HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018 11-13 PRAAGENDA
Brooklyn Center Parks and Recreation Commission
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
Room #221, Brooklyn Center Community Center
1. Call to Order 6: 30 p.m.
2. Roll Call
3. Approval of Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes- October 16, 2018
5. City Council Liaison Report
6. New Business
- Freeway Park- Master Planning Process
- 2018 Holly Sunday Activities
7. Old Business
- Comprehensive Plan- Implementation Chapter/Commissioner Comments?
- Little League Improvements— Update
8. Other
9. Set Next Meeting Date and Agenda
(January 15, 2019)
10. Adjournment
MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION
FOR THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE
STATE OF MINNESOTA
REGULAR SESSION
OCTOBER 16, 2017
COMMUNITY ROOM #221, COMMUNITY CENTER
CALL TO ORDER
Chair Sorenson called the meeting to order at 6:30 pm.
ROLL CALL
Chair Sorenson and Commissioners Bonovsky, Dalton, Ebert, Shinnick, Thorbus and Witalka
were present. Also present was City Council Liaison April Graves and Community Activities,
Recreation & Services Director Jim Glasoe.
APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Chair Sorenson asked if there were any additions or changes to the proposed agenda.
By consensus, the agenda was approved as presented.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES — September 18, 2018
Commissioners Witalka and Dalton noted minor typographical errors.
There was a motion by Commissioner Shinnick, seconded by Commissioner Witalka to approve
the minutes of the September 18, 2018 meeting of the Park & Recreation Commission as
amended. The motion passed unanimously.
COUNCIL LIAISON REPORT
Councilmember Graves reported the City Council had approved a community beautification and
art initiative and noted one of the first projects involved the streetlight banners. Councilmember
Graves noted that pictures of actual residents would be used, with youth being designated as the
"Hope" for the Community, adults as the "Heart" and seniors as the "Wisdom" of Brooklyn
Center.
Councilmember Graves continued noting the City Council had approved changes to the rental
licensing process and ordinance, noting the changes streamlined the process.
Councilmember Grave also reported changes to the parking restrictions when snowfall exceeded
2.5 inches or greater. Councilmember Graves noted the associated ticketing and towing of
vehicles might adversely affect some of our lower income residents. Commissioners asked how
the city would inform the residents when the snow met the plowing threshold.
2019-2033 PARKS CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN
CARS Director Glasoe noted this item had been on the September agenda and that he would be
looking for a specific recommendation on the parks CIP plan at tonight's meeting.
After some discussion, there was a motion by Commissioner Dalton, seconded by Commissioner
Ebert to recommend the City Council approve the proposed 2019-2033 parks portion of the
Capital Improvements Plan as written. The motion passed unanimously.
2040 DRAFT COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE -PARKS CHAPTER
CARS Director Glasoe reported the City Council had approved a draft of the 2040
Comprehensive Plan update and had authorized it being sent out for public comment. Mr.
Glasoe noted the comment period would last and included soliciting comments from residents, as
well as neighboring communities.
CARS Director Glasoe continued that the Parks Chapter was only a small part of the document
and that he encouraged the Commissioners to review the entire draft at
http://brooklynceliterplan2O4O.com.
Chair Sorenson noted that some of the trail maps appeared to be older versions. Commissioner
Dalton indicated the map of the Three Rivers Trails noted the 57`x' Avenue trail as still proposed,
even though construction had been completed.
CARS Director Glasoe responded that the City Council was looking for big picture and small
comments/corrections, so the document could accurately reflect the direction of the city. Mr.
Glasoe noted that he would be happy to take any comments from the Commissioners and pass
them along to City Council.
DOG PARK -POTENTIAL LOCATIONS
CARS Director Glasoe reported that Commissioner Ebert had reminded him about continuing
the discussion regarding a dog park and potential locations.
Commissioner Bonovsky indicated he had visited a number of locations and found Kylawn Park
and Centennial Park to have the most potential. Commissioners discussed each location, noting
parking, proximity to housing and access to each.
Commissioner Thorbus indicated she was not convinced of the need for an off leash dog park,
noting that Brooklyn Park and Crystal each had one very close to Brooklyn Center.
After additional conversation, Commission consensus was to have staff examine both the
Kylawn and Centennial locations and report back the Commission with cost estimates and a
recommendation.
LITTLE LEAGUE IMPROVEMENTS- UPDATE
CARS Director Glasoe reviewed the progress on the Little League improvements, noting that the
re -grading of existing fields, construction of a new t -ball field, replacement of all ball field
fencing, parking lot sealcoating and irrigation updates had been completed.
Mr. Glasoe added, work on the rehabilitation of the concession/storage building was set to begin
this week or next.
ICE RINK WARMING HOUSES
CARS Director Glasoe reported that following the ice rink discussion at the last meeting he had
shared the Commission consensus with Streets & Parks Supervisor Todd Berg and noted staff
had a follow up conversation regarding warming houses.
Mr. Glasoe continued that while warming houses were still planned for Evergreen and West
Centennial Parks, staff was recommending staffing the warming houses on Friday nights,
Saturday and Sundays. Mr. Glasoe noted the attendance figures for weekday visits for the last
couple of years did not warrant staffing.
The Commission discussed the issue and the consensus was that the staffing plan acceptable
given the skating rink attendance numbers.
OTHER
Councilmember Graves indicated she had noticed the "Nice Ride" bikes and scooters in a
neighboring community and wondered about Commission interest in having them in Brooklyn
Center. Commissioners discussed the idea and noted the apparent success of the program in
other areas.
CARS Director Glasoe suggested Councilmember Graves contact Assistant City Manager Reggie
Edwards, as he has hosted a meeting with the bicycle share folks within the past year.
Commissioner Bonovsky asked about the reason for the removal of the decorative crosswalks on
Bass lake Road. CARS Director Glasoe indicated he was not aware, but would ask.
Chair Sorenson reported the crosswalk at 69t" Avenue and Perry was dangerous as a result of
vehicle speed and vehicle passing on the right.
SET NEXT MEETING DATE
By consensus, the next meeting of the Park and Recreation Commission was set for November
13th, 2017 at 6;30 p.m.
MEETING ADJOURNED
A motion was made by Commissioner Shinnick, seconded by Commissioner Bonovsky to
adjourn the meeting at 7:34 p.m. The motion passed unanimously.
J�.
PLANNING DESIGN SERVICES
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FREEWAY PARK
MASTER PLAN
ARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
Doran,
Having a variety of public parks and outdoor recreation areas is a simple way to improve
the health and happiness of City residents, However, to implement new parks requires
the services of a firm with expertise in a wide range of disciplines, and the City of
Brooklyn Center will need a committed partner to see through the development of a
master- plan for the Freeway Park project ISG is eager to take on this role and help the
City determine its options for the Pari.
ISG understands the City has a long-term lease with the adjacent cemetery to use the
space as paridand, With the cemetery wanting to expand and end the lease, ISG is
prepared to help the City identify how much space it needs for the parkland and how
much land the cemetery will be able to use to expand as a result. ISG will provide this
information so the City can be informed during the updates to the City's lease of the
land.
For the development of a master plan, ISG offers a number of key advantages, including
the following:
• Parks Experience, ISG has developed master plans for a number of parrs across
Minnesota and the Midwest. ISG can determine the best amenities for parks while
considering growing communities' needs for the future,
• Multi -Disciplinary Resources. ISG offers a full range of resources and expertise, with
280+ professionals backing the project team, Because ISG is a full-service firm, the
team can draw on a deep well of architectural and electrical engineering expertise to
fully determine the Park's needs,
• Community Engagement, Public support and input is integral to producing a quality
master plan. With assistance from the marketing team, ISG will spearhead the
creation of activities, forums, and materials that are intended to get feedback from
the community and forge consensus for the future of Freeway Pari,
• Responsive Team. The team assembled for this project is well equipped to take on
this project and will serve as committed partners to the City. ISG will tend to any of
the City's needs and the firms close proximity to Brooklyn Center means the team
can provide in-person support
ISG is excited about the opportunity to bring a new park to the Brooklyn Center
community, We look forward to providing the City with responsive service, a
collaborative approach, and timely delivery,
Sincerely,
Amanda Prosser, PLA, CPSI
Associate Principal + Practice Group Leader
7900 International Dive f Suite 550 Minneapolis, MN 55125 : 5952426.0699 www,is•gp.com
1 _) r . 7. .J I rf �� '° $ E ", C�
With the cemetery looking to expand, ISG will help the City identify how much space
will be needed for the parkland. With the firm's wide range of experts, ISG and the
City will work together to develop a master plan to facilitate updates to the lease with
the Mound Cemetery Association, ISG's familiarity with the area and its residents will
help the City determine how much parkland will be needed in the future.
ISG's plans will incorporate the ever-changing nature of this community. Because
the neighborhood is highly transitional with older residents selling their homes and
younger, diverse families moving in, the Master Plan needs to reflect these changing
demographics. Few improvements over the years and isolation with major freeways
surrounding the park mean that it has not been used to its full potential. ISG's
proposed improvements will consider the changing demographics to ensure that the
Park is used fully in the future.
The major shift in demographics over the last 5-10 years means that demands and
requests for parks and recreation facilities and features are also changing. ISG will
consult with community members and the City to identify what kinds of amenities
will be used in the future and how much parkland it will take to facilitate them. This
project is about delivering what this growing and changing community wants and
needs moving forward,
Ballfield
Play area
Open-air picnic shelter
Portable restroom
Basketball court
Trails
Parking lots
Identify parkland needed for
future use of the Park
Update park amenities/facilities to
fulfill community wants/needs
Introduce new types of
recreation features
Revitalize space
Ensure long-term nature
of the City's lease
Allow for universal use
Embrace character of the area
Provide multi -modal opportunities
PAGE 2 WWW.IS-GRP.COM
t 1 V f �) I �'J
f . ,3
Familiar with the location and community, ISG has developed some
preliminary opportunities for the Freeway Park site, This space
provides many opportunities for improvements that inspire community
engagement, and the aerial below outlines some possible improvements
ISG could bring to the park, Moreover, the list to the right provides more
WWW.IS-GRP:COIvI
Protection of existing mature trees
EADA -compliant future amenities
and accessible routes to all
existing activities within the Park
Appropriate safety surfacing and
ADA connections for all play areas
Collaboration with local artists and MNDOT
to integrate a mural along the sound wall
EVI Centrally located pavilion/parking
area for maximum buffer and equal access
for neighbors to east and west of Park
EInternal trail loop system and/or multiple loops
ESocial/gathering and seating
areas throughout the Park
Central lawn that can be used for
multiple activities and integration of
native/pollinator plantings in remaining Park
areas to minimize mowing and maintenance
E' Safety measures, including clear sight lines
across the Park, adequate lighting, and a
good trail/driveway system
for quick police scans
DV Adoption of a Park cleanup
day for the adjacent residents
F/J Educational signage kiosks
Activities for all demographics,
ages, and abilities
PAGE 3
The Plan is intended to serve as a guide for future decision-making, balancing demands and opportunities and providing a framework
for evaluating land development and programming. Understanding process, organization, accountability, and schedule all play a critical
role in the overall plan, ISG will follow the strategic work plan outlined below, which provides a high-level snapshot of services and
deliverables.
The project team will collect and review existing planning documents available from City O
staff, aerial photographs, topographic maps, utility data, and other pertinent documents to
conduct a thorough evaluation of the project site. Areas of observation are anticipated to
include the following;
DILIVERABLES
• General state and condition
• Aesthetics and design Inventory and analysis map
Preliminary list of concems,
• Compatibility with user groups opportunities, and potential recreation/
• Public access and parking Facility program
• Program capacity Meeting summary
• Safety and security Site visit +kickoff meeting
• Connectivity
• Review of current amenities
• Environmental review
• Water quality improvement opportunities
• Relationship to adjacent land uses (specifically the cemetery and Interstate 94)
ISG will facilitate a Site Visit + Kickoff Meeting with City Staff, Community Activities, Recreation, and Services (CARS) staff, and
representatives of the Mound Cemetery Association, The goal of the kickoff meeting will be to confirm project schedule, key
stakeholders, approach to Community Engagement, and to facilitate a visioning session with the group, including documentation of the
items listed above,
PAGE 4 WWW,IS-GRP.COM
PROJECT SCOPE
Based on information obtained from Step One, ISG will develop up to three concept
plans. To convey the overall design character and intent, the plans created will address the a
following: (A
• Circulation routes and connections to adjacent roads, parks (including Palmer Lake D .. I
Park), trails, parking areas, and other proposed park amenities
• Placement of proposed features and their integration with the site, including but not
Three concept plans (including revisions
following the stakeholder meeting)
limited to, play areas, buildings, storage space, open lawn areas, etc.
High-level cost estimates
• Relationship to the adjacent cemetery, interstate, and residences
High-level phasing options
• Area of impact (for use in updating the lease agreement with the cemetery)
Stakeholder meeting
ISG will also analyze and take into consideration any utilities and stormwater requirements
Public input meeting (including a print
Upon the conclusion of the development of concept plans, a meeting with stakeholders
and electronic meeting invite that the
will be held to review the concepts. The goal of this meeting will be to gather- preliminary
City can use to promote the input
meeting)
feedback and to ensure the City is onboard with the proposed concepts. After the
stakeholder meeting minor adjustments will be made to the plans, if necessary, in
Meeting summaries
preparation of sharing with the public. A public input meeting (at a location near the
neighborhood would be preferred) will be held to present the comments and gather feedback
from residents.
After the public input meeting, a preliminary preferred design plan will be developed
based upon the preference for alternative concepts or the combination of portions of each
concept. The plan will represent the design solution that best responds to the needs and
desires of the stakeholders and community. _
Upon conclusion of the development of preliminary preferred design plans, ISG will share
the documents with City staff electronically for review and comment. If requested, any
major adjustments will be made to the plans, if necessary, in preparation of sharing with the
public,
A public input meeting (at a location near the neighborhood would be preferred) will
be held to present the comments and gather feedback from residents. The plan will be
updated based on the feedback and the cost estimates and phasing plan will be updated as
necessary. Upon approval of the final preferred design plan, an electronic copy of all final
project documents in report format will be provided.
One preferred plan exhibit
One comprehensive edit to the
preferred plan package
Final prefened plan package
Preferred plan
Phasing plan
Final cost estimate
Summary of meeting discussions and
public input
Final preferred plan package to be
complete by March 1, 2019
WWW.IS-GRP.CONI PAGE 5
Project Leadership
Amanda Prosser PLA, CPSI will serve as Project Manager for the Freeway Park
Amanda Prosser, PLA, CPSI
Master Plan development effort. Amanda will also serve as the main point of contact
P P
Associate Principal,
advocating on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center in all matters, protecting the
Practice Group Leader -
vision for the Park's future, and providing a global perspective across each unique
discipline. Through the multi -disciplinary expertise of ISG's full project team, the City
can be confident in the integrity, accuracy, and full consideration guiding designs for the
PROJECT
park.
RESOURCES
Patrick O'Keefe
Landscape Designer
Multi -Disciplinary Team
Rather than reaching out for landscape architecture, environmental, civil engineering.
Tara Ketchum, AIA
Architect
and other design assistance to ensure balance across all project planning components
are maintained, ISG's full-service team will streamline project processes and foster
Andy Brandel, PE
Vice President
cohesive efforts. At any point during this comprehensive planning project, ISG is
able to seamlessly pull resources from a team of 280+ professionals in fields like
Travis Fristed, PWS
architecture and electrical engineering to provide cross -disciplinary guidance, This
Associate Principal, Practice Group
Leader
will prove invaluable by providing all services through a single partner with complete
project involvement.
Laura Sinn
Graphic Designer
Contingency Plans
ISG is a growing firm, and building in strategies to remain agile throughout the course
of each project has been key to that growth. Should Amanda become unavailable
throughout the course of the project, the City will maintain local contacts within ISG
and work directly with Landscape Designer, Patrick O'Keefe, or Vice President and
PAGE 6 WWW.IS-GRP,COM
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Landscape
Architecture; Bachelor of
Environmental Design, North
Dakota State University -
Fargo, ND
LICENSE
MN License #46766
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL, PRACTICE
GROUP LEADER
Amanda serves as the leader of ISG's park and open space
systems planning projects, and has designed a wide range of
park, trail, and urban greenspace amenities. Working for a variety
of cities and counties throughout the Midwest has familiarized
Amanda with various governmental regulatory standards, planning
best practices, and unique design strategies that she integrates into
these central community projects.
Dedicated to providing effective communication, Amanda enjoys
receiving and responding to various stakeholder requests during
master planning efforts, ensuring that the end product supports
a cohesive vision for each community's parks and recreation
system as a whole, She is continually looking for opportunities
to easily integrate active recreation into the daily routines of
community members, creating positive outdoor opportunities
while promoting healthy lifestyles for project users.
LANDSCAPE DESIGNER
Patrick looks at landscape architecture as the design of
experiences, considering how individuals will move through and
interact with an outdoor space, His main areas of expertise are
in park design, urban design, and waterfronts, where he does
design work, construction documentation, client interaction, and is
involved in the design and development process.
PROJECT TEAM
RECENT
PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
East Medicine Lake Park
Site Plan
Plymouth, MN
Glen Park Improvements
River Falls, WI
Keyes Park Master Plan
Columbia Heights, MN
Rockford Veterans
Memorial
Rockfovf, MN
City of Rogers
Comprehensive Parks,
Open Spaces, and Trail
System Plan
Rogers, MN
RECENT
PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
Rogers Park System Plan
Rogers, MN
Cowley Lake Park
Rogers, MN
Triangle Park
Rogers, MN
The Bluffs Traverse
Master Plan
Winona, MN
Jefferson Quarry
Master Plan
Mankato, MN
Lake Washington
Regional Park
Le Sueur County, MN
WWW.IS-GRP.COM PAGE 7
PROJECT TEAM
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Architecture,
University of Minnesota -
Minneapolis, MN; Master of
Architecture, University of
Oregon, Eugene - Eugene, OR
LICENSE
MN Registration #54011
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Civil Engineering,
University of Minnesota
- Minneapolis, MN
LICENSE
MN Registration #47078
ARCHITECT
Tara is a creative designer who enjoys developing innovative
solutions to combine a client's needs together with existing
site conditions. A detail -oriented problem solver, Tara likes to
design ways to bring all of the client's needs together into one
cohesive plan. Tara has a broad range of project experience
including educational, hospitality, commercial, religious, sports
and recreation facilities. She brings a fresh approach and insights
from each of these experiences to every new project.
❑ ❑ �.ir.. flit s .bill
0 ,� 4 https;//bit.ly/2BZUogf
❑!
VICE PRESIDENT
As a responsive professional who brings a comprehensive civil
engineering background to each project, Andy commits to
representing the best interest of each client. Showcasing his
abilities, he leads ISG's Minneapolis/St. Paul office, a position he
was appointed in recognition of his natural leadership skills and
dedicated professionalism. Andy's extensive civil engineering
portfolio also includes studies, planning, and design for park
infrastructure improvement projects, In addition, Andy works
closely with government entities to provide feasibility studies and
recommendations for transportation and utility extension projects.
RECENT
PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
Bethany College Athletic
Fieldhouse
Mankato, MN
Umore Park
Rosemount, MN
East Medicine Lake Park
Plymouth, MN
Hammer Athletic
Complex
Albert Lea, MN
RECENT
PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
East Medicine Lake Park
Site Plan
Plymouth, MN
Lake Washington
Regional Park Site Plan
Le Sueur, MN
Minnesota River
Valley Recreation +
Conservation Plan
Redwood + Renville
Counties, MN
Faribault Soccer Complex
Design
Fanbault, MN
PAGE 8 WWW,IS-GRP.COM
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Science
in Ecology, Minor in
Environmental Science,
Minnesota State University,
Mankato - Mankato, MN
LICENSE
Professional Wetland
Scientist; Registration #2360
EDUCATION
Bachelor of Arts in
Graphic Design, University
of Wisconsin, Stout -
Menomonie, WI
ASSOCIATE PRINCIPAL,
PRACTICE GROUP LEADER
Managing complex environmental projects for a wide variety
of public and private clients, Travis routinely works with
engineers to identify and minimize impacts in the planning
stage. In addition, Travis helps contractors and construction
managers address environmental compliance in the field to
ensure safe and responsible construction operations.
Travis brings a working knowledge of regulatory permitting
with local, state, and federal agencies that makes him an
invaluable resource for clients as they navigate complex
compliance structures. Travis' project experience includes
stormwater management, wetlands, natural resource evaluations,
compliance inspections, and plan development for everything
from rural trail development to urban park infrastructure,
GRAPHIC DESIGNER
Laura has a wide range of experience as a graphic designer
and visual leader, having produced a wide variety of custom
products and digital illustrations. Laura has worked on several
projects at ISG, which include branding and promotional materials
intended to engage the public and build informed consensus,
PROJECT TEAM
RECENT
PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
Arborist Consulting
Services
Washington County, MN
Dean Parkway Trail
Improvements
Minneapolis, 111N
Mississippi River Regional
Trail
Dakota County, MN
Minnesota OHV Park
EAW
Renville County, MN
Lake Minnewashta
Regional Park
Carver County, MN
RECENT
PROJECT
EXPERIENCE
City of Rogers
Comprehensive Parks,
Open Spaces, and Trail
System Plan
Rogers, MN
Levee Park + Main Street
Master Plan
Winona, MN
Lake Washington
Regional Park Site Plan
Le Sueur. MN
WWW.IS-GRP.COM PAGE 9
A
The following table outlines the task -by -task summary of the Project Scope, including an hourly breakdown of each ISG team member.
13asemap (-ollecton anci ueveiopment
b
U
V?
Kickoff/Visioning Meeting with City + Stakeholders
6
6
12
Three Concept Plans
12
40 12
2 2 2 70
Preliminary Cost Estimates
4
4 1
1 10
Phasing Options
2
2
4
City + Stakeholder Meeting
6
6 1
13
Public Input Meefing
6
6 1
2 15
4.0
Preferred Plan
12
16 8
1 1 1 39
Final Cost Estimate
4
4 2
10
Phasing Plan
2
8
1 11
Summary of Meetings and Input
1
6 1
8
City + Stakeholder Meeting
3
3 1
7
Public Input Meeting
3
3 1
2 9
sm
EM EMOMMMOMOM
PAGE 10
WWW,IS-GRP,COt'i
INVENTORY, ANALYSIS, AND VISIONING
COMMITMENT TO COMMUNICATION
PREFERRED PLAN DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPT PLAN DEVELOPMENT
ISG fully understands the importance of client communication - so much, in fact, that we continue to refine and customize the firm's
approach to maintaining and nurturing positive coordination with each individual client. The graphic below represents a general flow
of communication and project progress reports from initial project kick-off through to close-out and post occupancy follow-up.
PLANNING/ENGAGEMENT
SCHEMATIC DESIGN
PUNWIIINBUJIJINI
I'1' a Imr, ;nr,,10'-. 11,1'., ."s,,, _. ,,, i, A" PI�,s
CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS
BIDDING PHASE
RD ORTfhIG ♦ fEE D[ttb.v 1 CHEI IT TO JAKEHOLGER SI.IPPORT
CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
O P...lnrh.lhrn7 o f I'd 1--1 F'r. .,.. o Proyr i Pr, -i-11 InsrGut
OpPorlondrec i lamisnun�e f + P.illn.. up
6rrl�cll t 6�.Ea�.�m.'ni -� ,a rnlem
1_l1iPo,i inrlres _
nun
KEY FOCAL POINTS
Community engagement
Stormwater management
Aesthetic/sustainable balance
CONTACT
Kevin Hansen
nirartnr of R ihlir Wnrlrc
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
COLUMBIA HEIGHTS, MN
Keyes Park has been a neighborhood destination in the Columbia Heights community
for years, The City of Columbia Heights desired to make improvements to the Park '
and partnered with ISG to develop a master- plan for the renovations. ISG led a
process to gather input from the local residents to determine the wants and needs of
the community directly impacted by park upgrades were, ensuring a positive reception
and optimal use.
Through a highly collaborative project approach, ISG carefully reviewed individual
design components and provided sound solutions that positively impact the Park.
The result was a master plan that combined critical stormwater management features
into park amenities that were identified as valuable to the residents. The master plan
integrated the aesthetic eye of landscape architects and sustainable technical services
of engineers to provide the City with a plan for improvements that offer additional
environmental benefits to the entire neighborhood.
ROGERS, MN
ISG provided a updates to the City of Rogers' existing Master Plan for the parks
within the City's system. The plans created in this project were integrated into
the 2017 Park, Trails, and Open Space System Plan that the City was updating.
The updates considered four parks, and provided key improvements the City can
implement in the future. Considering the different sizes and primary uses for each
of the four parks, ISG developed individual plans for each space based on public
input gained through different community engagement efforts.
KEY FOCAL POINTS
Multi -modal integration
Funding strategies
Highway + metro connection
Contemporary design/planning
CONTACT
John Seifert
Public Works Director
City of Rogers
jseifert@rogersmn.gov
763.428.8580
WWW,IS-GRP.COIrI PAGE 17
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
KEY FOCAL POINTS
City review and collaboration
Improved wayfinding, lighting, and
visitor- accessibility
Regional trail connection
U.S. Army Corps of Engineering
permitting coordination
CONTACT
Chad Ubl
Community Services Director/
Assistant City Manager
City of Winona
cubl@ci.winona.mn.us
507.457.8258
WINONA, MN
After decades of fractured attempts and citizen demands to remodel Levee Park, which
overlooks the Mississippi River, the City of Winona spurred these dreams into action
by dedicating $2.2 million to the project in 2016. Providing a functional and aesthetic
space within budget for community members was a primary concern from the onset.
Cost estimates, phased planning, and construction administration ensured that proposed
changes could be completed within budgetary confines. A major feature of Levee Park
was the construction of an elevated plaza with both indoor and outdoor usage. The
elevated design created a sloped lawn that permitted seating for up to 390 individuals.
The upper portion of the plaza can accommodate 485 additional individuals, and was
also designed to accommodate an outdoor amphitheater and dining area. Throughout
the park, wayfinding, lighting, and visitor accessibility were improved to enhance the
visitor experience and make the Park easy to navigate. Bike paths were also added to
preexisting ones, linking visitors to larger regional and state trails. Changes were also
made to surrounding areas, such as mapping out parking on Main Street and adding
vegetation to the railroad corridor, and a gateway park entrance was added.
Following initial research, a site visit to the current Park, followed by an in-person
meeting with City staff, solidified an understanding of the project. The City was also
consulted during the schematic design process and three feasible options of updating
Levee Park were presented to the City Council.
FJJ
PAGE 18 WWW.IS-GRP.COM
PROJECT EXPERIENCE
- Ftiv%,ir trobPx,.l
og
L,_un„ivre•v55 L
, x.,erts vvn��T
a cP tn% sH stgo5yr
WWW,IS-GRP.COM PAGE 19
,
r.i
x
rr _
t
got
At:.
■
A,
,.Vn ,
a .
'WO
-Irs
n
v.
fr ��iiL�rr
m "
• � .. .. -' ,'. � � fiee, �' yy m. �. `�... �
p,
Co
,
t
m
_ _ T
�r
� E
• t r
owl..
VN
wow ft
it
�r
r �
F � a
f 4
L
•
w A
v#
i w s
m
�' " � '�• a =- `�-v..,..�.€,r. _ ��Q ¢k �r ;6''
� � , � � ��. • ��,�..-,.ti ``nom �� ��
z
• fl • i ' � ��� l, R �
r s �
DRAFT Revised 9/21/2018
IMPLEMENTATION CHAPTER
Description & Annotated Outline for Discussion
Introduction
This chapter is a critical part of the Comprehensive Plan Update process providing a roadmap
for the City of next steps and implementation strategies to help bring this Plan to reality. The
implementation strategies contained in subsequent sections of this Plan are specific to the
chapters, goals and strategies, and feedback heard throughout this planning process.
Throughout this planning process consistent themes and messaging emerged that became the
foundation for plan development, including the implementation strategies found in this chapter.
At key milestones in this process the City solicited targeted feedback from residents,
stakeholders, commission members and the City Council in an effort to establish Brooklyn
Center's top priorities for the next 10 — 20 years. The following top priorities, including those
characteristics of the community that are important to maintain, emerged from the planning
process (unordered):
• Our location is exceptional but a consistent brand for the community has yet to be
recognizable in the region since Brookdale closed. We have an opportunity to reimagine
and redevelop this area — we have to design and implement a plan that is innovative,
forward thinking and creative.
• Brooklyn Center's population is diverse and will be into the future. The City should
embrace its diversity and use it as a differentiator that makes the City a desirable,
exciting and vibrant place to live, work, and recreate.
• Creating an economically competitive, accessible and stable business climate is
important to developing a stable, vibrant and sustainable community long-term.
• Brooklyn Center's accessible regional location in conjunction with the available
redevelopment areas in the center city provide an opportunity to create a dynamic and
vibrant sub -regional job center that provides employment opportunities to the City's
residents and the larger region.
• Our youth is our future and we need to focus on their needs today, and in the future. We
should partner with schools, work -programs, public and private post -secondary
institutions to ensure kids have opportunities to work and live in the City as they become
adults.
• The City's housing stock is aging and lacks economic diversity. We need to find ways to
integrate a range of housing types, sizes, affordability, and market rate into
redevelopment to expand the choices available to new and existing residents.
• We need to establish clear standards and regulations for areas designated or identified
for redevelopment. It is important to consider massing, setbacks, relationship with
existing homes, open spaces, trails, and natural resources.
• We should capitalize on the transit improvements, particularly the C -Line, that could be
an amenity to any new development in the center city if designed and planned for
appropriately.
The City should establish and enhance key relationships with partner agencies such as
Metropolitan Council, DEED, MnDNR, Three Rivers Park District and Hennepin County
to create a more integrated region that provides improved connections within the City
and to the region.
Safety of transit users was repeatedly mentioned particularly for users that would like to
use the main transit station in the community. Community members identified concerns
such as loitering, lighting, accessibility, and lack of consistency with routes as concerns.
This transit 'hub' will likely become busier as the C -Line opens, and it is important for
the City to partner with Metro Transit to plan for this station to ensure residents feel
comfortable and safe at the station.
Based on these guiding priorities and principles the following implementation strategies were
derived. Most chapters' implementation strategies can be found in the following sections with
the exception of some the Housing Implementation Strategies that are partially included within
the individual chapter for consistency with the Metropolitan Council's checklist.
The following implementation strategies are meant to identify a set of high-level steps and
considerations that will help guide the City to achieve the goals and objectives of this Plan. The
strategies are not all encompassing, but instead are meant to serve as a guide and roadmap to
describe the methods, steps and types of questions the City will tackle throughout this planning
period. Just as this list may not include every strategy, Brooklyn Center may not complete
every strategy on this list based on market dynamics or other external factors. But generally the
City will use the following strategies as a guide to work towards implementing the Vision and
Goals that this Plan has established for the City as it continues to evolve and change into 2040.
Capital Improvement Plan
The Capital Improvement Plan is a flexible plan based upon long-range physical planning and
financial projections, which schedules the major public improvements that may be incurred by
the City over the next five years. Flexibility of the Capital Improvement Plan is established
through annual review, and revision if necessary. The annual review assures that the program
will become a continuing part of the budgetary process and that it will be consistent with
changing demands as well as changing patterns in cost and financial resources. Funds are
appropriated only for the first year of the program, which is then included in the annual budget.
The Capital Improvement Plan serves as a tool for implementing certain aspects of the City's
comprehensive plan; therefore, the program describes the overall objectives of City
development, the relationship between projects with respect to timing and need, and the City's
fiscal capabilities.
The full Capital Improvement Plan is available at Brooklyn Center City Hall and on the City's
website. It is also included as an appendix to the Comprehensive Plan. Specific implementation
strategies for water, sewer and transportation infrastructure are also described in those
chapters.
Chapter 3: Land Use, Redevelopment and Economic Competitiveness
The following list of Implementation Strategies is provided as a guide to implement the goals
and strategies identified in Chapter 2 of this Comprehensive Plan Update.
Land Use
1. The City will complete a full update of its zoning ordinance to support the modified land
use designations identified on the Future Land Use Plan.
a. The update at a minimum will include a full review of all residential, commercial,
and industrial zoning classifications that consider the following:
i. Setbacks
ii. Parking
iii. Height Restrictions
iv. Coverage
v. Performance Standards
vi. Permitted/Un-permitted Uses
vii. Conditional Uses
viii. Accessory Structures/Uses
ix. Fencing/Screening
b. To support the individual zoning district update process, a full review of the City
Code as it may pertain to the administration of the Zoning Code will be
completed. This process may result in changes and updates or may find that
the existing ordinances are adequate. At a minimum, the review will consider the
following:
i. Sign Standards
ii. Public Nuisances
iii. Special Use Permit (SUP) will be brought into Compliance with Minnesota
State Statute requirements for Conditional Use Permits
iv. Variance process and language will be updated and revised to reflect
'Practical Difficulties' if not already completed.
v. Platting ordinance will be reviewed for platting process compliance and
proper reference to revised zoning ordinance.
vi. PUD process and procedures will be reviewed for consistency with the
City's stated goals and objectives, particularly as it relates to
redevelopment areas identified within this Plan.
vii. Addition of a Shoreland Ordinance to comply with MRCCA requirements.
c. The process to prepare the zoning ordinance update will be led by the City's
staff, with support and assistance from a Consultant and input and direction from
the City Council.
i. The City may establish a community engagement plan for the Zoning
Code update process. This may include a sub -committee or task force to
provide feedback and input on key issues throughout the update process
to ensure a broad spectrum of perspectives is represented and
addressed within the process.
2. The City will continue to support and explore incorporating policies within ordinance
updates that address community resiliency and long-term sustainability.
a. As ordinances are updated, the City will explore opportunities to encourage
through incentives or regulations energy efficiency in redevelopment and site
design.
b. Addressing resiliency with respect to the City infrastructure and PTOS systems
can be cost-effective when incorporated into initial site design requirements. The
City will explore opportunities to address and incorporate such site design
standards into its ordinances, particularly within new zoning districts.
Redevelopment
3, The City will create zoning districts to support the new land use designations identified
on the Future Land Use Plan.
a. At a minimum seven new zoning districts will be developed for consistency with
the Transit Oriented Development (TOD), Neighborhood Mixed -Use (N -MU),
Commercial Mixed -Use (C -MU), and Business Mixed Use (B -MU) land use
designations.
b. The process to prepare the new zoning districts will be led by Staff and a
Consultant with direction from the City Council and City Commissions. The
process should be initiated immediately upon adoption of this Comprehensive
Plan and should be completed within nine (9) months of its adoption. Each
zoning district will address, at a minimum:
i. Massing and architectural design
ii. Setbacks
iii. Height restrictions
iv. Site design/landscape standards
v. Permitted, conditionally permitted and not permitted uses
vi. Accessory structures/uses
vii. Transition of uses
viii. Mix of uses
ix. PUD process or other incentive process
x. Establishment of how mixed-use will be applied (i.e. through a master
plan approach, parcel -by -parcel basis, etc.)
4. The City will develop a process and methodology for tracking the mixed-use and
redevelopment projects to achieve the mix of uses as contemplated within this
Comprehensive Plan. The ordinances should be developed with graphic
representations of the standards to be more user friendly. The process may include
exploration of ghost -platting, development of a database/tracking spreadsheet, and the
development of `cheat -sheet' or development reference guides for developers and land
owners that describe the mix of uses contemplated and the process to ensure
compliance with the ordinance and this Plan.
5. The City will establish guidelines and procedures for the sale of EDA -owned property.
This may include creating marketing materials and promoting revised ordinances that
highlight the ease of developing in the community.
6. The City will continue to evaluate opportunities for additional land acquisition particularly
within proximity to land holdings in the center city that may offer larger redevelopment
opportunities.
7. The City will participate as an active partner in any redevelopment effort that includes
City financial participation including as the land owner, or TIF, tax abatement, grant
partner, etc.
8. What has historically been known as the "Opportunity Site" is re -guided in this Plan to
allow for mixed-use development of the site. At the time of this Plan the City is working
with a developer on a master plan for the redevelopment that will add a significant
number of new households to the community. Understanding that this redevelopment
effort is in -progress, the new zoning districts that are created to support the land use
designation must be prepared for consistency with the anticipated development. In an
effort to minimize duplication of the process, the City will create a minimum of one
supporting zoning district that is consistent with the known redevelopment plans. The
zoning district will address, at a minimum, the following:
a. A minimum percentage of a project that must contain commercial, office or retail
uses that support and are consistent with any developed housing.
b. The ordinance development process should consider how to incorporate a range
of housing types, including considering incentives and/or standards that
encourage the construction of new affordable housing
c. The ordinance will incorporate architectural and landscape design standards that
support the goals and strategies contained within Chapter 2 of this Plan.
d. The ordinance will incorporate incentives, and where applicable standards, that
are focus on sustainable site improvements and resilient infrastructure
improvements such as: transit, trail and sidewalk connections, pervious pavers
and other innovate landscape products, localized surface water management
and other low impact development techniques.
e. The ordinance will require development that incorporates best practices for
creating transit oriented places, including density minimums, parking maximums,
pedestrian -oriented design, and accommodates a mix of uses.
Chapter 4: Housing
The Implementation Strategies that support the Metropolitan Council's checklist to achieve the
City's Housing goals and objectives can be found in Chapter 4 of this Plan. The following
implementation strategies support those contained within Chapter 4.
1. As part of the zoning ordinance update process the City will evaluate the rules and
regulations to ensure that they allow existing and future residents to improve their homes
in ways that add value and are desirable, and allow for infill housing that offers a range
of housing types and products.
a. Residential zoning districts should be written to allow for a mix of housing types,
with various setbacks and massing standards to allow for diversity within an
individual development.
b. Ordinances should be written to define 'family' consistently with current
demographics. This may require additional study to fully understand the greatest
needs anticipated in the community over the next planning period.
c. Setback requirements should reflect existing conditions and allow reasonable
expansions and additions to homes.
2. The City will evaluate the housing stock for consistency with current and projected
demographics. This includes understanding appropriate mix of bedrooms, unit types,
etc., that match the changing needs of the City's residents. The following examples may
require additional study:
a. Unit mix, such as studios, 1 -bedrooms, 2 -bedrooms, 3 and 3+ Bedrooms
b. Private entry rental opportunities such as town homes, row homes, etc., versus
standard multi -family apartments and condominium development.
3. The City will continue to operate its Rental Licensing Program, which has proven to be
highly effective in maintaining the City's rental housing stock.
4. The City will continue to operate a robust code enforcement program that incorporates
both complaint -based enforcement and proactive sweeps. The City will continue to
engage residents and business owners to ensure code compliance and to provide
information in a way that is understandable and clear.
5. The City will continue to operate its Vacant Building Program, which tracts and monitors
vacant properties in the City, as well as ensuring adequate upkeep and maintenance.
6. The City will explore programs and policies that promote home ownership in the City.
7. The City will explore programs and policies that provide assistance with single-family
housing rehabilitation and maintenance, including low and no -cost loans and grants,
project consultation, and other resources. This may include partnerships with outside
agencies as well as programs administered by the City.
8. The City will explore polices and ordinances, including incentives and standards, that
encourage the construction of new affordable housing.
9. The City will explore partnerships that provide sources of financing and incentives to
preserve existing multi -family housing, particularly ways to preserve naturally occurring
affordable housing that maintains its affordability.
10. The City will explore programs and policies that encourage landlords to invest in their
rental properties.
11. The City will consider creating a housing coordinator position to build relationships with
existing landlords and tenants, administer programs, seek funding opportunities, and
promote the City's housing goals.
12. The City will consider adopting policies that promote further the goal of providing safe,
secure, and stable housing for renters. This may include adopting ordinances and/or
policies that protect the rights of renters.
13. The City will consider inclusionary housing policies that ensure that affordable housing is
a component of new housing development when the market strengthens to the extent
that it would not deter investment.
a. For example, if market rents rise to levels that are affordable to those making
80% AMI then the City would consider adopting an inclusionary housing policy.
14. The City will consider adopting a public subsidy policy that gives greater consideration to
projects that forward the City's housing goals. This includes the option of TIF Housing
Set -Aside funds or new TIF Districts that support mixed -income and affordable housing.
The City will support grant applications to outside agencies to benefit projects that
forward the City's housing goals.
Chapter 5: Community Image, Business Stability & Economic Competitiveness
The following list of Implementation Strategies is provided as a guide to implement the goals
and strategies identified in Chapter 2 of this Comprehensive Plan Update.
1. The City will work to create strategies and supporting resources to incorporate affordable
commercial, retail and office space into new redevelopment areas.
2. The City will actively pursue a branding and marketing strategy that leverages the
community's diversity as a key asset from which new businesses can be developed.
3. To promote and support local businesses the City will explore the development of a local
procurement policy.
4. The City will form a task force or steering committee to study local entrepreneurial
needs, gaps and opportunities of residents. Study and research will focus on:
a. Identification of barriers to growing or starting a business in City.
b. Review of existing ordinances and policies to ensure they support small, start-up
and pop-up businesses.
c. Understand what opportunities exist locally and regionally, and what strategies
the City might employ to further support local entrepreneurs.
5. The City will explore the feasibility of a commercial land trust model that promotes
perpetually affordable commercial space.
6. The City will review its existing business and industrial zoning district designations and
revise and update, as necessary, language and policies to ensure regulations support
and incentivize:
a. Local businesses to stay and grown in the City
b. New businesses to locate in the community
c. A mix of land uses that reflect current market needs and desires
7. The City will explore opportunities to enhance partnerships with local secondary and
post -secondary education institutions that support school -work opportunities, skills and
job training, and matching local companies with young talent.
8. The City will partner with DEED and Hennepin County to offer entrepreneurial resource
and support programs such as WomenVenture and Open to Business.
9. The City will create a Business Retention & Expansion Program to work directly with the
businesses within the community to ensure that their needs are being met.
10. The City will amend its Business Subsidy Policy to prioritize the creation of livable and
high wage jobs.
11. The City will create and fund a revolving loan/grant program to assist property and
business owners with expansions, interior buildouts, equipment purchasing, and exterior
enhancements.
12. The City will explore other economic development programs, including with outside
agencies, which would incentivize business expansion and attraction.
13. The City will explore job training and career pathways programs and policies that would
benefit residents.
14. The City will explore options to connect the local workforce to employers.
15. The City will continue to support partnerships that promote workforce readiness and
removing barriers for existing residents to access education and workforce training, such
as the Brooklynk partnership with Brooklyn Park.
16. The City will explore partnerships and programs that promote financial literacy and
wealth creation amongst residents.
17. The City will continue to explore ways to reduce racial disparities that exist as they relate
the economic stability of its residents, including access to livable wage jobs, home
ownership opportunities, financial literacy and wealth creation, and job pathways
training.
Chapter 6: Parks, Trails and Open Space (PTOS)
The following list of Implementation Strategies is provided as a guide to implement the goals
and strategies identified in Chapter 2 of this Comprehensive Plan Update.
a. The City will continue to prioritize the completion of the PTOS system within
redevelopment areas and will work with developers to identify appropriate and
reasonable opportunities to enhance and improve access to the system by all
residents.
2. Redevelopment projects will be required to provide trail connections that align with the
surrounding local and regional trail system that are existing or planned within this Plan.
3. Redevelopment projects will be required to plan for parks and open spaces consistent
with this Plan, and the City will work with developers to identify and prioritize
improvements to the PTOS system.
4. The City will continue to maintain and manage the existing parks, trails and open space
plan consistent with past and current practices. Current management includes:
a. Annual CIP budgeting and planning to support current park, trail, and open space
function.
b. Continue to support the City's Park and Recreation division through appropriate
capital investments.
c. Periodic survey of residents and stakeholders to understand appropriate and
needed parks, trails, and open space programming within the system.
d. Prepare and plan for system improvements that respond to the needs of the
community. This includes improvements such as park system component
conversions including transitioning baseball fields to multi-purpose fields
(example)
5. Brooklyn Center will continue to support opportunities for community gatherings at each
of its parks, including, but not limited to the summer markets, pavilion rentals, Brooklyn
Center's entertainment/movies in the parks, and Cetennial Park events that unite the
community.
6. The City will continue to complete the sidewalk and trail network consistent with previous
planning efforts. This plan acknowledges that trails and sidewalks are a critical
component of the Park and Recreation system but are equally as important to the
transportation system.
Chapter 7: Transportation
The following list of Implementation Strategies is provided as a guide to implement the goals
and strategies identified in Chapter 2 of this Comprehensive Plan Update.
1. The City's accessibility to the region, and within the region, is an important differentiator
and asset to the community. The City will continue to prioritize roadways as an
important part of the transportation network.
2. The City will continue to partner with Hennepin County and MnDOT on planned road
reconstruction projects to ensure safety and accessibility of the road system within the
City are prioritized.
3. Any roadway reconstruction or improvement will consider the incorporation of a
stormwater assessment, and any plans should incorporate and implement the Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency's Best Management Practices to improve stormwater quality,
recharge local aquifers, and reuse and conserve stormwater where possible.
4. The City will continue to budget for regular maintenance of roadways, including seal
coating, every approximately five to eight years, and include such plan within the City's
Capital Improvement Program.
5. Brooklyn Center will plan for completing the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network
(RBTN) that is currently planned within the City to connect to other regional and sub -
regional job centers. As redevelopment and reconstruction of roadways occurs RBTN
segments or gaps will be constructed to help complete the system.
6. Many of the City's residents use Transit, and many more could if service were improved
in the City. Currently the City is divided into Transit Market II and Transit Market II, which
provides varying levels of services. The following summary of considerations is
provided:
a. The City will work with Metro Transit over this planning period to evaluate the
appropriate Transit Market areas for the City per the Metropolitan Council.
i. The mapping completed for this Plan demonstrates that some of the
residents that may benefit most from frequent and reliable transit may be
underserved.
ii. The City is developed with a similar urban grid pattern for the majority of
its neighborhoods without much distinction. Therefore, it seems
inaccurate to identify some areas as more typical "suburban"
development.
b. The City's Future Land Use Plan has identified the 'central spine' for possible
redevelopment in this planning period. The redevelopment pattern contemplated
embraces the Transit Station and uses it as an organizing feature.
Chapter 8: Sewer and Water (Utilities)
The following list of Implementation Strategies is provided as a guide to implement the goals
and strategies identified in Chapter 2 of this Comprehensive Plan Update.
1. The City will continue to plan for water and sewer infrastructure improvements to occur
concurrently with any planned roadway improvements and redevelopment projects.
2. The City prepared a full sanitary sewer plan and supportive modeling in conjunction with
this Plan update. As redevelopment occurs, the sewer plan will be used to guide proper
infrastructure improvements including sizing and capacity recommendations, timing and
consideration for future phases of redevelopment.
3. The City prepared an update to its water plan and supportive modeling in conjunction
with this Plan update. As redevelopment occurs the water plan will be used to guide
proper/necessary infrastructure improvements.
a. The water supply permit from the DNR will be updated once this Plan and Future
Land Use Plan are adopted to reflect projected housing and employment
forecasts contained in this Plan.
4. The LSWMP identifies several capital and administrative projects that are incorporated
into this implementation plan by reference. The City will properly manage and schedule
such improvements to be included within its CIP for on-going planning and action.
5. The City will continue to work with its regional partners, including the Metropolitan
Council, on sewer and water infrastructure planning and development so that regional
coordination is maintained throughout this planning period.
6. Consideration for how to incorporate sustainable and resilient infrastructure through new
development will be addressed at the specific site redevelopment level. This will first be
accomplished through the ordinance review, creation and update process and described
within previous sections; and will then be implemented through site and redevelopment
plan sets and engineering.
a. The City's public works department and its staff will work collaboratively with the
Community Development department to identify potential ordinance revisions
that would support the development of an integrated green network that not only
supports the PTOS system but the City's infrastructure.
Appendix: Mississippi River Critical Corridor Area Plan
The following list of Implementation Strategies is provided as a guide to implement the MRCCA
Plan contained within Appendix B of this Plan.
The City will develop ordinances to support the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MnDNR) requirements to regulate property contained within the MRCCA
overlay designations.
a. At a minimum the City will develop a shoreland ordinance for properties that abut
the Mississippi River and will structure the ordinance to comply with MnDNR
requirements.
b. The City will work collaboratively with the MnDNR to establish appropriate
setback and height standards based on specific parcel locations and potential
redevelopment.
L The City may seek flexibility from the MnDNR's standard requirements,
particularly on sites identified for redevelopment. The City will work with
the MnDNR to identify appropriate standards.
c. The City will engage residents during the ordinance development to provide
education about the MRCCA standard requirements and ordinance development
process.
L The public engagement process will also solicit feedback regarding
specific standards development include appropriate setbacks, height,
coverage requirements, etc.