Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 04-24 CCP Regular SessionAGENDA CITY COUNCIL STUDY SESSION April 24, 2017 6:00 p.m. City Hall Council Chambers A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the podium. 1.City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions 2.Miscellaneous a. Preemption Legislation 3.Discussion of Work Session Agenda Items as Time Permits 4.Adjourn [I]1tio1Aii.' April 25, 2017 Tim Willson Mayor Honorable Governor Mark Dayton Office of the Governor and Lt. Governor 130 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Honorable Senator Paul Gazelka, Majority Leader Minnesota Senate Bldg., Room 3113 95 University Avenue W. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Honorable Representative Kurt Daudt, Speaker of the House 463 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Dear Governor Dayton, Majority Leader Gazelka, and Speaker Daudt: I am writing to urge you to protect local control and oppose/veto any legislation (HF 600/SF 580) that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. It is local governments that are on the front lines fighting to protect public health and safety and setting modern workplace standards that work for local communities. State law sets a minimum standard that local governments can build and improve on. Local governments have a keen understanding of the diverse needs of the local communities throughout Minnesota; thereby, making local government the most equipped and able unit of government to effectively respond to diverse community needs. Now, state legislators are attempting to interfere with the democratic process and strip local elected governments of their basic governing power and responsibility. HF 600/SF 580 has real consequences for real people. The proposal would take away earned sick time from 150,000 working Minnesotans. This vulnerable group of working people, many who work multiple jobs just to make ends meet, would be forced to go back to choosing between a paycheck and taking care of their health and family. Please oppose/veto any legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. Sincerely, Tim Willson Mayor Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION IN OPPOSITION TO H.F. 600 AND S.F. 580 REGARDING EXPRESS PREEMPTION; UNIFORMITY OF PRIVATE EMPLOYER MANDATES WHEREAS, it is local governments that are on the front lines fighting to protect public health and safety and set modern workplace standards for local communities. But, as more communities try to enact local health, wage, and workplace reforms, they are being blocked by Corporate Interference, a.k.a. "Preemption" laws that strip local governments of their law-making authority; and WHEREAS, the push to enact Corporate Interference laws in Minnesota, including House File 600 and Senate File 580, is part of an alarming effort around the country in which powerful corporate interests, such as the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), interfere in the democratic process and stop the people of a local community from passing their own laws that improve upon statewide minimum standards; and WHEREAS, the effort in Minnesota is a transparent effort to stop improvements being made in Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Duluth, and by the Metropolitan Airports Commission, as well as in other communities, and has real consequences: The proposal would take away earned sick time from 150,000 Minnesotans. These workers would have to go back to choosing between a paycheck and taking care of their health and family; and WHEREAS, the Minnesota Legislature has reserved to local governments the authority to act in the best interest of their residents (provided their actions don't conflict with state or federal law), and this includes the authority to act to protect public and private property, to benefit trade and commerce, and to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of local residents; and WHEREAS, this division of powers between federal, state, and local government is a strength of our system and it is there for a reason: communities have diverse needs that only local government can be responsive to; and WHEREAS, corporate priorities shouldn't interfere with local control. State law sets a minimum standard that local governments can build and improve upon. This attack on local autonomy would have far-reaching and lasting impacts on families, communities, workers, and their local representatives, including: • Working families in cities across the state would see basic workplace standards suppressed; • Local residents' opportunities for political participation would be severely weakened; • Low-income workers who have been stepping into leadership positions in RESOLUTION NO. municipal policy development commissions around the state would have their voices taken away; Without the authority to make workplaces safer for workers, consumers, or the public, local government's ability to promote public health and the safety of their residents would be curtailed; Mayors, City Councilmembers, County Commissioners, School Boardmembers, Park District Commissioners, members of the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Council, and other local elected officials would be stripped of basic powers they have had for decades. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center that the City of Brooklyn Center go on the record in opposition to House File 600, Senate File 580 and any other legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Brooklyn Center notify Governor Mark Dayton and Legislative Leaders of the adoption of this Resolution, and ask them to oppose/veto any legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. r.rnti :i.ijjjY From: Curt Boganey Sent: Saturday, April 8, 2017 12:19 PM To: BC City Council Cc: Sharon Knutson Subject: FW: Preemption Legislation Attachments: Preemption legislation 2017 Session.zip City Council, Per the request of the Mayor, This item will be added to the Study Session on Monday. Curt Boganey From: Tim Willson Sent: Tuesday, April 4, 2017 2:34 PM To: Curt Boganey Subject: Preemption Legislation Curt I've zipped up a packet of information from the discussion this morning with Afreda Princess Daniels. These are scanned documents from a packet of material she provided. I'd like to see two things with this. Ones is add it to our next study session for the Council to consider a letter. There are examples in the files. Second if the Council so desires there is a sample resolution we can work with and if approved by the Council send to the Governor, Legislative leads, and our Legislators. Mayor Tim Willson Brooklyn Center "A great place to start, A great place to stay" Start by doing what's necessary, Then do what's possible, You'll discover you are doing, What you previously thought was Impossible. mayorwillson(ci.brooklVn-center.mn .u5 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.Orcl/ phone: 763-503-5729 voice: 763-569-3450 "Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail" HF600 SECOND ENGROSSMENT REVISOR SS H0600-2 This Document can be made available in alternative formats upon request State of Minnesota HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES NINETIET'If SESSION H. F. No. 600 01/30/2017 Authored by Garofalo, Howe, Peppin, Pelowski, Marquart and others The bill was read for the first time and referred to the Committee on Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance 02/06/2017 Adoption of Report: Amended and re-referred to the Committee on Government Operations and Elections Policy 02/09/2017 Adoption of Report: Re-referred to the Committee on Ways and Means 02/27/2017 Adoption of Report: Placed on the General Register as Amended Read for the Second Time 03/02/2017 Calendar for the Day Read for the Third Time Passed by the 1-louse and transmitted to the Senate 1.1 A bill for an act 1.2 relating to employment; providing uniformity for employment mandates on private 1.3 employers; proposing coding for new law in Minnesota Statutes, chapter 181. 1.4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA: 1.5 Section 1. TITLE. 1.6 This act shall be titled the "Uniform State Labor Standards Act." 1.7 Sec. 2. [181.7411 EXPRESS PREEMPTION; UNIFORMITY OF PRIVATE 1.8 EMPLOYER MANDATES. 1.9 Subdivision 1. Definitions. (a) For the purposes of this section, the terms defined in this 1.10 subdivision have the meanings given them. 1.11 (b) "Employer" means a private person employing one or more employees in the state. 1.12 (c) "Local government" means a home rule charter city, statutory city, town, county, the 1.13 Metropolitan Council, a metropolitan agency as defined in section 473.121, subdivision 5a, 1.14 or a special district. 1.15 Subd. 2. Express preemption. (a) A local government must not adopt, enforce, or person employing one or more employees in the state. 1.12 ocaJoemiflent's means a home rule charter city, statutory city, town, County, the 1.13 Metro po litanCouncil , a metropolitan agency as defined in section 473.121, subdi vi s ion Sa, 1.14 or a special district. us Subd.2.P reemjo a) A local government must not adopt, enforce, or 1.16 administer an ordinance, local resolution, or local policy requiring an employer to pay an 1.17 the applicable state minimum w a ge rate provided in section 1.18 177.24. 1.19 (b) A local governr 1.20 resolution, or local Do]' i3.iust not wee, or administer an ordinance, local iring an to provide either paid or unpaid leave time. Sec. 2. HF600 SECOND ENGROSSMENT REVISOR SS H0600-2 2.1 (c) A local government must not adopt, enforce, or administer an ordinance, local 2.2 resolution, or local policy regulating the hours or scheduling of work time that an employer 2.3 provides to an employee. This paragraph does not preempt an ordinance, local resolution, 2.4 or local policy limiting the hours a business may operate. 2.5 (d) A local government must not adopt, enforce, or administer an ordinance, local 2.6 resolution, or local policy requiring an employer to provide an employee a particular benefit, 2.7 feri3a of employment, or working condition. 2.8 Subd. 3. Local governments as employers and contractors This section does not 2.9 regulate wages, hours, benefits, paid or unpaid leave, attendance policies, or other terms of 2.10 employment or working conditions that a local government: 2.11 (1) provides to its own employee; 2.12 (2) requires an employer to provide to its employee to the extent that employer is 2,13 providing goods or services to the local government, and the requirement applies specifically 2.14 to work performed in providing goods or services to the local government; or 2.15 (3) requires an employer to provide to its employee to the extent that employer is 2.16 receiving funding from the local government or is providing goods or services funded in 2.17 whole or in part by the local government, when the requirement is an express condition of 2.18 the funding. 2.19 EFFECTIVE DATE. This section is effective upon final enactment and applies to 2.20 ordinances, local policies, and local resolutions enacted on or after January 1, 2016. ALFREDA DANIELS Community Organizer Minneapolis Regional Labor Federation,AFL AFL-GO 4ao Office. 612.379.4206 ext. 105 312 Central Avenue, Suite 542 Cell: 320.224.7095 Minneapolis, MN 55414-1097 Fax: 612.379.1307 vww.minneapolisunions.org E-mail: alfredatminneapolisunions.org PROTECT LOCAL CONTROL Key points: 1)H.F. 600 has real consequences. The proposal would take away earned sick time from 150,000 Minnesotans. These workers would have to go back to choosing between a paycheck and taking care of their health and family. 2)Corporate priorities shouldn't interfere with local control. State law sets a minimum standard that local governments can build and improve on. 3) Communities have diverse needs that only local government can be responsive to. Throughout the state, local governments are at risk of losing their basic governing power. DO •o Talk about the issue in the context of local communities building upon state minimums o Make it clear why states are intervening (corporate interest, not a state issue) o Assert values we all share: Local government exist for a reason—some issues are best decided at the local level • Affirm need for local government and the need to protect local control • Emphasize that it's easier to access and hold local elected officials accountable o Connect it to issues people already know and care about (earned sick time) o Give specific examples to illustrate the problem—stakes could also include wages, fracking, local limits on pollution o Note: The public has problems with intrusion. (People understand there are different costs of living and believe that local minimum wage standards can best reflect those differences.) DON'T • Demonize state government • Make this a partisan issue • Use corporate spin, i.e. 'Patchwork" 11 CONNECTING & INNOVATING SINCE 1913 February 23, 2017 Representative Pat Garofalo 485 State Office Building 100 Rev, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. St. Paul, MN 55 155 Subject: HF 600—Employment mandates on private, employers uniformity provided Dear Representative Garofalo, The League of Minnesota Cities (LMC), a statewide association representing 833 of Minnesota's 853 cities, respectfully opposes HF 600, a bill that preempts local governments from imposing certain employment mandates on private employers, The bill is in conflict with the League's long held core value that local elected decisionmakers are in the best position to determine what health, safety and welfare regulations best serve their constituents, Ordinances at the local level are enacted only after a comprehensive, legal and open process. Local units of government are required to. publish notices about meetings where policies will be discussed and decisions will be made. Under the state's Open Meeting Law, these discussions and decisions must occur in meetings that are accessible to members of the public. Just like state legislative leaders, local elected officials are held accountable through Minnesota's robust elections process. Preservation of local control in Minnesota has yielded statewide benefits. Cities are often laboratories for determining public policy approaches to the challenges that face residents and businesses, For example, recognizing secondhand smoke is a leading cause of preventable death in the United States, multiple cities implemented smoking bans in public places in the early 2000s, Public acceptance of smoking restrictions led to the 2007 Freedom to Breathe Act, an amendment to the Minnesota Clean Indoor Air Act, Please note the LMC does not object to the language in section 2, subdivision 3, which explicitly authorizes local governments as employers and contractors to regulate wages, benefits, terms of employment, working conditions or attendance policies. Sincerely, Anne Finn Assistant Intergovernmental Relations Director 14$ UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST FHOE (651) 281-1200 rAx (6S1) 281-1299ST, PAUL, MN 55103-2044 TOIL FREE (800) 925.1122 WEB: WWWLMcORG METRO CITIES -11 Association of Metropolitan Municipalities February 2, 2017 Representative Pat Garofalo, Chair, and Committee Members House Job Growth and Energy Affordability Policy and Finance Committee Dear Chair Garofalo and Members: Metro Cities, an association representing 90 cities in the seven-county metropolitan area before the Legislature and Executive Branch, is writing to respectfully oppose HF 600. This legislation mandates statewide uniformity on employment practices, and preempts local governments from imposing local regulations on private employers. Metro Cities policies support local control and decision-making authority. Locally elected officials are in the best position to respond to a community's specific needs and should be allowed to make appropriate local decisions. Metro Cities' policies overall oppose statutory or other policy restrictions that would impede the ability of local officials to act and protect the best interests of the community. In supporting local decision making authority, Metro Cities policies recognize that what works for one community may not for another, and thus, flexibility that allows local officials to respond to the needs and circumstances of their communities is important, and must be maintained. HF 600 removes local decision making authority and Metro Cities must respectfully oppose this legislative approach. We look forward to working with you and the committee in the future, Thank you. Sinly, jatrieia INauman Executive Director 145 University Ave We St. Paul, MN 55103-2044 e Phone (651) 215-4000 e Fax (651) 281-1299 0 www.MetroCltlesMN.org City Council - 8th Ward 3505. Fifth St', Room 307 Minneapolis, MN 55415 TEL 612.673.2208 www.minneapoilsmn.gov Minneapolis City of Lakes Febrt.thry 27, 2017 Dear Chair Knoblach and Members of the House Ways and Means Committee: On bhalf of the City ofMinneàolis, I am writing to express our opposition to HF 600, which would prohibit local units of government from being able to respond to constituent needs regarding paid sick and safe time, rnihimu rn wages, and Other workplace issues, As locally elected offidalsin the City of Minnèpoli, our 'residents elected 'us'td listen and respond to the needs of'our community In orderto be in the best position to represent Our constituents as noted In our legislative agenda ap:iroved by the Mayor and CityCouncil, the-Cfty sup p orts "efforts t in'a,Fiitalh or enhance local governance, and opposes efforts by the legislature to Interfere In local government decisIon making authority." We uflderstand'that thE stated purpose fort bill IIIe N 6b0 is to aThid, ituation'that has been describedas a"patchworl' of policies related to wages; ben'efits. and time off; As I have testified at several legislative hearings, tha City of Minneapolis supports statewide action on these issues, such as an increase in the state minimum wage 'arid a state safel and sick time policy, However, Ththe,absence of action .tthe state or .federa) level, and in response to Tholisapds of eeside "n%-de mandlrig action from the City ofWinn*MinneoB'weeicteda paid sick and safe -0ttmeô'rdianca in In the, development Of ourordinance,. WE'sô'uh't 1ghfian't.and divërsestakehcilder input We foundthat many employers In the City already have good workplace policies that allow workers time off to address health and medical needs. However we also found that appoimathly 41% Of Minhe'apbls workers do not have access to paid ^ick time, many of whom work in the service Industry, where going to work sick can iTrippct the public health of co-workers and customers. As locally elected offlciaI:repres'entihg the residents of the City of Minneapolis,'we have a unique lens on the needs and concerns of our residents ) and are best able to respond to those needs when we have the ability to dO so. The 'provisions in HF 600 would undermine our ability to address the needs of our residents, and would take sick and safe time away from thousands of Minnesotans who will begin earning it under our local ordinance. We askthat you not approve the proposal and that you stand with us in support of allowing locally elected leaders to represent their constituents. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Elizabeth Glidden CITY OF SAINT PAUL OFFICE OF THE CITY COUNCIL February 23, 2017 ChainnanJimKnoblacth nd 'members of the Ways and Means Committee: Wrthe'ir1t'Pa1Jl CitSrouncil, are writing today in opppsitlon to I 6QO the local prethptin, bill. Thi s bitI not only specifically seeks to preempt local control on wages, earned safe and sicktirne and scheduling requirements, butubd 2 (.4 also offers a broad "catchall" provision to cover most a fly aspect of employment As-outlined in the city's 2017 legislative agebda this bill clearly runs contrary to our fiYm po5ltloh "the state should flgt enact litiat1ves that erode the fundamental pr'lhclp.le. of localcontrol in. cities across Minnesota."' iQci cflfftbI ia 'oU democracy. C!ty lecta official 6 ked;wih,undrthndtig and resØoridlng to the rieeds of their citizeris Ina finer-grained way than is possible at the state Or -,ha io 0 ll know from mpresehtirig your districts, each of our cities has its own unique character and needa and It s vltl that the officials i'ectetJ to raeeritiity residents be ble to respond to th0to needs as they see fit Please don't work to undermine th crittcallyTmportarit relationship between us as iocaIlij elected officials nd our contituehts tth fèct of'thi billon th. d-ickó'dSafTineorcfl'ñan.ce that vie: passed in September of O-I at the request apd with the support of our citizens This-bill would not onlyretract our diligent work withur communItto mss our ørd nance but It also does iothtng to offei a statewide replacepent Or solution In thet tlltliât 1rdtucts our resIdhts, citie .riüst ha\ié freadomto. at.onoup own. 'We wouIdwe!cbrne the opporthnity ) on the other hand)o.woikwith or Iwhtwid re ,iIcate.tle,good-'work we have done in Saint Paul across the State of Minnesota Ensuring that no one has to choose between going to work sick and payinS rentor between goin,g to work sick arid losing a Job, should be a non-partisan issue for the State of M1nnes0ta This Is- particularly true in a time when the conversations at the federJ level leave Mrnnestans with of their health care. 1tJested p'rolgsm oke free environment's fbr fanillle$ 'and lt!es are agaifl ladig tQ' ns1jre fmiJles have a reasonable safe arid sick time benefit in times of strife If the federal government proposed a bill to re-empt Minflesota ,nd ,t rsthtesfrom taking action on behalf of their reidents,what would your position 'be? 'Thank, you foryour time and consideration. Sincerely, an Bostrom Amy Brendmoen Rebecca N,ocker Jane Priflce Russ Stark Dal Thao Chris Tolbrt CrrYliALL SAflrTPATJL. MUNBSOTA 551 02-1 6i5 6511266-8640 AA-ADA-SEO Emp)oyc Governor Mark Dayton Office of the Governor and Lt. Governor 30 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Senator Paul Gazelka, Majority Leader Minnesota Senate Bldg., Room 3113 95 University Avenue W. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Representative Kurt Daudt, Speaker of the House 463 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Dear Governor Dayton, Majority Leader Galzelka, and Speaker Daudt, I am writing to urge you to protect local control and oppose/veto any legislation (HF 600/SF 580) that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy thatexceeds state or federal law. ocal governments are on the front lines in the fight to protect public health and safety and set nodern workplace standards that work for our communities. State law sets a minimum standard that local governments can build and improve on. Minnesota communities have diverse needs that o nlylocal government can be responsive to. Now, state legislators are attempting to interfere with the democratic process and strip local elected governments of their their basic governing power. HF 600/SF 580 also has real consequences for real people. The proposal would take away earned sick time from 150,000 working Minnesotans. These working people, many who have multiple jobs just to make ends meet, would have to go back to choosing between a paycheck and taking care oftheir health and family. Please oppose/veto any legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federallaw. Sincerely, Name: Thcted Office: Address: City, Zip: Governor Mark Dayton Office of the Governor and Lt. Governor 130 State Capitol 75 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Senator Paul Gazelka, Majority Leader Minnesota Senate Bldg., Room 3113 95 University Avenue W. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Representative Kurt Daudt, Speaker of the House 463 State Office Building 100 Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd. Saint Paul, MN 55155 Dear Governor Dayton, Majority Leader Galzelka, and Speaker Daudt, I am writing to urge you to protect local control and oppose/veto any legislation (HF 600/SF 580) that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. Local governments are on the front lines in the fight to protect public health and safety and set modern workplace standards that work for our communities. State law sets a minimum standard that local governments can build and improve on. Minnesota communities have diverse needs that local government can be responsive to. Now, state legislators are attempting to interfere with the democratic process and strip local elected governments of their their basic governing power. HF 600/SF 580 also has real consequences for real people. The proposal would take away earned sick time from 150,000 working Minnesotans. These working people, many who have multiple jobs just to make ends meet, would have to go back to choosing between a paycheck and taking care oftheir health and family. Please oppose/veto any legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. Sincerely, Name: Elected Office: Address: City, Zip: PROTECT LO CA L CONTROL WHEREAS: Local governments are on the frontlines in the fight to protect public health and safety and set modern workplace standards. But as more communities try to enact local health, wage and workplace reforms, they are being blocked by Corporate Interference, a.k.a. "Preemption" laws that strip local governments of their law-making authority; and WHEREAS: The push to enact Corporate Interference laws in Minnesota, including House File 600 and Senate File 580, is part of an alarming effort around the country in which powerful corporate interests, such as the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), interfere in the democratic process and stop the people of a local community from passing their own laws that improve upon statewide minimum standards; and WHEREAS: The effort in Minnesota is a transparent effort to stop improvements being made in Minneapolis, Saint Paul, Duluth, and by the Metropolitan Airports Commission, as well as in other communities, and has real consequences: The proposal would take away earned sick time from 150,000 Minnesotans. These workers would have to go back to choosing between a paycheck and taking care of their health and family; and WHEREAS: The Minnesota Legislature has reserved to local governments the authority to act in the best interest of their residents (provided their actions don't conflict with state or federal law), and this includes the authority to act to protect public and private property, to benefit trade and commerce, and to promote the iealth, safety, and general welfare of local residents; and WHEREAS: This division of powers between federal, state, and local government is a strength of our system and it is there for a reason: communities have diverse needs that only local government can be responsive to; and WHEREAS: Corporate priorities shouldn't interfere with local control. State law sets a minimum standard that local governments can build and improve upon. This attack on local autonomy would have far-reaching and lasting impacts on families, communities, workers, and their local representatives, including: • Working families in cities across the state would see basic workplace standards suppressed; • Local residents' opportunities for political participation would be severely weakened; • Low-income workers who have been stepping into leadership positions in municipal policy development commissions around the state would have their voices taken away; • Without the authority to make workplaces safer for workers, consumers, or the public, local government's ability to promote public health and the safety of their residents would be curtailed; • Mayors, City Councilmembers, County Commissioners, School Boardmembers, Park District Commissioners, members of the Metropolitan Airports Commission and the Metropolitan Council, and other local elected officials would be stripped of basic powers they have had for decades; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: That the [X], go on the record in opposition to House File 600, Senate File 580 and any other legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law; and 3E IT FURTHER RESOLVED: That the [X] notify Governor Mark Dayton and Legislative Leaders of the adoption of this Resolution, and ask them to oppose/veto any legislation that interferes with or preempts local governments' authority to enact ordinances related to the minimum wage or any other benefit, term of employment, working condition, or attendance or leave policy that exceeds state or federal law. Glil, LOCAL rJewish ICommunity1 Land Stewardship Project im Page 1 of I February 14, V I O pposing SF 5110 Mr. Chair, Committee Members, Good morning. My name is Brad Lehto and I am Legislative Director/Chief of Staff at the Minnesota AFL-CIO, the labor federation representing our state's unions. We are the educators, nurses, firefighters, building trades, public employees, industrial, retail, and service workers who make a difference in our communities every day. We are Minnesota's labor movement and we stand united in support of local democracy and in OPPOSITION to Senate File 580. The MN AFL-CIO supports the ability of workers' right to organize and bargain collectively. That being said we stand will all working families in the state of Minnesota. We oppose HF 580 for all workers The committee has a clear choice today that will impact local communities, local families - all working Minnesotans. If enacted, this bill would immediately deny paid sick days to more than ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND working Minnesotans. It would stop residents, businesses, and their local elected officials from deciding whether they should improve conditions for the people who work in their communities. And it would send a message to Minnesotans that local democracy doesn't matter. Mr. Chair, Committee Members, there has been talk in various committees about anti-workers ordinances that might be considered on the local level. Make no mistake, the Labor movement sees that kind of talk for what it really is; an attempt to distract and divide. Well, it won't work. It won't work because the labor movement's support for local control is not just about us as union members. We are committed to protecting local democracy to benefit all working people. And no matter how much window dressing, there's no eliminating the fact that this bill would sp communities from improving working conditions. I strongly urge you to vote NO. Thank you. CITY COUNCIL MEETING City of Brooklyn Center April 24, 2017 AGENDA 1.Informal Open Forum with City Council - 6:45 p.m. —provides an opportunity for the public to address the Council on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the Council will be for clarification only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing the citizen for informational purposes only. 2.Invocation - 7 p.m. 3.Call to Order Regular Business Meeting —The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the podium. 4.Roll Call 5.Pledge of Allegiance 6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda —The following items are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration Items. a. Approval of Minutes 1.April 5, 2017— Joint Session with City Advisory Commissions 2.April 10, 2017 - Study Session 3.April 10, 2017— Regular Session 4.April 10, 2017 - Work Session b. Licenses C. Resolution Approving and Authorizing Execution of Joint Powers Authority Dissolution Agreement Relating to Fire Training Facility Association d.Resolution Amending the Special Assessment Fees for 5250 Great View Ave N e.Resolution Authorizing the Community Activities, Recreation and Services Department to Apply For Grant Funding Through the Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant Program CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -2- April 24, 2017 f.Resolution Accepting a Feasibility Report, Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Calling for Improvement and Assessment Public Hearings for Improvement Project No. 2016-05, 57th Avenue Street Improvements, and Improvement Project Nos. 2017-10 and 2017-11, 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Avenue and France Avenue) g.Resolution Designating 2017 Planting List of Allowable Boulevard Tree Species h. Resolution Recognizing the Designation of Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA for the Twenty-Fifth Consecutive Year 7. Presentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a.Proclamation Declaring April 28, 2017, to be Arbor Day and May 2017 to be Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt proclamation. b.Proclamation Declaring May 21-27, 2017, Public Works Week in the City of Brooklyn Center Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt proclamation. 8. Public Hearings —None. 9.Planning Commission Items a. A Request Submitted by Nicholas Standal for a Simple Lot Division to Re- Establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as Two Separate Tax Parcels —The Planning Commission recommended unanimous approval (by 5-0 vote) of this request at its March 30, 2017, meeting. 1. Resolution Regarding a Request Submitted by Nicholas Standal Authorizing Approval of a Simple Land Division to Re-Establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as Two Separate Tax Parcels (6145 & 6131 Camden Ave N) Requested Council Action: —Motion to adopt resolution. 10.Council Consideration Items a. Consideration of Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental Licenses 1.4200 Woodbine La 2.Resolution Approving a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 6106 Aldrich Ave N 3. Resolution Approving a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 7048 France Ave N CITY COUNCIL AGENDA -3- April 24, 2017 Requested Council Action: —Mayor poli audience for applicants to address Council. —Receive staff report. —Motion to open hearing. —Receive testimony from applicants. —Motion to close hearing. —Take action on rental license applications and mitigation plans. b. Mayoral Appointment of Financial Commissioner Requested Council Action: —Motion to ratify Mayoral nomination. 11.Council Report 12.Adjournment AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION April 24, 2017 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the podium. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1.Branding & Identity Campaign 2.Water Tower No. 3 Painting Project Update PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1.Liquor License Regulations 2.South Opportunity Site Development 3.Strategic Plan Update 4.Community Center HVAC Update 5.Conducting City Council Business Electronically 6.Water Meter Failure Update 7. Community Dialogue SIE:!&tuLiiuiILldhV Agenda U('IUU No. l MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA RECEPTION AND JOINT WORK SESSION WITH CITY COMMISSIONS APRIL 5, 2017 COMMUNITY CENTER - CONSTITUTION HALL RECEPTION A reception and general conversation period was held in Constitution Hall from 6:00 p.m. until 6:20 p.m. .IS] 1 I] The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Joint Work Session with the Charter, Financial, Housing, Northwest Hennepin Human Services Council, Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications, Park and Recreation, Planning, and Shingle Creek and West Mississippi Watershed Management Commissions and was called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:25 p.m. INTRODUCTIONS Mayor Willson welcomed the commissioners and stated appreciation for staff and commissioners. City Manager Curt Boganey welcomed all those in attendance. He stated he appreciated all their work and guidance. IN ATTENDANCE Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. City Staff present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Activities, Recreation & Services Director Jim Glasoe, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Interim Communications Coordinator/Planning Specialist Angel Smith, Deputy Director of Building and Community Standards Jesse Anderson, and Deputy City Clerk Rozlyn Tousignant. Commissioners present were Charter Commissioners Donald Bumgarner, Kathryn Eligren, Charlene Johnson, Robert Marvin, Beverly Rieschl, Abraham Rizvi, Susan Warner; Financial Commissioners Anna Burke, Jeffrey Dobbs, Rex Newman (also NWSCC), Dean Van Der Werf; Housing Commissioner Kathie Amdahl, David Johnson, Kathleen Nelson, Susan Pagnac; Park & Recreation Commissioners Travis Bonovsky, Jill Dalton, Gail Ebert, Thomas Schinnick, Jerome Witalka; Planning Commissioners Randall Christensen, John MacMillan, Abraham Rizvi, Stephen Schonning, Susan Tade; and Watershed Commissioner David Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commissioner Darryl Sannes. 04/05/17 -1- DRAFT PRESENTATIONS BY CITY COMMISSIONS Charter Commission: Charter Commissioner Robert Marvin provided an overview of the Commission. In 2016, Charter Commission began looking at election procedures and policies. Financial Commission: Financial Commission Chair Rex Newman provided an overview of the Commission activities. The primary goal is to work on the budget. The Commission worked with the Mayor and City Council, City Manager and Staff. The Commission is continuing to focus the success and improvement of the Centerbrook Golf Course. Housing Commission: Housing Commissioner Susan Pagnac provided a PowerPoint overview of the Housing Commission activities. Updates were provided about the New Neighbor Welcome Program, recommendation of porch setback regulations and curbside clean-up, as well as review of the senior housing and opportunity site plans. Northwest Suburbs Cable Communications Commission: NWSCC Commissioner Darryl Sannes provided a brief overview of the Commission. Park and Recreation Commission: Park and Recreation Commissioner Thomas Schinnick provided a PowerPoint overview of Park and Recreation Commission activities. The Commission participated in several activities including reviewing capital improvements, park monitoring, neighborhood meetings, Centerbrook Golf Course improvements and continued C.A.R.S Activities monitoring. Planning Commission: Planning Commission Chair Randall Christensen provided a PowerPoint overview of the Commission activities. Questions were asked regarding several Capital Improvement Projects expected to take place in 2017. After the Commission reports, Mr. Boganey thanked the Commissioners for their hard work and service and opened the floor to questions. Council input was very positive. Randall Christensen (Planning) asked a question for the Park and Rec Commission about any smoking/e-cig bans in the City parks. Councilmember April Graves stated that the Youth Council brought that issue to the Council. Councilmember Graves asked a question regarding opportunities for community organizations to attend various Commission meetings. Mayor Willson explained the process. Mr. Boganey addressed the question as well by explaining the role of the staff liaison for the Commissions. Other input was offered for community groups wanting to stay informed on Council and Commission action such as the meetings being recorded and posted online, open forum opportunities, etc. Commissioner Rex Newman (Financial) made a point to thank City Clerk Sharon Knutson for her dedication to working with the Commissions. Mr. Boganey also made a point to thank Mrs. Knutson as well as all of the City staff working with the various Commissions. A discussion occurred regarding the City of Brooklyn Center's 'broad' definition of a Council Meeting to ensure proper adherence to State Law. Mayor Willson highlighted that electronic 04/05/17 -2- DRAFT forms of communication do in fact constitute a quorum and to be mindful of that when using various forms of group communication. Mr. Boganey added to that by advising Commissioners to use their staff liaison as a resource to disseminate information among the Commission. Mr. Boganey then invited the Mayor up to present Certificates of Perfect Attendance to commissioners who attended all of their Commission meetings in 2016. Recipients included Charter Commission- Mark Goodell, Mawuli Blabuh, Gary Brown, Donald Bumganier, Robert Marvin, Mary O'Connor, Beverly Rieschl, Mark Yelich; Housing Commission- Kathleen Nelson; Financial Commission- Rex Newman; Park and Recreation Commission- Travis Bonovsky, Jill Dalton, Thomas Schinnick, Jerome Witalka; Planning Commission- Stephen Schonning. For those commissioners who were not able to attend, the certificates were given to the Commission Chairs for distribution. Mayor Willson thanked everyone for their dedication and attendance. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjourned by Mayor Willson at 7:20 p.m. 04/05/17 -3- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION APRIL 10, 2017 CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS till] i o a The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:00 p.m. Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan were also present. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Deputy Director of Building and Community Standards Jesse Anderson, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Michaela Ku] awa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS Mayor Willson requested the following correction to the Study Session minutes of March 27th, 2017: Page 2, Paragraph 5, Line 2: "Thursday. March 30th 2017, Dr. Burrowes author of "Between the Kola Forest and the Salty Sea" will be at the Brooklyn Park Community. Activity Center, from 12 p.m. - 2 p.m." Mayor Willson also requested the following correction to the Work Session minutes of March 27th, 2017: Page 3, Paragraph 2, Line 1: "Mayor Willson noted about six or seven years ago he had also requested this issue be brought for Council discussion." It was the majority consensus of the City Council to accept the correction to the March 27th, 2017, Study Session and Work Session minutes. MISCELLANEOUS Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she hadn't had time to review miscellaneous item 2a 04/10/17 -1- DRAFT and asked Mayor Willson for a brief overview on the Preemption Legislation item. Mayor Willson stated currently cities have legal authority to make certain laws such as choosing the minimum wage. He stated if this passes the federal law will displace state law and cities will no longer get to make these choices for their city. He stated they will need to make a decision soon before Legislation acts on this item. Councilmember Ryan stated he feels it should be left to the discretion of the cities to make decisions based on the wants and needs of the citizens. He reviewed the League of Minnesota Cities letter, which expressed their thoughts on the topic; they have been following the issue closely he noted. Mayor Willson suggested giving the Councilmembers time to review the documents and then bring this item back for review at the next Council meeting. He stated hopefully action isn't taken on it in the meantime. Councilmember Ryan stated another bill the State is looking at is the T-Mobile Small Cell Preemption Bill. He stated he believes this is something that should be managed by the City Public Works Department so they can retain local control of certain issues like these. Mayor Willson stated Reverse Referendum is something they have talked about in legislation as well. He stated he isn't certain where that is in the process. Councilmember Ryan stated it is bad policy in his opinion. Mr. Boganey stated he could draft a resolution on this item for the next City Council meeting. He stated that way if the Councilmembers have reached a decision on the direction they want to go, they can move forward immediately. Mayor Willson stated he thinks that is a great idea and that staff should move forward with that draft. City Attorney Gilchrist stated as of this morning he heard that the Right-of-way Bill (small cell preemption) will not be moving forward this session and noted he feels this is good news. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated, after being absent at the last meeting, she was pleased to see the Councilmembers made the decision to move forward with getting new logo ideas. She stated that citizens have expressed on social media that they like the "Great place to start, great place to stay". Councilmember Ryan stated his principle objection was with the logos and he hopes they get some better options. Councilmember Butler stated she has seen an increase in the garbage at local businesses and thanked Mr. Boganey for working with her on getting the retail areas clean and holding them accountable. She stated Earth Day is coming up and it is important to remember ways to keep the City clean. Mayor Willson noted Brooklyn Center isn't a unique City, and stated with the snow melting recently, you start to see a lot of the garbage that accumulated through the winter months. Mayor 04/10/17 -2- DRAFT Willson stated he agrees with Councilmember Butler and would like to see the City be as clean as it can be. Mr. Boganey stated one of the critical elements to keeping the business clean is getting the landlords, owners, and residents to agree it's in everyone's best interest to keep the City clean. He also stated when a business doesn't keep their garbage containers emptied and as a result they have garbage flying around, those businesses will be held accountable for not maintaining and containing the garbage per the City Ordinances. Councilmember Graves stated she has gotten a notice about the parks having a lot of garbage in them and asked who would be responsible for that upkeep. Mr. Boganey stated Brooklyn Center City workers are responsible. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if staff can look into getting some signs to post stating prohibition of panhandling. Mayor Willson stated he and Mr. Boganey talked about this issue a week ago and noted Mr. Boganey is looking into it. Mr. Boganey stated if Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson or Mayor Willson could let him know what city has the sign they are referencing that would be helpful. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she will look it up and send it to him. Mayor Willson stated on 66th there is a person soliciting money from people using a stick with a fishing net attached to the end of the stick. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated at Bass Lake Road some panhandlers actually step into the street. Mayor Willson stated a lot of them do that. Mayor Willson stated he would like to note that on April 18, 2017, at 7 p.m. at the Brooklyn Center Community Center Constitution Hall, the Police and Citizens Awards Ceremony will be held. He stated he encourages everyone to go if they can make it and noted it is an annual event that is great to attend. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated the Housing Commission and Park and Recreation Commission both are scheduled for the same time as the Police and Citizens Awards Ceremony and asked which they should attend. Mayor Willson replied and stated they can attend whichever. they prefer however noted the Commission meetings are monthly and this event is only once a year. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS WATER METER FAILURE RATE - MR. LILLEHAUG Mr. Lillehaug introduced this item and provided a presentation and history on this item. Discussion of this item continued and reached conclusion at the April 10, 2017, Work Session. 04/10/17 -3- DRAFT ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Study Session at 6:45 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 04/10/17 -4- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION APRIL 10, 2017 CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Deputy Director of Building and Community Standards Jesse Anderson, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Michaela Kujawa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Mayor Tim Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Dianne Sannes, 7006 Willow Lane, addressed the City Council. She stated there is a presentation on the issue of human trafficking in Hennepin County on April 12, 2017, from 11 a.m. to 12 p.m., at Brooklyn United Methodist Church located at 7200 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center. She stated Amanda Koonjbeharry will be speaking and it will be a great and informative presentation. She stated there is a new bus in town, a mobile market bus that is a grocery store on wheels. She stated it has frozen foods and other items you can find in a typical food market and at comparable cost to other grocery stores. She stated the bus is around every Saturday afternoon, and more information is located through the Wilder Foundation, who runs the program. Ms. Sannes stated there is another program called "Good in the Hood" it is another mobile bus program. The Shoe Away Hunger bus travels reselling donated shoes and the proceeds are used to feed the hungry. She stated Schuler Shoes is a sponsor of this program and used shoes for donation can be dropped off at any of their locations. She stated more information on this program can be found on the CEAP website. Rev. Kingsley Ayesu, Christ Covenant Chapel, 5452 Dupont Avenue North, addressed the City Council. He stated the Brooklyn Center Community Prayer Breakfast will be held on May 6, 2017 starting at 8 a.m. at the Embassy Suites located at 6300 Earle Brown Drive, Brooklyn Center. He stated they will be praying for the City and would be very happy to have the Councilmembers present. 04/10/17 -1- DRAFT Mayor Willson noted this is an annual event, and Rev. Ayesu said this is the 39th year. Councilmember Butler asked if you can buy tickets at the door. Dianne Sannes replied and stated she has tickets for purchase for $15 each. Mayor Willson stated he has a table reserved and was going to donate the open seats; however, if some of the Councilmembers would like to attend they can have the open seats at his table. Teresa Barnes, 6925 Dallas Road, addressed the City Council. She stated her concern is the trash in the City. She stated it is affecting other businesses nearby those businesses that don't clean up their property. She stated she feels the City needs to take a harder stance on the issue. Mayor Willson stated they are researching what can be done and when it can be done. He noted it could be an issue where the trash isn't screened by employees at the business and as a result the trash is overflowing. Ms. Barnes stated she would like to see higher end businesses here and if they see the garbage all over they won't want to bring their business here. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:55 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2.INVOCATION Councilmember Graves recited a poem as the Invocation. 3.CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 7:00 p.m. 4.ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager, Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel, Deputy Director of Building and Community Standards Jesse Anderson, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Michaela Kujawa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, as amended, with amendments to the Study Session and Work Session minutes of March 27, 2017, and the following consent items were approved: 04/10/17 -2- DRAFT 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1.March 27, 2017 - Study Session 2.March 27, 2017 - Regular Session 3. March 27, 2017 - Work Session 6b. LICENSES MECHANICAL Air Mechanical Assured Heating A/C & Refrigeration B &D Plbg Htg & A/C Centaire Htg & A/C, Inc. CenterPoint Energy Cool Air Mechanical, Inc. Corval Constructions, Inc. Ductwork Heating & AC LLC Elk River Heating & A/C Inc. Fireside Hearth & Home Genz-Ryan Plbg & Htg Co Go Fetsch Mechanical LLC Hoffman Refrigeration & Heating Jayhawk Mechanical Knott Mechanical Kraft Mechanical LLC Majors Mechanical McDowall Company Minnesota Petroleum Services Modem heating & A/C NAC Mechanical & Electrical Services Perfection Heating & Air Pronto Mechanical Heating & A/C Riccar Heating and A/C Ridler Heating & Cooling Inc. Solid Refrigeration LLC Summit Facility & Kitchen Service LLC Total Comfort UHL Company SIGNHANGER Scenic Sign Corporation Signation Sign Group 16411 Aberdeen Street NE Ham Lake 13571 Balsam Lane N Dayton 4145 MacKenzie Court St. Michael 7402 Washington Ave S Eden Prairie 6161 Golden Valley Rd Golden Valley 1544 134th Ave NE Ham Lake 1633 Eustis Street St Paul 6108 Olson Memorial Hwy Golden Valley 19567 Twin Lakes Rd NW Elk River 2700 Fairview Ave N Roseville 2200 W. Hwy 13 Burnsville 565 Shoreview Park Rd Shoreview 5660 Memorial Ave N Stillwater 3307 N 2nd Street Minneapolis 3051 220th Street E Prior Lake 2441 Ventura Drive, Ste. 100, Woodbury 11201 86th Ave N Maple Grove P0 Box 606 Waite Park 682 39th Ave NE Minneapolis 2318 First Street NE Minneapolis 1001 Labore Industrial, Ste. B Vadnais Heights 1770 Gervais Ave Maplewood 415 Cahill Rod Edina 2387 Station Parkway N.W. Andover 3110 Washington Ave N Minneapolis 1125 American Blvd E Bloomington 2445 Nevada Ave N Golden Valley 4000 Winnetka Ave N #100 New Hope 9065 Zachary Lane N Maple Grove 828 South 5th Street P0 Box 881 St Cloud 6840 Shingle Creek Pkwy Brooklyn Center TRANSIENT ACCOMMODATIONS - LEVEL I Best Western Plus 2050 Freeway Blvd DoubleTree 2200 Freeway Blvd 04/10/17 -3- DRAFT TRANSIENT ACCOMMODATIONS - LEVEL II Norwood Inn & Suites 6415 James Cir N Quality Inn 1600 James Cir N Super 8 Motel 6445 James Cir N RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE III— one-year license) 6706 Toledo Ave N Stephen Burson INITIAL (TYPE II— two-year license) 6907 Grimes Ave N Jack Zheng 5727 Major Ave N David Koenig RENEWAL (TYPE III— one-year license) Sommerset Place Apts Nedzad Ceric 5301 Russell AveN Beverly Dahl Morris Matthews (Missing 2 ARM meetings) Gary Scherber Cecilia Pineda Earl & Evalyn Krueth Eric A. Syrstad Michael Johnson Mains'l Properties 5119 66th Ave N 5200 Drew Ave N 5243 Ewing Ave N 5419 Humboldt Ave N 6769 Humboldt Ave N 6906 Newton Ave N 6900 Quail Ave N 3206 Thurber Rd RENEWAL (TYPE H— two-year license) Brookside Manor Apts 1300 67th Ave N 3200 63rd Ave N 1706 71st Ave N 6119 Beard Ave N 6737 Camden Ave N 5825 Colfax Ave N 7208 Dallas Rd 4701 Eleanor Lane 1106 Emerson Lane 5640 Fremont Ave N 5620 Girard Ave N 5540 Morgan Ave N 5506 Oliver Ave N RENEWAL (TYPE I— three-year license) 5351 4th StN 5701 Bryant AveN 7208 Bryant Ave N 04/10/17 -4- Roger & Elizabeth Family Properties LLC Adedamola Ogundipe Patricia A. Sandeen Konrad Wagner do Phil Beaumia Ronald Jasicki Brahana Tsegaye Neng Xi Zhang Charles Jing Bright Jan Dietrich Douglas Allen Wahl Kevin and Mandy Schultz James Arkins John Hennen Infinite Property LLC Lin Shuang LLC Prosperous Property LLC DRAFT 6c.RESOLUTION NO. 2017-51 ADOPTING A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR FINANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES 6d.RESOLUTION NO. 2017-52 ADOPTING A REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS; INSURANCE AGENT OF RECORD 6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-53 PROVIDING COMPETIVITE NEGOTIATED SALE OF $8,830,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION IMPROVEMENT AND UTILITY REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2017A 61. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-54 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-05, EVERGREEN SCHOOL AREA SAFE ROUTES TO SCHOOL TRAIL AND SIDEWALK IMPROVEMENTS 6g.RESOLUTION NO. 2017-55 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SITE LEASE AGREEMENT WITH T-MOBILE CENTRAL LLC, AT WATER TOWER NO.3 6h.RECEIVE REPORT REGARDING SUNDAY LIQOUR SALES Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a.PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 22-29,2017, TO BE GREAT SHINGLE CREEK WATERSHED CLEANUP WEEK Mayor Willson read in full a Proclamation Declaring April 22-29, 2017, to be Great Shingle Creek Watershed Cleanup Week. Councilmember Graves moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt a Proclamation Declaring April 22-29, 2017, to be Great Shingle Creek Watershed Cleanup Week. Motion passed unanimously. 7b.PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 22, 2017, TO BE EARTH DAY IN BROOKLYN CENTER Mayor Willson read in full a Proclamation Declaring April 22, 2017, to be Earth Day in Brooklyn Center. Mr. Lillehaug provided an overview on what events the City will be having for Earth Day. He stated they will have an open house at the Public Works Facility where they will provide education on the environment and the Watershed will be there to answer questions. He stated 04/10/17 -5- DRAFT thanks to the American Legion and Sons of the American Legion for their donations, there will be some refreshments available. He stated he hopes to see everyone there ready to help clean-up. Councilmember Ryan commended the citizens and businesses that come out and help clean up the public spaces. He noted it is important to bring attention to this issue. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt a Proclamation Declaring April 22, 2017, to be Earth Day in Brooklyn Center. Motion passed unanimously. 8.PUBLIC HEARINGS None. 9.PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS None. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS lOa. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSES Mayor Willson explained the streamlined process used to consider Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental Licenses. Mayor Willson polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to provide testimony on any of the rental licenses as listed on tonight's meeting agenda. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Willson called for a motion on Agenda Items 1 Oal through I Oal 0. lOal. 1605 68TH AVENUE NORTH 10a2. 2119 70TH AVENUE NORTH 100. 7015-21 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD (WILLOW LANE APARTMENTS) 10a4. 7143 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH 10a5. 5618 HILLSVIEW ROAD 10a6. 6413 PERRY AVENUE NORTH 10a7. 5406 SAILOR LANE 10a8. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-56 APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE FOR 3000 62ND AVENUE NORTH 10a9. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-57 APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE FOR 6642 DUPONT AVENUE NORTH lOalO. RESOLUTION NO. 2017-58 APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE FOR 7033 UNITY AVENUE NORTH Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson seconded to approve the 04/10/17 -6- DRAFT issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for the following: 1605 68th Avenue North; 2119 70th Avenue North; 7015-21 Brooklyn Boulevard (Willow Lane Apartments); 7143 France Avenue North; 5618 Hillsview Road; 6413 Perry Avenue North; 5406 Sailor Lane; and to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2017-56 Approving a Type IV Rental License for 3000 62nd Avenue North; RESOLUTION NO. 2017-57 Approving a Type IV Rental License for 6642 Dupont Avenue North; and, RESOLUTION NO. 2017-58 Approving a Type IV Rental License for 7033 Unity Avenue North, with the requirement that the mitigation plans and all applicable ordinances must be strictly adhered to before renewal licenses would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Willson noted for the public that the City carefully maintains and monitors rental properties. He stated they want to keep them affordable and in good condition for the public, noting all rentals are needed and appreciated. lOb. MAYORAL RATIFICATION OF FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER Councilmember Graves moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to ratify the Mayoral appointment of Abate Terefe, 5101 Howe Lane, to the Financial Commission with a term to expire December 31, 2019. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Ryan reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • March 28, 2017: Attended the American Cancer Society CAN Minnesota Day at the Capital in St. Paul • April 1, 2017: Attended Town Hall Meeting lead by State Legislators • April 2, 2017: Attended and helped at the Brooklyn Center Lions Waffle Breakfast • April 5, 2017: Attended Joint Session with Commissions • April 6, 2017: Attended Brooklyn Center Lions Monthly Dinner, where City Manager Boganey gave a presentation • April 14 - 15, 2017: Attending CEAP food drive at Cub Foods at Bass Lake Road Councilmember Ryan noted volunteers will be onsite collecting food for the drive from 10 a.m. to 3 p.m. He expressed his gratitude to Cub Foods Manager Steve Johnson and his staff for their help. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • April 5, 2017: Attended Joint Session with Commissions • April 12, 2017: Attending the Breakfast and Prayer event at Brooklyn United Methodist Church • April 12, 2017: Attending Street Pavement Improvement Project Meeting at City Hall • April 18, 2017: Attending Police and Citizen Awards Ceremony 04/10/17 -7- DRAFT April 22, 2017: Attending Shingle Creek Clean-up Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson noted that April is organ tissue donor month and stated it has personally touched her life and she encourages everyone to learn more about this issue. Councilmember Graves reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • March 30, 2017: Attended Liberian Luncheon • March 30,2017: Attended Housing Forum hosted by ACER • April 2, 2017: Taught Community Yoga in North Minneapolis April 5, 2017: Attended Joint Session with Commissions Councilmember Graves noted that Youth Council has started their training for summer jobs. Councilmember Butler reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • March 28, 2017: Attended MAC Meeting • March 30, 2017: Attended the Financial Commission Meeting • April 5, 2017: Attended Joint Session with Commissions • April 12, 2017: Attending Human Trafficking presentation • April 18, 2017: Attending and Serving at the Police and Citizen Awards Ceremony • April 20, 2017: Attending Metro Twin Cities Meeting Councilmember Butler noted she will be on vacation April 22-27, 2017, and absent for the next City Council Meeting. Mayor Willson reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • March 30, 2017: Attended Dr. Burrowes Presentation • April 1, 2017: Attended the Legislators Town Hall Meeting • April 4, 2017: Attended meeting with Alfred Princess Daniels • April 5, 2017: Attended the Joint Session with Commissions • April 6, 2017: Attended the cable 12 interview on water and survey • April 9, 2017: his neighborhood was part of the bulky waste cleanup and he drove around and asked residents how they feel about the cleanup. He stated most are very happy with the event and noted the cleanup is biennial now but could become yearly at some point. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 7:32 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 04/10/17 -8- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION APRIL 10, 2017 CITY HALL - COUNCIL CHAMBERS iXI] .1 U DI ti The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 7:33 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Tim Willson and Councilmembers/COmmissioners Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Michaela Kujawa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. WATER METER FAILURE RATE - MR. LILLEHAUG - continued Public Works Director/City Engineer Steve Lillehaug continued his PowerPoint presentation and displayed the different meters. Mayor/President Willson asked if there is enough information on the pit meter to know its history with regard to functioning well. Mr. Lillehaug stated there is a 6% failure rate over eight years on the pit MIU meter, compared to the 34.4% failure rate on the two devices currently being used that are malfunctioning. Mr. Lillehaug stated some of these units are too new to have data to know how they are working long term. He stated he will look into the information on the new meters before he brings back recommendations for the City Council at the next meeting. Mayor/President Willson stated the batteries are supposed to be warranted to last 20 years, and he feels this is something else they need to look at with the vendor for replacing or fixing. Mr. Lillehaug stated the batteries are under warranty however they are prorated so it is not a full 20- year warranty. Mayor/President Willson asked if some of the units that are under a 10-year warranty are malfunctioning. Mr. Lillehaug stated the new meter version seems to have a better sensor and a cover which could help the malfunctioning problem that the older version of this unit had. 04/10/17 -1- DRAFT Mayor/President Willson asked if there is any leaking into basements due to the bad units. Mr. Lillehaug stated there is no leaking he is aware. He stated they are just not able to read the meters for water usage for some homes. Mr. Lillehaug stated his recommendation would be option C. He stated he wants to take a step back and look at some of the brass issues on the new options and then come back to the City Council with further information and recommendations at the next meeting. Mayor/President Willson stated he likes the 2c option because it's a fixed device and staff intensive, but he is struggling with the cost when they could potentially have another device that won't work. Mr. Lillehaug stated he can't say for sure that they won't have issues with another device and stated only time will tell if they are better. He stated he does believe that the company has worked out a lot of kinks they had with the original device that the City is using. He noted the City was one of the first to use the devices that are having the malfunctions. Mayor/President Willson asked how long of a process it would be if they switched to the 2c option. Mr. Lillehaug stated it took about 9 months for the last process and this one could take longer because they will need to get permission and have time to access all homes. Councilmember/ConTimissioner Ryan stated this appears to be a problem with mechanisms. He stated he is astonished by the problems with the meter itself, he noted it is understandable for the batteries to go bad over time but it is the other issues he doesn't understand. He asked if there is a certain period of time that they could do nothing than review the failure rates to decide what to do. Mr. Lillehaug stated Maple Grove and St. Louis Park have the v4 so he can get some information and data from them to try to predict what failure rates on that version looks like. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson asked who incurs the $150 cost to replace the battery. Mr. Lillehaug stated it would be funded through the water fund and then paid for through the water fees. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she isn't very confident in the vendor right now and doesn't want to spend $2 million on another product from the same vendor. Councilmember/Commissioner Butler stated with all the issues, she would like to know if there has been other evidence with the same issues Brooklyn Center is having. Mr. Lillehaug stated Coon Rapids may have the same issues and are going through the same process and he has heard as well as there have been some other issues with the v4 model in the Maple Grove community. Councilmember/Commissioner Butler stated she also doesn't have confidence in the vendor and would like see more options at the next meeting that should include other vendor choices and their costs. Mayor/President Willson stated he would like to see that as well. Mr. Lillehaug stated looking at a new vendor to start over will be the most expensive option. He stated the costs would end up being close to $5 million and upwards. Mayor/President Willson asked Attorney Gilchrist if they have any legal recourse on this issue. Mr. Gilchrist stated after meeting with another attorney and staff they decided that wasn't a viable option. 04/10/17 -2- DRAFT City Manager Boganey stated at this stage they will review the questions and feedback and then gather more information for them for the next meeting. Mayor/President Willson stated his main concern is that the City has to pay for this. He stated he isn't happy about the failure rates and the amount of money they need to invest after the initial cost. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated she would like to see a contingency plan rolled into the options and what the vendor can do to build the City's confidence in them back up. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan asked if they could look at the other cities such as St. Paul to look at the device they use to get information as to what is working for the other cities. The majority consensus of the City Council/EDA was to have Staff gather more information and bring this item back to the Council at the next meeting. COMMUNITY DIALOUGE Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards provided a presentation and history on this item. Mr. Edwards stated he would like to know if the values outlined for the proposed process are in line with those of the City Council/EDA, if there is a consensus regarding the outcomes desired for the proposed process, and if there is a consensus for staff to move forward with the process. Mayor/President Willson stated the meetings in the park are a good way to get information to and from citizens and he stated he wants those to continue. He stated his concern is that a small minority of citizens will show up providing them with only that group's ideas and opinions. He stated he would like to reach a broader crowd with any meetings they decide to move forward with. He stated he thinks they have a good handle on what people want and how they want to the City to move forward currently. He stated he does not want to have the issue where a certain few people manipulate the conversations and intimidate the other citizens. He noted his role as the Mayor is to listen to the community, go in the direction the City wants to go, and make the hard decisions when there is no consensus among the citizens. Councilmember/Commissioner Butler thanked Mr. Edwards for putting this together, noting it is well thought out. She stated she thinks they should do listening sessions as that is what the citizens are looking for. She stated if they do community dialogue events they will have the small group of people only who will show up. She stated she feels doing the park meetings and listening sessions in addition would be good. Mayor/President Willson stated maybe doing a neighborhood meeting where they travel to different areas with the Brooklyn Center police and they could hold listening meetings in churches or some neutral locations would work well. 04/10/17 -3- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated having some listening sessions initially would be good to start with and she likes the ideas Mr. Edwards has put together to follow-up the listening sessions potentially. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan agreed with Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence- Anderson and stated the neighborhood meetings in the parks are good. He stated most people who come to the meetings in the park, however, seem to be selective and older usually not as diverse as they would like for this type of input. He stated he thinks starting with a listening meeting would be good, and noted they will want to be mindful of additional expenses and time commitments by staff while adding more meetings. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated she is in agreement with the other Councilmembers/Commissioners and feels it isn't as much of an issue where they start with the listening sessions and meeting, but more important that they just need to start somewhere, note the locations, decide who is leading the sessions, if there will be child care available, and lay out the ground rules for the meeting ahead of time so no one person can monopolize the conversation. Mayor/President Willson stated they will want to have a way to communicate issues or questions that are asked right away so the City Council/EDA can respond and inform citizen of issues already being worked on or those that already have a solution when they are brought up. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated maybe there is a way comprehensively to document what they talk about prior to the meetings. Mayor/President Willson stated they need to look at other media sources to get information to the public because once people get to the website after requesting information they seem to find all the information they need, but the issue lies with getting them to the website initially. He stated they need to offer a way for others to get the information to the public. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated that mediators or facilitators have given a good foundation for meetings as a third party uninterested person, they are a good positive feature to make sessions work well. Mayor/President Willson stated there is consensus regarding the values outlined in the process, as well as what the City Council/EDA sees as their desired outcomes. He stated the process itself is where it seems they have come to a different idea and would like to have a town hall style meeting to let citizens voice their opinions to start with. Mr: Boganey stated he is hearing they would like to move forward with an open forum but longer with the City Council/EDA responding to citizens during the process. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she would expect to engage and have dialogue with people and let them know they are being heard and that the City Council/EDA cares about their concerns. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves echoed her thoughts. 04/10/17 -4- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissiofler Ryan stated there should be time for interaction and it is up to the City Council to clearly layout and remind people ahead of time what their expectations are for the meetings. He stated they want to remind the public that they are not always subject matter experts on all things and they can only do their best for the largest number of people as possible. Mayor/President Willson stated they will need to be careful not to accidently make quorum while having the meetings. He stated if they can engage a moderator it may be the best way of doing it. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated maybe having the secretary take minutes or have only two members present at each meeting to eliminate that concern. Councilmember/Commissiofler Butler stated she wants to be able to respond and would be concerned that if all members aren't there that they will be perceived to not care about the citizens' concerns and issues. Councilmember/ConTlrnissiOfler Graves stated she feels they need all members there but maybe only two members respond to begin with so they are making sure to listen and answer questions keeping time in mind. Attorney Gilchrist stated he appreciates the concern about the open meeting law. He stated, however, that as long as the meetings are posted and there is an announcement made stating they have no intent to take action that evening on anything discussed and it is for discussion purposely only; that would eliminate the open meeting law concerns. Councilmember/CommisSiOner Ryan stated the City Council is bound by City and State law before they can take formal action on things such as ordinances. He noted open forum was established years ago to allow citizens to come forward and express concerns but what has happened is that Councilmembers have, in the past, gotten into a dialogue with citizens that isn't productive and then everyone loses as a result. He stated they try to avoid that and allow staff to respond to their concerns and staff does a great job. Attorney Gilchrist stated as a City Council they can set up the listening sessions as a hybrid, have it be something completely different than what they normally do, and not change their open forum rules. Mayor/President Willson stated it all comes down to how the meeting is structured and that the ground rules and expectations need to be provided up front. The majority consensus of the City Council/EDA was to have staff move forward with looking at options to hold some listening sessions with the public using the values and desired outcomes presented by Mr. Edwards. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember/Commissiofler Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember/Commissiofler Graves seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 9:18 p.m. 04/10/17 -5- DRAFT Motion passed unanimously. 04/10/17 -6- DRAFT L'Ity CouncH Agenda ftem No, 6b [i[I1IJ[iJ I • N N Dk"A U'A I Db74 (I) 1'WI IIIA'A I DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Mane FROM: Rozlyn Tousignant, Deputy City Clerk<-\ SUBJECT: Licenses for City Council Approval Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the following licenses on April 10, 2017. Background: The following businesses/persons have applied for City licenses as noted. Each business/person has fulfilled the requirements of the City Ordinance governing respective licenses, submitted appropriate applications, and paid proper fees. Applicants for rental dwelling licenses are in compliance with Chapter 12 of the City Code of Ordinances, unless comments are noted below the property address on the attached rental report. MECHANICAL Dependable Heating & Cooling Infinity Heating & A/C, LLC Northern Heating & A/C Inc dba Northern One Hour Quality Refrigeration South-Town Refrigeration Standard Heating & A/C Wenzel Heating & A/C MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP 2619 Coon Rapids Blvd NW, Coon Rapids, MN 55433 1017 Meadowwood Dr, Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 9431 Alpine Dr NW, Ramsey, MN 55303 6237 Penn Ave So, #100, Richfield, MN 55423 6325 Welcome Ave N Ste #200, Brooklyn Park, MN 55429 130 Plymouth Ave N, Minneapolis, MN 55411 4145 Old Sibley Mem Hwy, Eagan MN 55122 BB Motor Sales, LLC 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard dba: Luther Brookdale Chevrolet BB Motor Sales, LLC 4301 68th Ave N dba: Luther Brookdale Buick GMC BCV Motors, LLC 6801 Brooklyn Boulevard dba: Luther Brookdale Volkswagen Brooklyn Park Motors, Inc. 6700 Brooklyn Boulevard dba: Luther Toyota Scion Metro Brookdale, LLC 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard dba: Luther Brookdale Mazda Mitsubishi R.L. Brookdale Motors, Inc. 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard dba: Luther Brookdale Honda RENTAL See attached report. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that en/sauces the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [S141U[iJ I fl N V akYA LA I aIh'A (I) 1'WI ,lgL!A1 SIGN HANGER Signart Company 2933 Mondovi Rd, Eau Claire, WI 54701 TRANSIENT ACCOMMODATIONS - LEVEL I Country Inn & Suites 2550 Freeway Blvd Motel 6 #1460 2741 Freeway Blvd Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of lift for all people and preserves the public trust EI1016 I fl I I MhYA UhYA I øk'4 (I] 1I )IBJk'A I Rental License Category Criteria Policy - Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category Number of Units Property Code Violations per (Based on Property Inspected Unit Code Only ) Type 1-3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 3+ units 0-0.75 Type 11-2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III - 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV - 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 License Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Category Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category 1-2 0-1 Impact 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than I 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Property Address Dwelling Type Renewal or Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS * Final License Type ** Previous License Type *** Unpaid Utilities Unpaid Taxes 5401 70th Cir Single Family Initial Kris Kienzle 0 I N/A II OK OK 6618 Colfax Ave N Single Family Initial Chandrawatie Khemraj 7 III N/A III OK OK 6037 June Ave N Single Family Initial Paul Miller 2 II N/A II OK OK 3707 Urban Ave N Single Family Initial Tech Ung 1 I N/A II OK OK Georgetown Park Townhouses 700 66th Ave N 24 Bldg 92 Units Renewal Wiensch Construction/Scott Gann 226 (2.5/Unit)III 7 (.08/Unit)III IV OK OK 5301 Dupont Ave N 1 Bldg 6 Units Renewal Minnesota Apartments LLC 11 (1.8/Unit)III 1 (.1/Unit)III IV OK OK 5308 Emerson Ave N Two Family (1)Renewal Michael Williamson 2 II 0 II II OK OK 2923 68th Ln N Single Family Renewal Steven Pfeiffer 2 II 0 II II OK OK 6501 Beard Ave N Single Family Renewal RHA 3, LLC 4 II 0 II III OK OK 6607 Beard Ave N Single Family Renewal Ernie Zheng 7 III 0 III III OK OK 6806 Drew Ave N Single Family Renewal Thomas James Davidson 4 II 0 II II OK OK 5548 Dupont Ave N Single Family Renewal John Ford Lindahl 7 III 0 III II OK OK 5616 Dupont Ave N Single Family Renewal Luis Deleon 3 II 0 II IV OK OK 6015 Dupont Ave N Single Family Renewal Main Street Renewal, LLC 3 II 0 II III OK OK 5337 Girard Ave N Single Family Renewal Tracy and Joseph Groves 8 III 0 III IV OK OK 6749 Humboldt Ave N Single Family Renewal Phong Nguyen 4 II 0 II II OK OK 5524 Logan Ave N Single Family Renewal Avalon Home Investment, LLC 4 II 0 II I OK OK 7049 Regent Ave N Single Family Renewal Main Street Renewal, LLC 6 III 0 III III OK OK 6573 Riverwood La Single Family Renewal Betty Gunderson-Hargan 2 II 0 II I OK OK 5937 Vincent Ave N Single Family Renewal Jack Johnson 3 II 0 II II OK OK 6101 Xerxes Ave N Single Family Renewal Govan Singh 6 III 0 III III OK OK * CFS = Calls For Service for Renewal Licenses Only (Initial Licenses are not applicable to calls for service and will be listed N/A.) ** License Type Being Issued Type I = 3 Year Type II = 2 Year Type III = 1 Year *** Initial licenses will not show a previous license type All properties are current on City utilities and property taxes Rental Licenses for Council Approval on April 24, 2017 Oty C©iuirnll Agenda Hem N©0 6c [Ei1U(SJ I N *Y4 Uh'A I M4 0] t1I WJ I DATE: April 12 'h , 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Man3 FROM: Jeremy Hulke, Fire Chief SUBJECT: Dissolution of Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of the resolution approving and authorizing execution of Joint Powers Authority Dissolution Agreement relating to the Fire Training Association. Background: In 1991 the Cities of Fridley, Brooklyn Center, Spring Lake Park, Blame and Mounds View entered into a Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) to form the Fire Training Association. The Fire Training Association consists of the three fire departments serving those cities and was formed for the purpose of building a fire training facility. They are the Fridley Fire Department, the Brooklyn Center Fire Department and the Spring Lake Fire Department, Inc. In 1997 the Association entered into a twenty-five year lease for the property located at 300 71st Avenue in Fridley. The Association constructed a training building on the property along with a garage and a confined space sewer system to be used in training firefighters for the three fire departments. The property is now the site where the new Fridley Civic Campus is scheduled to be built. The Fire Chiefs representing each of the three fire departments has, under direction of legal counsel, secured "tail" insurance that will cover any liability for the Association until the buildings have been removed, distributed assets as outlined in the JPA, and are now requesting dissolution of the JPA. This will allow the City of Fridley to take ownership of the property located on the site and so that the site may be cleared anticipation of construction of the Civic Campus. Each of the three Fire Chiefs has been in contact with City Administrators in each of the represented cities and there has been general agreement to the conditions of dissolution of the JPA. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Strategic Priorities: Not applicable Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves f/ic public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY DISSOLUTION AGREEMENT RELATING TO FIRE TRAINING FACILITY ASSOCIATION WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority set forth in Minn. Stat. § 471.59, the City of Brooklyn Center (the "City") and Fridley, Spring Lake Park, Blaine, and Mounds View (collectively the "Cities") entered into a Joint Powers Agreement in 1991 entitled Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association (the "WA") for the construction and operation of the Fire Training Association (the "Association"), a joint powers entity under Minnesota law; and WHEREAS, the Association originally consisted of four Member Departments with Spring Lake Park, Blaine, and Mounds View collectively considered one Member Department ("SBM") and Brooklyn Center, Fridley, and Columbia Heights individually comprising the other three Member Departments; and WHEREAS, at the time they entered into the JPA, the City and the Cities determined that it was to their mutual advantage to form a single joint powers entity under Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, to jointly and collectively construct, use, and maintain a fire training facility; and WHEREAS, the fire training facility, comprised of several structures, improvements and fixtures, and alternatively referred to as the fire training center or the building (collectively, the "Facility") was constructed on real property owned by Fridley located at 348 71s Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota or alternatively identified as 300 71St Avenue, Fridley, Minnesota (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Cities amended the JPA in 1994 with the execution of the Amendment Of Joint Powers Agreement For Construction And Operation Of Fire Training Site (the "Amendment"), which terminated the participation of one Member Department, Columbia Heights, from the JPA; and WHEREAS, the Property is now being redeveloped as a part of the City of Fridley's construction of the new City Hall Campus, the Facility's location conflicts with those redevelopment plans, and the Member Departments, including the City, have determined that there is no longer a need for the JPA; and WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing circumstances, the City and the Cities and their respective Member Departments desire to dissolve and terminate the Fire Training Association JPA; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the City Council hereby approves the dissolution of the Fire RESOLUTION NO. Training Association and its SPA and authorizes the Mayor and City Manager to execute the Dissolution Agreement related to the same. Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. DISSOLUTION AGREEMENT This Dissolution Agreement (the "Agreement"), is entered into by and between the City of Fridley ("Fridley"), the City of Brooklyn Center ("Brooklyn Center"), the City of Spring Lake Park ("Spring Lake Park"), the City of Blame ("Blaine"), and the City of Mounds View ("Mounds View"), all Minnesota municipal corporations, hereinafter collectively referred to as "the Cities". RECITALS WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority set forth in Minn. Stat. § 471.59, the Cities entered into a Joint Powers Agreement in 1991 entitled Joint Powers Agreement - Fire Training Association (the "JPA"), a copy of which is attached hereto, as Exhibit A, for the construction and operation of the Fire Training Association (the "Association"); and WHEREAS, the Association originally consisted of four Member Departments with Spring Lake Park, Blaine, and Mounds View collectively considered one Member Department ("SBM") and Fridley, Columbia Heights, and Brooklyn Center individually comprising the other three Member Departments; and WHEREAS, at the time they entered into the JPA, the Cities determined that it was to their mutual advantage to form a single joint powers entity under Minnesota Statutes Section 471.59, to jointly and collectively construct, use, and maintain a fire training facility; and WHEREAS, the fire training facility, comprised of several structures, improvements and fixtures, and alternatively referred to as the fire training center or the building (collectively, the "Facility") was constructed on real property owned by Fridley located at 348 71st Avenue NE, Fridley, Minnesota or alternatively identified as 300 71 " Avenue, Fridley, Minnesota (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Cities amended the JPA in 1994 with the execution of the Amendment Of Joint Powers Agreement For Construction And Operation Of Fire Training Site (the "Amendment"), a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, which terminated the participation of one Member Department, Columbia Heights, from the JPA; and WHEREAS, the Property is being redeveloped, the Facility's location conflicts with those development plans, and the Member Departments have determined that there is no longer a need for the JPA; and WHEREAS, based upon the foregoing circumstances, Cities and their respective Member Departments desire to dissolve and terminate the JPA. NOW, THEREFORE, the Cities and their respective Member Departments agree as follows: 1 1.The Association shall divide all assets and liabilities, if any, among the remaining Member Departments in proportion to the contribution of the remaining Member Departments, as provided in Paragraph 17 of the JPA. 2.To dissolve the JPA and terminate the Chief's Board and Operations Committee created by and through the JPA upon the completion of division and distribution of all assets and the liabilities other than the Facility and the Property. 3.The Facility and Property shall revert back to Fridley, upon dissolution, as provided in Paragraphs 16 and 17 of the JPA. 4.This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall constitute one and the same instrument. 5. The effective date of this Agreement shall be the date upon which the last of the Cities has caused this Agreement to be executed pursuant to an authorizing resolution of its governing body. [The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.] CITY OF FRIDLEY J,,,- t 1 , 2 "o, , , JMayor Scott J. L4/nd 1 /Date 4anag4eraltey.Wysopa1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Mayor Date City Manager Date CITY OF BLAINE Mayor Date City Manager Date CITY OF SPRING LAKE PARK Mayor Date City Manager Date CITY OF MOUNDS VIEW Mayor Date City Manager Date City Cmu©il Agenda Hem N©0 6d [iII]JJS1 I fl U I M4 U I kTA (I) 11I IIIJhYA I DATE: April 24, 2007 TO: Curt Boganey, City Man FROM: Jesse Anderson, Deputy Director of Building and Community Standards SUBJECT: A resolution amending the special assessment fees for 5250 Great View Ave N Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the attached resolution removing a portion of certified special assessments for 5250 Great View Ave N. Background: In December of 2013 the property located at 5250 Great View Ave N was found to be in violation of city code with an accumulation of Junk and debris. Two notices were sent to the owners of record and a copy sent to the resident. The property was inspected every few weeks resulting in citations for non-compliance from December 31, 2013 to April 25, 2014. The citations increase in amounts each time they were issued, with a maximum of $2,000. The violations were corrected in May of 2014, when the occupant Greg Olson asked the trustees of the property about the citations. The ownership records did not have information relating to the revocable trust for the property and the owners had passed away. Therefore the notices were likely only being received by the occupant, Greg Olson whom is a vulnerable adult and may not have understood the notices and citations. The city has received a copy of the revocable trust on June 8, 2015 and has added additional mailing addresses for the property records. Further, Due to previous hostility towards staff there was a do not approach note in the system, therefore staff did not attempt to speak to Mr. Olson directly. On April 7, 2017 the trustee's for the revocable trust for 5250 Great View Ave N sent a letter requested that the fees be removed for the violations that had occurred in 2014. This request was being made as a result of the property facing tax forfeiture due to unpaid taxes, from 2015. The trustees are working with Hennepin County to pay the property taxes. However, this would be the last opportunity for them to have the special assessments adjusted. Staff have reviewed the details of this property and the currents trusts inability to afford the amount from the fines. Therefore, due to extenuating circumstances, staff is recommending that the $9,125 assessed to the property be reduced to an amount not to exceed $2,000. This would require that $8,100 be removed from the assessment. As a result of this assessment already being certified to the taxes it requires a council resolution to amend the assessment. lIlission: Ensurinç an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people am! preserves the public trust S1flIJ[SJ I U I I 31k'A U I k"4 0] UI P1IJ!A1 Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Strategic Priorities: Enhanced Community Image il'Jission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive coininuflitj' that enhances the quality of life for al/people awl preserves the public frust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION CERTIFYING THE REMOVAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE FINES/CITATION FOR 5250 GREAT VIEW AVE N, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN, PID NUMBER 10-118-21-21-0021 WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has caused Administrative Fines/Citation costs in the amount of $9,125 under the authority of City Ordinance Section 18- 204 and Minnesota Statutes, Section 429; and WHEREAS, on September 8, 2014, the fees Administrative Fines/Citation costs remained unpaid and were adopted by City Council Resolution 2014-126; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 18-210 and Minnesota State Statute authorizes the certification of certain delinquent Administrative Fines/Citation accounts to the County tax rolls for collection; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined to remove $8,100 from the certified special assessment for the property located at 5250 Great view Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN, PID number 10-118-21-21-0021. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that: 1.The special assessment of Administrative Fines/Citation costs incurred for 5250 Great view Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN, is hereby adopted and amended to remove $8,100 from the certified Levy No. 18767. 2.The removed special assessment amount of $8,100 shall also remove any associated interest accrued by the $8,100. 3.The remaining amount due for special assessment on 5250 Great View Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN is $1,825.00 and shall have collected interest at a rate of 6 percent for a length of 15 months, not to exceed $2000. 4.The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplication of this resolution to the County Auditor to be extended on the proper tax lists of the county and such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. J) l'k No ()3 15 P 2 / APO 2Q17 <- t4yor fire tiion CRY of Brooklyn Cnle 6302 Shinto Creek Parkway 0ronyt Center, Mn. S431) Ro Property Addremis 52S0 meet View Ave. N. finer Sir Pebble ad I are assisting Greg Okon to t:y and l'rve the special se ss ent levied against 50Grut - Vrerv Ave. in arocklyn Center vnide(I (Property ID. 101182321-01O21). hOVe we ee the i$ues, 1. Greg Olson is a vuInerabe adult. Greg has lived at 5250 Greet Viev Ave almost his entire life. F'te lived there with his parents whil they passed away; his mother Lcrenilla Schoen O!on on 2 October 1998 and f -as lecher George OIon on IS April 2C07, Grep was born itYSept. 1957 To I he best of our knowledge there had been no late payment of psoperiy taxes or special assessments assigned to ths 1prope:vy prior to 2613 2 his property does now have some unpaid property taxes ;'rwo 201320-145015 in 1h$S000 to $9000 range. babble and I met with Hennepin County 30 March ?,917 .,and have offered th immediately pay the orstanding property taxes The county evised us fowait until the special assessments are resoivarl. The property taxes for 2016 and the.flrst half of 2017 have been paid. Greg Olsons incornrr from Souil Security/Retirement, Suivivurs and bisebility nsurancc was formerly handled by Greenteef Payment Sevicos and cuerenhy by Sr. Stephens Human Savice When Greenfea went out of business In August 2014, pwpe:ty ax payments got neglected in the shift to St Stephens, 3 Sometime in FebruerV 2017, a neighbor found a "Notice Of Expratlon Of Redemption" (see exihit 1) on G:egs' front door m[l gave to Greg. Greg did Cli usout we did not (PcCive th message until returning from vacatIon on 25 feb 2017. I picked up the notice an Monday 20 March 2017; and so hcçn we are trying to put 111j,;Issue to test -. This all should have begn fln&ized lung ago but was not. The facts are stillthc same. Your petsonal review of this matter wond be greatly app: eciateri, 4. The special anessmens rwtently total In the $10,000 to 111000 range incuding dtefions tees, serviec costs and interest, in a meeting wn.h the City on 24 Mr 2017. Debbie and I were gvCn two pages entitled "Cork Enforccrnl3rit CittSons' (see exhibit 2 paces 1 & 2). The bulk et the citations totaling $sK]s ( 13026597-01 Ilnu 08) were issued against the property from 37//2O to (1/2,S/2,014, A mere tour month window during winter coçiitions, Citations Cl till Act 607 WARM(U35. \ j piLi tfnt OS &l appear to be Foi the same viol ation as the nature of offense reads Identical. The fees etnibeted per citation worn in numerical urdor 5125, $2S0 SOO 1O00, and tour at ?OOO totaling $5575. At the some meeting, I dd review photographs the Chy showed no and in my opinon the pynii iding of the tines just seems harsh and eive. To do sonic of toe items the City was asng to be taken care of ut was not possible until tho arrival ul Spring. K S. Debbie receved a 14 August 2015 emfilied lettOr from the Cty on 22 AuguSt 7015 that made us painfully aw a r e of what was happening as 5250 GmeatvieWAve. That leacr jsoe xinib't 3 pgs 1 &2), ditnd in Angu.t 2015 refemenOlog levy Number 20068 wus addressed o Greg Olcn. St. Stephens Payee, 2509 localeS Ave, Mpls. Mn. 55044 io;d was for a $375 spatial sossIncut believe tac (Rye Letter o 22 August 21)15 was concerning citationS 24025111(11 to $125 and 14-025171 07 to- $250 (see exhibit 7 page 2). I personally resolved those two citalonS on 24 August 2015 0nd krlc Sonncnbtrg told mc no charges against the property would be pursund 6.Co curnentivvAthtti'e City; letter of 22 mpst 201% we reJedcOpiOi citations 13OSS? to 05, When I ca°cd lese Anderson w54 August 2015 about those citationS he tokl ow they had already boon rolled over to Hennepin County to be wlloatd with property taxes. Very uolortunatel? 0bbie and I, and also heIive oreg Oisun were not aware thot ctatioc .02C597.0l thu (IS had bcri mailed and one thru council meetings and WCIC sent to Henriepil CounW for collection. Even as of this writing, we have not seen th paper viotk or hoi all of that happened 7.We finaibod cleanup of the yard on S May 2024 after the yard had thawed out. I talked wth Edt Sonrnunbcrg on 6 May 2014. I-Ic Was going to rkpcat am7 May 2014 and 'dose out the tare" if everything v.as O.k. I did not hear back from Eric 5, S o how wore clations 01 thruOS and I assirne the ensuingcouncil meeting notices ever conveyed to the property or Greg Olson? At our meeting with the City on 24 Mrtb 2027, the City told us that tnc'y had been mailed rtd none were returned. There is no active nso$ thtiivry to 5250 Greatv,cW Ave. csreg 03,,,W he did not receive any mailed citations nor did he Sign for any cemtffid mail. When tho City sent their 1 etSer of 14 AuguSt 2015 to DebhIe it arrived certified mail retun ecotpt rqueStecI. 9.All of the cmtotions 1302659 /-01 thru US were issued to Leanilla O son and fteulgn Olson dOd 03'03 cverla airo ssud to Resdent Copy. George and Leanilia çrtinly v,ce rot going to rpond. It just Scorns that Y)1I000C, Iitt Cc', 1 Ile Shiarihi, 5huuld/could have vented that The Resident, Greg Olsoir, was receiving the CiWs' rjieSsoP,Cs so that he could respond or at vest mooch OW to sOOmCOfle like us so that we could heIp him respond. 10.Dhbie arid lace truStCCS of a teomicable 101St agreenient et up by Leanilia end George Olson. Tho (Sty has cup'j. Henomupin County has a copy. ide not sea where the trust agneement is pertinent If) the contents of thiS letter but plDse contact me if you see it otl 1 0rv/iSC and wuid like to meviOW thc trust 11. Toe sstscd aroucity value isapproxirmmatOIV $50,000. To tfr Oest S my kurcWIedO, there m crthr encumbrances Cr' I'r5 against thk propCty other than lstcd me paragraphs 2 and 15 above-P , ,, !rr. $ 21? 7:PM ; \ in dowtg WO K the City to void the speci& assessments against 5250 crcatvicw Ave The hardship caused by the pyramiding speciat ascesrnens is not warranted. Hornupin County has been ex remcy cooperative but dw City of Brooklyn Cente has been unrelenting, xlong Thao of the City left us a voite mail on 1ridy 32 March 2017 that SaId "Me City wilt not look at reversing the citations or feet. Mayor Willsorc hopefuily you wit take the We to review IS Situation and ofe us a mitten response by 21 April 2 00. ^Qec re ecking community overview y foRvadipg a copy of this leltcr to those bswd b,iow. Any 55i5tflEC the community cou'd provide in resolving tlil Issuc would he greatly appreciated. Sincerely, 161155 ImnaW Ave I akevilie, Min nesota 5504 Deborah G. lie5er (J e r a ld W, Kieser 9S2AS 3330 rigic cser@p,rnail corn Oty CouncH Agenda ^tem No. 6e i1IJh(i I U I M1 Uh'A I MTA 0) 1'II IHJk'A I DATE: April 7, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Man? FROM: Jim Glasoe, Director of Community Activities, Recreation and ServicF8 ' SUBJECT: Resolution Authorizing the Community Activities, Recreation and Services Department to Apply For Grant Funding Through the Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant Program Recommendation: It is recommended the City Council consider adoption of the attached resolution supporting an application for a Department of Natural Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant. Background: The Department of Natural Resources is seeking local units of government interested in acquiring, developing, or upgrading facilities for outdoor recreation. Eligible projects include: park acquisition and/or development/redevelopment including, internal park trails, picnic shelters, playgrounds, athletic facilities, boat accesses, fishing piers, swimming beaches and campgrounds. All park projects must meet requirements for perpetual outdoor recreation use. The City of Brooklyn Center and the Brooklyn Center Little League, through a grant from the Minnesota Twins Community Fund, have designed a comprehensive "master planned" baseball complex, capable of hosting local and state tournaments. The site complex will include three regulation fields, along with one tee ball field. The fields will include fencing, dugouts, irrigation and scoreboards. The grant monies will be used for the site grading, construction of the baseball fields and associated amenities. This proposed project has been reviewed, approved and recommended by the Brooklyn Center Little League Program and the Brooklyn Center Park & Recreation Commission. Staff continues to pursue grant funds to help offset a portion of the project's construction cost. The Outdoor Recreation Grant submission requirements calls for the local governmental unit making the application to provide a resolution from its governing body authorizing the application submission. Accordingly, a resolution is attached for City Council consideration. Budget Issues: The anticipated total cost for these improvements is $1,137,771.00. The 2017-2031 Capital Improvements Fund budget includes $200,000 for related Centennial Park improvements. The remainder would come from grant funds, private donations or other sources. Strategic Priorities: Strengthened and Empowered Youth Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe comnulnily that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES, RECREATION AND SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO APPLY FOR GRANT FUNDING THROUGH THE DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center would act as legal sponsor for the project contained in the Outdoor Recreation grant application, submitted on March 31, 2017 and that the City Manager is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural Resources for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and financial capability to meet the match requirement (if any) and ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has not incurred any development costs and has not entered into a written purchase agreement to acquire the property described in the Cost Breakdown section on this application; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has, or will acquire fee title or permanent easement over the land described in the site plan included in the application; and WHEREAS, that, upon approval of its application by the state, The City of Brooklyn Center may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above-referenced project, and that the City of Brooklyn Center certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement including dedicating the park property for uses consistent with the funding grant program into perpetuity. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council, of the City of Brooklyn Center, the CITY MANAGER is hereby authorized to execute such agreements as are necessary to implement the project on behalf of the applicant. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City Couno*l Agenda Item !\\Jo . 6f COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Mr THROUGH: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer 3-' FROM: Mike Albers, Project Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Accepting a Feasibility Report, Declaring Costs to be Assessed and Calling for Improvement and Assessment Public Hearings for Improvement Project No. 2016-05, 57th Avenue Street Improvements, and Improvement Project Nos. 2017-10 and 2017-11, 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69 "' and France Avenue) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the resolution accepting a feasibility report, declaring costs to be assessed and calling for improvement and assessment public hearings for Improvement Project No. 2016-05, 57th1 Avenue Street Improvements, and Project Nos. 2017-10 and 2017-11, 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Avenue and France Avenue). If approved by the City Council, legal notice would be published, and all property owners who could potentially be assessed for improvements would receive a Notice of Public Hearings via mail. Background: 57th Avenue Street Improvements The project was established by the City Council on July 27, 2015, by Resolution 2015-117, for the area commonly referred to as the 57th Avenue Street Improvements. This action was taken in accordance with the Capital Improvement Program (CEP), which identifies 57t1 Avenue between Humboldt Avenue and Interstate 94 for street improvements during the 2017 construction season. This project will be programmed concurrently with Three Rivers Park District's 57th Avenue Twin Lakes Regional Trail Project (Logan Avenue to the Regional Mississippi River Trail), which is also planned to be constructed in 2017. 69th Avenue and France Avenue Street Improvements The project was established by the City Council on March 27, 2017, by Resolution 2017-43, for the area commonly referred to as the 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Avenue and France Avenue). This action was taken in accordance with the CIP, which identifies 691h Avenue between Shingle Creek Parkway and Dupont Avenue; and France Avenue between 69th Avenue and the north City Limits for street improvements during the 2017 construction season. The attached feasibility report provides a summary of the project evaluation process and street improvements. The report also includes the results of a resident questionnaire that was mailed to all property owners within the project areas. A public informational meeting was conducted on April 12, 2017, to provide project information to property owners and tenants within the project area and gain additional input from the public. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive conununity that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves tliepu bhic trust [EI1IJ[iJ I V V kA Uh'A I Dk'A 0] 1I IIIJh'A I The informational meeting was generally positive in nature with the majority of questions and concerns relating to design details, street lighting, special assessments and project schedule. A formal presentation of the feasibility for the projects is planned at the public hearing. The attached resolution declares certain project costs to be assessed for the projects and calls for a public hearing on the proposed special assessments on May 22, 2017, immediately following the improvement hearing. Staff recommends that the City Council consider holding the special assessment hearing immediately following the project improvement hearing. The purpose of holding the special assessment hearing prior to beginning the project is to assure that any objections to or appeals of the assessments are known prior to entering into a construction contract or issuing bonds to finance the assessed portion of the project. The established assessment rate would set the maximum levy amounts, guaranteeing property owners of the final cost they will pay for the project. Special assessments for this project have been calculated in accordance with the City's Special Assessment Policy. Budget Issues: The total project cost for the 57th Avenue Street Improvements is estimated to be $460,000; the total special assessments are estimated to be $32,987.33 for the street improvements. The total project cost for the 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Avenue and France Avenue) is estimated to be $1,872,000; the total special assessments are estimated to be $219,584.76 for the street improvements. Funding sources for the project are proposed from a variety of sources as described in the feasibility report. The Draft Special Assessment Levy Roll for Improvement Project Nos. 201 6 - 05 and 2017-10 are included in Appendices 0 and H of the feasibility report. Strategic Priorities: o Key Infrastructure Investments Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for al/people am/preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A FEASIBILITY REPORT, DECLARING COSTS TO BE ASSESSED AND CALLING FOR IMPROVEMENT AND ASSESSMENT PUBLIC BEARINGS FOR IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2016-05, 57TH AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENTS, AND IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2017-10 AND 2017-11, 2017 PAVEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNAL SYSTEM AND TRAIL REHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS (69TH AVENUE AND FRANCE AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council, by Resolution No. 2015-117, directed the preparation of a feasibility report regarding proposed improvements to 57th Avenue (Humboldt Avenue to Interstate 94); and WHEREAS, the Brooklyn Center City Council, by Resolution No. 2017-43, directed the preparation of a feasibility report regarding proposed imrovements to 69th Avenue (Shingle Creek Parkway to Dupont Avenue) and France Avenue (69t Avenue to the north City Limits); and WHEREAS, the City Engineer has prepared said report and recommends that the proposed improvements be considered; and WHEREAS, a portion of the cost of street improvements for said projects are proposed to be assessed against properties within the project areas; and WHEREAS, the total project cost for the 57 th Avenue Street Improvements is estimated to be $460,000, the total cost of the street improvement portion of said project is estimated to be $310,000 and the project funding sources are currently estimated to be: Special Assessments $ 32,987.33 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $10,000.00 Water Utility Fund $ 10,000.00 Storm Drainage Utility Fund $ 50,000.00 Street Light Utility Fund $ 20,000.00 Municipal Sate Aid Fund $337,012.67 Total $460,000.00 WHEREAS, the project cost for the 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Avenue and France Avenue) is estimated to be $1,872,000, the total cost of the street improvement portion of said project is estimated to be $1,542,000 and the project funding sources are currently estimated to be: RESOLUTION NO. Special Assessments $219,584.76 Sanitary Sewer Utility Fund $30,000.00 Water Utility Fund $30,000;00 Storm Drainage Utility Fund $110,000.00 Street Light Utility Fund $30,000.00 Capital Projects Fund $242,000.00 Street Reconstruction Fund $55,000.00 Municinal State Aid (MSA) Fund $1,155,415.24 Total $1,872,000.00 WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have prepared proposed assessment rolls showing the proposed amount to be specifically assessed for such improvement against every assessable lot, piece, or parcel of land within the district affected, without regard to cash valuation, as provided by law. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1.The Engineer's Feasibility Report for the 57th Avenue Street Improvements and the 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Avenue and France Avenue) is received and accepted. 2.An improvement hearing shall be held on the 22 nd day of May, 2017, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard to pass upon said improvement project and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by said improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to said improvements. 3.The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the improvement hearing to be published in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. 4.Portions of the costs to be assessed against benefited property owners for street improvements included in City Improvement Project No. 201 6-05 is declared to be $32,987.33; and City Improvement Project No. 2017-10 is declared to be $219,584.76. 5. An assessment hearing shall be held on the 22nd day of May, 2017, in the City Hall Council Chambers at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard to pass upon such assessment and at such time and place all persons owning property affected by such improvements will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. RESOLUTION NO. 6.The City Clerk is directed to cause a notice of the assessment hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. 7.The City Clerk shall cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearing. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Fenasibihty Report for 57th Avenue Street Improvements Improvement Project No. 2016-05 and 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (France Avenue and 69th Avenue) Improvement Project No's. 2017-10 and 2017-11 City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota SEH No. BROCTI41381 4.00 April 24, 2017 ii SEH Building a Better World for All of Us Engineers I Architects I Planners I Scientists Feasibility Report for 57th Avenue Street Improvements and 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (France Avenue and 69th Avenue) City Improvement Project No's. 2016-05, 201710 and 2017-11 City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota SEH No. BROCTI41381 April 24, 2017 I hereby certify that this report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. a, , -'0 ael-z Wayne Houle, FE Project Manager Date: April 18, 2017 Lic. No.: 25057 w aL Michael J Albers, PE Reviewed By: City Project Manager Date:April 18, 2017 Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. 10901 Red Circle Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343-9302 952.912.2600 SEH is a registered trademark of Short Elliott Hendrickson Inc. Feasibility Report BROCT141381 City of Brooklyn Center Page Table of Contents Certification Page Title Page Table of Contents Page I.BACKGROUND ........................................................................................................I II.PROJECT AREAS ....................................................................................................2 III. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ................................................................................5 A.57th AVENUE NORTH IMPROVEMENTS ........................................................ 5 B.691h AVENUE NORTH IMPROVEMENTS.......................................................7 C. FRANCE AVENUE NORTH IMPROVEMENTS..............................................9 IV. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS......................................................................10 V.ESTIMATED COSTS AND FUNDING CONSIDERATIONS ...................................11 VI.RECOMMENDED PROJECT SCHEDULE .............................................................18 VII. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................18 List of Tables Table1: Cost and Funding ..................................................................................................................12 Table2: Cost and Funding ..................................................................................................................14 Table 3: Preliminary Project Schedule ................................................................................................18 List of Figures Figure 1 - 57th Avenue North Mill & Overlay ...................................... ................................................... 2 Figure 2— 69th Avenue Mill & Overlay and Trail...................................................................................3 Figure 3 - France Avenue Mill & Overlay and Traffic Signal ................................................................4 Figure 4— 57th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Assessment Properties.........................................15 Figure 5-69th Avenue Mill and Overlay Assessment Properties......................................................16 Figure 6 - France Avenue Mill and Overlay Assessment Properties..................................................17 BROCTI41 381 Feasibility Report Page ii City of Brooklyn Center List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H 571h Avenue Complete Street Worksheets 69th Avenue Complete Street Worksheets France Avenue Complete Street Worksheets 57th Avenue Property Owner Questionnaire/Property Owner Comments 69th Avenue Property Owner Questionnaire/Property Owner Comments France Avenue Property Owner Questionnaire/Property Owner Comments 57th Avenue Draft Proposed Pending Assessment Roll 69th / France Avenue Draft Proposed Pending Assessment Roll Feasibility Report City of Brooklyn Center BROCTI4I38I Page iii April 2017 IFeasibilityIReport1Ifor 57thAvenue Street improvements and 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (France Avenue[L1111 1V%YLilI[1 Prepared for City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota :Y.iatiti1uJ Iii 2017 is the City of Brooklyn Center's 24th year of its long-range infrastructure rehabilitation program. This program has consisted of a systematic rehabilitation and/or replacement of the City's aging streets, water main, sanitary sewer, storm sewers, sidewalks, and streetlights. The City's Capital Improvement Program identifies 57th Avenue, 691h Avenue, and France Avenue for pavement reconditioning, trail and traffic signal rehabilitation in 2017. The proposed projects includes a roadway mill and overlay, minor concrete pavement repairs, minor utility improvements, trail pavement rehabilitation, and traffic signal rehabilitation. The improvement areas are shown in Figures 1, 2, and 3; the improvements are described below: Segment 571h Avenue 691h Avenue France Avenue 69th Avenue Trail 691h Ave & France Ave Extent Humboldt Ave to 1-94 Shingle Creek Pkwy to Dupont Ave 691h Ave to City Limits Shingle Creek to Dupont Ave Intersection Improvements Mill and Overlay Mill and Overlay Mill and Overlay Pavement Rehabilitation Traffic Signal Rehabilitation This report was prepared in response to City Council Resolution No's. 2015-117 and 2017-43 dated July 27, 2015 and March 27, 2017, directing staff to prepare a feasibility report and collect public input for the proposed projects. A property questionnaire and letter have been distributed as part of the project evaluation process. A summary of property owner comments is provided in Appendix D, E, and F. A public informational meeting with property owners located within the project areas was held on April 12. The 2017 project area consists of approximately 2.35 miles of streets, 0.82 miles of trail, and one signalized intersection. The project consists of the following type parcels: Segment 57th Avenue 69th Avenue France Avenue Property Types Residential 22-R1, 2-R4 18-R1, 60-R3, 1-R4, 60-R5 59 Commercial/Industrial 0 5-C2, 2-Il [øJ Feasibility Report BROCT1 41381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 1 LJJ±tLJ HThONflN9AV HOtJO1'T .V JJLFfl7JJiI[IEITJii '1 -1ij1i1 TJ1rLL1i HJ1--ON ii 1FPF [fl:- - TLL1I LJ1 -- - 1 Cu ) 1) D_ IL > -4 )a)— 0 Uj IS LO I a0- a 1LLA II. PROJECT AREAS Figure 1 - 57th Avenue North Mill & Overlay n t7r TEflILJ(rL-1 - -: - - - iIJT I FA, i ;- I -HWON 3t1N3AV HOiiQy - J rnIiLLLb1LL±5-. NiOr anN 3 /W1NVA8 11IU0N 3flNAV XW1OI 'TJ.j LLLL1lr[FVLIL.LL_t ....1...LILLjJ1 J J- 1 N3flN3AyiNOdfla-flJ AYNOSJ13 - -- Ui- LL UhLI L -- H.WON3flNAY1NOJrJIjIT 'TT__A 1 777 mLII I rTl-f-T----r ifT-rLILL_IJ.. i.LIllijj - pmprn :Tr:Fqp-.1 U - -- --:q BROCT141 381 Feasibility ReportPage 2 City of Brooklyn Center Figure 2 69th Avenue Mill & Overlay and Trail 1- •lHVLt. H ONflMAV-LNOd1p- IUPONT EM ry 1 jf TfJdH k :!I ijiLLiL F I J —ul--- i 1 I •± AgAll H L I L -Lii ----------- -L _4 •LiLR —: --- P U -—,LION JflNBAV 9OO1_. LU o (7R LU iiV ION t4tj -Ij I ) C r; TI ---.-, ----I -------C Iiti: \\ '•S CD -D oED< 0 0CD CD o_ u A 1\ EL ; LIq Feasibility Report BROCT1 41 381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 3 Figure 3 - France Avenue Mill & Overlay and Traffic Signal Jw-.1STAWtIUE I1ORT .---- 0z LLI- -- -• z.__Lu LLJ! 1iThT. - - --- ---io :z - z M o- 2 - uI LI, I lI IuiI.t Project Boundary;IIII; Proje Ct Area I TER DR. JLot:brctI 4lt II Pat tDate: uThaii I FRANCEAVEMLLAND OVERLAYIfiT. PAUL,I II I O LC IJC N IId PhCI 69th Avenue to 73rd Avenue -I Brooklyn Center, MN m BROCT141381 Feasibility Report Page 4 City of Brooklyn Center ii. - ii lI.11 Ii It'iI J {'I1'A i'iI I 1 Based on age, condition and extensive maintenance needs of the existing roadways and public utilities, the recommended improvements are described below. In accordance with the Complete Streets Policy adopted by the City in 2013, all streets and trail projects, including design planning, reconstruction, rehabilitation, maintenance or operation by the City of Brooklyn Center shall be designed and executed in a responsible, equitable and financially reasonable way to accommodate and encourage travel by bicyclists, pedestrian's, public transportation, emergency and commercial vehicles in a balance manner. Implementation of the City's Complete Street Policy ensures that the needs and safety of pedestrians, bicyclists, motorists and transit riders of all ages and abilities are taken into account in the design and operation of roads. Accordingly, a worksheet has been completed to assist in the complete streets evaluation (see Appendix A, B, and C, Complete Street Worksheets). All street improvements include updating of any pedestrian ramps to meet the current American with Disabilities Act (ADA) requirements. A. 57th AVENUE NORTH IMPROVEMENTS 1.Street— Existing Conditions 57th Avenue was reconstructed in 1996 and is a designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The existing street is 38-feet wide urban section with concrete curb and gutter. A concrete sidewalk exists along the entire south side of 57th Avenue North from THIOO to 194 and on the north side from Camden Avenue to the Mississippi Regional Park entrance. An existing pavement evaluation was conducted by the City resulting with the surface showing significant deterioration, such as the roadway surface prematurely failed and excessive potholes have occurred in connection with a past roadway chip sealcoat application. Approximately 50% of the lane (typically wheel-path to wheel-path) has been milled and overlaid. Soil borings and pavement core measurements were conducted at five locations within the project area. These measurements revealed that the existing pavement sections within 571h Avenue consist of 4.5 to 6 inches of bituminous pavement and an undetermined thickness of aggregate base over a fine to coarse granular subgrade material. This underlying pavement structure is generally stable for the majority of the roadway. Additionally, limited sections of deteriorated concrete curb and gutter were identified within the project area. Recent traffic counts along this segment of roadway are 4,100 vehicles per day west of Dupont Avenue and 1,100 vehicles per day east of Dupont Avenue. The current roadway configuration has been in-place for over 50 years and appears to be functioning adequately. Traffic counts on 57th Avenue are not projected to substantially increase in the future. 2.Street - Proposed Improvements The recommended pavement improvement consist of a mill and overlay rehabilitation of the existing pavement. The existing concrete curb and gutter on 57th Avenue North has not exceeded its life expectancy and can be suitably rehabilitated with spot repairs. Approximately 20 percent of the concrete curb and gutter and concrete driveway aprons are estimated to be replaced due to heaving I settling issues and as warranted or impacted by other construction (e.g public utility repairs). The Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan adopted in March 2014 was also reviewed and a future trail was identified along 57th Avenue North. Three Rivers Park District is in the process of converting the existing sidewalk along the southerly Feasibility Report BROCT141381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 5 side of 57th Avenue to a 10-foot regional trail from Logan Avenue to the Regional Mississippi River Trail east of Interstate 94. The southerly curb and gutter will be moved to the north to accommodate the trail as part of the Park District project. The trail project will be occurring this summer and once the trail project is completed the roadway will then be milled and overlaid. 3. Street Lighting - Existing The street improvement program has historically included the replacement of free-standing streetlights located within the project area. Free-standing streetlights are defined as lights mounted on poles, which do not contain any other overhead utilities attached to them. The existing street light system along 57th Avenue North are cobra style lights mounted to multiuse wood power poles that carry overhead power utilities. However, there are two free standing light poles. The recommended streetlight improvements include replacement of the two free-standing light poles with fiberglass poles with a cut-off type LED light fixture and underground power. 5.Sanitary Sewer— Existing The sanitary sewer on 57th Avenue consists of 8-inch to 10-inch poly-vinyl-chloride (PVC) pipe that was installed between 1998 and 1999. All public sanitary sewer pipe were inspected with remote televising equipment. The condition of the sanitary sewer within the project area is rated good. 6.Sanitary Sewer— Proposed Sanitary sewer improvements will be made to the existing system that includes replacing manhole castings and lids within the project area. The replacement of the castings with external seals will help minimize inflow and infiltration of rainwater into the sanitary sewer system. 7.Water System Existing The existing water mains all cross 57th Avenue and consists of 6-inch diameter ductile iron pipe (DIP) installed in 1996. Based on current maintenance records, no watermain breaks have occurred on 57th Avenue since the new watermain was installed. 8.Water System - Proposed Water main improvements will be made to the existing system that include adjusting I replacing gate valve castings as impacted within the project area. 9. Storm Drainage and Treatment System - Existing The existing storm sewer along 57th Avenue consists of a 21-inch to 36-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) that drains to the Mississippi River. All storm sewer along 57th Avenue was installed in 1996. A televising of the storm sewer in this area was found to be in good condition. BROCT141381 Feasibility Report Page 6 City of Brooklyn Center 10. Storm Drainage and Treatment System - Proposed Storm sewer improvements will be made to the existing system includes casting replacements and adjustments as necessary. :. Jv4 LIJ *[i] I III k'i I sY4 I 1.Street— Existing Conditions 69th Avenue was reconstructed in 1996 and is a designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The existing street is an urban section with a width ranging from 30 to 50-feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. An existing pavement evaluation was conducted by the City resulting with the surface showing significant deterioration, such as the roadway surface prematurely failed and excessive potholes have occurred in connection with a past roadway chip sealcoat application. In 2016, CenterPoint Energy replaced a portion of the roadway with their gas main replacement. Soil borings and pavement core measurements were conducted at eight locations within the project area. These measurements revealed that the existing pavement sections within 69 1 h Avenue consist of 5.3 to 7.3 inches of bituminous pavement and an apparent thickness of 4 to 8 inches of aggregate base over a fine to coarse granular subgrade material. This underlying pavement structure is generally stable for the majority of the roadway. Additionally, limited sections of deteriorated concrete curb and gutter were identified within the project area. Recent traffic counts along this segment of roadway are 5,100 vehicles per day west of Humboldt Avenue and 3,400 vehicles per day east of Humboldt Avenue. The current roadway configuration has been in-place for over 50 years and appears to be functioning adequately. Traffic counts on 69th Avenue are not projected to substantially increase in the future. 2.Street - Proposed Improvements The recommended pavement improvement consist of a mill and overlay rehabilitation of the existing pavement, excluding the pavement that was replaced in 2016 by CenterPoint Energy with their gas main replacement project. After the mill and overlay is completed a chip sealcoat will be provided over the entire roadway. The existing concrete curb and gutter on 69th Avenue North has not exceeded its life expectancy and can be suitably rehabilitated with spot repairs. Approximately 10% of the concrete curb and gutter and concrete driveway aprons are estimated to be replaced due to heaving / settling issues and as warranted or impacted by other construction (e.g public utility repairs). The Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan adopted in March 2014 was also reviewed and no recommended improvements were identified for this section of roadway. 3. Trail - Existing Conditions The trail along 69th Avenue North from approximately Shingle Creek to Dupont Avenue is generally an 8-foot wide bituminous trail, except when the trail is adjacent to the curb it varies between 9 feet and 10 feet. The trail was constructed in 1996 and is showing significant deterioration. Feasibility Report BROCTI41381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 7 4.Trail - Proposed Trail improvements include a full depth reclamation along with updated pedestrian ramps is proposed for the trail along 69th Avenue North. The proposed trail will be an 8-foot bituminous trail with a 5-foot boulevard except at locations where the trail is adjacent to the curb, near Humboldt Avenue, where the trail will be 10-foot wide at these locations. 5.Street Lighting - Existing The existing street light system along 69th Avenue North consists of one wood and seven fiberglass free-standing lights. The existing free standing street lights have underground power service with a cobra head type LED light fixture. 6.Street Lighting Proposed Update the one wood free-standing light pole with a fiberglass pole with cut-off type LED light fixture and underground power. 7.Sanitary Sewer Existing The sanitary sewer on 69th Avenue consists of an 8-inch diameter VCP installed between 1961 and 1969, and a 12-inch diameter VCP installed in 1969. All public sanitary sewer pipe were inspected with remote televising equipment. The condition of the sanitary sewer within the project area is rated good. 8.Sanitary Sewer - Proposed Sanitary sewer improvements will be made to the existing system that includes replacing manhole castings and lids within the project area. The replacement of the castings with external seals will help minimize inflow and infiltration of rainwater into the sanitary sewer system. 9.Water System - Existing The existing watermain on 69th Avenue consists of a 16-inch diameter CIP installed in 1960 and a 24-inch diameter DIP installed in 1996. Based on current maintenance records there have been two watermain breaks since the roadway was reconstructed in 1996. 10.Water System - Proposed Water main improvements will be made to the existing system that include adjusting I replacing gate valve castings as impacted within the project area. 11.Storm Drainage and Treatment System - Existing The existing storm sewer along the west end of 69th Avenue consists of a 15-inch to 18-inch diameter RCP that drains to Shingle Creek; the east side of 69th Avenue from Oliver Avenue to Dupont Avenue consists of a 12-inch to 30-inch diameter RCP that drains to the Mississippi River. All storm sewer on 69th Avenue, with the exception of the 250-feet of 30- inch RCP, was installed in 1996 as part of the roadway reconstruction; the 30-inch RCP was installed in 1969. A televising of the storm sewer in this area was found to be in good condition. BROCTI4138I Feasibility Report Page 8 City of Brooklyn Center 12. Storm Drainage and Treatment System - Proposed Storm sewer improvements will be made to the existing system includes casting replacements and adjustments as necessary. [e. - 11 [ii %YkiIJ1 [I] 4 1:11 'iI J (s1'1 I*IfL 1.Street Existing Conditions France Avenue was reconstructed in 1997 and is a designated Municipal State Aid (MSA) route. The existing street is an urban section that is typically 32-feet wide with concrete curb and gutter. A concrete sidewalk exists along the west side of France Avenue. An existing pavement evaluation was conducted by the City resulting with the surface showing significant deterioration, such as the roadway surface prematurely failed and excessive potholes have occurred in connection with a past roadway chip sealcoat application. Soil borings and pavement core measurements were conducted at three locations within the project area. These measurements revealed that the existing pavement sections within 69th Avenue consist of 5.5 to 6.3 inches of bituminous pavement and an apparent thickness of 5 inches of aggregate base over a fine to coarse granular subgrade material. This underlying pavement structure is generally stable for the majority of the roadway. Additionally, limited sections of deteriorated concrete curb and gutter were identified within the project area. Recent traffic counts along this segment of roadway are 5,100 vehicles per day. The current roadway configuration has been in-place for over 50 years and appears to be functioning adequately. Traffic counts on France Avenue are not projected to substantially increase in the future. 2.Street - Proposed Improvements The recommended pavement improvement consist of a mill and overlay rehabilitation of the existing pavement. The existing concrete curb and gutter on France Avenue North has not exceeded its life expectancy and can be suitably rehabilitated with spot repairs. Approximately 20 percent of the concrete curb and gutter and concrete driveway aprons are estimated to be replaced due to heaving / settling issues and as warranted or impacted by other construction (e.g public utility repairs). The Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan adopted in March 2014 was also reviewed and no recommended improvements were identified for this section of roadway. An estimated 15 percent of the sidewalk along the westerly side of France Avenue is warranted to be replaced due to heaving/settling issues and to obtain American with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance. 3.Street Lighting - Existing The existing street light system along France Avenue North consists of five fiberglass free- standing streetlights with cobra head type light fixtures. 4.Street Lighting - Proposed No street light improvements are proposed. 5. Sanitary Sewer - Existing The sanitary sewer on France Avenue consists of an 8-inch VCP with a cured-in-place (CIPP) liner that was installed in 1997 and also a segment of 8-inch diameter PVC also Feasibility Report BROCT141381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 9 installed in 1997. All public sanitary sewer pipe were inspected with remote televising equipment. The condition of the sanitary sewer within the project area is rated good. 6.Sanitary Sewer - Proposed Sanitary sewer improvements will be made to the existing system that includes replacing manhole castings and lids within the project area. The replacement of the castings with external seals will help minimize inflow and infiltration of rainwater into the sanitary sewer system. 7.Water System Existing The existing watermain on France Avenue consists of 14-inch diameter DIP installed in 1997. Based on current maintenance records there have been watermain breaks since the roadway was reconstructed in 1997. 8.Water System - Proposed Water main improvements will be made to the existing system that include adjusting I replacing gate valve castings as impacted within the project area. 9.Storm Drainage and Treatment System - Existing The existing storm sewer on France Avenue consists of 12-inch to 18-inch and a 48-inch diameter RCP that drains to Palmer Lake. The 12-inch to 18-inch storm sewer system was installed in 1997. The 48-inch RCP was installed in 1968. A televising of the storm sewer in this area was found to be in good condition. 10.Storm Drainage and Treatment System - Proposed Storm sewer improvements will be made to the existing system includes casting replacements and adjustments as necessary. 11.Traffic Signal Existing Conditions The traffic signal system located at 69th Avenue North and France Avenue North was installed in 1992 and re-timed in 2011. A signal evaluation was conducted in December of 2014. The evaluation of the signal system indicated that the signal paint was in fairly good condition with some rust and flaking of the paint at the base of the signalpoles, the signal indications appear to be light-emitting diodes (LEDs), the inside of the signal cabinets need to be cleaned, the pedestrian signal equipment does not meet ADA standards, an emergency vehicle preemption system (EVP) does not exist, and the luminaires are non LED lights. 12. Traffic Signal - Proposed Improvements The proposed improvement include new controller and cabinet, painting of the poles and mast arms, installation of countdown pedestrian heads, Accessible Pedestrian System (APS) push buttons, EVP system, flashing yellow left turn system, new wiring, a video detection system and other appurtenance replacement as necessary. IV. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND EASEMENTS Generally, all public infrastructure owned, maintained and operated by the City throughout the project areas are located within City easements and/or right-of-way. It is not anticipated that the City will need to obtain any additional easement for any existing or proposed improvements located within the BROCT14I38I - Feasibility Report Page 10 City of Brooklyn Center roadways or trail. If necessary, any identified easement needs during final design will be further coordinated with the City Attorney and identified property owners. Due to the separate Three Rivers Park District trail project along 57th Avenue North we are proposing to bid the 69th Avenue North and France Avenue North Projects as one bid package and 57th Avenue North as a separate project. The total estimated cost of the proposed 571h Avenue Street Improvements is $460,000. Table I provides a summary of the estimated project costs and recommended funding amount from the various sources as indicated. The total estimated project cost of proposed 2017 Pavement, Traffic Signal System, and Trail Rehabilitation Improvements (69th Ave and France Ave) is $1,872,000. Table 2 provides a summary of the estimated project costs and recommended funding amount from the various sources as indicated. These preliminary estimates includes the cost for project administration, legal, engineering and construction contingency. Special assessments for street improvements are proposed in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy. The standard 2017 residential street assessment rate for mill and overlay projects will be established with this project and will be $1,401 per Ri zoned residential property. This rate would be assessed to all benefitting single family residential properties within the project area. The multi-family properties that are zoned R3 and would be assessed based on a per unit assessment based on the frontage rate, multiplied by the total feet of frontage and divided by the total number of units. The multi-familyproperties that are zoned R4 and R5 and commercial/industrial properties would be assessed based on an acreage basis. An "A" zone benefit includes the area abutting the street be improved, extending to a depth of 200-feet and a "B" zone of lesser benefit for the remainder of the property area. The "A" zone rate is based on assessing 70 percent of the total street project cost deemed to benefit the property and the "B" zone rate is based on 30 percent. A. FUNDING FOR 57th AVENUE STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 57th Avenue North - Street Improvements The estimated project cost of roadway improvements for 571h Avenue is $310,000. This preliminary estimate includes the cost for project administration, legal, engineering and construction contingency. Special assessments for street improvements are proposed in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy. Table 1, below, provides a summary of the estimated project costs and recommended funding amount from the various sources as indicated. A total estimated special assessment amount of $32,987.33 would be levied for street improvements, see Figure 4 for special assessment areas. The remaining street construction costs would be funded from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Fund. A summary of the proposed special assessments for street improvements are provided in Appendix G. 2. 57th Avenue North - Utility Improvements The estimated cost of storm drainage improvements is $110,000; the estimated cost of sanitary sewer improvements is $10,000; the estimated cost of water main improvements is $10,000; and the estimated cost for street light replacement is $20,000. As previously noted, these total cost estimates include the costs for project administration, engineering, legal and construction contingency. All costs for water, sanitary sewer and street light improvements Feasibility Report BROCT141381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 11 will be funded by their respective utility funds in accordance with established policy for such improvements. to . Oo• LL n 4-, 0U) 0.o DWQ to c_) - )c ci0000100)00 CO CDC) ci ci0 ci 0 00 N- 10 ci C3 C)CJ r-.:dcddci c-000o)r-. C31 C)0 CO 000)00000C) C)C)0E0:C6-C,! CC)(C)U,ciood:ciCC) c C)(C)U)Ui C))U)&U)U)U) U)U)U) U)U)U)N-U) 0 ci0001ci000)C)0 0 00 n j0i 0ci 1 0ci ci000C)ci ci -U) CIJU)COIU)CD(NU) ddCl)-(I)C')U) 0 ci0000000100.0 q 000000 Ci ql 000 cici0 000C) C2 Z7, 6 6 6 (U) ocicil 0 ci ci000)C)C)C' odd!6 1 ó 000000o00.w.!co,---!0 0 ciU)U)U)to ci 000000D00iPP 0)C)cidcC)I(D ciC)0,C)ciC)ci0 E'°°I 0 0 ci C) - 00.ci2002oo bOo 0 F-C')0000C)0 CO.O 0 0C) C)It CL)U)00 0 (NC')N-0 C)U)NW)!)C')U)(F)(NU)U)U)U) ZI co LL) LL in I V LO th LL .ofl)1 Q ..2U)D C) LL C) LLI 0 a? 0)° 0)E C). E . Ui wiwE 4.- Ui ,U)C/,Ct0) LU I-lii I- BROCT141381 Feasibility Report Page 12 City of Brooklyn Center B. FUNDING FOR 2017 PAVEMENT, TRAFFIC SIGNAL, AND TRAILREHABILITATION IMPROVEMENTS (69TH AVE and FRANCE AVE) 1.69TH Avenue North & France Avenue North Street Improvements The estimated project cost of roadway, traffic signal and trail improvements on 69th Avenue and France Avenue is $1,542,000. This preliminary estimate includes the cost for project administration, legal, engineering and construction contingency. Special assessments for street improvements are proposed in accordance with the City's Assessment Policy. Table 2, below, provides a summary of the estimated project costs and recommended funding amount from the various sources as indicated. A total estimated special assessment amount of $219,584.76 would be levied for street improvements, see Figures 5 & 6 for Special Assessment Areas. The remaining street construction costs would be funded from the Municipal State Aid (MSA) Fund, Capital Projects Fund, and the Street Reconstruction Fund. A summary of the proposed special assessments for street improvements are provided in Appendix H. 2.69TH Avenue North & France Avenue North Utility Improvements The estimated cost of storm drainage improvements is $240,000; the estimated cost of sanitary sewer improvements is $30,000; the estimated cost of water main improvements is $30,000; and the estimated cost for street light replacement is $30,000. As previously noted, these total cost estimates include the costs for project administration, engineering, legal and construction contingency. All costs for water, sanitary sewer and street light improvements will be funded by their respective utility funds in accordance with established policy for such improvements. Feasibility Report BROCT141381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 13 a) a)> a)0 U- V a)do > T'- 0_ r- ael- C -o £ to 0o w EM = 0 . c y CL 4-,U) U) U)C-, U- V U)00 a) .0 I— ---ci P 0 C)N-C C)0 C)00 Cl C) C)ci C)C)C) C)C)C)CD to CD4--C)C.C)ci CO C C)C C)C)C C) Eo C) C)C)C)If)0 CD C)ci ci ci cicdcc')OdCcddC4L6LC c'-.-'-Ci)C')It (C)'C)N-(N (N CO (N 69 (C>69 (N (C>—COW696969.1 03 03 (19 (/3 0 C ci 0 0 CD000ciC)C'cicici ci 0 ciCDC,0 0 ci(,)'4-ci C.cit ci d 0ci ciciC')COCi)co co Ci) e9 691 V) oT 03 Lc) 1DUc;41 t 0 LLLOaLU.,-.-t LLW0 LU--E 'E—4-0wcww -w 'LUU)coo O)COOO) BROCT141381 Feasibility Report Page 14 City of Brooklyn Center Figure 4 57th Avenue Pavement Rehabilitation Assessment Properties U -ITLJ1 r'H •'-,v.II'1vAcJc1:IIHEE [EEF'TTF [z Js I N3AVXvo Di coLO I N2AV.LNQdflQThJjI P[HFF 'TJFnr[mttiii ttWt1 iIt1LiN 3AV NOSJtLt:2NLf Ad, 1 - 9L 909 so 0r9 cc,Q : LB1 i >cu (i) ca > - ()(J)ci) (flci) EEELE LLttLtilUiLi L EN 'U a ± a a) a)o a (0 C)o a a) -a O22- 0) I II II I I-J LJL_JLJ..J tL) Feasibility Report BROCT141 381 City of Brooklyn Center Page 15 Figure 5 - 69th Avenue Mill and Overlay Assessment Properties LiL-fittI1Tft1Tii DUPONTAV I ES All : r__ V) (fl (J) (f) U)I ___-, o E iIJIrwLJJLu_u_uJij_ L----1 . Q wr—rDrrM1V1I I 4-'----I--1— i - n ri____J ni ripim nr - ii rnTrrni [': :jL_I ____ caH H- 'j -flTftH :DLUIiJ z 000 __VIIIII :IH TJZIa CL co (-J) \\ LU ,c7 BROCT141 381 Feasibility Report Page 16 City of Brooklyn Center Figure 6— France Avenue Mill and Overlay Assessment Properties I 73RD AVE-N-liH U H 72NDAVE Ntill 71ST AVE N / I • I 1/ Z L. LLUI u_I I ------ 7236 j 1i 7230 3813 7142 3812 I 7130 7124 7118 7112 7106 7100 7048 7042 7036 UJ 7030 uJI 7024 Z 7018 LL 1 7012 I 7006 7000 6942 7243 7237 7231 7225 7216 7213 7207 7201 7143 7137 7131 7125 7119 7113 7107 7101 3901 7037 7031 7025 7019 7013 7007 7001 6943 I I I BROOKLYN PARK / I / BROOKLYN CENTER 0 o49Ir J I / / I 1111 •/' / Ii_ (.-. 1b U'. 11 \\ • 1 t / D. LJRBANAVEN ./., L ' LL LegendTI RI Assessment Project Boundary 70TH AVE NI 6936 1 1 6937 (. .1 4 6930A6931 6925 i 6M —TTITT Th 'TTET . 69T1TAVENTh - Assessment Map France Avenue Project Area + April 2017 Feasibility Report City of Brooklyn Center BROCT14I38I Page 17 IYA - 1 i('] 'iI 'il l '] 1 1s!1 11.l:1 'liii Table 3: Preliminary Project Schedule Mill & Overlay, Trail and Signal Projects Schedule ACTION TARGET DATE City Council Receives Feasibility Report, Declares Cost to be Assessed and Calls for Public Hearings April 24, 2017 City Council Holds Public Hearing, Authorizes the Project and Orders Preparation of Plans and Specifications May 22, 2017 City Council Approves Plans and Specifications and Authorizes Advertisement for Bids June 12, 2017 City Receives and Opens Project Bids July 13, 2017 City Council Considers Award of Contract July 24, 2017 Start Project Construction August 2017 Construction Substantially Complete October 2017 IYA I €S] [' 1.U11 [']I I III 1 i('] I 'il I i]UII] The overall condition of the City's street and utility infrastructure systems is critical to the operation safety, welfare and economic health of the entire community. As a result of the infrastructure needs described and the proposed solution and estimated costs provided in this report, the proposed project is considered to be necessary, cost effective and feasible. BROCTI41381 - Feasibility Report Page 18 City of Brooklyn Center 57th Avenue Complete Street Worksheets City of Brooklyn Center Complete Streets Policy 57th Avenue North Appendix A Complete Streets Worksheet This Complete Streets Worksheet is intended to serve as a guide when reviewing a roadway's ability to accommodate all modes of transportation (pedestrian, bicyclists, transit riders, freight, and automobiles) and people of all abilities in a cost-effective manner, while promoting safe operation for all users. Complete streets address the design of the entire street right-of-way to determine the best allocation of space between the various transportation modes. Complete streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of smaller-improvements or maintenance activities overtime. This worksheet was developed to facilitate implementing the complete streets process and to help sort through potentially conflicting modal priorities. The worksheet is also available in an electronic format that allows responses to by typed directly into the worksheet. Please reference the following materials when filling out the checklist: o City and/or County Comprehensive Plans that cover the project area • Transportation Plans that cover the project area (e.g., City, County, and/or State) • Bicycle or Pedestrian Master Plans that cover the project area (e.g., City, Park district, County, and/or State) • City and/or County ADA Transition Plans that cover the project area • Area specific studies • A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO "Green Book") • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition • MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual • Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) • ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) • Proposed Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) • Hennepin County Complete Street Policy • State of Minnesota Complete Street Policy Complete Streets Policy Adopted by City Council June 24, 2013 j.1F1I.]leu.II[.1.Date: 4/10/201 Project Location City of Brooklyn Center (municipality): City of Brooklyn Center Roadway Jurisdiction: 57th Avenue Mill and Overlay Project/Roadway Name: Improvement area consists of properties beginning at Humboldt Project Start Point:Avenue. See project area map in feasibility report. Improvement area consists of properties ending at 1-94. See Project End Point:project area map in feasibility report. Mike Albers, City of Brooklyn Center Project Manager Define Existing and Future Land Use and Urban Design Context 1.Do any adopted plans call for the development of bicycle, pedestrian, transit or roadway facilities on, crossing, or adjacent to, the proposed project? If yes, list the applicable plan(s). Guidance: Possible sources of this information include Comprehensive Plans, Transportation Plans, Bicycle or Pedestrian Master Plans or area-specific studies developed by applicable City County and/or State Agencies. Twin Lakes Regional Trail is proposed in the future as referenced in the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (City of Brooklyn Center, March 2014). This trail project will be completed by Three Rivers Park District in 2017. None are identified in the Hennepin County 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan (Hennepin County, April 2015). 2.Are there any local, county, statewide or federal policies that call for incorporating multimodal facilities? Guidance: Policies at the state and federal level may impact a project due to funding sources. No. A-2 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 3.Describe the study area. Guidance: What are the predominant land uses along the corridor? What is the community character? (e.g., tree-lined streets, historic, new development) Are there any planned redevelopment areas in the project area? The project area consists of approximately 0.55 miles of streets and utilities. The project consists of single family homes, with the exception of 2 multi-family high density properties that are zoned "R4". No redevelopment is planned. 4.What trip generators (existing and future) are in the vicinity of the project that might attract walkers, bikers or transit users? Guidance: For example, large employers, downtown or shopping districts, schools, parks, community centers, medical centers, transit stations, government buildings and senior care facilities. Restaurants and shopping within 1.5 miles of project area. Future regional trail within the project area. Define Existing and Future Transportation Context 5. Describe existing and projected modal volumes, if available. olume as IYLiI I • 57th Ave (2015):57th Ave (2035): Average Daily Traffic 4,100 West end /1,100 East end 4,200 West end /1,200 East end Not Available Not Available Pedestrian Counts Not Available Not Available Bicycle Counts Not Available Not Available Truck Volumes Not Available Not Available Transit Volumes APPENDIX A: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET A-3 6. Existing vehicle speed conditions. a.What is the posted speed limit for the project and associated intersecting streets? 30 mph b.Provide speed data, if available. Not Available c. Are excessive speeds an issue in the project area? None Known 7. Describe crash data, if available, and known conflict locations. Guidance: Crash data will likely not be available for pedestrians and bicycles. Crash trends and known conflict points should include neighborhood input and antidotal data, such as areas of known"near misses", or areas where seasonal activities cause safety issues, such as sports arenas or fairgrounds. Transportation U rmb e of Crashes Period CoveredMode 13 throughout the corridor Vehicles 2011-2016 Pedestrians Bicycles a.Are there any crash trends between specific modes? There are no crash trends between the specified nodes. b.Are there known conflict points between specific modes? No A-4 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 8. Describe Classifications. a.What is the road functional classification? 57th Avenue is designated as a Collector. b.Does the street cross any high functional classification roads? (yes/no) If so, please list. Yes: The west boundary of the project is Humboldt Avenue which is a Collector and the east boundary of the project is adjacent to Lyndale Avenue which is a Collector. The project limits are adjacent to Lyndale Avenue at the 1-94 bridge. c. Does the roadway have other classifications (e.g., truck route, transit route, bicycle route, emergency vehicle route)? (yes/no) If so, please list. Yes: 57th Avenue is a MSA route. 9. Sketch in or attach the existing cross-section(s). Guidance: The existing cross-section should include the full right-of-way and be clearly dimensioned. Additional cross-sections are advisable to illustrate specific situations or if corridor segments greatly yaw. EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION NORTH SOUTH ROW ROW APPENDIX A: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET A-5 1 0. What multimodal accommodations exist in the project and on streets that it intersects? Guidance: Multimodal accommodations may include transit routes, sidewalks, trails, and designated on-street bicycle facilities, such as bike lanes, sharrows or signed bike routes. Concrete sidewalk exists along the south side of 57th Avenue between Humboldt Avenue and 1-94. Concrete sidewalk exists along the north side of 57th Avenue between Camden Ave and 1-94. Concrete sidewalks existing along the east and west sides of Dupont Avenue north of 57th Avenue. Concrete sidewalks existing along the west side of Humboldt Avenue. 11.If there are no multimodal accommodations, how far away are the closest parallel facilities? Guidance: Designated transit routes or bikeways may not exist within the community, and therefore, may not be applicable. Metro Transit routes exist on 57th Avenue and on Dupont Avenue. 12.What multimodal amenities exist in the project? Guidance: multimodal amenities may include benches, bile racks/lockers, trash receptacles, crosswalks, traffic signals, mature tree canopy, transit stops/shelters, and wayfinding signage. 57th Avenue amenities: Metro Transit stops. 13. Describe any particular user needs/challenges along the project corridor that you have observed or have been informed of. Guidance: User needs may consist of lack of facilities (worn dirt pathways), traffic congestion, difficulty accessing bus stops or sidewalks due to snow piles at intersections, at-grade crossings of railroads or high volume roadways, and steep terrain. None identified. A-o COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 14.Are the existing facilities ADA and PROWAG compliant? Guidance: Reference resources include the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), Proposed Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), and MnDOT Accessibility Design Tools website. The pedestrian curb ramps will be reviewed for compliance and will be replaced with truncated dome detectable warning systems in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Identify Existing Deficiencies 15.Based on the land use and transportation context analysis, describe existing and anticipated future deficiencies to full multimodal transportation that the project could/should address. Twin Lakes Regional Trail is proposed in the future as referenced in the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (City of Brooklyn Center, March 2014). This trail project will be completed by Three Rivers Park District in 2017. Describe Future Objectives 16.Develop objectives regarding how multimodal facilities will be integrated into the project and how identified deficiencies will be addressed. Guidance: The objectives will form the basis for the street design. -Pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed throughout the project at each crosswalk location with truncated dome detectable warning systems in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). -Regional trail constructed along south side of roadway. Recommend Area Typology/Street Typology and Test Cross-section(s) 17.Complete the following questions if your community has developed Area Typologies and Street Typologies (See page 21, "Roadway Classification versus Settings" for a description of area and street typologies.) Guidance: If applicable, list document that contains your agency's Area Typologies and Street Typologies a.What is the recommended Area Typology? Not applicable b.What is the recommended Street Typology? Not applicable APPENDIX A: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET A-7 1 8. Sketch in or attach the initial cross-section(s) that depicts desired street elements. Guidance: Initial cross-section should be clearly dimensioned and indicate any additional right-of-way required. Additional cross-sections are advisable for specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. Not applicable. This is a mill and overlay project and significant changes are cost prohibitive. Pedestrian/bike or Twin Lakes Regional Trail improvements are not proposed to be included in the scope of work. 19.Describe any constraints associated with the initial cross-section. Guidance: Potential constraints include lack of right-of-way, existing structures, existing mature trees or environ- mental features, topography or number of driveways. Not applicable. 20.Sketch in or attach alternative cross-sections. Guidance: Alternative cross-sections should be modifications of the initial cross-section that respond to identi- fied constraints. All modes should receive equal consideration and accountability in the development of alternatives. Not applicable A-8 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE Describe Tradeoffs and Select Cross-section 21.Describe tradeoffs associated with the alternative cross-sections. Guidance: Examples of tradeoffs include removal of mature vegetation, narrower travel lanes, removal of on-street parking (one or both sides), right-of-way acquisition costs, and provision of bikeway facility on an adjacent parallel street. Not applicable. 22.Sketch in or attach the selected cross-section(s). Guidance: Selected cross-section should be clearly dimensioned and indicate any additional right-of-way required. Additional cross-sections are advisable for specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. NORTH ROW tYPICAL 11' 32' FACE TO FACE 467' BLVD I I BLVD SOUTH F ROW 10' TRAIL PARKING JLANE JLANE ,J, 23. If the project does not accommodate all modes, list reasons why facilities for that mode are not provided. Guidance: For example, the cost of the facility will be disproportionately high in relation to number of projected users; adequate right-of-way does not exist and acquisition of additional right-of-way would create adverse impacts to valued community assets; a bikeway facility is being planned on an adjacent parallel route that can service bicyclists' needs. Not applicable. APPENDIX A COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET A-9 Implementation 24.Identify project milestones, roles and responsibilities for project implementation City Council Conduct Public Hearing / Order Plans: May 22, 2017 City Council Approve Plans/Authorizes Advertisement for Bids: June 12, 2017 City Council Accept Bids/Award Project: July 13, 2017 Begin Construction: August 2017 Substantial Completion: November 2017 25.How will access for all modes be maintained during project construction? Guidance: Reference resource includes MnDOT Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) Webinar, Maintaining Pedestrian Access Through Construction & Maintenance Work Zones A drivable street will be maintained at most times during the construction. The exception would be during the installation/repair of the City utilities and rehabilitation of the existing roadway, when access may be cut off for a limited period of time. Even during those activities, though, access will be restored by the end of each day. Access to the sidewalk system will be available for the majority of the construction project. However, the main interruption to access of the sidewalks will be during the replacement of deficient sections of sidewalk. For this work, access will not be available for approximately 7-10 days while the concrete cures. 26. Facility Maintenance a.What agency will be responsible for on-going maintenance for each mode? City of Brooklyn Center - Public Works Department will be responsible for on-going maintenance for the streets, sidewalks and trails. b.What specific seasonal and long-term maintenance is needed for each mode? Maintenance activities typically include patching, sealcoating, crack sealing, sweeping and minor sidewalk repair. A-i 0 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE jiiiiri1!I] 69th Avenue Complete Street Worksheets City of Brooklyn Center Complete Streets Policy 69th Avenue North Appendix B Complete Streets Worksheet This Complete Streets Worksheet is intended to serve as a guide when reviewing a roadway's ability to accommodate all modes of transportation (pedestrian, bicyclists, transit riders, freight, and automobiles) and people of all abilities in a cost-effective manner, while promoting safe operation for all users. Complete streets address the design of the entire street right-of-way to determine the best allocation of space between the various transportation modes. Complete streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of smaller-improvements or maintenance activities overtime. This worksheet was developed to facilitate implementing the complete streets process and to help sort through potentially conflicting modal priorities. The worksheet is also available in an electronic format that allows responses to by typed directly into the worksheet. Please reference the following materials when filling out the checklist: • City and/or County Comprehensive Plans that cover the project area • Transportation Plans that cover the project area (e.g., City, County, and/or State) • Bicycle or Pedestrian Master Plans that cover the project area (e.g., City, Park district, County, and/or State) • City and/or County ADA Transition Plans that cover the project area • Area specific studies • A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO "Green Book") • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition • MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual • Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) • ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) • Proposed Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) • Hennepin County Complete Street Policy • State of Minnesota Complete Street Policy Complete Streets Policy Adopted by City Council June 24, 2013 Project Information Date: 4/10/2017 Project Location 'City of Brooklyn Center (municipality): City of Brooklyn Center Roadway Jurisdiction: 69th Avenue Mill and Overlay Project/Roadway Name: Improvement area consists of properties beginning at Shingle Project Start Point:Creek Parkway. See project area map in feasibility report. Improvement area consists of properties ending at Dupont Project End Point:Avenue. See project area map in feasibility report. Mike Albers, City of Brooklyn Center Project Manager Define Existing and Future Land Use and Urban Design Context 1.Do any adopted plans call for the development of bicycle, pedestrian, transit or roadway facilities on, crossing, or adjacent to, the proposed project? If yes, list the applicable plan(s). Guidance: Possible sources of this information include Comprehensive Plans, Transportation Plans, Bicycle or Pedestrian Master Plans or area-specific studies developed by applicable City County and/or State Agencies. None are identified in the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (City of Brooklyn Center, March 2014). None are identified in the Hennepin County 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan (Hennepin County, April 2015). 2.Are there any local, county, statewide or federal policies that call For incorporating multimodal facilities? Guidance: Policies at the state and federal level may impact a project due to funding sources. Will B-2 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 3.Describe the study area. Guidance: What are the predominant land uses along the corridor? What is the community character? (e.g., tree-lined streets, historic, new development) Are there any planned redevelopment areas in the project area? The project area consists of approximately 1 .29 miles of streets and utilities. The project consists of Single Family homes (RI), Townhomes (Medium Density) (R3), Multi-Family (High Density) (R4, R5), Retail Business (02), Industrial (II and PUD/11), Railroad Or Utilities (Ii), Public Space (PUD/RI), Parks, Recreation Or Open Space (01), and Schools (02). An I-I Industrial Park Study Area planned in the future. There are one Industrial (PUD/Il) and one Public Space (PUD/RI) planned unit development properties. 4.What trip generators (existing and future) are in the vicinity of the project that might attract walkers, bikers or transit users? Guidance: For example, large employers, downtown or shopping districts, schools, parks, community centers, medical centers, transit stations, government buildings and senior care facilities. Parks, restaurants, retail and regional trail within the project area. Hotels are also nearby. Define Existing and Future Transportation Context 5. Describe existing and projected modal volumes, if available. -Volumes (as Pr Existing Projected (Yea ,7ffavailable)7v 69th Ave (2015):69th Ave (2035):Average Daily Traffic 5,100 West end/ 3,400 East end 5,200 West end/ 3,470 East end Not Available Not AvailablePedestrian Counts Not Available Not AvailableBicycle Counts Not Available Not AvailableTruck Volumes Not Available Not AvailableTransit Volumes APPENDIX B: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET B-3 6. Existing vehicle speed conditions. a.What is the posted speed limit for the project and associated intersecting streets? 35 mph, with the exception of the last 1/2 block between Emerson and Dupont Avenues, where the speed limit is 30 mph The intersecting streets are primarily 30 mph b.Provide speed data, if available. Not Available C . Are excessive speeds an issue in the project area? None Known 7. Describe crash data, if available, and known conflict locations. Guidance: Crash data will likely not be available for pedestrians and bicycles. Crash trends and known conflict points should include neighborhood input and antidotal data, such as areas of known "near misses", or areas where seasonal activities cause safety issues, such as sports arenas or fairgrounds. a.Are there any crash trends between specific modes? There are no crash trends between specified nodes. b.Are there known conflict points between specific modes? No B-4 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 8. Describe Classifications. a.What is the road functional classification? 69th Avenue is designated as a Collector. b.Does the street cross any high functional classification roads? (yes/no) If so, please list. Yes: The west boundary of the project is Shingle Creek Parkway which is an Arterial and the east boundary of the project is Dupont Avenue which is a Collector. Intersecting street Humboldt Avenue is also a collector. c. Does the roadway have other classifications (e.g., truck route, transit route, bicycle route, emergency vehicle route)? (yes/no) If so, please list. Yes: 69th Avenue is a MSA route. 9. Sketch in or attach the existing cross-section(s). Guidance: The existing cross-section should include the full right-of-way and be clearly dimensioned. Additional cross-sections are advisable to illustrate specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION NORTH SOUTHROW ROW TYPICAL 34' FACE TO FACE VARIES i 8'-F BLVD I - TRAIL LANE APPENDIX B: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET B-5 10.What multimodal accommodations exist in the project and on streets that it intersects? Guidance: Multimodal accommodations may include transit routes, sidewalks, trails, and designated on-street bicycle facilities, such as bike lanes, sharrows or signed bike routes. A bituminous trail exists along the south side of 69th Avenue between Shingle Creek and Dupont Avenue. Concrete sidewalk intersects the project area at Humboldt and Dupont Avenues. The Shingle Creek regional trail exists within the project area as well. 11.If there are no multimodal accommodations, how far away are the closest parallel facilities? Guidance: Designated transit routes or bikeways may not exist within the community, and therefore, may not be applicable. Metro Transit routes exist on 69th Avenue between Humboldt and Dupont Avenues and along Humboldt Avenue. 12.What multimodal amenities exist in the project? Guidance: multimodal amenities may include benches, bike racks/lockers, trash receptacles, crosswalks, traffic signals, mature tree canopy, transit stops/shelters, and wayfinding signage. 69th Avenue amenities: Metro Transit stops, crosswalks, wayfinding signage on the Shingle Creek regional trail. 13.Describe any particular user needs/challenges along the project corridor that you have observed or have been informed of. Guidance: User needs may consist of lack of facilities (worn dirt pathways), traffic congestion, difficulty accessing bus stops or sidewalks due to snow piles at intersections, at-grade crossings of railroads or high volume roadways, and steep terrain. None identified. B-o COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 14.Are the existing facilities ADA and PROWAG compliant? Guidance: Reference resources include the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), Proposed Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG), and MnDOT Accessibility Design Tools website. The pedestrian curb ramps will be reviewed for compliance and will be replaced with truncated dome detectable warning systems in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Identify Existing Deficiencies 15.Based on the land use and transportation context analysis, describe existing and anticipated future deficiencies to full multimodal transportation that the project could/should address. The Brooklyn Center Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan has not identified any improvements or deficiencies for this area. Describe Future Objectives 16.Develop objectives regarding how multimodal facilities will be integrated into the project and how identified deficiencies will be addressed. Guidance: The objectives will form the basis for the street design. -Pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed throughout the project at each crosswalk location with truncated dome detectable warning systems in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). -The minimal bike traffic that exists can use the shoulder as a shared travel lane. Recommend Area Typology/Street Typology and Test Cross-section(s) 17.Complete the following questions if your community has developed Area Typologies and Street Typologies (See page 21, "Roadway Classification versus Settings" for a description of area and street typologies.) Guidance: If applicable, list document that contains your agency's Area Typologies and Street Typologies a. What is the recommended Area Typology? Not applicable b.What is the recommended Street Typology? Not applicable APPENDIX B: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET B-7 1 8. Sketch in or attach the initial cross-section(s) that depicts desired street elements. Guidance: Initial cross-section should be clearly dimensioned and indicate any additional right-of-way required. Additional cross-sections are advisable for specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. Not applicable. This is a mill and overlay project and significant changes are cost prohibitive. Pedestrian/bike improvements are not proposed to be included in the scope of work. 19.Describe any constraints associatedwith the initial cross-section. Guidance: Potential constraints include lack of right-of-way, existing structures, existing mature trees or environ- mental features, topography or number of driveways. Not applicable. 20.Sketch in or attach alternative cross-sections. Guidance: Alternative cross-sections should be modifications of the initial cross-section that respond to identi- fied constraints. All modes should receive equal consideration and accountability in the development of alternatives. Not applicable. B-8 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE Describe Tradeoffs and Select Cross-section 21.Describe tradeoffs associated with the alternative cross-sections. Guidance: Examples of tradeoffs include removal of mature vegetation, narrower travel lanes, removal of on-street parking (one or both sides), right-of-way acquisition costs, and provision of bikeway facility on an adjacent parallel street. Not applicable. 22.Sketch in or attach the selected cross-section(s). Guidance: Selected cross-section should be clearly dimensioned and indicate any additional right-of-way required. Additional cross-sections are advisable for specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. NORTH SOUTH ROW ROW 23. If the project does not accommodate all modes, list reasons why facilities for that mode are not provided. Guidance: For example, the cost of the facility will be disproportionately high in relation to number of projected users; adequate right-of-way does not exist and acquisition of additional right-of-way would create adverse impacts to valued community assets; a bikeway facility is being planned on an adjacent parallel route that can service bicyclists' needs. Not applicable. APPENDIX B: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET B-9 Implementation 24.Identify project milestones, roles and responsibilities for project implementation City Council Conduct Public Hearing I Order Plans: May 22, 2017 City Council Approve Plans/Authorizes Advertisement for Bids: June 12, 2017 City Council Accept Bids/Award Project: July 13, 2017 Begin Construction: August 2017 Substantial Completion: November 2017 25.How will access for all modes be maintained during project construction? Guidance: Reference resource includes MnDOT Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) Webinai Maintaining Pedestrian Access Through Construction & Maintenance Work Zones A drivable street will be maintained at most times during the construction. The exception would be during the installation/repair of the City utilities and rehabilitation of the existing roadway, when access may be cut off for a limited period of time. Even during those activities, though, access will be restored by the end of each day. Access to the trail system will be available for the majority of the construction project. However, the main interruption to access of the trail will be during the replacement of the trail. For this work, access will not be available for approximately 2 weeks per the construction. 26. Facility Maintenance a, What agency will be responsible for on-going maintenance for each mode? City of Brooklyn Center - Public Works Department will be responsible for on-going maintenance for the streets, sidewalks and trails. b. What specific seasonal and long-term maintenance is needed for each mode? Maintenance activities typically include patching, sealcoating, crack sealing, sweeping and minor trail repair. B-I 0 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 69th Avenue Complete Street Worksheets City of Brooklyn Center Complete Streets Policy France Avenue North Appendix C Complete Streets Worksheet This Complete Streets Worksheet is intended to serve as a guide when reviewing a roadway's ability to accommodate all modes of transportation (pedestrian, bicyclists, transit riders, freight, and automobiles) and people of all abilities in a cost-effective manner, while promoting safe operation for all users. Complete streets address the design of the entire street right-of-way to determine the best allocation of space between the various transportation modes. Complete streets may be achieved through single projects or incrementally through a series of smaller-improvements or maintenance activities over time. This worksheet was developed to facilitate implementing the complete streets process and to help sort through potentially conflicting modal priorities. The worksheet is also available in an electronic format that allows responses to by typed directly into the worksheet. Please reference the following materials when filling out the checklist: • City and/or County Comprehensive Plans that cover the project area • Transportation Plans that cover the project area (e.g., City, County, and/or State) • Bicycle or Pedestrian Master Plans that cover the project area (e.g., City, Park district, County, and/or State) • City and/or County ADA Transition Plans that cover the project area • Area specific studies • A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (AASHTO "Green Book") • AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, 4th Edition • MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual • Minnesota Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MMUTCD) • ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) • Proposed Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) • Hennepin County Complete Street Policy • State of Minnesota Complete Street Policy Complete Streets Policy Adopted by City Council June 24, 2013 P rojec t Information Date: 4/10/201I - - Project Location City of Brooklyn Center (municipality): Roadway Jurisdiction:City of Brooklyn Center France Avenue Mill and Overlay Project/Roadway Name: Improvement area consists of properties beginning at 69th Project Start Point:Avenue. See project area map in feasibility report. Improvement area consists of properties ending at 73rd Avenue. Project End Point:See project area map in feasibility report. Mike Albers, City of Brooklyn CenterProject Manager Define Existing and Future Land Use and Urban Design Context 1.Do any adopted plans call for the development of bicycle, pedestrian, transit or roadway facilities on, crossing, or adjacent to, the proposed project? If yes, list the applicable plan(s). Guidance: Possible sources of this information include Comprehensive Plans, Transportation Plans, Bicycle or Pedestrian Master Plans or area-specific studies developed by applicable City, County and/or State Agencies. None are identified in the Brooklyn Center Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (City of Brooklyn Center, March 2014). None are identified in the Hennepin County 2040 Bicycle Transportation Plan (Hennepin County, April 2015). 2.Are there any local, county, statewide or federal policies that call for incorporating multimodal facilities? Guidance: Policies at the state and federal level may impact a project due to funding sources. No. C-2 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 3.Describe the study area. Guidance: What are the predominant land uses along the corridor? What is the community character? (e.g., tree-lined streets, historic, new development) Are there any planned redevelopment areas in the project area? The project area consists of approximately 0.49 miles of streets and utilities. The project consists entirely of Single Family homes (RI). No redevelopment is planned in the project area. 4.What trip generators (existing and future) are in the vicinity of the project that might attract walkers, bikers or transit users? Guidance: For example, large employers, downtown or shopping districts, schools, parks, community centers, medical centers, transit stations, government buildings and senior care facilities. Parks and restaurants are within I mile of the project area. Define Existing and Future Transportation Context 5. Describe existing and projected modal volumes, if available. TL1iujiol ____________________rojected (Year)available) 11 - France Ave (2015): 5,1000 France Ave (2035):5,200Average Daily Traffic Not Available Not AvailablePedestrian Counts Not Available Not AvailableBicycle Counts Not Available Not AvailableTruck Volumes Not Available Not AvailableTransit Volumes APPENDIX C: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET C-3 6. Existing vehicle speed conditions. a.What is the posted speed limit for the project and associated intersecting streets? 30 mph. The intersecting streets are primarily 30 mph. b.Provide speed data, if available. Not Available c. Are excessive speeds an issue in the project area? None Known 7. Describe crash data, if available, and known conflict locations. Guidance: Crash data will likely not be available for pedestrians and bicycles. Crash trends and known conflict points should include neighborhood input and antidotal data, such as areas of known "near misses", or areas where seasonal activities cause safety issues, such as sports arenas or fairgrounds. Tran7 Tration Number of Period CoveredMode 7 throughout the corridor I Vehicles 2011-2016 Pedestrians Bicycles a.Are there any crash trends between specific modes? There are no crash trends between specified nodes. b.Are there known conflict points between specific modes? No C-4 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 8. Describe Classifications. a.What is the road functional classification? France Avenue is designated as a Collector. b.Does the street cross any high functional classification roads? (yes/no) If so, please list. Yes: The south boundary of the project is 69th Avenue which is a Collector, c. Does the roadway have other classifications (e.g., truck route, transit route, bicycle route, emergency vehicle route)? (yes/no) If so, please list. Yes: France Avenue is a MSA route. 9. Sketch in or attach the existing cross-section(s). Guidance: The existing cross-section should include the full right-of-way and be clearly dimensioned. Additional cross-sections are advisable to illustrate specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. EXISTING TYPICAL SECTION WEST EAST ROW ROW APPENDIX C: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET C-5 1 0. What multimodal accommodations exist in the project and on streets that it intersects? Guidance: Multimodal accommodations may include transit routes, sidewalks, trails, and designated on-street bicycle facilities, such as bile lanes, sharrows or signed bike routes. A concrete sidewalk exists along the west side of France Avenue. A bituminous trail and concrete sidewalk intersects the project area at 69th Avenue. 11.If there are no multimodal accommodations, how far away are the closest parallel facilities? Guidance: Designated transit routes or bikeways may not exist within the community, and therefore, may not be applicable. Metro Transit routes exist on France Avenue and along 69th Avenue. 12.What multimodal amenities exist in the project? Guidance: multimodal amenities may include benches, bike racks/lockers, trash receptacles, crosswalks, traffic signals, mature tree canopy, transit stops/shelters, and wayfinding signage. France Avenue amenities: Metro Transit stops and crosswalks. 13. Describe any particular user needs/challenges along the project corridor that you have observed or have been informed of. Guidance: User needs may consist of lack of facilities (worn dirt pathways), traffic congestion, difficulty accessing bus stops or sidewalks due to snow piles at intersections, at-grade crossings of railroads or high volume roadways, and steep terrain. None identified. C-o COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 14.Are the existing facilities ADA and PROWAG compliant? Guidance: Reference resources include the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), Proposed Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROiVAG), and MnDOT Accessibility Design Tools website. The pedestrian curb ramps will be reviewed for compliance and will be replaced with truncated dome detectable warning systems in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Identify Existing Deficiencies 15.Based on the land use and transportation context analysis, describe existing and anticipated future deficiencies to full multimodal transportation that the project could/should address. The Brooklyn Center Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan has not identified any improvements or deficiencies for this area. Describe Future Objectives 16.Develop objectives regarding how multimodal facilities will be integrated into the project and how identified deficiencies will be addressed. Guidance: The objectives will form the basis for the street design. -Pedestrian curb ramps will be constructed throughout the project at each crosswalk location with truncated dome detectable warning systems in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). -Sidewalk will be spot repaired/replaced to ensure ADA compliance. -The minimal bike traffic that exists can use the shoulder as a shared travel lane. Recommend Area Typology/Street Typology and Test Cross-section(s) 17.Complete the following questions if your community has developed Area Typologies and Street Typologies (See page 21, "Roadway Classification versus Settings" for a description of area and street typologies.) Guidance: If applicable, list document that contains your agency's Area Typologies and Street Typologies a. What is the recommended Area Typology? Not applicable b.What is the recommended Street Typology? Not applicable APPENDIX C: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET C-7 1 8. Sketch in or attach the initial cross-section(s) that depicts desired street elements. Guidance: Initial cross-section should be clearly dimensioned and indicate any additional right-of-way required. Additional cross-sections are advisable for specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. Not applicable. This is a mill and overlay project and significant changes are cost prohibitive. Pedestrian/bike or Twin Lakes Regional Trail improvements are not proposed to be included in the scope of work. .19. Describe any constraints associated with the initial cross-section. Guidance: Potential constraints include lack of right-of-way, existing structures, existing mature trees or environ- mental features, topography or number of driveways. Not applicable. 20. Sketch in or attach alternative cross-sections. Guidance: Alternative cross-sections should be modifications of the initial cross-section that respond to identi- fied constraints. All modes should receive equal consideration and accountability in the development of alternatives. Not applicable. C-B COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE Describe Tradeoffs and Select Cross-section 21.Describe tradeoffs associated with the alternative cross-sections. Guidance: Examples of tradeoffs include removal of mature vegetation, narrower travel lanes, removal of on-street parking (one or both sides), right-of-way acquisition costs, and provision of bikeway facility on an adjacent parallel street. Not applicable. 22.Sketch in or attach the selected cross-section(s). Guidance: Selected cross-section should be clearly dimensioned and indicate any additional right-of-way required. Additional cross-sections are advisable for specific situations or if corridor segments greatly vary. WEST EAST ROW ROW TYPICAL 23. If the protect does not accommodate all modes, list reasons why facilities for that mode are not provided. Guidance: For example, the cost of the facility will be disproportionately high in relation to number of projected users; adequate right-of-way does not exist and acquisition of additional right-of-way would create adverse impacts to valued community assets; a bikeway facility is being planned on an adjacent parallel route that can service bicyclists' needs. Not applicable. APPENDIX C: COMPLETE STREETS WORKSHEET C-9 Implementation 24.Identify project milestones, roles and responsibilities for project implementation City Council Conduct Public Hearing I Order Plans: May 22, 2017 City Council Approve Plans/Authorizes Advertisement for Bids: June 12, 2017 City Council Accept Bids/Award Project: July 24, 2017 Begin Construction: August 2017 Substantial Completion: October 2017 25.How will access for all modes be maintained during project construction? Guidance: Reference resource includes MnDOT Context Sensitive Solutions (CSS) Webinar, Maintaining Pedestrian Access Through Construction & Maintenance Work Zones A drivable street will be maintained at most times during the construction. The exception would be during the installation/repair of the City utilities and rehabilitation of the existing roadway, when access may be cut off for a limited period of time. Even during those activities, though, access will be restored by the end of each day. Access to the sidewalk system will be available for the majority of the construction project. However, the main interruption to access of the sidewalks will be during the replacement of deficient sections of sidewalk. For this work, access will not be available for approximately 7-10 days while the concrete cures. 26. Facility Maintenance a.What agency will be responsible for on-going maintenance for each mode? City of Brooklyn Center - Public Works Department will be responsible for on-going maintenance for the streets, sidewalks and trails. b.What specific seasonal and long-term maintenance is needed for each mode? Maintenance activities typically include patching, sealcoating, crack sealing, sweeping and minor sidewalk repair. c-i 0 COMPLETE STREETS IMPLEMENTATION RESOURCE GUIDE 57th Avenue Property Owner Questionnaire/Property Owner Comments QUE SflONNMRE 2016 57th Avenue Regional Trail and Street Mill and Overlay Project Based on input and information from all stakeholders, a recommended layout has been prepared for the reconfiguration of 57 1h Avenue. The proposed reconfiguration includes: replacing the sidewalk with a trail including boulevard along the south side of the roadway; eliminating parking on the south side of the roadway (parking allowed only on the north side) from Logan to Emerson Avenues; and eliminating on-street parking on both sides of the street between Emerson and Camden Avenues due to the narrower roadway easement on the easterly portion of 57 t11 Avenue. On the backside of this questionnaire are exhibits of the two typical layouts. You can also visit the City of Brooklyn Center's Website at: wvw.ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us (Search "57th Avenue" and click on "Proposed Layout") to view the complete layout. This questionnaire will help us to better understand any needs or issues in your neighborhood that you may have with the proposed plan. Please return the completed questionnaire in person or by mail to the City of Brooklyn Center/Engineering Division, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430; fax at 763-569-3440; or email at: publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us . Please return questionnaire by October 2, 2015. You may also contact the Engineering Division at 763-569-3340 to discuss these issues. Thank you for your cooperation in providing this important information! 1.Contact Information: Name: Address: Email Address: Phone Number: 2.Do you support the parking layout as depicted in the proposed reconfiguration layout? Please circle one Yes No Please provide comments below pertaining to parking concerns and issues. Do you have a lawn irrigation (or sprinkler) system located within your property? Please circle one Yes No Is street/trail lighting adequate along 57th Avenue? Please circle one Yes No What other concerns, comments, and/or issues do you have pertaining to the streets, sidewalks, utilities, etc., in your neighborhood? Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the Engineering Division at 763-569-3340. Please return by October 2, 2015 to: Engineering Division City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 FAX 763-569-3440 Email: publicworks(ci .brooklyn-center.rnn.us (OVER) Figure 1. Typical 57th Avenue Layout (between Logan and Emerson Avenues: no parking on south side, parking ( allowed only on north side) 4 I - - -F,- k • < _1 rI 57TH AVENUE N - c - - ; - - F UIIM) 5h AVN - /ail (i JAMES AV - • - TRAVELLANE PARKING LANE -. -- - - 57I1iAVN I NO PARKING -: 3 --• IRVINGAVN] fl -GRASS BOULEVARD I - - -• -_ \:/ : -- IIIIIIMINOIIS lUAU ------- ----- ---_ - • Figure 2. Typical 57 th Avenue Layout (between Emerson and Camden Avenues, no parking either side of roadway) dft I t---- '- I I I= I - \ I-i -- .. -• 57rH AVENUE N - - IICSNI) TVELLAN ___ • - •thAVN.f 57thAVN UIORICHAVN BRYAJffA] • - - . PARKING LANE . •••.• •All _•_-_:_• -• NO PARKING - -•-' I. GRASS BOULEVARDBOJJLEVARI) - -- - - - IIIIIJMINOIIS uusn 57th Avenue Regional Trail and Street Mill and Overlay Project Survey Summary Results Support Parking If yes, Comments .Lawn lmgation (3)Street/Trail Lighting Comments/Concems!lssues re: streets, (2)(4)sidewalks, utilities, etc. (5) 57thA venue N No; I am No No Last time the street was re-done the asphalt that concerned that was used was faulty and is in need of repair. I am when I have family assuming that I will have to move my landscaping gatherings that from the front of my house. there will not be adequate parking Yes No choice really; we have to No No We will need better lighting along the path. My park on side streets and make son uses the sidewalk now and said it is too dark. our driveway larger PS, one concern we have is the busses going around the corner at Dupont onto 57th. We are worried that they won't be able to make the corner once the roadway is narrower, they come up to our curb now and have a hard time getting around cars at the corner. We have even had to stop way back from the corner so the bus could make the turn the other day. People also walk on our side of the road to get to the bus stop on our corner, so hopefully they will take the trail on the other side and not walk on our yard all the time. No; I do not see a No Did not answer To take our parking privilege away. Especially group of riders on when there are a few bilkers that use 57th 57th Avenue riding Avenue. We do have a lot of traffic on this busy bikes. Maybe a street. After all we do pay taxes. Would you want handful with a this bike trail on your street. week. Irving Ave N Yes No over night parking; better No No Will you be taking any of my side yard? No over lighting; trash cans and pick night parking. The grass boulevard should just be up trash cemented in; people won't mow that and people forget to do that now. Yes No No I feel this is a very busy street for a bike trail. Also, on the 57th Avenue bridge heading towards Wal-Mart, as I was walking the cross walk indicator said "walk" and traffic entering onto Highway 100 had a green light.PenyAve N No 1 parking The road is narrow if there is No Did not answer N/A 69th Avenue Property Owner Questionnaire/Property Owner Comments QUE STIONNA IRE 201769 1h Avenue Mill and Overlay Project This questionnaire will help the City of Brooklyn Center Engineering staff to better understand the infrastructure needs and issues on 69 0' Avenue (Shingle Creek Parkway to Dupont Avenue). This survey can be returned in person or by mail to: City of Brooklyn Center/Engineering Division, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430; by fax at 763-569-3440; or by email at: publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us . Please return this survey by March 23, 2017. Thank you for your cooperation in providing this important survey! Contact Information: Name/Business: Address: Email Address: Phone Number: 2. Do you have a problem with drainage or flooding in the street, your yard, or your basement? Do you have a lawn irrigation (or sprinkler) system located within your property? Please circle one: Yes No 4. What other concerns, comments and/or issues do you have pertaining to the streets, sidewalks, utilities, etc.? Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the Engineering Division at 763-569-3340. Please return by March 23, 2017 to: City of Brooklyn Center - Engineering Division 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Fax: 763-569-3440 Email: publieworl<s@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us 69th A venue Mm as vid Ovy Project &wy &iimmiflj Rift Drainage or Flooding (2)Lawn irrigation (3)Comments/Concerns/Issues re: streets sidewalks, utilities, etc. (4) 69th A venue A few years ago-street No Hi-Crest Square HOA - town homes; how will problems; no yard issues; no this affect our street access? Mgr: Brad basement in townhome.Calton 763-241-0838. Yes it has happened twice No because the sewer drain off was plugged with sand; it flooded our street. Yes Yes No No None. Flooding occurs in our No basement/utility room; some yard pooling by patios facing 69th Avenue. No No We were at the meeting last night; we did not receive the first questionnaire. No No No No Yes No Yes The 6840 building requires quarterly sewer jetting - not sure if that has anything to do with City lines or not? I live 69th Avenue west of Humboldt across from Earle Brown Apartments. We have an over night parking problem because of the apartments. Would it be possible to put up the No Overnight Parking sign by the first parking spot on 69th Ave just west of Humboldt Ave. France Avenue Property Owner Questionnaire/Property Owner Comments QUESTIONNAJ{RE - 2017 France Avenue Mill and Overlay Project This questionnaire will help the City of Brooklyn Center Engineering staff to better understand the infrastructure needs and issues on France Avenue (north of 69 t "Avenue). This survey can be returned in person or by mail to: City of Brooklyn Center/Engineering Division, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430; by fax at 763-569-3440; or by email at: publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us . Please return this survey by March 23, 2017. Thank you for your cooperation in providing this important survey! Contact Information: Name/Business: Address: Email Address: Phone Number: Do you have a problem with drainage or flooding in the street, your yard, or your basement? Do you have a lawn irrigation (or sprinkler) system located within your property? Please circle one: Yes No 4. What other concerns, comments and/or issues do you have pertaining to the streets, sidewalks, utilities, etc.? Should you have questions or need more information, please contact the Engineering Division at 763-569-3340. Please return by March 23, 2017 to: City of Brooklyn Center - Engineering Division 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Fax: 763-569-3440 Email: publieworks@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us FrnmceAvenuo MDII and OvHiy Project Suwvy Gummy Rut Drainage or Flooding (2)Lawn Irrigation (3)Comments/Concerns/Issues re: streets, sidewalks, utilities, etc. (4) France A venue No No Are we going to be taxed again? Most important to me and others. No Yes No. The sewer in front of neighbors No France Avenue is very beat up; please rip it house does not drain; the up an start from scratch. neighborhood is out there during each big rain helping to force the water in; water does tend to pool in our yard. Flooding in the Street; heavy Yes rains storm drain cannot handle flow Street flooding - during heavy No Sidewalks on wrong side of street - on west rains,side walk XXXX from house on east side; manhole cover shid be closer to street level. No Yes; and located in the Street lighting is inadequate. boulevard No No No No No Consider speed bumps or a stop sign; or rename the street 'the France Avenue Speedway' or Truck Route #1. Who is paying for this?? No No None. No No No; problems with flooding or No Litter and speeding are our biggest concerns. drainage No No No No None. Yes; in the SW corner of my Yes None. basement. No No Use better quality of material (last longer); inforce parking regs; possibly going to fewer garage haulers - have bids for section of City. Woodbine Lane No INo IFrance Avenue needs to be replaced. memo .iiINe 57th Avenue Draft Proposed Pending Assessment Roll CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL April 24, 2017 2017 57TH AVENUE MILL AND OVERLAY STREET PROJECT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2016-05 PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY#STREET NOTES 0111821240069 716 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821310006 801 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821310007 805 57TH AVE N $ 1401.00 0111821240068 806 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240067 810 157TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240066 816 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821310084 827 5TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821310085 833 5TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240010 916 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821320018 1107 57TH AVE N $ 1,119.10 Multi Family R4 (A) 6,882.51 sf, (B) 0 sf 0111821320105 1201 57TH AVE N $ 1,046.23 Multi Family R4 (A) 6,434.38 sf, (B) 0 sf 0111821230013 1300 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821320121 1313 57TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240062 5700 BRYANT AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240060 5701 BRYANT AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821420028 5642 CAMDEN AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821130045 5700 CAMDEN AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240106 5705 CAMDEN AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821310016 5650 DUPONTAVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821240056 5700 DUPONT AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821230019 5701 EMERSON AVE N $ 1,401.00 0111821320046 5651 GIRARD AVE N 1 $ 1,401.00 0111821230014 5700 GIRARD AVE N $ 1,401.00 _____________________ 0111821320047 15650 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 1,401.00 Total Assessments 1 $ 32,987.33 Appendix H 69th / France Avenue Draft Proposed Pending Assessment Roll CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL April 24, 2017 2017 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (69TH AVENUE AND FRANCE AVENUE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-10 ab, IL PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY#STREET NOTES 3611921220113 1315 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220114 1319 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220107 1322 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220115 1323 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220108 1326 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220116 1327 67TH LAN $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220109 1330 67TH LA N $ 11006 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220117 1331 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220110 1334 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220118 1335 167TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220111 1338 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220119 1339 67TH LA N $ 1106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220112 1342 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220120 1343 67TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3511921110052 1600 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110056 1601 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110051 1604 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110055 1605 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110050 1608 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110054 1609 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110049 1612 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110053 1613 67TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3611921220055 1300 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220061 1301 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220056 1304 68TH LAN $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220062 1305 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220057 1308 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3 Unit Rate 3611921220063 1309 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220058 1312 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220064 1313 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220059 1316 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220065 1317 168TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220060 1320 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220066 1321 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220089 1324 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220095 1325 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220090 1328 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220096 1329 168TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220091 1332 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220097 1333 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220092 1336 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220098 1337 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220093 1340 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220099 1341 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220094 1 1344 68TH LA N ______$ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL April 24, 2017 2017 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (69TH AVENUE AND FRANCE AVENUE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-10 -%Olt PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY#STREET NOTES 3611921220100 1345 68TH LA N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3511921110044 1600 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110048 1601 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110043 1604 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110047 1605 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110042 1608 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110046 1609 68"H LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110041 1612 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110045 1613 68TH LA N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 2511921330086 1200 69TH AVE N $ 8,406,00 Special Use RI = 6 equivalent parcels 2511921330048 1308 69TH AVE N $12,740.11 Multi Family R5 (A) 78.480,86 sf, (13) 7185.06sf 2611921440069 1500 69TH AVE N $ 2,302.36 Commerical 02 (A) 14,739.79 sf, (B) 0 sf 3511921110005 1505 69TH AVE N $ 2,960.45 Commerical C2 (A) 18,952.92 sf, (B) 0 sf 2611921440068 1510 69TH AVE N $ 2,387.01 Multi Family R4 (A) 15,281.74 sf, (B) 0 sf 2611921440106 1600 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921440105 1606 69"H AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921440104 1612 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 26 1921440073 1618 69T1-i AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921440076 1700 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 3511921110040 1701 69TH AVE N $ 30,901.13 Multi Family R5 (A) 103,112.85 sf, (B) 220,819.41 sf 2611921440079 1708 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 26 1921440088 1714 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921440087 1720 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921440086 1800 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921440093 1820 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921430031 2100 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921430030 2106 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921430104 2112 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921340003 2200 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2611921340004 2204 69TH AVE N $ .1,401.00 2611921340005 2208 69TH AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340050 3901 7I STAVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420062 3812 72ND AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420094 3813 72ND AVE N $ 1,401.00 3611921220026 6842 EMERSON AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340064 6907 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430062 6910 FRANCE AVE N .$ 1,401.00 2711921340063 6913 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340062 6919 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430050 6924 FRANCE AVE N ______$ 1,401.00 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL April 24, 2017 2017 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (69TH AVENUE AND FRANCE AVENUE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-10 -% PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY#STREET NOTES 2711921340061 6925 FRANCE AVE N $ 1401.00 2711921430051 6930 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340060 6931 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430052 6936 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340059 6937 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430053 6942 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 271921340058 6943 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430054 7000 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340057 7001 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430055 7006 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340056 7007 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430056 7012 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340055 7013 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430057 7018 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340054 7019 FRANCE AVE N $ 1 ,401.00 2711921430058 7024 FRANCE AVE N $ .401.00 2711921340053 7025 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430059 7030 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921340052 7031 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430060 7036 FRANCE AVE N $ 1401.00 2711921340051 7037 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921430061 7042 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420021 7048 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420022 7100 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310056 7101 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420023 7106 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310055 7107 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420024 7112 FRANCE AVEN $ 1,401.00 2711921310054 7113 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420025 7118 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310053 7119 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420026 7124 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310052 7125 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420027 7130 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310051 7131 FRANCEAVEN $ 1,401.00 2711921310050 7137 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420095 7142 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310049 7143 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310008 7201 -FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310007 7207 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310006 7213 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310005 7219 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310004 7225 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420002 7230 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310003 7231 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420061 7232 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420045 7236 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921310002 7237 FRANCE AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711 921310001 7243 FRANCE AVE N ______$ 1,401.00 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL April 24, 2017 2017 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (69TH AVENUE AND FRANCE AVENUE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-10 -% PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY#STREET NOTES 3611921220078 6800 FREMONT FL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220080 6801 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220077 6804 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220079 6805 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220082 6809 FREMONT PL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220076 6812 FREMONT FL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220081 6813 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220075 6816 FREMONT FL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220106 6819 FREMONT FL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220074 6820 FREMONT PL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220105 6823 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220073 6824 FREMONT PL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220104 6827 FREMONT PL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 361 921220072 6828 FREMONT PL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 361 921220103 6831 FREMONTPL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 361 i921220071 6832 FREMONT FL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220102 6835 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220070 6836 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220101 6839 FREMONT PL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220069 6840 FREMONT FL N $ 111106 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220068 6844 FREMONT FL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220067 6848 FREMONT PL N $ 110.06 Multi Family R3, Unit Rate 3611921220047 6800 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 3440.97 Commerical C2 (A) 22,029.24 sf, (B) 0 sf 351192110087 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110088 6807 HUMBOLD T AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110089 6807 HUMBOLDTAVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110090 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110091 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110092 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110093 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110094 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110095 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110096 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110097 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110098 6807 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 351921110075 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 351 921110076 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110077 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110078 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 35119V 110079 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 351192 110080 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110081 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110082 6813 HUMBOLDAVEN $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110083 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110084 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110085 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110086 6813 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110063 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110064 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N ______$ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER PROPOSED PENDING ASSESSMENT ROLL April 24, 2017 2017 PAVEMENT REHABILITATION PROJECT (69TH AVENUE AND FRANCE AVENUE) IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-10 -%Olt PROPERTY ID HOUSE STREET NAME LEVY#STREET NOTES 3511921110065 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110066 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110067 6819 HUMBOLDTAVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110068 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110069 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110070 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110071 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110072 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110073 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110074 6819 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 80.95 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3611921220036 6840 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 2,026.18 Commerical C2 (A) 12,971.71 sf, (B) 0 sf 2511921330049 6900 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 1,756.79 Commerical 02 (A) 11,247.08 sf, (B) 0 sf 2511921330047 6910 HUMBOLDT AVE N $ 3,175.22 Multi Family R5 (A) 14,110.17sf, (B) 14,495.66sf 3511921110061 6616 IRVING PLN $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110060 6620 IRVING PL N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110059 6700 IRVING PL N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110058 6704 IRVING PL N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3511921110057 6708 IRVING PL N $ 544.85 Multi Family R5, Unit Rate 3411921110124 6890 SHINGLE CREEK PKWY $ 801.44 Industrial PUD/Il (A) 5,130.87 sf, (B) 0 sf 3511921220054 6890 SHINGLE CREEK PKWY $ 21,251.45 Industrial PUD/11 (A) 108,649.41 sf, (B) 63,886.76sf 2711921420096 3812 VIOLET AVE N $ 1,401.00 2711921420044 3812 WOODBINE LA $ 1,401.00 Total Assessments 1 $ 219,584.76 Oty CounclE Agenda- Item No. 6g COUNCIl ITEM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manag FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Designating 2017 Planting List of Allowable Boulevard Tree Species Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the attached resolution designating the 2017 planting list of allowable boulevard tree species. Background: In 1990, City residents and Council Members expressed strong support for an improved City Forestry Program. Staff was directed to develop a Community Forestry Work Plan and policies regarding public tree care. In February 1992, Chapter 20 of the Code of Ordinances regarding trees was adopted by the City Council. Section 20402 of the Ordinance states that the City Council shall annually adopt a resolution designating allowable boulevard tree species. This section is included in the Ordinance to emphasize the importance of maintaining a variety of species to minimize the impact of future tree disease. Attached is a resolution designating the 2017 planting list of allowable boulevard tree species along with a copy of the boulevard permit that residents are required to complete and submit before the planting of boulevard trees. There are no recommended changes in species and the list is the same as last year (2016). Budget Issues: Staff time for inspections is contained in the annual Forestry budget. There are no other budget issues. Strategic Priorities: o Enhanced Community Image Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive conununitp that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public (just Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION DESIGNATING 2017 PLANTING LIST OF ALLOWABLE BOULEVARD TREE SPECIES WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center promotes a diverse urban forest so as to minimize the spread of tree disease; and WHEREAS, Section 20-402 of the Ordinances provides for an annual listing of allowable boulevard tree varieties. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the following trees are hereby designated as allowable boulevard tree species for 2017: Birch (River, Paper) Kentucky Coffeetree Crabapple (Flowering Cultivars) Elm (Accolade, New Horizon, Patriot, Princeton, Valley Forge) Hackberry Thornless Honeylocust (Shadernaster, Skyline, Summerlace) Linden (American, Littleleaf) Maple (Red and Sugar Cultivars incl. Autumn Blaze) Oak (Bur, Northern Pin, Red, White) Serviceberry (Allegheny) April _24,_2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. City of BROOKLYN CENTEF 6301 Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center MN 55430 BOULEVARD TREE PLANTING 1ERMT PROPERTY ADDRESS: OWNER NAME: ADDRESS: CITY, STATE, ZIP: PHONE: DAY OTHER VARIETY OF TREE: TO BE PLANTED (COMMON NAME) APPROXIMATE DATE OF PLANTING: F7 Please stake or of/i envise indicate yoni preferred tree location as soon (IS possible. I have called or will call Gopher State One Call at 651-454-0002 to obtain underground utility locations. Owner Signature Date * * * ALLOW 48 HOURS FOR PROCESSING * City use only: Initial and date each item checked Variety Sight Distance_____________ Approximate Width of Blvd. Sidewalk?______________________ ALL REQUIREMENTS MET: At least 5' from underground utilities At least 10' from overhead utilities Proposed distance from edge of street Proposed distance from edge of sidewalk Signature Title Date BEFORE YOU PLANT. The City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center has adopted an ordinance to establish policies for the care of boulevard trees. The ordinance contains very specific information regarding where boulevard trees may be planted. Please read the following information before you plant a boulevard tree. A copy of the complete ordinance is available at City Hall. Section 20-200, PUBLIC TREE CARE IN GENERAL Subdivision 3. Planting Boulevard Trees. No tree may be planted on the boulevard except by permit obtained from the Director of Public Works or designee. The City may move, remove or trim or cause or order to be moved, removed or trimmed any boulevard tree not planted by permit, or any boulevard tree which is not in compliance with this code. This section does not prohibit the planting of boulevard trees by adjacent property owners providing the selection, location and care of said trees are in accordance with the provisions of this code. The purpose of a permit is to ensure that all requirements are met, especially those relating to sight distance, both at corners and near driveways, sidewalks, alleys, etc. The following is the list of allowable boulevard trees for 2017: Birch River, Paper) Kentucky Coffeetree Crabapple (Flowering Cultivars) Elm (Accolade, New Horizon, Patriot, Princeton, Valley Forge) Hackberry Thornless Honeylocust (Shademaster, Skyline, Summerlace) Linden (American, Littleleaf) Maple (Red and Sugar Cultivars incl. Autumn Blaze) Oak (Bur, Northern Pin, Red, White) Serviceberry (Allegheny) CR'ty CouncH Agenda ^tem No. 6h kI1IJ[i I i I ahYA LA I ak'A Ci] iIi UhJh I DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Ma2#'^ FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Resolution Recognizing the Designation of Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA for the Twenty-Fifth Consecutive Year Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of a resolution recognizing Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA. Background: For each of the past twenty-five years, Brooklyn Center has strived for and achieved designation as a Tree City USA by the National Arbor Day Society. The City has again been notified that Brooklyn Center has received this recognition for its 2016 efforts. This national award recognizes communities with effective community forestry programs. The City's Forestry Program includes the following: • Care for and planting of park and boulevard trees • Diseased and nuisance tree removal program • Mandatory tree contractor registrations requiring certain minimums of liability insurance • Boulevard tree planting permits requiring proper placement of tree and selection of tree species • A tree ordinance specifying proper standards of care for all trees • An Arbor Day and Month Program that includes educational activities and an event to promote the planting of trees Budget Issues: Funding needed to support and meet the goals of this program in 2017 is included in the 2017 budget under the Forestry operating budget. Strategic Priorities: • Enhanced Community Image Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE DESIGNATION OF BROOKLYN CENTER AS A TREE CITY USA FOR THE TWENTY-FIFTH CONSECUTIVE YEAR WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center is committed to preserving and enhancing its urban forest; and WHEREAS, the National Arbor Day Society has designated the City of Brooklyn Center as a Tree City USA in recognition of 2016 forestry activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1.The City Council hereby recognizes and accepts the designation of Tree City USA for the twenty-fifth consecutive year. 2.The City Council reaffirms its commitment to urban forestry and directs staff to continue its reforestation efforts as planned and budgeted in 2017. 3. The City Council commends Brooklyn Center residents and staff for their work in maintaining and enhancing Brooklyn Center's urban forest. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Oty Council Agenda Hem N©0 7a iS[I1IJ[iJ fl V V *L'A UhYA I )k'4 [I] 1iI lIJk'i I DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Mana( THROUGH: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer _SJ FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring April 28, 2017, as Arbor Day and May 2017 as Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of a proclamation declaring April 28, 2017, Arbor Day and May 2017 Arbor Month in Brooklyn Center. Background: Arbor Day originated in 1872 in America as a national holiday in which individuals and groups are encouraged to plant and care for trees. Each year, Brooklyn Center typically celebrates National Arbor Day and Arbor Month by hosting local volunteer/educational events with students from an elementary school and other groups within the City of Brooklyn Center. This year's event tentatively includes City employees planting 17 trees in Centennial and Cahlander Parks. Several trees were removed as part of the recent pond dredging projects within these parks, and planting new trees would help reestablish the natural buffer areas. This event and proclamation supports the City's Forestry Program that has resulted in Brooklyn Center receiving its twenty-fifth consecutive national Tree City USA award by the National Arbor Day Foundation. Budget Issues: The American Legion and Sons of the American Legion have provided a $250 contribution to help offset the expenses for the Arbor Day event. Additional funding needed for the event supplies is expected to be less than $1,500 and is included in the 2017 Budget under the Public Works Forestry operating budget. Strategic Priorities: e Enhanced Community Image Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive co,ninuniti' that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust PROCLAMATION DECLARING APRIL 28, 2017, TOBEARI3OR DAY AND MAY 2017 TO BE ARBOR MONTH1NBROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Trees are an increasingly vital resource in Minnesota todaj enriching our lives by purifying air and water, helping conserve soil and energy serving as recreational settings, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds and making our cities more livable, and WHEREAS, Trees in our City increase property values, enhance the economic vitality of business areas and beautify our community and WHEREAS, Human activities such as pollution, as well as drought disease and insects threaten our trees, creating the needfor concerted action to ensure the future of urban and rural forests in our state, country and world, and WHEREAS, People can contribute to the environmental stewardship of our community by locally planting trees and ensuring that these trees are nurtured, protected and wisely used in the years ahead; and WHEREAS, The City of Brooklyn Center desires to continue its tree management efforts. NOW, THEREFORE, I, ASMJI YOR OF THE CITY OFBROOKLYN CENTER, State ofMinnesota, with the consent and support of the Brooklyn Center City Council, do hereby proclaim. April 28, 2017, to be Arbor Day in the City of Brooklyn Center. 2.May 2017 to be Arbor Month in the City of Brooklyn Center. 3.I urge all citizens to support efforts to care for our trees and woodlands and to support our City Community Forestry Program. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor Council Members A TTEST: City Clerk City Council Agenda Item N0 7b [iiIJ[* I flI I k'4 I'A I Dk'A [I] lI I1IJ'A I DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Mang' FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: Proclamation Declaring May 21-27, 2017, Public Works Week in the City of Brooklyn Center Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider adoption of a proclamation declaring May 21 through May 27, 2017, as Public Works Week in Brooklyn Center. Background: National Public Works Week is a celebration of the tens of thousands of men and women in North America who provide and maintain the infrastructure and services collectively known as public works. Instituted as a public education campaign by the American Public Works Association in 1960, the weeklong celebration calls attention to the importance of public works in community life. The week seeks to enhance the prestige of the professionals who serve the public good every day with quiet dedication. In 2017, we celebrate the contributions of public works professionals as well as the communities they serve. The theme for 2017 is "Public Works Connects Us". There would be no community without the quality of life public works provides. There would be no community to police and protect, no public to lead or represent. Public works allows the world as we know it to be. This year's theme "Public Works Connects Us" speaks to the essential nature of public works services in support of everyday quality of life. The Public Works Department employs 38 full-time and 19 seasonal employees in the five divisions of the department - engineering, street maintenance, parks maintenance, public utilities and the central garage. All divisions work together as a team to provide high-quality service for people who visit, live or work in Brooklyn Center. Many of the tasks like plowing streets, mowing parks, putting up signs, pumping water, maintaining large equipment and designing improvement projects are high profile. Many more tasks are completed almost unnoticeable except in their absence. Many people do not realize that significant efforts of the department take place while everyone else is sleeping. It is not unusual for street or park employees to get called out in the middle of the night after a storm to clear fallen trees from the road, to plow or provide ice control during a winter storm, or utility employees to be called out to respond to a sewer backup or water main break. Our Public Works employees take great pride in their work. Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Strategic Priorities: o Key Infrastructure Investments Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust F/fl ZZM DECLARING MAY21-27, 2017 PUBLIC WORKS WEEK IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER WHEREAS, Public Works services provided in our community are an integral part of our citizens' everyday lives,' and WHEREAS, The support of an understanding and informed citizenry is vital to the efficient operation of public works systems and programs such as engineering, water, wastewater, storm drainage, streets and highways, parks and central vehicle fleet maintenance,' and WHEREAS, The health, safety and comfort of this community greatly depend on these facilities and services,' and WHEREAS, The quality and effectiveness of these facilities including their planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance are vitally dependent upon the efforts and skill ofpublic works personnel. NOW, THEREFORE, I, AS MAYOR OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, State ofMinnesota, with the consent and support of the Brooklyn Center City Council, do hereby proclaim May 21-27, 2017, as "National Public Works Week" in the City of Brooklyn Center, and lcall upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint themselves with the issues involved in providing our public works and to recognize the contributions which Public Works personnel make every day to our health, safety, comfort and quality of life. Affil 24, 2017 Date Mayor Council Members A TTEST: City Clerk City Co©ll Agenda Hem No. 92- COUNC]IL fl[]EM MEMORANDUM DATE: April 24, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City MaM FROM: Gary Eitel, Director of Business & Development SUBJECT: Simple Lot Division Request by Nicholas Standal to re-establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as two separate tax parcels. (6145 and 6131 Camden Ave. N) Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval/adoption of the Resolution Regarding Simple Lot Division Request by Nicholas Standal to Re-Establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as Two Separate Tax Parcels. (6145 and 6131 Camden Ave. N.) Background: Nicholas Standal is requesting a tax parcel division to separate his residence located on Lot 1, Block 2 Sonnenberg's Addition (6145 Camden Ave. North) from Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition (a vacant lot that had been combined for tax purposes). A review of the City's records indicates that the single family residential subdivision of Sonnenberg's Addition, a subdivision of 28 residential lots, was platted in August of 1946. The plat map illustrates that all lots had been built on with the exception of Lot 2, Block 2 Soimenberg' s Addition (addressed as 6131 Camden Ave. North) which is shown as being combined for tax purposes to adjacent property developed as 6145 Camden Ave. North. The City records illustrate that the residence at 6145 Camden Ave. North was built in 1947 and was connected to municipal services in 1962. Sanitary sewer and municipal water services were provided to both of these platted lots. A combination for tax purposes is an Administrative action that is processed through the local assessor. However, the division to reestablish the lot as a buildable lot requires the filing of a resolution approved by the City Council and recorded with Hennepin County. Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition has 78 feet of lot width on Camden Ave. North, a lot depth of 134.89 feet, and a lot area of 10,521 square feet, which exceeds the minimum dimensional standards of the subdivision ordinance: Lot Width: 75 feet wide at the established building setback line Lot Depth: not less than 110 feet Lot Area: not less than 9,500 square feet in area Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clew,, safe, inclusive coinmilnit' that enhances the quality of life for (Il/people and preserves the public Ii',ist I[I]JJ[iJ I fl U k'1 U'A I MYA (I) 1II WA'i The property owner has agreed to remove a small shed that was built on Lot 2 to comply with the provisions of the zoning ordinance that restricts the placement / construction of an accessary structure on a lot prior to the construction of the principal building. On March 30, 2017, the Planning Commission considered this proposed tax split and adopted PC Res. No. 2017-03, which provides a favorable and unanimous (5-0) vote to approve this tax split, re-establishing Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as two separate tax parcels, with the condition that the property owner enter into an agreement to remove an existing shed/accessory structure on Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition. Budget Issues: This tax division re-establishes Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition, as a buildable lot for a new single family home and provides an additional property that will be part of assessable / benefiting properties contributing to the future Capital Improvements scheduled for neighborhood street and utility improvements in 2019. Strategic Priorities: Targeted Redevelopment Jfission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING SIMPLE LOT DIVISION REQUEST BY NICHOLAS STANDAL TO RE-ESTABLISH LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 2 SON1ENBERG'S ADDITION AS TWO SEPARATE TAX PARCELS. WHEREAS, the residential subdivision of Sonnenberg's Addition created the residential lots identified as Lot 1, Block 2, Sonnenberg' s Addition (6145 Camden Ave. North) and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition (6131 Camden Ave. North; and WHEREAS, in 1947 a building permit was issued for the construction of the single family residence on Lot 1, Block 2 Sonnenberg's Addition; and WHEREAS, a lot combination of Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg' sAddition to the property developed as 6145 Camden Ave. North established a single parcel for tax purposes; and WHEREAS, the property owner has requested to remove the tax combination of these two lot with the intentions of re-establishing Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg' s Addition as a buildable lot. WHEREAS, on March 30, 2017, the Planning Commission approved Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017-03 recommending approval of Nicholas Standals's request for a simple lot division to re-establish Lots 1 and 2, Block 2 Sonnenbergs as two separate tax parcels. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that the Simple Lot Division Request by Nicholas Standal to Re- establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 Sonnenberg's Addition as Two Separate Tax Parcels be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. That the property owner enter into an agreement to remove the existing accessory structure on Lot 2, Block 2 Sonnenberg's Addition. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk RESOLUTION NO. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Commissioner Sweeney introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03 RESOLUTION REGARDING SIMPLE LOT DIVISION REQUEST BY NICHOLAS STANDAL TO RE-ESTABLISH LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 2 SON]ENBERG'S ADDITION AS TWO SEPARATE TAX PARCELS. WHEREAS, the residential subdivision of Sonnenberg's Addition created the residential lots identified as Lot 1, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition (6145 Camden Ave. North) and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition (6131 Camden Ave. North; and WHEREAS, in 1947 a building permit was issued for the construction of the single family residence on Lot 1, Block 2 Sonnenberg' s Addition; and WHEREAS, a lot combination joining Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition to the property developed as 6145 Camden Ave. North for tax purposes; and WHEREAS, the property owner has requested to remove the tax combination of these two lot with the intentions of re-establishing Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as a buildable lot. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Advisory Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center to recommend to the City Council that the Simple Lot Division Request by Nicholas Standal to Re-establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2 Sonnenberg's Addition as Two Separate Tax Parcels be approved based upon the following considerations: 1. That the property owner enter into an agreement to remove the existing accessory structure on Lot 2, Block 2 Soimenberg's Addition. •'C% (C 3o tb 0. Date Randall Christensen, Chair ATTEST: ary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member MacMillan; and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, Schoiming, Sweeney, and MacMillan and the following voted against the same: None; whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA MARCH 30, 2017 FdtIIIM1flti The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Christensen at 7:04 p.m. Chair Randall Christensen, Commissioners Alexander Koenig, Jack MacMillan, Stephen Schonning, Rochelle Sweeney, and Abraham Rizvi (arrived at 7:25 p.m.) were present. Commissioner Susan Tade was absent and excused. Also present were Director of Business & Development Gary Eitel, Planning Assistant Angel Smith and Michaela Kujawa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Li 'J 'J tSi!fl L0) :Ih1 P7L There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Koenig, to approve the Planning Commission Meeting Agenda as amended: Agenda Item 4 Change "Abraham Risvi" to Abraham Rivi". The motion passed unanimously. 4.ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE This item was considered as Agenda Item 8a. 5.APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MARCH 16, 2017 There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve the minutes of the March 16, 2017 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously. 6. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION Chair Christensen explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. PC Minutes 03-30-17 -1- DRAFT 7. PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS 7a) APPLICATION NO. 2017-003 NICHOLAS STANDAL PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6145 CAMDEN AVE NORTH AND fRItk II] I AVENUE1h.N ORTH Direct of Business and Development Gary Eitel introduced Application No. 2017-003. He reviewed the background and purpose of this application. Mr. Eitel asked the Commissioners if they had any questions for him on this Application. The Commissioners stated they didn't have any questions on this item. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2017-03 REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2017-003 SUBMITTED BY NICHOLAS STANDAL There was a motion by Commissioner Sweeney, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to approve Planning Commission Resolution No. 2017-03 as submitted. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Koenig, MacMillan, Schonning and Sweeney. And the following voted against the same: None. The motion passed unanimously. E. ]FT5f1(IAtUtakM 8a) ADMINISTER OATH OF OFFICE Director of Business and Development Gary Eitel administered the Oath of Office to Commissioner Abraham Rizvi. There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to approve the appointment of Commissioner Abraham Rizvi. The motion passed unanimously. The Commission watched the presentation on the survey results provided by Morris Leatherman. Chairperson Christensen stated what he found unsettling were the results regarding the school systems in the City. He stated it was apparent there is no connection and the residents don't think the schools are as good as they should be. PC Minutes 03-30-17 -2- DRAFT Commissioner Schonning stated it was interesting that there was such a high demand for senior housing. He stated the City is moving in the right direction and providing what some expressed are a need. He noted it was valuable to hear Mr. Leatherman's comments giving a comparison on how the City is ranking comparing to others by stating they are "average, above average, etc.". 8c) 2020-2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING PROCESS: - DISCUSSION/REVIEW OF THE 2010 PLANNING ISSUES MAP - DISCUSSION/IDENITIFY1NG FUTURE PLANNING ISSUES (2020 ISSUES MAP) - STRENGTHS, WEAKNESS, OPPORTUNITIES, THREATS (SWOT) Mr. Eitel introduced this item and stated if the Commissioners would like provide him with some ideas and sites they would like to see on the list and he would add them and noted when the 2018 items are presented they will be combined with this list and it would be presented to the Commission then. Mr. Eitel stated he would like to remind everyone about the Joint Commissioners Meeting on April 5, 2017. ilL _, n.iu aii aii There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 8:28 p.m. Chair PC Minutes 03-30-17 -3- DRAFT DATE: March 30, 2017 TO: Chair Randall Christensen and Planning Commissioners FROM: Gary Eitel, Business and Development Director Angel Smith, Planning Assistant SUBJECT: Simple Lot Division Request by Nicholas Standal to re-establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition as two separate tax parcels. Attached is a request for a tax parcel division to separate the residence located on Lot 1, Block 2 Sonnenberg's Addition (6145 Camden Ave. North) from Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition (a vacant lot that had been combined for tax purposes). Introduction: A review of the City's records indicates that the single family residential subdivision of Sonnenbergs Addition, a subdivision of 28 residential lots which dedicated half of the right of ways for Aldrich Ave. on the west, 62nd Ave. on the north, Lyndale Ave (West River Road) on the east, and 61St Ave. on the south and 60 feet of right of way for an interior street (Camden Ave.) was platted in August of 1946. The plat map illustrates that all lots had been built on with the exception of Lot 2, Block 2 Sonnenberg' s Addition (addressed as 6131 Camden Ave. North) which is shown as being combined for tax purposes to adjacent property developed as 6145 Camden Ave. North. The City records illustrate that the residence at 6145 Camden Ave. North was built in 1947 and was connect to municipal services in 1962. Sanitary sewer and municipal water services were provided to both platted lots. A combination for tax purposes is an Administrative action that is processed through the local assessor. However, the division to re-establish the lot as a buildable lot requires the filing of a resolution approved by the City Council and recorded with Hennepin County. Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg's Addition has 78 feet of lot width on Camden Ave. North, a lot depth of 134.89 feet, and a lot area of 10,521 square feet, which exceeds the minimum dimensional standards of the subdivision ordinance: Lot Width: 75 feet wide at the established building setback line • Lot Depth: not less than 110 feet Lot Area: not less than 9,500 square feet in area The property owner has agreed to remove a small shed that was built on Lot 2 to comply with the provisions of the zoning ordinance that restricts the placement / construction of an accessary structure on a lot prior to the construction of the principal building. Recommended Action: City planning staff requests the Planning Commission review the request for the simple land split (lot division) proposed by Nicholas Standal; and recommend adopting the attached Planning Commission Resolution, which recommends acceptance and approval of this proposed lot split. H Hennepin County Property Map Date: 2/1412017 AW ta - __ ____ I1I!!TIJ L — I - • . Ii VMS * :- •0 PARCEL ID: 3611921340085 OWNER NAME: N Standal & A Stan dal PARCEL ADDRESS: 6145 Camden Ave N, Brooklyn Center MN 55430 PARCEL AREA: 0.48 acres, 20,933 sq ft AT-B: Torrens SALE PRICE: $144,000 SALE DATA: 04/2013 SALE CODE: Excluded From Ratio Studies ASSESSED 2015, PAYABLE 2016 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead MARKET VALUE: $163,700 TAX TOTAL: $2,821.46 ASSESSED 2016, PAYABLE 2017 PROPERTY TYPE: Residential HOMESTEAD: Homestead FuIAPVPT\IM I IP f17fl flnfl - 1 inch = 50 feet I Comments: This data (I) is furnished 'AS IS' with no representation as to completeness or accuracy; (f) is furnished with no warranty of any kind; and (iii) is notsuitab le for legal, engineering or surveying purposes. Hennepin County shall not be liable forany damage, injury or loss resultng from this data COPYRIGHT © HENNEPIN COUNTY 2017 A;, Auusf 194G 0 2ORad5 /34.89 /34.89 •i: /34.85 134.89 I 3.2It e .134.89 tO /3485 P 13489 L /34.89 43489 tzl A 8 /3489 /3485 3a /3489 /3489 IRaN AlaN. FIVA 75 214.5\ iaia ,/ \o1 • • 75 1.50.0 /81.7 8 7 •5(O9 ZQ /70.3 Al I 33 3 .J. 5/ aceP /óv/ ('jj / 0 Xec/, 3 21//4 fec/ic'n 77/9, 8'S!. This /a/ n's proved 7ccef/ed £4 ½e 2//'e / 49coo/yô Cet7/er ess/ s/ s ef1//a ee,'y /ee/ ½e/cY i,ic IJL Z E COUNCIL Of 'oo/L N C,-YV7f -9, M/,vA< City Use Only Date Received:_____________________________ Date Application Complete: Letter of Completeness: Application No A preliminary meeting with the Planning and/or Engineering Staff is required prior to the submission of a Planning Application. No application will be accepted prior to such meeting. City Staff shall have five (5) business days to review applications for completeness. The 60-day statutory review period does not begin until staff determines the application is complete. Application Request (Mark all that Apply) Site & Building Plan ($750) Rezoning ($1050) Variance ($200) Planned Unit Development ($1800) PUD Amendment ($700) Special Use Permit ($200) Subdivision Approval ($300) Appeal ($200) Determination ($200) Applicant Information: Name: 1C41L=P 6 Sitl—Signature MA 4z_1 Address: 11 -7 Li >1-C.6 fJOP—Ttf PL-C (OR50 Office Phone: Cell: (fn- 7. Email: 1cf..js4 ,a. I -Cofl FAX: Owner Information* (if d)fferesst from Applican: Name: Signature Address: Office Phone: Cell: Email: FAX: * The fee title owner of the pr000rtv must Sian this Application to make it official Please provide a general description of your Application Request: -'0' L of Lr oc PI-TT-0J Address/Location of Property: " e'- A4 - - '? IS1!3 W-a —c4 - s?m 5 Legal Description of Property: Lo1 I, 's\ oeK a, S e4cae-r35 A^l.. - ,t,CjIKZ. oe'ceç 1412sJ. The applicant requests processing of this application and agrees to pay to the City of Brooklyn Center, within fifteen (15) days after mailing or delivery of the billing statement, the actual costs Incurred by the City for Engineering, Planning and Legal expenses reasonably and necessarily required by the City for the processing of the application. Such costs will be in addition to the application fee described herein. Withdrawal of the application will not relieve the applicant of the obligation to pay costs incurred prior to withdrawal. Application Fee $__ Acct No. 10100-4403 Receipt No. City of Brooklyn Center -Business and Development - 6301 Shingle Creek Pkmvy - Brooklyn Center MN 55430 (763) 569 -3300 Planning Application Page 1 Rev 5-21-12 i=Th Li Thi :c fl6rJ oJ c(-fL-' j:\. City Council April 24, 2017 Item No. 9a Nicholas Standalis requesting a tax parcel  division to separate his residence located on Lot 1, Block 2 Sonnenberg’sAddition (6145 Camden Ave. North) from Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg’s Addition (a vacant lot that had been combined for tax purposes). A combination for tax purposes is an  Administrative action that is processed through the local assessor.However, the division to re- establish the lot as a buildable lot requires the filing of a resolution approved by the City Council and recorded with Hennepin County. Lot 2, Block 2, Sonnenberg’sAddition has 78  feet of lot width on Camden Ave. North, a lot depth of 134.89 feet, and a lot area of 10,521 square feet, which exceeds the minimum dimensional standards of the subdivision ordinance: Lot Width:75 feet wide at the established  building setback line Lot Depth:not less than 110 feet  Lot Area:not less than 9,500 square feet  in area It is recommended that the City Council  consider approval/adoption of the Resolution Regarding Simple Lot Division Request by Nicholas Standalto Re-Establish Lot 1 and Lot 2, Sonnenberg’sAddition as Two Separate Tax Parcels.(6145 and 6131 Camden Ave. N.) City C©ull Agenda I[trn N©0 #1 IEI1Ik'[iJ I I k'A IhYA I b1'4 (I) 1II P1IJ I DATE: April 24, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Mana FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk na1{ SUBJECT: Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 4200 Woodbine La Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Mitigation Plan and issuance of a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 4200 Woodbine La. The applicant or representative has an opportunity to present evidence regarding the submitted Mitigation Plan. If the Council chooses to modify or disapprove the Mitigation Plan, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare proposed findings for disapproval of the Mitigation Plan and notify the license applicant of any pending license actions to be taken at a subsequent Council Meeting. Background: This owner is applying for a renewal rental license. This is a single family property. The previous rental license was a Type III Rental License. This property qualifies for a Type IV Rental License based on nine (9) property code violations found during the initial rental license inspection and zero (0) validated police nuisance incidents for the past twelve months. Staff from Administration, Building & Community Standards and Police Departments worked with the property owner regarding a mitigation plan, which requires Phase I, II and III of the Crime Free Housing Program, and other items included by City ordinance for a Type IV Rental License. A Mitigation Plan has been developed addressing the requirements of the ordinance and any issues specific to the property. Therefore, staff is recommending approval of the Type IV Rental License on condition of adherence to the Mitigation Plan. Please refer to the attached copy of the Mitigation Plan for more information. The following is a brief history of the license process actions: 01-20-2017 The Owner, Brent Berg, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 4200 Woodbine La, a single family dwelling. 02-13-2017 An initial rental license inspection was conducted. 9 property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 03-09-2017 A second rental inspection was conducted and passed. 03-21-2017 City records indicate zero validated police nuisance incidents occurred in the past twelve months. 03-21-2017 A letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [1i1SJ[SJ I U I MYA U'A I 4 (1) 1WI 1IJi license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 03-30-2017 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 04-14-2017 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 04-17-2017 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held April 24, 2017. If approved, after six months, a new rental license is required. The license process will begin within four months. The new license will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12-911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. - Excerpt from Chapter 12 of City Code of Ordinances: Section 12-913. TYPE IV PROVISIONAL LICENSES. 1.Rental properties that meet the provisional licensing criteria as described in Section 12- 901 are eligible only for provisional licenses. 2.The City will provide by mail to each licensee a monthly report of any police and fire calls and incidents and applicable property Code violations as described in Section 12- 901. 3.Mitigation Plan. The applicant for a provisional license must submit for Council review a mitigation plan for the license period. The mitigation plan shall describe steps proposed by the applicant to reduce the number of police and fire calls and/or the property Code issues described in Section 12-901 and 12-911 to a level that qualifies for a Type I, II, or III license. The mitigation plan may include such steps as changes in tenant screening procedures, changes in lease terms, security measures, rules and regulations for tenant conduct, security personnel, and time frame to implement all phases of the Crime Free Housing Program. 4.Council Consideration. The application with a proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council together with a recommendation by the City Manager or the Manager's designee as to the disposition thereof. After giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, the Council shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions the application and the mitigation plan. If the Council disapproves an application and mitigation plan or approves it with conditions, it shall state its reasons for so doing in writing. In evaluating a mitigation plan, the Council will consider, among other things, the facility, its management practices, the nature and seriousness of causes for police and fire incidences and/or property Code issues and the expected effectiveness of measures identified in the plan to reduce the number of police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. In evaluating a mitigation plan submitted by an applicant already under a provisional license, the Council will also consider the effectiveness of measures identified in the applicant's previous mitigation Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [IBMIJ I fl I N Ik'A L'A I Mk'A 0) 1iI U Bk'A I plan and the need for different or additional measures to reduce police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. 5. Compliance with Mitigation Plan. The licensee shall comply with the mitigation plan as approved or modified by the Council. No later than the tenth day after each calendar month, the licensee shall mail or deliver to the City Manager a written report describing all steps taken in furtherance of the mitigation plan during the preceding month. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [EI1SJ[iJ I U MTA I I DI4 0) flI 1IJ1 Rental License Category Criteria Policy - Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 1.Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2.Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license, inspect, monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3.Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4.License Category Criteria. a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may, upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected, the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: • At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. • At least 25% of units, to include a minimum of 12 units, will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for al/people and preserves the public trust Greater than 4 but not more than 8 Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Greater than 8 Greater than 3 Type III - 1 Year Type IV —6 Months iLS1iJ(i1 I fl U I LA I k'A (I] 1'WI WJk'À I b. Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are "Family or household members" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of "Domestic Abuse" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (a). 3-4 units ureater man v.' 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Category Decrease 2 Categories but not more than 0.50 [J'Iission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the (JllahitJ' of life for al/people and preserves the public trust [Ei1U[SJ I U I V I4 UYA I *4 0] UhI aui i Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Strategic Priorities: Enhanced Community Image Attachment - Mitigation Plan Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Prop" Adr$;Wc,>.ti no LA Cen ter UN 55429 Own?s Nam): &rilf3erg Ownees Address-, aaoi Kentu ckvAve NrkJynP4MN55445 Ov,er'a Pli: -9 Cwnef Ejl: brenbarg@outloolccom Current Expfratiai Date; 04P2)17 Local Agent(s): Beehl Berg Aeiit Addrs: DN SrDA^n Park MN 55445 Ants Plina; 74514 Agnte Enja ilz brernbcrg@ookoni Pending Expiration Date: 100I17 rrii ffm ren14llM Based n prciperty cOniioris ndiOtvdilthtod pol nuis1 iridente, the above referenced ptpetr quali fl ea for a Type IV-5 Month R e ritall Uceriae, Fdor to application approval by the City Coicii a filty wm pleted MiIiion Plan must be completed and approved by City staff- A Mitigtior Plan mu s t be completed im ediately in orde r to en su re timely ccrniplelion of the tcene application process. The ?iilfaUomi Plan sh ou ld indicate the staps. being taken to correct krentffled vfofaffons and the rneaures that Y011 be taken to ensure ongolW compliance vth City Ordinances and applicable co des. A MitIalion Plan aflc'bvs the oier and the City to raew cocms and identify po ssi bl e solutions to improve overafl conditions of the property. Lf the Mit ig a t ion Plan is not submitted, and all items are not completed within the pending 111censa period, or the ab przprty operates beyond the license ex piration date, enforcement aciorte s,ich es citao1, fnil crflplaint 1 or licen s e review may reeu]L Befo re submitting, iII-it Sections 1A, B, and C located on pages 2 3 4 and S Wn 444-5 C1y Ih fHZUIUkI7n null; Dpi±mini E301 nci?1Ler. M51'21!? I Ph ç75E3-33YJ I TTY-711 I 440 110? R Z N yn - EThDING AND CO MUNITY STANDARDS 4200 Woodbirr* LnrIii Ce nte r MF1 542 R enta l Li ce nse MitIgtn Ran -- ucenso Sec tions ACme Free Hors!ig Frnrrn Requ ireamats Phase } 1) usea vitefl l easa areernrit. The lease agireemewit h[l include tha Crirna Free - IloiJ&ng Lee Addendum, A copy ofth e agroament and crime F rae Houkg Lea st Atidn-ntum must be attached to the Mitig ation Pinwheii isu bmItted. j 2) Aura o pursue the temiintin r lea rTai 4W ecticin of tenants who ve1te the terms of te lease or any addendum, ] 3) C onduct wirhinal barkrowid theJc fo r all new prOpive tenants. If it i tenant a r*w ba ckgro und chick Is not required - Must be beto provide doJrn.rite1ien lo Ci ty if requested. jj 4) Attend e City app roved h4w- Crime Free H o sin training cours e , I ormaticn for a pproved co w s es can be found at wwvw.rrincpa.net ur4r the T?frfrg ond Events tab. A copy of the Cthie Free Housing Cior t ifir coite must be attached to the MllJatior, PIrn when vibmitted. Crime Free Hc*51r 1rnng was oipIeted on9s schedute d for; 12o14 Owner er agent attened!is planrilri; to attend training sL city of U rod%^m Pak ;S u brnit MnthIy Update by the i y of each rncirth Phase U 1 Complete &i Seurly As s ess trwrit and implement CM—provemers reqiE5td by The B rooklyn Cen ter Police D e partment To Khedule an initial or feIow-tip Security Asseamnt, ca-11 (163) 59 -3344. A foIJow.up as ssiiit must be compl e ted before the ficerrae expiration date to ve rlN The security Improvement s have i mplemented. Ifa $ eernethas beeri previcusN ccuplted, write the cemp1alei SeeuiyA5rne11twas eorpfeted ? Se rity Assess me n t fo 0 ow-u p was criipleted oNis sob edufed foi'_________ Continue S ect ions A. Phase 111 on page 3. Pi 2 Type W 55410 Jai t'c girt, Rev. 444 City of anti Gofflitinnify 5itdI I Tt711 I F}.I J] fi Owmr or agent will tInd at niinimirn ZO% (2) of the AR2I, neetng ilie meet i n g s must be Completed w fthin the re n tal period and bebrc Thpanding Type IV Lne ex pirationdate- Registradoft [s iot reqtiIed, haver youmusl slgrt-^n during th rneeting, Write two rmefing dates an owner or egnt pn to Eq1, Omer rtj1 attend &RJ, M-eeffings scheduled on: MaY OlV an dJ 2) Have no repeat v0de violations previonly do tend wfth t he patit year. The 11kwng a ctions ar6 teqvired fo r properties with four (4) o rmore 0 1) Cordut resident tra ining aflnua Ry that indWo c rime p evEr1iQr, tecntques,E 2) Conduct regular resi dent meeting rrvp 444- city if Bik1yi c t—Euflthg RM4 Cinu&iity Stmd=ds Dtpartm o mt 63 01 SWVIa Cmek Frcfty, EicwAyn Cent, KIM 5.543D-21.9R I Th) 5 m 711 1 F [T) E4&J B1!LLD INC AND COMMUNFrT STANDARDS 47-1 ty CCl Rental Lkie fltigaton PlanENTER B=klyn Cenier KIN 55429 Type N Lkti S ections —L o ng Term Capital Improve Plan Ba.ed on coftdW o n andage, e sti mated repbrnent dates need to he provided for rimon cpitaI items. rfur4 ing sbould be co n s idered acordingly, I terns that are brolcen, wo rn, of o 1henvise in violation prr to The e s timated repl aoment da t e need to be pced sooner. All I tems must have a d a te for Eziiffma ted Ri crnxyt Dfe. Dates such unure don 1 t "when brokerr will not bOr if you a re un s ure of whe rt an ifem will need to be replaced, you can predioion based on the e, appearance, condition. or manufactuty romnienda1un Additi o nal on Expected Ueftil Life can be found tvwhijd.v. Itern Date LatRpaceci CondltlorV Ex p ected Re plarAme nt Date ErnpJe: Wafer He afer My 2-'0 W F May 2020 FurnacE Water Heater r012 N - I<itthn Appliances - Laundry Applian ces 2t31 Srroke Alartn1 Carbon idde A-larms 2017 21322 Exterior ltrn - Fainti-SicIfng 2012 G Virindows 1990 G Roof 2010 a 2045 Fence IM G 2090 Shed Garage 19 59 G- 25 Driveway tdewalks other _________ Abbran w=N F'irF Keeift RprnntR FAf City of flrk1yntei^—Bw lld1ng and Opmn m-T-mily Stan d arrbtDepnrbt ww1 l'ncri1r ir 63d1 StirI Crk P41MAV Y, c.nCMi-, MN 54-1 FPo: (7€) 64$3) TY 711 I F (6 The items in thia sedan have been proven to as with rperty manage rneri propedy image. The fWrowing actions are requird: El i Checkin with tenants every 30-day. 2 Drive by property to check ft pibie code violaUons. [J 3) Evict tanar4s ivvraioii f the lease or any rthirn, 4)FEFflin current on all iriity teas, Lues, asse5sments, fines, PQ iUs, and other financial dimpymenta due to the Oi'y.U The following actions aTe optional unless required by the City. fl 1) Provide FMitnow 2) Provide garbage seiiice [J 3) inalI secLffity system.U 4} Provide maintenafte Service plan for appliances. Name of ie Moe oornpany 5)Other I th Type IV Ponth Renal License is approved by the City C iniF, the licensee must coiiply with the approved Mitigation Plan and all appflcabte City Codes. Aw1tn report must be Submitted by thw I10 1t'day of each nwnTh with aii update of acttons heing taken by thoand/or aerfl to comply with this Mltigailoi Fli, A copy of the Monhiy Update can be found i page 7. A liliable foriit can be found n the Citys website at wwwc ofbrokI eiteag or call (763) 6933O to 1have an electronic copy sent to you vie emeft rese attach additional ftifrniet1or! If necss-ary. Pam, W Typ W Pan to) Li ii Fnr 444 C1t fExok1yL Centw—Simildby and rrvnni1y t!rds Dpibiteii 'Wt 6301 SHNks Cmk P.rnkwy BnxApInCenter, MN 1,5430-21MFh; C3] E-3Z1 I Try; 11 I Fac ff63 5844I BWIJMNG AND COMKMTY STANDARDS. ally ofATIM-COOHLYN kICB1MN 5549Rental Licanso Mitigpftn Plan Sign and Vr1fy I Verify that II Informa0bri provided is true and aciree undstaid that if I do not cmpty with The approved M18gotion Pn, complywiih all Iem iththi1 the ftenae rivd, or operate bytinc the 11cense expIration date, erifercement acalore., %joh as citations, fornial complaints, or Iitne review may reuL Brent Berg, PFesiftnt de Ovmriir Tft (Pa frr) - ) Dfe Addtiwi OwnerAi rrni d (if AppXkJt Ak(J?ai wrAnt T1JJ Ap) Dare Dart' i& tiq, rL,rny Sies Dpthpfii Data Yp WøLFLii gr !. F - tty or Brrnk1y 1in and Commumityslandayde Dpia±rnr.t th!i Creek rMyi Center, MM 0219 1 Phure.'fM)W33= I TW: 711 I F (Ye) -.1E() Oty CounrH A©i'lldii I[trn N0 1©i #2 111[J I WN N Nk'4 L'A I k'A (I) 1I 1SJ3 I DATE: April 24, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk AUN(441^^ SUBJECT: Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 6106 Aldrich Ave N Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Mitigation Plan, Resolution and issuance of a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 6106 Aldrich Ave N. The applicant or representative has an opportunity to present evidence regarding the submitted Mitigation Plan. If the Council chooses to modify or disapprove the Mitigation Plan, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare proposed findings for disapproval of the Mitigation Plan and notify the license applicant of any pending license actions to be taken at a subsequent Council Meeting. Background: This owner is applying for a renewal rental license. This is a single family property. The previous license was a Type IV Rental License issued on July II, 2016, on condition of adherence to the Mitigation Plan and City Ordinances. The property would qualify for a Type II Rental License based on four (4) property code violations found during the initial rental inspection and zero (0) validated police nuisance incidents for the past twelve months. However, the owner failed to comply with the Mitigation Plan and applicable Ordinances, specifically failed to turn in monthly updates. According to City Ordinances, if the requirements of the license category and the Mitigation Plan are not met, the license renewal category remains a Type IV. City Ordinance Section 12-901.2 requires a licensee of a Type IV Rental Property to complete Phase II of the Crime Free Housing Program. City Ordinance Section 12-914.3.c requires an owner (or authorized representative) to attend a minimum of 50 percent of Owners/Managers Association Meetings. Staff is recommending approval of the continued Type IV Rental License in lieu of denial, revocation or suspension because the owner is working with staff to meet the license requirements and the property is currently in compliance with the ordinance. The following is a brief history of the license process actions. I'Iissio,z: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust S1i1IJ[iJ I fl I I DIk'4 I I Dk"A LI] 1WI ilSJk'A I Current rental license approval activities: 10-20-2016 The owner, Main Street Renewal, LLC, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 6106 Aldrich Ave N, a single family dwelling. 11-30-2016 An initial rental license inspection was conducted. Four property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 01-05-2017 A second inspection was conducted and passed. 01-17-2017 City records indicate zero validated police nuisance incidents occurred in the past twelve months. 01-17-2017 A letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 01-31-2017 The previous Type IV Rental License expired. 02-09-2017 A second letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6- Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 04-05-2017 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 04-14-2017 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 04-17-2017 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held April 24, 2017. Prior Type IV Rental License approval activities: 05-05-2016 The owner, Main Street Renewal, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 6106 Aldrich Ave N, a single family dwelling. 05-23-2016 An initial rental license inspection was conducted. Zero property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 06-07-2016 City records indicate zero validated police nuisance incidents occurred in the past twelve months. 06-07-2016 A letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 06-17-2016 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 06-28-2016 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 07-01-2016 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held July 11, 2016. Prior Type IV Rental License approval activities: 11-12-2015 The Owner, Kimberly Magel, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 6106 Aldrich Ave N, a single family dwelling. 12-03-2015 An initial rental license inspection was conducted. 14 property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 01-12-2016 A second rental inspection was conducted and failed. A $100 reinspection fee was charged to the property. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [Ei]IJ[ii I fl I N *'A L'A I I'A 0] t1I I1O I 01-27-2016 A third inspection was conducted and failed. A $100 reinspection fee was charged to the property. 01-31-2016 The previous rental license expired. 02-18-2016 A fourth inspection was conducted; corrections complete. The $200 in reinspection fees is still owed. 03-04-2016 A $300 Administrative Citation was issued for renting without a license. 03-10-2016 The $200 in reinspection fees was paid. 03-22-2016 City records indicate zero validated police nuisance incidents occurred in the past twelve months. 03-22-2016 A letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 04-13-2016 A second letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6- Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 04-20-2016 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 05-04-2016 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 05-13-2016 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held May 23, 2016. If approved, after six months, a new rental license is required. The license process will begin in three months. The new license will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12-911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Excerpt from Chapter 12 of City Code of Ordinances: Section 12-913. TYPE IV PROVISIONAL LICENSES. 1.Rental properties that meet the provisional licensing criteria as described in Section 12- 901 are eligible only for provisional licenses. 2.The City will provide by mail to each licensee a monthly report of any police and fire calls and incidents and applicable property Code violations as described in Section 12- 901. 3. Mitigation Plan. The applicant for a provisional license must submit for Council review a mitigation plan for the license period. The mitigation plan shall describe steps proposed by the applicant to reduce the number of police and fire calls and/or the property Code issues described in Section 12-901 and 12-911 to a level that qualifies for a Type I, II, or III license. The mitigation plan may include such steps as changes in tenant screening procedures, changes in lease terms, security measures, rules and !'Iissioiz: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for al/people and preserves the public trust ES1IJ[ii I fl I I k'A U'A I 0) 1I P1IJ VA I regulations for tenant conduct, security personnel, and time frame to implement all phases of the Crime Free Housing Program. 4.Council Consideration. The application with a proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council together with a recommendation by the City Manager or the Manager's designee as to the disposition thereof. After giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, the Council shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions the application and the mitigation plan. If the Council disapproves an application and mitigation plan or approves it with conditions, it shall state its reasons for so doing in writing. In evaluating a mitigation plan, the Council will consider, among other things, the facility, its management practices, the nature and seriousness of causes for police and fire incidences and/or property Code issues and the expected effectiveness of measures identified in the plan to reduce the number of police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. In evaluating a mitigation plan submitted by an applicant already under a provisional license, the Council will also consider the effectiveness of measures identified in the applicant's previous mitigation plan and the need for different or additional measures to reduce police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. 5.Compliance with Mitigation Plan. The licensee shall comply with the mitigation plan as approved or modified by the Council. No later than the tenth day after each calendar month, the licensee shall mail or deliver to the City Manager a written report describing all steps taken in furtherance of the mitigation plan during the preceding month. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive comniunily that enhances the quality of life for al/people and preserves the public trust [ES1Ii(iJ i V ak UhYA I ak'A (I) t1II )1IJ1 Rental License Category Criteria Policy - Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 1.Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2.Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license, inspect, monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3.Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4.License Category Criteria. a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may, upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected, the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: e At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. At least 25% of units, to include a minimum of 12 units, will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. Jl'Iission: Ensuring on attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust :Es1sJ(J I U I N DIk"4 U'A I Øk"4 cs tiii auii Type 11-2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III - 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV - 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3+ units Greater than 3 b Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are "Family or household members" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of "Domestic Abuse" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (a). 5 or more units 0-0.3 5 Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 'l but not more than 3 Category 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for al/people and preserves the public trust I[S1SJ[J I UI V MYA Uh'A I k'A 0) 1II aIJ'A I Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Strategic Priorities: Enhanced Community Image Attachment - Mitigation Plan - Resolution Approving a Type IV Rental License for 6106 Aldrich Ave N Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE FOR 6106 ALDRICH AVE N WHEREAS, City Ordinance Sections 12-900 to 12-916 set forth requirements for licensed rental properties; and WHEREAS, the property located at 6106 Aldrich Ave N, was issued a Type IV Rental License on July 11, 2016; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 12-901.2 requires a property owner who receives a Type IV Rental License complete Phase I, II and III of the Crime Free Housing Program; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 12-914.3.c establishes the requirement for Phase II of the Crime Free Housing Program including attendance at a minimum of 50 percent of Owners/Managers Association Meetings and completion of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Requirements; and City Ordinance Section 12-913 requires submittal of monthly updates; and WHEREAS, the property owner of 6106 Aldrich Ave N, Brooklyn Center failed to turn in monthly updates. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that a TYPE IV Rental License is hereby approved for the property at 6106 Aldrich Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. X!Ba CO^' 0 K LY N BJThDING AND COMMTJ1'flTcitypt Rental Ll re nme MUgaion FanCENTERType IV Licen se Ha ndwri tten MIfigt1on Pla ns will not be acc epte d A flIable fo rm can be foun on the Ctys wbs1t at wr1i fbrckly trrg or tall (763) 65-333O to have an e le ctronic cony sent to you via email. PpertyAd dress'; 0100 AIdricIi Ani' North raokIyn Center MIJ 554 3 0 Owners Nuiie) HOME SFR Eknune r • Ownir'sAcIdress 300 rrth MOpBr ExpreEway, #200 • •.;AustA, A4 77 ner' Fh one;512} 851-230 Owner's E.rriail uppmrewaLo Curtert Expiration Date ) gill Local /gent(s): Main t4 re et Re n eyea l Krim Uon Agent's Address",111 ciy R d. B West, Rc'iiio MN&11 Agen t 's Phone (61 Agent's Emair Kuptonlrsronl corn Fending Expiration Oat (5b rmnft frçi wwA o*iratkn) I Based on property ewidtlons and/or validated pol i ce riai1ce i ric lklents, the above referenced property qu&ifles fo r a Type gV-e Month Rental License- Prior to appfkaIon appro val by the City CciinI a fulty completed Migalin Plan must completed and approved by City staff. A Mitigation Plan rnist be completed immed i ately In order t o ensure tine1y complIetion of the license app l ica t ion pro cess. The lylftigaUon Flan should indicate the steps being taken to correct identified violations and the rneasires that willl be t a ken to ereure Ooin co rnpl i ance with City Ordinances and applicable codes. A Miation Plan allows the ow ner and thg City to 1eiew to n cems and idenUfy possible solutions to improve overall con ditions of the property, If the Mitigation Pla n is not sub m itted , and all litems- not completed within the pending hcense petod or the above property operates beyond iha license expiraUon dale, enforoernent a c t1orks si1 s lttiii, fonil ccniptinL or Piense review m ay resuIt Before subn'ilttln 1lII.out Sections A B and C located on pages 2, 3 4, and 6 . p T &Rla kM ti FAi 4444 City ô Btiy EciId1 d CtnuftuAify St&ndmxd!;DcpubrL4iIt 631 J SFingl t!iDF=k-P.P kxw, MN 55430-2t l r:T3 5-33 I M:711 I F31&3-M0 B1=1XG AND COMMUNITY TM4DMWZ ROb1YN fl6 Afddch Avenue North CENTER rükn ce*r1 Mr F43) Reritai Lieens Mitigation Plan Type IV Vicense Sections A—Crime Thee Housing Program Rqkzits Phase r 17 I) Use a written lease erriflt The !a rent shall inoWde the Cdnie Free Housinj Lee A nduit A copy of the Ce agreement and Grime Free Housing Lease Addendum must be attached to the Mitigation Plan when submitted, fttea to purie the term ination or reae agreement or eviction oflenants who vicilate the terms ofth heae or any 2ddendi,mis. ) Conud cimiria1 bao-kgf hk fir Jl new pr petive terarts. If it is a cirrrent tenant a new background check Is not required. Must be able Ii provide Iotari 10 Cyeted. hL 4) Mend a City approved eight-hour Crime Free Housing training curse Information for approved courses can be fu rid at mne ijrLder the Trfr?ing a nd Evert ab A copy of th e Crime Free Housing Oattifteate must be attoohed to the Mitigation Plan when submitted. CLIme Fro-9 Housit ek,in was nipeted ns cheduied i ) 2,00 Nine r or ant a nded/is p1ennlng to attend training at city of EI1 5) Submit Monthly Update by the 10 day o eXh Month. Pha II 4) Complete a Security Asessment and i'mpement improvements requested by the Brooklyn Cent t Police DparImett To safieduk art initial or follow-up Security Assessment, call 5-344, A follow-up assessment must be completed before the license expiration date to verify the security Improments have been iniIartieiitd. If a Sewl1y A sessrrertt bas been pievktsly completed, write the completion dater Security Assessment was completed onus scheduled tor: 4)26118 Security Assessment follow-up was corrpsted onus scheduled for 51-12116 Continue Soctions, A. Phase 1I on page Z. Ti MPar Pv 4444------------------------- ---- -- cIt U! Binkly c nun St ud Djiitmt ren1er.or 51 Shir lrEIc oIn Carder, MN 4-21 SO I Phone: ?8) M-33W I TFYI. 711 1 F 5EU BUILDING AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS CttyfBROOKLYN 1ci Aldrich Avenue CENTER Bwo1cI Cgfl'4 MN 43U Rental Linae Mitigation Plan Type IV Ltene Sectiori AC rime Free Housing Program Reqffrements ttc Phase III [71 1) Owner or agentwII attend at minimum 50% of the A.R.M meetings. ThG ARJIL meetings must be completed within the rental lens period arid Wart thim pandIng , Type IV Liei se "p1ratinin date. Registration is not required however you must sign-in during the meeting. Write two meeting dates an owner or agent plan t Iten& Owner willwilt Uend A.Rtul. Meetings scheduled and3l'GV17 25 Have no pe de violations pviiy documented with the past yer. The following actbns are required for properties with four 4) or more units.Ej 1) Othit resWem ttainin annoally that incus rirn prevenlbn teo1inques. 2) Cciridut regular rs3drtt iIins, pogo NO Tyro Wallaf Lksnse gfiga ftn P, v. 444-5 City of i1t Cqmmurnaity tn44a Dptweit 5O1 hlr Crs1c BrLktycCertr MO-21 I PMfle!(7t13)553-33WTTY. 711 I BUELDflG AND COMMUNITY STMmAR.r}s Cityu BROO1LYN CENTER Bruikyn Cwlr, MN 554w Rental LFns Mitigation, Lteanse Sections Thi'm Capita l hprveme,t P!n on condition and age, estimthd replacemaril dates need to be provided for cornnion capital 1tis, Fundirig thoiik be considered accordingly. Items that are brii, wrn Qrothewi5e in latiQn prior to tiriad repluement date need to be replaced sooner. All Ims rni.st have date for EsJkno.Vod Rpil ffi. Oates udi : iiure don't know iF "when brken' will not Lxi accepted. If you are unsure of whei an item will need to be replaced, you can make a prediction based on the e, appeaanoe 1 condition, or rrwnufactue)iridu* recommendations Additional lnforrriabon on Experted Usefut Le can be found at www hud gor Item Date Lest Rpkcod Examp&: WaerHter My 20W Furnace 1122U13 Water Heater 123 Kitchen App1ances 1:092014 Laundry Appliances Ti1n Qmd Smoke PlarmsI Caitcin Monoxide Marrn E x ter i or lteni, PaWsiding May 2000 May 2" Roof May 2000 Fence NfA Shed Camp Attached to Driwy 1954 Sidewalks 1954 sm Oo]idltkjl* Epted Replacement Date May =2 0 0 i1I43 N 12/O112OB iW112034 N O1P2OO - May 2030 0 MB G May F 2I2O F 2020 F4eiF4 Fair--F Needs plaementR Page 416 Tnt AtncV Ray. 4.14.,,rj.5 ôfB1dn C w Standards 11iteia1 -1 Cenler, MN E543t21E# Phine (7 -3i3 TTY; 711 j F 11ThDING AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS City A1dr1C1 Avenue NcThBROOKLYN rIJyn Ce'ir, AN 5543 Rental License Mitigation PlanCENTERType IV License Sections C.&eps to Imprv4 Ma nag em en t rId Con dWozs o f PrQperiy The items in this section have been proven to assist with property me nmrt and pvopeity image, The folbw[tig actions are [] 1) Check-in with tenants every 30-days- 2)Drive by property to check for possible code v]1aion, 3)Evict tenants In violation of the tease or I1y adendtims. [] ) Remain current on all utility fees, taxes, asseuments, fines. penalties, and other financial claims/payments due to the C1t3i. [] 5) OTher: The following actions are optional unless required by the City. [] 1) Provide lawnfsriow seriice [] 2) Provide garbage service. 3) lrtail security system. [J 4) Provide maintenance service pari tr appliances Name of service company. E1 5) U the Type V-6 Mtili ReMl Line is approved by the City Council, the licensee must comply with the approved Mitigation Plan and aM appliubte City Codes. A written report must be submitted by the I O day of each month wlih an update of actions Wing taken by the owner erdor agent to comply with this Mitigation Plan. A copy of the Monthly Update can be found on page 7. A tillable form can be found on the Citys website at v or call (763) 69-333i to have an electronic copy sent to VOLT via emdfl Please aLtach additIonal Information if neeas*ry. Pao W Ron ev. c44-5 city ofBiiak1yn CtTB i41d4n n4 ç4t t4r4 pImen1 1tyoltrenterr 6301 SWrolerIc Parky, ErwElpCerr, MN 554N-21 S9 I Phone- (7E)Ea3J] I TTY-Ml I FzDc(7&3)FA"11W BUILDING AND COMMUNITY STANDARDS Cily *1 E1JdrIth Avenue F4arThcmim 6r1yn Center, MW iti L1cene Ultigalidp Plan Type IV Licerie 81jrianVe1y : I verify that an information provided i true i nd irate I understand that If I do not comply with thr approved Mitigation Plan, comply with all items within the license perd or operate beyond th license expiration date erirorcenient ar-lions such as citations formal complaints,or ficenso rIew may result KrHn Pg. Up1n, Branch Msner Oiir arAgeRl Name and T!e (Revzo FtfrO Kristin UptonI I I UI I D12O4O4;O;28-Y cA -4r4 &narure diTkiJ rc T f Appkahre, Moss p AMI tAgir4 Shirm W JM.ti) Date CIfy F1irnerr k' Wcf qaina // &e - ti, citj bt Brooldyn ie —1iIkth9 imd CorranoWly Standards "OrLment 6O 5iIecric Prkwa, iyrMT 4-i 6-333 I T1Y: 711 Fa (7543O Cty C©Euft©il Ado- ]It©m N©0 1© #3 ES1IJ[1 I fl I *Y4 I'A I [I) 1I )lik'A I DATE: April 24, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk ) i'2i(111J'& SUBJECT: Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 7048 France Ave N Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider approval of the Mitigation Plan, Resolution and issuance of a Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License for 7048 France Ave N. The applicant or representative has an opportunity to present evidence regarding the submitted Mitigation Plan. If the Council chooses to modify or disapprove the Mitigation Plan, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare proposed findings for disapproval of the Mitigation Plan and notify the license applicant of any pending license actions to be taken at a subsequent Council Meeting. Background: This owner is applying for renewal of two rental licenses. This is a single family property. The property qualifies for a Type IV Rental License based on ten (10) property code violations found during the initial rental inspection and zero (0) validated police nuisance incidents for the past twelve months. Under this license action, the property owner will receive two successive Type IV Rental Licenses- one that will have expire on June 30, 2017 and one that will have expired on December 31, 2017. The following license qualifies for a Type IV Rental License based on three (3) property code violations found during the initial rental inspection and zero (0) validated police nuisance incidents for the past twelve months. However, the owner will fail to comply with the Mitigation Plan and applicable Ordinances, specifically will fail to attend Owners/Managers Association Meetings. According to City Ordinances, if the requirements of the license category and the Mitigation Plan are not met, the license renewal category remains a Type IV. City Ordinance Section 12-901.2 requires a licensee of a Type IV Rental Property to complete Phase II of the Crime Free Housing Program. City Ordinance Section 12-914.3.c requires an owner (or authorized representative) to attend a minimum of 50 percent of Owners/Managers Association Meetings. Staff is recommending approval of the continued Type IV Rental License in lieu of denial, revocation or suspension because the owner is working with staff to meet the license requirements and the property is currently in compliance with the ordinance. The following is a brief history of the license process actions. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [I[I]8[I1 I fl I V 1h"A U I Mk!'I (I) &'WI flJA!A I Current rental license approval activities: (License that is being considered and expires on 06-30-2017) 12-30-2016 The owner, Tam Pham, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 7048 France Ave N a single family dwelling. 12-31-2016 The previous rental license expired. 02-01-2017 An initial rental license inspection was conducted. Ten property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 03-24-2017 A second inspection was conducted and one earlier correction was not complete; further a new violation was added. A $100 reinspection fee was charged to the property. 03-28-2017 A third inspection was conducted and passed. 03-27-2017 City records indicate 0 validated police nuisance incidents occurred in the past twelve months. 03-27-2017 A letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 04-05-2017 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 04-14-2017 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 04-17-2017 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held April 24, 2017. Current Type IV Rental License approval activities: (License that is being considered that expires on 12-31-2017) 03-23-2017 The owner, Tam Pham, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling license for 7048 France Ave N a single family dwelling. 03-24-2017 An initial rental license inspection was conducted. Three property code violations were cited, see attached rental criteria. 03-28-2017 A second inspection was conducted and passed. 03-27-2017 City records indicate 0 validated police nuisance incidents occurred in the past twelve months. 03-27-2017 A letter was sent to the owner(s) notifying of qualification for Type IV 6-Month Provisional Rental License, including additional requirements to obtain a rental license. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of Phases I, II, and III of Crime Free Housing Program, etc. 04-05-2017 A Mitigation Plan was submitted. 04-14-2017 The Mitigation Plan was finalized. 04-17-2017 A letter was sent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the Council will be held April 24, 2017. If approved, after six months, a new rental license is required. The license process will begin immediately. The new license will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12-911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of ilfe for all people and preserves the public trust [EI1BJ(SJ I U I I MYA U I DI4 [I] 1.'II I1IJYA I If approved, after six months, a new rental license is required. The license process will begin immediately. The new license will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal license inspection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in 12-911. The terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Excerpt from Chapter 12 of City Code of Ordinances: Section 12-913. TYPE IV PROVISIONAL LICENSES. Rental properties that meet the provisional licensing criteria as described in Section 12- 901 are eligible only for provisional licenses. 2.The City will provide by mail to each licensee a monthly report of any police and fire calls and incidents and applicable property Code violations as described in Section 12- 901. 3.Mitigation Plan. The applicant for a provisional license must submit for Council review a mitigation plan for the license period. The mitigation plan shall describe steps proposed by the applicant to reduce the number of police and fire calls and/or the property Code issues described in Section 12-901 and 12-911 to a level that qualifies for a Type I, II, or III license. The mitigation plan may include such steps as changes in tenant screening procedures, changes in lease terms, security measures, rules and regulations for tenant conduct, security personnel, and time frame to implement all phases of the Crime Free Housing Program. 4.Council Consideration. The application with a proposed mitigation plan will be presented to the City Council together with a recommendation by the City Manager or the Manager's designee as to the disposition thereof. After giving the applicant an opportunity to be heard and present evidence, the Council shall approve, disapprove, or approve with conditions the application and the mitigation plan. If the Council disapproves an application and mitigation plan or approves it with conditions, it shall state its reasons for so doing in writing. In evaluating a mitigation plan, the Council will consider, among other things, the facility, its management practices, the nature and seriousness of causes for police and fire incidences and/or property Code issues and the expected effectiveness of measures identified in the plan to reduce the number of police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. In evaluating a mitigation plan submitted by an applicant already under a provisional license, the Council will also consider the effectiveness of measures identified in the applicant's previous mitigation plan and the need for different or additional measures to reduce police and fire incidences and/or property Code violations. 5.Compliance with Mitigation Plan. The licensee shall comply with the mitigation plan as approved or modified by the Council. No later than the tenth day after each calendar month, the licensee shall mail or deliver to the City Manager a written report describing all steps taken in furtherance of the mitigation plan during the preceding month. )Wission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for al/people and preserves the public trust I1I]JJ[J I fl I I k'4 UYA I 0] 1WI 1BJ3 I Rental License Category Criteria Policy - Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 1.Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2. Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license, inspect, monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3.Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4.License Category Criteria. a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may, upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected, the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: • At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. • At least 25% of units, to include a minimum of 12 units, will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances (lie quality of life for al/people and preserves (lie public trust Ii[I1JJ[iJ I I I k'A UIYA I *kA (I] 1I I1BJ I Type 11-2 Year Type III - 1 Year Type IV —6 Months 3+ units 1-2 units 3+ units 1-2 units 1-2 units 0-0.75 Greater than 1 but not more than 4 Greater than 4 but not more than 8 Greater than 8 b. Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are "Family or household members" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of "Domestic Abuse" as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 51813.01, Subd. 2 (a). 5 or more units 0-0.3 5 Decrease 1 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 Category 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 1-2 Greater than 3 Categories 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust [iII1IJ[S1 I N V DE'A 1h'A I D1'4 (I] 1II 1SJhYA I Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. Strategic Priorities: o Enhanced Community Image Attachment - Mitigation Plan - Resolution Approving Two Type IV Rental Licenses for 7048 France Ave N Mission: Ensuring, an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE FOR 7048 FRANCE AVE N WHEREAS, City Ordinance Sections 12-900 to 12-916 set forth requirements for licensed rental properties; and WHEREAS, the property located at 7048 France Ave N, is issued a Type IV Rental License with an expiration date of June 30, 2017; and WHEREAS, the property located at 7048 France Ave N, is issued a subsequent Type IV Rental License with an expiration date of December 31, 2017; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 12-901.2 requires a property owner who receives a Type IV Rental License complete Phase I, II and III of the Crime Free Housing Program; and WHEREAS, City Ordinance Section 12-914.3.c establishes the requirement for Phase II of the Crime Free Housing Program including attendance at a minimum of 50 percent of Owners/Managers Association Meetings and completion of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design Requirements; and City Ordinance Section 12-913 requires submittal of monthly updates; and WHEREAS, the property owner of 7048 France Ave N, Brooklyn Center failed to attend Owners/Managers Association Meetings. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that two TYPE IV Rental Licenses are hereby approved for the property at 7048 France Ave N, Brooklyn Center, MN. April 24, 2017 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 51) 3-349:a2&Owner Pone: QWTe1C EmaiF: 0lrfr2rIt xpiratien Dae 2/ / f Agent's PIion: 12) O3-610 AgErlj'S Ern Pending Expiration Date: r,rr& frffi mt EWIJJING AND COMMUNITY STANDARDOf) g-. l•• •'•I -W4 x IV CENTER:' A iRenta Llt;ense MftIjticir Fran Type IV Ltcene !-dwvIUep Mffl2etin PQ!not be a ptdAiIIab1e forn can be found on theCity 's wbtte at WVW.dtycfbiook ri-rnei,of 5-323O to have an electronic cnpy Sent toYou 'ria emaIr Propexty Add re-&: 7043 FRANCE AVENUE N1RTrf EIROG<LYN CENT, MN 55420 Ownor's 4ame lid HON LLc Owpir Addi.e: trE corrQNwo cwVADMIS HEK+fl., MN PM27 , Local Agent(e): EOSliYCi13M PROPERTY MANAGEMENT Agent's Address: 07,46 11riepi Ave 11 201MN 554M Based on pIopery conddiots er4/or vItdated police nuiane ihddents, the thwe ifnroedproperly daliffes for a Type lV- Morh enthT Llcenae. Prior to application appro'iei by the CiyCouncil a fufly completed Mitit1o, Plan mutlec.rnpreed and apprcvd br City staff, AMillgalion Plan MuM be completed Immediately Iti order lo ensure 1fely crnpIetIon f1eFkens application proce The Mitiatloti F1.n should indjce the fep& being talcen to cilarrept idehllfiedvlla1Foris and the measures that will be taken to ereure Ohgoinjg ornpILne with Cily Ordinanceand appileable codes, A 1`41 r higalion iran allwvr. the owner and Ifte City lo review conem& and 'deniffypossibla solurjuns to improve overall conditions of the property If the Mihgat?ctr PLan iotumiLted, and all items are not compled within the pending lcer'sa parfd, or th above propertyopeaies beyond the license expiration date, enforc-6mentactions such as citatiork., formal complaint, Of licenio review may ro-uJ, efoi-e Submiffing, fill-outS"e-ctions /. 13, and C tocatd 13 paea 2 4 and E 7:vPO -VALn4 L MPaI, AW. 4-4-5 city Ixikty c r iUj -3O1 Hr1e Crk Prj1, rkn 1eiku, MN 4-21 I n: 17C I TrY: 711 F Y] E0-u BThLE]G AND C OMMUNflTIS STAD E S--TGQ FFWXE AVEWE NORTH CENTER RQOt<LTh CFJTEF MPJ 4Z Rental LIGE1e MrtEgatoi PXn Type rV Lide Stkr —Crfin Fr i*!ng Ptqgm kEqu!rmn 1)Use a wfiftefl teae agremenL The leasa agreemflj shall inude theCim Free Mdnurn, A py Of the 1ea rment and Cr1rt Free Housf ng / Lee Addendum rnt be attached to the MMgation Pkrn when submittod. 2)Agree fo pursue 1halermination oT leateagreameintoraViction or tenants 'iho v1Fete, the teems DI The Sa r any EedurrL, 3)Conduct criminal' bacFcroijnd check for n1I n's propEd-ye I&nent, If It a cLhrrent/ tenant new bthreiund check is nareqilretf, Must be able to prvFda dGeuniitatonIQ City if requeci, 4)Attend a City apprtedehthu Crime Free I-1&uin ' trainlr cour, lrderrnaior (Gr aWnved courses an be feunc mnQpa rt under Ihe Treiiinrnd Events tab,A copyof the CT-1e Free Fir*inj CeFtJfleata rntet be attached to the Mftlt1nPlan when bmEtte d. Crime Free H40uslifig lrafnfng was conipjgted oryis schsdtrled for: / Owret f3 r agent attendedfis prna1g tD atttrd 4an1n t cftjor S C' [[Jf S) Submit Monthly Update by the 10 dy of each month, Ph cIt I) Compete a S?crity Atsessmant And fflnPtMent 11TIPFOVernentS rque&d by the Srtmkryn Center Police Depairiied, To gchedulL.an initial or folv-up Setrity Ascsiiient, call (763) -344. A fo1*wup it must mpbt before the i1eerie expiration data to verb 1hpsiociufty niprvemn[ have beenfmplonente, If Secuslty A5 ,zessraentha been previorIy 'c e1ed write theamp.laiQn date. Scurty Asseusmentw cpIetec on/a hedued fbi 2 fl/ 1 - P1 3ewiry ASeenent follow-up was cornplejed Onus scht3dulad for; 2 /1 Cordinue SecLiQrs A Phase J1 on page 3, Ce tiJim.g Eli an1le Crk CiIcPn Ce-iIcr, FN 5i4i I PJ: 1? 3-53O T: 1 1 Fx V3 -5U E1flLDflC AND COMMUNITY STANDARD cy I -Th3 FIAI IENUENORT)-f - CENITR OOtCLyN CTE MJ E42 Rent1 Li M1ttw-n Par - type N Ln tci-n A—CrimeFe HafgIij7g Frrn, Reqzt1remez (tInued) Phae flI 1)Owner oragent wil Ltd at min imjm 50%2)fthARr meetings. The AAM. mB-ungs Jiut ba cop p1d within the frental license perIQd and bfoe thpandling Type N Lben.e expirentloh ft& Regitaior is rrnt required, icwver 'nuutduring 1/ijf two mGjig d? an iWi-ier of -eg eM pra -r t 01%1 "f -Ot agant will 1endAP M tg duled n dkA.(L--[] 2) kve ro peat code vIIprj ptevjouI durnentd with the payer. The f 1 owing a0tions kre reqiiad fOt PFOPOlIfES with fir 4or more ,rritsfj1) Conduct re-&drt tIffln n*JIIyth iricIud ciirrn preveniior techniques. 2)Ctfuct reuir &&drt mejrrjs. pagIR - 4444ffCtr Dr1x and Ce tnmuLty da fla1itMI 5hinIn Cw: Pdc.w, Budt1yq C-Bnrr, 54aJ1 5€-33 j TTY-.711 F BMMINCY AND COMMUNITY S DM1MT4v City Of Ej:(BN 704S FRANCE AVENUEE HORTH iEr42I Ucenso M]tIaLkiii pn --'type IV LFMe S ectf011 s B—Loi Tent Cap141 ihprrwment Plan Rased on vandition and .a, e5ftated replaceMeritdae need to be porided fo rpor,=o r, capiaI items, Fudn hôL1d ba onidord accordinty. ifma that aw broken, wQrn or athermsem in jion prior to the estirnac1 rp1cemnt dale ne di to be rep1ced Cner. AJ itm must he adate frEst/rn'fd Reprrnrii Cue. bates such "don't knw, w whobknwiIJ hGtbo If yeu amunuofv4- an item will reed to be rpcetj,yu canmake a predf1irb Lad on thr pearante condifiGn, Of nanUuenthfryreeoida1jr, MditonaJ hthmtln on Epeced Usefifi Lire can be 1ourd atviwwhuc.gov , Irn Ex.mpie: WaterHe!er Fu rnct raf&, Iter I<itchon AppIian Ltindiy Appli We Date Last Rop]apd May 2.010 2007 2C 201 4 ClJdiflon* Expected Replacement Date F My 2020an. ZI--- o_i_____ G S mQke Alarms/ Carbon Monoxido ?clanni 2a11 EiXttr[O r Fainttdir 2017 N ADI Wi'ndclw5 1 0 Roof 20LIO Fence Grae 1DIlveway 2L G tzgwafks Other TafM- 1;n AbjaIfar: w--r FBP Nds pIacEm!rliR FE ptm R8 w. 44445Ci±y I4yrtlldii M Cmwi1ty di pi1aent 5301 ShingleCr PrKy, rickIyn 30-21 FJrnr: I TTY, 711 F F Q3}53rj 1J City of fl1flL1MG AND COMMUNrET STANDAriSBR LCENTER j YNCENT2J Typo IV 1.1teose Stpr C—Stpt 1mpri MaMagM ent and Condiffon ôfFropry Trie fem Jrsection have been povrT to sLt with prprty mn.grnen1 arid popertyThE Iowitig abrts ir r?quErcf: 11 Chdç4ti wiIh tran every 30thy, 2) Dri'ie by prQprty lo dick for poSsible cOde viciaion, / 3.) Evir tRflann in vlotationof the le r arw ddnum, 4)Remain ourreni f3n all Ue ane periaNie and otherfinancial cfafr ii r f payrnent due to the City. 5)Other. The foflokv4ng artiomti are (3ptorja rquirod by the Clty,fl 1 ) Provide Iatmisnow servke,Li 2) Pdegbags -vj0 2 rn1p security syatera.D 4) PrOvidO maitltenOn Selvice pIri for appriances, Name of vice company; 5) Other If th Type IV6 Minth Rantal 1-1;ense J pprovd by the City Coil, th rccan:5ee must ti3rnptywith 1ha Bppro Matlon FFan and all ?pplicabje City Ccdes. A written report rtmt Iesbrnftted by the 10h dy nif each,month with an u pda te of ac to beIr taken by th uwndf- agent to comply with this MFtat1Oh Plait A copy of the Monthly Update canì be found tinpe 7. A ilIaba forn can be found on the City's wibite at or tall73) 5-330 an elwran copy sent to you via email. FIese atti iddtl-jall hi atIcjn if neca:t sary , P &'3 kew Li uar, Rdv. 444-5, .ye F41 Pr 1rEIcIIn Cnt MN 1O-7i d Phc;(Th3) F34o I Try 711 F f?) rL BUILDZNG AID COMIWTr STANDARDS BROflLYN Rtia1 LIe 4F11ition Pir - - TypVLicerie Sign iui Vdfy I verify that all inrMmathn provided Is 1jue and &Ur. I UnderStatid thM if I do nol COmply With Lhaproad MI[kati Pkiii, compIy i1h ll ltem within Lh r'n pario. r opr1 nrlifteJinense laxpiration the, enforcerneill actlansinh iatktia, fmial crnpFlrt, DE Piconsereviewrrty result, LPJfl Ot"TONG PRJP1Fri MAKAGEM96ff(AGE NT NAf O4t- rAyir Mt 1iiid rVo 13-2 rrA Sii1'e - crJ1 Namm arI Th (ftc1 Addftoaf Ow Aiii (if Appth) sf orgy M yçfr - __ 4-Fij (11(1 Da sk 1y#1 1V Cu;J! arid CDIup Y' flCnartLD1 ink G kFs PAF54-21E 'iin: t?}E-E 1;111 f x; (-i& -BUILDING AXTh CcThflWuNfl7y STIDADSclt?or XLYK -Rent a l Lic e nse trt1n pl a n Type IV LI c erise J*mwreji Mitigalign pjjEFn:s,-wjttnot b pt4:AflFrbI& fo rm can b e found on the Cweb-3 1[a a t Urc6LTh3) 5-333O to ha ve an &trinic t,ipy tayou via ernj1. Pperty Ates: 704 FP.Awrx AVENUE NO RTHRODL'1f CEN TE R, MN Owners Nrne(; Vd HON LLC OwrT6 Adth8s 176 C OWao RNEWitAFS 1EJGHT-$, MN 55127 c& Ani): Q1i1YV OPTION SP4OER1y PINGMENT Pvje nfs. 3.45i•1ririp1i Ave 020154 0wner1 P h one,- (651) 34-2 Age Wrs Pho 6E6IO owners ErniI; 7rnLoni CLrrreiit Epra1kr Date: . A gent's EnisiI: nqui1J., Flend ing Epire1iür Date , I z-j ? asi2 fil r4 p irmlon) Used on properly conell(fdns andfor vid1 P o lice nuisance inciden1 1 the abblie referencedproperty qual i fies or a Type IV-B WnI4 Ren t al Lene. Prior to app alkin approval by the CityCouncil a fully comilleted MI!Igiioii Pan rnuI be QDmprEte and approved by city staff. AMi1itin F11.9n mf he co rnpl at6 d irnm rty in ondrto ensure thi,e!y compton of the lieappIiiaikn proc. The 1,11119tkn Plan Qioutd indicate the stop being ta1vili to crret identifiedviolations and the h -jea su res that wiI be t a ken to ensu vwk 9o fnq to rnprrancev with City OdFnaneand applicable co tter., A Mltlthn Fran GU O via t he Owner and tha City to r eview C0flcem andIdn1ffy pu ^s lblotp j utfons tp improve ovrI1 conditi ons of the property. Ittie Mi1igUin I'llark is notsubmitted, arid aN iten e notcornp)eted within the pen d hg kensa pEriod, or the Lqbm propertyoperalee Ib L%)m r4 the Unae expira tif3j, date, enforcemaril actons su c h as c1tticrn, fatm a l comp lai ntor 1111c o ma review may rem. Befort su btwilttfng tJflpit Sections A, 8, aritll,17, iaIed on page-5 2 3, 4 and E Nffe V6 - c —II1itr3g mgty paz-lmfit ww cmro mt- nr301 6l-* CrO k Prk, -ocCntr, MN 542t41 n; 63J 56-O I TTY, 711 1 Fox V8 3) $5q-wflo BVIL1JNC AND COMMIINtTY STANDA SiIyf 'Tt'$ RooxI TMFRMCE VE('LfE OFm CZrITR BROOKLYN CENTER, PAtd!n-,;2q Rental LIGeie Mrtaton PIu - Type WLkn A—Crfin F-ree Hay.51nq Ftc gnm p eg ufromep ts Phas 1) Use a *itten lease agrlmaxnenL The Jzasa aveemeM shallinIudG Ifte Clirtle FreePfiusfq Lee Add4um, A epy of The Ioe rrnert nd Cr1rn Free HousIng/ Lese Addendum rntst be attavhod to the Plan when ubrrFtted. 2 Agree to pursue the lermination w lee, agreampint orerjjn oFteflarits w]io viatethe teuyisE2/3} Conduct crimfnaf background check for all flew prpectve tnnts, If t e utrenttenant a new background check is not requIred, Must be able to prvide dcumertaiion /to C14f if requearei, 4)Attend a City appro'ead ht-aur Crime Free HaMing train in cou, infefrmBk)n er aplJrnved oaurvescan be fcjund at vrnnipart under Ihe Trein!nçr wd £vrrs ia.A eppy or the CHme Free Housing Certificate nitst be attached to the MitigationPlan when submItted. Crime FFBE i-fou&jg 1riig tcompleted riJis schriduled for: Owner Or attendeclft p1enfrg tu attend trainIng at city or P,, Ci 5)SubnitMoh1y Update by the 1Odayofea rneth, FF1 eli 1) Cômptete SPWrity Msessmant rd fr-nplament irnven-ierts rqiresed by therQkFyn Cnter Polke Deparm, TO itchedula on initi] or foIkw-up Saurftycal' (763) 5-344. A fiflw-up assesement must be Cmplete1before the license exjitratJor) dato tu verify Ihe security iiiprcvents ha'ie beenfrnp1merid, if a Security Aes fleet has bean prevloiy rnp-ieed write thecom1eicir date. Stirty ALuossment vra5 completed on1m 2v,,hedOed far-i Secuity Aener fclfow-up was cempeted On/s -scheduled rr; LI1' ctiwe Se-cti-prvl A Phase JJJ on pag 3, F i TYM,JV ic"PqaoLicir ç, Pcn, iii (-144j1y1 k1y e —1ItdüLg nrD1ini1y pa1fl WCri-r SMiitIe Ck tørkwa Ce,Ir, UN 5i41 I Ph: I? -ao rr l 1 a- IWILrnNC AND C Q1Ufl'y TANDARD)- r -7 ,c BRYN M3 FRANCE AVENUE NORTH J UMFtFO.0 Plan 7'ypo IV re Housing FrQgrim Reqifr !s (conthiq) Pha tJ ) Owner or agent will td a t mirj 1mw-n 50% (2) ofth A. RM. rnetftig, The A.R. ihiftkol^tinqs mut b iompitd within tho renti licerme perici d rtd Wore, thipth Type IV Lke. pirtIn Reg JiQr i S nt 1equirec, haw e ver yawrut rri tturing the 1iieetiig. Wri wo meikig dates ar owner Int a ge p, p lart 10 Owner bragentwill i&ndA,RM. r1wetim9s csch ia duled on: j 2) k3ve n repeat code viol a tignS pviu&y documente d with Vie p year. Tho fi5 t [owitig aatk,tis ja re required for PrQpetl1Ea with four 4) or cor& reIdr t 1h i ng a nhU a lly that include iirrit prven1ior tec hni q ue s -2) Cui rur city arkmok C CMrrntLty p1tntQ1 Shin g la Creek ParhyRy , auth1yn CerL 1N Phix: J TTY.71 EUThDING AND CoMMl1Ty STANDAIWS FRANCE VENUNORTH j Rental LIcense MiIa P1arb Type IV LiFe tk]i 8—Loig Tem CapThI hnproveiit Phin Based DII cun'ition and age, e5timated replace ment date riaad ki be pvided fox cornmon capi1iitems. Fundin hcns]d be c6nsidered accotcngly. Uma that aw broken, wom, w Qherv1ie i niiation prior to the stirned replacement date need to b e rep1cd thonr, All items rriut have adate for E -,Uftiafed 'drft krow, or -when brokn will notbo accepteda If you am unu fhen an item will need to be rpced, yøu canmake a pxedic1in bad an tho e appa'rrne, condition, o nanufujerincury recorimenda1on., AddffonaJ information on Epeced Useful Life cinbe found atw.'itvjiucLqv, Item Date Last Replaced £x.w7pk: Wteri!!er may 2010 Furnae 21307 V'iat&x eter 2[19 Kitthon AppIiantss Latrndry Applraruei 2q14 Smoke Alarms/ Carbon Mcinxkfe Alarm 2(111- CJon Expected Replacement Data F MiYY20261 G 'sap EW erorin Fain f/S 2017 1 voyneirlwS 2010 Roaf 20GO Fence - dO_ Garage T __ Dtleway wtk O1hr; CrbIn Abratfar Fir= Nods RpIacEimr11=R iij. 4.4-5 —Building and DepaAment 3O1 Wngla crtek Pa, rwty , BroCHSn CO n te ItT'J 430-2 1AS I Phar*: 1 T1Y: 711 F 3, 569.3 r ZL1MMG AND COTh7Uim STDpr LTN ..L Rental Type JV,Lh:g?r%so th t, $mpr MarngeMent d Co]tk Of FiprtyTr in INS sectionhave been proven, t &t with properly mngmenj and popei-fyThe Mtrowing oic, Jj0rLS ar requEr 1)ChEck4n WFIf tenaAft every 3Oy, 2)Drive by prprty b dieck 101 pssibfb rode violation, 3 Evici terients in V1thtithe1edftdum. 4) Remain Curren n all u1iity fa aern Thie enaliiee, rcT herfinancial tI rnpyrnent due to th City. [J 5) Other. The iliown are 0001110 uinl rqufrod by tfie Cily,fl i FM-6deFM-6d laviwanowU2 Pvid abag ervic, 3) e.irfty sy,5tenj. JJ 4) Proijd rnait nc 5eMce plan for app1ne, Name oTervicQrnptiy. - - fth Type lV6 Month Rental LIena is aprpvd by the City C'iircI, th liear ee rn t erptywith Ent approved Mliatfr}j1 Planand all applicable City A written report rnut be-subMitted by the 10 th day Of each month With ah update of actioflsanj1 beJr taken by the uwnr comply with this hT[tjqstrot3 PFi, A copy Of the Monthly Update an be found an t7 Page 7. A Ilab term c an be eud or the Giy webite a or call3) le tave ai, electren cy ee to yu via mal. PIeae atbd, addifloij,91 F!"fomation If 44-5ktyn C ni ciiyBM 'fCr Urc$iJy Cnt€.r, MN j M.711 BTJILDflSTG AND COMMtfljfl!y (2 mmARDs BRdKL JANUE1 C ENTER rrdJl LpM onNir Type IV LIG Sln 4nd Vedfy I verfy that all in fa fma t ion provided Is Uu I thgc it I do nol toiply with th epprovd OA lLIation Pimi, c:uTp,-%pIy with all Items withfn IhG ffCejjGib parjoij, Or opera lu b e ihficense OYpiraffo n de, eti forcomenil acths such fornidmrinfa, i itanse rerbiwrry euFt EQUITY 01 -TiONS PRPErrY GEMIff1 (AGENT NM.1E) o*- i;r4ir N ,W?d Th'' opass P?-ft Datec,rj1E ii'e ic9 C rwij'&'I M'in Th (ffA M% see R^lo frXkii? QrrAn SigJF..UW (ff AIN '- \.MIM Pmv,gJi5 n f-;Ciiy at kot d muft tIe ww4tIjfljilnr cr rr;u r item iNo. tiIii [I[i1SJh'[iJ I fl Ik'1 L'A I 0) t1'I I1lJJ DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Mana FROM: Sharon Knutson, City Clerk SUBJECT: Mayoral Appointment of Member to Serve on Financial Commission Recommendation:e City CouncilIt is recommended that thcil consider ratification of the Mayoral appointment of Tia Hedenland, 2613 65th Avenue North, to the Financial Commission with term to expire December 31, 2017. Background:The Financial Commission is composed of a chairperson and six members. There is one vacancy on the Commission. Since August 16, 2016, notice of vacancy on the Commission continues to be posted at City Hall and the Community Center, on the City's website, Facebook, and Twitter, and airs on Cable Channel 16. A letter was sent to those persons who previously had submitted an application for appointment to a Brooklyn Center advisory commission informing them of the vacancy and requesting that they call the City Clerk if they are interested in applying for the Commission. They were given the choice of either submitting a new application or having their application previously submitted considered. Notices were also sent to current advisory commission members. A copy of the application received was forwarded to City Council Members in the April 14, 2017, update. Attached for City Council Members only is a copy of the application received: Tia Hedenland 2613 65th Avenue North Mayor Willson recommends appointment of Tia Hedenland to the Financial Commission. As previously requested by the City Council, the City Advisory Commission Bylaws are not included in the materials but can be found on the City's website at www.cityo fb ro OklyncellteLorg. The membership roster is also available at this site and in the City Council Reference Book. Budget Issues:There are no budget issues to consider. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe community that enhances the quality of life and preserves the public trust Work Session Agenda AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY WORK SESSION April 24, 2017 Immediately Following Regular City Council and EDA Meetings Which Start at 7:00 P.M. City Hall Council Chambers A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the podium. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1.Branding & Identity Campaign 2.Water Tower No. 3 Painting Project Update PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS Later/Ongoing 1.Liquor License Regulations 2.South Opportunity Site Development 3.Strategic Plan Update 4.Community Center HVAC Update 5.Conducting City Council Business Electronically 6.Water Meter Failure Update 7. Community Dialogue ItemUiIi1I1 MEMORANDUM COUNCIl WORK SESS]ION DATE: April 20, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City Manager FROM: Reggie Edwards, Deputy City Manag SUBJECT: Discussion of the Brooklyn Center Branding & Identity Campaign Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider the themes identified and taglines developed during the Brooklyn Center Branding & Identity Campaign process. It is recommended that the Council consider the themes of what residents "liked most" about the City identified during the 2017 City Survey process. It is further recommended that the Council consider establishing consensus on a ranking of the themes and taglines. Background: In October, 2016 the City entered into an agreement with Vitalink Inc. to execute the City's Branding & Identity Campaign. On Monday, January 23, Vitalink, Inc. presented an update on the Branding & Identity Campaign to the Council. Vitalink shared four top characteristics and most notable attributes (themes) of the City per the results of an electronic survey completed by approximately 400+ participants (including residents and staff). The four themes identified and ranked included: • Diversity - 79.7% • Great location, proximity to Minneapolis 71.83% • Affordable housing - 57.61% • Park systems, trails, sidewalks - 48.98% The percentages listed above represent the ranking of each characteristic/attribute in terms of "strength of identification of the City" by survey participants. The ranking results did not include qualitative data collected during the focus group sessions. On February 27 "', the Council received a presentation by the Morris and Leatherman Company on the 2017 City Survey. Morris and Leatherman Company conducted a telephone survey of 400 randomly selected households in the City. A sample of 400 residents provided results that were projectable to the entire city adult population within ± 5.0 percent in 95 out of 100 cases. During the presentation Mr. Peter Leatherman presented a graph depicting responses of residents of what they "liked most" about the City (see attachment for the complete list). The top items liked most about the City included: o Location - 34% • Housing and Neighborhood - 26% • Quiet/Peaceful - 11% Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community that enhances the quality of life for all people and preserves the public trust hI!AI MYA [I) 1I 1Ii Ei1IJ[i1 I 'LI) 1 Sb1 *'Ei (I)l The percentages listed above with the City Survey results represent proportions of a total of 100% for all "liked most" items identified by the survey respondents. The three items listed above were the only items that receive double-digit scores by the respondents and account for 71% of all items "liked most". Vitalink, Inc. developed five logo and three message options, which were reviewed by the Council on January 23'' and February 13 t The Council narrowed the five logo options down to three for public review. Council directed staff to conduct a public review of the three logo and message options. On April 10th, staff presented the results of the public review of the logo and message options per the direction of the Council. There were 1,228 logo and message survey reviewers. City staff completed 128 (10.42%) survey rankings out of the total 1.228 survey rankings. Several city staff members reside in the City. The proposed tagline rankings resulted in "At the Center" being rated as the most favorable tagline (see chart below). Public Branding Message/Tagline Options Results Ranking Percentage of Total At the Center 1 59% Within Reach 2 25% Get Closer 3 16% At the conclusion of the April lO Council meeting staff was directed to work with Vitalink in develop new logo options for consideration. Staff is seeking consensus from the Council on the ranking of the themes developed in the Branding & Identity Campaign and the 2017 City Survey. Consensus of the top ranking one or two themes will be used to further develop a logo that depicts a focused message on the uniqueness and most special attribute of the City. Staff believes that consensus on both a key theme and tagline will help guide and provide greater insight to Vitalink in the development of a new city logo. Budget Issues: None Policy Issues: 1.Is there a consensus of the Council regarding the ranking of themes? 2.Is there a consensus of the Council regarding a tagline? Strategic Priorities: Enhanced Community Image Miss/oil: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive community th atat enliaiices the quality of life for all people and preserves the public (lust > (a) a)0 AOWAVA ,=C) CO20 (2) (c1'\ >.>1 > ucocr QQ © Iq Iq a (.0 CD fl mfl cm C4 el mil I ] n i M W(1) 0 E > 0 a)c1 o (1) = (1) ® LL 0 0 .zo 00 0 0 = w 0 a)0 =J00 0)C _ c0 a)(1) a) 0z 0) 0 D(1) I a) 00 ci) a) 0 SO Themes and Tagline Ranking Process Logo Development Approach The City Council consider  the themes identified and taglines developed during the Brooklyn Center Branding & Identity Campaign process. The City Council consider  the themes of what residents “liked most” about the City identified during the 2017 City Survey process. The City Council consider  establishing consensus on a ranking of the themes and taglines. In October, 2016 the City entered into an agreement with Vitalink Inc. to execute the City’s  Branding & Identity Campaign. In October, November and December 2016, Vitalink Inc. conducted a City Identity Survey and  Focus group. One Monday, January 23, the Council heard anupdate on the Branding & Identity Campaign rd  from representatives of Vitalink, Inc. On February 27, the Council received a presentationby the Morris and Leatherman Company th  on the 2017 City Survey. During the presentation Mr. Peter Leatherman presented a graph depicting responses of residents of what they “liked most” about the City (see attachment for the complete list). Vitalink, Inc. developed five logo and three message options, which were reviewed by the  Council on January 23and February 13. On February 13, the Council narrowed the five rdthth logo options down to three for public review. At that time the Council directed staff to conduct a public review of the three logo and message options. On April 10, staff presented the results of the public review of the logo and message options th  per the direction of the Council. During the meeting Council directed staff to work with Vitalink in develop new logo options for consideration. The City of Brooklyn Center is a complex and dynamic first-ring urban city with  a high desire to project an inspiring image of the City. The City of Brooklyn Center is a growing diverse city (i.e. economically,  culturally, and demographically) and home to the global businesses and prominent public institutions. The City desires to successfully compete nationally and internationally as a  destination city. The City desires to make known to those who may be seeking to live, visit or  do business in Brooklyn Centerof the assets such as quality of life, business development opportunities, diverse cultures, and skilled human resource capacity that exist in the City. The City desires to develop, execute, and coordinate the promotion of its  brand and image to people throughout Minnesota, the Midwest, Nation and World regarding why Brooklyn Center is a great destination place to live, visit and do business. Findings Themes and Tagline Ranking 400 Most Identifiable Characteristic Of the City Diversity 179.7% Location/Proximity 271.83% Affordable Housing 357.61% Park System/ 448.98 Sidewalks 400 Liked Most About the City Location 134% Housing/ 226% Neighborhood Peaceful / 311% Quiet 1,228 159% At the Center Within Reach 225% Get Closer 316% Ranking Themes and Tagline Ranking Location & Proximity  Diversity  Ranking Affordable Housing  of Park Systems, Trails  Themes & Sidewalks Quiet & Peaceful  At the Center  Within Reach  Ranking of Get Closer  Taglines Great Place to  Start, Great Place to Stay Is there a  consensus of the Council regarding the ranking of themes? Is there a  consensus of the Council regarding a tagline? W©k S e ssion Agendn fftem N©0 2 MEMORANDUM COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE: April 18, 2017 TO: Curt Boganey, City ManØ FROM: Steve Lillehaug, Director of Public Works/City Engineer ^s ^,- SUBJECT: Water Tower No. 3 Painting Project Update Recommendation: It is recommended that the City Council consider providing direction to staff pertaining to the aesthetic components of the Water Tower Painting project. Background: The City Council awarded a contract to V&T Painting, LLC, on June 27, 2016, to recondition City water tower No. 3 located in Centerbrook Golf Course as part of the City's Capital Improvement Program. The project is currently underway with the contractor installing the exterior containment system and other preparation work. The project is expected to be completed by the end of July 2017. Prior to commencing the actual painting of the water tower, the selection of the aesthetic items including color scheme, lettering and logo are needed. It should also be noted that all three water towers are programmed to be painted in the near future: water tower No. 3 in 2017, water tower No. 2 in 2018 and water tower No. 1 in 2020. Determining a consistent aesthetic standard is desired to be established now to ensure these notable community landmarks promote the desired image of the City. Color Scheme There are many color schemes that a water tower could be painted - the sky is really the limit but cost is dependent on this factor. Many entities choose a simple, single color and rely on a logo and lettering to render the "trademark" and aesthetics for the community landmark; others choose a multicolor scheme. The current contract includes up to three colors. Staff recommends proceeding with a single natural off-white color that would generally compliment any combination of logo and lettering, once determined. A presentation will be provided that outlines considerations of the color and paint schemes. Lettering and Logo The City's current rebranding initiative is expected to result with a new logo and lettering that would be used on the water towers. Ideally the logo and lettering would be determined by approximately June 2017 to coincide with the water tower painting project schedule. While it is feasible to paint the logo and lettering at a later date, not meeting this timeline would result in additional work and costs, dependent on timing. This potential additional work is estimated to cost $10,000 for additional preparatory, setup, containment and other miscellaneous work. Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive coinnzunitv that enhances the quality of life for al/people and preserves the public trust IhYA I akA [I) 1iI IlIJk'A I1IJ[ I !Li] 1 41 *fi [I]I Policy Issues: Does the City Council desire to proceed with painting the water tower using a single natural off- white color or does the City Council desire an alternate color scheme? Strategic Priorities: Key Infrastructure Investments Mission: Ensuring an attractive, clean, safe, inclusive corninunhti' that enhances the qua/i/v of life for all people and preserves the public trust I'C- .'- •Co___ C I) C L) L C Ci I) U (ID t IN --r-,- ;_- H N N S ., I- I)cj bO .'- Cti.E cid 0 c . .- 'I S. S H r :11' (1) 0N.- Cti lk C C0 CC o C .— .— . I H 0I)0 CfJ _ CC.E. ct rçJr l) 0 C l) Rus nuIL S UIis ii IImom*l IUUs us IU .151t 151. SIR$ 115 NO as IENO INN ON l'sU RI I -4-111111 Ill JUl UI 1UhU SillIii u lusas •ii i MONO 0.IU 1k II UIus ii iissuu115 :I.I5 •N ; IN I 5111UI lull £ III Li LI Jt Al' IflUtju rr..l 1_ I - I --I - E i E ct co- • • 0 ea I I '-'cJ C 7::^ II cl cJ c) 42 r -C73 c CC .,- . cc I - I ,- - I) 40 rME4 C I - Cl)C0 Cl) C 1)0Cl) [] - . C C .'- C I)E ct I ,- C0 S cli . 'I 0 I) I)+-eCt I ,-co a 0 E 04-', ki r-çJ ct C ci) I) N CldI) Cl)o C .- I -C — .- - o o .. C ct lboqII Cl) 00 C I) Ea 0 0 I-Ct C ct I) I-CtIN 0 CL) 0 z CH I)0C '-4 C Ct1) 0 C L) rs TJ) C C--bio Pi '-4 C C'I eI C C C0 l) ^54 .- C S 0