The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2016 09-29 PCPPLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER September 29, 2016 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Agenda • Motion to Approve Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for September 29, 2016 4. Approval of Minutes • Motion to Approve the September 15, 2016 special meeting minutes 5. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 6. PLANNING ITEMS a) Gatlin Development Company Planning App. No. 2016-009 Property Addresses: 2510 County Road 10 (etal) PUBLIC HEARING – Consideration of Amendment No. 8 to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, to allow the re-adjustment and re- subdivision of certain properties in and around the former Kohl’s property; the re- subdivision of properties situated between Walmart and Shingle Creek waterway; the re-adjustment and relocation of Building X; the addition of new Building W; and to repurpose the old Kohl’s building into a self-storage, interior-only warehouse facility with reduced parking • Direct Staff to present Planning Report; • Motion to open Public Hearing; take public input; • Motion to close Public Hearing; • Commission discuss requested item: • Motion to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-11 7. Discussion of Future Planning Items 8. Adjournment PC Minutes 09-15-16 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 1. CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Christensen at 7:08 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Chair Randy Christensen, Commissioners Jack MacMillan, Stephen Schonning, Susan Tade were present. Commissioner Rochelle Sweeney and Alexander Koenig were absent and excused. Commissioner Carlos Morgan was absent. Also present were Secretary to the Planning Commission Tim Benetti, Director of Business & Development Gary Eitel, and Michaela Kujawa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – SEPTEMBER 15, 2016 There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Tade, to approve Planning Commission Meeting Agenda. The motion passed unanimously. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – SEPTEMBER 1, 2016 Commissioner Tade requested the following change to Page 3, third paragraph from the top. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Schonning, Sweeney, Tade and Morgan. There was a motion by Commissioner Macmillan, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve the minutes of the, September 1, 2016 meeting as amended above. The motion passed unanimously. 5. CHAIR’S EXPLANATION Chair Christensen explained the Planning Commission’s role as an advisory body. One of the Commission’s functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. PC Minutes 09-15-16 -2- DRAFT 6. PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS 6a) Consideration of a Land Division Request by the City of Brooklyn Center of City-Owned Land (EDA), located at 6250 Earle Brown Drive Mr. Benetti introduced and gave background on this item. The request will facilitate the land division of the EDA owned lot known as the “Embassy Suites - Phase II” parcel. The City will retain ownership of the easterly 165-feet of the lot; with the remaining portion to be deeded to the developers of the new Fairfield Inn and Suites hotel. He noted this action was given preliminary approval under the Embassy Suites PUD Amendment of 2013, in which said amendment authorizes the city to complete a land division of this lot by means of a metes and bounds description. The division provides an ideal method for the City to retain the rights to the pond area located east of the new hotel site. Mr. Benetti stated the ultimate objective of this land split/division is to transfer or attach the City/EDA owned portion of land with the Earle Brown Heritage Center properties to the east. Commissioner MacMillan asked if the City plans to add water fountains and walkways at some point again. Mr. Eitel stated they do plan to add a fountain as well as pathways that tie back into the trails and possibly a covered walkway. He stated the idea is to complement the Earle Brown Center in any way possible. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS – RESOLUTION NO. 2016-10 Chair Christensen recognized residents in the audience who wished to speak on this matter. There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Macmillan, to open the public hearing on the Consideration of the Simple Lot Division (Metes and Bounds) of the EDA Owned Parcel (Embassy Suites PUD – Phase II Hotel Lot – Fairfield Inn and Suites Hotel site), at 7:19 p.m. Chair Christensen called for comments from the public. There were no individuals in attendance and no comments received at that time. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to close the public hearing on the Consideration of the Simple Lot Division (Metes and Bounds) of the EDA Owned Parcel (Embassy Suites PUD – Phase II Hotel Lot- Fairfield Inn and Suites Hotel site), at 7:21 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. PC Minutes 09-15-16 -3- DRAFT ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016-10 REGARDING THE SIMPLE LOT DIVISON (METES AND BOUNDS) OF THE EDA OWNED PARCEL (EMBASSY SUITES PUD – PHASE II HOTEL LOT – FAIRFIELD INN AND SUITES HOTEL SITE. There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Tade, to recommend approval of The Simple Lot Division (Metes and Bounds) of the EDA Owned Parcel (Embassy Suites PUD – Phase II Hotel Lot – Fairfield Inn and Suites Hotel Site. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Tade, MacMillan, Schonning and Sweeney. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 7:25 p.m. STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and assigned Secretary to the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Regular Session of the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center held on September 15, 2016. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the Planning Commission approved said minutes at its September 29, 2016 meeting. _______________________________ _______________________________ Tim Benetti, Secretary Randall Christensen, Chair ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: September 29, 2016 Application No. 2016-009 Applicant: Gatlin Development Company Location: Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Project Site Request: Planned Unit Development – Amendment No. 8 INTRODUCTION Gatlin Development Company is requesting its eighth planned unit development amendment to the previously approved Shingle Creek Crossing PUD redevelopment plans. This updated PUD plan provides for the re-subdivision of certain properties in and around the former Kohl’s property and certain properties situated between the Walmart and Shingle Creek waterway; the re-adjustment (larger size) and relocation of planned Building X; the addition of a new Building W with a reduced setback standard; and an allowance to repurpose the old Kohl’s building into an interior only, self-storage/warehouse facility with reduced parking. There is no Site and Building Plans submitted with this PUD Amendment application at this time. Some of the new and existing buildings will require separate site and building plan approvals (or amendment) when time comes for the Developer to construct said units. This matter is being presented as a public hearing item; and notices have been mailed to all surrounding property owners within 350-feet of the affected site. BACKGROUND The original Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved on May 23, 2011 (which is considered the 1st Amendment to the original Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development of 1999) and provided for the overall redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall properties. This mall originally consisted of over 1.1 million square feet of retail space, which was reduced by the demolition of approximately 760,000 sf. of old mall space, followed by the planned renovation of approximately 123,242 sf. of the Food Court mall located next to the Sears store; the development of approximately 402,489 sf. of new retail commercial and restaurant uses; and approval of the Single Creek day lighting features. PUD Amendment No. 2 was approved a short time later on September 12, 2011, which provided for the physical separation of the food court building from the Sears store; the renovation/conversion of the Food Court’s “common area” into additional retail space, whereby the net leasable retail area was increased from 123,242 sq. ft. to 150,591 sq. ft.; the removal of planned Building N between Sears and Wal-Mart; and the addition of a new 6,000 sf. commercial pad site located at the southeast corner of Xerxes Avenue/56th Avenue entrance. PUD Amendment No. 3, adopted September 24, 2012, provided for the replatting of certain lots and revisions to new certain building pad sites (Building D, Building Q, and Building O • Application Filed: 09/13/16 • Application Deemed Complete: 09/16/16 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 11/12/16 • Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 2 restaurant pad site). PUD Amendment No. 4, adopted October 14, 2013, approved the removal and replacement of the former Brookdale Mall Food Court and replacement plan with ten (10) new retail/service buildings. PUD Amendment No. 5 was related to various sign allowances granted throughout the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. PUD Amendment No. 6 was approved on June 9, 2014, and included the following changes: a) revised layout and sizes of Bldgs. 9 and 10 (former Brookdale Food Court replacement plans; b) new Buildings R - a 5,400 sq. ft. restaurant pad site; c) new Building T - a 5,500 sq. ft. restaurant pad site; d) revised size and layout of Bldg. B from 8,500 sq. ft. to 6,673 sq. ft.; and e) approval of preliminary/final plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 5th Addition. The previous PUD Amendment No. 7 was approved November 9, 2015, which authorized the subdivision of the former Kohl’s store property into two separate lots, and the planned development of a new 9,400 sf. commercial building with reduced setbacks in one of these lots. The image below is highlighted to illustrate the area of this previous amendment request. PUD AMENDMENT ANALYSIS Records show the 75,000 sf. Kohl’s building was constructed in 1987. Since the inception and approval of this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD (SCC-PUD), the Developer intended to keep and maintain the existing Kohl’s department store as originally designed. Although part of the originally created SCC-PUD of 2011, this area and building have remained untouched (except for exterior wall panel repairs) or unaffected until this application. Since the closure of Kohl’s in 2013, the Developer has actively sought new users or tenants to fill this 75,000 sq. ft. retail commercial space; but unfortunately there have been only a handful interested parties seeking to lease or purchase this space, none of which reached fruition. Mr. Gatlin also undertook expensive repair work on the exterior façade due to water damage, but still no buyers or users. ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 3 Platting Considerations As noted previously, Amendment No. 7 provided an approval to split the original Kohl’s parcel into two new lots. The first lot would have consisted of 1.48 acres in size and reserved for a new 9,400 sf. Bldg. X, while the remaining 5.35 acre lot would be left t for the old Kohl’s. The original PUD Plan amendment called for the location of the smaller Building X to be situated as close to the access road to the west, and provide a shared parking area between both Bldg. X and old Kohl’s store (refer to layout image below): After the amendment request was approved, the Developers also received approval of the first version of re-subdividing this Kohl’s parcel into two new lots, which was to be titled “Shingle Creek Crossing 6th Addition”. After the Developer received preliminary plat approval of SCC 6th Addition, the developer ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 4 elected not to file a final plat of this area, which in effect rendered the first plat application void. The new PUD Amendment No. 8 now calls for the creation of three lots in this general area, which provides a pad site for new planned Building W; the adjusted and relocated Bldg. X; and the existing Kohl’s building, now identified as Bldg. Y. The PUD also calls for the slight readjustment and replatting of the 5 lots (Bldgs. L, M, N/S; O, and Q) located between the Walmart and the Shingle Creek waterway (noted red-outline layer): The city has received an application for the new (updated) Preliminary Plat of Shingle Creek Crossing 6th Addition, which is related to this PUD Amendment, but is not being officially considered under this PUD Amendment request at this time. This plat, both preliminary and ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 5 final plat, is scheduled to be presented for consideration at the next Planning Commission meeting in October. Parking Considerations The PUD Site Data Table (noted below), which accompanies this and all previous PUD Map submittals, has been highlighted to note the lots affected under this PUD Amendment request. The original Kohl’s site contains 447 parking spaces, which is 34 spaces more than needed under the current Zoning Ordinance standards for commercial/retail developments of this size. Since the Kohl’s site is now part of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, the PUD Agreement allows a reduced parking ratio for all retail/commercial uses of 4.5 spaces per 1,000 sf. of GFA. In this case, the required parking for the 75,000 sf. building can be reduced to 338 spaces, which reflects 109 additional spaces. Under the previous No. 7 Amendment, the Developer intended to keep the 75,000 sf. building on a 5.38 acre lot, with 342 parking spaces, thus maintaining a 4.56 ratio. The original planned 9,400 sf. Bldg. X meanwhile, would sit on a new 1.48 acre lot, with 51 spaces or 5.43 ratio. Under this requested No. 8 amendment, the original Kohl’s parcel is essentially being split into three new lots. Lot 1, Block 2 is a 1.1 acre parcel to be reserved for Bldg. W, a 6,300 sf. retail/service building, with 50 spaces allocated and a 7.94 parking ratio. Lot 3, Block 2 is created for the readjusted and relocated Bldg. X, which has been increased from 9,400 sf. to 19,800 sf in size, 125 parking spaces, and a 6.31 ratio. The former Kohl’s, now identified as Bldg. Y, remains with a 75,000 sf. building area, but the new lot is reduced from 5.3 acres down to 2.83 acres; with only 16 parking spaces, or a 0.21 ratio. This parking allocation for Bldg. Y is a considerable reduction, due to the proposed use of this old Kohl’s store building site by the developer, which will be addressed under the next section of this report (“Use and Building Considerations”). The Site Data table above also highlights existing Bldg. F lot (the City/EDA owned parcel), which is shown with 14,000 sf. building, 63 spaces, and a 4.5 ratio. This table row line is ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 6 footnoted with a remark “Includes Parking on Lot 2, Block 2 SCC 6th Addn.”, which indicates the Developer is seeking to include parking for Bldg. F is shared with Bldg. W. The PUD Plan shows Bldg. F site with 35 marked spaces, while Bldg. W site has 78 marked spaces, for a total of 113 spaces between both lots. Bldg. F requires a minimum of 63 spaces (14 x 4.5 = 63), while Bldg. W would require only 29 spaces (6.3 x 4.5 = 28.35, or 29). The shared amount of parking between both lots should be adequate to accommodate both commercial pad sites if needed. Use & Building Considerations Bldg. Y (old Kohl’s) is shown with a reduced lot and parking area due to the Owner/Developer is requesting from the City an allowance to repurpose and reuse this former retail store into a fully secured, interior only, self-storage facility. The developer of the BC Storage development of 2015 (approved under Planning App. Nos. 2015-009 & 2015-010) - located south of the Regal Theatre at 6330 Camden Avenue North, is now seeking to provide a similar self-storage facility at this Bldg. Y location, which is similar to separate building rehab project they performed in a different metro city. Under the current PUD Agreement between Gatlin and the City, this self-storage/warehouse use is not specifically called out as a permitted or prohibited use, and is not permitted or allowed under the PUD/C-2 zone created for this overall commercial/retail center development. However, under the wide-ranging powers granted under PUD approvals, the Developer (and the City) is allowed some latitude and flexibility in allowing certain uses, or even relaxing or strengthening certain standards, such as setbacks, parking, signage, etc., provided they are agreed upon by both parties. The PUD is allowed to be amended at times in order to allow for changing patterns or economic trends, which in some cases ensures the continuation and sustained development within an approved PUD site, such as this one. The developer of the original BC Storage project originally presented a very nice and ideal designed self-storage facility on a similar PUD/C-2 zoned parcel within the City, and although that project was not completed, the developer feels the rehab and remodeling (reuse) of this old retail department store is another reasonable and more feasible site to complete his goal of providing self-storage needs for the community and metro area. Staff is pleased to note that the developer accepts and will comply with the no outside storage or parking of vehicles on this site, which was similar to the approvals made under the Camden Avenue site. The limited number of parking is shown due to the very limited nature or low volume of vehicle traffic that is expected on this Bldg. Y site. Gatlin has effectively adjusted the parking spaces over on to the new Bldg. W and Bldg. X sites. Bldg. X is also been relocated to provide an effective “screen” of sorts for the Bldg. Y, and also make the building face or redirect its frontage back towards the main Shingle Creek Crossing mall areas. Setback Considerations: The PUD Plan Maps (09/14/16) submitted by Gatlin do not indicate or specify any identifiable building setbacks from lot lines or roadway lines. By using the map scale, city staff has estimated the setback for Bldg. W along Co. Road 10 is approximately 20 feet. Development standards in the C2 (Commerce) District provides the following setbacks: Front ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 7 Yard = 35-ft.; Rear Yard =40-ft.; Side Yard = 10-ft.; and Corner Side Yard = 25-ft. One of the paramount benefits of developing under a PUD is to allow or provide Developers some flexibility in uses, design standards and layouts, which in some cases includes building setbacks. This entire PUD, both existing and planned developed sites, reveal obvious allowances and flexibility in these setback standards. For all intents and purposes, when the City accepts or approves a master development plan or amendments, the planned design and layouts, along with assumed setbacks, are essentially approved under the PUD Amendment process, and can be extended to any new buildings that are comprehended lager under separate Site and Building Plan applications. Under the original SCC-PUD Agreement of 2011, a select number of building pad sites were approved with reduced setbacks, due in part to the dedication of Twin Lake Regional Trail along Bass Lake Rd./Co. Road 10; and one building affected by the proposed Shingle Creek daylighting improvements. These setbacks are noted as follows: A. The setbacks from public right of ways to buildings are reduced from 35 feet to 20 feet for Lots 7, 8, 9, 12, & 13, Block 1 and 18 feet for Lot 11, Block 1 to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the Twin Lake Regional Trail. B. The setbacks from property lines for a side and rear yard setback are reduced from 10 feet to 6 feet for the east and south lot line of Lot 16, Block 1 and from 10 feet to 0 feet for the south lot line of Lot 3, Block 1. Because this Bldg. W is being presented with a reduced setback similar to those approved under the original PUD Agreement, the City must acknowledge and approve the reduced setbacks specifically for this new building site. City staff does not see any objections or reasons not to allow this reduced setback for Bldg. W at this location. This will be consistent with the allowances made for the seven other lots originally platted in 2011. To ensure that the city recognizes and acknowledges these reduced setbacks on this proposed building pad site, planning staff is requesting the Planning Commission discuss and provide a recommendation to allowing these reduced setbacks from this County Road 10 right-of-way. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION Similar to those findings Staff indicated and provided under previous considerations of Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendments, the requested replatting, new building pad site, new building adjustment, and the consideration of the self-storage use with reduced parking allocation, can be supported based on the following findings: a) The replatting of the former Kohl’s property into three separate lots for an existing building site and two new retail commercial pad sites; along with the replatting of Bldg. Pad Sites L, M, O, Q, and N/S, will promote and enhance the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing; b) The replatting of the Bldg. Pad Sites L, M, O, Q, and N/S is found to be a reasonable request and provides an ideal opportunity for the City to explore or finalize potential ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 8 options of expanding the daylighting features of the Shingle Creek waterway in this development area; which in turn will provide increased aesthetic elements for future development sites within the PUD, and may help to increase water quality; c) The reduced setback allowance for Bldg. W at 20-feet along County Road 10 is consistent with those reduce setback allowances granted under the original 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement; d) The additional Bldg. W pad site and relocated/expanded Bldg. X pad site reflects a growing demand and need for this area, which benefits and sustains the ongoing efforts to improve, market and complete the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Plan by the Developer; e) The additional lot and future building site, along with the acknowledgement by the City that all new Buildings and Pad Sites will meet the required parking standards established by the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement, should not be detrimental or pose any threat or danger to the general public. f) The additional lot and future building site will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD; g) The allowance of a self-storage facility with interior warehousing and storage only, with no outside storage or parking of vehicles or personal items, should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD; h) The additional lot and future building site, the reduced setback allowance for Bldg. W, and the allowance for the self-storage use will not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD; and i) With the addition of Bldg. W, the relocation and enlargement of Bldg. X, and the reduced parking numbers and ratio allocated to Bldg. Y, the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD site will have adequate measures in place to maintain and provide suitable access and shared parking within the site. j) The proposed layout of all new development lots and all new buildings, including reduced setbacks and any other related flexibility or reductions identified on said Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Plans (dated 09/14/2016) are hereby acceptable and approved. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2016-11, which comprehends the approval of Planning Application No. 2016-009, the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment No. 8, which would allow certain changes to the original 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (and all subsequent amendments), subject to the following conditions and allowances: 1. Developer is allowed to amend the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development by replatting the former Kohl’s site, located at 2501 County Road 10, into ________________ App. No. 2016-009 PC 09/29/16 Page 9 the three new lots, along with replatting the five lots generally located between the existing Walmart and the Shingle Creek waterway, addressed as 1150, 1050, 1020, 1000, and 1100 Shingle Creek Crossing, into the “Shingle Creek Crossing 6th Addition”. 2. Developer is allowed to reuse or repurpose (develop) the existing 75,000 sq. ft. building space located on Bldg. Y site into an interior only, self-storage facility. This commercial self-storage site shall not allow outdoor storage of personal or commercial vehicles, including rental trucks or trailers, boats and/or trailers, recreational vehicles (of all forms), miscellaneous equipment and other personal property items, on this site, nor any other parking areas inside the Shingle Creek Crossing development. 3. A separate Site and Building Plan application will be required for new Bldg. W; the relocation and enlargement of Bldg. X; and the new improvements for Bldg. Y. 4. Developer is granted a reduction to the amount of parking normally required on this Bldg. Y site due to the acceptable limited nature of a proposed self-storage use, and the lower levels of expected (estimated) vehicle traffic and trip generations attributed to such use. 5. Developer must obtain a building permit and adhere to all requirements prior to beginning any removals, demolition, land disturbance work, or new construction of parking, utilities or buildings. 6. Developer shall comply with all conditions or request of additional information as noted in the City Engineer Review Memorandum, dated Sept. 21, 2016. 7. Unless amended otherwise or under separate agreement, all existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and subsequent amendments, shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. 8. Any future PUD amendments or application requests will require the submittal and adoption (acceptance) of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 9. No other allowances as illustrated or indicated on the submitted “Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment No. 8 Plans (dated 09/14/2016) shall be comprehended or permitted under this specific approval. 10. The Developer shall enter into and execute an updated PUD Agreement (or similar document) as prepared by the City Attorney. Attachments • Planning Commission Res. No. 2016-11 • City Engineers Review Memo (09/21/16) • Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment Plans No. 8 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: September 21, 2016 TO: Tim Benetti, Planning and Zoning Specialist FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Public Works - PUD Amendment No. 8, Review Memo – Shingle Creek Crossing Public Works staff has reviewed the 12 sheet set of plans entitled Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment No. 8, which were prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.; dated August 8, 2016. PUD Amendment No. 8 applies to Building F, L, M, N, O, Q, S, X, W and Y sites. The following comments are offered relative to the above-referenced submittals. They are contingent upon preliminary and final plat approval, final site plans and land alteration/building permit submittals and approval. PUD Items - Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment No. 8: 1. Drive-thru details for Building F have not been reviewed and will be examined in closer detail during future stages when detailed drive-thru design elements are provided. 2. Re-platting will be requested for the sole purpose of revising the property lines as depicted in the attached drawing. Under this premise, the proposed property line revisions appear to pose no negative impacts to the development and are consistent with City requirements. The only known impacts of the revisions pertain to the shifting of parking designation ratios, which minimums do not appear to be met (e.g. site Q and Y). 3. Rededicating and terminating certain easements are required as part of the required replatting. Formal vacation documents are required and must contain easement vacation descriptions and depiction exhibits signed by a professional surveyor. A separate application is required for the easement vacation actions. 4. No portion of building or appurtenant structures may encroach on the City drainage and utility easement. 5. Any further development of Sites S, N and Q must include a well designed area between the ring road including concrete curb and gutter along the north side of the ring road. 6. The landscape plan appears to be incomplete for sites F, S, N, Q and W. 7. The PUD has been reviewed by Hennepin County. The right-in access along CSAH 10 (Bass Lake Road) at the former Kohl’s site must be removed. 8. The applicant is responsible for coordinating site development plans with Xcel Energy, CenterPoint Energy, Qwest Communications and other private utility companies. Any further easements necessary to provide utility service to the proposed site development shall be dedicated to the public for public use with the final plat. 9. The existing 16” watermain that crosses Lot 4, Block 2 will need to be re-routed per layout depicted in PUD No. 8. Public utilities work must meet and conform to all City standards and specifications, to be further coordinated and approved by City Engineer. 10. Plans must provide 1” abstraction from all impervious surfaces for the entire site to meet Shingle Creek Watershed Commission rule changes since the approval of the stormwater plan with the original development. Update plans and stormwater narrative as necessary. Provide design calculations. 11. Existing stormwater facility must be able to be accessible and maintained. Suggested PUD Amendment No. 8 Plan Review –Shingle Creek Page 2 September 21, 2016 consideration should be given to replacing the existing facility located on Lot 4, Block 2 (Site X). 12. All newly proposed loading dock and truck turning/backing areas must be fully separated from public customer parking areas, must not direct or invite public parking ingress/egress routes through loading dock and turning/backing areas and must not encroach on main drive aisles. It appears site N is non-compliant with this condition. 13. Circulation exhibit must be updated to include site N, Q, W and S (e.g. delivery and garage truck turning movements. 14. Provide an update of the original and amended traffic impact study to reflect the current site and building revisions for PUD Amendment No. 8 and prior outstanding revisions. 15. Revise site plan to provide better pedestrian connectivity for Buildings W, X and Y with the internal PUD sidewalk system. 16. Parking area to the south of site S must be revised so the parking stalls and backing areas are separate from the drive aisle/intersection area to the main site roadway between Walmart and site S. 17. The area immediately to the northeast of site X must be better defined as parking area or delivery drop area to ensure adequately designed. 18. Upon project completion the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 19. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Inspection for the watermain relocation must be performed by a City hired Engineer to be reimbursed by the developer. Upon project completion the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The designer/project engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as- built survey). 20. An updated certified abstract of title or registered property report must be provided to the City Engineer and City Attorney for review at the time of the preliminary plat application (within 30 days of preliminary plat application). Additionally, this will need to stay current and be updated through the approval process as required to maintain and be current within 30 days of release of the final plat. 21. All recommendations and requirements approved as part of previous actions pertaining to all prior PUD/PUD amendment approvals, Preliminary Plan approvals and Final Plat approvals relative to this development and/or portions thereof are withstanding and must be incorporated into the final plans. 22. A utility facilities easement agreement is required that will provide the City perpetual accessibility to all private utilities and storm drainage areas to inspect and enforce proper utility service and maintenance for the entire site. This easement agreement also includes private inspection, maintenance and reporting responsibilities and must be executed prior to issuance of building and land alteration permits. 23. A drainage and utility easement encompassing all storm water treatment facilities and the rerouted watermain must be dedicated on the plat. PUD Amendment No. 8 Plan Review –Shingle Creek Page 3 September 21, 2016 24. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center’s standard specifications and details. The City’s standard details must be included in the plans. 25. The final plans must be certified by a licensed engineer in the State of Minnesota and forwarded to the City Engineer for approval. All aforementioned items, comments and recommendations are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. The PUD amendment and site plan must be developed and maintained in substantial conformance with the referenced plans, unless modified by the staff recommended conditions above. Subsequent approval of the final plan may require additional modifications based on engineering requirements associated with final design of the water supply, storm drainage, sanitary sewer, final grading, geometric design and other design elements as established by the City Engineer and other public officials having jurisdiction over approval of the final site plans. Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2016-11 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2016-090 SUBMITTED BY GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT NO. 8 TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (LOCATED AT 1150, 1050, 1020, 1000, AND 1100 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING AND 2501 COUNTY ROAD 10) WHEREAS, the City Council of Brooklyn Center adopted Resolution No. 2011-85, dated June 13, 2011, which is considered the first amendment to the previously approved 1999 Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development, whereby this amendment approved the establishment of the new Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an approved Development/Master Plan and certain allowances and development standards that would govern over the PUD; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2011-127, dated September 12, 2011, which approved the first amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2012-106, dated August 13, 2012, which approved the second amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2012-129, dated September 24, 2012, which approved the third amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2013-124, dated October 14, 2013, which approved the fourth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2013-72, dated July 8, 2013, which approved the fifth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2014-75, dated June 9, 2014, which approved the sixth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned PC RESOLUTION NO. 2016-11 Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Resolution No. 2016-170, dated November 9, 2015, which approved the seventh amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, Gatlin Development Company submitted Planning Application No. 2016-009, which is considered the eighth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends additional adjustments not approved under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and the related 2011 PUD Agreement, specifically the proposed amendments to be comprehended under this application include the following: a) authorize the replatting the former Kohl’s property, located at 2510 County Road 10 into three separate lots, along with the replatting of the five lots generally situated between Walmart and Shingle Creek daylight waterway, and addressed as 1150, 1050, 1020, 1000, and 1100 Shingle Creek Crossing, into a new subdivision to be titled “Shingle Creek Crossing 6th Addition”; b) allow a new proposed Bldg. W, a 6,300 sf. multi-tenant commercial building, with an approved reduced setback of 20-feet from the adjacent County Road 10 right-of-way; c) allow the relocation and enlargement of previously approved Building X, from 9,400 sf. to 19,800 sf. ; and d) allow the reuse and repurpose of the old Kohl’s building (new Bldg. Y) into an self-storage, interior only warehouse facility with reduced parking.; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on September 29, 2016, whereby a staff report and public testimony regarding the Planned Unit Development Amendment were received and considered by the Planning Commission; and the Planning Commission gave proper consideration of this Planned Unit Development Amendment request by utilizing the guidelines for evaluating such amendments as contained in Section 35- 355 of the City's Zoning Ordinance and the City's Comprehensive Plan; and PC RESOLUTION NO. 2016-11 WHEREAS; in light of all testimony received, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center did determine that Planning Application No. 2016- 009, submitted by Gatlin Development Company, may be approved based upon the following findings and considerations: A. The replatting of the former Kohl’s property into three separate lots for an existing building site and two new retail commercial pad sites; along with the replatting of Bldg. Pad Sites L, M, O, Q, and N/S, will promote and enhance the general public welfare of this PUD, as it maintains and keeps the redevelopment activity of this site intact and ongoing; B. The replatting of the Bldg. Pad Sites L, M, O, Q, and N/S is found to be a reasonable request and provides an ideal opportunity for the City to explore or finalize potential options of expanding the daylighting features of the Shingle Creek waterway in this development area; which in turn will provide increased aesthetic elements for future development sites within the PUD, and may help to increase water quality; C. The reduced setback allowance for Bldg. W at 20-feet along County Road 10 is consistent with those reduce setback allowances granted under the original 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement; D. The additional Bldg. W pad site and relocated/expanded Bldg. X pad site reflects a growing demand and need for this area, which benefits and sustains the ongoing efforts to market and complete the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Plan by the Developer; E. The additional lot and future building site, along with the acknowledgement by the City that all new Buildings and Pad Sites will meet the required parking standards established by the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Agreement, should not be detrimental or pose any threat or danger to the general public. F. The additional lot and future building site will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD; G. The allowance of a self-storage facility with interior warehousing and storage only, with no outside storage or parking of vehicles or personal items, should not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in PC RESOLUTION NO. 2016-11 this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD; H. The additional lot and future building site, the reduced setback allowance for Bldg. W, and the allowance for the self-storage use will not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD; and I. With the addition of Bldg. W, the relocation and enlargement of Bldg. X, and the reduced parking numbers and ratio allocated to Bldg. Y, the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD site will have adequate measures in place to maintain and provide suitable access and shared parking within the site. J. The proposed layout of all new development lots and all new buildings, including reduced setbacks and any other related flexibility or reductions identified on said Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Plans (dated 09/14/2016) are hereby acceptable and approved. AND WHEREAS, the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center did determine that the guidelines for evaluating Planned Unit Development Amendment, as contained in Section 35-355 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, have been met, and the proposal is therefore, in the best interest of the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that Planning Application No. 2016-009 submitted by Gatlin Development Company, requesting approval of the eighth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, may be approved subject to the following conditions: 1. Developer is allowed to amend the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development by replatting the former Kohl’s site, located at 2501 County Road 10, into the three new lots, along with replatting the five lots generally located between the existing Walmart and the Shingle Creek waterway, addressed as 1150, 1050, 1020, 1000, and 1100 Shingle Creek Crossing, into the “Shingle Creek Crossing 6th Addition”. 2. Developer is allowed to reuse or repurpose (develop) the existing 75,000 sq. ft. building space located on Bldg. Y site into an interior only, self- storage facility. This commercial self-storage site shall not allow outdoor storage of personal or commercial vehicles, including rental trucks or trailers, boats and/or trailers, recreational vehicles (of all forms), miscellaneous equipment and other personal property items, on this site, nor any other parking areas inside the Shingle Creek Crossing PC RESOLUTION NO. 2016-11 development. 3. A separate Site and Building Plan application will be required for new Bldg. W; the relocation and enlargement of Bldg. X; and the new improvements for Bldg. Y. 4. Developer is granted a reduction to the amount of parking normally required on this Bldg. Y site due to the acceptable limited nature of a proposed self-storage use, and the lower levels of expected (estimated) vehicle traffic and trip generations attributed to such use. 5. Developer must obtain a building permit and adhere to all requirements prior to beginning any removals, demolition, land disturbance work, or new construction of parking, utilities or buildings. 6. Developer shall comply with all conditions or request of additional information as noted in the City Engineer Review Memorandum, dated Sept. 21, 2016. 7. Unless amended otherwise or under separate agreement, all existing provisions, standards and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and subsequent amendments, shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. 8. Any future PUD amendments or application requests will require the submittal and adoption (acceptance) of an updated master plan, which plan shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. 9. No other allowances as illustrated or indicated on the submitted “Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment No. 8 Plans (dated 09/14/2016) shall be comprehended or permitted under this specific approval. 10. The Developer shall enter into and execute an updated PUD Agreement (or similar document) as prepared by the City Attorney. September 29, 2016 Date Chair PC RESOLUTION NO. 2016-11 ATTEST: Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair , Commissioners , , , , , and ; and the following voted against the same: None; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 10, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 2 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 2, BLOCK 1LOT 3, BLOCK 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 LOT 6, BLOCK 1 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 PROPERTY LINE METRO TRANSIT STATION EXISTING FULL ACCESS TRAFFIC SIGNAL EXISTING PRIVATE 1 0 'D R A I N A G E & U T I L I T Y E A S E M E N T40'B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K SHINGLE CREEK DAYLIGHTING (EXISTING) 20' D & U EASEMENT 57' DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 30' D & U EASEMENT 30' D & U EASEMENT 20' BUILDING SETBACK 10' D & U EASEMENT TRAIL EASEMENT (WIDTH VARIES) T R A I L E A S E M E N T (W I D T H V A R I E S ) 45' NSP EASEMENT EXISTING FULL ACCESS TRAFFIC SIGNAL EXISTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL OUTLOT A EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTING SIDEWALK EXISTINGSIDEWALK EXISTING FULL ACCESS 20' D & U EASEMENT P R O P E R T Y L I N E (T Y P .) 35' BUILDING SETBACK 10' D & U EASEMENT S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O .1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N O R T H COUNTY RD NO 10 / BASS LAKE RD 20' BUILDING SETBACK 1 0 'D &U E A S E M E N T DRIVE-THRU PHARAMCY DRIVE-THRU DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT (WIDTH VARIES) PUD BOUNDARY (TYP.) 15' BUILDING SETBACK 3 4' D & U E A S E M E N T M MMM M M P P P FP FP N E W S E A R S E N T R A N C E 10' D & U EASEMENT BOX CULVERTS EXISTING FULL ACCESS EXISTING 35' D & U EASEMENT PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS (TYP.) DRIVE-THRU EXISTING APPLEBEES M BUILDING 5 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 9 BUILDING 10 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 LOT 4, BLOCK 2 RELOCATED 20' D&U EASEMENT LOT 1, BLOCK 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 K EXISTINGSTORMWATER S T O R M W A T E R H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200sf SMALLRETAIL SMALLRETAIL EXISTINGAPPLEBEE'S 6,000sf Q EXISTINGSIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTINGSIGNAL A E 4,800sfG 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A B U I L D I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T B U I L D I N G 4 B U I L D I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R B U I L D I N G 2 B U I L D I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf PUD BOUNDARY (TYP.) BUILDING DESIGNATION SCC ADDITION NO.LOT AREA BUILDING PARKING PROVIDEDRATIO EXISTING WALMART 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 18.05 ACRES 181,943 SQ. FT.889 SPACES 4.89 EXISTING APPLEBEES 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 0.87 ACRES 4,869 SQ. FT.53 SPACES 10.89 1,2,3,4,5 5 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7.63 ACRES 79,508 SQ. FT.381 SPACES 4.79 10 5 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 0.93 ACRES 6,000 SQ. FT.33 SPACES 5.50 9 5 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 1.42 ACRES 13,332 SQ. FT.61 SPACES 4.58 6,7,8 5 LOT 6, BLOCK 1 2.07 ACRES 12,141 SQ. FT.60 SPACES 4.94 A 4 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.70 ACRES 7,322 SQ. FT.36 SPACES 4.92 B 4 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 1.45 ACRES 6,673 SQ. FT.32 SPACES 4.80 C 3 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 0.85 ACRES 2,488 SQ. FT.27 SPACES 10.85 D 2 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.98 ACRES 11,200 SQ. FT.50 SPACES 4.46 E 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 0.92 ACRES 4,800 SQ. FT.48 SPACES 10.00 F 6 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 1.19 ACRES 14,000 SQ. FT.63 SPACES 4.50 G 1 LOT 11, BLOCK 1 1.44 ACRES 8,420 SQ. FT.56 SPACES 6.65 H 3 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 1.25 ACRES 11,200 SQ. FT.55 SPACES 4.91 J 3 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 3.09 ACRES 38,000 SQ. FT.187 SPACES 4.92 K 1 LOT 10, BLOCK 1 1.19 ACRES 9,500 SQ. FT.45 SPACES 4.74 L 6 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 1.29 ACRES 11,200 SQ. FT.60 SPACES 5.36 M 6 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 1.05 ACRES 7,500 SQ. FT.67 SPACES 8.93 N 6 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 2.93 ACRES 12,541 SQ. FT.104 SPACES 8.29 O 6 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 0.81 ACRES 7,500 SQ. FT.38 SPACES 5.07 Q 6 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 1.83 ACRES 6,000 SQ. FT.58 SPACES 9.67 R 5 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 1.03 ACRES 5,400 SQ. FT.56 SPACES 10.37 S 6 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 -6,600 SQ. FT.34 SPACES 5.15 T 5 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 1.54 ACRES 5,500 SQ. FT.55 SPACES 10.00 W 6 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 1.10 ACRES 6,300 SQ. FT.50 SPACES 7.94 X 6 LOT 4, BLOCK 2 2.87 ACRES 19,800 SQ. FT.125 SPACES 6.31 Y 6 LOT 3, BLOCK 2 2.83 ACRES 75,000 SQ. FT.16 SPACES 0.21 TOTAL 61.31 ACRES 574,737 SQ. FT.2,739 SPACES 6.43 OVERALL SITE DATA TABLE * * INCLUDES PARKING ON LOT 2, BLOCK 2 SCC 6TH ADDITION SIGN LEGEND: NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 PUD AMENDMENT 8 CONCEPTUAL PLANS SITE PLAN EXHIBIT SH EET 1 OF 11 SHINGLE CR EEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 01 SYMBOL LEGEND: FPPM PUD B O U N D A R Y EXIS T I N G S E A R S EXIS T I N G WALM A R T EXISTING APPLEBEES PUD BOUNDARY COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD C R K P K W Y STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N O R T H NO R T H W A Y COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD XE R X E S A V E N O R T H COUNTY RD N O 1 0 B A S S L A K E R O A D K EXISTING STORMWATER STO R M W A T E R H F 14,000sf K H M O L Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E G J C 11,200sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf SEARS PROPERTY: NOT A PART OF THIS PROJECT PHASING HATCH LEGEND: NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N P U D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S PH A S I N G E X H I B I T SH E E T 2 O F 1 1 02 K EXISTING STORMWATER STO R M W A T E R H 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O 7,400sf L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL EXISTING APPLEBEE'S 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E 4,800sf G 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf FFE: 850.75 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 852.67 FFE: 852.60 FFE: 851.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 855.50 FFE: 849.90 FFE: 850.50 FFE: 846.75 FFE: 847.75 FFE: 847.50FFE: 850.25 FFE: 853.00 FFE: 851.00 FFE: 853.00 NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N PU D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S PR O P O S E D G R A D I N G E X H I B I T SH E E T 4 O F 1 1 03 LEGEND K EXISTING STORMWATER STO R M W A T E R H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O 7,400sf L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL EXISTING APPLEBEE'S 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E 4,800sf G 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf FFE: 850.50 FFE: 846.75 FFE: 847.75 FFE: 847.50FFE: 850.25 NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N PU D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S PR O P O S E D G R A D I N G E X H I B I T SH E E T 4 O F 1 1 04 LEGEND K EXISTING STORMWATER STO R M W A T E R H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL EXISTING APPLEBEE'S 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E 4,800sf G 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf 15" TRACT AREA MAJOR ANCHOR 1 16.36 ACRE 152,036 SQ. FT. TRACT 1 (GROSS LEASABLE)12.19 ACRE 123,242 SQ. FT. TRACT 2 0.89 ACRE 3,530 SQ. FT. TRACT 3 1.48 ACRE 15,353 SQ. FT. TRACT 4 4.33 ACRE 45,021 SQ. FT. TRACT 5 1.17 ACRE 13,770 SQ. FT. TRACT 6 1.56 ACRE 7,700 SQ. FT. TRACT 7 (STORMWATER)0.60 ACRE TRACT 8 (STORMWATER)0.31 ACRE TRACT 9 1.27 ACRE 5,813 SQ. FT. TRACT 10 1.42 ACRE 7,555 SQ. FT. TRACT 11 (STORMWATER)1.26 ACRE TRACT 12 1.32 ACRE 8,533 SQ. FT. TRACT 13 1.11 ACRE 9,018 SQ. FT. TRACT 14 0.69 ACRE 7,605 SQ. FT. TRACT 15 6.10 ACRE 57,671 SQ. FT. TRACT 16 5.45 ACRE 36,532 SQ. FT. TRACT 17 (HWY EASEMENT)1.13 ACRE APPLEBEE'S 1.47 ACRE 4,869 SQ. FT. KOHLS 6.99 ACRE 75,000 SQ. FT. *CITY OWNED (BUILDING E)1.06 ACRE 5,933 SQ. FT. TRACT 18 (STORMWATER)0.49 ACRE TOTAL 68.65 ACRE 579,181 SQ. FT. *THE CITY OWNED PARCEL IS TO BE REPLATTED AS INDICATED ON GRAPHIC ABOVE. PROPOSED SITE ACREAGE WILL BE 1.26 ACRES. SITE DATA TABLE STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N U E NO R T H 56T H A V E . N COUNTY ROAD NO. 10 15" 15" E36" E12" E24" E24" E12" E10" 12" E12" E24" E24" E12" E24" PR I V A T E D U A L EX I S T I N G E21" E42"E51"E42" E24" E12" EXISTING SEDIMENT TRAP DAY-LIGHTED SHINGLE CREEK TO E X I S T I N G REG I O N A L P O N D S E18" E42" E24" E15" E15"E2 4 " E 2 4 " E24" 15" E23"x 3 6 " E15"E24" E24" E48" E48" E48" E23"X36"E30" E 1 2 " 2x 1 5 " E15" E15"E48" E12" E18" E48" E15" E15"E36" E36" CULVERT E15" E15" E18" E15" E18" E18" 2'x4' BOX CULVERT EXISTING STORMCEPTOR EXISTING STORMCEPTOR EXISTING STORMCEPTOR EXISTING STORMCEPTOR 18" E15" E48" E18" E24" E18" 12 ' x 1 2 ' BO X C U L V E R T E15" E36" E24" E15" E48" E48 " E48" E15 " E24" E42" E15" E36" E48" E15" E24" 15" E36 " E42" E15" E15" E18" E30" E15" E42" E42" E42"E18" E42" 24" E18" E18" E15" E18" E18" E18" E10" E10" E10" E10" E18" E18" E18" E8" E15X24" E12" E15" E15"E15" E18" E15" E12" 12" 12" E12" E12" E12" E12" 12" UNDERGROUND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 12" 12" EXISTING PRIVATE STORM SEWER PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM SEWER EXISTING X-INCH STORM SEWER PROPOSED X-INCH STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE WATER FEATURE/STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA X" EX" PU D A M E N D E M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S ST O R M S E W E R E X H I B I T SH E E T 5 O F 1 1 NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 05 LEGEND *ON-SITE STORM SEWER IS PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 16" 16" 6" EFH 6" K H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E 4,800sf G 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf TRACT AREA BUILDING MAJOR ANCHOR 1 16.36 ACRE 152,036 SQ. FT. TRACT 1 (GROSS LEASABLE)12.19 ACRE 123,242 SQ. FT. TRACT 2 0.89 ACRE 3,530 SQ. FT. TRACT 3 1.48 ACRE 15,353 SQ. FT. TRACT 4 4.33 ACRE 45,021 SQ. FT. TRACT 5 1.17 ACRE 13,770 SQ. FT. TRACT 6 1.56 ACRE 7,700 SQ. FT. TRACT 7 (STORMWATER)0.60 ACRE TRACT 8 (STORMWATER)0.31 ACRE TRACT 9 1.27 ACRE 5,813 SQ. FT. TRACT 10 1.42 ACRE 7,555 SQ. FT. TRACT 11 (STORMWATER)1.26 ACRE TRACT 12 1.32 ACRE 8,533 SQ. FT. TRACT 13 1.11 ACRE 9,018 SQ. FT. TRACT 14 0.69 ACRE 7,605 SQ. FT. TRACT 15 6.10 ACRE 57,671 SQ. FT. TRACT 16 5.45 ACRE 36,532 SQ. FT. TRACT 17 (HWY EASEMENT)1.13 ACRE APPLEBEE'S 1.47 ACRE 4,869 SQ. FT. KOHLS 6.99 ACRE 75,000 SQ. FT. *CITY OWNED (BUILDING E)1.06 ACRE 5,933 SQ. FT. TRACT 18 (STORMWATER)0.49 ACRE TOTAL 68.65 ACRE 579,181 SQ. FT. COUNTY ROAD NO. 10 / BASS LAKE ROAD *THE CITY OWNED PARCEL IS TO BE REPLATTED AS INDICATED ON GRAPHIC ABOVE. PROPOSED SITE ACREAGE WILL BE 1.26 ACRES. SITE DATA TABLE STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N U E NO R T H 56T H A V E . N E3" DOMESTIC E8" FIRE E1 0 " E12" E10" EXISTING 16" PUBLIC WATERMAIN E10" E10" 6" 8"E6" E10" E10" E10" E10" E12" E6" E8" STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFH EFHE6" E10" E10" E10" E10" E6"E8" E 8 " EFH EFH E6" E6"E6" E6" E6" E6" E6" E6" PUD BOUNDARY E6" 6" EXISTING PUBLIC WATERMAIN E6" PUD BOUNDARY EXIS T I N G S E A R S EXISTING APPLEBEES 6" E8" E8" FH E6" EFH E6" E6"E8" EFH E6" E10" E10" E10" E6" E6" E8" EFH E6" E8" E8" E8" E6" 6" LEGEND EX" X" EFH FH NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 06 PU D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S WA T E R U T I L I T Y E X H I B I T SH E E T 6 O F 1 1 *ALL WATER LINE AND STRUCTURES ARE PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE E8" E8" 4" P R I V A T E FOR C E M A I N K H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E 4,800sf G 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf TRACT AREA MAJOR ANCHOR 1 16.36 ACRE 152,036 SQ. FT. TRACT 1 (GROSS LEASABLE)12.19 ACRE 123,242 SQ. FT. TRACT 2 0.89 ACRE TRACT 3 1.48 ACRE TRACT 4 4.33 ACRE TRACT 5 1.17 ACRE TRACT 6 1.56 ACRE TRACT 7 (STORMWATER)0.60 ACRE TRACT 8 (STORMWATER)0.31 ACRE TRACT 9 1.27 ACRE TRACT 10 1.42 ACRE TRACT 11 (STORMWATER)1.26 ACRE TRACT 12 1.32 ACRE TRACT 13 1.11 ACRE TRACT 14 0.69 ACRE TRACT 15 6.10 ACRE TRACT 16 5.45 ACRE TRACT 17 (HWY EASEMENT)1.13 ACRE APPLEBEE'S 1.47 ACRE KOHLS 6.99 ACRE *CITY OWNED (BUILDING E)1.06 ACRE TRACT 18 (STORMWATER)0.49 ACRE TOTAL 68.65 ACRE 579,181 SQ. FT. COUNTY ROAD NO. 10 *THE CITY OWNED PARCEL IS TO BE REPLATTED AS INDICATED ON GRAPHIC ABOVE. PROPOSED SITE ACREAGE WILL BE 1.26 ACRES. SITE DATA TABLE STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N U E NO R T H 56T H A V E . N PUD BOUNDARY EXIS T I N G S E A R S EXISTING APPLEBEES STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 E12" E18" EXISTING LIFT STATION E27" E27" E24" E 2 7 " E27 " E8" E 8 " E18" E6" E8" E6" 6" 30' D & U EASEMENT 20' D & U EASEMENT E6" PRIVATE LIFT STATION PUBLIC SEWER PUB L I C S E W E R P U B L I C S E W E R PU B L I C S E W E R E8 " E8" E8 "E6"E6" E8" 4" FORCEMAIN 35' D & U EASEMENT E8" E8" E8" PUBLIC P U B L I C PUBLIC PUBLIC E6" 6" 6"6" 6" E6" E6"E6" E8" E8" 6" E8 " E8" LEGEND EX" X" NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 07 PU D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S SA N I T A R Y S E W E R E X H I B I T SH E E T 7 O F 1 1 *ALL SANITARY SEWER AND STRUCTURES ARE PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD SH I N G L E C R K P K W Y STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N O R T H NO R T H W A Y COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD XE R X E S A V E N O R T H COUNTY RD N O 1 0 B A S S L A K E R O A D K H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL A E 4,800sf G 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf KV PUD BOUNDARY 1 FC 3 FC 5 FC (FOOT CANDLES) LIGHT POLE & FIXTURES Luminaire Schedule Symbol Arrangement Description LLF Lumens/Lamp Arr. Lum. Lumens Arr. Watts D180 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 173304 2160 ROTATED 2 IN 90 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 94478 2160 SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 45676 1080 3 @ 90 DEGREES GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 259956 3240 SINGLE GB-5-100-CMH-F 16' POLE 0.790 9000 5766 129 SINGLE GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 86652 1080 EXISTING LIGHT TO REMAIN EXISTING LIGHT EXISTING LIGHT EXISTING LIGHT EXISTING LIGHT NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: A.CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE BASES WILL BE USED FOR LIGHT POLE BASE FOUNDATIONS. POLE BASE DESIGNS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ENGINEERING PERMITTING STAGE. B.REFER TO ARCH. PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLAN. C.LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE METAL HALIDE. PU D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S LI G H T I N G E X H I B I T SH E E T 8 O F 1 1 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 08 NOTE: EXISTING LIGHTS REFLECT CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS AT THE END OF PHASE I. ALL PHASE II LIGHTS ARE SHOWN PROPOSED. KV COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD STA T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N O R T H COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD XE R X E S A V E N O R T H CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC COUNTY RD N O 1 0 B A S S L A K E R O A D K EXISTING STORMWATER STO R M W A T E R H F 14,000sf K H M O S L Q A E G J C A BUILD I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T BUILD I N G 4 BUILD I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R BUILD I N G 2 BUILD I N G 3 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf PUD BOUNDARY (TYP.) PUD BOUNDARY (TYP.) QTY PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME - SIZE 2" CAL. ROOT B & B QUAKING ASPEN - - - #20 CONT. 6' HT SWAMP WHITE OAK BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SYMBOL VIBURNUM COMMON HACKBERRY BIRCH (SINGLE STEM & CLUMP) RED PINE DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS EVERGREEN SHRUB/ PERENNIAL MASSING B & B DOGWOOD #3 CONT. #1 CONT. BLACK-EYED SUSAN ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS NEW HORIZON ELM KARL FOERSTER DAYLILY AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE IVORY SILK LILAC CRABAPPLE LILAC SPIREA KOBOLD LIATRIS 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B #20 CONT. #20 CONT. #20 CONT. 6' HT B & B #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. JUNIPER 6' HT B & B NO MOW MIX LEGEND EXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN) EXISTING RAIN GARDEN/ STORMWATER AREA SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL.B & B OVERSTORY TREES BOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMEQTY.SYM. SWAMP WHITE OAKSWO5 COMMON HACKBERRYCHB2 AUSTRIAN PINE PINUS NIGRAAUP7 BLACK HILLS SPRUCEBHS12 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST GLEDITSIA TRIACANTHOS VAR. INERMIS 'SKYCOLE'SHL 23 AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE ACER X FREEMANII 'AUTUMN BLAZE'ABM 7 EVERGREEN ORNAMENTAL/SMALL TREES PICEA GLAUCA DENSATA CELTIS OCCIDENTALIS QUERCUS BICOLOR ACCOLADE ELM ULMUS JAPONICA X WILSONIANA 'MORTON'ACC 20 RBC 6 RIVER BIRCHRVB3 BETULA NIGRA RIVER BIRCH (CLUMP)BETULA NIGRA PFC 18 PRAIRIE FIRE CRAB MALUS 'PRAIRIE FIRE' SDC -SNOWDRIFT CRAB MALUS 'SNOWDRIFT' SSC 4 SPRING SNOW CRABAPPLE MALUS 'SPRING SNOW' SHRUBS/PERENNIALS HRD 320 KARL FOERSTER GRASSKFG132 CALAMAGROSTIS 'KARL FOERSTER' HAPPY RETURNS DAYLILY HEMEROCALIS 'HAPPY RETURNS' ISH 54 INVINCIBLE SPIRIT HYDRANGEA HYDRANGEA ABORESCENS 'NCHA1' FPR 36 FOXI PAVEMENT ROSE ROSA 'PAVEMENT FOXI' RSD 485 RUBY STELLA DAYLILY HEMEROCALIS 'RUBY STELLA' EVERGREEN QTY PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME 21 SIZE 2" CAL. ROOT B & B QUAKING ASPEN 3 3 2,510 SF #20 CONT. 6' HT SWAMP WHITE OAK BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SYMBOL VIBURNUM COMMON HACKBERRY BIRCH (SINGLE STEM & CLUMP) RED PINE DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS EVERGREEN SHRUB/ PERENNIAL MASSING B & B DOGWOOD #3 CONT. #1 CONT. BLACK-EYED SUSAN ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS NEW HORIZON ELM KARL FOERSTER DAYLILY IVORY SILK LILAC CRABAPPLE LILAC SPIREA 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B #20 CONT. #20 CONT. #20 CONT. 6' HT B & B #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. JUNIPER 6' HT B & B LEGEND EXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN) SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST KV QTY PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME - SIZE 2" CAL. ROOT B & B QUAKING ASPEN - - - #20 CONT. 6' HT SWAMP WHITE OAK BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SYMBOL VIBURNUM COMMON HACKBERRY BIRCH (SINGLE STEM & CLUMP) RED PINE DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS EVERGREEN SHRUB/ PERENNIAL MASSING B & B DOGWOOD #3 CONT. #1 CONT. BLACK-EYED SUSAN ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS NEW HORIZON ELM KARL FOERSTER DAYLILY AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE IVORY SILK LILAC CRABAPPLE LILAC SPIREA KOBOLD LIATRIS 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B #20 CONT. #20 CONT. #20 CONT. 6' HT B & B #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. JUNIPER 6' HT B & B SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST 2.5" CAL.B & B EVERGREEN QTY PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE COMMON NAME 21 SIZE 2" CAL. ROOT B & B QUAKING ASPEN 3 3 2,510 SF #20 CONT. 6' HT SWAMP WHITE OAK BLACK HILLS SPRUCE SYMBOL VIBURNUM COMMON HACKBERRY BIRCH (SINGLE STEM & CLUMP) RED PINE DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS EVERGREEN SHRUB/ PERENNIAL MASSING B & B DOGWOOD #3 CONT. #1 CONT. BLACK-EYED SUSAN ORNAMENTAL DECIDUOUS NEW HORIZON ELM KARL FOERSTER DAYLILY IVORY SILK LILAC CRABAPPLE LILAC SPIREA 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B 2.5" CAL.B & B #20 CONT. #20 CONT. #20 CONT. 6' HT B & B #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #3 CONT. #1 CONT. #1 CONT. JUNIPER 6' HT B & B SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST LEGEND EXISTING TREES (TO REMAIN) EXISTING RAIN GARDEN/ STORMWATER AREA NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 PU D A M E N D M E N T 8 CO N C E P T U A L P L A N S LA N D S C A P E E X H I B I T SH E E T 9 O F 1 1 09 NOTE: EXISTING TREES REFLECT CONSTRUCTED IMPROVEMENTS AT THE END OF PHASE I. ALL PHASE II TREES ARE SHOWN PROPOSED. SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N K H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200 SMALLRETAIL SMALLRETAIL EXISTING APPLEBEE'S 6,000sf Q EXISTINGSIGNAL EXISTINGSIGNAL EXISTINGSIGNAL A E 4,800sfG 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A B U I L D I N G 9 D B T B U I L D I N G 1 0 R 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC S H I N G L E C R E E K T R A I L HATCH LEGEND: NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SHINGLE CR EEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 10 PUD AMENDMENT 8 CONCEPTUAL PLANS CIRCULATION EXHIBIT SHEET 10 OF 11 CC CC CC CC CC CC CC CC S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O .1 0 0 X E R X E S A V E N O R T H COUNTY RD NO 10 / BASS LAKE RD K EXISTINGSTORMWATER S T O R M W A T E R H F 14,000sf 9,500sf K H 11,200sf 7,500sf M 7,500sf O L 11,200 SMALLRETAIL SMALLRETAIL 6,000sf Q A E 4,800sfG 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf A B U I L D I N G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 B U I L D I N G 9 D B T B U I L D I N G 4 B U I L D I N G 5 B U I L D I N G 1 0 R B U I L D I N G 2 B U I L D I N G 3 6,673sf 19,800sf X 75,000sf Y W 6,300sf 6,600sf S N 12,541sf ENLARGED BUILDING X. RELOCATED D&U EASEMENT SUBDIVIDE LOT. MODIFIED SITE LAYOUT. RE-PLAT PARCELS ADDED BUILDING W. SMALLER BUILDINGS N & S. MODIFIED SITE LAYOUT. BUILDING DESIGNATION SCC ADDITION NO.LOT AREA BUILDING PARKING PROVIDEDRATIO EXISTING WALMART 1 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 18.05 ACRES 181,943 SQ. FT.889 SPACES 4.89 EXISTING APPLEBEES 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 0.87 ACRES 4,869 SQ. FT.53 SPACES 10.89 1,2,3,4,5 5 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 7.63 ACRES 79,508 SQ. FT.381 SPACES 4.79 10 5 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 0.93 ACRES 6,000 SQ. FT.33 SPACES 5.50 9 5 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 1.42 ACRES 13,332 SQ. FT.61 SPACES 4.58 6,7,8 5 LOT 6, BLOCK 1 2.07 ACRES 12,141 SQ. FT.60 SPACES 4.94 A 4 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.70 ACRES 7,322 SQ. FT.36 SPACES 4.92 B 4 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 1.45 ACRES 6,673 SQ. FT.32 SPACES 4.80 C 3 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 0.85 ACRES 2,488 SQ. FT.27 SPACES 10.85 D 2 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 0.98 ACRES 11,200 SQ. FT.50 SPACES 4.46 E 2 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 0.92 ACRES 4,800 SQ. FT.48 SPACES 10.00 F 6 LOT 1, BLOCK 2 1.19 ACRES 14,000 SQ. FT.63 SPACES 4.50 G 1 LOT 11, BLOCK 1 1.44 ACRES 8,420 SQ. FT.56 SPACES 6.65 H 3 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 1.25 ACRES 11,200 SQ. FT.55 SPACES 4.91 J 3 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 3.09 ACRES 38,000 SQ. FT.187 SPACES 4.92 K 1 LOT 10, BLOCK 1 1.19 ACRES 9,500 SQ. FT.45 SPACES 4.74 L 6 LOT 1, BLOCK 1 1.29 ACRES 11,200 SQ. FT.60 SPACES 5.36 M 6 LOT 2, BLOCK 1 1.05 ACRES 7,500 SQ. FT.67 SPACES 8.93 N 6 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 2.93 ACRES 12,541 SQ. FT.104 SPACES 8.29 O 6 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 0.81 ACRES 7,500 SQ. FT.38 SPACES 5.07 Q 6 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 1.83 ACRES 6,000 SQ. FT.58 SPACES 9.67 R 5 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 1.03 ACRES 5,400 SQ. FT.56 SPACES 10.37 S 6 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 -6,600 SQ. FT.34 SPACES 5.15 T 5 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 1.54 ACRES 5,500 SQ. FT.55 SPACES 10.00 W 6 LOT 2, BLOCK 2 1.10 ACRES 6,300 SQ. FT.50 SPACES 7.94 X 6 LOT 4, BLOCK 2 2.87 ACRES 19,800 SQ. FT.125 SPACES 6.31 Y 6 LOT 3, BLOCK 2 2.83 ACRES 75,000 SQ. FT.16 SPACES 0.21 TOTAL 61.31 ACRES 574,737 SQ. FT.2,739 SPACES 6.43 OVERALL SITE DATA TABLE * * INCLUDES PARKING ON LOT 2, BLOCK 2 SCC 6TH ADDITION SIGN LEGEND: NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 PUD AMENDMENT 8 CONCEPTUAL PLANS REVISIONS TO PREVIOUS PUD SHEET 11 OF 11 SHINGLE CR EEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 11 SYMBOL LEGEND: CO U N T Y R D N O 1 0 B A S S L A K E R O A D SHINGLE CRK PKWY S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 XERXES AVE NORTH NORTHWAY DRIVE CO U N T Y R D N O 1 0 B A S S L A K E R O A D XERXES AVE NORTH COUNTY RD NO 10 BASS LAKE ROAD KV EX I S T I N G F U L L AC C E S S T R A F F I C SI G N A L EX I S T I N G F U L L AC C E S S TR A F F I C S I G N A L EXISTINGTRAFFICSIGNAL S T A T E H I G H W A Y N O . 1 0 0 XERXES AVE NORTH CO U N T Y R D N O 1 0 / B A S S L A K E R D EXISTINGAPPLEBEES PR O P O S E D TR A I L PU D BO U N D A R Y (T Y P . ) PU D BO U N D A R Y (T Y P . ) EXISTINGFULLACCESS EX I S T I N G WA L M A R T EXISTINGSEARS NO R T H SC A L E FE E T 0 10 0 20 0 MA J O R V E H I C U L A R A C C E S S R O U T E S SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN12 MAJOR ACCESS ROUTES - PUD SHEET 12 OF 12 SY M B O L L E G E N D RE G I O N A L T R A I L PE D E S T R I A N C O N N E C T I O N S