Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2015 10-29 PCM MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER INT COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA OCTOBER 29, 2015 1. CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Christensen at 7:01 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Chair Randy Christensen, Commissioners Alexander Koenig, John MacMillan, Carlos Morgan (arrived at 7:17 p.m.), Stephen Schorming, Rochelle Sweeney, and Susan Tade were present. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development Gary Eitel, and Denise Bosch, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Schorming to approve the October 29, 2015 agenda. The motion passed unanimously. 4. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Christensen explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES—OCTOBER 15, 2015 There was a motion by Commissioner Sweeney, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to approve the minutes of the October 15, 2015 meeting. The motion passed unanimously. 6. PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS 6a) APPLICATION N . 2015-009 BUHL INVESTORS/CROWN BRAWLEY, LLC; CONSIDERATION OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (NO. 2) TO THE REGAL ROAD (REGAL THEATRE) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF 1998, TO ALLOW THE PLANNED NEW DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW COMMERCIAL SELF-STORAGE FACILITY IN THE PUD/C2 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/ COMMERCE DISTRICT); (6330 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH) Chair Christensen introduced Application No. 2015-009, consideration of a Planned Unit Development Amendment (No. 2) to the Regal Road (Regal Theatre) Planned Unit Development PC Minutes 10-29-15 of 1998, to allow the planned new development of a new commercial self-storage facility in the PUD/C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce District), located at 6330 Camden Avenue N. (See Planning Commission Reports dated October 29, 201.5 for Application No. 2015-009) Mr. Benetti introduced the application; provided background; the PUD development site plan; showed pictures of the development site; provided information on the requested building setbacks and pointed out an abandoned ring road and a jagged piece of land on the southern border that MnDOT owns that affects the setbacks. He provided information on the utility plan that includes a shell filtration basin; the landscape plan; the lighting plan; the architectural elements including a green branding element; access and parking plans; and the PUD findings. Mr. Benetti stated a legal notice was published in the local Sun-Post and notice letters were delivered to all neighboring properties within 350 feet of the subject site. As of this meeting date, no responses were received by staff. Mr. Benetti stated Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide a recommendation to the City Council to approve Planning Application No. 2015-009, consideration of a Planned Unit Development Amendment (No. 2) to the Regal Road (Regal Theatre) Planned Unit Development of 1998, to allow the planned new development of a new commercial self-storage facility in the PUD/C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce) District, with the conditions noted in the Planning Staff report and also similar in the Resolution with the following modifications: 1) Developer is allowed to develop this Pad Site No. 3, identified under the original Regal Road (Regal Theatre) Planned Unit Development of 1998, with a new 4 story, 80,000 sf. commercial self-storage building, with reduced setbacks as shown on the approved Site/Development Plan for the subject site. and 2) The commercial self-storage site shall not allow outdoor storage of vehicles, recreational vehicles (all forms), boats and/or trailers, miscellaneous equipment and other personal property items. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS —APPLICATION NOS. 2015-009 and 2015-010 Chair Christensen recognized residents in the audience who wished to speak on this matter. There was a motion by Commissioner Morgan, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to open the public hearing on Application Nos. 2015-009 and 2015-010, at 7:23 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Christensen called for comments from the public. There were no individuals in attendance and no comments received at that time. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to close the public hearing on Application Nos. 2015-009 and 2015-010. The motion passed unanimously. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -2- Chair Christensen called for questions and comments from Commissioners. Commissioner MacMillan asked if the building would be staffed 24 hours a day. Mr. Tim Vaughn, project architect with Speries®Refiners Architects and representing the developer, stated that as far as he knows it will be monitored and staffed 24 hours a day. Chair Christensen asked about the doors on the building and which were vehicle accessible and about the vehicle flow. Mr. Vaughn and Mr. Benetti stated these garage openings are limited to only 6 bays, and will accommodate those that wish quick access to their unit and/or storage of personal vehicles and equipment. Commissioner Schonning asked about the abandoned section of the road and how visible it was from the highway and if anything could be done while they determine if it can be deeded. Mr. Benetti replied that the area is MnD®T property and it is a little bit noticeable from the highway. He stated he is confident that MnD®T would be willing to work with the developer regarding the property because they have no purpose for the land. Mr. Eitel stated that it is not noticeable from Hwy. 694. Commissioner Schonning stated his concern about the look of the abandoned land alongside a new building. Chair Christensen asked if there would be more parking spots if the land was deeded over. Mr. Benetti replied affirmatively but stated that parking is acceptable as it is. Chair Christensen asked about the Camden Avenue N dead end turnaround and if there were going to be any setback issues. Mr. Benetti replied there would be no issues with setbacks. Chair Christensen asked about the exterior materials that will be used particularly the metallic surface and if it would be mirror-like. Mr. Vaughn stated that the metallic silver would be a matte, non-glossy finish, similar to an automotive silver paint, and would not be mirrored. Commissioner Morgan stated his appreciation for the thoroughness of the materials provided to the Commissioners and the difference it makes because it gives the City Council confidence that items are being well thought out by the Commission. Commissioner Schonning stated that this is one of the best uses that can be made with this property and he is really glad to see it going forward. Mr. Benetti stated that the developer has made a concerted effort to bring a nice development to this area and that the Planning Staff was looking for a nice product because this is a high visibility corner. He also stated that there is nothing new with the recent rumors surrounding the sale or redevelopment of the Regal Theatre site, and the theatre remains active. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -3- Commissioner Morgan stated his perception that the City's allowance for new buildings are now at a higher caliber than previously, and that maybe one day the City will be looked at as a leader or set a great example for other communities to develop or look like in the future. Chair Christensen asked if the site is being sold as a separate site. Mr. Benetti replied that it is his understanding that it will be sold off directly to Buhl Investors [which was verbally confirmed by a member of the audience, Mr. Terry Moses, representing Crown-Brawley, LLC,']. Chair Christensen confirmed his understanding that it will still be under the PUD. Mr. Benetti replied that this is an active PUD and the amendment is allowing the development to be carried forward and it is still subject to the original 1998 PUD and it will be amended with new declaration of covenants and restrictions. Future owners will have to amend the PUD as needed. Chair Christensen asked what the PUD included. Mr. Benetti stated it included three pad sites and that the other sites have been developed with the exception of this one. He also stated that should the Regal Theatre property be targeted for redevelopment, it too would require another PUD amendment. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-10 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-009 SUBMITTED BY BUHL INVESTORS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (NO. 2) TO THE REGAL ROAD (REGAL THEATRE) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF 1998 TO ALLOW THE PLANNED NEW DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW COMMERCIAL SELF- STORAGE FACILITY IN THE PUD/C2 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/COMMERCE DISTRICT; (6330 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH) There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-10. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Morgan, Schonning, Sweeney, and Tade. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its November 9, 2015 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 6 ) APPLICATION NO. 2015-010; BUHL INVESTORS/CROWN BRAWLE , LLC; CONSIDERATION F A SITE AND BUILDING DEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATED TO THE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT PC Minutes 10-29-15 -4- DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (NO. 2) TO THE REGAL ROAD (REGAL THEATRE) PLANNE UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1998, T ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 4-STORY, 80,000 SF COMMERCIAL STORAGE FACILITY IN THE PUD/C2 FOR THE GAL ROAD (REGAL TEA ) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT F 1998, TO ALLOW THE PLANNED NEW EVEL ENT OF A NEW COMMERCIAL SELF-STORAGE FACILI'T'Y IN THE PUD/C2 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/COMMERCE) DISTRICT; (6330 CAMDEN AVENUE N) Chair Christensen introduced Application No. 2015-010, consideration of a Site and Building Development Plan related to the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment (No. 2) to the Regal Road (Regal Theatre)Planned Unit Development 1998, to allow the development of a new 4-story, 80,000 sf commercial storage facility in the PUD/C2 for the Regal Road(Regal Theatre) Planned Unit Development of 1998, to allow the planned new development of a new commercial self-storage facility in the PUD/C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commerce), located at 6330 Camden Avenue N. (See Planning Commission Reports dated 10-29-2015 for Application No. 2015-010) It was noted previously that legal notice was published in the local Sun-Post and notice letters were delivered to all neighboring properties within 350 feet of the subject site. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-11 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-010 SUBMITTED BY BUHL INVESTORS FOR CONSIDERATION OF A SITE AND BUILDING DEVELOPMENT PLAN RELATED TO THE PROPOSED PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT (NO. 2) TO THE REGAL ROAD (REGAL THEATRE) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 1998 TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW 4-STORY, 80,000 SF COMMERCIAL STORAGE FACILITY IN THE PUD/C2 FOR THE REGAL ROAD (REGAL THEATRE) PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT OF 1998 TO ALLOW THE PLANNED NEW DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW COMMERCIAL SELF-STORAGE FACILITY IN THE PUD/C2 (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT/COMMERCE) DISTRICT; (6330 CAMDEN AVENUE N) There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Tade, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-11. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Morgan, Schonning, Sweeney, and Tade. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -5- The Council will consider the application at its November 9, 2015 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 6c) APPLICATION NO. 2015-011; GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY; CONSIDERATION F AMENDMENT N . 7 TO THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF THE FORMER KOHL'S STORE PROPERTY INT TWO SEPARATE LAND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW MULTI-TENANTCOMMERCIAL L ING FOR ONEOF THE LOTS; AND ALLOWANCE CERTAIN SETBACK STANDARDS; (2510 COUNTY ROAD 1 ) Chair Christensen introduced Application No. 2015-011, consideration of Amendment No. 7 to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, to allow the subdivision of the former Kohl's Store property into two separate lots, and the planned development of a new multi-tenant commercial building for one of the lots; and allowance of certain setback standards, located at 2510 County Road 10. (See Planning Commission Reports dated October 29, 2015 for Application No. 2015-011) Mr. Benetti introduced the item; provided background; the PUD analysis that included the required parking spaces; an aerial map; site setbacks; movement of the building to accommodate the back doors on the building; the proposed master plan dated September 2015; and the PUD plan and findings. Mr. Benetti stated that legal notice was published in the local Sun-Post and notice letters were delivered to all neighboring properties within 350 feet of the subject site. No response was received. Mr. Benetti stated Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide a recommendation to the City Council to approve Planning Application No. 2015-011, consideration of Amendment No. 7 to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, to allow the subdivision of the former Kohl's Store property into two separate lots, and the planned development of a new multi-tenant commercial building for one of the lots; and allowance of certain setback standards, with the conditions noted in the Planning Staff report and also similar in the Resolution. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS —APPLICATION NO. 2015-011 Chair Christensen recognized residents in the audience who wished to speak on this matter. There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2015-011, at 7:58 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Christensen called for comments from the public. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -6- There were no individuals in attendance and no comments received at that time. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2015-011. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Christensen called for questions and comments from Commissioners. Chair Christensen talked about the setback, the City's Active Living initiative and the bike traffic that may be generated from a project site north of this site. He was concerned about the path bike traffic would take through the site and wants to make sure there are adequate biking/pedestrian accommodations. Mr. Benetti stated that planning staff is also concerned about this and that the engineering consultants and the lead project engineer have said the building could be shifted over with no problem. Chair Christensen stated he would like to see that as a recommendation. Mr. Benetti agreed to make the recommendation. Commissioner Schonning stated that this is the developer's property and they can do what they want within reason, but he does not like the building and its location on the site and its proximity to the creek. He stated that there was a lot of money spent on improving the creek. Mr. Schonning continued by stating he wants to see the development move forward; and does not want to impede it. Chair Christensen stated that he appreciates Commissioner Schonning's concerns with regard to the look of the site. He stated that the City has expectations on how the buildings are supposed to look front and back and he has commented in the past that some of the buildings near County Road 10 looked closed because the backside tends to be storage and it doesn't lend itself to being inviting when coming in from County Road 10. He shares the concern and knows that commuters will be looking at it entering Hwy 100 and he wants to make sure that something is there that invites people to come into Shingle Creek Crossing. Commissioner Morgan stated that he thinks that the developer has the tools to bring people in and they will do everything possible to make it inviting. If they succeed, the City will succeed by having a prosperous development. Chair Christensen stated that he hopes this is the case and that it is important to express the Commissioner's opinions and encourage and recommend what it can so that the City Council understands the Commission's concerns. Mr. Eitel stated that some of these concerns are site plan concerns and Commissioners will have more information when they see the site plan. He stated that it is the anchor in the new Kohl's building that will drive commercial businesses that want a front. He stated that it is too close to PC Minutes 10-29-15 -7- the road and it will be moved back and the meters do have to be addressed and he stated that the sidewalk is a service walkway where the garbage will go out to. Chair Christensen stated that people will take the shortest route to get to the bridge going over Hwy. 100 or to the regional trail and that will be down the service road/sidewalk and he is concerned about bikers and pedestrians. He asked that this issue be addressed. Chair Christensen called for a motion with a recommendation to move the building and pay attention to potential bike traffic. Discussion took place regarding changing the wording of the following condition to read "shall" instead of "should": "Developer should revise the site plan to eliminate the need for the rear service doors to swing-out or open directly onto this walkway area. " Mr. Benetti stated that the developer has agreed to this and a plan can be brought back to the Commission for review. Planning Staff feels that the PUD amendment can still be approved with the understanding that items will be revised and modified later on. Chair Christensen stated his wish to softly encourage the developer to see what can be done to encourage bike traffic. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-12 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-011 SUBMITTED BY GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT NO. 7 TO THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF THE FORMER KOHL'S STORE PROPERTY INTO TWO SEPARATE LOTS AND THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT OF A NEW MULTI-TENANT COMMERCIAL BUILDING FOR ONE OF THE LOTS; AND ALLOWANCE OF CERTAIN SETBACK STANDARDS• (25 10 COUNTY ROAD 10) There was a motion by Commissioner Morgan, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-12 with a recommendation to change the word "should" to "shall" under the following condition: "Developer should revise the site plan to eliminate the need for the rear service doors to swing-out or open directly onto this walkway area. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Morgan, Schonning, Sweeney, and Tade. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -8- The Council will consider the application at its November 9, 2015 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 6 ) APPLICATION N a 2015-012; GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY; CONSIDERATION PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING T" ADDITION; (251 COUNTY ROAD 1 ) Chair Christensen introduced Application No. 2015-012, consideration of preliminary plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 6th Addition, located at 2510 County Road 10. (See Planning Commission Reports dated 10-29-2015 for Application No. 2015-012) Mr. Benetti introduced the application; provided background; and the plat map. It was noted that legal notice was published in the local Sun-Post and notice Letters were delivered to all neighboring properties within 350 feet of the subject site. Mr. Benetti stated Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide a recommendation to the City Council to approve PlanninApplication No. 2015-012, consideration of preliminary plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 6t Addition, with the conditions noted in the Planning Staff report and also similar in the Resolution. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS—APPLICATION NO. 2015-012 Chair Christensen recognized residents in the audience who wished to speak on this matter. There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2015-012, at 8:22 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Christensen called for comments from the public. There were no individuals in attendance and no comments received at that time. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2015-012. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Christensen called for questions and comments from Commissioners. Mr. Eitel stated that the building can be shifted and moved up and it can be accommodated without changing the preliminary plat. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -9- ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-13 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-012 SUBMITTED BY GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR CONSIDERATION OF A PRELIMINARY PLAT OF SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 6TH ADDITION; (25 10 COUNTY ROAD 10) There was a motion by Commissioner Sweeney, seconded by Commissioner Macmillan, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-13. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Schonning, Sweeney, and Tade. Commissioner Morgan was not present for the vote. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its November 9, 2015 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 6e. APPLICATION NO. 2015-013, GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY; CONSIDERATION F A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN OF NEW BUILDING X IN THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT A (2510 COUNTY A 10) Chair Christensen introduced Application No. 2015-013, consideration of a Site and Building Plan of new Building X in the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development project area, located at 2510 County Road 10. (See Planning Commission Reports dated 10-29-15 for Application No. 2015-013) Mr. Benetti introduced the item; provided an aerial plan; the site plan; the grading/drainage plan; the utility plan; the landscaping plan; the architectural plan; and the floor layout plan. It was noted that legal notice was published in the local Sun-Post and notice letters were delivered to all neighboring properties within 350 feet of the subject site. No response was received. Mr. Benetti stated Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission provide a recommendation to the City Council to approve Planning Application No. 2015-013, consideration of Site and Building Plan of new Building X in the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development project area, with the conditions noted in the Planning Staff report and also similar in the Resolution. PC Minutes 10-29-15 -10- Chair Christensen asked about what was north of the trash enclosure. Mr. Benetti replied that it is called a grit chamber and is meant to capture dirt and debris from the parking lot and hold it until it is cleaned out. It is a stopgap for dirt before it gets into the storm system. Discussion took place regarding a service sidewalk and another sidewalk that serves the pedestrian movement on the site. Mr. Eitel talked about enhancing the building's architecture and screening of the utilities. Chair Christensen stated that he would not open a public hearing, asked for additional comments from Commissioners and called for a motion. The Commissioners interposed no objections to approval of the Application. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2015-14 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2015-013 SUBMITTED BY GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR CONSIDERATION OF SITE AND BUILDING PLAN OF NEW BUILDING X IN THE SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (25 10 COUNTY ROAD 10) There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2015-14. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Morgan, Schonning, Sweeney, and Tade. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. The Council will consider the application at its November 9, 2015 meeting. The applicant must be present. Major changes to the application as reviewed by the Planning Commission will require that the application be returned to the Commission for reconsideration. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS There were no other discussion items. 8. OTHER BUSINESS None at this time. 9. ADJOURNMENT PC Minutes 10-29-15 -11- There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:45 p.m. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and assigned Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Regular Session of the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center held on October 29, 2015. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the Planning Commission approved said minutes at its November 9, 2015 regular meeting. Tim Benetti, Secretary Randall Christensen, Chair PC Minutes 10-29-15 -12-