HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017 08-17 PCP3Cib of
BROOKLYN
CENTER
PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
August 17, 2017
1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM
2. Roll Call
3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Motion to Approve Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for August 17, 2017
4. Approval of Minutes
Motion to Approve the July 27, 2017 meeting minutes
5. Chairperson's Explanation
The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to
hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes
recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these
matters.
6. Planning Items
No Planning Applications for this meeting.
7. Discussion Items
a) 2018-2020 Strategic Plan
• Targeted Redevelopment
b) Comprehensive Planning
• Update of the Socio -Economic Conditions
8. Other Business
a) Update on Planning Applications for the September 14'1' Agenda:
HOM Furniture PUD Amendment
Establishing front yard setback for 5301 James Ave. N.
9. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF
HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA
JULY 27, 2017
The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Christensen at 7:02 p.m.
Chair Randall Christensen, Commissioners Alexander Koenig, Jack MacMillan, Stephen
Schonning, Rochelle Sweeney, Susan Tade and Abraham Rizvi were present. Also present were
Director of Business & Development Gary Eitel and Interim Planning Assistant Angel Smith.
' : ely.-y [e7�I_Tt'1 -01117_1
There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan to
approve the Planning Commission Meeting Agenda. The motion passed unanimously.
4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JULY 13, 2017
There was a motion by Commissioner Koenig, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney to approve
the minutes of the July 13, 2017 meeting as submitted. The motion passed unanimously.
5. CHAIR'S EXPLANATION
Chair Christensen explained the Planning Commission's role as an advisory body. One of the
Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings,
the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final
decisions in these matters.
6. PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS
a. Consideration of minor revisions to the General Development Plan for the
Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment No. 8 (the addition of a storm
water bio filtration system and the reduction in proposed building sizes for
pad sites X and F.
Chair Christensen introduced this agenda item regarding consideration of minor revisions to the
approved General Development Plan of Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Amendment No 8 to
reflect the Watershed Commission's requirement of a storm water bio filtration system.
Mr. Eitel introduced this item and provided a presentation with background on the Shingle Creek
Crossing PUD amendments 1-7; the February 13, 2017 approval of the HOM Furniture PUD
amendment 8; the July 13th Watershed Commission's approval; and the developer's request to
discuss with the Commission optional plans/development concepts that they would like to PUD
to include to provide flexibility in their future redevelopment strategies..
Wayne Johansen, Chairman of HOM Furniture, commented on the challenges of redeveloping
the Kohl's site (restrictive covenants that limit the potential business uses; soil conditions
requiring pilings/corrective actions; additional storm water management requirements; other use
restrictions by existing leases within Shingle Creek Crossing; and the uncertainty of the overall
market conditions in this area which effect business decisions and shape the overall economics of
this redevelopment project.
It is for these reasons that HOM is requesting that flexibility is allowed within the PUD
documents that would enable them to proceed with their initial renovation & expansion of the
Kohl's building at this time with the confidence that the future development of the EDA parcel
and additional lot within the Kohl's parking lot will be acceptable to the City.
Optional designs discussed included:
- A 3 story office/medical building, varying sizes of retail buildings, and a combination of
restaurant and retail on the future/new Kohl's lot;
- varying sizes of retail uses, restaurant, and restaurant/retail uses on the EDA parcel;
with the underling criteria that the uses would comply with the parking standards established by
the PUD.
Chair Christensen commented on the City's aspiration for additional sit down restaurants as part
of the Shingle Creek Crossing Development.
The Commission discussed the options; their understanding for the need to be flexible;
recognition that this is a complex site; and importance of moving forward with the
renovation/redevelopment of the Kohl's lot to bring new excitement to the Shingle Creek
Crossing Development.
The consensus of the Commission Members was that HOM Furniture should proceed with a
PUD amendment that would include alternate development options.
7. DISCUSSION ITEMS
There were no discussion items.
8. OTHER BUSINESS
Dr. Angel Smith commented on the July 25th Community Dialogue which provided a cafe style
opportunity for the community to engage in conversations with City Council Members, noting
that additional sessions are scheduled for August 5th and August 22nd at the Community Center.
Additionally, this year's National Night Out Kick Off Party, open to everyone, is scheduled for
July 31st starting at 6:00.
Chair Christensen commented inquired about the City's Sign Ordinance and regulations relating
to business portions, such as sandwich boards to advertise specials.
Mr. Eitel noted that they are working on a business inventory within the City's community and
neighborhood centers that will include photographs of existing signage building and free
standing signs. The review of this inventory would also provide an opportunity for the
Commission to review how the City's sign standards could be used to promote business
opportunities for existing and new businesses.
There was a motion by Commissioner Koenig, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney to adjourn
the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at
8:24 p.m.
Chair
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ss. Certification of Minutes
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER )
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and assigned Secretary to the Planning Commission of
the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies:
1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Regular
Session of the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center held on July 13,
2017.
2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at
Brooklyn Center City Hall.
3. That the Planning Commission approved said minutes at its July 27, 2017 regular
meeting.
Acting Secretary
Randall Christensen, Chair
N
O
_a
00
N
O
N
O
(/1
r+
�t
rD
n
m
I e
/
0
/�
L
:)o
LA
CD
ƒ
2
0
\
«
/ / /
. §
% Ln ? 2
§/ Dƒ
\ § � 0 /
2 � / V E
cu n y. n 0
/ / / j /
r 3 o \
/ ƒ\ rD
+/
C \< 0
un
/ / 0 a
® ( :3 rD r
& a e°/
j M 2 / \
A cu s' n
n q m
X-
I \ /
7
\ 0 y m2
o § ° ° °
q ] / / Qj
_
/ / /
r+
�
(D\
LA
O ƒ r j
/
a
ƒ /
C \ =0
CD r
\0
j 7 ( ƒ
A n g
\ l £ 0
q 0 \�
/ j $ 0 ~
a e
ƒ LA° /
y
(. 2
ƒ r \
/ /
ƒ
/ g =
R ƒ
/ 4 §
2 / &
ƒ
ƒ
\ . /
r un
un
0
\
\
/
\
0
n
:)o
\
4
\
/
0
$
/
CS.
\
ƒ
\
�
0
/
0
�
\
§
/
\�
7
\
\
7
2
R
;
I.
vv
5�
m
D
rte+
T
�
Ln
n
LA
m
.�
r+
rD
ni
<
(°
n
O
p 4
O
O
ppq
O
p
(D
GQ
C
Z
n
Q.
(D
p
, +
rD
a
(D
r+
n
UQ
07
7
n
�'
(D
`"
m
m
�
x
�
O
�,
Ort
g
c
O
N
Q
O
p
3
Ln
3
w
n
X-
v
C
O
—
wL,m
�
N
,<o
3
n
O
On'
a'
0
n.
�
((D
04
(D
fl
<
-<
`<
<
o
l<
LA
v
N
p'
r+
3
�,
r+
(D
m
v
rt
o'
�
3
rD
�
LMA
3
S
rt
(,
°
+
rD
�,
'�
°rD
w
o
LA
LA
r+
rt
o
In
3
v
(D
(D
3
<
O
<
r+
Oo
rt
r+
n
m
m<
Dp
h
h
v
n
o
r�'h
—
N
C
'p
pN
rn-I-
O
O
U4
�
r�r
Z)
CLJ
p
r+
O
OQ
1
(D
04
Or0.
CLQ.
'r
Ln
r+
O
to
Y
r+
rt
(D
N
LA
N
D
v
LA
N
Vl
4
W
N
N
N
W00
�
C
O
.
.
..p
O�
�O
m
W
V
�
N
l0
-P
n
O
0
O
7
n
rD
LA
r+
lu
lu
r+
rD
0'4
n'
v
v
O
r�
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
V
M � zr
rD rD
LA
r+
3•
o
U(0.
r+
v, n.
M O -0
< o
V) rD' r+
O `Z ro
O rD `^
aJ O- 7-
Q zr l<
crD O
n C
E n
Ln L
rD O O"
3 Ln n
(D
r+ : N
o aJ
as °-
N
r+ rrt
3 aJ
r+
< QQ
Ln0
O
r+.
r+ <
rD LA
n v
O rD
3 N
C
3
rt v
N
°"
<. O
O
� r+
Q4 C"
r+ rD
rD O
O
0LA
�•
v v
rt
m (D
rD
M
H.
aJ
M
a
w
aJ
n
FD'
r+
zr
rD
7-
l<
O
C
r+
n
O
m
Ln
O
0
0`
D
rta
`<
—I
Q
n0
v
rD
NtA
v
m
-art+
rD
O
C
0
C
rD
Q C
00.
N
O
n(
<
h
n
N
N
aj rD
_+
a1
rD
X
rr
ZT
rD
U0.
N
`<
zr
a(D
<
ZT
a(D
n
to
.c
0
r+ •
o
rD
n
rD
�
fD
LA
rD
rD
O
-h O
n
=
C
<
r0
N
a
n
v
v
O
o-
rD
�
:3 .
p'
O1
vi
-1 rD
=03
4
tA
r+.
S
(D
0
o-
Di
M
0
rr+
Ln
Ln
�
r+ r+
q
rD
`�
S
�+
Ln
r+
v
D
�,
n
a v
—Z$
rD
a(
r�og
N
rD
r+
v,
r+-,
-O
a
O
n
rD
—
3
r+
a,
�
Q
C(D
C
<
rt
C
00.
O
rD
0--0
0
-h
G0.
n•
r+
o•
C
O
S
O
O
'd
N
aJ
r+
r+ r+
aJ
C
rp
N
aj
O
Z;
V1
rD fi
rD
L
al
aJ
r+
r+
V
Ln
rDD
r
zr "
O
QJ
ai
aJ
N
rt
rD
<
�•
r+ —
*<
<
NN
Ln
Ln
X
rD
Q
rD
N
<
r-
rD 0
r-+,
r+
"6 O
r+
O
N
0.
-<
L J-
zr
�
rf Do
a
O v
�
rD
*—
m
vq,
W
V)
rD
-a
__
a-
n
o
_
rp
-1
-1
OT
�.
cu
C C
O
c
cr
rD
r�0
fl.
1
0
-O
O
- h
n m
o-0
r+
rD
rD
O
N ID
N
Q
aJ
T
a1
in
,
O
(1
r+
fl1
to
-O
rD a)
�
rD
C
"
nrD
r0
rn
Q,
rCi
N
C
to
C
r+
m
0-
0
O
r+r+D
rD
OQ
LA
O C'
0-00.
r r
L
O
co
LA
rD
rD
O
rD
r+
n
v'
<
LA
n
a
rD
rD
'�•
<
N
_
cu O
to
<
aJ
2
!21
<
r+
�"
(D
n
r*
N
<
_S
fl
<
UQ
O
�.
1+
wr+
`r
O
(D
cu
rD
r+
O�
O
`< rD
r+
n
O
a
OYi
'p
r+
S C
O
P
m
r,+,
n
OC
°
�n
0'0.
N
rD
Qi
_0
W
O
O
aJ
a
O
a �Ln rD
a
3
rD
Z;.
r}
O
<
aJ
rh
In
r+
S
a
O
p ZY
OA
QLD.rD
n
v,
�
rD
r+0
0
CL
3
0
'
Qi
o
n
°1+
rD
rt
O
v
U0.
S W
O =
r+
zr
CLn
-r,
Ln
a
�.
r+
,-h rD
rD
O
O
m to
<_
rp
c
a
rD
�.
O
N
ID
7
O
–h zr
C
r+
rt
VI
rD
X
arD(D
in --s
C
v
r+
o
aJ
; O
r+
S
LA
r+
_
N
O
rD C
rD
O
O
n
rD
N
CL
0--o
=;*
C
-h
Zr
O
m
(D
n
rt
(D
LPC
3
aJ
n
0
-r,
0
0
n
rD
7
r+
rD
U4,
n
v
v
0
q
N
O
N
0
N
O
v
0
N
rf-
O
O
T'
n
rD
r+
m
LA
r -r
OR
n•
QJ
C
LA
N
O
00
N
O
rljO
n
0
0
0
0
n
U)
r+
r
rD
off•
n
nr
0
0
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
0
tA
m
3
o,
S
_=
N
rt
�
(D
ori
rn
a
:
n
Q4,
Ef
n
3
3
M•
O
o
c
o
a.
-o
co
r+
r) v
O
v
00
°
O
�,
n
m
O
-p
n
w
77 (D
rDt
cr
o s
�.
_n
r+
O
rt
`<
<
m
+
rD
(D 7i
N
Q
rD
D.
(D
a'
to
=
<
rD
<n,
rr+
to
rD
n
rD
O
`<
rD
L^
rD
v
<'
c I,
7
::3°�
o
`�
o
CU
���o�
r)
���_
un
o
o
�'
Qo
C
am,
a q
r+ �
rD
fl-
n, l<
r+ O
rD 1LA LA
ai
r,
v
O -6
�
° rC,
0
�
rD
(D (D
(DM
p0
n
x
,�
m
o�C:
o--
fu
3
N
-a„
-
n�
n
v
C
o
0
rD
-a
<
❑1
fi
r+
OO
<
rD
LA
rD
-1
OD
rD
O
O
rD
<
r:D
�'
Ln
O o a
G4
a
°+
vi
L
O
a
v
rD
rt
v,
eD
�"
3
rD
rD
L
n
n
<•
(D
�.
n
rD
ate-
"
m
� �
°:
rn
0
-D
v
< � 6
^
v
rnrt
`C -a
0
0
rD
m
�
v
mo N
o
<
3
rD
0
r
3
Ln IIl nhi
rD
0
0
rD
a-
rD
rD
(D
O4 °"
LA
-� rD
3
-a
(D
p)
Po �
-a
d
rD0'
rD
(p
rt
rNi
N
r)
lu
rt
(D <
rt
N
rD
(D(DD
n
3
°
,
rDrD
O
LA
r+
rD
r' a
rDrD
3
N
rD
rD
rt
ni �'
3
a
-a
rD
O
d
r -f
rF
r+
mftp
LnLA
C•
rD
N
°
o
3
r+
fi
..o
O
r+
rD
°
rD
Fu
rD
GR
rt
r+
N
rf-
O
O
T'
n
rD
r+
m
LA
r -r
OR
n•
QJ
C
LA
N
O
00
N
O
rljO
n
0
0
0
0
n
U)
r+
r
rD
off•
n
nr
0
0
N
O
N
O
N
O
N
0
In
n
O
0
0
`G
3
n
ro
fi
v
r+
(D
au
n'
-D
rD
0
N
O
N
O
N
O
`<
N
O
a
m
mac,
c
L
m
�
O
•+
r3
3
c
e+
o
o
r(D
o�
M
o
D
E
3
ai
-h
3
-p
rD
+
o
O
a
rt
c
n
�
N
3
r"D
v_,
r�D
(DD
O
Q
c
c
in
O
m
o-
e
rDrD
v
r +
n
r+
ro
n.
_h-
O
fl
N
aj
zr
zr
D
-a
0
L
rrt
m
m
a
c
r
0
o
rD
°t
v,
m
D
m
D
m
<
rDLn
n
n!
o-
-
r)
v,
c
r+
-p
to
to
rD
°+
(D
rt
v
�'
n
rD
N
O
�
c
r
c
tA
UQrD
vii
vii
O
N
'
m
N
'
<
N
N
Q'
0 0
c
o
-�
A
3
o
n
fl1
�,
r+
O
�
o
N
c
N
O
Q
<
•
;
Q
Ln
a
In
O
c
rD
uni
r�D
rrDD
rci
(D
d.
O
c
6
f+
n
rD
c
N
O�
rD
LA
O
_<
0
.<
3
r
'_"
l<
N
rDLn
v
w
(D
Ln
rr+
h
N
-p'
rD
O
Oc
to
W
`<
rD
l-
O
N
rD
p-
rr+
o
m
�
v
�O
O
:��h
2-c
o
m
D
3
50
3
0
+
<
=oa
c
cm
-'
<
3
<
�
n<
rD
c
r+
Q
c
Q
(D
c
-
(
(,'D
"a
LA
O
C:
°_+
n_+
N
c
v
o
O
O
�
O
�
LA
3
O
rD
-0
v
"a
rD
3
v
N
O
c
D
c
rr+
03
O
OU
In
rD
*
c
DJ
rD
M
3
hh
In
to
rD
rD
S
a
_0tA
�.
n
O
0
0
`G
3
n
ro
fi
v
r+
(D
au
n'
-D
rD
0
N
O
N
O
N
O
`<
N
O
a
ESE
D
l<
0
0
0
0
n
m
0
r+
rD
Lln
r+
cu
v
r+
C
c,
rDrD
O
N
O
8.
N
O
N
O
v
N
O
u
w
o ma
3 r�
o,
OrQ
3 1A
3
m
n
rt m
m
a
r
m
o,
c
mo
-a
3
rD
o
O
rD
rr
v
O
C
M<
_+
rF 3
rD
CU
N
v
<
rF
rnr
C'
r+
O �'
p
R°
C
O
-t
C
C C
-p
ro
rr
prQ
r
r r
UQ
rr
C
C -�
(D
aJ
O
QQ
N
C
_
On
(D
rh
`<
O
t^
d
fl1
N
(D
r'
(D
Ln=
<
rrt
rD
(;D
rt
rD
rD
rD
L.
C &)
d 4
D°'
0�
D°1
p
a
rr
v,
oaj
<
"d
rD
<
"C
rD
rD
<
-a
"p
(D (D
<
on- 3
v n, �
o
rrDD
O
N
3
0
r+
rD
rr
N
rr
rr
m
O
w
O
rD
o
o
O o
rD
°+ 00
SQ
m
C.
FA*
0, 5
r+
rD
o
GQ�
m
o
rD
Ln
C
n
�' n.
<
<
u,
-°
,
�
.0 C'
-1
3
O
Q'
`<
v_,
n
p
-1
pq rD
rD
cm
N
° rD
`�
3 rD
0
m-
�,
r+ 0-0
O
T
r -I
rt
O Nj
rt
o
3
ai
p<i
rD
O"
rrD
N
:3
On
v, Q o
0Q
�
C
<
Di
(l
O
CU
rr
• Q
o- 3
o
N
(D
O
(�D
ro
<'
n'
<
+
�
-s
aj
O_
3'
f D
rD
o
3- -tea
Oo
rD
D
w
O<
1+
N
v
cu p
N
Q°
r+
C
r r
0 3
N
m
O
N0
=; =3fD
rD
r
rr
r+
C C r�D
C
I
-n
QJ
r+:3
rDrD C
-a
6
s
<
DJ
N
LA
a1
rD
Qp rD
rD
0
OIQ
O
rn
r
(D
cumi
h
C)
aj LA
r+rD
3
n
� rD
n
M
�+
rr
D
l<
0
0
0
0
n
m
0
r+
rD
Lln
r+
cu
v
r+
C
c,
rDrD
O
N
O
8.
N
O
N
O
v
N
O
u
V
n
l<
O
0
O
n
r+
rD
LA
r
rD
CS.
a
7
x
(D
O
r�-
N
O
N
O
N
O
v
5 ;R
<
eD '<
N �
3
M
N
-0
N O
Z
e -F
Ol
e'h
O
%N
3
unVl
lu
N
C:
r+
(D
Q fl1
CQ
Q
M
0
7'
n
N :-,
zi
3
<
3
S
aQ N
p
pp r+
O-1
ZT
n
W
r+
O ::rO
r+
N
rD
Q
3
vim„
O
H
3 'vim„
O 'D
�wvm
1+
"O
O
(D
`i-
o
O
a
fp
r+ o °-
S-
N
5'
r+
Lu.
tA
LA
(D
N
N
(D N
Nr+
-�
N
a1
n
v
�
'
N
10
o
--so
fD
NO O "d o
v'
0
3
-°
3
a
0
o 3'01,0,n
3
NO
m
n
�-
a
r
r
N
w,
rD
Q
0- �-
r
�'
�4
0- �'
c d4
N
N
0
3
O h,
(D E
r+G N
fl) Z
r+ W
O rD
< (D
N
� n n
O O
Z; =;
N <
rD
n LA.
O
M
R°
n
l<
O
0
O
n
r+
rD
LA
r
rD
CS.
a
7
x
(D
O
r�-
N
O
N
O
N
O
v
K -I
(D o'
� c
(D rD
0'Q ,
O =
O n
O- O
* 3
� r+
O
C- C
L'I -z
O L'
-i, rD
Zr
(D LA
� Q
r+ (D
D —
rD �.
U c
O QQ
n
(D C
O aj(D
rD
v
ai N.
(D
rF n
O 0
C rt
LA N
�<
(D
r+ n
� r+
(D <
n rD
,+ v
N' C
(D 0-
:3 (D
to -h
* n
(D m.
LA =1
(D r+
< 3
<
'i
O
rD -o
E
r* <
v
C
(D
w 0
rD o
� o
O '+
C 0
C C
Q Ln
(D fll
LA n
r+ O
3
rt r n
rD 3
c rD tAt
rt O
3
O_ 0
O to 'S
rD
nO
33
rD aj
cUl n n
rr+ `<
O n
3 c
rD tA
I f-+.
O
Qj O 3
Q. rD
rD
< zr
(D a.
� 0'Q
c c
r+ �
`< fL
L c
(DtA
C.
(D
rD
r+ rD
� n
f,+
N
A
U)
. .
c
CL
L'
ri+
O
Ln
O'
a
C
(D
r+
O
r -r
n
O
c
rD
c
FD'
c
r+
0
n
O
c
w
c
a.
n
O
3
3
(D
C
ry-
r+
O
w
(D
of
fi
C-
rD
m
O
O
m
c
r+
n
c
r
c rD
v
c
n. o
(D 00
n 0
O O
v
rt
o
c c
v n
o �
(D �
C'
0'Q
rr N
�• cu
W r+
Ln
<'
v
c a.
n
c Ln
<' o
3
v
n c
rD
r+ r+
rt
r+
N
O
"C3 �
rD _
O
v CrQ
Ql �
GQ O
(D -h
0 0
< C
ro Ln
0 OQ
n Q-
fl1 C
Ul
0 N
3 LA
rD In
Ln
O�
r+
zr
aj
r+
rD
c
ZT
a,
c
n
CD
LA
r+
rD
c
l<
O
-h
rD
-h
0
rD
O
(D
DJ
O
Z3
rD
(D
rD
Ln
r+
zr
rD
-C7
C
6'
n'
r+
C
r+
--1
rD
D
LA
LA
o'
c
0
-h
r+
n
rt
O
O
O
c
n
rD
r*
rD
LA
r+
O
(D
n
tA
C
rD
v
r+
r+
rt
rD
n
DJ
C
LA
v
-h
(D
N
c
C..
C'
n
E
n
O
3
c
r+
w
fi
l<
O
0
0
n
n
v,
r,-
ni
CLQ.
-a
Di
0
0
t4
N
O
N
O
N
O
41
`G
N
O
Me-
rt
OQ -0
-1
m
O -O
�
•-h
m
- °-,
n
(D
0)
F6•
3
l
LA
n
n
C.
0
�
m
N
ZT O
n
o
O
(D
<
LA :3
O n
OJ
n
O
a; (D
O
�
n
ai
n-�
0
—h
n=
v,
mo
x Q
o
?
n
vOi a
r+
Os
h_
2
D"
N
<
rD
r +
LA <
--h
-+,rD
aJ
v -
v o
o a
in =3-
0
r)
o
-S
N
oah
o��
�s
art
=
v
v�D
3(D
rD
nj
N�
O
rD 3
rD
r+
0
77
0
L
O 0q
rti
O
rD
r,+.
0
rrt
�'
rt)
m
D
o
�+.
rD
n Q
C
rD
CL
a
cu Fc
L,)
0
zr
In
ETCA
O.<
<
c
rD
O
nnfD
LA
Ln
O
o
v °
0
N
n0 (D
CW
o
o
i
O_
rt
Q
/}O
V
I
rD
N
oi-,
m
OtA
On
O0,
rF
FPi1J
N
2
O
v,
cr
o
O
m
o
�-
to
rD
5
a
`
Q
s
�(
0
rD
°,
v�
�
-
° °
��
N !D
°
Ia
n n
V1 -0
C:,�..
�•
N
O
0
C O
rt:
r10
O O
O
w
-12
0 c
Q
0
N
v
°
fD
rr
O
0
p-
N
c
CD
N
O —
O
-,I
27
<
C
O
1+
:3
OQ L^
C.
m
S Vii
O
C1
v
C
p G
j
rF
o
<
Q
o 0
n
n
<
r)
n
O
CL
�
N.
* 3
rD
o
�-
_9-
(D
rrt
.70n
-<
CU
0- n
cu n
rD1+
0
roti-
N
L
O
:2�
V1
r^^DO
0
C
n
N
v v
(D
LL
no
(
LU
NrD
-
rp
Q
uN
o 6
0-
Q
O LA
F
m
3=
0
T r+
n
X
v
in
m
n
p
iD
rD
LA
n
--h
m
O
r+
(D
fll
11 0
O
rD O
0-
(TQ
0
rD
rD
O
rD
1+
aL N
m (D om
O Ort 0-
O Ln O
L 3
�. QQ
-,, rD0
O r+
FD
I VVi
(DD 77O
rD
rD
h r+
O rD �
N
O(D
LA
rD 'd
h
C O DJ
<� O rD
r)
rD O
O
I V) x
* o 3
rD CU O zr �.
O '
N (SD
n
NCA C:
� m
n �
zr =t rte+
M n in
O h
vrD
Is n
rD p O
fi
rD
r+
(A N
O —{ O
U0. rD v
_ O
w0 N
O rt
N
O rD
rD 3
rD 0-
M M
rD .< rD
r+ h O
rh
(rD
rD rDN
rt -1
rD
ii
ill C
0i rD
r+
n
l<
0
O
0
D
n
ro
D
m
Ln
r+
a
c
n
D)
77
CD
0
4
N
O
co
N
O
N
O
41
`G
N
O
m
O
n
�
r+®
O
LA
iD
LA
0
-t
w
r+
r,
vn
r+
r
—{
(D(D
m
LA
i
;
S. nrD
❑
❑
❑
0
C
rD
rD
rD
rip
v
C
r+
<
3
rip
Diw
rr+
n
O r
fu
<
r+
0z
° :
O
lu
_
C
C
-t
.
-n
v (D
"
p
_
C
0
� �
r+
rD
o
0-
LA
n s
o
r
r�
s O
N
v
Sp
n
O
r.--,
o
o(D
v
3
v
C
3
<
v
C
N
n
6
0-
rf
N
O
C ci
-�
�
O
Ln
o
n
�,
o
v
LA
in
rD
LA
aro
a�
r+0
c `.
rD
(D
0
vi
O
N
�^,
v
<
D
S Ply.
q
(D
N
rD
O
�.
—
0
rD
r h
�,
a
�.
�_
a
n'
LA
Zr
N
3
(D
N
=
Nn
L
�
O
N
3
L
-h
m
p
rD
n
O
m
O
p
r+
C
ro
s�
vi
C:
O
LA.
n
r
rD
®.
Ln
O
`<
n
O
a
ET
=$m
o
C-
p
0
zr
LA'
Ln
�
v
r+
rD
n
p.
C
C
)
nn
rD�+
r+�J
rD
1-1
u
O
r+
0
0
0
0
CD
n
0
r+
rD
cu
0'4
n�
0
DO
rD
O
N
O
W
N
O
N
O
v
N
0
u
p
r+®
LA
iD
a
r+ --q
S
-t
w
r+
r,
vn
r+
r
—{
(D(D
p
LA
r
;
S. nrD
rD
n
0
rD
rD
`<
rip
•
�1Q
rah
rip
Diw
-
UQ
�^
S O
<
C
C
LA.
_
C
C
-t
.
0
l<
p
_
—h
Z 00
N
r+
rD
r+
r^
rD
c
-- -n
o
v,
_
CDrDL
s O
O•
3
n
O
O
�^
v
C
<
LA
N
n
6
v
yC
�,
0
DJ
rnh
®4
�n-,
:3
rf
(D
n
LA
in
c
LA
Q
0
`�
er+
r -F
o
N
O
N
�
v
<
S Ply.
q
(D
r+
zr
GL
rD
r h
�,
a
r+
ZTLA
�_
a
Zr
N
n
(D
=
L
to
N
fl+
O
rD
p
3
O
O
p
r+
C
s�
vi
C:
O
LA.
n
rD
®.
O
`<
a
=$m
o
r
p
zr
LA'
Ln
�
v
N LA
C
rD
n
p.
C
C
)
nn
rD�+
r+�J
u
E
a
N
v
v
n
d"
QQ
On
C
®
to
O
C
C
(A
r+
O
m
Wo
Cl4
<
a
rD
<C
rD
r+
�
�%
r+
N' n
3
C
UQ
rD
r+
�
N•
O
r+
='
Di`�
V;
r+
p
:y o
7
o
Qn
tA
Q
rD
r+
E
rD
i
v
a1
rD
rD
n
a 1
rD
:
'
-a
!
C
a
r^,
O ci
LLA A
�'
op
GQ
rt
=
k
O
Ln
No
rD
r)
n
rD
N:3
O
5.
0
n
o
F,'
Ln
3
rD
N
rD
rD
p +
rD
a
Ln
y
rr0r
S
r0
n
rD
C
v
�
v
Q
C
N
fl1
S� f�i
aj
QJ
to
0'q0
Z$
rD
M.
N
r+
Q
p_
N O
N'
`C
C
W
rD
O
z
LA
3
3
rD
1
a
LA
v
o
Q
3
"o_
rD
-0
=
O
:- r*
rt
rD
O
rD
<
<
O
a
r+
�'
O
X
O.
O.
M
h
=$
Z$
r+
0
0
0
0
CD
n
0
r+
rD
cu
0'4
n�
0
DO
rD
O
N
O
W
N
O
N
O
v
N
0
u
rD N
m
N O
n -S.
QJ m
O �
a-
m
04
=t
I0 n'
(D m'
O
S r -r
C to
3 -�
a1 rNi-
m
m 3
mr+
3 n
m
r+
3.
N
O O
3
M O_
M
(nD r
crq
n r
Ln L
n
m LA
rt
m
N x. fl1
(D O- ,_+ n
7 n O
n 3
n (—' 3
r O m
3
D
rD n inLn
O_
r+ m (-Ds n
3 W< O
a. O r+
N <O
0'4 m
3
rt -0
O
r+
r+
r+
3
O
O
r+
O
O
t
r
O
0
0
n
r+
CD
r~
v
0'4
n'
v
0
rT
N
O
00
N
0
N
O
N
l<
N
O
w
C
CrUi-
m
-0
n
O
3
4
O
mi
n
ai
n
LA0
="
C
<
O
`C
m
to�*
r+
Ln
�•
n
LA
C
r+
fi
y
LA
0
c
—
n.
(D
al
O
m
m
L^
OO
Ln
N
QO
-o
r+
—LA
-a
�
0n
°
-h
O
m
*
(D
a
c
o
--h
m
O
v'
o
r+
fD
-°a
v
m
(m
r+-
rD
�
�
D
-a
m
to
OO
O
N
a
<
r+
N
1+
0
O
O
(^
n
c•
m
_
N
Q:
ou
3
CA
A
C
LA
n
C
N
m
r+
3
m
m
O
m
O_
O
E
3
o
n
=1
Ln
O
O
O
m
N
m
n
N
M
-O
O
C
QJ
°
r+
r+
rt
ry
0
m
C
m
(D
:2,LA—
r+
o
L
CD3
N
((D
r+
C
o
in
z
N'
O
N
O
h
m
Q
v
m
rF
r+
v
<
v
LA
n
v
4
(�D
(`gyp
C
N
_O
N
r+
3
m
0
O
mt,
LA
-0
O
0
O
N
m
r+
O
O
�^
(D
N !:
<
v
O
�
m
r+
m
m
LA
O
L
rD
�
3
(rD
M
(D
r*
O
�
m
o_
z
o
ozr
rt
°
3
v
(D
m
o
nO
UQ
r+
O
(mD
r
(D
0-
zr
LA
n
's
m
v
O
r+
n
w
r�—r
r+"
3O
m
n
(D
D4
m
N
Ln
(D
O
c
m
O
n
v,
Z$
D-
C
m
n
N
r+
(nD
N
r+
C
LA
NO
rt•
N
m
a,
3
rt
`�
PD
rD N
m
N O
n -S.
QJ m
O �
a-
m
04
=t
I0 n'
(D m'
O
S r -r
C to
3 -�
a1 rNi-
m
m 3
mr+
3 n
m
r+
3.
N
O O
3
M O_
M
(nD r
crq
n r
Ln L
n
m LA
rt
m
N x. fl1
(D O- ,_+ n
7 n O
n 3
n (—' 3
r O m
3
D
rD n inLn
O_
r+ m (-Ds n
3 W< O
a. O r+
N <O
0'4 m
3
rt -0
O
r+
r+
r+
3
O
O
r+
O
O
t
r
O
0
0
n
r+
CD
r~
v
0'4
n'
v
0
rT
N
O
00
N
0
N
O
N
l<
N
O
w
C
O
ro-
ai
to�*
r+
Ln
O
r+
fi
Ln
r+
c
r+
c
t
n
m
LA
c
(D
z
o
r+
O
m
..
to
OO
O
N
C
LA
n
--CU
r,
1+
<
(rD
y
(D(D
m
C:
l<
3
04
A
Oro
LA
o
N
-
O
m4
Ln
O
OQ
((DD
-O
O
C
to
�
O
0
h
In
N
r+
O
n
N
r+
C
<
N
in
z
N
O
C
m
FD
4
:3
m
r+
3
Q
O
FD°
O
r+
m
0-
rD N
m
N O
n -S.
QJ m
O �
a-
m
04
=t
I0 n'
(D m'
O
S r -r
C to
3 -�
a1 rNi-
m
m 3
mr+
3 n
m
r+
3.
N
O O
3
M O_
M
(nD r
crq
n r
Ln L
n
m LA
rt
m
N x. fl1
(D O- ,_+ n
7 n O
n 3
n (—' 3
r O m
3
D
rD n inLn
O_
r+ m (-Ds n
3 W< O
a. O r+
N <O
0'4 m
3
rt -0
O
r+
r+
r+
3
O
O
r+
O
O
t
r
O
0
0
n
r+
CD
r~
v
0'4
n'
v
0
rT
N
O
00
N
0
N
O
N
l<
N
O
w
El
LA
W.
LA
r+
CJ
r+
El
m
r�f•
W
l<
o_
0
0
77
n
(D
D
-s
r
m
OA
n•
v
rD
0
q
N
O
00
N
O
N
O
cu
N
O
°<
o
m
D
W ''�
�
co
I=
o I�
O
o
x<
is
Z
0
El
0
�
�•
�
O
c
�
� '-<
-�
�,
sirD
U)
o
(D
r+
UQ
(D
r-
�
K(10
D
p
a)
n
ID
(D
(D
r
Ln
E
�
in
N
N
crq :3
m
'sLA
n
=3r+
(D
co
0
O�
r+
O
N
rt
Vl
O
D
-I
o
O
-i
S
n
C
e••h
O
`<
r+
O
y
r+
G
Q r+
S
_0Ou
Q'
-I
-n
v
crct
LA
ri
C
=
m
O
O
O
Q'
�1
m
a N
T3
(D
(D
n'
N
coN
rn
rt f0
NN
�n
rte'..
�^
CL
<
a
a
_
n
0
Z)
C
p
ro
O
C
O a
-
u,
Z;
(D
(D
O
�-
(C
Q4q
n0
in
rt
CU
aj
O
=
vim,
O
O
a
N
r+
�.04
r)
w
3
'z
a
:3
rLAC
3
-S
O
� p•
r+
a
fp
n-
a v,
(D
rte+
^
V1
Q4
p
~'
rt
O -ii,
o
ii
r•h
O
0 n
r+
p
v
N
[gyp
O
(D
`�
N,
p
CrQLn
<
(D
cU
�+
S
3
°'
°-
rn
tA
as
O
('D
r+
O
O
r+
v
m
rD
OJ
v,
�
n
`<
d
LA
(D
Q
CrQ
p'
r+
(D
w
�
i1•
N vi
LA
3
MCU
�p
N
O
rt
(D
O•
N
O
o
O
r -r
o
r+
_
Dj
r+
3
vrri
fl
(DrDD
a
r+
O
(/�
tNn
rD
zr
l<0
rD
LA
c
m
I
v
0
0
�,
Q
r^+
C
1+
Q
r+
(�D
n
C
O.LA
-t
(D
C --r
F
W
0
S
N
�
O
r+
L.
n
(D
�.
O
LA
�
v
N
�
(D
a
p
z�.
L
ut
v
L
N
L
r+
0
<
fll
(D
(p
(D0
(D
X
too
a
o
r+
El
LA
W.
LA
r+
CJ
r+
El
m
r�f•
W
l<
o_
0
0
77
n
(D
D
-s
r
m
OA
n•
v
rD
0
q
N
O
00
N
O
N
O
cu
N
O
R
M v m
m m X a
r+ r+ L
LA m m
0
-h m
r+ m
OLJ rD
v ZT r
v4
�
, v t
r+ �.
v OCLJ
m Zr' o O
m m
r+
m m
o -h 3 n
a"
0
-1 = L'
CD r+ rD m
M � c
(D n
r+ O O-
O -a m
n a N
O c
3
nj
N r+
m m N
r+ N m
S < 0-
(D
m o
n c
Q- O
m 3 —I
n x. °+
zy- 3 v
ai
N
m m c-
c N m
m r
LA rD
=1 o
°1
a Crn+ 3
z 0
O
-a a o_
O o_ LA
c �
M
a
n
� Ort
N T
n LA
r+
rD
�' a a -
r+ L
rD N
n0 < O
C �
3 Q r1
N
r+ fl1
o.
.
.
.
.
�u
3<
z
D
D
>
ni
o
rD
r+r+
—I
C
Q°
O
C:
un
m
3
o
rte+
n
rn
a
3
:�•
n
rD
<
m
Ln
r
W
rD
n
O
�
04
3
m
m'
N
O
r+
rD
v
n
0-
.2.
-0
rD
m
r+•
rD
m
r<D
LA
n
-a
�.
r+
(JQ
3
0
�
m
O
c
O
v
r+
r+
O
m
m
Ln
. . m
D
h r n p 777
rn
o. n, rD ou v,
LA 0 I V1
n" 0 0-
n n m
m
v lu to (nD n
Ln3
m O �
O
0 o_ C O o_
r�D r+
0 r+ O S
3 rD
_ m
m o O
r+
n -1
r+ m �.
Q
o
N N
t
aJ
0
Fu'
r+
m
7
r+
S
m
n
O
3
3
c
a
r+
r3D
o_
rD
LA
0
c
n
m
N
m
N
r+
m
o_
r+
O
1
3<
rD
70
°'
rD<
L
m
3
3
—I
C
Q°
ID
rD
C:
Z
Cr
a
3
o
rn
�4
-a
n
rD
<
m
Ln
r
W
N
O
�
rD
UQ
3
m
m'
N
O
r+
. . m
D
h r n p 777
rn
o. n, rD ou v,
LA 0 I V1
n" 0 0-
n n m
m
v lu to (nD n
Ln3
m O �
O
0 o_ C O o_
r�D r+
0 r+ O S
3 rD
_ m
m o O
r+
n -1
r+ m �.
Q
o
N N
t
aJ
0
Fu'
r+
m
7
r+
S
m
n
O
3
3
c
a
r+
r3D
o_
rD
LA
0
c
n
m
N
m
N
r+
m
o_
r+
O
1
Z,
O
-h o
`^ o
L
� r+
n. ?
Ln
O (D
n
v
� N.
rf-
(D
-h UQ
�• O
�+
rD
r x
O
3 m.
3 n.
C r+
C S
rD
N
C
rr
flJ
C
r+
3
rD
C
(D
O
0'4
ni
0'Q
(D
O..
Q.
a.
'-r
O
C
ai
O'
ai
n.
Ln
r+
O
s
3
aq
r+
O
Q
(D
O
r+
O
O_
LA
(D
rt
. m M
n n D r z n-0 7
rt ° fD ° o" Z
rt �, N 6 v m
r+ o 3 v�
— ° C rt LA
OL1 (D 0
rN+ n O O —{
C C 3_ C- _
N
cu
C(D `< n I ((DD
3rD L)j ° ° rD O D
: 0 p
zi
�+
rD
PO
LA �.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
QJ
7a
77m
Sx
Z$
-p
Z
X
-p
rD
aq
n
(DDrD
3•
o
+
o(D
0
2
I
M
N
M
r+
'
(D
°
r+
<
°+,
o
3
L
0-
�,rD
ri
S
O
0
LA
a
<
h
(D
n
r
3
v
rD
C
r
(D
z
C
<
rD
rD
LA
rn
n
<
r+
l/1
w
Q
rD
(D
N
LA
0�4
0
O
C
al
N
—
�
�4
r_r
r+
O
C
rD
r+
N
_3
C
fl..
01 V'7 -P W N Vj 0 O
< :3 l/1
rDW rD M > r+
ai
Ln r+ (D M 0 n v < N n, Q° d) n
n n _ x v, (D o- -, -1 v
D LA C: n m ri r+ (�D (tel N rD CU � 3. —1 (D 2
O n f 1 ,_r O LA O Q4 0Q � v N fl D
O rD Q 3 0 0 - �. �' rte+ rD 9J D ' Q rD rD �—
h< O 3 TJ .� � rD , -00 T m
o � �. c rD �' � v r+ bi v o rD -o o
o
n � r+ TJrD ,� n' n M �m L + 3 C1
0 rD rD rD
LArD
rD O 0Qcu to n LN+ � n (<D - Cr p)
rt r+S rD LA
f11 (D 0-
in `< rD rf p_ C ni„ rD
r+ rD Ln tn 0 3
CU r -f-
n -i, p- v, (D Or�4
LC rD =
N r)o' r+
: n
rD p
v Oro <
rD
rrDD 0
r+ r- in
O -a r+
rD n
C
L/) LA
r+ to
� rD
r+
rD r+
0'4 z"
F,' r
vG'
LA
o c
rD
LA
ror+
L
rD r+
3 :�
(D (D
" -1
CrQ rD
Q 3
0
N
_+
- 3
v �
z O
N rt
ai
D
r+
r+
O
r+
S
rD
n
0
3
3
C
n
l<
0
0
0
n
m
r+
lu
lur
Del
n
v
v
zi
rD
0
4
N
O
N
O
N
O
v
N
O
Vl V
m
x
m
Ln
LA
m
a
0,
Ln
c
CD
m
r+
m
FIR,
�* 0 > p
n rr+ r
o
n 3 -s
OfD Z$ 3
_
5 r+ .
3
O n C
°1
rt m OrR
r+
0 0 `^
o O � n
— n' iD
GQN
m m o
-0 D r+
o Q N
GQ rD
r+ O
N rD (D 7�
r+ o- m
o v
�a o
� (D
rD
m o <
arD
L. -1
3 -0 �.
0- � (D m
O n 0- 0-
m u,
r O
r+ N
rD
3 o n `, r'
m m °
C
�n vii D
-o g
rD 3
m
I m FC
o m 0_ r^
3 rD X
n o `C
rD 3
W Q �
rD T O DJ
Ln O m rr
a N O
(D W n "S
-h �-
m N
m h O
n (D D.
c
N
r+ N --I
LA W v �l
v LA �Q
O rD Zr M
n 3 �- N
O L
m
a
LA
C
n
n
m
LA
Ln
o'
r+
0'4
LA
m
n•
m
rD
x
m
n
r+
nj
r+
0
C
m
n
C
rt
rr+
r+
n
r+
(D
r+
f,
Z)
IOQ
77
rD
v
0
1
r -r
v
r+
0
V)
r+
n
r+
LA
PA
LA
r+
n
r+
a
m
r�
O
rD
C
r --r
M
M.
OIQ
zr
o -
O
O
0
Q
m
LA
n:
m
r+
M. v
a
m
zr
a-
0
O
O
n.
n
O
3
m
I
D.
rD
0-
rD
m
0
.D
rD
0
l+
-_h
C
C
n
GQ
T
rD
LA
(D
n
V)
r+
v
rD
n
O
3
C:
n
rt
A
Ln
r+
n
r+
a
m
m
0
rD
C
rt
m
O
a -
O
1zO
0
rD
Ln
a:
m
r+
n.
Oro
O
1
zr
O
O
a
n
O
3
n
n.
m
m
0
rD
0
r -r
C
C
n
C'
OQ
v
0'Q
rD
r+
rD
0-
rD
0-
rD
rD
0
rD
n
r+
m
rD0
r+ �
tA r+
C•
aQ
v
a
0'4
O
0
r+
0
a
m
0
r+
LA
w
r+
n
r+
0
m
n
r+
0
n
fi
N
rD
O
m
C
0�
v
m
D
C
r+
0
m
0
N
m
0
-h
C
OrQ
m
C
n
n
0
3
c
r+
`<
W
n
E
LA
rD
n
O
c
D
m
O-4
v
m
rD
rD
r*
m
rD
a,
r*
m
LA
r+
m
r+
LA
r+
O
s
LA
m
D,
1
-h
ro
Ln
r+
C
m
LA
0
c
n
m
,!n
LA
rt
v
r+
rD
a
n
O
C
0
r+
N
rD
rD
m
r*
m
n
O
0
lJl
r+
v
a
n
ET
v
a,
vQ
m
m
M
r+
a -
C
o_
vQ
m
Oro
m
N
O
C
Lnn
m
rD
m
C
c
m
LA
cu
un
un
rD
r+
O'Q
m
rD
O
.o
m
I
ni
o°
n
O
n
r+
O
rn
LA
m
<
n'
m
m
m
ul
n
v
M off,
-0 n �.
n l
I � �R
rD rD r+
rD fD
rD� In
fu
oQ
O
v cu
Q � n
o'
0-+ OrD .
r
rD r+ (D
Q :7 N
m
�< n
�
M
M
(D
rxi
O
C 0 o
_ CA
r+
O 0
0 7
v
E
L-• n
zr m
r+ r+
zr m
m
r+
v m
Q �
m O
={'• C
C �
r+
0 °-
m
L
r+
0-
m
n
O
n
m
U
r+
Ln
-h
O
1
m
cit
n
m
n
l<
O
O
O
0
n
ro
(D
r+
r
C
N
O
N
O
N
0
N
O
v
N
O
a
V
n
0
il0
0
n
rD
a
r+
r
N
0 R.
n
OLJ
0
N
O
w
N
O
N
O
Di
N
O
X
O_
0
0
O
lu
O
n
c
O
�
O
O
"'
01
O
O
O
O
as
o
n
n(D
n
0
c
c
n
5.O
<'
�'
n
v
n
n
Q4
n—
n
n
n
O
te
3
or�
Ln
'
\
nr�+-S
^
o
(D
R
r)
o
�
r�mnO
CD
rN+
r
r+
to
<_.
rn
D
n
O
D
0
o-
n
o
v
O
ago
O
3
N
..
o
v
r+
'^
c
0
3
O
rD
o
f
D
�_
n
rD
`�
_n
v,
z
a
C:
nn
O
°
rD
�'
rr
N
OrD
3
ZT
<
n
a,
rD
(D
rD
C:
rD
cr
rD
a-
3
<
0
°-
`<
04
z-
a-
to
rD
v_,
o
r+
n
�•
<
rD
LJI
n
ami
N
rD
T-
*
�
a'
m'
3
n.
3
O
-1
°-
rD
fl-
n
CrQ
�-
r�r
_
d
a)
`C
d4
rD
-0
Q-
(D
_
Oil cu
N
�
rD
LA
�.
Q-
0
rD
o
rD
0h
o
_'
o
rD
n
o
0
In
N
�,
QJ
-o
rD
O
un�
3
3
D
r+
O
0-
3
rD
a•
0
rt
OrD C
�
O
0
rD
s
7-..
�
rD
r+
O
00
n
0
C
�,
rt
D.
rD
W
�•
Ul
\
2
D
rr
'^
rD
o
0
OC:
-
O
'rt
<'
rD
O
rO+
N
N
I
rD
Q
n
'=1
�
-S
n
.
m
rD
to
LA
QrQ
.�+
O
N
°'
o
rD
-0
-
D
°-
n
a,
<
3
LA Q
-1
f�D
�
fD
O
rrDD
Q
N
m
LA
m
O
rD
m
�
a-
O
O
G'
N
O
�m
o
LA
0
(D
0
W
r°
-'
v
rt
<(D
Z(D
3
N
LA
a
O
p
D
O
I
T.
n
fD
—
v'
3
rD
N.
r
�
O
``
O
—
3
�
LA
On
(D(D
n
f D
=
oo
o
r -h
rD
a,
-0
�_
M
n
o
3
-o
rD
�D
°
r+
<
<
O
i^
ami
inai
o
Q
ai
O
W
n
i
v
ttA
ami
D
<
((D
Ln
=
Ln
DJ
-r
0
o
r�D
n
r
a�
t^'
0-
p-
a,
p q
0-
�'
rD
y
0
C77aro
-i
a,
rt
(D
wCr4
�-
rD
n
LAaro
fi
to
m
5'
CrQ
v
2
1
rD
N
In
n
v
o
arti
X-
<
zr
-0
CO
n_
a1
-s
to
10,10
O
U-1
\
�
_0
al
rD
r
O
Ln
LA
ami
n
�*
e+
i i
n'
n
n
`<
n
(D
ami
O'
rt
N
o a
cu
v
O
v
X-
M
<'
v
-a
%°
rD
_
rD
+
rD
<CLJ
r°
p
°
n
rD
v
�
"
o
n'
rD
<
0
0
p'
�"
co
p
N
r+
O
r+
rr+
C
O
(D
te
r+
O
rt
C
N
A:
<m
al
r+
NJ•
O�O
l<
a)
n
0
il0
0
n
rD
a
r+
r
N
0 R.
n
OLJ
0
N
O
w
N
O
N
O
Di
N
O
O
W
O
O
c
n
m
c
r+
m
n
n
O
-a
G'
zr
r+
zr
G
r -h
S
O
C
Q4
LA
r+
r+
m
n'
m
LA
-h
O
m
v
n
zr
c
O'
r+
O
rt
m
G4
r -F
v
r+
m
Ln
v
m
O
a
El
L'
c
m
n
m
LA
tA
r+
O
zya
m
a,
-h
O
n
C:
Ln
m
0 -
Ln Ln
m
r+
0
-h
r+.
O
`n
n
c
_a
D
a
rD
r+
rD'
a
-a
m
c
r+
a,
r+
0
O
r*
(D
Ln
r -f
O
Oro
c
n:
m
0
1
0'0.
a)
O
N
r+
0
c
O
m
O
zr
m
n
r+
l<
—I
O
LA
C
n
n
m
LA
U,
41
c
v
a
Lna
m
r+
S
(D
LA
r+
-I
0)
r+
m
n'
O
FD' m
LA
v
c
a
a1
n
S
m
m
rrt
s
m
3'
r+
rD
c
a
m
a
O
C:
14-
r)
+n
O
3
m
W
m
X
LA
LA
m
0-
r+ r+
S
m
m
O
1
3
cu
n
m
r+
0
r+
LA
r.
IM
IM
fD
QrQ
m
N
0•
v
CD
C
M
LA
Ph
I
m
�Q.
V
+
m
N
flJ
a
en -h
O
aJ
N
v
v
c
n
O
-v
r+r
m
a
cr
l<
N
O
N
O
c
r+
n
0
m
m
m
M
zr
v
n
n
m
a
3
O
a
D!
N
N
X
O
c
0
a
Di
O
v
rn
m'
n
r+
3
m
LA
r+
O
n
m
--I
d
:-r
0
O
o\°
c
c
a
c
c
a
rD
M'
v
v
O
n
O
(D
r+
m
a
cr
l<
N
O
N
O
bi
log
N
v
0
r+
v
0
rD
w
r+
rD
D
r+
n p -
O < O
r+ rD r+
O m o
3 m 3
r� r�
n
o
M
c'
3_ m
r+ a
_v
c a
moi
=
O- n
O
a c
< <
� O
fl1 �
r F rf
c
m
Ora 3
S m
o
z- O
O
O <
CL o
Oc
77 r)
00
O m
n
77
rt
v
r+
LA
n
n'
n r^.
C
r+ �
O
in rr
c
v
N O
L m
LA tA
LA
v r+
r+ �
n v
� c
v m
M
5 -0
0'
°J O
� c
(D O
m r+
rt ,<
v
Al
c
r+
n
0
m
D
r
c
LA
a�
-o
0
n•
T
r)
O
3
C
O
rt
(D
v
O
Z$
LA
X
O
LA
c
m
to
0
1
3
v
rD
m
a
Q'
n
T
d
flJ
r+
v
0'
rD
X
n
m
m
0-
00 00
0110
rD
n
c
rD
LA
r+
rD
n
O
3
C:
Z5
fi
n O- v
N. O o O � O
r+r+ a r+
3 o 9 3
M m O M
3 0
r* O
m r+
W r- o c
rD �n 0 O �
v
�a
tA_
Ln rD
c
m m
o (D `< L'
(DD
<
o �-Y
O c DJ
-0 Z;r+ �• QQ
(D r+
n
O a" < u,
`< fD -+ n
N O fi
p O <_. -1 <
< o E- 3 m
m v r+ <
o o cr
I
3 to
x 0
�
(D a' c O
c
m to
3 fD
rD v
`rr+ (D rr+
O
� v
O p
m
O m
y _0 O
OQ m rD
M v
Ort w
p m �
m m m
m m
3
O (DD
3 fu r+
m v
r+ �
n O
O < O
O LA ai
Ln
Ln
a,
m orrQ
zr
M
flJ
6a
rD
r -F
rD
a
rD
0-
M
rD
O
rD
Z5
r+
rD O.. n
RIWE
< 0-
rD �
O
(D
n o
O c
� n
Ln
S 0
(D O
C
T. O
(D (D
n (D
� n
rt
rr-F N
LA C
O
(D �y
- O
0 C
O r+
v
r+
rr
nl
n
Q
I
LA
(D
n°
n,
s
rr
w ru p W (D
p' flJ a n d" FU � N a. Cl F v Ri �
n 0 m m r)N 0 (l (l m p Q (DD
< < �_^ < �_ ° a oi
< rD o + < a a
rD (D < (D _° rD rD �+ �+ � � n � (D Cr
O O (D p 0 0 rt p (D (D - p (D C Z, rf
n1 n) O rD rDrt n v n C n1 n �
ZS Z; D_ Q r+ v
O O rD M. (D 0- ZT W O r+ �
rt r+ (D (1 C - C O
n n C �° ni N -p N rD O'4 Oro r+ rD n
m r+ X w C
O O fTl 'T '-+ (D '� pJ (D < -p 7 + rC+ Ln
rD
C (D 3 N rD M d" 3 C' n.
0O rt O. rD (D nJ v
rD rD p q O rp' O . < �, C ni 04 0'Q � �
tCn vii m 0 CU rD
-1 C `-t n r+
rD (D ai
<° <° O (DD rD OC N rD N
(D r h
V1 n h r�-I- + "0 r+
O O -O w O trtn O rt
�.3
3
M C� cu
3 C `< 3 (D rD
C
d -z cu p' OR
r+ C
O fl + Q
CLA -h
O'0. r+
pp (DD S
UQ n < 3
m rD
v �
3
rD
Q O'
r+
N FD.
N
rh
O
-n C
( a
r+ r+
o_a rD
n° r+
�• a
rh
=' O
r+
r+ �
rD
rD nJ
n
ni s
n <
(o
3
r+ rD
W. =3(° r+
Q 0
Sl)
r+
n z -
r+ �
O
O
n
rt
O
O
O
D
n
ro
rD
vi
w
r+
rD
CR
v
v
D
rD
O
N
O_
W
N
O
N
O
v
N
O
1I
O
N
(0
C
O
N
O
N
O
N
t
O
0-
a)
rr
a
v
Q)
+1
V)
L
v
v
V
C
O
O
m
O
J.
.F,
V
V
r�
N
N
v
c
N
Q
C: ra
ra +,
E
O
O ++
L QJ
E ° E
b0 �bO ro
.v bO v
Q
(a
E E
ra
v E v
V E
L '
O (V O v
a V +,
v v ami
-� E '-
O
m V ate. j
ra O V
Mo
C
ra
a
C:
O
+-j
m
+1
c
v
E
v
CL
E
(a
CO
O +'
•N v
L �
L
O O
ra
aJ
aJ m
L
N
N O
_ 0
ro fl
R.
4J
41
J+
.N
C
ra
�
L
bO
O
O
-J
0-
p
s
=
Lp
a
c
ro
+�
c
a
a'
E
c
n
aj
O
E
v
a>
_O
N
>
w
L
ul
ro
E
C
4-+
i++
L'^v
E
E
w
E
E
v
v
v
O
Q
ra
ra
>
V
L.L.
C
LL
C
�
aJ
O
O
V)
dl
ra
r6
Q)
Z3
v
Q)
!Z
Q
ro
I"
ra
-6
V
fQ
V)
Ct
LIl
V
r�
N
N
v
c
N
Q
C: ra
ra +,
E
O
O ++
L QJ
E ° E
b0 �bO ro
.v bO v
Q
(a
E E
ra
v E v
V E
L '
O (V O v
a V +,
v v ami
-� E '-
O
m V ate. j
ra O V
Mo
C
ra
a
C:
O
+-j
m
+1
c
v
E
v
CL
E
(a
CO
O +'
•N v
L �
L
O O
ra
aJ
aJ m
L
N
N O
_ 0
ro fl
R.
J- ra Q
N C
N
O
C:
r
V)a v �
•— v u
� � v
O � �
ra
4� u
V C
a1 ~ O
tip V
� C V
t a1
E
4 i
ra O Q
O N
4- +,
O +�
C
O E
�+ L
O
u uQ
U Q aJ
N 4. VI
VI a)
ai
ra "a
C
2O N
/ L C
N 4i O
4+ u
t O
v +,
O
+� Z,
a--+
bD
v +J
Q L
�
Q
> > E
ra '
L
Vt a1 ra
?>>
fa N
al
°" o E
� a O
N u �
L O
aJ
V O
a1 4,
m Ln
N
VI
w
Ln
u
•L
U1
u
4-j
L
.�
L
a)
4
V)L
O
"O
EbQ)
O
a
a
L
•v
�
L
�
cv
L
fl
L
i_n
O
C�
E:03
O
O
d
L
+�
v
L.L
Q
aJ
E
fl
V
L
aJ
O
nA
V
Q
--v
p
o
O
v
z
O
_
N
-O
�'
4'
I
L
a)
L
O
'6
to
a
Q
4-
t
a)
v
C
W
Vl
L
V
Q
rz
u
t
V
>
L
O
Q
�
a--+
V
-p
V
.O
LL
u
Q
aJ
V
u
O
V1
ai
L
L�
W
"a
n
O
C
m
vi
a1
C
Ln
m
ra
�v
rY
Q
u
L
L
VI
�
L
YiA
41
L
E
f6
a
'i=
ra
+'
N
O
E
v
W
j=
:EQ
Y
V
V
CC
F-
--I
Z
N
U)
rt
r+
(D
0'Q
n'
r+' --a
M
r+ rn
<' z
rD
x
D
n —
O
v
W
a a
O
O�
0-4
a
a,
rt
FA'
V)
n
S
O
a
c
m
a
a
ro 0
m
O 0
3
rD
rD Ln
c �
� c
a
ET
cO
LA
DO
c
LA
5'
rD
LA
LA
C
LA
LA
c
I
� C
< p
O
O
O
3 n
fD
rD
m
n
I L/I
rD '+
O O
3 v_
ro
c c
r+
� c
-o a
O
rD
a
r
EE
p
�
n
5
�'
O
< rD
r+
rD
to rD
O
O
m
O
r+
O
r+
o
rD
rF
o
rt
N
n
-p `C
`q�
m
n
C
n
rD
N
Ort
O
3
O
0
L"
p
p
<
fl;
p
rD
LAM
°+ -t,
n
O
rn
rn
n1
vii
rD
c
r+
(DLA
v
v
0
0
o
LA
o
r+ zr O
n
n,
7
'^
rD
c rD
c
f+
M �<
o
rD
m
n
I
N <v
rD
rD
O
p
rn
ai
0
x
v
O
n
n
rD
rO)
LA
n
00
(Da
O
I
�
o
w
I
n•
rD
00
a
rD
1+
n
n
n
m
o
3
o
M
O
5'
n_
rnD
m
N
3.
r+
Oro
-a
D
ZY,
-�
c
r+
+n
rD
rD
w
a
c
rn p
r
a
p
� '0 2
n
Dn
p
D
r+
<(D rD
<
m
'"
a 0 rD
7
O
O
m
�,
r+
n, O
O
r+
o
rD
rF
o
c,
-p
w
O
CD
m
n
C
n
3
O
0
L"
p
0
0
m 90
c
(D
rD
°+ -t,
n
O
rn
rn
n1
vii
rD
c
��*
n
O
c
rD
c c
0
N
c
r+
o
0
r+ zr O
n
n
7
'^
v
,<
f+
M �<
o rD
-0
rD
m
n
�
rD
O
p
to
H
r+ O
rD
�o
O
rD
Ln
a=
-0 m
n
(Da
rt
N � r+
o
O
rD
.<
r+
n
n
m
o
N
rnD
p
r+
Oro
-a
D
ZY,
-�
c
r+
rD
w
a
rD
d
O
�
a
Ul
O
r+
cr
UQ
V
l<
nDv
-a
"o
LA
-0
-0
Dn
Dn
m
O
3
r+ a
o rD n,
m
n, O
O
r+
o
ni
rF
o
flJ
O
w
O
CD
n_
n
Z3
O
0
m w M R'
w
m 90
M
n
n1
O
n1
0
Vi
OO
D �n
h
en
a
O
a
c
n
7
'^
,<
f+
M �<
m r+Q
n �<
n
n
r+ O
0
�
O
rD
�
N
O
W
d
�
Ul
O
UQ
V
r+
O
D
v
V
V
rte+
m
c. �
rD
r+
m
� UQ
'0
�.
3
rD
O O
e+
00, `<
N O
O
O n
o O
tA O 3
r+ V
a� Q°
a o
o
t
tACL
O
� O
z
v
+.J
fG
0
00
00
ON
•r''
d!
n
=
00
00
00
bA
Ln
-
'n
=
M
rra
F-
ON
N
f�
�
N
ma
N
w
C-1-�
J v
41
'U
N
41
41
C
4 bA.0
-p
C
N
C
bD
Q
C
C
w
-C
a
L C
a
o
a
L
�
0
u
>,
J
p
LA
ro M
ru
Q�u
Q
ry
O
>,
�-'
u
rrs
,
GC
V d
Vl O Lou
W
V)
V
on
V
W
J
a)
co
�
4JrB
06
tA
rB
4-1
O
O
N
"C
C
4J
a '
C
vii
N
++
'
V
N
L
O
vO
N
L
++
O -
++C
:3L
+�
Q
bA
>-0
°
O
O
V1
O
OV
M
u
C L
N
v
Q
C+
(V
Q '�
++
41
N
.-
o
N
Q
G1 GJ
E E
VI
Ln
= >p
C
O
U—
v
v
C
C
bjD
V
�'
in
O
Q
O
o-
� OJ
u
Q�
-p
4J
t�j
++
VI
u
O
V
C
C
>,
4-
O
C
O
1
0
v
++
O
O
v
to O
=
4-
Ln
v
OJ
Q
O
o
L
Eu
L
O
>
GJ ro
V1
4-
D
u..l
°
L
p
v p
++
C
bA
C
w
p
a6
v
bA
-M
-0
Q
a
c
y.
O
}
v
D
c
'^
0
c- c
v
E
O
-o
N
v
v
c
O
°6
b0
4°
f0
GJ
i
r6 a
++
'Q
°
Q
N
N
-
Q)
to
.2
b.0
C
U
V
7
> '-
V1
U
m
W E
L
O
N
L
>
O
ro
Q
C
.0
0O
.�
L
C
E O
N
p
C E
ate+
C
C>
C
0
.N
>
Q
L
i
I
p
vLn4-
ra
o
v
i
v
v
Q
f0
C
LU
u
CO
v
o c
J�
v=
Q
o
a.
ra
Q
0-
++ O
O
>
L
C
n
-0
r6
C
L
b�
L
Ln
'D
o
E N
o- E
Q
L
E
U
E
C
c
N
+'
r0
`~
O L>,
D
O
Li
N
Q
U
> C
L
C
O
N
ro
v
.D O
a
41O
C v
a
N
4-j
>�
ate-+
4-
L
GJ V
u
"6 ate
-+
i
v
ra
C
°
u
V
E
+-
O
Q
O
vi
E
0 t
0
O
N
v
C
Q
>
+,
ro
4J
E
4-j
bD C
W
O
N
rD
N
fl-
L
m
~ E
C
�
p ra
bA
O
i
L
41
fl-
LA
v
C
�
+n
E
o
Q
a
-o c
a
°
3
n-
c
C
4J
°
,_ O
.L
O
-1
�
O
..°
n,o
EQ
�
O >
>
0) 0-
C
C
-
+'
C
C
c
W
v
v
v
v
Q)
v
vv
u
u
L
°-
°u'
Q
�
°-
v c°'c
v
3
Ln
Q
Ln
J
0
Q
C
V
L L
+r
++
L a
0)
N
in
N
L
N
'D
C
•�
in
LW
VI
t=i1
V
O
0 F-
�
Q
>p
> >
m
>O
>
i1
J
CD
00
w
Ln
CN
ON
M
ra
ra
L
LA
�
>
.v
ra
>C>
>
ra
LA
0
V
O
C
O
a1
Ln
L
Ln
_M
M
ul
0_
V
J
a1
rru
Fa
�
�
c
V
w
1—
to
M
M
F,
L
O
C
.N
ro
V
++
C
C
a
N
C:
aJ
E
.F,
O
O
rCa
v
c
p
rB
+�
V
41
O
E
+'
'p
aJ
a
°
C
>,
v
viOu
w
v
>
>
>
o
ai
ra
-v
M
p-
v
cc
Q)
C6
+0+ .CO
v1
rCa
>
b p
(A
>+ �
vii
O
Q
C
N
N
+ ,
u
, H
N
U
Q
_O
E
O
7 ++
i l!
0
ra
4.
v
v
v-
p
O
Q
m
C
a
�
E
�
>,
_°
O o
v
>
'O
}
aJ bA
a1
>
rU
Ln
O
V1
Q
of
u
m
11
O E
a%
>
41
ra
O
v V
v
O
L
C
C
u C
+
O o
E
C-
�'v
C d
O
p�
V
vi
C
bA
C
.E
O
C
ra
O
>
by
C
w O
a
C
L
E t
O
E
u
M
O
V
0
C
C
>
ate)
O
L
N
N
V
_
a
a '
LA
C
or
C
O
OC
aJ
ra
L
O
�
ro
'n
v
in
c
C
v
+1
bn
C
ra ra
vl
>
a
a0i
ro
m
L`n
C
O
O
vi
E
E
a
O
m
+,
>,
OL
C
O
>, O
-o
a
`^
E
L
v
E
N
aJ
>
C:
ra
6
u
N�F-
a
�
O
o a,
'L "O
E
C
U
V
Q
Q
4,
�
C
> ate+
C
O
W
>
>
ra
C)
v
'
C bO
a
v v
"d
n
+' Z;O
V1 in
v
V O
+ ra
to I—
w
ra
LA
0
0
O
Ln
_M
M
M
ON
E
L
O
ro
V
C
a
N
C:
>,a0
O
O
rCa
v
-�
c
p
rB
+�
V
41
.:n
+'
(a
C
Q
viOu
w
r6
ra
o
ai
ra
C
N
V
C
ra
41
ra
v
vi
C 41
E
a1
>
rU
Ln
O
C
ra
a%
>
41
ra
v V
v
O
L
C
C
u C
+
u
E
C-
�'v
C d
O
p�
x a)
.E
O
C
O
>
Z
C
L.L.
v
4-
C
u
M
O
V
>
ate)
O
L
i
V
Q)
t
a
a '
LA
C
or
C
O
OC
aJ
ra
L
O
�
c
y,
ra ra
M
>
v
Q>
O
a1 vi
C
LAO
E
>,
OL
4-1(V
E
L
4-1
�
v
L
Q
N�F-
++
_
aJ
C
C
ifu
�
C
,
raX
O
W
Q
V
w
V
n
LU
aJ
t
a-+
C
L
ra
O
4j
tA
C
E
v
o
E
C
ELn
0
Q�
>
aJ
ra
N
0E
V
o
a
c
C
ra
O
4-1
—
L-
ro
w
L
v
C
Ln
>
LA
E
rs
Ln
v
u
4
v
aJ
v
u
O
O
>
uO
�_
E
++
+1
Q)41o
V)c
v
v
�_
M
a,
"
°
E
ai
bA
Dv
o
v-
C
v
>
V)
Ln .0
in
++
>, —
v
0
O
E
N>
v
"
41
C:'n
°'
bb
C
Q
0
W LZ
W
O
-�v
L
(V
J
Q
ON
M
Q
L
w
+r
W
ra
LSO
00
�
00
a)�
Lf1
c-
Ln
Ln
Ln
c
L
v
fa
L
C a..i
C: c
a-+
to
++
N
C
�
> .D
�
�xx
W
>,
..0_
>
ra fa
ra L
>;
p
±'
ra
3 'v
ra
>,
C
a�
C
O
a ±'
D
U v
v c
G
aJ
c
L
:3
(a a)
>,
U
v
c
L
0-
aJ
;�
>1
++ W
41
cl/1
ac
c-0Oc
m
aC
a)
C
C
QoE
>
ri
���_Ln
L-
LJ
O
ra
L/1
•-
Ln
p
O
N
4-
Q
°
U
to
C
O
df = ra
a
Q
>,
E
c
a
fa
N C
OO
W
c
0
W
U
m
p>
4L
t
V
V rca
W V
V;
I0
tca
W
V
OC
V a- Lq
bb
C
°
+'
c
C
v
p
.E.i
o-
i
Ln
-0
v c
IZ-
+'
Ln
L
a
•1�
Q
Qj
a E
o
v
�
o
E
°
U
v
E o
cnr
o
o
c-
O
v
Qj
�
�
Ln
d1
Ln
4-4-1Ln
ate1
C
v
ro
O
ra
>
Ln
cLA
0
U
Ln
Q
WC:v
41
0L
•
tH
>
N
0N
O
N
C°°°
N
C
0
° o
a
O
E
u
ul
ru
-°0
c >,
°
°
C
v ra
—
>
v
v
a
.a
C
V
v
j c
V
O
7
t
C
'v
N
p
06 Ln
O
=
O_ "p
~
Q
al E
4-1
y-
-z'gy
m
c
ate+
O
>
0
Q
Ou
C
o
D
LO
4J
V
°'
L-
V
d
E
E +°
Ln
ra
O Q
N
O _0
M
O
N�
c
c
v
v
W
-0
rn ra
V
W
W
°;
CC
V
LL
-
O
:2
a Ln
O
N
N
i
LP1
"c
Ln
ra
+'
c
c
4c m
C `n E
+:
�
�
_
E ro
E `� °
C
v
E
a
o
+,
c
v
u
_
= v
0
v Ln
u
ra
O
°
aJ
ra
O i
a1
L ..
U
u
_
E
Ln
v
ai �+-
>
C
ra
Ln v
+'
ra
>
(V
>
C' }
v
L-
C
>
O
v
L —
Ln
-°
w '�
ra- v
b0
°
v O
v
ra
c 6
C) Z)
x
c
>,
OC C
c
v
E Q
E
N
v
C N
E
o rB
4-
n- L
a1
a)
Q
.f..
Q
O N
'�
v
u
C
++
O v
++ C
E •°
rCa
=
u
L
aJ O
bA
c>
O
aJ
> L
Q
v -a
W
L
a
L-
L6
v
-°
E
v
W o
o
v
Q
�,
•� O
�o
a;
c° 2 a
E
-0
LL,
a,
o
_o
>
m
v
ho
L
°
c
L-
w
°�
V
'i aJ
'D
V;
C Ln v
ra
-a
-
M
Q�
a;
a
vi >
C
M
d E
d
N
E
ra
�
V `
.Q
>
Ln
L-
>, L
E
o
°
t
o
o ra
ra
o'
w
"
+�
C
`'_ � k
L
a1
a
vini
v a1
v �-
v
v
m
I a1
to
O
�' 0 In
aJ
>
L
> Ln
> -a)
b.0
C
Fu
L
++
.N
U
o°
o Q
C] Ln
a
Q
'�
CC
L% H-
Q
ruo
3
ON
M
c
c
QJ
00
00
rn
QJ
c
c
QJ
QJ
)
o
0
bA
b.0bA
>, v
w
> u
Q
Q�x
Q�X
V
V_
)
W
W
W
W
W
ra
L
ro
ra
ra
ro a
gra 1
a
m
V
V
V
V D V)
V
In
V
aJ
+'
ro
al
Q)
in
aJ
+O+ ate-aJ
m in
t
+�+
b.0>
-c
ro
00
j
= ro
-
o
c
L
(11c
c
a
Q
bq
c =
Z;in
m Q-=
>
o
.�
vi
0
a�
ro
LA
aJ
+�
4,
C-0
M°
N
o
V)+�
4-1
D
>
vi
a;
+'
+�
v
V
v'^
41o
4-
in
vi
c
=
u in
A
>
D
c
v v
n
3
V
o Q
C
+jaJ
0
z;
O
OL .N
°-
+'
aJ
+�
ra
v
s
+'0-
v-
L
'''
E
o
a
ra
4-
0
0
m aJ
Q
L
ra
O
4,
Q
v
O
4-
O
�=
E
in
L
0
41
v
c
dS
O
E
c
c
+,
c c
o
c
v
4-
E
ro
ate,,
c >,
v
a)
ro
aJ
aJ
Z,
L
>
o
f
°'
E
a E
a
c
o°
0
°'
Q
_o
ro 4
°'
i
Q
0
Q
O
+� Q
c O
c
L
aJ
v
0 y_
C Q
L
O
E
QJ
Q)
o aJ
�+
"O
0
v
v
j a''
v
Ul V
a;
Ln
Q)
v
N
N
N
Q
ro
aJ aJ
pO
-0
-0
0
4-
L
4 u
r\
L
Q)
N
41
o
M--
fa
'L
O
aJ
a)
O
a +
.L
41
c
tAL
aJ
.moi
bA
aJ
v
,a
E
V)
fl-
aJ
-O
c
N
to
�
v
a1
E
�
X
Ln
�
N
vi
++
++
Q
>
>
ro Ln
c
O
(a L
ra
L
.�
41
ra
CD
ra
Q
aJ
QJ
-O 'vi
+' °ten
a1
Ln
O
dS c
v
++
p
0
4+ M
mF,
v 0
—
c
a
o
Ln
aJ
-v
s
L- O
o
v
+,
v
v
4,
�
M
m E
aL1
7,
rua
L
m
V
a
L
E
p
a-+
Ln
E
aJ a1
C
a1 d
Q p
+,
p
c
p
00
41
in L
>.
++
in
+'
+'
v
+
>,
fl-
aJ
O E
�
O QJ
m -N
fl- l J
�
u
Ln
-c
c
wC
o
C
o
o
fl- c-
v>
v
E
v
+�
to
LAo
E
0
:L
O
Q
v
N
>
0
+
o
�
v
NOQ
aJ
L
v
-fie
�
bD
E
vi
C
O
i
n>
Q
O
O
p v
ro +�
p,
v
+J
in
v
7
v
O
c
+�
+,
L>
(-
N
o
_
E
co
ro
v 0
�;
a
Ln
c
Q)
°�'
c
v
c
aJ
a
dS
'�,
0
o
Ln 4-j
o
E
f°
E
+'
a"
aJ
0 E
LJ L
c
>,
v
0
Q
N
o
L
o
4-
�,
L a1
Q
C
v v
Q L
u _v
Q
Q
U
C
c
-0
+, 0
4--
o>
u
v
Q
+�
�-
>, +�
•L
v
L
> Fv,
rot>
o
aJ
0
dS
rLa
E
QJ
aJ
L
Q
v
v-
i
4-
i
aJ
L
aJ
L
.�
p
i
�G
aJ
aJ
ro
ra
aJ
0
a-+
N
>
ro
>
aJ
Q)
LA
.0
+�+
rLo
>
a
c
v
�
O-
v v ai
a
-Op
v
O
Z
v
Q
E rca
�n
�
E=
L
u
N
.�
o
��
v
0
v
0
4°
a
o
c
n
n
•-
Ln
o
r
Ln
t0
M =
r-
O
N r
N
r*�
00
co
r
c
c
c
1
O
by
O
O
A
+� W
>,
++
W
b
A
c
-fl
>,
W
oN
a-+
V L .Ln
VXX
L
4+
.�
¢_xx
V-XX L
LAwn
0
p6
_X
W
W
a1
(_�
W
W
(0
i
i
L
i
t
N
N
a1
aJ
OG
l7 Ln
v
V
to
V
V
to
ru a-+
N 4-
O
m
'�
4-.�
4�
bA V
c >1
O
N
�
1 O
+
C
N
VI
v
4-1
a1
L
m 0-
-C
1-
o 0
-
_
d
06
L
y
Vl
b0�
blo
C
N
N >
4J PO
a1
dam-+
O
PB
c
E
Ln
>
O
0
•� �
N
L
4-
N v
Q L
1-
0 4,
V�
I
O
L
�
v
�
a1
0-
0- �
!B
`~-co
a f6
V
_
�
`1
0-
4-
L
_C +j
m N
0
O
E
C
a1
c
E
4_
V) O
v:
4-
c '_
�_
O v
c
Z�
E
O >°
m
41
L
O
uJ
m
C
Q
omw
Q
L
O
Q
Q
'_O
L
O
aI
C
m
f1 fl-
aJ
>_
Ln N
N V
Cal
v fl-
o
aJ
aJ
V
v
v 1
a' _0
:3
Q 2
O
L1
LJ O
a. V
-0
4-
-
c
c
N
4�
C
Q41
aJ
4� VI C
N i
O
v
v
o
L
c
m
c
N
V
c
O
-N
N '�
m
aO
1
m
>,
L
m in
L
(�
�
M
QC:
�
4�-
°
4OE
0-E
f°
Q
o
c
I
3
�'
E
a,
4J
—
V
a1
C6
a1
VI
•�
Q
—
-F+ a1
V1
•FA
to ac, �
c
v
�
°"
o
•>
v
Q
v
° >
C E a,
v
-0
0E
s- a
:c
°�-
v c
nn
vLn
LA
>_
N> L
L
In
-0
L
v
.N
C:
.1.J
:3
{.j
O
C>
a1
L E
Q 0_
L
1
V
Ln a1 �-
7
o-
c
-o
E
w
v
Q
+,O-
v
c
+, o
Ln
+�
a1
CI- c
Q) 'O
a1
L
°c
0--
bA
uq
I
v
+1
o 0
0
. �
a�1
a�1
v
E
o
O
C-
d
o
v
¢
a1 >
a,
L
° a1
v
c
bLO
Cvv
C
4L
a�1
dS
J
E
bA (� C
4-
C
O
L
N
ate+
¢
O a1
(� 4-
c Q
v
v
VI
w
O
'`—'
N
�'
v
��
v +'
Q
c
O N a1
m
aJ
x
O
ry
E
c�$
t�
O
L
S
—
N
c
E
'L
E
o
+1 -o N
v
c
o
v
ra
v
O
Ln>
m
3:
: 3
¢
E
m
Ln
E
W
0
.n
0
oC Cz
v
N
v
fa
0
000
_O
ra
fa
Cr
�O
L.
H
W
V
a)
O
� W
N
bJD
•-
;�
E,
C
O
.�
O
.�
bA
�^
O
d$ C: Fa
d$
C
v
C
v
c
O=IA
L v
O
a1
O
+�
•>
s
GJ
ra
V
w
Vii
w
Vii
oC
V a Ln
v
4J
O
v
v
`,-
*'
E
°6
a
O
a
>
ru
v
Ln
a
ra
-p
Ln
C
ra
N
�
N
tA
bA
Q)
++
d1
robO
a
aG1i
O
C
OJ
N
J
to
O
L
V>
L
L
41
E
'
�
7 wn
V
E
v
�-
�
vra
C. u
to
O C
Era
+�
>
C.
O
O "a
v
Q)
p
O +�+
v
+� v
p
E
O
7
4-1
p
i
0
N
ra
>Ln
E
•�
d
(A
:3 O
O �c
"v
Oai
L
V
S
ra
ra
�
L
++—
U0
Q)
•VI
VI
VI
N
V1
++
C
N
�
C
O
4-
C
-r-•-1
++
c :3v
to
VI
C
'fa
ra
'U
Q)
Q)
tA
+
ra
S
L
O
dLn
ni
=
'�
Ln
3
a.
Q)
C
X
O
OO
Cra
+1
fa
Vldf4�
ra
"a
0
C.
°C
v
> N
(0
N�
U
N
OV
C6
C
v
•V1
a)
ra
VI
L
E
a-
C
�Ln
>
C
C E
"6
d
0
fa
p
L
N
++
O
'd
E
fu
v—
Wo
V
-0
5
p
v
v
4-
O
p O ra
N>
Vj
v
>
ut
v
>(3)
°�
4
po°�,
n
v1
Q)
-0
°uv
-6
E
w
v�
aao
E
�
°
v
E
o
>
u
Q
fkA
++
v1
O
u
ro
bA
t}
>
•L
L
Ut
ro
E
++
'p
a1
=
D
X
O
ra
0
dS
fU
�..
ia1
d
U
d GJ
1.i
ro
vi •>
a- L
E
ra
di
0
E
L
C
VI
L
O
•bA
QJ
A Ln
O
O
VI
4-
'
L
ra
QJ
>
L
,Fj
4�-
bQ
fV
E
+J
,
i-�
++
Ln
ra
•E
_O
fa
ria
.0-
to
m°U
+Q)Ln
fa
C
QJ
0
in I—
5¢
-° �, ra
E
Q
E
ra
v,
E
N
M
d"
Ln
r
N
r
r
00
Ln
r
Lr>
r
Ln
Ln
00
C
=
M
V
-N
V
b.p
bA
(�
C:
C
LV
ra
b.p U
LLJ
'U
LLJ
W
W
•L ru
ra
j u
bjD
C c
ra
ra
C
L
a
C
L
L
ra
L
ra
L
ra
v
a
a
L v
ro a
L
a.0
L QJ
a
0
4 +
>
A-'
0
++
V
V
V
Ln
.�
V) LL
V LnVl
LL
V Vl
Q
V
Q
bA
v
C
},
ra
++ 4 +
U
4�
C
E
aL, N
++
L
p
E ra
o
Ln
E Ln
+,
'n +,
-0
�
QJ
O
`�
c
Q- C
Ou
0 v
u
_C
•QQ 4�
ro
D
N
•>
t
++
_O
QJ .N
QJ
p
> L
�
In
c-
ro ��
o
•O
a
ai >
v
v°
0
CO
N
ra
ra
M
in
�'
f6
N
>
v N
L
o
+,
�'
��, v
v
vl Q
�_
'�
v
>
Q) v
�
lJ
+,
V;
a QJ
C
v
E
f° c
i -N
v
4C
QJ
++
v
ti -
aJ
o
v 4 '
ru
b0
Q)
tA
O'
in
QJ
a o
-p
0
ra
++
L
v
�,
+' ra
'D
v
v
41
c
O
ra QJ
ru
O QJ
c
+�
1
E>
a
+, L-ra
> v
u c
E
n a
ra
+1 a
D
N�
-a o
±' ra
o:
a
ra
v
Ln
E
(v
ra
¢ C
Ln
Q c
o a
v
(v°-
>�
v v
a
°
Q>J
v
0 9
•L
a
Z
v
E
Q "o
41
a -�
o
L
L
cc
4--
LU a
v
4- a
w a-0
Q
a
v
ra
C
Q)
++
V
L
�O
fa
u
Q)
y_.
O
C: t
Vl
.1L.+
C V)
a
C
L
QJ
N
D
LLJ
p
v
a
-° Q
a
c
�
ra vi
a--�
v
>
>-
ra (A
L
c
(a
v
ru
Q)
E
o
v
v
ra w
E
bA
3
Q)
LA
a
4,
r4�
Q
O
c�c
o a
°0
p
a p
J
c
a
o
v
Vv
V)
S
u
�
E O
> O
N
p
uv
C
i
u
c
p
O
c+
v
O+
Ln
-0
c
_
v
v
E
�'Ln
a
L
v
QQJ
-.+
c
L ++
C
Qi
E
E
>+,
v
V)
+j
0
v
-°
+� o
Z)
°-
E
-°
°- 0
v
Ln
�
V
E?
v
d5
a=
aJ
v
v
v
�'
v
°
v
0 0
L
o
E Qj v
c
v
�.�
a
E
41
a
o
Ln
Q
> fl-
�°�
L
o
E
L
a
v
N
-Q°J
°;
v 0
c
ra
)
QJ
v 41
c
p
41
>,
>>
O
c
v
c
L bA
Mu-
'tn
bA
L
>
v0
O
v
_
QJ
Ln
ra
O
V
.p
a
c
+,
>,
-0 41
N
i
O
QJ
c
i fa
p
u
p
c
a v
,n
L v
a
c
-6
ra
QJ A
QJ QJ
L
L
L
ra
4- L
L
.�..,
4-
(a
(a
O
0
v QJ
>-
.>
v
Z, m
_
y
,
v
n
>
� a
QJ
v ru
v
c>
p
v
E
a
a
v
i
v
Q) `°
v v
�'
o
QJ
�,
CC LL
OC
u
'in
.�
O
in
D +�+
V
N
Z)
M
d"
j tx
�. \ =OIL
I �
�X-1
��.
ci
41
�� d"'•+fir j �' Gti 1 l.s • e -!
FF��F�:::_`���tyyy.�/ •� / tf l\/ N"•r
QI at "�\\
LL
\ ��.11 04k
LGLE�-_
as
M
0
in
M
M
SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONDITIONS
7b
-�-►-t'1
The following section presents demographic and economic data for the City of Brooklyn Center. This data
provides an understanding of key trends that influence land use and other important community systems. In
many of the exhibits included in this section, additional data is also presented for Hennepin County and the 7 -
County Twin Cities Metropolitan Area (' TCMA"). This additional data is intended to provide greater context to
trends and patterns that extend beyond Brooklyn Center's border that may influence the community's future.
Metropolitan Council Forecasts
The Metropolitan Council prepares socio-economic forecasts for each community in the TCMA. These
forecasts are meant to inform and guide each components of a community's Comprehenisve Plan Update.
The following table and chart presents data on the historic and forecasted growth trends for Brooklyn Center,
Hennepin County, and the TCMA through 2040. In a departure from historic growth patterns, the Metropolitan
Council anticipates Brooklyn Center will increase its number of persons and households by 4-7% each decade
through 2040. Because Brooklyn Center is fully developed, new household growth will require a thoughtful
approach as to where and how redevelopment will occur within the City.
Table SE -1: Population and Household Growth Trends 1970-2040
Estimate ---------- Met Council Forecast
Geography
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
2016
2020
2030
2040
Population
11,430
10,756
11,042 11,300
12,300
13,300
Hennepin County 309,708
365,536
419,060
456,129
Brookyln Center
35,173
31,230
28,886
29,172
30,104
31,231
31,400
33,000
35,400
Hennepin County
960,080
941,411
1,032,431
1,116,200
1,152,425
1,237,560
1,255,220
1,329,580
1,406,640
7 -County Metro Area'
1,874,380
1,985,873
2,288,721
2,642,062
2,849,567
3,041,195
3,127,660
3,388,950
3,652,060
Percent Change
8.8%
4.3%
-- 11.0%
7.2%
6.1%
7 -County Metro Area -
25.8%
21.4%
16.7%
Brookyln Center
--
-11.2%
-7.5%
1.0%
3.2%
--
4.3%
5.1%
7.3%
Hennepin County
--
-1.9%
9.7%
&1%
3.2%
--
8.9%
5.9%
5.8%
7 -County Metro Area
--
5.9%
15.3%
15.4%
7.9%
--
9.8%
8.4%
7.8%
Households
Brookyln Center 9,151
10,751
10,751
11,430
10,756
11,042 11,300
12,300
13,300
Hennepin County 309,708
365,536
419,060
456,129
475,913
511,518 528,090
566,360
600,730
7 -County Metro Area' 573,582
721,444
875,504
1,021,456
1,117,749
1,192,364 1,256,580
1,378,470
1,491,780
Percent Change
Brookyln Center --
17.5%
0.0%
6.3%
-5.9%
-- 5.1%
8.8%
8.1%
Hennepin County --
18.0%
14.6%
8.8%
4.3%
-- 11.0%
7.2%
6.1%
7 -County Metro Area -
25.8%
21.4%
16.7%
9.4%
-- 12.4%
9.7%
8.2%
1 7 -County metro area, w hich includes the
counties of Anoka, Carvery, Dakota, Hennepin,
Ramsey, Scott, and Washington
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council
Figure SE -1: Population Growth Rates 1970-2040
16%
12%
1970s
1980s
is 8%
10�
1990S
0 4%
■ 20006
' II
■ 2010s
o-:'''
0 0/
m
■ 2020s
o -4%
■ 2030s
a
-8%
-12%
Brookyln Center Hennepin County Metro Area
SourcesUS Census, Metropolitan Council
Age Distribution
The age profile of the community has important ramifications on demand for housing, goods and services, and
social cohesion. The following table and two figures present data on the age profile of Brooklyn Center,
Hennepin County, and the TCMA. Unlike the broader TCMA region (where the population continues to age
rapidly) Brooklyn Center's population became younger between 2000 and 2010, and has stayed relatively
stable since 2010. This is largely due to a significant increase in people age 25 to 34 during the decade, many
of whom are now starting families and having children. Increases in the number of young families place
demands on schools, housing affordability, and the types of retail goods and services needed.
Table SE -2: Age Distribution of the Population 2000-2016
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Under 5
73,261
76,236
81,745
Change 2000-2016
Distribution
6.6%
Age Group
2000
2010
2016
No.
Pct.
2000
2010
2016
BROOKLYN CENTER
15.7%
18 to 24
108,767
113,551
112,439
3,672
3.4%
9.7%
Under 5
1,957
2,674
2,552
595
30.4%
6.7%
8.9%
8.2%
5 to 17
5,353
5,628
6,011
658
12.3%
18.3%
18.7%
19.2%
18 to 24
2,805
3,056
2,657
-148
-5.3%
9.6%
10.2%
8.5%
25 to 34
4,330
4,768
5,244
914
21.1%
14.8%
15.8%
16.8%
35 to 44
4,451
3,681
4,336
-115
-2.6%
15.3%
12.2%
13.9%
45 to 54
3,395
3,817
3,669
274
8.1%
11.6%
12.7%
11.7%
55 to 64
2,374
2,822
3,149
775
32.7%
8.1%
9.4%
10.1%
65 to 74
2,428
1,653
1,718
-710
-29.2%
8.3%
5.5%
5.5%
75 to 84
1,569
1,377
1,222
-347
-22.1%
5.4%
4.6%
3.9%
85+
510
628
673
163
31.9%
1.7%
2.1%
2.2%
Total
29,172
30,104
31,231
2,059
7.1%
100.0%
100.0% 100.0%
Median Age
35.3
32.6
32.8
-2.5
--
--
--
--
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Under 5
73,261
76,236
81,745
8,484
11.6%
6.6%
6.6%
6.6%
5 to 17
194,241
185,109
194,733
492
0.3%
17.4%
16.1%
15.7%
18 to 24
108,767
113,551
112,439
3,672
3.4%
9.7%
9.9%
9.1%
25 to 34
183,860
187,523
209,948
26,088
14.2%
16.5%
16.3%
17.0%
35 to 44
191,872
154,304
162,590
-29,282
-15.3%
17.2%
13.4%
13.1%
45 to 54
156,068
171,130
172,004
15,936
10.2%
14.0%
14.8%
13.9%
55 to 64
85,773
133,758
153,315
67,542
78.7%
7.7%
11.6%
12.4%
65 to 74
59,737
66,516
82,421
22,684
38.0%
5.4%
5.8%
6.7%
75 to 84
44,942
42,476
44,595
-347
-0.8%
4.0%
3.7%
3.6%
85+
17,679
21,822
23,771
6,092
34.5%
1.6%
1.9%
1.9%
Total
1,116, 200
1,152, 425
1,237,560
121,360
10.99/6
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Median Age
34.9
35.9
36.1
1.2
--
--
--
--
7-COUNTY METRO AREA
Under 5
188,236
194,329
200,616
12,380
6.6%
7.1%
6.8%
6.7%
5 to 17
509,298
506,631
519,966
10,668
2.1%
19.3%
17.8%
17.3%
18 to 24
244,226
263,462
267,717
23,491
9.6%
9.2%
9.2%
8.9%
25 to 34
411,155
420,311
454,518
43,363
10.5%
15.6%
14.7%
15.1%
35 to 44
469,324
391,324
396,260
-73,064
-15.6%
17.8%
13.7%
13.2%
45 to 54
363,592
440,753
438,335
74,743
20.6%
13.8%
15.5%
14.6%
55 to 64
200,980
326,007
371,486
170,506
84.8%
7.6%
11.4%
12.4%
65 to 74
130,615
163,425
201,165
70,550
54.0%
4.9%
5.7%
6.7%
75 to 84
90,292
97,442
104,920
14,628
16.2%
3.4%
3.4%
3.5%
85+
34,338
45,883
50,435
16,097
46.9%
1.3%
1.6%
1.7%
Total
2,642,056
2,849,567
3,005,419
363,363
13.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Median Age
34.2
36.0
36.5
2.3
--
--
--
--
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -2: Age Distribution of the Population 2015
20%
18%
0 16%
Q 14%
0
a 12%
0
c 10%
a�
a� 8%
0-
6%
4%
a
2%
0% -
Under 5 5 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 to 84 85+
Age Group
■ BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY
7 COUNTY METRO AREA
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council
Figure SE -3: Median Age 2000-2016
38.0
37.0
36.0
(D 35.0
0)
Q 34.0
c
33.0
a>
2E 32.0
31.0
30.0
29.0
28.0
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
--*—BROOKLYN
CENTER
`4—HENNEPIN
COUNTY
-- —7 -COUNTY
METRO AREA
Changing family and household structures can have a profound effect on housing and other community needs.
For example, decreasing household size has a direct impact on the amount (square footage) of housing a
household needs. The presence of children not only impacts local schools, parks, and housing types, but also
the kinds of retailers that can be supported in the community.
Since 2010, the number of households with children in both single -parent and married couple households has
grown significantly. Meanwhile, the trend among households without children, especially married couples (i.e.,
empty -nesters) has been on the decline. The percentage of households with children is approaching 40%,
which well above the rate in the County and the TCMA.
Table 3: Household Type 2000-2096
Change 10-16 Distribution
Household Type 2000 2010 2016 Number Percent 2010 2016 Change
BROOKLYN CENTER
Married, no children
Married, children
Single Parent, F
Single Parent, M
Other family*
Single Person
Roommates
Total Households
■ N ' ► •► j
3,149
2,487
2,176
-311
-12.5%
23.1%
19.7%
-3.4%
2,148
1,861
2,312
451
24.2%
17.3%
20.9%
3.6%
963
1,181
1,336
155
13.1%
11.0%
12.1%
1.1%
280
362
514
152
42.0%
3.4%
4.7%
1.3%
842
1,119
882
-237
-21.2%
10.4%
8.0%
-2.4%
3,218
2,978
3,174
196
6.6%
27.7%
28.7%
1.1%
830
768
649
-119
-15.5%
7.1%
5.9%
-1.3%
1 430
10 756
11,042
286
2.7%
100%
100%
0%
1, ,
Married, no children
111,018
116,099
125,713
9,614
8.3%
24.4%
24.6%
0.2%
Married, children
95,469
89,084
98,819
9,735
10.9%
18.7%
19.3%
0.6%
Single Parent, F
28,322
29,334
35,391
6,057
20.6%
6.2%
6.9%
0.8%
Single Parent, M
7,471
8,841
11,565
2,724
30.8%
1.9%
2.3%
0.4%
Other family*
25,023
29,527
24,808
-4,719
-16.0%
6.2%
4.8%
-1.4%
Single Person
145,086
155,807
167,676
11,869
7.6%
32.7%
32.8%
0.0%
Roommates
43,740
47,221
47,545
324
0.7%
9.9%
9.3%
-0.6%
Total Households
456,129
475,913
511,518
35,605
7.5%
100%
100%
0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Married, no children
263,626
298,723
318,955
20,232
6.8%
26.7%
26.7%
0.0%
Married, children
256,655
244,687
265,418
20,731
8.5%
21.9%
22.3%
0.4%
Single Parent, F
65,606
71,417
85,260
13,843
19.4%
6.4%
7.2%
0.8%
Single Parent, M
18,640
23,710
28,905
5,195
21.9%
2.1%
2.4%
0.3%
Other family*
53,632
68,959
59,035
-9,924
-14.4%
6.2%
5.0%
-1.2%
Single Person
281,086
319,030
343,158
24,128
7.6%
28.5%
28.8%
0.2%
Roommates
82,209
91,223
91,633
410
0.4%
8.2%
7.7%
-0.5%
Total Households
1,021,454
1,117,749
1,192,364
74,615
6.7%
100%
100%
0%
* Other Family households can consist of households w ith adult siblings, parents w ith adult children, or householders w ith
parents
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+will
Figure SE -4: Household and Family Types 2016
3070
30%
U)
:2 25%
0
m
w
0 20%
2
0
.: 15%
U
a_
10%
5%
0%
Married w/o Married w/ Single Single Other Family Single Roommates
Child Child Parent, F Parent, M Person
■ BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY ■ 7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Sources: US Census; Metrolpolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -5: Households with Children 2000-2016
40%
-0
0
N 35% ----------
I
0
0
m
30%
a
25% 1 i I
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
—o --BROOKLYN
CENTER
♦HENNEPIN
COUNTY
—0 -7 -COUNTY
METRO AREA
Poverty Level
The number of persons living in poverty increased significantly between 2000 and 2016. Of those in poverty,
over one-third are under 18. Over 19% of Brooklyn Center residents are below the poverty level and about
44% are below 200% of the poverty level. The poverty level was defined as $24,563 for a family of four in
2016. Generally, a greater number of persons living in Brooklyn Center have incomes that place them below
the poverty level and below 200% of the poverty level than in other neighboring cities.
Table SE -4: Poverty Level 2000-2016
HENNEPIN COUNTY
All Persons below Poverty Level
2000
8.3%
2010
12.1%
2016
12.5%
% Change
Poverty Level
No.
Pct.
No.
Pct.
No.
Pct.
'00-10
'10-16
4.8%
Person 65 and over below Poverty Level
6,894
0.6%
BROOKLYN CENTER
0.8%
11,473
0.9%
33.7%
24.4%
All Persons below 200% of Poverty Level
221,254
19.8%--
All Persons below Poverty Level
2,170
7.4%
4,915
16.3%
6,009
19.2%
126.5%
22.3%
Persons under 18 below Poverty Level
785
2.7%
2,286
7.6%
2,605
8.3%
191.2%
14.0%
Person 65 and over below Poverty Level
246
0.8%
466
1.5%
344
1.1%
89.3%
-26.2%
All Persons below 200% of Poverty Level
6,393
21.9%
--
--
13,758
44.1%
--
All Persons Regardless of Poverty Level
29,172
100.0%
30,104
100.0%
31,231
100.0%
3.2%
3.79/6
HENNEPIN COUNTY
All Persons below Poverty Level
92,339
8.3%
138,881
12.1%
154,117
12.5%
50.4%
11.0%
Persons under 18 below Poverty Level
29,195
2.6%
44,381
3.9%
46,531
3.8%
52.0%
4.8%
Person 65 and over below Poverty Level
6,894
0.6%
9,219
0.8%
11,473
0.9%
33.7%
24.4%
All Persons below 200% of Poverty Level
221,254
19.8%--
--
--
330,911
26.7%
--
--
All Persons Regardless of Poverty Level
1,116,200
100.0%
1,152,425
100.0%
1,237,560
100.0%
3.2%
7.49%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
All Persons below Poverty Level
182,780
6.9%
284,811
10.0%
324,148
10.8%
55.8%
13.8%
Persons under 18 below Poverty Level
63,276
2.4%
96,120
3.4%
104,468
3.5%
51.9%
8.7%
Person 65 and over below Poverty Level
14,468
0.5%
20,430
0.7%
23,767
0.8%
41.2%
16.3%
All Persons below 200% of Poverty Level
462,760
17.5%
--
--
733,205
24.4%
--
All Persons Regardless of Poverty Level
2,642,056
100.0%
2,849,567
100.0%
3,005,419
100.0%
7.9%
5.5%
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+will
Figure SE -6: Poverty Level 2016
100%
90%
80%
C
70%
0 60%
rz
O 50%
a`) 30%
0-
20%
_
20%
10%
0%
BROOKLYN HENNEPIN 7 -COUNTY
CENTER COUNTY METRO AREA
' Near poverty level are persons living w ith incomes at or tw ice the level of poverty
Sources: US Census, Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
■ Population well
above poverty
level
■ Population near
poverty level*
71 Population below
poverty level
Figure SE -7: Change in Population in Poverty 2000-2016
25%
C
L 20%
0
0
0 15%
0
a)
rn
a)
10%
2
a)
n
W.
0% i I
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
-@-BROOKLYN
CENTER
-0--HENNEPIN
COUNTY
-0-7-COUNTY
METRO AREA
Table SE -5: Poverty Levels in Brooklyn Center and Neighboring Cities
20%
18%
C: 160
2000
2010
2016
% Change
Brooklyn Park
% in
% Near
% in % Near
% in
% Near
--o-Robbinsdale
8%
Geographic Area
Poverty
Poverty*
Poverty Poverty*
Poverty
Poverty*
100-110
110-115
0% i iI
Brooklyn Center
7.4%
14.5%
16.3% ---
19.2%
24.8%
8.9%
2.9%
Brooklyn Park
5.1%
11.1%
11.4% ---
11.1%
18.7%
6.3%
-0.3%
Crystal
4.4%
8.8%
9.3% ---
10.1%
15.8%
4.9%
0.8%
Robbinsdale
4.7%
12.8%
6.5% ---
12.8%
12.4%
1.8%
6.3%
Columbia Heights
6.4%
15.8%
13.5% ---
16.8%
24.9%
7.1%
3.3%
Fridley
7.3%
11.3%
10.1% ---
13.0%
19.3%
2.8%
2.9%
Hennepin County
8.3%
11.5%
12.1% ---
12.5%
14.3%
3.8%
0.4%
Metro Area
6.9%
10.6%
10.0% ---
10.8%
13.6%
3.1%
0.8%
* Near poverty level are persons living w ith incomes at or tw ice the level of poverty
Sources: US Census; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -8: Change in Poverty Levels of Brooklyn Center and Neighboring Cities 2000-2016
20%
18%
C: 160
}Brooklyn Center
0
14%
Brooklyn Park
o_
0
12%
o
_ ,..._ _- +Crystal
o) 10%
m
--o-Robbinsdale
8%
Fridley
m
o_ go/
Columbia Heights
4%
2%
0% i iI
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census: Perkins+Will
The City's trend of increasing racial diversity accelerated during the 2000s and early 2010s as shown in the
following tables and charts. As of 2016, nearly 60% of Brooklyn Center's residents were people of color or non-
white. This is in steep contrast to the metro area, which has significantly less racial diversity. The largest
absolute increase between 2000 and 2016 occurred among African Americans adding 4,286 people, and the
number of Hispanic residents realized the largest percentage increase of nearly 300%.
Table SE -6: Racial Composition 2000-2016
Racial/Ethnic Group 2000 2010 2016
BROOKLYN CENTER
American Indian or Alaska Native
229
182
125
Asian
2,549
4,291
5,177
Black or African American
4,088
7,744
8,374
Hispanic or Latino
823
2,889
3,145
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
4
11
0
Some Other Race
70
70
107
Two or More Races
879
1,102
1,050
White
20,530
13,815
13,253
Total
29,172
30,104
31,231
Non -White
8,642
16,289
17,978
HENNEPIN COUNTY
American Indian or Alaska Native
10,212
8,848
7,303
Asian
53,229
71,535
83,423
Black or African American
98,698
134,240
148,276
Hispanic or Latino
45,439
77,676
84,433
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
473
431
423
Some Other Race
2,115
2,321
3,309
Two or More Races
25,018
30,704
38,967
White
881,016
826,670
871,427
Total
1,116,200
1,152,425
1,237,560
Non -White
235,184
325,755
366,133
American Indian or Alaska Native
18,592
17,452
14,978
Asian
120,384
182,496
212,306
Black or African American
154,113
234,334
260,063
Hispanic or Latino
95,902
167,558
184,784
Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander
1,041
1,091
884
Some Other Race
3,971
4,609
5,473
Two or More Races
50,427
68,809
89,301
White
2,197,626
2,173,218
2,273,407
Total
2,642,056
2,849,567
3,041,195
Non -White
444,430
676,349
767,788
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; IOrkins+Will
Change 2000-2016
Distribution
No.
Pct.
2000
2010
2016
4.8%
6.2%
6.7%
49,578
50.2%
-104
-45.3%
0.8%
0.6%
0.4%
2,628
103.1%
8.7%
14.3%
16.6%
4,286
104.8%
14.0%
25.7%
26.8%
2,322
282.1%
2.8%
9.6%
10.1%
-4
-100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
37
52.7%
0.2%
0.2%
0.3%
171
19.5%
3.0%
3.7%
3.4%
-7,277
-35.4%
70.4%
45.9%
42.4%
2,059
7.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
9,336 108.0% 29.6% 54.1% 57.6%
-2,909
-28.5%
0.9%
0.8%
0.6%
30,194
56.7%
4.8%
6.2%
6.7%
49,578
50.2%
8.8%
11.6%
12.0%
38,994
85.8%
4.1%
6.7%
6.8%
-50
-10.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1,194
56.5%
0.2%
0.2%
0.3%
13,949
55.8%
2.2%
2.7%
3.1%
-9,589
-1.1%
78.9%
71.7%
70.4%
121,360
10.9%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
130,949 55.7% 21.1% 28.3% 29.6%
-3,614
-19.4%
0.7%
0.6%
0.5%
91,922
76.4%
4.6%
6.4%
7.0%
105,950
68.7%
5.8%
8.2%
8.6%
88,882
92.7%
3.6%
5.9%
6.1%
-157
-15.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1,502
37.8%
0.2%
0.2%
0.2%
38,874
77.1%
1.9%
2.4%
2.9%
75,781
3.4%
83.2%
76.3%
74.8%
399,139
15.1%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
323,358 72.8% 16.8% 23.7% 25.2%
Figure SE -9: Racial Composition 2016
80%
70%
0 60%
M
D 50%
0
0 40%
c
p 30%
a>
n
20%
10%
0%
American Asian Black or Hispanic or Native Some Other Two or More White
Indian/ African Latino Hawaiian/ Race Races
Alaska American Pacific
Native Islander
■ BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY 7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -10: Change in the Percentage of Persons of Color (Non -White Population)
70%
60%
C:
0
m 50% / —0 --BROOKLYN
a CENTER
0
a 40%—+—HENNEPIN
0 01�COUNTY
30% r —9 -7 -COUNTY
a) METRO AREA
20%
10%
0%
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Brooklyn Center is one of the most racially and ethnically diverse communities in the county, TCMA and state.
However, neighboring cities are becoming increasingly diverse as well. Brooklyn Park has a similar profile with
over 50% of its population comprised of people of color or non-white. Although Crystal's and Robbinsdale's
levels of racial and ethnic diversity mirror that of the region, Columbia Heights and Fridley also have a non-
white population that is comprised of approximately a third (1/3) or more of their populations.
Table SE -7: Racial Composition of Neighboring Cities 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -11: Racial Composition of Neighboring Cities 2016
100%
90%
80%
70%
0
60%
CL
o- 50%
0
ami 40%
2
N
0-30%
20%
10%
0%
Brooklyn Brooklyn
Center Park
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council;
E N
Crystal Robbinsdale Columbia
Heights
Distribution
Brooklyn Brooklyn Robbins- Columbia
Center Park Crystal dale Heights Fridley
0.4%
0.3%
0.6%
Population
0.7%
1.1%
16.6%
Brooklyn
Brooklyn
1.5%
Robbins- Columbia
7.1%
Racial/Ethnic Group
Center
Park
Crystal
dale
Heights
Fridley
American Indian/Alaska Natie
125
222
137
60
142
307
Asian
5,177
12,228
760
224
1,079
2,029
Black or African American
8,374
21,263
2,299
2,050
3,720
4,006
Hispanic or Latino
3,145
5,279
1,878
522
2,099
2,065
Hawaiian/Pacific Islander
0
59
0
0
3
0
Some Other Race
107
362
78
82
170
7
Two or More Races
1,050
2,316
550
454
654
964
White
13,253
38,721
17,152
11,312
12,291
19,253
Total
31,231
80,450
22,855
14,704
20,158
28,631
Non -White
17,978
41,729
5,703
3,392
7,867
9,378
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -11: Racial Composition of Neighboring Cities 2016
100%
90%
80%
70%
0
60%
CL
o- 50%
0
ami 40%
2
N
0-30%
20%
10%
0%
Brooklyn Brooklyn
Center Park
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council;
E N
Crystal Robbinsdale Columbia
Heights
Distribution
Brooklyn Brooklyn Robbins- Columbia
Center Park Crystal dale Heights Fridley
0.4%
0.3%
0.6%
0.4%
0.7%
1.1%
16.6%
15.2%
3.3%
1.5%
5.4%
7.1%
26.8%
26.4%
10.1%
13.9%
18.5%
14.0%
10.1%
6.6%
8.2%
3.5%
10.4%
7.2%
0.0%
0.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
0.4%
0.3%
0.6%
0.8%
0.0%
3.4%
2.9%
2.4%
3.1%
3.2%
3.4%
42.4%
48.1%
75.0%
76.9%
61.0%
67.2%
100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
57.6% 51.9% 25.0% 23.1% 39.0% 32.8%
Fridley
■ White
■ Two or More
Races
■ Some Other Race
■ Hawaiian/Pac.
Isldr.
Hispanic/Latino
Black/African
Amer.
Asian
American Indian
English Proficiency
Changing levels of English proficiency not only indicate demographic change, but can also represent
challenges for residents to access jobs and essential goods and services within the community. As of 2016,
the percentage of Brooklyn Center residents who speak English "not well" or "not at well" was just over 6%.
This is not a significantly high proportion, but it is over twice the metro area rate. Although the number of
residents that identified speaking English as a potential barrier grew rapidly in Brooklyn Center from 2000 to
2010, that number appears to have actually declined slightly from 2010 to 2016.
Table SE -8: English Proficiency among Population Age 5 and Older 2000-2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council, Perkins+Will
Figure SE -12: Change in the Population the Speaks English "Not Well" or "Not at All"
m
O
L
0
LO
a)
0)
Q
c
0
.5
5
CL
0
n
0
a)
U
L
^a)
LL
8% ------
6%
4%
2% --
0% I
2000 2010 2015
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
♦BROOKLYN
CENTER
--O--HENNEPIN
COUNTY
--e---7-COUNTY
METRO AREA
Change '00 '16
Distribution
English Proficiency
2000
2010
2016
Number
Percent
2000
2016 Change
BROOKLYN CENTER
Nati\e English Speaker
22,830
19,548
20,365
-2,465
-10.8%
84.1%
71.0% -13.1%
Speak another language - speak English "very well" or "well"
3,489
5,746
6,495
3,006
86.1%
12.9%
22.6%
9.8%
Speak another language - speak English "notwell° or "not at all"
826
1,951
1,819
993
120.2%
3.0%
6.3%
3.3%
Population Age 5 Years and Older
27,145
27,245
28,679
1,534
5.7%
100%
100%
0%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Speak only English
909,793
889,242
956,318
46,525
5.1%
87.2%
82.7%
-4.4%
Speak another language - speak English "very well" or "well"
101,603
133,075
158,727
57,124
56.2%
9.7%
13.7%
4.0%
Speak another language - speak English "not well" or "not at all"
32,413
38,345
40,771
8,358
25.8%
3.1%
3.5%
0.4%
Population Age 5 Years and Older
1,043,809
1,060,662
1,155,815
112,006
10.7%
100%
100%
0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Speak only English
2,185,261
2,241,384
2,376,616
191,355
8.8%
89.0%
84.7%
-4.3%
Speak another language - speak English "very well" or "well"
208,836
294,761
342,182
133,346
63.9%
8.5%
12.2%
3.7%
Speak another language - speak English "not well' or "not at all"
61,050
78,101
86,005
24,955
40.9%
2.5%
3.1%
0.6%
Population Age 5 Years and Older
2,455,147 2,614,246 2,804,803
349,656
14.2%
100%
100%
0%
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council, Perkins+Will
Figure SE -12: Change in the Population the Speaks English "Not Well" or "Not at All"
m
O
L
0
LO
a)
0)
Q
c
0
.5
5
CL
0
n
0
a)
U
L
^a)
LL
8% ------
6%
4%
2% --
0% I
2000 2010 2015
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
♦BROOKLYN
CENTER
--O--HENNEPIN
COUNTY
--e---7-COUNTY
METRO AREA
Geographic Mobility
The following table and charts present data on geographic mobility of households. Geographic stability can
often be desirable because it represents more long-term residents in the community, which can lead to more
civic involvement and investment. However, limited mobility can also signify challenges in the housing market
due to limited options, from the perspective of both supply and financial affordability.
As of 2016, the geographic mobility of Brooklyn Center's residents is similar to Hennepin County and the
TCMA, which indicates some stability in the community. However, since 2010 the geographic mobility of
households throughout the region has dropped sharply. This is likely due to the current condition of the
housing market which lacks adequate supply and few homes are for sale and few apartment units are available
for rent.
Table SE -9: Geographic Mobility of Households by Tenure 2000-2016
Change '00 '16 Distribution
Geographic Mobility
2000
2010
2016
Number
Percent
2000
2016 Change
-5.1%
Own - moved within 1-4 years
78,848
36,820
BROOKLYN CENTER
-33,898
-43.0%
17.3%
8.8%
-8.5%
Own - moved 5+ years ago
193,244
250,526
Own - moved within last year
683
745
134
-549
-80.4%
6.0%
1.2%
-4.8%
Own - moved within 1-4 years
1,649
436
1,044
-605
-36.7%
14.4%
9.5%
-5.0%
Own - moved 5+ years ago
5,542
5,711
5,642
100
1.8%
48.5%
51.1%
2.6%
Rent - moved within last year
1,409
1,466
879
-530
-37.6%
12.3%
8.0%
4.4%
Rent - moved within 1-4 years
1,430
1,186
2,064
634
44.3%
12.5%
18.7%
6.2%
Rent - moved 5+ years ago
717
1,212
1,280
563
78.5%
6.3%
11.6%
5.3%
Total Households
11,430
10,756
11,042
-388
-3.4%
100%
100%
0%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Own - moved within last year
29,743
22,809
7,044
-22,699
-76.3%
6.5%
1.4%
-5.1%
Own - moved within 1-4 years
78,848
36,820
44,950
-33,898
-43.0%
17.3%
8.8%
-8.5%
Own - moved 5+ years ago
193,244
250,526
268,771
75,527
39,1%
42.4%
52.5%
10.2%
Rent - moved within last year
64,204
66,401
37,343
-26,861
-41.8%
14.1%
7.3%
-6.8%
Rent - moved within 1-4 years
59,346
50,088
91,029
31,683
53.4%
13.0%
17.8%
4.8%
Rent - moved 5+ years ago
30,744
49,269
62,380
31,636
102.9%
6.7%
12.2%
5.5%
Total Households
456,129
475,913
511,518
55,389
12.1%
100%
100%
0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Own - moved within last year
75,863
55,884
17,572
-58,291
-76.8%
7.4%
1.5%
-6.0%
Own - moved within 1-4 years
196,852
98,341
112,979
-83,873
-42.6%
19.3%
9.5%
-9.8%
Own - moved 5+ years ago
456,402
641,602
683,686
227,284
49.8%
44.7%
57.3%
12.7%
Rent - moved within last year
120,217
122,935
72,987
-47,230
-39.3%
11.8%
6.1%
-5.6%
Rent - moved within 1-4 years
113,615
100,675
179,537
65,922
58.0%
11.1%
15.1%
3.9%
Rent - moved 5+ years ago
58,505
98,311
125,604
67,099
114.7%
5.7%
10.5%
4.8%
Total Households
1,021,454
1,117,749
1,192,364
170,910
16.7%
100%
100%
0%
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -13: Geographic Mobility of Households 2016
60 % -- - - ---- -- --
U) 50%
0
N 40%
0
2
o 30%
c
a�
U
20%
a
10%
0%
Own: Own: Own: Rent: Rent: Rent:
moved within moved within moved 5+ :moved within moved within moved 5+
last year 1-4 years years ago : last year 1-4 years years ago
■ BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY 07 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -14: Change in the Percentage of Households that moved within the Last Year 2000-2016
15%
0
10%
0
0
a�
U
5% -
0%
------------------------------ % ------ * ----------
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
+ Own -BROOKLYN CENTER
+ Own - HENNEPIN COUNTY
+ Own - METRO AREA
— - — Rent -BROOKLYN CENTER
— Rent - HENNEPIN COUNTY
Rent - METRO AREA
Education Levels
The educational level attained by Brooklyn Center residents decreased between 2000 and 2016. Of the 2016
population aged 25 and over, 82 percent were high school graduates, while 20 percent had a bachelor's
degree or higher. In comparison, in 2000 87 percent of the population aged 25 and over were high school
graduates and 17 percent had a bachelor's degree or higher. In Hennepin County in 2016, by contrast, 93
percent were high school graduates and 47 percent had a college degree.
Table SE -10: Education Levels 2000-2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Change 2000-2016
Distribution
Highest Level of Formal Education
2000
2010
2016
No.
Pct.
2000
2010
2016
BROOKLYN CENTER
Did not graduate from high school
2,502
3,445
3,580
1,078
43.1%
13.1%
18.4%
17.9%
High school graduate
6,626
5,622
6,134
-492
-7.4%
34.8%
30.0%
30.7%
Some college, no degree
5,161
4,448
4,480
-681
-13.2%
27.1%
23.7%
22.4%
Associate degree
1,591
1,807
1,836
245
15.4%
8.3%
9.6%
9.2%
Bachelor degree
2,387
2,804
2,803
416
17.4%
12.5%
15.0%
14.0%
Graduate/professional degree
790
621
1,178
388
49.1%
4.1%
3.3%
5.9%
Total Population Age 25 or Older
19,057
18,746
20,011
954
5.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Did not graduate from high school
69,200
61,184
62,513
-6,687
-9.7%
9.4%
7.9%
7.4%
High school graduate
156,838
154,155
151,171
-5,668
-3.6%
21.2%
19.8%
17.8%
Some college, no degree
172,879
159,417
165,471
-7,408
-4.3%
23.4%
20.5%
19.5%
Associate degree
51,809
60,572
70,641
18,832
36.3%
7.0%
7.8%
8.3%
Bachelor degree
199,602
228,229
257,329
57,728
28.9%
27.0%
29.4%
30.3%
Graduate/professional degree
89,603
113,971
141,518
51,915
57.9%
12.1%
14.7%
16.7%
Total Population Age 25 or Older
739,931
777,529
848,643
108,712
14.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Did not graduate from high school
157,481
139,930
141,508
-15,973
-10.1%
9.3%
7.4%
7.0%
High school graduate
412,472
430,008
422,994
10,523
2.6%
24.3%
22.8%
21.0%
Some college, no degree
409,177
405,772
414,844
5,666
1.4%
24.1%
21.5%
20.6%
Associate degree
128,740
165,537
194,146
65,406
50.8%
7.6%
8.8%
9.6%
Bachelor degree
411,153
499,465
553,885
142,732
34.7%
24.2%
26.5%
27.5%
Graduate/professional degree
181,273
244,434
289,742
108,469
59.8%
10.7%
13.0%
14.4%
Total Population Age 25 or Older
1,700,296
1,885,145
2,017,119
316,823
18.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -15: Education Levels 2016
35% -r
30%
0
N 25%
0
Q�
c
20%
0
CU
15%
Q
0
o_
O 10%
c
5%
0% _
Did not graduate
from high school
High school
graduate
i
Some college, Associate
no degree degree
III III
Bachelor Graduate
degree degree
■BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY :7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council, Perkins+Will
Figure SE -16: Change in the Population without a High School Diploma 2000-2016
20%
18%
o —
C, 16%
7-0--BROOKLYN0 0 14%
a- o
CENTER
p Lo 12%
C14
—HENNEPIN
ami m 10%
COUNTY
`Q
— 8%
—&---7-COUNTY
ri
METRO AREA
6%
4%
2%
0% 1 1I
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census, Metropolitan Council, Perkins+Will
Household Income Levels
Household income is important to track because it is strongly correlated with age and also directly affects the
spending power of area residents and their ability to support retail and afford new types of housing. The
following tables and charts present data on the median household income of Brooklyn Center, the county and
the TCMA.
Brooklyn Center has a very low median household income which as of 2015 was just under $45,000. This is
nearly one-third lower than Hennepin County's median income which was approximately $66,000. Much of this
difference can be explained by a sharp decrease in Brooklyn Center's median income between 2010 and
2015. Since 2010, the median income of Brooklyn Center declined by nearly 9% while Hennepin County's
median income continued to increase at a rate almost 8%. Some of this decline can be explained by significant
growth in the number of younger households who have yet to reach their peak earning years, and also the
continued transitioning of older residents into retirement who are no longer working full time.
Table SE -11: Median Household Income 2000-2015
% Change
Household Age
2000
2010
2015
'00-10
'10-15
BROOKLYN CENTER
Households under 25
$25,729
$26,305
$24,510
2.2%
-6.8%
Households 25-44
$50,849
$51,385
$44,490
1.1%
-13.4%
Households 45-64
$56,775
$59,899
$57,848
5.5%
-3.4%
Households 65+
$28,688
$32,791
$35,625
14.3%
8.6%
All Households
$44,570
$49,226
$44,855
10.4%
-8.9%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Households under 25
$27,324
$29,688
$29,998
8.7%
1.0%
Households 25-44
$55,706
$65,885
$71,364
18.3%
8.3%
Households 45-64
$66,917
$76,581
$81,948
14.4%
7.0%
Households 65+
$32,114
$39,094
$42,827
21.7%
9.5%
All Households
$51,711
$61,238
$65,834
18.4%
7.5%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Households under 25
$29,818
$32,159
$31,434
7.9%
-2.3%
Households 25-44
$58,616
$69,652
$74,243
18.8%
6.6%
Households 45-64
$67,861
$77,813
$84,804
14.7%
9.0%
Households 65+
$31,233
$38,589
$44,133
23.6%
14.4%
All Households
$54,807
$64,471
$69,233
17.6%
7.4%
Sources: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey; Perkins+will
Figure SE -17: Median Household Income by Age of Householder 2016
$90,000
$80,000
$70,000
a)
E $60,000
U
$50,000
m
$40,000
Q
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$0
Households Households Households Households All
under25 25-44 45-64 65+ Households
■ BROOKLYN CENTER z HENNEPIN COUNTY 7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
SourceS: US Census; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -18: Change in Median Household Income 2000-2016
$75,000
E $65,000 BROOKLYN
o CENTER
-0-HENNEPIN
c $55,000 COUNTY
Q ---7-COUNTY
METRO
AREA
$45,000
$35,000
2000 2010 2015
Sources: US Census; Perkins+Wll
Table SE -12: Change in Median Household Income for Neighboring Cities 2000-2016
Sources: US Census; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -19: Change in Median Household Income for Neighboring Cities 2000-2016
$70,000
$65,000
-�
--*-Brooklyn Center
% Change
Brooklyn Park
Geographic Area
2000
2010
2016
'00-10
10-16
Brooklyn Center
$44,570
$49,226
$44,855
10.4%
-8.9%
Brooklyn Park
$56,572
$62,077
$62,974
9.7%
1.4%
Crystal
$48,736
$60,032
$59,188
23.2%
-1.4%
Robbinsdale
$48,271
$55,270
$58,155
14.5%
5.2%
Columbia Heights
$40,562
$51,565
$47,717
27.1%
-7.5%
Fridley
$48,372
$51,656
$54,652
6.8%
5.8%
Hennepin County
$51,711
$61,238
$65,834
18.4%
7.5%
Metro Area
$54,807
$64,471
$69,233
17.6%
7.4%
Sources: US Census; Perkins+Will
Figure SE -19: Change in Median Household Income for Neighboring Cities 2000-2016
$70,000
$65,000
-�
--*-Brooklyn Center
$60,000
Brooklyn Park
(D
E
$55,000
c
--*-Crystal
m
-o-Robbinsdale
c $50,000
c
Q
Fridley
$45,000
-*-Columbia Heights
$40,000
$35,000
2000
Sources: US Census; Perkins+Wll
2010 2016
Vehicle Access
Limited access to vehicles can indicate a need for transit and a walkable/bikeable built environment. The
following table and charts present data on the number of vehicles available in each household in Brooklyn
Center, Hennepin County, and the TCMA. Roughly 9% of Brooklyn Center households do not have access to a
vehicle. This is below the Hennepin County rate and above the TCMA rate. In 2010, the rate was much higher,
which was likely due to the impact of the Great Recession. With an improving economy more households can
afford automobile ownership. However, it underscores that in lower income communities, economic cycles can
significantly impact residents by altering the ability of persons to access vehicles, and thus employment
opportunities.
Table SE -13: Household Access to Motor Vehicles 2000-2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Wll
Figure SE -20: Change in the Percentage of Households with no Vehicle Available 2000-2016
11%
0 10%
a)
0
0
2
0 9%
0- 8%
7% 1 I I 1
2000 2010 2015
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Wll
-t- BROOKLYN
CENTER
-t-HENNEPIN
COUNTY
-9-7-COUNTY
METRO AREA
Change '00 '16
Distribution
Vehicle Access
2000
2010
2016
Number
Percent
2000
2016 Change
BROOKLYN CENTER
Households with no vehicle available
1,032
1,148
997
-35
-3.4%
9.0%
9.0%
0.0%
Households with 1 vehicle available
4,353
3,754
4,206
-148
-3.4%
38.1%
38.1%
0.0%
Households with 2+ vehicles available
6,045
5,854
5,839
-205
-3.4%
52.9%
52.9%
0.0%
Total
11,430
10,756
11,042
-388
-3.4%
100%
100%
0%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Households with no vehicle available
48,930
49,713
52,675
3,745
7.7%
10.7%
10.3%
-0.4%
Households with 1 vehicle available
166,357
171,877
183,774
17,417
10.5%
36.5%
35.9%
-0.5%
Households with 2+ vehicles available
240,842
254,323
275,069
34,227
14.2%
52.8%
53.8%
1.0%
Total
456,129
475,913
511,518
55,389
12.1%
100%
100%
0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Households with no vehicle available
87,091
88,503
96,127
9,036
10.4%
8.5%
8.1%
-0.5%
Households with 1 vehicle available
334,299
362,373
385,083
50,784
15.2%
32.7%
32.3%
-0.4%
Households with 2+ vehicles available
600,064
666,873
711,154
111,090
18.5%
58.7%
59.6%
0.9%
Total
1,021,454
1,117,749
1,192,364
170,910
16.7%
100%
100%
0%
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Wll
Figure SE -20: Change in the Percentage of Households with no Vehicle Available 2000-2016
11%
0 10%
a)
0
0
2
0 9%
0- 8%
7% 1 I I 1
2000 2010 2015
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Wll
-t- BROOKLYN
CENTER
-t-HENNEPIN
COUNTY
-9-7-COUNTY
METRO AREA
Being situated relatively close to the center of the metropolitan area, most Brooklyn Center residents that work
have commute times that are consistent with other communities and the broader region. However, there are
lower rates of workers with very short commute times (under 15 minutes). This suggests that there might not
be a lot of jobs located in Brooklyn Center that are accessible to residents.
Table SE -14: Travel Times to Work 2000-2015
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Less than 10 minutes
Percentage of Working
11.2%
10.1%
Residents
14.5%
Travel Time to Work
2000
2010
2015
BROOKLYN CENTER
16.1%
20 to 24 minutes
18.3%
Less than 10 minutes
10.1%
8.4%
7.5%
10 to 14 minutes
11.8%
11.3%
10.1%
15 to 19 minutes
19.4%
18.6%
19.8%
20 to 24 minutes
22.9%
22.2%
24.2%
25 to 29 minutes
8.7%
9.7%
8.8%
30 to 34 minutes
14.8%
15.1%
16.6%
35 to 44 minutes
4.7%
6.8%
5.0%
45 to 59 minutes
4.8%
5.3%
4.5%
60 or more minutes
2.9%
2.7%
3.5%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Median Travel Time in Minutes
21.9
22.7
22.6
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Less than 10 minutes
10.9%
10.4%
9.6%
10 to 14 minutes
15.3%
14.9%
13.7%
15 to 19 minutes
18.7%
18.2%
18.2%
20 to 24 minutes
19.8%
19.4%
19.3%
25 to 29 minutes
8.1%
8.7%
8.9%
30 to 34 minutes
14.2%
14.8%
15.1%
35 to 44 minutes
5.7%
5.8%
6.4%
45 to 59 minutes
4.4%
4.6%
5.2%
60 or more minutes
3.1%
3.1%
3.5%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Median Travel Time in Minutes
21.3
21.6
22.2
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Less than 10 minutes
11.6%
11.2%
10.1%
10 to 14 minutes
14.5%
13.6%
12.9%
15 to 19 minutes
16.9%
16.5%
16.1%
20 to 24 minutes
18.3%
17.8%
17.7%
25 to 29 minutes
8,1%
8.3%
8.7%
30 to 34 minutes
14.5%
14.8%
15.4%
35 to 44 minutes
6.9%
7.3%
7.8%
45 to 59 minutes
5.8%
6.5%
6.9%
60 or more minutes
3.4%
3.9%
4.4%
Total
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Median Travel Time in Minutes
21.9
22.4
23.1
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Figure SE -21: Travel Times to Work 2015
30%
E 25%
0
U
20%
i
m
_�5 15%
0
0 10%
m
a�
c�
c
a) 5%
o,°
°
Less than 10 to 14 15 to 19 20 to 24 25 to 29 30 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 59 60 or
10 minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes minutes more
minutes Travel Time minutes
■BROOKLYN CENTER 0HENNEPIN COUNTY 07 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Figure SE -22: Change in Travel Times to Work 2000-2015
23.5
a�
23.0
_C
0 22.5
H
22.0
c
ca
21.5
MCI
2000 2010 2015
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
—*—BROOKLYN
CENTER
`—HENNEPIN
COUNTY
_'— 7 -COUNTY
METRO AREA
Mode of Transportation to Work
The following table and charts present data on the mode of transportation used by working residents in
Brooklyn Center, Hennepin County, and the metro area. Although Brooklyn Center residents do not have
appreciably lower rates of vehicle accessibility, they do appear to use transit at higher rates than compared to
Hennepin County and the greater TCMA. This can be partially explained by the availability of transit in
Brooklyn Center. However, the rate of transit use has increased significantly since 2000, which suggests some
other dynamic. Previously, it was demonstrated that the population is getting younger and less affluent in
Brooklyn Center, which may explain the rise in the use of transit. If transit use continues to rise, it will be
important to consider how certain places within Brooklyn Center may be planned to accommodate this change
in behavior.
Table SE -15: Mode of Transportation to Work 2000-2015
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Percentage of Working
Residents
Mode of Transportation to Work
2000
2010
2015
2000
2010
2015
BROOKLYN CENTER
Drive alone
11,299
9,746
10,426
76.9%
72.8%
73.3%
Carpool
1,701
1,680
1,728
11.6%
12.5%
12.2%
Transit
745
1,017
1,371
5.1%
7.6%
9.6%
Walk
32
80
93
0.2%
0.6%
0.7%
Bicycle
304
347
182
2.1%
2.6%
1.3%
Other modes
189
168
72
1.3%
1.3%
0.5%
Work at home
416
354
349
2.8%
2.6%
2.5%
Total
14,686
13,392
14,221
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
All modes other than driving alone
23.1%
27.2%
26.7%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Drive alone
455,123
442,351
469,204
74.9%
73.6%
73.4%
Carpool
57,684
50,214
52,029
9.5%
8.4%
8.1%
Transit
43,058
44,321
46,756
7.1%
7.4%
7.3%
Walk
4,735
9,388
11,486
0.8%
1.6%
1.8%
Bicycle
19,116
19,892
21,460
3.1%
3.3%
3.4%
Other modes
4,035
4,985
5,346
0.7%
0.8%
0.8%
Work at home
23,816
29,810
33,176
3.9%
5.0%
5.2%
Total
607,567
600,961
639,457
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
All modes other than driving alone
25.1%
26.4%
26.6%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Drive alone
1,111,210
1,138,275
1,200,250
78.1%
77.5%
77.3%
Carpool
138,676
124,813
128,244
9.8%
8.5%
8.3%
Transit
69,513
76,673
81,663
4.9%
5.2%
5.3%
Walk
6,675
12,903
16,537
0.5%
0.9%
1.1%
Bicycle
35,180
35,661
36,089
2.5%
2.4%
2.3%
Other modes
8,289
11,941
12,004
0.6%
0.8%
0.8%
Work at home
52,536
67,805
77,317
3.7%
4.6%
5.0%
Total
1,422,079
1,468,071
1,552,104
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
All modes other than driving alone
21.9%
22.5%
22.7%
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Figure SE -23: Change in Transit Use 2000-2015
11%
U)
N `U 10%
:0
rn
� — 9%
BROOKLYN
CENTER
Y`o o 8%
—0—HENNEPIN
U,
COUNTY
o m 7%
m f—
—0 -7 -COUNTY
0)
rn
METRO AREA
cu U) 6%
U �
L
a 'r 5%
4% '
2000 2010 2015
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
FA Wilror-Ig =-
Of Brooklyn Center's adult population (age 16+), 68% were in the labor force in 2015 which is below
neighboring cities, Hennepin County and the TCMA as shown in the following table. The unemployment rate
for persons in the labor force was 8.1 %. (The "labor force" is defined as all persons 16 or over who are
employed or unemployed — i.e., those who are actively seeking and available for work. It does not include
persons in the military.) Low labor force participation is generally correlated to a high percentage of retired
persons. However, it may also indicate a mismatch in the local economy between jobs available and worker
skills, or a high level of child care needs.
Table 5E-16: Employment Levels in Brooklyn Center and Neighboring Cities 2015
Community
% in Labor
Force
% Unem-
ployed
Brooklyn Center
68.3%
8.1%
Brooklyn Park
73.5%
7.2%
Crystal
70.0%
4.2%
Robbinsdale
71.0%
7.6%
Coumbia Heights
69.3%
10.7%
Fridley
69.2%
7.5%
Hennepin County
72.3%
6.0%
7 -County Metro Area
72.3%
5.9%
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community
Survey
Jobs in Brooklyn Center
The number of jobs based in Brooklyn Center decreased significantly during the 2000s, but began to rebound
slightly in the 2010s as demonstrated in the following table. The Metropolitan Council has forecasted an 18%
growth in jobs in Brooklyn Center during the current decade, followed by 6% job growth in each of the next two
decades.
Based on a jobs -to -residents ratio, Brooklyn Center has a lower ratio (69 jobs per 100 "working age" residents
age 18-64) than Hennepin County and the TCMA. However, it has a higher ratio than several of its neighboring
communities.
Job growth in neighboring cities during the 2000s and early 2010s shows no consistent pattern. Of these cities,
Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park and Fridley are significant centers of employment. With significant tracts of
land available for development, only Brooklyn Park has experienced significant job growth in recent years. As a
fully developed community, job growth in Brooklyn Center is related closely to redevelopment.
Table SE -17: Jobs in Brooklyn Center 2000-2040
Sources: Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Employment and Econorric Development (D=)
Figure SE -24: Number of Jobs per 100 Working Residents Age 18-64 2016
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Brookyln Brooklyn Crystal Robbinsdale Columbia Fridley Hennepin MetroArea
Center Park Heights County
Sources: Metropolitan Council: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
The following table and charts break down Brooklyn Center's employment base by industry. Employment in a
community can influence not only its tax base and use of land, but the types of housing demanded and types
of retail that can be supported.
Between 2010 and 2016, Brooklyn Center's employment base increased by roughly 2,000 jobs or 18%.
Industries that have led this growth have been in the "Eds and Meds", retail, and PDR (production, distribution,
and repair) sectors.
The educational and medical services sector (Eds and Meds) has driven job growth in Brooklyn Center in
recent years which is representative of a larger regional trend. It is the industry that has performed the best
throughout the metropolitan region since 2000 and has accounted for nearly 120,000 new jobs, and no other
industry sector even comes close.
Estimate
-------------- Forecast
-------------
Numeric Change
Percent Change
2016 Jobs/100
Geography
2000
2010
2016
2020
2030
2040
'0010
'10'20
'20'30
'30'40
'00210 '10220 '20'30 '30'40
residents 18-64
Brookyln Center
16,698
11,001
12,871
13,000
13,800
14,600
-5,697
1,999
800
800
-34.1%
18.2%
6.2%
5.8%
68.8
Brooklyn Park
23,558
24,084
29,208
32,100
36,100
40,200
526
8,016
4,000
4,100
2.2%
33.3%
12.5%
11.4%
59.7
Crystal
5,538
3,929
4,386
4,400
4,640
4,900
-1,609
471
240
260
-29.1%
12.0%
5.5%
5.6%
30.5
Robbinsdale
7,079
6,858
7,224
7,000
7,100
7,200
-221
142
100
100
-3.1%
2.1%
1.4%
1.4%
77.6
Columbia Heights
6,345
3,484
4,134
4,280
4,440
4,600
-2,861
796
160
160
-45.1%
22.8%
3.7%
3.6%
32.6
Fridley
26,278
21,333
22,829
23,700
24,900
26,100
-4,945
2,367
1,200
1,200
-18.8%
11.1%
5.1%
4.8%
131.4
Hennepin County
874,882
805,089
899,951
924,710
981,800 1,038,140
-69,793
119,621
57,090
56,340
-8.0%
14.9%
6.2%
5.7%
114.8
Metro Area
1,414,024 1,543,872
1,701,785 1,791,080
1,913,050 2,032,660
129,848
247,208
121,970
119,610
9.2%
16.0%
6.8%
6.3%
89.8
Sources: Metropolitan Council, Minnesota Department of Employment and Econorric Development (D=)
Figure SE -24: Number of Jobs per 100 Working Residents Age 18-64 2016
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Brookyln Brooklyn Crystal Robbinsdale Columbia Fridley Hennepin MetroArea
Center Park Heights County
Sources: Metropolitan Council: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development
The following table and charts break down Brooklyn Center's employment base by industry. Employment in a
community can influence not only its tax base and use of land, but the types of housing demanded and types
of retail that can be supported.
Between 2010 and 2016, Brooklyn Center's employment base increased by roughly 2,000 jobs or 18%.
Industries that have led this growth have been in the "Eds and Meds", retail, and PDR (production, distribution,
and repair) sectors.
The educational and medical services sector (Eds and Meds) has driven job growth in Brooklyn Center in
recent years which is representative of a larger regional trend. It is the industry that has performed the best
throughout the metropolitan region since 2000 and has accounted for nearly 120,000 new jobs, and no other
industry sector even comes close.
Table SE -18: Employment by Industry 2000-2016
BROOKLYN CENTER
Employment Counts
I
Distribution
Numeric Change
Percentage Change
Industry
2000
2005
2010
2016
1 2000
2005
2010
2016
'0045
'05-10
'10216
'00205
'05210
'10216
PDR**
4,226
3,263
2,641
3,135
25.5%
25.1%
24.3%
24.4%
I -963
-622
494
-22.8%
-19.1%
18.7%
Retail
3,767
2,025
1,521
2,228
22.7%
15.6%
14.0%
17.3%
-1,742
-504
707
-46.2%
-24.9%
46.5%
Knowledge*
3,312
2,100
2,327
2,408
j 20.0%
16.2%
21.4%
18.7%
-1,212
227
81
-36.6%
10.8%
3.5%
Eds/Meds
2,472
3,179
2,384
3,121
14.9%
24.5%
21.9%
24.2%
707
-795
737
28.6%
-25.0%
30.9%
Hospitality
1,759
1,546
1,121
1,060
10.6%
11.9%
10.3%
8.2%
-213
-425
-61
-12.1%
-27.5%
-5.4%
Godt
505
473
418
401
3.0%
3.6%
3.8%
3.1%
-32
-55
-17
-6.3%
-11.6%
-4.1%
Other
545
393
465
518
3.3%
3.0%
4.3%
4.0%
' -152
72
53
-27.9%
18.3%
11.4%
Total
16,586
12,979
10,877
12,871
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
-3,607
-2,102
1,994
-21.7%
-16.2%
18.3%
7 -COUNTY METRO
AREA
Ern ploymentCounts
Distribution
Numeric Change
Percentage
Change
Industry
2000
2005
2010
2016
2000
2005
2010
2016
'00205
'05210
'10216
'0045
'05210
'10=16
PDR**
468,424
426,911
356,457
392,961
28.8%
26.3%
22.9%
23.1%
-41,513
-70,454
36,504
-8.9%
-16.5%
10.2%
Retail
181,371
178,263
157,279
166,914
11.1%
11.0%
10.1%
9.8%
-3,108
-20,984
9,635
-1.7%
-11.8%
6.1%
Knowledge*
451,059
434,882
430,823
456,905
27.7%
26.8%
27.6%
26.8%
-16,177
-4,059
26,082
-3.6%
-0.9%
6.1%
Eds/Meds
274,382
311,016
348,911
390,068
16.9%
19.2%
22.4%
22.9%
36,634
37,895
41,157
13.4%
12.2%
11.8%
Hospitality
137,828
151,232
147,182
168,931
8.5%
9.3%
9.4%
9.9%
13,404
-4,050
21,749
9.7%
-2.7%
14.8%
Godt
58,384
63,200
65,974
69,475
3.6%
3.9%
4.2%
4.1%
4,816
2,774
3,501
8.2%
4.4%
5.3%
Other
56,212
55,992
52,403
56,551
3.5%
3.5%
3.4%
3.3%
-220
-3,589
4,148
-0.4%
-6.4%
7.9%
Total
1,627,660
1,621,496
1,559,029 1,701,805
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
-6,164
-62,467
142,776
-0.4%
-3.9%
9.2%
UNITED STATES
Ern ploymentCounts
Distribution
Numeric
Change
Percentage Change
Industry
2000
2005
2010
2016
2000
2005
2010
2016
- '00205
'05210
'10216
100-105
105=10
110=16
PDR**
37,900,038
35,194,199
30,226,593
32,787,642
29.3%
26.8%
23.7%
23.8%
-2,705,839 -4,967,606
2,561048
-7.1%
-14.1%
8.5%
Retail
15,344,488
15,321,421
14,547,773
15,459,457
11.8%
11.7%
11.4%
11.2%
-23,067
-773,647
911683
-0.2%
-5.0%
6.3%
Knowledge*
28,238,313
28,385,876
27,236,236
30,22,264
21.8%
21.6%
21.3%
21.9%
! 147,566
-1149,641
2,976,028
0.5%
-4.1%
10.9%
Eds/Meds
24,788,001
27,691,157
30,235,490
32,782,750
19.1%
21.1%
23.7%
23.7%
! 2,903,156
2,544,323
2,547,261
, 11.7%
9.2%
8.4%
Hospitality
12,127,146
13,107,637
13,479,279
15,297,094
9.4%
10.0%
10.6%
11.1%
1060,491
291642
1817,815
8.7%
2.2%
13.5%
GOVt
6,961,572
7,149,265
7,543,200
7,202,374
5.4%
5.4%
5.9%
5.2%
_' 187,692
393,935
-340,626
2.7%
5.5%
-4.5%
Other
4,200,335
4,379,841
4,404,848
4,305,658
3.2%
3.3%
3.5%
3.1%
_' 179,506
25,007
-99,190
''. 4.3%
0.6%
-2.3%
Total
49,559,890
131309,404
127,673,418
138,047,236
; 100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
1,749,515
-3,635,986
10,373,818
1.4%
-2.8%
8.1%
PDR = Production, Distribution, and Repair industry sectors (i.e., Manufacturing, Construction, Transportaton, Utilities, etc.)
Know ledge = Consists of "know ledge -based" industry sectors, such as Information, Finance, and Professional Services/Management
Sources: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEVV); Perkins+Will
Figure 25: Brooklyn Center Employment Change by Industry 2000-2016
4,500 4,226
4,000
3,500
c
3,000
a
0
2,500
LU
1,500
1,000
500
0
PDR** Retail Knowledge* Eds/Meds Hospitality Gov't Other
Industry
* Knowledge = Consists of "knowledge-based" industry sectors, such as Inforrration, Finance, and Professional Services/Managrrent
"PDR =Production, Distribution, and Repair industry sectors (i. e., Manufacturing, Construction, Transportation, Utilities, etc.)
Sources: Minnesota Departrrent of Errployrrent and Econorric Developrrent, QCEW dataset; Perkins+Will
Figure 26: Employment Profile by Industry 2016
100%
10%
0%
BROOKLYN 7 -COUNTY UNITED
CENTER METRO AREA STATES
* Knowledge = Consists of "knowledge-based" industry sectors, such as Information, Finance, and
Professional Services/Managrrent
** PDR = Production, Distribution, and Repair industry sectors (i.e., Manufacturing, Construction,
Transportation, Utilities, etc.)
Sources: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economc Developrrent, QCEW dataset; Perkins+Wll
■Other
80%
® Gov't
70%
Y
■ Hospitality
L
0 60%
Eds/Meds
50% -
■ Knowledge*
a�
a
■ Retail
ao%
A
■ PDR**
30%
20
10%
0%
BROOKLYN 7 -COUNTY UNITED
CENTER METRO AREA STATES
* Knowledge = Consists of "knowledge-based" industry sectors, such as Information, Finance, and
Professional Services/Managrrent
** PDR = Production, Distribution, and Repair industry sectors (i.e., Manufacturing, Construction,
Transportation, Utilities, etc.)
Sources: Minnesota Department of Employment and Economc Developrrent, QCEW dataset; Perkins+Wll
Jobs of Residents
The jobs of city residents can also be categorized by occupational category and compared with jobs in the
Twin Cities region as shown in the following table. Compared to the region, Brooklyn Center has higher
percentages of production, skilled craft and administrative support jobs and considerably fewer professional/
technical jobs. The relatively high percentage of Brooklyn Center residents employed in a production, skilled
craft occupation is related to the relatively high percentage of employed residents in the manufacturing
industry.
Table 19: Occupational Distribution of Employed Residents 2015
Occupational Group
Brooklyn
Center
7 -County
Metro Area
Executive/Managerial
15.5%
23.8%
Professional/Technical
20.5%
25.5%
Sales
6.9%
10.1%
Administrative Support
14.1%
13.2%
Services
15.9%
10.5%
Production, Skilled Crafts
20.8%
10.9%
Farmers, Construction
6.3%
5.9%
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community
Survey
HOUSING
Building on the previous socio-economic section, this section provides data specific to housing conditions in
Brooklyn Center. It is intended to provide a better understanding of where important gaps in the supply of
housing may exist.
Metropolitan Council Housing Assessment
In support of each community updating their comprehensive plan, the Metropolitan Council prepared an
existing housing assessment that provides specific housing data required for the comprehensive plan and
integral to determining the need for certain types of housing, especially affordably priced housing. The
following table presents this data.
Table H-20: Metropolitan Council Existing Housing Assessment for the City of Brooklyn Center (February 2017)
AFFORDABILITY2
TENURE
TYPE'
PUBLICLY SUBSIDIZED UNITS4
HOUSING COST BURDENED HOUSEHOLDS5
AMI = Area Median Income; area in this definition refers to the 16 -county Minneapolis -St. Paul metropolitan statistical area
Source: Metropolitan Council, 2015 housing stock estimates
2 Source: Metropolitan Council staff estimates for 2015 based on 2105 and 2016 MetroGIS Parcel Datasets (ownership units), 2009-2013
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy data from HUD (rental units and household income), and the Council's 2015 Manufactured Housing
Parks Survey (manufactured homes).
9 Source: US Census Bureau, 2011-2015 American Community Survey five-year estimates; counts adjusted tobetter match the Council's 2015
housing stock estimates
Source: HousingLink Streams data (covers projects whose financing closed by December 2014), http://www.housing link.org/streams
e Housing cost burden refers to households w hose housing costs are at least 30% of their income. Source: U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development, 2009-2013 Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) data, w ith counts adjusted to better match Metropolitan Council
2015 household estimates.
Metropolitan Council Map of Estimated Market Value of Brooklyn Center Homes
The map below was produced by the Metropolitan Council in order to identify the location of affordably -priced
owner -occupied homes in Brooklyn Center. Based on a set of assumptions, such as down payments, interest
rates, etc., the Metropolitan Council considers an owner -occupied home to be affordable if it is valued at
$236,000 or less. Almost all of the owned homes in Brooklyn Center meet this criteria.
Owner -Occupied Housing by Estimated Market Value
Brooklyn Center METROPOLITAN
C O u N C I L
r---1 Owner -Occupied Housing 1 inch = 0.5511 miles KF.
t___ County Boundaries Estimated Market Value, 2015
j City and Township Boundaries $238,500 or Less
Lakes and Major Rivers $238,501 to $350,000
Source: MetmGIS Regional Parcel Dalaset, 2015 estimated market values
Street Centerlines 0 $300,001 to $450,000 for taxes payable in 2016.
Over $450,000 Note: Estimated Market Value includes only homesteaded units
with a building on the parcel.
The age of housing is often a good proxy for its overall condition and value; older homes require more -frequent
and costlier repairs, and their size and design may not match current cultural preferences. Although older
housing stock can many times have aesthetic and historic value, if the homes are not well-maintained they are
at significant risk to deferred maintenance, which could result in declining values and potential blight.
Therefore, many communities closely track the condition of their older housing stock and support programs
that aid homeowners in their upkeep and overall maintenance.
The vast majority of Brooklyn Center's housing stock is more than 40 years old. This is a major concern
because at 40 years of age exterior components of a building including siding, windows and roofs need to be
replaced to protect its structural integrity.
The following table and chart shows that while the 1950s were the peak decade for housing construction in the
City, this was a period in which owner -occupied housing predominated. Most of the City's rental housing -- i.e.,
most of its multifamily apartments -- were built in the 1960s and 70s. The lack of vacant land has limited
housing construction since then, and new construction will mostly take place through redevelopment.
Table H-21: Housing by Year Built and Tenure 2015
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Number
Distribution By Year Built
Distribution by Occupancy
Year Built
Own
Rent
Vacant
Total
Own
Rent
Vacant
Total
Own
Rent
Vacant
Total
BROOKLYN CENTER
2010 -Present
0
0
0
0
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
--
--
-
--
2000-2009
93
27
0
120
1.4%
0.6%
0.0%
1.0%
77.5%
22.5%
0.0%
100.0%
1990-1999
90
451
34
575
1.3%
10.7%
4.3%
4.9%
15.7%
78.4%
5.9%
100.0%
1980-1989
319
577
80
976
4.7%
13.7%
10.0%
8.3%
32.7%
59.1%
8.2%
100.0%
1970-1979
687
1,500
219
2,406
10.1%
35.7%
27.5%
20.4%
28.6%
62.3%
9.1%
100.0%
1960-1969
1,485
1,085
132
2,702
21.9%
25.8%
16.6%
22.9%
55.0%
40.2%
4.9%
100.0%
1950-1959
3,311
466
286
4,063
48.8%
11.1%
35.9%
34.5%
81.5%
11.5%
7.0%
100.0%
Pre -1950
806
99
46
951
11.9%
2.4%
5.8%
8.1%
84.8%
10.4%
4.8%
100.0%
All Housing Units
6,791
4,205
797
11,793
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
57.6%
35.7%
6.8%
100.0%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
2010 -Present
2,863
2,923
65
5,851
0.9%
1.6%
0.2%
1.1%
48.9%
50.0%
1.1%
100.0%
2000-2009
28,552
17,116
4,273
49,941
9.3%
9.4%
15.2%
9.6%
57.2%
34.3%
8.6%
100.0%
1990-1999
30,348
15,328
1,609
47,285
9.9%
8.4%
5.7%
9.1%
64.2%
32.4%
3.4%
100.0%
1980-1989
43,979
26,723
3,519
74,221
14.3%
14.6%
12.5%
14.3%
59.3%
36.0%
4.7%
100.0%
1970-1979
38,821
37,714
3,834
80,369
12.6%
20.6%
13.6%
15.5%
48.3%
46.9%
4.8%
100.0%
1960-1969
31,070
25,179
3,119
59,368
10.1%
13.8%
11.1%
11.5%
52.3%
42.4%
5.3%
100.0%
1950-1959
51,676
15,373
3,612
70,661
16.8%
8.4%
12.8%
13.6%
73.1%
21.8%
5.1%
100.0%
Pre -1950
80,086
42,445
8,105
130,636
26.1%
23.2%
28.8%
25.2%
61.3%
32.5%
6.2%
100.0%
All Housing Units
307,395
182,801
28,136
518,332
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
59.3%
35.3%
5.4%
100.0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
2010 -Present
9,570
6,027
115
15,712
1.2%
1.7%
0.2%
1.3%
60.9%
38.4%
0.7%
100.0%
2000-2009
109,222
42,555
8,342
160,119
13.9%
11.7%
14.7%
13.3%
68.2%
26.6%
5.2%
100.0%
1990-1999
123,747
39,311
5,225
168,283
15.8%
10.8%
9.2%
13.9%
73.5%
23.4%
3.1%
100.0%
1980-1989
119,915
56,336
6,637
182,888
15.3%
15.4%
11.7%
15.2%
65.6%
30.8%
3.6%
100.0%
1970-1979
105,139
72,799
8,535
186,473
13.4%
20.0%
15.1%
15.5%
56.4%
39.0%
4.6%
100.0%
1960-1969
76,288
46,570
6,228
129,086
9.7%
12.8%
11.0%
10.7%
59.1%
36.1%
4.8%
100.0%
1950-1959
96,299
28,556
6,136
130,991
12.3%
7.8%
10.8%
10.9%
73.5%
21.8%
4.7%
100.0%
Pre -1950
145,232
72,588
15,366
233,186
18.5%
19.9%
27.2%
19.3%
62.3%
31.1%
6.6%
100.0%
All Housing Units
785,412
364,742
56,584
1,206,738
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
65.1%
30.2%
4.7%
100.0%
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Figure H-27: Year Housing Structure Built 2015
40%
35%
30%
25%
U)
n
= 20%
0
0
c 15%
U
0 10%
CL
5%
0%
Pre- 1950- 1960- 1970- 1980- 1990- 2000- 2010-
1950 1959 1969 1979 1989 1999 2009 Present
Year Built
■ BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY ■ 7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Source: US Census: 2011-2015 American Community Survey
The type housing structure can influence not only affordability but also overall livability. Having a range of
housing structures can provide residents of a community options that best meet their needs as they shift from
one life stage to another. For example, retirees often desire multifamily housing not only for the ease of
maintenance, but also for security reasons. For those fortunate to travel south during the winter, multifamily
residences are less susceptible to home maintenance issues or burglary concerns because of on-site
management. For those with health concerns, multifamily residences often have neighbors that can also
provide oversight should an acute health problem occur.
The majority (63%) of Brooklyn Center's housing stock consists of detached single-family homes. This is above
the proportion found in Hennepin County (55%) or throughout the metropolitan area (59%). Nevertheless, the
City's housing stock is diversified, with many multifamily units in large structures, as well as a significant
number of single family attached units.
Table H-22: Housing Structure Type 2000-2015
Change 2000-2015 Distribution
Housing Type 2000 2010 2015 No. Pct. 2000 2010 2015
BROOKLYN CENTER
Single Family Detached
7,180
6,696
6,872
-308
-4.3%
62.9%
63.5%
62.5%
Single Family Attached
929
965
884
-45
-4.8%
8.1%
9.1%
8.0%
2 -Units
97
83
94
-3
-3.1%
0.8%
0.8%
0.9%
3-4 Units
142
105
105
-37
-26.1%
1.2%
1.0%
1.0%
5 or more Units
3,048
2,678
3,033
-15
-0.5%
26.7%
25.4%
27.6%
Other Unit Types
28
26
8
-20
-71.4%
0.2%
0.2%
0.1%
Total
11,424
10,553
10,996
-428
-3.7%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
HENNEPIN COUNTY
Single Family Detached
260,349
265,319
271,200
10,851
4.2%
57.1%
56.0%
55.3%
Single Family Attached
32,477
41,925
42,701
10,224
31.5%
7.1%
8.8%
8.7%
2 -Units
20,555
17,579
16,841
-3,714
-18.1%
4.5%
3.7%
3.4%
3-4 Units
11,816
10,795
11,554
-262
-2.2%
2.6%
2.3%
2.4%
5 or more Units
129,411
136,607
146,411
17,000
13.1%
28.4%
28.8%
29.9%
Other Unit Types
1,521
1,631
1,489
-32
-2.1%
0.3%
0.3%
0.3%
Total
456,129
473,856
490,196
34,067
7.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Single Family Detached
624,734
669,718
682,595
57,861
9.3%
61.2%
60.3%
59.3%
Single Family Attached
84,436
123,763
130,366
45,930
54.4%
8.3%
11.1%
11.3%
2 -Units
35,054
29,435
29,780
-5,274
-15.0%
3.4%
2.7%
2.6%
3-4 Units
24,416
22,573
23,891
-525
-2.2%
2.4%
2.0%
2.1%
5 or more Units
236,350
250,059
268,930
32,580
13.8%
23.1%
22.5%
23.4%
Other Unit Types
16,464
15,169
14,592
-1,872
-11.4%
1.6%
1.4%
1.3%
Total 1,021,454 1,110, 717 1,150,154 128,700 12.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Figure H-28: Housing Structure Type 2015
70%
60%
_N
C
50%
m
N
0 40%
2
10%
0%
Single Family Single Family 2 -Units 3-4 Units 5 or more Units Other Unit Types
Detached Attached
■ BROOKLYN CENTER ■ HENNEPIN COUNTY D7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Figure H-29: Percentage of Housing Units that are Single -Family Detached Homes 2000-2015
66%
64%
N
5,510
D 62%
—*—BROOKLYN
m
C
CENTER
60%
HENNEPIN
=
COUNTY
0 58% --
-
Cape Cod
� 7 -COUNTY
(D
METRO AREA
2 56% -
-
o_
54% ----.._ --------------
-- --------
52% 1 1 I
2000 2010 2015
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Conmunity Survey
The rambler with full basement was the home style of choice in the 1950s and 1960s when most of the single-
family housing in the community were constructed. At 68%, ramblers are the predominant single-family
housing structure type in the City. With the living space on one level, these homes are better suited for elderly
persons than are other home styles where stairs are required to access some of the space. This housing style
allows the elderly to remain in their own home for a longer period of time. Multi-level style homes such as the
split entry and split-level became popular in the 1960s and 1970s and, as indicated in the following table, not
many homes of this style have been built in Brooklyn Center. In recent decades a significant number of town
home units and some condominium units have also been built.
Table H-23: 2017 Single -Family -Family Structure Subtype
Single -Family Home Style Number
Rambler
5,510
Expansion Bungalow
839
Townhouse
662
Split Leel
398
Split Entry
372
Colonial
283
Cape Cod
1
TOTAL
8,065
Source: Hennepin County Assessor
The following table shows a similar housing mix in neighboring communities. As in Brooklyn Center, single-
family detached units predominate, while units in larger multifamily buildings are the second most common.
Townhouses are slowly increasing in number.
Table H-24: Housing mix in Brooklyn Center and Neighboring Cities 2015
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Population
Distribution
Brooklyn
Brooklyn
Robbins- Columbia
Brooklyn
Brooklyn
Robbins- Columbia
Racial/Ethnic Group
Center
Park
Crystal
dale
Heights
Fridley
Center
Park
Crystal
dale
Heights
Fridley
Single Family Detached
6,872
16,410
7,113
4,066
5,041
6,397
62.5%
61.3%
76.1%
66.0%
63.7%
57.8%
Single Family Attached
884
4,001
159
414
930
957
8.0%
15.0%
1.7%
6.7%
11.7%
8.6%
2 -Units
94
250
124
84
277
129
0.9%
0.9%
1.3%
1.4%
3.5%
1.2%
3-4 Units
105
294
112
66
127
219
1.0%
1.1%
1.2%
1.1%
1.6%
2.0%
5 or more Units
3,033
5,774
1,840
1,517
1,505
2,977
27.6%
21.6%
19.7%
24.6%
19.0%
26.9%
Other Unit Types
8
29
0
14
38
397
0.1%
0.1%
0.0%
0.2%
0.5%
3.6%
Total
10,996
26,758
9,348
6,161
7,918
11,076
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
Housing tenure is important to track because it provides insight into the community's potential to respond to a
changing age profile or shocks to the economy, such as a recession. For example, many older households
often transition out of homeownership into rental housing as they require more assistance with activities of
daily living. The following table and charts provide detailed information of housing tenure in Brooklyn Center,
Hennepin County, and the TCMA.
Roughly 62% of all households in Brooklyn Center own their housing as of 2016. This is similar to the
homeownership rate for Hennepin County (63%) and just below rate for the metro area (68%). However, like
elsewhere in the region, the homeownership rate has been declining in Brooklyn Center since 2000. This is
likely due to an aging population as well as broad economic trends driven by the recession of 2007-2008 in
which the country experienced the worst housing bust since the Great Depression. During last decade's
recession, many single-family residences went into foreclosure and transitioned into rental properties.
Table H-25: Housing Tenure by Age of Householder 2000-2015
2000
2010
2016
Numeric Change'l0216
Percent Change '10216
Age Group
Total
Rent
Own
Total
Rent
Own
Total
Rent
Own
Total
Rent Own
Total
Rent
Own
BROOKLYN CENTER
Under 25
707
548
159
490
363
127
299
229
70
-191
-134 -57
-39%
-37%
-45%u
25-34
2,043
953
1,090
2,036
973
1,063
2,268
1,242
1,026
232
269 -37
11%
28%
-3%
35-44
2,492
725
1,767
1,970
735
1,235
2,346
1,039
1,306
376
304 71
19%
41%
6%
45-54
1,965
425
1,540
2,186
693
1,493
1,912
688
1,224
-274
-5 -269
-13%
-1%
-18%
55-64
1,343
227
1,116
1,645
375
1,270
1,875
409
1,466
230
34 196
14%
9%
15%
65-74
1,487
186
1,301
998
202
796
1,061
263
798
63
61 2
6%
30%
0%
75-84
1,098
326
772
947
196
751
791
167
625
-156
-29 -126
-16%
-15%
-17%
85+
295
185
110
484
249
235
489
186
303
5
-63 68
1%
-25%
29%
All HHs
11,430
3,575
7,855
10,756
3,786
6,970
11,042
4,223
6,819
286
437 -151
3%
12%
-2%
Distribution
by Age
Under25
6%
15%
2%
5%
10%
2%
3%
5%
1%
-
- -
-1.8%
-4.2%
-0.8%
25-34
18%
27%
14%
19%
26%
15%
21%
29%
15%
---
- -
1.6%
3.7%
-0.2%
35-44
22%
20%
22%
18%
19%
18%
21%
25%
19%
-
- -
2.9%
5.2%
1.4%
45-54
17%
12%
20%
20%
18%
21%
17%
16%
18%
-
- -
-3.0%
-2.0%
-3.5%
55-64
12%
6%
14%
15%
10%
18%
17%
10%
21%
-
- -
1.7%
-0.2%
3.3%
65-74
13%
5%
17%
9%
5%
11%
10%
6%
12%
-
- -
0.3%
0.9%
0.3%
75-84
10%
9%
10%
9%
5%
11%
7%
4%
9%
-
- -
-1.6%
-1.2%
-1.6%
85+
3%
5%
1%
4%
7%
3%
4%
4%
4%
-
- -
-0.1%
-2.2%
1.1%
Al HHs
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
- -
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
HENNEPIN
COUNTY
Under25
28,632
25,252
3,380
25,524
22,734
2,790
22,338
20,817
1,521
-3,186
-1,917 -1,269
-12%
-8%
-45%
25-34
94,998
50,435
44,563
94,162
54,312
39,850
103,900
63,398
40,502
9,738
9,086 652
10%
17%
2%
35-44
108,967
29,926
79,041
86,630
28,946
57,684
91,405
34,144
57,261
4,775
5,198 -423
6%
18%
-1%
45-54
92,866
18,829
74,037
100,339
24,688
75,651
100,274
26,199
74,075
-65
1,511 -1,576
0%
6%
-2%
55-64
52,083
9,412
42,671
82,357
16,891
65,466
94,074
21,106
72,969
11,717
4,215 7,503
14%
25%
11%
65-74
37,762
7,090
30,672
42,530
8,502
34,028
52,830
10,834
41,997
10,300
2,332 7,969
24%
27%
23%
75-84
30,325
8,242
22,083
29,083
7,108
21,975
30,284
7,523
22,762
1,201
415 787
4%
6%
4%
85+
10,496
5,150
5,346
15,288
6,611
8,677
16,412
6,733
9,679
1,124
122 1,002
7%
2%
12%
All HHs
456,129 154,336
301,793
475,913 169,792 306,121
511,518
190,752 320,766
35,605 20,960 14,645
7%
12%
5%
Distribution
by Age
Under25
6%
16%
1%
5%
13%
1%
4%
11%
0%
-
- --
-1.0%
-2.5%
-0.4%
25-34
21%
33%
15%
20%
32%
13%
20%
33%
13%
-
- -
0.5%
1.2%
-0.4%
35-44
24%
19%
26%
18%
17%
19%
18%
18%
18%
-
- -
-0.3%
0.9%
-1.0%
45-54
20%
12%
25%
21%
15%
25%
20%
14%
23%
-
- -
-1.5%
-0.8%
-1.6%
55-64
11%
6%
14%
17%
10%
21%
18%
11%
23%
-
- -
1.1%
1.1%
1.4%
65-74
8%
5%
10%
9%
5%
11%
10%
6%
13%
-
- -
1.4%
0.7%
2.0%
75-84
7%
5%
7%
6%
4%
7%
6%
4%
7%
-
- -
-0.2%
-0.2%
-0.1%
85+
2%
3%
2%
3%
4%
3%
3%
4%
3%
-
- -
0.0%
-0.4%
0.2%
All HHs
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
--
- --
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Under25
56,489
46,699
9,790
49,736
41,789
7,947
44,295
39,150
5,145
-5,441
-2,639 -2,802
-11%
-6%
-35%
25-34
205,413
91,342 114,071
201,952
99,716 102,236
219,521
116,897
102,624
17,569
17,181 388
9%
17%
0%
35-44
262,167
58,438 203,729
213,981
59,303 154,678
219,041
69,875
149,167
5,060
10,572 -5,511
2%
18%
-4%
45-54
213,167
36,077 177,090
253,783
51,379 202,404
254,046
54,795
199,252
263
3,416 -3,152
0%
7%
-2%
55-64
120,788
18,205 102,583
196,950
34,355 162,595
224,111
42,902
181,209
27,161
8,547 18,614
14%
25%
11%
65-74
82,521
14,491
68,030
103,345
17,998
85,347
126,632
22,195
104,437
23,287
4,197 19,090
23%
23%
22%
75-84
60,685
17,109
43,576
66,268
16,185
50,083
69,715
16,929
52,786
3,447
744 2,703
5%
5%
5%
85+
20,224
10,127
10,097
31,734
14,549
17,185
35,003
15,386
19,617
3,269
837 2,432
10%
6%
14%
All HHs
1,021,454 292,488 728,966
1,117,749 335,274 782,475
1,192,364 378,128 814,236
74,615 42,854 31,761
7%
13%
4%
Distribution by Age
Under25
6%
16%
1%
4%
12%
1%
4%
10%
1%
--
- --
-0.7%
-2.1%
-0.4%
25-34
20%
31%
16%
18%
30%
13%
18%
31%
13%
-
- -
0.3%
1.2%
-0.5%
35-44
26%
20%
28%
19%
18%
20%
18%
18%
18%
-
- -
-0.8%
0.8%
-1.4%
45-54
21%
12%
24%
23%
15%
26%
21%
14%
24%
-
- -
-1.4%
-0.8%
-1.4%
55-64
12%
6%
14%
18%
10%
21%
19%
11%
22%
-
- -
1.2%
1.1%
1.5%
65-74
8%
5%
9%
9%
5%
11%
11%
6%
13%
-
- -
1.4%
0.5%
1.9%
75-84
6%
6%
6%
6%
5%
6%
6%
4%
6%
--
- --
-0.1%
-0.4%
0.1%
85+
2%
3%
1%
3%
4%
2%
3%
4%
2%
-
- -
0.1%
-0.3%
0.2%
Al HHS
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
-- -
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Wll
Figure H-30: Brooklyn Center Housing Tenure by Age of Householder 2016
1,600
1,400
1,200
0 1,000
m
800
0
600
400
200
0
Under 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 85+
Age of Householder
■ Owner -Occupied Households ■ Renter -Occupied Households
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council: Perkins+Will
Figure H-31: Homeownership Rate 2000-20156
74%
72%
70%
a>
0
68%
0
66%
a�
U
n 64%
62%
60% 1 '
2000 2010 2016
Sources: US Census; Metropolitan Council; Perkins+Will
—@—BROOKLYN
CENTER
—*—HENNEPIN
COUNTY
—0 -7 -COUNTY
METRO AREA
Owner -Occupied Housing Affordability
According to data from the Minneapolis Association of Realtors, the median home sales price for Brooklyn
Center through June 2017 was $181,500. This is 25% below the metro area median home sales price
($245,000). This indicates that the existing housing stock in Brooklyn Center is very affordable compared to the
rest of the region. It should be noted as well that the peak median sales price for Brooklyn Center occurred in
2006 when it reached nearly $192,925. Although prices have improved in the last several years, the median
sales price has yet to return to pre- bust pricing. However, the broader metro -wide market appears to have
regained all of the lost value from the bust and is actually now achieving new pricing peaks.
Table H-26: Median Home Sales Prices for Brooklyn Center and Neighboring Cities 2006. 2011, and 2017
Percent Change
Community
2006
2011
2017*
'06211
'11217
'06217
Brooklyn Center
$192,925
$82,500
$181,500
-57.2%
120.0%
-5.9%
Brooklyn Park
$230,825
$127,000
$225,000
-45.0%
77.2%
-2.5%
Crystal
$197,700
$105,000
$200,000
-46.9%
90.5%
1.2%
Robbinsdale
$199,950
$104,775
$195,000
-47.6%
86.1%
-2.5%
Columbia Heights
$188,300
$101,750
$188,700
-46.0%
85.5%
0.2%
Fridley
$209,900
$120,000
$196,000
-42.8%
63.3%
-6.6%
Metro Area
$230,000
$150,000
$245,000
-34.8%
63.3%
6.5%
Source: Minneapolis Area Association of Realtors
Figure 32: Median Home Sales Price for Brooklyn Center and Neighboring Cities 2006, 2011, and 2017
$250,000
$200,000
U
d
N
Co $150,000
E
0
2
$100,000
a
m
$50,000
$0 --- —s— --- --- ---
Brooklyn Brooklyn Park Crystal Robbinsdale Columbia Fridley Metro Area
Center Heights
■ 2006 P2011 ■ 2017*
* Januarythru June
source: Minneapolis Area Association of Reallors
Although home sales data provides an accurate assessment of current market trends, only a small proportion
of a city's housing stock is ever sold in any given year. Therefore, the following data from the Hennepin County
Assessor provides more insight into the truly affordable nature of homes in Brooklyn Center. According to the
table, nearly half of all the owner -occupied homes in Brooklyn Center are assessed at an estimated market
value of between $100,000 and $149,999. Another 43% are assessed at between $150,000 and $199,999.
This means that the overwhelming majority of Brooklyn Center's housing stock would be considered
"affordable" according to the Metropolitan Council's definition of affordable owner -occupied housing.
Table H-27: Estimated Market Value of Owner -Occupied Single -Family Homes in Brooklyn Center in 2017
Homesteaded Properties Number Percent
Less than $100,000
$100,000-$149,999
$150,000-$199,999
390 5.7%
3,224 47.0%
2,953 43.0%
$200,000+ 295 4.3%
TOTAL 6,862 100.0%
Source: Hennepin County Assessor
Renter -Occupied Housing Affordability
According to the US Census' most recent data, rental housing in Brooklyn Center tends to be affordable as well. With a
high percentage of multifamily properties more than 40 years old, this is not surprising given the style and design of older
rental units and their likely condition due to normal wear and tear. Over 70% of Brooklyn Center renters report paying less
than $1,000 per month for their housing. Moreover, nearly one out of every two renters report paying less than $800 per
month for housing.
Table H-28: Monthly Rental Costs 2015
Number of Households
Percentage of Households
Monthly Contract
BROOKLYN
HENNEPIN 7 -COUNTY
BROOKLYN
HENNEPIN
7 -COUNTY
Rent
CENTER
COUNTY METRO AREA
CENTER
COUNTY METRO AREA
Less than $300
200
13,780
25,190
4.9%
7.7%
7.1%
$300 to $399
60
3,863
8,785
1.5%
2.2%
2.5%
$400 to $499
108
4,597
10,013
2.6%
2.6%
2.8%
$500 to $599
158
7,797
17,164
3.8%
4.4%
4.8%
$600 to $699
659
19,068
38,235
16.0%
10.7%
10.8%
$700 to $799
664
23,714
49,272
16.2%
13.3%
13.9%
$800 to $899
737
22,343
46,939
17.9%
12.5%
13.2%
$900 to $999
380
17,958
35,829
9.2%
10.0%
10.1%
$1,000 to $1,249
638
30,818
60,805
15.5%
17.2%
17.1%
$1,250 to more
507
34,884
62,892
12.3%
19.5%
17.7%
Total Households
4,111
178,822
355,124
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
Source: US Census, American Community Survey 2011-2015
Figure 33: Monthly Rental Costs 2015
25%
a
0 20%
L
(V
N
7
u 15%
c
N
0
o) 10%
m
c
N
U
a)
5%
0% sop En
Less than $300 to $400 to $500 to $600 to $700 to $800 to $900 to $1,000 to $1,250 to
$300 $399 $499 $599 $699 $799 $899 $999 $1,249 more
Monthly Contract Rent
■ BROOKLYN CENTER v HENNEPIN COUNTY o 7 -COUNTY METRO AREA
Source: US Census, 2011-2015 American Community Survey
i � 9
\\ 9iiO.np�o
�So \
F S'\
N \
^q� I
( p
psi
1 dM1`N
m
�N
O [1 O
n
-
O In
m rt
3
A�
Ill
cots
DPf
ma
�
Z
,�12y
O n
(n
00 mzM
0=0Dm0
Clio)
�
PO m
3
A�
Ill
cots
A
,�12y
�:
O n
(n
00 mzM
0=0Dm0
Clio)
�
PO m