community and each
activity should have a budget of at least $7,500. When funds are committed by other cities to carry
out a single activity of mutual interest such as a public service activity, the allocation should not be less
$3,500. Communities are strongly encouraged to develop joint initiatives to address mutual needs by
consolidating their resources.
LOW MODERATE-INCOME BENEFIT
Each city must expend at least 70 percent of the CDBG allocation on activities benefiting very low
and low-income persons. The authorizing statute for the CDBG Program requires that each funded
activity meet one of three national objectives: benefiting low and moderate- income persons,
preventing or eliminating slums and/or blight, or meeting an urgent need. The statute states that each
grantee must meet this requirement.
FUNDING PUBLIC SERVICES
Participating communities have the flexibility to use up to 15 percent of their CDBG planning allocation
to fund eligible, priority public services. HUD rules limit grantee use of CDBG funding for public
services. Any public services not previously funded must be new services or a substantial increase in a
service. The CDBG funds are not intended to replace other funds.
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS
Public Hearing:
Prior to February 27, 2014, each community receiving a direct funding allocation must conduct a local
public hearing and adopt a council resolution on the proposed use of CDBG funds. A sample public
hearing notice and resolution are enclosed. The resolution includes language authorizing the execution
of subrecipient and third party agreements.
Request for Funding Forms:
A REVISED fillable excel form is included with this memo. It has two tabs. There is one tab for public
service projects and one tab for all other projects. Use one form for each project. Hennepin County
staff will review each project to determine CDBG eligibility, program benefit and the relationship to
countywide priorities.
Submit the following by February 27, 2014:
•Request for Funding Form(s)
•Council Resolution (as soon as possible)
•Public: Hearing Notice — Affidavit of Publication (as soon as possible)
•Minutes from the Public Hearing (as soon as possible)
Preferably, the forms should be submitted by e-mail to tonjamest-hafnerahennepin.us. However, they
can be sent regular mail to our office ATTN: Tonja West-Rather.
TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE
If you have any questions or need assistance with the planning process, please send an e-mail
addressed to all three of us (tonja.west-hafnerPhennepin.us , abby.shaferPhennepin.us ,
catherine.goldPhennepin.us ). By doing so it will allow us to ensure you will get the most prompt
response.
4
OTHER FUNDING AVAILABLE IN 2014
The County's Coordinated Request for Proposal (CR FP), released today, provides additional
opportunities for cities and other eligible applicants to apply for funding for housing and transit
oriented development. Application materials and program information are available on the County's
website atwww.hennepin.us/business/work-with-henn-co/rfp
HOME Program-$15 million (est.)
Under the Coordinated RFP, the county is currently requesting proposals for HOME funds. All cities will
receive direct notification for the HOME Program. If your city or a housing developer is interested in
HOME Program funding please contact Tonja West-Hafner at 612-348-2599.
Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG) Program - $189,000 (est.)
NOTE: A separate request for proposals will be issued later in 2014 through the county's Human
Service and Public Health Dept. (HSPHD.) If your city, non-profit emergency shelter, and/or emergency
service provider in your community is interested in ESG funds please contact Mercy Das-Sulc at 612-
343-5973.
Affordable Housing Incentive Fund (AHIF) Program - $2 million (est.)
The Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority (HCHRA) established the AHIF for the
purpose of expanding the supply of safe, decent, sanitary housing for very low-income households and
individuals in Hennepin County. For information please call Carol Stinar at 612-348-2670.
Transit One Development Program(TOD)- $2 million (est.)
For redevelopment area projects, including affordable housing, that increase ridership along Hennepin
County transit corridors and routes. For more information please contact Thatcher Imboden at 612-
348-4191.
HUD Continuum of Care for the Homeless Program —TBD
NOTE: A separate request for proposals may be issued later in 2014 through the county's Human
Service and Public Health Department (HSPHD.) Consistent with priorities established in the Heading
Home Hennepin Plan to End Homelessness funds can be used for acquisition, new construction,
rehabilitation, leasing or rental assistance for new permanent supportive housing for homeless
•families, singles adults or youth. Funds can also be used to renew (continue) funding of previously
awarded grants for support services, leasing, and rental assistance, For more information please
contact Allan Henden at 612-596-1841.
Enclosures
5
Attachment IX-- Affidavit of Publication of Public Hearing Notice
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN )
Charlene Vold being duly sworn on an oath,
states or affirms that they are the Authorized
Agent of the newspaper(s) known as:
SP Brooklyn Ctr/Brooklyn Park
and has full knowledge of the facts stated
below:
(A)The newspaper has complied with all of
the requirements constituting qualifica-
tion as a qualified newspaper as provided
by Minn. Stat. §331A.02, §331A.07, and
other applicable laws as amended.
(B)This Public Notiee was printed and pub-
lished in said newspaper(s) for 2 succes-
sive issues; the first insertion being on
0112312014 and the last insertion being on
0113012014.
By: CKQUO_SURA, V
Authorized Agent
Subscribed and sworn to or affirmed before
me on 01/30/2014.
1AAAAWSMAAAAMAAAAAWAA/AAAWAt),
fRAPI);
Notary Pithlio-Itifiine:Ata.
liV lkn.k, !Expirzv., ..1.2n 3, . 4/186 viA,vvr,m,vv.0.-,..v,...v,„,...www.rvvvvil
Rate Information:
(1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial user
for comparable space:
$46.90 per column inch
Ad ID 163907
City of Brooklyn Center
(Official Publication)
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
2014 URBAN HENNEPIN COUNTY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
Notice is hereby given that the
City of Brooklyn Center In coop-
eration with Hennepin County,
pursuant to Title I of the Housing
and Community Development Act
of 1974, as amended, is holding
a Public Hearing on February 10,
2014, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereaf-
ter as the matter rosy be heard, at
the Brooklyn Center City Hall, 6301
Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota.
The Public Hearing is on the
housing and community develop-
rrieht needs and the City's proposed.,
use of the estimated 2014 Urban
Hennepin County Community De-
velopment Block Grant Program
planning allocation of $239 249
The City of Brooklyn Center is
proposing to undertake the follow-
ing activities with 2014 Urban Hen-
nepin County COBB funds starting
on or about July 1, 2014.
Public Service Projects $35,887
Neighborhood $150,000
Revitalization Code
Enforcement Activity
Rehabilitation of
Private Property $53,362
For additional Information about
the priorities, proposed activities,
level of funding and program perfor-
mance, contact the City of Brooklyn
Center at 763-569-3300 or the Hen-
nepin County Housing Department
at 612-348-9260.
The Public Hearing is being held
pursuant to MS 471.59.
Auxiliary aids for persons with
disabilities are available upon re-
quest at least 96 hours In advance.
Please contact the City Clerk at
763-569-3300 to make arrange-
ments.
1/23/14, 3SP1, PHN 2014
Urban COBS, 163907
Suggested Agenda
r Hold Public Hearing to obtain feedback from citizens
and applicants for Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funds
Process meets HUD and Hennepin County requirements
Review CDBG Program Requirements and Information
r 2014 CDBG Allocations & Recommendations
= Public Service Activities/Program Applicants
Other CDBG Activities
Hear comments from Public Service Activity
Applicants
Bring forward resolution with CDBG allocations for
Council approval on February 24, 2014
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 2
-
City Council Meeting
February 10, 2014
2/10/2014
CDBG Funds
A_ °cation
u Ib) IC FearrFi riq
Presented by:
Vickie Schleuning, Assistant City Manager/Director ofBuilding and Community Standards Department
1
Background
CDBG funds are federal funds passed through
Hennepin County
o Brooklyn Center is a Sub-Recipient
Generally, funds must meet one of three
national objectives
•Benefit low income persons
o Prevent or eliminate slums and/or blight
o Meet urgent community needs
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014
Background cont..
City of Brooklyn Center using CDBG funds since
program created in mid-1970's
■ In 2008 some funds shifted from County Rehab
program to fund code enforcement efforts due to
foreclosures, vacant properties, and neighborhood
blight
A Maximum of 15% of CDBG funds may be allocated
to Public Services due to Federal requirement
•City not obligated to provide any funding for Public Services
City has typically provided maximum 15% to Public Service
Activities
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 4
2/10/2014
2
2013 Disffibutiion
r 2013 CDBG allocation for Brooklyn Center was
$239,249
The 201 3 Distribution
o Household & Outside Maintenance for Elderly(H.O.M.E.) Program, Senior Community Services -$12,500
Senior Services Program, Community EmergencyAssistance Program (CEAP) -$12,500
o HOME Line's Tenant Advocacy - $6,740
o Neighborhood Stabilization/Code EnforcementProgram -$150,000
o Housing Rehabilitation ( Rehabilitation of PrivateProperty) - $57,509
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 6
2/10/2014
Background cont...
1> Other public service activity/program
allocation guidelines by Hennepin County
•$7,500 minimum allocation to each funded activity
•$3,500 minimum is public service program receives
CDBG funds from other Cities
Limit to three public service activities/programs
Reasons- funding is limited so aim for most
effective use of money per public service agency,
administrative efficiencies for processing by County
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014
3
20H4 Dlistrii oution
2014 CDBG funds may be used from July 1, 2014
to December 31, 2015.
Allocation of 2014 Brooklyn Center CDBG funds
estimated $239,249. (Final adjusted 2013 amount)
■ Specific CDBG allocation amount undetermined,
therefore unknown to County and City at this
time
o Hennepin County waiting for information from HUD
Amounts may be adjusted depending on CDBG fundingavailability
o Amounts can be adjusted throughout year depending onfunding availability
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 7
2014 Public Service Applicant
Home Line
HOME
g.r°
Home Line Tenant Advocacy Services requests $9,167
; Services include:
r Free legal advice to tenants about tenant law
•Legal help for unsafe living conditions
•Legal help for security deposit losses
Program part of the City's CDBG program for 5 years
In 2013, Home Line stated they saved Brooklyn Center
tenants at least $35,261; prevented eviction of 24
families, and advised 237 Brooklyn Center renters
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014
2/10/2014
4
2014 Public Service Applicant
Community Emergency Assistance Program
Community Emergency Assistance Program (CEAP)
requests $15,000
Services include:
•Meals on Wheels
-Senior Chore Services
Program part of City's CDBG program for 14 years
In 201 3 CEAP stated they provided 12,600 hot
meals to Brooklyn Center residents and performed
612 chores.
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 9
2014 Public Service Applicant
Senior Community Services
SC S
Senior
Community
Services
Household Outside Maintenance for the Elderly
(H.O.M.E.) program requests $14,500
Services include:
o Homemaking
o Home maintenance
-Chore services
Program part of City's CDBG program for 19 years
r In 2013, H.O.M.E stated they provided 1,038 hours
of service to 84 Brooklyn Center residents over the
age of 60.
—"lq%44mmmm._ cityonmameethig 02/10/2014
2/10/2014
5
2014 Public Service Applicant
Avenues for Homeless Youth
Avenues for Homeless Youth program requests $5,000
o Future 10-bed shelter and transitional housing program with
support services for homeless youth
Location planned for renovated property in Brooklyn Park in
coordination with Brooklyn Park EDA
Anticipated opening in September 2014
Currently in EDA and CDBG process in Brooklyn Park (In kind funds
with use of house and $10,000 CDBG funds requested)
Avenues for Homeless Youth operate other shelters
Program would be newly funded program for the City of
Brooklyn Center CDBG funds
o Avenues for Homeless Youth states goal for the program is to
support 30 to 40 homeless youth each year.
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014
2014 Public Service Applicant
PRO USA
Youth Financial Literacy Training program requests $10,000
Youth Financial Literacy Training includes:
Budgeting
-Debt reduction
o Good credit building
•Consumer protection
Program would be newly funding program for the City of
Brooklyn Center CDBG funds
PRO USA states they anticipate funds will be used to train
over 50 secondary-school students in northwest metro.
o Application submitted late and incomplete
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 12
2/10/2014
6
2014 CD 3G Activpiy
Neighborhood Stabilization/Code Enforcement
The Neighborhood Stabilization/Code Enforcement requests
$150,000, consistent with approved 2014 City budget
Addresses City Goal- Vibrant Neighborhoods
Implements Four Step Foreclosure and Vacant Property Strategies
• Data Collection, Neighborhood Stabilization, Prevention and
Intervention, Reinvestment
Arrests decline and eliminates blight in community
Program part of City's CDBG program for 6 years
Eligible areas based on following criteria:
1.Low to moderate income census blocks according to American
Community Survey (2008)
2.Foreclosure, vacancy, code violations (2009 data)
111■■___
\taw—City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 14
2/10/20 14
2014 CDBG Activity
Home Rehabilitation Program
Requested allocation of $53,362 for Home
Rehabilitation Program on condition:
Neighborhood Stabilization/Code Enforcement approved
at $150,000 and maximum public service amount of 15%
awarded to any or all public service requestors
Funds used to address emergency home maintenance
type repairs such as furnace replacement, water and
sewer service repair, etc. for individual properties.
Home Rehabilitation Program part of the City's
CDBG program since initiation of CDBG program
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 13
7
2/10/2014
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 15
CDBG Activity
CDBG Cumulative Data
01/01/2013 - 12/31/2013
I201 3 CDBG Activity
Information cont...
2013 CDRG Activity linformation
Neighborhood Stabilization/Code Enforcement
General Data
; City-Wide Data: 511 properties identified as vacant throughout 2013; Asof February 10, 2014 currently 276 known vacant properties
CDBG Focus Areas: 345 properties identified as vacant throughout 2013;currently 158 known vacant
CDBG Focus Areas
120 properties issued re-occupancy certificates after repairs made toeliminate life/health safety hazards and meet property codes
47 vacant properties issued abatement orders for health/life safety andpublic nuisances (I.e. garbage, junk, open to trespass, utility abatement,etc.). Of those 47, 20 abatements conducted. (Typically, a responsible
party not yet identified)
8,340 separate actions taken to obtain compliance in the CDBG Focusareas
■ 2,385 property code violations addressed
Neighborhood
Stabilization/Code
Enforcement
CDBG Focus Areas
and Activities
(2013 Calendar Year)
8
201 4 Allocation Options
Four options provided for consideration for CDBG Program Year 2014. After
feedback, a resolution will be prepared for February 24th City Council meeting.
Requested
Amount Option 1 Option 2 Option 3
$14,500 $12,800 $14,500 $12,500
$15,000 $11,500 $13,064 $12,500
59,167 $8,087 $8,323 $7,387
$10,000
$5,000 $3,500 $3,500
$44,500 $35,887 $35,887 $35,887
$150,000 $150,000 $150,000 $150,000
$53,362 $53,362 $53,362 $53,362
$247,862 $239,249 $239,249 $239,249
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 17
City of Brooklyn Center'
Neighborhood Stabilization/ Code
Enforcement
Home Rehabilitation ProgramIPTotal CDBG Funds
CDBG Activity It
Public Services
Senior Community Services III
H.O.M.E. Program
CEAP Senior Service Program -111
pomp I Ina Tanant Arivnr.rAt
Program
Youth Financial Literacy Training
(Incomplete/late submission)
Avenues for Homeless Youth
Total Public Services mama
Non-Public Services
Basis for R ecommendations
If City chooses to fund public service programs with CDBG funds,limited to 15% of CDBG Funds; Cannot shift funds from other nonpublic services programs
■ Limited funds available for allocation to public services programs
■ Staff recommendation based on new rating system that includesthe following criteria:
O Does the program meet the CDBG requirements?
•Does the program fulfill community needs?
How does the program align with City goals?
Has the organization demonstrated the ability to successfully implement aprogram using CDBG funds?
What is the overall budget for the program and does it have other fundingsources to ensure sustainability?
Are there similar services available for the community?
o What is the ease of access of services to the community? I.e. Location ofagency, methods of contact
Was the application submitted by deadline and complete?
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014
2/10/2014
9
Next Steps
Staff requests direction from the Council
regarding allocation of the CDBG funds
Based on feedback, staff will prepare
resolutions for approval at the February 24,
2014 City Council Meeting.
Questions?
City Council Meeting 02/10/2014 19
2/10/2014
10
EDA MEETING
City of Brooklyn Center
February 10, 2014
AGENDA
1.Call to Order
—The EDA requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A
copy of the full City Council packet, including EDA (Economic Development Authority),
is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the front of the Council
Chambers by the Secretary.
2.Roll Call
3.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda
—The following items are considered to be routine by the Economic Development
Authority (EDA) and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in which event the item will
be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission
Consideration Items.
a. Approval of Minutes
1. January 13, 2014— Regular Session
4.Commission Consideration Items
a. Resolution Opting Not to Waive Tort Liability for 2014
Requested Commission Action:
—Motion to adopt resolution.
5. Adjournment
EDA Agenda Item No. 3a
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
JANUARY 13, 2014
CITY HALL — COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1.CALL TO ORDER
The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Regular Session called to
order by President Tim Willson at 9:15 p.m.
2.ROLL CALL
President Tim Willson and Commissioners Carol Kleven, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, Lin
Myszkowski, and Dan Ryan. Also present were Executive Director Curt Boganey, Finance
Director Nate Reinhardt, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, City Attorney
Charlie LeFevere, and Mary Mullen, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc.
3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA
Commissioner Ryan moved and Commissioner Myszkowski seconded approval of the Agenda
and Consent Agenda, and the following item was approved:
3a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. December 9, 2013 — Regular Session
Motion passed unanimously.
4.COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEMS
4a. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-01 ELECTING OFFICERS FOR THE ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN
CENTER
Executive Director Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the
purpose of the proposed resolution.
Commissioner Ryan moved and Commissioner Myszkowski seconded adoption of
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-Of Electing Officers for the Economic Development Authority in and
for the City of Brooklyn Center
01/13/14 -1- DRAFT
Motion passed unanimously.
4b. RESOLUTION NO. 2014-02 AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF
PROPERTY TO FACILITATE NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS AND
REDEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITIES WITHIN THE BROOKLYN
BOULEVARD CORRIDOR (6031 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD)
Executive Director Curt Boganey introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the
purpose of the proposed resolution.
Commissioner Kleven moved and Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson seconded adoption of
RESOLUTION NO. 2014-02 Authorizing the Acquisition of Property to Facilitate
Neighborhood Improvements and Redevelopment Opportunities within the Brooklyn Boulevard
Corridor (6031 Brooklyn Boulevard).
Motion passed unanimously.
5. ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Ryan moved and Commissioner Myszkowski seconded adjournment of the
Economic Development Authority meeting at 9:20 p.m.
Motion passed unanimously.
01/13/14 -2- DRAFT
EDA Agenda Item No. 4a
EDA ITEM MEMORANDUM
DATE: February, 10 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Nathan Reinhardt, Finance Director VO°
SUBJECT: Statutory Tort Liability Limits
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority consider approval/adoption of the
attached resolution adopting the no waiver option for statutory tort liability insurance.
Background:
Each year the EDA must choose whether to waive tort liability limit protections of Minnesota
Statutes 466.04 as part of the insurance policy renewal application process. M.S. 466.04 states
that the maximum liability for a city for any claim arising after January 1, 2010 is $500,000 with
an aggregate maximum of $1,500,000 per incident. In past years the EDA has chosen not to
waive the liability limits and-the regular premium for insurance has covered all claims.
If the EDA were to waive the limits set by statute, it would be prudent to purchase additional
insurance coverage to cover possible higher awards in liability claims. Premiums for such
insurance would be approximately $3,500 per year.
Budget Issues:
The 2014 budget anticipates leaving the no waiver option in place for 2014 and has anticipated
insurance premiums based on that no waiver option. Waiving the statutory limits would require
that approximately $3,500 in additional premium costs be allocated for 2014 and in each
succeeding year.
Strategic Priorities:
• Financial Stability
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust
Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved
its adoption:
EDA RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OPTING NOT TO WAIVE TORT LIABILITY FOR 2014
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center
has an option to waive its protection under the tort liability limitations contained in Minnesota
Statutes 466.04; and
WHEREAS, the statutory tort limit for 2014 is $ 500,000 per individual with an
aggregate limit of $ 1,500,000 per incident; and
WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center
has not opted to waive its rights to limited tort liability in past years and is required to make a
declaration of its intention every year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority
of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Authority does not waive the monetary limits on
municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.02 for 2014.
February 10, 2014
Date President
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by commissioner
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
and the following voted against the same:
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.
SECTION I: LIABILITY COVERAGE WAIVER FORM
Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide
whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The
decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects:
If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no
more than $500,000. on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants
would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be
limited to $1,500,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city
purchases the optional excess liability coverage.
i) If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single
claimant could potentially recover up to $1,500,000. on a single occurrence. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to $1,500,000., regardless of the number of claimants.
If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant
could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all
claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would
also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants.
Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision.
This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and
return this form to 1.1VICIT before the effective date of the coverage, For further information, contact
LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues with your city attorney.
Brooklyn Ctr EDA/HRA accepts liability coverage limits of $ 500,000/$1,500,000 from the League of
Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT).
Check one:pg The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by
Minnesota Statutes 466.04.
Ei The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04,
to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT.
Date of city council meeting
Signature Position
Return thts completed form to LMCI7; 145 University Ave W, $t. Paul, MN. 55103-2044
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION
February 10, 2014
Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall
A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is
located at the front of the Council Chambers by the Secretary.
ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS
1.City of Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Update
2.E-Cigarette Report
PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS
Later/Ongoing
1.BC University
2.Inclusion and Diversity Follow Up — Community Engagement Strategies
3.Consideration of Modifying Setback Requirements for Front Porches
4.Citywide Environmental and Sustainability Efforts Update
5. Sister City Voinjama Visit Update
Parking Lot Issues
1. Joint Meeting with Charter Commission
Work Session Agenda Item No. 1
MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DATE: February 4, 2014
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 63 id)
SUBJECT: City of Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan Update
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding the City of
Brooklyn Center's DRAFT Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan.
Background:
In October 2011, Hennepin County was awarded the Community Transformation Grant (CTG) from
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The CTG is a five year grant to reduce
chronic diseases through strategies in active living, healthy eating, tobacco-free living, and clinical
services. Pedestrian and bicycle planning are components of Hennepin County's CTG active living
strategies. Under this program, the City of Brooklyn Center received a grant in 2013 through the
Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) to prepare a citywide pedestrian and bicycle plan.
A private consulting firm, WSB & Associates, Inc., was hired by the County in February 2013 to
perform the study and prepare a plan. The following were the expected outcomes and deliverables
of the study defined by the County:
•Evaluate and document best practices and existing conditions
•Develop and implement a community engagement and communications strategy
•Develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan
•Deliverables:
1.Documentation of existing conditions and preliminary needs and priorities2.Documentation of municipal pedestrian and bicycle planning best practices
3.Community engagement and communications strategy and timeline
4.Documentation of community engagement and communications
5. Final Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan (see attached)
The final plan was completed on September 30, 2013. The plan was then presented to the Parks and
Recreation Commission for review and comment on January 21, 2014. The Commission was
supportive of adoption of the policy and attached are draft meeting minutes from that meeting for
the Council's consideration.
Policy Issues:
Does the City Council desire to formally adopt the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan?
Does the City Council desire to consider adopting the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan as an official
planning and development guideline?
Strategic Priorities:
•Vibrant Neighborhoods
-7 -
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life
for all people and preserves the public trust
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
FEBRUARY 21, 2014
COMMUNITY ROOM #221, COMMUNITY CENTER
CALL TO ORDER
Chairperson Sorenson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Chair Sorenson, Commissioners Bonovsky, Dalton, Ebert, Shinnick and Witalka were present.
Commissioner Russell was absent and excused.
Also present was Community Activities, Recreation and Services Director Jim Glasoe.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Hair Sorenson asked that an item relating to Willow Lane Rink Lighting be added to the agenda.
By consensus, the agenda was approved as amended.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — November 19, 2013
There was a motion by Commissioner Witalka, seconded by Commissioner Shinnick to approve
the minutes of the November 19, 2013, meeting of the Park & Recreation Commission as
presented. The motion passed unanimously.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
CARS Director Glasoe reported that Councilmember Lyn Myszkowski had been appointed as
liaison to the Commission for 2014, but that she was currently in Liberia with a delegation from
Brooklyn Center that is visiting our sister city Voinjama.
ELECTION OF OFFICERS
Chair Sorenson opened nominations for Commission Chair. Commissioner Shinnick nominated
Commissioner Sorenson. Commissioner Witalka seconded the nomination. The motion was
unanimously passed.
Chair Sorenson named Torn Shinnick as Vice-Chair.
2014 AGENDA ITEMS
CARS Director Glasoe indicated that, Chair Sorenson had identified a number of future agenda
items at the November 2013 meeting and noted he would be working with Chair Sorenson to
develop the agendas for future meeting. Chair Sorenson asked that Commissioners continue to
identify and forward agenda items throughout the year.
BROOKLYN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLAN
Public Works Director Steve Lillehaug presented the draft Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and
Bicycle Plan to the Commission. Mr. Lillehaug reviewed the study purpose, the importance of
walking and cycling, some community background information, the existing and planned
pedestrian and bicycle network, the community engagement process, system challenges, study
recommendations and best practices review.
Following the presentation, Mr. Lillehaug asked for Commission input regarding the plan. Chair
Sorenson noted several traffic and pedestrian issues related to County Road 130, west of
Brooklyn Boulevard and identified some best practices that might help alleviate them.
Commissioner Ebert noted the educational component was good, but added enforcement of
existing laws, such as jaywalking, was also important. Commissioners also asked about funding
for the recommendations. Mr. Lillehaug noted that funding was not identified as a part of the
plan, but added this study was a planning document and would be used as a guide whenever
improvements are contemplated.
After additional discussion, Commissioner Shinnick made a motion, seconded by Commissioner
Witalka recommending the City Council formally adopt the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and
Bicycle Plan. The motion passed unanimously.
NORTHPORT SCHOOL HENNEPIN YOUTH SPORTS GRANT APPLICATION
CARS Director Glasoe reported the Robbinsdale School District had submitted an application for
a Hennepin Youth Sports Grant to assist with construction costs of a playfield adjacent to
Northport Elementary School and noted the application had been approved.
Mr. Glasoe added the District was beginning the process of developing plans and specifications
for the project and had indicated they would be providing the Commission an opportunity to
review and comment on the plans as the project will require the relocation of a small section of
park trail and some grade modifications near the Babe Ruth baseball field.
CENTENNIAL SOCCER FIELDS
CARS Director Glasoe reported modifications to the plans and specifications for construction
work on the youth soccer fields in Centennial Park had been completed. Mr. Glasoe added the
availability of the files for play in in the summer depended largely upon the weather this spring,
when sod would be available and when seed would grow. Mr. Glasoe noted the schedule still
anticipated the fields being ready for use at some point in 2014.
MEMORIAL AMPHITHEATER
CARS Director Glasoe reported that the plans and specifications for the amphitheater had been
completed and were being reviewed by staff. Mr. Glasoe also noted the City had requested a
probable cost of construction estimate from the architect and distributed a letter from the
architect with their response.
Mr. Glasoe indicated the architect had consulted with a General Contractor they work with to get
a better gauge on the current construction market. Mr. Glasoe noted the estimate for the
contractor was double the original estimate, but urged Commissioners to not "push the panic
button" quite yet. CARS Director Glasoe added that city staff was reaching out to some of their
contacts in the construction trades to get additional estimates and noted this exercise had
provided an opportunity for the architect to identify a number of areas where the plans could be
simplified, materials changed and costs reduced.
CARS Director Glasoe noted the intent was to still go out for bids on the project some time next
month.
WILLOW LANE SKATING RINK LIGHTS
Chair Sorenson reported that he had visited Willow Lane Park a number of times during the past
few weeks and, despite the lights being on each time, had not seen any skaters. CARS Director
Glasoe indicated he would speak with Streets and Parks Supervisor Todd Berg in the morning
and remind him of the Commission's recommendations regarding Willing Lane skating.
SET NEXT MEETING DATE
By consensus, the next meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was set for February
18, 2014, at 7:00 p.m. in Community Room #221 of the Brooklyn Center Community Center.
MEETING ADJOURNED
Commissioner Shinnick made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Witalka to adjourn the
meeting at 8:00 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
ri."1"111111111111111111_41 StuAJD
City of
BROOKLYN
CENTER
edestrian. &Bic cle Plan
Contents
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
CRIAPITEP 5TUPTI noo ."n.....1
Study Goals 1
Increase Walking and Biking 1
Engage the Community 1
Identify Best Practices 2
Identify Opportunities for Implementation
firt POR7ANCE or WALKING AND
2
CYCLING 3
Benefits Associated with Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning 3
CillAPITEr COMIUNITY BACKGROUND ----5
Community Profile 5
Demographics 5
Development Patterns 7
Redevelopment Areas and Trends 7
Popular Community Facilities and Destinations 10
Parks 10
Other Recreational Facilities 13
Earle Brown Heritage Center 13
Schools 13
Transit Station and Park and Ride Locations 15
Hennepin County Service Center 15
Shingle Creek Crossing 15
Big Box Locations and Restaurants 15
CHAP —ITER 4:1EXIISTUNÜ AND PLANNED PEDESTRIAN
AND BICYCLE NETWORK 17
City Facilities — Existing and Planned 17
Sidewalks 17
Trails 19
On-Road Facilities 21
Three Rivers Park District- Existing and Planned Facilities 22
Shingle Creek Regional Trail 22
A
Twin Lakes Regional Trail 22
Mississippi River Regional Trail 25
Hennepin County — Existing and Planned Facilities 27
County Road 152 — Brooklyn Boulevard 29
Hennepin County Bicycle Plan 29
CHAPTER n C MINUMIT -TI KNOAGEKENT......... SS
Surveys 33
Survey Highlights — Walking 33
Survey Highlights - Bicycling 36
Mobile Display 38
Partnerships with Local Organizations 38
Other Outreach Efforts 39
Presentations 39
News Releases 40
Other Studies 40
CHAPTER GTISTEN CHALLENGES 41
System Gaps 41
Sidewalk Gaps 43
Trail Gaps 44
Crossings 44
Wayfinding 46
Infrastructure, Infrastructure Condition and Maintenance.... 47
Lighting 47
Bicycle Racks 47
Wider Trails 47
Pavement Surface 47
Winter Maintenance 47
Other 48
Security 48
ti.611L61zIll til I 11CM ale
Education/Enforcement 48
Equipment 49
ther Comments 49
CHALTIER TPECCRK
Trail and Sidewalk Network Vision 50
On-Road Facilities 52
Crossings 53
Policies, Activities and Practices 54
Regular Plan Review, Project Identification and Studies 54
Update Ordinances/Encourage Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure 55
Partnering with Other Agencies/Organizations 55
Education 57
Maintenance 58
Security 60
Wayfinding 60
Signage for Sidewalks 60
Signage for Trails 61
Signage for On-Road Facilities 62
Priority Areas for Wayfinding 62
CHAPTER 8: BEST PRACTICES ................
Considerations for All Facilities 64
Eliminate Gaps 64
Consult MMUTCD 65
Conduct Studies 65
Signage and Wayfinding Materials 65
Pedestrian-Level Lighting 66
Pedestrian Facilities 67
ADA Requirements 67
Sidewalks 67
Curb Extensions 68
Median Refuge Islands 68
Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks 69
Leading Pedestrian Interval 70
Pedestrian Crosswalk Safety Systems 70
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon 71
High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk 71
LED Signage and In-Roadway Warning Systems 72
Countdown Pedestrian Signals 73
Multi-Use Facilities 73
Consult MnDOT's Bikeway Facility Design Manual 74
ADA Requirements 74
Off-Road Trails 74
Bicycle Facilities 75
Consult MnDOT's Bikeway Facility Design Manual 76
Traditional Bike Lanes 76
Buffered Bike Lanes 76
Protected Bike Lanes/Cycle Tracks 77
Pavement Treatment — All On-Road Facilities 77
Intersection Treatment — Through Bike Lane and Right-Turn Lane (vehicle) 77
Intersection Treatment — Bike Boxes 78
Intersection Treatment — Forward Stop Bar 78
Intersection Treatment — Intersection Crossing Markings 79
Intersection Treatment — Median Refuge Islands 79
Intersection Treatment — Bicycle Signals 79
APITER SO
Opportunities 80
Funding Sources 82
Hennepin County Sidewalk Participation Program 82
Hennepin County Roadside Enhancement Partnership Program 82
Hennepin County Bikeway Development Participation 82
A1:14.114:111t1111141
Hennepin County Bike Program Discretionary (Gap Program) 83
Transportation Alternatives Program 83
Surface Transportation Program (administered by Met Council) 83
Highway Safety Improvement Program 84
Minnesota DNR Local Trail Connections Program 84
Minnesota DNR Federal Recreational Trail Program 84
Statewide Health Improvement Program 84
Livable Communities Demonstration Account 84
Ongoing Monitoring 85
APPEINDICE&••••noonorzoononnonnononnonno MMMMMMM ononollonnononoene•sennoes••AW
Appendix A - Crossings at Shingle Creek Summary 87
Appendix B - Surveys 90
Appendix C - Survey Summary 99
Appendix D - Press Releases 105
Brook! n Center
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The city would like to thank Hennepin County and the many people who have had a hand in the
development of this plan, including: staff, appointed officials, residents and students at Brooklyn
Junior High. Their contribution to this study will result in an improved biking and walking
environment for the City of Brooklyn Center.
The city also wishes to acknowledge the Center for Disease Control and Prevention for making
funding available for the development of this plan.
AlA TIE STUDY !PURPOSE
The City of Brooklyn Center, in partnership with Hennepin County, is completing this Pedestrian
and Bicycle Plan for a number of reasons, with the ultimate aim of increasing walking and
bicycling within the community.
The purpose of this plan is to provide the City of Brooklyn Center and other relevant agencies with
a framework for future decision-making with regard to policy and infrastructure for pedestrians
and bicyclists. The study partners recognize that most trips begin or end with someone walking.
Therefore, it is important for communities to have the necessary infrastructure in place to make
those portions of trips easier. The plan strives to develop an accurate description of existing
non-motorized networks, identify missing gaps and key connections and to establish future needs,
best practices and other strategies that will enhance the ability of residents to walk and bike
within the city.
The plan aims to make biking and walking a more viable option than it is currently by making it
safer, more convenient and comfortable. While both Hennepin County and the City of Brooklyn
Center have both adopted complete streets policies, the existing non-motorized transportation
network faces challenges which are identified and addressed in this plan. The plan analyzes
these challenges and makes recommendations for improvements that can be achieved with the
implementation steps provided at the end of the plan.
Study Goals
The sections below discuss the goals of the study — which are to:
O Increase walking and biking
O Engage the community in creative ways to generate interest in the study
O Identify best practices and recommendations to make walking and biking more
appealing to residents
G Identify opportunities to implement study recommendations
Increase Walking and Biking
As noted above, the City of Brooklyn Center and Hennepin County have committed their agencies
to making walking and biking more attractive for transportation, recreational and health purposes.
Ultimately, the city and the county want to increase walking and bicycling by providing the
necessary infrastructure, policies and encouragement to make these modes more attractive, safe
and enjoyable for residents of all ages and backgrounds.
Engage the Community
This study's ultimate aim is to increase walking and biking. In order to accomplish this, the
city and county need to understand why people walk and bike and what residents want and/
or need to make walking and biking more attractive options — be it for health, transportation
Br id noo y Center .
or recreational reasons. To better understand the needs of the residents and the users of the
pedestrian and bicycle network, a significant focus of this study was spent engaging residents at
community events and public locations and soliciting their input and feedback.
Input collected at the community events and through surveys was focused on understanding travel
behavior — how frequently do people walk or bike, where do people go when they walk or bike,
why do people walk or bike; what could be done to the physical infrastructure to make walking
and biking easier; what could be done to help people navigate the existing pedestrian and bicycle
networks; what destinations are people interested in getting to; and what else is important to
making biking and walking more appealing to residents.
Identify Best Practices
Along with understanding the needs and desires of residents, this plan seeks to identify industry
"best practices" for developing a safe, efficient and enjoyable pedestrian and bicycle networks.
By implementing strategies that have been proven effective over time, the city, county and Three
Rivers Park District can ensure that the projects they propose to complete will provide users of the
system with what they need in order to get to their destinations. Providing a safe and convenient
sidewalk and bikeway system will increase walking and biking within the community.
Identify Opportunities for Implementation
Finally, this study intends to identify opportunities that the city, county and Three Rivers Park
District can take advantage of to implement improvements over time and steps that can be taken
to track pedestrian and bicycle use to ensure that the ongoing needs of users are evaluated and
addressed.
2
11111111111111111.11:ATIW [Mil 111 I f411 :MAW-
CHAP -fir ILITANCE or
WALKIM N111) E CLING
America and the communities within it are undergoing a number of changes that have emerged
over the past decade. Our population is aging — the baby boomers are getting older and
their transportation and recreational needs are changing. Additionally, health concerns about
cardiovascular disease and increasing levels of obesity (at the adult and childhood levels) and the
negative health effects associated with obesity (cholesterol, diabetes, strokes, certain types of
cancer, etc.) have come to the forefront of the medical community and health consumers as a
whole as insurance premiums have increased and the national health care debate has taken place.
Since the 1970s, the percent of children who are obese has tripled, with the largest increases
seen in children of African American descent or from low income populations'. The trends for
adults are no less concerning. Today more than one third of American adults are obese. In 2008,
medical costs associated with obesity were estimated at *147 billion 2 . As with children, obesity
is more prevalent in the African American community. Regular exercise and physical activity can
reduce obesity — yet studies show that less than half of children meet and less than 10 percent of
adults meet recommended guidelines for physical activity 3 .
Benefits Associated with Pedestrian and Bicycle Planning
The changes in our communities (both health and demographic) are beginning to make their
impact and influence felt. Many cities have started to think about the actions they can take to
encourage physical activity, to make their communities healthier, and to make systems more
accessible for people as they age. Physical activity is likely to occur for four primary reasons
— work, household activities, recreation/leisure and transportation'. One of the ways in which
communities can make a difference is in its recreational and transportation facilities and their
connections to key destinations.
Creating conditions that make walking and biking convenient and safe are beneficial for several
reasons. One of the most important benefits is that increased biking and walking rates encourage
a healthier community. If conditions are in place to make it safe, convenient and enjoyable to
walk or bike, more people will have the opportunity to choose non-motorized transportation for
commuting, running errands, getting to and from school or for recreational and leisure activities.
For many people, walking and biking as a means of transportation may be their only opportunity
for exercise in a given day.
1 Anderson PM, Butcher KF. Childhood Obesity: Trends and Potential Causes. The Future of Children:
Childhood Obesity, 2006.
2 Centers for Disease Control
3 Ibid
4 Design for Health website: designforhealth.net/physical-activity 3
rooklyn Center riadLy Ian
Information obtained from the Design for Health website indicates the following 5 :
•Proximity to public transit stops (bus, light rail, heavy rail) was linked to higher levels of
physical activity among adults.
•People who use public transportation were less likely to be sedentary or obese.
•29 percent of transit users meet the recommended 30 minutes or more of physical
activity a day while walking to and from transit. Racial and ethnic minorities reported
even greater percentages.
•Most studies of children and adolescents indicate that walking or biking to school is
related to overall higher physical activity levels.
Safe Routes to Schools programs increase rates of biking and walking to schools
(schools within Brooklyn Center are participating in this program).
Programs such as Safe Routes to Schools usually lead to infrastructure improvements
that can be used by the community at large — thereby providing a safer environment for
all users — not just students.
More sidewalks are associated with adults having higher rates of walking and meeting
physical activity recommendations.
The presence of bicycle lanes and trails is positively related to cycling and to more
adults meeting physical activity recommendations.
Building multi-use trails can lead to both short- and long-term increases in walking and
bicycling.
Living near trails or having trails in one's neighborhood has been associated with people
being 50 percent more likely to meet physical activity guidelines.
•Fast traffic and high traffic volumes can be a barrier to walking and biking. Systems
that increase the safety and/or separate the modes will encourage more use.
Additionally, a non-motorized transportation system will improve mobility for those who do not or
cannot drive. This may include children, the elderly, those who are not physically able, and those
who simply choose not to drive. With an increasing elderly population and a desire to appeal to
young families, improving the safety and convenience of biking and walking is beneficial to the
entire city.
Another benefit of increased walking and biking is reduced dependency on fossil fuels. While the
number of electric and hybrid vehicles is increasing, most vehicles still operate on regular gasoline
or diesel fuel which emits pollutants that contribute to poor air quality. Even at low levels, these
emissions are known to cause respiratory issues, and are a suspected cause of some cancers.
With the volume of vehicle related emissions increasing, efforts to increase non-motorized
transportation are welcome for overall community health.
5 /bid; Active Transportation — Making the Link from Transportation to Physical Activity and Obesity —
Summer 2009 Research Brief 4
CrillAPTIM 3: COMMUNITY
ul.)4iCliGIAOUND
In order to achieve the overall purpose of the study and to address the goals outlined previously,
an understanding of the community and its amenities is needed.
Community Profile
The City of Brooklyn Center is a first-ring suburb of the City of Minneapolis (Figure 1). It is
approximately 8.5 square miles and is situated along the Mississippi River. It is approximately
six miles from downtown Minneapolis and is connected to the Cities of Brooklyn Park, Crystal,
Minneapolis and Robbinsdale. Brooklyn Center was first incorporated as a village in 1911, but
remained largely rural until the city's population boomed during the 1950s. Today Brooklyn
Center's population is approximately 30,104, which is not anticipated to change substantially
through 2030.
Demographics
As noted previously, the City of Brooklyn Center has a population of approximately 30,000. The
city's population has been relatively stable over the past 30 years, experiencing little growth or
decline due to its full development. However, the city has a fair number of residents that are
in age groups where the automobile may not be the primary means of transportation on a daily
basis. According to the 2010 Census Data, approximately 28 percent of the population is under
the age of 20 and approximately 14 percent of the population is over the age of 60. The percent
of the population over the age of 60 is expected to increase as more of the baby boomers enter
that demographic.
The city's population is similar to that of other first-ring suburbs; in that, it is much more
diverse than more outlying areas. There are diverse ethnic communities (most notably Hispanic,
Hmong and Liberian) that contribute to the city's diversity. According to 201 0 Census
Data, approximately half of the population is Caucasian. Black/African Americans make up
approximately 25 percent of the city's population. Asians are approximately 14 percent of the
city's population and those of Hispanic decent are approximately 1 percent.
The community's profile — with approximately 40 percent of the population over the age of 60 or
under the age of 20 — in conjunction with a large number of new/newer immigrants (23 percent of
the population was born outside of the United States as noted in the 2010 Census), contributes
to a moderate poverty rate. In 2010, the median household income was approximately $48,000
with a per capita income of $21,400. Persons living in poverty were approximately 17 percent of
the city's population.
5
CNI
kt '
•k
v04
s
. ;r2
9
9•
'
IS 1
aVOli I (*Ali !IA I (t-N1 II 1 II il rwg u
The demographics indicate that there are a number of residents within the community that could
be users of the pedestrian and bicycle network and would benefit from improvements to that
network. Brooklyn Center recognizes that there are many groups of people that do not drive
including children, the elderly, those who are not physically able, those who may have limited
means to own and operate a motorized vehicle and those who simply choose not to drive. By
making pedestrian and bicycle transportation options safer and more convenient, the city will
become more accessible.
Development Patterns
As a result of developing during the latter half of the 20th century, the City of Brooklyn Center is
faced with the challenge of a largely auto-oriented landscape, consistent with many other first-
ring suburbs in the Twin Cities. These development patterns pose some inherent constraints
with regard to walking and bicycling, including sidewalk gaps, limited planned trail network,
unsignalized or unmarked roadway crossings and high travel speeds on many corridors.
Of the existing land uses, 35 percent of the total acreage within the city is single-family
residential development (as shown in Figure 21. This is by far the largest land use within the
community. The next largest land use is roadways, which make up 23 percent. Cities with
these characteristics generally do not present favorable conditions for walking and bicycling as
destinations tend to be spread out.
Contributing to this challenge within Brooklyn Center is the fact that much of the commercial
land uses are located near 1-94, 1-694, and TH 100. In general, interstate roadways and roadways
with heavy traffic volumes and high speeds (such as TH 100 and TH 2521 are not intended for
bicycle or pedestrian traffic. These roadways can also serve as barriers to pedestrian and bicycle
networks that need to cross or get around them, resulting in indirect routes that take longer and
are less appealing to pedestrians and bicyclists. Fortunately, the City of Brooklyn Center and
Hennepin County have recognized these challenges and have over time constructed a number of
grade separated crossings for both pedestrians and bicyclists over facilities such as 1-94, 1-694
and TH 100.
Redevelopment Areas and Trends
Figure 3 shows some of the major areas in Brooklyn Center where redevelopment is occurring.
Moving forward there are some opportunities for modifying development and non-motorized
transportation patterns as redevelopment occurs. Some of the redevelopment efforts can be
seen along County Road 152 also known as Brooklyn Boulevard. Over the years, commercial
development along this corridor has been changing to meet more local needs. Additionally,
long-term, the city is envisioning existing residential uses along the corridor to transition to
more commercial uses. Realizing the changing nature of the corridor and the existing traffic
conditions (lower speeds, heavier volumes, limited pedestrian refuges, crashes, traffic operations
at intersection, etc.) the city and the county undertook a corridor study that identified motorized
transportation needs (access modifications, additional turn lanes, intersection geometrics,
additional traffic signals, etc.) and pedestrian and bicycle needs. The study made a number of
recommendations to make it safer and more appealing for pedestrians and bicyclists.
7
(
Tis -o cr, M
zs 73 0 ',Fs czc w co D. >
CO
0u. X U- Cl) 01
Cl) i— n0 C _ rt
•
0 u)
0c
•
._ 0..O 0 0cc 2 - ›, E ca o._E .—= .c c-m A'R, -0 c.
u.. 0 ± F..- ..0as= a)L. 13oa)
ca t17, 0= .0 0•II
0)c
.— -0To. F.,..R —a) 10
n . ;Rom
u) c4.1cu .—
cu 7-1
E Er., 6L.c .1 t IL 0 CCS 0
II
1 '4•S .r";=(1)Ir V-) C u) 7 i • - ti cp .--, -., - L. •0 a, •-
M.a)0[sAVIPlaqwnH-2----i
•' --. '.-I
cy a) P
>" 103 4 - = W0
< ; C4 (i) E
U) g 46_..s2
to "b 8 CL
, CY C X -.5 . , ., it ih- CZ a) • -
- , ii TS 0:: 0
0.) th 'a
/ iv 0 -0 7.)
._. 0 0 al
0 (11 C .C2Z E. (0 M
aseLsclt
•
aaaa i r-,
a
r
cr)
"
Cc. rot
C7)
C c„"
<
<z
UY alvot,4.
1,151/11141" ,c,t zc
51
011 1 1
Improvements include constructing a multiuse trail along the west side of Brooklyn Boulevard
and a sidewalk on the east side. It is recommended that the trail and sidewalk be set back at
least 10 feet from the roadway to enhance user comfort and safety. A trail on the west side of
the roadway enhances connections to four neighborhood parks and one elementary school. The
trail will also link to Twin Lakes Regional Trail and a local city trail. The sidewalk will provide
convenient access to a city park, an elementary school and the city's commercial core.
Along with the sidewalk and trail improvements, median refuge islands, countdown timers, and
a new traffic signal at 61st Avenue are also recommended to enhance pedestrian and bicycle
safety and use. Finally, an at-grade crossing at 55th Avenue for the Twin Lakes Regional Trail
is recommended, unless future redevelopment occurs along the east side of Brooklyn Boulevard
between 55th Avenue and TH 100. If that occurs, opportunities should be investigated for a
grade-separated crossing. Implementation of the recommendations will be ongoing — with both
agencies seeking funding for the proposed improvements.
Other locations for redevelopment that are intended to include more pedestrian and bicycle
amenities include the area around the former Brookdale Mall, now referred to as Shingle Creek
Crossing. Redevelopment plans for this area include retail, office and multifamily housing linked
together by a trail network.
Popular Community Facilities and Destinations
The City of Brooklyn Center has a number of natural, community, cultural and commercial
facilities that are linked or have the potential to be linked via the trail and sidewalk system. Figure
4 shows a number of these facilities as well as the trail and sidewalk system.
Parks
The city owns and operates over 520 acres of park and natural recreation areas and over 65
miles of city owned and operated trails and sidewalks, with approximately seven miles of Three
Rivers Park District Regional Trails. The 24 parks within the system are dispersed throughout the
community and offer a wide variety of activities. One of the parks, North Mississippi, is a regional
park — the rest are city parks. Some parks are more natural and offer passive opportunities
(walking, nature watching, gardens, etc.) and others offer more active opportunities (ball fields,
playgrounds, boating, etc.). Some of the parks are smaller — designed to serve a neighborhood —
and others are larger — intended to serve the broader community. Figure 4 shows the locations of
the parks. Parks within the community include:
1.Arboretum — Eugene H. Nagel Arboretum: 61st and Major
Amenities include: Natural wetland, flowers and trail
2.Bellvue Park: 801 55th Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, softball field, skating rink, playground, picnic area/
shelter and trail
3. Bob Cahlander Park: 65th and Brooklyn Boulevard
Amenities include: Wildlife, flower gardens and trail
1 0
.15
4.Centennial Park: 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Amenities include: Soccer fields, softball fields, tennis courts, archery, picnic area/
shelters, playground and trail to Palmer Lake Nature Area
5.Centennial Park West: 6254 Brooklyn Drive
Amenities include: Basketball court, hockey rink, skating rink, playground, community
gardens shelter and trail
6.East Palmer Park: 7027 Oliver Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, softball fields, playground, picnic area/shelter and trail
7.Evergreen Park: 7112 Bryant Avenue North
Amenities include: Baseball field, basketball court, softball fields, lighted football/soccer
field, hockey rink, skating rink, pickle ball, tennis court, picnic shelter, playground, shelter
building and trail
8.Firehouse Park: 6535 Bryant Avenue North
Amenities include: Softball fields, playground, picnic area/shelter, grill and trail
9.Freeway Park: 6701 Beard Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, softball field, playground, picnic area/shelter and trail
10.Garden City Park: 3607 65th Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball hoops, softball field, shelter building and playground
11.Grandview Park: 1600 59th Avenue North
Amenities include: Baseball field, basketball court, lighted football/soccer field, hockey
rink, tennis courts, sliding hill and trail
12.Happy Hollow Park: 5030 Abbott Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, playground, picnic area/shelter, grill and trail
13.Kylawn Park: 6015 Kyle Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, softball fields, tennis courts, hockey rink,
playground, picnic area/shelter, shelter building and trail
14.Lions Park: 5501 Russell Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, tennis courts, playground, picnic shelter, grill and
trail. This park is adjacent to Centerbrook Golf Course and Little League Field
15.Marlin Park: 6404 Marlin Drive
Amenities include: Playground and trail
16.Northport Park: 5512 Sailor Lane and 57th and France Avenue
Amenities include: Baseball field, basketball court, hockey rink, skating rink, soccer field,
football field, tennis courts, playground, picnic area/shelter and trail
17.Orchard Lane Park: 6512 Perry Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, softball field, picnic area and shelter, playground and trail
18. Palmer Lake Park: 2800 69th Avenue North
Amenities include: 200 acre natural area, trail loop — paved trail and a woodchip trail and
picnic area
12
(-/1111 kW) Diull fl 1 I ri 11 VE111Ww
19.Riverdale Park: 7031 Dallas Road
Amenities include: Basketball court, picnic area/shelter, playground and softball fields
20.Twin Lake Park: 4651 Twin Lake Avenue
Amenities include: Basketball court, playground, picnic shelter, grill and trail
21.Wangstad Park: 6100 France Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball court, picnic area, playground and trail
22.West Palmer Park: 7110 Palmer Lake Drive
Amenities include: Baseball field, softball fields, basketball court, picnic area/shelter,
playground, skating rink, tennis courts and trail.
23.Willow Lane Park: 4800 69th Avenue North
Amenities include: Basketball hoop, hockey rink, skating rink, picnic area/shelter,
playground, softball field and trail
24.North Mississippi Regional Park: 49th Avenue and 1-94
Amenities include: Boating, fishing, biking, hiking, trails, geocaching, picnic areas/
shelters, grills, playgrounds, wading pool, Carl Kroening Interpretive Center, natural setting
and snowshoeing. This park is shared with the City of Minneapolis.
Other Recreational Facilities
In addition to the city's parks and trails there is a local golf course, Centerbrook, and a community
center. Centerbrook golf course is located near the center of the city. It is a 9-hole, Par 3 golf
course that is appealing to both beginner and experienced golfers. There are a number of leagues
for residents to participate in.
Located near the intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and 1-94/1-694 is the Brooklyn Center
Community Center. The community center offers a number of amenities that are appealing to residents
of all ages. Amenities include: Olympic-sized swimming pool, water slide, wading pool, diving boards,
exercise rooms, changing and locker rooms and meeting and event rooms. It is also possible to host
children's birthday parties at the center. Figure 4 shows the locations of these facilities.
Earle Brown Heritage Center
The Earle Brown Heritage Center is a historic restoration site that is home to a large conference
center that hosts over 500 events a year. The site is approximately 15 acres and has a number
of buildings and gardens for visitors to use. On site, and available for all visitors to review, is
information about Earle Brown. Earle Brown was a resident of Brooklyn Center and was one of
the area's largest landowners. In 1920, he became sheriff of Hennepin County and reformed
many corrupt practices. In 1929, he established the Minnesota Highway Patrol — one of the first
in the nation. This center is a popular destination for local residents as well as visitors to the area.
Figure 4 shows the location of the Earle Brown Heritage Center.
Schools
The City of Brooklyn Center is served by four school districts. There are a total of 14 schools,
which serve children between kindergarten and high school. This includes both public and private
schools. Figure 5 shows the locations of the schools.13
II ..,
- .. -......._ - - -• --I 1 1 . 31 V O:, ?I - . • ''.5 ' '; -S,3 ,10,1
....P....1-. ,.....-
I
. bli',1.1" •■,-.1 1: .4; ,,...
--..., t •+. - I .-
•\''' ' — -4..1 ..... - -
N /AV-Sitatt.I.
:
itl3M'S., 11 -.
I ..!AV MI*
/H .., ,i1,0•3■--
,
ti no We:,
11 3;•Ii k1,0
••10,
•;;;
•••
11.0
e.• L.
-
•
N3A In
'H
Et: I
i•••■
weer. A,. 16
„,-"„",‘
■ CI.
a)
a)a)0) u) a). ._a Ea. ZIt I- = 0
To Ta 2 TaaC c 1- to .-0 0 To ...c.) 2' c.c.- .-01 01 CJ 2 •cana a0 0) o ace ix ;a .,i (f) I- c I-(a .x 10 tn 0 ■on 10C 0 I— 0 CU co 0 t..40 c 7 a 2 2) co 0E1 o._.u) a a a 0 = ..a ...- -'` cax a a _rti .12 as 0 RI
W a ...I a. 0) CL CO a 6 --)
C. i= tii ci _1 ri if) W a 01-11
1 1 1 i 1 1 1 I
I _:
(cAAAtoll :d.6J I Itql 'I LIUM DI 101 1111111,"INNIIIIMPF11111.11111MM 1011
In addition to elementary, middle and high schools, the City of Brooklyn Center has four
institutions of higher learning that are a draw for residents and regional populations. These
institutions include: Brown College, Minnesota School of Business and Globe University, ITT
Technical Institute and National American University.
Transit Station and Park and Ride Locations
The City of Brooklyn Center is well-served by Metro Transit, the Twin Cities largest transit
provider. There are a number of transit routes along major transportation corridors within the
community that are fairly easy for residents to access. In addition to stops along corridors, there
are also several park and ride facilities that people can walk or bike to in order to access transit
service. Additionally, there is a major transit station, which serves multiple transit routes, located
at Shingle Creek Crossing (mall). Figure 6 shows the transit routes, park and ride locations and
the transit station.
Hennepin County Service Center
Given its location within Hennepin County and its population density, the City of Brooklyn Center
was selected by Hennepin County to have one of its service centers. The service center is a
location where people can obtain certificates, identification documents, licenses, permits and
registrations. In addition, there are court and library facilities. Figure 6 shows the location of the
service center.
Shingle Creek Crossing
Shingle Creek Crossing is located on the former Brookdale Mall site (Figure 6). This area is
undergoing extensive redevelopment and updating, including the daylighting of Shingle Creek. On
site are three anchor tenants — Sears, Walmart and Kohls. Additionally there is an Applebee's
restaurant, an L.A. Fitness and a Holiday gas station. Shingle Creek Crossing draws many local
users with its stores and expects to draw in even more as the site continues to redevelop.
Assisting in the attractiveness of the area as a destination is Metro Transit's station area which
serves a number of transit routes.
The city and private developers have been making significant investments in the site and the
area is starting to redevelop. Adjacent parcels are also starting to see investments and upgrades
to make the entire area more appealing and more of a destination. In addition to the activities
identified above, investments are being made in redeveloping nearby residential areas — thus,
bringing a population concentration to the area. With these improvements, it is expected that
there will be a corresponding increase in demand for transit and pedestrian and bicycle amenities.
Big Box Locations and Restaurants
While not normally considered major destinations in terms of recreational or commuting purposes,
residents participating in the survey indicated that their walking and bicycling destinations
included local stores such as Walmart, Target and Cub Foods, as well as gas stations and fast
food restaurants. These locations are an important part of the daily and weekly lives of residents
in the community, and they desire to be able to safely get to these locations. These commercial
destinations are located throughout the community. 15
00 [7
CN1
0
0
"Cf
CillAPTE 41: EXISTING AND
ELANN LD prnEsTIZIAN AND
BCYCL KTTWORK
This chapter describes the existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle network within the City of
Brooklyn Center. Information is provided on facilities owned by the City of Brooklyn Center, Three
Rivers Park District and Hennepin County. Figure 7 shows the existing and planned trails within
the community regardless of ownership.
City Facilities — Existing and Planned
Sidewalks
The City of Brooklyn Center owns and maintains (snow removal and repair) the entire sidewalk
network that is shown in Figure 7. The existing sidewalk and trail network comprises over
65 miles. Most of the sidewalk is between four and six feet wide and is made of concrete.
Sidewalks can be found in residential and commercial areas as well as around public facilities.
As shown in Figure 7, the sidewalk network is not complete for all neighborhoods. As the
community developed over time, there were certain periods in history where constructing
sidewalks was not a priority, so sidewalks were not constructed. At other times, sidewalks were
commonplace with new development, so they were constructed. Unfortunately, a majority of the
city developed when it was not popular to construct sidewalk or trail facilities so the city is faced
with the challenge of constructing sidewalks after the fact.
Second, as time has passed, the city has attempted on occasion to construct sidewalks where
there are none during city street rehabilitation projects. However, there has not been much
support to construct new sidewalks by many of the residents immediately adjacent to the
project and decisions were made to not include such sidewalk improvements as part of the city's
roadway project. Residents can be hesitant to have sidewalks added to the roadway project for
a number of reasons. Some do not want to have to pay additional assessments (the city allows
for a 10-year repayment on roadway projects. Sidewalks typically add 3-5 percent to the project
cost.), some do not want to have the sidewalk on their property and some have fear of liability if
someone should fall. Others are also concerned that they will be required to shovel the sidewalk
in the winter or be billed if they fail to do so. Although the city maintains (snow removal and
repair) the sidewalk network, some residents still fear that they will be required to maintain the
sidewalk.
It should be noted that it is city policy to include sidewalks on both sides of all arterial street
reconstruction projects unless specifically omitted by the city council. Additionally, they
are generally recommended to be included on one side of the street of collector roadway
reconstruction projects.
17
X-
<
CO
1:1114:11111/1111r4111Dial1.4ifilMr 1Broiikl
In terms of future sidewalks, the city, will continue to encourage their development as part of
roadway reconstruction projects. In addition, the city and the school districts have recently
completed a Safe Routes to School evaluation process for nine schools serving the community.
This process has identified a limited number of new sidewalk connections that could be
constructed to make walking and biking to elementary and middle schools easier for children.
Copies of recommended improvements (in addition to sidewalks, the process identified crosswalk
locations and treatments, maintenance improvements, etc. that could be implemented) are
available from the City of Brooklyn Center. Due to space constraints of this report, the individual
school plans are not included. The proposed sidewalk connections identified as part of the Safe
Routes to School study are included in the map in Chapter 6 — Recommendations.
Trails
Along with the sidewalk network, the city also owns a limited number of multiuse trail facilities
that link to sidewalks and regional trails (discussed under "Three Rivers Park District"). These
trails are intended to serve both pedestrians and bicyclists. Snow removal is provided on city
trails. They are shown on Figure 7.
The City of Brooklyn Center has a limited trail expansion plans within its community that are
for local trails. Most planned trail improvements are to the Twin Lakes Regional Trail extension
(discussed under Three Rivers). There are, however, four trail segments that the city is working to
construct in the future.
The first trail is on the city's northwestern border with the City of Brooklyn Park. The city has
coordinated with the City of Brooklyn Park and Hennepin County to study a trail connection
that will feed into the Shingle Creek Regional Trail. In 2009, Connections at Shingle Creek — A
Corridor Study was completed. This study identified a number of improvements for increasing
the quality of Shingle Creek Trail, revitalizing land uses along the creek area and for providing
trail connections to serve the area and to link to Shingle Creek Regional Trail. There were two
recommendations made for trails — short-term and long-term improvements. Figure 8 shows the
proposed trail connections.
In the short-term, the proposed plan shows a connection that ties into an existing trail just to
the east of Park Center High School and follows Shingle Creek to Brooklyn Boulevard (County
Road 152). It then parallels Brooklyn Boulevard until Regent Avenue, where it crosses Brooklyn
Boulevard and connects with an existing trail. The economic development authority for the City of
Brooklyn Park applied for, and received a grant to construct the short-term improvement. The two
cities and Hennepin County, along with input from the watershed district and the school district,
are beginning plans to design the project, with construction occurring in 2014 or 2015.
Long-term plans for the trail utilize the connection from Park Center High School to Brooklyn
Boulevard. Once the trail reaches Brooklyn Boulevard, the long-term plan includes a grade
separated crossing of Brooklyn Boulevard at this location rather than an at-grade crossing at
Regent Avenue. Once over Brooklyn Boulevard, the trail parallels Shingle Creek until it connects
with the existing trail. No funding has been identified for the long-term project at this time.
19
.•
!ILI 4.
; yrthion
:i±eaL
t ,A Va4V°.iu9 ri r-
4\3-
„' , •r 1r,. LA ,ftriL"
!., et
7
ot4 L.;.
: I .411z.„
0
<7
For more details on all of the study recommendations, a copy of the 2009 study may be obtained
from the city. A summary of the study purpose and recommendations can be found in Appendix A.
The second trail that the city would like to construct is a part of the Mississippi River Trail located
along the city's eastern border. The Mississippi River Trail is part of a larger, national effort to
develop a bikeway (both on-road and off-road — facility type includes off road trails, shoulders,
bike lanes and shared roadways) that follows the Mississippi River from its origins in Itasca State
Park (Minnesota) to the Gulf of Mexico (Louisiana). The planned trail is close to 3,000 miles long.
The trail is a work in progress, with more segments to be constructed in the future.
Within the City of Brooklyn Center, a portion of the trail is owned by the city and a portion of the
trail is owned by Three Rivers Park District. The city owns the segment of trail from 1-694 to the
city's northern border. The existing gap in the trail is from just north of 1-694 to 65th Avenue
North. Pedestrians can continue on a sidewalk. Bicyclists are required to travel along Willow
Lane North, a low-volume city street. This segment has been identified as a gap area by the city
as well as by Hennepin County in its Bicycle Plan.
The third trail segment the city plans on constructing is a segment of trail on the south side
of Shingle Creek Crossing. This trail would complete a circle around the mall area and link
pedestrians and bicyclists to shopping, transit and employment nodes.
The fourth trail segment the city plans on constructing is a segment of trail between TH 100 and the
Twin Lakes Regional Trail just south of the interchange with County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard).
This section of trail will link high-density residential areas to the Twin Lakes Regional Trail.
On-Road Facilities
In addition to the sidewalks and trails, there are a limited number of city streets that have the
space and/or shoulders to accommodate the more serious commuter bicyclists. These roadways
include portions of Xerxes and Dupont Avenues North. The city does not sign these roadways as
on-road routes. More information on these routes is provided under "Hennepin County".
In the future, the city's comprehensive plan indicates that it may be feasible to accommodate on-
road bicycle facilities on select roadways where right of way could accommodate such facilities.
The city's plan identifies the following potential candidates:
O Humboldt Avenue (County Road 57): This route also shows up on the Hennepin
County Bicycle Plan. No facilities are in place yet.
O Dupont Avenue: This route shows up on the Hennepin County Bicycle Plan — much of
this corridor includes shoulders capable of accommodating bicycle traffic and is noted
as an existing route in the Hennepin County Bicycle Plan.
O Xerxes Avenue: This route is identified as being needed north of County Road 10 (Bass
Lake Rd). The Hennepin County Bicycle Plan also has this route identified. The county
shows sections of this roadway as being in place (between 65th and 59th). Other
segments still need to be completed.
21
0 69th Avenue: The plan identifies the area west of County Road 152 (Brooklyn Blvd) as
an on-street facility. Hennepin County's plan identifies this route and indicates that the
existing roadway (shoulders) presently accommodates bicyclists.
0 57th Avenue and County Road 10 east of Brooklyn Blvd: A trail exists on County
Road 10 east of Xerxes Avenue to County Road 57 (Logan Avenue). A trail will be
constructed from County Road 57 to Lyndale Avenue in 2015 (Twin Lakes Regional
Trail) addressing a majority of the identified needs.
Three Rivers Park District- Existing and Planned Facilities
The Three Rivers Park District owns approximately seven miles of trails within the city. These
trails are regional trails and include: Shingle Creek, Twin Lakes and the Mississippi River Regional
Trails. The City of Brooklyn Center performs snow removal on these trails.
Shingle Creek Regional Trail
The Shingle Creek Regional Trail is a multiuse trail through the Cities of Brooklyn Park and
Brooklyn Center. The trail is about eight and a half miles long. Figure 9 shows the location of
the trail in relationship to other trails. The Rush Creek Regional Trail connects to this trail. The
Shingle Creek Regional Trail skirts Edinburgh Golf Course, travels along Shingle Creek Park, travels
through Palmer Lake Park, crosses Shingle Creek, connects to Garden City Park, crosses Highway
100 and ends at the southern edge of Lions Park. There are no planned improvements for this
trail within the city. The City of Brooklyn Center is working with Brooklyn Park on a local trail that
will connect to the regional trail. This segment of trail is discussed under city facilities.
Twin Lakes Regional Trail
The Twin Lakes Regional Trail is under development, with segments of the trail already in place.
Figure 9 shows the relationship of the trail with other regional trails. Figure 10 provides greater
detail of the trail.
Portions the Twin Lakes Regional Trail were developed and constructed by Brooklyn Center as a
local trail. However, Three Rivers Park District recognizes that there are gaps in the regional trail
network, especially in the first ring suburbs due to the fact that they were developed in an era
where trails and sidewalks were not routinely a part of development — as such, there are sections
of the Twin Cities that lack regional trail facilities. To address gaps in the first ring suburbs, the
Three Rivers Park District completed First Tier Trails, Greenways, and Parks Master Plan in 2000.
This plan became a part of the Metropolitan Council 2030 planning framework. The Twin Lakes
Regional trail is a result of this effort.
22
1CO
Ill
r4;i
t.a,tn
\ 1 - . _
1_k'n
51T: i-4
11 7° 0 V .1-al
E s g .2 0. g A
q r.2.,,
,,,,,, .
,...
,..
..I . .5 iS a 4,' 43" TA, .a;0Lt '-' I 00a o....
4Fa'..., 1... 4.U ik,
—,..
T.3 7a"oce :-.--. Zz• 0
N el ,....1:1)
. g . CDN o ..'I et1 i lid' 0.,.,. a).4 ..t
6 1 COi: il
i 0 ce g ia tS.ri E ,E
ci 1 P b.
11 . k oa
rm 17, ..
Hi ". fr 0-M 7g .! ;
a . a)(J o u.il 0
.9.'t)c...Q
(0)
t
1
P-9
te)1.1;=-
C4.1-
‘1.C
Lf)
0<
0 It.!7.017,.41 ,
any iu Winn A2 't le,
m.f.S!..ga 1--- T3 c
<!;14,. .Dyl o .4.fi------ E.....
- E
ed rp ,..,c 0 , 0. !I'F.E. 0
a m c! '1.o_
"4 V IPIcCia,./1 '7 8 ....t 2 fu. = ni 1c.-.., E 5 t_. ct, 01 ....,2
3.4V 01
a)
a)
—.2a)a) CY
Cs
Ls' 0O0
• 2w
0
0
0
0
gr)
0
ILl22
4-, 'a E.,' 0-1ca
n,nc..)
01.,;5
ame olur.+1
.11
r5UM
[Li;pri lir ri r
The Twin Lakes Regional Trail is planned to begin at the southern end of Twin Lakes in the City
of Robbinsdale near Highway 100. From there it continues northward into Brooklyn Center
where it crosses Shingle Creek Regional Trail and continues eastward to the North Mississippi
Regional Park and Trail. Future plans for are documented in the Twin Lakes Regional Trail Master
Plan completed by Three Rivers Park District in conjunction with Brooklyn Center, Robbinsdale
and Minneapolis, Hennepin County, MnDOT and the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.
There are two gaps identified that should be addressed in the short-term (Figure 10). These
segments include the section of 57th Avenue North from Logan Avenue to the North Mississippi
Regional Park and Twin Lakes Avenue between Lakeside and Lake Breeze Avenues. Programmed
improvements have been identified for the 57th Avenue segment for the years 2015 - 2016.
Other improvements have been identified for the long-term. These improvements include:
Extending a portion of the trail along Lakeside Avenue from Twin Lakes Avenue to an
independent corridor that would connect to Lake Breeze Avenue.
0 Providing a connection in front of Shingle Creek Crossing.
Mississippi River Regional Trail
As noted under the discussion on city facilities, the Mississippi River Trail is part of a larger,
national effort to develop a bikeway (both on-road and off-road — facility type includes off road
trails, shoulders, bike lanes and shared roadways) that follows the Mississippi River from its
origins in Itasca State Park (Minnesota) to the Gulf of Mexico (Louisiana). The planned trail is
close to 3,000 miles long. The trail is a work in progress, with more segments to be constructed
in the future.
As previously mentioned, this trail is owned and operated by a number of jurisdictions within —
it is not solely under the ownership of Three Rivers Park District, but has been included in this
section due to the fact that the trail serves more of a regional connection.
Most segments of the trail within the community are currently in place — a majority of the trail is
off-road in Brooklyn Center. There is a short gap in the off-road system that requires users to use
Willow Lane North, a low-volume city street.
Figure 11 shows the trail. In the northern portion of the city, at the border with the City
of Brooklyn Park (73rd Avenue North), the trail is parallel to West River Road. It continues
southward until 66th Avenue North. This section is an off-road facility. At 65th Avenue North,
pedestrians can continue on a sidewalk until it connects to an off-road facility just north of 1-694.
Bicyclists are required to travel along Willow Lane North, a low-volume city street. This segment
has been identified as a gap area by the city as well as by Hennepin County in its Bicycle Plan. It
should be noted that this segment of trail is owned and operated by the City of Brooklyn Center.
25
•Q-
Co.12
▪.A)
0
a
▪
a N-CLI>., 0 0
a) a)
.,--W •- —._ a a
a. CC CL u) 0)a, co a) la 2.—
0) a a) Ta u) .2,co a a) -,-. a(/)to co ms .2 o
Cii Er_ iT) o_ca -,.2_
1.--SZ..
••It IL
illitINDI
South of the gap, the trail is located in North Mississippi Regional Park, which is located in both
the Cities of Brooklyn Center and Minneapolis. The park is owned by the Minneapolis Park and
Recreation Board and operated by Three Rivers Park District. To add to the mix, the section of trail
south of the gap until 57th Avenue North is operated by the Three Rivers Park District. South of
57th Avenue North, the trail is owned and operated by the Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board.
Hennepin County — Existing and Planned Facilities
Hennepin County does not operate nor maintain any trail facilities within Brooklyn Center. Rather,
the county assists in their identification and construction through transportation projects along
county roadways. Once developed, the trail is usually under the jurisdiction of the community or
Three Rivers Park District. The county roadway where at least some segments of trail have been
developed is:
O County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) from 71st Avenue North to 66th Avenue North
The trails along this roadway fall under the jurisdiction of the City of Brooklyn Center.
The Hennepin County Bicycle Plan notes that some existing on-road facilities are in place. In
reviewing the facilities that exist within Brooklyn Center, they are limited to on-road shoulders
that could accommodate an experienced cyclist. They are not facilities designed for inexperienced
cyclists or parents with young riders. The current Hennepin County Bicycle Plan map identifies
existing on-road bicycle facilities (in this case roadway shoulders) along the following 6 :
O County Road 130 (69th Avenue North) between western city limits and County Road
152 (Brooklyn Boulevard).
O County Road 10 (58th Avenue North) between western city limits and County Road
152 (Brooklyn Boulevard).
Dupont Avenue: Existing facilities are noted between 57th and 67th Avenues.
•Xerxes Avenue: Existing facilities are noted between 65th and 59th Avenues.
It should be noted that the Hennepin County Bicycle Plan shows on-road facilities for both county
roadways and city streets. Hennepin county maintains on-road facilities for roadways under its
jurisdiction.
In addition to identifying bicycle facilities along or on county highways and city streets, the
Hennepin County Bicycle Plan also identifies independent trail corridors and some off-road city
trails. The Hennepin County Bicycle Plan acknowledges all three of the regional trails previously
described (Shingle Creek, Twin Lakes and Mississippi River). It also recognizes the off-road trail
developed by the city along 69th Avenue North from County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard to
York Place North and from York Place North to West River Road).
Figure 12 shows the locations of these facilities.
Planned pedestrian and bicycle facilities involving Hennepin County came from two primary
resources: the County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) corridor study completed by the city and
the county and the recommendations from the Hennepin County Bicycle Plan.
6 1-lennepin County is in the process of updating its Bicycle Plan. A final plan is expected by summer 2014. 27
0
II I
...................
%
0.1 11I [---Cij 1 WEST R VER RD•
fl mop 0.1.4. N ,...1NOd........iiAAV MU
1.1%) 11il
II ' -al PONTAVE N7------. --- ---tjiz !Ilig ii I 1 • 0
Z— 1
—1 I UJ
Y0
II =
XUBX
kV 3180N
aler
County RoadRoad 152 - Brooklyn Boulevard
The county and the city have identified a number of improvements for County Road 152 (Brooklyn
Boulevard). The improvements are a result of a transportation study that identified and evaluated a
number of roadway, bicycle and pedestrian alternatives for the corridor. Based on technical analysis,
feedback from the agencies, and input from the public, the following improvements were identified:
O Construct trails parallel to the roadway
O Provide landscaping that will enhance the corridor's appearance
o Improve intersection crossings along the corridor for pedestrians and bicyclists
o Consider additional crossing locations — including a grade-separated crossing
The pedestrian and bicycle improvements are likely to be included as part of a larger project that will
reconstruct the highway. A timeline for implementing the proposed improvements are dependent on
available partnership funding. Figure 13 shows long-term concepts for County Road 152.
Hennepin County Bicycle Plan
The Hennepin County Bicycle Plan identifies a number of bicycle connections that could be on-
road facilities, off-road facilities or independent trails. The plan identifies several different levels of
accommodation that should be considered as facilities are developed. These accommodations are
described below. Recommendations for the City of Brooklyn Center are shown in Figure 14.
Bikeway — Primary Routes
Primary routes are shown in blue. These are corridors where full accommodation is desired. Full
accommodation includes both on-road and off-road facilities in order to serve all levels of bicyclists
from beginners to advanced commuters. Within Brooklyn Center the following have been
identified as primary routes:
•County Road 152 (Brooklyn Blvd): from northern city limits to southern city limits
O County Road 10 (58th Ave/Bass Lake Road): between western city limits and Xerxes Ave N
o County Road 57 (Humboldt Avenue): from 57th Avenue to the southern city limits
•County Road 130 (69th Ave): between western city limits and County Road 152
(Brooklyn Blvd)
o 69th Avenue: between County Road 152 (Brooklyn Blvd) and West River Road
o Shingle Creek Parkway: from York Place North to Xerxes Ave N
O West River Road: from northern city limits to 1-694 crossing
•Xerxes Ave North: from Shingle Creek Parkway to County Road 10 (Bass Lake Road)
29
Cwoa laal c..) c>, -a o -a es
173. -a= = cuO Ea)22 r.
-5 -51- 0 p2 00,_ .5 1as CD C.1
Cif L.-.i.
I—
--- Y .Ne e --a•a)
aoU)a)a 8
as ,N5 >,
—8
co a, 03 z, (7 0-a E 2= =
2
0 0..—:0 70 F-' aa) as "5 c
CO CO 1:0 U) U) 0O iii 8
0)
Li. 111
0) •la -a a) To Li. cs, u,01 c c ra g,C 03 (f) CU C -. :.'.47, •
47+ " 4. E
...t 2 O. ....,— 0
n .0
2 ..5 .7? a 4.7C C 7 )co 0.. C0 a .. - 0x co = m X o 2 .0 X .- f<.) 2 0 ....LU 0 0 a_ La a. 1- Co 1110 La c.) 0_0
I
C")
No timeframe or specific recommendations have been developed for these corridors (other
than County Road 152 which had a study that identified off-road facilities only — no on-road
improvements).
On-road facilities identified in the Hennepin County Bicycle Plan include the use of shoulders and/
or bike lanes. Use of shoulders may result in signing as a bike route in some circumstances, but
not all.
Secondary Routes
Secondary routes are shown in green. They are bikeways which have a heavy recreational focus
or are lesser routes which still have an auxiliary importance to the overall system. Something less than
full accommodation, such as an on-road shoulder or (not both) an off-road multiuse path is typical of
secondary routes. There are no planned secondary routes within the City of Brooklyn Center.
Independent Corridor Trails
Independent trails are shown in red. These are the trails that are not within a roadway right
of way. These trails have been included because they provide an important connection within
Hennepin County. They generally cover a longer distance and cross a number of natural and other
(large roadways, railroads, etc.) physical barriers. Planned independent trails include:
O Shingle Creek Regional Trail: between the city's northern and southern limits (this trail
has been constructed).
o Twin Lakes Regional Trail: between the southwestern limits of Brooklyn Center to North
Mississippi Regional Park. See Three Rivers Park section for planned improvements and
their timing.
O Mississippi River Regional Trail: between the northern and southern city limits along
West River Road and through North Mississippi Regional Park. The only missing
segment on this trail is the portion along Willow, north of 1-694. No timing on
improvements has been identified.
32
Broblil • - • -
(CHAPTER 5:C kiMIUNITY
TN6AGIEMENif
Critical to the success of this Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan is to understand what the residents in
Brooklyn Center need to help them walk or bicycle more and what barriers prevent them from
doing so. To get resident input, several strategies for community engagement were identified and
implemented as part of the overall study. These strategies were specifically identified in order to:
O Identify priority populations to target activities.
o Implement creative methods to engage hard-to-reach populations.
•Work with community organizations and city and county staff to implement strategies.
O Identify ideas from residents that will encourage them to walk and bike more frequently.
O Identify barriers to biking and walking that can be addressed through the plan.
Because it is challenging to engage residents and property owners in long-term planning efforts,
traditional efforts such as public meetings, open house events and city council meetings, were
replaced with activities that engaged residents in locations where they were likely to be as part
of their daily routine and through targeted community groups. In addition, the activities and
materials used were designed to promote walking and bicycling as fun and healthy activities. The
sections below highlight the community engagement strategies that were employed.
Surveys
The primary focus of the community engagement strategies was to get residents to take a survey
that identified their walking and bicycling needs and their current bicycling and walking habits.
The survey questions aimed to collect details on how often residents walk and bike, why they
engage in these activities (for transportation or recreational purposes), where they go and what
could be done to make these activities more attractive to them as users.
The survey was available in English, Hmong and Spanish. The survey was available in a hard
copy form and an electronic form. The electronic version was available online via www.
surveymonkey.com between March 20, 2013 and July 8, 2013. A total of 165 surveys were
submitted (40 hard copies and 125 online). Copies of the survey are included in Appendix B and a
full summary of the survey results is provided in Appendix C.
Survey Highlights - Walking
The first part of the survey focused on walking activities. As noted in the responses, a majority
of survey respondents indicated that they walked at least once a week and that they walked
for a variety of reasons. Popular destinations include community parks and facilities, shopping
locations and fast food restaurants. When it came time to identify barriers to walking, survey
respondents cited typical challenges related to: intersection crossings, lighting, security,
maintenance, additional connections, wayfinding and shared-use facilities.
33
The following information was gathered from the survey.
1. How frequently do you walk around Brooklyn Center?
A.Never: 13.2 percent
B.Less than once a week: 22.1 percent
C.1 to 2 times a week: 18.4 percent
D.More than twice a week — but not every day: 30.9 percent
E. Every day: 15.4 percent
2. Main reason why you walk.
A.Have fun: 23.1 percent
B.Exercise: 60.3 percent
C.Walk instead of drive: 10.7 percent
D.Get to work: 1.7 percent
E. I do not walk: 4.1 percent
3. What places do you walk to?
O Local parks
O Around the neighborhood
O Community center
O Library
O Gas station (convenience food/products)
9 Local trails
O Large retail/grocery stores
O Fast food locations
34
Brookl n Ceifter efirStrittilic drPlan
4. What would help you walk to places more easily?
O Improving intersection crossings on busy roadways
O Bridges over busy/dangerous intersections
O Adding lighting to see at night and for safety
O Adding cameras for safety
O Add sidewalks to all local streets
o Extend trail connections near Shingle Creek Crossing (mall area)
O Add pavement markings to trails so you know where bicyclists and walkers are
supposed to go
o Widen trails so it is easier to accommodate both pedestrians and bicyclists
o Snow and ice removal on trails; faster clearing of sidewalks
o Maps and directional signage
o Mobile app for city trails/sidewalks
5. Which places do you wish you could walk to more easily?
O Local parks
O Community center
O Movie theater
O Library
O Gas stations
Retail/grocery centers
Fast food places
35
AU_ 1
Survey Highlights - Bicycling
The second part of the survey focused on bicycling habits of survey respondents. In general, fewer
people indicated that they biked within the community. They also had different reasons for bicycling
than those that did for walking. A greater percentage of respondents indicated that they bicycled
for work purpose or to replace a car trip than those who identified themselves as walkers. Like
walkers, bicyclists most frequently cited exercise and to have fun as the main reasons for bicycling.
Popular destinations for bicyclists also included community parks and facilities, shopping locations
and fast food restaurants. Schools were also noted by bicyclists, which were not noted by walkers.
When it came time to identify barriers to bicycling, survey respondents cited: needing more trails
and trail connections, additional bicycle racks at popular destinations, wider trail facilities, smoother
pavement surfaces, mapping/signage and challenging intersection crossings.
The following information was gathered from the survey.
1. How frequently do you bike around Brooklyn Center?
A.Never: 29.3 percent
B.Less than once a week: 23.6 percent
C.1 to 2 times a week: 16.3 percent
D.More than twice a week — but not every day: 23.6 percent
E. Every day: 7.3 percent
2. Main reason why you bike.
A.Have fun: 30.6 percent
B.Exercise: 38 percent
C.Bike instead of drive: 11.1 percent
D.Get to work: 6.5 percent
E. I do not bike: 13.9 percent
36
3. What places do you bike to?
O Local parks
O Around the neighborhood
O Community center
O Library
O Gas station (convenience food/products)
O Local trails
O Large retail/grocery stores
O Fast food locations
O Local schools
O Coon Rapids Dam
4. What would help you bike to places more easily?
O Additional trails and trail connections
O Additional bicycle racks at popular destinations
•Wider trails that accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians
•Make busy intersections easier/safer to cross
O Smoother trail surfaces
G Additional maps/directional signage
5. Which places do you wish you could bike to more easily?
O Movie theater
•Schools
O Parks
O Shingle Creek Crossing (noted as Brookdale in response)
•Library
•Large retail/grocery centers
37
I
Mobile Display
A mobile display booth was created and used to engage people in conversation about walking
and biking. The display included information about the pedestrian and bicycle study, a link to
the online survey and fun facts about walking and biking. Hard copies of the survey in English,
Spanish and Hmong were also available with the display.
The display was used as an informational table at three events and at four locations with a heavy
amount of foot traffic. The display was staffed by consultant project staff and/or city staff at the
following local events:
O Brooklyn Center Earth Fest: Saturday April 20, 2013 at Brooklyn Center High School
o Brooklyn Junior High Parent-Teacher Conferences: Thursday, April 25, 2013 at
Brooklyn Junior High
O Earle Brown Days Festival- Dunkin's Jamboree: Friday, June 28, 2013 at Centennial Park
The display was also used to engage people in high-frequented locations within Brooklyn
Center. Project staff was available to provide information and answer questions at the
following display locations:
Brooklyn Center Community Center, 6301 Shingle Creek Pkwy: Thursday, May 16, 2013
Brookdale Library/Service Center, 6125 Shingle Creek Pkwy: Friday, May 24, 2013
Cub Foods, 3245 County Road 10: Friday, June 7, 2013
•Northwest Family Service Center, 7051 Brooklyn Blvd: Monday, June 10, 2013
Partnerships with Local Organizations
In addition to outreach efforts with the mobile display and surveys, project staff collaborated with
local organizations and schools to assist in gathering information and to promote the study and
survey through their publications, networks, websites and social media sites. The intent of this
effort was to provide information on the study and the survey to the organization and in turn have
the organization share that information with their members. Information about the study and
survey was distributed to: 0 Brown College — Brooklyn Center
campus
O Riverwood Homeowners Association
O North Hennepin Chamber of
Commerce
O Brooklyn Center Business Association
O TwinWest Chamber of Commerce
O Minnesota School of Business —
Brooklyn Center campus
•ITT Technical Institute — Brooklyn
Center campus
O National American University —
38
MITTc k:11LisiullifIllira ' '
Brooklyn Center campus
0 North Hennepin Community College
As part of the local partnership efforts, the Riverwood Homeowners Association set up a display
at the Brookdale Library promoting walking/biking, the study and the survey.
The study and survey were also promoted by city staff who work with community groups,
including the city's Cultural Liaison Officer, Crime Prevention Specialist and Juvenile Officer.
Other Outreach Efforts
In an effort to engage people who do not already walk and bike, as well as hard-to-reach
populations, various community groups were identified and contacted. Project staff offered to
attend an event hosted by the organization and/or provide a presentation in order to encourage
walking and biking and to share information about the project study, as well as promote the
community survey. A focus was made to work with organizations that cater to Hmong, Latino
and African communities.
Presentations
Presentations were made to two groups during the study to engage different stakeholders about
the study and their needs as residents of Brooklyn Center. The first group — students at Brooklyn
Junior High — were selected because of their age (cannot drive yet — so as a group do more
walking and bicycling) and because of their interest in math, science and engineering. The second
group — Brooklyn Center Multicultural Advisory Committee — was selected because it had a more
diverse cultural background that could provide insight into the concerns of different populations
within the community.
Each presentation included an overview of the development of the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian
and Bicycle Plan, information about the benefits of walking and biking, and information about the
survey. Both groups completed a mapping exercise and completed the survey.
Comments/themes recorded during the mapping exercise included:
•Additional lighting is needed. This is especially true during winter months when it gets
dark out — it is hard to see to walk and/or bike. Lighting also helps for personal safety
concerns.
o Police enforcement/presence in locations with bridge crossings would be appreciated.
These areas sometimes act as locations where people gather without a purpose.
o Traffic signals are needed to help people cross on busy roadways. In locations where
there are traffic signals, make sure the push buttons work properly. Some of them take
a long time to allow pedestrians and bicycles to go through the intersection.
o There are gaps in the system that need to be completed to make walking/biking easier.
•It would be nice to have a place to rent bicycles or have bicycles available for people to use.
•More efforts are needed to get helmets and bicycles for children and for those that may
39
have limited incomes.
O Bike racks should be installed at parks, schools and other public destinations.
•More grade-separated crossings of TH 100,1-94 and Brooklyn Blvd are wanted.
o Connections need to be made within parks to the rest of the network.
O Most of the sidewalks and trails are in good condition. Some locations have cracks and
broken segments.
O Some users liked trails better than sidewalks and vice-versa
Students used trails/sidewalks to get to the homes of their friends, to go the park and to
get to stores and fast food restaurants.
Other organizations that did not request a presentation but were contacted by city/project
consultant staff and provided with information about the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle
Plan and the survey included:
O Northbrook Alliance Church
O Brookdale United Methodist Church
•Spiritual Life Church
O St. Alphonsus Church
G Imam Hussain Islamic Center
News Releases
Press releases were made to get the information out through local newspapers. City staff issued
a press release at the end of April to let news organizations know about the study and the survey.
A press release was issued at the end of June to remind news organizations about the study and
to let them know that the survey closure date was approaching. Appendix D has copies of the
two press releases.
Other Studies
Additional information about walking and bicycling was obtained through Brooklyn Center's Safe
Routes to School Planning Study. This study engaged local school officials, teachers, parents,
students, city and county staff and elected officials in identifying walking and bicycling needs/
improvements around elementary and middle schools within the community. As part of the study,
an evaluation was made of walking/biking routes and the types of improvements that could be
implemented over time. Information from this group is incorporated into the identification of
system deficiencies and the recommendations sections of this plan.
40
iiIIIMMTM LLiilLA.MIlitliltM 11 Lielk
CHAPTER 6: SYSTEMI
CIIIIMIENG ES
System challenges were identified through a number of efforts. First, staff and the consulting
team reviewed existing facilities and identified areas where links were missing, areas where
crossings were limited or challenged due to traffic volumes, speeds or barriers such as creeks,
other natural resources or development. Second, information collected as part of the surveys
was used to identify gaps in the network, crossing challenges and other issues that make walking
and bicycling difficult from system users. Third, information identified as part of other studies
and plans previously conducted was incorporated. These studies included plans from the city,
Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District. The studies also included information from the
recently completed safe routes to school planning study completed jointly by the city and the
school districts. Fourth, the study looked beyond the traditional infrastructure to identify barriers
to walking and bicycling that may limit or hinder use of the existing facilities in place.
Figure 15, Public Input on System Challenges, includes all the comments collected as part of the
study process, regardless of whether or not there is data, studies, etc. to support the comment.
For example, someone may have commented that it is a challenge to cross Earle Brown Drive due
to sight distance issues. Because of the study's time and budget constraints, it was not feasible
to verify every comment that was made. However, staff felt that it was important to include the
comments as part of the public input process and to acknowledge them as part of the study.
The information collected on system challenges has been sorted into eight categories:
1.System Gaps
2.Crossings
3.Wayfinding
4.Infrastructure Condition and Maintenance
5.Security
6.Education/Enforcement
7.Equipment
8.Other
System Gaps
Gaps in both the sidewalk and trail networks were identified throughout the study process. Input
on gap locations was obtained from city and county staff, participants in the Safe Routes to
School program, residents and users of the system. It should be noted that the table and the
figure include all comments about gaps identified through the study outreach process. Like Figure
15, Tables 1 and 2 include comments on gaps that have not been fully vetted.
41
CT)
/
i
401110'
:1:11L:Mll 0 MP TM il MINA
Sidewalk Gaps
As noted previously, Brooklyn Center was developed during an era when sidewalks were not
always provided. To remedy this situation, the city has made efforts to construct sidewalks as
part of street reconstruction projects and at the request of neighborhoods. As a result of these
efforts, as well as some construction of sidewalks at the time of development, the city has a
rather extensive sidewalk system. However, there are areas where input from stakeholders
suggests that there are still some gaps in the network. Table 1 lists the gaps by roadway name.
Table 1: Gaps in the Sidewalk System
Gap Location From To
53rd Avenue North Greatview Avenue France Avenue North
53rd Avenue North Russell Avenue North Penn Avenue North
55th Avenue North France Avenue North Sailor Lane
59th Avenue North (south side)Knox Avenue North Dupont Avenue North
61st/Scott Avenues North Noble Avenue North Boulder Lane
62nd Avenue North Lilac Drive North Lyndale Avenue North
67th Avenue North France Avenue North Drew Avenue North
70th Avenue North Brooklyn Boulevard (CR 152)Halifax Avenue North
70th Avenue North (south side)West of Camden Avenue North TH 252
70th Avenue North West River Road Willow Lane North
71st Avenue North Halifax Avenue North France Avenue North
72nd Avenue North Bryant Avenue North Camden Avenue North
73rd Avenue North Halifax Avenue North France Avenue North
73rd Avenue North Penn Avenue North Camden Avenue North
73rd Avenue North West River Road Willow Lane North
Boulder Lane Scott Avenue North Unity Avenue North
Camden Avenue North 70th Avenue North 73rd Avenue North
Dupont Avenue North 57th Avenue North 53rd Avenue North
Eckberg Drive Halifax Avenue North France Avenue North
France Avenue North 69th Avenue North 67th Avenue North
Frontage Road Brooklyn Boulevard (CR 152)Xerxes Avenue North
Frontage Road Bass Lake Road (CR 10)John Martin Drive
Halifax Avenue North France Place Eckberg Drive
Humboldt Avenue North
Freeway Overpass Sidewalk
ITT Technical Institute Parking
Lot (freeway side)
Earle Brown Drive
Irving Avenue North 57th Avenue North 59th Avenue North
John Martin Drive Earle Brown Drive Frontage Road
Northport Drive Northport Elementary School 53rd Avenue North
Palmer Lake Drive West 72nd Avenue North North of Woodbine Lane North
Perry Avenue North 65th Avenue North Howe Lane
Unity Avenue North Boulder Lane 63rd Avenue North
Willow Lane North 73rd Avenue North 70th Avenue North
Xerxes Avenue North South of 55th Avenue North Frontage Road
43
thold
Trail Gaps
Along with the gaps in the sidewalk network, there are also some gaps in the trail network that
were identified by stakeholders. Gaps are identified regardless of the agency that may ultimately
own and operate the trail. Gaps in the trail network are shown in Figure 15 and listed in Table 2.
Table 2: Trail Network Gaps
Gap Location From To
50th Avenue North (independent
trail — not along a roadway)
Drew Avenue North 53rd Avenue North
57th Avenue North Logan Avenue North Mississippi Regional Park
58th Avenue North Halifax Avenue North June Avenue North
63rd Avenue North Perry Avenue North Major Avenue North
66th Avenue North Orchard Avenue North Indiana Avenue North
Azelia Avenue North (extension)South of Lake Breeze Avenue Lakeside Avenue
County Road 130 (69th Ave)Unity Avenue North County Road 152 (Brooklyn Blvd)
County Road 152 (Brooklyn
Blvd)
1-94/694 49th Avenue North
Drew Avenue North 67th Avenue North 65th Avenue North
France Avenue North/France
Place
Halifax Avenue North 53rd Avenue North
Halifax Avenue North 58th Avenue North France Place North
June Avenue North 59 1/2 Avenue North 58th Avenue North
Lakeside Avenue North Twin Lake Avenue Azelia Avenue North (extension)
Logan Avenue North 59th aVenue North 57th Avenue North
Major Avenue North 63rd Avenue North Arboretum
Marlin Drive 65th Avenue North Marlin Park
Perry Avenue North Howe Lane 63rd Avenue North
Shingle Creek Crossing 55th Avenue North Bass Lake Road
TH 252 or Willow Lane North North of 1-694 66th Avenue North
Twin Lake Avenue Lakeside Avenue North Lake Breeze Avenue
Northern City Limits — along
Shingle Creek
Brooklyn Boulevard Park Center High School/
Brooklyn Junior High
Crossings
In addition to identifying areas where trail or sidewalk segments are missing, study participants
also identified locations where they found it challenging for bicyclists and/or pedestrians to cross
the roadway. Locations were identified for a number of reasons such as: heavy traffic volumes,
a large roadway or barrier to cross, high-speed traffic, lack of crossings for a significant distance
or lack of crossings at a desired destination, and a desire for additional freeway crossings. These
areas are shown on Figure 15 and are described below.
44
1.Interstate 94: West of County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) there are no pedestrian
overpasses or any grade-separated roadway crossings within the city. As a result, residents
living west of County Road 152 are required to go to County Road 152 to get to areas north
and south of 1-94. This can require pedestrians and bicyclists to go quite a bit out of their
way. Additionally, conditions on County Road 152 are not as pedestrian and bicycle friendly
as they could be (improvements have been identified, but not yet constructed). This results
in limited use of County Road 152 by pedestrians and bicyclists.
East of County Road 152 there are a number of grade separated crossings that pedestrians
can use, including a regional trail (Shingle Creek).
2.Trunk Highway 252: MnDOT operates Trunk Highway 252 within the city. This roadway
has three existing at-grade intersections where pedestrians and bicyclists can cross to/from
the Mississippi River Regional Trail along West River Road. TH 252 is primarily a six-lane
roadway with dedicated left- and right-turn lanes at the three intersections. In addition,
TH 252 has a large, grass center median. Because there are a number of lanes and a wide
median, it can be very challenging for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross at these locations.
3.TH 100: TH 100 is another large roadway that can be a barrier for pedestrians and
bicyclists. There are a few grade separated crossings that pedestrians and bicyclists can
use, but they do not always provide the most direct route to and from various destinations.
It is important to note that there are crossings that connect with the mall (Shingle Creek
Crossing) and near the Earle Brown Center. There are also sidewalks that can be used along
County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) and along Lake Breeze/France Avenue.
4.County Road 10 (Bass Lake Road): County Road 10 is an east-west roadway that enters
the city at its western limits just north of Upper Twin Lake and continues to TH 100. West
of County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) it is a three-lane roadway (one travel lane in
each direction with a center turn lane). The area is primarily residential in nature and travel
speeds are not excessive. However, there are no officially designated crossings.
East of County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) to TH 100, County Road 10 becomes a
four-lane divided roadway with dedicated turn lanes and traffic signals at some locations.
The land use in this segment transitions to more commercial (including the mall area) and
industrial uses. Traffic volumes are generally heavier and speeds can be faster. This
section of roadway has transit stops and bus pullouts at some locations. Because of some
major electrical transmission lines, the roadway has a wide median. However, the signalized
intersections have wide enough medians that they serve as a pedestrian and bicycle refuges
and offer people a safe place to stop half way across the corridor.
Comments from stakeholders indicated that they would like to see a grade-separated
crossing along the segment east of County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) and maybe have
something in place to assist in crossing between neighborhoods west of County Road 152.
5. County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard): County Road 152 is a north-south roadway that
travels through and beyond the city. This roadway has many design types. In some
locations it is a four-lane undivided facility with center turn lanes, in others it is four- or
six-lanes with a center median and dedicated turn lanes, in some locations it is a four-lane
undivided facility and in some segments it is a four-lane divided facility without dedicated
turn lanes.
45
Some of the segments have trails, with sidewalks along most of the corridor. Travel
speeds and traffic volumes can fluctuate depending upon where one is in the corridor. A
majority of the corridor is currently commercial or industrial, with pockets of residential and
institutional uses as well.
One of the more challenging segments of roadway for pedestrians and bicyclists to cross
is in the area between 65th and 58th Avenues North. In this segment, the roadway is four
travel lanes, two center turn lanes and some locations with dedicated turn lanes except for
the signalized intersections at 65th, 63rd, and 58th Avenues. At these locations, there is a
center median and at least dedicated left-turn lanes.
Because the roadway segments are large (minimum of six lanes to cross), and there are a
limited number of signalized crossings, it is hard and unsafe for pedestrians to cross County
Road 152 in this area. Other contributing conditions that make the crossing the roadway
challenging include intersections that are off-set from one another. This means that the
intersecting streets do not line up with one another and pedestrians cannot cross directly
from one side of the roadway to the other.
To address roadway, bicycle and pedestrian transportation issues, the city and Hennepin
County completed a corridor study between 1-694/94 and 49th Avenue North. The
study made a number of recommendations for the roadway and intersections as well
as for supporting facilities such as trails and sidewalks. Within the study area it was
recommended that a trail be constructed along the west side of the corridor and that a
sidewalk remain on the east. In addition, it recommended providing an additional place for
pedestrians to cross at 61st Avenue so that there would not be such a long gap between
locations (63rd Avenue North and 58th Avenue North) where pedestrians can cross with
the assistance of a signal.
6. Earle Brown Drive: Earle Brown Drive is a curvilinear roadway with a number of different
land uses including the Earle Brown Center, a few hotels, institutions of higher learning
and a fair number of people that are generally not familiar with the area (tourists,
visitors to Earle Brown, etc.). The northeast corner of the roadway (in front of the Earle
Brown Center) was identified by a couple of individuals as a location where it is hard for
pedestrians and cars to see one another and to judge speed accurately.
Wayfinding
Comments from survey respondents indicated that directional signage would make getting to
destinations easier. This is especially true on regional trails, which tend be longer and generally
serve multiple destinations. Without signage on these facilities, it can be challenging for users
to mentally calculate how far it is to a particular location or how long it will take to reach that
location. Additionally, if the trails meander or have multiple connections, users can get confused
as to which direction they should go.
While it is not practical to list on a sign all destinations that are possible on every street with a
sidewalk or along every trail, opportunities may exist to provide additional wayfinding measures to
guide system users. Potential opportunities for wayfinding measures are included in Chapter 7.
46
Infrastructure, Infrastructure Condition and Maintenance
The City of Brooklyn Center recognizes that it is important to have a complete pedestrian and
bicycle network in good working order to encourage its use. To reflect that understanding, the
city annually inspects approximately a quarter of the city for trails and sidewalks; it maintains
the sidewalks in the winter; and applies to different grant programs for funding to construct and
reconstruct facilities, to purchase bicycle racks and to identify short-,mid- and long-term needs.
Comments from those participating in surveys or speaking with staff and the consultant agreed
that overall the city did a good job when it came to infrastructure. However, there were some
comments/themes that warrant discussion.
Lighting
Lack of lighting, particularly lighting that is more pedestrian scale in nature, was noted by a
number of survey respondents and by individuals participating in outreach efforts. Lighting is
particularly important for users of the system during winter months when it is dark going and
coming to work as well as year-round for those that work non-traditional shifts. Lighting is
needed not only to see sidewalks, trails and roadways better, but also for security/personal safety
and for ice during the winter.
Bicycle Racks
Even though the city has actively pursued and received funding for bicycle racks, some survey
respondents indicated that they would like additional bicycle racks at popular destinations, schools
and at commercial/non-public locations such as strip malls, Target, Cub, Walmart, etc.
Wider Trails
Some survey respondents indicated that they would like to have wider trails or trails that had
pavement markings designating which direction people should be walking and biking. On some
of the more popular trails without these amenities, some users indicated that they felt crowded or
there was not enough room on the trail.
Pavement Surface
Some of the bicycle survey respondents indicated that trail surfaces were not always smooth and
that there were some locations where the pavement was cracked and contributed to a rougher ride.
Winter Maintenance
The City of Brooklyn Center performs winter maintenance (snow removal) on all sidewalks along
city and county roadways. It also clears snow off of trails owned by Three Rivers Park District.
Timing of winter maintenance for sidewalks and trails can be challenging — everybody wants
k:11 Dizi I ill I Irel 1 El 1 I W.
47
the sidewalk and trail that they use to be cleared right after the snow event so that they can
use nearby facilities. Study participants indicated support and appreciation for snow removal
— however, they also wanted faster clearance times. Clearance of snow from sidewalks near
schools was also brought up as an issue as part of the Safe Routes to School planning efforts. In
general, the city attempts to clear streets near schools in time for arrival and dismissal.
Other
An additional issue identified as part of the surveys indicated that there may be regular flooding
issues on trails near some of the lakes. It was suggested that trails be raised in these areas. The
city, in partnership with Three Rivers Park District, recently located a regional trail out of the
floodplain for this very reason. Other segments still need to be addressed.
Security
People need to be and feel safe if they are going to walk or bicycle within the community or if
they are going to be willing to let their children walk and/or bike without supervision. Some study
participants noted that personal safety/security was a concern or a barrier that limited their use of
the pedestrian and bicycle network.
As noted previously, lighting can play an important role in how safe someone feels. Lighting
not only enables someone to see where they are going, it also helps them be aware of their
surroundings and environment as a whole. It also makes people more visible should any type
of incident (fall, injury, etc.) occur. Along with additional lighting, some study participants
suggested that it would be appreciated if there were police patrols along trails and sidewalks,
especially when it is darker out or in locations where crime can be an issue. Recognizing that
police cannot be everywhere, it was also suggested that cameras be installed in areas with known
safety/security concerns.
Education/Enforcement
While not a physical issue associated with the pedestrian and bicycle network, study participants
noted a general lack of understanding of rules when it comes to motorized vehicles and bicyclists/
pedestrians — on both the part of the vehicle drivers and the cyclists/pedestrians. It was
suggested that educational efforts be made to make all users aware of the rules of the road and
that police officers become more aggressive in enforcing these rules.
In addition to comments regarding education on the rules of the road, it was also noted that more
education on owning and properly maintaining a bike may be desired and useful for residents.
48
Ali II ti 1 I It411 '
Equipment
Given the downturn in the economy and the economic constraints that residents may have,
comments were made that it would be beneficial to have programs available within the community
that would help children obtain bicycle helmets and/or bicycles. In discussions with city and
county officials, it was noted that some of these programs exist and that it may be necessary to
make the availability of these programs more widely known and/or advertised.
Study participants also recommended that a program similar to Nice Ride (bicycle rental program
— bicycles can be obtained and returned at multiple locations within a community and can be
rented hourly) may benefit the community by providing options for those that may not be able to
purchase a bicycle or need it for limited periods. It was also seen as an opportunity to potentially
bring people into the community and explore its amenities.
Other Comments
Other comments received focused on operations at signalized intersections. Study participants
requested audible crosswalk indicators and longer crossing times for pedestrians and bicyclists at
busy intersections.
49
rl VI 1 II 414 1k11I ft11
CHAPTER 7:
LITCOKIKENDATIONS
The City of Brooklyn Center has the opportunity as part of its Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan to
create the foundation for providing important community links and connections that would
allow individuals to pursue walking and biking as part of their work, household, recreation, and
transportation activities by making its system of sidewalks, trails and transportation facilities safer
and more convenient. The city also has the opportunity to develop policies, coordinate with other
agencies and implement practices that will encourage walking and bicycling within the community.
This section outlines an overall vision for pedestrian and bicycle facilities within the community
and provides some broad recommendations for activities and practices that will encourage the
long-term use of the system and a healthy lifestyle.
Chapter 8 provides overall best practices that should be considered when planning, designing
and constructing improvements. Chapter 8 provides greater detail on design activities and
considerations.
Trail and Sidewalk Network Vision
The proposed trail and sidewalk network vision should reflect the input of study participants
and good planning practices that encourage connections to important destinations within the
community, that provide opportunities for recreation as well as commuting purposes and that
provide connections throughout the entire community. The proposed vision for the trail and
sidewalk network:
o Creates linkages to existing and planned recreational facilities'
o Creates linkages to schools from residential areas
o Creates linkages to community destinations (city hall, community center, mall, etc.)
o Creates linkages along transit lines and to transit facilities (bus stops, park and rides, etc.)
•Eliminates gaps in the existing network
•Provides parallel/separated facilities on higher-volume and/or higher-speed roadways
The vision in this plan is for the long-term. It is to be used as a guide for the city and its partners
when making both long- and short-term decisions with regard to planning and construction
of facilities. It is intended to be used to incorporate pedestrian and bicycle needs not only
into projects immediately on the table, but to not preclude them as part of planning and other
activities. For instance, a trail may not be completed or constructed as a single parcel redevelops,
but right of way or an easement should be preserved if it is included as part of the vision so that it
can be constructed at some point when there are enough parcels for a trail to be constructed.
Figure 16 shows the trail and sidewalk network vision. Trails and sidewalks shown in solid
lines represent facilities already in place. Dotted lines show "proposed" connections needed to
complete the vision.50
0
0LI)
on I
Input on the pedestrian and bicycle facility vision was developed based on the input from
stakeholders regarding system challenges as well as from other studies (Safe Routes to School)
that were recently completed.
As alluded to previously, there are not any specific priorities or timelines identified for
improvements. Discussions with staff, appointed committees and elected officials will be used to
identify priorities. In some cases, priority may be determined as a result of joint efforts with other
agencies such as schools, Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District. In other instances
it may be the availability of funding for a particular type or improvement or grant funding that
is targeted to a specific project. In some instances, improvements may never be prioritized,
opportunities for improvements may not occur and funding may not be available.
On-Road Facilities
At this time, there are no specific recommendations to sign roadway shoulders as bicycle routes
within Brooklyn Center. Experienced cyclists will choose to ride on roadway shoulders based
on their comfort level and trip destination. As indicated previously, both the county and the city
have identified roadways where consideration could be given to construct on-road facilities for
experienced bicylclists to use for transportation purposes. It is recommended that individual
corridors be studied if demand is sufficient and there are requests made for providing specific
facilities. Opportunities as part of reconstruction projects or maintenance projects should jointly be
explored by the county and the city to consider shoulders, bike lanes and other accommodations as
appropriate. Corridors for potential study/consideration that have been identified previously by the
county and/or city include:
O County Road 10 (58th Ave/Bass Lake Road): between western city limits and Xerxes
Ave N
O County Road 57 (Humboldt Avenue): from 57th Avenue to the southern city limits
•County Road 130 (69th Ave): between western city limits and County Road 152
(Brooklyn Blvd)
O 69th Avenue: between County Road 152 (Brooklyn Blvd) and West River Road
o Shingle Creek Parkway: from 69th Avenue to Xerxes Ave N
•West River Road: from northern city limits to 1-694 crossing
O Xerxes Ave North: from Shingle Creek Parkway to County Road 10 (Bass Lake Road)
The studies on these corridors should identify what type of on-road facility is most appropriate
(bike lanes, shoulder use, cycle tracks, etc.). Based on the type of facility that is identified, the
corresponding signage can be developed. It is important to ensure that the on-road facilities have
connectivity to other bicycle facilities so riders are not forced into the traffic flow unexpectedly.
This is particularly important for the less experienced cyclists and those that may be riding with
children.
52
It should be noted that County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) was noted as a potential corridor
for on-road facilities. The Brooklyn Boulevard study evaluated this alternative and recommended
not including them. Instead, the study recommended a trail on the west side and a sidewalk on
the east side as being sufficient to serve pedestrian and bicycle needs on the corridor.
Crossings
As noted in Chapter 6 — System Challenges, there are roadways where crossing provides some
especially difficult challenges for pedestrians and bicyclists using the sidewalk and trail network.
The good news is that there were consistent comments on where a majority of the crossing issues
were concentrated and the overall number of corridors with concerns is fairly limited. This does
not mean that other locations are not problematic or could be improved with some of the best
practices identified in Chapter 8. It also does not mean that any improvements may be identified
— especially if future studies indicate that there are no problems.
Crossing challenges identified by stakeholders included:
O 1-94/694 west of County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard)
O TH 252 from the northern city limits to 66th Avenue North
O County Road 10 (Bass Lake Road) between the western city limits to County Road 152
(Brooklyn Boulevard)
•County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) between 63rd Avenue North and County Road
10 (Bass Lake Road)
o Earle Brown Drive in the northeastern portion of the roadway
This plan recommends the following:
1.Implement proposed improvements to County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard), including
upgrading intersections to make them more attractive, providing additional crossing
opportunities at 61st Avenue and ensuring that ADA requirements are met. At this point,
the city and the county will need to work together to identify the funding needed to make
the improvements.
2.Conduct studies that address crossing issues similar to the County Road 152 (Brooklyn
Boulevard) study on TH 252 and County Road 10 (Bass Lake Road) between the western
city limits and County Road 152 (Brooklyn Boulevard) with the appropriate partners.
3.Conduct a roadway segment/intersection analysis (sight distance review, crossing
location review, crash analysis, etc.) on Earle Brown Drive to identify any potential changes.
4.Discuss with MnDOT potential opportunities for another crossing of 1-94/694. If MnDOT
is open to the opportunity, complete a study that would identify and compare potential
crossing locations.
53
F. 1
While some may want grade-separated crossings at all intersections on bigger/busier roadways
because it reduces the time and/or length of one's trip, this is not practical and it is not cost
effective. As such, careful thought and consideration will need to be given to any new grade-
separated crossings.
The areas identified above should be the focus of future studies to determine the appropriate
treatments that are specifically suited to that particular location(s). General treatments and best
practices have been identified in Chapter 8 — including treatments for intersections and mid-block
crossings — that may be applicable to the situations above. However, additional study should
be completed to thoroughly understand existing conditions at these locations in order to identify
improvements that are most appropriate.
Policies, Activities and Practices
There are a number of things that the City of Brooklyn Center and its partners can do to ensure
use of the pedestrian and bicycle network that go beyond constructing sidewalks, trails and
on-road improvements. Some of the activities require a policy direction from the Brooklyn
Center City Council, others require staff coordination and time and other activities may require
cooperation from outside agencies. The sections below highlight other opportunities the city
should consider.
Regular Plan Review, Project Identification and Studies
Having this plan is one of the first steps that Brooklyn Center has taken to ensure that there will
be a robust pedestrian and bicycle network to serve residents throughout their lives. Additional
steps will need to be taken to ensure that the plan's long-term goals are achieved. These steps
include:
o Regular Plan Review: One way to ensure that plan recommendations are being
implemented and that people are using the pedestrian and bicycle network is to conduct
a regular review of the plan (every 3 to 5 years) to ensure that the recommendations are
relevant and that projects and policies are being implemented. Update the plan as needed.
o Identify Projects and Develop a Timeline: Identify potential projects on a set schedule
(every year, every other year, etc.) for inclusion in the city's capital improvement
program. This ensures that projects are included in budgetary decisions and will assist
in selecting priority projects.
O Studies: For more complicated issues/locations, invest in corridor or intersection studies
to identify the appropriate recommendations. This will likely require coordination with
other agencies such as Hennepin County, MnDOT and Three Rivers Park District. It
could also include adjacent communities such as Brooklyn Park, Minneapolis, etc. Once
studies are completed, implementation timeframes should be established if possible so
that agencies can adequately prepare budgets for proposed improvements.
54
111111:*.
olumi■Ilimumfrirmai LW! IW 111 I !k1 IêLi1 Lii
Update Ordinances/Encourage Pedestrian and Bicycle Infrastructure
The City of Brooklyn Center has been successful with its street reconstruction projects in adding
neighborhoods to the sidewalk network and the city has successfully negotiated with developers
to incorporate trails and/or sidewalks as part of major redevelopment efforts. These activities can
be further enhanced by:
o Zoning Code: Incorporating sidewalk and/or trail requirements into development/
redevelopment requests that are submitted to the city for review and approval. By
incorporating requirements into the zoning/subdivision code, the city can make
incremental changes in areas that lack facilities and/or supporting infrastructure (bicycle
racks, signage, lighting, etc.).
o City Improvements: When the city makes improvements or changes to its facilities,
consideration should be given for incorporating additional sidewalk and trail facilities and
supporting infrastructure.
o Coordinating with Existing Property Owners: Work with existing property owners at
popular destinations (Earle Brown, schools, technical schools, businesses) to encourage
bicycle and pedestrian improvements. There may be opportunities to partner on grants
for bicycle racks, signage, etc. that would benefit businesses, customers and the city.
Partnering with Other Agencies/Organizations
When agencies cooperate with one another, with other organizations and with the private sector,
additional funding and resources can become available to make walking and bicycling easier for
a greater number and types of users. A number of agencies and organizations have coordinated
with the City of Brooklyn Center to get the pedestrian and bicycle network to the point where it is
today. Continued cooperation and coordination will be required to grow and maintain the network
in an orderly manner and to encourage walking and bicycling within the community. Potential
partnering could include:
o Plan Consistency: Regular and ongoing coordination with Hennepin County and
the Three Rivers Park District will ensure consistency among the plans for the three
agencies. This consistency will be useful when applying for grants and trying to obtain
funding for proposed projects.
Hennepin County has just completed its Pedestrian Plan and elements of that plan are
reflected in this plan. The county is also just starting the process of updating its Bicycle
Plan. As part of that process, the Three Rivers Park District and the City of Brooklyn
Center will be invited to provide comments and input into the plan development. It will
be important for the city to participate in this process so that any modifications can be
incorporated into an update of this plan at a later date.
55
o Establishing Standards: The city, county and Three Rivers should establish some
minimum design standards for trail facilities, signage, lighting and other amenities.
Consistency in facilities is important to users of the system. It also allows for the easier
transfer of facilities at a later date if jurisdictional changes need to be made.
o Funding: Coordinating with other agencies, organizations and the private sector
provides greater opportunities to obtain and leverage funding for infrastructure and
educational efforts. It can also open up new avenues of funding opportunities. For
instance, the state may have a grant available for senior housing projects that pays for
sidewalk improvements. Working with a developer on a senior housing project may pay
for the sidewalk and free up funding for other improvements/enhancements to the site
or reduce city costs.
o Identify Needs: Cooperating with other agencies and organizations can assist the City
of Brooklyn Center in identifying any additional infrastructure, education, maintenance
or program needs. The city, in turn, can assist other agencies in doing the same thing.
When needs show up in multiple plans it can make obtaining funding easier and it can
help in prioritizing improvements and programs. Additionally, making other agencies and
organizations aware of needs may lead to sharing of information about resources that
the city may not have heard about previously.
o Education and Promotion: Putting on programs jointly or sharing information across
jurisdictions can save resources or allow for more robust programs that can reach more
participants. It can also bring together groups that may not normally work together
(for example, a bicycle education program that includes schools, police, bike shop,
insurance company).
The city should consider partnering with the school districts, insurance companies,
bicycle shops, etc. to implement educational workshops, bike rodeos and walk/
bike to school activities. Educational activities on safety involving children can be
used to engage the parents as well. Events can focus on how to maintain/care for
equipment, the importance of wearing a helmet and understanding the rules of the road.
Additionally, these efforts can be used to assist the city in identifying any additional
improvements or programs that may be needed as part of the program.
Educational activities on health could be developed by partnering with Hennepin County
and insurance companies to conduct educational workshops within the community
on the importance of a healthy and active lifestyle. The workshops can promote
opportunities to use the pedestrian and bicycle network within the community.
o Equipment: Partnering with other organizations and groups may enable the city, county
and/or schools to get access to items such as new bicycle helmets and new and used
bicycles that they can use in their programs and distribute to residents based on need.
Other opportunities could also include working with Nice Ride to determine whether or not
there is enough market demand to expand the program into Brooklyn Center.
1111=111■11111F-
bk1 thCenter.._ _ estr
o Monitoring: One of the goals of this plan is to get more people walking and biking
within the community. On its own, the City of Brooklyn Center may not have the ability
to count pedestrians and bicyclists using the system. However, in working with the
schools, there may be an opportunity to have annual surveys on the number of kids that
walk or bike to school. In working with Three Rivers Parks, there may be opportunities
to use their data or assist them in counting usage on regional trails. In working with
Hennepin County, there may be opportunities to obtain pedestrian and bicycle counts
if the county is conducting traffic counts for highway projects. Pulling these sources
together will assist the city in understanding usage of its system.
o Transit: Metro Transit serves the City of Brooklyn Center with regular route and
express bus service. There are three park and ride locations, a transit station and
numerous bus stops along regular route service lines. Improving pedestrian and bicycle
connections to these facilities can assist in integrating biking and walking into the
transportation discussion, thereby benefiting the transit system, the roadway network
and the pedestrian and bicycle networks. It is also an opportunity to partner with Metro
Transit on bus stop locations, shelter placement and overall service to the community.
Regular communication with Metro Transit can be used to ensure that pedestrian and
bicycle facilities (as well as supporting infrastructure — bicycle parking) are located on
transit routes and connect to major transit facilities if routes are modified or if route
modifications are discussed.
Education
As noted throughout this plan — the intent of the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan is to
encourage more people to walk and bike. Providing the necessary infrastructure is one part of that
process — however, in order to see changes in behavior, additional efforts will be needed. These
efforts should include education — about the system, the benefits of walking and bicycling and
safety.
•System Awareness: In order to increase the number of users on the system, residents,
businesses and public agencies/groups should be provided information about Brooklyn
Center's existing pedestrian and bicycle network. One way to do this is to distribute
maps showing the existing network. This can be done on the city's website, having
hard copies of the maps at city locations (city hall, golf course, community center, etc.)
or distributing maps as part of a city-wide newsletter. Another option is to build on the
public outreach that the city initiated as part of this plan and have maps or information
about maps on the website available at community events such as Earth Fest and Earle
Brown Days.
Other options include working with the school districts to distribute maps to students
during the school year so that they can use them to map their route to school and other
destinations within the community.
57
11111111111fttiBrooklyn 111Center r BOMPL
o Health Benefits: As noted previously, there are opportunities to work with Hennepin
County, health providers and insurance companies about the benefits of walking and
bicycling. In addition to working together to put on programs within the community, there
may be an opportunity to partner with some of the technical schools to teach a session
on this topic in some of their health-related classes. Additionally, the city could potentially
team with local clinics to put up a display (similar to the mobile one used in this study) on
the benefits of walking and bicycling in their lobbies for a limited period of time.
o Safety: Safety is something that the city, county and Three Rivers Park District take
seriously. They also understand that system users need to feels safe while on the
system and while crossing major barriers (bigger roadways, railroads, creeks, etc.)
or they will not use it. To this end, the agencies providing the infrastructure have
identified best engineering practices for constructing the physical network. However,
efforts beyond providing a well-designed system are needed to make users feel safe.
The city and the school districts have partnered together to implement Safe Route to
School Activities. Ongoing efforts outside of the official program should be considered
to continue to educate young people about safe walking and bicycling. This will
reinforce the messages that they have been receiving and will expand that knowledge
to new students annually. As more young people become better acclimated with rules
and practices for safe walking and biking, the more likely they are to use the system
and to share their knowledge with others.
In addition to providing safety training to children, consideration should be given
to provide training and information about safe walking and biking to adults through
community education programs, police outreach efforts or through handouts available via
the internet or hard copy. Training for adults can serve as a refresher on safe practices
and can be a way to introduce new users to the pedestrian and bicycle network.
Maintenance
As previously indicated, how well a facility is maintained can be an indicator of use. Well
maintained facilities will encourage more use, whereas facilities in disrepair can provide a negative
experience, and in some cases create a safety concern that will deter users. Regular maintenance
of facilities also shows the city's, county's and Three Rivers Park District's commitment to and
investment in the non-motorized transportation network. Things the city can do to improve
maintenance include:
Reporting: The city, county and Three Rivers cannot be in every spot every day to
ensure that infrastructure is in operable and safe conditions. Additionally, much of
the public is unaware of what facilities belong to which agency. To make it easier
for residents and users of the system to report problems or maintenance issues, the
city should consider putting a "report a sidewalk" or "report a trail" link on its website
so that users can report problems to the city. From there, the city can coordinate
appropriately with other agencies if needed. Having an electronic way to identify
problems to city officials will make it easier for users to report problems on the network
and will provide staff with another means of being informed about issues to address.
58
11=11111U_
Brook! n Center
PA111 [WI !A El 1 Ia
o Inspection: Regularly inspect the condition of trails and sidewalks owned and/or
maintained by the city. Items identified as needing attention should be addressed if they
pose an immediate hazard. If they can wait, they should be incorporated either into
the city's capital improvement program or maintenance program. The City of Brooklyn
Center inspects approximately a quarter of the community on an annual basis. This
consistent approach ensures that most facilities are in operable and safe conditions.
o Budgeting: Just as roadway maintenance is a part of the city's budget, a budget for
sidewalk and trail maintenance should also be considered for short- and long-term
maintenance needs. Including maintenance activities ensures regular use of funding for
keeping the system safe and operational.
o Snow Removal: Snow and ice removal is an important safety consideration — especially
for the pedestrian network. Handicapped and elderly populations are of particular
importance when considering snow removal policies and practices. Facilities that are
not maintained may force users to find other modes or may force them into locations
(such as in the roadway) that are not safe. In addition to removing snow, policies
should consider the timing of removal — is it done within a certain period of time after
a snow event? Does it follow plowing for city streets? Are there certain facilities
maintained by the city that should receive higher priority than others? These are
questions that city policies should address.
Presently the City of Brooklyn Center provides snow removal on sidewalks and Three
Rivers Park District trails. The plowing of the sidewalks and trails is done concurrently
with the plowing of city streets in order to clear snow as soon as possible. As part of
reviewing and updating its snow plowing route planning, the city may want to consider
developing a priority list for snow removal on facilities that have higher usage or link to
schools and transit destinations. In general, the city attempts to clear snow on routes
with schools in advance of arrival and dismissal times. Doing so is not always feasible
based upon the timing of the snow event.
o Vegetation: The city should consider trimming vegetation or asking homeowners to trim
vegetation that extends into the public right of way. Vegetation can block sidewalk and
trails by extending over these facilities, narrowing the travel path for users. It can also
create an unexpected hazard for users. This can be problematic on high-use corridors
where the full width of the facility is needed.
o Drainage: As part of the inspection process, review the trail/sidewalk area for any
standing water or drainage issues. Sidewalks and trails can settle over time and
redevelopment/construction can change drainage patterns. Standing water or mud/
sand/debris washed onto a sidewalk or trail can create a safety problem or make it
difficult for wheelchairs and/or bicycles to navigate.
o Roadway Improvements: The city should consider pavement materials when making
roadway repairs. Plans should ensure that storm water grates are perpendicular to
the roadway so that bicycle tires do not get trapped. When paving travel lanes, care
should be taken to avoid leaving a ridge or joint where the bicycle may be traveling.
Coordination and discussion should occur with the county and the state when
improvements are made to their facilities.
59
Brookl nCet tlVtL
o Signage and Pavement Markings: The condition of signage and pavement markings is
an important part of the maintenance process. It is important to evaluate signage and
pavement markings as part of regular inspections. The signage and pavement markings
provide important information and they should be kept in good repair so that they are
readable/visible to users.
Security
Security on the pedestrian and bicycle network was identified as a concern by study participants.
If users feel physically unsecure, they will not use the system, nor are they likely to encourage
family members (spouses, children, etc.) to use the system. There are several things the city
could consider to improve user security. These include: installing pedestrian-level lighting,
educating users on personal safety through a community program, having officers patrol areas
where there are sidewalks and trails, and installing cameras in known problem locations or
locations where getting patrols into the area is problematic (trails within park areas or areas
separated from roadways).
Wayfinding
Development and implementation of a cohesive signage program is an important aspect of the
pedestrian and bicycle plan. Wayfinding signage can be used both on road and on trail systems
to help users navigate their way through an area. Because wayfinding is used to navigate and
to provide information to system users it is important that the system that gets put into place
is uniform and consistent. Signing and pavement marking must warranted by use and need.
Multiple designs, oversigning and signs clashing with or too similar to regulatory signage can
actually increase confusion, degrade the usefulness of signs, cause distractions and introduce
conflicts between different mode users.
Signage for Sidewalks
Wayfinding is not recommended for the sidewalk system. The amount of signage provided by
street labels at intersections provides pedestrians with information of their current location.
Kiosks with maps and signs listing all potential destinations would add clutter and would likely
add confusion for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Additionally, providing such signage
would be cost prohibitive. Instead, it is important to ensure that street signs are in place and are
in good condition so that pedestrians can orient themselves.
60
u gu:10 ra it
Signage for Trails
Trails are different than sidewalks. Trails generally result in longer trips and include more of a
mix of users. Trails are used for both recreational and commuting purposes and often times
travel through parks, scenic areas and locations that are not easily locatable by street signage.
Therefore, users of this system may need signage beyond what is provided for sidewalks. As
noted earlier, signage for trails should be consistent and uniform — at the very minimum consistent
throughout a single trail corridor, preferably throughout the community. The signage should also
be used appropriately — that is — putting signs where it is useful, where it can provide guidance
and where it does not create confusion for system users or users of other modes. To maintain
consistency, the Minnesota Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines (MN DNR 2007)
should be used as a guide for trail signage development. As explained in the guideline, trail
signage generally falls into four categories:
o Regulatory, traffic control and warning signs. These signs should be in place to alert
users to safety conditions, sharp curves, slopes or a change in condition that users
should be aware of as they proceed down the trail.
o Trailhead and orientation signs. These signs should be used in locations where many of
the trail users will be entering the system. Areas where there is parking, restrooms, etc.
that users will start from. These signs provide an overall map and orient users where
the trail starts and ends, what connections may be made off of or onto the trail, unique
features, key destinations and identify where the user is currently located in relationship
to the rest of the trail.
o Directional and route guide signs. These signs tell users where to go, how the trail
continues and may indicate the next major destination or connection so that users know
they are continuing in the correct direction.
o Trail identification and warning signs for motorists. These signs are for locations where
there is the potential for conflicts between the modes. These should be used when
trails cross roadways at-grade, especially in locations where there may be limited or no
traffic control devices.
Incorporating these types of signage when trails are developed will enable all users of the system
to safely navigate their way through the area.
61
AWIliffM911 I LW1.11 d mitt litY
Signage for On-Road Facilities
If the city decides to develop on-road facilities, signage for these facilities needs to be consistent
with the Minnesota Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). Consistency with
the MMUTCD and guidelines outlined in MnDOT's Bikeway Facility Design Manual should provide
motorists and bicyclists with the appropriate information to that they need to navigate facilities
that are intended to serve multiple user groups.
In general, signage and/or striping for bikeways should only be provided under the following
circumstances:
o Along routes that are part of the core bikeway system identified and supported by the
community.
o The routes should be configured properly to safely accommodate bicyclists as proposed
(do not sign and/or stripe for a bike lane unless it meets minimum design standards).
Priority Areas for Wayfinding
The previous sections suggest that wayfinding signage is most needed on trail systems where
users may be travelling longer distances, may have numerous turns in direction or connections with
other trail or on-road facilities or may be removed or separated from roadways or other locations
that can provide users with a sense of place and/or direction. Trail users may also be less familiar
with an area (due to the recreational component of most trails) than more advanced cyclists that
use on-road facilities for commuting purposes and make the same trip on a regular basis. As such,
additional direction through wayfinding signage is needed for users of the trail system.
The City of Brooklyn Center has been working with the Three Rivers Park District to provide
wayfinding signage along the regional trails within the city to address user needs identified by
both agencies and from feedback Three Rivers received from system users. Figure 17 shows
the locations of existing signage along the trails. Locations for additional signage have also
been suggested and are shown on Figure 17. In general, locations with trail connections, major
intersections and trailheads are rioted.
As more of the system gets developed, additional signage should also be considered as part of the
planning and design processes. For example, as more of the trail near the Shingle Creek Crossing
mall area is completed it would be important to consider the placement of an additional kiosk
or wayfinding map on the southern portion of the site to complement the existing kiosk that is
located on the northern portion of the site near the transit hub. There are likely different users of
the system going to/through the northern and southern sections of this site.
62
avr.'
ct)
IC'c
. cC a) 2Imo ._CO 3.71. •2 .t.
co u) co co (;),..--
co,,r2. ...3 e , z„,..
I— :E •.c .,-, .92 --
'13 c tr.
u) 0 •= >,co a >, ni
it co., to a i ra ig.
co E so 0
c E c u>
-.(7) c .,p0, a z ),z_ c
._ ');X CU X 2wre wI),
))
0
),
)2 1 'H11, .?.; 4.4
CCLI:
I-- *
0
Q
111APTIER 8: BEST PRACTICES
Just as there are best practices and design guidelines associated with developing roadway
facilities, there are also best practices and design guidelines associated with developing pedestrian
and bicycle facilities. This section of the report identifies best practices that should be considered
as projects are developed. Some of the recommendations apply to the system as a whole, while
others are targeted to a particular portion (e.g., sidewalk, trail, on-road facility) of the network.
The best practices that are specific to particular portions of the network are not intended to be
applied in every situation or that one recommendation is always better than another.
Considerations for All Facilities
There are some practices that should be considered regardless of the facility type that is being
developed. These considerations include eliminating gaps, utilizing the Minnesota Manual on
Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD), conducting studies, wayfinding and lighting.
Eliminate Gaps
One of the most frustrating challenges for pedestrians and bicyclists is to reach a gap in the
system and interrupt their trip, leave them in a location where they are unable to complete
their journey without some challenges or require them to reroute significantly out of their way.
Systems with a number of gaps in them will reduce the likelihood of users and will create
frustration and safety concerns for those willing to use the system.
For pedestrians, if the gap is on a city street (local roadway) with low traffic volumes, lower
speeds and with opportunities to use the roadway facility, the gap may be overcome by the
user. However, on facilities with heavier traffic volumes (collector roadways and above)or higher
speeds, a gap in the sidewalk or trail system can be a significant barrier because the user will not
feel safe mixing with traffic and may not have anywhere else to go.
The City of Brooklyn Center should continue its practice of constructing sidewalks to eliminate gaps
on collector roadways and above and as a part of its roadway reconstruction program. Between
these two efforts, the sidewalk network will continue to grow and provide more connections to
important destinations within the city. When reconstructing roadways, the Pedestrian and Bicycle
Plan should be consulted to check for identified gaps in the trail and sidewalks network.
Additionally, the city should work with Hennepin County and MnDOT to encourage the
completion or construction of pedestrian facilities in conjunction with county and state
roadway reconstruction and transitway projects. Coordination with these agencies for sidewalk
construction/reconstruction should also occur with regard to new development and redevelopment
projects located along or near county and state roadway facilities.
The City of Brooklyn Center should continue its practice of identifying and addressing gaps in the trail
network as part of its roadway reconstruction program and in its coordination with Hennepin County
roadway maintenance and reconstruction projects. It should also continue to work with Three Rivers
Park District in constructing gaps in the regional trail network. Efforts in past coordination have
been successful — with significant portions of three regional trails being mostly complete and with
recommendations for closing those gaps being made. When reconstructing city or county roadways,
the Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan should be consulted to check for identified gaps in the trail network.
64
Standards and Guidelines for Signage and Wayfind .rip MAerja
•Signage should be consistent so as
to be recognized by all users.
o Signage should not be placed in
such a way as to distract cyclists
focusing on their surroundings.
•Signage for trails or along
, roadways must be consistent with
MMUTCD.
Finally, considerations for on-road bicycles facilities need to ensure that gaps are not created
when making roadway improvements. Failure to have a complete connection with on-road
facilities could create a safety problem. At this time it is recommended that additional studies be
completed on the routes previously identified for potentially accommodating on-road facilities to
determine the appropriate on-road improvement and logical termini.
Consult MMUTCD
All improvements related to signage, striping and traffic control devices should be reviewed
against the current Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD). This
manual provides the most up-to-date requirements and design practices. If additional information
is needed, an additional resource is the federal Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD). However, the MMUTCD should be the guiding reference document for improvements.
Conduct Studies
The improvements identified in this section of the report are best practices. Not all practices
should be used in all situations. Some situations favor one type of treatment over another given
a set of circumstances. As such, treatments should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis and not
just applied because a treatment has been identified as a best practice.
Signage and Wayfinding Materials
Signage can be helpful to direct pedestrians and cyclists towards popular destinations such as
parks, community facilities, transit stations, malls/retail nodes, or other trail connections. Generally
signage for wayfinding is used on regional trail facilities and on important city and county trail and/
or sidewalk connections. Signage is generally not used on sidewalks within residential areas on
roadways classified as local. Coordination with multiple agencies (Hennepin County, Three Rivers
Park District, Metro Transit, etc.) may be needed for regional facilities and for connections to
regional destinations.
•Signage for hazards or advisory
warnings must be consistent with the MMUTCD.
65
O Kiosks with maps or historic and/or cultural
information can enhance user experience.
Other considerations that can assist pedestrians and
bicyclists find their way for their trips:
O Ensure that trail and sidewalk maps are regularly
updated and posted on the city's website.
o Provide linkages to the county bicycle map located on Hennepin County's website.
o Provide linkages to the Three Rivers Park District website.
o Consider providing a downloadable smart phone application with sidewalk and trail
information.
o Consider map kiosk placement in community parks.
o Consider map kiosk placement as part of mall rebranding efforts.
o Work with Metro Transit to develop opportunities for signage at park and ride and
transit facilities.
O Work with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District on signage opportunities.
Pedestrian-Level Lighting
Pedestrian-friendly environments encourage walking and bicycling. Pedestrian-level lighting,
street furniture and landscaping all contribute to a pedestrian- and bicycle-friendly environment.
While amenities such as lighting, street furniture and landscaping may add to project costs, their
contribution to making the community friendlier to pedestrians
and bicyclists should not be overlooked, especially in the case of
lighting where it adds to a sense of security and safety.
The Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan recommends continuing its
Roadway Enhancement Partnership Program (REPP). This program
is used to enhance the roadside environment on county road
corridors. Funding can be used to construct sidewalks, trails,
pedestrian lighting, burying of utilities, transit shelters, benches,
streetscaping and landscaping.
Coordination with the county or MnDOT should be considered
as part of larger roadway construction projects or as part of
66
intersection or standalone projects on roadway facilities owned by the county or state.
Design Standards and Guidelines for Lighting:
o Lighting should be downward facing so that sidewalks, trails and roadways (if applicable)
are lighted rather than lighting upwards which provides little benefit for users.
o Lighting can be used for safety as well as security reasons.
O Lighting can be staggered or aligned directly across from each other. Staggering can
allow for fewer lights.
o More closely spaced lighting fixtures can create a stronger edge along a trail or
sidewalk, reinforcing the use of these facilities.
o Bigger roadways (wider, more lanes) require different fixtures than narrow streets due to
the arc of light.
O A photometric analysis should be used to determine the appropriate spacing of light
fixtures (given their design/height) to ensure that light is provided where it is needed.
Pedestrian Facilities
The following are best practices for improving pedestrian sidewalk facilities:
ADA Requirements
The American with Disability Act has requirements for the slopes, size, crossing placement and
other elements of pedestrian facilities. Any new construction and reconstruction of existing
facilities should take these requirements into account to ensure that all potential users are able to
enjoy the pedestrian network developed by the
city.
Sidewalks
Sidewalks are the basis of the pedestrian
network. As noted previously, gaps in
system should be eliminated where possible, but
especially in areas where roadways are classified 4:7
as collector facilities and above and where there
are linkages to important community facilities such as schools, parks, etc.
Design Standards and Guidelines for Sidewalks:
O Minimum width is 5 feet; 6 feet preferred in residential areas.
O Minimum width in commercial areas should be wider — 6 to 8 feet to accommodate
67
rookl h .Center I F
heavier use.
O Maximum cross slope should be 2 percent
Curb Extensions
extensions where feasible.
Pedestrian bump-outs extend the sidewalk and shorten
the distance of crossings. These decrease the amount
of time needed to cross at intersections and can
help to lower traffic speeds by narrowing the street.
Pedestrian bump-outs can be most beneficial at existing
intersections with wide crossings.
Installation of curb extensions is a proven safety
strategy included in the Hennepin County Road Safety
Plan. This plan identified corridors with a history of
at least one severe pedestrian-vehicle crash between
2005 and 2009 and recommended constructing curb
One of the roadways identified was Brooklyn Boulevard (CSAH 152).
Curb extensions can be done as standalone projects or as part of a roadway reconstruction
project. Generally they are constructed on higher-volume roadways such as county and state
facilities rather than local city streets. Coordination with the county or MnDOT should be
considered as part of larger roadway construction projects or as part of intersection or standalone
projects.1
Design Standards and Guidelines for Curb Extensions
O Should not extend into traffic lanes or cut off bike lanes.
O Intended for streets with on-street parking or wide shoulders.
O Should be visible for oncoming traffic.
Median Refuge Islands
Median refuge islands provide cyclists and pedestrians a safe zone halfway through an
intersection. By providing a safe midpoint while crossing a street, pedestrians and cyclists are only
required to focus on one direction of oncoming traffic at a time. This is especially beneficial when
crossing wide roads with high traffic volumes and
high traffic speeds. Median refuge islands allow
pedestrians (and cyclists) cyclists to take advantage
of gaps in one direction of traffic which decreases
the amount of time waiting to cross. Placing a
median refuge island within a roadway can also
have a calming effect on traffic.
Like curb extensions, refuge medians can be
constructed as a standalone project or as part of
a roadway reconstruction project. They are also
68
U:11(Willi11llIrli1[ie
generally constructed on busier roadways owned by the state or the county. Coordination with
the county or MnDOT should be considered as part of larger roadway construction projects or as
part of intersection or standalone projects.
Design Standards and Guidelines for Median Refuge Islands
O Can be applied at signalized or unsignalized intersections.
o Minimum width is 6 feet, but 10 feet is desired to allow for cyclists with trailers.
O Medians should be raised at least 6 inches.
O Shape of the island should conform to the natural vehicle paths.
O Must be clearly visible for oncoming vehicles.
O Reflective markers around the median are recommended.
•Should only occupy the minimum area necessary while providing enough space to
serve its purpose.
If median refuge islands are placed in locations where bicyclists can or will likely use them, then
the city may wish to have a minimum width of 10 feet in order to
accommodate bicyclists that have trailers or connect with a second
bicycle.
Marked Pedestrian Crosswalks
This is a marked portion of the roadway indicating use for
pedestrians to cross. Striping the roadway at the location of a
crosswalk alerts drivers that this is a location where pedestrians may be present and have the
right to enter the roadway. If feasible and practical, these locations should be at intersections,
where drivers are more likely to be aware of the presence of activity. Mid-block crossings should
be avoided if there is an intersection alternative that is close and likely to be used by pedestrians.
If mid-block crossings are truly the appropriate location for a crossing, active notification should be
considered as part of the design.
Design Standards and Guidelines for Crosswalks
•May be used at intersections or uncontrolled/mid-block locations.
•Marked crossings are especially beneficial for intersections with high levels of vehicle
traffic and high speeds.
•Crosswalks at midblock locations may be accompanied by active warning systems
(options discussed on the following pages) to increase awareness. This should be
evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
69
O Should be at least 6 feet in width.
Continental markings or zebra-style are recommended (perpendicular to crosswalk
direction). Lines should be 12-24 inches wide and be spaced 12-24 inches apart.
o Marked crossings should extend the full width of the crossing.
o Appropriate signage warning drivers of crossings may be considered.
o Durable materials (rather than paint) should be used when feasible. The more durable
materials can last several years versus the one to two years that may be obtained by paint.
Leading Pedestrian Interval
The leading pedestrian interval feature (LPI) activates the
walk sign a few seconds prior to the vehicle light changing
to green, giving the pedestrian a chance to get out into the
intersection where they may be more visible to right-turning
vehicles. Studies have found that the LPI method reduces
conflicts for pedestrians. Hennepin County's Road Safety Plan
identified the deployment of advance walk/leading pedestrian
intervals as a proven strategy for improving pedestrian safety
as signalized intersections.
Coordination with Hennepin county or MnDOT should be considered as part of larger roadway
construction projects or as part of intersection or standalone projects on county and state
facilities.
Standards and Guidelines for LPI
o The FHWA recommends the LPI method be used where older pedestrians may
frequently use an intersection.
o The leading pedestrian interval should be at least three seconds in duration.
o During the LPI, consideration should be given to prohibiting turns across the crosswalk.
Pedestrian Crosswalk Safety Systems
There are a few options for improving pedestrian safety at uncontrolled intersections. The
following systems are pedestrian-activated (meaning a pedestrian has to physically engage the
system in order for it to work).
O Standard beacons
o Perimeter mounted LED lights
•Rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB)
70
I Mr
Of the three alternatives, the use of RRFBs is generally preferred due
to their effectiveness and the fact that they provide confirmation
to pedestrians via a flashing light on their side of the system. This
reassures the pedestrians that the system has been activated. RRFBs
are discussed in more detail on the following page.
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacon
Rectangular Rapid Flashing Beacons (RRFBs) are a warning system
used at crosswalks that flash a blinking light to oncoming motor
vehicles to alert them of pedestrians or cyclists using the crosswalk.
These types of systems are used at midblock and un-signalized
intersections where warranted to notify drivers to yield to cyclists
and pedestrians using the crosswalk. The system is typically activated by pedestrians and
cyclists pushing a button but may also be designed to automatically detect users. By requiring
pedestrians to activate the system or incorporating detection as part of the design, the system
reduces the likelihood of drivers overlooking the beacon. If the beacon is always on — motorists
have a tendency to begin to ignore it and not pay attention to see if there are any pedestrians or
bicyclists present.
Although these systems are not currently in the MMUTCD, RRFBs have received interim approval
from FHWA for the optional use as a warning beacon to supplement standard pedestrian crossings
or school crossing signs at crosswalks across uncontrolled approaches in Minnesota. RRFBs have
been identified as an effective measure in the Hennepin County Road Safety Plan due to their high
compliance rates and overall costs.
Coordination with Hennepin county or MnDOT should be considered as part of larger roadway
construction projects or as part of intersection or standalone projects on county and state facilities.
Standards and Guidelines for RRFBs
RRFBs should be installed on the sides of roadways.
•Beacons should not be lit unless being used by pedestrians and cyclists to cross the
intersection.
o RRFBs should not be used at signalized intersections or intersections with a yield or stop sign.
If RRFBs are used in locations where bicyclists can or will likely use them, then the city should
consider placing them in locations where cyclists can activate
them without having to dismount from their bicycle.
High-Intensity Activated Crosswalk
High-intensity activated crosswalk (HAWK) or hybrid beacons
can be used when a street with lower traffic volumes intersects
with a major street and a traffic signal is not desired. The
71
Brook! n Center
hybrid beacon helps pedestrians (and bicyclists) when crossing the major streets. Hybrid beacons
consist of an overhead signal over the major street and have two horizontal red lights on top
of one yellow light to alert drivers of people using the crosswalk. The HAWK or hybrid beacon
is only lit when pedestrians (or bicyclists) activate the system. This reduces the likelihood of
drivers overlooking the signal. Drivers tend to ignore traditional pedestrian signals because they
are always on and are usually green for the motorists. HAWK signals have been identified as an
effective measure in the Hennepin County Road Safety Plan due to their high compliance rates
and overall costs.
Coordination with Hennepin county or MnDOT should be considered as part of larger roadway
construction projects or as part of intersection or standalone projects on county and state facilities.
Standards and Guidelines for HAWKs
O Typically used when a major street intersects a minor road with low traffic volumes and
does not warrant a traffic signal.
O The MMUTCD permits the use of hybrid beacons depending on vehicle speed, traffic
volume, intersection length, and pedestrian volume.
O The MMUTCD provides standards for hybrid beacons including location and height, as
well as length of signal phases.
O Sight obstructions such as on-street parking should not be permitted within 100 feet in
front of a hybrid beacon or 20 feet beyond the marked crossing.
O The signal should not be lit unless being used by pedestrians to cross the intersection.
O Installation of a HAWK system should be based on meeting one of the signal warrants
of Chapter 4C of the MMUTCD and justification through an engineering study. The
engineering study should consider major-street volumes, speeds, widths and gaps in
conjunction with pedestrian volumes, walking speeds and delay if no warrants are met.
Systems should be installed based upon the provisions of
Chapters 4D and 4E.
LED Signage and In-Roadway Warning Systems
Flashing LED stop signs or in-pavement LED markers can be an
effective means of alerting vehicles that a pedestrian is using
the crosswalk. Systems may use sensors or be activated by
the user pushing a button to activate the flashing of the lights. Utilizing LEDs can be an effective
way to catch a driver's attention and can be used to provide advance notice of a crossing ahead.
They are also beneficial when visibility conditions are poor (e.g., nighttime, poor weather).
Flashing in-roadway lights are currently limited to marked uncontrolled crosswalks.
Coordination with Hennepin county or MnDOT should be considered as part of larger roadway
construction projects or as part of intersection or standalone projects on county and state facilities.
Standards and Guidelines for LED Signage and In-Roadway Systems
O The MMUTCD regulates design, color, spacing and usage of light sources used for
traffic crossings.
72
Brooklyn Center Peoesff BIcycle Plan -
0 Flashing in-roadway lights are currently limited to marked uncontrolled crosswalks.
Countdown Pedestrian Signals
Countdown timers at signalized intersections display the amount of time
pedestrians have available to cross a roadway before the traffic signal
changes. The countdown timers and audible/vibrotactile indicators allows
users to use their judgment as to whether or not they can safely cross the
intersection in the time available. Without timers and/or audible/vibrotactile
indicators, pedestrians may enter the intersection believing they have
enough time to cross only to have the signal change before reaching the
other side. This is especially helpful for wider crossings and benefits
those who need more time to cross intersections. Although countdown
timers have been shown to increase the number of pedestrians entering
the crosswalk after the flashing orange hand starts, they reduce the
percentage of pedestrians that do not complete crossing the intersection in time. This is likely due
to people speeding up their walk as the timer approaches zero.
Countdown timers were included as a proven safety strategy in the Hennepin County Road Safety
Plan. The county is currently installing countdown timers as part of a signal retrofit program. This
program should be continued and countdown timers should be installed at any remaining signals
operated by the county.
Standards and Guidelines for Countdown Signals
O The MMUTCD requires that any new signal must include a countdown timer unless the
pedestrian change interval is seven seconds or less.
•Timers must finish their countdown prior to the onset of the signal changing to yellow.
•Recommended for longer crossings.
•Timers should be designed in accordance with the MMUTCD which regulates size, color,
and location of countdown numerals.
o Considerations should be made with all new traffic signals and/or reconstructed traffic
signals pertaining to accommodations for the deaf and visually impaired by providing
both audible and vibrotactile walk indications.
Multi-Use Facilities
Multi-use trails are popular with recreational bicyclists and pedestrians alike. Bicyclists that are
focused on purely commuting/transportation purposes are not as likely to use these facilities because
they have a mix of users and those users can block their way through the corridor. Additionally,
the more advanced cyclists do not like interruptions (driveways and other interruptions) that require
them to slow or stop as compared to on-road facilities. Multi-use facilities generally link to major
73
experience() c clists to usevr-t-
community destinations such as parks, schools, community centers and popular retail/commercial
destinations. The following describe best practices for multiuse facilities:
Consult MnDOT's Bikeway Facility Design Manual
MnDOT has put together a manual targeted to designing bicycle facilities. The manual provides
recommendations and guidelines to improve safety and to provide a consistent facility for users
throughout the state. When designing trails and on-road facilities, this manual should be consulted.
ADA Requirements
The American with Disability Act has requirements for the slopes, size, crossing placement and
other elements of pedestrian facilities. As time has passed, many agencies have been incorporating
some of the ADA requirements into their recreational trail facilities. Although not required at this
time, ADA design standards are an option the city can consider as part of its trail design.
Off-Road Trails
The existing network of off-road trails in the City of Brooklyn Center provides a safe way for
pedestrians and cyclists to get around the community. Off-road trails can be a much more
comfortable option than an on-street bike lane for less experienced cyclists because they are
separated from motorized vehicles. Multi-use trails provide a great opportunity for children and less
non-motorized transportation and feel safe. In many cases, off-road
trails are used by multiple types of users such as cyclists, joggers,
people on rollerblades, and people walking their dog. This variety
can present some safety conflicts and should be anticipated by users.
Providing adequate signage can be one way of alerting users of
potential conflicts.
Hennepin County's Pedestrian Plan highlights the need to continue
to coordinate with cities regarding the construction of multiuse trails
along county roadways. The city and the county have successfully
worked together in the past to identify off-road trail facilities along
Brooklyn Boulevard (County Highway 152). As the roadway gets
reconstructed, the proposed improvements will be implemented.
Hennepin County is in the process of updating its Bicycle Plan
and they will be seeking input from Three Rivers Park District and
the communities within Hennepin County to identify typical design sections and other design
elements. The City of Brooklyn Center should participate in this study and provide input on
design and locational elements. This process also provides an opportunity for the three agencies
(city, county and Three Rivers) to identify minimum trail standards and widths that could be
constructed by any of the agencies so that additional partnering opportunities in the future could
occur. In the interim, the following standards and guidelines are recommended.
Standards and Guidelines for Off-Road Trails
74
11111111111111111111•11MEMPIII LOD I I I/ MICA NI um's,-
•For two-way trails, the minimum width is 10 feet. For trails that experience significant
use, 12-14 feet is encouraged.
o Center lines should be provided for heavily used trails.
o Cautionary signage should be utilized as necessary.
O Intersection crossings should be at flat grades.
O Off-road paths should not cross roadways in areas where the roadway is not straight.
O Trails should be maintained in good condition to avoid potential safety hazards.
O If a route experiences significant traffic from a variety of users (cyclists, pedestrians,
people on rollerblades, etc.) separate trail facilities should be considered. A 2 foot
graded shoulder should be provided on each side of the path in case cyclists drift off the
path or need to avoid hazards.
O Any signage, poles, trees or other obstructions should be at least 3 feet from the edge
of the path. However, signage for cyclists should not be farther than 6 feet from the
edge of the path.
Pedestrian-scale lighting should be considered for user safety and security
For routes that receive significant use, separate trails for different users may be
necessary. When separate paths are provided, proper signage should indicate which
paths are to be used by pedestrians and which should be used by cyclists. Using
different paving materials or providing a median between the separate facilities can
further reinforce designation for different users.
o Separated facilities for cyclists and pedestrians should be considered when peak hour
bicycle traffic volumes exceed 100 users per hour or where combined pedestrian and
cycle user volume is greater than 2,000 individuals per day.
Bicycle Facilities
In some instances, it may be advantageous to provide exclusive facilities for bicyclists. (In
general, most city and regional trails are designed to accommodate both the bicyclist and the
pedestrian. These trails are discussed in the Multi-Use Facilities section). The more expert
bicyclists generally prefer to have on-road facilities. The expert cyclists are comfortable riding
with passenger cars, busses and larger trucks. They primarily use the larger roadways which are
more likely to provide bicycle facilities such as shoulders, bicycle lanes, etc. Having a system in
place for these users is not necessarily the focus of this plan — however, their needs and desires
should be considered and evaluated as county and state facilities are updated.
Before a decision is made for the use of on-road facilities, traffic volumes, speeds, right of way
availability and connectivity to other bicycle facilities (on- or off-road) should be considered. If
on-road facilities are considered for use, the following should be evaluated as part of the process
in selecting the preferred method of delivering the facility:
75
a Brooklyn Center
Consult MnDOT's Bikeway Facility Design Manual
MnDOT has put together a manual targeted to designing bicycle facilities.
The manual provides recommendations and guidelines to improve safety
and to provide a consistent facility for users throughout the state. When
designing trails and on-road facilities, this manual should be consulted.
Traditional Bike Lanes
On-road bike lanes provide designated space exclusively for cyclists and are
distinctly separate from motorized vehicle lanes. On-road bike lanes go in
one direction, consistent with vehicle traffic and are striped and clearly visible for drivers. Striped
bicycle lanes have been shown to have a channeling effect for both drivers and cyclists, and makes
cyclists feel more confident that drivers will not drift into their path of travel.
Standards and Guidelines for Bike Lanes
•Lanes should be of a consistent width.
•Bicycle lanes should be 5-6 feet. Bike lanes wider than 6 feet may be misinterpreted as
travel lanes or right turn lanes for vehicles.
•Bike lanes with a width of 4 feet may be appropriate on some roads with low traffic
levels and low speeds.
•If adjacent to on-street parking, bike lanes should be setback slightly to provide room
for vehicles to open their doors.
•On-road bike lanes may be considered on roads that cyclists are most likely to use,
such as those that provide the most direct route and connect to popular destinations.
Generally, residential roadways have lower traffic volumes and speeds and do not
require separate bicycle facilities.
Buffered Bike Lanes
Numerous techniques exist to shield and separate bike lanes from vehicle traffic which adds
actual and perceived safety. This added security helps attract new riders that may not otherwise
feel comfortable riding adjacent to traffic. Buffered bike lanes include a painted buffer between
the bike lane and travel lanes (minimum of two feet). Buffered bike lanes require additional right
of way as compared to traditional bike lanes.
Standards and Guidelines for Buffered Bike Lanes
The buffer should be a minimum of 2 feet, with a 5-foot
(preferably 6-foot) bike lane.
Larger buffers are recommended on roads with higher vehicle
speeds and heavier traffic volumes.
76
Elrookiyter t riafl tI iCy an
Protected Bike Lanes/Cycle Tracks
Cycle tracks provide a middle ground between buffered bike
lanes and off-road trails as they are considered on-street
facilities, but are separated from traffic, parking and the
sidewalk. Cycle tracks may be separated by a raised median,
bollards, curb or other physical barriers. They offer a path
exclusively for cyclists which is usually colored and marked as
such. The separation from traffic makes them more appealing
to less experienced riders due to the increased perception of
safety.
Standards and Guidelines for Cycle Tracks
O Cycle tracks may be most appropriate along roads with high speeds and high traffic
volumes but with fewer intersections.
O Cycle tracks should be wide enough to allow cyclists to pass one another (usually 6.5 or
7 feet).
•On street parking should be between the cycle tracks and vehicle traffic.
O May be one-way or two-way. Two-way traffic requires additional width if passing
space is to be provided.
o Requires a significant amount of right of way.
•Barriers should not limit drivers' visibility of bicyclists.
Pavement Treatment — All On-Road Facilities
To make on-road bicycle facilities more visible to both cyclists and to motorized vehicles,
consideration could be given to coloring the bicycle pavement. Federal rules permit colored
pavement on marked bicycle lanes and through intersections.
Intersection Treatment - Through Bike Lane and Right-Turn Lane (vehicle)
Striping a combination of an advisory bike through lane within a right-turn lane is used to allow
vehicles making right turns at upcoming intersections the opportunity to cross over the bike lane
into the right-turn lane. This allows cyclists going through an intersection to better position
themselves and avoid conflicts with right-turning vehicles. At an intersection, cyclists remain in
the bike lane, which is to the left of a right turn lane. It provides a specific location for motorists
to safely cross over a bike lane and transition into a right-turn lane. Motorists should always yield
to cyclists when crossing a bike lane.
Standards and Guidelines for Through/Right-Turn Lanes
•Applicable to intersections with right turn lanes.
77
o A dotted line is used to indicate the merging area,
which must begin at least 50 feet from the intersection.
Beginning the dotted section up to 100 feet before the
intersection is recommended on high-speed roadways.
O Dotted lines to indicate the merge area should be at
least 2 feet long and 6 inches wide.
O Through bike lanes should not be used at intersections
with double right turn lanes.
Intersection Treatment — Bike Boxes
Bike boxes are a safety feature being installed at intersections that help make cyclists more
visible to vehicles stopped at an intersection. Bike boxes are green boxes painted at an
intersection that force drivers to stop short of the crosswalk, giving space for cyclists to position
themselves ahead of vehicles. Bike boxes are especially helpful at reducing crashes where
drivers are making right turns and cyclists are going straight. By grouping cyclists together at
the front of an intersection, they tend to move through the intersection more quickly than if they
went through one by one. Because cyclists are positioned ahead of vehicles, they also avoid
breathing in vehicle fumes while waiting for the signal change.
Standards and Guidelines for Bike Boxes
O Intended for use at signalized intersections with high left- and right-turn crash rates.
o Most applicable on roads with high volumes of cyclists.
O Boxes should be 10-16 feet deep.
O Prohibits vehicles from making a right-turn on a red.
Intersection Treatment — Forward Stop Bar
A forward stop bar is a stop bar just for bicyclists in the bicycle lane. It is located closer to the
intersection (and often in front of a marked crosswalk) than the stop bar for motorized traffic.
By providing a space separate and ahead of motorists, bicyclists are afforded better visibility of
cross traffic and traffic can better see cyclists. It also provides cyclists with a few extra feet
head start over motorized traffic when the traffic signal turns green. This can be used in place
of bike boxes — however, it has less capacity than a bike box.
Standards and Guidelines for Forward Stop Bar
O Intended for use at signalized intersections with high left- and right-turn crash rates.
O Most applicable on roads with lower volumes of cyclists than those selected for bike
boxes.
O Should be a minimum of 10 feet deep.
78
Intersection Treatment - Intersection Crossing Markings
By marking the presence of a bike lane through an intersection, it keeps cyclists in a distinct path
and is a visual queue to drivers to be alert of potential cyclists. A marked bike lane through an
intersection indicates that cyclists going through an intersection have priority over turning vehicles.
It should also increase predictability for drivers for where cyclists will be.
Standards and Guidelines for Intersection Crossings Markings
O Applicable for most signalized intersections where a bike lane exists.
O Most beneficial at complex intersections where paths for cyclists are not well defined.
O Markings should remain consistent among all intersections.
O A dotted line is typically used to mark a bike lane through an intersection and should be
at least 6 inches in width.
Intersection Treatment - Median Refuge Islands
See Pedestrian Facilities section for specific details.
Intersection Treatment - Bicycle Signals
Signals specific to cyclists can increase safety by reducing times where
conflicting movements may be present between cyclists and motorists.
Signals can also be used to give priority to cyclists. For example, a bicycle
signal may turn green before a traffic signal to allow cyclists to go through
an intersection before permitting right or left turning vehicles. Bicycle signals are used most
frequently in conjunction with cycle tracks or at complex intersections involving multi-use trails.
Standards and Guidelines for Bicycle Signals
o The clearance interval should be sufficiently long to allow cyclists to complete their
movement before conflicting movements are permitted by vehicles.
O Signal heads should be located so as to be visible by all approaching cyclists.
o Include bike signal detection systems such as marked loop detectors, video detection, or
push button detections. If using a push button system, ensure that it is placed easily for
cyclists to engage from their bicycles.
o Restrictions on certain vehicle movements may also be necessary, such as a red right
turn arrow while cyclists move straight through the intersection.
O A "Bicycle Signal" sign below the signal head is recommended to improve
understanding.
O Should only be considered in areas with heavy bicycle traffic.
79
iiBroOkl WCenteri
MAPTIER 9: IHIPEITYPENTC -ION
The recommended system and supporting policies, activities and practices identified to increase
walking and bicycling within Brooklyn Center will take time to implement. Not all of the
recommended changes/improvements will be able to be implemented in the near term. Some of
the recommendations could take years before fully implemented. However, it is important that
the plan and its associated recommendations remain in-place so that the city and its partners
are prepared to: take advantage of opportunities as they arise, systematically implement
recommendations through applying for grants and incorporating programs and projects into
department budgets, and to monitor progress in achieving this plan's objectives and goals.
Opportunities
As staff, other agencies and residents become aware of the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and
Bicycle Plan, new opportunities for implementation of the recommendations outlined in Chapter
6 may become available. The synergy that can be generated through regular dialogue, joint
programming and working together on studies can expose agencies to additional funding sources,
new partners and energized volunteers.
Opportunities the city could consider pursuing in the short- to mid-term include:
1.Adopting the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan. Adopting the plan will ensure
that the system and recommendations identified will be considered for implementation as
funding becomes available and opportunities arise.
2.Incorporate Study, Construction and Maintenance Activities in the Budget. As new budget
cycles emerge, include programming specific to sidewalk/trail studies, construction and
maintenance. Consider programming a study a year to address system gap and crossing
issues identified as part of the plan.
3.Coordinate Internally with Other Departments. Support from other departments will
be needed in order to implement the recommendations identified as part of this plan.
Specifically, efforts with the planning and the police department will be needed to address
zoning issues, safety, education, and outreach efforts. Working together internally to
develop and send a consistent message to the public will be important. Internal coordination
also allows an opportunity for department resources to be pooled to deliver needed services.
4.Continue to Review the System. The city annually reviews a quarter of its sidewalk and
trail systems. Staff should continue these practices to ensure that the system is safe and in
usable condition. To enhance existing efforts, a link could be put on the city's website for
residents to report problems on the network.
5. Continue to Include Sidewalk Construction as Part of Street Reconstruction Projects.
The city already incorporates sidewalk construction as part of its street reconstruction
projects. This practice should continue as additional roadways are reconstructed in the
future. Additional emphasis on sidewalk construction, the health benefits of walking,
city maintenance procedures and the overall sidewalk network may be incorporated into
presentations/information provided to residents when it comes time for them to decide on
whether or not they want to include sidewalks as part of the project.
80
.3MITINIMIll U:11 DiZIN11111t4i1LIC
6.Update Zoning Codes/Ordinances. Review existing zoning codes and ordinances with
regard to sidewalk and trail construction, as well as support facilities (bicycle parking,
etc.). Consideration for trail and sidewalk facilities should be made for redevelopment and
expansion projects so that identified gaps can be addressed as part of construction.
7.Provide Maps of the Existing Sidewalk and Trail Networks. Post a map with existing trails
and sidewalks on the city's website. The map should also include the schools, parks and
other major destinations. Printed copies of the map could be made available at city hall, the
library and the community center. Consider developing an application for smart phones that
has the system available.
8.Annually Identify Grants for Potential Projects. The section below identifies a number of
funding sources for sidewalk and bicycle construction. The city should annually review
grant opportunities against system gaps and/or intersection crossing locations to pursue
grants that are a best fit with system needs.
9.Work with Hennepin County on its Bicycle Plan Update. Hennepin County is in the process
of updating its Bicycle Plan. This is an opportunity to work with the county and Three
Rivers Park District in establishing standards for trail design and support facilities (signage,
bicycle parking, etc.).
10. Set up Annual Meetings with Partnering Agencies. Meet annually with Hennepin County,
Three Rivers Park District, Metro Transit, MnDOT and other organizations (as appropriate) to
discuss sidewalk and trail concerns and opportunities. Topics for discussion could include:
O System needs
O Upcoming projects (could be roadway, intersection, route changes, etc. that impact
sidewalks and trails and/or provide opportunities to address identified issues)
O Best practices
O Funding opportunities
O Education and outreach activities
O Study opportunities
81
Funding Sources
Local funding resources can be supplemented by funding from regional, state and federal grants.
While the grant programs and opportunities may change over time, consideration should be given
to apply to programs that will enable the city to eliminate gaps and crossing challenges. Potential
grants to consider include:
Hennepin County Sidewalk Participation Program
This funding can be used to construct sidewalks and crossing improvements such as curb
extensions, refuge medians, countdown timers and durable crosswalk markings. Hennepin
County will participate at a rate of 25 percent up to a maximum of $50,000.
Hennepin County Roadside Enhancement Partnership Program
The purpose of this funding is to enhance the roadside environment on county road corridors in
communities located within the 1999 Metropolitan Urban Services Area (MUSA). Funding can be
used for: sidewalks; trails; undergrounding utilities; installing lighting, transit shelters, benches,
streetscape materials, landscaping and vertical elements (bollards/banner poles).
Hennepin County will participate anywhere from 25 to 50 percent depending upon the element.
This funding is generally used in conjunction with highway reconstruction, but has been available
outside of major projects in the past.
Hennepin County Bikeway Development Participation
The purpose of this program is to assist in the development and implementation of effective
bikeway projects. The primary goal is to support and enhance the Hennepin County bikeway
network. Projects must be adjacent to a Hennepin County road and must be a designated route
on the most current Hennepin County Bicycle transportation System Plan map or Bicycle Gap
Study map.
Eligible projects include: construction of trails, bike lanes, shoulder widening, bridges, tunnels,
etc. Projects are prioritized based on their potential to reduce crashes, project readiness, cost
effectiveness, transportation purpose and connections to bicycle trip generators.
Additionally, the county will also contribute to feasibility studies to refine the scope of a
project and determine the readiness of the project for future funding. Feasibility studies should
result in locations ready for design and/or constructions. If successful, projects can apply for
infrastructure grants in the future.
Hennepin County will participate at a rate up to 50 percent to a maximum of $100,000 for
infrastructure projects and a maximum of $20,000 for a feasibility study.
82
Hennepin County Bike Program Discretionary (Gap Program)
The purpose of this program is to assist in developing and implementing projects that eliminate
gaps in the Hennepin County bikeway system. To be eligible, the project must be a designated
gap on the most current Hennepin County Bicycle Gap map.
Eligible projects include: construction of trails, bike lanes, shoulder widening, bridges, tunnels,
etc. Project design and plan preparation are eligible expenses. Projects are prioritized based on
their potential to reduce crashes, project readiness, cost effectiveness, transportation purpose and
connections to bicycle trip generators.
Hennepin County will participate at a rate up to 50 percent to a maximum of $100,000 for any
project. If outside funding is involved, county participation is limited to 50 percent of the local
match up to a maximum of $100,000.
Transportation Alternatives Program
The 2012 federal surface transportation bill, Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century
(MAP-21) made provisions for alternative transportation programs, replacing the former
Transportation Enhancements programs that existed previously. While the details for MAP-21
programs have not yet been determined, there will likely be funding for trail projects included
in the Metropolitan Council's regional solicitation program (competitive program that distributes
federal transportation dollars). The city should review the new program guidelines when they
become available.
It should also be noted that the Safe Routes to School program has been incorporated into the
Transportation Alternatives Program. Presently MnDOT and the Metropolitan Council are working
together to determine if/how Safe Routes will be integrated into the regional solicitation. The
program may be separated from the rest of the regional solicitation activities.
Surface Transportation Program (administered by Met Council)
MAP-21 will continue to support the surface transportation program, although it will be at lower
funding levels than in the past. This program is primarily used for roadway reconstruction, but
does allow for construction of trails and sidewalks as part of a larger overall project. The program
also supports the construction of independent bikeways (generally used for commuting purposes
rather than recreational purposes). Brooklyn Boulevard would be a potential candidate for funding
from this program. The grant would allow the vehicular and pedestrian and bicycle improvements
identified in the Brooklyn Boulevard study to be implemented.
83
Highway Safety Improvement Program
The Highway Safety Improvement Program provides funding to smaller projects that address a
targeted safety issue. The funding is administered by MnDOT. Depending upon the year, the
program can be used to address safety problems in a proactive or reactive manner. Reactive
projects generally include improvements at intersections, especially signalized intersections.
Proactive improvements can include countdown timers, median construction, signing and striping,
sidewalks, and other smaller-scale improvements designed to improve safety.
Funding can support 90 percent of project costs.
Minnesota DNR Local Trail Connections Program
This program is used to promote relatively short trail connections between residential areas and
desirable locations. Up to 75 percent of the total eligible costs up to a maximum of $150,000 are
provided by grant.
Minnesota DNR Federal Recreational Trail Program
The DNR Federal Recreational Trail Program provides up to $150,000 for trail projects (maximum
of 75 percent cost participation). Funding categories are prioritized annually prior to the
solicitation process.
Statewide Health Improvement Program
The Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) is part of the Minnesota Department of Health
initiatives to improve the overall health of Minnesotans and to decrease obesity rates. Funding
for this program has recently been renewed. However, funding goes through community health
boards, so the city will need to partner in order to be eligible for funding. Funding can be used for
education, encouragement and enforcement strategies.
Livable Communities Demonstration Account
The Livable Communities Demonstration Account funds innovative development/redevelopment
projects that efficiently link housing, jobs, services and transit in an effort to create inspiring and
lasting communities. Grants are available to fund basic public infrastructure and site assembly.
Projects can vary significantly from one community to the next, but they all provide linkages
between multiple uses. Infrastructure, such as sidewalks, trails, benches, bicycle racks, etc.
could be incorporated and paid for as part of this grant. However, the projects are generally large-
scale in effort and are focused on redevelopment efforts.
84
IMIT111111_
Brooklyn Center has identified areas where redevelopment is occurring. There may be
opportunities to work with developers and the Metropolitan Council to explore options for using
funding from this program to support overall redevelopment as well as pedestrian and bicyclist
infrastructure.
Ongoing Monitoring
To ensure that the system is being used and that overall levels of walking and bicycling have
increased, it will be important to have ongoing monitoring and tracking of the network. Below is a
list of potential performance measures and tracking techniques that could be used.
1.Number of Trail Users. While it is not practical to go out and count the number of people
using any one sidewalk or trail on a particular day for the entire network, it is important
to have an understanding if the systems are being used. To be most effective, it is
recommended that the city partner with Hennepin County and Three Rivers Park District in
obtaining information related to pedestrian and bicycle counts on regional trails and county
facilities. Additionally, the city could solicit volunteers or hire interns to complete counts on
city-owned facilities every few years. Supporting information could also come from Safe
Routes to School activities and surveys.
2.Miles of Trail Constructed/Reconstructed. The city can track the length of trails (city and
regional) constructed on an annual basis. Numbers could be reported every three to five
years to show progress.
3.Number of Gaps Addressed. Public works/engineering can track the number of gaps
identified in the system map that have been addressed. Numbers could be reported every
three to five years. This tracking can be used to help the city council understand where
targeted dollars for construction activities have been applied.
4.Number of Crossings Addressed. Public works/engineering can track the number of
intersection and/or mid-block crossings that have been improved. Numbers could be
reported every three to five years.
5.Number of Snow Events. Public works can track the number of snow events that have
required city crews to clear snow from sidewalks. Tracking the number of events enables
residents and council members to understand the level of effort required to keep sidewalks
passable/usable and the importance of this service.
6.Number of Sidewalk/Trail Segments Fixed. The city regularly maintains its system. It
should note the length or segments of sidewalk and trail that are repaired annually. If
the city decides to include an opportunity for residents to report problems with trails or
sidewalks on its website or through telephone calls, the number of requests responded to
and/or addressed could also be tracked.
7. Incorporate Applicable Reporting from Hennepin County Pedestrian Plan. The Hennepin
County Pedestrian Plan has identified a number of county-wide performance measures
related to health that could be included in reporting by the city. While not specific to
Brooklyn Center, it gives an overall indication of resident health that is easier to track.
85
8.Incorporate Applicable Reporting from Hennepin County Bicycle Plan. The Hennepin County
Bicycle Plan (to be updated in 2014) will include performance measures. There may be
opportunities for the city to include these measures as part of their reporting.
9.Grants. The city should track and monitor the grants that it applies for and its success rate.
This may help to focus efforts on which grants to apply for depending upon project type.
86
A Pit-INDICES:
Appendix A — Crossings at Shingle Creek Summary
Appendix B — Surveys
Appendix C — Survey Summary
Appendix D — Press Releases
87
1.11112in
_
CC 0)
CI .'5
1:7'?,C a)
'Co'
12- "` •E 7„
.i',.). .f
'5 2 .17:Q 22of, 2 a
-a
.- e-. 2 -a'a)CC1,15) ,gi. tni ,?... E
.,, (Cd :6 .771 a.
0.4 2') a':.)
,'D2 t D.r,,,!
E 0-co t
c) '11) .c6a.) &.) E
o_at1F2gEEooo__
AAAAA
c c,52-e, 8 .20p,rL', P(2,cAUI
E -Ec
90 0 =9 .9 0 8 9,
.9 g
V,2 .5>Tt'nMrE
ORbIgW,ga
2 E>E -g 2•E'(-)7,
"0.92 aLid'gP6,-'7,-rn•c 2,22
a§,2 ,6-6 =
•
m
•
TV•atm'EE0 °- _.") E /u-
rn P- t''n f0.E2222=.-c.°22 -2 ,,4,2-'51 .>'3,2, 0
zap.5,0150 ,t.-E-
Og8P--E696-9,9E650
c,2/50 a .E213, •
Jp.
-occ .13 c _8 Tl 'cr, -0 8 - •
70-,AFL2 -%3t--5 12 -2So 20
Cd
'PratogEtfi
=m2E:
▪
WE'
852f202-6,9-mfILS2LE0=42a.Pa,2 CC
•
c c')
=8g
2,E'ESs
Cd CC
5.9
Pr;
0 2
,IaLE:H21,Mg!
g
Ei-,%.:2
a P 6- -:, '5.s 5 '2 2 :-.)
P. 8g = E '
-,9 = -2 8 ,`, I 31= -... '2,- 2 a
'EA8, 8 2' , '! 5g . V A8
0.,..>,', 0 - a o
Po_.?•,-,. 22
. =' t' g i) 5 ,-ri'.c
▪
2D 2 "6
r'' E ra f,Ti ,..2 Ea .2- 01 2 t ...cm = '5 2 T5 " '. g_2 {-1 g 5 .80. - 2 cr) a
■-. _.t• o 8, '',,,ioZor=A273. :. , . E -0 2 8 1') K 2'f, g -.. 5 .c2 c. 0-22_
•8 6 2 a. 2 OA E_
E21CD .8
S a5
,
g_Ty: T?)=
.PcJ'f-
n;1!
cl):74JA
22
2 1)5"g5- 2
g ``) -2 8 2n-o•.6moo •
' 0,2.72 0 2 < -<,
tb g 2- = te- .15 2
r.) -.s . f, ,al, -`g5 o To 2 8 n
`'c^ o 08 2 .g.i i 6 1 .
1-7,1 .t''' -14 i 2
2 ,,8ugA((1(18- t 15
o 2 a -g 2', T, 20 , -
-°1'' ,s < 0)ti 1-..Q 2 a , .5 ;2 t. 2- 6 .0 5 E, .‘2
co. E 7:,- '4-5 VU-i-s -.5.0— 9 g 2 .-.... 2' . ),, r-,' I f;!!2' d •S' fi .2 a 2 E') 2 .8 ,,,) g _L=4 qt .: 2 72
Ot2f to) 71 (..).. t ‘24 .,,
cc 0., -2 a; i- 8 I" g, g -8c,ic'c'2'8 dE 488_2
IIPVIZIPP 41 1
IlL
Appendix B — Surveys
Survey Questions
We want to make Brooklyn Center a fun place to live, work and play and one way to do that is to make the city a great place for
walking and biking! This survey is part of a project to develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for the City of Brooklyn Center to help
the city become a more bike-friendly and walkable community.
By responding to the following questions, you will help us understand your ideas and concerns about walking and bicycling in
Brooklyn Center. Your responses will be kept confidential.
Thank you for participating!
General Activity
1. What do you like to do most to be active? Please list your top three choices.
1.
2.
3.
Walking in Brooklyn Center
2. During the summer months, how often do you walk in or around Brooklyn Center?
1:1 Never
El Less than 1 time a week
El 1 to 2 times a week
O More than 2 times a week, but not every day
El Every day
3.1 mainly walk to (check one):
El Have fun
DI Exercise
El Go places instead of driving a car
El Get to work
O Other [open ended
O I don't walk.
4. What places do you walk to in or around Brooklyn Center? Please list up to your top 3 places.
1.
2.
3.
5. What would help you to walk to places in or around Brooklyn Center more often? For Example, is there a specific
location that does not have sidewalk or trail facilities that enable you to get where you want? Is there a roadway that you
are afraid to cross?
90
4s11-
cyc anrooklynCeiiter
6. What would help you get to your destination? For example, do you need signs to help you figure out where you are or
where trails/sidewalks go to?
7. Which places in or around Brooklyn Center do you wish you could walk to more easily? Please list up to 3 destinations.
1.
2.
3.
Bicycling in Brooklyn Center
8. During the summer months, how often do you bike in or around Brooklyn Center?
O Never
ID Less than 1 time a week
O 'I to 2 times a week
O More than 2 times a week, but not every day
O Every day
9.1 mainly bike to (check one):
ID Have fun
CI Exercise
O Go places instead of driving a car
1:1 Get to work
O Other [open ended]
O I don't bike.
10. What places do you bike to in or around Brooklyn Center? Please list up to your top 3 places.
1.
2.
3.
11. What would help you to bike to places in or around Brooklyn Center more often? For example, is there a specific road
way that does not have trail facilities that enable you to get to where you want? Is there a roadway that is hard to cross or
an intersection where it is challenging to ride a bike?
91
12.What would help you get to your destination? For example, do you need signs to help you figure out where you are or
where trails/sidewalks go to?
13.Which places in or around Brooklyn Center do you wish you could bike to more easily? Please list up to 3 destinations.
1.
2 .
3.
Additional Comments
12. Please provide any additional information or ideas that you think could help increase walking or biking in Brooklyn
Center
Optional
The Draft Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for the City of Brooklyn Center will be available at the end of summer 2013. If you want to
continue to be involved in this process and hear more about the study, please provide either an email address and/or residential
address.
Name
Email
Residential Address
Street City State Zip
Thank you for your time in helping to make Brooklyn Center a great place for walking and biking!
This survey is also available online through July 1, 2013.
www.surveymonkey.com/s/BCPedBikeStudy
-or-
Submit this survey via mail to:
Zan Associates
105 5th Ave. S, Suite 490
Minneapolis, MN 55401
For more information or questions about the study:
Steve Lillehaug
City of Brooklyn Center
(763) 569-3340
publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us
92
Luis KILN Sokitsuiam
Peb xav ua kom Brooklyn Center yog ib lub nroog nyob lomzem, zoo ua haujlwm thiab uasi. lb txoj key uas yuav ua tau li no yog
yuavtsum ua kom lub nroog muaj key taug kotaw uasi thiab caij tsheb ob lub log! Daim ntawv sojntsuam no yog ib feem ntawm
txoj key npaj los tsim Key Rau neeg Taug Kotaw thiab Caij Tsheb Ob Lub Log rau lub nroog Brooklyn Center kom pab lub nroog
dhau mus ua tau lub zejzog uas tsis muaj key ntshais taug kotaw thiab caij tsheb ob lub log.
Thaum teb coy lus nug hauv gab, koj yuav pab peb totaub koj coy tswvyim thiab tej key txhawj txog key taug kotaw mus los thiab
key caij tsheb ob lub log nyob nroog Brooklyn Center. Koj coy lus teb peb yuav ceev tsis muab qhia rau leej twg.
Ua koj tsaug uas pab koomtes!
Key Taug Kotaw nyob Brooklyn Center
1. Yam dabtsis koj nyiam ua tshaj hais txog key pab rau koj kom nyob keeg hlo tsis muaj mob nkeeg? Thov sau koj peb
yam uas koj xaiv ties zoo tshaaj.
1
2.
3.
2. Sijhawm coy hli nyob lub caij ntuj so, koj mus thug kotaw ncig Brooklyn Center npaum cas?o Tsis thug mus kiag
o Tsawg tshaj ib zaug ib asthiv
D 1 rau 2 zaug ib asthiv
o Ntau tshaj 2 zaug ib asthiv, tiamsis tsis yog txhua hnub
O Txhua txhia hnub
3. Feem ntau, thaum kuv taug kotaw, yog kuv taug key mus (ko ib qho):
o Ncig uasi lomzem
o Ua esxawsxais (exercise)
O Rau lwm qhov chaw, tsis xav tsav tsheb
O Ua haujlwm
O Lwm q h ov/yam
O Kuv tsis mus taug key kotaw
4. Qhov chaw twg yog chew uas koj nyiam mus taug kotaw nyob hauv lossis nyob ib ncig Brooklyn Center? Thov sau txog
li 3 qhov chaw uas koj nyiam mus taug kotaw tshaj.
1.
2.
3.
5. Yuay ua cas pab (pab dabtsis?) koj thiaj yuav mus taug kotaw lossis taug kotaw mus rau tej chew nyob hauv lossis nyob
ib ncig Brooklyn Center heev tsis tseg tsis tu? Pivsam Ii, puas muaj ib qhov chew twg uas tsis muaj sab key taug kotaw
lossis txoj lw taug key uas koj xav tau kom mus tau rau qhov chew koj xav mus? Puas muaj txoj key tsheb twg uas koj
tshai hla?
93
6.Yuav ua cas pab (pab dabtsis?) koj thiaj mus txog rau koj qhov chew mus? Pivsam Ii, koj puas xav tau kom muaj daim paib
qhia key pab kom koj paub tias koj nyob qhov twg lossis tias txoj lw taug mus rau twg?
7.Nyob hauv lossis nyob ib ncig Brooklyn Center, ghov chew twg yog ghov uas koj xav kom tau key mus kotaw taug mus
yoojyim? Thov sau txog Ii 3 ghoy chew mus.
1
2.
3.
Key Ca ij Tsheb Ob Lub Log nyob Brooklyn Center
8. Sijhawm caij ntuj so, koj caij tsheb ob lub log nyob hauv lossis nyob ib ncig Brooklyn Center heev npaum cas?
O Tsis caij kiag
LI Tsawg tshaj ib zaug ib asthiv
O 1 rau 2 zaug ib asthiv
o Ntau tshaj 2 zaug ib asthiv, tiamsis tsis yog txhua hnub
O Txhua txhia hnub
9. Feem ntau, thaum kuv caij tsheb ob lub log, yog kuv mus (ko ib qho):
O Ncig nasi lomzem
1=1 Ua esxawsxais (exercise)
O Rau lwm ghov chew, tsis xav tsav tsheb
O Ua haujiwm
O Lwm qhov/yam
O Kuv tsis caij tsheb o blub log
10. Qhov chew twg yog chaw uas koj nyiam mus caij tsheb ob lub log nyob hauv lossis nyob ibncig Brooklyn Center?
Thov sau txog li 3 ghov chaw uas koj nyiam mus tshaj.
1.
2.
3.
11. Yuav ua cas pab (pab dabtsis?) koj thiaj yuav caij tsheb ob lub log mus rau tej chaw nyob hauv lossis nyob ib ncig Brooklyn
Center heev tsis tseg tsis tu? Pivsam Ii, puas muaj ib qhov chaw twg uas tsis muaj tsev so raws txoj lw taug key uas yuav pab
tau kom koj mus txog ghoy chew koj xav mus? Puas muaj txoj key tsheb uas nyuab hla losis ntu key tshuam uas nyuab rau
caij tsheb o blub log?
94
This survey is also available online through July 1, 2013.
www.surveymonkey.com/s/BCPedBikeStudy
-or-
Submit this survey via mail to:
Zan Associates
105 5th Ave. 5, Suite 490
Minneapolis, MN 55401
For more information or questions about the study:
Steve Lillehaug
City of Brooklyn Center
(763) 569-3340
publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us
95
12.Yuav ua cas pab (pab dabtsis?) koj thiaj mus txog rau koj ghov chew mus? Pivsam Ii, koj puas xav tau kom muaj daim paib
qhia key pab kom koj paub ties koj nyob qhov twg lossis tias txoj lw taug/sab key taug mus rau twg?
13.Nyob hauv lossis nyob ib ncig Brooklyn Center, qhov chaw twg yog qhov uas koj xav kom tau key caij tsheb ob lub log
mus los yoojyim? Thov sau txog Ii 3 qhov chew mus.
1.
2.
3.
Lwm Yam Lus Xa Hais Ntxiv
14.Thov sau yog muaj lwm yam ntxiv lossis tswvyim uas koj xav tics yuav pab txhawb key taug kotaw lossis caij tsheb ob lub
los nyob hauv Brooklyn Center.
Nyob ntawm nyiam, teb los tau, tsis teb los tsis ua cas
Daim ntawv ua thawj zaug txog Key Npaj Key Taug Kotaw thiab CaijTsheb Ob Lub Log hauv Nroog Brooklyn Center yuav tiav pub
rau saw/claws sijhawm xaus caij ntuj soy 2013. Yog koj xav koomtes mus ntxiv lossis xav nov ntxiv txog qhov key tshawb xyuas,
thov muab koj npe thiab email lossis chew nyob..
Npe
Email
Chew Nyob
Street City State Zip
Ua tsaug rau koj lub sijhawm thiab key pab kom Brooklyn Center yog lub chow zoo taug kotaw thiab calf tsheb ob lub log!
A
Neguntas de la encuesta
Deseamos hacer de Brooklyn Center un lugar divertido para vivir, trabajar y jugar y, una manera de hacerlo es convertir a la ciudad
en un lugar genial para caminar y andar en bicicleta. Esta encuesta es parte de un proyecto para desarrollar un Plan de Brooklyn
Center para Ciclistas y Peatones para la Ciudad, a fin de ayudar a que esta se tome en una comunidad donde se pueda caminar y
andar en bicicleta sin problemas.
Al responder a las siguientes preguntas, usted nos ayudara a entender sus ideas y lo que le preocupa acerca de caminar y andar en
bicicleta en Brooklyn Center. Mantendremos sus respuestas en forma confidencial.
iGracias por participarl
Actividad General
1. LQue le gusta hacer para estar activo(a)? Por favor enumere las tres cosas que mas le gustan.
1.
2.
3.
Caminar en Brooklyn Center
2. Durante los meses de verano, Lcon que frecuencia camina en Brooklyn Center o en sus alrededores?o Nunca
•Mendos de 1 vez por semana
o De la 2 veces por semana
O Mas de 2 veces por semana, pero no todos los dias
o Todos los dias
3. Camino principalmente para: (marque una opciOn):
O Divertirme
•Hacer ejercicio
o Visitar lugares en vez de ir en automOvil
o Ir al trabajooOtro
O No camino.
4. I.Por que lugares camina usted en Brooklyn Center o en sus alrededores? Por favor, enumere los 3 lugares que
le gustan mas.
1.
2.
3.
5. zQue seria lo que le ayudaria a caminar mas seguido hacia lugares que esten en Brooklyn Center o en sus alrede
dores? Por ejemplo, hay algn lugar en especial, que no tenga aceras o sendas que le permitan Ilegar adonde desea?
zHay algOn camino que usted tema cruzar?
96
L -r"raMZX
6.2.Que seda lo que le ayudarla para Ilegar a su destino? Por ejemplo, Lnecesita carteles que le ayuden a saber dOnde esta o
hacia d6nde van las sendas/aceras?
7. En que lugares de Brooklyn Center o de sus alrededores deseada caminar con mayor facilidad? Por favor, enumere hasta 3
destinos.
1.
2.
3.
Andar en bicicleta por Brooklyn Center
8. Durante los meses de verano, icon que frecuencia anda usted en bicicleta en Brooklyn Center o en sus alrededores?
o Nunca
o Menos de 1 vez por semana
El De la 2 veces por semana
o Mas de 2 veces por semana, pero no todos los dias
O Todos los dias
9. Ando en bicicleta principalmente para: (marque una opciOn):
O Divertirme
o Hacer ejercicio
O Visitar lugares en vez de ir en automOvil
o Ir al trabajo
o Otro
O No ando en bicicleta.
10. zEn que lugares de Brooklyn Center o de sus alrededores anda usted en bicicleta? Por favor enumere los 3 lugares que
mas le gustan.
1.
2.
3.
11. Que seda lo que le ayudaria a ir en bicicleta con mayor frecuencia, hacia lugares de Brooklyn Center o sus alrededores?
Por ejemplo,zhay algOn lugar en especial que no tenga sendas que le permitan ir adonde usted desea? iHay alg6n camino-
que sea dificil de cruzar o una intersecci6n donde sea peligroso andar en bicicleta?
97
This survey is also available online through July 1, 2013.
www.surveymonkey.com/s/BCPedBikeStudy
-or-
Submit this survey via mail to:
Zan Associates
105 5th Ave. 5, Suite 490
Minneapolis, MN 55401
For more information or questions about the study:
Steve Lillehaug
City of Brooklyn Center
(763) 569-3340
publicworks@cibrooklyn-center.mn.us
98
12. zQue seria lo que le ayudaria para Ilegar a su destino? Por ejemplo,i .necesita carteles que le ayuden a saber d6nde esta o
hacia dOnde van las sendas/aceras?
13. En que lugares de Brooklyn Center o de sus alrededores desearia que se pudiera andar en bicicleta con mayor facilidad?
Por favor, enumere 3 destinos.
1.
2.
3.
Comentarios adicionales
14. Por favor, brinde cualquier otra informaciOn o idea que usted piense que mejoraria el hecho de caminar o andar en bidi
cleta en Brooklyn Center:
Opcional
El borrador del Plan de Brooklyn Center para Ciclistas y Peatones para la Ciudad estarâ a su disposici6n a fines del verano de 2013.
Si desea continuar involucrado en este proceso y saber mas cosas sobre el estudio, sirvase indicar una direcciOn de correo elec-
trOnico o una direcciOn residencial.
Nombre
Correo Electronico
DirecciOn Residencial
Street . City State Zip
iGracias por su tiempo de ayuda para hacer de Brooklyn Center un lugar genial para caminar y andar en bicicleta!
1E11 1110 LICAL410liiir
1 ?ENDIX C - SU SUMMARY
Sturvey Summary
Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for the City ifBr oklyn Center
The survey for the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan consisted of 13 questions related to
walking and biking in the city, with an opportunity for additional comments at the end. The survey
was open and available for several months and publicized via news releases and website updates,
at events and displays at public locations, and through local community members. A total of 165
people completed the survey; a general summary of the responses to each question is below.
Walking in Brooklyn Center
1. What do you like to do most to be active? Please list your top three choices.
Frequent responses included:
•Walk/Run
•Bike
•Team sports (soccer, basketball, etc.)
•Go to the gym (weight lifting, fitness classes)
•Rollerblade
•Swim
•Golf
•Go to the park
•Yard work
2. During the summer months, how often do you walk in or around Brooklyn Center?
Never
Less than 1 time a week
1 to 2 times a week
More than 2 times a week, but not every day
- Every day
Response results:
Lfri Never
IM Less than 1 time a week
if 1 to 2 times a week
,—, More than 2 times a
'---- week, bot not every day
Um Every day
99
3. I mainly walk to (check one):
Have fun 1
Exercise
Go places instead of driving a car
-Get to work
-Other [open ended]
-I don't walk
Response results:
Have fun
1111E1 Exercise
Go places insteadNMIof driving a car
TJ Get to work
17:1 I don't walk
4. What places do you walk to in or around Brooklyn Center? Please list up to your top 3 places.
Frequent responses included:
•Local parks (Grandview Park, Central Park, Palmer Lake Park, Centennial Park,
Evergreen Park)
O Around one's neighborhood
O Community Center
OLocal libraries
•Local gas stations
o Mississippi River Walk
o Large retail/grocery stores (Walmart, Target, Cub Foods)
100OFast food locations (Subway, Cherry Berry, Culver's)
5. What would help you to walk to places in or around Brooklyn Center more often? For example, is
there a specific location that does not have sidewalk or trail facilities that enable you to get to
where you want? Is there a roadway that you are afraid to cross?
[open ended]
Frequent responses/themes included:
O Improving intersections and roadways that are difficult/uncomfortable to walk
along/across:
o Shingle Creek Pkwy/Earle Brown Drive
o 73rd Avenue N. from Camden to Dupont Ave
o Drew Ave from 67th Ave N. to 65 1h Ave N.
o H 252
o Brooklyn Blvd
o Bass Lake Road
o Adding more lights for safety (on trails as well as local streets)
o Adding 'watchdog' cameras at identified dangerous intersections
o Extend the trail from the Sears parking lot north
O Add sidewalks to local streets and residential areas
o Add pavement markings to trails to designate which direction people should be
walking/biking
o Widen paths to allow room for both pedestrians and bicyclists
o Raise trails vertically to avoid flooding near the lakes
o Better snow/ice removal on trails and sidewalks
o Work with local businesses to promote ability of employees to walk during breaks
6. What would help you get to your destination? For example, do you need signs to help you figure
out where you are or where trails/sidewalks go to?
[open ended]
Frequent responses/themes included:
o Additional trails/sidewalks
o Maps along trails
o Additional directional signage along trails, particularly at trail intersections
o Directional signs to major destinations
o Mobile app for city trails
o Distance markers along trails
o Pedestrian bridges over busy/dangerous intersections
7. Which places in or around Brooklyn Center do you wish you could walk to more easily? Please list
up to 3 destinations.
Frequent responses included:
•Local parks (Grandview Park, Central Park, Palmer Lake Park, Centennial Park,
Evergreen Park)
•Community Center
•Movie theater
•Local libraries
o Local gas stations
o Large retail/grocery stores (Walmart, Target, Cub Foods)
o Fast food locations (Subway)
101
Bicycling in Brooklyn Center
8. During the summer months, how often do you bike in or around Brooklyn Center?
Never
Less than 1 time a week
-1 to 2 times a week
More than 2 times a week, but not every day
-Every day
Response results:
MN Never
Less then 1 time a week
MB 1 to 2 times a week
More than 2 times a
week. but not everyday
rmi Every day
102
11111111111 MBrookArrene n NM,
9. I mainly bike to (check one):
-Have fun
Exercise
Go places instead of driving a car
Get to work
Other [open ended]
I don't bike
Response results:
OM Have fun
Exercise
MN Go places instead•of driving a car= Get to work
I= !don't bike
10. What places do you bike to in or around Brooklyn Center? Please list up to your top 3 places,
Frequent responses included:
O Local parks (Grandview Park, Central Park, Palmer Lake Park, Centennial Park,
Evergreen Park)
•Around one's neighborhood
o Community Center
O Local libraries
o Local gas stations
oMississippi River Walk
o Large retail/grocery stores (Walmart, Target, Cub Foods)
O Fast food locations
o Coon Rapids Dam
O Local schools 103
11M
VPIOrkl urkLII LUZ 1 -1 (I Ell I UW1 i Gi\XCI !.d I 1
11. What would help you to bike to places in or around Brooklyn Center more often? For example, is
there a specific location that does not have trail facilities that enable you to get to where you
want? Is there a roadway that is hard to cross or an intersection where it is challenging to ride a
bike?
[open ended]
Frequent responses/themes included:
•Additional trails and trail connections
O Additional bike racks at popular destinations
o Wider trails that accommodate both bicyclists and pedestrians
O Make busy intersections easier/safer to cross
•Smoother trail surfaces
12. What would help you get to your destination? For example, do you need signs to help you figure
out where you are or where trails/sidewalks go to?
[open ended]
Frequent responses/themes included:
O Additional maps along trails
•Additional directional signage
•Additional trails, particularly near popular destinations
o Signs to warn motorists of pedestrian/bicycle crossings
13. Which places in or around Brooklyn Center do you wish you could bike to more easily? Please list
up to 3 destinations.
Frequent responses included:
8 Movie theater
O Local schools
O Local parks (Grandview Park, Central Park, Palmer Lake Park, Centennial Park,
Evergreen Park)
o Brookdale Center
OLocal libraries
O Large retail/grocery stores (Walmart, Target, Cub Foods)
Additional Comments
14. Please provide any additional information or ideas that you think could help increase walking or
biking in Brooklyn Center:
[open ended]
Response themes included:
•Desire for bike rental program (such as Nice Ride)
O Reiteration of desire for more trails and sidewalks in general
o Desire for audible crosswalk indicators
•Desire for longer crossing times at busy intersections
O Desire for safety improvements—more lighting, pavement markings
G More enforcement of traffic laws
O Educational campaigns needed for motorists and bicyclists
O Organize more biking/walking events
O Improve maintenance of trails (snow/ice and trash removal, etc.)
104
-MIME_ 1
APPENDIX L - PRESS RELEASES
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 30, 2013 (Brooklyn Center, MN)
ONGOING STUDY HOPES TO HELP INCREASE BIKING AND WALKING IN BROOKLN CENTER
Hennepin County and the City of Brooklyn Center are working together to conduct a pedestrian and
bicycle study. This study is identifying different methods to increase biking and walking in Brooklyn
Center. The primary goals of this study are to improve the health of residents, increase the safety of
biking and walking in the community, and increase overall biking and walking.
The pedestrian and bicycle study is gathering input from Brooklyn Center residents to help identify
existing conditions, where people walk and bike, safety concerns, and gaps in the current sidewalk and
trail facilities. The information collected will be used to develop a Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan for the City
of Brooklyn Center that will include recommendations for improving biking and walking throughout the
city.
An online survey is available to gather public input through July 1, 2013. All residents are encouraged to
participate by taking the survey at: www.surveymonkey.com/s/BCPedBikeStudy . A hardy copy of the
survey and translated surveys in Hmong and Spanish are available upon request.
For more information and questions on the study or to request a hardcopy or translated survey, contact
Steven Lillehaug, City of Brooklyn Center Director of Public Works: 763-569-3340
publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us
105
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
June 17, 2013 (Brooklyn Center, MN)
PUBLIC SURVEY FOR BROOKLYN CENTER PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PLAN ENDS JULY 1
The online survey for the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian and Bicycle Plan will end July 1, 2013. All residents
are encouraged to participate by taking the survey at: www.surveymonkey.com/s/BCPedBikeStudy . A
hardy copy of the survey and translated surveys in Hmong and Spanish are available upon request.
The survey is part of ongoing outreach efforts by Hennepin County and the City of Brooklyn Center to
conduct a pedestrian and bicycle plan. This plan is identifying different methods to increase biking and
walking in Brooklyn Center. The primary goals of this plan are to improve the health of residents, increase
the safety of biking and walking in the community, and increase overall biking and walking.
The pedestrian and bicycle survey will assist in gathering input from Brooklyn Center residents to help
identify existing conditions, where people walk and bike, safety concerns, and gaps in the current
sidewalk and trail facilities.
For more information and questions on the study or to request a hardcopy or translated survey, contact
Steven Lillehaug, City of Brooklyn Center Director of Public Works: 763-569-3340
publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us
106
Work Session Agenda Item No. 2
MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION
DATE: February 5; 2O14
TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager
FROM: Kevin Benner, Chief of Police
SUBJECT: Electronic Cigarettes and Related Vapor Inhalation Devices Presentation
Recommendation:
It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff regarding the
licensing and allowed use of electronic cigarettes and related vapor inhalation devices.
Background:
In January 2014, the City Council had directed staff to review the possible• health concerns
related to the use of electronic cigarette and related vapor inhalation devices. Commander Tim
Gannon and Juvenile Officer Kris Knodle conducted extensive research on the current trends
related to the use of these vapor producing devices and the rules that other cities have adopted to
address them. They will present the City Council with the information from their research and
discuss recently enacted model policies from other Minnesota communities. They will be
available for questions following that presentation.
Policy Issues:
Discuss possible changes in the license ordinance as it pertains to the use/sale of electronic
cigarettes and related vapor inhalation devices found in ordinance 23-101.
Strategic Priorities:
• Community Image
Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, hick's/ye community that enhances the quality of life
for alipeople and preserves the pithlic Mist
■
= 11=nJ Vim...0 1--.
-1=I... vcrLel L._ 4.--,
-U V (L1, ÷-, •mr,cl) JC__-
U
..e
-V-4 In
1....1 I--0Lel cill L=.el.J1 4—, p.4, ..= ID
I.■ l■ IFEI
C4 .-.4. C..
t=r. LAI CI Li_ 4-,= = E c--) .,.- ==.- Pm) 1.1.c_--, Uri I.. j L.i4
ru 1....j --,I-1 LiIIG
CO ..=i•la7.
••-1.1::1Ellug
ft-
,---,--MI
__,
i
'I'r-1..-1-=_
-_,-1=1 -1=1
(=I IM
P—•Lel.4__,
ra I—.--,VI --•ICLI/.-I I=:.=i
--1=1
I-a-•CD .:---
4--._L--.
_o o ..o 4-,
(731—'E
O OD 0CD Ln
—
CO
(i)
11111111111111mp
-c3a)C CL)•■
C as co CO CU 4--) v) U 4-1 5-
C CU
. - U Pup 0.)CU
C (f) W EV)
0 (1) 0 a) 0 Cr) ‘4.... _c. -
C 460_ uC or)
CD C 0 -cj-0
-0 CI)LI)0 4—
..E > . — (I)
V)
5.-. L- L....
0 gp- 0
U cl) a) c a.) c -0 cr) • —
O 4--) ."8 E .-c °-1-J 0 -1-00..Cr) -1-J 0.0U c 4_9 42 CD> =
0 2 cu
2cco 0 0Oc = 0- E
o_ o ._
ELI)co co L_u c (/) 0 coL_ .1-J 0 8 cu co _cCD u .4:3 0 _c -'> = o_ t4- -C3 C•— 7:5-(T) (2. E 73'10 ----'u <CO .+9
0 0_ Ln= —iW ...-... u... co
G)= %a) ri,C (13 oc= u 4--,.-0 .1.-3
—
r 1
. 4 71 CU v)
O v) C CU n , ... v) `.-,:=. 0U °C co u_z E L--- v; 0 LAa.) 4-, co (1.)
opLi— coO --c0cu L-v) > u _0 0a) 0 °a) o= 4_. < -0 4-J Q.3.--
CO o 2 L-,LI)
4-) C
O 0
= v)
O v)COCU -0 auc L.2. >••• coro C.) a) —s- -__C
CA- 0 4-) a.)
E -E5_ (I) =
X CU (I)
O LAi- 4-r V)—U CO
(1)CU U4-, cn•— _CM cr)U 0 -1--) GU
CU Ci_ =
•
CX s_a) 6 a.) >, (f)
o u 4-, a) =c _c_o4-, u co w 4-) a)-0 ID U -C(1) 0
NJ -I-) bb C 1-. -
>* 0 °— C - - _
.- .4-.)U)C CO CU7
CD.— 0 U v)v) -C C3 2 c. ,. — 0 4-, ..p. o00 ,_, co c Cr-1 = Q.) CO CU V)4-
4
0- >
*- V) -0 Q)0 0 Cll • —
Q) -) U 0
CI) -C s-
bi3 bp s- .4-) 0 75 `;
CO C = ../ 0v) 0 (1) s- 0.)
CU '-'17' Q.) >. ../ CU -C
_C CD- 0 v*) U U4-.) E -0 a)
_c co a) a)s- a) _c 4-1 V)(r) _C UQ) 4—) 4—) C>, 4:1) 4-) co=C
•
CO
0 CO C -0•■• • ■
= > (1) C 0_,. —CD-C CO a _o 4 ,_4-, v) _c >- • — om a)cu uo0 1—• I--_c > (1)>- (1)4-1_„ -C CO _c
U 47 -C 4-P
04-
LT)
CI)
4-)
Q.)
CD
U)
-C
C1Z5. —
D-
E
a)_c
CC
a)
("a
a)
4-1a)L-as
(1)
cu
s_04-c
04-,
-o
CDC:1
0:5
1.11
00LCD
C710LU
_C 0 4-)co4-1LT]<0—
p5-
C ,
N
7:5C
0
COcuC
cu vi 0
-r(S-3 _c U
(I) a.) NA I—
0 c
-C -Ct, a.; -c 4-' C.
11 > U V) U
0
C-1= ai.) (13 LE
*4---,_I o u o co
c 4-) U0(T3
./.;
-0 a)
._
1 cu 0., cu s_ v)' a)
---)j s_ E c.r)4-
S-a.)
_c C "Q4-) -C4-)
-I-) 0 a) a) s_ 4-,co
01 E 0 ._u v) ,_
a) >- ov) sa.)
q- 4-i4-Ia) _o 4_,4_, c0 2
a) o
s_a)NJ
0.
Ea)
0 co
a)
s_ uuco s_co to E . E -6o .0..) ra(y-)
2 *P o .-u oE
u > COCO -0
M
MI (20 X)
4-,0
u.;
+-, a)
v) ..: rt Li=1 u ,1,w = Q.) 0=
L 1 C _C - .-
= -0(1) ..:.I- CU >
4-)CT3 .4—a cu 4—) v)C v)C-1 v)
[ --1 • ,,— v) _C s_ M co
_ ..-
(---1 5 -
-- v) G.) > (la v--1 uv)
0ta0((- 1 v) v)
CU v) = ._ o..) L._
0 _c a..) oz34-)-V) V) a) 4-, u c v) cb coCU ._ 4- M.'•U C cn = .-; 0 r-I
-C • ...... = CU
U
CO (1)
'C U —C V)= -0 co' ID
0-, , 0.),-,
(1.)
U -0 0x-I (13 Up 4-)0 V) _1
C (r3 it. 1 1- a) 0 0t-I > t-
(0 C N L.n -C C2_ s_ CO= 4=
L.-
sa)CM 4-) v) 0 a)
0
-
4-14-0oUCO
o
0
-CE— r-mi LL 01:5
CD
1111111111011111011111111ff
O 4
▪
—
L. a) 0a) a)E s_ u
co cu ccu a) 04-J CL
° w
.—0 s_ 0 a)°-0 0U -c
•_•Liu) 2
fp 0 "4—D (i) 0'--0z ou 0
—G)
7:3 < _0
▪
(1)>- coa) E E•c E (1)—a) a) 0 E_c > u -04-,-CD C
o ro4-1 (/)W CU L- UC < CU CI::
O 0 U
U 1/4-1
c• —
•— • -- e .N>""CL w
O (1)+-• < c
cu c (73 o...c cu >-J7;
0 0_0
0 0 0
U
< (10
tan C
•..m.
f7 V)
o r—, 117;\ , Los
0 a)
F
, -0,,,,,,
-0 0)VI bb co s_•.....a) c .7::) =-•vi a'4
▪
-) ccu e.,E co 2s_ro a) up v)ruo > c tw
*0 7 : )CO CU 0._ ,
_C 0O s..0..±—.) CO, rom -c)a) (13 cu$ 4-1-o 4-.) cou c a) .L--s...., o) ro ro ctau Q.)>0- L-7)
00Cr) 0")v-1
_c -0+-) >, 0 W
co 0,-) 0 -0 a)w °- _c c v) 4-)
r_c7. ID — co >.W(3,)
E (1.) oc -0U Q)'4:--; Q.) a) ro +-,
4--) vi 0 (...) u
tto c) u > cu
C 0 >c a)o > co -sCro i :i2, -0o 0_ cu v) v)
_C 63 a) c-- a)
4--) tto o >
•Ref,a. (1)
CX co n C * 0-1-:0 V) Q.)
O Q) (1) COL- -,' -0 • -
>
CU CD- (I)4-1 V; w a)O E 6 Ca)
c 0.0 o 0.) u o_w 0.0 c 0 • 1•1==
7:3 Z C W C t- a)
.–0 • -•U o>% \'' -a 0U '-'-c a)a)...c
a) n 0 n v)cm OD • - -0 t3 E co =
co c -0 v)L... v) -0 cm
u 2 co E3' w ._,.._
:,-7 c:L c G.) c._ E o
E_ v) 0 2 4-C6 (13Up (13 -0 0
E LE 4_, 4-, F. +-,a) c c -0
bp 1- co s_ roC. c
0 u 4-;
tio c w 4- ) 0 u
u W .47, (..n „.O 7-) uro >. c v) 0 Q) `4••C C W_ ...0 0 o+-) = u 4-) L_ s.... :5 V 0 '47, c ID L 4-1
O C L.- (f)'' CU ..
("Cf cu ro (13 CU 'ZC
D CO 4-) (r) L_W 2 t- C = -5 la t-1- C CO L-
+-1 ,-7 a) a) to co o
ro tio 0•5 0•— — n n E v) CUL__ bo +>: ta° 7:3
v) v) 4 vi W M
CL) < C • _.__ Q) (1) c_•...... .., _
v) v) (/)s_ _0 — 4- —
(1) -1--' CU s_ u 0 s_ .- _OC
s_ u u 0 c LL Q) V) _c CU (13
C 0 Q) CL) u t5 _C o 4-1 a)O 0 • _ v) ..•c 4-4_ n H CD cr) Q.) 4,--) Z 0 CI_ D 0
0t.)
0-o a)—o
E • =V) 4-4 L---" >-
W tiCs —0
> C CU "c-E 0_(13>--- 1:5 •4.J co -0 a) 0
(f) o_@ us_ 0 roTD _C
u 0_ (13
(1) C>(T5
(r) 0 -c a)
"G) E c
-0 Tcsa) co
(1) 0 Z5 ca).+-= 0 4-4 >,u- 03 `)4-2ov)a) -1 04-+CO4-J 405j 1) (1) Eo-0 472 z4-__-(f) iv s-00.) taf3 (1)CU 0 0
2 bp La co .oc (,) v) 4-,o L7-;r_ "a) oco co :(1) cu
wcu w ioEmow u E• - 0-
(I)
-C 0 0 n_co_ 0- "
CD
cu “:5
c ...co
O iijs onu
._ •c c
c .._E *--:
73 u
CD a3 (1)
>E ti)
2 to cut°o_ c
0 c_ f
co s ',.7)C ccuQ.)fu O > (r)U 44->Ou) 0 0Cid (t3 (U x) 0
1c3 _0 0 Li—.
0 (13 00(r)-, ug) 4.- Q) Li)co a)
0.ff- 0C _0
4-) 0 (0to • ...QJ C S- ...---, 4-) V)
0 • - 0 Lr) 4- =.-0_ 4- a) 0
4-, co
C . . Lnco if +: cnr: 7:3c cucc) co cu
-oro: 11CD E
a) ca) .-wotu_c u u c co.0 -,, = 6 rt3 CO 1-0_Tii 4-4' v) (f) --- V) V)4-) Q) v) -1 4-1 0O):
cu LaE uL_,.. .5 .0 LE .:E couas . f=E _awto 2 g cu5 o2 ,. 0
0_ 73 C3_ GI- 4--,.. C
e— rg 0
..._
a) 2 c.)co (r) et° --00,= 4_, C '0 730 u — CU C -0
D 01- C (IS C
75 47; V) CO
0 0 73 0 W tr)U 0_ u 0_ 4-)
co C 0_-0 0 .._.c =•0 w u ._ WOO2(13 .. > a)•_o -0 2 CDr'-) 0 OW ci v) o
_--1 ..rz 4-I _CD4- 0_ 01) (.)U
II r- 1 (t) 0 0Pki ro _c coc 4-.) n
0 -8(.0 s_0F I .-
0 •47, 4- 0 4-)
( 1
73
c
*E -
0 LIQ.)7:3
—. —a) w cov)
J 0 4= a), ou >CD COanCl) Q.) c r _ ] (-->, -c3 -0- cu ._u =
0/ 8 _ccu Lf)v) -o _c —
4-1 ..-5 C 4-1 CO V)W
[, ul 0
W tr) s_.(1)
c) c.L tr3)., (i)•-+-, ai u)4-,s_ L- ozs c ° _ E
0 (1) -6° 4-1 CO .-E :-EC ' 0 cr 2
F_ :--1 0_ ro od(13 D .75E
-
a)e-, 1---- 1 ' 0
(M-2
CO
03.)
0
(f)co
a)
co
0
cu
-C
co
"r5
CU_0
tr)co_c
CD_c
0
sa)
0
4-1—
co v) Q.) a) sc.) 0- •Im(1)4-0 C • co c L_co 'Ci -1-, c t A -c ro13 v) 0 4-1cr) C E o_ t v) a)
4 7; Lo12=, CU H a)__./co cu CD I CD— (13 L_
0 = cc 2 (.9) (.9o w >()I t°:Z -0 0 0 0
-0CD+0(hW' 7 "1:5 CUU C .5ur) w co a)c: X=3 .'s_u
•
(L3 o d
= (-6 ..c +.,V E 03
Ca_ -0 v) coOW c -,vj 4-, o
o €5) ._
C c (1) 0_ cco co u 5 .-,) 2cu (./) >, cua) > _c cu a.) (f) C C.'•al +-) 0..0 D CO 4-) r= 04-1 0 >-J -, F - 0C,) 0 (f) -1--/W a) c vis = L- C.0 a) +-, co (Ls_ co44-, LA' cu 5 4-3 Ti
_C !an 4_, CO Ea)on.-. "0 .— (_9 a.)CU a) = 73 .4±-0 c (r) -c.„ a) 1-C ,' I
co 0 _c CO 4-j.‘CD co c4-I
v) > 1 - L-• -0U 4--J 75
4-
=CU • 6••• . 8
C C13 0 C ..■ CD
U CU VI 7:5 0 LJ- z (13 a.3 laC (1) C +-) 0 T.:"C3 CU LID (A' , ,ca e.P c = 4, ' co0U
a 0 a 2 . ..■0 1.1.1 E • cu -' rin8 =M.
=0 Z n -'0 al 0 c 5 ' t29 co
O 13 " co 0 a) cr) --r • . "00 13 CO 7:5 -C3 -I- CCD 0 >,-C
▪
CD (0U 5■ . . < = .(73 C XU0 =J 4-1 • 0 c n a)ra c_a CI) -C3 D 4-) 2 -o o <=o m 'c 2 o c , u - •
-o +2
CD
( f ) O 4 - ic uc u° - 80 4 - '2 z2+a
w .0 w u .— .—
-Td 0
C•47--•ta
▪
n-C4J C.=o (r)
CD
CDa) Cr;_cs_O Z;O c
a) co
./ co— ••=, C LL
>0 -a
a) 4--J-- CU 0
CO C 0
M—I
—0 . -0 C 2 a)an a)
co co cC
L) c co
bn (13 (/) C
vi -0 coC
c O'''0 . z
co co 4-1
U)1 0— co
•
Co
'a)
-' ta) c
c ro C CL
CO 0 7tlo c ...COLU 2 >,- co _cc _c 4..)
0 , c- OL') 0„.
-0 W _C•— CL + W
-) ..' 70_ coc =co > E < tau cil
CD
C
cos_ -0ta0W
...0 -1--)
C0_ 'E0_ U • _
O 0_ • • CO _0
O < V)U)001,) U •• 4 , • • E
c z coCU • •=Uu +-, 4--) c . •••c 0 D>C n U +-, Z0 cCU = 073 0 u c U =
U 0 s_,_,> co cu a) U cuI— co 4--) 4--,CU 0 c 4--,
+-, co>0 ._ c E 0 o)0 I= C CD (I) CO U s_
CU < 0 1 v) 0
or 0 C)
0
0
0
4-0
417=(c
4/1
0
b.0
0UU -0co..0 c
O ro
4-#Ci.8+L.a) .jc- c.0 (r) -,
4-I C V)
O SD-
0O0 _C4-+ H v)
(1) > L.- 0
5 ei -Li co u
E a.) uco msv) • —-0•>4 w _ac2 4_, 0
c) cl.
2 cu_E
cu_c
7:3 4-1 §‘ tj
C .4::: sa.)co E 5 49ro' .— v) >-75 q_fr) --05 .-ro 0.) c EC.°47/ = .co ( . . . ) u 2a) a) o_>--7-)ai cn tr)4-) Li=:3 b.0 cr° E -8C• CD — C
L1.1 u ...--- a)
0 = >L_-- (1)CD — ro 0
>0 CL u
(4... 1.. .-.71 4—
) u2 cu a) c (13..0 .—,__-.?:s7 76 -ELu +_,
C)._
-0 _C 1E
C 4-, Cs
CD = , = c o
o * (E5
.7 (..)(Jo R3 IX. 6 C
M 4_,-. -0 4_, 1 ,1E
eL c ro c s_ u
.v) = c co -1-,
5 0 co "-) cdu CC) co :-CM
o E
—I CU Na../ 4_, Q) ''' 73
4—I V) .1.-) 1— 4-) C n
C 0 4-' 0 • —
. — :171 z -C 0
(-0 (r) vi- (f) c- c 4-)
4-) -2-C SCj -F
bn
CO C-C . bp c
._. ._
a) a) tlo CU0-
0 M 1 .17 +13 IC sEICO _c
I co c o .(10 +-;' eC50 U ,a) -6 = -6a) -0 cp z 2 CD —C = IA_ _0 a) co a) cc) , v) cU .E Li=
> 0.- vi * WI 03 co 71Sc=
C -1-0 . — -C3 Li° S--
CD vi .0 ..-_E CD 73 ---' ',.‘ 0
-0 LIO CT3 5 ,z1 (T-5 — 7IS C (i) 0 LU —(1) 0 .4:5 4-i GU (f)M (-9 v) (r) -0 73 §‘ • • -' -05'sE,i'ii • • ro cU " C CU 4-, 4-, (13< = .1 5 C m cl)0.) oil = L_..
u p c ..0 0 0.m >. 4_, -c5c c 2 oa)u . o4-,
cr-u oc c cr3 -6-c—01,uo D ,00 ,,,— co z2tO et4 c -c 0 4-, 2
+-d u = u 0 cu-' 6
..2 C a) < 4r2 al- CU a.) -5 • = CD CO
O .5. C .4--) 0 4-, v) _L 4._, ..,r0 cCCC E°- a) v)E ' a) 76 a3 .(-T3 co m On m w mCI' i v) 0 v) r= r2 L.9" 2.-- 0 ‘,0 4— o o o
4—)
(A' w4-,_c cuto _a•.._r Z cu a)0. ii m >V) (1) a$
4-3
0.14 Ft CD4-J+a U 0 tir)a)i... c '0 a)UCO W c Clx0 10J
0 = = fri
0/ 2 03 Eiff) 0_
!
U
0,:, C= t-:'
■=' ,,, v 4=1
_. co
0Eo as •_,=wu 4-•. c v) :,7CD -V)v)
W 0 1:/ 2 a) 16,E0 00 , . -o0 LLI -aW C reD c CCD(0,03 w = =t= (5.t alC . co 0 rz_c,-, coi''') c- 0
Cu
6')
-03
D_k)
0 1=3
r'3)
U)
0 0:•.1
0
'417
-0
(1-1 1 tto
—1 =2
L 1
L 0