Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-097 CCRMember Debra Hi is trom introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2000-97 RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2000-008 SUBMITTED BY CLARK ENGINEERING CORPORATION ON BEHALF OF HENNEPIN COUNTY. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2000-008 submitted by Clark Engineering Corporation on behalf of Hennepin County proposes rezoning from R-7 (Multiple Family Residence - Six or More Stories) to C-1A (Service/Office - No Height Limit) of a 3.352 acre parcel of land located on the west side of Shingle Creek Parkway at John Martin Drive; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 11, 2000, when a staff report and testimony regarding the rezoning request were taken; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 2000-008 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2000-01 on May 11, 2000; and WHEREAS, the City Council considered the rezoning request at its May 22, 2000 meeting in light of the report received, testimony given, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, and in light of the recommendations of the City's Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendation NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2000-008 submitted by Clark Engineering Corporation on behalf of Hennepin County be approved in consideration of the following: 1. The rezoning will allow for the appropriate expansion, renovation and redevelopment of the Hennepin County Regional Service Center which is considered to be a benefit to the public. 2. The rezoning proposed is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan for this area which calls for it to be used for a public or semi-public purpose. 3. The proposed C-1A zoning of the property is consistent and compatible with surrounding land use classifications. 4. All permitted uses in the proposed C-1A zone may be contemplated for development or redevelopment of the subject property. 5. The subject property will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the C- lA zoning district. RESOLUTION NO. 2000-97 1 6. It is believed that the proposal is consistent with the guidelines for evaluating rezonings contained in Section 35-208 of the Zoning Ordinance, is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and is, therefore, in the best interests of the community. Mav 22. 2000 Date ATTEST:l *Iftt9~- Clerk 4Mar-'( The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member Kay Lasman and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Myrna Kragness, Debra HLlstrom, Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, and Robert Peppe; and the following voted against the same: none; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.