Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018 07-23 CCP Regular SessionCouncil Study Session City Hall Council Chambers J uly 23, 2018 AGE NDA 1.City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions - 6 p.m. The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City C ounc il packet is available to the public . The packet ring binder is loc ated at the podium. 2.M iscellaneous 3.Discussion of Work S ession Agenda Item as T ime P ermits 4.Adjourn C IT Y C O UNC IL M E E T I NG City Hall Council Chambers J uly 23, 2018 AGE NDA 1.Informal Open Forum with City Council - 6:45 p.m. Provides an opportunity for the public to address the C ounc il on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political c ampaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with citizens. Questions from the C ounc il will be for c larific ation only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reac ting to the comments made but, rather, for hearing the c itizen for informational purposes only. 2.Invocation - 7 p.m. 3.Call to Order Regular Business M eeting The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City C ounc il packet is available to the public . The packet ring binder is loc ated at the podium. 4.Roll Call 5.P ledge of Allegiance 6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda The following items are c onsidered to be routine by the C ity Council and will be enac ted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the c onsent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration I tems. a.Approval of Minutes - J uly 9, 2018 J oint Meeting of City Council and P lanning Commission - J uly 9, 2018 Regular S ession - J uly 9, 2018 Work S ession - J uly 16, 2018 Executive Special Meeting - J uly 16, 2018 J oint Meeting of City Council and F inancial Commission b.L icenses c.Resolution A mending S pecial A ssessment L evy Roll Nos. 19775 and 19776 to P rovide for the Deferment of S pecial A ssessments - Motion to approve resolution d.An I nterim Ordinance A uthorizing a S tudy and P lacing a Moratorium on the Sears Property - Motion to adopt ordinance 7.P resentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a.Presentation by S hannon Full, President/C E O of Twin West Chamber of Commerce 8.P ublic Hearings 9.P lanning Commission Items a.Resolution to Approve Planning Commission A pplication No. 2018-012, Submitted by Von Petersen of T S P, I nc. on behalf of B rooklyn Center S chool District, Requesting Site and B uilding Plan Approval (L ocated at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North) - Motion to approve resolution b.Resolution to Approve Planning Commission A pplication No. 2018-013, Submitted by Casey's Retail Company for A pproval of a S ite and Building Plan and I ssuance of a S pecial Use Permit for a Gas S tation and Convenience S tore in the C2 (Commerce) District (L ocated at 2101 Freeway Boulevard) - Motion to approve resolution 10.Council Consideration Items a.Consideration of Type I V 6-Month P rovisional Rental L icenses 1. Resolution A pproving a Type I V 6-Month Provisional Rental L icense for 7018 Brooklyn B oulevard 11.Council Report 12.Adjournment COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:R eggie Edwards, Deputy C ity Manager F R O M:Barb S uciu, C ity C lerk S UBJ EC T:Approval of Minutes Recommendation: It is recommended that the C ity C ounc il c onsider approval of the minutes for: July 9, 2018 Joint Meeting of C ity C ouncil and P lanning C ommission C ity C ounc il R egular meeting Work S ession meeting July 16, 2018 Exec utive S pecial Meeting Joint Meeting of the C ity C ounc il and F inanc ial C ommission Background: Requested Council Action: - July 9, 2018 Joint Meeting of C ity C ounc il and P lanning C ommis s ion - July 9, 2018 R egular S es s ion - July 9, 2018 Work S es s ion - July 16, 2018 Exec utive S pecial Meeting - July 16, 2018 Joint Meeting of C ity C ouncil and F inancial C ommis s ion Budget Issues: N/A S trategic Priorities and Values: O perational Exc ellenc e 07/09/18 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT WORK SESSION WITH PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 9, 2018 CITY HALL – COUNCIL/COMMUNITY MEETING ROOM 1. CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission and the session was called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 5:00 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson (arrived at 5:32 p.m.), and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Others present were Planning Commission Chair Randall Christensen, Commissioners Alexander Koenig, Jack MacMillan, Stephen Schonning, Rochelle Sweeney, and Susan Tade were present. Planning Commissioner Abraham Rizvi was absent. 3. JOINT PLANNING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DISCUSSION Mayor Willson thanked the Planning Commission for their work on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Community Development Director Meg Beekman summarized the presentation that will be made tonight including a compressed presentation followed by rapid fire questions and answers with a follow up at a future Work Session meeting during which more information will be received. Jennifer Haskamp, AICP, Owner and Principal Planner with Swanson Haskamp Consulting + Planning (SHC), LLC, introduced herself and recognized the Planning Commission for their work on this document. She reviewed the topics to be covered tonight, noting anything missed will be discussed and covered at the next Work Session. Ms. Haskamp described the purpose of a Comp Plan to establish goals, strategies, and a long-range plan for the City. Comp Plans are required by the Metropolitan Council along with a 20-point checklist that must be followed. She explained their intent to address the checklist items while assuring a balance the City feels good about and wants to use to do a better job. Ms. Haskamp explained the checklist and draft Comp Plan get submitted to adjacent jurisdictions for a six-month review. Following that, the draft Comp Plan is submitted to the Met Council for 07/09/18 -2- DRAFT review. She stated the 2015 System Statement from the Met Council identifies forecasts for housing and employment by 2040. The Comp Plan needs to be drafted to meet that 2040 estimate. Jay Demma, AICP with Perkins + Will, highlighted key facts, forecasts, and finding contained in the Background Report that shows a current snapshot and what the Comp Plan is being built from. He reviewed the population growth rates from 1970-2040, showing most growth by Baby Boomers in the 1960s. He noted there is an expectation of consistent population growth, similar to Hennepin County until 2040 at which time the City exceeds it. This is, in part, cyclical because aging populations are replaced by younger populations with families. Mayor Willson noted an increase in population can also occur due to higher vertical density. Mr. Demma presented the 2016 age distribution of population, household, and family types showing an increase in those with children. He next reviewed community diversity showing racial and ethnic groups that are well represented in Brooklyn Center when compared to the rest of the metro area. This may show potential challenges and barriers for them to integrate into the community if language is a barrier. However, since 2010 the number of those who do not speak English well or at all has decreased. Mr. Demma reviewed median incomes and poverty levels, noting peak incomes occur when resident’s age hits 45-64 and then income declines through retirement years. He explained the overall poverty increase can also be a reflection of the fact the City has a younger population and not yet in the life cycle of higher incomes. Councilmember Graves suggested that diversity also plays a part in that. Mr. Demma agreed that can be the case. He then displayed a map depicting areas of income categories, noting it does not show pockets of affluence. Ms. Haskamp called attention that when looking at block group levels and looking for patterns, such as poverty thresholds, it groups more than by block group, creating and including large swaths of area. Because of that, it does not tell the full story of what is going on in the neighborhoods but it does tell the relationship between transit market areas because they are not as heavily funded or served by the Met Council. Mr. Demma stated the data includes number of cars per household and how transit dependent those residents are. He explained that transit investments should be concentrated in areas of transit dependency. Councilmember Ryan stated having done an extensive and broad-based survey of the City, he has seen in driveways of single-family homes and multi-family parking lots repeated examples of cars sitting with expired tabs, some being inoperative vehicles. He stated residents hold them because they cannot afford to repair or replace them at this time, which anecdotally correlates to that last point. He noted the absence of mass transit to serve that population is acutely apparent. Mayor Willson stated they also cannot afford to get rid of those vehicles. 07/09/18 -3- DRAFT Ms. Haskamp stated the graphic depicting households with no vehicles and pockets of higher poverty all have vehicles because they need one since there is not frequent transit choices. She explained this shows a relationship between what you intuitively think should be happening and what is not. Mr. Demma stated another consideration is the high cost to own a car when your income is low to begin with. Ms. Haskamp used a map to point out the alignment of the new transit line and existing transit lines, noting they do not show the frequency at which they run. She stated the northeast area does not receive as frequent of service as other areas, which can be patterned depending on how fast, frequent, and reliable the transit is. Ms. Haskamp noted with the first piece in the discussion guide outline, they have identified there would be up to 2,216 new households between now and 2040. For Brooklyn Center, that is a big number and needs to be discussed in how that works in relationship with the market. Mr. Demma stated going out to 2040, that is 100 households per year, a sizeable apartment building or 10 blocks of new single-family units. City Manager Curt Boganey asked for elaboration on the underlying assumptions indicating that household growth. Mr. Demma explained the Met Council looks at historic trends throughout the metro area, which overtime has experienced steady growth, so they feel confident looking at historic trends. Going out 20 years, the Met Council looks where in the region that housing is expected to occur. One thing is shifting household types from aging population into maintenance free housing, the cultural dynamic of younger persons with digital focus and preference to live in areas closer to transit, mix of uses to walk to job and entertainment, and the dynamic behind housing costs. Also, because of the severe housing bust, and that younger populations are more reluctant to purchase a house. Brooklyn Center is centralized in the region and with an employment community, they will experience more housing growth. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson arrived at 5:32 p.m. Mr. Demma next addressed market considerations, noting across the country the rental market is extremely tight today so rents are rising rapidly, typically up to 10% year after year. This makes it difficult for folks to stay in their housing over time. So, within the region, development of new rental housing has focused in the central city and select neighborhoods but is now moving to suburban areas as that market is reaching saturation in core cities. In addition, strong job growth fuels rental demand. Mr. Demma noted the for-sale housing market has recovered from the bust that occurred 10 years ago but there is still a low supply of homes for sale and in particular with the entry housing market so prices are bit up and affordability is lower. Mr. Demma stated when first looked at, the Brooklyn Center prices were still below the pre-bust peak but those prices have increased in the last year and are now above the 2006 peak. Single 07/09/18 -4- DRAFT family construction has lagged but is now starting to pick up and condominiums/townhomes are well behind the pre-bust pace. Mr. Demma reviewed market trends with retail, noting that industry is currently undergoing major changes due to the slow growth amongst major retailers and the greater emphasis of selling an experience as compared to selling a good. He also reviewed office market trends that show fewer square feet needed per worker so less demand for space with a greater emphasis on locations near transit and neighborhood amenities, less emphasis on campuses or districts, and increase in telecommuting. Ms. Haskamp explained the process used by the Planning Commission to derive the goals and strategies by review of the Background Report, market considerations, and development of a framework to start with. Then an analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunity, and Threat (SWOT) was added to the structure to determine priority. Topics and themes then emerged such as community image, land use and redevelopment components, the housing component, which rose to the top due to Met Council projections and interest in the condition of the current housing stock and neighborhoods. The Planning Commission created a 15-page list of items that were then prioritized. Ms. Haskamp used the idea of Brooklyn Center being centrally located and accessible by car due to freeways and major thoroughfares. That idea turned discussion to consider how that shapes the community, especially since it is known that younger populations want to live by mass transit. Ms. Haskamp stated another idea is that if everyone is always going out because of the freeways and major thoroughfares, the question is how to get people to come and stay in Brooklyn Center. Another discussion was on the diversity of the community and the significant change that occurred in how your neighbors look, how to use it to promote the City as an interesting place to be, how to embrace that and make housing stock more accessible and livable, and how that marries into business. The issue of business incubators, how to create it, and where it goes was another big discussion by the Planning Commission. Chair Christensen stated they used to have Brookdale, which was the destination draw, but now the City is trying to figure out destination with the projected growth and how to attract and set up the businesses. He stated the St. Louis Park West End has commercial up front and the parking ramp in the back, getting people in and out, which was also a big discussion. Councilmember Graves stated she has talked about business incubators since before she served on the City Council so she is happy it is being discussed. Ms. Haskamp stated she attended Holly Sunday and Earle Brown Days and a number of people communicated the desire to have small businesses, local restaurants, and a place for local entrepreneurs and Artisans to do their craft so there is a clear desire to provide that type of space. Mr. Demma described the creative adaptation of existing buildings, such as a lumber company, and how it can work really well for a market environment. Mayor Willson stated Boston also has a lot of incubator business spaces. He stated the City 07/09/18 -5- DRAFT Council hosted a Pop Up Saturday and is looking for space in The Crossings to find a more permanent location for entrepreneurs starting out. Mr. Boganey asked what is driving this interest in small incubator shops and to what extent the critical mass is population around those spaces for the economic success of an incubator. He also asked what income levels play into that success. Mr. Demma stated he is not an expert in creating that type of business plan but traditionally, with retail space, inevitably the owner is looking for credit worthy tenants. That, by in large, is a national retailer who comes to the table with deep pockets and amazing credit resources so they are able to sign a ten-year lease. However, in this internet age, the credit worthy retailer model is shifting to on-line sales. Where the innovation happens is small entrepreneurial, family-owned businesses that know the local market but the barrier to entry is an issue. Mr. Demma explained that finding how to lower that barrier can include temporary spaces, supportive subsidized spaces, or working with non-profits, but they all take a lot of effort. Mayor Willson stated in New York, when Bloomberg was the Mayor, they looked at their small businesses, incubator spaces, and laid out blocks for small businesses with few employees. At that time, it was indicated that 60% of growth in jobs and new jobs was coming from new businesses. Councilmember Ryan commented on why areas with an overabundance of obsolete but salvageable structures should not be over looked. He noted Northeast Minneapolis had substandard housing and there was critical mass of young people who wanted to do those things who were also involved in the arts. It worked in Northeast Minneapolis because Minneapolis-St. Paul has long had a recognizable music scene, theater, and plastic arts. In addition, it has long been recognized that an old industrial building can be leased cheaply and then you can undertake art production. This has exploded in Northeast Minneapolis as seen at the Art Crawl. Councilmember Ryan noted if those elements are on the ground and present, it can occur. But to start business incubators in Brooklyn Center, there would need to be initial funding to start them. Mayor Willson described the French Quarter in Quebec that has old houses with commercial businesses on the first floor, noting Boston has similar areas. He agreed that Brooklyn Center does not have that type of old structure buildings so the City would have to go from the ground up. Councilmember Ryan noted the storefronts behind the Target strip mall could perhaps be considered. Mayor Willson stated that mall has been looked at by several groups. Mr. Boganey asked whether folks are asking for more accessible businesses, different kinds of retail opportunities, jobs, or the opportunity to build a business, noting depending on the issue an incubator business may or may not be the answer. He stated the City has strict regulations for home businesses and while that is the most economical way for that to happen, it changes neighborhoods. Ms. Haskamp stated from an anecdotal perspective, what makes some incubator spaces work is the identification of gap in a small geographic area that a resident thinks they can fill. It may not be the need for formal space but being able to work from home, if there are structures large enough to accommodate that such as an attached/detached garage space. 07/09/18 -6- DRAFT Ms. Haskamp explained the goals and strategies indicate the answer is not fully known at this point. She stated if retail has changed significantly, then what is Brooklyn Center if not Brookdale. Ms. Haskamp stated when asked, that is when ideas come forward about the type of incubator space, neighborhood nodes, or converting houses along a street for retail use. Councilmember Graves stated she has an intuitive connection and agrees a move towards creating an experience over selling a good is a consideration. She stated people want a space where they can work with another and help someone fill a gap. She stated she has defended markets on social media because she didn’t like that it was identified as ‘black-owned food trucks’ and wants to assure it calls out people to support those vendors. Ms. Haskamp stated people prefer to go to a locally-owned restaurant over a national chain, even if the food is not that great, because they want to support local people. Ms. Haskamp stated part of the strategies identified need to talk about maybe not having the answer so a strategy is needed to figure it out. She asked how it is learned what the community really wants, needs, a community gathering space, during what season, and what type of facility they need for their business. Ms. Haskamp explained the Comp Plan can lay out those strategies, perhaps establishing a task force to engage entrepreneurs and find out what they need and want and how it can be supported through policies and zoning, which is part 2 in the process. Ms. Haskamp presented the goal statement action words, noting each is ranked in one of three categories: no commitment of financial investment, may include financial investment, or commitment to financial investment, if needed. Financial investment can also include staff resources and policy directives. As a homework assignment, she asked those present to focus on the action words and determine whether they are correctly ranked. She also asked them to determine whether something is missing. Ms. Beekman stated the City Council will receive an electronic version of this information along with instructions on items to review before the next Work Session. Mayor Willson agreed with the importance of refining the Comp Plan language before the City Council commits additional resources. Councilmember Graves asked what was discussed around youth, the City’s biggest population. Ms. Haskamp stated nothing targets kids, but in her opinion, kids are little people and covered in many goals and strategies when you think about setting aspirations. She stated they are part of the City’s fabric, noting the Plan language also does not separate out seniors. Councilmember Graves stated she would like to address growth of young people into 2040 as it relates to economics, access to jobs, and skills. Mayor Willson reviewed a meeting he attended with other community representatives where they discussed how to work more cooperatively with schools to assure youth have life skills as well. Councilmember Graves stated the City has made some steps and she wants to assure that is 07/09/18 -7- DRAFT supported and expanded to meet the City’s needs. Commissioner Sweeny asked Ms. Haskamp to talk about the input she received from kids during Heritage Days. Ms. Haskamp stated the best feedback she receives is from kids because they are willing to say things their parents won’t say and 75% of Heritage Days and Holly Sunday responses were from kids. At Heritage Days, people were asked to write on flags what they hope for or want for the community in 2040 and housing was one of the topics. One kid said his mom can’t find a place to rent that has enough bedrooms so if there were places with more bedrooms and they wouldn’t have to share a bedroom, it would be cool. Ms. Haskamp asked whether the City’s housing stock matches the resident’s needs. Another fellow, when asked about housing, took a flag, sketched a bungalow, and wrote ‘bungalow’ on it. When asked how a 10-year old knew what that was, he said he had watched a design show and they seemed like nice houses so the City should have more of them. Ms. Haskamp noted kids’ responses are reflected in this language. Mayor Willson stated they are very bright and already thinking about their future. Ms. Haskamp stated the last and important piece is identifying areas for redevelopment and mixed- use designations. Mayor Willson commented on the City’s Overlay District, which has been a strategic piece for a number of years and agreed it should be looked at to determine whether it should be changed or things done differently. Ms. Haskamp used a map to point out the overlay corridor that will have a land use to regulate/guide and be an added layer of refinement. She asked if areas not directly on Brooklyn Boulevard should be included, noting that adds the issue of penetrating into residential neighborhoods. It is currently depicted at 500 feet in width so that takes in the full block. This overlay would not obligate taking in all of that land but allows consideration of it with performance and design standards included that have to be addressed to protect single-family residences. If considered, she suggested the corridor be wide enough to be successful. Mayor Willson asked if it should be wide enough to provide a buffer between uses. Ms. Haskamp stated she is buffer averse and prefers to address that concern through design guidelines and uses. Chair Christensen stated Ms. Haskamp has done a good job of including the 2030 Comp Plan pieces and urged reading that information to create context. Ms. Beekman stated staff will send out an electronic draft this week as well as the questions to be raised this evening for a more robust discussion at the next Work Session. Mayor Willson suggested the City Council attend an upcoming Planning Commission meeting so there is enough time for discussion. Ms. Haskamp thanked those present for taking time for this presentation and review. 07/09/18 -8- DRAFT 4. ADJOURNMENT Mayor Willson adjourned the Joint Work Session at 6:33 p.m. 07/09/18 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JULY 9, 2018 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Director of Public Works Doran Cote, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. Mayor Tim Willson opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Ralph Neinas, 3920 52 nd Avenue N., addressed the City Council. He stated he is a 30-year resident and an active neighborhood resident. He described his encounter with Victory Tree Service, a tree trimmer hired by his neighbor who trespassed on his (Mr. Neinas’) property and did over $2,000 of damage to his house. Mr. Neinas contacted City staff many times and thought the issue wasn’t being addressed. He wanted to bring the issue to the City Council attention. Mayor Willson stated Mr. Boganey will research and investigate this case and get back to Mr. Neinas. Lennie Chism, PO Box 581452, Minneapolis, addressed the City Council. He described the success of the first Saturday Pop-Up Market and stated the next event will be on August 4 th . He thanked City Manager Boganey, City Attorney Gilchrist, and City staff for their hard work, noting the Jerry Food parking lot got a clean up and this is an opportunity to move forward. Roger Kloster, 7223 Lee Avenue N., addressed the City Council. He asked whether public comment will be heard during Agenda Item 8a relating to Council salaries. Mayor Willson answered in the affirmative. Mr. Kloster stated his frustration with the number of panhandlers within the City and applauded the City Council for their action to adopt an ordinance to address that issue. 07/09/18 -2- DRAFT Mayor Willson closed the Informal Open Forum at 6:58 p.m. 2. INVOCATION Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson read a quote by Michael Jackson as the Invocation. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 7:00 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Director of Public Works Doran Cote, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. June 25, 2018 – Study Session 2. June 25, 2018 – Regular Session 3. June 25, 2018 – EDA 4. June 25, 2018 – Work Session 6b. LICENSES GARBAGE HAULER Allied Waste Services of 8661 Rendova St. NE, Circle Pines North America LLC Darling Ingredients, Inc. 9000 382 nd Avenue, Blue Earth Farmers Union Industries P.O. Box 26, Redwood Falls LePage & Sons, Inc. 23602 University Avenue NW, Bethel MECHANICAL All appliance Installation Plus P.O. Box 133, Cambridge Anderson’s Residential Heating 1628 Cty Road 10 #34, Spring Lake Park 07/09/18 -3- DRAFT Crown Mechanical 1670 S. Robert St. #132, West St. Paul H2C Inc. Heating Cooling & Plumbing 820 N. Concord Street, South St. Paul Homeworks Plumbing, Heating Air 1230 Eagan Industrial Road, Ste. 117, Eagan Metro Heatings & Cooling LLC 1220 Cope Avenue E, Maplewood Owens Companies, Inc. 930 E 80 th St, Bloomington Residential Heating and Air 1815 E. 41 st St, Suite A, Minneapolis RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 6816 Fremont Place North Ali Sajaad Beard Avenue Apartments 6101 Beard Avenue North Keven Riley (Missing 2 ARM Meetings) INITIAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 1706 Amy Lane Sean Ogunniran RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 6532 France Avenue North Chen Zhou RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 3815 52nd Avenue North Jeffrey Sandberg 1500 72 nd Avenue North Thomas Le 6831 Drew Avenue North David Gardner 2331 Ericon Drive Scott Terhaar 2812 Ohenry Road Mains’l Properties RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 4806 69th Avenue North Prosperous Property 4806 Howe Lane Prosperous Property, LLC 5720 Logan Avenue North Jeniffer Kuria 6342 Orchard Avenue North Art Zink 6700 Perry Avenue North PWS Holdings, LLC 5115 Twin Lake Blvd. East Ruth E. Cioni SIGNHANGER GK and M Enterprises Inc. 1517 94th Lane NE, Blaine Jones Sign Company 1711 Scheuring Rd, De Pere, WI 54115 Spectrum Sign Systems, Inc. 8786 W. 35W Service Drive NE, Blaine VEO Sign LLC 6353 Martin Ave NE, Ostego TRANSIENT ACCOMODATIONS – LEVEL 1 Quality Inn 1600 James Circle N. 6c. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-132 RESOLUTION APPROVING A TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE GENERAL FUND AND THE MUNICIPAL LIQUOR STORE FUND TO THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS FUND 07/09/18 -4- DRAFT 6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-133 APPROVING TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER OPERATING FUND TO EARLE BROWN HERITAGE CENTER CAPITAL FUND 6f. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-134 ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHOIRIZING FINAL PAYMENT, PROJECT NOS. 2016-01, 02, 03, 04, AND 12, PALMER LAKE WEST AREA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS Mayor Willson commented on the $600,000 being generated by the Liquor Fund that will be used towards maintenance projects. Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-135 ACCEPTING CENTERPOINIT ENERGY COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIP GRANT Director of Public Works Doran Cote described the grant application process and award of $2,000 towards purchase of six 800-MHz radios for the Public Works Director, dispatch, and four Public Works Crew Leaders. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2018-135 Accepting the CenterPoint Energy Community Partnership Grant. Mayor Willson asked how the remaining cost for the six radios will be funded. City Manager Curt Boganey advised there are sufficient funds within the Public Works budget line items to cover that cost and this is the recommendation of the Director of Public Works. Motion passed unanimously. Kyle Meyer, representing CenterPoint Energy, presented the grant check to Mayor Willson. Mayor Willson extended the City’s appreciation for this generous donation. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS 8a. ORDINANCE NO. 2018-08 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2016-08 REGARDING COUNCIL SALARIES Finance Director Nate Reinhart introduced the item, discussed the background, and provided a PowerPoint presentation detailing the purpose of the proposed ordinance to increase City Council salaries by two percent for 2019 and two percent for 2020 as recommended by the Financial Commission. It was noted this ordinance received first reading on June 1, 2018 and was published in the Sun Post newspaper on June 22, 2018. 07/09/18 -5- DRAFT Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Roger Kloster, 7223 Lee Avenue, addressed the City Council. He asked what the Mayor and City Council have done or accomplished to receive a pay raise. He expressed his concerns with Sears leaving and believed the Mayor and Council were to be civic leaders to promote the City and stop the decline. Ralph Neinas, 3920 52 nd Avenue N., addressed the City Council. He stated he agrees with Mr. Kloster, noting that 30 years ago Brooklyn Center was considered the ‘Edina of the North,’ and he has also seen it decline and particularly in his neighborhood. Mr. Neinas stated he does not know how the Mayor and Council see the City but they have to live in it and he is concerned. He suggested Friday meetings with staff to address issues. Mr. Neinas stated his opinion the decline is due, in part, because of people moving in from other cities. Barbara Jenson, 6539 Drew Avenue N., addressed the City Council. She stated she has lived in Brooklyn Center since 1963 and sees the City as an open, affordable, and welcoming community. She sees the Mayor and Council at community events, parks, Senior Forums, and all over. She also sees the Police Department as outstanding with their involvement in the Multi- Cultural Advisory Committee, direction from the City Council, and a Police Chief who is understanding of a diverse and unique community. Mayor Willson added that was the case with the last three Police Chiefs. Ms. Jenson agreed and stated a 2% raise is reasonable considering the hours the Mayor and Council put in so she supports it. Todd Henning, 1906 Brookview Drive, addressed the City Council. He stated his agreement with Ms. Jenson. He stated he has worked with the Fire Department, Police Department, Public Utilities, and thanked the Mayor and Council for their service. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2018-08 Amending Ordinance No. 2016-08 Regarding Council Salaries. Councilmember Ryan asked if the City Council were to work gratis across the board, it would have barely a noticeable significance relative to a $20 million operating budget. Mr. Boganey stated that is correct. 07/09/18 -6- DRAFT Councilmember Ryan stated all members of the City Council must be residents of the City, he has 42 years of residency, and works very hard every day of the week to do the best he can for his home town. In this capacity, he is driven by public service. Councilmember Ryan explained his assignment is to act as a liaison to organizations that help the City relative to the State Legislature and Met Council. In that effort, he attends many meetings in St. Paul and other locations yet does not charge the City for mileage. Councilmember Ryan noted if a greeter at WalMart, he would come out ahead financially. In addition, he has printing expenses and it is fair and reasonable for the Mayor and Council to receive a small monetary payment for their services. Councilmember Ryan stated he hopes those who have had a bad experience with the City will have their concerns resolved and not let that color their view of Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Butler thanked City staff who does an excellent job and to Councilmember Ryan’s point, agreed the Mayor and Council invest a lot of their time in the City because they want to make a difference in the community. She welcomed audience members to run for office or serve on Commissions to see if they can do a better job. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson clarified that with Brooklyn Center’s government model, the City Council’s only employee is City Manager Boganey who is accountable for all staff members. Through that model, the City Council does not meet with staff. Mayor Willson stated that he retired a few years ago and when looking at the time he puts in, his salary is under 45 cents per hour as he attends a lot of meetings and promotes the City in a lot of places. Mayor Willson noted his day started with the regional Conference of Mayors’ meeting, followed by more meetings the rest of the day, and now the City Council meetings tonight. He stated City staff has done an excellent job to promote the City and attract redevelopment, noting staff is currently handling 8-9 projects this summer and that did not occur 10-12 years ago when businesses moved to Maple Grove. He disagreed that the City is in decline but instead believed it is moving forward, building, and rejuvenating. Mayor Willson stated the City Council has positioned Brooklyn Center for the future and it looks bright. Councilmember Graves added her agreement to the City Council’s comments. Motion passed unanimously. 8b. ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09 AMENDING CHAPTER 1 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES Director of Public Works Doran Cote introduced the item, discussed the history, and provided a PowerPoint presentation detailing the purpose of the proposed ordinance to prohibit the feeding of wild animals. It was noted this ordinance received first reading on June 11, 2018, and was published in the Sun Post newspaper for public hearing tonight. Councilmember Graves, moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. 07/09/18 -7- DRAFT Ralph Neinas, 3920 52 nd Avenue N., addressed the City Council. He stated he lives by Twin Lake and is a hunter but enjoys wildlife. He believed animals in our City are street smart and will not get hit by a car. He stated he has seen a 10-point deer in his neighborhood for 10+ years, does not see an over population, and enjoys watching wildlife. Mr. Neinas stated people can position their feeders so wildlife cannot get them but he does not know how to reduce the population without killing them. Mayor Willson stated he is also a hunter and thinks animals should be revered because whole species are going away. Roger Kloster, 7223 Lee Avenue, addressed the City Council. He asked what the amendment will change. Mayor Willson stated the meeting packet is available for review and explained the amendment is to change a word change ‘deer’ to ‘wild animals.’ Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2018-09 Amending Chapter 1 of the City Code of Ordinances. Motion passed unanimously. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 9a. PLANNING COMMMISISON APPLICATION NO. 2018-010, SUBMITTED BY LINDA MCGINTY (THE LUTHER COMPANY, LLLP, REQUESTING ISSUANCE OF AN INTERIM USE PERMIT FOR THE OFF-SITE STORAGE OF NEW VEHICLES (LOCATED AT 5900 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY) Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh provided an overview of Planning Commission Application No. 2018-010 and advised the Planning Commission recommended approval of the applications at its June 28, 2018 meeting. The day after approval, Health Partners contacted City staff indicating HealthPartners Dental had been utilizing a portion of the subject site for parking. Staff met with them and after review determined an easement was in place. As a result, the Luther Company submitted a revised site plan on July 5, 2018, to shift the north fence line south one parking row and the drive aisle south to comply with existing parking. The gate and barricade were also shifted to the south, the driveway pedestrian and parking easement are called out on the site plan, and the west fence line and drive aisle were shifted one parking row to make up for the lost parking. Ms. McIntosh answered questions of the City Council regarding the request of Linda McGinty, the Luther Company LLP, requesting an Interim Use Permit (IUP) for the off-site storage of approximately 750 new vehicles at 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway. 07/09/18 -8- DRAFT Councilmember Ryan noted the area of the new car storage will be on the existing paved surface and fenced. Ms. McIntosh stated that is correct and described the shift in parking row/drive aisle and arrangement of parking. Councilmember Ryan stated the reason Luther is making this request is so they can store new car inventory in another location because the present storage location is under construction for the new Mazda Mitsubishi dealership. Ms. McIntosh stated that is correct. Councilmember Graves moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 018-136, Regarding the Recommended Deposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2018-010, submitted by Linda McGinty of The Luther Company, LLLP, for the issuance of an of an Interim Use Permit for the off-site storage of new vehicles (located at 5900, Shingle Creek Parkway. Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Willson stated his support for considering this request from one of the City’s premiere businesses. He noted they now have eight dealerships, are one of the highest paying tax payers, creates jobs, presence, and been good to the City with a number of other contributions. 9b. PLANNING COMMMISISON APPLICATION NO. 2018-011, SUBMITTED BY LUK APARTMENTS, LLC, REQUESTING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1992 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND DOCUMENTS AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSION OF A FORMER SENIOR LIVING FACILITY TO MARKET RATE APARTMENTS (LOCATED AT 6100 SUMMIT DRIVE NORTH) Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh provided an overview of Planning Commission Application No. 2018-011 regarding the request of Luk Apartments, LLC for an amendment to the 1992 Planned Unit Development (PUD) plans and documents and site improvements to convert a former senior living facility (currently closed) to market rate apartments at 6100 Summit Drive N. The request includes an allowance for off-street parking ratio of approximately 1.7 parking spaces per dwelling unit versus the minimum required two parking spaces per dwelling unit; wall signage allowance of up to 350-square feet on the south elevation of the existing 11-story apartment building; and, allowance of three additional dwelling units for future approval of a total of 143 units versus the existing 140 units. Ms. McIntosh explained consideration tonight is only for the three allowance requests, not final approval and if approved, the applicant will be required to return with final plan sets, site plan, and make application through the Planning Commission. Councilmember Butler asked why the City Council should encourage under parking as many residents own cars, more than one per rental unit, and there is already a parking issue at current apartment parking lots. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant conducted an informal survey of their other apartment properties and calculated approximately how many cars were parked based on the number of apartments. Based on that survey, the applicants have indicated they are 07/09/18 -9- DRAFT comfortable with a ratio of about 1.7 parking spaces per unit. Ms. McIntosh noted since this will be for market rate apartments, the applicant will not want to be in a situation where people won’t rent because there is not enough parking in the lot. She stated that issue can be addressed when they return with final plan sets. Councilmember Butler stated she is not comfortable approving an allowance at 1.7 spaces per unit considering what she already knows about the situation at existing apartment parking lots. She asked whether the three requested allowances are considered as one or separately as she does not have a problem with the other two requests. Mayor Willson stated based on past practice, a Councilmember can request to separate considerations. Mayor Willson noted this consideration is slightly out of order from what has occurred in the past and he thought these allowances would first be considered by the Planning Commission with a recommendation for the City Council’s consideration. He asked if the allowances are binding on the City Council if approved. Ms. McIntosh clarified that the property is not owned by the applicant but they are in talks with the owner. Because the applicant wants to convert the building from senior housing to market rate, parking is a determining factor. In that effort, the applicant has addressed parking by adding surface parking as there is no intent to add to the parking structure. Mayor Willson stated the City Council does not get into the property purchase negotiations between private properties but this feels like that may be the case. He asked if the allowances are binding if approved tonight or can the allowances be changed later by City Council action. City Attorney Troy Gilchrist advised this action would approve the scope of flexibility allowed with this property. He stated he suspects this is before the City Council because the applicant would like to exercise this flexibility in deciding whether to purchase this property. City Attorney Gilchrist advised the City would not be bound by these allowances, if approved tonight, but that may be counter to what the applicant expects the City Council to consider in final design. Mayor Willson expressed concern with considering allowance flexibility before ever seeing the project plans. He stated he has no problem with the three requests other than the way the process is going forward because normally, the Planning Commission would have looked at this in conjunction with the final plans and then make a recommendation to the City Council. Mayor Willson stated his concern that if approved tonight, the City Council ‘goes in blind.’ Ms. McIntosh stated this process is also different for City staff as they usually get full plan sets so instead this is like looking at changing the Master Plan to a PUD. She noted the applicant has indicated they are looking at surface parking but if the City Council is not comfortable with surface parking and would want a ramp, then that should be indicated now. Ms. McIntosh noted the full plan sets still need to be submitted for Planning Commission review and recommendation. Mayor Willson stated again his concern that these allowances would be binding on a future consideration and that by approving tonight, the City Council has no control over building plans when they come forward on these three issues. City Attorney Gilchrist advised the City Council will have control but the plans come with the expectation the City Council will grant the flexibility being considered tonight. In addition, approving allowances tonight does not approve 07/09/18 -10- DRAFT specific building plans as that comes later. City Attorney Gilchrist stated if approved, there would be an expectation from the applicant that if the plans reflect these allowances, it would be acceptable. But, the City Council still has authority to make changes, such as to parking location. Councilmember Ryan stated the substance of consideration is the applicant cannot go below 1.7 parking spaces and if this is an upscale conversion, there is strong economic interest to increase parking availability. Ms. McIntosh stated the 1.7 parking spaces are all on site. Councilmember Ryan noted there is also opportunity to consider off-site parking on neighboring properties that can be considered later. Ms. McIntosh stated that is correct and a condition can be added to require the applicant to take additional action if parking is deemed to be insufficient at any point in the future. Mayor Willson stated he has no problem with the three allowances being requested, though he thinks it is the wrong time. He stated he is willing to consider the allowances separately. Mayor Willson stressed to staff that he does not want to consider a precedence or consider this process again in the future. Councilmember Graves stated Councilmember Butler expressed her same thoughts and especially if the project converts from senior living to market rate multi-family, which conceivably could have more than one driver per apartment and only 1.7 parking spaces per unit are being provided. She felt that ratio makes more sense for senior housing. Also, adding three more units would then potentially increase the need for parking. Councilmember Graves stated she does not have a problem with the requested signage allowance. Mayor Willson stated the applicant and owners will have to deal with the parking issues. The City deals with rental licensing and number of police calls to the property. Mayor Willson noted if there are police calls about parking on the street, then that is where the City’s enforcement of the rental license comes in. Councilmember Graves stated her preference to prevent police calls from happening in the first place and not after the fact. Mr. Boganey agreed this is an unusual consideration and he appreciates the Mayor’s comments in that regard. He stated from his perspective, it is important to explain why it was brought before the City Council in this way. Mr. Boganey noted the current building has 140 units and under current standard that requires 280 parking spaces. There is no place to put 280 parking spaces on this site so it has been out of compliance since Day 1. Now the building is unoccupied and a purchaser wants to take a ‘lemon and make lemonade’ but there is no economic way to add 109 spaces. For that reason, the purchaser is rightfully hesitant to acquire the vacant property with the expectation that he will have to add 109 spaces to comply with the current Ordinances. The purchaser would like some indication the City Council is willing to offer some flexibility beyond the ordinance requirement for 280 parking spaces. Mr. Boganey noted the purchaser has some options to negotiate with the seller an agreement to allow for additional days to go through the site plan review process and get all required approvals before entering into the final purchase 07/09/18 -11- DRAFT agreement or do what is being done today to get a clear read from the City Council as to whether they are willing to be flexible. Mr. Boganey stated the question may be what makes staff think this apartment will function effectively without two parking spaces per unit when parking on the street is also prohibited. That information was provided to staff and the owner has indicated they feel comfortable that 1.7 spaces per unit is adequate based on their experience with the market they intend to serve. If staff had not seen that data, staff would not be presenting it to the City Council. Mayor Willson asked about the option for parking off site. Erik Falkman, Lux Apartments LLC, 6401 Camden Avenue N., addressed the City Council. He stated they own close to 650 apartment units in Brooklyn Center, in four separate buildings, and conducted an informal internal survey of those apartment properties at 2:30 a.m., when the parking lot was the most full. Based on that survey, they determined that 1.7 was the maximum used by their apartments. Mr. Falkman stated they are making a substantial investment in this property and he appreciates the City Council’s consideration of this request. He agreed the sequencing is out of order from the normal process but they want to have control of the parking issue. Mr. Falkman noted this property has 140 units, with 90 one-bedrooms, 50 two-bedrooms and no three-bedrooms. Jim Soderberg, Lux Apartments LLC, 6401 Camden Avenue N., addressed the City Council. He stated they will install upgraded finishes including new doors with electronic locks, granite, stainless steel appliances, upgraded exterior materials, two roof-top decks, and signage to attract traffic from Highway 100. Mr. Soderberg stated they came to Brooklyn Center in 1995 and since then, think the changes in Brooklyn Center are spectacular. He described other crime- ridden apartment buildings they have purchased and improved and stated they have over $50 million in Brooklyn Center and this new project would add $3.5 million of improvements. Mr. Soderberg addressed Councilmember Graves’ concern and assured the City Council that if they did not think they had enough parking, they would not do this deal. He stated they also surveyed their Hopkins apartment where they had 1.9 parking spaces per unit. Mr. Soderberg stated their support of the Top Golf business and anything that benefits Brooklyn Center, noting levels of crime in the City’s apartments have been greatly reduced. Mayor Willson stated he does not dispute the good improvements the applicants have made to apartments in the City but his struggle is the procedural piece, which he finds to be odd. But, on the other hand, Mayor Willson acknowledged the applicant is paying the money so he understands their desire to ask the City Council to move in the direction with which they are comfortable. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked about the bedroom mix. Mr. Falkman stated there are currently 140 units, with 90 one-bedrooms and 50 two-bedrooms. Councilmember Ryan thanked the applicants for sharing additional information, noting he is more comfortable with the procedural anomalies after further explanation that the parking 07/09/18 -12- DRAFT requirements meet their expectations and comments by Mr. Boganey. He stated he is encouraged by the level of improvements and acknowledged and thanked the applicants for turning around other multi-family properties in the City to address those significant and serious problems in the past. Councilmember Ryan stated he is now comfortable supporting this request. Councilmember Graves asked about the parking spaces, noting if every two-bedroom had two drivers, and half of the one-bedrooms had two drivers, then parking is still under their number. She stated she made an estimated guess that they need 235 spaces and 244 spaces are being provided. Mr. Falkman stated that is a good observation and roughly the same calculations they used. Plus, they can expand that number if using some of their surrounding properties. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson asked if there are any plans for a future parking ramp. Mr. Soderberg stated there is a two-level parking ramp but you could not add on three more floors. In addition, a parking ramp is economically impossible and would look horrible as it would be in front of a gorgeous building. Mr. Soderberg assured the City Council that with the intended landscaping and fencing, the on-site parking will not look that bad. Councilmember Butler asked about visitor parking when there is not enough parking for each unit if there are two drivers per unit. She stated in going to community meetings, 40-50 people have told her there is not enough parking for apartment residents and no parking for their visitors. Mr. Soderberg agreed with the importance of providing adequate visitor parking, which will be located the farthest away from the doors, the same as at their other 24 apartment communities. Mr. Falkman stated he is not a parking expert but they deal with it every day and receive feedback from their residents. He stated they have a lot of ways to maximize the flow of parking, noting they have other properties where parking is constrained but they understand how that parking has to be moved around. Mr. Boganey stated if you begin with the assumption that reducing the parking requirement is potentially problematic, he would ask why then add three units and make it even worse. Mr. Soderberg stated 1.7 is not problematic because they think they will have a lot of left over parking spots at 1.7. With regard to the three additional units, there is a seventh-floor balcony that could be used for a penthouse apartment or maybe two units. He noted the tenth-floor balcony will have views of downtown, they will change the metal balcony railings to glass railings, and add other nice amenities. Mr. Soderberg stated they want to create statement units and for people to think it is a brand-new building. Mr. Boganey asked what is the principal reason the applicants are unable to delay closing until after they have gone through the typical application process for site and building plan review by the Planning Commission with recommendation to the City Council. Mr. Soderberg explained discussions with the sellers started in December, this has already been delayed, and the sellers have run out of patience at this point. He would like a resolution tonight to gain a comfort level to move forward. Mr. Soderberg noted this is one of the last areas to redevelop and assured the City Council this will be an incredible improvement. 07/09/18 -13- DRAFT Councilmember Graves stated she contacted people who were displaced from an apartment and was told they were not given much notice about moving out. She asked why residents were not aware of what was happening sooner. Mr. Falkman stated that happened before they became involved but some of the issues came down to process and legalities with senor living. He noted they were at 30% occupancy for a period of time, the building was functionally obsolete for senior housing use, and they were not financially able to continue operation. He stated his understanding they went above and beyond in notice and upgraded those residents living situation within 30-45 days. Mr. Soderberg stated in December, the timing had to do with The Sanctuary, which was also delayed, and they wanted to make sure they had a place for displaced residents. He agreed the people were relocated quickly and into better housing. Mayor Willson noted City staff also stepped up to work with those residents and went beyond what was required to make sure those residents had a place to go. In addition, The Sanctuary went above and beyond. Mayor Willson commended staff for what they had done for those residents. Mr. Soderberg stated they also covered some moving expenses for those residents even though they were not required to do so. Councilmember Ryan moved and Mayor Willson seconded to approve an allowance for an off- street parking ratio of approximately 1.7 parking spaces per dwelling unit versus the minimum required two parking spaces per dwelling unit. Councilmember Butler voted against the same and Councilmember Graves abstained. Motion passed. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to approve a wall signage allowance of up to 350-square feet on the south elevation of the existing 11-story apartment building Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to approve an allowance of three additional dwelling units for future approval of a total of 143 units versus the existing 140 units. Councilmember Lawrence Anderson asked whether the number of additional dwelling units can be amended to be allowed only if there are no issues with parking at a ratio of 1.7 parking spaces. Mayor Willson stated that is not an issue as the allowance is 1.7 parking spaces no matter the number of units. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she wants to assure there is not a parking issue already and then units are added. Councilmember Ryan noted the motion references the need for future approval so that decision can be made at a future point. 07/09/18 -14- DRAFT Motion passed unanimously. Mayor Willson stated his appreciation to the applicant for taking on another large project and making an investment in the City. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. CONSIDERATION OF TYPE IV 6-MONTH PROVISIONAL RENTAL LICENSES Mayor Willson explained the streamlined process that will now be used to consider Type IV 6- Month Provisional Rental Licenses. Mayor Willson polled the audience and asked whether anyone was in attendance to provide testimony on any of the rental licenses as listed on tonight’s meeting agenda. Seeing no one coming forward, Mayor Willson called for a motion on Agenda Items 10a1 through 10a2. 10a1. 7131 HALIFAX AVENUE NORTH 10a2. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-138 APPROVING A TYPE IV RENTAL LICENSE FOR 5351 IRVING AVENUE NORTH Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to approve the issuance of a Type IV six-month provisional rental license and mitigation plan for the following: 7131 Halifax Avenue North; and, adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2018-138 Approving a Type IV Rental License for 5351 Irving Avenue North, with the requirement that the mitigation plans and all applicable ordinances must be strictly adhered to before renewal licenses would be considered. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Ryan reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • July 7, 2018: Pop Up Market • July 9, 2018: Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Comp Plan • July 12, 2018: Association for Responsible Management • July 9-11, 2018: Policy Management Meetings on Transportation • July 19, 2018: Southeast Bellvue Park Neighborhood Meeting Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • June 29, 2018: Dudley Classic • July 7, 2018: Pop Up Market • July 9, 2018: Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Comp Plan 07/09/18 -15- DRAFT Councilmember Graves reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • June 28, 2018: Northside Story Kick-Off Event • June 28, 2018: Dudley Classic • July 6, 2018: NAACP Film Screening of The Suspect • July 7, 2018: Pop Up Market • July 9, 2018: Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Comp Plan Councilmember Graves announced she will be out of town from July 29 to August 5, 2018, and will miss the July 30, 2018, meeting. Councilmember Butler reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • June 27, 2018: Delivered New Homeowner Bags • June 30, 2018: Hmong Freedom Festival • July 7, 2018: Pop Up Market • July 9, 2018: Joint Work Session with the Planning Commission on the Comp Plan • July 11, 2018: Delivery of New Homeowner Bags • July 13-15, 2018: Local Progress Convening Event Councilmember Butler announced she will be out of the country July 23, 2018, and unable to attend the City Council Meeting. Mayor Willson reported on his attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • June 26, 2018: Rotary Luncheon • June 29, 2018: Meeting with Mr. Boganey • July 1, 2018: St. Peter for Veterans Memorial Celebration and Monument Unveiling • July 6, 2018: Meeting with Mr. Boganey • July 7, 2018: Pop Up Market • July 9, 2018: Regional Council of Mayors • July 9, 2018: Blue Line Now Meeting • July 9, 2018: Joint Work Session with Planning Commission on the Comp Plan 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS 9b. PLANNING COMMMISISON APPLICATION NO. 2018-011, SUBMITTED BY LUK APARTMENTS, LLC, REQUESTING APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE 1992 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND DOCUMENTS AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS TO ALLOW FOR THE CONVERSION OF A FORMER SENIOR LIVING FACILITY TO MARKET RATE APARTMENTS (LOCATED AT 6100 SUMMIT DRIVE NORTH) – continued 07/09/18 -16- DRAFT City Attorney Gilchrist advised that while the City Council acted on the three allowance items, it did not act on the resolution that included additional restrictions on approval. He recommended the City Council take action on the full resolution. Councilmember Ryan moved and Mayor Willson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2018- 127, Regarding the Recommended Disposition of Planning Commission Application No. 2018- 11 Submitted by Lux Apartments, LLC, for an amendment to the 1992 Planned Unit Development Plans and Documents and site improvements to allow for the conversion of a former senior living facility to market rate apartments (Located at 6100 Summit Drive North). Councilmember Ryan stated he appreciates the remarks of the City Attorney and hence his oversight on the motion. Mayor Willson stated his support of the City Attorney’s recommendation to take this action. Motion passed unanimously. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 9:04 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 07/09/18 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION JULY 9, 2018 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Tim Willson at 9:13 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Tim Willson and Councilmembers/Commissioners Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Carla Wirth, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. FORMER JERRY’S FOOD REDEVELOPMENT CONCEPT FOLLOW-UP DISCUSSION City Manager Curt Boganey introduced the topic and stated the City Council is asked to review the process through which a charter school could be approved on the former Jerry’s Food site and to provide feedback and direction to staff on whether to proceed. Community Development Director Meg Beekman reviewed that at the June 25, 2018, City Council Work session a concept was introduced to redevelop the former Jerry’s Food site into a charter school. At that time, the developer presented their concept and indicated timing is critical for the successful reuse of the site into a charter school, and they would need to be able to proceed with construction as soon as possible. This is pertinent to the discussion because in order to move forward with an approval for the project, the City would need to amend the Zoning Code, rezone the property, and amend the Comprehensive Plan to allow a future land use designation that is appropriate for this use, all of which take time. Ms. Beekman presented the staff report and considerations before the City Council. She stated the Comprehensive Plan amendment is the most time consuming as it requires Met Council approval, meaning that December is the soonest this decision can be made. Ms. Beekman reviewed the overlay district, which also needs to be amended to exclude the Jerry’s Food site or amend the language to allow a charter school, noting a discussion with the City Attorney is needed to determine which procedure would be the best. 07/09/18 -2- DRAFT Ms. Beekman stated another issue relates to the City’s design standards and guidelines that are used Citywide and with rezoning or PUD consideration, the design guidelines become required. Based on discussions with the developer and price per square foot, it is suspected allowance to the design standards would be needed. However, until full plan sets are submitted, it is impossible to determine what areas will require accommodation but it is important to note that requests for that accommodation may be part of the application. Ms. Beekman stated the developer will determine on their own whether to proceed with a formal application but the discussion tonight relates to the process it would entail. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated this includes complicated procedural steps should the City Council/EDA consider the proposed charter school on the Jerry’s Food site. In addition, if the changes are made, there could be potentially a whole set of policy issues for the City Council/EDA to consider beyond the Jerry’s Food site including policy of future overlay sites and zoning standards. Ms. Beekman stated that is a good point as there are a lot of policy decision needed but this is a land use never considered on this site or land use situation. From staff’s point, they want to be cautious in offering a false sense of security that the City Council/EDA would consider this as there is no precedence in how this process would be handled. She noted the City Council/EDA has the discretion to rezone, rewrite land use policies, and overlay districts but it comes with needing to weigh the pros and cons of that action. She stated those are weighty issues and take time for consideration. With setting precedence, she stated she would refer to the City Attorney but given the discretionary nature, she ventured to say it would not create a legal precedent. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated the summary presented in Mr. Boganey’s update lists the projects staff is currently working on and if the City Council were to consider this request, it would even more heavily task staff to consider these changes and meet the deadline as well as the Met Council review of the Comp Plan amendment. Mayor/President Willson stated he does not see staff time as a significant problem, though it would increase their task load. But more importantly, the data received by Ms. Beekman and changes being contemplated do not fit well in that area as it is designated for retail, the City is building on that retail, and a charter school does not fit well. Mayor/President Willson stated he wants to be as transparent as possible and after a full review, he is not able to support this project and move forward with the changes required for it to happen. Mayor/President Willson stated the retail anticipated for properties in that general area will be a higher usage than what’s being proposed, which is an important consideration with the tax base. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated her initial reaction was excitement about the idea and concept but she has a hard time seeing it in that space. Mayor/President Willson agreed that what they are trying to do is great and there is a need but he believes this is the wrong place. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan concurred it is a noble undertaking but the wrong place and is not the highest and best use for this significant location. He stated the City Council/EDA may be criticized for this position but this is not the right project for this site. 07/09/18 -3- DRAFT Mayor/President Willson stated his unwillingness to consider all of these changes and the time it would take and certainly not without further study by the Planning Commission. He stated his appreciation to the developer for considering this location but in his mind, it does not fit the use. Jeffrey Laux, developer, addressed the City Council/EDA. He thanked the City Council/EDA for considering what they are proposing and giving him a fast answer. He stated his appreciation to Ms. Beekman for the time she put into it. He stated it was enjoyable to watch each member of the City Council/EDA at the last meeting during which members voiced their love for kids and seeing lives transformed. He stated he met with the school’s representatives today and told them he did not know how it would go tonight. Mr. Laux asked the City Council/EDA to let him know of other locations in Brooklyn Center that would be more appropriate for this use. He recognized the City Council/EDA for their work on behalf of the City, which is commendable, and stated citizens should be proud of what they are doing. Darcy Winter, Realtor representing Jerry’s Foods, addressed the City Council/EDA. She stated they would like to sell the property for a use that benefits the community such as retail. She reviewed her professional experience as a Realtor, noting she has never worked with such a difficult site. She stated her client also owns the Cub store development and Aldi was not a deal as they did not offer market rate. Mayor/President Willson stated the City has approached Jerry’s Food a number of times to purchase the property and even indicated a willingness to consider no compete language. Ms. Winter stated she has been the Real Estate broker of Jerry’s Foods for more than 12 years and the City has never approached her with a reasonable offer on the property. She stated there has been high-level discussion and if a price has been offered, it was one that would not work. Mayor/President Willson stated there has been some interest in this site including for worker rate housing. Ms. Winter asked whether worker rate housing would be of interest but not a charter school. Mayor/President Willson answered in the affirmative. AN INTERIM ORDINANCE AUTHOHRIZING A STUDY AND PLACING A MORATORIUM ON THE SEARS PROPERTY Community Development Director Meg Beekman introduced the topic and stated the City Council is asked to review the draft interim ordinance authorizing a study, placing a moratorium on the Sears property, and provide direction to staff on how to proceed. Ms. Beekman reviewed that in early June of 2018, Sears Roebuck and Company announced the Brooklyn Center Sears store and automotive repair store would be closing by the end of September 2018. The City has not been contacted by Sears or any other contractor interested in the store, which is the final remaining structure from the former Brookdale mall. Thus, it has not been studied or planned for as part of the overall development guidance for the Single Creek Development area. 07/09/18 -4- DRAFT Ms. Beekman reviewed the zoning and overlay on the Sears property that is 15.26-acre site and has high visibility from Highway 100. She noted the City Council/EDA has the authority to adopt an interim ordinance to place a moratorium on development of a particular site, or of a particular type of development citywide. A moratorium would allow the City time to study a particular area or topic to ensure an appropriate regulatory framework is in place to adequately inform future development. Ms. Beekman stated the adoption of an interim ordinance authorizing a study and placing a moratorium on the Sears site will allow time to decide whether any changes are needed to how the property is zoned and guided and to ensure development of the property is consistent with the Shingle Creek Development area. If a study and moratorium are not placed on the property, the property has a potential to be developed in a manner which is inconsistent with the surrounding developments and could extend a negative effect on the area. Ms. Beekman reviewed the process to be followed should an interim ordinance and moratorium be adopted for staff to conduct a study of the property and determine whether the current planned land use and zoning should be revised. Recommendation from that study will be shared with the City Council/EDA upon completion. Also, as part of the Comprehensive Plan update process currently underway, this property has been identified as one of the sites that requires additional focused planning efforts. She noted the current building is not suitable for reuse. Mayor/President Willson supported an 18-month moratorium to assure adequate time for study, noting that should staff not require the full 18 months, the moratorium can be lifted sooner. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated a previous City Council/EDA placed a moratorium on the Pep Boy site so the City’s PUD process could not be circumvented. He stated support for a moratorium on the Sears site as recommended by staff. Mayor/President Willson stated the City also placed a moratorium on a 57 th and Logan site. City Attorney Gilchrist advised the initial moratorium cannot exceed one year but it can be extended under certain circumstances. Mayor/President Willson stated he would then support a one-year moratorium with the City Attorney researching the terms for an extension. Mr. Boganey stated City staff wants to get it done before one year, which may require hiring some outside resources to accomplish. He explained the City wants to be in a position so when Sears moves forward, the City is not an obstacle and can help them identify the best and right use. He reported that use of vacant Sears buildings in other locations range from converting to housing to being torn down for a new use. The majority consensus of the City Council/EDA was to support a one-year moratorium on the Sears site with the City Attorney to research terms for extension, if needed. ADJOURNMENT 07/09/18 -5- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan moved and Councilmember/Commissioner Graves seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 9:50 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 1 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SPECIAL SESSION JULY 16, 2018 CITY HALL – ALL AMERICAN CONFERENCE ROOM CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in a special session. At 5:35 p.m. Councilmember Butler moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded a motion to open the special meeting. Motion passed unanimously. IN ATTENDANCE Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler and Dan Ryan. City Staff present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Police Chief Tim Gannon, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist. Also present were Claims Supervisor Mark Rossow, League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust, and Defense Counsel Jason Hiveley, Iverson Reuvers Condon. CLOSED SESSION Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded a motion to go into closed session for an attorney-client privileged discussion with the city’s attorneys pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.05, subdivision 3(b) regarding the Kevin Flicek vs. City of Brooklyn Center litigation matter. Motion passed unanimously. Litigation matters were discussed. REOPEN SESSION At 6:34 p.m. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded a motion to go into open session. Motion passed unanimously. ADJOURNMENT At 6:34 p.m. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded a motion to adjourn the meeting. Motion passed unanimously. 2 STATE OF MINNESOTA) COUNTY OF HENNEPIN) ss. Certification of Minutes CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, certifies: 1. That attached hereto is a full, true, and complete transcript of the minutes of a Special Session of the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center held on July 16, 2018. 2. That said meeting was held pursuant to due call and notice thereof and was duly held at Brooklyn Center City Hall. 3. That the City Council adopted said minutes at its July 23, 2018, Regular Session. _________________________ _____________________________ City Clerk Mayor 07/16/18 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITYOF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JOINT WORK SESSION WITH FINANCIAL COMMISSION JULY 16, 2018 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Joint Work Session with the Financial Commission and the session was called to order by Mayor Tim Willson at 6:41 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Tim Willson and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Finance Director Nate Reinhardt, Public Works Director Doran Coate, City Engineer Mike Albers, and Deputy City Clerk Rozlyn Tousignant. Councilmember Kris Lawrence-Anderson was absent. Others present were Financial Commissioners David Dwapu, Tia Hedenland, Abate Terefe, Teneshia Kragness, and Dean Van Der Werf. Commissioners Jeffrey Dobbs was absent. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Councilmember Ryan moved for adoption of the July 16, 2018, agenda, Councilmember Graves seconded. Motion passed unanimously. OVERVIEW/INTRODUCTION Mayor Willson provided a brief welcome and overview, along with City Manager Curt Boganey and Finance Director Nate Reinhardt. Mr. Boganey informed the purpose of tonight’s meeting was to discuss the long-range Capital Improvement Plan and the annual Capital Program for the various Capital Funds of the City. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 2019 – 2033 Finance Director Nate Reinhardt provided a PowerPoint presentation and review of the Capital Improvements Plan 2019 – 2033. Mr. Reinhardt reviewed the project types and funding sources. Mayor Willson asked about Trunk Highway 252 being listed for the 2021 Capital Improvement Plan. Mr. Albers explained that MNDoT has requested that the City move the construction on the interchange at 66 th to the year 2022 due to the construction on 35W. 07/16/18 -2- DRAFT INDIVIDUAL CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Mr. Reinhardt’s presentation included information on the various Capital Projects Funds including Capital Improvements Fund, Municipal State Aid Fund, Street Reconstruction Fund, Special Assessments, Infrastructure Fund, Overview of Utility Fund, Technology Fund, EBHC Capital Fund, and BC Liquor Capital Fund. He provided an overview of CIP changes, costs, funds, and cash flow analysis. Mr. Reinhardt explained the City’s Capital Improvement Fund Policies. Councilmember Graves inquired about whether the interstate area improvements were already scheduled or were a result of the plans for construction on Trunk Highway 252. Mr. Albers replied that the interchange projects had always been included in the CIP plans. Mr. Boganey noted that for 2020-2023 no proceeds from bonds are expected. Mr. Reinhardt explained that the large projects in 2017-2018 there was not the cash on hand, however, the City should have the cash-flow for future projects. Councilmember Ryan requested clarification on the payments for the Water Treatment facility. Mr. Reinhardt responded by explaining the process of a PFA loan and that 2035 is the estimate payoff date. Mr. Boganey highlighted the sanitary sewer system as an example of the payoff of the Capital Improvement Project fund in maintaining City infrastructure. Councilmember Ryan asked if the City is receiving good numbers from the Metro Environmental Services. Mr. Reinhardt explained that the Metropolitan Council manages the City’s Sanitary Sewer flow and that the City will follow up in the meetings focused on the Operational Funds. Mayor Willson inquired about the pond-work behind EBHC. Mr. Reinhardt shared that the funding for the project has yet to be determined. Mayor Willson followed up about renovating Shingle Creek south of Kohls. Mr. Boganey stated that at this point the City is waiting on the developer to take the lead on that project. Mr. Boganey inquired what types of improvements will be made in 2022-2026 that would general capital costs to the Street Light Fund. Mr. Albers explained that in previous street reconstruction, and mill and overlay projects, the street lights had not been replaced. Mayor Willson asked what the expected life is for the street-lights replaced with LEDs. Mr. Coate responded that Xcel typically uses 10-year lights, though depending on the usage the lights can last up to 15-years. 07/16/18 -3- DRAFT Councilmember Butler inquired about the City’s entry-point displays and when those projects would be completed. Mr. Reinhardt and Mr. Boganey explained that those renovations would be included in the Brooklyn Boulevard CIP projects. Councilmember Graves asked how the City decides when and how to start a particular fund; in particular, how to target those funds to the strategic priorities of the City. Mr. Boganey stated that funds are create when there exists a unique operational need, where the cost of the project would not be covered by an existing fund or not appropriately paid out of the General Fund. Mr. Boganey added that the creation of a fund depends on the source of revenue. A discussion was held regarding Council priorities in regards to the General Fund. A discussion was held regarding whether the City should buy or lease space for the Liquor Stores, and potential relocation sites. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to adjourn the Work Session at 8:29 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:R eggie Edwards, Deputy C ity Manager F R O M:R ozlyn Tous ignant, Deputy C ity C lerk S UBJ EC T:Lic enses Recommendation: It is recommended that the C ity C ounc il c onsider approval of the following licens es on July 23, 2018. Background: T he following bus inesses/pers ons have applied for C ity licens es as noted. Eac h busines s /person has fulfilled the requirements of the C ity O rdinanc e governing respec tive lic enses, submitted appropriate applic ations , and paid proper fees . Applicants for rental dwelling licens es are in compliance with C hapter 12 of the C ity C ode of O rdinances, unless comments are noted below the property addres s on the attached rental report. ME C HAN IC AL Air Mec hanical Inc.16411 Aberdeen S t. NE, Ham Lake, MN 55304 Kline C orp DBA P rac tic al S ys tems; DBA Duc tworks Heating & C ooling 3230 G orham Ave S te 1, S t. Louis P ark, MN 55426 Wenc l S ervices Inc.8148 P ills bury Ave S ., Bloomington, MN 55420 Requested Council Action: Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity Pr o p e r t y A d d r e s s Dw e l l i n g Ty p e Re n e w a l or I n i t i a l Ow n e r Pr o p e r t y Co d e Vi o l a t i o n s Li c e n s e Ty p e Po l i c e CF S * Fi n a l Li c e n s e Ty p e * * Pr e v i o u s Li c e n s e Ty p e * * * 90 4 5 3 r d A v e N S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Mo s h e V o r o t i n o v / I s t o k i So u r c e s M e k o r o t 2 I I 0 I I I V 13 3 0 6 7 t h L n N Si n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Ma r k S i b i l e v 2 I I 0 I I I I 13 2 0 6 8 t h L n N Si n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Ra c h e l O m a o a n d C y r u s K e r i a g o 1 I 0 I I 66 1 4 B r y a n t A v e N S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Yi L i n / K h a i H o n g L i m Pr o p e r t i e s 8 I I I 0 I I I I I 67 0 6 D r e w A v e N S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l 6 7 0 6 D r e w A v e L L C 3 I I I 0 I I I I I 70 4 4 D r e w A v e N S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Je n n i f e r L e n h a r t / J a n Mo r h f e l d 1 I 0 I I I 24 0 6 E r i c o n D r S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Cr y s t a l B r u m m e r / B r u m m e r Re a l t y , L L C 1 I 0 I I V 59 3 1 H a l i f a x P l S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l J e r i l o u W i e d m e y e r 1 I 0 I I I 58 1 9 K n o x A v e N S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l Cr y s t a l B r u m m e r / B r u m m e r Re a l t y , L L C 1 I 0 I I V 69 1 2 U n i t y A v e N S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l G e r i L y n n W i l l i a m s 4 I I 1 I I I I 38 0 1 W o o d b i n e L a S i n g l e F a m i l y R e n e w a l T o m P r a s k y 3 I I 0 I I I I I * C F S = C a l l s F o r S e r v i c e f o r R e n e w a l L i c e n s e s O n l y ( I n i t i a l L i c e n s e s a r e n o t a p p l i c a b l e t o c a l l s f o r s e r v i c e a n d w i l l b e l i s t e d N / A . ) ** L i c e n s e T y p e B e i n g I s s u e d Ty p e I = 3 Y e a r T y p e I I = 2 Y e a r T y p e I I I = 1 Y e a r Y ** * I n i t i a l l i c e n s e s w i l l n o t s h o w a p r e v i o u s l i c e n s e t y p e Al l p r o p e r t i e s a r e c u r r e n t o n C i t y u t i l i t i e s a n d p r o p e r t y t a x e s Re n t a l L i c e n s e s f o r C o u n c i l A p p r o v a l o n J u l y 2 3 , 2 0 1 8 COUNCIL ITEM MEMORANDUM Our Vision: We envision Brooklyn Center as a thriving, diverse community with a full range of housing, business, cultural and recreational offerings. It is a safe and inclusive place that people of all ages love to call home, and visitors enjoy due to its convenient location and commitment to a healthy environment Rental License Category Criteria Policy – Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3+ units Greater than 3 License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0 .5 0 Budget Issues: There are no budget issues to consider. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Doran C ote, P ublic Works Director S UBJ EC T:R esolution Amending S pecial Assessment Levy R oll Nos . 19775 and 19776 to P rovide for the Deferment of S pecial Assessments Recommendation: It is recommended that the C ity C ounc il approve the res olution amending S pecial Assessment Levy R oll Nos . 19775 and 19776 to provide for the deferral of s pecial as s es s ments . Background: O n Dec ember 11, 2017, the C ity C ouncil by R es olution 2017-205, approved S pec ial As s es s ment Levy R oll Nos . 19775 and 19776 for the F irehous e P ark Area S treet and S torm Drainage Improvements, P rojec t Nos . 2018-01 and 02. T he attached resolution amends the res pective levy rolls to provide for the deferral of s pecial as s es s ments on two properties where the qualifying person is eligible becaus e they are at leas t 65 years of age or older, or permanently dis abled and whose hous ehold meets certain financial limitations. T he C ity of Brooklyn C enter c alculates and levies s pecial as s es s ments in ac cordance with S ection 2.10 of the C ity C ounc il C ode of P olic ies . T his doc ument outlines the proc es s and proc edures within the C ity’s S pec ial As s es s ment P olic y for funding of public improvement projects . S ubsec tion 4 of the S pec ial As s es s ment P olicy provides for a program to defer a portion of the s pecial as s es s ments for qualifying persons under the provisions of Minnesota S tatutes 435.193 through 435.195. A copy of s ubsec tion 4 of the S pec ial As s es s ment P olicy is attached to this memorandum. T he C ity received two applications for deferral of spec ial assessments that met the required standards to qualify under the attac hed S pecial Assessment P olicy standards. T hese properties are as follows: 6824 C olfax Avenue N 6437 G irard Avenue N T he applic ants have provided inc ome tax documentation meeting “very low income” limits es tablished by HUD. Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve resolution Budget Issues: T he proposed s pecial as s es s ments deferral for said properties totals $7,609.10 ($5,853.11 for street and $1,755.99 for storm drainage). T he amount to be c ertified for said properties totals $3,708.90 ($2,852.89 for s treet and $856.01 for s torm). T he total amount of s pecial as s es s ments previously levied was $2,001,844.28. T he net reduc tion in short-term projec t revenue of less than one percent due to the proposed deferment does not c reate a subs tantial funding c onc ern bas ed on an analysis of the project c os ts to date. S trategic Priorities and Values: Key Transportation Inves tments Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _____________ RESOLUTION AMENDING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT LEVY ROLL NOS. 19775 AND 19776 TO PROVIDE FOR THE DEFERRAL OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the City Council has met, heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed Special Assessment Levy Roll Nos.19775 and 19776 for the Firehouse Park Area Street and Strom Drainage Improvements, Project Nos. 2018-01 and 02; WHEREAS, Special Assessment Levy Roll Nos.19775 and 19776 were approved by the City Council on December 11, 2017; and WHEREAS, the City Council has established a program to defer a portion of the special assessments of qualifying persons who are at least 65 years of age or older or who are retired due to permanent and total disability whose households meet certain financial limitations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota that the following properties are eligible to defer a portion of their special assessment for Improvement Project Nos. 2018-01 and 02, therefore amending Special Assessment Levy Roll Nos. 19775 and 19776 as noted below. Special Assessment Levy Roll No. 19775 is hereby amended to reduce the previous amount of $4,353 from the following assessments to the new amount as noted: Pid No. Levy Amount DeferredAmount Interest Rate (%) 36-119-21-21-0024 $1,712.97 $2,640.03 4.0 36-119-21-32-0040 $1,139.92 $3,213.08 4.0 Special Assessment Levy Roll No. 19776 is hereby amended to reduce the previous amount of $1,306 from the following assessments to the new amount as noted: PID No. Levy Amount DeferredAmount Interest Rate (%) 36-119-21-21-0024 $513.98 $792.02 4.0 36-119-21-32-0040 $342.03 $963.97 4.0 July 23, 2018 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director S UBJ EC T:An Interim O rdinance Authorizing a S tudy and P lacing a Moratorium on the S ears P roperty Recommendation: It is recommended that C ity C ouncil make a motion to approve the interim ordinance authorizing a study and placing a moratorium on the S ears property, loc ated at 1297 S hingle C reek Drive and legally des cribed as R egis tered Land S urvey No. 0936 Hennepin C ounty, Minnes ota. Background: In early June of 2018, S ears R oebuc k and C ompany announc ed the Brooklyn C enter S ears store and automotive repair s tore would be closed. Both the S ears store and the automotive c enter are s cheduled to be closed by the end of S eptember 2018. T he S ears s tore is the final remaining s tructure from the former Brookdale Mall and has not been s tudied or planned for as part of the overall development guidance for the S hingle C reek Development Area. T he S ears property is 15.26 ac res and has high vis ibility from Highway 100. T he C ity C ouncil has the authority to adopt an interim ordinance, whic h would plac e a moratorium on development of a partic ular s ite, or of a partic ular type of development city-wide. A moratorium allows the C ity time to s tudy a particular area or topic to ensure that an appropriate regulatory framework is in place to adequately inform future development. T he adoption of an interim ordinance authorizing a study and plac ing a moratorium on the S ears site will allow time to decide whether any changes are needed to how the property is zoned and guided and to ens ure development of the property is cons is tent with the S hingle C reek Development Area. If a study and moratorium is not plac ed on the property, the property has a potential to be developed in a manner whic h is inc onsistent with the s urrounding developments and which c ould have extended negative effects on the area. Upon adoption of the interim ordinance and moratorium, C ity S taff will begin to conduc t a study of the property to determine if the current planned land use and zoning of the property should be revis ed. R ecommendations from the study will be s hared with the C ity C ouncil upon c ompletion of the study proc es s . As part of the C omprehensive P lan update process currently underway, this property has been identified as one of the s ites which requires additional focus ed planning efforts. T he moratorium will ensure that no new expans ions or new cons truction will occ ur on the site during the duration of the s tudy. T he C ity will not ac cept, process, or is s ue any development applic ations or approvals during the duration of the study and moratorium. T he moratorium would not apply to any applications for permits or approvals whic h only seek to maintain or repair the existing buildings . T he C ity C ouncil has the ability to s elect the length of time for the moratorium to be placed on the property. T he moratorium can be legally plac ed on a property for no more than twelve months , and extended under certain circ umstanc es per Minnesota S tate S tatute 462.355 subdivision 4d. S taff is rec ommending a duration of 12 months to provide enough time to complete a land use and zoning s tudy for the s ite. T he C ity C ounc il has the ability to repeal the moratorium prior to the deadline if the study is completed or it is determined that no change in future land us e or zoning is required. Requested Council Action: - M otion to adopt ordinance Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment 1 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. __________ AN INTERIM ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING A STUDY AND PLACING A MORATORIUM ON THE SEARS PROPERTY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Legislative Findings. The City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center (“City”) hereby finds and determines as follows: 1.01. The City Council has the authority under Minnesota Statutes, section 462.355, subdivision 4 to adopt an interim ordinance “applicable to all or part of its jurisdiction” to “regulate, restrict, or prohibit any use, development, or subdivision” within the City if it has authorized a study to be conducted or has scheduled a hearing for the purpose of considering an amendment to its comprehensive plan or official controls. 1.02. The adoption of an interim ordinance does not require a public hearing and is not subject to the City’s standard ordinance adoption process as it is in the nature of an emergency ordinance in that waiting the several weeks for it to go into effect would undermine the purpose and authority to adopt an interim ordinance. 1.03. The City is in the process of updating its comprehensive plan. 1.04. The City has engaged in extensive planning and has developed guidance for the Shingle Creek development area located between Highway 100, County Road 10, and east of Xerxes Avenue North (“Shingle Creek Development Area”). With the exception of certain properties that were already utilized and had not been redeveloped in several years. 1.05. One such property that had not specifically been planned for as part of the overall development guidance for the Shingle Creek Development Area is the property (PID 03-118-21-44-0026) owned by Sears Roebuck and Company located at 1297 Shingle Creek Drive and legally described as Registered Land Survey No. 0936 Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Sears Property”). 1.06. A recent announcement indicated that the Sears store located on the Sears Property would be closing in the fall of 2018, which raises the potential for redevelopment of the property in the near term. 1.07. Development of the Sears Property occurring before the City has an opportunity to study the planning and zoning for the property, determine whether any changes are needed, and to take action to develop and adopt any such changes could result in development that is inconsistent with other development in the Shingle Creek Development Area and have lasting negative effects. 2 1.08. In order to protect the planning process and to promote consistency within the Shingle Creek Development Area, the City Council determines it is in the best interests of the public to place a temporary moratorium on the development of the Sears Property while the City conducts a study to determine how best to guide development of the Sears Property and to determine if it is appropriately zoned. Section 2. Study Authorized. The City Council hereby authorizes City staff, as directed by the City Manager, to conduct a study of the current planning and zoning for the Sears Property, determine whether the guidance in the comprehensive plan and the zoning for the Sears Property should be revised to be more consistent with the planned guidance for and zoning of the other properties in the Shingle Creek Development Area, and to develop any recommended amendments for consideration by the City Council. Section 3. Moratorium. To ensure that no new construction or expansion occurs on the Sears Property that might be inconsistent with the appropriate guidance in the comprehensive plan or the zoning for the Sears Property that may be identified from the study authorized herein, the City hereby imposes, for the term of this interim ordinance, a moratorium on the acceptance, processing, or issuance of any development applications or approvals including, but not limited to, preliminary plats, rezonings, variances, conditional use permits, site plans, planned unit developments, and permits for the construction or expansion of any building on the Sears Property. The moratorium imposed by this interim ordinance shall not apply to applications for permits or approvals that seek only to maintain or repair, without expanding, an existing building on the Sears Property. Section 4. Effective Date and Term. This interim ordinance shall go into effect immediately upon adoption and shall remain in effect for 12 months, or upon the effective date of any rezoning or comprehensive plan amendment related to the Sears Property adopted in furtherance of the recommendations resulting from the study, whichever occurs first. The City Council may also act by resolution to terminate this interim ordinance prior to the expiration of the term established herein. Section 5. Enforcement. The City may enforce this interim ordinance by mandamus, injunction or any other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. Section 6. Separability. Every section, provision or part of this interim ordinance is declared separable from every other section, provision or part of this ordinance. If any section, provision or part of this interim ordinance is held to be invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction, such judgment shall not invalidate any other section, provision, or part of this interim ordinance. Adopted this 23 rd day of July, 2018. ______________________________ Tim Willson, Mayor ATTEST:____________________________ City Clerk COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director S UBJ EC T:P resentation by S hannon F ull, P res ident/C EO of Twin West C hamber of C ommerce Recommendation: Background: S hannon F ull will be pres ent to introduce herself and dis cus s with the C ouncil her vision for Twin West Area C hamber of C ommerc e, as well as introduc e new initiatives that may benefit the C ity. Requested Council Action: S trategic Priorities and Values: R es ident Ec onomic S tability COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:G inny Mc Intosh, C ity P lanner S UBJ EC T:R esolution to Approve P lanning C ommission Application No. 2018-012, S ubmitted by Von P eters en of T S P, Inc. on behalf of Brooklyn C enter S chool District, R equesting S ite and Building P lan Approval (Loc ated at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North) Recommendation: It is rec o mmended that the C ity C ounc il, following c o nsideratio n o f this planning ap p licatio n item, ap p ro ve the res olution regarding the dispositio n o f P lanning C o mmis s io n Applic ation No . 2018-012, s ubmitted by Von P etersen of T S P, Inc . on behalf of the Brooklyn C enter S chool District. Background: C ity staff met with the Applic ant, the Brooklyn C enter S c hool Dis tric t, and other project representatives on multiple oc c as ions to dis c us s antic ip ated reno vatio ns to the existing 195,797-square fo o t Bro o klyn C enter S econdary S c hool, whic h hous es b o th the mid d le and high s cho o ls . T he p ro p o s al as pres ented inc ludes plans to c o ns truc t a 2,250-s q uare fo o t new front entry ad d ition, 845-square foot 2nd floor mec hanical mezzanine addition, and s elect site landsc ap ing, s idewalk, and as p halt imp ro vements . T hese reques ts are p art of a larger plan to renovate a s ubstantial portio n o f the exis ting s c ho o l’s interio r as p art of a referend um p as s ed in November 2017 that allowed for inc reas es to the Dis tric t’s operating levy and c onstruc tion funding. It s ho uld be no ted that the propos ed interior improvements, inc luding the reloc ation of the middle s c hool to the west wing and high s cho o l to the north wing, relo catio n of shared us e and sup p o rt func tions , s ec urity and s afety improvements , ro o m up d ates, reno vatio ns and ad d itions to res tro o m fac ilities and lo c ker rooms , and deferred maintenanc e, will be reviewed b y C ity s taff s eparately thro ugh the C ity’s Building P ermit proc es s . The items for review under the scope of this application are limited to the proposed exterior additions and select site improvements. T he exis ting s c hool c amp us is loc ated on ap p ro ximately 35.5 ac res and was cons tructed in 1961. G iven the age of the sc hool, the Applic ant will be c ompleting a number of updates relating to deferred maintenanc e, inc luding a reques t under this application to cons truct an 845-s q uare foot 2nd floor mechanic al mezzanine addition. T he Applic ant is also reques ting ap p ro val of a new fro nt entry ad d ition to the s c ho o l, whic h would provide fo r a mo re clearly defined p ublic s o uth main entry with increas ed vis ib ility and s ec urity. T he third item request relates to p lans to install a pedestrian c urb ramp , c ro s s walk, and s elec t sidewalk and as phalt wo rk as they relate to the propos ed new fro nt entry addition. Although sc hool us es are not spec ifically identified under the C ity’s Land s cape P o int S ys tem P olic y, the Applic ant intend s to p lant dwarf Norway s pruce trees and Japanese lilacs in the vicinity of the front entry, d ro p -o ff, and p arking area loc ated along F reeway Boulevard/65th Avenue North to allow for added sc reening from the parking lot and as an esthetic improvement. As the ap p licatio n s ub mitted is for s ite and b uilding plan ap p ro val, no pub lic hearing no tic e was pub lis hed in the Brooklyn C enter S un P ost, and no mail notices were s ent. T he Ap p licant (Vo n P eters en of T S P, Inc .) and a representative o f the Brooklyn C enter S cho o l District were present at the P lanning C ommis s ion meeting on July 12, 2018, and ans wered q uestio ns the P lanning C o mmis s io n had regarding the p ro p o s ed interior improvements, up graded sec urity and ac c es s , and separatio n of the mid d le s cho o l from the high s chool. Additional ques tions were made as they relate to the propos ed 2nd floor mec hanical mezzanine addition. No p ublic c o mments were made p rio r to o r during review o f the reques t. F ollowing a review o f the application requests , the P lanning C o mmis s io n unanimous ly (4-0) recommended approval of the s ite and build ing plan requests as identified under P lanning C ommission Application No. 2018-012. C opies o f the P lanning C o mmis s io n R ep o rt, d ated July 12, 2018, and C ity C o uncil res o lutio n are attached as referenc e. Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve resolution Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: Enhanc ed C ommunity Image Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2018-012 SUBMITTED BY VON PETERSEN OF TSP, INC. ON BEHALF OF BROOKLYN CENTER SCHOOL DISTRICT, REQUESTING SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL (LOCATED AT 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2018-012 was submitted by Von Petersen of TSP, Inc. on behalf of Brooklyn Center School District, requesting consideration of Site and Building Plan approval for an approximately 2,250-square foot front entry addition, 845-square foot 2 nd floor mechanical mezzanine addition, and select site landscaping, sidewalk, and asphalt improvements along the front entry for the Subject Property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2018, the Planning Commission reviewed and received a planning report and Assistant City Engineer’s memorandum on the proposed Site and Building Plan for the proposed additions and site improvements on the approximately 35.5 acre Subject Property; and WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, and utilizing the guidelines and standards for evaluating site and building plans, as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City’s Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission considers this Site and Building Plan an appropriate and reasonable improvement to the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, hereby recommends that the Site and Building Plan for the proposed approximately 2,250-square foot front entry addition, 845-square foot 2 nd floor mechanical mezzanine addition, and select site landscaping, sidewalk, and asphalt improvements along the front entry to the Subject Property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North, as comprehended under Planning Commission Application No. 2018-012, and as submitted by Von Petersen of TSP, Inc. on behalf of the Brooklyn Center School District, may be approved based on the following considerations: A. The Site and Building Plan is compatible with the standards, purposes and intent of the City’s Zoning Ordinance in that the proposed additions and improvements would be constructed well outside the minimum building setback requirements, the proposed landscaping along the front entry and drop off area would offer screening from the parking area as well as visual appeal from the street, and offer pedestrian enhancements and ADA improvements; B. The improvements and utilization of the Subject Property as a secondary school will be continued through additional investment into the continued RESOLUTION NO. function and improved efficiency of the secondary school for students and staff, and general safety and security, is considered a reasonable use of the property and will conform with ordinance standards; C. The Site and Building Plan proposal is considered consistent with the recommendations of the City’s Comprehensive Plan for this area of the City as it is designated for a school use and has functioned at this location since 1961; D. The Site and Building Plan proposal appears to be a good and continued long range use of the existing site and the proposed improvements to the front entry along Freeway Boulevard/65 th Avenue North, addition of a 2nd floor mechanical mezzanine, site improvements, and anticipated interior renovation to the existing 195,797-square foot building, will allow the Subject Property to continue serving as an asset to the community; and E. Based upon the above considerations, it is believed that the guidelines for evaluating and approving a Site and Building Plan, as contained in Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, are met and the Site and Building Plan proposal is, therefore, in the best interest of the community. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, does hereby recommend that Planning Commission Application No. 2018-012, submitted by Von Petersen of TSP, Inc. on behalf of Brooklyn Center School District, for the property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North, be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Building and Site Plan and Review: The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. a. Final construction and demolition plans are to be submitted to the City for review and issuance of a demolition and Building Permit. b. A pre-construction conference shall be held with City staff and other entities designated by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit/Land Disturbance (Alteration) Permit. 2. Agreements: a. The Developer shall execute a separate Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and RESOLUTION NO. maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications and standards comprehended under this Site Plan. b. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement and associated escrow deposit is required prior to Building Permit release. c. The Developer shall submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements, and any utility service lines prior to release of the Performance Agreement financial guarantee. 3. Engineering Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated July 9, 2018. a. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 4. Construction Standards: a. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City’s Public Works Department. b. All work performed and materials used for construction of any utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 5. Landscaping: All landscaped areas, including street boulevards, shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. a. The contractor shall submit irrigation shop drawings for review and approval prior to installation. 6. Signage: Signage for the Subject Property is subject to the Public Use allowances as identified within Chapter 34 ( Sign Ordinance ). Any requests for wall or freestanding signage will require the Applicant to submit a Sign Permit application to the City for review and approval. RESOLUTION NO. July 23, 2018 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: July 12, 2018 Application No. 2018-012 Applicant: Von Petersen of TSP, Inc. (on behalf of Brooklyn Center Schools) Location: 6500 Humboldt Avenue North Request: Site and Building Plan Approval INTRODUCTION Von Petersen of TSP, Inc. (“the Applicant”), on behalf of Brooklyn Center Schools, is requesting the review and consideration of a building and site plan submittal that would result in a small expansion to the existing 195,797-square foot building and site improvements to the Subject Property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North. As part of the request, a 2,250-square foot addition and entrance, and an 845- square foot 2nd floor mechanical mezzanine addition would be constructed. Additional site work, including new landscaping along the parking lot and drop off areas, and select asphalt and sidewalk improvements, have also been requested. This application is associated with requests by the Brooklyn Center School District to increase the District’s operating levy and construction funding for Earle Brown Elementary School and Brooklyn Center Middle and High School. These requests were approved through a referendum that was passed on November 7, 2017. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING STANDARDS Land Use Plan: S-Schools Neighborhood: Firehouse Current Zoning: R1 (One Family Residence) District Surrounding Zoning: North: R5 (Multiple Family Residence) District East: R1 (One Family Residence) District South: R1 (One Family Residence) District West: R1 (One Family Residence) District | R5 (Multiple Family Residence) District | C2 (Commerce) District Site Area: Approximately 35.5 Acres BACKGROUND The Subject Property, located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North, was constructed in 1961, with subsequent additions to the building and the construction of outbuildings (e.g., bus garage, gym building) approved over the years. •Application Filed: 06/12/2018 •Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 08/11/2018 •Extension Declared: N/A •Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 2 Pursuant to City Zoning Code Section 35-310, Subpart 2, “Public and private elementary and secondary schools offering a regular course of study accredited by the Minnesota Department of Education” are allowed by special use permit in the R1 (One Family Residence) District. A review of City records and previous approvals indicated that a special use permit was issued to operate the school; however, staff is unable to locate the originally approved Planning Commission application for the school. This is as City records for projects dating back to the early 1960s and before are often incomplete or missing. The earliest application on file for the Subject Property is from 1976 for the installation of a masonry athletic storage structure under the main bleachers of the high school athletic field. The most recent approval was for the detached recreation and gymnasium building located to the east of the school, which received approval in 2011. As part of this application, staff noted that, “any other future expansion or alterations deemed by City Planning Staff to be minor in nature or considered accessory or ancillary to the general, typical and overall operations of the Brooklyn Center Junior/Senior High School campus, shall not be subject to any future special use amendment, but may be subject to additional site and building plan application and consideration.” BUILDING AND SITE PLAN APPROVAL The majority of the improvements to take place at the Brooklyn Center Secondary School (“the Subject Property”) are anticipated to occur within the interior of the existing 195,797-square foot building. These renovations will require the Applicant to submit full construction plans to the City for review and issuance of a Building Permit. The interior renovations include the relocation of the middle school students to classrooms located primarily in the west wing of the existing building, and the relocation of the high school students to the north wing. As proposed, support and shared use functions would be located between the west and north wings for convenience and overall accessibility. Many of the anticipated improvements are to address security measures that would allow for a higher level of pedestrian control within the hallways, and for after-hours zoning to restrict access to certain areas or wings of the building. Brooklyn Center Secondary School also intends to address existing room adjacencies and sizing as part of Map 1. Existing Subject Property (6500 Humboldt Avenue North). ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 3 the reconfiguration. Outdated rooms will be brought up to current standards and requirements, and new finishes will be installed in outdated and worn areas of the school. Significant changes are proposed for the restrooms and physical education locker rooms to address ADA clearances and plumbing fixture counts. Group shower areas in the locker rooms will be replaced with single user stalls and private dressing areas in addition to staff and gender neutral restrooms located in each academic wing and locker room areas. The addressing of extensive deferred maintenance is also identified as a main objective in the upgrades to the Brooklyn Center Secondary School. Although these improvements have been included as part of the submitted Planning Commission Application, the focus of review for building and site plan approval relates to the proposed exterior alterations, including the 2,250-square foot new front entry addition, 845-square foot mechanical mezzanine addition, and site improvements. Building – New Front Entry Addition As the Applicant has indicated within their submittal, “One of the project objectives is to create a more evident and clearly defined public south main entry, with increased visibility and security. The identification aspect is addressed by the massing and height of the entry vestibule consisting of an entry canopy, signage, and raised roof form. The security aspect is addressed by utilizing a security vestibule arrangement. Once a building visitor enters through the outer vestibule doors, they would interact with school staff to gain further entry into the building, or have proper credentials that allow them through the security control point.” Image 1. New Front Entry Addition. As noted in Image 1 above, the proposed 2,250-square foot front entry addition would substantially line up with the existing front building footprint along Freeway Boulevard/65th Avenue North and would be located over 150 feet from the front property line. The new addition and entry would feature a vestibule with access to a reception/ waiting area, attendance office, and contain administrative offices. ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 4 Image 2. Interior Layout of New Front Entry Addition. Image 3. Existing Front Entry. Image 4. Proposed Front Entry. The Applicant has expressed their intent to blend the new entry addition into the existing building through the continued use of brick. New brick and salvaged existing brick would be incorporated as part of the construction. Windows along the new entry would feature aluminum casings with vision glass and ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 5 cast stone headings. A raised roof over the new building entry would be installed with an aluminum constructed clerestory, which would tie into the prefinished metal parapet running along the top of the new addition. Building- 2nd Floor Mechanical Mezzanine Addition As part of the submittal, the Applicant is also requesting approval of a second floor mechanical mezzanine addition, as outlined in Image 5 below. Any protrusions from the roof of the building should utilize materials complementary to the existing building materials and any other mechanical additions. The Building Official will require a construction set with detailing for the mechanical addition, including an interior layout, building elevations, etc. Additional permits may be required as part of the requested addition. Image 5. Interior Layout of 2nd Floor Mechanical Mezzanine Addition. Access and Parking The Subject Property is currently served by two accesses off Freeway Boulevard/65th Avenue North and Dupont Avenue North. As was indicated in a Planning Commission Report for construction of a 9,000- square foot bus garage and addition to the high school in 2003, a determination was made in 1991 that the required parking for the school should be 350 parking spaces based on a one parking space for every three seat ratio for the largest capacity facility at the school. The 350 spaces identified at that time were based off the bleacher seating capacity for the gymnasium, which had a seating capacity of 1,050. There are no plans to alter the existing parking or drop off areas as part of the site and building plan review request, other than the proposed installation of a pedestrian curb ramp, crosswalk, and select sidewalk and asphalt work along the front of the building. It should be noted that there are no plans to expand the need for parking at this facility with the front entry addition and mechanical mezzanine addition on the 2nd floor. ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 6 Lighting The building elevations provided note the installation of four new wall lighting sconces along the front of the new entry addition. The proposed sconces would be LED and downcast. A photometric plan was submitted with the application; however, the plans do not reflect the property line running along Freeway Boulevard/65th Avenue North. An updated photometric plan noting the property line will be required as part of any Building Permit submittal. Any new lighting would need to meet the requirements of Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City Zoning Code by not exceeding three (3) foot candles measured at property lines abutting residentially zoned property, or 10 foot candles when abutting street right-of-way or non-residentially zoned properties. As is specified, no glare shall emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. Landscaping The project submittal includes a partial landscape plan for the front parking lot and drop off area along Freeway Boulevard/65th Avenue North. Although City Code does not have any specific requirements on landscaping types and species, the City has operated under and held new and redeveloped areas to complying with the City’s adopted Landscape Point System Policy, which assigns points to a given site based on the acreage of a development. As “schools” are not specifically outlined as a use under the Landscape Point System Policy, staff reviewed the submitted plans to determine whether adequate screening would be provided for the parking areas. Per Section 35-711 (Parking Lot Screening), “such off-street parking and loading areas within any yards which abut along a street which is residentially zoned on the side opposite shall be screened from street view by a screening device as approved by the City Council.” As proposed, the Applicant intends to install 30 dwarf Norway spruce trees, with a mature height of four (4)feet in height, along with three Japanese lilac trees, with a mature height of 25 feet. The spruce trees would be planted in sets of 10 with a Japanese lilac tree paired with each set. The submitted landscape plan does indicate the presence of existing trees as well. Please refer to Image 6 below. Image 6. Partial Landscape Plan for Subject Property. ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 7 As part of any approval, the Applicant will need to install an irrigation system and provide shop drawings of the proposed irrigation system for City review. The landscape plan dated June 12, 2018, notes that “tree planting and shrub areas shall be irrigated with an underground irrigation system.” ASSISTANT CITY ENGINEER REVIEW Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg conducted a review of the application submittal and documents. Comments regarding this application can be found in the memorandum to City staff and dated July 9, 2018, attached hereto (Exhibit B). It should be noted that some of the outlined conditions may be applicable at time of approval for future land disturbance or Building Permits. As the total disturbed area is less than 0.5 acres, no project review is required for the West Mississippi Watershed Commission and an NPDES permit is not required. The City does request that the Applicant attempt to install BMPs to improve water quality. The Applicant should review the attached memorandum to identify what anticipated permitting and submittal requirements will be necessary in order to work through the City Building Permit review process. FIRE INSPECTOR REVIEW The Applicant shall work to ensure all 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any building and site plan approval, including installation of a new Knox box, fire egress, etc. SIGNAGE No formal requests for approval were made as part of the application submittal, although a wall sign is indicated on the new front entry addition. Any new signage, including wall and monument signs, would require conformance with Chapter 34 of the City Code (Sign Ordinance), and specifically for Public Uses. Under the Sign Code, Public Uses are permitted one wall sign (not to exceed 36 square feet) and one wall sign immediately above or beside each public entrance to that part of the building that is used as a school and meets the requirements of the Minnesota Department of Education. These sign areas shall not exceed 10 square feet. The Applicant will need to file a separate Building Permit application for any proposed signage. Based on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommend approval of the site and building plans for the proposed 2,250-square foot partial addition, 845-square foot 2nd floor mechanical mezzanine addition, and site improvements along the proposed new front entrance area for the property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North; subject to the Applicant complying with the comments outlined in the Approval Conditions noted below. APPROVAL CONDITIONS Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2018-012 for the Subject Property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North: 1.Building and Site Plan and Review: The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, and other fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. a.Final construction and demolition plans are to be submitted to the City for review and issuance of a demolition and Building Permit. b.A pre-construction conference shall be held with City staff and other ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 8 entities designated by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit/Land Disturbance (Alteration) Permit. 2.Agreements: a.The Developer shall execute a separate Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications and standards comprehended under this Site Plan. b.A Construction Management Plan and Agreement and associated escrow deposit is required prior to Building Permit release. c.The Developer shall submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements, and any utility service lines prior to release of the Performance Agreement financial guarantee. 3.Engineering Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memo, dated July 9, 2018 (Exhibit B). a.Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 4.Construction Standards: a.Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City’s Public Works Department. b.All work performed and materials used for construction of any utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 5.Landscaping: All landscaped areas, including street boulevards, shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. a.The contractor shall submit irrigation shop drawings for review and approval prior to installation. 6.Signage: Signage for the Subject Property is subject to the Public Use allowances as identified within Chapter 34 (Sign Ordinance). Any requests for wall or freestanding signage will require the Applicant to submit a Sign Permit application to the City for review and approval. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above-noted findings, staff recommends the Planning Commission recommends: The Planning Commission recommends approval to the City Council of the as proposed site and building plan approval for the proposed 2,250-square foot partial addition, 845-square foot 2nd floor mechanical mezzanine addition, and site improvements along the proposed new front entrance area for the property located at 6500 Humboldt Avenue North, subject to the Applicant/Property Owner complying with the conditions outlined in the Approval Conditions of this Staff Report. ________________ App. No. 2018-012 PC 07/12/2018 Page 9 Should the Planning Commission accept these recommendations, the Commission may elect to adopt the draft resolution, to be provided at the Planning Commission meeting. Attachments Exhibit A- Planning Commission Application and Plans for Brooklyn Center Secondary School, submitted June 12, 2018. Exhibit B- Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, dated July 9, 2018. Exhibit A SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 430 – 2nd Street. (952) 474-3291 Excelsior, MN 55331 www.teamtsp.com PROJECT: Brooklyn Center Schools – Secondary School DATE: June 12, 2018 RE: Site Plan Review Submittal PROJECT DESIGN NARRATIVE: This project consists of a partial south addition of 2,250 square feet, a partial 2nd floor mechanical mezzanine addition of 845 square feet and renovation of a large portion of the existing 195,797 square foot building. The intent of the new addition exterior design is to create an addition that uses the context and character of the existing facility to generate its architectural expression and design character. This intent is not to replicate the existing building verbatim, but generate an addition that is responsive and complimentary to the existing building. The design will consist of a composition of face brick, metal wall panels, precast concrete/cast stone panels, aluminum framed storefront and curtainwall window/door framing. One of the project objectives is to create a more evident and clearly defined public south main public entry, with increased visibility and security. The identification aspect is addressed by the massing and height of the entry vestibule: consisting of an entry canopy, signage and raised roof form. The security aspect is addressed by utilizing a security vestibule arrangement. Once a building visitor enters through the outer vestibule doors, they would interact with school staff to gain further entry into the building, or have proper credentials that allow them through the security control point. Some building interior reconfigurations are occurring with this project. The Middle School students will be located primarily in the west academic wing. The High School students will be located primarily in the north academic wing. Assorted support and shared use functions are located between these two wi ngs. Another security improvement will be strategically located cross-corridor doors that allow for a higher level pedestrian control, should the facility be entered into a higher level of security, and for a higher level of after-hours zoning to restrict access to areas of the building. These doors will be arranged to restrict unauthorized building visitor movement in the facility, while meeting fire egress requirements. Several rooms are being adjusted to respond to updated deliver of education requirements. Room adjacencies and sizes are being addressed as part of the reconfigurations. Outdated rooms are being brought up to current standards and requirements. New finishes are being applied to areas that are worn and outdated. Finishes are being evaluated for initial upfront cost, and life cycle cost analysis. Restrooms and P.E. Locker Rooms are being improved to address ADA clearances and plumbing fixture counts. Strategically located Staff Restrooms are being added to facilitate use by school personnel. Grou p shower areas in the Locker Rooms are being replaced with single user shower stalls with private drying/dressing areas. Gender Neutral Restrooms are being added at each academic wing and locker room area. Deferred maintenance items are being incorporated into the project, responding to the referendum descriptions. CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN GUIDELINES: The project will comply with the City of Brooklyn Center Architectural Design Guidelines: Building Materials, Building Mass, Façade Design, Doors and Windows. SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 430 – 2nd Street.(952) 474-3291 Excelsior, MN 55331 www.teamtsp.com BUILDING CODE SUMMARY: (A more extensive Building Code Analysis will be included in the Building Plan Submittal at a later date) Construction Type: II-B Primary Occupancy Classification: E Secondary Occupancy Classification: B (Offices, Kitchen, Receiving) A-2 (Cafeteria) A-3 (Gymnasium, Auditorium) Original Building Size: 195,797 square feet New Addition (1st Floor Administration): 2,250 square feet (2nd Floor Mechanical): 845 square feet Reconfigured Building Size: 198,892 square feet Via existing 2-hour fire walls, the overall facility is broken into four separate buildings - see Code Plan: Building-1: 67,586 square feet (actual) 79,640 square feet (allowable) Building-2 (1st Floor): 48,010 square feet (actual) 48,285 square feet (allowable) Building-2 (2nd Floor): 6,760 square feet (actual) 48,285 square feet (allowable) Building-3: 35,021 square feet (actual) 77,720 square feet (allowable) Building-4: 41,515 square feet (actual) 79,460 square feet (allowable) ARCHITECTURAL SPECIFICATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS: DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS: 00 01 01 Project Title Page 00 01 15 List of Drawing Sheets 00 11 13 Advertisement for Bids 00 21 13 Instructions to Bidders 00 22 13 Supplementary Instructions to Bidders 00 25 13 Pre-bid Meetings 00 26 00 Procurement Substitution Procedures 00 31 13 Preliminary Schedule 00 31 19 Existing Condition Information 00 31 26 Existing Hazardous Material Information 00 31 32 Geotechnical Data 00 43 13 Bid Security Forms 00 43 23 Alternates Form 00 51 00 Notice of Award 00 91 13 Addendum DIVISION 01 – GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 00 00 General Requirements 01 10 00 Summary 01 23 00 Alternates 01 25 00 Substitution Procedures 01 26 00 Contract Modification Procedures 01 29 00 Payment Procedures SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 430 – 2nd Street. (952) 474-3291 Excelsior, MN 55331 www.teamtsp.com 01 31 00 Project Management and Coordination 01 32 00 Construction Progress Documentation 01 33 00 Submittal Procedures 01 35 16 Alteration Project Procedures 01 40 00 Quality Requirements 01 42 00 References 01 50 00 Temporary Facilities and Controls 01 56 39 Temporary Tree and Plant Protection 01 60 00 Product Requirements 01 73 00 Execution 01 74 19 Construction Waste Management and Disposal 01 77 00 Closeout Procedures 01 78 23 Operation and Maintenance Data 01 78 39 Project Record Documents 01 79 00 Demonstration and Training DIVISION 02 – SITE CONSTRUCTION 02 41 16 Structure Demolition 02 41 19 Selective Demolition DIVISION 03 – CONCRETE 03 30 00 Cast-In-Place Concrete 03 33 00 Architectural Concrete DIVISION 04 – MASONRY 04 01 20.63 Brick Masonry Repair 04 01 20.64 Brick Masonry Repointing 04 20 00 Unit Masonry 04 22 00 Concrete Unit Masonry 04 72 00 Cast Stone Masonry DIVISION 05 – METALS 05 12 00 Structural Steel Framing 05 12 13 Architecturally Exposed Structural Steel Framing 05 21 00 Steel Joist Framing 05 31 00 Steel Decking 05 40 00 Cold-Formed Metal Framing 05 50 00 Metal Fabrications 05 52 13 Pipe and Tube Railings DIVISION 06 – WOOD AND PLASTICS 06 10 00 Rough Carpentry 06 16 00 Sheathing 06 20 23 Interior Finish Carpentry DIVISION 07 – THERMAL ANDMOISTURE PROTECTION 07 13 26 Self-Adhering Sheet Waterproofing 07 21 00 Thermal Insulation 07 21 19 Foamed-In-Place Insulation 07 26 00 Vapor Retarders 07 27 26 Fluid-Applied Membrane Air Barriers 07 42 13.16 Metal Plate Wall Panels 07 42 93 Soffit Panels SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 430 – 2nd Street. (952) 474-3291 Excelsior, MN 55331 www.teamtsp.com 07 62 00 Sheet Metal Flashing and Trim 07 71 00 Roof Specialties 07 72 00 Roof Accessories 07 81 00 Applied Fireproofing 07 84 13 Penetration Firestopping 07 84 43 Joint Firestopping 07 92 00 Joint Sealants 07 92 19 Acoustical Joint Sealants 07 95 13.13 Interior Expansion Joint Cover Assemblies DIVISION 08 – DOORS ANDWINDOWS 08 11 13 Hollow Metal Doors and Frames 08 14 16 Flush Wood Doors 08 31 13 Access Doors and Frames 08 41 13 Aluminum-Framed Entrances and Storefronts 08 71 00 Door Hardware 08 71 13 Automatic Door Operators 08 80 00 Glazing 08 83 00 Mirrors 08 91 19 Fixed Louvers DIVISION 09 – FINISHES 09 22 16 Non-Structural Metal Framing 09 29 00 Gypsum Board 09 30 13 Ceramic Tiling 09 51 13 Acoustical Panel Ceilings 09 54 23 Linear Metal Ceilings 09 65 13 Resilient Base and Accessories 09 65 19 Resilient Tile Flooring 09 68 13 Tile Carpeting 09 84 33 Sound Absorbing Wall Units 09 91 13 Exterior Painting 09 91 23 Interior Painting 09 96 00 High-Performance Coatings DIVISION 10 – SPECIALTIES 10 11 00 Visual Display Surfaces 10 12 00 Display Cases 10 14 19 Dimensional Letter Signage 10 14 23.13 Room-Identification Signage 10 21 13.17 Phenolic-Core Toilet Compartments 10 21 23 Cubicle Curtains and Track 10 28 00 Toilet, Bath, and Laundry Accessories 10 44 13 Fire Protection Cabinets 10 44 16 Fire Extinguishers 10 51 13 Metal Lockers 10 75 16 Ground-Set Flagpoles DIVISION 11 – EQUIPMENT 11 52 13 Projection Screens 11 53 13 Laboratory Fume Hoods SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 430 – 2nd Street.(952) 474-3291 Excelsior, MN 55331 www.teamtsp.com DIVISION 12 – FURNISHINGS 12 21 13 Horizontal Louver Blinds 12 21 16 Vertical Louver Blinds 12 32 16 Manufactured Plastic-Laminate-Faced Casework 12 35 53.16 Plastic-Laminate-Clad Laboratory Casework 12 35 53.19 Wood Laboratory Casework 12 36 23.13 Plastic-Laminate-Clad Countertops 12 36 61.16 Solid Surfacing Countertops 12 48 13 Entrance Floor Mats and Frames DIVISION 13 – SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION – SECTION NOT USED DIVISION 14 – CONVEYING EQUIPMENT- SECTION NOT USED END OF TABLE OF CONTENTS VICINITY MAP PLAN NORTH INDEX TO DRAWINGS - VOLUME 1 MOST COMMONLY USED ABBREVIATIONS D DEPTH DBL DOUBLE DEMO DEMOLITION, DEMOLISH DEPT DEPARTMENT DET DETAIL DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN DFPT DRYFALL PAINT DIA DIAMETER DIAG DIAGONAL DIM DIMENSION DIV DIVIDE, DIVISION DISP DISPENSER DN DOWN DR DOOR DS DOWNSPOUT DW DISHWASHER DWG DRAWING (S) DWR DRAWER DWTR DUMBWAITER --------------------- (E) EXISTING E EAST EA EACH EF EACH FACE EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRICAL ELEV ELEVATOR ENL ENLARGED EMER EMERGENCY ENGR ENGINEER EOP EDGE OF PAVEMENT EPDM ETHYLENE PROPYLENE DIENE MONOMER EPS EXPANDED POLYSTYRENE BOARD EPT EPOXY PAINT EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT ES EACH SIDE EST ESTIMATE ETC ETCETERA ETR EXISTING TO REMAIN EW EACH WAY EXIST EXISTING EXC EXCAVATE/EXCAVATION EXH EXHAUST EXP EXPANSION/EXPOSED EXT EXTERIOR EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EWS EYE WASH AND SHOWER --------------------- FA FIRE ALARM FAB FABRICATE/FABRICATION FD FLOOR DRAIN FDC FIRE DEPRATMENT CONNECTION FDTN FOUNDATION FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FF FINISHED FLOOR FFE FINISH FLOOR ELEVATION FIN FINISH (ED) FLOUR FLOURESCENT FLR FLOOR (ING) FO FACE OF FOC FACE OF CONCRETE FOM FACE OF MASONRY FOS FACE OF STUD FOF FACE OF FINISH ABBREVIATIONS: AB ANCHOR BOLT/ROD ABV ABOVE AC ASPHALTIC CONCRETE/AIR CONDITIONER ACC ACCESSIBLE ACM ALUMINUM COMPOSITE MATERIAL ACOUSACOUSTICAL ADD ADDENDUM ADH ADHESIVE ADJ ADJUSTABLE, ADJACENT, ADJOINING AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AFG ABOVE FINISH GRADE ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM APC ACOUSTICAL PANEL CEILING ARCH ARCHITECT (URAL) ASI ARCHITECTURAL SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION --------------------- BD BOARD BEV BEVELED BFF BELOW FINISH FLOOR BL BRICK LEDGE BLDG BUILDING BLKG BLOCK (ING) BM BEAM BOT BOTTOM BO BOTTOM OF BOC BOTTOM OF CONCRETE BOF BOTTOM OF FOOTING BRG BEARING BRK BRICK BSMT BASEMENT BTWN BETWEEN BUR BUILT-UP ROOFING --------------------- C CHANNEL/CELSIUS CAB CABINET CB CERAMIC BASE CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CEM CEMENT CF CUBIC FEET OR FOOT CG CORNER GUARD CIPC CAST-IN-PLACE CONCRETE CJ CONTROL/CONSTRUCTION JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLG CEILING CLKG CAULKING CLR CLEAR, CLEARANCE CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CO CHANGE ORDER/CLEAN OUT COL COLUMN COMB COMBIMATION COMP COMPOSITE/COMPOSITION CONC CONCRETE CONN CONNECT (ION) CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS, CONTINUE CONTR CONTRACT (OR) COORDCOORDINATE CORR CORRUGATED/CORRIDOR CPT CARPET CSMT CASEMENT CT CERAMIC TILE CTB CARPET TILE BASE CTR CENTER FR FIRE RESISTANT/FRAME FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL FS FLOOR SINK FT FOOT, FEET/FIRE TREATED FTG FOOTING FURR FURRING FUT FUTURE --------------------- GA GAGE, GAUGE GB GRAB BAR GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GALV GALVANIZED GI GALVANIZED IRON GL GLASS GLU LAM GLUE LAMINATED (BEAM) GWB GYPSUM WALL BOARD GYP GYPSUM --------------------- HB HOSE BIB HC HANDICAP / HOLLOW CORE HD HEAVY DUTY HDBD HARDBOARD HDR HEADER HDWD HARDWOOD HDWR HARDWARE HM HOLLOW METAL HORIZ HORIZONTAL HR HOUR HT HEIGHT HSS HOLLOW STRUCTURAL STEEL HVAC HEATING, VENTILATION, AIR- CONDITIONING --------------------- IBC INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE ID INSIDE DIAMETER/DIMENISON IN INCH(ES) INCL INCLUDE (D), INCLUDING INFO INFORMATION INSP INSPECTION INSTR INSTRUCTION(S) INSUL INSULATE (D), INSULATION INT INTERIOR --------------------- JAN JANITOR JST JOIST JT JOINT --------------------- KCJ KEYED CONSTRUCTION JOINT KO KNOCK OUT --------------------- L LENGTH / ANGLE LAB LABORATORY LAM LAMINATE (ED) LAV LAVATORY LB POUND LF LINEAR FEET LH LEFT HAND LKR LOCKER LOC LOCATION LONG LONGITUDINAL LT LIGHT LVR LOUVER LVT LUXURY VINYL TILE --------------------- MBC MINNESOTA BUILDING CODE MAS MASONRY MATL MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM RFI REQUEST FOR INFORMATION RFP REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL RH RIGHT HAND RL RIDGE LINE RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING ROW RIGHT OF WAY RVS REVERSE (SIDE) RWL RAIN WATER LEADERSSOUTH --------------------- SB SPLASH BLOCK SC SOLID CORE SCHED SCHEDULE SCR SHOWER CURTAIN ROD SCT SECTION SD SOAP DISPENSER SF SQUARE FOOT SHT SHEET SHTHG SHEATHING SIM SIMILAR SLDG SLIDING SLNT SEALANT SND SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER SNDU SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL UNIT SOG SLAB ON GRADE SPEC SPECIFICATION (S) SQ SQUARE SSM SOLID SURFACE MATERIAL SST STAINLESS STEEL ST STREET STC SOUND TRANSMISSION CLASS STD STANDARD STL STEEL STOR STORAGE STRUCT STRUCTURAL SUSP SUSPENDED SV SHEET VINYL SW SHEARWALL SYM SYMMETRICAL --------------------- T TREAD T&B TOP AND BOTTOM T&G TONGUE AND GROOVE TB TOWEL BAR TBD TO BE DETERMINED TEMP TEMPORARY/TEMPERED TER TERRAZZO THD THREAD (ED) (S) THK THICKNESS THRU THROUGH TKBD TACKBOARD TL TILE TO TOP OF TOB TOP OF BEAM TOC TOP OF CONCRETE/CURB TOD TOP OF DECK TOF TOP OF FOOTING (FOUNDATION) TOP TOP OF PIER TOJ TOP OF JOIST TOS TOP OF SLAB/STEEL TOW TOP OF WALL TPD TOILET PAPER DISPENSER TPO THERMOPLATIC POLYOLEFIN TPTN TOILET PARTITION TRANS TRANSVERSE TS TUBE STEEL TYP TYPICAL UG UNDERGROUND UH UNIT HEATER UNFIN UNFINISHED UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UTIL UTILITY --------------------- V SHEAR VAR VARIES VB VAPOR BARRIER / VINYL BASE VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VERT VERTICAL VEST VESTIBULE VIF VARIFY IN FIELD VR VAPOR RETARDER VWB VINYL WALL BASE VWC VINYL WALL COVERING --------------------- W WEST/WIDTH W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT WA WEDGE ANCHOR WB WOOD BASE WC WATER CLOSET WD WOOD/WOODWORK WDW WINDOW WF (W) WIDE FLANGE WG WALL GUARD WH WATER HEATER WI WROUGHT IRON WL WIND LOAD WP WATERPROOF (ING) WR WATER RESISTANT WSCT WAINSCOT WT WEIGHT/WINDOW TREATMENT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC SYMBOLS USED AS ABBREVIATIONS: & AND L ANGLE LL DOUBLE ANGLE @ AT d PENNEY # POUND OR NUMBER Ø ROUND OR DIAMETER MC MEDICINE CABINET MECH MECHANICAL MEMB MEMBRANE MEZZ MEZZANINE MFR MANUFACTURE (R) MIN MINIMUM MISC MISCELLANEOUS MO MASONRY OPENING MR MIRROR MTL METAL --------------------- (N) NEW N NORTH NA NOT APPLICABLE NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NOM NOMINAL NTS NOT TO SCALE --------------------- OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OFCI OWNER FURNISHED / CONTRACTOR INSTALLED OFOI OWNER FURNISHED / OWNER INSTALLED OH OVERHEAD OPP OPPOSITE OPG OPENING ORIG ORIGINAL ORD OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN OZ OUNCE --------------------- PAR PARALLEL PCF POUNDS PER CUBIC FOOT PED PEDESTAL PERF PERFORATED PERP PERPENDICULAR PL PLATE PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PLYWD PLYWOOD PNL PANEL PR PAIR/PROPOSAL REQUEST PRCST PRECAST CONCRETE PREFAB PREFABRICATE PSI POUNDS PER SQUARE INCH PSF POUNDS PER SQUARE FOOT PT PAINT / PRESSURE TREATED PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER PTN PARTITION PTR PAPER TOWEL RECEPTACLE PVC POLYVINYL CHLORIDE --------------------- QT QUARRY TILE --------------------- R RADIUS/RISER RB RUBBER BASE RBR RUBBER RCP REFLECTED CEILING PLAN RD ROOF DRAIN REBAR REINFORCING BAR REC RECESSED REF REFERENCE/REFRIGERATOR REINF REINFORCE (D), (ING), (MENT) REQ REQUIRE REQD REQUIRED RES RESILIANT FLOORING RET RETURN REV REVISION (S), REVISED A -5 0 1 A N N NA SHEET SEQUENCE NUMBER 01-99 SHEET TYPE DESIGNATOR DISCIPLINE CHARACTER MODIFIER CHARACTER SHEET TYPE DESIGNATORS 0 GENERAL (SYMBOLS LEGEND, NOTES, ETC) 1 PLANS (HORIZONTAL VIEWS) 2 ELEVATIONS (VERTICAL VIEWS) 3 SECTIONS (SECTIONAL VIEWS) 4 LARGE SCALE VIEWS 5 DETAILS 6 SCHEDULES AND DIAGRAMS 7 USER DEFINED 8 USER DEFINED 9 3D REPRESENTATIONS (ISO, PERSP, PHOTOS) 1 2 3 4 5 6 E2 E3 E4 C5 A4A1 A B C D E TSP A B C D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 DISCIPLINE CHARACTERS G GENERAL H HAZARDOUS C CIVIL L LANDSCAPE S STRUCTURAL A ARCHITECTURAL I INTERIOR P PLUMBING M MECHANICAL E ELECTRICAL T TELECOMMUNICATIONS R RESOURCE SHEET IDENTIFICATION TYPICAL MODIFIER CHARACTERS B SUBSTRUCTURES C CEILING/CHEMICALS D DEMOLITION E ELEMENTS F FRAMING/FURNISHINGS G GRAPHICS/GRADING H HVAC I INFORMATION/IMPROVEMENTS L LIGHTING N FINISHES P PLAN/PIPING/POWER/PAVING/PLANTING Q EQUIPMENT S SITE T TECHNOLOGY/TRANSPORTATION U UTILITIES TITLE/DISCIPLINE NAME/CONTACT COMPANY PHONE PROJECT MANAGER VON PETERSEN TSP, Inc.507.288.8155 PROJECT ARCHITECT ROB COLLINS TSP, Inc.605.336.1160 CIVIL ENGINEER ????TSP, Inc.605.343.6102 STRUCTURAL ENGINEER TADD HOLT TSP, Inc.605.884.7090 INTERIOR DESIGNER LORETTA HAUGEN TSP, Inc.507.288.8155 MECHANICAL ENGINEER ROGER NIKOLAS TSP, Inc.605.336.1160 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER KELLI OSTERLOO TSP, Inc.307.672.6496 DESIGN TEAM petersonvj@teamtsp.com E-MAIL collinsrr@teamtsp.com fmlast@teamtsp.com holttm@teamtsp.com haugenla@teamtsp.com nikolasrc@teamtsp.com osterlooka@teamtsp.com I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 1 : 4 9 : 4 4 A M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ s c h r a d e r a r . r v t COVER SHEET - VOLUME 1 G-100.1 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 ---06/12/2018 ---05161256.2 SHEET INDEX - GENERAL G-100.1 COVER SHEET - VOLUME 1 G-101 OVERALL CODE PLAN BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING SITE PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 06/12/2018 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET INDEX - CIVIL C-1.00 C-1.01 C2.01 C5.01 L1.01 OVERALL SITE PLAN DEMOLITION & SITE PLAN GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLAN AP111 OVERALL FLOOR PLAN AP111A FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA A AP111B FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B AP111C FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA C AP111D FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA D AP111E FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA E AP111F FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA F AP111G FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA G AP111H FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA H AP121 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLANS - AREAS C, D, G AR111 ROOF PLAN - AREA B A-201 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-301 BUILDING SECTIONS A-311 WALL SECTIONS SHEET INDEX - ARCHITECTURAL A-205 A-301 PERSPECTIVE VIEWS BUILDING SECTIONS UP UP UP UP UP LIFE SAFETY LEGEND TRAVEL DISTANCE 25'-0" FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER FE EGRESS WIDTH/OCCUPANT LOAD SERVED COMMON PATH 3 2 " 160 OCC OCCUPANT LOAD CONCURRENT OCCUPANT LOAD 10 # 2HR FIRE WALL 2HR FIRE BARRIER 1HR FIRE BARRIER 1HR FIRE PARTITION 1HR SHAFT ENCLOSURE 2HR SHAFT ENCLOSURE 1HR SMOKE BARRIER SMOKE PARTITION 2HR SMOKE BARRIER BUILDING-1 AREA 67,586 SF ALLOWABLE 71,920 SF BUILDING-2 AREA 48,424 SF ALLOWABLE 48,285 SF BUILDING-3 AREA 35,021 SF ALLOWABLE 77,720 SF BUILDING-4 AREA 41,515 SF ALLOWABLE 79,460 SF GOVERNING CODES: BUILDING 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 1303 (INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE 2006) ACCESSIBILITY 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 1341 FIRE /LIFE SAFETY 2007 MINNESOTA FIRE CODE - CHAPTER 7511 (2006 INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE) MECHANICAL 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 1346 (INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE 2006) PLUMBING 2012 MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE - CHAPTER 4715 ENERGY 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 7670 ELECTRICAL 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 1315 (NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 2011) FUEL AND GAS 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 1346 (INTERNATIONAL FUEL AND GAS CODE 2006) ELEVATOR 2007 MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE - CHAPTER 1307 CODE SUMMARY E Classrooms B Offices, Kitchen and Recieving A-2 Cafeteria A-3 Gymnasiums Occupancy Classification: Type II-B Fully Sprinklered - 903.2.1.3 Type of Construction: Total Building Height = 26'-4" = 2 Stories Actual Height: IBC Table 503 - 2 Stories, 55 ft *Section 504.2 Sprinkler Increase New Additions only = 3 Stories, 75 ft Allowable Height: Actual Areas: Section 506 Table 503 = 14,500 sf Equation 5.1 - Allowable Area per Story = 14,500 + (14,500 x .75) + (14,500 x 2) Allowable area per story = 54,375 sf Allowable Area: Travel Distance (Table 1016.1): A-2 250 Feet A-3 250 Feet B 300 Feet E 250 Feet Fire resistive Rating Requirements (Table 601): Structural Frame 0 Exterior Bearing Walls 0 Interior Bearing Walls 0 Exterior Non Bearing Walls (per table 602)0 Interior Non Bearing Walls 0 Floor Construction 0 Roof Construction 0 Building Element Rating (in hours) Not Required as per Section 508.3.2 - Non - Separation Occupancies Occupancy Separation: CHAPTER 3 CHAPTER 5 CHAPTER 6 CHAPTER 9 CHAPTER 10 First Floor = 31,927 sf Second Floor = 43,995 sf Total Building = 75,922 sf Egress Width (Section 1005): Occupancy x .2 Corridors (Table 1018.1): E Occupancy - Serving greater than 30 occupants with sprinker system do not need to be rated. Common Path Travel Distance: 75' - 0" PROJECT ADDRESS: WEBSTER K-5 SCHOOL 425 5TH STREET NORTHEAST MINNEAPOLIS, MN I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 6 : 3 2 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t OVERALL CODE PLAN G-101 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 Checker05161256.2 PLUMBING CALCULATIONS - A-3.1 OCCUPANCY (2015 IBC) Occupancy Function Area Occ. Load Factor Calculated Occ. TOILET FIXTURES LAVATORIES DRINKING FOUNTAINMALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE Assembly Without Fixed Seating Concentrated (chiars only not fixed) 10789 SF 7 SF 1542 6.17 11.86 3.855 3.855 3.08 Assembly Without Fixed Seating Standing Space 6323 SF 5 SF 1265 5.06 9.73 3.1625 3.1625 2.53 Assembly Without Fixed Seating Unconcentrated (tables and chairs) 6345 SF 15 SF 424 1.70 3.26 1.06 1.06 0.85 Exercise Rooms 13546 SF 50 SF 277 1.11 2.13 0.6925 0.6925 0.55 Library - Stack Areas 5461 SF 100 SF 55 0.22 0.42 0.1375 0.1375 0.11 Stages and Platforms 2389 SF 15 SF 160 0.64 1.23 0.4 0.4 0.32 44853 SF 3723 14.89 28.64 9.3075 9.3075 7.45 PLUMBING CALCULATIONS - B OCCUPANCY (2015 IBC) Occupancy Function Area Occ. Load Factor Calculated Occ. TOILET FIXTURES LAVATORIES DRINKING FOUNTAINMALE FEMALE MALE FEMALE Business Areas 11304 SF 100 SF 148 2.96 2.96 1.85 1.85 1.48 Educational - Classrooms 54568 SF 20 SF 2767 55.34 55.34 34.5875 34.5875 27.67 Educational - Shops and other Vocational Room Areas 751 SF 50 SF 16 0.32 0.32 0.2 0.2 0.16 Industrial Areas 1799 SF 100 SF 20 0.4 0.4 0.25 0.25 0.2 Warehouses 167 SF 500 SF 2 0.04 0.04 0.025 0.025 0.02 68588 SF 2953 59.06 59.06 36.9125 36.9125 29.53 THIS SHEET CONTAINS COLOR-CODED INFORMATION. THIS SHEET SHOULD BE PRINTED IN COLOR. TSP LOGO TO THE RIGHT SHOULD BE RED. SCALE: 3/64" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL CODE PLAN MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ?? MM/DD/YYYY REVISION 1 48,010 SF E X I S T I N G S C H O O L P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G A D D I T I O N S I T E P L A N L A N D S C A P E P L A N A 1 L 1 . 0 1 A 1 C 1 . 0 1 1 5 0 5 0 S C A L E I N F E E T K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . R © T S P , I n c . 2 0 1 8 I S S U E S S H E E T N U M B E R S H E E T T I T L E C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E T S P , I n c . P R O J E C T T I T L E 4 3 0 2 n d S t r e e t E x c e l s i o r , M N 5 5 3 3 1 ( 9 5 2 ) 4 7 4 - 3 2 9 1 w w w . t e a m t s p . c o m I S S U E D A T E C H E C K E D B Y D R A W N B Y P R O J E C T # LISTED DRAWINGS SCALE(S) UNLESS REDUCED FROM ORIGINAL 30 x 42 FORMAT C O N S U L T A N T S A r c h i t e c t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g 5/29/2018 9:36:34 AM I:\_TSP Revit Local\05161256.2 BROOKLYN CTR ISD286 MIDDLE-HIGH ADDITION & REMODEL_A17_GrothmanJR.rvt SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 6 5 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N U E N O R T B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 3 0 M I D D L E S C H O O L & H I G H S C H O O L - A D D I T I O N A N D R E M O D E L I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R I S D # 2 8 6 L T H 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 M J W 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 9 0 1 N 3 r d S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 2 0 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 w w w . e l a n l a b . c o m p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . M a r c e l l e J . W e s l o c k , P E , L E E D A P 4 2 3 2 3 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 R E G I S T R A T I O N N O . D A T E S I T E A N D B U I L D I N G P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 C O N S T R U C T I O N N O T F O R A 1 O V E R A L L S I T E P L A N 1 " = 5 0 ' O V E R A L L S I T E P L A N C 1 . 0 0 L E G E N D P E R V I O U S A R E A P R O J E C T A R E A S U M M A R Y S I T E E X C L U D E D R I G H T - O F - W A Y 1 , 5 8 4 , 9 5 8 S F . ( 3 9 . 3 9 A C . ) ( P E R H E N N E P I N C O U N T Y P L A T ) E X I S T I N G P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G 1 9 2 , 0 2 4 S F . 1 9 2 , 0 2 4 S F . A D D I T I O N - 2 , 2 5 0 S F . W A L K / D R I V E 3 9 0 , 0 5 5 S F . 3 8 9 , 8 5 8 S F . T O T A L I M P E R V I O U S 5 8 2 , 0 7 9 S F . 5 8 4 , 1 3 2 S F . P E R V I O U S 1 , 0 0 2 , 8 7 9 S F . 1 , 0 0 0 , 8 2 6 S F . I N V E N T O R Y L A N D S C A P E P O I N T S Y S T E M E X I S T I N G Q U A N T . M I N . S I Z E P O I N T S S H A D E T R E E S 4 2 2 . 5 " D I A . 4 2 X 1 0 = 4 2 0 ( B A S S W O O D , A S H , M A P L E ) C O N I F E R O U S T R E E S 1 0 5 ' H T . 1 0 X 6 = 6 0 ( S P R U C E ) D E C O R A T I V E T R E E S 1 5 1 . 5 " C A L . 1 5 X 1 . 5 = 2 2 . 5 ( C R A B ) S H R U B S 2 6 1 2 " G A L . 2 6 X 0 . 5 = 1 3 T O T A L 5 1 5 . 5 B U I L D I N G A D D I T I O N R E M O V E P L A N T E R S S A L V A G E F L A G P O L E S A L G A V E S I G N R E M O V E L A N D S C A P E E D G I N G R E M O V E C O N C R E T E S I D E W A L K R E M O V E C O N C R E T E S I D E W A L K R E M O V E B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T R E M O V E E X I S T I N G C U R B & G U T T E R P R O T E C T E X I S T I N G T R E E T R E E P R O T E C T I O N F E N C E ( T Y P ) A 2 C 5 . 0 1 T R E E P R O T E C T I O N F E N C E P R O T E C T E X I S T I N G T R E E E X I S T I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R S E C O N D A R Y S C H O O L 1 9 2 , 0 2 4 S F R E M O V E B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T E X I S T I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R S E C O N D A R Y S C H O O L P R O P O S E D A D D I T I O N ± 2 , 2 5 0 S F 1 9 2 , 0 2 4 S F S I D E W A L K J O I N T ( T Y P ) D 4 C 5 . 0 1 R E I N S T A L L P A R K I N G S I G N R E I N S T A L L F L A G P O L E P E D E S T R I A N C U R B R A M P B 1 C 5 . 0 1 1 2 . 5 ' 1 2 ' B I T U M I N O U S I N T E R L O C K A T M A T C H L I N E ( T Y P ) E 1 C 5 . 0 1 V E R T I C A L C U R B ( T Y P ) E 3 C 5 . 0 1 R E S T R I P E A C C E S S I B L E R O U T E S I D E W A L K P A V E M E N T S E C T I O N ( T Y P ) E 5 C 5 . 0 1 4 4 8 ' E Q . E Q . F L A G P O L E B A S E D 1 C 5 . 0 1 S I G N M O U N T I N G D 2 C 5 . 0 1 C A N O P Y O V E R H A N G C A N O P Y O V E R H A N G 8 ' 8.4' A S P H A L T P A V E M E N T S E C T I O N ( T Y P ) E 4 C 5 . 0 1 A S P H A L T P A V E M E N T S E C T I O N ( T Y P ) C O L U M N ( T Y P ) C O L U M N ( T Y P ) 3 0 1 0 S C A L E I N F E E T K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . R C 1 D E M O L I T I O N P L A N 1 " = 1 0 ' © T S P , I n c . 2 0 1 8 I S S U E S S H E E T N U M B E R S H E E T T I T L E C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E T S P , I n c . P R O J E C T T I T L E 4 3 0 2 n d S t r e e t E x c e l s i o r , M N 5 5 3 3 1 ( 9 5 2 ) 4 7 4 - 3 2 9 1 w w w . t e a m t s p . c o m I S S U E D A T E C H E C K E D B Y D R A W N B Y P R O J E C T # LISTED DRAWINGS SCALE(S) UNLESS REDUCED FROM ORIGINAL 30 x 42 FORMAT C O N S U L T A N T S A r c h i t e c t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g 5/29/2018 9:36:34 AM I:\_TSP Revit Local\05161256.2 BROOKLYN CTR ISD286 MIDDLE-HIGH ADDITION & REMODEL_A17_GrothmanJR.rvt SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 6 5 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N U E N O R T H B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 3 0 M I D D L E S C H O O L & H I G H S C H O O L - A D D I T I O N A N D R E M O D E L I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R I S D # 2 8 6 L T H 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 M J W 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 9 0 1 N 3 r d S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 2 0 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 w w w . e l a n l a b . c o m p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . M a r c e l l e J . W e s l o c k , P E , L E E D A P 4 2 3 2 3 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 R E G I S T R A T I O N N O . D A T E S I T E A N D B U I L D I N G P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 C O N S T R U C T I O N N O T F O R A 1 S I T E P L A N 1 " = 1 0 ' D E M O L I T I O N & S I T E P L A N C 1 . 0 1 D E M O L I T I O N P L A N L E G E N D R E M O V E B I T U M I N O U S R E M O V E C O N C R E T E R E M O V E C U R B & G U T T E R S I T E P L A N L E G E N D C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T B I T U M I N O U S P A V E M E N T 1 . D I M E N S I O N S S H O W N O N T H I S P L A N A R E T O F A C E O F C U R B A N D E X T E R I O R F A C E O F B U I L D I N G U N L E S S N O T E D O T H E R W I S E . 2 . M E E T A N D M A T C H E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S . P R O V I D E T R A N S I T I O N A S N E C E S S A R Y . 3 . A L L C U R B S T O H A V E 3 / 4 " E X P A N S I O N J O I N T S A T A M A X I M U M O F 1 0 0 ' - 0 " A N D C O N T R O L J O I N T S A T A M A X I M U M O F 1 0 ' - 0 " . 4 . P A I N T T O P A N D F A C E O F C U R B Y E L L O W . 5 . P R O V I D E D I A G O N A L S T R I P I N G A L O N G A C C E S S I B L E R O U T E W H E R E I N D I C A T E D . S T R I P E W I D T H , S P A C I N G A N D A N G L E T O M A T C H E X I S T I N G S T R I P I N G . S I T E P L A N N O T E S D E M O L I T I O N P L A N N O T E S 1 . B A C K G R O U N D I N F O R M A T I O N A N D T O P O G R A P H I C S U R V E Y T A K E N F R O M S U R V E Y D A T E D M A Y 2 5 , 2 0 1 8 B Y S U N D E L A N D S U R V E Y I N G , B L O O M I N G T O N , M I N N E S O T A , E X P R E S S L Y F O R T H I S P R O J E C T . E L A N D E S I G N L A B C A N N O T G U A R A N T Y T H E A C C U R A C Y O R C O M P L E T E N E S S O F T H I S I N F O R M A T I O N . V E R I F Y A L L F I E L D C O N D I T I O N S A N D U T I L I T Y L O C A T I O N S P R I O R T O E X C A V A T I O N / C O N S T R U C T I O N . I F A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S O R U N K N O W N U T I L I T I E S A R E F O U N D T H A T I M P A C T D E S I G N O R I M P A I R C O N S T R U C T I O N , T H E E N G I N E E R A N D O W N E R S H O U L D B E I M M E D I A T E L Y N O T I F I E D . 2 . C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L B R I N G A N Y C H A N G E D O R U N F O R E S E E N C O N D I T I O N S T H A T C O U L D R E S U L T I N A D D I T I O N A L C O S T T O T H E A T T E N T I O N O F T H E O W N E R A N D E N G I N E E R A S S O O N A S T H E Y A R E D I S C O V E R E D S O T H A T T H E Y C A N B E P R O P E R L Y D O C U M E N T E D . F A I L U R E T O N O T I F Y O R C O V E R I N G U N - W I T N E S S E D W O R K S H A L L R E S U L T I N R E J E C T I O N O F C L A I M S F O R A D D I T I O N A L C O M P E N S A T I O N . 3 . P R O T E C T A L L S T R U C T U R E S A N D L A N D S C A P E N O T L A B E L E D F O R D E M O L I T I O N F R O M D A M A G E D U R I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N . A N Y O N - S I T E O R O F F - S I T E A R E A S D I S T U R B E D D I R E C T L Y O R I N D I R E C T L Y D U E T O C O N S T R U C T I O N S H A L L B E R E T U R N E D T O A C O N D I T I O N E Q U A L T O O R B E T T E R T H A N T H E E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N . C O N T R A C T O R I S S O L E L Y R E S P O N S I B L E F O R A N Y C I V I L P E N A L T I E S R E S U L T I N G F R O M T H E I R W O R K U N D E R T H I S C O N T R A C T . 4 . N O D E M O L I T I O N M A T E R I A L S S H A L L B E D I S P O S E D O F O N - S I T E . A L L D E B R I S S H A L L B E H A U L E D O F F - S I T E T O A D I S P O S A L A R E A A P P R O V E D B Y A P P R O P R I A T E G O V E R N M E N T A L A U T H O R I T I E S F O R T H E H A N D L I N G O F D E M O L I T I O N D E B R I S . W O R K S I T E S H A L L B E L E F T I N A C O N D I T I O N T H A T M I N I M I Z E S E R O S I O N P O T E N T I A L O N A N I G H T L Y B A S E . 5 . L I M I T C O N S T R U C T I O N A C T I V I T I E S T O T H E R E M O V A L L I M I T S S H O W N O N T H E P L A N . A L L C O N S T R U C T I O N A C T I V I T I E S S H A L L C O M P L Y W I T H L O C A L O R D I N A N C E S . 6 . C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E S H A L L B E I N P L A C E A S S O O N A S D E M O L I T I O N O P E R A T I O N S A L L O W . S E E S H E E T C 2 . 0 1 F O R E R O S I O N C O N T R O L M E A S U R E S A N D A P P R O P R I A T E S T A G I N G . 7 . P R O V I D E N E C E S S A R Y B A R R I C A D E S , S U F F I C I E N T L I G H T S , S I G N S A N D O T H E R P E D E S T R I A N A N D T R A F F I C C O N T R O L M E T H O D S A S M A Y B E N E C E S S A R Y F O R T H E P R O T E C T I O N A N D S A F E T Y O F T H E P U B L I C A N D M A I N T A I N T H R O U G H O U T T H E L I F E O F T H E P R O J E C T . P E R V I O U S A R E A 8 4 8 . 8 7 8 4 8 . 7 7 8 4 7 . 4 1 5.0% 8 4 7 . 2 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 0 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 1 7 8 4 7 . 3 0 8 4 7 . 5 4 8 4 7 . 4 7 T C 8 4 7 . 7 1 2.0% 2.0% 4.4%2.0% 8 4 8 . 8 7 8 4 8 . 8 7 8 4 8 . 7 7 8 4 8 . 7 7 8 4 8 . 3 7 8 4 8 . 3 7 8 4 8 . 2 7 8 4 7 . 7 7 8 4 8 . 2 7 T C 0.9% 8 4 8 . 6 9 0 . 7 % 8 4 8 . 2 4 8 4 8 . 0 0 T C 8 4 8 . 0 7 1 . 0 % 8 4 8 . 6 1 8 4 7 . 6 T C ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 9 ± M A T C H E X I S T I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R S E C O N D A R Y S C H O O L F F E 8 4 8 . 8 7 P R O P O S E D A D D I T I O N F F E 8 4 8 . 8 7 8 4 6 . 6 ± M A T C H 8 4 6 . 7 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 1 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 0 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 9 1 T C 2 . 0 % 2 . 0 % 2 . 0 % 2.0% 8 4 8 8 4 8 3.1% ± 2 , 2 5 0 S F 1 9 2 , 0 2 4 S F 8 4 8 . 2 2 5.0% 4.4% 2.0% 8 4 8 . 6 5 8 4 8 . 6 9 5'8.9'5' 5' 8 4 6 . 8 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 0 ± M A T C H 8 4 7 . 1 ± M A T C H T R E E P R O T E C T I O N F E N C E ( T Y P ) T R E E P R O T E C T I O N F E N C E ( T Y P ) A 2 C 5 . 0 1 B I O R O L L S E D I M E N T C O N T R L ( T Y P ) A 3 C 5 . 0 1 C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E A 1 C 5 . 0 1 C O L U M N ( T Y P ) C O L U M N ( T Y P ) B I O R O L L S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L ( T Y P ) 3 0 1 0 S C A L E I N F E E T K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . R © T S P , I n c . 2 0 1 8 I S S U E S S H E E T N U M B E R S H E E T T I T L E C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E T S P , I n c . P R O J E C T T I T L E 4 3 0 2 n d S t r e e t E x c e l s i o r , M N 5 5 3 3 1 ( 9 5 2 ) 4 7 4 - 3 2 9 1 w w w . t e a m t s p . c o m I S S U E D A T E C H E C K E D B Y D R A W N B Y P R O J E C T # LISTED DRAWINGS SCALE(S) UNLESS REDUCED FROM ORIGINAL 30 x 42 FORMAT C O N S U L T A N T S A r c h i t e c t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g 5/29/2018 9:36:34 AM I:\_TSP Revit Local\05161256.2 BROOKLYN CTR ISD286 MIDDLE-HIGH ADDITION & REMODEL_A17_GrothmanJR.rvt SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 6 5 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N U E N O R T H B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 3 0 M I D D L E S C H O O L & H I G H S C H O O L - A D D I T I O N A N D R E M O D E L I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R I S D # 2 8 6 L T H 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 M J W 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 9 0 1 N 3 r d S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 2 0 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 w w w . e l a n l a b . c o m p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . M a r c e l l e J . W e s l o c k , P E , L E E D A P 4 2 3 2 3 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 R E G I S T R A T I O N N O . D A T E S I T E A N D B U I L D I N G P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 C O N S T R U C T I O N N O T F O R C 1 G R A D I N G & E R O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N 1 " = 1 0 ' G R A D I N G & E R O S I O N C O N T R O L P L A N C 2 . 0 1 E R O S I O N C O N T R O L L E G E N D T R E E P R O T E C T I O N F E N C E B I O R O L L S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L G R A D I N G & E R O S I O N C O N T R O L N O T E S 1 . V E R I F Y A L L F I E L D C O N D I T I O N S A N D U T I L I T Y L O C A T I O N S P R I O R T O E X C A V A T I O N / C O N S T R U C T I O N . I F A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S O R U N K N O W N U T I L I T I E S A R E F O U N D T H A T I M P A C T D E S I G N O R I M P A I R C O N S T R U C T I O N , T H E E N G I N E E R A N D O W N E R S H O U L D B E I M M E D I A T E L Y N O T I F I E D . 2 . R E L O C A T E B E N C H M A R K S A S N E C E S S A R Y W I T H N E W B E N C H M A R K L O C A T I O N S W I T H I N A T O L E R A N C E O F 0 . 0 1 0 V E R T I C A L F E E T . 3 . T H E P R O P O S E D G R A D E S S H O W N O N T H E G R A D I N G P L A N A R E F I N I S H E D G R A D E S . S P O T E L E V A T I O N S A L O N G C U R B L I N E S R E P R E S E N T T H E F L O W L I N E U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D . 4 . G R A D I N G A C T I V I T Y W H I C H B L O C K S T R A F F I C O F A N Y S T R E E T , A L L E Y , O R D R I V E I S S U B J E C T T O A P P R O V A L B Y T H E C I T Y O F B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R . 5 . C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L S T O P W O R K I M M E D I A T E L Y A N D N O T I F Y T H E A R C H I T E C T I F C O N T A M I N A N T S A R E F O U N D I N T H E E X I S T I N G S O I L S . 6 . A L O N G A C C E S S I B L E R O U T E S , C R O S S - S L O P E S S H A L L N O T E X C E E D 2 . 0 % A N D L O N G I T U D I N A L S L O P E S S H A L L N O T E X C E E D 5 % . 7 . C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L S E E D , F E R T I L I Z E A N D M U L C H A L L D I S T U R B E D A R E A S F O L L O W I N G F I N A L G R A D I N G A C T I V I T I E S . 8 . A L L G R A D E S W I T H I N T H E L A N D S C A P E D A R E A S H A L L N O T E X C E E D 3 H O R I Z O N T A L T O 1 V E R T I C A L A N D H A V E A M I N I M U M G R A D E O F 2 % . 9 . A L L P A V E M E N T G R A D E S S H A L L B E A S F O L L O W S U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D : A S P H A L T P A V E M E N T - 1 . 5 % M I N I M U M , 5 % M A X I M U M C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T - 0 . 5 % M I N I M U M , 5 % M A X I M U M 1 0 . F O L L O W A L L L O C A L , C O U N T Y , W A T E R S H E D , A N D S T A T E R E Q U I R E M E N T S C O V E R I N G S T O R M W A T E R C O M P L I A N C E . 1 1 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L L I M I T T H E I R A C T I V I T I E S T O T H E G R A D I N G L I M I T S S H O W N O N T H E G R A D I N G P L A N . A L L C O N S T R U C T I O N A C T I V I T I E S S H A L L C O M P L Y W I T H L O C A L O R D I N A N C E . T H E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L S C H E D U L E T H E I R O P E R A T I O N S T O M I N I M I Z E T H E D I S T U R B E D A R E A A T A N Y G I V E N T I M E . I M P E R V I O U S P E R V I O U S E X I S T I N G P R O P O S E D B U I L D I N G T O T A L I M P V N P D E S A R E A S U M M A R Y T O T A L * 0 S F ( 0 . 0 0 A C ) P A V E M E N T 4 , 7 2 5 S F ( 0 . 1 1 A C ) 4 , 7 2 5 S F ( 0 . 1 1 A C ) 3 , 2 7 0 S F ( 0 . 0 7 A C ) 7 , 9 9 5 S F ( 0 . 1 8 A C ) 2 , 2 5 0 S F ( 0 . 0 5 A C ) 4 , 5 2 7 S F ( 0 . 1 0 A C ) 6 , 7 7 7 S F ( 0 . 1 5 A C ) 1 , 2 1 8 S F ( 0 . 0 3 A C ) 7 , 9 9 5 S F ( 0 . 1 8 A C ) * T A B L E R E P R E S E N T S D I S T U R B E D A R E A O N L Y © T S P , I n c . 2 0 1 8 I S S U E S S H E E T N U M B E R S H E E T T I T L E C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E T S P , I n c . P R O J E C T T I T L E 4 3 0 2 n d S t r e e t E x c e l s i o r , M N 5 5 3 3 1 ( 9 5 2 ) 4 7 4 - 3 2 9 1 w w w . t e a m t s p . c o m I S S U E D A T E C H E C K E D B Y D R A W N B Y P R O J E C T # LISTED DRAWINGS SCALE(S) UNLESS REDUCED FROM ORIGINAL 30 x 42 FORMAT C O N S U L T A N T S A r c h i t e c t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g 5/29/2018 9:36:34 AM I:\_TSP Revit Local\05161256.2 BROOKLYN CTR ISD286 MIDDLE-HIGH ADDITION & REMODEL_A17_GrothmanJR.rvt SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 6 5 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N U E N O R T H B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 3 0 M I D D L E S C H O O L & H I G H S C H O O L - A D D I T I O N A N D R E M O D E L I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R I S D # 2 8 6 L T H 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 M J W 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 9 0 1 N 3 r d S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 2 0 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 w w w . e l a n l a b . c o m p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y L i c e n s e d P r o f e s s i o n a l E n g i n e e r u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . M a r c e l l e J . W e s l o c k , P E , L E E D A P 4 2 3 2 3 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 R E G I S T R A T I O N N O . D A T E S I T E A N D B U I L D I N G P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 C O N S T R U C T I O N N O T F O R D E T A I L S C 5 . 0 1 S A W C U T A L L E D G E S . R E M O V E B I T U M I N O U S A N D E N O U G H A G G R E G A T E B A S E M A T E R I A L T O A C C O M M O D A T E N E W P A V E M E N T . M I L L 1 / 2 T H I C K N E S S O F E X I S T I N G P A V E M E N T 1 2 " W E A R C O U R S E N O N - W E A R C O U R S E A G G R E G A T E B A S E S A W C U T N E W P A V E M E N T T A C K C O A T A L L E D G E S E 1 B I T U M I N O U S I N T E R L O C K A T M A T C H L I N E N O S C A L E N O T E : 1 2 " S A W C U T N E W P A V E M E N T T A C K C O A T A L L E D G E S A T C U R B A T P A V E M E N T 4 " 1 / 2 T H I C K N E S S O F E X I S T I N G P A V E M E N T 4" E 5 S I D E W A L K C O N C R E T E P A V E M E N T S E C T I O N N O S C A L E 4 " A G G R E G A T E B A S E 8 " S C A R I F I E D A N D C O M P A C T E D S U B G R A D E 2"2"6" A S P H A L T S U R F A C E C O U R S E A S P H A L T B A S E C O U R S E A G G R E G A T E B A S E 8 " S C A R I F Y A N D R E C O M P A C T S U B G R A D E E 4 A S H P A L T P A V E M E N T S E C T I O N N O S C A L E A 1 5 0 ' M I N . A S I N D I C A T E D O N P L A N 6 " M I N I M U M D E P T H O F 1 " - 2 " D I A . W A S H E D R O C K G E O T E X T I L E F A B R I C U N D E R L Y I N G M A I N T A I N R O C K E N T R A N C E T O P R E V E N T T R A C K I N G M U D O N T O P U B L I C S T R E E T S . A D D R O C K O R R E I N S T A L L T H E R O C K E N T R A N C E A S N E C E S S A R Y . N O S C A L E R O C K C O N S T R U C T I O N E N T R A N C E N O S C A L E E 3 V E R T I C A L C U R B F I L L E R S E A L E R S U R F A C E P A V E M E N T J O I N T 3 / 4 " B A C K E R M A T E R I A L J O I N T 3 / 4 " D J O I N T S E A L E R W B A C K E R T D C O N T R A C T I O N J O I N T M A T E R I A L P A V E M E N T S U R F A C E C R A C K I N I T I A L S A W C U T ( 1 / 8 " ) J O I N T B O T T O M O R I N S E R T W = W I D T H O F S E A L A N T R E S E R V O I R ( 1 / 2 " ( M I N ) , 5 / 8 " ( M A X ) ) D = D E P T H O F S E A L A N T ( 1 . 0 T O 1 . 5 W ) T = 1 / 4 S L A B T H I C K N E S S I S O L A T I O N / E X P A N S I O N J O I N T N O T E : T O P O F S E A L A N T W I L L B E 1 / 8 " T O 1 / 4 " B E L O W T O P O F P A V E M E N T S U R F A C E F O R E X T E R I O R P A V E M E N T S 1 . D 3 J O I N T S E A L A N T N O S C A L E D R I P L I N E 4 - F T M I N N O T E S : 1 . 2 . 3 . 6 - F T . H I G H T E M P O R A R Y O R A N G E C O N S T R U C T I O N F E N C E S H A L L B E P L A C E D A T T H E D R I P L I N E O F T H E T R E E T O B E S A V E D . F E N C E S H A L L C O M P L E T E L Y E N C I R C L E T H E T R E E ( S ) . I N S T A L L F E N C E P O S T S U S I N G P I E R B L O C K S O N L Y . A V O I D D R I V I N G P O S T S O R S T A K E S I N T O M A J O R R O O T S . F O R R O O T S O V E R 1 - I N D I A . T H A T A R E D A M A G E D D U R I N G C O N S T R U C T I O N , M A K E A C L E A N , S T R A I G H T C U T T O R E M O V E T H E D A M A G E D P O R T I O N . A L L E X P O S E D R O O T S S H A L L B E T E M P O R A R I L Y C O V E R E D W I T H D A M P B U R L A P T O P R E V E N T D R Y I N G , A N D S H A L L B E C O V E R E D W I T H S O I L A S S O O N A S P O S S I B L E . W O R K W I T H I N P R O T E C T I O N F E N C E S H A L L B E D O N E M A N U A L L Y . N O S T O C K P I L I N G O F M A T E R I A L S , V E H I C U L A R T R A F F I C , O R S T O R A G E O F E Q U I P M E N T O R M A C H I N E R Y S H A L L B E A L L O W E D W I T H I N T H E L I M I T O F T H E F E N C I N G . A 2 T R E E P R O T E C T I O N N O S C A L E 45°' F L O W F L O W F L O W F L O W S T A K E A 3 N O S C A L E B I O R O L L S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L 8 " - 1 2 " B I O R O L L S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L L O G 2 " X 2 " X 1 6 " L O N G W O O D E N S T A K E S A T 1 2 " S P A C I N G . S T A K E S S H A L L B E D R I V E N T H R O U G H T H E B A C K H A L F O F T H E F I L T E R L O G A T A N A N G L E O F 4 5 d W I T H T H E T O P O F T H E S T A K E P O I N T I N G U P S T R E A M . R U N O F F F L O W 8 " - 1 2 " B I O R O L L S E D I M E N T C O N T R O L L O G U S E K N I T T E D P O L Y P R O P Y L E N E T U B E S F O R T E M P O R A R Y I N S T A L L A T I O N S O R J U T E O R B U R L A P W H E N D E G R A D A T I O N I N P L A C E I S D E S I R E D . C A U L K W A T E R P R O O F C E M E N T H A R D W O O D W E D G E S A L U M F L A S H C O L L A R D R Y S A N D 1 " P V C 2 ' - 6 " 6" S T E E L S U P P O R T P L A T E ( 6 " ) W E L D T O G R O U N D S P I K E G R O U N D I N G S P I K E 1 / 2 " S T E E L B A S E P L A T E 1 / 4 " G A L V S T E E L T U B E 1 / 8 C U Y D O F 1 " R O C K T I G H T L Y T A M P E D S T E E L W E D G E S C O N C R E T E B A S E D E P T H A N D D I A M E T E R T O B E D E T E R M I N E D B Y T H E C O N T R A C T O R A N D C E R T I F I E D B Y A S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R D 1 F L A G P O L E B A S E N O S C A L E 1 2 " 3'7' S A L V A G E D S I G N F I N I S H G R A D E 3 0 0 0 P S I C O N C R E T E N O T E S : 1 . C O N S T R U C T A L L S I G N S W I T H E I T H E R S I N G L E S H E E T S T E E L ( 0 . 0 5 9 8 " M I N . T H I C K N E S S ) O R S I N G L E S H E E T A L U M I N U M ( 0 1 0 0 " M I N . T H I C K N E S S ) F U R N I S H E D W I T H A L L C O N N E C T O R S O R B A C K I N G Z E E S , P O S T S , A N D F O O T I N G S . 2 . P O S T S S H A L L B E 1 2 . 5 ' ' L O N G ( M I N I M U M ) H O T - R O L L E D H I G H T E N S I L E R A I L S T E E L , P E R F O R A T E D W I T H 3 / 8 " H O L E S A T 1 " C E N T E R S , F I N I S H E D W I T H B R O W N B A K E D E N A M E L .1" D 2 S I G N M O U N T I N G N O S C A L E B 1 P E D E S T R I A N C U R B R A M P 5 ' 2' 2 ' 3 ' 2 ' 3 ' 6'VARIES 4' MIN. C O N C R E T E S I D E W A L K L A N D I N G 1 : 1 0 F L A R E 1 : 1 0 F L A R E 0 " C U R B H E I G H T F U L L C U R B H E I G H T F U L L C U R B H E I G H T T R U N C A T E D D O M E P A V E R S W / S E A L E D G R O U T J O I N T S 6 " T R U N C A T E D D O M E P A V E R S W / S E A L E D G R O U T J O I N T S 2 ' M I N . P A V E M E N T D E T E C T A B L E W A R N I N G P L A T E S S H A L L B E N E E N A H Q U I C K C O N N E C T P L A T E S 4 9 8 4 - 2 4 Q O R R A D I U S P L A T E S P E R P L A N I N U N C O A T E D C O N D I T I O N . I N S T A L L A T I O N S T E P S 1 . C O N N E C T P L A T E S T O G E T H E R ( M I N I M U M O F T W O ) 2 . P O U R C O N C R E T E 3 . U S E S U P P L I E D L I F T I N G S P R I N G S A N D C O N S T R U C T I O N 2 X 4 O R P I P E T O L I F T P L A T E S I N T O P O S I T I O N 4 . S E T P L A T E S I N W E T C O N C R E T E A T F I N A L P O S I T I O N 5 . R E M O V E L I F T I N G S P R I N G S 6 . P R E S S A S S E M B L Y I N T O W E T C O N C R E T E T O F I N A L E L E V A T I O N 7 . F I N I S H C O N C R E T E A R O U N D A S S E M B L Y 8 . R E M O V E A N Y W E T C O N C R E T E T H A T M A Y H A V E S P I L L E D O N C O N C R E T E 9 . A V O I D S P R A Y I N G C U R I N G C O M P O U N D O N P L A T E S M A X I M U M 2 % C R O S S S L O P E A N D 1 2 : 1 R U N - S E E P L A N 8" MINIMUM M A T C H O U T S I D E E D G E O F C U R B A G G R E G A T E B A S E S P E C I F I E D S I D E W A L K T H I C K N E S S C O N C R E T E S I D E W A L K 1 / 2 " E X P A N S I O N J O I N T 1 1 / 2 " R A D I U S V E R T I C A L C U R B P A V E M E N T 1 2 " m i n 6 " 1 " 5 " 1'-6" M A X I M U M S P A C I N G 1 0 0 ' . A L S O U S E W H E N A B U T T I N G B U I L D I N G S . S P A C I N G : S E E P L A N 1 / 4 " R 1 / 4 " R J O I N T S E A L E R S E E D 3 / C 5 . 0 1 E X P A N S I O N J O I N T T O O L E D C O N T R O L J O I N T 4" SIDEWALK 1 / 2 " 1/2" 3 / 8 " 1 / 8 " 4" WALK 1" D 4 S I D E W A L K J O I N T N O S C A L E S A L V A G E D F L A G P O L E 3 5 ' M O U N T I N G H E I G H T E X I S T I N G T R E E S O D A T H A R D S C A P E ( T Y P ) A 5 L 1 . 0 1 F L A G P O L E E X I S T I N G O R N A M E N T A L T R E E E X I S T I N G T R E E E X I S T I N G T R E E E X I S T I N G L I G H T P O L E ( T Y P ) T R E E P L A N T I N G ( T Y P ) D 5 L 1 . 0 1 6 5 T H A V E N U E N 1 0 P A 1 0 P A 1 0 P A E D G I N G A T P L A N T I N G B E D ( T Y P ) B 5 L 1 . 0 1 S H R U B P L A N T I N G ( T Y P ) C 5 L 1 . 0 1 1 S R 1 S R 1 S R P A R K I N G S I G N E X I S T I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R S E C O N D A R Y S C H O O L P R O P O S E D A D D I T I O N ± 2 , 2 5 0 S F 1 9 2 , 0 2 4 S F 3 0 1 0 S C A L E I N F E E T K n o w w h a t ' s b e l o w . C a l l b e f o r e y o u d i g . R © T S P , I n c . 2 0 1 8 I S S U E S S H E E T N U M B E R S H E E T T I T L E C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E T S P , I n c . P R O J E C T T I T L E 4 3 0 2 n d S t r e e t E x c e l s i o r , M N 5 5 3 3 1 ( 9 5 2 ) 4 7 4 - 3 2 9 1 w w w . t e a m t s p . c o m I S S U E D A T E C H E C K E D B Y D R A W N B Y P R O J E C T # LISTED DRAWINGS SCALE(S) UNLESS REDUCED FROM ORIGINAL 30 x 42 FORMAT C O N S U L T A N T S A r c h i t e c t u r e E n g i n e e r i n g P l a n n i n g 5/29/2018 9:36:34 AM I:\_TSP Revit Local\05161256.2 BROOKLYN CTR ISD286 MIDDLE-HIGH ADDITION & REMODEL_A17_GrothmanJR.rvt SITE AND BUILDING PLAN REVIEW SUBMITTAL 6 5 0 0 H U M B O L D T A V E N U E N O R T H B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 5 5 4 3 0 M I D D L E S C H O O L & H I G H S C H O O L - A D D I T I O N A N D R E M O D E L I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R I S D # 2 8 6 L T H 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 M J W 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 9 0 1 N 3 r d S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 2 0 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 0 1 w w w . e l a n l a b . c o m p 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 8 0 f 6 1 2 . 2 6 0 . 7 9 9 0 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 R E G I S T R A T I O N N O . D A T E S I T E A N D B U I L D I N G P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 0 6 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 C O N S T R U C T I O N N O T F O R A 1 L A N D S C A P E P L A N 1 " = 1 0 ' L A N D S C A P E P L A N L 1 . 0 1 L E G E N D S O D Q U A N T . K E Y C O M M O N N A M E S C I E N T I F I C N A M E S I Z E R O O T C O N D . M A T U R E S I Z E P L A N T S C H E D U L E S U B S T I T U T I O N S : I F A N Y S U B S T I T U T I O N S A R E R E Q U I R E D , S U B M I T W R I T T E N D O C U M E N T S A N D P R O P O S E D S U B S T I T U T I O N S T O L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T F O R A P P R O V A L 5 D A Y S P R I O R T O P U R C H A S E A N D / O R I N S T A L L A T I O N . L A N D S C A P E N O T E S 4 ' H X 4 ' W P O T P I C E E A A B I E S ' P U M I L A ' D W A R F N O R W A Y S P R U C E 3 0 P A P L A N T I N G S O I L ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) M U L C H ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) E D G I N G ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) H O L D S O D D E D A R E A 1 " B E L O W P A V I N G S U R F A C E R E M O V E A L L P O T A N D A L L P L A S T I C L O O S E N R O O T S P R I O R T O P L A N T I N G C 5 S H R U B P L A N T I N G N O S C A L E B 5 E D G I N G A T P L A N T I N G B E D N O S C A L E A 5 S O D A T H A R D S C A P E E D G E N O S C A L E S C A R I F Y S I D E S A N D B O T T O M P R I O R T O P L A N T I N G 1 2 " M I N . P R O V I D E P L A N T I N G B E D 1 2 " M I N . A R O U N D P L A N T S M A K E S A U C E R A R O U N D P L A N T S T O P S O I L ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) P L A N T I N G S O I L ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) M U L C H ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) E D G I N G ( S E E L A N D S C A P E N O T E S ) T O P O F E D G I N G T O B E M A X I M U M 1 / 2 " A B O V E S U R F A C E M A T E R I A L 1 2 " M I N . P R O V I D E P L A N T I N G B E D 1 2 " M I N . A R O U N D P L A N T S I N S T A L L S T A K E S P E R M A N U F A C T U R E R ' S I N S T A L L A T I O N G U I L D L I N E S T O P O F M U L C H B E L O W T O P O F P A V E M E N T 2 4 " M I N . T O P A V E M E N T 3 0 " H T . D 5 T R E E P L A N T I N G N O S C A L E 2 5 ' H X 2 0 ' W B & B S Y R I N G A R E T I C U L A T A J A P A N E S E T R E E L I L A C 3 S R 2 . 5 " C A L . I h e r e b y c e r t i f y t h a t t h i s p l a n w a s p r e p a r e d b y m e , o r u n d e r m y d i r e c t s u p e r v i s i o n , a n d t h a t I a m a d u l y L i c e n s e d L a n d s c a p e A r c h i t e c t u n d e r t h e l a w s o f t h e s t a t e o f M I N N E S O T A . P i l a r s i n e e S a r a i t h o n g 4 5 0 5 9 1 . L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E S P O N S I B L E F O R F I N I S H E D G R A D I N G A N D P O S I T I V E S U R F A C E D R A I N A G E I N A L L L A N D S C A P E A R E A S . L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R M U S T E N S U R E T H A T T H E F I N A L G R A D E S A R E M E T A S S H O W N O N G R A D I N G P L A N . I F A N Y D I S C R E P A N C I E S A R E F O U N D , I M M E D I A T E L Y N O T I F Y L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T F O R R E S O L U T I O N . 2 . A L L P L A N T M A T E R I A L S A R E T O C O N F O R M W I T H S T A T E & L O C A L C O N S T R U C T I O N S T A N D A R D S A N D T H E C U R R E N T A D D I T I O N O F T H E A M E R I C A N A S S O C I A T I O N O F N U R S E R Y M E N S T A N D A R D S . A L L P L A N T M A T E R I A L S A R E T O B E H E A L T H Y , H A R D Y S T O C K , A N D F R E E F R O M A N Y D I S E A S E S , D A M A G E , A N D D I S F I G U R A T I O N . 3 . Q U A N T I T I E S O F P L A N T S L I S T E D O N T H E P L A N A R E T O G O V E R N A N Y D I S C R E P A N C Y B E T W E E N T H E Q U A N T I T I E S S H O W N O N T H E P L A N T S C H E D U L E A N D P L A N . P L A C E P L A N T S I N P R O P E R S P A C I N G F O L L O W I N G L A Y O U T F I G U R E S . 4 . T O P S O I L A N D P L A N T I N G S O I L T O B E A S I N D I C A T E D I N S P E C I F I C A T I O N S , F R E E O F C H E M I C A L C O N T A M I N A N T S , D E B R I S , L A R G E R O C K S G R E A T E R T H A N 1 / 2 " D I A M E T E R , A N D F R A G M E N T S O F W O O D . S U B S O I L S H A L L B E S C A R I F I E D T O A D E P T H O F 4 " B E F O R E P L A N T I N G S O I L I S S P R E A D . 5 . S P R E A D P L A N T I N G S O I L A T M I N I M U M E I G H T E E N ( 1 8 ) I N C H D E E P I N A L L P L A N T I N G B E D S P R I O R T O P L A N T I N G . T H O R O U G H L Y W A T E R T W I C E T O F A C I L I T A T E C O N S O L I D A T I O N P R I O R T O P L A N T I N G . D O N O T O V E R L Y C O M P A C T S O I L . 6 . S O D S H O W N O N L A N D S C A P E P L A N T O B E I N S T A L L E D B Y L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R . S O D T O B E M N D O T 3 8 7 8 . 2 A , D E N S E , A N D O F U N I F O R M T E X T U R E , F R E E O F W E E D S A N D D I S E A S E . A P P L Y M I N I M U M S I X ( 6 ) I N C H E S O F S E L E C T T O P S O I L B O R R O W A N D T H O R O U G H L Y A P P L Y F E R T I L I Z E R T O B E F O R E L A Y I N G S O D . L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R T O M A I N T A I N S O D D E D A R E A S I N H E A L T H Y C O N D I T I O N U N T I L F I R M L Y R O O T E D . 7 . M U L C H T O B E S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D B A R K M U L C H , C O N S I S T E D O F R A W W O O D M A T E R I A L F R O M T I M B E R A N D B E A P R O D U C T O F A M E C H A N I C A L C H I P P E R , H A M M E R M I L L , O R T U B G R I N D E R . T H E M A T E R I A L S H A L L B E S U B S T A N T I A L L Y F R E E O F M O L D , D I R T , S A W D U S T , A N D F O R E I G N M A T E R I A L A N D S H A L L N O T B E I N A N A D V A N C E D S T A T E O F D E C O M P O S I T I O N . T H E M A T E R I A L S H A L L N O T C O N T A I N C H I P P E D U P M A N U F A C T U R E D B O A R D S O R C H E M I C A L L Y T R E A T E D W O O D , I N C L U D I N G , B U T N O T L I M I T E D T O , W A T E R B O A R D , P A R T I C L E B O A R D , A N D C H R O M A T E D C O P P E R A R S E N A T E ( C C A ) O R P E N T A T R E A T E D W O O D . T H E M A T E R I A L S H A L L B E T W I C E - G R O U N D / S H R E D D E D , S U C H T H A T ; N O I N D I V I D U A L P I E C E S H A L L E X C E E D 2 I N C H E S I N A N Y D I M E N S I O N . 8 . A P P L Y T H R E E ( 3 ) I N C H D E P T H O F S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D B A R K M U L C H I N F O U R ( 4 ) F O O T D I A M E T E R R I N G A R O U N D A L L T R E E S . N O A L U M I N U M E D G I N G I S R E Q U I R E D . 9 . E D G E A L L S H R U B B E D S W I T H 3 / 1 6 " X 4 " M I L L F I N I S H E D A L U M I N U M E D G I N G W I T H S T A K E S . A L L E D G I N G T O B E C O M M E R C I A L G R A D E . 1 0 . A P P L Y T H R E E ( 3 ) I N C H D E P T H O F S H R E D D E D H A R D W O O D B A R K M U L C H I N A L L S H R U B B E D A R E A S . 1 1 . T R E E P L A N T I N G A N D S H R U B A R E A S S H A L L B E I R R I G A T E D W I T H A N U N D E R G R O U N D I R R I G A T I O N S Y S T E M . N O W A T E R I S A L L O W E D O N A N Y P A V E M E N T , P A R K I N G , W A L K W A Y , A N D B U I L D I N G . T H E I R R I G A T I O N C O N T R A C T O R I S T O D E S I G N A N D S U B M I T S H O P D R A W I N G O F I R R I G A T I O N D E S I G N A N D C A L C U L A T I O N S T O L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T F O R R E V I E W 5 D A Y S P R I O R T O P U R C H A S I N G A N D I N S T A L L A T I O N . I R R I G A T I O N D E S I G N I S T O M E E T A L L C I T Y A N D S T A T E P L U M B I N G C O D E S A N D R E Q U I R E M E N T S . 1 2 . F O L L O W L A N D S C A P E D E T A I L S F O R A L L I N S T A L L A T I O N , U N L E S S O T H E R W I S E N O T E D . 1 3 . L A N D S C A P E C O N T R A C T O R S H A L L M A I N T A I N P L A N T S I N B O T H P R I V A T E P R O P E R T Y A N D R I G H T - O F - W A Y I N H E A L T H Y C O N D I T I O N T H R O U G H O U T W A R R A N T Y P E R I O D . M A I N T E N A N C E S H A L L I N C L U D E M U L C H I N G , P R U N I N G , W A T E R I N G , A N D R E P L A C I N G D E A D M A T E R I A L S . T H E W A R R A N T Y P E R I O D I S O N E F U L L Y E A R F R O M D A T E O F P R O V I S I O N A L A C C E P T A N C E U N T I L F I N A L A C C E P T A N C E . W A R R A N T Y P E R I O D F O R P L A N T M A T E R I A L I N S T A L L E D A F T E R J U N E 1 S T S H A L L C O M M E N C E T H E F O L L O W I N G Y E A R . SHEET GENERAL NOTES: UP UP UP UP W UP KEY NOTES: FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. DOOR TAG ROOM TAG REVISION TAG FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINETFEC FIRE EXTINGUISHERFE KEYNOTE TAG WALL TAG CARD READERCR FLOOR PLAN LEGEND 101 NAME WINDOW TAG 1 W1 A1-A REV EQUIPMENT TAGXXX CJ MASONRY CONTROL JOINT 101B CJ GYPSUM BOARD CONTROL JOINT 1 HR FIRE BARRIER. REF LIFE SAFETY PLANS 2 HR FIRE BARRIER. REF LIFE SAFETY PLANS ELECTRICAL PANEL. REF ELECTRICAL PLANS NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 1 : 5 1 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t OVERALL FLOOR PLAN AP111 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 PLAN NORTH THIS SHEET CONTAINS COLOR-CODED INFORMATION. THIS SHEET SHOULD BE PRINTED IN COLOR. TSP LOGO TO THE RIGHT SHOULD BE RED. SCALE: 1" = 30'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - OVERALL MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: A144 SCIENCE LAB A145 PLTW LAB (STEAM) A141 SCIENCE LAB A142 SCIENCE STORAGE A143 SCIENCE LAB A146 PLTW LAB (STEAM) A138 GENDER NEUTRAL RR A140 MALE RESTROOM A147 LOCKED STORAGE A148 TEACHER WORK AREA A136 EXIST MECH A149 EL C/R A150 CLASSROOM A151 CLASSROOM A127 SP ED CENTER BASED C/R A130 SHARED RESTROOM A129 BREAK OUT A132 SP ED CENTER BASED C/R A126 VESTIBULE A114 HEALTH RESOURCE A112 CLASSROOM A111 CLASSROOM A110 SP ED CENTER BASED C/R A109 SP ED STORAGE A108 BREAK OUT A106 SP ED RESOURCE C/R A104 SP ED RESOURCE C/R A103 EL C/R A102 CLASSROOM A139 FEMALE RESTROOM A137 COMMONS A101 CORRIDOR A134 STAFF RR A135 JANITOR A131 HEALTH RESOURCE VISION A-410 A3 11 ' - 4 " 6'- 8 " 10 ' - 8 " 5'- 0 " 2' - 6 " 9' - 1 0 " 5'- 8 3 / 8 " + / - 5' - 0 " 3' - 1 1 5 / 8 " 5'-0" 7'-4" 20'-0" 26 ' - 0 " 9'-0" A1 0 2 A1 0 3 A1 4 3 A A1 4 3 B A1 4 1 A A108A A108B A109B A1 0 9 A A142A A1 4 4 B A1 4 2 B A142C A1 4 4 A A1 4 6 B A1 4 6 A A1 4 5 B F1 0 8 A1 5 1 A1 5 0 A1 4 9 A1 4 8 A130A A129A A129B A130B A1 3 4 A1 3 6 A138 A143C B1 0 1 C MB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 5'- 4 " A-404 C2 A-404 B2 A-404 A2 A1 4 1 B M8A 27'-0" 27'-0" 15'-0 3/4" M6A M6A M6A M8A M8A M8A M8A M6A M6B M8A M8A M8A M8A M6B 14'-5 3/8" 16'-10 1/4" 6'-8" 1'-6" 38'-1" 41'-11 5/8" 33'-8 3/8" 20'-8 3/8" 34'-9 5/8" M4A 1'-4" A115 WAITING A125 TOILET A124 WORK A116 RECEPTION A123 EXAM A122 EXAM A117 OFFICE A118 OFFICE A119 OFFICE A120 EXAM A113 HEALTH A121 EXAM A128 BREAK OUT MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB MB MB MB A-410 E1 MB MB MB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB MB TB A133 BREAK OUT A1 3 3 TB 8'- 0 " A128 MB MB MB MB MB MB MB6 MB8 TB MB8 MB8 MB8 TB MB8 MB6 5' - 0 " MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 2'- 0 " 1'-10" 24'-3" 1'-7 3/8" MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB TB TB MB8 MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 A1 4 5 A F1-a A-410 D1 A-410 E3 A-410 E4 E5 A-410 A1 A-410 A2 A-410 A4\ A-410 A5 A-410 B2 A-410 B1 A-410 C2 A-410 C1 A-410 C4 A-410 C3 A-410 D1 A-410 D1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474 -3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N AL 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 2 : 1 1 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 MI D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA A AP111A SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author 06/12/2018 RRC 05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A1 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA A PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: B119 MAGNET COORDINATOR B108 WORK ROOM B120 POLICE LIAISON B143 AVID B141 IT SERVER B140 IT OFFICE B139A JANITOR B138 GEND NEUTRAL TLT B134 FAMILY RESOURCE B137 MALE RESTROOM B136 FEMALE RESTROOM B126 NURSE B127 TOILET B124 TOILET B159 CLASSROOM B158 CLASSROOM B153 CONFERENCE B156 COMMUNITY PARTNER - THERAPY B146 STORAGE B152 SOCIAL WORKER B151 SOCIAL WORKER B149 WAITING B145 GRAPHIC ARTS B154 GUIDANCE B122 Q-COMP B118 COMMUNITY PARTNER B131 OFFICE B132 EXAM B142 MECH ROOM B129 CONFERENCE ROOM B128 OFFICE B155 GUIDANCE B148 ACADEMIC ENRICHMENT B106 ATTENDANCE B105 RECEPTION / WAITING B144 COMMONS B101 VESTIBULE B102 CORRIDOR B103 VESTIBULE B104 CORRIDOR B150 CORRIDOR B157 CORRIDOR B107 CORRIDOR B107 CORRIDOR 11'-11 5/8" 12 ' - 0 " 5'- 4 " 11'-11 5/8"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"10'-6"8'-0"1'-5"6'-9"6'-4"18'-10" 8'- 0 3 / 4 " 9'- 5 1 / 2 " 7'- 0 " 10'-7" 3'-4" 14 ' - 0 " 12 ' - 8 " 6'-6"17'-4" 6'- 2 " 11 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 7'- 0 1 / 2 " B135 COMMUNITY LIASON B130 NEOPATH WAITING B133 STORAGE 11'-4" 11'-10"10'-7 5/8"24'-8"12'-0"24'-8" 12 ' - 1 0 " 13 ' - 4 " 5'- 4 " 28 ' - 4 " 47'-1 5/8"12'-0" 9'- 5 1 / 4 " 9'- 4 " 9'- 4 " 12'-11 1/8"5'-5 1/2"12'-2"16'-8"34'-8 1/4" 10 ' - 4 " 10 ' - 4 " 5'-4"5'-4" B134 B1 3 5 B130 B133 B1 3 1 B1 3 2 B1 2 0 B1 2 2 B107 B1 0 1 C B1 0 1 D B1 0 1 A B1 0 1 B B1 0 3 B B105B B1 2 7 B1 2 6 B1 2 9 B1 2 8 B138 B1 3 9 A B1 4 0 B1 4 2 B1 4 3 B1 2 4 B1 4 5 A B1 4 8 B1 4 9 B151 B152 B153 B154 B155 B150 B1 5 6 B145B B1 4 6 B1 5 8 B1 5 9 F112 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 B119 B118 B113 COMMUNITY ED OFFICE B112 SPEECH, PHYCH OFFICE B111 DISTRICT MENTOR B125 LACTATION ROOMB123 VAULT B121 STORAGE 10'-6"5'-4"16'-0"13'-0"8'-6"10'-0" B1 2 1 B1 2 3 B1 1 3 B1 1 2 B1 1 1 B109 ENROLLMENT B110 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL B114 ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL B115 PRINCIPAL ASSISTANT B116 PRINCIPAL 19'-0"12'-4"12'-4"12'-4"11'-0" B1 1 6 B1 1 5 B1 1 4 B1 0 9 A-405 B2 B1 2 5 B106 3'-0" B105A M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A WX M8A M8A WX M8A M8A M8A D2A M8A M8A D3A D3AD3A M4A TA-GB1 M4A 12 ' - 2 " 12 ' - 2 " 11 ' - 4 " 5'- 4 " 10 ' - 6 " 8'- 6 " 10 ' - 6 " 12'-6 5/8" 3'- 0 " 10'-8"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"6'-0"4'-8"6'-0"8'-0"16'-0" WX B3 A-301 A1 A-301 D3 A-301 B1 A-301 83'-2 5/8" 4'- 8 " 48 49 50 B1 1 0 13'-8" 8'-8" B1 3 9 B B139B ELECTRICAL 1'-4" 12'-1 3/4" B147 ART DISPLAY 3'-2 5/8" B1 0 3 A A-411E2 E3 TBTB MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8MB8 F1-b F1-a 16 ' - 8 " 6'- 0 " F3 F3 F3 F3 F5 MB8 MB8 2'- 0 " C135 F3 F3 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-411 E1 A-411 E4 A-411 C3 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY B119 MAGNET COORDINATOR B118 COMMUNITY PARTNER B106 ATTENDANCE B105 RECEPTION / WAITING B101 VESTIBULE B103 VESTIBULE 11'-11 5/8" B1 0 1 C B1 0 1 D B1 0 1 A B1 0 1 B B1 0 3 B A-201 A1 B109 ENROLLMENT B116 PRINCIPAL B1 0 9 B105A 12 ' - 2 " 12 ' - 2 " 12'-0"2'-0"16'-0"2'-0"12'-0"2'-0" 3'- 0 " B3 A-301 A1 A-301 B1 A-301 48 50 B1 0 3 A MB8 F1-b F1-a 16 ' - 8 " 6'- 0 " F3 F5 2'- 0 " F3 F3 A-411E1 A-411 A-411E5 A-411 E6 D5 D6 A-411 D4 A-411 A-411 E4 A-411 C3 A-411 C5 A-411 C4 C6 B3 A-301 A1 A-301 48 F5 I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 2 : 3 2 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B AP111B SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B - CANOPIES SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"3 FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA B - CLERESTORY PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION UP UP W SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: C102 CAFETERIA C103 ALA CART C114 STORAGE C113 ELEC C115 FACULTY LOUNGE C116 TOILET C117 TOILET C124 THE PIT VGVG STAIR C119 MS FEMALE LOCKER ROOM C126 PE STORAGE C127 CORRIDOR C123 HS FEMALE LOCKER ROOM C120 PE OFFICE C122 COACHES C130 PE STORAGE C131 AD OFFICE C132 FACS C133 DEAN OFFICE C135 ALTERNATE TO SUSPENSION C118 GYMNASIUM C101 CORRIDOR C108 DISH ROOM C111 OFFICE C110 CASH OFFICE C109 TOILET C106 KITCHEN C105 STORAGE C107 WALK IN COOLER C112 WALK IN FREEZER C104 SERVING LINE C128 FEMALE OFFICIAL C129 TOILET B103 VESTIBULE B104 CORRIDOR C121 COACHES LOCKER ROOM 23'-0" 19'-0" C125 PE STORAGE 2'-0" 9'-8" 14'-0" 4'-8" 1'- 4 " 9'-4" 14'-0" 2'- 0 " 5'-0" 3'-8" 4'-8" B1 0 3 B C1 3 3 A C1 3 3 B C1 3 2 B C1 3 2 A C1 3 1 C118 C124 C1 2 3 C1 2 8 C129 C126 C1 2 5 C1 2 0 B C1 2 2 B C1 2 2 A C1 2 0 A MB8 MB8 MB8 A-402 A1 C121B C121A M8A M12A A3B A3B M6B M8A M6B 1'- 8 " 1'- 6 " B1 0 3 A AP111B 3 F5 MB8 MB8 8'-3" 2' - 8 " MB8 A-411 A1 A3 A5 C135 C101 E119B E132 E131 E129 E127 A-201 B4 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474 -3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N AL 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 2 : 5 3 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 MI D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA C AP111C SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author 06/12/2018 RRC 05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA C PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION UP UP SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: D116 THEATER CLASSROOM D119 STORAGE D120 PRACTICE D118 PRACTICE D106 AUDITORIUM D102 LOBBY D105 CONTROL BOOTH D101 VESTIBULE D103 COATS/TICKETS D104 JAN/MECH D110 PAES LAB D113 WOMEN RESTROOM D114 MEN RESTROOM D115 CORR D111 ELEC D112 CORRIDOR D117 CHOIR D121 OFFICE D107 STAGE D108 SCENE SHOP D109 STORAGE D126 BAND D128 STORAGE D124 OFFICE D122 CORRIDOR D125 PRACTICE D127 STORAGE D123 PRACTICE D116 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 3 : 0 6 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA D AP111D SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA D PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: E103 GYMNASIUM E118 PE OFFICE E117 COACHES LOCKER ROOM E115 MS MALE LOCKER ROOM E114 AUX GYM STORAGE E108 WOMEN DRESSING E109 TOILET E111 TOILET E110 MEN DRESSING E125 ELECTRICAL ST02 STAIR E129 TRAINING ROOM E130 STORAGE E131 GENDER NEUTRAL SHOWER E126 BOILER ROOM E124 LAUNDRY E123 CUSTODIAN OFFICE E122 PERFORMING ARTS STORAGE E121 ELEC E120 EQUIPMENT ROOM E113 BOILER ROOM E107 CORRIDOR E102 CORRIDOR E104 WEIGHT ROOME105 PHY ED E106 S&R E132 GENDER NEUTRAL SHOWER E127 MALE OFFICIAL E128 TOILET E116 COACHES E119 HS MALE LOCKER ROOM E101 VESTIBULE M6B M8A M6B M6A M8A M6A M8A M8AM8A M6A M6A M8A M6A M8A M6A M8AM6A M6A M8A M6A M8A M6A M8A M6A M8A M8A M8A M6A M6A 4'-8"7'-6"10'-1 7/8"2'-0"8'-5 5/8"35'-4 7/8"3'-5 5/8"12'-2 3/8"31'-3 5/8" 9'-9 5/8"7'-4" 3'-4" 7'-3 3/4"10'-7 5/8"2'-0"10'-4"9'-9 7/8"10'-1 1/4"3'-5 5/8"3'-5 5/8"3'-5 5/8"1'-8 3/8"11'-10 3/8"17'-0"29'-3 5/8"2'-0" M12A M8A M12A 3'- 6 " 5'- 3 3 / 8 " 3'- 5 5 / 8 " 14 ' - 8 " 9'- 5 " 13 ' - 5 3 / 4 " 9'- 6 3 / 8 " 17 ' - 2 1 / 8 " 10 ' - 3 1 / 4 " 17 ' - 3 " 12 ' - 8 3 / 8 " 9'- 1 1 5 / 8 " 18 ' - 4 7 / 8 " 3'- 5 5 / 8 " 3'- 5 5 / 8 " 4'- 9 1 / 2 " 4'- 5 3 / 4 " 5'- 3 5 / 8 " A 1' - 8 " 1'- 6 " MB8 E115 E116A E118AE118B E117B E117A E116B E119A E130 E125 E119BE132E131 E129 E128 E127 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 3 : 1 7 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA E AP111E SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA E PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: F111 CLASSROOM F110 CLASSROOM F109 ART F108 ART/PLTW STORAGE F107 PLTW LAB (STEAM)F106 CLASSROOM F105 CLASSROOM F117 MEDIA CENTER COPY ROOM F104 STAFF RR F102 CLASSROOM F119 WORK ROOM/OFFICE F116 MEDIA ROOM F115 ASC F114 SP ED COORDINATOR F113 DEAN'S OFFICE F101 CORRIDOR F112 WAITING F103 CORRIDOR G102 ALCOVE G103 MECH ROOM 19 ' - 2 3 / 4 " 8'- 0 " 7'-4"2'-8" F104 F1 0 7 F1 0 8 F1 0 9 A F109C F1 0 9 B A1 5 1 A1 5 0 A1 4 9 A1 4 8 G1 1 3 F1 1 5 F1 1 4 F112 F1 1 3 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8MB8MB8MB8MB8MB8 A-403 C2 F1 1 6 M6B 7'-8" M8A M6AM6A M4A 9'-8" WX WX WX 13 ' - 1 1 " 12 ' - 1 0 " 13 ' - 3 1 / 2 " WX 25'-1" M8A 8'-7" F117A RACK ROOM F117A F117 TB TB MB8 MB8 F118 SP ED FLEX 18 ' - 6 " MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 2'- 4 " MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB 25'-8" TB MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-412 D1 A-412 D3 A-412E5 E4 A-412E1 A-412 E2 A-412D4 A-412 D5C5C6 A-413 E1 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 3 : 3 2 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA F AP111F SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA F PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION UP SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: G101 CUSTODIAN SHOP G127 KILN G126 PUG MILL G124 3D ART G123 LOCKED STORAGE G121 ELEC G132 STUDIO G130 STORAGE G129 COMPUTER/ PHOTO LAB G134 TEACHER WORK AREA G138 2D ART G139 STAFF RESTROOM G140 EL C/R G141 CCC LOUNGE/COMPUTERS G142 CCC OFFICE G143 CCC OFFICE G144 CCC OFFICE G145 CCC CONF G116 PLTW LAB (STEAM) G115 PLTW STORAGE G112 PLTW STORAGE G113 PLTW LAB (STEAM) G111 PLTW LAB (STEAM) G110 GENDER NEUTRAL RESTROOM G109 STAFF RESTROOM G137 FEMALE RESTROOM G136 MALE RESTROOM G128 CLASSROOM G108 SP ED RESOURCE C/R G107 SP ED RESOURCE C/R G105 CLASSROOM G122 CLASSROOM G135 COMMONS G104 CORRIDOR G114 PLTW LAB (STEAM) G117 CORRIDOR G125 STORAGE G131 CONTROL ROOM G106 CLASSROOM G102 ALCOVE G103 MECH ROOM G133 STAIR G120 CORRIDOR 6'-8"10'-0" G1 2 7 G1 2 6 G1 2 5 G123 G124A G129 G134 G108 G109 G110 G139G140 G1 4 5 G1 4 4 G1 4 3 G1 4 2 G116A G114B G111A G1 1 3 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 30 STUDENTS MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 A-406 E1 A-406 B2 M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A M8A 41 ' - 3 3 / 4 " 39 ' - 2 1 / 4 " 13 ' - 4 " 7'-8" 18 ' - 6 " MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 10 ' - 0 " 10 ' - 0 " 8'- 0 " 2'- 4 " 8'- 0 " 3'- 4 " MB8 TB TB TB TB G1 4 1 A G1 4 1 B MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB6MB6 MB8 MB8MB6 MB6 MB6 MB6 MB8 MB8 TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB MB8MB8 TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8TB MB8 MB8 TB MB8 MB8 TB MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 G114A G115B G112A G112B G1 1 5 A G118 ELEC G1 1 2 C G118 A-413 E1 A-413 E2 A-413 D1 A-413 D2A-413 D5 A-413 D4 A-413 E5 A-413 E3 A-413C1 A-413 C3 A-413 C2 A-413 C5 A-413 C6 A-410 E1 A-410E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410E1 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 4 : 2 5 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA G AP111G SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA G PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION ?? MM/DD/YYYY REVISION 1 SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: H116 EL C/R H117 CLASSROOM H118 CLASSROOM H119 EL TEST H120 ELEC H122 PHYSICS H124 CHEMISTRY H123 SCIENCE SUPPORT H126 CLASSROOM H111 CLASSROOM H104 CLASSROOM H121 CLASSROOM H115 MECHANICAL H114 JANITOR H103 CLASSROOM H105 SP ED RESOURCE C/R H106 SP ED CENTER BASED C/R H125 BIOLOGY H127 SP ED LVL 3 EBD H112 CLASSROOM H110 SP ED CENTER BASED C/R H107 SHARED RESTROOMH108 BREAKOUT H109 BREAKOUT H102 SP ED STORAGE H113 CORRIDOR H101 CORRIDOR 11'-4" H1 1 6 H117 H118 H1 1 5 H122A H124A H1 2 4 C H1 2 3 A H123B H1 2 3 C H1 2 4 D H125A H124B H127 H112 H111 H106 H1 0 7 A H1 0 7 B H1 0 8 B H1 0 9 B H1 0 9 A H1 0 8 A MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8MB8 MB12 MB12 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 A-406 A2 MB8 MB8 MB8 H121 M8A M8A M8A M6B M8A M8A M8A M12A M8A M8A M6B M6A 8'- 0 " 6'-4" 28 ' - 1 1 / 2 " 27 ' - 6 " 27 ' - 4 7 / 8 " 13'-4 3/8"30'-4"12'-4" 20'-2 3/4"36'-4" 20 ' - 4 " 20 ' - 8 3 / 8 " 18 ' - 0 " 13 ' - 4 " 16 ' - 0 " 14 ' - 0 " 17 ' - 8 3 / 8 " 29 ' - 9 " 24 ' - 4 " 3'-4"42'-8 3/4"10'-6" H105A RACK ROOM H105A MB8 MB8 MB8 9'- 0 3 / 8 " 17 ' - 1 1 5 / 8 " TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB MB8 MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 MB8 TB TB TB TB MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 MB12 MB8MB8MB8 TB TB MB8 MB8 MB8MB8 MB8MB8 MB8 A-412 B42'-0" A-413 B2 B1 9'-0"9'-0"9'-0" A-412 A1 A4 B1 B3 A-413 A2A1 TB A-413 C6 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410E1 A-410E1 A-410E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410 E1 A-410E1 A-410E1 A-413 B6 FLOOR PLAN A. ALL PENETRATIONS THROUGH FIRE RATED WALLS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE BUILDING CODE AND NFPA. B. PROVIDE BLOCKING AT PARTITIONS AS REQUIRED FOR MOUNTING OF FURNISHED AND NON- FURNISHED WALL MOUNTED ITEMS. C. ALIGN FINISHED FACE OF CONTINUOUS PARTITIONS THAT CHANGE PARTITION TYPES ALONG A STRAIGHT RUN. D. EDGE OF INTERIOR DOOR FRAMES TO BE 4" FROM ADJACENT WALL, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. E. REFER TO SHEET A-601 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE AND TYPES. F. REFER TO SHEET A-602 FOR WINDOW TYPES. G. ALL WALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF GYPSUM BOARD, CMU, BRICK, OR CONCRETE; UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. H. ALL WALLS ARE TO BE TYPE A3AS U.N.O. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN FLOOR PLAN 1. XXX 2. YYY I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 4 : 4 9 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA H AP111H SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA H PLAN NORTH MARK DATE DESCRIPTION UP UP UP UP C2XX MECHANICAL MEZZANINE I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474 -3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N AL 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 5 : 0 6 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 MI D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLANS - AREAS C, D, G AP121 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author 06/12/2018 RRC 05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA C SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA D SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 3 SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN - AREA G MARK DATE DESCRIPTION SHEET GENERAL NOTES: KEY NOTES: B3 A-301 A1 A-301 D3 A-301 B1 A-301 F5 PLAN NORTH CANOPY SUPPORT COLUMN (TYP.) NEW ROOF SYSTEM OVER BUILDING ADDITION TIE INTO EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM RAISED AND SLOPED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY NEW CANOPY ROOF WITH ROOF DRAINS AND OVERFLOW SCUPPERS NEW CAMOPY ROOF WITH ROOF DRAINS AND OVERFLOW SCUPPERS EXISTING ROOF SYSTEM ROOF PLAN A. ALL SURFACES DAMAGED DURING DEMOLITION SHALL BE REPAIRED FOR APPLICATION OF NEW FINISHES OR PATCHED TO MATCH EXISTING. B. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS AND DIMENSIONS WHICH ARE TO MATCH EXISTING CONSTRUCTION. CONTACT A/E WITH DISCREPANCIES. C. MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING ROOF TO BE DONE BY CERTIFIED INSTALLED TO AVOID WARRANTY ISSUES. D. MINIMUM INSULATION THICKNESS OF 2" AT ROOF DRAINS. NOTE: NOT ALL KEYNOTES MAY BE USED ON EACH PLAN ROOF PLAN 1. - OS OVERFLOW SCUPPER RD ROOF DRAIN OD OVERFLOW ROOF DRAIN REVISION TAG KEYNOTE TAG SECTION TAG DETAIL TAG ROOF PLAN LEGEND 1 A-101 A1 SIM EPDM WALKMATS - PROVIDE AROUND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND AS SHOWN VTR VENT THROUGH ROOF - REF PLUMBING REV A1 A-301 3" APPROXIMATE ROOF INSULATION THICKNESS I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474 -3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N AL 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 1 2 : 4 5 : 1 9 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 MI D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ c o l l i n s r r . r v t ROOF PLAN - AREA B AR111 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author 06/12/2018 RRC 05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 ROOF - AREA B MARK DATE DESCRIPTION B3 A-301 B1 A-301 NEW BUILDING ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING FIRST LEVEL 100' - 0" FOUNDATION 95' - 0" ROOF 114' - 5 5/8" LOW ROOF 111' - 10" A1 A-301 48 49 50 A1 A-301 48 49 50 I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474 -3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N AL 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 2 : 4 6 : 3 0 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 MI D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ s c h r a d e r a r . r v t SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A-201 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author 06/12/2018 RRC 05161256.2 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A1 SOUTH ELEVATION - NEW ADDITION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" B4 EAST ELEVATION - NEW ADDITION SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" B2 WEST ELEVATION - NEW ADDTION SCALE: C1 SOUTH ADDITION SCALE: D1 SOUTH ADDITION SCALE: D4 SOUTH ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING NEW ENTRY CANOPY NEW BRICK NEW CAST STONE WINDOW HEAD DETAIL (TYP.) NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY WITH ALUMINUM CLERESTORY EXISTING BRICK NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORT NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORT NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW WITH VISION GLASS NEW CASTSTONE WINDOW HEAD DETAIL (TYP.) NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORT EXISTING BRICK NEW ENTRY CANOPY NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORT NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY WITH ALUMINUM CLERESTORY NEW ALUMINUM CLERESTORY ENTRY NEW ENTRY CANOPY NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORTS EXISTING BUILDING NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW WITH VISION GLASS & SPANDREL GLASS BOTTOM PANES NEW CAST STONE WINDOW HEAD DETAIIL (TYP.) NEW BRICK NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY WITH ALUMINUM CLERESTORY NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORTS NEW ENTRY CANOPY PLAN NORTH NEW BUILDING ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORTS NEW ENTRY CANOPIES NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY WITH ALUMINUM CLERESTORY EXISTING ROOF TO REMAIN NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY WITH ALUMINUM CLERESTORY NEW CAST STONE WINDOW HEAD DETAIL (TYP.) EXISTING BUILDING NEW PREFINISHED METAL SOFFIT FRAMING NEW ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL CLERESTORY NEW PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORT (TYP.) NEW ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL ENTRY NEW PREFINISHED BENT PLANE METAL WALL PANEL SYSTEM AT CANOPY FASCIA EXISTING ALUMINUM WINDOWS EXISITNG BRICK SCALE: NOT TO SCALE B1 EXISTING MAIN ENTRY MARK DATE DESCRIPTION EXISTING BRICK SALVAGED EXISTING BRICK REINSTALLED PREFIN. METAL SOFFIT FRAMING SALVAGED EXISTING BRICK REINSTALLED EXISTING BRICK EXISTING STOREFRONT NEW ALUMINUM WINDOW WITH VISION GLASS & SPANDREL GLASS BOTTOM PANES I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474 -3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N AL 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 2 : 4 1 : 4 2 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 MI D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ s c h r a d e r a r . r v t PERSPECTIVE VIEWS A-205 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author 06/12/2018 RRC 05161256.2 MARK DATE DESCRIPTION FIRST LEVEL 100' - 0" FOUNDATION 95' - 0" ROOF 114' - 5 5/8" LOW ROOF 111' - 10" B3 A-301 D3 A-301 B1 A-301 NEW EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY NEW ROOF ASSEMBLY NEW BUILDING ADDITION NEW CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE EXISTING BUILDING EXISTING BUILDING NEW ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL CLERESTORY NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY NEW ENTRY CANOPY EXIST. EXTERIOR WALL NEW CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE FIRST LEVEL 100' - 0" FOUNDATION 95' - 0" ROOF 114' - 5 5/8" LOW ROOF 111' - 10" A1 A-301 48 D6 A-411 D4 A-411 NEW CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE NEW ALUMINUM CURTAINWALL CLERESTORY NEW RAISED ROOF OVER BUILDING ENTRY NEW PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP NEW ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING NEW ENTRY CANOPY FIRST LEVEL 100' - 0" FOUNDATION 95' - 0" ROOF 114' - 5 5/8" LOW ROOF 111' - 10" A1 A-301 48 4950 NEW ADDITION EXISTING BUILDING NEW ROOF EXISTING ROOF NEW CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE NEW PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORT A1 A-301 4850 NEW PREFINISHED METAL PARAPET CAP NEW ENTRY CANOPY NEW BRICK CANOPY SUPPORTS NEW CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE EXISTING CONCRETE FLOOR SLAB ON GRADE I Hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. ARCHITECT Date: Print Name: Signature: License # Robert R. Collins 53244 NORTH AREA 'A'AR E A ' B ' AREA 'D'AREA 'C' AREA 'E' AREA 'F' AREA 'G' AREA 'H' © TSP, Inc. 2018 ISSUES SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C 1 A B 2 3 D E 1 2 3 4 5 6 4 5 6 A B C D E TSP, Inc. PROJECT TITLE N OT F OR C O N ST R UC T ION 430 2nd Street Excelsior, MN 55331 (952) 474-3291 www.teamtsp.com ISSUE DATE CHECKED BY DRAWN BY PROJECT # LI S T E D D R A W I N G S S C A L E ( S ) U N L E S S R E D U C E D F R O M O R I G I N A L 3 0 x 4 2 F O R M A T CONSULTANTS Architecture Engineering Planning 06/12/2018 6/ 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 2 : 4 6 : 3 4 P M I: \ _ T S P R e v i t L o c a l \ 0 5 1 6 1 2 5 6 . 2 B R O O K L Y N C T R I S D 2 8 6 M I D D L E - H I G H A D D I T I O N & R E M O D E L _ A 1 7 _ s c h r a d e r a r . r v t BUILDING SECTIONS A-301 SI T E P L A N R E V I E W S U B M I T T A L 6500 HUMBOLDT AVENUE NORTH BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 MIDDLE SCHOOL & HIGH SCHOOL - ADDITION AND REMODELING BROOKLYN CENTER ISD #286 Author06/12/2018 RRC05161256.2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"A1 BUILDING SECTION at OFFICE ADDITON - E/W SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"B3 BUILDING SECTION at VESTIBULE B103 - N/S SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"D3 BUILDING SECTION at OFFICE ADDITION - N/S SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"B1 BUILDING SECTION at VESTIBULE B101 - N/S MARK DATE DESCRIPTION A A 1 A A 1 A A 1 A A 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 D R A W I N G S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " D 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 D 1 A A 1 A A 1 D R A W I N G S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " CalculiteLEDgen3_4in_Downlight_C4RDL 03/18 page 1 of 6 Project: Location: Cat.No: Type: Lamps: Qty: Notes: Downlighting Calculite LED 4" generation 3 features industry leading visual comfort, excellent uniform illumination over time, and patented installation flexibility. Complete luminaire = Frame + Engine + Trim + Accessories (optional) Calculite LED gen 3 Frame example: C4RN Series Aperture Installation Voltage / Options R C4 Calculite LED 4"R Round N New construction 1 R Remodeler — Universal 120 V/277 V (specify for Power Over Ethernet configurations) 3 347 V (not compatible with ELV dimming) EM Emergency 1,2 LC Chicago Plenum 1 Engine example: C4L15835NZ10U Series Lumens CRI CCT Beam Dimming / Driver Voltage C4L C4L Calculite LED 4" 05 500 lm 3 10 1000 lm 15 1500 lm 20 2000 lm 4 25 2500 lm 4 30 3000 lm 4 8 80 CRI 9 90 CRI 27 2700 K 30 3000 K 35 3500 K 40 4000 K N Narrow (43°) M Medium (56°) W Wide (76°) Z10 0 -10 V 1% 3 SOL EldoLED Solo 0-10 V 0.1% D Dali U Universal 120 V/277 V/347 V L Lutron LDE1 EcoSystem (fade-to-black) DMX Digital Multiplexing E E LV (120V dimming only) 5 1 Universal 120 V/277 V P Power over Ethernet (PoE)E Ethernet 48 V DC Only compatible with 1000 (10) to 2500 (25) lumen configurations. Trim example: C4RDLCCP Series Aperture Style Finish Flange C4 R DL C4 Calculite LED 4" R Round DL Downlight BK Black (matte) CL Specular clear CC Comfort clear CD Comfort clear diffuse CZ Champagne bronze –White (matte) P Polished F Flangeless WH White (matte)–White (matte) F Flangeless SL Shower light (non-conductive) 6 WH White (matte)–Not applicable Accessories CA4RFT Mud-in ring for use with flangeless installations (ordered with a flangeless trim) CAEM Field installable EM pack (not compatible with Power over Ethernet configurations) C4RVPWH IP65 rated vandal proof matte white accessory that mounts onto a flangeless trim AMS ActiLume multi-sensor (optional accessory for Power Over Ethernet configurations) SWZDT SpaceWise wireless controller with dwell time functionality (compatible with all 0-10V - see "SWZDT" spec sheet) 1.Emergency (EM) and Chicago Plenum (LC) options are only available with New construction (N) installations. 2. Emergency (EM) frame comes with emergency battery pack and ceiling mountable test switch (see page 4). 3.The 500lm (05) package is only compatible with 0-10V (Z10) dimming. 4.The 2000lm (20), 2500lm (25), and 3000lm (30) packages have marked spacing requirements (see page 3). 5.ELV (E) dimming is only compatible with up to 2000lm (20) configurations. 6.Non-conductive flush mount lens with pre-installed gasket (matte white non-conductive flange with diffuse lens that is flush with the flange). 4" round downlight, 500 - 3000lm CalculiteLEDgen3_4in_Downlight_C4RDL 03/18 page 2 of 6 Flangeless mud-in ring (CA4RFT) accessory 7 in 178 mm D CA4RFT CA6RFT CA6SFTCA4SFT Detail D 47⁄8 in 125 mm 5 in 127 mm 5 in 127 mm 67⁄8 in 176 mm D Detail D C4RDL Calculite LED generation 3 4" round downlight New Construction (N) Remodeler (R) Vandal Proof (VP) accessory Chicago Plenum (LC) n mm g 163⁄8 in 416 mm 131⁄4 in 337 mm 8 3⁄4 in 221 mm 107⁄8 in 277 mm 7 1⁄2 in 190 mm 13 in 329 mm 103⁄8 in 264 mm 163⁄8 in 416 mm 111⁄4 in 286 mm 6 1⁄8 in 156 mm 131⁄4 in 337 mm 7 3⁄4 in 197 mm ø53⁄4 in 146 mm ø61⁄4 in 158 mm Ceiling Cutout ø47⁄8 in 124 mm ø43⁄8 in 111 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 9 1⁄4 in 235 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 3⁄8 in 10 mm 6 1⁄8 in 156 mm 2 in 51 mm Maximum ceiling thickness iling ss Wash 8mm ø41⁄2 in 114 mm 143⁄8 in 365 mm 111⁄2 in 293 mm (max.) 9 1⁄4 in 235 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm Ceiling Cutout ø51⁄8 in 130 mm ø41⁄2 in 114 mm ø53⁄4 in 146 mm 163⁄8 in 416 mm 131⁄4 in 337 mm 8 3⁄4 in 221 mm 107⁄8 in 277 mm 7 1⁄2 in 190 mm 13 in 329 mm 103⁄8 in 264 mm 163⁄8 in 416 mm 111⁄4 in 286 mm 6 1⁄8 in 156 mm 131⁄4 in 337 mm 7 3⁄4 in 197 mm ø53⁄4 in 146 mm ø61⁄4 in 158 mm Ceiling Cutout ø47⁄8 in 124 mm ø43⁄8 in 111 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 9 1⁄4 in 235 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 3⁄8 in 10 mm 6 1⁄8 in 156 mm 2 in 51 mm Maximum ceiling thickness h ø41⁄2 in 114 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 13 in 329 mm 103⁄8 in 264 mm 131⁄4 in 337 mm 8 3⁄4 in 221 mm 107⁄8 in 277 mm 7 1⁄2 in 190 mm 13 in 329 mm 103⁄8 in 264 mm 163⁄ 416 111⁄ 286 ø53⁄4 in 146 mm ø61⁄4 in 158 mm Ceiling Cutout ø47⁄8 in 124 mm ø43⁄8 in 111 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 3⁄8 in 10 mm Driver 2 in 51 mm Maximum ceiling thickness ø41⁄2 in 114 mm CalculiteLEDgen3_4in_Downlight_C4RDL 03/18 page 3 of 6 C4RDL Calculite LED generation 3 4" round downlight Marked spacing applications Light engine 2500 lm 3000 lm C4L_Z10U series —X C4L_LU series X X C4L_DU series —X C4L_DMXU series —X Modules marked with an X require marked spacing: - Center-to-center of adjacent luminaires: 24" (610mm) - Luminaire center to side building member: 12" (305mm) Lifetime (TM-21) data Lumens Narrow beam Medium/Wide beam* 500lm 1000lm 1500lm L90 @ 60,000hrs.L90 @ 60,000hrs. 2000lm 2500lm 3000lm* L90 @ 60,000hrs.L85 @ 60,000hrs. * Lutron 3000lm with Medium/Wide beam is L80 @ 60,000hrs. 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 13 in 329 mm Mounting bar 103⁄8 in 264 mm Grounding spring Mounting bar clamp T-bar clip 131⁄4 in 337 mm 8 3⁄4 in 221 mm 107⁄8 in 277 mm 7 1⁄2 in 190 mm 13 in 329 mm 103⁄8 in 264 mm ø53⁄4 in 146 mm ø61⁄4 in 158 mm Ceiling Cutout ø47⁄8 in 124 mm ø43⁄8 in 111 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 3⁄8 in 10 mm Driver receptical plug 2 in 51 mm Maximum ceiling thickness Maxium Ceiling Thickness Lensed Wall Wash (LW): 1 1⁄2 in 38mm Wall Wash (WW, DW, CW): 1 in 25mm ø41⁄2 in 114 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm 13 in 329 mm Mounting bar 103⁄8 in 264 mm Grounding spring Mounting bar clamp T-bar clip 8 3⁄4 in 221 mm 4 7⁄8 in 123 mm Driver receptical plug Maxium Ceiling Thickness Lensed Wall Wash (LW): 1 1⁄2 in 38mm Wall Wash (WW, DW, CW): 1 in 25mm Narrow Light engine Input volts Input freq Input current Drive current Input power THD power Power factor C4L05_NZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.05 110 mA 6W <20%>0.95 277V 0.03 <20%>0.90 C4L10_NZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.08 230 mA 11W <15%>0.95 277V 0.04 <20%>0.95 C4L15_NZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.12 360 mA 16W <10%>0.95 277V 0.06 <15%>0.95 C4L20_NZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.17 490 mA 21W <10%>0.95 277V 0.08 <15%>0.95 C4L25_NZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.22 640 mA 27W <10%>0.95 277V 0.10 <15%>0.95 C4L30_NZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.27 790 mA 33W <10%>0.95 277V 0.13 <15%>0.95 Narrow (Power over Ethernet) Light engine Input Volts1 Voltage2 Freq Current Power C4L10___NPE 53V 51-54V DC 160 mA 8.9 W C4L15___NPE 53V 51-54V DC 250 mA 13.6 W C4L20___NPE 53V 51-54V DC 340 mA 18.5 W C4L25___NPE 53V 51-54V DC 460 mA 24.6 W 1. Nominal input volts. 2. Preferred volt range. Medium (Power over Ethernet) Light engine Input Volts1 Voltage2 Freq Current Power C4L10___MPE 53V 51-54V DC 160 mA 8.8 W C4L15___MPE 53V 51-54V DC 250 mA 13.4 W C4L20___MPE 53V 51-54V DC 320 mA 17.6 W C4L25___MPE 53V 51-54V DC 430 mA 23.2 W Wide (Power over Ethernet) Light engine Input Volts1 Voltage2 Freq Current Power C4L10___WPE 53V 51-54V DC 160 mA 8.8 W C4L15___WPE 53V 51-54V DC 250 mA 13.4 W C4L20___WPE 53V 51-54V DC 320 mA 17.6 W C4L25___WPE 53V 51-54V DC 430 mA 23.2 W Medium/Wide Light engine Input volts Input freq Input current Drive current Input power THD power Power factor C4L05_MZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.05 110 mA 6W <20%>0.95 277V 0.03 <20%>0.90 C4L10_MZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.08 230 mA 11W <15%>0.95 277V 0.04 <20%>0.95 C4L15_MZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.12 350 mA 16W <10%>0.95 277V 0.06 <15%>0.95 C4L20_MZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.16 470 mA 21W <10%>0.95 277V 0.08 <15%>0.95 C4L25_MZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.21 610 mA 25W <10%>0.95 277V 0.09 <15%>0.95 C4L30_MZ10U 120V 50/60Hz 0.26 770 mA 31W <10%>0.95 277V 0.12 <15%>0.95 CalculiteLEDgen3_4in_Downlight_C4RDL 03/18 page 4 of 6 C4RDL Calculite LED generation 3 4" round downlight Frame-in-kits New Construction Galvanized stamped steel for dry or plaster ceilings. Preinstalled telescoping mounting bars from 13" to 24". For 4' distances, use 1/2" EMT, 1-1/2" x 1/2" U or C channel. Max ceiling thickness is 2" (51 mm). Including PoE frame 4.88" (124 mm). Emergency Reflector mounted test switch requires above ceiling access. For reflector mounted test switch, order emergency frame and add "EM" suffix to reflector (example: C4RDLCCEM). Patented install Mounting frame With no driver attached, this versatile frame is independent of driver accommodating a wide range of lumen packages, driver types and CCTs, including 120V and 277V inputs. Pre-installed mounting bars for fast and tool- less installs into T-grid & hat channel ceilings. Close-cut aperture design eliminates possibility of gap between ceiling opening & reflector flange. Separate wiring compartment for wiring frame to building allows inspection prior to light engine install. Simple plug-and-play connection between frame and light engine from below ceiling eliminates need for wiring between frame and LED driver, and also saves time during installation and future replacements/upgrades. Plug-and-play receptacle accommodates technology upgrade of light engines and replacements for the life of the building. Dimming - Advance 0-10V 1% dimming - Lutron Hi-lume EcoSystem H Series 1% dimming - EldoLED ECOdrive Dali 1% dimming - EldoLED SOLOdrive 0-10V 0.1% dimming - ELV dimming and DMX dimming Power over Ethernet Powered via Philips PoE lighting controller: complies with FCC rules per Title 47 part 15 (Class A) for EMI / RFI (conducted & radiated). PoE lighting controller accessible from below ceiling. Rated life: 60,0000 hrs at 70% lumen maintenance based on IES LM-80-08 and TM-21-11. Optical systems Comfort throughout the space: Patented optical system combines primary and secondary optics to provide a true 50° physical cutoff and 45° reflected cutoff virtually eliminating the view of the light source and bright spots in the reflector. A new reflector curve reduces reflector brightness by up to 50% compared to existing products, allowing for the use of higher lumen packages in smaller apertures without creating bright spots in the ceiling. Quality of light: 2 SDCM ensures color consistency from fixture to fixture and over the luminaire’s long lifetime. Proprietary optical grade silicone lens with patterned surface provides soft, even beam diffusion without hotspots or dark rings. Light Engine Quick connect power pack comprised of light source and driver allow for easy installation and replacement from below ceiling with no need for additional wiring. This allows for: - Frame and ceiling installation to be performed while still finalizing details such as lumen packages, CCT and control type. - Easy replacement of electronics at end of life with minimal wasted material and labor required. - Ease and upgradability of technology. Options and Accessories Flangeless mud-in ring: Use CA4RFT for use with flangless plaster installations. Sloped ceilings: Compatible with sloped ceiling adapters (see SCA spec sheet). Vandal Proof: Use C4RVPWH for an IP65 rated vandal proof matte white accessory. Must be ordered with a flangeless trim. ENERGY STAR® exceptions 500lm & 90 CRI configurations Champagne Bronze & Black finishes 347V & Emergency voltage/options Dali, EldoLED Solo & PoE drivers Title 24 exceptions 1000lm configurations Champagne Bronze & Black finishes Labels and Listings cULus listed for wet location ENERGY STAR®, RoHS & CEC Title 24 JA8 certified CCEA (frames with *LC suffix) IP65 rated with vandal proof accessory IBEW Union made (light engines & reflectors) Warranty 5 year warranty on complete system. Complete warranty available at: http://images.philips. com/is/content/PhilipsConsumer/PDFDownloads/ United%20States/ODLI20150930_003-UPD-en_US- Philips-warranty-indoor-PLS-us.pdf Reflector Flange Specular clear (CL): Most specular and most efficient finish, delivers maximum photometric performance but can produce a mirror image effect of the interior space. Champagne bronze (CZ): Semi- specular finish that softens light at the source of the reflector while providing a warmer reflector appearance (slightly warmer). White (–): (matte) Provides the smoothest transition to ceilings when off. Comfort clear (CC): Semi-specular finish that softens the light at the source of the reflector and creates a subtle, even luminance from the reflector cone. White (WH): (matte) Brightest illuminated aperture and provides the smoothest transition to most ceilings when off (white is only available with a white flange). Polished (P): (matches aperture) Produces a continuous look throughout the reflector (aperture matching). Comfort clear diffuse (CD): Slightly diffuse clear finish, that eliminates iridescence and reduces the mirror image effect inherent with specular finishes. Black (BK): (matte) Specular finish that provides the lowest aperture brightness possible and significantly reduces source identification in a ceiling. Flangeless (F): (flush-mount) Creates a flush, virtually seamless transition from aperture to ceiling. CalculiteLEDgen3_4in_Downlight_C4RDL 03/18 page 5 of 6 C4RDL Calculite LED generation 3 4" round downlight Narrow beam, 1500lm Engine, 103.8 lm/W at 14.7W or 112.2 lm/W at 13.6W (Power over Ethernet) Candela Curve 750 1500 2250 3000 Frame: C4RN or 4RN Engine: C4L15835NZ10U Trim: C4RDLCL Output lumens: Input watts : CRI: CCT 1: Spacing Crit.: Beam Angle: 1526 lms 14.7 W 80 min 3500K 0.6 43° Zonal summary Zone Lumens %Luminaire 0-30 0-40 0-60 0-90 1354 1469 1526 1526 88.7% 96.3% 100.0% 100.0% Coefficients of utilization Ceiling 80%70% 50%30%0% Wall 70 50 30 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 0 RCR Zonal cavity method - Effective floor reflectance = 20% Ro o m C a v i t y R a t i o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 119 114 110 105 101 97 93 90 86 83 80 119 112 106 100 95 90 86 82 79 75 72 119 110 102 96 90 85 81 77 74 70 67 119 108 99 92 87 82 77 74 70 67 64 116 110 104 99 94 89 85 81 78 75 72 116 106 98 92 86 81 77 73 70 67 64 111 106 101 96 92 88 84 80 77 74 71 111 103 96 90 85 81 77 73 70 67 64 106 102 98 94 90 86 83 79 76 73 70 106 100 94 89 84 80 76 73 69 66 64 100 95 91 86 82 78 74 71 68 65 62 Single unit data Height to lighted plane Initial center beam foot-candles Beam diameter (ft)* 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 124 86 64 49 38 3.0' 3.6' 4.2' 4.8' 5.4' * Beam diameter is where foot-candles drop to 50% of maximum. Multiple unit data - RCR 2 Spacing on center Initial center beam foot-candles Watts per sq. ft. 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 71.3 46.8 33.4 27.8 22.3 0.65 0.43 0.31 0.25 0.20 38' x 38' x 10' Room, Workplane 2.5' above floor, 80/50/20% Reflectances Angle Mean CP Lumens 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 3112 3044 2785 2410 1672 837 324 163 128 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 282 652 420 115 57 0 0 0 0 Adjustment factors Finish CCT Lumens CL = 100% CC = 95% CD = 87% CZ = 63% WH = 87% BK = 57% 80CRI 4000K = 107% 80CRI 3500K = 100% 80CRI 3000K = 99% 80CRI 2700K = 93% 90CRI 3000K = 87% 90CRI 2700K = 81% 3000lm = 200% 2500lm = 167% 2000lm = 133% 1500lm = 100% 1000lm = 67% 500lm = 33% Efficacy: 103.8 lm/w Report 2: T20161390 Medium beam, 1500lm Engine, 114.6 lm/W at 14.2W or 121.4 lm/W at 13.4W (Power over Ethernet) Candela Curve 500 1000 1500 2000 Frame: C4RN or 4RN Engine: C4L15835MZ10U Trim: C4RDLCL Output lumens: Input watts : CRI: CCT 1: Spacing Crit.: Beam Angle: 1627 lms 14.2 W 80 min 3500K 0.9 56° Zonal summary Zone Lumens %Luminaire 0-30 0-40 0-60 0-90 1269 1537 1627 1627 78.0% 94.5% 100.0% 100.0% Coefficients of utilization Ceiling 80%70% 50%30%0% Wall 70 50 30 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 0 RCR Zonal cavity method - Effective floor reflectance = 20% Ro o m C a v i t y R a t i o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 119 114 108 103 98 94 89 85 81 77 74 119 111 104 97 91 86 81 76 72 68 65 119 109 100 93 86 80 75 70 66 63 59 119 107 97 89 82 76 71 66 62 59 55 116 109 102 96 90 85 80 76 71 68 64 116 105 96 88 81 76 71 66 62 59 55 111 105 99 93 88 83 79 74 70 67 63 111 102 94 87 81 75 70 66 62 58 55 106 101 96 91 86 81 77 73 69 66 63 106 99 92 85 80 74 70 66 62 58 55 100 94 88 82 77 72 68 64 60 57 54 Single unit data Height to lighted plane Initial center beam foot-candles Beam diameter (ft)* 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 70 49 36 28 22 4.5' 5.4' 6.3' 7.2' 8.1' * Beam diameter is where foot-candles drop to 50% of maximum. Multiple unit data - RCR 2 Spacing on center Initial center beam foot-candles Watts per sq. ft. 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 74.8 49.1 35.0 29.2 23.4 0.63 0.41 0.30 0.25 0.20 38' x 38' x 10' Room, Workplane 2.5' above floor, 80/50/20% Reflectances Angle Mean CP Lumens 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 1760 1783 1886 1887 1702 1283 762 406 236 116 14 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 174 524 572 268 89 1 0 0 0 Adjustment factors Finish CCT Lumens CL = 100% CC = 95% CD = 87% CZ = 63% WH = 87% BK = 57% 80CRI 4000K = 102% 80CRI 3500K = 100% 80CRI 3000K = 97% 80CRI 2700K = 87% 90CRI 3000K = 77% 90CRI 2700K = 73% 3000lm = 200% 2500lm = 167% 2000lm = 133% 1500lm = 100% 1000lm = 67% 500lm = 33% Efficacy: 114.6 lm/w Report 2: T20161397 1. Correlated Color Temperature within specs as defined in ANSI_NEMA_ANSLG C78.377-2008: Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting Products. 2. Tested using absolute photometry as specified in LM79: IESNA Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products. CalculiteLEDgen3_4in_Downlight_C4RDL 03/18 page 6 of 6 © 2018 Philips Lighting Holding B.V. All rights reserved. Philips reserves the right to make changes in specifications and/or to discontinue any product at any time without notice or obligation and will not be liable for any consequences resulting from the use of this publication. philips.com/luminaires Philips Lighting, North America Corporation 200 Franklin Square Drive, Somerset, NJ 08873 Tel. 855-486-2216 Philips Lighting Canada Ltd. 281 Hillmount Rd, Markham, ON, Canada L6C 2S3 Tel. 800-668-9008 C4RDL Calculite LED generation 3 4" round downlight Wide beam, 1500lm Engine, 106.6 lm/W at 14.2W or 113.2 lm/W at 13.4W (Power over Ethernet) 1. Correlated Color Temperature within specs as defined in ANSI_NEMA_ANSLG C78.377-2008: Specifications for the Chromaticity of Solid State Lighting Products. 2. Tested using absolute photometry as specified in LM79: IESNA Approved Method for the Electrical and Photometric Measurements of Solid-State Lighting Products. Candela Curve 250 500 750 1000 Frame: C4RN or 4RN Engine: C4L15835WZ10U Trim: C4RDLCL Output lumens: Input watts : CRI: CCT 1: Spacing Crit.: Beam Angle: 1517 lms 14.2 W 80 min 3500K 1.2 76° Zonal summary Zone Lumens %Luminaire 0-30 0-40 0-60 0-90 918 1368 1517 1517 60.5% 90.2% 100.0% 100.0% Coefficients of utilization Ceiling 80%70% 50%30%0% Wall 70 50 30 10 50 10 50 10 50 10 0 RCR Zonal cavity method - Effective floor reflectance = 20% Ro o m C a v i t y R a t i o 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 119 113 107 101 96 90 85 80 76 72 68 119 110 102 94 87 81 75 70 65 61 57 119 108 98 89 82 75 69 64 59 55 51 119 105 94 85 77 70 64 59 55 50 47 116 108 100 93 86 80 75 69 65 61 57 116 104 93 84 77 70 64 59 54 50 47 111 104 97 90 84 78 73 68 64 60 56 111 100 91 83 76 69 64 59 54 50 47 106 100 94 88 82 77 72 67 63 59 55 106 97 89 81 75 69 63 58 54 50 46 100 93 86 79 72 66 61 56 52 48 45 Single unit data Height to lighted plane Initial center beam foot-candles Beam diameter (ft)* 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 36 25 18 14 11 6.0' 7.2' 8.4' 9.6' 10.8' * Beam diameter is where foot-candles drop to 50% of maximum. Multiple unit data - RCR 2 Spacing on center Initial center beam foot-candles Watts per sq. ft. 5' 6' 7' 8' 9' 68.5 45.0 32.1 26.8 21.4 0.63 0.41 0.30 0.25 0.20 38' x 38' x 10' Room, Workplane 2.5' above floor, 80/50/20% Reflectances Angle Mean CP Lumens 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 906 945 1040 1128 1153 1114 978 732 460 175 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 318 506 450 148 2 0 0 0 Adjustment factors Finish CCT Lumens CL = 100% CC = 95% CD = 87% CZ = 63% WH = 87% BK = 57% 80CRI 4000K = 102% 80CRI 3500K = 100% 80CRI 3000K = 97% 80CRI 2700K = 87% 90CRI 3000K = 77% 90CRI 2700K = 73% 3000lm = 200% 2500lm = 167% 2000lm = 133% 1500lm = 100% 1000lm = 67% 500lm = 33% Efficacy: 106.6 lm/w Report2: T20161406 TM CORE 300 LX sconce Source Xicato XTM LED module - up to 3000 lumens C.C.T. 2700K, 3000K, 3500K or 4000K Color Consistency 1x2 SDCM (MacAdam) along BBL, CCT +/- 40K to 70K, Duv +/- .001 CRI (Ra) Driver / Location Input Voltage Reflector Material Finish Weight Location Approvals L80 Life Warranty IES Files Modifications 83 or 98 Included / Internal with remote or deep canopy options Up to 36 watts max, depending on LED module / driver 100 to 277VAC, phase dimmable versions are 120VAC only 20°, 40° or 60° - field replaceable without tools CNC machined aluminum with stainless steel hardware Powder coat - TGIC polyester for exterior and interior use 5 lb. [2.3 kg] Listed for Wet & Damp locations ETL Listed to UL 1598, 2108, 8750 and CSA C22.2# 9 & #250.0 > 50,000 hours at 80% lumen maintenance based on IESNA LM-80-08 Lifetime Limited Warranty - see warranty for details LM-79-08 IES files available at www.v2LightingGroup.com/downloads Any modification or customization is possible - consult factory SPECIFICATIONS PROJECT rev 151207 ©2015 v2 Lighting Group, Inc. Specifications subject to change without notice. v2LightingGroup.com 1 Power ORDERING LOGIC Driver Mounting Model Location Dimming Location Output CRI * C.C.T. Reflector Shell Color Options C3LS ---- N=Internal N=None D=Damp 07=700 lm 83=83 27=2700K 20=20°XX R=Remote P=Phase W=Wet 10=950 lm 98=98*30=3000K 40=40°(see chart on page 4) D=Deep V=0-10V 13=1300 lm 35=3500K 60=60° Canopy Z=Other 20=2000 lm 40=4000K ZZ=Custom 30=3000 lm * 98 CRI not available in 3000 lm Example Part Number: C3LS-NND-20832740-S3 CORE 300 LX Sconce - INternal Driver, No Dimming, Damp Location - 2000 lm, 83 CRI, 2700K, 40° Reflector - S3 Red Shell Job Type Part # Notes 4001580 LOCATION WET!"#DIMMABLEINDOOR OUTDOOR Dimming 0-10V or phase dimming to 10% standard; DALI, DMX and 1% dimming available TM Order Code V = 0-10V dimming to 10% LES1 CRI Lumens2, 3, 4 Wattage5 (W) Efficacy6 (lm/W)Order Code P = Phase dimming to 10% 700 5.6 129 Compatible with both forward and 950 8.2 118 reverse phase dimmers 1300 11.7 111 eldoLED 0-10V, DALI, or DMX dimming to 0% 2000 19.5 102 Lutron Hi-lume™A-series, EcoSystem or 3000 29.3 102 forward phase dimming to 1% 700 7.4 97 950 10.9 89 1300 15.6 83 * Standard LED drivers are suitable for Wet Location 2000 26.4 76 * Optional LED drivers are suitable for Damp Location *For EM applications: 1 LES: Light Emitting Surface diameter All LED drivers may be used with 3rd party inverter style systems 2 ±10% 3 Source lumens - see photometrics on page 3 for LOR to calculate delivered lumens 4 Higher lumen outputs are available in CORE / QUBE 400 series 5 Maximum luminaire wattage including LED driver = LED wattage x 1.2 6 Higher efficacies are available via lower drive currents - consult factory Optional LED Drivers* Lutron Hi-lume™ 5-series, EcoSystem dimming to 5% ReflectorOption LED Specifications Standard LED Drivers* (included in base price) Ra = 98R9 90R15 95 Ra = 83 ± 3 20°, 40° & 60° 19mm LED OPTIONS DIMENSIONS v2LightingGroup.com 2 CONTROL OPTIONS rev 151207 ©2015 v2 Lighting Group, Inc. Specifications subject to change without notice. CORE 300 LX sconce 12.2" 4.5" 0.3" 5" 2.2" Optional deep canopyfor canopy mounted LED driversOrder Code = DDiameter depends on LED driver size 2.4" 5"or6"Not to scale, dimensions are nominalConsult factory for CAD drawings All canopies fit standard 3.5" and 4"round and octagonal junction boxes TM PHOTOMETRICS v2LightingGroup.com 3rev 151207 ©2015 v2 Lighting Group, Inc. Specifications subject to change without notice. Beam Angle Order Code Intensity Plot (cd) (2000lm) Polar Plot (cd) (2000lm) Cone Diagram (2000lm) Description 20°20 0 30° 1280 60° 2560 90° 3840 5120 6400 0 1600 3200 4800 6400 5' Illuminance at Center 256 fc Beam Diameter 1.9' 10'64 fc 3.8' 15'28 fc 5.7' 20'16 fc 7.6' CBCP = 3195 cd/klm Beam Angle = 21°Field Angle = 63° LOR = 89.4 % Beam = full width @ 50%Field = full width @ 90% 40°40 0 30° 660 60° 1320 90° 1980 2640 3300 0 825 1650 2475 3300 5' Illuminance at Center 129 fc Beam Diameter 3.9' 10'32 fc 7.9' 15'14 fc 11.8' 20'8 fc 15.7' CBCP = 1607 cd/klm Beam Angle = 43° Field Angle = 73° LOR = 88.7 % Beam = full width @ 50%Field = full width @ 90% 60°60 0 30° 440 60° 880 90° 1320 1760 2200 0 550 1100 1650 2200 5' Illuminance at Center 84 fc Beam Diameter 5.6' 10'21 fc 11.3' 15'9 fc 16.9' 20'5 fc 22.6' CBCP = 1050 cd/klmBeam Angle = 59° Field Angle = 86° LOR = 85.2 % Beam = full width @ 50%Field = full width @ 90% LM-79-08 IES files available at www.v2LightingGroup.com/downloads Beam Shaping Options Add the order code shown below to the options box at the end of the part number: Order Code Description -HL Honeycomb Louver -DF Diffusion Lens -SF Satin finish on any standard reflector -LS Linear Spread Lens (60° x 1°) -WW Wall Wash Lens (shifts beam 20° from vertical) CORE 300 LX sconce TM v2LightingGroup.com 4rev 151207 ©2015 v2 Lighting Group, Inc. Specifications subject to change without notice. A2 Champagne A3 Light Bronze A4 Medium Bronze A5 Dark Bronze A1 Clear Silver A6 Black M2 Sea Foam M3 Forest Gray M5 Gunmetal Gray M6 Dove Gray M1 Pearl M7 Old Copper M4 Charcoal Gray M8 Old Brass L2 Gloss Light Gray L3 Gloss Dark Gray T1 Textured Matte White T2 Textured Matte Light Gray L1 Gloss White T3 Textured Metallic Dark Gray L4 Gloss Black T4 Textured Matte Black S2 Deep Orange S3 Red S5 Violet S6 Deep Blue S1 Light Orange S7 Sky Blue S4 Burgundy S8 Bright Green AnodizedEffect Metallic Basic Sparkle The complete range of powder coat colors from Tiger Drylac is available - consult factoryCustom match powder coat colors are available - consult factoryPrinted or on-screen colors are only approximations - consult v2 Color Chip Set Rev.4 before specifying C OLOR OPTIONS CORE 300 LX sconce M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 9, 2018 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Site Plan Review –BC Secondary Schools Public Works Department staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review on June 12, 2018, for 6500 Humboldt Ave N: Civil Site Plans dated June 12, 2018 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit: C5.2 – Detail and Specifications Plan 1. Accessibility ramps shall comply with ADA standards. Miscellaneous 2. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 3.The total disturbed area is less than 0.5 acres; no project review is required for the West Mississippi Watershed Commission and an NPDES permit is not required. However the City s requests the applicant attempt to install BMP’s to improve water quality. Prior to issuance of a Land Alteration 4.Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended as required by the City Engi neer. 5.A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of up to 125% of the estimated cost of site improvements as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. 6.A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Exhibit B 6500 Humboldt Ave Site Plan Review Memo, July 9, 2018 Page 2 of 2 Anticipated Permitting: 7. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warranted. 8. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 9. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated b y the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined b y the City. Von Petersen, TSP, Inc. (Brooklyn Center Schools) REQUEST: (1)Site and Building Plan Item 9.a City Council Meeting of 07/23/2018 Background & Request Applicantisrequestingapprovalof:  (1)SiteandBuildingPlan  2,250-squarefootfrontentryaddition  845-squarefoot2floormechanicalmezzanine nd  addition Siteimprovementsthataddresspartiallandscaping,  sidewalk,androadasphalt PropertyiszonedR1(OneFamilyResidenceDistrict)  Existingschoolwasconstructedin1961  Schoolisapproximately195,797-squarefeetinsizeandis  Source: Google Maps locatedon35.5acres ThisapplicationisassociatedwithrequestsmadebytheBrooklyn  CenterSchoolDistricttoincreasetheDistrict’soperatinglevyand constructionfundingforEarleBrownElementarySchooland BrooklynCenterMiddleandHighSchool. Theserequestswereapprovedthroughareferendumthat  waspassedonNovember7,2017. th Source: MHAPO Building Review Themajorityoftheimprovementstotakeplaceattheschoolareanticipatedtooccurwithintheinterioroftheexistingschool  building. TheserenovationswillrequiresubmittaloffullconstructionplanstotheCityforreviewandissuanceofaBuildingPermit.  InteriorRenovationsinclude:(1)relocationofmiddleschooltowestwing,(2)relocationofhighschooltonorthwing,(3)  relocationofsupportandsharedusefunctionsforaccessbybothschools,(4)securityandaccessupgrades,(5)upgradingof roomstocurrentstandardsandrequirementsandnewfinishes,(6)upgradingofrestroomsandphysicaleducationlocker rooms,includingreplacementofshowerswithsingleuserstallsandprivatedressingareas,additionalbathrooms,etc.,and (7)addressingofextensivedeferredmaintenance. Source: TSP Building Review (Cont.) (1)NewFrontEntryAddition(2,250SF)  New brick and reuse of  salvaged brick for blending Windows with aluminum  casings and vision glass with cast stone headings A raised roof over the new  entry with aluminum constructed clerestory Prefinished metal parapet  Source: TSP Building Review (Cont.) (2)2FloorMechanicalMezzanineAddition(845SF) nd  Mezzaninetobewithinexistingbuildingenvelopeintheflyspaceoftheoldstagearea  Theremaybesomeroofpenetrations,butnoproposedexterioradditionsunderthisplanrequest  Source: TSP Access and Parking Access ExistingaccesspointsoffFreewayBoulevard/65 th AvenuenorthandDupontAvenueNorthtoremain  Parking ThereisnoestablishedparkingformulaforschoolsundertheCityZoningOrdinance.  Applicanthasindicatednoadditionalparkingisrequiredasadditionsareformechanicaluseandafrontentry/administrativeofficeuse  Adeterminationwasmadein1991thattherequiredparkingfortheschoolshouldbe350spacesbasedonaoneparkingspaceperevery  threeseatratioforthelargestcapacityfacility Gymnasiumwasidentifiedatthattimewithaseatingcapacityof1,050(350spaces)  Lighting | Trash | Screening Lighting  PhotometricPlan:Planwassubmitted,however,planshouldbeupdatedtoreflect  propertylines. NewLightingFixtureCount(4):NewsconcesaretobeLEDanddowncast  NewlightingshallcomplywithSection35-712(Lighting)oftheCityZoningCode  = LED wall sconce Landscaping Apartiallandscapeplanwassubmittedforthefrontentryarea.  TheCityhasnospecificrequirementsonlandscapingtypesandspecies—operatesunderuseofLandscapePointSystem  Policy Schoolsarenotspecificallyoutlinedasa“use”undertheLandscapePointSystemPolicy  StaffreviewedwhetheradequatescreeningwouldbeprovidedfortheparkingareasperSection35-711(ParkingLot  Screening),whichnotesthat, “suchoff-streetparkingandloadingareaswithinanyyardswhichabutalongastreetwhichisresidentiallyzonedon  thesideoppositeshallbescreenedfromstreetviewbyascreeningdeviceasapprovedbytheCityCouncil.” Anirrigationsystemisrequired—perLandscapePlan,“undergroundirrigationisprovided.”  30 dwarf Norway spruce  trees (max. 4 feet in height) 3 Japanese lilac trees  (max. 25 feet in height) Staff Reviews AssistantCityEngineer  ApplicantshallcomplywiththecommentsandconditionsasnotedinthememorandumdatedJuly9,2018  (ExhibitB). Disturbedareaislessthan0.5acres—noprojectreviewisrequiredfortheWestMississippiWatershed  CommissionandanNPDESpermitisnotrequired. RequesttoinstallBMPstoimprovewaterqualitywherepossible  FireInspector  The Applicant shall work to ensure all 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site  plan approval. This includes, but is not limited to, installation of a new Knox box, fire egress, etc. The Applicant shall work with the Fire Inspector and Building Official to ensure all aspects of the site meet Fire Code  and Building Code requirements. Signage Noformalrequestforapprovalweremadeaspartoftheapplicationsubmittal,althoughawallsignisindicatedon  theproposedaddition. Anynewsignage,includingwallandmonumentsigns,wouldrequireconformancewithChapter34oftheCityCode  (SignOrdinance),andspecificallyforPublicUses. PublicUsesarepermittedonewallsign(nottoexceed36squarefeet);and  Onewallsignimmediatelyaboveorbesideeachpublicentrancetothatpartofthebuildingthatisusedasaschoolandmeetsthe  requirementsoftheMinnesotaDepartmentofEducation.Thesesignareasshallnotexceed10squarefeet. Summary No public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post and no mail notices were sent.  The Planning Commission had questions relating to the proposed interior improvements, upgraded security and  access, and separation of the middle school from the high school. Additional questions were asked by nd Commissioners as related to the 2floor mechanical mezzanine addition. No public comments were made prior to or during review of the request.  The Planning Commission unanimously (4-0) recommended approval of the site and building plan  requests as identified under Planning Commission Application No. 2018-012. Recommendation ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsCityCouncilapprovePlanningCommission  ApplicationNo.2018-012,submittedbyVonPetersenofTSP,Inc.onbehalfof BrooklynCenterSchoolDistrict,requestingsiteandbuildingplanapprovalforthe propertylocatedat6500HumboldtAvenueNorth,subjecttotheApplicant/Property Ownercomplyingwiththeconditionsoutlinedintheresolution. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:G inny Mc Intosh, C ity P lanner S UBJ EC T:R esolution to Approve P lanning C ommission Application No. 2018-013, S ubmitted by C asey's R etail C ompany for Approval of a S ite and Building P lan and Is s uance of a S pecial Use P ermit for a G as S tation and C onvenience S tore in the C 2 (C ommerc e) District (Loc ated at 2101 F reeway Boulevard) Recommendation: It is rec o mmended that the C ity C ounc il, following c o nsideratio n o f this planning ap p licatio n item, ap p ro ve the res olution regard ing the dis pos itio n o f P lanning C ommis s ion Ap p licatio n No. 2018-013, s ub mitted by C asey’s R etail C ompany. Background: C as ey’s R etail C o mp any (“the Ap p licant”) is req uesting cons id eration and approval o f a S ite and Building P lan and is s uance of a S pecial Us e P ermit to c onstruc t and operate a C asey’s gas station and c onvenience s tore at 2101 F reeway Boulevard (“the S ubjec t P roperty”). T he S ubjec t P roperty was fo rmerly ho me to a number of res taurants , inc luding the Mr. BBQ & Vo o d o o Lounge, who last oc cup ied the res taurant building. T he res taurant c lo s ed and the build ing was s ubs equently d emo lis hed in 2014. T he S ubjec t P roperty has s at vac ant since. Approval of the aforementioned req uests req uires a pub lic hearing d ue to the req ues t fo r is s uanc e of a S pecial Us e P ermit. A p ublic notice was p ublished in the Brooklyn C enter S un P ost on June 28, 2018, and mail notices were s ent to neighboring property o wners . A p ublic hearing was held on the ap p lic atio n reques t at the July 12, 2018, P lanning C ommission meeting. No c o mments fo r o r against were provid ed by the p ublic either prior to or during the review of the request. T he C o mmis s io ners as ked q uestio ns relating to the numb er of emp lo yees the s tore would hire, operating hours , what makes C asey’s d ifferent than other gas s tation convenienc e s to res , and signage. O ne C ommis s ioner inquired as to whether the S ubjec t P ro p erty had received any interes t in the pas t from other developers for other uses than a gas station and c onvenience s tore. C ity s taff noted that the Applic ant wo uld need to p ro vide justificatio n fo r c o nc erns relating to lighting and s pecific ally the under-c anopy lighting, defic ienc ies with the s ubmitted land s cape plan, req uests to remove three parking s p ac es from in fro nt o f the p ro p o s ed trash enc lo s ure, and identific ation o f rep lacement parking. Additionally, P ublic Works req uested that the Applic ant p ro vide a traffic s tud y that inc o rp o rates the proposed acc es s intersec tions and intersec tions adjac ent to the s ite as p art o f any p lan ap p ro val. Ad d itional time was taken to address S ectio n 35-414 of the C ity Zoning C ode, whic h outlines spec ial req uirements fo r automobile s ervic e stations (gas stations ). F ollowing a review of the applic ation requests , the P lanning C ommission unanimous ly (4-0) rec ommended approval o f the site and build ing p lan req uests as identified und er P lanning C ommission Ap p licatio n No . 2018- 013. It s hould be noted that the Applic ant has been in c o ntact with C ity s taff s inc e the June 28, 2018, P lanning C ommis s ion meeting to addres s the identified revis ions, defic ienc ies , and need for a traffic study. C opies o f the P lanning C o mmis s io n R ep o rt, d ated July 12, 2018, and C ity C o uncil res o lutio n are attached as referenc e. Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve resolution Budget Issues: T here are no budget items to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2018-013 SUBMITTED BY CASEY’S RETAIL COMPANY FOR APPROVAL OF A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN AND ISSUANCE OF A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR A GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE IN THE C2 (COMMERCE) DISTRICT (LOCATED AT 2101 FREEWAY BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2018-013, submitted by Casey’s Retail Company (“The Applicant”) requests approval of a Site and Building Plan and issuance of a Special Use Permit that would allow for the development of an approximately 4,600-square foot Casey’s gas station and convenience store and other associated site improvements on an approximately 2.12 acre site located at 2101 Freeway Boulevard (“Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is situated in the C2 (Commerce) District and pursuant to City Code Section 35-322; Subpart 3, “Gasoline service stations (see Section 35-414), motor vehicle repair and auto washes, provided they do not abut an R1, R2, or R3 district, including abutment at a street line” and “the sale or vending at gasoline service stations of items other than fuels, lubricants or automotive parts and accessories (and other than the vending of soft drinks, candy, cigarettes and other incidental items for the convenience of customers within the principal building), provided adequate parking is available, consistent with the Section 35-704, 2(b) and 2(c)” are only allowed by means of Special Use Permit in the C2 (Commerce) District, and the Applicant has submitted such application to the City of Brooklyn Center for official consideration under Planning Commission Application No. 2018-013; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly noticed and called public hearing on July 12, 2018, whereby a planning staff report was presented and public testimony regarding the Site and Building Plan and Special Use Permit were received; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the Site and Building Plan and Special Use Permit requests in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating the Special Use Permit contained in Section 35-220 ( Special Use Permits), Section 35-222 ( C2 Commerce District ), and Section 35-414 ( Special Requirements for Automobile Service Stations ) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, and the requests comply with the general goals and objectives of the City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, to recommend that Planning Commission Application No. 2018-013, submitted by Casey’s Retail Company, may be approved based upon the following considerations: A. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort, and the Applicant has submitted plans that are in substantial conformance with the provisions of Section 35-414 ( Special Requirements for Automobile Service Stations ), which outlines certain requirements for gas stations relating to esthetics, function, impact on surrounding properties, and overall access and parking for gas stations. B. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyments of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially RESOLUTION NO. diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The Subject Property has been vacant since 2014 when a former restaurant was demolished. It is hoped that the addition of a gas station and convenience store would serve as an amenity to residents, neighboring businesses and workers, and visitors to the Brooklyn Center area. As specified in Section 35-414 ( Special Requirements for Automobile Service Stations ), “the appearance of the community and landscape is to be disturbed as little as possible. Moreover, the design of buildings and of the canopy, if there is one, shall be in scale with the surroundings. This subsection shall apply to all exterior additions or alterations including accessory structures and signs.” Per the conditions of approval as noted below, the Applicant will revise plan sets to address these provisions, and a traffic study shall be provided as part of any Special Use Permit and Site and Building plan approval and subsequent Building Permit issuance. C. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district as the area is substantially developed and the surrounding properties consist of numerous hotels, a Hindu temple, and other commercial and industrial properties. The land is bordered to the south by I-94/I-694. D. Adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The Applicant is cognizant of the right turn lane access running along the eastern edge of the Subject Property and has instead provided two driveway access points off Freeway Boulevard that are in conformance with the provisions of Section 35-414 (Special Requirements for Automobile Service Stations ) and the City’s Zoning Code. As a condition of any approval, the Applicant shall submit a traffic study that addresses access to the Subject Property and the intersections adjacent to the site. The Applicant has provided a sidewalk connection from Freeway Boulevard, but will work with staff to reflect interior crosswalk connections to the convenience store and access from the nearby Shingle Creek Trail, just west of the Subject Property. E. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. The submitted plans substantially conform to the City’s Codes. Any deficiencies as outlined in the approval conditions and Assistant City Engineer’s memorandum shall be revised to reflect conformance and be submitted to City staff for review and approval. The Applicant will need to apply for licensure with the City of Brooklyn Center to obtain a Filling Station license, as well as any other relevant licensure. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, to recommend that Planning Commission Application No. 2018-013, submitted by RESOLUTION NO. Casey’s Retail Company, be approved subject to the following conditions and considerations: 1. Site and Building Plan Review: The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits; and the final location or placement of any fire hydrants or other fire-related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. a. Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. i. The Applicant shall revise the site plans to reflect the removal of spaces 26, 27, and 28 in front of the proposed trash enclosure. The Applicant shall identify opportunities to relocate parking spaces elsewhere on site. ii. The Applicant shall incorporate internal crosswalk connections to the convenience store from the proposed sidewalk on the plans and the addition of a bike rack for users of the Shingle Creek Trail, which runs just west of the Subject Property and has a direct sidewalk connection to Freeway Boulevard. b. The Applicant shall verify that the proposed Site and Building has met City Code requirements. c. Elevations and detailing of the gas pump canopy structure and footings are to be provided as part of the Building Permit review process. d. A pre-construction conference shall be held with City staff and other entities designated by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Agreements: a. The Property Owner/Applicant shall execute a separate Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications, and standards comprehended under this Site and Building Plan. b. The Developer shall submit an as-built survey of the Subject Property, as well as any improvements and utility service lines, prior to release of the Performance Agreement financial guarantee. 3. Licensure: The Applicant shall work with the City to obtain any relevant licensure, including, but not limited to an annual Filling Station license. 4. Engineering Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated July 9, 2018. a. Final grading, drainage, utility, irrigation, erosion control, and as-built plans, and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. b. The Applicant shall provide a traffic study to address the proposed access intersections and intersections adjacent to the site as part of any Site and Building Plan and Special Use Permit approval. 5. Fire Inspector Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions required per Fire and Building Code. These include, but are not limited to: a. Installation of a Knox-Box to allow for emergency access to the proposed riser/utility room. RESOLUTION NO. b. Verification of minimum turn-radius required for fire truck apparatus as part of parking lot approval and clearance around the gas pump canopy. 6. Construction Standards: a. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City’s Engineering Department. b. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 7. Facilities and Equipment: a. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements. b. Any outdoor enclosures shall be constructed with materials that are complementary to the principal building. c. The Applicant shall utilize lighting in accordance with Section 35-712 ( Lighting ) of the City Zoning Ordinance. Although the surrounding properties are non-residentially zoned, the Applicant shall identify opportunities to reduce lighting along the property lines to 3- foot candles or less given the presence of hotels to the north, east, and west. d. The Applicant shall identify opportunities to reduce the overall intensity of foot-candles under the gas station canopy and minimize light spray. e. The Applicant shall furnish fixture specifications and imagery of proposed light installations as part of the Building Permit application submittal. 8. Landscaping: a. The landscaping plan shall be revised to meet the minimum Landscape Point System Policy requirements. i. Additional plantings are to be included along the east and north east edges of the Subject Property. Opaque plantings (e.g., hedges) shall be located outside the designated sight triangle; however, plantings are to be introduced in locations where headlight glare may impact neighboring properties. b. All landscaped areas, including street boulevards, shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. c. Irrigation shop drawings shall be provided to the City for review and approval prior to installation as noted on submitted Sheet L100 ( Landscape Plan ). 9. Signage: The Applicant shall submit a Building Permit application for any proposed signage as part of the development proposal. Signage is subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 ( Sign Ordinance ). RESOLUTION NO. July 23, 2018 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: July 12, 2018 Application No. 2018-013 Applicant: Casey’s Retail Company Location: 2101 Freeway Boulevard Request: Site and Building Plan Approval with Special Use Permit for a Gas Station/Convenience Store INTRODUCTION Casey’s Retail Company (“the Applicant”) is requesting consideration and approval of a Site and Building Plan and issuance of a Special Use Permit to construct and operate a gas station and convenience store at 2101 Freeway Boulevard (“the Subject Property”). The Subject Property was formerly home to a series of restaurants, including Chuck Muer’s, LaCasita’s, Chi-Chi’s, and the Mr. BBQ & Voodoo Lounge. The restaurant building was demolished in 2014 and the site has sat vacant since. Although site and building plan approvals do not require a public hearing, the request for issuance of a Special Use Permit requires that a public hearing be scheduled. A copy of the published notice, confirming publication in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on June 28, 2018 (Exhibit A), is included. Mail notices were also sent out to property owners in accordance with Section 35-220 (Special Use Permits) of the Brooklyn Center Zoning Ordinance. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND ZONING STANDARDS Land Use Plan: RB - Retail Business Neighborhood: Shingle Creek Current Zoning: C2 (Commerce) District Surrounding Zoning: North: PUD/I1 (Planned Unit Development / Industrial Park) District East: C2 (Commerce) District South: I-94/I-694 West: Freeway Boulevard / I1 (Industrial Park) District Site Area: Approximately 2.12 acres Setback Standards: The typical minimum building setback requirements for a C2-zoned property are as follows: Front Yard: 35 feet Rear Yard: 40 feet Side Interior Yard: 10 feet Corner Side Yard: 25 feet The Subject Property is located at the southwest intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard and situated north of the westbound ramp to I-94/I-694. The setbacks as proposed on the • Application Filed: 06/12/2018 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 08/11/2018 • Extension Declared: N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 2 submitted site plan have been identified as follows: Front Yard: ~155 feet Rear Yard: ~275 feet Side Interior Yard: ~65 feet Corner Side Yard: ~53 feet Conformity to: Land Use Plan: Yes Zoning Ord.: Yes (C2 District) Subdivision Ord.: Yes Sign Ord.: To be discussed within Staff Report. Variance Needed for Request: No BUILDING AND SITE PLAN REVIEW Building/Canopy The proposal calls for the construction of an approximately 4,600-square foot, one-story convenience store at 2101 Freeway Boulevard (“the Subject Property”). The total heights from finished floor to roof parapet are noted at approximately 18 and 21 feet. The building would be located on approximately 2.12 acres just north of the westbound I-94/I-694 on-ramp, near the intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard, and in proximity to the City’s hotel establishments and industrial park. A civil set, containing site, utility, grading, landscaping, and photometric plans, have been provided by the Applicant and are attached hereto as Exhibit B. Map 1. Subject Property Location. Although unofficial, the City does reference a set of design guidelines when reviewing site and building ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 3 plan applications. These guidelines are based on the Shingle Creek Crossing Architectural Design Guidelines, which were approved in 2011. These guidelines strive to have at least 50-percent of each elevation (wall surface) constructed with Class I materials, with the remaining surfaces to be constructed of Class II materials. Class I materials include: brick or acceptable brick-type material, marble; granite; other natural stone or acceptable natural looking stone; textured cement stucco; copper; porcelain, glass; architectural textured concrete pre-cast panels; and other materials including masonry units with enhanced detailing such as patterns, textures, color, dimension, banding, and brick inlay, as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council. Class II materials include: exposed aggregate concrete panels; burnished concrete block; integral colored split face (rock face) and exposed aggregate concrete block; cast-in-place concrete; artificial stucco (e.g., E.I.F.S., Drivit); artificial stone; fiber-reinforced cement board siding with a minimum thickness of ¼ inch; canvas or vinyl awnings; prefinished metal; and other materials not listed elsewhere, as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council. Image 1. Architectural Rendering of the East Elevation (view from Shingle Creek Parkway) Image 2. Architectural Rendering of the West Elevation. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 4 Image 3. Architectural Rendering of the North Elevation (view from Freeway Boulevard). Image 4. Architectural Rendering of the South Elevation (view from I-94/I-694). The Applicant proposes to use a mix of glass, spandrel glass, real antique red brick (utilizing soldier course and running bond patterns), Aluminum Composite (ACM) panels, and cultured stonework in a rustic brown on the exterior of the building. Glass, brick and acceptable brick-type materials, along with natural stone and acceptable natural looking stones are considered as Class I type building materials, whereas pre-finished metals are considered a Class II type building material. Please refer to Exhibit C for copies of the building elevations and materials. City staff discussed the installation of spandrel glass with the Applicant and specifically inquired whether it would be possible to install real glass windows. Due to the location of the proposed coolers, kitchen hood, and restroom areas, the Applicant has indicated that the use of real glass would not be possible. As the submitted plans note the use of tinted glass, City staff held additional discussions regarding the overall visibility. Photos of like window tinting at other Casey’s were provided to City staff and show the ability to view inside the store as well as out. As proposed, the Casey’s store would feature two entrances. The primary entrance would face outward towards Shingle Creek Parkway and the gas pump canopy structure, while the secondary entrance would be located on the rear or west elevation of the building. The entrances would not mirror one another in location or size as the primary entrance is intended to draw in traffic from the adjacent roadways and users of the fuel pumps and as the coolers located along the rear portion of the building require that the rear entranceway be off center. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 5 The proposed gas station pump canopy structure would be approximately 66 feet wide by 114 feet long and feature eight double-sided pumps. The pumps would have a separation of 30 feet. Assuming an average car width of approximately eight feet (the minimum width of a parallel parking space under the City Zoning Code), approximately 14 feet of drive aisle would remain for cars to navigate through the pump islands. The Applicant will be required to submit plans noting the canopy elevations and structure details (e.g., footings) as part of any building permit approval. ACCESS AND PARKING Vehicular Access/Parking Section 35-414 (Special Requirements for Automobile Service Stations) outlines a number of requirements regarding the esthetics, function, impact on surrounding properties, and overall access and parking for automobile service stations (gas stations). This section specifies that automobile service stations can pose problems relating to function and esthetics “involving traffic hazards, noise, light glare at night, outdoor storage of merchandise, poor architectural design, indiscriminate advertising, etc., all of which contribute to less enjoyment and use of and reduction of property values in surrounding properties.” In order to minimize adverse functional and esthetic conditions that may result from the operation of an automobile service station, a series of requirements are outlined within Section 35-414 to address these concerns. These requirements are outlined within this section and in the Special Use Permit section of this Planning Commission Report. The Applicant intends to remove one of the two existing driveways located along Freeway Boulevard, construct a new driveway curb cut, and retain the remaining, easternmost driveway access point. The driveways are proposed to be approximately 35 feet in width at their respective approaches and would be located approximately 145 feet apart. Per Section 35-414, automobile service stations are to maintain a minimum 50-foot separation between driveways. The Applicant does not propose to install a driveway along Shingle Creek Parkway and recognizes that the east side of the property runs alongside the right turn lane to the I-94/I-694 on-ramp. As driveway curb openings for automobile service stations may not be located within 40 feet of any intersection for corner properties, such as the case with the Subject Property, the Applicant has indicated that the easternmost driveway would be located an additional 145 feet from the intersection of property lines at Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard. The proposed drive aisles would meet and exceed the minimum drive aisle width requirement of 24 feet for 90-degree, two-way traffic, and the parking spaces are noted as approximately nine feet wide by 20 feet deep, meeting and exceeding the minimum 8 feet, 8 inch width by 18 feet deep requirement under the Zoning Code. Following a review of other approved gas station locations in the City, staff determined that the minimum parking requirements for gas station and convenience stores was based upon the number of gas pumps under the canopy and a minimum of 5.5 parking spaces per every 1,000-square feet of building area for the convenience store (retail use). The City Zoning Code requires that off-street parking and perimeter parking lot driveways be prohibited within 15 feet of the street right-of-way, allowing this area to be maintained as a green strip. The Applicant has no plans to expand into the identified green strip area and has indicated through the submitted plans that this green strip will include landscaping. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 6 Table 1. Parking Requirements. Parking Use Minimum Required Parking Spaces Provided Parking Spaces (in bold) Gas Pumps (2 cars per double-sided pump) 1 parking space per each side of gas pump (8 double-sided gas pumps= 16 spaces required) 16 spaces Convenience Store (Retail Use) 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 Gross Floor Area @ 4,606-SF (25.33 spaces required) 28 spaces ADA 1 (for 1 to 25 parking space requirement-minimum stall requirement of 25 stalls per 2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code) 2 spaces Total Required Parking (Convenience Store and Gas Pumps) 41.33 spaces (ADA spaces incorporated into total) Total Provided Parking 44 spaces  41 spaces with removal of 3 parking spaces in front of trash enclosure doors (ADA spaces incorporated into total) Source: Brooklyn Center Zoning Code, 2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code Parking Requirements. Per a review of the site plan, 28 marked parking spaces are indicated. As three of the parking spaces are proposed for installation in front of the trash enclosure, City staff has requested that these spaces be removed in order to provide clear access to the trash enclosure. This would leave 25 marked parking spaces, including two ADA parking spaces with their respective loading zones. The minimum required parking for a convenience store of 4,606-square feet would require a minimum of 25.33 parking spaces. Given the presence of eight double-sided gas pumps and the cross-use of the site for both gas fill-ups and the convenience store, it is assumed that some gas pump users would leave their vehicles at the gas pump and access the convenience store from there. The submitted site plan notes a substantially wide drive aisle of approximately 55 feet along the rear entrance and alongside the proposed bioinfiltration basin. The Applicant could consider relocating spaces 26, 27, and 28 there. Given the width of drive aisle and a minimum drive aisle of 24 feet in width for 90-degree, two-way traffic, the Applicant should also consider reducing the amount of impervious surface where not needed. The Applicant shall revise the plans to reflect internal crosswalk connections from the proposed sidewalk connections (e.g., Freeway Boulevard). Additionally, bike racks should be installed for users of the nearby Shingle Creek Trail running immediately to the west of the Subject Property. LIGHTING | TRASH | SCREENING Lighting The Applicant furnished a photometric plan of the Subject Property, which indicates 10 light poles, 32 under canopy lights, 12 building wall-packs, and 9 canopy/soffit luminaires. As proposed, the light poles would be mounted on 15 foot poles with two (2) foot concrete bases. Per the City Zoning Ordinance, “all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades, so as to concentrate illumination on the property of the owner or operator of said illumination devices.” Additionally, glare shall not emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City Zoning Ordinance further specifies that lighting shall not exceed ten (10) foot candles when measured at the property lines abutting the street right-of-way or ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 7 non-residentially zoned properties or three (3) foot candles for residentially zoned properties. Although the neighboring properties, which are located across the street, are all zoned commercial or industrial, there are numerous hotels, including the Super 8, Best Western, and Double Tree, that are in close, visual proximity to the Subject Property. Given the more residential nature of these properties, it is requested that the Applicant work to ensure that the lighting provided, particularly under the canopy, is no more than necessary. A review of the provided photometric plan, dated May 4, 2018, noted an average of 5.99 foot candles on the paved areas of the Subject Property, while the foot candles under the gas canopy were noted as 43.26 foot candles on average. The maximum foot candles noted along the property lines is 4.5. Although this falls below the maximum requirements for non-residentially zoned properties, City staff is requesting that the Applicant see if it is possible to reduce the foot-candles to be no more than three (3) foot candles along the property line, which would be in line with abutting residentially-zoned properties. City staff is also requesting that the Applicant verify the necessity for an average of 43.26 foot candles under the gas station canopy, as the lighting appears excessive. Further strides should be made to ensure light spray from the under canopy lighting is minimal and that lighting is concentrated downward through the use of shields, and to avoid glare emanating from the Subject Property. Per the unofficial City architectural design guidelines, light poles, fixtures, and bases should maintain a consistent dark color (i.e., bronze, black, or brown), and feature dark sky-friendly or cutoff style fixtures. As part of the building permit submittal, the Applicant will need to provide imagery of the proposed lighting, as well as fixture specifications. Trash A trash enclosure is noted on the submitted site plans, dated June 11, 2018. The proposed trash enclosure would be located at the southwest corner of the building, and, as proposed, the trash enclosure would be fully screened with a brick enclosure and metal access gates. As has been requested, the parking spaces are to be removed from in front of the trash enclosure to ensure clear access. A side door on the south elevation of the convenience store would provide direct access via a sidewalk to the trash enclosure. As part of any building permit approval, the Applicant will need to update the construction plan sets to reflect the trash enclosure in the same location, as the photometric plan shows the trash enclosure on the southeast corner of the building. Screening The trash enclosure and any other ground mounted equipment (e.g., transformers, mechanical) shall be effectively screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and adjacent properties by a solid wall or fence constructed of wood, masonry, or other durable materials that are complementary to the materials used on the primary building. Per Chapter 12 (Building Maintenance and Occupancy) of the City Code, roof-mounted equipment shall also be screened from view through use of parapets, wall/fencing materials, or paint to match surrounding colors when visible from the public right-of-way. As identified in the submitted building elevations, a 73 inch high custom aluminum mechanical screen would be installed on the roof. The Applicant will need to provide confirmation as to whether the screening is sufficient for any roof- mounted equipment. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 8 LANDSCAPING The project submittal includes a detailed landscape plan, which illustrates the proposed planting schedule (i.e., shade trees, coniferous trees, decorative trees, shrubs). Although City Code does not have any specific requirements for landscape plantings, the City has operated under and held new and redeveloped areas to complying with the City’s adopted Landscape Point System policy, which assigns points to a given site based on the acreage of a development. The Point System requires commercial sites to provide a specific amount or number of landscaping units, and is based on a maximum percentage of certain materials (i.e., 50% shade trees; 40% coniferous trees; 35% decorate trees, and 25% shrubs). As the proposed event center would be located on approximately 2.12 acres, the development would need to achieve a minimum of 167.2 points, assuming a development use category of “Restaurant/Retail/Service/ Entertainment/Hotels.” Table 2. Landscape Point System Policy Planting Type Minimum Size Points Per Planting Maximum Points (%) Points Accrued Shade Trees (Serviceberry, Crabapple) 2 ½” diameter 10 50% or 83.6 points 80 points accrued (8 trees x 10 = 80) Coniferous Trees (Tamarack, Pine) 5’ height 6 40% or 66.8 points 36 points accrued (6 trees x 6 = 36) Decorative Trees 1” diameter 1.5 35% or 58.5 points 0 points accrued (0 trees x 1.5 = 0) Shrubs (Juniper) 12” diameter 0.5 25% or 41.8 points 7 points accrued (14 shrubs x 0.5 = 7) Total 100% = 167.2 points 123 points As summarized in Table 2 above, the submitted landscape plan does not meet the minimum required 167.2 points necessary and is deficient by approximately 44 points. To address the shortage of plantings, the Applicant can achieve an additional 30 points by planting five (5) additional conifers. Additionally, 34 points still remain for shrub plantings (0.5 point per planting) and approximately 58 points remain for the planting of decorative trees. A revised landscape plan noting compliance with the Landscape Point System Policy would be required as part of any building permit submittal. Although care needs to be taken to ensure the sight triangle is not compromised, the Applicant should revise the landscape plan to reflect additional plantings along northeast and east portions of the Subject Property, along Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard. Per Section 35-414 (Special Requirements for Automobile Service Stations), “any required buffer or screening area shall be so constructed and maintained as to keep the beam of automobile headlights from shining into abutting properties.” Although there are no directly abutting properties, year-round landscaping should be strategically places to break up the glare from vehicle headlights as they face towards Freeway Boulevard and Shingle Creek Parkway from the inside of the Subject Property. The Applicant should reference the City’s unofficial Architectural Design Guidelines regarding overall landscaping and site treatment. As part of any approval, the Subject Property will require an irrigation system to be installed and a plan to be submitted to the City. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 9 CITY ENGINEER REVIEW As part of any approval of the requests, the Applicant would need to comply with the recommendations and conditions as noted by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg in the memorandum dated July 9, 2018 (Exhibit D). The Assistant City Engineer has indicated that a traffic study of the proposed access intersections and intersections adjacent to the site is necessary as part of any site plan approval. As the total disturbed area exceeds one acre, an NPDES permit will also be required. It should be noted that some of the outlined conditions may be applicable at time of approval for future land disturbance (alteration) or building permits. The installation of all utility services and lines, and the finished grading of the Subject Property are to be reviewed and conducted under issuance of a Land Disturbance (Alteration) permit, which is reviewed and approved by the City engineers, and inspected for completeness by the City engineers and the Building Official. FIRE INSPECTOR REVIEW The submitted Utility Plan dated June 12, 2018, noted a proposed fire service line on the north end of the convenience store and the intent to salvage an existing fire hydrant located along Freeway Boulevard. The Applicant shall work with the Fire Inspector and Building Official to ensure all aspects of the building and site meet Fire Code and Building Code requirements. Although this is not a full list of requirements, the Fire Code does necessitate a minimum 20-foot wide drive aisle and a 13.5 foot clearance for fire trucks. There may be additional requirements relating to dead end roads, turn radius, FDC connections, Knox boxes, etc., which will need to be addressed as part of any building permit process. BUILDING OFFICIAL REVIEW Building Official Dan Grinsteinner reviewed the plans and commented that the proposed 1,000 gallon below grade grease interceptor, to be located toward the northeast corner of the building, will need to be reviewed as part of the City building permit process and through the Hennepin County Health Department. The proposed underground storage tanks (USTs), to be located along the eastern edge of the Subject Property, will require review and approval through the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and Hennepin County. The Applicant will need to work with the Building Official to comply with all City building codes as part of any building permit approval process. SIGNAGE A sign package was submitted as part of the Applicant submittal to the City. The Applicant had initially submitted a proposal to incorporate two exterior advertising wall signs on either side of the entrance, but has since requested that consideration of the signage be removed from the request. It should be noted that City staff is unaware of any other gas station location that has exterior advertising signage on an on-going, rotating basis. Per the Sign Code, C2-zoned properties, “May have wall signs and projecting signs on each wall, provided the aggregate area of such signs does not exceed 15% of the area of the wall supporting the signs.” ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 10 A review of the submitted sign package indicates that wall signage will be installed on the primary and rear entrances. The Applicant shall revise the submitted wall signage to note the dimensions of each sign on the wall, as well as the amount of wall supporting the wall signs. The proposed Casey’s gas station and convenience store would be limited to a freestanding sign of no more than 155-square feet in sign area and no more than 25 feet in height (above 1st floor). Dynamic message signs (DMS) are permitted in the C2 (Commerce) District, but must adhere to the requirements as outlined in the Sign Code. The submittal provided indicates an illuminated freestanding sign along Shingle Creek Parkway with dynamic messaging. The proposed sign has an area of approximately 124- square feet and a height of 26.6 feet. The freestanding sign will need to be revised to fall within the maximum allowances. No portion of the freestanding sign may rotate. The Applicant should also review the submitted signage package to identify the potential for alterations to address the overall sign design per the requirements of Section 35-414. Gasoline service stations are also entitled to a freestanding informational sign on each pump island. The size of the sign shall not exceed 20 square feet in area and have a height no greater than 15 feet. A review of canopy signage located on other gas stations within the City determined that none of the gas pump canopies identified within the City feature signage. Per a review of a Planning Commission Report from 1997 for the Holiday gas station at the intersection of Trunk Highway 252 and 66th Avenue North, “It should be pointed out that illuminated canopies are not allowed unless that can be considered part of, and in lieu of, permitted freestanding signery.” All signage will require conformance with Chapter 34 of the City Code (Sign Ordinance). The Applicant will need to file a separate Building Permit application for any proposed signage. Based on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of the requested site and building plans for the Subject Property, located at 2101 Freeway Boulevard; subject to the Applicant receiving approval of a Special Use Permit for the use of a gas station and complying with the comments outlined in the Approval Conditions noted below. SPECIAL USE PERMIT REVIEW As part of the Site and Building Plan approval, the Applicant is also requesting approval of a Special Use Permit to allow for a gas station (gas/automobile service station). According to Section 35-220 (Special Use Permits) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, “Special uses are those which may be required for the public welfare in a given district but which are, in some respects, incompatible with the permitted uses in the district. Before a building or premises is devoted to any use classified as a special use by this ordinance, a special use permit must be granted by the City Council.” Section 35-322 (C2 Commerce District) notes that “Gasoline service stations (see section 35-414), motor vehicle repair and auto washes, provided they do not abut an R1, R2, or R4 district, including abutment at a street line” and “The sale or vending at gasoline service stations of items other than fuels, lubricants or automotive parts and accessories (and other than the vending of soft drinks, candy, cigarettes and other incidental items for the convenience of customers within the principal building) provided ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 11 adequate parking is available consistent with the Section 35-704, 2 (b) and 2 (c),” are permitted in the C2 (Commerce) District by Special Use only. Per the Standards of Special Use Permits, a Special Use Permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the following are met: 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort. Per Section 35-414 of the Zoning Code, certain requirements are outlined for automobile service stations. These requirements include provisions that require areas to be unobstructed and free of all vehicles, pumps, signs, displays or materials which tend to obscure visions where the use site is at the intersection of two streets. The Applicant shall also be required to meet all provisions within this Section, including the location of merchandise for sale. As noted in the submitted plans, the Applicant intends to meet and exceed the minimum setback requirements for the building, green strip, and driveway spacing and setbacks. The Applicant shall revise the submitted plans as necessary to provide internal crosswalk connections from the proposed sidewalk connections for pedestrians and bicyclists. The Assistant City Engineer has also requested that a Traffic Study be provided to the City as part of any building permit approval to address the anticipated increase in traffic near the intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard given that the Subject Property is currently vacant and was last used as a restaurant. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The Subject Property is currently vacant, therefore, City staff is of the sense that redevelopment of the Subject Property would increase the value of the Subject Property. It is hoped that the addition of a gas station and convenience store would provide a service to residents and neighboring businesses, employees, and customers. Section 35-414 specifies that, “In evaluating architectural design, the City Council shall follow the principle that the building express sincere concepts and honest construction and be compatible with surrounding buildings. The appearance of the community and landscape is to be disturbed as little as possible. Moreover, the design of buildings and of the canopy, if there is one, shall be in scale with the surroundings. This subsection shall apply to all exterior additions or alterations including accessory structures and signs. The Applicant has submitted architectural plans and signage for review as part of this Application, including one freestanding sign and wall signage. The submitted architectural plans note the use of one story building comprised of brick, glass, Aluminum Composite panels, and cultured stone. As noted previously, City staff is requesting that the sign package be revised to meet the requirements of the Sign Code. Per Section 35-414, the Applicant should also review the submitted freestanding sign to identify opportunities to blend the freestanding sign into the surrounding area. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 12 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. The building previously located on the Subject Property was demolished in 2014 and has been vacant since. The surrounding properties to the north, east, and west have been developed with numerous hotels, Schmitt Music, a Hindu temple, and other commercial and industrial properties. The land to the south of the Subject Property contains MN DOT property including I- 94/I-694. It is hoped that the proposed gas station and convenience store will serve as an amenity to those other uses permitted on the surrounding properties. The nearest gas station is located just under a mile to the east at the intersection of Humboldt Avenue North and Freeway Boulevard. 4. Adequate measurements have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The Applicant is aware of the right turn lane access to I-94/I-694 along the eastern edge of the Subject Property and has placed all driveway access points along Freeway Boulevard. An existing third curb cut is to be removed as a bioinfiltration basin will be located along the western edge of the Subject Property. The two proposed 35-foot wide driveway access points meet and exceed the minimum spacing requirement of 50 feet per Section 35-414 (Automobile Service Stations) and a distance of approximately 145 feet has been provided from the property line along the intersection of Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard. This distance exceeds the minimum 40 foot setback required for driveway curb openings at automobile service stations on corner properties. The Subject Property requires just over 25 parking spaces to serve the proposed approximately 4,600 square foot convenience store and 16 parking spaces along the eight double-sided pumps. As a condition of approval, a traffic study will be required to address access to the Subject Property and the intersections adjacent to the site. The Applicant will need to meet all requirements as outlined by MN DOT as well. The Applicant should also identify opportunities to add parking on the west side of the property (rear entrance), as the drive aisle is extremely wide. The Applicant has noted the installation of a 5-foot sidewalk connection, but will be required to revise the plans to reflect an interior crosswalk connection to the convenience store. 5. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. As has been indicated in the staff report, the submitted plans substantially conform to the City’s codes. Any deficiencies as outlined within the staff report shall be revised to reflect conformance and be submitted to City staff for review and approval. The Applicant will need to apply for licensure with the City of Brooklyn Center to obtain a Filling Station license, along with any other relevant licensure. Based on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of the requested issuance of a Special Use Permit for a gas station and convenience store for the property located at 2101 Freeway Boulevard (Subject Property); subject to the Applicant complying with the comments outlined in the Approval Conditions noted below. APPROVAL CONDITIONS: Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Application No. 2018-013 for 2101 Freeway Boulevard (Subject Property): ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 13 1. Building and Site Plan Review: The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits; and the final location or placement of any fire hydrants or other fire-related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Inspector. a. Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. i. The Applicant shall revise the site plans to reflect the removal of spaces 26, 27, and 28 in front of the proposed trash enclosure. The Applicant shall identify opportunities to relocate parking spaces elsewhere on site. ii. The Applicant shall incorporate internal crosswalk connections from the proposed sidewalk on the plans and the addition of a bike rack for users of the Shingle Creek Trail, which runs just west of the Subject Property and has a direct sidewalk connection to Freeway Boulevard. b. The Applicant shall verify that the proposed building and site has met City Code requirements. c. Elevations and detailing of the gas pump canopy structure and footings are to be provided as part of the building permit review process. d. A pre-construction conference shall be held with City staff and other entities designated by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. 2. Agreements: a. The Property Owner/Developer shall execute a separate Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications, and standards comprehended under this Site and Building Plan. b. The Developer shall submit an as-built survey of the Subject Property, as well as any improvements and utility service lines, prior to release of the performance guarantee. 3. Licensure: The Applicant shall work with the City to obtain any relevant licensure, including, but not limited to an annual Filling Station license. 4. Engineering Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated July 9, 2018 (Exhibit D): a. Final grading, drainage, utility, irrigation, erosion control, and as-built plans, and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. b. The Applicant shall provide a traffic study to address of the proposed access intersections and intersections adjacent to the site is necessary as part of any site plan approval. 5. Fire Inspector Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions required per Fire and Building Code. These include, but are not limited to: a. Installation of a Knox-Box to allow for emergency access to the proposed riser/utility room. b. Verification of minimum turn-radius required for fire truck apparatus as part of parking lot approval and clearance around the gas pump canopy. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 14 6. Construction Standards: a. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City’s Engineering Department. b. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 7. Facilities and Equipment: a. Any outside trash disposal facilities and rooftop or ground mechanical equipment shall be appropriately screened from view per City Code requirements. b. Any outdoor enclosures shall be constructed with materials that are complementary to the principal building. c. The Applicant shall utilize lighting in accordance with Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City Zoning Ordinance. Although the surrounding properties are non-residentially zoned, the Applicant shall identify opportunities to reduce lighting along the property lines to 3-foot candles or less given the presence of hotels to the north, east, and west. d. The Applicant shall identify opportunities to reduce the overall intensity of foot-candles under the gas station canopy and minimize light spray. e. The Applicant shall furnish fixture specifications and imagery of proposed light installations as part of the Building Permit submittal. 8. Landscaping: a. The landscaping plan shall be revised to meet the minimum Landscape Point System Policy requirements. i. Additional plantings are to be included along the east and north east edges of the property. Opaque plantings (e.g., hedges) shall be located outside the designated sight triangle; however, plantings are to be introduced in locations where headlight glare may impact neighboring properties. b. All landscaped areas, including street boulevards, shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. c. Irrigation shop drawings shall be provided to the City for review and approval prior to installation as noted on submitted Sheet L100 (Landscape Plan). 9. Signage: The Applicant shall submit a Building Permit application for any proposed signage as part of the development proposal. Signage is subject to the provisions of Chapter 34 (Sign Ordinance). RECOMMENDATION Based on the above-noted findings, Planning Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommends City Council approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2018-013, Site and Building Plan and Special Use Permit for a gas station and convenience store for the property located at 2101 Freeway Boulevard (Subject Property); subject to the Applicant complying with the Approval Conditions. Should the Planning Commission accept this recommendation, the Commission may elect to adopt the draft resolution which memorializes the findings in granting site and building plan and Special Use Permit approval, subject to the Applicant complying with the above-mentioned conditions of approval. This draft resolution will be provided at the Planning Commission meeting. ________________ App. No. 2018-013 PC 07/12/2018 Page 15 Attachments Exhibit A- Affidavit of Publication for Notice of Hearing (2101 Freeway Boulevard), published June 28, 2018, in Brooklyn Center Sun Post. Exhibit B- Brooklyn Center Casey’s Civil Set, prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., dated June 12, 2018. Exhibit C- Architectural Renderings of Proposed Casey’s Gas Station (2101 Freeway Boulevard), prepared by Bates, dated August 14, 2017. Exhibit D- Review Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, dated July 9, 2018. Exhibit A Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 25 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E W E S T , S U I T E 2 3 8 N , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C A S E Y ' S \ B R O O K L Y N _ C E N T E R _ M N \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 0 - C O V E R S H E E T . d w g J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 - 2 : 3 5 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R CO V E R S H E E T C000 BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R - CA S E Y ' S CA S E Y ' S R E T A I L CO M P A N Y BR O O K L Y N CE N T E R MI N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . AN D R E W T . B E R G 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 47 9 8 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 8 2 0 0 2 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 AS S H O W N AC L AC L AT B NORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY, MINNESOTA 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A Previous paper size (34.00 x 22.00 Inches) SHEET. 3. ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4. ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR EGAN, FIELD, AND NOWAK 1229 TYLER STREET NE, SUITE 100 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55413 TELEPHONE: (612) 466-3300 CONTACT: CHRISTOPHER TERWEDO ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: ANDREW T. BERG 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238 N ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER CASEY'S RETAIL COMPANY ONE SE CONVENIENCE BLVD. ANKENY, IA 50021 TELEPHONE: 515-965-6100 BROOKLYN CENTER - CASEY'S GENERAL STORE SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 119N, RANGE 21W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT BATES ARCHITECTS 106 N 37TH STREET, SUITE C ROGERS, AR, 72756 TELEPHONE: (479) 633-8155 CONTACT: JAMES DAMRON DRAWING INDEX SHEET NO.SHEET TITLE C000 COVER SHEET C100 SITE PLAN C200 GRADING PLAN C300 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. CHAD FEIGUM 2550 UNIVERSITY AVE W, SUITE 238 N ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (763) 251-1030 Ex h i b i t B U T I L I T Y N O T E # 2 U T I L I T Y N O T E # 3 & # 4 U T I L I T Y N O T E # 1 U T I L I T Y N O T E # 5 N O T E # 2 6 M I S C . N O T E # 2 N O T E # 2 4 N O T E # 2 4 4 2 ' F R E E W A Y B O U L E V A R D SH I N G L E C R E E K P A R K W A Y 3 5 ' P R O P O S E D A P P R O A C H 3 5 ' P R O P O S E D A P P R O A C H SIDEWALK S I D E W A L K P R O P O S E D " O O " C A S E Y ' S S T O R E 4 9 ' - 0 " x 9 4 ' - 0 " F L A T R O O F B U I L D I N G SIDEWALK N O P A R K I N G H . C . P A R K I N G B O L L A R D ( T Y P . ) 9'x20' 8'8' 5' H . C . S I G N S I D E W A L K 9'x20' P R O P O S E D 6 6 ' x 1 1 4 ' C A N O P Y 30' 6 5 ' 30' 30' 3 0 ' 4 0 ' 55'-4" 2 8 ' - 4 " 2 2 3 ' - 9 " 1 5 0 ' - 7 " 4 9 ' 1 0 ' 6 ' 7 5 ' 47'-5" 94' 6' 6' L C N O P A R K I N G H . C . P A R K I N G BOLLARD (T Y P . ) 9'x20' 9'x20' 8'8' 5' H . C . S I G N 8 7 9 1 0 6 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 1 6' C U R B CURB CURB C U R B C U R B 1 8 ' N O P A R K I N G N O P A R K I N G 2 0 2 4 2 3 2 2 2 1 1 9 1 8 E X I S T I N G F E N C E ( V E R I F Y O W N E R S H I P ) E X I S T I N G F E N C E ( V E R I F Y O W N E R S H I P ) A A A A A A B B B B A C C A A D D F F E X I S T I N G S I D E W A L K E E X I S T I N G S I D E W A L K E EXI S T I N G S I D E W A L K 5 1 2 A F F E X I S T I N G S I D E W A L K E X I S T I N G S I D E W A L K EXI S T I N G S I D E W A L K 6' P R O P O S E D B I O F I L T R A T I O N B A S I N ( S E E C I V I L S H E E T S ) 3 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 0 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 3 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 35' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 35' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 3 5 ' B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 15' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 15' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K 1 5 ' P A R K I N G S E T B A C K C U R B A A 33'-2" 2 5 ' - 9 " PROP. 5' SIDEWA L K 1 6 1 7 4 3 C U R B A M I S C . N O T E # 1 2 5 2 6 2 7 30'-5" 2 8 2 1 4 0 ' - 5 " 1 5 ' 3 5 ' P R O P O S E D 2 8 ' x 2 0 ' D U M P S T E R R E C Y C L E A R E A N T S V I C I N I T Y M A P N O T E : G A S O L I N E P U M P P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( D O N O T P A I N T L I N E S O R O T H E R W I S E M A R K ) M A R K E D P A R K I N G S P A C E S ( P A I N T L I N E S A S I N D I C A T E D ) 5 3 2 V F I L L C A T C H B A S I N W / D R O P T U B E O V E R S P I L L P R O T E C T I O N ( T Y P . ) T U R B I N E E N C L O S U R E T Y P . C O N T A I N S ; S U B - P U M B W / L I N E D E T E C T I O N , T A N K P R O B E F O R F U E L M O N I T O R I N G , I N C L U D I N G T H E I N T E R S T I T I A L S E N S O R A N D T A N K S U M P S E N S O R V E N T E X T R A C T O R W / V A P O R R E C O V E R Y / S P I L L C O N T A I N M E N T S U M P S E N S O R @ E A C H D I S P E N S E R . F U . G . S . T . N o t e s L e g e n d G e n e r a l C o n s t r u c t i o n N o t e s S I T E P L A N A L - 1 0 1 1 " = 3 0 ' S i t e L a y o u t P l a n A 1 A R E A L I G H T S ( 1 0 S H O W N ) R E F E R T O L I G H T I N G P L A N ( R L - 5 4 1 5 - S 1 - R 1 ) D O N E B Y R E D L E O N A R D . 1 . ) 2 - 3 0 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N D O U B L E W A L L F I B E R G L A S S T A N K S . T A N K 1 - 2 2 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N ( 8 7 E ) T A N K 2 - 1 4 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N ( D I E S E L ) T A N K 3 - 8 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N ( 9 1 E ) T A N K 4 - 8 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N ( 9 1 C ) T A N K 5 - 8 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N ( E 8 5 ) 2 . ) T A N K S E T T I N G D E T A I L S P A G E Q F - 3 0 1 3 . ) F I L L P I P E A N D M A N H O L E D E T A I L P A G E Q F - 3 0 1 4 . ) C I R C U I T B R E A K E R P A N E L P A G E E - 5 0 1 5 . ) R E F R I G E R A T I O N W I R I N G P A G E Q R - 6 0 2 6 . ) G I L B A R C O W I R I N G P A G E Q F - 6 0 1 7 . ) I S L A N D S I Z E - 3 ' x 5 ' W / D U A L G U A R D P I P E 8 . ) 8 - G I L B A R C O 7 0 0 S D I S P E N S E R S - B L E N D E D 4 = N G 1 4 N O Z Z L E S & 8 M E T E R S E A C H 4 = N J 4 6 N O Z Z L E S & 8 M E T E R S E A C H 9 . ) I S L A N D D E T A I L S P A G E A L - 5 0 1 1 0 . ) I S L A N D C O N D U I T D E T A I L P A G E E - 6 0 2 1 1 . ) D O N O T P L A C E P R O D U C T P I P I N G U N D E R I S L A N D 1 2 . ) 1 8 " M I N . F R O M T A N K P I P I N G T O F I N I S H S U R F A C E 1 3 . ) S I G N B A S E D E T A I L S P A G E A L - 6 0 1 1 4 . ) S I G N D E T A I L S P A G E A L - 6 0 1 1 5 . ) D R I V E W A Y J O I N T S T O B E P A C K E D & C A U L K E D 1 6 . ) C O N C R E T E D R I V E T R O W E L E D W I T H L I G H T B R O O M F I N I S H 1 7 . ) C O N T R O L J O I N T S - M I N . 1 0 0 s q . f t . - M A X . 1 2 5 s q . f t . - 2 5 % D E E P 1 8 . ) C O N S T R U C T I O N J O I N T S - P I N N E D 4 ' O . C . 1 2 " E A C H W A Y W I T H 1 / 2 " R E B A R # 4 1 9 . ) A P P R O A C H E S T O B E 7 " N O N - R E I N F O R C E D O R A S P E R S T A T E / C I T Y S P E C . 2 0 . ) S L O P E M A X . 2 % F O R B U I L D I N G S I D E W A L K , H . C P A R K I N G 1 : 5 0 A L L D I R E C T I O N S A L L A C C E S S I S L E S T R I P I N G A T 4 5 D E G R E E A N G L E B E I N G M A X . 4 ' S E P A R A T I O N 2 1 . ) R U N V E N T L I N E S U P S E P A R A T E C A N O P Y C O L U M N , V E R I F Y 2 2 . ) V E R I F Y A L L U T I L I T Y L O C A T I O N S A N D D I M E N S I O N S . 2 3 . ) C A N O P Y F O O T I N G : S I Z E 6 ' - 3 " L E N G T H x 6 ' - 3 " W I D T H x 3 ' - 0 " D E P T H . C O N C R E T E : M I N I M U M C O M P R E S S I V E S T R E N G T H O F F ' C - 3 0 0 0 p . s . i . C O N C R E T E R E I N F O R C I N G : A S T M A - 6 1 5 G R A D E 6 0 . R E B A R C A G E : ( 8 ) # 6 H O R I Z O N T A L T I E S L E N G T H W I S E T O P A N D B O T T O M 1 2 " M A X I M U M S P A C I N G . 2 4 . ) A L L F U E L D I S P E N S E R S F A L L W I T H I N A 1 0 0 F O O T R A D I U S O F T H E E M E R G E N C Y S H U T - O F F S W I T C H L O C A T E D I N S I D E A T T H E S A L E S C O U N T E R F O R T H E C O N V E N I E N C E S T A F F . A S E C O N D A R Y S H U T O F F S H A L L B E I N S T A L L E D O N A P O S T A T T H E C U R B I F A L L F U E L D I S P E N S E R S D O N O T F A L L W I T H I N A 1 0 0 R A D I U S . 2 5 . ) I R R I G A T I O N R E Q U I R E D W I T H R A I N S E N S O R M O U N T E D O N B A C K R A I L I N G O F R O O F . 2 6 . ) A I R C O M P R E S S O R B O X , M O U N T E D T O S T E E L P O L E , I N S T A L L E D O N 3 ' x 6 ' C O N C R E T E P A D 1 6 " F R O M B A C K O F C U R B . 1 1 0 V O L T - 6 0 H Z - 5 . 5 A M P . 8 G A U G E M I N I M U M R E C O M M E N D E D . A R E A T O B E S O D 4 O n e C o n v e n i e n c e B l v d . , P . O . B o x 3 0 0 1 , A n k e n y , I A 5 0 0 2 1 5 1 5 - 9 6 5 - 6 1 0 0 C A S E Y ' S C O N S T R U C T I O N D I V I S I O N P R O J E C T : D R A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N : P U B L I S H E D : R E V I S E D O N : D R A W I N G I N F O R M A T I O N : C O N S T R U C T I O N D I V I S I O N D R A W N B Y : C H E C K E D B Y : R . S t e v e n s 0 4 / 2 5 / 1 8 B r o o k l y n C e n t e r , M N O O S T O R E - F L A T R O O F I n t e r s e c t i o n o f S h i n g l e C r e e k P k w y & F r e e w a y B l v d . 5 U t i l i t y N o t e s C O N C R E T E P A V I N G O R S I D E W A L K S ( 4 7 , 5 8 5 + / - S Q . F T . ) S Y M B O L I N D I C A T E S E X I S T I N G U T I L I T Y T O E X I S T I N G S T R U C T U R E T O B E R E M O V E D O R D I S C O N N E C T E D B Y A P P R O P R I A T E C O N T R A C T O R . V E R I F Y W I T H U T I L I T Y C O M P A N Y R E P R E S E N T A T I V E . U T I L I T Y N O T E # 1 : P R O P O S E D E L E C T R I C A L S E R V I C E E N T R A N C E . E L E C T R I C 3 P H A S E , 8 0 0 A M P . , 1 2 0 2 0 8 V O L T S , 4 W I R E . T E L E P H O N E 2 0 P A I R , 8 L I N E S . U T I L I T Y N O T E # 2 : P R O P O S E D 1 . 5 " S C H E D U L E 4 0 I R O N P I P E G A S S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N . C O N N E C T I O N L O A D I S 6 8 0 M B H . T O T A L C O N N E C T E D L O A D I S 6 8 0 , 0 0 0 B T U 6 1 8 C U / F T . H R . H O U S E P R E S S U R E I S 7 " W . C . U T I L I T Y N O T E # 3 : P R O P O S E D 6 " S A N I T A R Y S E W E R C O N N E C T I O N . U T I L I T Y N O T E # 4 : P R O P O S E D 1 , 0 0 0 G A L L O N B E L O W G R A D E G R E A S E I N T E R C E P T O R W I T H 2 M A N H O L E S . U T I L I T Y N O T E # 5 : P R O P O S E D 2 " C O P P E R W A T E R S E R V I C E C O N N E C T I O N . M i s c . # 1 : D U M P S T E R A R E A B R I C K E N C L O S U R E W / M E T A L G A T E S . 4 - 6 ' G A T E S A N D 3 ' S E R V I C E G A T E M i s c . # 2 F O U R P R O D U C T P Y L O N S I G N . Z o n i n g I n f o r m a t i o n L e g a l D e s c r i p t i o n : T r a c t A , R e g i s t e r e d L a n d S u r v e y N o . 1 5 3 8 , l o c a t e d i n S e c t i o n 2 5 , T o w n s h i p 1 1 9 N o r t h , R a n g e 2 1 W e s t , 5 t h P r i n c i p a l M e r i d i a n , b e i n g d e s c r i b e d a s : B e g i n n i n g a t t h e N o r t h e a s t e r l y c o r n e r o f s a i d T r a c t A , R e g i s t e r e d L a n d S u r v e y N o . 1 5 3 8 ; t h e n c e S o u t h 2 1 d e g r e e s 2 9 m i n u t e s 4 8 s e c o n d s W e s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 1 0 9 . 8 8 f e e t ; t h e n c e S o u t h 3 2 d e g r e e s 4 4 m i n u t e s 1 2 s e c o n d s W e s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 1 0 1 . 9 8 f e e t ; t h e n c e S o u t h 8 0 d e g r e e s 4 0 m i n u t e s 1 9 s e c o n d s W e s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 1 1 4 . 2 0 f e e t ; t h e n c e N o r t h 6 8 d e g r e e s 3 4 m i n u t e s 2 4 s e c o n d s W e s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 7 4 . 4 8 f e e t ; t h e n c e N o r t h w e s t e r l y a d i s t a n c e o f 2 8 2 . 0 3 f e e t a l o n g o n a t a n g e n t i a l c u r v e c o n c a v e t o t h e S o u t h w e s t h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 7 8 6 . 2 0 f e e t a n d a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 2 0 d e g r e e s 3 3 m i n u t e s 1 2 s e c o n d s ; t h e n c e N o r t h 1 6 d e g r e e s 2 6 m i n u t e s 2 0 s e c o n d s W e s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 6 7 . 7 6 f e e t ; t h e n c e N o r t h 7 0 d e g r e e s 3 6 m i n u t e s 3 3 s e c o n d s E a s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 2 1 2 . 8 4 f e e t ; t h e n c e E a s t e r l y 3 6 9 . 9 7 f e e t a l o n g a t a n g e n t i a l c u r v e c o n c a v e t o t h e S o u t h h a v i n g a r a d i u s o f 5 1 7 . 0 2 f e e t a n d a c e n t r a l a n g l e o f 4 0 d e g r e e s 0 0 m i n u t e s 0 0 s e c o n d s ; t h e n c e S o u t h 6 8 d e g r e e s 2 3 m i n u t e s 2 7 s e c o n d s E a s t , a d i s t a n c e o f 9 . 6 9 f e e t t o t h e p o i n t o f b e g i n n i n g . 1 ( C - 2 ) C O M M E R C E F R O N T B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K : 3 5 F T . S I D E B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K : 1 0 F T . R E A R B U I L D I N G S E T B A C K : 4 0 F T . C A N O P Y S E T B A C K : N / A B U I L D I N G H E I G H T : N O N E P A R K I N G R E Q U I R E M E N T S : 2 5 S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D , W I T H 1 A D A S P A C E . T O T A L P R O V I D E D : 4 0 ( 2 0 M A R K E D , 1 6 U N M A R K E D , 2 A D A S P A C E S ) N O T I C E : A L L W O R K I N / O N T H E R . O . W . A R E A I S S U B J E C T T O T H E C I T Y O F B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R A N D T H E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A D . O . T . A P P R O V A L A N D S P E C I F I C A T I O N S . C B A K e y e d C o n s t r u c t i o n N o t e s P R O P O S E D 1 5 ' R A D I U S 2 ' S T U B , T A P E R E D C U R B 2 % M A X . C R O S S - S L O P E I N S I D E W A L K A R E A R E M O V E E X I S T I N G A P P R O A C H T I E I N T O E X I S T I N G F L O W L I N E A N D C U R B S I D E W A L K M A T S ( V E R I F Y W I T H C I T Y ) M i s c . N o t e s R e f e r e n c e d S h e e t s C I V I L P L A N S B Y K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . * C 0 0 0 C o v e r S h e e t C 2 0 0 G r a d i n g P l a n C 3 0 0 U t i l i t y P l a n L 1 0 0 L a n d s c a p i n g P l a n C o n t a c t I n f o r m a t i o n : B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R - C I T Y H A L L 7 6 3 - 5 6 9 - 3 3 1 9 B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R P U B L I C W O R K S ( S E W E R , W A T E R ) 7 6 3 - 5 6 9 - 3 3 2 7 X C E L E N E R G Y ( E L E C T R I C A L ) 7 6 3 - 4 9 3 - 1 8 4 8 C E N T E R P O I N T E N E R G Y ( N A T U R A L G A S ) 7 6 3 - 7 8 5 - 5 4 2 8 C E N T U R Y L I N K ( T E L E P H O N E A N D I N T E R N E T ) 8 6 6 - 9 6 3 - 6 6 6 5 S T A T E D O T P E R M I T O F F I C E 6 5 1 - 2 3 4 - 7 9 1 1 P r o p o s e d C a s e y ' s G e n e r a l S t o r e l o c a t i o n S C R E E N I N G R E Q U I R E D K N O X B O X R E Q U I R E D B R I C K D U M P S T E R E N C L O S U R E 4 - P R O D U C T H O R I Z O N T A L P Y L O N S I G N E D 0 5 / 0 3 / 1 8 F 0 5 / 0 7 / 1 8 0 5 / 1 7 / 1 8 0 5 / 2 5 / 1 8 0 6 / 0 6 / 1 8 0 6 / 1 1 / 1 8 SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH 850 85 0 855 848 8 4 8 849 8 4 9 85 1 852 853 854 856 857 85 0 8 5 0 85 0 85 5 8 4 9 84 9 8 5 1 8 5 1 85 1 85 2 8 5 2 85 2 85 3 85 4 85 6 85 7 8 5 0 8 5 1 8 5 0 848 849 851 847 848 849 849 846 847 848 849 84 9 850 847 848 849 8 4 9 8 4 8 847 850 85 0 850 855 849 849 849 849 85 1 852 853 854 856 848 849 84 9 849 85 0 85 0 84 884 9 84 9 850 848 849 8498 4 9 846 847 848 84 5 84 1 84 2 84 3 84 4 846 84 6 84 7 84 7 84 8 84 8 84 8 84 8 84 9 84 9 84 5 850 84 2 84 3 84 4 84 6 84 7 848 84 9 8 5 1 847 8 4 8 848 849 84 7 84 7 8 4 8 85 0 84 8 84 9 CASEY'S FFE: 849.50 1.5 3 % 1.66% 1.76 % 2. 9 4 % 2.1 5 % 2.8 2 % 2.09% 2.33% 2.74 % 2. 8 3 % 1. 8 8 % 1. 3 2 % 1.95% 3.08% 1.6 1 % 1.2 9 % 2 . 1 9 % 3.9 2 % 2 . 4 0 % 1.26% 1.90 % 1. 9 8 % 24 . 9 1 % 24.45% 25.50 % 6.73% 4.32% 2.86 % 32.08% D D D D STRM - 202 RE:843.45 IE:841.60 E IE:841.60 NW STRM - 203 RE:847.65 IE:842.22 E IE:842.22 W STRM - 201 RE:847.57 IE:841.14 SE IE:841.14 W SAFL BAFFLE STRM - 301 RE:847.50 IE:841.92 NE IE:841.92 SW SAFL BAFFLE STRM - 302 RE:847.06 IE:842.10 E IE:842.10 SW STRM - 303 RE:846.91 IE:842.82 E IE:842.82 W STRM - 304 RE:846.64 IE:843.00 W STRM - 204 RE:845.81 IE:842.54 W STRM - 101 RE:842.50 IE:839.00 NE SEE DETAIL STRM - 100 RE:844.31 IE:843.81 SW IE:837.60 W IE:837.60 E 36 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50%145 LF - 12" PVC @ 0 . 5 0 % 36 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50% 48 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50% 62 LF - 12" PVC @ 0 . 5 0 % 91 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50% 29 LF - 12" RCP @ 0.50% 126 LF - 12" PVC @ 0.50% 122 LF - 12" RCP @ -3.94% ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION ROOF DRAINS @ MIN. 1.0% SLOPE. CONNECT TO STRM-202 ME:851.38 ME:851.48 ME:850.28 ME:850.35 ME:851.42 ME:851.04 ME:847.07 ME:847.23 ME:845.92 ME:846.03 ME:846.42 ME:846.60 ME:846.50 ME:846.81 FL:847.02 FL:847.50 HP:847.91 LP:847.57 FL:847.91 FL:848.06 FL:848.90 FL:848.90 FL:848.93 FL:848.93 FL:848.94 FL:848.95 FL:848.90 FL:848.91 FL:848.91 FL:848.91 FL:848.90 FL:849.08 FL:846.72 LP:845.81 FL:845.96 FL:846.05 FL:846.48 FL:847.41 HP:847.93 HP:847.93 FL:846.98 FL:846.73 FL:846.64FL:846.91 FL:847.54 FL:847.64HP:848.52 FL:848.10 FL:847.06 848.66 848.85 848.89 849.50 849.50 849.50 849.50 848.47 848.48 848.49 848.60 848.59 848.55 847.52 847.65 847.70 847.63 847.08 847.00 846.85 846.61 STRM - 300 IE:841.68 NE STRM - 200 IE:841.00 E CANOPY DOWNSPOUT DRAINS @ MIN. 1.0% SLOPE. CONNECT TO STRM-203. 4" PERFORATED PVC UNDERDRAIN @ MIN. 0.50% SLOPE BIOFILTRATION BASIN Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 25 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E W E S T , S U I T E 2 3 8 N , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C A S E Y ' S \ B R O O K L Y N _ C E N T E R _ M N \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 5 - G R A D I N G P L A N . d w g J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 - 2 : 3 5 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R GR A D I N G P L A N C200 BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R - CA S E Y ' S CA S E Y ' S R E T A I L CO M P A N Y BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MI N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . AN D R E W T . B E R G 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 47 9 8 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 8 2 0 0 2 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 AS S H O W N AC L AC L AT B NORTH GRADING PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2. CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ 1-800-252-1166 AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3. STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5. SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9. ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10. REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12. INSTALL A MINIMUM OF 4" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13. UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF 4" OF TOPSOIL. 14. ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15. GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18. ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19. ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21. MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION LP:0.0 FL:0.00 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED SCOUR STOP MAT (SEE DETAIL) PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION D IT E M 1 4 ITEM 1 1 SSWR - 101 RE:848.26 IE:842.23 S IE:842.13 NW SSWR - 100 RE:844.48 IE:841.13 SE IE:840.83 N SSWR - 103 IE:843.00 N SSWR - 102 RE:848.70 IE:842.72 S IE:842.56 N 14 LF - 6" PVC @ 1.96% 17 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% 50 LF - 6" PVC @ 2.00% DEMO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DEMO EXISTING WATER STUB CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER LINE ELECTRIC/TELECOMM SERVICE NATURAL GAS SERVICE 2" COPPER WATER SERVICE CONNECTION WITH CURB STOP PROPOSED CASEY'S RELOCATE SALVAGED HYDRANT SALVAGE HYDRANT PROPOSED 6" FIRE SERVICE Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 25 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E W E S T , S U I T E 2 3 8 N , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C A S E Y ' S \ B R O O K L Y N _ C E N T E R _ M N \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ C 6 - U T I L I T Y P L A N . d w g J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 - 2 : 3 5 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R UT I L I T Y P L A N C300 BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R - CA S E Y ' S CA S E Y ' S R E T A I L CO M P A N Y BR O O K L Y N CE N T E R MI N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L EN G I N E E R U N D E R T H E L A W S O F T H E S T A T E O F MI N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . AN D R E W T . B E R G 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 47 9 8 0 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 8 2 0 0 2 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 AS S H O W N AC L AC L AT B UTILITY PLAN NOTES 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2. SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3. WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4. MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5. ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6. ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9. LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10. TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11. ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12. EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13. REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND/OR STATE OF MINNESOTA WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15. THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19. BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20. ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21. ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. NORTH PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER PROPOSED WATERMAIN PROPOSED HYDRANT PROPOSED TEE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC PROPOSED TELEPHONE PROPOSED GAS MAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER LEGEND STRM - 304STRM - 30312" PVC STRM - 302 12" PVC STRM - 301 12" P V C STRM - 300 12 " R C P STRM - 204 STRM - 202 12" PVC STRM - 201 1 2 " P V C STRM - 20012" RCP STRM - 203 STRM - 101 STRM - 100 12 " R C P 14 - MJR 2 - ABS 1 - ABS 1 - ABS 4 - PPC 3 - WHP STEEL EDGER 3 - TMK FREEWAY BOULEVARD SH I N G L E C R E E K P A R K W A Y TREES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE ABS 4 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA `AUTUMN BRILLIANCE``AUTUMN BRILLIANCE` SERVICEBERRY B & B MULTI-TRUNK PPC 4 MALUS X `PURPLE PRINCE`PURPLE PRINCE CRABAPPLE B & B 1.5" CAL. TMK 3 LARIX LARICINA TAMARACK B & B 5` HT MIN WHP 3 PINUS STROBUS WHITE PINE B & B 5` HT MIN SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE MJR 14 JUNIPERUS SCOPULORUM `MEDORA`MEDORA JUNIPER #5 CONT. 48" O.C. PLANT SCHEDULE LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) SOD MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 STORMWATER AREA Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 25 5 0 U N I V E R S I T Y A V E N U E W E S T , S U I T E 2 3 8 N , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ C A S E Y ' S \ B R O O K L Y N _ C E N T E R _ M N \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ P l a n S h e e t s \ L 1 - L A N D S C A P E P L A N . d w g J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 1 8 - 2 : 3 6 p m BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N PR E P A R E D F O R LA N D S C A P E P L A N L100 BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R - C A S E Y ' S CA S E Y ' S R E T A I L CO M P A N Y BR O O K L Y N CE N T E R MI N N E S O T A DA T E : I H E R E B Y C E R T I F Y T H A T T H I S P L A N , SP E C I F I C A T I O N O R R E P O R T W A S P R E P A R E D B Y ME O R U N D E R M Y D I R E C T S U P E R V I S I O N A N D TH A T I A M A D U L Y L I C E N S E D P R O F E S S I O N A L LA N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U N D E R T H E L A W S O F TH E S T A T E O F M I N N E S O T A . MN LI C . N O . CH A D E . F E I G U M , P L A 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 46 5 0 8 DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 9 8 2 0 0 2 06 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 8 AS S H O W N KA G KA G CE F 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11. OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13. WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14. STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF MULCH. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH WASHED AGGREGATE. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. STORMWATER BASIN SHALL BE SEEDED WITH MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. LANDSCAPE NOTES REQUIRED AND PROPOSED PLANTINGS PLANTING TYPE MINIMUM SIZE POINTS/PLANTING MAX % OF POINTS MAX NUMBER OF POINTS BY CATEGORY PROPOSED PLANT POINTS BY CATEGORY SHADE TREES 2.5" CAL.10 50 83.6 83.6 CONIFEROUS TREES 5' HT.6 40 66.88 66.88 DECORATIVE TREES 1" CAL.1.5 35 77 12 SHRUBS 12" DIAMETER 0.5 25 55 7 TOTAL 169.48 LANDSCAPE POINTS REQUIRED TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT 0-2 AC 2-10 AC TOTAL (2.12 AC) RESTAURANT / RETAIL / SERVICE / HOTELS / ENTERTAINMENT 80 60 167.2* * 80 + 80 + (0.12 x 60) = 167.2 REQUIRED POINTS IT E M 1 4 SPEED LIMIT 40 MPH SPEED LIMIT 35 MPH ITEM 1 1 REVISIONSPAGE DRAWING NAME: JOB NO. FILE NO. FIELD BOOK KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES SURVEY FOR:PROPERTY ADDRESS: 2101 FREEWAY BLVD. BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY SHEET 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: BY: CHECKED FIELDWORK CHIEF: N WWW.EFNSURVEY.COM Minneapolis, Minnesota 55413 PHONE: (612) 466-3300 1229 Tyler Street NE, Suite 100 FAX: (612) 466-3383 Egan, Field & Nowak, Inc. l a n d s u r v e y o r s s i n c e 1 8 7 2 CERTIFICATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SURVEY ITEMS PER SCHEDULE B: NOTES: KIMLEY-HORN & ASSOCIATES BOUNDARY SURVEY FOR: VICINITY MAP SITE LEGEND: PROPOSED "OO" CASEY'S STORE 49'-0" x 94'-0" FLAT ROOF BUILDING FREEWAY BOULE V A R D SH I N G L E C R E E K P A R K W A Y LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE SYMBOL QTY LABEL ARRANGEMENT LUMENS LLF BUG RATING WATTS/LUMINAIRE TOTAL WATTS MANUFACTURER DESCRIPTION 10 A4 SINGLE 11259 1.040 B2-U0-G2 134 1340 Cree Inc.ARE-EDG-4M-DA-06-E-UL-BZ-700 32 C SINGLE 13251 1.040 B3-U0-G1 134 4288 CREE, INC.CAN-304-SL-RS-06-E-UL-WH-700 12 W SINGLE 8739 1.040 B2-U0-G2 100 1200 CREE, INC.SEC-EDG-3M-WM-06-E-UL-BZ-525 9 SE SINGLE 3902 1.040 B2-U0-G0 34 306 CREE, INC.SFT-228-PS-RM-03-E-UL-BZ-350-IC LUMINAIRE LOCATION SUMMARY LUM NO.LABEL MTG. HT. 1 A4 17 2 A4 17 3 A4 17 4 A4 17 5 A4 17 6 A4 17 7 A4 17 8 A4 17 9 A4 17 10 A4 17 11 C 16.5 12 C 16.5 13 C 16.5 14 C 16.5 15 C 16.5 16 C 16.5 17 C 16.5 18 C 16.5 19 C 16.5 20 C 16.5 21 C 16.5 22 C 16.5 23 C 16.5 24 C 16.5 25 C 16.5 26 C 16.5 27 C 16.5 28 C 16.5 29 C 16.5 30 C 16.5 31 C 16.5 32 C 16.5 33 C 16.5 34 C 16.5 35 C 16.5 36 C 16.5 37 C 16.5 38 C 16.5 39 C 16.5 40 C 16.5 41 C 16.5 42 C 16.5 43 SE 10 44 SE 10 45 SE 10 46 SE 10 47 SE 10 48 SE 10 49 SE 10 50 SE 10 51 SE 10 52 W 10 53 W 10 54 W 10 55 W 10 56 W 10 57 W 10 58 W 10 59 W 10 60 W 10 61 W 10 62 W 10 63 W 10 FOOTCANDLE LEVELS CALCULATED AT GRADE USING INITIAL LUMEN VALUES LABEL AVG MAX MIN AVG/MIN MAX/MIN PAVED AREA 5.99 45.4 1.0 5.99 45.40 UNDEFINED AREA 0.89 14.6 0.0 N.A.N.A. UNDER CANOPY 43.26 54 25 1.73 2.16 1 A4 2 A4 3 A4 4 A4 5 A4 6 A4 7 A4 8 A4 9 A4 10 A4 11 C 12 C 13 C 14 C 15 C 16 C 17 C 18 C 19 C 20 C 21 C 22 C 23 C 24 C 25 C 26 C 27 C 28 C 29 C 30 C 31 C 32 C 33 C 34 C 35 C 36 C 37 C 38 C 39 C 40 C 41 C 42 C 43 SE44 SE45 SE46 SE47 SE48 SE49 SE50 SE51 SE 52 W 53 W54 W 55 W 56 W 57 W 58 W 59 W 60 W61 W 62 W 63 W 4.4 5.6 4.5 2.1 2.2 4.8 6.0 5.0 6.2 3.8 4.5 4.3 2.2 2.4 4.9 5.4 4.9 5.6 5.3 2.8 4.6 3.9 4.1 5.0 4.9 5.0 5.4 3.6 3.2 3.2 2.7 4.4 6.7 8.3 8.4 8.4 8.3 7.5 5.0 4.5 3.3 3.7 4.2 3.5 4.0 6.3 4.4 3.2 2.4 3.6 7.7 2.7 4.6 3.4 3.0 2.6 2.6 3.4 7.2 11.5 5.0 2.6 4.9 13.6 4.4 4.8 3.6 2.2 1.5 1.6 2.5 8.8 17.1 6.1 2.7 6.0 18.0 5.8 3.2 2.7 1.8 1.2 1.2 1.9 5.1 23.3 7.6 3.0 6.4 19.2 6.2 1.6 1.4 1.4 1.1 1.1 1.9 5.6 37.0 10.1 3.2 6.7 19.4 6.4 2.9 2.4 1.7 1.1 1.1 2.1 8.7 41.7 11.6 3.3 6.7 19.3 6.5 4.6 3.4 1.8 1.1 1.0 1.8 5.0 42.8 10.8 3.4 6.7 19.0 6.4 4.5 3.0 1.9 1.2 1.1 1.9 5.8 43.0 11.0 3.4 6.6 19.3 6.4 4.5 3.1 2.0 1.2 1.2 2.2 8.6 45.4 11.4 3.3 6.7 19.7 6.7 4.7 3.7 2.1 1.3 1.3 2.0 5.0 32.1 9.4 3.2 6.5 19.7 6.8 4.5 3.6 2.8 2.4 2.0 1.8 2.5 6.3 21.5 7.1 2.9 6.2 19.4 6.9 3.5 3.1 3.2 4.6 3.7 2.4 2.7 3.4 2.7 3.8 10.3 16.6 6.1 2.8 5.7 17.2 6.5 3.9 5.4 3.6 4.0 5.0 4.0 2.7 3.2 5.3 3.9 4.5 7.3 12.9 12.6 14.8 15.2 13.5 12.4 9.5 4.7 2.6 4.4 12.3 5.1 3.4 4.0 4.7 4.3 3.6 2.7 2.3 4.1 4.2 5.0 5.5 6.8 6.6 4.6 5.8 7.4 6.2 6.5 5.4 4.0 2.6 2.9 6.5 10.3 13.7 14.4 13.7 14.3 13.6 10.4 6.6 3.4 3.0 3.9 4.6 4.2 3.1 1.6 2.6 5.1 4.8 4.4 4.8 4.3 2.5 2.0 2.7 3.8 4.7 4.4 4.4 4.2 4.3 3.3 2.5 2.1 2.9 5.0 3.4 3.3 5.4 4.8 5.4 4.2 2.3 2.5 2.9 3.6 3.4 2.8 2.0 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.5 2.9 3.5 2.0 2.7 4.9 3.9 1.7 2.3 3.6 5.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.0 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.8 1.2 0.1 1.2 0.9 0.5 0.6 0.9 1.3 0.1 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.9 2.3 2.5 0.1 2.6 2.4 1.2 1.2 2.5 2.7 0.2 2.7 2.5 1.1 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 1.0 1.5 2.2 2.2 1.4 1.0 0.4 0.5 1.4 3.7 3.3 0.1 3.4 3.9 1.8 1.8 4.0 3.6 3.6 3.6 4.0 1.7 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.7 0.9 2.4 2.7 4.0 3.9 2.5 2.1 0.8 0.6 1.6 4.2 5.4 4.9 2.2 1.0 0.6 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.8 1.7 2.4 2.3 2.5 3.8 3.5 4.0 3.9 3.3 3.2 1.3 0.7 1.5 4.3 4.4 1.7 1.1 0.7 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.3 2.5 3.0 4.2 1.9 1.3 3.2 1.3 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.1 3.6 3.9 8.4 7.3 8.3 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.7 2.3 4.0 3.6 13.6 12.3 14.6 1.3 0.7 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.5 2.6 3.2 1.6 0.8 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 1.1 2.4 3.4 1.9 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.5 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.0 2.2 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 1.4 2.5 3.1 2.1 1.1 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 2.2 3.9 3.8 2.1 1.1 0.6 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.8 2.2 3.9 3.9 2.2 1.2 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.7 1.9 3.0 3.4 2.5 1.6 1.1 0.8 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 1.0 2.6 4.4 2.5 1.4 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.8 2.8 3.4 2.9 1.9 0.8 0.3 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.9 4.3 3.6 2.9 1.1 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 1.0 2.2 3.3 3.6 2.9 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 2.8 3.0 4.8 3.3 2.1 2.0 3.6 3.5 3.5 4.2 2.8 1.8 0.7 0.3 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 1.2 2.5 3.4 2.8 1.5 1.3 2.0 2.7 4.1 3.1 3.3 1.7 1.2 2.5 2.3 1.3 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.4 0.9 0.6 0.8 1.3 1.8 1.5 1.5 0.8 0.8 2.2 2.8 3.7 3.6 3.3 3.4 2.6 1.5 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.5 1.2 1.8 3.3 3.1 2.7 2.2 3.6 3.2 1.6 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.5 0.8 0.1 1.4 1.4 1.2 1.4 2.3 3.4 4.5 3.6 3.3 1.5 0.6 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.6 1.1 2.2 4.6 3.8 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.9 1.9 2.6 3.2 2.7 1.7 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 25 30 34 31 32 33 34 33 31 31 34 29 25 28 37 35 28 38 39 40 38 38 35 34 36 28 36 42 28 48 47 47 47 48 29 42 36 34 44 44 38 47 47 49 47 47 46 44 44 34 38 45 51 48 49 50 50 50 49 48 51 45 37 40 47 54 54 50 52 52 52 50 54 53 47 40 38 45 51 51 49 51 51 50 49 48 51 45 38 36 46 45 38 48 49 51 49 48 46 45 45 35 40 46 31 53 52 52 52 52 34 46 39 35 45 44 38 47 48 50 48 47 50 44 44 34 36 43 50 46 49 49 49 49 49 47 49 43 36 38 45 51 51 49 51 50 51 49 52 50 45 38 36 43 50 46 47 49 50 49 49 47 49 43 36 35 45 44 38 47 48 50 48 47 45 44 44 34 40 46 31 53 52 52 52 52 34 46 39 36 46 45 38 48 49 51 49 48 46 45 45 35 38 45 51 48 49 51 51 50 49 48 51 45 38 40 47 54 54 50 52 52 52 50 54 54 47 40 38 45 51 48 49 50 50 50 49 48 51 45 38 34 44 44 38 47 47 49 47 47 46 44 44 34 36 42 27 48 47 47 47 48 30 42 36 28 36 34 28 38 38 40 38 38 35 34 36 28 25 29 34 30 31 33 34 33 31 31 34 30 25 NOTE: ALL AREA LIGHTS ON NEW 15 FT. POLES MOUNTED ON 2 FT. CONCRETE BASES 1340 Kemper Meadow Dr. Cincinnati, OH 45240 513-574-9500 www.redleonard.com r l aPERSONS USING THIS PROGRAM ARE ADVISED THAT THIS PROGRAM MAY CONTAIN ERRORS WHICH RED LEONARD ASSOCIATES, INC. OR ITS SOFTWARE PROVIDER HAVE NOT OBSERVED. IN ADDITION, THE USE OF THIS PROGRAM TO AID IN LAYOUT OF LIGHTING AND ESTIMATING MATERIAL QUANTITIES IS NOT INTENDED TO REMOVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE USER TO VERIFY THE COMPLETENESS OF ANY BILL OF MATERIAL AND THAT THE LAYOUT OR USE OF LUMINAIRES IS IN FULL ACCORDANCE WITH ALL LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL STATUTES, REGULATIONS OR OTHER REQUIREMENTS, OR THE REQUIREMENTS OF ANY INSURANCE GROUP, ORGANIZATION OR CARRIER REGARDING LUMINAIRES AND THEIR APPLICATION. FOR INFORMATIONAL AND ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY. ALL PRODUCT, SERVICE AND CORPORATE NAMES ARE THE PROPERTY OF THEIR RESPECTIVE OWNERS. PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS AND QUANTITIES MAY VARY. THESE DOCUMENTS ARE THE PROPERTY OF RED LEONARD ASSOCIATES, INC. ANY USE OF THESE DOCUMENTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF JAYME J. LEONARD OF RED LEONARD ASSOCIATES, INC. IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. ILLUMINATION RESULTS SHOWN ON THIS LIGHTING APPLICATION ARE BASED ON PROJECT PARAMETERS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER LISTED, USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH LUMINAIRE TEST PROCEDURES CONDUCTED UNDER LABORATORY CONDITIONS. ACTUAL PROJECT CONDITIONS DIFFERING FROM THESE PARAMETERS MAY AFFECT FIELD RESULTS. THE CUSTOMER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING COMPLIANCE WITH ANY APPLICABLE ELECTRICAL, LIGHTING, OR ENERGY CODE. SCALE: D 5/04/18 BJM LAYOUT BY: DWG SIZE:DATE: PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NUMBER:RL-5415-S1-R1 REV. BY DATE DESCRIPTION R1 . . . BJM . . . 5/24/18 . . . REVISED LAYOUT PER NEW SITE PLAN . . . CASEY'S BROOKLYN CENTER, MN1" = 20' Ex h i b i t C M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 9, 2018 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/ Zoning Administrator FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Site Plan Review –Casey’s General Store Public Works Department staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review on June 12, 2018, for the proposed Casey’s General Store project: Civil Site Plans dated June 12, 2018 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit: C100 – Site Plan 1. Use City details for driveway apron and B618 curb detail. 2. Provide detail sheet. 3. Provide demo plan. 4. Provide turning template for gas delivery and garbage trucks. 5.Patches to match pavement section in Freeway Blvd. C200 – Grading Plan 6.Provide Erosion Control Plan. 7. Provide and list a SWPPP inspector/manager with contact information that must be available within 4-hrs notification to respond to and implement SWPPP related corrective measures. If the applicant is found to be non-responsive, the City may issue a stop work order and/or take other means necessary to correct SWPPP related issues. 8. Provide quantities of erosion control BMP’s. C300 – Utility Plan 9. Connect into existing storm sewer in gutter line rather than in Freeway Blvd. C4 – Detail and Specifications Plan 10. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City of Brooklyn Center standard specifications and details. The City’s standard details must be included in the plans. Exhibit D Casey’s General Store Site Plan Review Memo, July 10, 2018 Page 2 of 3 Miscellaneous 11. See redlines for additional Site Plan comments. 12. Provide irrigation plan. 13. Provide at traffic study for the proposed access intersections and intersections adjacent to site. Ensure appropriate sight lines are provided at the proposed access driveway, so safe ingress and egress will be provided. 14. Upon project completion, the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 15. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the state of Minnesota and must certify all required as- built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). 16. The total disturbed area exceeds one acre, an NPDES permit is required. In addition, the total disturbed area is less than 5 acres; applicant has submitted plans to the City of Brooklyn Center for project review on behalf on the West Mississippi Watershed Commission. Proposed project meets Watershed Commission rules for storm water management. 17.The City has submitted the plans to MN Dot for review. Applicant must meet requirements from the MN Dot review. 18. Applicant must apply for a land disturbance permit. 19. Utility Facilities Easement Agreement required. 20.A 10-ft drainage and utility easement must be dedicated on the plat around the entire perimeter of the site and over the storm water BMP’s treatment areas up to the 100 year event. Prior to issuance of a Land Alteration 21.Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended as required by the City Engi neer. 22.A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of up to 125% of the estimated cost as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. Casey’s General Store Site Plan Review Memo, July 10, 2018 Page 3 of 3 23. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility provisions, temporary parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non- compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Anticipated Permitting: 24. A City of Brookl yn Center land disturbance permit is required. 25. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 24. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warranted. 25. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 26. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated b y the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined b y the City. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Xiong T hao, Housing & C ommunity S tandards S upervis or S UBJ EC T:C ons ideration of Type I V 6-Month P rovisional R ental Licens es Recommendation: It is recommended that the C ity C ounc il c onsider approval of the Mitigation P lan, R esolution and issuanc e of a Type I V 6-Month P rovisional R ental Licens e for 7018 Brooklyn Blvd. T he applicant or representative has an opportunity to pres ent evidenc e regarding the s ubmitted Mitigation P lan. If the C ouncil choos es to modify or disapprove the Mitigation P lan, it is recommended that the motion be to direct staff to prepare propos ed findings for modification or disapproval of the Mitigation P lan and notify the lic ense applicant of any pending licens e ac tions to be taken at a subs equent C ouncil Meeting. (By ordinanc e, the applic ant hearing is intended only to modify or approve the Mitigation P lan and is not to be used as an opportunity to modify a licens e type.) Background: T his owner is applying for renewal of two rental licens es . T his is a multi-family property. T he property would qualify for a Type I V R ental Licens e based on s eventy-four (74) property code violations found during the initial rental inspec tion and zero (0) validated polic e nuisance inc idents for the past twelve months . F urther, the owner failed to comply with the Mitigation P lan and applicable O rdinanc es , s pecific ally attend O wners/Managers Assoc iation Meetings and turn in monthly updates. Acc ording to C ity O rdinanc es , if the requirements of the licens e c ategory and the Mitigation P lan are not met, the lic ense renewal c ategory remains a Type I V. Under this licens e ac tion, the property owner will rec eive two succ es s ive Type I V R ental Lic enses- one that will expire on July 31, 2018 and one that will expire on January 31, 2019. C ity O rdinance S ection 12-901.2 requires a lic ensee of a Type I V R ental P roperty to complete P has e I I of the C rime F ree Housing P rogram. C ity O rdinance S ection 12-914.3.c requires an owner (or authorized repres entative) to attend a minimum of 50 perc ent of O wners/Managers Assoc iation Meetings. S taff is rec ommending approval of the continued Type I V R ental Lic ense in lieu of denial, revoc ation or s uspens ion becaus e the owner is working with staff to meet the licens e requirements and the property is currently in compliance with the ordinanc e. T he following is a brief history of the licens e proc es s ac tions . C urrent rental licens e approval ac tivities for lic ense that expires on 7/31/2018: 10-12-2017 T he O wner, Nelia G . S chaff, applied for renewal of the rental dwelling licens e for 7018 Brooklyn Blvd, a multi-family dwelling. 11-14-2017 An initial rental licens e ins pection was conduc ted and failed. 74 property code violations were c ited, see attached rental criteria. 12-06-2017 O wner c alled to re-sc hedule ins pection. 01-02-2018 A sec ond rental ins pection was conduc ted and failed. Multiple correc tions were not made, additional violations were found that were not found during the initial inspec tion. 01-26-2018 O wner c alled to re-sc hedule ins pection. 01-31-2018 T he previous rental licens e expired. 02-22-2018 A third rental ins pection was conduc ted and failed. Most c orrections made. Installation of 8 new windows oc curred without a permit. Additional violations were found that were not found previously. A $700 re-ins pection fee was c harged to the property. 03-05-2018 T he $700 re-ins pection fee was paid. 03-09-2018 A fourth ins pection was conduc ted and failed. No re-ins pection fee c harged, due to all previous c orrections made. 03-19-2018 A $300 Adminis trative C itation was is s ued for renting without a lic ense. 03-26-2018 A fifth inspec tion was c onducted and failed. Building permit for windows and support pillars has not yet been pulled. O nc e it is, the rental lic ense will pas s with a weather deferral. 05-17-2018 A sixth ins pection was conduc ted and pas s ed. 07-03-2018 A Mitigation P lan was submitted. 07-10-2018 T he Mitigation P lan was finalized. 07-13-2018 C ity records indic ate 0 validated polic e nuisance inc idents oc curred in the pas t twelve months . 07-13-2018 A letter was s ent to the owner(s ) notifying of qualific ation for Type I V 6-Month P rovis ional R ental Lic ense, including additional requirements to obtain a rental lic ense. I.e. submit mitigation plan, completion of P has es I, I I, and I I I of C rime F ree Hous ing P rogram, etc. 07-13-2018 A letter was s ent to the owner notifying that the hearing before the C ouncil will be held July 23, 2018. If approved, after six months , a new rental lic ense is required. T he licens e proc es s will begin in approximately three months . T he new lic ense will be based on the property code violations found during the initial renewal licens e ins pection and the number of validated police calls for services for disorderly ac tivities and nuis anc es as defined in 12-911. T he terms of the mitigation plan must also be met. Requested Council Action: 1. R es olution Approving a Type I V 6-Month P rovisional R ental Licens e for 7018 Brooklyn Boulevard Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity E conomic Development Authority City Hall Council Chambers J uly 23, 2018 AGE NDA 1.Call to Order The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full C ity Counc il packet, including E D A (E conomic Development Authority ), is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the podium. 2.Roll Call 3.Approval of Consent Agenda The following items are considered to be routine by the Economic Development A uthority (E D A) and will been acted by one motion. T here will be no separate discussion of these items unless a C ommissioner so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and considered at the end of Commission Consideration I tems. a.Approval of Minutes - Motion to approval of the June 25, 2018 minutes. b.Resolution Supporting the Minnesota I nvestment F und Application for Get Bizzy, I nc. - Motion to approve resolution c.Resolution A ccepting a P edestrian Easement A greement - Motion to approve resolution d.Resolution to Approve a L ease A greement B etween the E D A of B rooklyn Center and L uther A uto Dealership - Motion to approve resolution 4.Commission Consideration Items a.Resolution A pproving the Purchase and Development Agreement and Conveyance of Certain P roperty L ocated at 7216 B rooklyn Boulevard (address to be re-assigned to 4728 W ingard L ane) Requested E D A Action: - Open the public hearing; - Take public input; - Close the public hearing; - Consider approval of the resolution and purchase and development agreement. b.Resolution Establishing a Revolving L oan F und P rogram Requested E D A Action: - Motion to approve the resolution. 5.Adjournment ED A ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:R eggie Edwards, Deputy C ity Manager F R O M:Barb S uciu, C ity C lerk S UBJ EC T:Approval of Minutes Recommendation: Background: Budget Issues: N/A 06/25/18 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JUNE 25, 2018 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Regular Session called to order by President Tim Willson at 9:31 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL President Tim Willson and Commissioners Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan were present. Also present were Executive Director Curt Boganey, Deputy Executive Director Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Business and Workforce Development Specialist Brett Angell, City Attorney Troy Gilchrist, and Michaela Kujawa-Daniels, TimeSaver Off Site Secretarial, Inc. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Butler moved and Commissioner Ryan seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following item was approved: 3a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 29, 2018 – Regular Session Motion passed unanimously. 4. COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEMS 4a. RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07 AUTHORIZING THE SUBMISSION OF A MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND APPLICATION ON BEHALF OF GET BIZZY, INC. Business and Workforce Development Specialist Brett Angell introduced the item, discussed the history, and stated the purpose of the proposed resolution. Mr. Angell introduced Co-Founder Andrew Healy to come forward and address any questions the City Council/EDA may have for the applicants. 06/25/18 -2- DRAFT Commissioner Graves stated she was interested to know the reason for the request of new equipment. Mr. Healy stated they are in need of new equipment to continue to grow their business. Commissioner Graves noted that is not a bad problem to have. Commissioner Ryan moved and Commissioner Butler seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. No one appeared to address this item. Commissioner Graves moved and Commissioner Ryan seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Commissioner Graves moved and Commissioner Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2018-07 Authorizing the Submission of a Minnesota Investment Fund application on behalf of Get Bizzy, Inc. Motion passed unanimously. President Willson stated he is happy to see them coming to Brooklyn Center with their business and welcomed them into the community. The other Commissioners echoed his sentiments. 5. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Graves moved and Commissioner Butler seconded adjournment of the Economic Development Authority meeting at 9:42 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. ED A ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Brett Angell, Bus iness and Workforce Development S pecialist S UBJ EC T:R esolution S upporting the Minnes ota Investment F und Applic ation for G et Bizzy, Inc. Recommendation: It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority c onsider adoption of R es olution S upporting the Minnesota Inves tment F und Application on Behalf of G et Bizzy, Inc. Background: O n June 25, 2018, the EDA reviewed, held a public hearing, and approved the submis s ion of a Minnesota Investment F und (MI F ) loan applic ation to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED) on behalf of G et Bizzy, Inc. (i.e. Bizzy C offee). T he MI F loan applic ation was s ubmitted to DEED on June 26, 2018. Upon review of the applic ation by DEED, they identified further s tatements whic h they would like included in the EDA s igned resolution. T he MI F application was approved contingent on the adoption of this res olution on July 13th. T he attached resolution c omplies with the additional criteria required in the res olution by DEED. Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: R es ident Ec onomic S tability Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. 2018- RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND APPLICATION SUBMITTED BY THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR THE PROJECT ENTITLED GET BIZZY, INC. WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center will act as the legal sponsor for the project contained in the Minnesota Investment Fund application, which was submitted to the Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development on Tuesday, June 26 th , 2018; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to administer the proposed project; and WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center has not violated any Federal, State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice; and WHEREAS, that upon final approval of its application by the State, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center may enter into a Grant Contract with the State of Minnesota for the approved project, and that the City of Brooklyn Center certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws, statues, regulations and rules as stated in the Grant Contract and described in the Project Compliance Certification of the Application; and WHERES, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center has reviewed the application prior to submittal and authorized employees have obtained credit reports and credit information on Get Bizzy, Inc. and company owners Alex French and Andrew Healy. No adverse findings or concerns regarding, but not limited to, tax liens, judgments, court actions, and filings with state, federal, and other regulatory agencies were identified. Failure to disclose any such adverse information could result in revocation or other legal action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (“Board”) of the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota hereby express their support of the submitted Minnesota Investment Fund application on behalf of Get Bizzy, Inc., and authorizes the Economic Development Authority Secretary to submit the application, execute any agreements and to administer the loan. June 25, 2018 Date President EDA RESOLUTION NO. 2018- ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ED A ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H: F R O M:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director S UBJ EC T:R esolution Acc epting a P edestrian Eas ement Agreement Recommendation: It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn C enter approve a resolution approving a pedestrian eas ement agreement for a sidewalk over property owned by S F G Net Leas e T G Minneapolis, LLC that s ervic es the Metro Trans it park and ride lot loc ated near 6420 C amden Avenue North. Background: R egal T heater had entered into a lease agreement with the Metropolitan C ouncil to allow for the use of 200 s talls of their parking lot and driveway to be us ed as a park and ride for Metro Transit bus service. T he leas e als o included a provision that allowed Metro Transit riders to travers e the R egal C inema property via a s idewalk that c onnected the park and ride to the bus s helter loc ated on Highway 252. After Top G olf acquired the R egal T heater property, they entered into a land s wap agreement with the EDA of Brooklyn C enter, which resulted in the EDA ac quiring that portion of land which was being used by Metro Transit for a park and ride facility in exc hange for land owned by the EDA to the s outh of the s ite. At the time of the land s wap, and subs equent re-platting of Top G olf's property, a pedestrian eas ement to c ontinue to allow Metro Trans it riders to us e the s idewalk to ac cess between the park and ride and bus s helter was not created. T hus, riders have been traversing Top G olf's property without a right to acc es s since the expiration of the lease agreement at the end of las t year. Top G olf has s inc e sold their property to S F G Net Leas e T G Minneapolis, LLC , whic h has agreed to provide a pedestrian eas ement in favor of the EDA to allow Metro Transit riders to acc es s the bus s helter on 252, and to allow Metro Trans it, through the EDA, to maintain the sidewalk for year-round us e. T he EDA and Metro Transit are negotiating a s ubsequent lease agreement which will outline the terms of their continued use of the s ite. T his will inc lude a requirement that Metro Transit be res ponsible for snow clearance for both the parking lot and sidewalk. T he P edestrian Eas ement Agreement is attac hed to this memo and has been reviewed by EDA legal c ouns el. S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity 530581v1 SJS BR305-144 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-______ RESOLUTION APPROVING A PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT AGREEMENT FOR A SIDEWALK OVER PROPERTY OWNED BY SFG NET LEASE TG MINNEAPOLIS, LLC THAT SERVICES THE METRO TRANSIT PARK AND RIDE LOT LOCATED NEAR 6420 CAMDEN AVENUE NORTH BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (“Board”) of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (“Authority”) as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. In 2006, the Metropolitan Council (the “Metropolitan Council”) and Regal Cinema (“Regal”) entered into a license agreement that gave the Metropolitan Council a license to use 200 parking spaces of the movie theater parking lot and driveway owned by Regal located at: 6520 Camden Avenue North, near the intersection of Highway 252 and 66 th Avenue (the “Regal Property”) as a park and ride lot for Metro Transit commuters together with a sidewalk connecting the park and ride lot to a Metro Transit bus stop located in the Minnesota Department of Transportation right-of-way (the “License Area”). 1.02. Regal conveyed the Regal Property to Topgolf for redevelopment. The Property was platted and as part of a land exchange with Topgolf, the Authority is now the owner of Lot 2, Block 1, Topgolf Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota, which consists of a portion of the Regal Property and a majority of the License Area. 1.03. Topgolf conveyed its portion of the Regal Property to SFG NET LEASE TG MINNEAPOLIS, LLC (“SFG”), who is leasing the property back to Topgolf as part of its financing of the redevelopment project. 1.04. Regal’s license agreement with the Metropolitan Council was assigned to the Authority. In order to allow the Authority to continue to meet its obligations as the licensor under the license agreement, the Authority has requested that SFG grant the Authority an easement over the SFG Property for pedestrian purposes and SFG has agreed to grant the Authority an easement. Section 2. Authority Approval; Further Proceedings. 2.01. The Board hereby approves the attached Pedestrian Easement Agreement (the “Agreement”) in substantially the form presented to the Board, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the Agreement and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the Agreement by those officials shall be conclusive evidence of their approval. 2 2.02. Authority staff and officials are authorized to take all actions necessary to perform the Authority’s obligations under the Agreement as a whole. Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ED A ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H: F R O M:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director S UBJ EC T:R esolution to Approve a Lease Agreement Between the EDA of Brooklyn C enter and Luther Auto Dealers hip Recommendation: It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority adopt a res olution approving a lease agreement between the Ec onomic Development Authority and Luther Auto Dealers hip and authorize s taff to exec ute the agreement. Background: At their July 9, 2018, meeting the C ity C ounc il voted to approve an Interim Us e P ermit to allow Luther Auto to s tore vehicles for a period of two years , with a possible one year extension, on the EDA-owned property located at 5900 S hingle C reek P arkway, s ubjec t to the execution of a lease agreement between the EDA and Luther Auto. T he lease agreement was prepared by the C ity Attorney, and is attached to this memo for the EDA Board's review and c onsideration. Luther prepared a S ite, S ec urity, Lighting, and Acc es s plan in c ooperation with the P olice Department that has been reviewed and approved by the C hief of P olic e. Luther will install fencing, lighting, and host 24-hour s ecurity on site, which is anticipated to have benefits on surrounding property. T he leas e agreement ac kno wledges that the C ity has a P reliminary Development Agreement with Alatus for the area to be leased, and Luther agrees to acc ommodate Alatus ’ needs regarding s oil testing and c onducting due diligence on the s ite. T he lease further allo ws the C ity to terminate or transfer the leas e upon s ale o r trans fer of the property. T he E DA mus t c o ns ider the imp acts o f the lease on the go als o f the EDA to redevelo p the s ite, as well as any negative imp acts to s urrounding property that may result from the lease. S taff feels that thes e concerns are adequately mitigated by the language and terms of the leas e agreement. Budget Issues: Luther Auto will pay $7,500 per month to the EDA for the duration of the lease. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-___________ RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A LEASE WITH LUTHER AUTOMOTIVE GROUP WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (“EDA”) owns the property located at 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Brookdale Square 2nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Property”); and WHEREAS, Luther Automotive Group (“Luther”) desires to enter into a lease with the EDA to use the parking lot portion of the Property for storage of its new vehicles in compliance with the Interim Use Permit approved by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center (“City”) to allow Luther to store vehicles on the Property for a period of time, subject to certain conditions; and WHEREAS, the EDA determines that the storage of new vehicles by Luther is a reasonable use of the Property and will serve to address Luther’s interim need to secure off-site vehicle storage to facilitate the construction of its new dealership facility within the City; and WHEREAS, the proposed lease has a term of two years, with the option to extend the term for an additional year, subject to the term of the approved Interim Use Permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (“Board”) as follows: 1. The Board hereby approves entering into a lease with Luther to allow it to store its new vehicles on the Property. 2. EDA staff and officials are authorized to further negotiate the terms of the lease and the President and Executive Director are authorized to execute the lease once it is in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. July 23, 2018 Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: EDA RESOLUTION NO._______________ 2 524477v1 TJG BR305-1 and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 LEASE AGREEMENT This Lease Agreement (“ Lease ”) dated as of the 1st day of August, 2018 (“ Effective Date ”), by and between the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (“EDA ”) and The Luther Company, LLLP, 3701 Alabama Ave S, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (“ Luther ”). The EDA and Luther may hereinafter be referred to individually as a “party” or collectively as the “parties.” RECITALS A. The EDA owns the property located at 5900 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, legally described as Lot 1, Block 1, Brookdale Square 2 nd Addition, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“ Property ”); B. Luther desires to lease the parking lot portion of the Property as depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A (said portion the “ Leased Premises ”) to store its vehicles in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Lease; AGREEMENT In consideration of the mutual promises and agreements contained herein, and intending to be legally bound, the EDA and Luther hereby agree as follows. 1. Lease . In consideration of Luther’s performance of its obligations under this Lease, the EDA hereby leases the Leased Premises to Luther for the purposes of storing its vehicles as provided in this Lease and subject to the restrictions contained herein. 2. Term . This Lease shall commence on the Effective Date and shall terminate on July 31, 2020, unless terminated earlier as provided herein. The parties may, prior to expiration of the current term, mutually agree to extend the term of this Lease by an additional year. 3. Termination . Either party may terminate this Lease by providing the other party at least 180 days’ written notice of termination. The EDA may terminate this Lease upon 90 days written notice to Luther if the EDA determines, in its sole discretion, that such termination is needed in order to avoid interfering with the implementation of development plans prepared by the EDA’s selected developer for the Property. The EDA may also terminate this Lease upon breach by Luther as provided herein. Luther shall, within 30 days of the effective date of any termination of this Lease, remove its vehicles, barricades, and other materials and personal property that may be located on the Lease Premises. 4. Rent . Commencing on August 1, 2018, and continuing on the 1st of every month thereafter, Luther shall pay the EDA rent in the amount of $7,500. The rent payment is nonrefundable. 2 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 5. Use Restrictions . Luther’s use of the Leased Premises is subject to the restrictions in this Section. (a) Legal Compliance. Luther shall comply with all applicable laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances in its use of the Leased Premises and shall obtain all permits and other permissions that may be required. Luther shall further comply with the conditions imposed on the permits issued related to its use of the Leased Premises. (b) Access Points. Access to the Lease Premises shall be limited to one of the four access points to the Lease Premises as shown on the attached Exhibit A. Luther shall be responsible for barricading the other three access points in a manner acceptable to the EDA. A gate shall be erected at the one access point that will remain open and be used as the entrance to the Lease Premises. (c) Security and Lighting. Luther shall be responsible, at its own cost, for securing and lighting the Leased Premises. (d) Use. Luther shall use the Leased Premises only for the storage of vehicles in accordance with the following: (1) Access, security, and lighting improvements shall be in place on the Leased Premises prior to Luther locating any vehicles on site; (2) An Access, Security, and Lighting plan (“Plan”) shall be submitted to the City, subject to the review and approval of the Chief of Police. Luther understands and agrees the City may amend the Plan and require additional security measures should it be determined by the Chief of Police that additional security measures are necessary; (3) Only operable new vehicles that are available for sale or lease to customers as part of Luther’s business operations within the City may be stored on the Leased Premises; (4) Vehicles may only be brought to or removed from the Leased Premises Monday through Saturday, between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 9:00 P.M.; (5) No signage, other than no trespassing and minimal directional signage internal to the site, shall be permitted on the Leased Premises; (6) No vehicle repairs, sales, cleaning or detailing shall occur on the Leased Premises; (7) Only Luther (or a Luther affiliate’s) employees or contractors shall be allowed on the Leased Premises, no customers are allowed; and 3 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 (8) Vehicles shall be stored on the Leased Premises in an orderly fashion, as described in the approved Interim Use Permit, issued by the City Council on July 9, 2018 for the purpose of permitting Luther to store vehicles off-site. 6. Maintenance and Repair . Luther shall keep the Leased Premises in a clean and orderly condition during the term of the Lease, including the removal of any materials, debris, or refuse on the Leased Premises. Luther shall be responsible for all snow removal within the Leased Premises. Luther shall not store snow on the Property outside of the Leased Premises. Other than snow removal, Luther shall not be responsible for maintaining the Leased Premises, but shall be responsible for repairing, at its own cost, any damage it does to the Leased Premises, reasonable wear and tear excepted. 7. Alterations or Improvements . Luther shall not make any additions or improvements in or to the Leased Premises, other than those required or permitted by this Lease, without the EDA’s prior written consent. The EDA shall not be responsible for making any repairs or improvements to accommodate Luther’s use of the Leased Premises. 8. Utility Costs . Luther shall be responsible for any utility costs associated with its use of the Leased Premises. Luther shall pay the utility costs directly or make arrangements with the EDA to reimburse it for the utility costs incurred related to its use of the Leased Premises. 9. Indemnification . Luther expressly agrees to be responsible for claims, loss, damage, actions, causes of action, expense, and liability resulting from the negligent or wrongful act or omission by Luther in relation to its use of the Leased Premises pursuant to this Lease or caused by any employee, contractor, or agent of Luther or any damage caused by Luther to the Leased Premises. 10. Insurance . Luther agrees to maintain, during the entire term of this Lease, commercial general liability insurance with limits of at least $1,500,000. Luther shall be solely responsible for maintaining insurance coverage on the vehicles it stores on the Leased Premises. The EDA shall in no way be responsible for any damages caused to Luther’s vehicles or other property while stored on the Leased Premises. Luther hereby waives and releases all claims, liabilities, and causes of action against the EDA and its officials, agents, and employees for loss or damage to, or destruction of personal property of Luther, located in, upon or about the Leased Premises resulting from fire, explosion, theft, vandalism, storms, or the other perils. 11. EDA’s Rights and Responsibilities . The EDA has entered into a preliminary development agreement with a developer that encompasses the Leased Premises. Nothing in this Lease shall supersede the developer’s rights to access the Property. Luther shall cooperate fully with the developer to allow them to conduct their due diligence as it relates to soil samples and testing on the Property, including the Leased Premises. Nothing in this Lease shall be deemed to limit the EDA’s right to have access to the Leased Premises, or to exercise its remedies under the Lease, or to make applications to a governmental entity with respect to the Leased Premises, or to protest taxes or assessments related to the Leased Premises, or to 4 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 take other similar action with respect to the Leased Premises as a responsible landlord would elect. 12. Environmental . Luther agrees that throughout the term of the Lease, it shall not use the Leased Premises for the storage, handling, transportation, or disposal of any Hazardous Substances. “Hazardous Substances” for purposes of this Lease shall be interpreted broadly to include, but not be limited to, any material or substance that is defined, regulated, or classified under any Environmental Law of other applicable federal, state or local laws and the regulations promulgated thereunder as: (i) a “hazardous substance” pursuant to section 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601(14), the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(14), as now or hereafter amended; (ii) a “hazardous waste” pursuant to Section 1004 or Section 3001 of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 6903(5) , 6921, as now or hereafter amended; (iii) toxic pollutant under section 307(a)(1) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1317(a)(1) as now or hereafter amended; (iv) a “hazardous air pollutant” under Section 112 of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7412(a)(6), as now or hereafter amended; (v) a “hazardous material” under the Hazardous Materials Transportation Uniform Safety Act of 1990, 49 U.S.C. § 5102(2), as now or hereafter amended; (vi) toxic or hazardous pursuant to regulations promulgated now or hereafter under the aforementioned laws or any state or local counterpart to any of the aforementioned laws; or (vii) presenting a risk to human health or the environment under other applicable federal, state or local laws, ordinances or regulations, as now or as may be passed or promulgated in the future. “Hazardous Substances” shall also mean any substance that after release into the environment or upon exposure, ingestion, inhalation, or assimilation, either directly from the environment or directly by ingestion through food chains, will or may reasonably be anticipated to cause death, disease, behavior abnormalities, cancer, or genetic abnormalities and specifically includes, but is not limited to, asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (“PCBs”), radioactive materials, including radon and naturally occurring radio nuclides, natural gas, natural gas liquids, liquefied natural gas, synthetic gas, oil, petroleum, and petroleum-based derivatives and urea formaldehyde. 13. Representations . The EDA warrants that it has full right to execute and to perform this Lease with respect to the Leased Premises and that Luther, upon Luther’s performance of all of the terms, conditions, covenants and agreements on Luther’s part to be observed and performed under this Lease, may peaceably and quietly enjoy the Leased Premises subject to the terms and conditions of this Lease. 14. Assignment or Subletting . Luther shall not sublet any portion of the Leased Premises or transfer or assign this Lease; provided that the use of the Leased Premises by affiliates of Luther shall be permitted. The EDA’s right to assign this Lease is and shall remain unqualified. 15. Sale or Encumbrance . If the EDA sells or otherwise voluntarily conveys the Leased Premises during the term of this Lease, Luther’s rights under this Lease shall not be disturbed, and Luther shall attorn to the rights of the purchaser. 5 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 16. Holding Over . If Luther remains in possession of the Leased Premises after the expiration or termination of this Lease and the period provided herein for it to remove its property, it shall be deemed to be occupying said Leased Premises as a tenant at sufferance, subject to all the conditions, provisions and obligations of this Lease insofar as the same can be applicable to a tenancy at sufferance, including but not limited to the duty to pay rent. 17. Surrender . Upon expiration or termination of this Lease, Luther shall peaceably surrender the Leased Premises and remove all debris, vehicles, and personal property from the Leased Premises within twenty (20) days. Luther shall be conclusively deemed to have abandoned any vehicles or personal property not removed prior to thirty (30) days after the effective date of the EDA’s termination of this Lease or Luther’s surrender of the Leased Premises, unless the parties agree to a written extension of this Lease to allow the orderly removal of the vehicles over a longer period. The EDA may dispose of all debris, vehicles, and personal property Luther fails to remove within the removal period and Luther shall be responsible for reimbursing the EDA for its disposal costs. 18. Default . (a) Luther Default. The occurrence of any one or more of the following events shall constitute an event of default: (1) Luther’s failure to pay the full amount of rent when due; (2) Luther’s use of the Leased Premises in a way that violates the terms of this Lease; (3) Luther’s attempt to sublet any portion of the Leased Premises, or assign its interest under this Lease; or (4) Luther’s failure to fully perform any of its obligations under this Lease, which failure remains uncured for fifteen (15) days following the EDA’s written notice to Luther of Luther’s failure to perform such obligation. (b) EDA’s Remedies. If an event of default occurs, the EDA shall have the following remedies: (1) The EDA may, but shall not be obligated to, and without notice to or demand upon Luther and without waiving or releasing Luther from any obligations of Luther under this Lease, perform any obligations of Luther; pay any cost or expense to be paid by Luther; and make any other payment or perform any other act on the part of Luther to be made and performed as provided for in this Lease, in such manner and to such extent as the EDA may deem desirable, and in exercising any such right, may also pay all necessary and incidental costs and expenses, employ counsel and incur and pay attorneys’ fees. Luther shall pay costs to the EDA upon demand with interest at seven percent per annum. 6 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 (2) The EDA may terminate this Lease by written notice to Luther in which case Luther shall vacate the Leased Premises as provided in the Surrender section of this Lease. Neither the passage of time after the occurrence of an event of default nor the EDA’s exercise of any other remedy with regard to such event of default shall limit the EDA’s right to terminate the Lease by written notice to Luther. (3) The EDA may, whether or not the EDA has elected to terminate this Lease, immediately commence summary proceedings in unlawful detainer to recover possession of the Leased Premises. In the event of the issuance of a writ of restitution in such proceeding, upon the EDA’s reentry upon and repossession of the Leased Premises, the EDA may remove Luther and all other persons from the Leased Premises (subject to Luther’s right and responsibility to remove its personal property as provided herein). (4) In addition to all other remedies of the EDA, the EDA shall be entitled to reimbursement upon demand of all reasonable attorneys’ fees which the EDA incurs in connection with any event of default. (5) The EDA may initiate legal proceedings to enforce the provisions of this Lease. No remedy provided for herein or elsewhere in this Lease or otherwise available to the EDA by law, statute, or equity, shall be exclusive of any other remedy, but all such remedies shall be cumulative and may be exercised from time to time and as often as the occasion may arise. 19. General Provisions . (a) EDA’s Disclaimer of Warranty. The EDA disclaims any warranty that the Leased Premises is suitable for Luther’s use. (b) Relationship of Landlord and Luther. The Lease does not create the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint venture or of any association between the EDA and Luther, the sole relationships between the parties hereto being that of landlord and tenant under this Lease. (c) Waiver. No waiver of the EDA’s remedies upon the occurrence of an event of default shall be implied from any omission by the EDA to take any action on account of such event of default, and no express waiver shall affect any event of default other than the event of default specified in the express waiver and such an express waiver shall be effective only for the time and to the extent expressly stated. One or more waivers by the EDA shall not then be construed as a waiver of a subsequent event of default. (d) Choice of Law. Any claim, controversy or dispute arising out of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Minnesota. (e) Time. Time is of the essence in the performance of all obligations under this Lease. 7 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 (f) Notices and Demands. Except as otherwise expressly provided in this Lease, any notice, demand, or other communication under the Lease any related document by either party to the other shall be sufficiently given or delivered if it is dispatched by United States Mail or delivered personally to: (1) in the case of Luther: The Luther Company, LLLP Attn: Linda McGinty 3701 Alabama Ave S St. Louis Park, MN 55416 (2) in the case of the EDA: EDA of Brooklyn Center Attn: Curt Boganey 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 or at such other address with respect to either such party as that party may, from time to time, designate in writing and forward to the other party. (g) Entire Agreement and Amendment: This Lease constitutes the entire agreement between the EDA and Luther affecting the Leased Premises and there are no other agreements, either oral or written, between them other than said documents and as are herein set forth. No subsequent alteration, amendment, change or addition to this Lease shall be binding upon the EDA or Luther unless reduced to writing and executed in the same form and manner in which this Lease is executed. (h) Successors and Assigns: The terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Lease effective as of the Effective Date. 8 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 EDA: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA By: _________________________________ Tim Willson Its: President By: _________________________________ Curt Boganey Its: Executive Director LUTHER: THE LUTHER COMPANY, LLLP By: __________________________________ Its: ____________________________ A-1 528758v3 JPD1 BR305-1 EXHIBIT A Depiction of the Leased Premises (attached hereto) BARRICADE BARRICADEBASS LAKE ROAD(CO.RD. 10)SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY JOHN MARTIN DRIVE H W Y 1 0 0 S N O W S T O R A G E A R E A V E H I C L E S T O R A G E VEHICLE STORA G E E A R L E B R O W N D R I V E BARRICADE G A T E B A R R I C A D E D R I V E W A Y & P E D E S T R I A N EA S E M E N T P E R D O C . 2 1 2 7 9 5 6 PARKING EASEME N T AR E A L a n d f o r m a n d S i t e t o F i n i s h a r e r e g i s t e r e d s e r v i c e m a r k s o f L a n d f o r m P r o f e s s i o n a l S e r v i c e s , L L C . R R in collaboration with:THE LUTHER COMPANY, LLLP T E M P O R A R Y V E H I C L E S T O R A G E F A C I L I T Y · B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R , M N 0 7 . 0 5 . 2 0 1 8 S I T E P L A N L E G E N D P R O P O S E D F E N C E P R O P O S E D B A R R I C A D E E X I S T I N G L I G H T P O L E S N O W S T O R A G E A R E A N O R T H 0 2 0 0 D R I V E W A Y A N D P E D E S T R I A N E A S E M E N T P E R D O C . 2 1 2 7 9 5 6 ED A ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Brett Angell, Bus iness and Workforce Development S pecialist S UBJ EC T:R esolution Approving the P urchas e and Development Agreement and C onveyance of C ertain P roperty Loc ated at 7216 Brooklyn Boulevard (addres s to be re-as s igned to 4728 Wingard Lane) Recommendation: It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority open the P ublic Hearing, take public input, close the P ublic Hearing, and cons ider adoption of R esolution Approving P urc hase and R edevelopment Agreement and C onveyance of C ertain P roperty Loc ated at 7216 Brooklyn Boulevard (addres s to be re-as s igned to 472 Wingard Lane). Background: T he property, 7216 Brooklyn Boulevard, is a 0.47 acre s ite located at the northeast c orner of the Brooklyn Boulevard and Wingard Lane intersec tion. T he former s ingle family home whic h was located on this property was demolis hed in 2013 and was purchas ed by the EDA in June 2013 for $34,350. T he property has been vac ant since this date. Attached for your reference is a copy of the floor plans and building exterior provided by Novak-F lec k, Inc . T he home will be cons tructed in the s ame style and format as 5301 James Avenue, whic h the EDA sold to Novak-F leck in 2017. T he s plit-entry home includes the following: • Main level: 2 bedrooms, bathroom, living room, dining room, kitc hen, with options for a dec k off of the living are; • Lower level: 1 bedroom, bathroom, family room, utility and laundry room, and c rawl s pace area; and • A two-c ar attac hed garage. Purchase and Redevelopment Agreement T he C ity Attorney has prepared the enc los ed P urchas e and R edevelopment Agreement, whic h inc ludes the following components related to the EDA’s sales of this vac ant lot for an infill development of a new single family res idenc e: • T he purchas e pric e is $35,000. • T he buyer agrees that it will cons truct a new single family dwelling on the P roperty, intended for sale to a pers on or persons for res idential oc cupanc y (an O wner O c cupant). • T he minimum improvements s hall cons is t of a three-bedroom house with approximately 1,200 gross s quare feet; 2 bathrooms and a garage and s hall be c onstruc ted s ubstantially in acc ordanc e with plans on file in Brooklyn C enter C ity Hall. • T he minimum improvements must be s ubstantially completed by November 20, 2018. C ons truction will be cons idered subs tantially c omplete when the final c ertific ate of oc cupanc y has been is s ued by the C ity of Brooklyn C enter building official. At this time, a C ertific ate of C ompletion for the Minimum Improvements will be issued by the EDA. • T he Buyer shall c onvey the P roperty to an O wner O c cupant whose hous ehold inc ome does not exceed: (a) 100% of median inc ome in the case of one or two person household O wner O cc upant, or (b) 115% of the median inc ome in the case of three or more pers ons hous ehold O wner O c cupants . T he average median income for the s even-county metropolitan area for 2016 is $70,900. • P rovisions whic h provide the EDA with the rights to re-enter and take pos s es s ion of the property in the event the buyer does not carry out the obligations with respec t to the c onstruc tion of the Minimum Improvements or abandons or s ubstantially s uspends c onstruc tion. Budget Issues: T he proc eeds from this land sale are c onsidered Tax Inc rement R evenues and will be placed back into the T I F 3 Housing F und. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment 528016v1 SJS BR305-150 Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. 2018-______ RESOLUTION APPROVING PURCHASE AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND CONVEYANCE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7216 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD (ADDRESS TO BE REASSIGNED TO 4728 WINGARD LANE), BROOKLYN CENTER, MN BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (“Board”) of the Economic Development Authority of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (“Authority”) as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Authority is authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (the “EDA Act”), to acquire and convey real property and to undertake certain activities to facilitate the development of real property by private enterprise. 1.02. To facilitate development of certain property in the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the “City”), the Authority proposes to enter into a Purchase and Development Agreement (the “Contract”) between the Authority and Novak-Fleck Incorporated (“Buyer”), under which, among other things, the Authority will convey the property located in the City at 7216 Brooklyn Boulevard (address to be reassigned to 4728 Wingard Lane) and legally described as: Lot 2, Block 1, Shingle Creek Manor, according to the recorded plat thereof, Hennepin County, Minnesota (“Property”) to Buyer to construct a new single family dwelling on the Property, intended for sale to an individual or family for residential occupancy. 1.03. The Authority has on this date conducted a duly noticed public hearing regarding the sale of the Property to Buyer, at which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. 1.04. The Authority finds and determines that conveyance of the Property to Buyer is in the public interest and will further the objectives of its general plan of economic development, because it will provide an opportunity for increased housing opportunities in the City and serve as an impetus for further development. Section 2. Authority Approval; Further Proceedings. 2.01. The Board hereby approves the Contract in substantially the form presented to the Board, including conveyance of the Property to Buyer, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided 2 that execution of the Contract by those officials shall be conclusive evidence of their approval. 2.02. Authority staff and officials are authorized to take all actions necessary to perform the Authority’s obligations under the Contract as a whole, including without limitation execution of any documents to which the Authority is a party referenced in or attached to the Contract, and any deed or other documents necessary to convey the Property to Buyer, all as described in the Contract. July 23, 2018 Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ED A ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Brett Angell, Bus iness and Workforce Development S pecialist S UBJ EC T:R esolution Establis hing a R evolving Loan F und P rogram Recommendation: It is recommended that the Economic Development Authority c onsider adoption of the resolution establis hing a R evolving Loan F und (R LF ) P rogram for the C ity of Brooklyn C enter. Background: At the June 25th meeting, the EDA approved the s ubmission of a Minnes ota Investment F und (MI F ) application on behalf of G et Bizzy, Inc . (Bizzy C offee). A requirement of the MI F program is that any recipient C ity have revolving loan fund policies in place. T he MI F loan fund allows for a portion of the loan repayment, up to $100,000, to be placed within a revolving loan fund acc ount to help fund other economic development projects within the C ity. At this time, the EDA is not being as ked to provide funding to the revolving loan fund acc ount. A revolving loan fund (R LF ) is a gap financ ing measure that is used primarily for the development and expans ion of small busines s es . It is a self-replenis hing pool of money utilizing interes t and princ ipal payments on old loans to issue new loans. O ften the R LF is a bridge between the amount the borrower c an obtain on the private market and the amount needed to start or sus tain a busines s . P olicies and procedures for a revolving loan fund have been created to establis h this program with the goal of enhanc ing the appearanc e and/or s afety of buildings and to create or retain livable wage jobs in the C ity. T he R LF would be us ed for either exterior enhanc ements of the building, to create livable wage jobs , or other fixed as s et financing. T he applicants for an R LF may be individual bus iness owners , partners hips, c orporations , tenant operators , or c ontract for deed purchas ers . T he loan details of any R LF project would inc lude the following: • A minimum amount of $5,000 and a maximum amount at the disc retion of the EDA, but not to exceed 75% of the total R LF funds , or 40% of the total projec t costs , or 30% of the total purchas e pric e for machinery or equipment. • T he terms (length) of the loan will be determined by the EDA on a case-by-case bas is with the maximum term for any R LF loan being 10-years. • T he rates for any loan will be a fixed–rate and s et at 2% below the prime interes t rate es tablished at c los ing. • A 10% equity inves tment of total project c os ts will be required of all applic ants . • T he applic ant for an R LF loan would be respons ible for all hard loan c os ts. • Ac ceptable c ollateral s hall inc lude a mortgage on the building or assets involved or other c ollateral as approved by the EDA. As part of the program, the applic ant will be required to prepare an estimate of the number of jobs to be created and the wages of each position for the firs t five (5) years of operation after receiving an R LF loan. Yearly check-ins with the bus iness will occ ur to ensure that the busines s is meeting the goals outlined in the application process. Any applic ation for R LF financ ing will be reviewed by staff to ens ure the applic ation is complete. C omplete applications will be brought forward to the EDA and the EDA will have the s ole disc retion to c hoose whether to finance a projec t or to deny the applic ation. T he EDA will have the ability to terminate the R LF program at any point. Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: Enhanc ed C ommunity Image, R es ident Ec onomic S tability Commissioner _____________________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO.______________ RESOLUTION APPROVING POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR REVOLVING LOAN FUND WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the “EDA”) acknowledges the need to provide financial assistance to businesses to further the economic development objectives of the City of Brooklyn Center (the “City”); and WHEREAS, the EDA has determined to adopt written procedures regarding how the City will carry out its revolving loan fund program, and to that end has caused to be prepared a document titled Policy and Procedures for the Revolving Loan Fund of the Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority as set forth in Exhibit A attached hereto (the “Policy”). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the “Board”), as follows: 1. The Board hereby adopts the Policy. 2. EDA staff are authorized to take all actions necessary to carry out the Policy. July 23, 2018 Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 530538v1 JSB BR291-303 EXHIBIT A POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR THE REVOLVING LOAN FUND OF THE BROOKLYN CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY I. PURPOSE The purpose of the Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) for the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center is to establish a low-interest loan program to provide the capability and incentive for property owners and tenants of new and existing businesses within the City to upgrade the appearance, structural condition, and/or operating efficiency of their places of business, thereby improving their marketability and retaining and expanding job opportunities within the City. II. REVOLVING LOAN FUND GOALS By providing low-interest loans to existing or new businesses, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center has established the following goals: 1. The proposed project must be a conforming use in the zoning district in which it is located and generally consistent with the City of Brooklyn Center’s Comprehensive Plan. 2. Any construction project which uses funds from the Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) shall require quality construction and must promote the highest and best use of the land. 3. The project will not significantly or adversely increase the impacts on existing utility service needs in the City. 4. The project should seek to utilize local contractors, suppliers, vendors, professionals, and/or financial institutions when feasible. 5. The project will help protect or increase property values and the general public’s health, safety and welfare. 6. The proposed project will help ensure a vibrant economic landscape and will help retain or expand livable wage job opportunities within the City. III. QUALIFYING IMPROVEMENTS AND USE OF FUNDS Revolving Loan Fund proceeds may be used for the following purposes: 1. To improve the exterior appearance of buildings and property, including land or building acquisition; building construction; expansion, renovation and/or modernization of buildings; permanent façade improvements; and/or energy efficiency improvements within the City of Brooklyn Center. 2. For interior improvements; however, in addition to the goals set for in the above section, must be made for one or more of the following reasons: a. Job creation and/or retention of livable wage jobs; b. Meet any City of Brooklyn Center approved economic development or redevelopment plans; c. To meet any City established design guidelines; or d. Prevention or elimination of blight conditions. EDA RESOLUTION NO._______________ 2 530538v1 JSB BR291-303 3. Other fixed asset financing, including machinery and equipment; for the purposes of job creation and/or retention. These items must be defined to have a useful lifespan of a minimum of five (5) years. Loan proceeds may not be applies to work which is in process or purchases made prior to the application approval. Additionally, loan proceeds may not be applied to properties located in the floodplain, refinancing of existing debts, non-fixed asset improvements, “soft” costs, landscaping or parking lot improvements, working capital, inventory, or payment for the applicant’s own labor and performance for construction or improvements. Qualifying Improvements must begin construction or be purchased within 90 days of loan closing, unless an extension is requested and approved. IV. APPLICANT ELIGIBILITY Applicants may be individual owners, partnerships, corporations, tenant operators, or contract for deed purchasers of a property or building within the City of Brooklyn Center. Documentation of entity status shall be delivered with the application forms. Applicants must have the ability to repay the loan and be an acceptable credit risk as determined by the participating lender and/or by the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center. V. LOAN DETAILS The Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center will review each loan application, pursuant to the goals and policies set forth in this document, on a case-by-case basis. 1. Minimum Loan Amount. The minimum loan amount shall be $5,000. 2. Maximum Loan Amount. The maximum loan amount is at the discretion of the Brooklyn Center EDA but shall not exceed 75% of the total funds on deposit in the Revolving Loan Fund; or 40% of the total project costs for land/building purchase/construction/renovation, or 30% of the total purchase price for machinery or equipment; whichever is less. 3. Loan Terms. The terms for any loan will be determined by the Brooklyn Center EDA, depending on the purposed of the funds. The maximum term for any RLF loan will be 10-years, but not longer than the useful life of the facility financed. 4. Loan Rates. The interest rate will be a fixed rate and set at 2% below the prime interest rate established at the time of closing, as determined by the EDA. 5. Equity Participation. There shall be a minimum of 10% percent equity investment of total project costs required of all applicants. 6. Loan Costs. The applicant is responsible for all loan costs including without limitation, title opinions, appraisals, abstracting costs, recording fees and mortgage tax. 7. Loan Repayments. Amounts collected on the loans shall be allocated first to reasonable collection costs, then to interest due, then to principal due. 8. Loan Security and Guarantees. The applicant must be able to secure the loan with a first or second mortgage upon the building and/or assets involved, or other collateral as approved by the EDA. Personal guarantees from company owners (greater than 20% ownership) shall be required. The Brooklyn Center EDA may also require additional agreements, such as a security agreement and a business subsidy agreement. The applicant must demonstrate the financial means to repay the loans as determined by EDA RESOLUTION NO._______________ 3 530538v1 JSB BR291-303 the EDA and/or financial institution. The applicant must further demonstrate that the assets involved are insured for an amount not less than the total outstanding loans. 9. Balance Due. If the applicant sells or transfers title of the improved building or equipment, or relocates any portion or all of the business outside of the City of Brooklyn Center, prior to the full repayment of the loan, the loan will be required to be paid in full with interest. VI. JOB REPORTS The applicant shall be required to prepare a job creation estimate, projecting the expected employment levels for the business, for each of the first five (5) years of operation upon approval of the RLF loan. VII. PAYMENTS Applicants are required, at the time of closing, to arrange to have the monthly payments automatically withdrawn and deposited into the EDA’s account. Any applicable fees will be paid by the borrower. A penalty of 5% of the payment amount, with a minimum of $15.00 shall be added to the outstanding balance of a loan in the event that a payment is received after the due date. VIII. REVIEW GROUP The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority will serve as the review group for loan applications. City of Brooklyn Center staff will review applications to ensure they are complete prior to review by the EDA. Determination of whether an RLF loan is approved will be in the sole discretion of the EDA. IX. PAYMENT OF LOAN PROCEEDS Loan proceeds shall be paid directly to applicants only after the work for which payment is requested has been performed and the work has been accepted in writing by the Brooklyn Center EDA or its Executive Director. The quality and progress of the work shall be monitored by the loan recipient and the EDA or its representative. All invoices and other necessary information as related to the project costs shall be provided to the EDA or its representative prior to the disbursement of funds. The EDA may, in its sole discretion, allow proceeds to be released earlier than upon completion of work if used as a down payment on a building purchase and/or to allow payment to be made directly to the participating lender, contractor, or vendor. X. DURATION Loans may be made under these policies to the extent that funds are available, as allocated to the fund by the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn and eligible loan recipients. The RLF program may be terminated by the EDA. If the RLF is so terminated, such termination shall not affect the rights and obligations of the EDA with respect to loans outstanding on the effective date of such termination. XI. MINNESOTA BUSINESS SUBSIDY LAW Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 116J.993 to 116J.95, business loans subject to the Business Subsidy Law and recipients of such loans shall be required to enter into a subsidy EDA RESOLUTION NO._______________ 4 530538v1 JSB BR291-303 agreement with the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, which will require, among other things, the satisfaction of certain wages, job goals, and a commitment to maintain operation of a business for a certain length of time. XII. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The applicant shall submit the name(s) of the owner(s), shareholder(s), partner(s), sole proprietor, corporation member(s), or other person(s) or business(es) with any financial interest in the project and its financing in order to preclude any conflict of interest in the RLF loan review and approval process. XIII. DISCRIMINATION PROHIBITED All persons/businesses submitting an application and receiving loan proceeds agree, by accepting said proceeds, to comply with all federal and state laws and related rules and regulations which prohibit discrimination. Generally, these laws and rules make it an unfair employment practice, expect when based on limited, statutory exception or a bona fide occupational qualification, for an employer to refuse to hire, discharge, or otherwise treat a person differently with respect to fire, compensation, terms, upgrading, conditions, facilities or privileges of employment because of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, status with regard to public assistance, disability, age, or sexual orientation; or in reprisal for objection to, or participating in the investigation or litigation of, alleged discrimination or for associating with disabled person(s) of a different race, color, creed, religion, sexual orientation or national origin. Council/E D A Work S ession City Hall Council Chambers J uly 23, 2018 AGE NDA The City C ounc il requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full C ity Council pac ket is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the podium. AC T I V E D I S C US S IO N I T E M S 1.Youth I n Government Day 2.Rental L icensing P rogram Review 3.Comprehensive Plan S chedule Discussion 4.2040 Comprehensive P lan Discussion P E ND I NG L I S T F O R F UT URE WO RK S E S S IO NS 1.F uture Ongoing I tems Cities United Membership A D A Transition Plan L iquor/P ublic Dance - August T-21Tobacco Regulations Hennepin County L ibrary Rental L icense - A ugust Casey’s Retail Company REQUEST: (1)Special Use Permit (2)Site and Building Plan Item 9.b City Council Meeting of 07/23/2018 Existing Conditions Source: Google Maps Subject Property History Propertywasformerlyhometoaseriesofrestaurants  includingChuckMuer’s,LaCasita’s,Chi-Chi’s,andtheMr.BBQ &VoodooLounge Therestaurantbuildingwasdemolishedin2014andhasbeen  vacantsince PropertyiszonedC2(Commerce)District  2030ComprehensivePlanidentifiessiteas“RB”(Retail  Business) Siteislocatedonapproximately2.12acres  Source: Google Maps Source: Yelp/AMF Background & Request Applicantisrequestingapprovalof:  (1)SpecialUsePermitforgasstation  AspartoftheSiteandBuildingPlanapproval,theApplicantisrequestingapprovalofaSpecialUsePermittoallowforagasstation.  AccordingtoSection35-220(SpecialUsePermits)oftheCity’sZoningOrdinance, “Specialusesarethosewhichmayberequiredforthepublicwelfareinagivendistrictbutwhichare,insomerespects,incompatible withthepermittedusesinthedistrict.Beforeabuildingorpremisesisdevotedtoanyuseclassifiedasaspecialusebythisordinance,a specialusepermitmustbegrantedbytheCityCouncil.” Section35-322(C2CommerceDistrict)notesthat,  “Gasolineservicestations(seesection35-414),motorvehiclerepairandautowashes,providedtheydonotabutan  R1,R2,orR4district,includingabutmentatastreetline”arepermittedbySpecialUseonly. “Thesaleorvendingatgasolineservicestationsofitemsotherthanfuels,lubricantsorautomotivepartsand  accessories(andotherthanthevendingofsoftdrinks,candy,cigarettesandotherincidentalitemsforthe convenienceofcustomerswithintheprincipalbuilding)providedadequateparkingisavailableconsistentwiththe Section35-704,2(b)and2(c)”arepermittedintheC2(Commerce)DistrictbySpecialUseonly. SubjectPropertydoesnotabutanyresidentially-zoned(andspecificallyR1,R2,orR4)properties.  Adjacenttonumeroushotels,commercialandindustrialproperties,aHindutemple,andI-94/I-694tothe  south. Background & Request (Cont.) Applicant is requesting approval of:  (2)SiteandBuildingPlan  Constructionofaone-story,approximately4,600-squarefootconveniencestorewith8double-sidedgaspumpcanopystructure,  bioinfiltrationbasin,andassociatedimprovements. Note:ApplicantprovidedrevisedsiteplanspriortoCityCouncilmeetingthatoutlineadjustmentstoparking(removalofparkingfromin  frontoftrashenclosure),thewestdriveaisle(nowreducedby20feet),andbike/pedestriandetailing(additionofbikerack,andinterior crosswalk)perCitystaff/MNDOTcomments. Renderings of Building (Proposed) Mixofglass,spandrelglass,realantiquebrick  (soldiercourse/runningbondpatterns), AluminumCompositepanels(ACM),andcultured stonework Renderings of Site (Proposed) Access and Parking Access  Remove one access driveway, construct a replacement access driveway, and retain an existing access driveway (total of two  driveways off Freeway Boulevard) Minimum green strip of 15 feet along Shingle Creek Parkway and Freeway Boulevard is met per plans  Per City staff/MN DOT requests, Applicant revised site plan to add internal crosswalk from proposed 5’ sidewalk off Freeway  Boulevard and add bike parking rack due to proximity to Shingle Creek Trail, located just west of the Subject Property. Parking  Minimum parking requirements dictated by number of fuel pumps and a calculation of 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 GFA (Retail  Uses) Parking UseMinimum Required Parking Provided Parking Spaces Spaces (in bold) Gas Pumps 16 spaces 1 parking space per each side (2 cars per double-sided of gas pump pump) (8 double-sided gas pumps= 16 spaces required) Convenience Store (Retail 25spaces 5.5 parking spaces per 1,000 Use) Gross Floor Area @ 4,606- SF (25.33 spaces required) ADA 2 spaces 1(for1to25parkingspace requirement-minimumstall requirementof25stallsper 2015MinnesotaAccessibility Code) Total Required Parking41.33 spaces (ADA spaces incorporated into total) Total Provided Parking 41spaces Lighting Lighting  TheApplicantfurnishedaphotometricplanoftheSubjectProperty,which  indicates9lightpoles,32undercanopylights,12buildingwall-packs,and9 canopy/soffitluminaires.Asproposed,thelightpoleswouldbemountedon15 footpoleswithtwo(2)footconcretebases. Requesttoidentifyopportunitiestoreducefoot-candlesundercanopyand  alongpropertylines Update:ApplicantprovidedrevisedphotometricplanspriortoCityCouncil  meetingwhichindicatereductioninfootcandlesalongpropertylines(3 footcandlesorless) TheUnderCanopylightingappearstobesubstantiallythesame  (e.g.,foot-candles)–apseudocolorlightingstudyandslideshow wasprovidedbyApplicant. Trash | Screening Trash  Theproposedtrashenclosurewouldbelocatedatthesouthwestcornerofthebuilding,and,asproposed,thetrash  enclosurewouldbefullyscreenedwithabrickenclosureandmetalaccessgates.Ashadbeenrequested,theparking spaceswereremovedfrominfrontofthetrashenclosuretoensureclearaccess.Asidedooronthesouthelevationof theconveniencestorewouldprovidedirectaccessviaasidewalktothetrashenclosure. Screening  Trashenclosureandanyothergroundmountedequipmentshallbescreenedfrompublicright-of-way,aswellasany  roof-mountedequipment(visiblefrompublicright-of-way). Verifyscreeningforproposed73inchhighcustomaluminummechanicalscreenonroof.  Applicanthasindicatedthattheproposedmechanicalscreenshouldprovidesufficientscreeningfrom  ROW. Landscaping Minimum landscaping requirements were identified utilizing the City’s Landscape Point System Policy.  For a use of “Restaurant/Retail/Service/Entertainment/Hotels” on an approximately 2.12 acre site, a minimum of  167.2 points must be achieved. PlantingTypeMinimumSizePointsPerPlantingMaximum Points (%)PointsAccrued 2½”diameter10 Shade Trees 80pointsaccrued 50%or83.6points (8treesx10=80) (Serviceberry, Crabapple) 5’height640%or66.8points ConiferousTrees36pointsaccrued (Tamarack,Pine)(6treesx6=36) DecorativeTrees1”diameter1.535%or58.5points 0pointsaccrued (0treesx1.5=0) 12”diameter0.525%or41.8points Shrubs7pointsaccrued (Juniper)(14shrubsx0.5=7) Total100%=167.2points123points The originally submitted Landscape Plan provided was deficient by approximately 44 points (above table). Applicant  submitted revised Landscape Plan prior to City Council meeting. City staff will identify whether deficiencies have been addressed. Original Landscape Plan noted no landscaping on north east or east perimeters of property. Applicant added 14 spirea  shrubs in revised plans. An irrigation system is required to be installed—shop drawings of the proposed system are to be submitted to the City for  review. Staff Reviews CITYENGINEERREVIEW  Aspartofanyapprovaloftherequests,theApplicantwouldneedtocomplywiththerecommendationsandconditionsas  notedbyAssistantCityEngineerAndrewHogginthememorandumdatedJuly9,2018(ExhibitD).TheAssistantCity Engineerhasindicatedthatatrafficstudyoftheproposedaccessintersectionsandintersectionsadjacenttothesiteis necessaryaspartofanysiteplanapproval.Asthetotaldisturbedareaexceedsoneacre,anNPDESpermitwillalsobe required. FIREINSPECTORREVIEW  ThesubmittedUtilityPlandatedJune12,2018,notedaproposedfireservicelineonthenorthendoftheconvenience  storeandtheintenttosalvageanexistingfirehydrantlocatedalongFreewayBoulevard.TheApplicantshallworkwiththe FireInspectorandBuildingOfficialtoensureallaspectsofthebuildingandsitemeetFireCodeandBuildingCode requirements.Althoughthisisnotafulllistofrequirements,theFireCodedoesnecessitateaminimum20-footwidedrive aisleanda13.5footclearanceforfiretrucks.Theremaybeadditionalrequirementsrelatingtodeadendroads,turnradius, FDCconnections,Knoxboxes,etc.,whichwillneedtobeaddressedaspartofanybuildingpermitprocess. BUILDINGOFFICIALREVIEW  BuildingOfficialDanGrinsteinnerreviewedtheplansandcommentedthattheproposed1,000gallonbelowgradegrease  interceptor,tobelocatedtowardthenortheastcornerofthebuilding,willneedtobereviewedaspartoftheCitybuilding permitprocessandthroughtheHennepinCountyHealthDepartment.Theproposedundergroundstoragetanks(USTs),to belocatedalongtheeasternedgeoftheSubjectProperty,willrequirereviewandapprovalthroughtheMinnesota PollutionControlAgency(MPCA)andHennepinCounty. TheApplicantwillneedtoworkwiththeBuildingOfficialtocomplywithallCitybuildingcodesaspartofanybuilding  permitapprovalprocess. Summary ApublicnoticewaspublishedintheBrooklynCenterSunPostonJune28,2018,andmailnoticesweresentto  neighboringpropertyowners. ThePlanningCommissionheldapublichearingattheirmeetingonJuly12,2018.  Nocommentsfororagainsttheproposalwereprovidedbythepubliceitherpriortooratthemeeting.  TheCommissionersaskedanumberofquestionsrelatingtothenumberofemployeesthestorewouldhire,operating  hours,whatmakesCasey’sdifferentthanothergasstationconveniencestores,andsignage. Followingareviewoftheapplicationrequests,thePlanningCommissionunanimously(4-0)recommendedapproval  ofthesiteandbuildingplanandSpecialUsePermitrequestsasidentifiedunderPlanningCommissionApplicationNo. 2018-013. Recommendation ThePlanningCommissionrecommendsCityCouncilapprovePlanningCommissionApplication  No.2018-013,submittedbyCasey’sRetailCompany,requestingapprovalofasiteandbuilding planandissuanceofaSpecialUsePermitforthepropertylocatedat2101FreewayBoulevard, subjecttotheApplicant/PropertyOwnercomplyingwiththeconditionsoutlinedinthe resolution. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:R eggie Edwards, Deputy C ity Manager S UBJ EC T:Youth In G overnment Day Recommendation: It is recommend that the C ity C ounc il c onsider agreement to partic ipate propos ed "youth in government day" on Monday, Augus t 13th that includes meeting with the youth at 5:00 pm for a youth moc k counc il meeting and continuing that meeting through the work s tudy s es s ion and permitting the youth to shadow the C ity C ouncil during the live C ounc il meeting taking place that night. Background: T he C ounc il has participated and engaged youth in various government educational efforts in the past including "youth in government". In 2017, the C ity C ouncil partic ipated in "youth in government" day by developing questions for disc ussion, engaging in a dialogue, and having youth shadow the C ounc il during an ac tual C ity C ouncil meeting. Both the youth and the C ounc il indicated apprec iation and valuing of the event. In 2018, the C ity C ounc il expres s ed a des ire to hos t another "youth in government day" event. S taff has developed a engaging program for the "2018 - youth in government day". T he participating youth will involve the C ity's BrookLynk Interns. C urrently the interns are bec oming well acquainted with the daily operational side of government via their internships ; however, partic ipation in the "youth in government day" will be to expose them to the policy side of government direc ted as direc ted by res idents via elec ted officials. T he youth will be engaged in a mock c ouncil meeting. T hey will deliberate and vote on whether or not to enac t a T-21 ordinanc e, which is a timely is s ue for the C ity. T he moc k counc il meeting will also provide C ouncil with an opportunity to obs erve and interact with youth on the issue. T he youth will be provided doc umentation and information to review on the is s ue in advance. T he youth will proceed to enac t a moc k counc il meeting including the playing the roles of mayor, c ity c ouncil, c ity manager, city attorney, and department presenter. F ollowing the mock c ouncil meeting the youth will debrief and reflec t with the C ounc il on proc es s , thinking, deliberating and ultimately dec is ion making (voting). F ollowing the debrief, reflec tion and dialogue the youth will s it-in with or s hadow the C ity C ounc il during the ensuing C ounc il meeting taking place that night. T he intended outc omes of the 2018 Youth in G overnment Day will be to: 1. Expose youth to the policy side of government 2. P rovide youth with an experienc e in deliberating and voting on a real policy issue 3. P rovide the C ounc il with an opportunity to gain insight from and dialogue with youth on a relevant and current polic y is s ue Does the C ity C ounc il c onfirm the proposed "Youth in G overnment Day" on Monday, Augus t 13th that inc ludes meeting with the youth at 5:00pm for a youth moc k counc il meeting and c ontinuing that meeting through the work s tudy s es s ion and permitting the youth to shadow the C ity C ouncil during the live C ounc il meeting taking plac e that night? Budget Issues: N/A S trategic Priorities and Values: Inclus ive C ommunity Engagement Youth in Government Day August 13, 2018 Get a behind-the-scenes look at how your city works. Experience city facilities, a mock council session and engage in conversations with decision makers and take an active role in a City Council Meeting. Youth in Government Day Created to welcome young people into  the process and structure of their local government Features:  Mock Council Meeting  Dinner with Council Members  Participation in City Council Meeting  Youth in Government Day New in 2018!  Brooklynk Interns will have an opportunity to  participate in Youth in Government Day after gaining experience working for the City Mock Council Meeting to provide youth an  opportunity to explore issues and vote Youth in Government Day Council Engagement  Reflect on Mock Council Meeting with  youth participants Converse over dinner  Engage youth during City Council Meeting  Youth in Government Day Proposed Timeline  Welcome and City tour, 3pm  Council welcome and introductions, 5pm  Mock Council Meeting, 5:15pm  Dinner with Council Members, 6pm  Council Meeting, 6:45pm  Thank you! COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Jesse Anders on, Deputy Direc tor of C ommunity Development S UBJ EC T:R ental Licens ing P rogram R eview Recommendation: It is recommend ed that the C ity C o uncil c o nsider provid ing d irectio n to s taff regard ing p o tential modifications to the rental licens ing program. Background: T he C ity of Brooklyn C enter has had a rental lic ensing program s inc e the 1970's . In 2010 the C ity C ounc il adopted modifications to the O rdinance. T he modific ations c reated a 4-tier performanc e-bas ed sys tem. T hat s ystem has been in operation ever s inc e, and has proven to be largely succ es s ful in terms of maintaining the C ity's rental hous ing stock and providing safe, sec ure hous ing. O ver the pas t eight years the C ity has been able to gather signific ant amounts of data regarding inspec tions , numbers and types of violations , as well as the rates at whic h properties fall into which type (I, I I, I I I, or I V), and rates at which properties either remain cons is tent or c hange type at renewal. T he information gathered has allowed s taff to identify with precision ways in which the s ystem might be improved in order to further the goals of the program even more. T he C ity holds monthly As s ociation for R espons ible Managers (AR M) meetings . At the Marc h meeting attendees expressed frustration over the existing rental licens e sys tem, indicating that it was too stringent compared with other c ities and was not set up to allow landlords to be s uc cessful. Attendees expres s ed a des ire to have input into the s ystem and see revisions that would make it eas ier to bec ome and maintain Type I or Type I I lic enses. F ollowing this meeting, S taff hosted a lis tening session and invited all of the landlords that had as ked to partic ipate, as well as other landlords who represented varying lic ense types in the C ity. S taff asked spec ific questions regarding their experienc e of the rental licens ing program, recorded their respons es , and then as ked partic ipants to vote on which sugges ted changes they most wanted to see. O ut of that proc es s three primary themes emerged: 1) Allow more infrac tions per licens e type - O verwhelmingly, most participants in the listening s es s ion expressed a desire to inc reas e the number of violations in each lic ense type c ategory. T he result, essentially, would be to make it eas ier to ac hieve a higher licens e type, thus reducing the frequenc y of ins pections. Mos t notably, partic ipants felt that the 0-1 violations allowanc e to ac hieve a Type I lic ense was too low. 2) Base license type on second inspection - P articipants in the listening session expressed frustration in the inspection process. I nspectors inspect a property and write corrections. T he landlord must then make the corrections and schedule a second inspection to show that all corrections have been completed; however, their license type (and frequency of inspections) is based on the number of violations noted in the initial inspection. A related suggestion from participants was to have inspectors do a pre-walk through, which would act like an unofficial inspection, noting corrections to be made ahead of the actual inspection. S taff's concern with this, is that it would require more than one inspection on every property, thus increasing the need for inspections staff. T his inspection format would also make the C ity responsible for making sure property was well maintained, rather than the property owner. 3) Weight violations based on severity - S everal participants noted that some cities have a weighted points-based system for inspections that places a great emphasis on life/safety issues as opposed to property maintenance issues. T he concern expressed by landlords was that their property could be in compliance for all but one very minor issues, such as a ding in the wall and a sagging kitchen drawer and they would have gone from a Type I license to a Type I I. F urther, there were landlords that noted that violations that were easy to fix, such as a missing light bulb or battery in a smoke detector, were counted as violations even when the landlord was able to correct them on site during the inspection. Staff's concern with weighting violations is that it creates a significantly more complex inspection process. It also opens debate over what is a minor versus a major violation. A missing light bulb may seem minor; however, given that it creates an exposed electrical circuit, they can also be very dangerous. F ollowing the listening s es s ion S taff met internally to go over the res ponses from landlords and for the inspec tors to weigh-in on the s uggestions. Bas ed on that meeting, S taff has prepared the following lis t of potential modifications to the rental licens e program. 1) R emove the As s ociation for R espons ible Managers (AR M) meeting requirement and Monthly Update requirement. W hile this was not an item that ros e to the top by the participants of the lis tening session, it was mentioned by more than one landlord. 347 Type I V R ental Lic enses were is s ued in 2015-2017. O f those, 155 repeated as a Type I V Lic ense. 58% of the repeats were the res ults of the owner/manager not attending an AR M Meeting or c ompleting monthly updates. However, 86% of repeat Type I V R ental Licens e improved on their inspec tion. Attendance has been high at AR M Meetings which has resulted in difficulty sc heduling a C ity conferenc e room that can ac commodate all attendees. F eedback from the landlord listening s es s ion was to remove the requirement. T he landlords s tated they would attend based on interes t in the subject being pres ented rather then being required to attend. During AR M meetings , attendees who are required to attend are not typically engaged in the s ubjec t matter or more negative in their participation, whic h creates disruption for thos e that are there bec ause they want to be. T he tracking of monthly updates is time c onsuming for s taff. In c as es where the monthly updates are not being turned in by the landlord, S taff finds that typically they are doing the requirements listed in the monthly reports , just not reporting on them. Landlords s tated they don't find value in reporting the is s ues they are finding at their properties, as they are handling is s ues at the time of their vis its. (S uc h as having there tenant pick up litter in the yard). Las tly, the C ity is unable to verify all of the items that are reported in the monthly updates . (s uc h as monthly c hec k-ins with tenant). 2) Add requirement for an Inspec tor C onsultation for all repeat Type I V rental lic ense that repeat due to property c ode violations . T his would es s entially replace the AR M meeting and Monthly Update requirement, and c reate a more targeted action for those landlords that have repeat Type I V lic enses and might need additional resources to unders tand how to manage their properties better. T he ins pection cons ultation would be required for the smaller percentage of repeat Type I V rental properties that are having difficulty maintaining their property. T he c onsultation would be a walk through, not a full ins pection of the property, with an ins pector explaining rental licens ing requirements and how to maintain the property on an ongoing bases. 3) R emove requirement for Mitigation P lans to be s ubmitted for C ounc il Approval. T he Type I V R ental Licens es require the Mitigation P lan to be submitted and approved by staff before it is brought to C ity C ounc il for final approval before a rental lic ense can be is s ued. T his c an delay the proc es s it takes for a landlord to receive their licens e by 2 weeks to 3 months depending on the respons e from the owner or manager. P roperties that qualify for a Type I V lic ense are more likely than other licens e types to require multiple inspec tions or take a longer time period to correc t the violations . T his delay, combined with the additional time it takes to prepare a Mitigation P lan in time for the C ouncil meeting, increases the likelihood that a licens e will expire before being renewed. Type I I I rental licens es require an Action P lan which does not require C ounc il approval. R emoving the Mitigation P lan from C ounc il approval would s treamline the Type I V R ental Lic ense process, and bring it into c onsistenc y with the Type I I I process. F urther, removing the required c ouncil memo would decrease workload for administrative and management staff. 4) Modify the number of property c ode violations for each c ategory. Increase the number of property code violations by 1 violation per c ategory. It was sugges ted at the landlord listening s es s ion that the Type I - 3 Year Lic ense be more obtainable. T he overall rental hous ing stock has improved from when the performance-based program was adopted; therefore, the types of violations that ins pectors see are typic ally les s severe. T his allows for a property that is in great condition and has 2 minor violations such as a mis s ing bac kflow preventer or mis s ing light bulb to still obtain a Type I - 3 year lic ense. In single-family homes , there are muc h more items that the inspec tor looks at (furnace, water heater, more bathrooms, etc) that are potential violations c ompared with an apartment unit whic h are generally s maller and lac k the mec hanical s ystems present in a house. T his res ults in single-family homes being more likely to be a Type I I I or Type I V Licens e. W hen reviewing lic enses is s ued in 2017 the following adjustment would have applied under the propos ed standards: (bas ed only on inspec tion results not c onsidering police calls or repeating a category due to other requirements) 54 more properties would have been a Type I - 3 Year Lic ense rather then a Type I I - 2 Year Licens e. 24 properties would have qualified for a Type I I - 2 Year licens e rather then a Type I I I - 1 Year Licens e. 14 properties would have qualified for a Type I I I - 1 Year Lic ense rather then a Type I V - 6 Month Lic ense L ice ns e Type C urre nt C ode Violaon R ange P roposed Violaon R ange Type 1- 3 Year L icense 0-1 0 -2 Type 2 – 2 Ye ar L icense 2-4 3 -5 Type 3 – 1 Ye ar L icense 5-8 6 -9 Type 4 – 6 M ont h L icense G reater then 8 G reater then 9 Staff feels that these modifications to the program will stream line the process, improve customer service for landlords, while also maintaining high quality rental property in the City. Based on the C ity C ouncil's input, S taff will work with the C ity Attorney to make any amendments to the R ental Lic ense O rdinanc e that may be needed and bring bac k to C ouncil for a firs t and s econd reading. Budget Issues: T he are not budgetary is s ues to cons ider. S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity Listening Session with Landlords May 2, 2018 Below are summary of the comments/suggestions that were provided based on the discussion topic. Inspections  Notice of inspections -Provide a more precise time vs a window for an inspection -Provide electronic email notice and text message confirmation  Actual inspection -Improve on inspector consistency -Provide information about the inspection online -Be flexible in types of code violations -minor vs major / health life safety vs non health life safety Program – license determination  Provide a pre-inspection with the owner/tenant before the actual inspection  Count code violations based on the results of the 2nd inspection  Increase the number of code violations per license category  Remove minor violations from the license determination as long as it is corrected  Everyone starts with a 3 year license and based on the number of code violations the license category would decrease with the increase in number of code violations CPTED / ARM Requirements  Eliminate ARM requirement  Eliminate CPTED requirement for single family  Provide automatic electronic notice of any police calls for service on a monthly basis for all properties Administrative Citation  Be more lenient on issuing citations for operating without a rental license Landlords had an unlimited number of votes for each comment and were instructed to vote on the one(s) they felt were most important and would like to see changed. Weighted violations - There were multiple comments and votes under this category. Comments were wide ranging consisting of weighted violations based on severity level ranging from major vs minor, health life vs non health life, and easy and quick. This received a total of 27 votes. License determination at the 2nd inspection – This received a total of 18 votes and it was stated in several different ways. Some of the comments were: only count after the 2nd inspection, conduct a pre- inspection and then base license after that, don’t count all the minor violations, only count health life safety violations, and only count the easy fix if it does not get repaired at the 2nd inspection. Increase # of code violations per category – There were only a few comments relating this to but it did receive 11 votes. Consider the rental type and size of the property – Only one comment was stated and received 7 votes. Inspector consistency – Only 1 comment and received 6 votes. Eliminate ARM and CPTED requirement – 2 votes Automatic notice of police calls for service – 2 votes Electronic notice – 1 vote RENTAL LICENSING STATISTICS Rentals – Active By Type Rental-Type I-3 Year 50% Rental-Type II-2 Year 42% Rental- Type III-1 Year 8% 100+ Units (on May 7, 2018) Rental-Type I-3 Year Rental-Type II-2 Year Rental-Type III-1 Year Rentals – Active By Type Rental-Type I-3 Year 22% Rental-Type II-2 Year 50% Rental-Type III-1 Year 21% Rental-Type IV-6 Months 7% 40-99 Units (on May 7, 2018) Rental-Type I-3 Year Rental-Type II-2 Year Rental-Type III-1 Year Rental-Type IV-6 Months Rentals – Active By Type Rental-Type I-3 Year 37% Rental-Type II-2 Year 32% Rental-Type III-1 Year 26% Rental-Type IV-6 Months 5% 5-39 Units (on May 7, 2018) Rental-Type I-3 Year Rental-Type II-2 Year Rental-Type III-1 Year Rental-Type IV-6 Months Rentals – Active By Type Rental-Type II-2 Year 46% Rental-Type I-3 Year 37% Rental-Type IV-6 Months 4% Rental-Type III-1 Year 13% 1-4 Units (on May 7, 2018) Rental-Type II-2 Year Rental-Type I-3 Year Rental-Type IV-6 Months Rental-Type III-1 Year Repeat Type IV License Review Type 4 Information 2015 & 2016 & 2017 Total Type IV 347 Total Repeat Type IV 155 (44%) Repeat where violation were still Type IV 48 (30% of repeats)(14% of all IV) Repeat for ARM or Monthly only 90 (58% or repeats)(25% of all IV) Met Requirements but had code violations 20 (13% of repeats)(6% of all IV) Improving on inspections 86% Didn’t repeat as type IV 55% Reasons For Repeating Type IV Licenses 2017 2016 2015 Missed Monthly only 4 12 4 Monthly and Security Assessment 1 2 2 Met Mitigation Plan- Code violations only 10 3 7 Missed Security Assessment only 1 1 4 ARM Only 17 9 10 Arm and Monthly 10 14 10 Arm and Security 2 7 3 arm, monthly and security 9 6 7 Crime free housing course only 1 1 What License Would Have Qualified For – Based on Code Violations 2017 2016 2015 Type 1 8 6 7 Type 2 14 25 7 Type 3 13 8 19 Type 4 19 14 15 Repeat Reason 2017 Based On Number of Times Repeated 2017 Repeat reason Total 1x repeat 2nd X Repeat 3 X Repeat 4x repeat 5x repeat 6x repeat Missed Monthly only 4 1 1 1 1 Monthly and security 1 1 Met Mitigation Plan Requirement 10 6 2 1 1 Missed security assessment only 1 1 Association Meetings 17 10 3 2 2 Arm and Monthly 10 6 1 1 2 Arm and Security 2 1 1 arm, monthly and security 9 4 3 1 1 Crime free housing course only Monthly, Security, Crime Free Housing Security and crime free housing course Arm, Crime free housing training Would have qualified for 2017 Type 1 8 5 2 1 Type 2 14 7 2 2 2 1 Type 3 13 7 3 2 1 Type 4 19 10 4 2 2 1 Repeat Reason 2016 Based On Number of Times Repeated Repeat reason 1x repeat 2nd X Repeat 3 X Repeat 4x repeat 5x repeat Missed Monthly only 6 4 1 3 Monthly and security 3 Met Mitigation Plan- Code violations only 1 2 Missed security assessment only 1 Association Meetings 3 1 1 2 Arm and Monthly 6 2 4 1 1 Arm and Security 5 2 arm, monthly and security 4 1 Crime free housing course only 1 Monthly, Security, Crime Free Housing 1 Security and crime free housing course Arm, Crime free housing training Would have qualified for Type 1 4 1 2 1 Type 2 12 8 1 2 1 Type 3 4 2 1 3 Type 4 10 4 Repeat Reason 2015 Based On Number of Times Repeated Repeat reason 1x repeat 2nd X Repeat 3 X Repeat 4x repeat 5x repeat Missed Monthly only 2 2 Monthly and security 1 Met Mitigation Plan- Code violations only 5 1 Missed security assessment only 4 Association Meetings 6 1 1 1 Arm and Monthly 7 1 2 Arm and Security 1 1 arm, monthly and security 4 2 Crime free housing course only 1 Monthly, Security, Crime Free Housing 1 Security and crime free housing course 1 Arm, Crime free housing training 1 Would have qualified for Type 1 5 1 Type 2 4 4 Type 3 12 4 2 Type 4 10 3 1 Police Nuisance Calls Effect On Rental License Category Type 4 Rental License 2015-2017 Count Total Type 4 Rentals 264 Not affected by police nuisance calls 261 Qualified for a one category decreace due to police nuisance calls 6 Would have had a decrease by one category but was already a type 4 3 Would have been a type 3 but police nuisance calls cause decrease by 1 category 3 Qualified for a 2 category decrease 0 Licensed Rentals by Size Property Type Number of properties Number of units Percentage 1-4 784 896 21% 5-39 24 401 9% 40-99 15 987 23% 100+ 12 2065 47% Total 835 4349 100% *As of 4/3/18 Number of Licenses Active Per License Category License Category 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Type I—3 year license 322 (41%) 247 (41%) 284 (34%) 315 (36%) 323 (38%) 296 (37%) Type II - 2 year license 359 (45%) 377 (45%) 427 (51%) 413 (47%) 278 (45%) 352 (43%) Type III - 1 year license 77 (10%) 85 (10%) 91 (11%) 115 (13%) 114 (14%) 115 (14%) Type IV - 6 mo. license 30 (4%) 29 (3%) 43 (3%) 28 (3%) 29 (3%) 44 (5%) Total 788 838 845 871 844 810 2017 Number of Single Family Properties per Violation Count Number of Property Code Violations Number of License Licensed Category Based Only on Property Code Violations 0 43 Type 1 - 3 Year License 1 65 Type 2 - 2 Year License 2 54 Type 2 - 2 Year License 3 41 Type 2 - 2 Year License 4 65 Type 2 - 2 Year License 5 24 Type 3 - 1 Year License 6 29 Type 3 - 1 Year License 7 26 Type 3 - 1 Year License 8 22 Type 3 - 1 Year License 9 14 Type 4 - 6 Month License 10 16 Type 4 - 6 Month License 11 16 Type 4 - 6 Month License 12 6 Type 4 - 6 Month License 13 9 Type 4 - 6 Month License 14 8 Type 4 - 6 Month License 15-20 19 Type 4 - 6 Month License 21* 8 Type 4 - 6 Month License 2017 Number of 4+ Unit Properties per Violation Count Number of License Number of Property Code Violations per unit Licensed Category Based Only on Property Code Violations 1 0 Type 1 - 3 Year License 2 0.20 Type 1 - 3 Year License 1 0.48 Type 1 - 3 Year License 2 0.60 Type 1 - 3 Year License 1 0.71 Type 1 - 3 Year License 1 0.75 Type 1 - 3 Year License 3 0.90 Type 2 - 2 Year License 5 1.15 Type 2 - 2 Year License 1 1.27 Type 2 - 2 Year License 2 1.45 Type 2 - 2 Year License 3 1.50 Type 2 - 2 Year License 1 1.61 Type 3 - 1 Year License 5 1.75 Type 3 - 1 Year License 3 1.85 Type 3 - 1 Year License 2 1.95 Type 3 - 1 Year License 3 2.45 Type 3 - 1 Year License 4 2.75 Type 3 - 1 Year License 2 3.00 Type 3 - 1 Year License 4 3.25 Type 4 - 6 Month License 1 3.75 Type 4 - 6 Month License 1 4.00 Type 4 - 6 Month License 1 5.45 Type 4 - 6 Month License 1 6.25 Type 4 - 6 Month License Page 1 of 2 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: 763-569-3300 TTY/Voice 711 Fax: 763-569-3494 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org Rental License Category Criteria Policy – Adopted by City Council 03-08-10 1. Determining License Categories. License categories are based on property code and nuisance violations noted during the initial or renewal license inspection or for a category verification inspection, along with excessive validated police service calls occurring over a year. License categories are performance based and more accurately depict the condition of the property and the City costs of service. 2. Fees. Fee amounts are determined by the costs of the city to license, inspect, monitor and work with the property to ensure category conditions are met. License fees do not include reinspection fees, late fees, charges for criminal or civil enforcement actions, or other penalties. 3. Category Conditions. The licensee or designated agent must meet the category conditions in the time period specified by the City. A licensee must meet all original conditions required by the License Category, even if a subsequent license category is achieved. 4. License Category Criteria. a. Property Code and Nuisance Violations. Property code violation rates will be based on the average number of property code violations per unit identified during the initial licensing inspection or category verification inspection. Property code violations for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include violations of property code and nuisances as defined in Chapter 12, 19, 7 and other applicable local ordinances. The City may, upon complaints or reasonable concerns that the establishment no longer complies with the license category criteria, perform a category verification inspection to the same standards as the license renewal inspection as indicated below. Inspections will be conducted in conjunction with established department policies. In cases where 100% of the units are not inspected, the minimum inspection standards will be established as follows: • At least 75% of units will be inspected for properties with 15 or less units. • At least 25% of units, to include a minimum of 12 units, will be inspected for properties with 16 or more units. Page 2 of 2 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-1 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 1 but not more than 4 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 4 but not more than 8 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 8 3+ units Greater than 3 b. Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Presented By Jesse Anderson Deputy Director of Community Development The City of Brooklyn Center has had a rental  licensing program since the 1970's.In 2010 the City Council adopted modifications to the Ordinance. The modifications created a 4-tier performance-based ◦ system. Over the past eight years the City has been able  to gather significant amounts of data regarding the program The information gathered has allowed staff to  identify ways in which the system might be improved in order to further the goals of the program The City holds monthly Association for Responsible  Managers (ARM) meetings. At the March meeting attendees expressed frustration over the existing rental license system. ◦Attendees indicated that it was too stringent compared with other cities and was not set up to allow landlords to be successful. ◦Attendees expressed a desire to have input into the system and see revisions that would make it easier to become and maintain Type I or Type II licenses. Staff hosted a listening session.  ◦Staff asked specific questions regarding their experience of the rental licensing program, recorded their responses, and then asked participants to vote on which suggested changes they most wanted to see 1) Allow more infractions per license type  ◦The result, essentially, would be to make it easier to achieve a higher license type, thus reducing the frequency of inspections. ◦Most notably, participants felt that the 0-1 violations allowance to achieve a Type I license was too low. 2)Base license type on second inspection -  Participants in the listening session expressed frustration in the inspection process. Their license type (and frequency of inspections) is ◦ based on the number of violations noted in the initial inspection. A related suggestion from participants was to have ◦ inspectors do a pre-walk through, Staff's concern with this, is that it would require more ◦ than one inspections, thus increasing the need for inspections staff. This inspection format would also make the City ◦ responsible for making sure property was well maintained, rather than the property owner. 3) Weight violations based on severity -Several  participants noted that some cities have a weighted points- The concern expressed by landlords was that their ◦ property could be in compliance for all but one very minor issues, Staff's concern with weighting violations is that it creates ◦ a significantly more complex inspection process. It also opens debate over what is a minor versus a major ◦ violation. A missing light bulb may seem minor; however, given that it  creates an exposed electrical circuit, they can also be very dangerous. Following the listening session Staff met  internally to go over the responses from landlords and for the inspectors to weigh-in on the suggestions. Based on that meeting, Staff has prepared the  a list of potential modifications to the rental license program. 58% of the repeat type IV were the results of the  owner/manager not attending an ARM Meeting or completing monthly updates.However, 86% of repeat Type IV Rental License improved on their inspection. Attendance has been high at ARM Meetings which has  resulted in difficulty scheduling aCity conference room that canaccommodate all attendees. Feedback from the landlord was to remove the  requirement.They stated they would attend based on interest in the subject being presented rather then being required to attend. During ARM meetings, attendees who are required to  attend are not typically engaged in the subject matter or more negative in their participation, which creates disruption for those that want to be at the meeting. The tracking of monthly updates is time  consuming for staff. In cases where the monthly updates are not  being turned in by the landlord, Staff finds that typically they are doing the requirements just not reporting on them. Landlords stated they don't find value in  reporting the issues they are finding at their properties,as they are handling issues at the time of their visits. Lastly, the City is unable to verify all of the items  that are reported in the monthly updates. This would create a more targeted action for  those landlords that have repeat Type IV licenses and might need additional resources to understand how to manage their properties better. The inspection consultation would be required  for the smaller percentage of repeat Type IV rental properties that are having difficulty maintaining their property. The consultation would be a walk through, not a  full inspection of the property, with an inspector explaining rental licensing requirements and how to maintain the property on an ongoing bases. The plan approval can delay the process by 2 weeks  to 3 months depending on the response from the owner or manager. Propertiesthat qualify for a Type IV license are more  likely than other license types to require multiple inspectionsor take a longer time period to correct the violations.This delay, combined with the additional time it takes to prepare a Mitigation Plan in time for the Council meeting, increases the likelihood that a license will expire before being renewed. Type III rental licenses require an Action Plan which  does not require Council approval Removing the required council memo would decrease  workload for administrative and management staff. Increase the number of property code violations  by 1 violation per category. It was suggested at the landlord listening session  that the Type I -3 Year License be more obtainable. The overall rental housing stock has improved  from when the performance-based program was adopted; typical violations are less severe. This allows for a property that is in great  condition and has 2 minor violations such as a missingbackflow preventer or missing light bulb to still obtain a Type I -3 year license. When reviewing licenses issued in 2017 the  following adjustment would have appliedunder the proposed standards: ◦(based only on inspection results only) 54 more properties would have been a Type I -3  Year License rather then a Type II -2 Year License. 24 properties would have qualified for a Type II -2  Year license rather then a Type III -1 Year License. 14 properties would have qualified for a Type III -1  Year License rather then a Type IV -6 Month License Current Code Proposed License Type Violation Violation Range Range Type 1-3 Year 0-10-2 License Type 2 –2 Year 2-43-5 License Type 3 –1 Year 5-86-9 License Type 4 –6 Greater then 8Greater then 9 Month License Based on the City Council's input, Staff will  work with the City Attorney to make any amendments to the Rental License Ordinance that may be needed and bring back to Council for a first and second reading. Questions?  COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director S UBJ EC T:C omprehensive P lan S c hedule Disc ussion Recommendation: Would the C ity C ounc il be open to moving the sc heduled August 13, 2018 Joint Work S es s ion with the P lanning C ommission to disc uss the 2040 C omprehens ive P lan to T hursday, August 16, 2018 to coincide with the P lanning C ommis s ion's regular meeting sc hedule? T his would allow more time for disc ussion, as the 2040 C omprehens ive P lan would be the only topic on that evening's agenda. Background: Budget Issues: N/A COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director S UBJ EC T:2040 C omprehens ive P lan Dis cus s ion Recommendation: It is recommended that the C ity C ounc il review the draft doc uments and provide input to s taff. Background: O n July 9, 2018, the C ity C ounc il held a joint work s es s ion with the P lanning C ommis s ion to review the progress of the 2040 C omprehensive P lan update. At that meeting, the C ity C ounc il rec eived draft goals and s trategies for several sec tions of the C omprehensive P lan, as well as draft land use des ignations and a draft future land use concept for the C ity. T he C ounc il was able to provide s ome feedbac k; however, given limited time, staff offered to bring the topic bac k to the C ity C ouncil at the next work s es s ion for additional conversation. T he C ounc il is being asked to review the draft goals and strategies and provide input for each sec tion, and to res pond to the ques tions identified at the end of each sec tion. Included in the attachments is the Definitions and G lossary sec tion, which identifies the ac tion words and their meanings. T hese words become important as the C ity identifies the level of res ourc es and c ommitment will go into ac hieving eac h goal. S taff will go over thes e items with the C ouncil to gather feedback, though C ouncilmembers are also welc ome to provide their c omments in writing if preferred. In addition to res ponding to the draft goals and strategies , pleas e c onsider the draft land us e map that was pres ented in your packets on July 9, 2018. As you review this map and the sugges ted future land use des ignations please cons ider the following: Are any sites missing from those identified on the draft map? Are there s ites inc luded that s hould not be? L ook at the B rooklyn Boulevard O verlay District/C orridor – how wide should the corridor be? S hould it include only properties with frontage on the roadway? O r should it be more encompassing? If you c ould identify only one c harac teristic/cons ideration/element for eac h land use des ignation what would it be? 1. TO D 2. Neighborhood Mixed Use 3. C ommercial Mixed Use 4. Bus iness Mixed Use DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 1 7/11/2018 Work Sheet Definitions & Glossary The terms Goal and Strategy can mean different things to people and may not always be viewed with the same level of importance or commitment. Throughout the Comprehensive Plan update Goal and Strategy will have the following meaning and definition: Goal : A general statement of community aspirations and desired objectives indicating broad social, economic or physical conditions to which the community officially agrees to try to achieve in various ways, one of which is the implementation of the Comprehensive Plan. Strategy : An officially adopted course of action or position to implement the community goals. (To be developed and refined as plan components are developed) Goals and strategies assign various roles, commitments and responsibilities to the city of Brooklyn Center. To assist with defining the city’s role for each goal and strategy , the following key terms are defined and indicate the city’s corresponding responsibility: Create : Bring about the desired goal, with city staff involved in all levels, from planning to implementation, and which may involve city financial assistance. Continue : Follow past and present procedures to maintain the desired goal, usually with city staff involved in all levels, from planning to implementation. Encourage : Foster the desired goal through city policies, which may involve city financial assistance. Endorse : Subscribe to the desired goal by adopting supportive city policies. Enhance : Improve the current goal through the use of policies, which may include financial support, and the involvement of city staff at all levels of planning. Explore : Investigate the stated method of achieving the desired goal, which may involve city staff and financial resources to research and analyze such method. Identify : Catalogue and confirm resource(s) or desired item(s), which may involve city staff and may require financial resources. Maintain : Preserve the desired state of affairs through the use of city policies. Financial assistance should be provided if needed. Recognize : Acknowledge the identified state of affairs and take actions or implement policies to preserve or change them. DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 2 7/11/2018 Work Sheet Prevent : Stop described event through the use of appropriate city policies, staff, action and, if needed, finances. Promote : Advance the desired state through the use of city policies and staff activity at all levels of planning, and if needed, finances. Protect : Guard against a deterioration of the desired state through the use of city policies, staff and, if needed, financial assistance. Provide : Take the lead role in supplying the needed financial and staff support to achieve the desired goal. The city is typically involved in all aspects from planning to implementation to maintenance. Strengthen : Improve and reinforce the desired goal through the use of city policies, staff and financial assistance, if needed. Support : Supply the needed staff support, policies and financial assistance at all levels to achieve the desired goal. Sustain: Uphold the desired state through city policies, financial resources and staff action to achieve the goal. Work : Cooperate and act in a manner to create the desired goal through the use of city staff, actions and policies. No commitment of financial investment, staff resources and policy directives May include financial investment, staff resources and policy directives Commitment to financial investment (if needed), staff resources and policy directives Continue Endorse Identify Reserve Recognize Work Create Encourage Enhance Explore Maintain Prevent Promote Protect Provide Strengthen Support Sustain DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 3 7/11/2018 Work Sheet Community Image Goals 2030 Plan 1. Improve the connections and linkages between neighborhoods, major corridors, parks and open space, and City Center, through streetscape enhancements, signage systems, and other public way improvements. 2. Improve local public access to and awareness of the city’s natural amenities, specifically the Mississippi River and the Twin Lakes. 3. Capitalize on the city’s visibility and access from state and interstate highways through improved signage and landscaping. 4. Minimize the impacts of stormwater runoff on water resources by minimizing the increase of impervious surface and using natural designed drainage, infiltration, other low impact development (LID) techniques and best management practices, in the development and redevelopment process. 2040 Draft Community Image Goals 1. Promote Brooklyn Center as an exceptional place for businesses (visitors) and residents, both existing and new, because of its locational advantage and accessibility within the region. Strategies: a. Continue to refine and enhance the City’s recent print and online rebranding efforts. b. Strengthen the City’s identity through proactive communications that reach the larger region (e.g. develop marketing collateral to send to DEED, professional associations, press releases, etc.) c. Support the development of a task force or working group of community stakeholders to provide on-going perspectives and feedback to City marketing and branding initiatives. 2. Support the development of sustainable, resilient, and accessible neighborhoods in the City Center that reinforce the City’s commitment to its diverse residents, neighborhoods, and businesses. Strategies: a. Promote redevelopment of the former Brookdale Mall site as a Transit Oriented Development site that plans for a mix of uses including diverse residential uses. b. Create a walkable and connected street, sidewalk and bikeway system throughout the City Center that connects to surrounding neighborhoods. c. Recognize the limitations of existing structures and land uses and allow for the reimagining and intensification of uses to further development of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) City Center. d. Encourage developers to incorporate innovative and sustainable site design elements that reintroduces and reestablishes green space in the City Center and adjacent redevelopment areas. e. Identify opportunities to incorporate green infrastructure into existing and redevelopment areas in all types of development. f. Provide incentives for redevelopment that incorporates housing at all levels of affordability from affordable to high-end market rate units, within a single project when feasible. g. Promote the City Center as a community gathering space with pop-up shops, open air markets, and flexible space to support local businesses. DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 4 7/11/2018 Work Sheet 3. Explore meaningful ways to represent the community’s diversity through the City’s branding, marketing and visual communications. Strategies: a. Enhance City issued and sponsored communications by providing materials translated in multiple languages that are tailored to Brooklyn Center’s population. b. Create a working group or task force with diverse representation to provide feedback and suggestions on major branding and marketing efforts. c. Identify key marketing and branding initiatives, particularly of redevelopment areas, and engage Brooklyn Center’s residents and business owners on-line to solicit feedback early and often throughout project development. 4. Encourage and promote reinvestment in the city’s infrastructure including roadways, streetscapes, trails and utilities to signal to observers Brooklyn Center’s commitment to the long- term success of its residents and businesses. Strategies: a. Maintain the City’s existing infrastructure through appropriate budgeting through the City’s CIP process. b. Identity areas that could be revitalized through targeted infrastructure reinvestment and include applicable inventory and analysis in applicable small area plans, redevelopment studies, etc. c. Work to develop a comprehensive wayfinding and signage system for bikeways and trails throughout the City. 5. Recognize the opportunity and value of Brooklyn Center’s changing demographics and entrepreneurial attitudes to create an identity that embraces diversity as part of the City’s future. Strategies: a. Work to understand the needs of Brooklyn Center’s population for office, commercial, restaurant, retail and multi-use spaces. b. Identify opportunities within redevelopment areas that could fulfill the needs of Brooklyn Center’s entrepreneurs and small business owners. Please complete the following for the COMMUNITY IMAGE goals & strategies: #1: Review the Action Word in BOLD within the goal statements; does it reflect the appropriate level of commitment? If not please use the table from the Glossary and suggest changes. #2: Is something missing? Please jot down notes/comments of what you feel should be added. #3: Is something inaccurate, or feels wrong/inconsistent with your vision for Brooklyn Center? DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 5 7/11/2018 Work Sheet Land Use & Redevelopment Goals 2030 Plan Adopted Goals 1. Protect and enhance the residential neighborhoods. 2. Continuously renew and redevelop to make better use of land in City Center and the Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor. 3. Improve the appearance of the city to enhance quality of life, property values and civic pride. 4. Improve the image of the City through branding and coordinated theme development in public areas. 5. Use the zoning ordinance to provide for a more flexible mix of land uses and to encourage good design. 2040 Draft Land Use & Redevelopment Goals 1. Support the Future Land Use plan through the update or creation of relevant and market-based small area plans, redevelopment plans, and the zoning ordinance. Strategies a. Identify and prioritize key redevelopment areas and develop a work plan and potential schedule/timeline for each area. b. Provide staff and consultant resources to prepare a comprehensive update to the City’s zoning ordinance to support the planned land uses. c. Protect the future land use plan through development of clear, concise and descriptive policy documents and initiatives that support the City’s long-term vision. 2. Continue to support a proactive, integrated approach to redevelopment that clearly defines the City’s objectives for specific areas and sites within the community. Strategies a. Strengthen the City’s vision for key redevelopment areas through preparation of Master Plans and Small Area studies to ensure thoughtful and responsive development. b. Encourage developers, staff, and stakeholders to think-big and creatively about redevelopment to create an interesting, vibrant, and innovative City Center and surrounding neighborhoods. c. Support and encourage development concepts that incorporate flexibility for space and programming that could be used for start-ups, small companies, pop-ups, and local markets that provide opportunities to promote the City’s diverse residents. d. Explore opportunities to increase the mix of uses on the Brooklyn Boulevard corridor, increasing densities, identifying key nodes for the concentration of commercial uses and providing opportunities for new housing types. 3. Strengthen opportunity for high-quality redevelopment through establishing clear planning and regulatory documents. Strategies a. Provide clear ordinances that permit uses consistent with the City’s vision and minimize the number of uses required to obtain special or conditional uses. DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 6 7/11/2018 Work Sheet b. Create new zoning and overlay districts that are concise, directive and use graphics (pictures and/or diagrams) to explain the City’s requirements. c. Explore opportunities to streamline the development process and utilize Brooklyn Center’s customer focus and nimble approach as a competitive advantage. 4. Enhance and maintain existing neighborhoods through proper land use designations and clear supportive zoning that makes reinvestment and rehabilitation easy for residents. Strategies a. Create and maintain a cheat-sheet for residents that explains in plain language the permitting and regulatory process. Provide this in multiple languages. b. Explore opportunities to engage and communicate with residents to learn about their needs and identify ways the City may help, either through education, information, or direct assistance. c. Create a policy and ordinance that describes expectations for home-based businesses and establishes a permitting process to ensure compatibility with existing single-family uses. d. Explore opportunities to utilize technology to m ake it easier and more convenient for residents to interact with the City. e. Create zoning regulations that reflect the demands of the current single-family housing market 5. Recognize that many areas in the community are aging and may require reinvestment, redevelopment, or reimagining and that all scales and sizes of opportunity have merit to further support the community’s future. Strategies a. Explore opportunities to create neighborhood nodes that are integrated and support the needs of residents and encourages a more walkable community. b. Identify opportunities and tools (that may include financial resources) that assist residents with regular maintenance, upkeep, and/or remodeling so that their homes meet their needs and are places they want to stay and contribute to a more stable neighborhood. c. Continue to evaluate how redevelopment can further enhance and support the sustainability of individual properties, neighborhoods and the larger community. 6. Provide clear direction to developers, property owners, and residents about the City’s desires for each redevelopment area through this comprehensive plan, small area studies, master plans and the zoning ordinance. Strategies a. Support redevelopment initiatives through a coordinated Request for Proposal (RFP) process that solicit interest and response from developers for city-owned properties. b. Promote the City’s vision for each redevelopment area through various means including online, print, and media. c. Explore opportunities to encourage redevelopment through site assembly, master planning, predevelopment, and land preparation. DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 7 7/11/2018 Work Sheet 7. Explore opportunities to create unified branding, connections, and visual cues to reinforce Brooklyn Center’s identity and relationship to existing neighborhoods. Strategies a. Create a city-wide beautification strategy that includes a process for creating community identity and pride through the use of public art. b. Work to develop a comprehensive list of design guidelines for residents, developers and stakeholders that provide a menu of Brooklyn Center “branding’ elements that can be incorporated into new and existing developments and neighborhoods. c. Strengthen the City’s commitment to its designation as a Tree City USA by incorporating more trees and landscaping at the City’s main gateways and entrances. d. Encourage residents, developers, and other stakeholders to use City authorized branding elements in marketing materials, streetscape improvements, and design elements. e. Identify key pedestrian, bikeway, auto and transit corridors that should incorporate consistent branding elements and landscape themes. f. Promote Brooklyn Center’s diversity through development of flexible spaces, opportunities for pop-ups and other small business incubators. Please complete the following for the Land Use and Redevelopment goals & strategies: #1: Review the Action Word in BOLD within the goal statements; does it reflect the appropriate level of commitment? If not please use the table from the Glossary and suggest changes. #2: Is something missing? Please jot down notes/comments of what you feel should be added. #3: Is something inaccurate, or feels wrong/inconsistent with your vision for Brooklyn Center? Housing Goals 2030 Plan Adopted Goals 1. Continue the selective redevelopment of targeted commercial, industrial and residential areas to eliminate obsolescent or deteriorating land uses and stimulate new investment. 2. Work to ensure that the City’s housing can evolve to meet the needs and demands of its current and future population. 2040 Draft Housing Goals 1. Promote a diverse housing stock that provides safe, stable, and accessible housing options to all of Brooklyn Center’s residents. DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 8 7/11/2018 Work Sheet Strategies a. Protect existing naturally occurring affordable housing options within the City through supportive land use designations and associated policies. b. Explore opportunities within multi-family redevelopment areas to include market-rate and affordable housing options within each project. c. Strengthen existing neighborhoods through focused efforts to assist with maintenance and preservation of the housing stock. 2. Recognize and identify ways to match Brooklyn Center’s housing with its changing demographics. Strategies a. Identify and inventory the City’s existing rental housing stock to understand the rental unit-mix and unit-type to determine where gaps in the supply exist. b. Work to incorporate increased diversity of units within new redevelopment areas from micro-apartments to three- and four-bedroom units. c. Encourage property owners to reinvest in existing properties to maintain owner-occupied and renter-occupied units to create a more sustainable and stable housing stock. d. Strengthen outreach efforts to understand what housing needs exist for current and prospective Brooklyn Center residents. 3. Explore opportunities to improve the City’s housing policies and ordinances to make them more responsive to current and future residents. Strategies a. Identify and review existing housing policies to ensure that they support the needs of current Brooklyn Center residents. b. Work with existing owners and renters to understand what challenges exist within current permitting and regulator processes. c. Enhance existing strategies and policies to better meet the needs of current and prospective residents. 4. Maintain the existing housing stock in primarily single-family neighborhoods through proper ordinances and enforcement. Strategies a. Protect existing neighborhoods through refinement of existing ordinances to ensure compatible uses are permitted, or conditionally permitted. b. Work with existing homeowners and renters to understand current challenges within existing neighborhoods. c. Endorse the update of existing ordinances and regulations to match and address the challenges identified by residents to make neighborhoods more accessible, stable and sustainable long-term 5. Explore opportunities to incorporate new affordable housing into redevelopment areas that promote safe, secure and economically diverse neighborhoods. Strategies DRAFT GOALS & STRATEGIES: IMAGE, LAND USE/REDEVLEOPMENT, HOUSING 9 7/11/2018 Work Sheet a. Recognize the importance of incorporating and integrating protected affordable housing in new projects. b. Encourage developers to incorporate protected affordable housing units within projects through establishment of incentives such as density bonuses or other tools. c. Strengthen existing policies to promote diversity of housing choices within a single project, and throughout all redevelopment areas. Please complete the following for the Housing goals & strategies: #1: Review the Action Word in BOLD within the goal statements; does it reflect the appropriate level of commitment? If not please use the table from the Glossary and suggest changes. #2: Is something missing? Please jot down notes/comments of what you feel should be added. #3: Is something inaccurate, or feels wrong/inconsistent with your vision for Brooklyn Center? City of Brooklyn Center - 2040 Comprehensive Plan Update DRAFT Mixed-Use Concepts MU-O (Mixed-Use Overlay District) Not a Land Use Designation co n s i d e r a t i o n s / n o t e s lo c a t i o n s • Land use is TOD; BRT is impetus for guiding • 1/4-Mile Radius consideration (plus a little) • Intent is to create opportunities for increased diversity of housing with a mix of business • Emphasis on walkable, bike friendly • Equitable development considerations • Zoning emphasizes permitted over CUP/SUP • Land generally within 1/4-mile to 1/2-mile of BRT stop • Extend to more than core? What about southern stops? • Include or exclude any Single Family? Land Use Designation Controls and Regulations Overlay calls attention, “land use designation” will control co n s i d e r a t i o n s / n o t e s lo c a t i o n s • Land use is N-MU in neighborhood nodes, C-MU in job focused/more significant intersections • Focus is on secondary redevelopment sites and neighborhood nodes • Areas outside of TOD designation • Could consider checklist - similar to TOD • Supported through creation of tailored zoning districts (two to three districts) • Neighborhood nodes identified in redevelopment exercise outside of TOD areas • More Commercially dominated nodes, but with opportunities for residential • Other key corners or intersections internal to SF neighborhoods? co n s i d e r a t i o n s / n o t e s lo c a t i o n s • Overlay on Land Use map to denote corridor • Corridor is 500-feet centered on roadway (approximately) • Underlying land use controls; could be N-MU or C-MU • Overlay has set of design principles/considerations, may develop design guidelines, or performance standards within zoning ordinance • Brooklyn Boulevard Corridor • Others? Density: 25 - 75 Dwelling Units Per Acre Density: Controlled by Land Use Designation co n s i d e r a t i o n s / n o t e s lo c a t i o n s • Designation is not intended to provide residential as permitted use; Live-Work may be considered with CUP • Intent is to encourage mix of business uses that could range from light industrial, experience to office and supporting retail and/or service • Create an experience for workers and their patrons • Zoning will include diverse mix of permitted and conditionally permitted uses • Existing Earle Brown conference center area (sup- porting uses such as hotel) • PC Recommendation: Add in light-industrial area north of I-94 (expanded) • Southern edge of City with existing light-industrial users • Others? Density: Residential not a permitted use TOD (Transit Oriented Development) Land Use Designation N-MU & C-MU (Neighborhood Mixed-Use; Commercial Mixed-Use) Land Use Designations B-MU (Business Mixed Use) Land Use Designations Density: 15 - 30 Dwelling Units Per Acre ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾ ¾ ½ ¾ ¾ ½¾¾½¾ ¾ ½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾½¾¾½ ¾¾½ ¾¾¿ ¾¾¿ ¾¾¿ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾¾¿ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾ ¾ ¿ ¾¾¿ ¾¾¿ ¾¾¿ ¾¾¿k k k 56th 8 1 L o g a n 56th 58th H a l i f a x 70th X e r x e s A l d r i c h 6 6 t h 73rd T w i n L a k e 694694 Lakeland 61st L i l a c John M artin H a l i f a x Mumford Y o r k B r o o k l y n B e a r d 73rd R a m p P a l m e r L a k e Z e n i t h Park w ay Freeway Q uail Summit R a m p 1 0 0 48th Nash R a m p 9 4 63rd 64th 47th Ohenry R a m p 51st R a m p H a l i f a x Wilshire 65th D r e w F r a n c e R a m p 70th 53rd 46th R a m p 1 0 0 53rd 56th 1 0 0 7 0 t h 54th Ramp I r v i n g S c o t t Fair vi ew B r o o k d a l e C e n t e r S h i n g l e C r e e k S h i n g l e C r e e k 94 71st 47th Unity L i l a c R a m p 49th W i n g a r d R a m p R a m p Y o r k C a m d e n T o l e d o 52nd N o b l e 4 t h 4 t h K n o x R a m p 65th O r c h a r d 5 t h V e r a C r u z Thurber 2 5 2 6 8th W e st B r o a d w a y Q u a i l U p t o nWashburn 6 6 t h 44 1/2 H u m b o l d t Y o r k A n g e l i n e 67th V e r a C r u z V i n c e n t 58th F r a n c e V e r a C r u z Z e n i t h B e a r d W i l l o w S a il o r A b b o t t K y l e 45th Q u a i l 58th Ramp 61st 70th 67 t h A d a i r 46th 67th 52nd S h e r i d a n A l d ri c h U n i t y M o r g a n L a w r e n c e R u s s e l l 67th Lakeside S h i n g l e C r e e k Lakebreeze 58th 57th Oliver X e r x e s Paul 7 1 s t 60th Q u e e n W e s t R i v e r U p t o n 55th J a m e s N o r t h p o r t 59th 58th Corvallis L i l a c 8 1 N e w t o n 50th I n d i a n a B r o o k d a l e C e n t e r C h o w e n H u m b o l d t T o l e d o 10 L e e Grimes B r o o k d a l e C e n t e r F r e m o n t Orchard R a m p Zane 50th 5 6 t h M i s s i s s i p p i 57th W e l c o m e Ramp 69th E w i n g 57th R a m p P e r r y R a m p D u p o n t Howe L a k e l a n d D r e w P e r r y 68th R a mp 59th 10 F r a n c e D u s h a r m e S c o t t C o l f a x A d a i r 5 5 t h B r u n s w i c k N e w t o n 69th J a m e s Wilshire E m e r s o n F r e m o n t 46th V e r a C r u z 57th W i l l o w R a m p P e n n PalmerLake Eckberg X e rx e s B e a r d El eanor R a m p A d a i r Ramp R a m p 4 5 t h Fairview R e g e n t F r e m o n t X e r x e s T o l e d o 73rd 48th Q u a i l R e g e n t 69th H ills vie w Commodore 6 7 t h 69th R a m p B e a r d D r e w 71st R a m p Lakebreeze T o l e d o V i n c e n t X e n i a R a m p F r a n c e 68th 59 1/2 67th Woodbine W e l c o m e 68th 49 1/2 S h o r e s 50th Eleanor Ramp 68th 60th 72nd D r e w 50th B r y a n t 61st G i r a r d Violet Ramp Y o r k Ramp 56th C a m d e n 51st 57th A d m i r a l A l d r i c h73rd E m e r s o n A d a i r 59th 62nd 47th A l d r i c h Z a n e 68th 68th W e l c o m e 66th 70th N o b l e G r i m e s V e r a C r u z S c o t t J u n e Woodbine 73rd 52nd Fa ir vi e w R a m p 72nd 50th 4 t h Q u a i l L i l a c A d m ir a l 67th Q u a i l 65th 57th 54th Victory Memorial 5 3 r d 64th 70th 47th 51st Urban 71st 68th 62nd 70th 7 2 n d 72nd L a k e K y l e 65th 67th B r o o k v i e w 53rd 56th 72nd 51st 72nd 52nd W e l c o m e 54th 68th A l d r i c h 52nd 61st 58 1/2 71st 60th 46th 60th R a m p F r e m o n t 66th 50th 47th 64th 56th R a m p R a m p H u m b o l d t D u p o n t 48th X e r x e s H a l i f a x F r a n c e 10 B r u n s w i c k S c o t t T h o m a s R a m p X e r x e s L a k e l a n d Z a n e O l i v e r S hin gle C re e k L i l a c O s s e o Ramp E w i n g A b b o t t Y a t e s C a m d e n T w i n L a k e L a k e v i e w R a m p B r u n s w i c k Z e n i t h 70th 66th K n o x L a k e s i d e C h o w e n G r i m e s R a m p U n i t y A z e l i a G r i m e s 7 0 t h A b b o t t R a m p Q u e e n R u s s e l l Ramp L a k e l a n d Brooklyn 64th M a j o r 6 5 t h Q u e e n L y n d a l e W a s h b u r n Adair P e n n O l i v e r D r e w B r o o kly n Osseo Road Frontage P e r r y D r e w 50th B e a r d A d m i r a l 56th 46th N o b l e Q u a i l E w i n g P e r r y 53rd F r a n c e I n d i a n a T o l e d o S c o t t T o l e d o D r e w T w i n L a k e U n i t y Z a n e R a m p R a m p K y l e Colorado H u m b o l d t Ramp 70th 73rd 71st P e r r y 64th L o g a n Ra m p Century Z e n i t h Crystal Airport M a j o r B r y a n t C o l f a x X e r x e s D a l l a s J a m e s H u m b o l d t 71st I r v i n g P e r r y R a m p Ramp 73rd 69th G i r a r d 55 t h B r u n s w i c k N o r t h p o r t R a m p B e a r d Y a t e s 49th Bellvue Ponds James I n d i a n a R a m p 47th 2 5 2 L i l a c C r y s t a l A i r p o r t I n d i a n a 73rd 7 1 s t 49th R a m p Ir ving J a m e s Ericon P e r r y 694 Q u a i l 694 O r c h a r d R a m p 67th 68th T o l e d o H a l i f a x L e e N o b l e G i r a r d E w i n g U p t o n P e r r y F r e m o n t P e r r y K n o x K n o x R u s s e l l Q u a i l M a j o r S c o t t P e n n R e g e n t K a t h r e n e 72nd O l i v e r Angeline C o l f a x 6 t h M i s s i s s i p p i A l d r i c h C o l f a x 4 t h K y l e J a m e s G r i m e s C h o w e n O r c h a r d E m e r s o n I r v i n g L o g a n H a l i f a x A l d r i c h N e w t o n A l d r i c h O l i v e r M o r g a n B r y a n t Winchester K n o x 66th M o r g a n V i n c e n t E w i n g M a j o r X e n i a Z a n e L o g a n Y a t e s W a s h b u r n N e w t o n X e r x e s T h o m a s S h e r i d a n M a j o r D r e w Q u a i l T o l e d o O r c h a r d G r e a t V i e w R i v e r w o o d H u m b o l d t E w i n g 65th C a m d e n R e g e n t C o l f a x J u n e R e g e n t X e n i a 48th U n i t y Lakeside L a k e l a n d L a k e C u r v e G r i m e s 54th W e l c o m e 47thByron Northway 53rd M o r g a n 6 6 t h 57th Bernard Corvallis 48th Poe U n i t y P e n n 56th U p t o n Burquest O r c h a r d R i v e r d a l e Boulder 46th 62nd C a m d e n Lilac G i r a r d G i r a r d J u d y 51st R a m p B r o o k l y n Oak H a l i f a x R a m p P e r r y Q u a i l B r o o k l y n R a m p M a r l i n L e e Lawrence Northway R a m p E a r l e B r o w n R a m p D a l l a s Amy 72nd Woodbine 51st 6 3 r d 94 B r o o k l y n O r c h a r d J u n e I n d i a n a B r o o k l y n B o u l e v a r d F r o n t a g e 94 P e r r y Q u a i l R e g e n t V i n c e n t C a m d e n 68th 4 t h E m e r s o n E w i n g R a m p L i l a c L a k e la n d N o b l e 9 4 M o r g a n R a m p V e r a C r u z J a m e s L e e L y n d a l e L y n d a l e 67th Ramp Joyce Janet D r e w E a s t L y n d a l e 62nd 66th Quarles Ramp Winchester H a n s o n R a m p R a m p 72nd R a m p Woodbine T w i n L a k e R a m p P e a r s o n L i l a c R a mp S c o t t Palmer T w i n Ryan T w i n M i s s i s s i p p i T w i n Brooklyn Center Brooklyn Park B r o o k l y n C e n t e r B r o o k l y n P a r k B r o o k l y n C e n t e r C r y s t a l B r o o k l y n C e n t e r F r i d l e y Brooklyn Center Robbinsdale Brooklyn Center Minneapolis Brooklyn Park Crystal B r o o k l y n P a r k F r i d l e y Crystal Robbinsdale F r i d l e y M i n n e a p o l i s F Land Use Designatio ns 2040 Mixed-Use Areas Transit Oriented Development (TOD) Neighborhood Mixed Use Commercial Mixed Use Business Mixed Use Parcels - Not Mixed-Use Brooklyn Blvd Overlay District k Planned C-Line Transit Stops ¾¾¿Planned C-Line BRT Route ¾¾½Hennepin County Bikeway System Regional Trails 0 1,200 2,400 3,600 4,800600 Feet F DRAFT Source: MnGEO, Metropolitan Council, Brooklyn Center, SHC 100 100 252 94 94 COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:7/23/2018 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M: S UBJ EC T:F uture O ngoing Items Recommendation: Background: 2040 Comprehensive Plan Discussion REQUEST: 1.Review Draft Goals and Strategies and provide input 2.Discuss the Draft Future Land Use Designations and Map and provide input 7/23/2018 City Council Work Session Meeting Goals and Strategies For each of the draft Goals and Strategy sections: Review the Action Word in BOLDwithin the goal statements; does it reflect  the appropriate level of commitment? If not please use the table from the Glossary and suggest changes. Is something missing? Please jot down notes/comments of what you feel  should be added. Is something inaccurate, or feels wrong/inconsistent with your vision for  Brooklyn Center? Draft Mixed Use Concepts Draft Future Land Use Draft Future Land Use Map On the Draft Future Land Use Map: Are any sites missing from those identified on the draft map?  Are there sites included that should not be?  Look at the Brooklyn Boulevard Overlay District/Corridor –how  wide should the corridor be? Should it include only properties with frontage on the roadway? Or should it be more encompassing? If you could identify only one characteristic/consideration/element  for each land use designation what would it be? TOD  Neighborhood Mixed Use  Commercial Mixed Use  Business Mixed Use 