HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015-14 PCR Commissioner Tade introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO, 2015-14
RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-013 SUBMITTED BY
GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, APPROVING THE SITE AND
BUILDING PLAN FOR PROPOSED BUILDING X WITHIN THE SHINGLE
CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (LOCATED AT 2510
COUNTY ROAD 10)
WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2015-013, submitted by Gatlin
Development Company, requesting approval of a new Site and Building Plan for a proposed
Building X, which is tentatively addressed under 2510 County Road 10, and which approval is in
conjunction with the ongoing improvements made under the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit
Development Project; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public meeting on October 29, 2015,
to fully consider Planning Commission Application No. 2015-013, and reviewed and received a
planning report on the proposed new Site and Building Plans for the proposed Building X
development and other related improvements in conjunction with the Shingle Creek Crossing
Planned Unit Development Project; and
WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, and utilizing the guidelines and
standards for evaluating site and building plans, as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of
the City's Zoning Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's
Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission considers this site and building plan an appropriate
and reasonable development of the subject property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the Site and Building plans for
this Building X is consistent with the General Development Plans of the overall Shingle Creek
Crossing Planned Unit Development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission
of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Site and Building Plan of
proposed Building X, as comprehended under Planning Application No. 2015-013, may be
approved based upon the following considerations:
A. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and
intent of the City's Zoning Ordinance;
B. The Site and Building Plan, in relation to the Planned Unit Development
proposed on the Subject Site, will facilitate the redevelopment and
improvement of this site, will allow for the utilization of the land in
question in a manner which is compatible with, complimentary to and of
comparable intensity to adjacent land uses as well as those permitted on
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2015-14
surrounding land;
C. The improvements and utilization of the property as proposed under the
planned redevelopment of this site is considered a reasonable use of the
property and will conform with ordinance standards;
D. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the
recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area;
E. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good long range use
of the existing land and this proposed development can be considered an
asset to the community; and
F. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for
evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan as contained in Section
35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City's Zoning Ordinance are met and the
site proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City
of Brooklyn Center does hereby recommend to the City Council that Planning Application No.
2015-013, may be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations:
1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions
noted in the City Engineer's Review memo, dated October 22, 2015.
2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building
Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
3. Developer shall revise the site plan to eliminate the need for the rear
service doors to swing-out or open directly onto the rear walkway area.
4. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site
engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City
Engineer prior to the issuance of permits.
5. The Developer shall provide additional building treatments or decorative
features to screen the outside electrical panels and gas meters should they
be located on the outside of the new building. These screening elements
shall be approved by the City's Business and Development Director.
6. Any outside trash disposal facilities and roof top or on-ground mechanical
equipment shall be appropriately screened from view.
PC RESOLUTION NO. 2015-14
7. An underground irrigation system shall be installed in all landscaped areas
to facilitate site maintenance.
8. Site Plan approval is exclusive of all final signs on this site, including new
wall (building) signs, which shall remain subject to Chapter 34 of the city
ordinances, and subject to the approved Signage Plan of the Shingle Creek
Crossing PUD Agreements.
9. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site
during construction as approved by the City's Engineering Department
and applicant shall obtain an NPDES construction site erosion permit from
the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency prior to disturbing the site.
10. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site
and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which
shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary.
11. The Developer shall submit an as built survey of the property,
improvements and utility service lines prior to release of the performance
guarantee.
12. All other provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011
Shingle Creek Crossing PUD shall remain in effect.
e
October 29,2015 `
Date Chair
ATTEST:
Secretary
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Sweeney;
and upon vote being taken thereon,the following voted in favor thereof:
Chair Christensen, Commissioners Tade, Schonning, Koenig, MacMillan, Sweeney, and Morgan;
and the following voted against the same: None;
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.