Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-11 PCR Commissioner Schonning introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-11 SOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-010 SUBMITTED BY BUHL INVESTORS, APPROVING THE SITE AND BUILDING PLAN (DEVELOPMENT PLAN) FOR THE PROPOSED BROOKLYN CENTER STORAGE BUILDING WITHIN THE REGAL ROAD DEVELOPMENT DITION PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (LOCATED AT 6330 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2015-010, submitted by Buhl Investors (the "Developer") on behalf of Crown Brawley, LLC (the "Owners") are requesting approval of a new Site and Building Plan of a proposed 4 story, 80,000 sf. commercial self-storage facility, titled the "Brooklyn Center Self-Storage"facility, for the property located at 6330 Camden Avenue North; and WHEREAS, this proposed Site and Building Plan comprehended under Planning Application No. 2015-010 shall serve as the new Development Plan in conjunction with the proposed Second Amendment to the Regal Road Development Addition Planned Unit Development of 1998; and WHEREAS, on October 29, 2015, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and meeting to fully consider Planning Commission Application No. 2015-010, and reviewed and received a planning report on the proposed new Site and Building Plans for the proposed Brooklyn Center Self-Storage facility development, and other related improvements in conjunction with this specific development; and WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, and utilizing the guidelines and standards for evaluating site and building plans, as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City's Zoning Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission considers this site and building plan an appropriate and reasonable development of the subject property; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Site and Building plans for this Brooklyn Center Self-Storage facility is consistent with the general Development Plans of the original Regal Road Development Addition Planned Unit Development of 1998. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Site and Building Plan of proposed Brooklyn Center Self-Storage facility, as comprehended under Planning Application No. 2015-010, may be approved based upon the following considerations: A. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and PC RESOLUTION NO. 2015-11 intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance; B. The Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and improvement of this site, will allow for the utilization of the land in question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on surrounding land; C. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards; D. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area; E. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an asset to the community; and F. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the site proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center does hereby recommend to the City Council that Planning Application No. 2015-010 may be approved, subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1) Developer agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated October 22, 2015. 2) Final drainage and utility plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer. 3) Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. A Storm water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) must be provided for review and approval. 4) The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2015-11 5) All landscaped areas, including street boulevards, shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. 6) Site Plan approval is exclusive of all signs scheduled to be installed on this site, including new wall (building) signs. New signs are subject to Chapter 34 of the City Code of Ordinances and shall be approved under separate sign permits. 7) Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan can only be made by amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City. 8) Developer must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Enginee October 29, 2015 Zzz Date Chair ATTEST: Secre ary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Tade; and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, Morgan, Sweeney, MacMillan, Tade, and Schonning; and the following voted against the same: None; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.