HomeMy WebLinkAbout2000-108 CCRMember Ed Nelson introduced the following resolution and moved its
adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-108
RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF APPLICATION NO. 2000-011
SUBMITTED BY THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA).
WHEREAS, Application No. 2000-011 submitted by the City of Brooklyn Center
Economic Development Authority (EDA) proposes rezoning from R-5 (Multiple Family Residence)
to C-1 (Service/Office) of the property addressed 6421 Brooklyn Boulevard; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 25,
2000, when a staff report and testimony regarding the rezoning request were taken; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No.
2000-011 by adopting Planning Commission Resolution No. 2000-02 on May 25, 2000; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered the rezoning request at its June 12, 2000,
meeting in light of the report received, testimony given, the guidelines for evaluating rezonings
contained in Section 35-208 of the City's Zoning Ordinance, the recommendations of the City's
Comprehensive Plan and the Planning Commission's recommendation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center that Application No. 2000-011 submitted by the City of Brooklyn Center
Economic Development Authority be approved in consideration of the following:
1. The rezoning will allow for the appropriate expansion, renovation and redevelopment of
the Brookpark Dental Center which is considered to be a benefit to the public.
2. The rezoning proposal is believed to be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan
for this area which generally calls for service/office land uses in this particular area of
Brooklyn Boulevard.
3. The proposed C-1 zoning of the property is consistent and compatible with surrounding
land use classifications.
4. All permitted uses in the proposed C-1 zone may be contemplated for development or
redevelopment of the subject property.
5. The subject property will bear fully the ordinance development restrictions for the C-1
zoning district.
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-108
6. The subject property is considered to be unsuited for uses permitted under its present
zoning classification.
7. It is believed that the proposal is consistent with the guidelines for evaluating rezonings
contained in Section 35-208 of the Zoning Ordinance, is consistent with the City's
Comprehensive Plan and good planning principles and is, therefore, in the best interest
of the community.
June 12, 2000
Date
Mayor Pro Tem
ATTEST: J-A.. '6~
Clerk
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Kay Lasman and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof.
Debra Hilstrom, Kay Lasman, Ed Nelson, and Robert Peppe;
and the following voted against the same: none;
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.