The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2019 05-28 CCPCouncil Study Session City Hall Council Chambers May 28, 2019 AGE NDA The City C ounc il requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full C ity Council pac ket is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the entrance of the council chambers. 1.City Council Discussion of Agenda Items and Questions - 6 p.m. 2.M iscellaneous 3.Discussion of Work S ession Agenda Item as T ime P ermits 4.Adjourn C IT Y C O UNC IL M E E T I NG City Hall Council Chambers May 28, 2019 AGE NDA 1.Informal Open Forum with City Council - 6:45 p.m. Provides an opportunity for the public to address the C ounc il on items which are not on the agenda. Open Forum will be limited to 15 minutes, it is not televised, and it may not be used to make personal attacks, to air personality grievances, to make political endorsements, or for political campaign purposes. Council Members will not enter into a dialogue with presenter. Questions from the C ounc il will be for c larific ation only. Open Forum will not be used as a time for problem solving or reacting to the c omments made but, rather, for hearing the presenter for informational purposes only. 2.Invocation - 7 p.m. 3.Call to Order Regular Business M eeting The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City C ounc il packet is available to the public . The packet ring binder is loc ated at the entrance of the council chambers. 4.Roll Call 5.P ledge of Allegiance 6.Approval of Agenda and Consent Agenda The following items are c onsidered to be routine by the C ity Council and will be enac ted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Councilmember so requests, in which event the item will be removed from the c onsent agenda and considered at the end of Council Consideration I tems. a.Approval of Minutes - Motion to approve the following minutes: May 13, 2019 Study Session May 13, 2019 Regular Session May 13, 2019 Work Session b.Approval of L icenses - Motion to approve licenses as presented c.An Ordinance A mending Ordinance 2003-22, Exhibit A ; X cel E nergy E lectric F ranchise Fee S chedule from X cel E nergy - Motion to adopt the first reading of the ordinance amendment for franchise fees and holding a second reading with a public hearing on July 8, 2019 d.An Ordinance A mending Ordinance No. 2003-23, E xhibit A; Centerpoint Energy Operations within the City of B rooklyn Centers from CenterP oint Energy - Motion to adopt the first reading of the ordinance amendment for franchise fees and holding a second reading with a public hearing on July 8, 2019 e.Resolution A uthorizing the S ubmission of a Transit -Oriented Development Grant A pplication to Hennepin County - Motion to approve a resolution authorizing the submission of a Transit- Oriented Development (TOD) grant application to Hennepin County f.Resolution A uthorizing the Use of E D A-Owned Property for the S aturday Market and A pproving the L ayout Plan for the Market - Motion to approve a resolution authorizing the use of EDA-owned property for the Saturday Market and approving the layout plan for the market. g.Resolution A pproving Americans with Disabilities A ct (A D A) Transition Plan – Public Right-of-Way - Motion to approve the resolution approving the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan – Public Right-of-Way h.Policy 2.06 Request for Out of State Conference A pproval - Consider provi di ng direction regarding the request to approve out of State travel by Council Member Graves 7.P resentations/Proclamations/Recognitions/Donations a.Census 2020 Update - Motion to receive the presentation on the City's Census 2020 Update 8.P ublic Hearings 9.P lanning Commission Items a.Resolution Regarding the Disposition of P lanning Commission Application No. 2019-007 for Review and Consideration fro a S ite and Building P lan Approval at 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing - Motion to adopt a resolution to approve a site and bui lding plan review for a municipal liquor store at 1350 Shingle Creek Crossi ng, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the condi ti ons of approval in the resolution b.Resolution Regarding Planning Commission A pplication No. 2019-006 for a Development P roposal at 5801 Xerxes Avenue N and First Reading of an Ordinance Amending Chapter 35 of the Zoning Code of Ordinance regarding the Zoning Classification of 5801 Xerxes Avenue N., and S et the S econd Reading and P ublic Hearing for J une 10, 2019 - (i) Motion to adopt a resolution to approve Planning Case 2019-006 for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) with zoning cl assi fi cation of PUD-TOD and development site plan for a proposed development at 5801 Xerxes Avenue N, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the conditions of approval in the resolution - (ii) Motion to approve a first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the Zoning Code of Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of 5801 Xerxes Avenue North, and set the second reading and public hearing for June 10, 2019 10.Council Consideration Items 11.Council Report 12.Adjournment COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Dr. R eggie Edwards , Deputy C ity Manager F R O M:Barb S uciu, C ity C lerk S UBJ EC T:Approval of Minutes Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve the following minutes: M ay 13, 2019 S tudy S ession M ay 13, 2019 R egular S ession M ay 13, 2019 Work S ession Background: AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type 5-13-19 S tudy S ession 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material 5-13-19 R egular S es s ion 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material 5-13-19 Work S es s ion 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material 05/03/19 -1- MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA STUDY SESSION MAY 13, 2019 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Study Session called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at 6:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Business and Work Force Development Coordinator Brett Angell, and City Attorney Jason Hill. CITY COUNCIL DISCUSSION OF AGENDA ITEMS AND QUESTIONS City Manager Curt Boganey stated City Staff had provided a revised budget meeting schedule for the City Council’s review. He added there were conflicts on a few dates in October. Mr. Boganey stated he met with Mayor Elliott earlier that day to discuss an agenda item related to an LCDA grant application. He added the deadline for the pre-development grant submittal was May 1, 2019, and the proposed application requires Council action at tonight’s meeting. He noted the City Council could decide not to submit the grant application. Mr. Boganey stated there would be another round of grant applications in Fall 2019. He added the application requires a commitment of 25%, or $15,000, from the City, which can be provided in cash or staff time. City Staff believes this is a unique concept proposal, and if the City participates, valuable market information will be gained that can be used for other potential developments. Councilmember Ryan requested the following correction to April 22, 2019, Regular Session minutes: -Page 5, under “License Type IV”, replace “1 year” with “6 months.” MISCELLANEOUS Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she spoke with Mr. Boganey earlier regarding IT support for the City Council. She asked whether the City Manager’s approval is required before City Councilmembers can contact City Staff for IT support. Mr. Boganey stated it is not 05/03/19 -2- necessary to contact him, and employees may deliver Council services directly to the City Council members as needed. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she would like to have the 7-day password reset reminder added back to the Novus portal. She added she would prefer not to need a login name and password to access the portal, but at the very least her login name should be shortened. Mr. Boganey agreed to check into that. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated all the documents and information on Novus are public record, and available for viewing, so login password data is not necessary. Councilmember Ryan stated a light pole is on the ground at the intersection of 65th Avenue N and Indiana Avenue and was tagged by the Police Department on April 11, 2019. He added he believes this is an Excel Energy issue. Mr. Boganey agreed to follow up. Mayor Elliott stated he agrees with the comments of Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson, that Novus usernames should be shorter, and no password should be required. Councilmember Graves stated she maybe unable the attend the budget meeting on July 29, 2019, as she will be camping. Councilmember Graves stated registration for the Young Elected Officials Conference is open, and she would like to register soon to get the early bird price and book her flights, and then submit for reimbursement. Councilmember Graves stated many communities around the United States are planning “400- year” events, to mark the first enslaved African being brought to Jamestown. She added some events are being planned in the City of Minneapolis in August 2019, and it might be interesting to have an event in Brooklyn Center. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff could do some research and schedule a discussion at an upcoming work session. Mayor Elliott agreed. Councilmember Butler asked whether the budget meetings all start at the same time. Councilmember Ryan stated the meetings have always started at 6:30 p.m. with no set end time. Mr. Boganey agreed to confirm that. Councilmember Graves stated it would be difficult for her to attend the August 7, 2019, meeting, due to work conflicts and her daughter’s 11th birthday. She added she would try to attend the meeting. Councilmember Butler asked whether a quorum is required for the budget meetings. Mr. Boganey stated a quorum is necessary only if action is taken, which does not generally happen at 05/03/19 -3- budget meetings. Councilmember Butler stated she would not be able to attend on August 7, 2019, as she will be in London. Councilmember Graves stated the August 7, 2019 meeting is the week before National Night Out. Mr. Boganey stated a neighborhood meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 23, 2019, in the Garden City neighborhood. He added Mayor Elliott is on the agenda to give a word of welcome. DISCUSSION OF WORK SESSION AGENDA ITEMS AS TIME PERMITS COUNCIL RETREAT Mr. Boganey stated City Staff had requested proposals from consultants to lead the City Council retreat that is being planned. He added there were five respondents. He requested the Council’s consideration of the approach, proposals, and qualifications of the respondents and any preferences. He requested City Council feedback and commented on what they would like to get out of the proposed retreat, as well as a potential date. Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards gave a presentation on the results of the request for proposals from consultants to lead the City Council retreat. He added City Staff is considering a 1½-day retreat at Earl Brown Center, with one day of City Council/City Manager interaction followed by half-day with City Staff Department Heads. Mr. Edwards stated potential consultants were told to focus on team building and relationships, inclusion and equity, and personal and team values. He added the facilitator is required to have experience in leading similar projects. He noted the short list would be asked to meet with the City Manager and then meet with the City Council. Discussion of this item continued and concluded the May 13, 2019, Work Session. ADJOURN STUDY SESSION TO INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL Mayor Elliott adjourned the Study Session at 6:45 p.m. 05/13/19 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 13, 2019 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. INFORMAL OPEN FORUM WITH CITY COUNCIL CALL TO ORDER INFORMAL OPEN FORUM The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Informal Open Forum called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at 6:45 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan . Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Business and Work Force Development Coordinator Brett Angell, and City Attorney Jason Hill. Mayor Mike Elliott opened the meeting for the purpose of Informal Open Forum. Harlan Daudt, 6000 York Avenue N, stated he saw there was a meeting held recently regarding the Brookdale Ford Site. He asked whether the proposed apartments would be tax subsidized. Mr. Boganey stated a TIF district has been established, which is a way to use property taxes to make development happen. He added TIF financing is a subsidy the financing can only be used if the projects meet a “but for” test after the financial analysis is completed. He added this is reviewed by the Economic Development Authority, and a public hearing is required. Mr. Dowd stated there should be more information on the City’s website about what is scheduled for Planning Commission meetings. Mr. Boganey stated notice goes into the Sun Post newspaper and also on the City’s website. He added residents could sign up online for meeting notifications. Mr. Boganey agreed to look into this. Mayor Elliott stated that perhaps an agenda could be attached online. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved, and Councilmember Butler seconded to close the Informal Open Forum at 6:53 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 2. INVOCATION 05/13/19 -2- DRAFT Councilmember Butler gave an invocation in commemoration of Mental Health Month. She added the month of May had been designated Mental Health Month since 1949 to raise awareness of mental health issues and the stigma attached to mental illness. She noted 46.6 million Americans face the reality of mental illness every day. Mayor Elliott thanked Councilmember Butler for comments. He added a citizen spoke at a recent City Council meeting during the Public Forum to urge consideration of an embedded mental health professional within Police Department units. He added this is something the City can do to address this issue. City Manager Curt Boganey stated Police Chief Tim Gannon has indicated that the Police Department is looking into options related to this issue and will present them to the City Council at an upcoming meeting. 3. CALL TO ORDER REGULAR BUSINESS MEETING The Brooklyn Center City Council met in Regular Session called to order by Mayor Mike Elliott at 7:00 p.m. 4. ROLL CALL Mayor Mike Elliott and Councilmembers Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Business and Work Force Development Coordinator Brett Angel, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist. 5. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE The Pledge of Allegiance was recited. 6. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved, and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda as amended, and the following consent items were approved: 6a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 2, 2019, Joint Council Commission Meeting 2. April 15, 2019 Board of Equalization and Taxation 3. April 22, 2019 Study Session 4. April 22, 2019, Regular Session 5. April 29, 2019 Board of Equalization and Taxation Reconvene Mayor Elliott requested the following correction to the April 22, 2019, Regular Session minutes: -Page 12, line 5 - replace “First” with “41st.” 05/13/19 -3- DRAFT Mayor Elliott moved, and Councilmember Ryan seconded to approve the correction to the April 22, 2019, Regular Session minutes. Motion passed unanimously. 6b. LICENSES GASOLINE SERVICE STATION LICENSE YD Holdings/Holiday Station Store 5710 Xerxes Avenue N Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 MECHANICAL LICENSE B & D Plumbing, Htg & A/C 4145 MacKenzie Court St. Michael, MN 55376 Centerpoint Energy 6161 Golden Valley Road Golden Valley, MN 55422 Erickson Plumbing Htg & Cooling 1471 92nd Lane NE Blaine, MN 55449 Hinding Heating & Air, Inc. 915 W. 7th Street St. Paul, MN 55102 Infinity Heating & Air Conditioning LLC 1017 Meadowwood Drive Brooklyn Park, MN 55444 Metro Heating and Cooling 1220 Cope Avenue E Maplewood, MN 55109 Northland Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 9001 Science Center Drive New Hope, MN 55428 Priority Plumbing and Drains 1143 South Shore Drive Plymouth, MN 55441 Pronto Heating & A/C 7415 Cahill Road Edina, MN 55439 Tim’s Quality Plumbing, Inc. 225 County Road 81 Osseo, MN 55369 MOTOR VEHICLE DEALERSHIP LICENSE BCV Motors LLC / 6801 Brooklyn Boulevard Brookdale Volkswagen Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Metro Brookdale LLC / 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Brookdale Mazda Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 R L Brookdale Motors INC / 6800 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Brookdale Honda Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 BB Motors Sales LLC / 4301 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Brookdale Chevrolet Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 BB Motors Sales LLC / 6701 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Brookdale Chevrolet Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 Brooklyn Park Motors Inc. 6700 Brooklyn Boulevard Luther Brookdale Toyota Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 05/13/19 -4- DRAFT SIGNHANGER LICENSE JH Signs & Design, Inc. 41357 460th Street Perham, MN 56573 Topline Advertising 11775 Justen Circle, #A Maple Grove, MN 55430 TOBACCO LICENSE YD Holdings / Holiday Station Store 5710 Xerxes Avenue N Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 TRANSIENT ACCOMMODATIONS LICENSE ESA Management LLC / 2701 Freeway Boulevard Extended Stay America Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 RENTAL INITIAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 5301 Russell Avenue N Lee Yan / Midwest GIR Group 6620 Bryant Avenue N Vera Dixon INITIAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 6912 Logan Avenue N HPA Borrower 2017-1 LLC INITIAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 6412 Unity Avenue N Wendy Hang RENEWAL (TYPE IV – six-month license) 7240 West River Road Nedzad Ceric (met mitigation plan) 907 57th Avenue N David LaFavor 5825 Colfax Avenue N Brahana Tsegaye RENEWAL (TYPE III – one-year license) 5240 Drew Avenue N Bradley Schumacher 6015 Aldrich Avenue N My Truong 6501 Beard Avenue N FYR SFR Borrow LLC 5421 Lyndale Avenue N Dragon Property Management RENEWAL (TYPE II – two-year license) 7240 West River Road Nedzad Ceric (met mitigation plan) 3707 61st Avenue N Douglas Wahl / Cel Monton 2912 69th Lane Lydia Kim 5418 Girard Avenue N Vinson Carlson/Carls Cache LLC 4906 Howe Lane Cosco Properties LLC c/o MSP Homes Rentals (met mitigation plan) 5302 Humboldt Avenue N MNSF 11 W1 LLC 05/13/19 -5- DRAFT 5559 Lyndale Avenue N Dragon Property Management 5727 Major Avenue David Koenig RENEWAL (TYPE I – three-year license) 819-21 55th Avenue N Stephanie Statz 4100 Lakebreeze Avenue N Keia Isaacson/PBK Properties (didn’t meet mitigation plan Missing CPTED/CFH) 5319 Queen Avenue N Karen Palek Trust 4708 Twi Lake Avenue Michael Mohs 2804 67th Lane N Bryan Aitkens 6835 Colfax Avenue N Adeyinka Badewa (met mitigation plan) 5807 Dupont Avenue N Todd Havisto/Dave Baumann DT Enterprises 4701 Eleanor Lane Charles Jing Bright 7101 France Ave N Becky Kienzie 5907 Xerxes Avenue N Dragon Property Management 6c. MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2020-2021 BUDGET 6d. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-073 ACCEPTING WORK PERFORMED AND AUTHORIZING FINAL PAYMENT, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2015-01, 02, 03 AND 04, FREEWAY PARK AREA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 6e. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-074 ESTABLISHING IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NOS. 2020-01, 02, 03 AND 04, GRANDVIEW PARK AREA STREET AND UTILITY IMPROVEMENTS 6f. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-075 APPROVING CHANGE ORDER NOS. 1-8, IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. 2018-05, BROOKLYN BOULEVARD CORRIDOR PROJECT PHASE 1 Motion passed unanimously. 7. PRESENTATIONS/PROCLAMATIONS/RECOGNITIONS/DONATIONS 7a. PROCLAMATION DECLARING MAY 19-25, 2019, NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK IN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Mr. Boganey stated it is his privilege to recommend that the City Council adopt a Resolution proclaiming May 19-25, 2019 as National Public Works Week, a tradition in the City of Brooklyn Center. He added the City’s Public Works Department has 44 employees providing excellent service in the areas of engineering, parks and street maintenance, and public utilities. He commended the City’s Public Works employees for their hard work and service, which is 05/13/19 -6- DRAFT critically important and should be recognized. He recommended City Council approval of the Resolution. Councilmember Graves stated the Public Works Department is vitally important to the City, providing maintenance for the City’s water, streets, and electricity. Commissioner Lawrence- Anderson stated the Public Works employees do an excellent job plowing snow in the winter. Mayor Elliott stated he received many Facebook messages from residents this past winter commending the City’s Public Works employees for their hard work and efforts on plowing the streets and keeping them clear of snow. He added the Public Works employees deserve commendation and thanks for their work. Councilmember Butler moved, and Councilmember Graves seconded to approve a PROCLAMATION Declaring May 19-24, 2019 as National Public Works Week. Motion passed unanimously. 8. PUBLIC HEARINGS -None. 9. PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS -None. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-076 IDENTIFYING THE NEED FOR LIVABLE COMMUNITIES DEMONSTRATION ACCOUNT (LCDA) FUNDING AND AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION FOR GRANT FUNDS Community Development Director Meg Beekman requested City Council consideration of a predevelopment grant application for the City’s Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA). She added the Metropolitan Council offers LCDA grants twice per year, and the maximum amount allotted per city for predevelopment purposes is $100,000. She noted the City of Brooklyn Center received $60,000 in LCDA grant funding in 2018 which was used to support Zoning Code updates and creation of mixed-use zoning districts. Ms. Beekman stated a development concept had been referred to the City of Brooklyn Center by the Metropolitan Council when it was determined that the project appears to align with the City’s goals for the Opportunity Site. She added Troy Parker, Executive Director of Gardner-Lee Workforce & Opportunity Solutions, has submitted a proposal for the first phase of a project called Monarch Park. She noted the concept plan is for a 5-7 story building, partnering with 05/13/19 -7- DRAFT minority-owned currently existing businesses to create a mixed-income housing and workforce development project, to be owned and managed by Gardner-Lee. Ms. Beekman stated this would be Gardner-Lee’s first development project, although Mr. Parker is knowledgeable about the construction and trade industry and has engaged in mentoring and training. She added the analysis that has been completed requires additional depth to determine feasibility. She noted Mr. Parker is focused on a community-led project which aligns with the City’s strategic priorities but would likely not proceed without further analysis and assistance from the City of Brooklyn Center. Ms. Beekman stated the funding that has been requested would be used to hire expert consultants to provide analysis and recommendations regarding preferred site location at either 57th Avenue N and Logan Avenue N or the Opportunity Site. City Staff feels the development might be a good fit for the Opportunity Site, given its format and density. She added there had been interest in this site from other developers as well. She noted the City’s portion of funding contribution would be $15,000. Ms. Beekman stated City Staff recommends City Council approval of the Resolution approving an LCDA funding request. Councilmember Graves stated the concept fits well with the City’s strategic priorities. She added the City should be willing to make the investment if the LCDA funding application is accepted. She noted she supports moving forward. Councilmember Ryan thanked Ms. Beekman for her review. He added the City Manager had commented on before the meeting that the City Council could approve this application without committing to a specific project. Ms. Beekman agreed, adding the project funding is not site-specific, but rather goes to the developer. Mr. Boganey agreed, adding the grant application is not a commitment to complete the proposed project. Councilmember Ryan expressed concern regarding the scale of the project in a single-family neighborhood. He added there is an enclosed storage facility there, but it is not in a central location. He noted the City could benefit from the advice of consultants, and he supports the Resolution. Mayor Elliott agreed, adding the height of the building is problematic and will probably not have neighborhood support. He added the grant could be sued to support community engagement efforts. He noted community outreach must be tight on this or any other proposed project, especially project areas that are owned by the City. 05/13/19 -8- DRAFT Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she supports the concept, although the developer has not completed a project of this size. She added she is concerned about the City investing $15,000 in a company that does not have sufficient experience. Mr. Boganey stated City Staff perceives the concept as an investment in the information that will be useful to the City, rather than an investment in the developer. He added the developer’s lack of experience with large-scale projects is one reason that City Staff is recommending a predevelopment agreement. Councilmember Graves moved, and Councilmember Ryan seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2019-076 Identifying the Need for Livable Communities Demonstration Account (LCDA) Funding and Authorizing an Application for Grant Funds. Motion passed unanimously. 11. COUNCIL REPORT Councilmember Ryan reported on his attendance at the following events: • April 23, 2019 – 2020 Census Coalition Planning Session at Brookdale Library. Census is required by law every ten years, and Brooklyn Center’s diverse community is often under- counted. He stressed the importance of a full and accurate census. • April 25, 2019 – Brooklyn Center Business Association Luncheon with guest speaker Amy Struve, TopGolf Marketing Director. The Brooklyn Center TopGolf location is in the company’s top 5 for sales. • April 26, 2019 – Annual Brooklyn Center Firefighters Relief Association Dinner. The Brooklyn Center Fire Department is celebrating its 70th year in 2019. • April 27, 2019 – Health Fair at the Community Center, sponsored by the City of Brooklyn Center and Independent School District 286. • April 29, 2019 - Board of Equalization and Appeal – second session • May 1, 2019 – fourth public planning session/workshop for the Opportunity Site at Brookdale Library. It was encouraging to see active citizen participation. • May 4, 2019 – Lions Park clean-up sponsored by Brooklyn Center Lions Club. Councilmember Graves reported on her attendance at the following events: • April 25, 2019 – taught yoga to students in Minneapolis Public Schools in a City-sponsored event. • April 26, 2019 – participated in a local fashion show featuring many designers from Brooklyn Center. • May 1, 2019 - fourth public planning session/workshop for the Opportunity Site at Brookdale Library. • May 10, 2019 - Birch Grove Elementary school for the Arts’ Art Troop performances, including her daughter Jasmine singing in the choir. • May 11, 2019 – Prom Grand March at Brooklyn Center High School. She added her son is a senior at BCHS. 05/13/19 -9- DRAFT • May 11, 2019 – Community Iftar Dinner with local elected officials and leaders from the Somali-American community. She added it was a beautiful event with great food to break the fast. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she did not have anything to report. Councilmember Butler reported on her attendance at the following and provided information on the following upcoming events: • Unable to attend the previous City Council meeting as she was on vacation. • April 29, 2019 - Board of Equalization and Appeal – second session • May 1, 2019 - fourth public planning session/workshop for the Opportunity Site at Brookdale Library. • May 11, 2019 – volunteered at Feed My Starving Children Mayor Elliott reported on his attendance at the following events: • April 23, 2019 – 2020 Census Coalition Planning Session at Brookdale Library. • April 29, 2019 - Board of Equalization and Appeal – second session • May 4, 2019 – Lions Park clean-up sponsored by Brooklyn Center Lions Club. • May 4, 2019 – Annual Prayer Breakfast, televised on local cable television • May 11, 2019 – Community Iftar Dinner hosted by Golden Valley Mayor Shep Harris and attended by members of the Muslim community as well as local officials. He added it would be great to do something like that in Brooklyn Center. Mayor Elliott stated he attended a recent Regional Council of Mayors monthly meeting. He added the meeting featured informational presentations on economic development initiatives within the region. He noted a representative of the Red Cross gave a presentation, as well as the CEO of Greater MSP Partnership, leading an initiative to develop skills and bring new jobs to the area. Mayor Elliott stated he attended the Minnesota Mayors Conference in Stillwater. He added this conference is a great way to meet other mayors from around the State, many of whom are facing the same challenges faced by the City of Brooklyn Center. 12. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember Ryan moved, and Councilmember Graves seconded adjournment of the City Council meeting at 8:05 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. 05/13/19 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL/ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA WORK SESSION MAY 13, 2019 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center City Council/Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Work Session called to order by Mayor/President Mike Elliott at 8:10 p.m. ROLL CALL Mayor/President Mike Elliott and Councilmembers/Commissioners Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence-Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were City Manager Curt Boganey, Deputy City Manager Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Business and Work Force Development Coordinator Brett Angell, Director of Community Activities, and City Attorney Jason Hill. COUNCIL RETREAT Mr. Edwards stated City Staff put out an RFP and had five respondents. He reviewed City Staff’s primary questions for the City Council regarding a retreat: 1. Does the City Council have a preferred approach? 2. How would you describe a successful retreat? 3. Preferred retreat dates Mr. Edwards stated all the respondents were competent and capable of providing this type of service. He added more information would be available after City Staff talks with them one-on- one. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves asked why only four proposals were included in the packet if there were five proposals. Mr. Edwards stated one responded did not provide an outline for the two days. He added City Staff has put forward the respondents’ approaches rather than the actual organization. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated she would have preferred to have the names of the respondents, rather than their approaches since the City Council will be choosing one of the organizations. She asked whether the respondents were asked to provide a budget. Mr. Edwards stated a budget was not requested in the RFP but spoke with the respondents to get an idea of consultant costs. 05/13/19 -2- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated it would be good to know what the City is getting for the investment of its money. She added she liked the proposal from two women of color. She noted she liked their focus on equity, diversity and cultural competence, and the concept of “including all voices” in their communication and facilitation process. She added she would like to see how much things will cost. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stressed the importance of team building, and what the City is trying to accomplish in the areas of equity and inclusion, as well as specific strategies for strategic goals. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated the third consultant stressed team building, building trust, and getting the City Council to work together. Councilmember/Commissioner Butler stated she liked approaches 2 and 3. She added she liked three more, although she didn’t see anything about exploring biases or intercultural competency. She noted those need to be included. Mayor/President Elliott agreed, stating he would like to determine which consultant would most effectively address intercultural competency. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she liked three best, but she also liked the issues and approach of four. She added she would lean more toward three. Mayor/President Elliott stated he wants to ensure focus on team building, building trust, equity, inclusion. He added the retreat should look internally at the City Council but also externally at the community. He noted it would be remiss in addressing one without the other. Mayor/President Elliott stated Brooklyn Center is a changing, evolving community, and as elected officials making decisions for the changing community, the City Council needs to explore how their capacities are changing. He noted this would involve looking at other institutions in the City, to achieve accomplishments that would require change. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated there seems to be some consensus for approach 3, and there are aspects that she likes about that approach. She added some of the items from approach 2 are important. She suggested combining aspects of 2 and 3, including establishing team operational norms; exploring differences in conflicts; and listening (part 1 & 2). She noted she would like more information regarding cost differences. Mayor/President Elliott agreed that there are key points in approach three that should be included. 05/13/19 -3- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated the only thing about approach two that he would like to see enhanced are team principles, exploring leadership, and recognizing operational norms. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves agreed, stressing the importance of gaining an understanding of the City Councils own leadership. She added that could fall under “learn about the team.” Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated it would be interesting to learn about colleagues’ operational and cognitive styles. He added Mayor/President Elliott attended such a session at the League of Cities’ conference and shared his thoughts about it, which Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan appreciated. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated Craig Rapp conducted a few City Council retreats in the past. He added he already knows the City’s Senior Department heads, which could be an advantage. Mayor/President Elliott asked whether it would be helpful to have a team of consultants, rather than just one facilitator, leading the retreat. Mr. Boganey stated there is the possibility of more than one retreat. He added other concepts and formats that can be considered. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated the May 24-25 dates are Memorial Day weekend. She added she is not available that weekend. Councilmember/Commissioner Butler stated she doesn’t believe any of the proposed dates will work because they are coming up too soon. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated he is available for any of the dates. He added his preference would be June 7-8, 2019. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stated she is available for the June 7-8 weekend, but not any of the other weekends. Mayor/President Elliott agreed. Mr. Boganey stated there does not seem to be a consensus on a weekend that will work, but a formal proposal will be sought from the consultants and additional dates brought back to the City Council for consideration. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves requested that Staff leadership should be a part of the process. She added they should be able to weigh in on what they want to get out of the retreat too. She noted they could consider how they could work better together, collaboratively across departments, or how they interact with the City Council. Mr. Boganey stated the City Council had expressed interest in approach 2 and 3. He asked whether there is any interest in approach 4. 05/13/19 -4- DRAFT Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated he sees value in the team operational norms aspects of approach 4. Mayor/President Elliott stated another retreat could be planned that would cover more extensively these other areas that are proposed. He added the consultant could be brought back for an hour. He noted it would be great if we could get feedback to the people who made these proposals. Mr. Boganey agreed, adding City Staff will meet with the respondents and provide the City Council’s feedback. He added they would be asked to provide a clear and specific plan that addresses the City Council’s comments and requirements. Mr. Boganey asked each Councilmember/Commissioner individually what they would consider a successful retreat. Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated she feels that success would be having a better understanding of other Councilmembers’ perspectives and getting to know each other on a deeper level. She added this would include collaboration, learning about strengths and weaknesses, and respecting each other’s opinions. Mayor/President Elliott agreed. Councilmember/Commissioner Graves stressed the importance of individual self-awareness and what each Councilmember/Commissioner brings to the City Council, both strengths and weaknesses. She stated the Councilmembers should have a chance to build trust so they can ask questions and have a healthy debate and not take things personally but be thoughtful about how to come to balanced, well-thought-out decisions. She noted it is also an opportunity for Councilmembers to see the different roles within the City Council - how they can be leveraged to meet priorities and be better integrated into City Staff’s strategies for carrying them out. Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan stated he concurs with Councilmember/Commissioner Grave’s insightful comments. He agreed that the concepts of team building, building trust, operational norms, and definitions of good governance in approach 3 are vitally important, as well as learning about each other’s strengths and weaknesses. Councilmember/Commissioner Butler stated she agreed with comments made so far, and she feels that success is coming out of having more of a team spirit. She added she feels the City Council is segmented. She noted getting to know each other, and building trust will be important. Mayor/President Elliott stated the City Council consider where the City currently is in this moment in its history. He added this would provide a better understanding of the environment in which the City Council operates, as well as provide ideas of how to operate on an ongoing basis. He stressed the importance of discussion about the community of Brooklyn Center. 05/13/19 -5- DRAFT Mr. Boganey stated the City Council’s comments were very helpful. He added City Staff would provide feedback to the respondents so they can draft proposals that are consistent with what the City Council is looking for. ADJOURNMENT Councilmember/Commissioner Ryan moved, and Councilmember/Commissioner Lawrence- Anderson seconded adjournment of the City Council/Economic Development Authority Work Session at 8:48 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Alix Bentrud, Deputy C ity C lerk S UBJ EC T:Approval of Licens es Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve licenses as presented Background: T he following bus inesses/pers ons have applied for C ity licens es as noted. Eac h busines s /person has fulfilled the requirements of the C ity O rdinanc e governing respec tive lic enses, submitted appropriate applic ations , and paid proper fees . Applicants for rental dwelling licens es are in compliance with C hapter 12 of the C ity C ode of O rdinances, unles s c omments are noted below the property address on the attac hed rental report. T he liquor lic ense renewals are bas ed on past prac tic es of dis tance requirements and may require an amendment in the future. A M U S EM EN T D EV I C ES L I C EN S ES T heisen Vending C ompany 2590 F reeway Blvd Brooklyn C enter, MN T heisen Vending C ompany 6211 Brooklyn Blvd Brooklyn C enter MN T heisen Vending C ompany 2105 57th Ave N Brooklyn C enter MN F IR E WO R KS P E R MIT C ity of Brooklyn C enter 6301 S hingle C reek P arkway Brooklyn C enter, MN ME C HAN IC AL LIC E N S E S Air R ite Heating & A/C 6935 146th S treet W #3 Apple Valley MN 55124 Boy’s Mec hanical Inc. 490 Villaume Ave #300 S outh S t. P aul, 55075 C andor C ompanies , Inc. 8919 176th Ave NE C olumbus , MN 55025 Linn S tar Transfer Inc 9440 Wright Bros C t S W C edar R apids, I A 52404 Mag Mec hanical, LLC 7100 Medicine Lake R d New Hope, MN 55427 P rofessional Mechanic al S ervices, LLC 18983 York S t. New S uite C Elk R iver, MN 55330 R ay Welter Heating C o 4637 C hicago Ave S Minneapolis, MN 55407 Vito Mec hanical Inc 1320 Tower View R oad Eagan, MN 55121 Weld & S ons P lumbing C o 3410 Kilmer Lane N P lymouth, 55441 S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type R ental C riteria 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material 5-28-19 R entals 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material Page 2 of 2 b.Police Service Calls. Police call rates will be based on the average number of valid police calls per unit per year. Police incidences for purposes of determining licensing categories shall include disorderly activities and nuisances as defined in Section 12-911, and events categorized as Part I crimes in the Uniform Crime Reporting System including homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, auto theft and arson. Calls will not be counted for purposes of determining licensing categories where the victim and suspect are “Family or household members” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (b) and where there is a report of “Domestic Abuse” as defined in the Domestic Abuse Act, Minnesota Statutes, Section 518B.01, Subd. 2 (a). License Category Number of Units Validated Calls for Disorderly Conduct Service & Part I Crimes (Calls Per Unit/Year) No Category Impact 1-2 0-1 3-4 units 0-0.25 5 or more units 0-0.35 Decrease 1 Category 1-2 Greater than 1 but not more than 3 3-4 units Greater than 0.25 but not more than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.35 but not more than 0.50 Decrease 2 Categories 1-2 Greater than 3 3-4 units Greater than 1 5 or more units Greater than 0.50 Property Code and Nuisance Violations Criteria License Category (Based on Property Code Only) Number of Units Property Code Violations per Inspected Unit Type I – 3 Year 1-2 units 0-2 3+ units 0-0.75 Type II – 2 Year 1-2 units Greater than 2 but not more than 5 3+ units Greater than 0.75 but not more than 1.5 Type III – 1 Year 1-2 units Greater than 5 but not more than 9 3+ units Greater than 1.5 but not more than 3 Type IV – 6 Months 1-2 units Greater than 9 3+ units Greater than 3 Property Address Dwelling Type Renewal or Initial Owner Property Code Violations License Type Police CFS * Final License Type ** Previous License Type *** 4000 61st Ave N Single Initial Adegbola Fola Ogundipe 12 IV N/A IV 3328 49th Ave N Single Renewal Sherman Yih Feng Kho 7 III 0 III II 4112 61st Ave N Single Renewal Christine Duong 2 I 0 I I 3307 63rd Ave N Single Renewal Rosemond Coleman 7 III 0 III II 1612 69th Ave N Single Renewal Prosperous Property LLC 1 I 0 I I 6618 Camden Dr Single Renewal Hussain Khan 8 III 0 III II 7208 Dallas RD Single Renewal Neng Xi Zhang 2 I 0 I II 6816 Fremont PL N Single Renewal Ali Sajjad / 786 Homes LLC (Met Action Plan)1 I 0 I III 5524 Logan Ave N Single Renewal Avalon Home Investment LLC 8 III 0 III II 6418 Major Ave N Single Renewal Jessica & Vernantius Summers 1 I 0 I II 6807 Quail Ave N Single Renewal Paul Pham 7 III 0 III II * CFS = Calls For Service for Renewal Licenses Only (Initial Licenses are not applicable to calls for service and will be listed N/A.) ** License Type Being Issued *** Initial licenses will not show a previous license type All properties are current on City utilities and property taxes Type 1 = 3 Year Type II = 2 Year Type III = 1 Year Rental Licenses for Council Approval on May 28, 2019 COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Nate R einhardt, F inance Director S UBJ EC T:An O rdinance Amending O rdinance 2003-22, Exhibit A; Xc el Energy Elec tric F ranchis e F ee S c hedule from Xcel Energy Requested Council Action: - M otion to adopt the first reading of the ordinance amendment for franchise fees and holding a second reading with a public hearing on July 8, 2019 Background: T he C ity C o uncil adopted a resolutions o n Dec emb er 8, 2003 whic h es tab lis hed franc hise fees with the two large no n-munic ip al utility c o mp anies in Bro o klyn C enter; Xc el Energy (electricity) and C enterP oint Energy (natural gas). T hese fees are c harged to the respec tive utility companies fo r the use of pub lic right-o f-way and other public grounds in the d elivery o f s ervic es to their c ustomers . T he C ity is proposing a three percent inc reas e to the Xcel Energy franc hise fee. T he C ity antic ip ates c o llecting $689,000 in franchis e fee revenue fo r 2019. T hes e fund s are credited to the S treet R ec o ns truc tion F und , whic h is us ed to fund the portio n o f s treet p ro jects that c anno t be assessed as outlined in the 15-year C apital Improvement P lan. T he franchis e fee agreements allo w the C ity to inc reas e the fee. T he agreement with Xc el limits the franc hise fee to two perc ent o f total annual revenues d erived from the C ity and limits the increase to not mo re than three percent every three years. T he Xc el agreement runs through 2023, with a c laus e that allo ws for a re-opener, if we desire, to amend the agreement for s pec ific provis io ns if the c o mp any has agreed with two or more c ities s inc e the franc hise agreement was adopted. T he agreement als o req uires that the fee formula is non- dis criminatory or place the c ompany at a competitive disadvantage. T he monthly impact on residential properties of the propos ed franchis e fee inc reas es are as follows : C urrent P ro p o s ed Monthly Increase Xc el Energy $1.60 $1.65 $0.05 *C ommercial and indus trial would also receive an equivalent percentage increase Increasing thes e franchis e fees req uires a minimum o f a s ixty-day no tic e to Xc el and a p ublic hearing to amend the franchis e fee ordinance. Xcel Energy has been notified of the proposed changes . A copy of the notific ation is attached. Budget Issues: A three perc ent increase in the franchis e agreements with Xc el and C enterP oint, amount to an estimated $23,000 annual increase in revenue. If approved , the 2020 S treet R ec o nstruc tion F und bud get will b e adjus ted to reflect this inc reas e. S trategic Priorities and Values: Key Transportation Inves tments AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type Xc el Energy F ranchis e F ee S chedule - 2003-22 5/21/2019 O rdinanc e Notification Letter - Xcel Energy 5/13/2019 Bac kup Material CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held on the 8th day of July 2019, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment of Ordinance No. 2003-22. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. 2019-02 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2003-22, EXHIBIT A; XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC FRANCHISE FEE SCHEDULE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 2003-22 setting the rates for a franchise fee on Xcel Energy for providing electric service within the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: EXHIBIT A XCEL ENERGY ELECTRIC FRANCHISE FEE SCHEDULE Class Fee Per Premise Residential $ 1.65 per month Small Commercial & Industrial – Non-Demand $ 4.25 per month Small Commercial & Industrial – Demand $ 22.75 per month Large Commercial & Industrial $103.00 per month Public Street Lighting $ 13.50 per month Municipal Pumping – Non-Demand $ 13.50 per month Municipal Pumping – Demand $ 13.50 per month Section 2. This ordinance amendment shall become effective for service billings by Xcel Energy after December 31, 2019. Adopted this 8 day of July, 2019. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Nate R einhardt, F inance Director S UBJ EC T:An O rdinance Amending O rdinance No. 2003-23, Exhibit A; C enterpoint Energy O perations within the C ity of Brooklyn C enters from C enterP oint Energy Requested Council Action: - M otion to adopt the first reading of the ordinance amendment for franchise fees and holding a second reading with a public hearing on July 8, 2019 Background: T he C ity C ouncil adopted res olutions on Dec emb er 8, 2003 which es tablis hed franchis e fees with the two large non-municipal utility companies in Bro o klyn C enter; Xcel Energy (elec tric ity) and C enterP oint Energy (natural gas). T hese fees are c harged to the res pective utility companies for the use of p ublic right-of-way and other public gro und s in the delivery of services to their cus tomers. T he C ity is proposing a three p ercent inc reas e to the C enterP oint Energy franc hise fee. T he C ity antic ip ates c o llecting $689,000 in franchis e fee revenue fo r 2019. T hes e fund s are credited to the S treet R ec o ns truc tion F und , whic h is us ed to fund the portio n o f s treet p ro jects that c anno t be assessed as outlined in the 15-year C apital Improvement P lan. T he franchis e fee agreements allo w the C ity to inc reas e the fee. T he C enterP oint agreement calls for c hanges to the franchis e fee to be c o mp arab le to ad justments mad e to franchis e fees with Xc el. T he agreement also requires that the fee fo rmula is no n-disc riminato ry o r p laces the company at a c o mp etitive disadvantage. T he C enterP oint franchis e agreement runs through 2035. T he monthly impact on residential properties of the propos ed franchis e fee inc reas es are as follows : C urrent P roposed Monthly Increase C enterP oint 1.61 1.66 0.05 *C ommercial and indus trial would also receive an equivalent percentage increase Increasing thes e franchis e fees requires a minimum o f a ninety-day no tic e to C enterP oint and a p ublic hearing to amend the franchis e fee ordinance. C enterP oint Energy have been notified of the propos ed changes . A c opy of the no tific ation to C enterP oint Energy is attac hed. Budget Issues: A three perc ent increase in the franchis e agreements with Xc el and C enterP oint, amount to an estimated $23,000 annual increase in revenue. If approved , the 2020 S treet R ec o nstruc tion F und bud get will b e adjus ted to reflect this inc reas e. S trategic Priorities and Values: Key Transportation Inves tments AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type C enterpoint Energy F ranc hise F ee S c hedule - O rd 2003-23 5/21/2019 O rdinanc e Notification Letter - C enterP oint Energy 5/13/2019 Bac kup Material CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a Public Hearing will be held on the 8th day of July 2019, at 7 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at the City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an amendment of Ordinance No. 2003-23. Auxiliary aids for persons with disabilities are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please contact the City Clerk at 763-569-3300 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. 2019-03 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2003-23, EXHIBIT A; CENTERPOINT ENERGY OPERATIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FEE SCHEDULE THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Exhibit A of Ordinance No. 2003-23 setting the rates for a franchise fee on CenterPoint Energy for providing natural gas service within the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: EXHIBIT A CENTERPOINT ENERGY GAS FRANCHISE FEE SCHEDULE Class Fee Per Premise Residential $ 1.66 per month Commercial A $ 1.74 per month Commercial Industrial B $ 5.63 per month Commercial C $ 22.50 per month SVDF A $ 56.23 per month SVDF B $107.96 per month LVDF $107.96 per month Section 2. This ordinance amendment shall become effective for service billings by CenterPoint Energy after December 31, 2019. Adopted this 8th day of July, 2019. Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Brett Angell, Bus iness and Workforce Development S pecialist S UBJ EC T:R esolution Authorizing the S ubmis s ion of a Transit -O riented Development G rant Applic ation to Hennepin C ounty Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve a resolution authorizing the submission of a Transit-O riented D evelopment (T O D ) grant application to H ennepin C ounty Background: In 2003, the Hennepin C ounty Board of C ommis s ioners es tablished the Transit O riented Development (TO D) program to s upport redevelopment and new cons truction activities within the c ounty that enhance trans it usage. Hennepin C ounty had a total of $2.2 million available for the 2019 spring round of applications, whic h both public and private entities were eligible to apply for. T he TO D program s eeks to s upport projec ts and developments that: Enhanc e transit us age; Increase density along transit c orridors ; R einforc e both the c ommunity and transit sys tem; Exhibit compac t and efficient use of available spac e; C ontain a divers ity and mix of uses with daily convenienc es and transit at the center; S upport pedestrian-friendly phys ical des ign that encourages walking bic yc ling and ac cess for people with phys ical dis abilities; and Are within a c omfortable walking distanc e to transit. R ecently, C ity s taff met with Hennepin C ounty C ommunity Works staff to disc uss s ome of the upcoming projects and initiatives for Brooklyn C enter. T hrough thes e c onvers ations , it was recommended that the C ity complete an applic ation for TO D funding for the O pportunity S ite. S taff completed the application with a request to aid in funding the public infras tructure from the C ounty. T he public infrastruc ture c os ts on the O pportunity S ite are anticipated to be between $14 and $16 million and would include new roads , s tormwater, utilities, sidewalks and trails. W hile many areas of the projec t are still to be decided as the O pportunity S ite goes through the master planning process, the application details the vis ion of the s ite as a dense, mixed-use downtown center for the C ity serving the needs of the existing and future residents of the C ity. T he vis ion for the O pportunity S ite aligns with the types of development which the TO D program s upports . C ity staff were notified on May 15th that the applic ation had been selec ted by the Hennepin C ounty Housing and R edevelopment Authority (HC HR A) Board of C ommissioners for a grant award of $595,000. In order to receive the funds from Hennepin C ounty, the C ity is required to pas s a res olution of support for the application. Based on the sc ale of the redevelopment of the O pportunity S ite, signific ant investment will need to be made through public and private methods . projec ts receiving Hennepin C ounty TO D funds are not limited to a s ingle funding round, s o the C ity will be able to apply for additional funds in future rounds . F urther, Hennepin C ounty's support for the project as an early inves tor, will help the projec t s core well in future funding applications with both the C ounty and the Metropolitan C ounc il. Budget Issues: T here are no budgetary issues regarding this item at this time. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type R esolution 5/20/2019 R es olution Letter G rant Application 5/20/2019 Bac kup Material G rant F unding Approval Letter 5/20/2019 Bac kup Material Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2019- ___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AND SUPPORTING AN APPLICATION FOR HENNEPIN COUNTY TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT FUNDS WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center has identified the Opportunity Site as a significant redevelopment project for the City and is currently undergoing master-planning efforts for the site; and WHEREAS, the City of Brooklyn Center will be making major investments in the area and around the site, including the construction of new public infrastructure; and WHEREAS, public infrastructure costs are an eligible expense and meets the grant program guidelines as established by Hennepin County; and WHEREAS, the City certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement; and WHEREAS, the proposed project and grant application is consistent with and advances the Strategic Priorities established by the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, after appropriate examination and due consideration, the governing body of the City: 1. Finds that it is in the best interests of the City’s goals and priorities for the following proposed Transit-Oriented Development project: Brooklyn Center Opportunity Site 2. Authorizes the Business and Workforce Development Specialist to submit on behalf of the City an application for Transit-Oriented Development grant funds for the Opportunity Site project components identified in the application, and to execute such agreements as may be necessary to implement the grant on behalf of the City. May 28, 2019 Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner 2 and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Hennepin County Housing and Redevelopment Authority 701 Fourth Avenue South, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55415 hennepin.us/hchra 2019 Transit Oriented Development Program Application Responses due by Thursday, February 7, 2019 at 3:00 p.m. Project Name Site Address City Applicant Information Applicant Name Address Contact Name Title Contact Phone Contact Email Project Overview—Please provide a brief summary of your project 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 2 1. Readiness Details Milestone Commitment date or anticipated date Amount Construction Timeline Land use approvals (including any zoning, comprehensive plan amendments, variances, etc.) Not Applicable Construction bids Not Applicable Permits Not Applicable HUD review Not Applicable Site control Not Applicable Financial closing Not Applicable Clean up/demolition Not Applicable Begin construction Not Applicable Project completion Not Applicable Funding Sources First Mortgage General Partner Cash/Other Equity Syndication Proceeds Deferred Loan TIF Sales Tax/Energy Rebates Deferred Developer Fee City of Minneapolis AHTF Hennepin County AHIF/HOME/ERF Met Council TOD/LCDA/TBRA DEED Redevelopment/Cleanup Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: Other: 1a. Total development cost 1b. Percentage of funds are committed 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 3 2. Request Details 2a. Amount Type The Hennepin County HRA has final discretion of whether the funds are awarded as a grant or as a loan 2b. Application type (See RFP for a description of types) 2c. Proposed Use of TOD Funds (check all that apply) Acquisition Utilities Public Infrastructure Wayfinding Lighting Site Work Landscaping Sidewalks/trail Stormwater Streetscaping Site Furnishings Plaza Transit Shelter Public Bike Infrastructure Private Bike Infrastructure Demolition Other (Please list) 3. Location Details 3a. Property ID Number(s) 3b. Redevelopment Area/Housing District The project must be located within a municipally-designated Redevelopment Area, or the municipality must express its intent to establish a Redevelopment Area. 3c. Is the project located within an Opportunity Zone? 3d. Hennepin County Commissioner District 3e. Transit lines, transit stations, bikeways/regional trails, and parks within ¼ and ½ mile 0-¼ mile from site ¼- ½ mile from site Transit lines (LRT, BRT, Bus) Transit stations (LRT, BRT, Bus) Bikeways/Regional Trails Parks 3f. List job centers located within a 10 minute walk, 15 minute bike, and/or 25 minute transit commute 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 4 4. Project Details The following informs the selection team’s understanding of the project and assists in comprehending how projects change over time. Applicants are encouraged to fill out the form as completely as possible, but it is recognized that some of the data will not apply or may change as the project is more fully developed. Indicate “N/A” if the item does not apply. 4a. Site size 4b. Zoning: Existing Proposed 4c. Proposed land use 4d. Date of or anticipated date of land use approvals 4e. Housing Units Existing units on the site Total units Affordable units AMI Market rate units Renovated units Retained/non-renovated units Newly created units Total number of bedrooms 4f. Commercial Square Footage Existing Sq. Ft. New Sq. Ft. Retained Sq. Ft. Total Sq. Ft. Office Retail Industrial Community/Amenity Other 4g. Density Dwelling units per acre Floor area ratio 4h. Is relocation required for any residents or commercial tenants? 4i. Describe any public infrastructure or public amenities to be built as part of the project 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 5 4j. Permanent Jobs Only include permanent full-time equivalent (FTE) jobs directly associated with the project. Do not include construction jobs. Existing Jobs New Jobs Retained Jobs Total Jobs Office Retail Industrial Housing Other Describe the methodology/assumptions for job projections (examples: number of jobs per SF, information from tenant, etc.) 4k. Auto Parking Housing Office Retail Other Stalls Ratio (per unit or per 1,000 sq. ft.) Describe how auto parking will be provided (structured, surface, etc.) and if there is a shared parking agreement. Will there be a cost for users to use parking? Will there be a Transportation Demand Management Plan? 4l. Bicycle Parking Total stalls Long-term stalls Short-term stalls Private stalls Public stalls Will any of the bike parking be secured or covered? If so, how many stalls? Will the bike parking be reserved for any certain users? If so, who? 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 6 5. Project Costs 5a. Market Value Current taxable market value of the site Anticipated taxable market value after project completion 5b. Development Costs Acquisition Cost Total Development Cost Residential Development Costs Commercial Development Costs Parking Development Costs 5c. Proposed Use of TOD Funds Please provide only the costs associated with the activities checked on page 3 “Proposed Use of TOD Funds” Activity Total Cost TOD Request Acquisition Utilities Public Infrastructure Wayfinding Lighting Site Work Landscaping Sidewalks/Trails Stormwater Streetscaping Site Furnishings Plaza Transit Shelter Public Bike Infrastructure Private Bike Infrastructure Demolition Other: Other: 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 7 6. Project Narrative 6a. Describe the following components of your project: i. Describe why this site was selected for this project. What is the status of site control, current land use, and site condition? ii. List project partners including development partners, the local neighbors, community organizations, current/future tenants and residents, management, service providers, and others. Describe how the local community, including current residents/tenants, were engaged in the planning process. iii. Describe how the project will catalyze other development in the area (include such items as nearby vacant/underutilitzed parcels, other pending development, etc.). iv. Describe how the project fulfills an identified area need (such as affordable or market rate housing, commercial/retail space, public infrastructure, etc.) 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 8 v. Describe area amenities and/or supporting land uses that are within walking and biking distance. vi. Describe how the project is maximizing the potential of the site. 6b. Describe the development team and other partners and its experience on similar projects. 6c. List the names of relevant, supportive policies/plans and provide links to websites (where available). 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 9 6d. Describe the biggest challenges or extraordinary costs facing your project and explain why the project is not feasible without Hennepin County funds. Please include any challenges not previously described such as status of site control, financing, rents and returns, tenants/leasing, and other items pertinent to a successful project. 6e. What is the status of the project and the likelihood the project will be completed with the items requested for funding by December 31, 2021? Briefly describe each of the following: current level of design, project schedule, municipal approvals, committed/assumed funding, and project partner commitments. What is a realistic project start date if TOD funds are committed? 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 10 6f. How does your project create a more livable community? Include information about the mix of uses, density, walkability/bikeability, transit availability, public realm, and others. Are there local policies to support this-if so, please describe. 6g. What would you consider to be a market rate rent for this project in this location, and how does this project’s rents compare (for residential, commercial or both)? How will this project’s rates compare with existing product (not necessarily new construction) in the area and how was this determined? If the project does not include rent and income-restricted units, what other provisions are being considered with regard to residential or commercial affordability, if any? 2019 Hennepin County Transit Oriented Development Program Application 11 Attachments Attach the following documents in the following order. Please label the attachments according to their number. All projects 1. Aerial map showing location and transit connections (copies of bus schedules are not needed) 2. Site plan, elevations, and existing conditions photos 3. Detailed project schedule 4. Redevelopment area map and adopting resolution 5. Copies of any funding commitment(s), preliminary loan commitment(s), etc. (if available) 6. Evidence of site control 7. Applicant W9 Infrastructure only projects 8. Project budget noting assumptions 9. Information on existing, planning and anticipated real estate development projects directly served by the proposed infrastructure that minimally includes the name, location, number of units of market rate and affordable housing units, square footage of commercial space, anticipated jobs created and retained, developer name, site square footage, and projected timeframe. Real Estate Development only projects 10. Development pro forma that minimally includes sources and uses, financing assumptions of any debt (amount, amortization, term, interest rate, etc.), debt service coverage ratio, loan-to-value, loan-to-cost, percent equity, and cash-on-cash return. 11. Housing unit breakout for projects that include housing, that minimally includes unit type, unit count, average unit size, number of affordable units per unit type and targeted level of affordability, assumed rental rate per square foot, and list of assumed utilities the tenant would pay direct. 12. Commercial rent roll for projects that include commercial space that minimally includes unit number and square footage, base rent per unit and per square foot, and operating expenses per unit and per square foot. 13. 15-year operating pro forma that minimally includes revenue by type, operating expenses, operating income, debt service, reserves, and cash flow. 14. Development team qualifications (no more than one page per partner and no more than three pages total). COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Brett Angell, Bus iness and Workforce Development S pecialist S UBJ EC T:R esolution Authorizing the Use of EDA-O wned P roperty for the S aturday Market and Approving the Layout P lan for the Market Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve a resolution authorizing the use of E D A-owned property for the S aturday M arket and approving the layout plan for the market. Background: In F ebruary during the C ounc il worksession, the C ity C ouncil dis cus s ed the propos ed plans for the 2019, S aturday Market and provided feedback and rec ommendations for the market. S ince that time, S aturday Market planning staff have worked to ens ure the market continues to grow and is repres entative of the community. T his includes the purc hasing of additional tents to be us ed by vendors, and increased outreach and communic ation to loc al organizations who work within the community to recruit vendors . T he first S aturday Market of the 2019 s eas on is less than one month away, oc curring on S aturday, June 8th from 11:00 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. at the former Brookdale F ord location - 2500 S hingle C reek P arkway. S taff anticipates there to be over 40 vendors at the event, whic h would be the highes t number of vendors the S aturday Market has s een to date. O ther highlights of the June 8th S aturday Market inc lude: an inflatable and face-painting offered for free to kids and families, a DJ for music throughout the event, and much more. T he layout plan creates adequate area for parking with a main parking area and overflow parking area. T he parking area will be s eparated from the market area using metal barricades which will be rented. Two portable toilets and a portable sink will be loc ated on s ite. Attached to this memorandum includes a lay-out plan for the S aturday Market for review. T he market will run from June through O ctober on the s econd S aturday of each month. Improvements to the s ite location for the S aturday Market have begun with the as s is tance of the P ublic Works Department. T he large dirt pile that has been located at the s ite was used to fill in the hole where the former Brookdale F ord building was located. T he lot has been s wept by a s treet sweeper and any larger objections, s uc h as roc ks, have been removed. P ublic Works has filled low areas and holes with gravel to ens ure s afety for vendors and attendees of the market. T he C ity will monitor the growth of weeds and gras s es in the lot and will have them s prayed if they begin to create an issue for the market. T he lay-out plan includes items whic h have not been dis cus s ed in detail with the C ouncil and would deviate s lightly from the zoning c ode. T his inc ludes the plac ement of a storage container to be used for the s torage of tents, tables and c hairs during the entire market season. T he s torage c ontainer will provide eas e with set-up and take down of the market. During the 2018 market s eas on, Lennie C hism provided a panel van which was us ed to trans port the materials from the C ity amphitheater to the market. Acc es s to the panel van is no longer pos s ible and the amphitheater storage room does not have the spac e to be utilized for s torage this s ummer. Additional researc h is also occ urring on the funding, feasibility, and placement of a temporary struc ture which could be available to vendors . T he temporary s tructure concept c ould inc lude the reus e of a shipping c ontainer or the cons truction of a chalet to be fashioned in a means to house a pop up food vendor. T he concept would be to c reate a struc ture whic h would provide the s ame level of s ervic e as a food truck, with temporary seating, in order to provide a food vendor acc es s to equipment they might not otherwise have available to them. T he temporary struc ture, if realized, would be plac ed on the s ite for the entire duration of the 2019 S aturday Market. In addition, S taff is coordinating with cons ultant teams for both the Beatification and P ublic Art Master P lan and the Becoming Brooklyn C enter project to utilize the S aturday Market for both public engagement and creative placemaking opportunities throughout the summer. Budget Issues: $25,000 is budgeted from the EDA towards the S aturday Market. S trategic Priorities and Values: R es ident Ec onomic S tability AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type R esolution 5/20/2019 R es olution Letter Layout P lan 5/20/2019 Exhibit Member __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. 2019- ___ RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE USE OF EDA-OWNED PROPERTY FOR THE SATURDAY MARKET AND APPROVING THE LAY-OUT PLAN FOR THE MARKET WHEREAS, the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center has allocated funding and support for the continued operation of the Saturday Market; and WHEREAS, the Saturday Market supports the strategic priority of Resident Economic Stability by promoting local entrepreneurs ability to sell their products to the public without the need of a permanent commercial location; and WHEREAS, the EDA agrees to allow the Saturday Market to be conducted at the EDA- owned property located at 2500 County Road 10, the former Brookdale Ford property, for the 2019 market season; and WHEREAS, the EDA has reviewed the proposed lay-out of the market including the location of the tents used for vendors, a storage container for materials storage throughout the summer, temporary vendor space creation, inflatables, signage and parking. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that it hereby approves the use of lands owned by the EDA to be used to host the Saturday Market and approves the proposed lay-out plan for the market. May 28, 2019 Date Mayor ATTEST: ___________________ City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Main P arking Overfl ow Parking Food Vendors Vend ors Toi lets/SinkDJ Seating Kids A rea Barri c ade Hy drant Storage Container Sign So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , G arm in , In te r m ap , i n cr em ent P Co rp ., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, N R CA N, G eo B as e , IGN , K adas te r N L, Or dnance Su rvey, Esri Ja pan, M ET I, EsriChina (H ong Ko ng), (c ) Ope n Str ee tM ap c o ntri bu tors, and the GIS User Co m m u ni ty,He n nep in Co u nty Saturda y Ma rket Layou t Pl an Re sid ent ial Labels Ae ria l s 2015 Re d: Ba nd_1 Gre en : Band_2 Blu e: Band_3 5/1 3/2 019, 2:32:11 PM 1 inch = 94 feet COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Doran C ote, P ublic Works Director F R O M:Andrew Hogg, Assistant C ity Engineer S UBJ EC T:R esolution Approving Americ ans with Dis abilities Ac t (ADA) Trans ition P lan – P ublic R ight-of-Way Requested Council Action: - M otion to approve the resolution approving the Americans with D isabilities Act (AD A) Transition P lan – P ublic R ight-of-Way Background: T he ADA was approved by the F ederal G overnment in 1992. T hese s tatutes p ro hibit pub lic agencies from dis criminating agains t persons with d is ab ilities b y exclud ing them from services, programs , or activities . T hese s tatutes require p ed es trian ac ces s for p ers o ns with d is ab ilities to an agenc y's right-o f-way if pedestrian fac ilities exist. T hes e regulations req uire c ities to imp lement thes e requirements b y imposing standards for ac cessible features such as curb c uts , ramp s , c ontinuous s id ewalks and detectab le warnings . ADA req uires public agencies with more than 50 emp lo yees to have a Trans ition P lan. An agency's Trans ition P lan s hould have been completed within s ix months o f January 26, 1992, and sho uld be based on updates o f the self-evaluation conduc ted to comply with the requirements of the F ederal S tatues . In 1993, the C ity had a Transitio n P lan develo p ed for build ing and park fac ilities for ADA c omplianc e. Deficiencies were identified througho ut the p arks and completed a Transitio n P lan which inc luded building, parking lot, trail and curb mo d ificatio ns within C ity p ark fac ilities and some build ings , b ringing tho s e items up to compliance with the ADA. T he C ity’s 1993 Transitio n P lan did no t d etail transportation infras tructure within the right-of-way and there was no formal C ity C ouncil adoption of the Trans ition P lan. T he Trans ition P lan enc ompas s es s everal items whic h includ e a s ched ule for provid ing acc es s ib le features with the public right-of-way. T he ADA Transition P lan s hould ac complish the following four tasks : 1. Identify physic al obstacles in the public agency's fac ilities that limit the ac cessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities ; 2. Des cribe in detail methods that will be used to make the fac ilities acc es s ible; 3. S pecify the s chedule for taking s teps nec es s ary to upgrade pedestrian acc es s to meet ADA and S ection 504 requirements in each year following the Transition P lan; and 4. Indicate the officials res ponsible for implementation of the Transition P lan. S taff has completed a s elf-evaluation of 100 percent of the C ity’s 867 pedestrian ramps , 45.67 miles of s idewalk and traffic control s ys tems . T he Transitio n P lan will p res ent the p o licies , proc ed ures and standards for the C ity to follow within the right-of-way. T he Transition P lan als o lays out a grievance procedure. T he C ity’s Trans itio n P lan was o p en fo r p ublic c o mment fro m Ap ril 1, 2019 through Ap ril 30, 2019. T he following is a des cription of the C ity’s outreac h program for the ADA Trans ition P lan – P ublic R ights -of-Way: P rovided res idents advanc e notic e of upc oming public outreach period for the C ity’s ADA Transition P lan – P ublic R ights-of-Way in December 2018 C ity news letter via “save the date” ad. S ent letters to various governmental and non-profit agenc ies reques ting additional information c onc erning ADA plans or possible groups within the c ommunity to foc us outreach. T his attempt yielded little benefits as the C ity was only c ontacted by one agenc y and only a day or two before the event. F lyers were s ent to loc al religious organizations with meeting times for the public comment O pen Hous e meetings. Meeting dates and times for the O pen House meetings were broadcast on soc ial media and a loc al community acc es s T V s pot with a broadc as t on a loc al T V channel and via their webpage. Held three O pen Hous e meetings at different times to provide flexibility with s chedules, one during the day (April 17, 2019 at 2 p.m.), one in the evening (April 25, 2019 at 5 p.m.) and one on the weekend (April 27, 2019 at 10 a.m.). T he April 27 O pen House meeting was part of a larger community health event hosted by the C ity. O ver the c o urs e o f the mo nth p ublic c o mment period the C ity had a webpage http://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/index.as px?nid=1262 with a draft p lan and informatio n on how to provide comments. T he F inal ADA Transition P lan – P ublic R ights-of-Way is included for review. Budget Issues: T here are no b udget issues to cons id er with this actio n. Up o n c o nsideratio n and approval o f the ADA Transition P lan – P ub lic R ights-of-Way, C ity s taff will c o ntinue to provid e acc es s ib le pedestrian improvements as part of the C ity’s C apital Improvement P rogram. S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type R esolution 5/21/2019 C over Memo ADA Trans ition P lan 5/21/2019 C over Memo Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. _______________ RESOLUTION APPROVING AMERICANS WITH DISABILITES ACT (ADA) TRANSTION PLAN- PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY WHEREAS, the ADA was approved by the Federal Government in 1992. These statutes prohibit public agencies from discriminating against persons with disabilities by excluding them from services, programs, or activities. These statutes require pedestrian access for persons with disabilities to an agency's right-of-way if pedestrian facilities exist; and WHEREAS, the Transition Plan encompasses several items which include a schedule for providing accessible features with the public right-of-way. The ADA Transition Plan contains the following four tasks: List of physical obstacles in the public agency's facilities that limit the accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities, detail methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible, schedule for taking steps necessary to upgrade pedestrian access to meet ADA and Section 504 requirements in each year following the Transition Plan; and indicates the officials responsible for implementation of the Transition Plan; and WHEREAS, the City held a public comment period from April 1, 2019, through April 30, 2019, and has reviewed all comments and addressed them in the plan as warranted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, that: 1) The ADA Transition Plan – Public Rights-of-Way is hereby APPROVED. May 28, 2019 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. ADA Transition Plan for City Rights of Way City of Brooklyn Center 5/28/2019 The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. Title II of ADA provides that, “…no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” 1 | Page 2 | Page Table of Contents Section 1- Introduction 1.1. Transition Plan Need and Purpose 1.2 ADA and Its Relationship to Other Laws 1.3 Agency Requirements Section 2 - Self-Evaluation 2.1. Overview 2.2 Summary Section 3 - Policies and Practices 3.1. Previous Practices and Current Practices 3.2 Transportation Projects 3.3 Reconstruction Projects 3.4 Bike, Sidewalk and Trail Projects 3.5 Traffic Control Signal Projects 3.6 Inventory Section 4 - ADA Coordinator Section 5 -Implementation Schedule 5.1 Policy 5.2 Methodology 5.3 External Agency Coordination 5.4 Prioritization and Schedule Section 6 - Public Outreach Section 7- Grievance Process Section 8 - Monitor the Progress 3 | Page Appendices 4 | Page Introduction Transition Plan Need and Purpose The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) was enacted on July 26, 1990, is a civil rights law prohibiting discrimination against individuals on the basis of disability. ADA consists of five titles outlining protections in the following areas: I. Employment II. State and local government services III. Public accommodations IV. Telecommunications V. Miscellaneous Provisions Title II of ADA pertains to the programs, activities and services public entities provide. As a provider of public transportation services and programs, the City of Brooklyn Center (City) must comply with this section of the ADA as it specifically applies to public service agencies. Title II of ADA provides that, “…no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” (42 USC. Sec. 12132; 28 CFR. Sec. 35.130) As required by Title II of ADA, 28 CFR. Part 35 Sec. 35.105 and Sec. 35.150, the City has conducted a self-evaluation of its facilities within public rights-of-way and has developed this Transition Plan detailing how the organization will ensure that all of those facilities are accessible to all individuals. This document serves as a supplement to the City’s existing Transition Plan covering buildings, services, programs and activities. ADA and Its Relationship to Other Laws Title II of ADA is companion legislation to two previous Federal statutes and regulations: the Architectural Barriers Acts of 1968 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 is a Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 is a Federal law that protects qualified individuals from discrimination based on their disability. The nondiscrimination requirements of the law apply to employers and organizations that receive financial assistance from any Federal department or agency. Title II of ADA extended this coverage to all state and local government entities, regardless of whether they receive Federal funding or not. 5 | Page Agency Requirements Under Title II, the City must meet these general requirements: • Must operate their programs so that, when viewed in their entirety, the programs are accessible to and useable by individuals with disabilities (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.150). • May not refuse to allow a person with a disability to participate in a service, program or activity simply because the person has a disability (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130 (a). • Must make reasonable modifications in policies, practices and procedures that deny equal access to individuals with disabilities unless a fundamental alteration in the program would result (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b) (7). • May not provide services or benefits to individuals with disabilities through programs that are separate or different unless the separate or different measures are necessary to ensure that benefits and services are equally effective (28 C.F.R. Sec. 35.130(b)(iv) & (d). • Must take appropriate steps to ensure that communications with applicants, participants and members of the public with disabilities are as effective as communications with others (29 C.F.R. Sec. 35.160(a). • Must designate at least one responsible employee to coordinate ADA compliance [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(a)]. This person is often referred to as the "ADA Coordinator". The public entity must provide the ADA Coordinator's name, office address and telephone number to all interested individuals [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(a)]. • Must provide notice of ADA requirements. All public entities, regardless of size, must provide information about the rights and protections of Title II to applicants, participants, beneficiaries, employees and other interested persons [28 CFR Sec. 35,106]. The notice must include the identification of the employee serving as the ADA Coordinator and must provide this information on an ongoing basis [28 CFR Sec. 104.8(a)]. • Must establish a grievance procedure. Public entities must adopt and publish grievance procedures providing for prompt and equitable resolution of complaints [28 CFR Sec. 35.107(b)]. This requirement provides for a timely resolution of all problems or conflicts related to ADA compliance before they escalate to litigation and/or the Federal complaint process. This document has been created to specifically cover accessibility within the public rights-of- way and does not include information on City programs, practices, or building facilities not related to public rights-of-way. 6 | Page Self-Evaluation Overview The City is required, under Title II of the ADA and 28CFR35.105, to perform a self-evaluation of its current transportation infrastructure policies, practices and programs. This self-evaluation will identify what policies and practices impact accessibility and examine how the City implements these policies. The goal of the self-evaluation is to verify that, in implementing the City’s policies and practices, the department is providing accessibility and not adversely affecting the full participation of individuals with disabilities. The self-evaluation also examines the condition of the City’s Pedestrian Circulation Route/Pedestrian Access Route (PCR/PAR) and identifies potential need for PCR/PAR infrastructure improvements. This will include the sidewalks, curb ramps, bicycle/pedestrian trails, traffic control signals and transit facilities that are located within the City’s rights-of-way. Any barriers to accessibility identified in the self-evaluation and the remedy to the identified barrier are set out in this transition plan. Policies and Practices Previous Practices and Current Practices Since the adoption of the ADA, the City has strived to provide accessible pedestrian features as part of the City’s capital improvement projects. As additional information was made available, as to the methods of providing accessible pedestrian features, the City updated their procedures to accommodate these methods. Past projects include 1993 ADA Transition Plan, along with improvements in neighborhood reconstruction projects. The engineering department will consider and respond to all accessibility improvement requests within the right of way. Requests should be sent to the ADA coordinator as specified in Appendix D. All accessibility improvements that have been determined to be reasonable will be scheduled, consistent with transportation priorities. The City will coordinate with external agencies as necessary to ensure that all new or altered pedestrian facilities within the city jurisdiction are ADA compliant to the maximum extent possible. Following are descriptions of the various policies and practices the City uses to assist with ADA compliance. Transportation Projects The City’s goal is to continue to provide and upgrade accessible pedestrian facilities as part of transportation projects. During the development of project plans, staff will inspect, inventory 7 | Page and plan for any required improvements to pedestrian facilities located in the public right of way to ensure ADA compliance. The city has established ADA design standards and procedures as detailed in Appendix G Street Reconstruction Projects The City’s street infrastructure is upgraded and maintained through Street Reconstruction Projects. The City is divided into 17 neighborhoods and projects are planned based on these neighborhood areas. The projects provide a systematic approach to managing the City’s transportation infrastructure, including pedestrian facilities within the right-of-way. The City incorporates ADA accessible pedestrian features into its reconstruction projects, including street rehabilitation and sidewalk maintenance. The segments of streets and sidewalks are selected based on condition, budget and are updated annually within the City’s 15 Year Capital Improvement Program (CIP) to reflect current infrastructure needs. Bike, Sidewalk and Trail Projects The City has an approved Pedestrian & Bicycle Plan (adopted by the City Council on March 24, 2014), with the goal to improve connectivity, safety and accessibility and overall community livability of the citywide network of sidewalks and trails. At times, its necessary to schedule sidewalk and trail construction separately from street and transportation projects. These projects will incorporate pedestrian ADA facility upgrades and improvements as necessary. Traffic Control Signal Projects The City is responsible for eight traffic control signals in Brooklyn Center. At times it is necessary to schedule traffic signal repair and replacement separately from street and transportation projects. These projects are driven by traffic control conditions and operations at the intersections and will incorporate pedestrian facility upgrades as necessary and feasible. Inventory In 2016 and 2017, the City conducted an inventory of pedestrian facilities within its public right- of-way consisting of the evaluation of following City owned facilities: • 45.6 miles of sidewalks • 839 curb ramps • 15.7 miles of trails • 8 signalized intersections A detailed evaluation on how these facilities relate to ADA standards is found in Appendix B and will be updated periodically. The engineering department will further assess accessibility of pedestrian ramps and traffic signals in advance of the CIP projects to allow for the design of ADA compliant pedestrian facilities. As resources allow, the department will gather additional 8 | Page data to assist in determining levels of ADA compliance of pedestrian facilities to assist in prioritizing and programing funds for projects to be added to the CIP. ADA Coordinator In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(a), the City has identified an ADA Title II Coordinator to oversee City policies and procedures. Contact information for this individual is located in Appendix E. Implementation Schedule Policy The City’s goal is to continue to provide accessible pedestrian design features as part of the CIP projects. The City has established ADA design standards and procedures as listed in Appendix G. These standards and procedures will be kept up to date with nationwide and local best management practices. The City will consider and respond to all accessibility improvement requests. All accessibility improvements that have been deemed reasonable will be scheduled consistent with transportation priorities. The City will coordinate with external agencies to ensure that all new or altered pedestrian facilities within the City jurisdiction are ADA compliant to the maximum extent feasible. Maintenance of pedestrian facilities within the public right-of-way will continue to follow the policies set forth by the City (Sidewalk Maintenance Policy, Snow and Ice Control Policy). Methodology The City will utilize two methods for upgrading pedestrian facilities to the current ADA standards. The first and most comprehensive of the two methods are the scheduled street and utility improvement projects. All pedestrian facilities impacted by these projects will be upgraded to current ADA accessibility standards. The second method is the stand alone sidewalk and ADA accessibility improvement project. These projects will be incorporated into the 15 year CIP on a case by case basis as determined by Brooklyn Center staff. The City CIP, which includes a detailed schedule and budget for specific improvements, is updated annually. External Agency Coordination Many other agencies are responsible for pedestrian facilities within the jurisdiction of the City. The City will coordinate with those agencies to track and assist in the facilitation of the elimination of accessibility barriers along their routes. 9 | Page Prioritization and Schedule The City will include accessibility improvements in all transportation projects planned in the CIP. The CIP is reviewed on an annual basis and will be revised as needed to address accessibility priorities with the needs of the City’s overall transportation system. The City has set the following schedule goals for improving the accessibility of its pedestrian facilities within the City jurisdiction: • Traffic signals, pedestrian ramps and sidewalks will be addressed through the neighborhood reconstruction projects from scheduling and constructing improvements. • Any facilities identified as an existing hazard or compliance issue that City staff believes needs to be addressed by a set date will have a work order issued or it will be incorporated into a CIP project. • After 15 years, 70 percent of accessibility features within the jurisdiction of City should be ADA compliant. Public Outreach The City recognizes that public participation is an important component in the development of this document. Input from the community has been gathered and used to help define priority areas for improvements within the jurisdiction of the City. Public outreach for the creation of this document consisted of the following activities: Advance notice of upcoming information meetings City newsletter article highlighting the public comment period, CXX tv spot highlighting public comment period, Social media post ADA Transition Plan City webpage This document was also available for public comment. A summary of comments received and detailed information regarding the public outreach activities are located in Appendix C. Grievance Procedure Under the ADA, each agency is required to publish its responsibilities in regards to the ADA. A draft of this public notice is provided in Appendix D. If users of the City facilities and services believe the City has not provided reasonable accommodation, they have the right to file a grievance. 10 | Page In accordance with 28 CFR 35.107(b), the City has developed a grievance procedure for the purpose of the prompt and equitable resolution of citizens’ complaints, concerns, comments and other grievances. This grievance procedure is outlined in Appendix D, with a complaint form in Appendix E. Monitor the Progress This document will continue to be updated as conditions within the City evolve. The appendices in this document will be updated periodically, while the main body of the document will be updated as needed with a future update schedule to be developed at that time. With each main body update, a public comment period will be established to continue the public outreach. 11 | Page Appendices A. Glossary of Terms B. Self-Evaluation Results C. Public Outreach D. Grievance Procedure E. Grievance Form F. Contact Information G. Agency ADA Design Standards and Procedures 22 | Page Appendix A – Glossary of Terms ABA: Architectural Barriers Act. ADA: Americans with Disabilities Act. ADA Transition Plan: MnDOT’s transportation system plan that identifies accessibility needs, the process to fully integrate accessibility improvements into the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and ensures all transportation facilities, services, programs and activities are accessible to all individuals. ADAAG: Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines. Accessible: A facility that provides access to people with disabilities using the design requirements of the ADA. Accessible Pedestrian Signal (APS): A device that communicates information about the WALK phase in audible and vibrotactile formats. Alteration: A change to a facility in the public right-of-way that affects or could affect access, circulation, or use. An alteration must not decrease or have the effect of decreasing the accessibility of a facility or an accessible connection to an adjacent building or site. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA): The Americans with Disabilities Act; Civil rights legislation passed in 1990 and effective July 1992. The ADA sets design guidelines for accessibility to public facilities, including sidewalks and trails, by individuals with disabilities. Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG): Contains scoping and technical requirements for accessibility to buildings and public facilities by individuals with disabilities under the ADA of 1990. APS: Accessible Pedestrian Signal. Architectural Barriers Act (ABA): Federal law that requires facilities designed, built, altered or leased with Federal funds to be accessible. The Architectural Barriers Act marks one of the first efforts to ensure access to the built environment. Capital Improvement Program (CIP): Capital Improvement Plan provides long-term planning and management of infrastructure and buildings throughout the City. The CIP is a planning document that presents a 15-year overview of scheduled capital projects to address the City’s goals for maintaining public infrastructure in four functional areas: street improvements, park improvements, public utilities and capital building maintenance Improvements. A capital 23 | Page improvement is defined as a major non-recurring expenditure related to the City’s physical facilities and grounds. Detectable Warning: A surface feature of truncated domes, built in or applied to the walking surface to indicate an upcoming change from pedestrian to vehicular way. DOJ: United States Department of Justice Federal Highway Administration (FHWA): A branch of the US Department of Transportation that administers the Federal-aid Highway Program, providing financial assistance to states to construct and improve highways, urban and rural roads and bridges. Pedestrian Access Route (PAR): A continuous and unobstructed walkway within a pedestrian circulation path that provides accessibility. Pedestrian Circulation Route (PCR): A prepared exterior or interior way of passage provided for pedestrian travel. PROWAG: An acronym for the Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way issued in 2005 by the U.S. Access Board. This guidance addresses roadway design practices, slope and terrain related to pedestrian access to walkways and streets, including crosswalks, curb ramps, street furnishings, pedestrian signals, parking and other components of public rights-of-way. Right-of-Way: A general term denoting land, property, or interest therein, usually in a strip, acquired for the network of streets, sidewalks and trails creating public pedestrian access within a public entity’s jurisdictional limits. Section 504: The section of the Rehabilitation Act that prohibits discrimination by any program or activity conducted by the Federal government. Uniform Accessibility Standards (UFAS): Accessibility standards that all Federal agencies are required to meet; includes scoping and technical specifications. United States Access Board: An independent Federal agency that develops and maintains design criteria for buildings and other improvements, transit vehicles, telecommunications equipment and electronic and information technology. It also enforces accessibility standards that cover federally funded facilities. United States Department of Justice (DOJ): The United States Department of Justice (often referred to as the Justice Department or DOJ), is the United States Federal executive department responsible for the enforcement of the law and administration of justice. 12 | Page Appendix B – Self-Evaluation Results This initial self-evaluation of pedestrian facilities yielded the following results: • 58% percent of sidewalks met accessibility criteria (26.44 miles ) • 26% percent of curb ramps met accessibility criteria (220/839) • 100% percent of traffic control signals had Accessible Pedestrian Signal(APS) (8/8) o 13% percent of traffic control signals had push buttons that are accessible (1/8) The inventory of the pedestrian ramps and traffic signals in the city public right of way can be found at the city’s ADA transition plan webpage. The inventory of the pedestrian ramps and traffic signals in the city public right of way can be found at the city’s ADA transition plan webpage: http://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/index.aspx?nid=1262 13 | Page Appendix C – Public Outreach The Following is a description of the City’s outreach program for the ADA Transition Plan – Public Rights-of-Way. • Gave the residents advance notice of the upcoming public outreach period for the City’s ADA Transition Plan – Public Rights-of-Way in December 2018 City newsletter via “save the date” ad • The City also sent a letters to various governmental and non-profit agencies requesting help with additional information concerning ADA plans or possible groups within the community to focus outreach too. This attempt yielded little benefits as the City was only contacted by one agency and only a day or two before the event. • A flyer was sent to local religious organizations with meeting times for the public comment meetings. • The meeting dates and times for the Open House meetings were broadcasted on social media and a local community access TV spot with the a broadcast on a local TV channel and via their webpage. • The City held three meeting at different times to provide flexibility with peoples schedules, one during the day (April 17, 2019 at 2pm) , one in the evening April 25, 2019 at 5pm) and one on the weekend (April 27, 2019 at 10am). The April 27 public comment meeting was part of a larger community health event put on by the City. • Over the course of the month long public comment period the City had a webpage http://www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org/index.aspx?nid=1262 with a draft plan and information on how to provide comments. All comments from the public comment period are included within the plan. 6 DECEMBER 2018, Edition 207 NEWS Ci t y Community Development DRAFT 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMPLETE The City of Brooklyn Center has completed its Draft 2040 Comprehensive Plan, and it is now available for public comment. The Draft Plan can be found here: www.brooklyncenterplan2040.com The City is looking for feedback on the Draft Plan, and input on how it will be implemented over the next ten years. In order to help provide feedback, the City has a survey that asks questions related to the plan. Residents are invited to take the survey, and use the questions to provide input on what is in the Draft Plan. The survey can be found on the City’s Comprehensive Plan website here: www. brooklyncenterplan2040.com In addition to getting feedback from the community, neighboring communities, along with Hennepin County and the school districts are also invited to comment on the Draft Plan. The period for public comment will close at the end of January. At that time the City will incorporate the comments that were received into a Final Plan, and once the Final Plan is approved by the City Council, will submit it to the Metropolitan Council for final approval and adoption. It is anticipated that this will happen in May 2019. SAVE THE DATE: ADA TRANSITION PLAN MEETING In early 2019, the City of Brooklyn Center will be looking for public comments in regards to the City’s draft ADA Transition Plan. The draft plan address facilities within the City’s Public Rights of Way like pedestrian ramps, sidewalks and signalized crossings at intersections as it relates to the American’s with Disabilities Act. For information on ways you can participate connect with us through social media at cityofbrooklyncenter.org/socialmedia, visit our website at cityofbrooklyncenter.org or contact Public Works at publicworks@ci.brooklyn-center. mn.us with questions. Under Construction • Bank of America (2545 County Rd 10) – Winter 2018 • HOM Furniture /Two-story Addition (2501 County Rd 10) – Winter 2018/2019 • Hennepin County Service Center—Courtroom Addition (6125 Shingle Creek Pkwy) – Winter 2018/2019 • Medtronic—Addition (6800 Shingle Creek Pkwy) – Spring 2019 • Indoor Commercial Storage Facility (1950 57th Ave N) – Winter 2018/2019 • Lux Apartments (6100 Summit Dr N)— Winter 2018 • BT Nails (1480 Shingle Creek Crossing) – Winter 2018/2019 • Lee Carlson Center/Clinic-Based Therapy (5540 Brooklyn Blvd) – Spring 2019 • Milavetz, Gallop, & Milavetz—Addition (1915 57th Ave N) – Spring 2019 • Fairfield Inn and Suites (6250 Earle Brown Dr) – Summer 2019 • Luther Mazda/Mitsubishi Dealership (4435 68th Ave N) – Summer 2019 Approved Plans • Casey’s Gas Station and Convenience Store (2101 Freeway Blvd) – Anticipated Construction Start: Fall 2018 • Brooklyn Center Secondary School (6500 Humboldt Ave N) – Anticipated Construction Start: Winter 2019 • Unity Place (7256 Unity Ave N) – Anticipated Construction Start: Winter/Spring 2019 • Earle Brown Elementary School (1500 59th Ave N) – Anticipated Construction Start: Summer 2019 Now Open • Bizzy Coffee-Headquarters (2700 Freeway Blvd, Suite 200) – Opened September 2018 • Nompeng Academy (6201 Noble Ave N) – Opened September 2018 • TopGolf (6420 Camden Ave N) – Opened September 2018 UPDATES 2019 SAVE THE DATE April 16 Police and Citizen Awards 7:00-9:00pm (CC) 9 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org BCPD Hosts SHOP WITH A COP On December 6th the Brooklyn Center Police Department participated in one of two Shop with a Cop Programs. We hosted school social workers and several families from area Brooklyn Center schools. We asked the school’s social workers to complete an application on youth they believe were in need. We had 15 kids at Walmart and it went great. The kids were very excited to shop for their parents and siblings. The first and unfortunately last Shop With a Cop at Brooklyn Center’s Target was held on Thursday, December 13. We hosted 17 kids and Target gave each family member a bag of numerous essentials to take home. PREVENTING AUTO THEFTS With the cooler months upon us, we need to remember a few basic tips so that we do not become victims of auto theft or theft from autos. • Lock your vehicle. • Do NOT leave valuables visible in your car. Lock them in your trunk before you reach your destination. Even small items such as loose change or sunglasses can be attractive to a thief. • Do NOT leave your vehicle running unattended with the keys in the ignition to warm up. It takes only seconds for a thief drive away with your car. • Under Brooklyn Center City Ordinance 27-122, which applies to unattended motor vehicles, it is a misdemeanor to leave a vehicle unattended without stopping the engine and removing the keys; you can be ticketed for this! Vehicle remote start systems where the key is removed from the ignition are exempt from ordinance 27-122. • Know your vehicle – especially if it is a ‘push button’ or ‘proximity key’ enabled vehicle. Some vehicles can be driven without the key inside of the vehicle or in the ignition. Test your car before leaving it running unattended or ask your vehicle dealer or mechanic about how your vehicle operates. • If your vehicle can be driven without the keys in the ignition or a key fob inside of the vehicle, you can be ticketed for violation of ordinance 27-122. • The best option for warming up your vehicle is utilizing a remote engine start system! If you have questions, please contact Auto Theft Officer, Brandon Zabel at 763-503-3240 or bzabel@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us BROOKLYN CENTER’S ADA TRANSITION PLAN The City of Brooklyn Center will be looking for public comments in regards to the City’s draft ADA Transition Plan. The draft plan address facilities within the City’s Public Rights of Way like pedestrian ramps, sidewalks and signalized crossings at intersections as it relates to the American’s with Disabilities Act. For more information on engagement opportunities, connect with us through social media at cityofbrooklyncenter.org/socialmedia, visit our website at cityofbrooklyncenter.org or contact Public Works at publicworks@ ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us with questions. ACCESSABILITY INC 360 HOOVER STREET NE MINNEAPOLIS MN 55413-2940 BLIND INC 100 EAST 22ND STREET MINNEAPOLIS MN 55404-2514 METROPOLITAN CENTER FOR INDEPENDENT LIVING 530 ROBERT STREET N ST PAUL MN 55101 COMMUNICATION SERIVCE FOR THE DEAF 2375 UNIVERSITY AVENUE W #110 ST PAUL MN 55114 DEAFBLIND SERVICES MN 1936 LYNDALE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403 MINNESOTA ASSOC OF DEAF CITIZENS INC 1824 MARSHALL AVENUE ST PAUL MN 55104 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF THE BLIND OF MINNESOTA 100 EAST 22ND STREET MINNEAPOLIS MN 55404-2514 REACH FOR RESOURCES 5900 GREEN OAK DRIVE #303 MINNETONKA MN 55343 VISION LOSS RESOURCES – WEST METRO OFFICE 1936 LYNDALE AVENUE S MINNEAPOLIS MN 55403-3101 DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING SERVICES DIVISION 444 LAFAYETTE ROAD ST PAUL MN 55155 DISABILITY SERVICES DIVISION 540 CEDAR STREET ST PAUL MN 55155 MINNESOTA RESOURCE CENTER: BLIND/VISUALLY IMPAIRED 1500 HIGHWAY 36W ROSEVILLE MN 55113-4035 MINNESOTA RESOURCE CENTER: DEAF/HARD OF HEARING 1500 HIGHWAY 36W ROSEVILLE MN 55113-4035 ACCESS PRESS 161 ST ANTHONY AVENUE #910 ST PAUL MN 55103 January 29, 2019 RE: ADA Transition Plan for Public Rights-of-Way and 2019 Community Health and Wellness Week The City of Brooklyn Center is looking for public feedback in regards to its ADA Transition plan for Public Rights-of-Way. At this time, the City has completed a self-evaluation of its right-of- way facilities. The self-evaluation examines the condition of the City’s Pedestrian Circulation Route/Pedestrian Access Route (PCR/PAR) and identifies potential need for PCR/PAR infrastructure improvements. This will include: • sidewalks, • curb ramps, • bicycle/pedestrian trails, and • traffic control signals that are located within the City’s rights-of-way. Any barriers to accessibility identified in the self-evaluation and remedy to the identified barrier are set out in this transition plan. Our next step is to gather input on the plan from the public, but we need your help. In order to gather worthwhile feedback, our goal is to develop a strategy to reach those affected by the plan. Do you have any resources/contacts you could provide to help us to best reach and communicate this plan to residents with disabilities. Depending upon the disability, what would be the best way to reach these groups? Secondly, the City is having a health fair on April 27, 2019, from 9 a.m. – 4 p.m. The goal of 2019 Community Health and Wellness Week initiative is to increase visibility of health and wellness resources within the Brooklyn Center community, increase personal health awareness, provide a variety of health screenings and education and motivate attendees to make a positive health behavior change. If you are interested in learning more about how your organization can participate as a vendor and/or event sponsor, please contact Dr. Angel Smith, Communications and Community Engagement Manager by Monday, February 11, 2019, at asmith@ci.brooklyn- center.mn.us or 763-569-3395. Thank you in advance for your time and any assistance you can provide regarding the inquiries. Respectfully, Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer ahogg@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us 763-569-3327 AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES (ADA) TRANSITION PLAN FEEDBACK The City of Brooklyn Center is looking for public feedback in regards to its ADA Transition plan for Public Rights-of-Way. At this time, the City has completed a self- evaluation of its right-of-way facilities. The self-evaluation examines the condition of the City’s Pedestrian Circulation Route/Pedestrian Access Route (PCR/PAR) and identifies potential need for PCR/PAR infrastructure improvements. This will include: • sidewalks, • curb ramps, • bicycle/pedestrian trails, and • traffic control signals that are located within the City’s rights-of-way. Any barriers to accessibility identified in the self-evaluation and remedy to the identified barrier are set out in this transition plan. Our next step is to gather input on the plan from the public, but we need your help. Public meetings for the transition plan will be held at the City of Brooklyn Center City Hall in the Council Chambers located at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 on the following dates to solicit comments from the public: April 17 - 2 to 3 p.m. April 25 - 5:30 to 6:30 p.m. April 27 - 10 to 11 a.m. ** City of Brooklyn Center Community Center (CC), located at 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway cityofbrooklyncenter.org SCHEDULE Saturday, April 27, 2019 Work Well. Live Well. Be Well TIME EVENT PRESENTER LOCATION 8:00 AM TO 10:00 AM BOOTH SET-UP Constitution Hall (CC) 8:00 AM TO 11:00 AM Shingle Creek Clean Up (Registration) Shelley Marsh, Engineering Tech III (City of Brooklyn Center) Area outside of Constitution Hall (CC) 9:00 AM TO 9:45 AM DEMONSTRATION: Yoga / Meditation Floyd Williams (Thought Healing) Cohen (CC) 10:00 AM TO 3:30 PM BOOTHS OPEN Constitution Hall (CC) 10:00 AM TO 10:30 AM COFFEE AND CONVERSATION WORKSHOP: 30 Minutes Can Save Your Life (Financial Health) Emmanuel Egbujor (Primerica) Cohen (CC) 10:00 AM TO 11:00 AM COFFEE AND CONVERSATION WORKSHOP: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Transition Plan Andrew Hogg, ADA Public Rights-of- Ways Coordinator (City of Brooklyn Center) City Hall (Council Chambers) 10:45 AM TO 11:15 AM WELCOME & VENDOR /SPONSOR THANK YOU Mike Elliott, Mayor (City of Brooklyn Center) & Community Health Fair Committee Constitution Hall (CC) 11:15 AM TO 11:45 AM DEMONSTRATION: The Joy and Comfort of Mindful Eating Michelle Auld, District Wellness Coordinator (Brooklyn Center Community Schools) Cohen (CC) 12:00 PM TO 12:45 PM LUNCH & LEARN WORKSHOP: Overcoming Adversity – The Impact of Stress on Health and Well Being Lunch Sponsor: Panera Bread *RSVP Required, Limited Seating Chris Bray, Ph.D., MA.L.P., Co-Director, Center for Resilient Families & Associate Director of ITR (University of Minnesota) & Cindy Devonish, MM, Community Engagement Specialist (City of Brooklyn Center) Cohen (CC) 1:00 PM TO 1:30 PM DEMONSTRATION: Getting Fit While You Sit Dr. Allie Danielson, DC (Trillium Chiropractic) Cohen (CC) 1:45 PM TO 2:15 PM WORKSHOP: Skin-Lightening Practice and Chemical Exposures Amira Adawe, Executive Director (The Beautywell Project) Cohen (CC) 2:30 PM TO 3:15 PM *EVERY 15 MINS. DEMONSTRATION: Amateur Boxing Rahim Shabazz (Circle of Discipline) Cohen (CC) 3:30 PM TO 4:00 PM BOOTH TEAR DOWN Constitution Hall (CC) ADA Transition Plan Public Rights-of-Way Open House April 2019 Strategic Priorities - Safe, Secure, Stable Community Open House Agenda •Purpose and Goals •Types of Pedestrian Facilities •ADA Transition Plan Highlights •Next Steps •Questions & Comments Purpose and Goals •What ? –Public right-of-ways and facilities are required to be accessible to persons with disabilities through Compliance with Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 •Prohibits public agencies from discriminating on the basis of disability by excluding them from programs, services or activities •Requires pedestrian access to persons with disabilities within public rights of way and facilities where pedestrian facilities exists •When? –City Council reviewed the draft plan in late 2018, will approve Final plan after Public Comment periods end in April of 2019 Background 1990 ADA becomes law 1993 City made improvements to City buildings facilities to bring into compliance 1994 to 2018 City has no formal ADA Transition Plan for right-of-way. Has informal policy of improvements based on complaints and reconstruction projects 2016 to 2018 Inventory and draft ADA Transition Plan for Public rights- of-way completed Future Receive public comments and receive formal Council approval Types of Pedestrian Facilities •Street Right of Way –Sidewalks (45.6 miles) –Curb Ramps (839 ramps) –Signals with Pedestrian Crossings (8 intersections) •Other –Parks & Recreation Facilities –City Buildings –Shared Use Trails (15.7 miles) Curb Ramps Signals with Pedestrian Crossings ADA Transition Plan Highlights •ADA Policy –ADA requires public agencies with more than 50 employees to have a Transition Plan •Identify physical obstacles in the public agency's facilities that limit accessibility of its programs or activities to individuals with disabilities •Responsible Official for Implementation of the Plan –Assistant City Engineer designated as ADA Coordinator for Public Rights-of-ways •Self Evaluation •ADA Guidelines & Design Standards –Describe in detail methods that will be used to make the facilities accessible •Grievance/Complaint Procedures •Programming, Prioritization and Scheduling of Pedestrian Facility ADA Improvements ADA Transition Plan Highlights -Self Evaluation •Self Evaluation –Identify physical obstacles and location –Detailed evaluation of each existing curb ramp, sidewalk or traffic signal. –Determine the need, costs and priority of improving existing pedestrian facilities City wide. –City Owned Pedestrian facilities : •Curb Ramps (839 ramps) –220 Compliant (26%) –619 Not Compliant (74%) •Sidewalks (45.6 miles) –TBD •Signals with Pedestrian Crossings (8 intersections) –1 intersection with compliant APS push buttons (12.5%) ADA Transition Plan Highlights - Implementation Plan •Implementation Plan –Upgrade accessible pedestrian facilities as part of the 15 year CIP •Reconstruction Projects –Curb Ramps, Sidewalks. Traffic Signals •Mill and Overlay Project –Curb Ramps –Street Maintenance - Sidewalk Maintenance Policy –Development & Building Permit Review –Review accessibility improvement as requested ADA Transition Plan Highlights - Implementation Cost •2018 City Owned Pedestrian facilities : •Curb Ramps (839 ramps) –220 Compliant (26%) –619 Not Compliant (74%) •After 2019-2033 CIP City Owned Pedestrian facilities : •Curb Ramps (839 ramps) –514 Compliant (61%) »294 would be completed in CIP project areas –325 Not Compliant (39%) »271 would be in future CIP project areas) »54 outside of CIP project areas »Note: these values do not address replacement of existing non-compliant walks or trails. •This represents a significant investment that the City of Brooklyn Center is committed to making to improve accessibility in the City. A systematic approach to providing accessibility will be taken in order to absorb the cost into the City of Brooklyn Center budget for improvements to the public right of way. ADA Transition Plan Highlights – ADA Guidelines •ADA Guidelines & Design Standards •Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG ), as adopted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) •Proposed Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities within the Public ROW ADA Transition Plan Highlights – PROWAG •Sidewalk Technical Requirements •4’ min clear width •2% max cross slope •Surfaces shall be firm, stable and slip resistant •Vertical alignment shall be smooth •Curb Ramp Technical Requirements •Perpendicular & parallel curb ramps •4’x4’ turning space (landing) •8.3% max running slope •2% cross slope •Surfaces shall be firm, stable and slip resistant •Detectable warning surface •Pedestrian Access Routes (PAR) Next Steps •Public Input – April 2019 –Hold 3public open houses in Spring 2019 to gather comments and plan feedback from residents. –Information on City website •Incorporate feedback in to draft plan –April/May 2019 •Formally approve ADA Transition Plan for public right-of-way – May 2019 *Work still needs to be done to ensure City meets all requirements for ADA in all aspects of the City’s programs. 14 | Page Appendix D – Grievance Procedure As part of the ADA requirements the City/County has posted the following notice outlining its ADA requirements: Public Notice In accordance with the requirements of Title II of the ADA Act of 1990, Brooklyn Center will not discriminate against qualified individuals with disabilities on the basis of disability in City’s services, programs, or activities. Employment: The City does not discriminate on the basis of disability in its hiring or employment practices and complies with all regulations promulgated by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission under Title I of the ADA Act. Effective Communication: The City will generally, upon request, provide appropriate aids and services leading to effective communication for qualified persons with disabilities so they can participate equally in the City programs, services and activities, including qualified sign language interpreters, documents in Braille and other ways of making information and communications accessible to people who have speech, hearing, or vision impairments. Modifications to Policies and Procedures: The City will make all reasonable modifications to policies and programs to ensure that people with disabilities have an equal opportunity to enjoy all City programs, services and activities. For example, individuals with service animals are welcomed in City offices, even where pets are generally prohibited. Anyone who requires an auxiliary aid or service for effective communication, or a modification of policies or procedures to participate in a City program, service, or activity should contact the office of ADA Coordinator (see Appendix F) as soon as possible but no later than 48 hours before the scheduled event. The ADA does not require the City to take any action that would fundamentally alter the nature of its programs or services, or impose an undue financial or administrative burden. The City will not place a surcharge on a particular individual with a disability or any group of individuals with disabilities to cover the cost of providing auxiliary aids/services or reasonable modifications of policy, such as retrieving items from locations that are open to the public but are not accessible to persons who use wheelchairs. 15 | Page Appendix E – Grievance Form Prior to filling a grievance, the public is strongly encouraged to contact the public right-of-way ADA Coordinator to discuss any concerns regarding City transportation facilities. The ADA Coordinator’s role is designed to provide a point of contact for the public to address concerns. It is anticipated that most concerns identified will be able to be resolved by the ADA Coordinator. Contact information for the ADA Coordinator can be found in Appendix F of this document. Purpose This Grievance Procedure is established to meet the requirements of the ADA Act of 1990. It may be used by anyone who wishes to file a complaint alleging discrimination on the basis of disability in the provision of services, activities, programs, or benefits by the City. The City’s Personnel Policy governs employment-related complaints of disability discrimination. Procedure The complaint should be in writing and contain information about the alleged discrimination such as name, address, phone number of complainant and location, date and description of the problem. Alternative means of filing complaints, such as personal interviews or a tape recording of the complaint will be made available for persons with disabilities upon request. The complaint should be submitted by the grievant and/or his/her designee as soon as possible but no later than 60 calendar days after the alleged violation. Contact information for the ADA Coordinator can be found in Appendix F of this document. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the complaint, ADA Coordinator or their designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days of the meeting, ADA Coordinator or their designee will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, such as large print, Braille, or audio tape. The response will explain the position of Brooklyn Center and offer options for substantive resolution of the complaint. If the response by ADA Coordinator or their designee does not satisfactorily resolve the issue, the complainant and/or his/her designee may appeal the decision within 15 calendar days after receipt of the response to the City Manager or their designee. Within 15 calendar days after receipt of the appeal, the City Manager or their designee will meet with the complainant to discuss the complaint and possible resolutions. Within 15 calendar days after the meeting, the City Manager or their designee will respond in writing, and where appropriate, in a format accessible to the complainant, with a final resolution of the complaint. 16 | Page All written complaints received by ADA Coordinator or their designee, appeals to the City Manager or their designee and responses from these two offices will be retained in accordance to State and Federal law. Method Those wishing to file a formal written grievance with the City may do so by one of the following methods: Internet Visit the Brooklyn Center website (cityofbrooklyncenter.org) and click the “ADA” link to the ADA Grievance Form. Fill in the form online and click “submit”. A copy of the ADA Grievance Form is included in this Appendix G. Telephone Contact the pertinent City staff person listed in the Contact Information section of Appendix G to submit an oral grievance. The staff person will utilize the internet method above to submit the grievance on behalf of the person filing the grievance. Paper Submittal Contact the pertinent City staff person listed in the Contact Information section of Appendix G to request a paper copy of the county’s grievance form, complete the form and submit it to the ADA Coordinator. Information Required The ADA Grievance Form will ask for the following information: • The name, address, telephone number and email address for the person filing the grievance. • The name, address, telephone number and email address for the person alleging an ADA violation (if different than the person filing the grievance). • A description and location of the alleged violation and nature of a remedy sought, if known by the complainant. • If the complainant has filed the same complaint or grievance with the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), another Federal or State civil rights agency, a court, or others, the name of the agency or court where the complainant filed it and the filing date. Process The City will acknowledge receipt of the grievance to the complainant within 10 working days of its submittal. The City will also provide to the complainant within 10 working days of its 17 | Page submittal; 1) a response or resolution to the grievance or; 2) information on when the complainant can expect a response or resolution to the grievance. If the grievance filed does not concern a Brooklyn Center facility, the City will work with the complainant to contact the agency that has jurisdiction. 3) within 30 calendar days of receipt, a City staff person will conduct an investigation necessary to determine the validity of the alleged violation. As a part of the investigation, the staff person would conduct an engineering study to help determine the City response. The staff person will take advantage of department resources and use engineering judgment, data collected and any information submitted by the resident to develop a conclusion. A staff person will be available to meet with complainant to discuss the matter as a part of the investigation and resolution of the matter. The City will document each resolution of a filed grievance and retain such documentation in the department’s ADA Grievance File for a period of seven years. The City will consider all specific grievances within its particular context or setting. Furthermore, the City will consider many varying circumstances including: • The nature of the access to services, programs, or facilities at issue; • The specific nature of the disability; • The essential eligibility requirements for participation; • The health and safety of others; • The degree to which an accommodation would constitute a fundamental alteration to the program, service, or facility, or cause an undue hardship to Brooklyn Center. Accordingly, the resolution by Brooklyn Center of any one grievance does not constitute a precedent upon which the county is bound or upon which other complaining parties may rely. File Maintenance The City shall maintain ADA Grievance Files in accordance with State and Federal law. Complaints of Title II violations may also be filed with the DOJ within 180 days of the date of discrimination. In certain situations, cases may be referred to a mediation program sponsored by the DOJ. The DOJ may bring a lawsuit where it has investigated a matter and has been unable to resolve violations. 18 | Page For more information contact: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Disability Rights Section - NYAV Washington, D.C. 20530 www.ada.gov (800) 514-0301 (voice – toll free) (800) 514-0383 (TTY) Title II may also be enforced through private lawsuits in Federal court. It is not necessary to file a complaint with the DOJ or any other Federal agency, or to receive a "right-to-sue" letter, before going to court. ADA Complaint Form The City has developed a grievance procedure to ensure that accessibility concerns are resolved quickly and fairly, as outlined in the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If you have issues with the form, or to file an oral grievance, call 763-569-3327. Complainant – Person Filing Grievance Name: Date: Address: City: State: Zip Code: Phone Number(s): Email: Person Claiming Accessibility Issue (If different from above) Name: Phone Number(s): Email: Complaint Where is the location of the problem? Please include street name, intersection (if applicable), city, facility name and/or location if other than a roadway. What efforts have been made to resolve this complaint? (If you have documentation, copies would be helpful. Examples are letters, email messages, written notes, etc.) Has the complaint been filed with any Federal or State Agency? ___ Yes ___No Name of Agency: Contact Name: Date Filed: Please attach additional pages if more room is needed. Signature of Complainant: Date: Return to: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 ahogg@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us Notice of Rights In accordance with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to inform you of your rights as they pertain to the private information collected from you. The personal information we collect from you is private. Access to this information is available only to you, the agency collecting the information and other statutorily authorized agencies, unless you or a court authorizes its release. The Minnesota Government Data Practices Act requires that you be informed that the following information, which you are asked to provide, is considered private. The purpose and intended use of the requested information is: To assist City of Brooklyn Center staff and designees to evaluate and respond to accessibility concerns within the public right-of-way. Authorized persons or agencies with whom this information may be shared include: City of Brooklyn Center officials, staff or designee(s). Furnishing the above information is voluntary, but refusal to supply the requested information will mean: City of Brooklyn Center staff may be unable to respond to or evaluate your request. 19 | Page Appendix F – Contact Information ADA Title II Coordinator Name: Curt Boganey Address: 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: 763.569.3303 Fax: 763.569.3494 E-mail: Public Right-of-Way - ADA Implementation Coordinator Title: Assistant City Engineer Name: Andrew Hogg Address: 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Phone: 763.569.3327 Fax: 763.569.3440 E-mail: ahogg@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us 20 | Page Appendix G – Agency ADA Design Standards and Procedures Design Procedures Intersection Corners Curb ramps or blended transitions will attempt to be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for an intersection corner to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and intersection corners will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those intersection corners shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless if full compliance can be achieved or not, each intersection corner shall be made as compliant as possible in accordance with the judgment of City staff. Sidewalks/Trails Sidewalks and trails will attempt to be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for segments of sidewalks or trails to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and segments will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those segments shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless if full compliance can be achieved or not, every sidewalk or trail shall be made as compliant as possible in accordance with the judgment of City staff. Traffic Control Signals City owed traffic control signals will attempt to be constructed or upgraded to achieve compliance within all capital improvement projects. There may be limitations which make it technically infeasible for individual traffic control signal locations to achieve full accessibility within the scope of any project. Those limitations will be noted and locations will remain on the transition plan. As future projects or opportunities arise, those locations shall continue to be incorporated into future work. Regardless on if full compliance can be achieved or not, each traffic signal control location shall be made as compliant as possible in accordance with the judgment of City staff. Bus Stops/Other Transit Facilities Bus stops and other transit facilities are present within the limits of the City. Those facilities fall under the jurisdiction of Metro Transit. The City will work with Metro Transit to ensure that those facilities meet all appropriate accessibility standards. 21 | Page Other Policies, Practices and Programs Policies, practices and programs not identified in this document will follow the applicable ADA standards. Design Standards The City has PROWAG, as adopted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), as its design standard. A copy of these documents can be found at https://www.dot.state.mn.us/ada/design.html. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:C urt Boganey, C ity Manager F R O M:C ounc il Member G raves S UBJ EC T:P olic y 2.06 R eques t for O ut of S tate C onferenc e Approval Requested Council Action: - C onsider providin g direction regardin g th e request to a p p rove out of S tate travel b y C ou n cil M ember G raves Background: C ouncil P olic y 2.06 o n C ounc il o ut of S tate Travel provid es that eac h counc il memb er is autho rized travel out of s tate twic e d uring the C o uncil members’ term. T he p o licy als o provid es that attendanc e at US C onference of Mayo rs , Natio nal League o f C ities o r conferenc es s p o ns ored b y a United S tate G overnment Agency is approved by policy. All other out of s tate c onferences must be approved in advance by the C ounc il. C ouncil Member G raves has reques ted approval of the C ounc il to attend the Yo ung Elected O ffic ials Network 2019 Natio nal C onvening August 1-4th taking place in Miami, F lo rid a. I have enclosed s o me background information regard ing the c o nvening. Additio nal info rmation on the Young Elec ted O fficials Network is available in their webs ite. https ://www.yeonetwork.org/miami C ouncilmember G raves will be available to answer ques tions about this reques t. Budget Issues: - None S trategic Priorities and Values: O perational Exc ellenc e AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type YEO Information 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Dr. R eggie Edwards S UBJ EC T:C ens us 2020 Update Requested Council Action: - M otion to receive the presentation on the C ity's C ensus 2020 U pdate Background: Every 10 years the US F ederal G overnment undertakes a c ensus of people residing in the Unites S tates of America. T he c ensus rec ords several types of data including: P opulation Age P lace of Birth Income Bus inesses Educ ation Housing and Home Values G eography In order to capture as c omplete of a count as pos s ible the US F ederal G overnment as k local units of government, ins titutions and community organizations to assist with marketing, promoting and encouraging as many people to complete their cens us in as timely manner as pos s ible. T he C ity of Brooklyn has agreed to work with the US F ederal G overnment by formulating and leading a C omplete C ount C ommittee (C C C ). A C C C is "a team of state/local influencers appointed/selected for the purpose of developing and implementing a census awareness campaign that will motivate every resident to respond to the census in a timely manner." T he C ity of Brooklyn C enter has c ombined efforts with the C ity of Brooklyn P ark in order to development and implement a "Brooklyns C ount C ampaign." T he Brooklyns C ount C ampaign involves : C oalition building (C omplete C ount C ommittee) Identific ation of historically underc ounted populations Development of strategies to reac h historically underc ounted populations Exec ute strategies in partnership with c ommunity organizations, ins titutions and community connec tors S taff will pres ent to the C ity C ounc il: C ensus overview and timeline Key is s ues Efforts undertaken to date O utline the general timeline moving forward through completion of the 2020 C ens us Budget Issues: 2019 Budget - $2,000 2020 Budget - $5,000 (propos ed) S trategic Priorities and Values: Inclus ive C ommunity Engagement COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Joe Hartmann, As s ociate P lanner S UBJ EC T:R esolution R egarding the Dis pos ition of P lanning C ommission Application No. 2019-007 for R eview and C onsideration fro a S ite and Building P lan Approval at 1350 S hingle C reek C rossing Requested Council Action: - M otion to a d opt a resolution to approve a site and b u ild ing p lan review for a municipal liq u or store at 1350 S hin g le C reek C rossing, based on th e findin g s of fact and submitted pla n s, as amended b y the conditions of approval in the resolution Background: Nate R einhardt, Direc tor o f F is cal R es ourc es (“T he Ap p licant”), o n b ehalf of the C ity o f Brooklyn C enter (“T he C ity”) is reques ting review and c o nsideratio n o f a s ite and build ing plan ap p licatio n fo r the cons truction of a new munic ip al liq uor s tore at S hingle C reek C ros s ing on the pad s ite o f Lo t 5, Blo ck 1, 5th Addition. T he C ity is proposing to c onstruc t an approximately 9,600 s quare fo o t munic ipal liquor s tore at the s ite, with the option to further c onstruc t an additional approximately 4,000 square foot attac hed retail bay. In addition to the building cons truction, the propos al inc ludes parking lot and landsc aping improvements, and the installation of traffic calming meas ures near the s ite. T he c urrent liquor s tore at 5625 Xerxes Avenue (“BC Liquor #1”) would relo cate to the new loc ation at S hingle C reek C ros s ing after c ons truc tio n is c o mp leted. T he new lo c atio n would provid e for mo re parking, a more s ecure internal layout o f the liq uor s tore, better visibility for the s tore, and more s ecure bac k loading area for deliveries . P revious ly, s taff pres ented on the potential relocation of liquor store from 5625 Xerxes Avenue to 1350 S hingle C reek C ros s ing at the January 14, 2019, C ity C ounc il work s es s ion. T he C ity C ounc il approved a purc hase agreement with G atline Development to acquire the parcel at 1350 S hingle C reek C rossing to build the new liquor s tore at the January 28th meeting. T he S hingle C reek C rossing Master P UD was approved on May 23, 2011, which provided for the overall redevelopment of the former Brookdale Mall properties. T he redevelopment would phase in approximately 403,000 s f. of new retail commerc ial and restaurant uses, and included the new daylighting and waterway features of S ingle C reek running through the s ite. T he proposed municipal liquor s tore would be cons tructed on the Building I site, which was approved for a 13,600 retail pad. T he propos ed munic ipal liquor store c onforms to the approved Mas ter P UD, and would complete the parking lot cons truction on that s ite of the development. T he 1.42 acre s ite has s pace to acc ommodate a building up to 13,600 s quare feet, but the preliminary floor plan for the new liquor store is 9,582 s quare feet, leaving 3,727 square feet available that would be owned by the C ity of Brooklyn C enter. T his additional s quare footage c ould be us ed for future expans ion, lease or sale. In addition to the new liquor store c onstruc tion, G atlin Development will provide the C ity with a $90,000 contribution to c omplete the remaining parking lot, utility c onnections for water, s ewer and s torm water, and final grades for the building and adjacent s idewalk areas. T hese improvements will s ervic e the propos ed Liquor S tore and the three remaining pad sites in the area. T he proposed use is in c onformance with the P UD/C 2 zoning classific ation for the property. Liquor s tores are a permitted use within the S hingle C reek C ros s ing shopping c enter. F ollowing c lo s e of the pub lic hearing, the P lanning C ommission elec ted to unanimo usly (6-0) recommend C ity C ouncil ap p ro val of the reques ted site and b uilding plan review fo r the S ub ject P ro p erty lo cated at 1350 S hingle C reek C ros s ing. T his recommend ation was also subject to the Applic ant complying with the conditions as outlined in the P lanning C o mmis s io n R eport d ated May 16th, 2019, and assoc iated P lanning C ommis s ion res olution. Budget Issues: T here are no budget is s ues to cons ider at this time. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/21/2019 Bac kup Material R esolution 5/21/2019 R es olution Letter App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: May 16, 2019 Application No. 2019-007 Applicant: Nate Reinhardt (City of Brooklyn Center) Location: 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing Request: Site and Building Plan Approval Requested Action Nate Reinhardt, Director of Fiscal Resources (“The Applicant”), on behalf of the City of Brooklyn Center (“The City”) is requesting review and consideration of a site and building plan application for the construction of a new municipal liquor store at Shingle Creek Crossing on the pad site of Lot 5, Block 1, 5th Addition. The City is proposing to construct an approximately 9,600 square foot municipal liquor store at the site, with the option to further construct an additional approximately 4,000 square foot attached retail bay. In addition to the building construction, the proposal includes parking lot and landscaping improvements, and the installation of traffic calming measures near the site. The current liquor store at 5625 Xerxes Avenue (“BC Liquor #1”) would relocate to the new location at Shingle Creek Crossing after construction is completed. The new location would provide for more parking, a more secure internal layout of the liquor store, better visibility for the store, and more secure back loading area for deliveries. Attached to this Planning Commission report are the application and submitted plans (Exhibit A). Background Previously, staff presented on the potential relocation of liquor store from 5625 Xerxes Avenue to 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing at the January 14, 2019 City Council work session. The City acquired that parcel of land located at 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing to build the new liquor store at that location after the City Council approved their purchase agreement with Gatlin Development at the January 28th meeting. • Application Filed: 04/16/2018 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 06/15/2019 • Extension Declared: N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 2 Hennepin County geographic information systems (GIS) department. Joe Hartmann. May 9th, 2019. The 1.42 acre site has space to accommodate a building up to 13,600 square feet, but the preliminary floor plan for the new liquor store is 9,582 square feet, leaving 3,727 square feet available that would be owned by the City of Brooklyn Center. This additional square footage could be used for future expansion, lease or sale. In addition to the new liquor store construction, Gatlin Development will provide the City with a $90,000 contribution to complete the remaining parking lot, utility connections for water, sewer and storm water, and final grades for the building and adjacent sidewalk areas. These improvements will service the proposed Liquor Store and the three remaining pad sites in the area. Site Data: 2040 Land Use Plan: TOD (Transit Oriented District) Neighborhood: Centennial Current Zoning: PUD/C2 (Planned Unit Development/Commercial Park) District Site Area: Approximately 1.42 Acres Surrounding Area: Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North TOD PUD/C2 Commercial South TOD PUD/C2 Commercial East TOD PUD/C2 Commercial West TOD PUD/C2 Commercial App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 3 Proposal Evaluation Zoning Review: The proposed use is in conformance with the PUD/C2 zoning classification for the property. Liquor stores are a permitted use within the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center. Master PUD The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved on May 23, 2011, which provided for the overall redevelopment of the former Brookdale Mall properties. The redevelopment would phase in approximately 403,000 sf. of new retail commercial and restaurant uses, and included the new daylighting and waterway features of Single Creek running through the site. The proposed municipal liquor store would be constructed on the Building I site, which was approved for a 13,600 retail pad. The proposed municipal liquor store conforms with the approved Master PUD, and would complete the parking lot construction on that site of the development. Traffic and Circulation A traffic and parking study was completed by Kimley Horn as part of the analysis of the site. The consultants recommended a number of traffic calming improvements to reduce vehicle speeds and increase pedestrian safety. Raised pedestrian cross walks are proposed at two locations, as well as additional decorative fencing and plantings to guide pedestrians to crosswalks. App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 4 The City is also requesting approval from Walmart and Sears to reduce the number of travel lanes in front of the building, which would narrow the roadway, improving pedestrian crossing conditions. Due to covenants on the property, both Sears and Walmart must give consent before changes to the primary circulation system can be made. Landscaping Per City requirements, the Applicant will need to ensure an irrigation system is installed as part of the landscape installations. Drawings are to be submitted to the City once the location of the system has been determined and as part of any approval of the project and building permit submittal. Although the project submittal includes a landscape plan and planting schedule, City Code does not have any specific requirements on the species of landscaping. The City has adopted a Landscape Point System policy, which assigns points to a given site based on the use of and acreage of a development. Along with the City’s Landscape Point System Policy, Shingle Creek Crossing has its own landscaping guidelines. In particular, their landscaping guidelines explain that ‘unity of design shall be achieved by repetition of certain plant varieties’ on their sites. The City’s Landscape Point System Policy requires the liquor store site to provide a specific amount or number of landscaping units, and is based on the maximum percentage of certain materials (i.e., 50% shade trees; 40% coniferous trees; 35% decorative trees; and 25% shrubs). Given a “Retail/Service” use and assuming an approximately 1.42 acre site, the Applicant would need to achieve a minimum of 113.4 points (80 points per acre for a development under 2 acres). The landscaping plan provided by the Applicant indicates on their planting schedule that there are 20 overstory shade trees, no coniferous trees, no ornamental trees, and 24 shrubs. According to the Landscape Point System policy, there is a maximum percentage of coniferous and ornamental trees allowed, but there is no minimum. It was indicated to staff that the deciduous trees in the planting App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 5 schedule were chosen specifically due to their change of colors in the fall; the Blaze Maple and Golden Gingko trees were chosen in particular for their red and yellow colors, which dominate the planting schedule. In addition to the proposed deciduous trees and shrub plantings, the Applicant also intends to incorporate Karl Foerster grasses, catmint, and daylilies along the front of the building. Planting Type Minimum Size Points Per Planting Maximum Points (%) Points Accrued Shade (Deciduous) Trees 2 ½” diameter 10 50% or 57 points 200 points (20 deciduous trees * 10 points) Coniferous (Evergreen) Trees 5’ height 6 40% or 46 points 0 points Decorative (Ornamental) Trees 1” diameter 1.5 35% or 40 points 0 points Shrubs 12” diameter 0.5 25% or 29 points 12 points (24 shrubs * 0.5 points) Total 212 points Based on a review of the Landscape Plan, the proposed plan would not meet the minimum requirements under the Landscape Point System Policy. Although the plan would accrue enough points to meet requirements, there are no evergreen trees or decorative trees envisioned in the plan. The proportion of shade trees exceed the maximum percentage allowed. Staff recommends that as a condition of approval, the landscaping plan be amended to substitute some coniferous and decorative trees for the shade trees and shrubs proposed so that the landscaping plan would meet the minimum points required overall and the maximum points allowed for each category. Any changes to the landscaping plan would also need to heed the Architectural Design Guidelines for Shingle Creek Crossing. Lighting Per the City Zoning Code, “all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades, so as to concentrate illumination of the property of the owner or operator of said illumination devices.” The submitted photometric plan notes lighting poles will be 39 feet tall with a mounting height of 42 feet, round, tapered, black steel poles with metal halide fixtures. Per the City Zoning Code, lighting shall not exceed three (3) foot candles measured at property lines abutting residentially zoned property, or 10 foot candles measured at the property lines abutting the street right-of-way or non-residentially zoned properties. As is specified, no glare shall emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. According to the Photometric Plan of the west lot, the proposed lighting fixtures would be comparable to the existing lighting fixtures and the proposed lighting fixtures for pedestrians along the south and west side of the lot. The preliminary review of the photometric plan indicates all new lighting will meet or exceed the foot candle or allowable light spill-over required by City Code. Parking Section 35-704 (Minimum Parking Spaces Required) would require a minimum of 53 parking spaces for the new building given it is defined under our ordinance as a retail store or center (approximately 9,600 square feet; 11 spaces for the first 2,000 square feet and 5.5 spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet; 7,600 / 1000 * 5.5 = 41.8 or approximately 42 spaces + 11 spaces = 53 spaces). The current App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 6 proposal would provide 90 spaces in the parking lot. If the City did pursue the additional retail bay construction, to incorporate the entire 13,600 square feet, it would require a minimum of 75 parking spaces (11 spaces for the first 2,000 square feet and 5.5 spaces for each additional 1,000 square feet; 11,600 / 1000 * 5.5 = 63.8 or approximately 64 spaces +11 spaces = 75 spaces). Depending on the use of the remaining 3,727 square feet, staff finds that the additional unused parking spaces should be adequate to provide enough parking for future retail uses. Gross Floor Area 1st 2,000 Square Feet Additional 1,000 Square Feet Parking Spaces Required 9,600 11 42 53 13,600 11 64 75 Signage According to the City Sign Ordinance, Chapter 34-140: “Attached establishments or enterprises clustered in a shopping center complex or in a multitenant office or industrial building may have wall signs and projecting signs subject to the following: i) Each establishment or enterprise may have such signs on each of its exterior walls, provided the aggregate area of such signs does not exceed 15% of the wall supporting the signs; ii) In lieu of the above, the aggregate of the establishments or enterprises may have a wall or projecting sign on each wall identifying the tenants collectively, or identifying the complex or building; provided the area of each sign does not exceed 15% of the area of the wall supporting it.” Under the agreement with Gatlin development, the city has the right to use panels on the existing pylon signs for signage, but the Applicant has also proposed wall signage on the façade of the building. Given this is the only establishment currently proposed in this multi-tenant site and the three remaining pad sites in the area are not being utilized, the liquor store could utilize the entire aggregate area available for all three sites, granted that the signs do not exceed 15% of the area of the wall supporting it. After consultation with the City, the Applicant is aware that 150 square feet of signage per building front is permitted at this location, based on the area of the wall supporting it. Brad Bennett. Property Manager for Gatlin Development Company. Joe Hartmann. May 9th 2019. Currently, the sign plan is forthcoming with the Applicant researching potential designs for the exterior signage on the building, and the Applicant has conveyed to staff that they are pursuing designs that will utilize internal lighting as opposed to a gooseneck design as initially planned. Upon consultation with the Applicant, staff have determined that the forthcoming sign plan will incorporate text (“Beer / Wine / Spirits”) displayed on both sides of the store front overhead. Staff recommends that as a condition of App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 7 approval, the Applicant submit and receive approval for a Sign Plan that follows the City Sign Ordinance and the Architectural Design Guidelines for Shingle Creek Crossing. Waste Enclosures Per Chapter 12 (Building Maintenance and Occupancy) of the City Code, “the trash area shall be effectively screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and properties by a solid wall or fence constructed of wood, masonry, or other durable materials that are complementary to the materials used on the primary building.” At the current site on Xerxes Avenue, the waste enclosure is highly visible from the street, but the new location on Shingle Creek Crossing would provide for a more secure location for the waste enclosures, situated behind the building in an area that is not readily accessible to the public. The Applicant provided a site plan featuring the design of a new trash enclosure that will be located behind the building. The plans reference two 6-yard dumpsters stored within the area of the gated enclosure proposed, which appears to be adequate storage capacity for a retail establishment of that size. If the liquor store demonstrates that it regularly exceeds that capacity, additional storage capacity may be required. Fire Inspector/Building Official Review: The Applicant shall work to ensure all Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any building and site plan approval. The Applicant shall work with the Fire Inspector to ensure the site plan meets Minnesota Fire Code provisions, including, but not limited to: maximum distance from fire hydrants, emergency access, fire sprinkler systems, etc. Engineering/Pubic Works Review: As per the Assistant City Engineer’s memorandum dated May 9th and subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the Applicant must apply for a Land Disturbance permit be revised in accordance with the referenced plans and approved prior to any construction. During the construction process, the Assistant City Engineer identified the need for site fencing to keep pedestrians out of construction areas. The memo provided by Assistant City Engineer requires the Applicant to provide storm water BMP’s quantities. If the total disturbed area exceeds one acre, an NPDES permit is required. Storm water requirements for the site where approved with the overall site improvements. The memo also calls for the Applicant to provide detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles and garbage trucks demonstrating specific and actual routes on the street. Based on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of the requested Site and Building Plan for a municipal liquor store in the Shingle Creek Crossing development; subject to the Applicant complying with the comments outlined in the Assistant City Engineer’s memorandum dated May 9th, 2019 (Exhibit B), any outstanding comments remaining from previous memorandums, and any conditions as outlined in the Approval Conditions section of this Staff Report. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2019-007 for the Subject Property to be located at 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing: App. No. 2019-007 PC 05/16/2019 Page 8 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memo, dated May 9th, 2019. 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 4. The Applicant shall amend the landscaping plan to come into compliance under the provisions of the Landscape Point System Policy to substitute coniferous and decorative trees for some of the shade trees and shrubs proposed so that the landscaping plan would meet the minimum points required overall and the maximum points allowed for each category. 5. The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding) as part of the development proposal. a. Approval of wall signs is subject to the review and approval of detailed sign plans as part of the City’s building and site plan review process through Planning Commission and City Council. b. All other signage not otherwise approved is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Code of Ordinances and shall be approved under separate sign permits. 6. The Applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines upon completion of the project. 7. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. 8. RECOMMENDATION Motion to adopt a Resolution recommending approval of Planning Case 2019-007 for a Site and Building Plan approval at Shingle Creek Crossing, based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, as amended by the Conditions of Approval in the May 16, 2019 Planning Commission Report. Attachments Attachments Exhibit A- Application, Memo, and Submitted Plans, prepared by Nate Reinhardt (City of Brooklyn Center), and dated April 16th, 2019. Exhibit B- Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, and dated May 9th 2019. Applicant Information: Name: Address: Office Phone: Cell: Email: FAX: Property Owner Information* (if different from Applicant): Name: Property Owner Address: Office Phone: Cell: Email: FAX: 2019 Planning Commission Application Project Information: Provide a general description of your project and request(s): Address/Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Application Type (Mark all that Apply) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,050 Appeal $200 Rezoning $1,050 Zoning Code Text Amendment $500 Special/Interim Use Permit $250 Special/Interim Use Permit Amendment $150 Site and Building Plan Review $750 Variance $200 Planned Unit Development $1,800 Planned Unit Development Amendment $700 Preliminary Plat $400 Final Plat $200 IMPORTANT: All applications may be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of costs incurred by the City for filing, reviewing, and processing applications in the form of an escrow to the City. Application Fee: $ Escrow Amount: $ Receipt No: For Office Use Only Date Received: Date Application Complete: Letter of Completeness: PC App No. For Office Use Only Escrows: All Planning Commission Applications shall be subject to a $1,000 escrow deposit. Costs expended in reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City. Charges to the escrow may include attorney and consulting fees and/or mailing and public notice costs. The escrow amount may be reduced or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis. If at any time a required cash escrow is depleted the applicant shall deposit additional escrow funds as determined by the City. Unused portions of an escrow deposit shall be returned to the Applicant upon successful implementation of an approved application. Complete/Incomplete Applications: A preliminary meeting with City Staff is required prior to the submission of a Planning Commission Application. No application will be considered complete prior to such meeting. Once an application is submitted, City Staff shall have fifteen (15) business days to determine if the application is complete. An incomplete application will delay process of the request. If incomplete, City Staff will notify the Applicant in writing that the application is incomplete and what information is needed in order to make the application complete. Once an application has been deemed complete it will be placed on the next available Planning Commission agenda. Meeting Schedule: The deadline for submittal of Planning Commission Applications is outlined in the below schedule. Failure to submit all application materials, fees, and escrows by 4:30 p.m. on the application submittal deadline may delay the review process. Planning Commission meetings are typically held the Thursday following the second Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. If a recommendation is made by the Planning Commission regarding the application it will typically be placed on the agenda of the next City Council meeting, which are held the fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. Meetings are held in the City Council Chambers at Brooklyn Center City Hall. Additional meetings and/or work sessions may be scheduled as necessary for the review of an application. 2019 Application Schedule (subject to change) Application Submittal Deadline (30-Days Prior to Meeting) Planning Commission Meeting Dates City Council Meeting Dates (for application review) December 18 (2018) January 17 January 28 January 15 February 14 February 25 February 12 March 14 March 25 March 12 April 11 April 22 April 16 May 16 May 28 (Tuesday) May 14 June 13 June 24 June 11 July 11 July 22 July 16 August 15 August 26 August 13 September 12 September 23 September 17 October 17 October 28 October 15 November 14 November 25 November 12 December 12 January 13 (2020) Note: The above schedule is outlined for those submitting Planning Commission applications and does not outline all City Council meetings scheduled. Please access the City of Brooklyn Center’s website at www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org to receive up to date meeting dates and notices of any changes made to this schedule. Individuals may also review and download meeting agendas and packets from the city website. Meeting Attendance: In order for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider any application, the Applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting(s). If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. Acknowledgement and Signature: The undersigned acknowledges that they understand that before a Planning Commission application can be deemed complete, all required fees and escrows must be paid to the City. By signing and submitting this application, the Applicant agrees to pay to the City of Brooklyn Center the actual costs incurred for expenses reasonably and necessarily required by the City for the review, filing, and processing of the application. Such costs will be in addition to the application fee described herein. Withdrawal of the application will not relieve the applicant of the obligation to pay costs incurred prior to withdrawal. Any administrative fees paid as part of the submission of this application are nonrefundable. ___________________________________________________ ______________________ Property Owner Signature (Required) Date ___________________________________________________ ______________________ Applicant Signature (If different than Property Owner) Date SITE IMPROVEMENT PLANS FOR SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING LOCATED AT SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 118N, RANGE 21W PARCEL ID# 03-118-21-41-0044 1.THE SITEWORK FOR THIS PROJECT SHALL MEET OR EXCEED THE "SITE SPECIFIC SPECIFICATIONS." 2.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO CONTRACT COMPLETION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. ALERT TO CONTRACTOR: PREPARED BY: VICINITY N.T.S.NORTH STORMWATER FIRE PREVENTION PLANNING AND ZONING ENGINEERING BUILDING DIVISION ENVIRONMENTAL HENNEPIN COUNTY HEALTH DEPT. PROJECT LOCATION UTILITY RESPONSIBILITY MATRIX FOR THIS PROJECT · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · OWNER/DEVELOPER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER 6301 SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55430 PHONE: (763) 569-3710 CONTACT: TOM AGNES EMAIL: TAGNES@CI.BROOKLYN-CENTER.MN.US CIVIL ENGINEER LUCAS C. PAYNE, P.E. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 PHONE: (651) 645-4197 EMAIL: LUKE.PAYNE@KIMLEY-HORN.COM LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TODD HALUNEN, RLA KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA 55114 PHONE: (651) 645-4197 EMAIL: TODD.HALUNEN@KIMLEY-HORN.COM ALL CONTRACTORS MUST CONTACT GOPHER STATE CALL ONE MN TOLL FREE 1-800-252-1166 BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 XERXES AVENUE NORTH AND COUNTY ROAD 10 BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA ARCHITECT KATHY ANDERSON, AIA ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM 901 NORTH THIRD STREET, SUITE 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PHONE: (612) 436-4030 FAX: (612) 692-9960 PROJECT TEAM GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER STEVE MARTIN, P.E. BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55110 (651) 487-3245 FAX (651) 487-1812 ENVIRONMENTAL/ HAZARDOUS MATERIALS BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION 11001 HAMPSHIRE AVENUE SOUTH MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55438 (952) 995-2000 FAX (952) 995-2020 NOTE PLEASE REFER TO THE FOLLOWING REPORTS PREPARED BY BRAUN INTERTEC CORPORATION FOR GEOTECHNICAL INFORMATION: ·GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING DATED JUNE 9, 2011 AND THE ADDENDUM DATED MAY 2, 2012. 1350 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING: CO V E R S H E E T 6010 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R DRAWING INDEX SHEET NO.SHEET TITLE 6010 COVER SHEET 6020 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 1 6021 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL PLAN PHASE 2 6022 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS 6023 EROSION & SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS 6031 EXISTING CONDITIONS & DEMOLITION PLAN 6040 SITE PLAN 6041 SITE DETAILS 6042 SITE DETAILS 6043 SITE DETAILS 6051 GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 6052 DETAILED GRADING & DRAINAGE PLAN 6053 GRADING & DRAINAGE DETAILS 6061 UTILITY PLAN 6062 DETAILED UTILITY PLAN 6063 UTILITY DETAILS 6101 LANDSCAPE PLAN 6102 LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR: MUNICIPAL LIQUOR 6081 PHOTOMETRICS PLAN - PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EXISTING SEARS 5 6 T H A V E N XE R X E S A V E N O R T H BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 FUTURE BUILDING 10 FUTURE BUILDING T FUTURE BUILDING R B R B R B R BR B R B R B R B R BR B R B R B R B R B R BR BR LEGEND LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, OFFSET 3' FOR CLARITY EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS BR PROPERTY LINE 0.0% ROCK ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL BIOROLL - FILTREXX SEDIMENT CONTROL, SEE DETAIL EXISTING DRAINAGE DIRECTION EXISTING CONTOUR CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE PHASING OF WORK WITH THE ENGINEER AND/OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN ALL WORK WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, WHICH INCLUDES STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RETURNING ALL AREAS AFFECTED BY WORK TO A CONDITION AS GOOD AS EXISTING OR BETTER. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FLOOD ZONE NOTE: THE PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE "X" AND FLOOD ZONE "AE", PURSUANT TO F.E.M.A. COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 270151 0212 E, REVISION DATE SEPTEMBER 02, 2004. ON-SITE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO END AT THE PROPERTY LINE. REINFORCED SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED JUST INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE AND OUTSIDE OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. VICINITY MAP, USGS QUAD MAP, OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE, ALL GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES AND SEQUENCE NOTES ARE ON SHEET 6022 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS. ACREAGE SUMMARY - MUNICIPAL LIQUOR (TO NEAREST HUNDRETH ACRE) ON-SITE DISTURBED AREA OFF-SITE DISTURBED AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETION (WITHIN LOD) PERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETION (WITHIN LOD) 1.02 0.59 1.29 0.31 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1.42 TOTAL LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA (LOD)1.61 ER O S I O N & SE D I M E N T A T I O N CO N T R O L P L A N P H A S E 1 6020 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H LEGEND INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, OFFSET 3' FOR CLARITY BIOROLL, SEE DETAILBR PROPERTY LINE 925 0.0% LANDSCAPED AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS CONCRETE SIDEWALK ASPHALT PAVEMENT ARCHITECTURAL APRON ROCK ENTRANCE, SEE DETAIL EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE PHASING OF WORK WITH THE ENGINEER AND/OR OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTAIN ALL WORK WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, WHICH INCLUDES STORAGE OF MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR RETURNING ALL AREAS AFFECTED BY WORK TO A CONDITION AS GOOD AS EXISTING OR BETTER. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL FLOOD ZONE NOTE: THE PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE "X" AND FLOOD ZONE "AE", PURSUANT TO F.E.M.A. COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 270151 0212 E, REVISION DATE SEPTEMBER 02, 2004. ON-SITE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE TO END AT THE PROPERTY LINE. REINFORCED SILT FENCE AND TREE PROTECTION FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED JUST INSIDE THE PROPERTY LINE AND OUTSIDE OF ALL PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. VICINITY MAP, USGS QUAD MAP, OPERATION TIME SCHEDULE, ALL GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES, MAINTENANCE NOTES AND SEQUENCE NOTES ARE ON SHEET 6022 - EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL DETAILS. EXISTING SEARS 5 6 T H A V E N XE R X E S A V E N O R T H BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 FUTURE BUILDING 10 FUTURE BUILDING T FUTURE BUILDING R FUTURE TENANT FFE=852.7 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 B R B R B R BR B R B R B R B R BR B R B R B R B R B R BR BR 1 . 8 4 % 2.68% 1 . 3 1 % 2 . 4 7 % 5.6 7 % 850 8 5 1 85 1 851 852 85 2 85 2 851 8 5 1 85 1 8 5 0 85 2 852 ACREAGE SUMMARY - MUNICIPAL LIQUOR (TO NEAREST HUNDRETH ACRE) ON-SITE DISTURBED AREA OFF-SITE DISTURBED AREA IMPERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETION (WITHIN LOD) PERVIOUS AREA AT COMPLETION (WITHIN LOD) 1.02 0.59 1.29 0.31 TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 1.42 TOTAL LIMITS OF DISTURBED AREA (LOD)1.61 ER O S I O N & SE D I M E N T A T I O N CO N T R O L P L A N P H A S E 2 6021 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H GENERAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES A.THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN IS COMPRISED OF THE SITE MAPS, DETAIL SHEETS, THE PLAN NARRATIVE, ATTACHMENTS INCLUDED IN SPECIFICATIONS AND ALL SUBSEQUENT REPORTS AND RELATED DOCUMENTS. B.ALL CONTRACTORS AND SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM GENERAL PERMIT (NPDES PERMIT) AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THEIR CONTENTS. C.CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AS REQUIRED BY THE SWPPP. ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AS DICTATED BY CONDITIONS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST OF OWNER THROUGHOUT ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. D.BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AND CONTROLS SHALL CONFORM TO FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL REQUIREMENTS OR MANUAL OF PRACTICE, AS APPLICABLE. CONTRACTOR SHALL IMPLEMENT ADDITIONAL CONTROLS AS DIRECTED BY PERMITTING AGENCY OR OWNER. E.SITE MAP MUST CLEARLY DELINEATE ALL STATE WATERS. PERMITS FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IMPACTING STATE WATERS OR REGULATED WETLANDS MUST BE MAINTAINED ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. F.CONTRACTOR SHALL MINIMIZE CLEARING TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICAL OR AS REQUIRED BY THE GENERAL PERMIT. G.GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL DENOTE ON PLAN THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA WHICH SHALL ALSO BE USED AS THE EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE AND CLEANING AREA, EMPLOYEE PARKING AREA, AND AREA FOR LOCATING PORTABLE FACILITIES, OFFICE TRAILERS, AND TOILET FACILITIES. CONSTRUCT A BERM DOWNSTREAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATION SECTION 02370. H.ALL WASH WATER (CONCRETE TRUCKS, VEHICLE CLEANING, EQUIPMENT CLEANING, ETC.) SHALL BE DETAINED AND PROPERLY TREATED OR DISPOSED. I.SUFFICIENT OIL AND GREASE ABSORBING MATERIALS AND FLOTATION BOOMS SHALL BE MAINTAINED ON SITE OR READILY AVAILABLE TO CONTAIN AND CLEAN-UP FUEL OR CHEMICAL SPILLS AND LEAKS. J.DUST ON THE SITE SHALL BE CONTROLLED. THE USE OF MOTOR OILS AND OTHER PETROLEUM BASED OR TOXIC LIQUIDS FOR DUST SUPPRESSION OPERATIONS IS PROHIBITED. K.RUBBISH, TRASH, GARBAGE, LITTER, OR OTHER SUCH MATERIALS SHALL BE DEPOSITED INTO SEALED CONTAINERS. MATERIALS SHALL BE PREVENTED FROM LEAVING THE PREMISES THROUGH THE ACTION OF WIND OR STORMWATER DISCHARGE INTO DRAINAGE DITCHES OR WATERS OF THE STATE. L.ALL STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION MEASURES PRESENTED ON THIS PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE INITIATED AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE. M.ALL DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE, MUST BE STABILIZED TEMPORARILY WITH THE USE OF FAST-GERMINATING ANNUAL GRASS/GRAIN VARIETIES, STRAW/HAY MULCH, WOOD CELLULOSE FIBERS, TACKIFIERS, NETTING OR BLANKETS AS SHOWN ON SITE MAP. N.DISTURBED PORTIONS OF THE SITE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY STOPPED SHALL BE PERMANENTLY STABILIZED AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THESE AREAS SHALL BE SEEDED, SODDED, AND/OR VEGETATED NO LATER THAN 7 DAYS AFTER THE LAST CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURRING IN THESE AREAS. CHANNELS MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS. REFER TO THE SITE/GRADING PLAN AND/OR LANDSCAPE PLAN. O.IF VEHICLES SHOW SIGNS OF TRACKING AND/OR DIRT, THEN IMMEDIATELY THE TIRES MUST BE WASHED BEFORE THE VEHICLES ENTER A PUBLIC ROAD. IF WASHING IS USED, PROVISIONS MUST BE MADE TO INTERCEPT THE WASH WATER AND TRAP THE SEDIMENT BEFORE IT IS CARRIED OFF THE SITE. ONLY USE APPROVED CONSTRUCTION INGRESS/EGRESS LOCATIONS. P.ALL MATERIALS SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED FROM VEHICLES ONTO ROADWAYS OR INTO STORM DRAINS MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY. Q.CONTRACTORS OR SUBCONTRACTORS WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING SEDIMENT IN THE DETENTION POND AND ANY SEDIMENT THAT MAY HAVE COLLECTED IN THE STORM SEWER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. R.ON-SITE & OFFSITE SOIL STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION THROUGH IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. STOCKPILE AND BORROW AREA LOCATIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE SITE MAP AND PERMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. S.SLOPES SHALL BE LEFT IN A ROUGHENED CONDITION DURING THE GRADING PHASE TO REDUCE RUNOFF VELOCITIES AND EROSION. T.DUE TO THE GRADE CHANGES DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROJECT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADJUSTING THE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES (SILT FENCES, ETC.) TO PREVENT EROSION AND POLLUTANT DISCHARGE. U.SEE SITE PLAN FOR PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SIGNAGE. V.GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGNATE/IDENTIFY AREAS ON THE SITE MAPS, INSIDE OF THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, FOR WASTE DISPOSAL AND DELIVERY AND MATERIAL STORAGE. W.REFER TO SWPPP FOR REPORTABLE SPILL QUANTITIES OF PETROLEUM PRODUCTS AND/OR HAZARDOUS WASTES. X.CONTRACTOR TO LIMIT DISTURBANCE OF SITE IN STRICT ACCORDANCE WITH EROSION CONTROL SEQUENCING SHOWN ON THE SITE MAP. NO UNNECESSARY OR IMPROPERLY SEQUENCED CLEARING AND/OR GRADING SHALL BE PERMITTED. Y.THE SITE RECEIVING WATER IS SHINGLE CREEK WHICH IS AN IMPAIRED WATER. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL MPCA REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPAIRED WATERS DURING CONSTRUCTION. Z.SWEEP ADJACENT PAVED AREAS AS NEEDED OR DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. AA.SWEEP DAILY OR AS REQUIRED BY CITY ENGINEER. BB. SWPPP INSPECTION REPORTS SHALL BE SUBMITTED DIGITALLY TO THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WITHIN 12 HOURS OF COMPLETION. BMP MAINTENANCE EROSION NOTES ALL MEASURES STATED ON THIS EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN, AND IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN, SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN FULLY FUNCTIONAL CONDITION UNTIL NO LONGER REQUIRED FOR A COMPLETED PHASE OF WORK OR FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE SITE. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE CHECKED BY A QUALIFIED PERSON IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR THE APPLICABLE PERMIT, WHICHEVER IS MORE STRINGENT, AND REPAIRED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING. 1.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES AND BARRIERS SHALL BE REPAIRED OR REPLACES IF THEY SHOW SIGNS OF UNDERMINING OR DETERIORATION. 2.ALL SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE CHECKED REGULARLY TO SEE THAT A GOOD STAND IS MAINTAINED. AREAS SHOULD BE FERTILIZED, WATERED, AND RESEEDED AS NEEDED. 3.SILT FENCES SHALL BE REPAIRED TO THEIR ORIGINAL CONDITIONS IF DAMAGED. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SILT FENCES WHEN IT REACHES ONE-HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. 4.THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOW OF MUD ONTO PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE CONSTRUCTION EXITS AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 5.THE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD CONDITION (SUITABLE FOR PARKING AND STORAGE). THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING OF THE TEMPORARY PARKING AS CONDITIONS DEMAND. 6.OUTLET STRUCTURES IN THE SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS AT ALL TIMES. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM SEDIMENT BASINS OR TRAPS WHEN THE DESIGN CAPACITY HAS BEEN REDUCED BY 50%. 7.PRIOR TO LEAVING THE SITE, ALL VEHICLES SHALL BE CLEANED OR DEBRIS. ANY DEBRIS AND/OR SEDIMENT REACHING THE PUBLIC STREET SHALL BE CLEANED IMMEDIATELY BY A METHOD OTHER THAN FLUSHING. 8.ALL MAINTENANCE OPERATIONS SHALL BE DONE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THE DISCOVERY, OR AS SOON AS FIELD CONDITIONS ALLOW. SODDING/SEEDING NOTES SOD: 1.PROVIDE SOD SPECIES, DEVELOPED PRIMARILY OF BLUE GRASS AND FESCUE SEED, SUITABLE AS LAWN TURF FOR THE REGION. SOD SHALL BE STRONGLY ROOTED, 2-YEARS OF AGE MINIMUM, WEED, DISEASE, PEST FREE AND UNIFORM IN THICKNESS. 2.DO NOT PLACE TOPSOIL UNTIL SUBGRADE HAS BEEN APPROVED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 02300. 3.BEFORE PLACING TOPSOIL, RAKE SUBSURFACE CLEAR OF STONES, DEBRIS AND ROOTS. DISK, DRAG, HARROW, HARLEY OR RAKE SUBGRADE TO A DEPTH OF 2"-4" AND REMOVE STONES LARGER THAN 1-1/2" TO PROVIDE BOND FOR TOPSOIL. 4.SPREAD TOPSOIL TO A DEPTH OF 4" BUT NOT LESS THAN REQUIRED TO MEET FINISH GRADES AFTER LIGHT ROLLING AND NATURAL SETTLEMENT. ADJUST DEPTH OF TOPSOIL IN AREAS ADJACENT TO PAVED SURFACES OR CURBS TO ALLOW FOR THE PLACEMENT OF SOD. 5.INCORPORATE SOIL AMENDMENTS AND COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER INTO THE TOP 4" OF TOPSOIL TO ACHIEVE THE SPECIFIED TOPSOIL REQUIREMENTS. TILL SOIL TO A HOMOGENOUS MIXTURE. 6.GRADE AREAS TO FINISH GRADES, FILLING AS NEEDED OR REMOVING SURPLUS TOPSOIL. FLOAT AREAS TO SMOOTH, UNIFORM GRADES AS INDICATED ON DRAWINGS. 7.CUT AND LAY SOD ON SAME DAY. ONLY HEALTHY VIGOROUS GROWING SOD SHALL BE LAID. WIDE MACHINE LAID ROLES ARE ACCEPTABLE. 8.LAY SOD ACROSS SLOPE AND TIGHTLY TOGETHER TO RESULT IN SOLID COVERAGE FREE OF GAPS. 9.ROLL NEW SOD TO SET OR PRESS SOD INTO UNDERLYING SOIL. 10.ALL FINISHED SODDING SHALL BE SMOOTH AND FREE OF LUMPS AND DEPRESSIONS. 11.AFTER SODDING HAS BEEN COMPLETED, CLEAN UP AND THOROUGHLY WATER NEWLY-SODDED AREAS IMMEDIATELY. 12.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SOD WATERING FOR 30 DAYS AFTER PLACEMENT. SEED: 13.REFER TO LANDSCAPE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PERMANENT SEEDING. BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES SEQUENCE NOTE: UPON IMPLEMENTATION AND INSTALLATION OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS: TRAILER, PARKING, LAY DOWN, PORTA-POTTY, WHEEL WASH, STOCKPILE AREA, CONCRETE WASHOUT, MASON'S AREA, FUEL AND MATERIAL STORAGE CONTAINERS, SOLID WASTE CONTAINERS, ETC., IMMEDIATEDLY DENOTE THEM ON THE SITE MAPS AND NOTE ANY CHANGES IN LOCATIONS AS THEY OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS. IN ADDITION, NOTE ALL AREAS WHERE FILL IS IMPORTED FROM OR SOIL IS EXPORTED TO ON THE SITE MAPS. PHASE 1 1.INSTALL STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS, 'NO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC' SIGNS, AND SWPPP INFORMATION SIGN. 2.INSTALL CONSTRUCTION AND SILT FENCES ON THE SITE (CLEAR ONLY THOSE AREAS NECESSARY TO INSTALL CONSTRUCTION AND SILT FENCE) AND INLET PROTECTION ON EXISTING INLETS. 3.PREPARE TEMPORARY PARKING AND STORAGE AREA. 4.INSTALL AND STABILIZE HYDRAULIC CONTROL STRUCTURES (DIKES, SWALES, CHECK DAMS, ETC.). 5.BEGIN CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND DEMOLITION OF THE SITE IN THOSE AREAS PERTINENT TO THE CURRENT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 6.BEGIN GRADING THE SITE. 7.START CONSTRUCTION OF BULDING PAD AND STRUCTURES. 8.SEED CONSTRUCTION PHASE 4 AREAS, PROVIDE AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL FOR ANY STOCKPILE AREAS, AND MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROL MEASURES UNTIL CONSTRUCTION PHASE II WORK BEGINS. PHASE 2 1.TEMPORARILY SEED, THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION, DENUDED AREAS THAT WILL BE INACTIVE FOR 7 DAYS OR MORE. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. 2.INSTALL UTILITIES, UNDERDRAINS, STORM SEWERS, CURBS AND GUTTERS. 3.INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL STORM SEWER STRUTURES AS EACH INLET STRUCTURE IS INSTALLED. 4.PERMANENTLY STABILIZE AREAS TO BE VEGETATED AS THEY ARE BROUGHT TO FINAL GRADE. 5.PREPARE SITE FOR PAVING/OVERLAY WITHIN THE CURRENT LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION. 6.PAVE SITE. 7.INSTALL APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES FOR PAVED AREAS AS WORK PROGRESSES. 8.COMPLETE GRADING AND INSTALLATION OF PERMANENT STABILIZATION OVER ALL AREAS INCLUDING OUTLOTS. 9.OBTAIN CONCURRENCE WITH THE OWNER THAT THE SITE HAS BEEN FULLY STABILIZED THEN: A.REMOVE ALL REMAINING TEMPORARY EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES, B.STABILIZE ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL OF BMPS, AND C.ASK THE OWNER TO CONTACT THE CEC TO COMPLETE THE CEC ON SITE INSPECTION AND REPORT. 10.CONTINUE DAILY INSPECTION REPORTS UNTIL THE FINAL DAILY INSPECTION REPORT, MARKED 'READY TO TERMINATE PERMIT', IS SIGNED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND THE NOT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED. NOTE: THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR MAY COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ACTIVITIES CONCURRENTLY ONLY IF ALL PRECEDING BMPS HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY INSTALLED. BMP-RELATED STEPS IN THE ABOVE SEQUENCE ARE ITALICIZED FOR CLARITY. SITE: BROOKDALE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN LAT: 45° 03' 40"N LONG: 93° 19' 03" W SITE LOCATION MAP NOT TO SCALE SECTION 2 - TOWNSHIP 188N - RANGE 21W USGS QUAD MAP NOT TO SCALE 1 MILE INFLUENCE ZONE ULTIMATE RECEIVING WATER: SHINGLE CREEK 1 MILE INFLUENCE ZONE SITE: BROOKDALE BROOKLYN CENTER, MN LAT: 45° 03' 40"N LONG: 93° 19' 03" W REGIONAL STORMWATER FACILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL NOTES 1.A CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN (CCP) HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE SITE BY BRAUN INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE "CCP" AS APPROVED BY THE MPCA. A.THE SITE MAY CONTAIN CONTAMINATED GROUNDWATER AND SOILS AS A RESULT OF CLOSED LUSTS (LEAKING UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS), FORMER DRY CLEANER, AND DRO. AS A RESULT, SCREENINGS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A BRAUN INTERTEC TECNICIAN ON SOILS UNCOVERED AS A RESULT OF DEMOLITION AND DURING EXCAVATION OF CONTAMINATED SOILS. B.SOIL VAPOR INTRUSION INVESTIGATIONS MUST BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TO DETERMINE WHETHER SOIL VAPOR INTRUSION MITIGATION IS NECESSARY. C.PRIOR TO ANY DEWATERING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A SPECIAL DISCHARGE APPLICATION AND SUBMIT AND OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, AND THE MPCA. D.DUST CONTROL MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WHEN NECESSARY AS WELL AS PROPER DECONTAMINATION PRACTICES SUCH AS ROCK APRONS AT THE EXITS, STREET SWEEPING, ETC. 2.SHINGLE CREEK IS AN IMPAIRED WATER ACCORDING TO THE MPCA. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL FOLLOW THE GENERAL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR IMPAIRED WATERS AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SWPPP. ULTIMATE RECEIVING WATER: SHINGLE CREEK ER O S I O N & SE D I M E N T A T I O N CO N T R O L D E T A I L S 6022 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R SWPPP INFORMATION 1. 3B. 3A. 4. 5. 2. SECTION NTS PLAN NTS FILTREXX® SEDIMENT CONTROL NTS ®™ ™ ®™ BIOROLL SCHEDULE BIOROLL SECTION TYPE SECTION LENGTH (FT.) DRAINAGE AREA (AC.) AVERAGE SLOPE OF AREA (%) 1 BIOROLL 110 0.17 2 2 BIOROLL 110 0.64 2 3 BIOROLL 219 0.47 2 4 BIOROLL 1043 3.89 2 ER O S I O N & SE D I M E N T A T I O N CO N T R O L D E T A I L S 6023 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES CLEARING & GRUBBING REMOVE FENCE LEGEND PROTECT EXISTING TREE, UTILITY STRUCTURE, ETC. FULL DEPTH SAWCUT DEMOLITION NOTES: 1.AN NPDES PERMIT WAS OBTAINED BY THE DEVELOPER. SITE DEMOLITION SHALL NOT COMMENCE UNTIL THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S ARE CONSTRUCTED AND SUBSEQUENTLY APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) OF ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE, STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE SPECIFICATIONS. 3.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE THAT IS NOT BEING RECYCLED OR OTHERWISE REUSED AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SEARS, KOHL'S, WALMART, AND APPLEBEES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE DEVELOPER AND COORDINATION WITH ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND THE CITY. 5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 6.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DISCONNECTION OF UTILITY SERVICES TO THE EXISTING BUILDINGS PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OF THE BUILDINGS. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL REQUIRED TEMPORARY UTILITIES NECESSARY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 7.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 8.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS THE ONLY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK. 9.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC CABLE AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC., (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC FOR OFFSITE WORK SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MN MUTCD), INCLUDING THE FIELD MANUAL FOR TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL ZONE LAYOUTS. 11.CONTINUOUS ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING FACILITIES. REFER TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 12.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED WHERE NECESSARY, PER THE EROSION CONTROL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 13.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR IT'S REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY UTILITY DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 15.CONTRACTOR TO USE EXTREME CAUTION DURING DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING STRUCTURE ADJACENT TO EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN. DAMAGE TO ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS TO REMAIN WILL BE REPLACED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 16.BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENTS, WITHIN THE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, SHALL BE REMOVED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS. 17. ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 18. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE PROPER SITE DRAINAGE BY UTILIZING TEMPORARY DRAINAGE PIPING AND/OR OTHER MEANS THROUGHOUT DURATION OF PROJECT, UNTIL PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS INSTALLED. 19. ALL UTILITIES SHALL BE DISCONNECTED PER CITY SPECIFICATIONS BEFORE BUILDING DEMOLITION BEGINS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN TO THE CITY FOR APPROVAL FOR ALL WORK THAT IMPACTS TRAFFIC WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. 21. GRAVITY SEWERS TO REMAIN SHALL BE BULKHEADED WHERE EXISTING CONNECTIONS ARE REMOVED. SANITARY INVERTS SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT STOCKPILE OR STORE MATERIAL WITHIN PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS. APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF TURF F F F F F F F F F F F FFFF F F A A A A A A A A A C D A A A A A C D D D D D DD D D D B BA B B B B B B B B B B B G G E E E E E E EE E E E E H H H H H H HH I B I I I I I I I I APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF PAVEMENT REMOVALS. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT TO EDGE OF TURF B B DEMOLITION LEGEND A PROTECT EXISTING TREE B PROTECT EXISTING CURB & GUTTER C PROTECT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT D PROTECT EXISTING STORM OR SANITARY STRUCTURES E PROTECT EXISTING PAVEMENT F PROTECT EXISTING LIGHT POLE G REMOVE LIGHT POLE H PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK I FULL DEPTH SAWCUT EX I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S & DE M O L I T I O N P L A N 6031 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H SYMBOL LEGEND: PROPOSED PARKING SPACES (SWSL)# STANDARD PARKING STALL PROPOSED LIGHT POLE (SEE LIGHTING PLAN FOR FIXTURE LEGEND) PROPERTY LINE ADA STRIPING PAVEMENT HATCH LEGEND: PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT EXISTING HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT EXISTING LIGHT POLE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP. SEE DETAIL. ARCHITECTURAL APRON LANDSCAPE AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPS 1. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTION OF ALL PROPERTY CORNERS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL MATCH PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER, CONCRETE AND PAVEMENT TO EXISTING IN GRADE AND ALIGNMENT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE EXISTING PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPECIFICATIONS. 4. THE EARTHWORK FOR ALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS AND SLABS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR ACTUAL BUILDING AND SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS, PORCH AND RAMP LOCATIONS. 6. GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, ADJUSTMENT OR RELOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS DESIGNATED ON PLANS. 7. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PIPE BOLLARDS FOR PROTECTION OF ALL ABOVE GROUND UTILITIES AND APPURTENANCES IN DRIVE AREAS. 8. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ACTUAL LOCATION OF ALL UTILITY ENTRANCES, TO INCLUDE, SANITARY SEWER LATERALS, DOMESTIC AND FIRE PROTECTION WATER SERVICE, ELECTRICAL, NATURAL GAS AND TELEPHONE SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES IN SUCH A MANNER AS TO AVOID CONFLICTS AND ASSURE PROPER DEPTHS ARE ACHIEVED, AS WELL AS COORDINATE WITH ANY UTILITY COMPANIES FOR APPROVED LOCATIONS AND SCHEDULING OF TIE-INS/CONNECTIONS TO THEIR FACILITIES. 9. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 10. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPAIRING THE DAMAGE DONE TO ANY EXISTING ITEM DURING CONSTRUCTION, SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DRAINAGE, UTILITIES, PAVEMENT, STRIPING, CURB, ETC. REPAIRS SHALL BE EQUAL TO, OR BETTER THAN, EXISTING CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO DOCUMENT ALL EXISTING DAMAGE AND NOTIFY CONSTRUCTION MANAGER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION START. 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL TOUCH-UP PAINT AS NECESSARY ON ALL LIGHT POLE BASES, FIRE HYDRANTS AND CURBS WHICH ARE CURRENTLY PAINTED AND WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE FOOD COURT IMPROVEMENTS. COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE BASE BID. 13. CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE OR RELOCATE, WHEN APPLICABLE, ALL EXISTING BUILDINGS, FOUNDATIONS, BASEMENTS, CONNECTING IMPROVEMENTS, DRAIN PIPES, SANITARY SEWER PIPES, POWER POLES, AND GUY WIRES, WATER METERS AND WATER LINES, WELLS, SIDEWALKS, SIGN POLES, UNDERGROUND GAS, SEPTIC TANKS AND ASPHALT, SHOWN AND NOT SHOWN, WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AND WHERE NEEDED,TO ALLOW FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN. 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL LOCAL, STATE AND FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN DISPOSING OF DEMOLISHED MATERIALS REMOVED FROM THIS SITE. 15. ALL PAINT USED FOR PARKING STRIPING SHALL BE PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER SPECIFICATIONS. 16. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 17. CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION PLAN FOR RELOCATIONS AND ADDITIONS. 19. PLANS SUBMITTED FOR PERMITTING SHALL MEET THE CITY'S CODES AND ALL APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES IN EFFECT AT THE TIME. 20. ALL PARKING ISLAND OUTSIDE CURBED RADII ARE TO BE 10'. INSIDE RADII TO BE 3', UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 21. ALL LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE METAL HALIDE. SITE PLAN NOTES EXISTING SEARS 5 6 T H A V E N XE R X E S A V E N O R T H BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 FUTURE BUILDING 10 FUTURE BUILDING T FUTURE BUILDING R FUTURE TENANT FFE=852.7 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 9 9 10 13 15 15 35.0'PRO P E R T Y S E T B A C K 9.0' TYP 24 . 0 ' TY P . 36 . 0 ' TY P . 18 . 0 ' TY P . 18 . 0 ' TY P . 24 . 0 ' TY P . 36 . 0 ' TY P . 24 . 0 ' TY P . 9.0' TYP 9.5' 2 0 . 8 ' 25 . 2 ' 12.6'12.0' 9.0'11.9' 22 . 6 ' 25.0' 24.0' 28.0' 34.9' 91 . 7 ' 23 . 3 ' 10.0'8.0' 3. 9 ' 5.5' A A E D D D D B E E E E E M P P T T T T T L J J H I K V K S E D AA Q Q A A H H H R R R R H H H H H R R F V V V V V V V 9.0' 9.0'9.0' 18 . 0 ' CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE ADA PARKING STALLS MEET 2010 NATIONAL ACCESSIBLE DESIGN STANDARDS. SURROUNDING PAVEMENT RESTORATION AS REQUIRED. 10.0'UTILI T Y E A S M E N T U B B B B B H H H W X L D M L JD K F F F F F F F F F F F F F FFFF F 9.0'9.0' G G V F E N Y N 6 . 0 ' X Z T T K B B B AA H R B F L O O O EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE SALVAGE AND REPLACE STOP SIGN 30"X30" (R1-1)(TYP.) I J LIGHT POLE. SEE LIGHTING PLAN AND DETAIL SHEET. PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDWALK. ALL SIDEWALKS 6' WIDE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. SEE DETAIL SHEET. L PAVEMENT MARKINGS AS REQUIRED. SEE DETAIL. N PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK 6' WIDE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. O STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PAVINGP CONNECT TO EXISTING SIDEWALK WITH FLUSH TRANSITIONQ HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT PAVINGR TRASH ENCLOSURE WITH HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT. SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL.S T U EXISTING SIDEWALK TO REMAIN V EXISTING 60° STANDARD PARKING SPACE DIMENSION 9' x 20' (TYP.) - SWSL/4" - RESTRIPE IF NECESSARY AREA STRIPED AT SYSL/4" AT 45' @ 2 O.C. K HANIDCAP PARKING SIGN PER LATEST MUTCD STANDARDS M LANDSCAPED AREA, SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE MIN. 4" TOPSOIL A SITE LEGEND ADA CURB RAMP EXISTING PARKING TO REMAIN C D E PROPOSED TYPE MNDOT B618 CURB. MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTERB F EXISTING LIGHT POLE TO REMAIN. PROTECT IN PLACE G H LIMITS OF PAVEMENT IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR TO CONNECT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT WITH FLUSH TRANSITION SUCH THAT EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS REMAIN INTACT 90° STANDARD PARKING SPACE DIMENSION 9'X18' (TYP.) - SWSL/4" TRANSFORMER PADW X BOLLARD. SEE DETAIL Y CONCRETE APRON, SEE STRUCTURAL PLANS FOR DETAIL Z ORNAMENTAL FENCE, SEE SITE DETAILS RAISED PEDESTRIAN CROSSWALK. SEE SITE DETAILS.AA DETECTABLE WARNING STRIPSBB BUILDING RATIO T 1.54 ACRES 5,500 SQ. FT.55 SPACES 10.00 R 1.03 ACRES 5,400 SQ. FT.56 SPACES 10.37 1.42 ACRES 13,230 SQ. FT.58 SPACES 4.38 1,2,3,4,5 7.63 ACRES 79,508 SQ. FT. 381 SPACES 10 0.92 ACRES 6,000 SQ. FT. BUILDINGS LOT 1, BLOCK 1 LOT 6,7,8 2.07 ACRES 12,141 SQ. FT.60 SPACES LOT 2, BLOCK 1 LOT 3, BLOCK 1 LOT 4, BLOCK 1 SITE DATA TABLE LOT AREA PARKING PROVIDED 9 4.79 33 SPACES 5.50 4.94 LOT 5, BLOCK 1 LOT 6, BLOCK 1 SI T E P L A N 6040 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H (MIN.)(SEE SITE PLAN FOR DIMENSIONS) SI T E D E T A I L S 6041 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R C H F E L PBM ASSEMBLY DETAIL SHOWN ON 1508HR J R S ’ SI T E D E T A I L S 6042 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R JIDA PP F KK D OO B MM K H G V W SI T E D E T A I L S 6043 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R LEGEND PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS EXISTING PRIVATE STORM SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER INLET EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE BREAKLINE LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE, OFFSET 3' FOR CLARITY PROPOSED PAVEMENT LIMITS, SEE SHEET 6040 - SITE PLAN FOR PAVEMENT TYPES THE PRESENCE OF GROUNDWATER SHOULD BE ANTICIPATED ON THIS PROJECT. CONTRACTOR'S BID SHALL INCLUDE CONSIDERATION FOR ADDRESSING THIS ISSUE. REFERENCE THE CONSTRUCTION CONTINGENCY PLAN BY BRAUN INTERTEC DATED 05/27/2011 FOR GROUNDWATER DEWATERING REQUIREMENTS. GOPHER STATE CALL ONE WHEN PERFORMING GRADING OPERATIONS DURING PERIODS OF WET WEATHER, PROVIDE ADEQUATE DEWATERING, DRAINAGE AND GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT TO CONTROL MOISTURE OF SOILS. REFER TO THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 1.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 2.ALL CUT OR FILL SLOPES SHALL BE 3:1 OR FLATTER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3.EXISTING PIPES AND STRUCTURES TO BE CLEANED OUT TO REMOVE ALL SILT AND DEBRIS. 4.EXISTING GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1 FOOT. 5.PROPOSED GRADE CONTOUR INTERVALS SHOWN AT 1 FOOT. 6.IF ANY EXISTING STRUCTURES TO REMAIN ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION IT SHALL BE THE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO REPAIR AND/OR REPLACE THE EXISTING STRUCTURE AS NECESSARY TO RETURN IT TO EXISTING CONDITIONS OR BETTER. 7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS AS OUTLINED IN THE EPA OR APPLICABLE STATE GENERAL N.P.D.E.S. PERMIT FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGE ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES AND THE WALMART SPECIAL CONDITIONS, SECTION 8, ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE AND STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION. THIS APPLIES TO WALMART BUILT PROJECTS ONLY. 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL ADJUST AND/OR CUT EXISTING PAVEMENT AS NECESSARY TO ASSURE A SMOOTH FIT AND CONTINUOUS GRADE. 9.TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION IS TAKEN FROM A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY LAND SURVEYORS. IF THE CONTRACTOR DOES NOT ACCEPT EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, WITHOUT EXCEPTION, THEN THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUPPLY, AT THEIR EXPENSE, A TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY A REGISTERED LAND SURVEYOR TO THE OWNER FOR REVIEW. 10.ALL UNSURFACED AREAS DISTURBED BY GRADING OPERATION SHALL RECEIVE 4 INCHES OF TOPSOIL. CONTRACTOR SHALL APPLY STABILIZATION BLANKET TO ALL SLOPES 3H:1V OR STEEPER. CONTRACTOR SHALL STABILIZE DISTURBED AREAS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING SPECIFICATIONS UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF VEGETATION IS OBTAINED. 11.CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND BE CONSTRUCTED TO SAME. 12.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE EXISTING PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK AREAS THAT ARE TO BE LANDSCAPED A MINIMUM OF 30" OR AS DEEP AS NECESSARY TO ENSURE ALL STONE BASE / PAVEMENT MATERIAL IS REMOVED (WHICHEVER IS GREATER) AND BACKFILL WITH CLEAN/ DRAINING SAND TO WITHIN 4" OF TOP OF CURB TO ENSURE PROPER SOIL FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 13.CONTRACTOR TO REVIEW DNR AND MPCA DEWATERING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS AND SHALL OBTAIN PERMIT IF REQUIRED FOR SITE CONDITIONS. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL GRADE THE SITE TO THE ELEVATIONS INDICATED AND SHALL REGRADE WASHOUTS WHERE THEY OCCUR AFTER EVERY RAINFALL UNTIL A GRASS STAND IS WELL ESTABLISHED OR ADEQUATE STABILIZATION OCCURS. 15.ALL AREAS INDICATED AS PAVEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE TYPICAL PAVEMENT SECTIONS AS INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS. 16.WHERE EXISTING PAVEMENT IS INDICATED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT THE FULL DEPTH OF PAVEMENT FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND REPLACE THE PAVEMENT WITH THE SAME TYPE AND DEPTH OF MATERIAL AS EXISTING OR AS INDICATED. 17.WHERE NEW PAVEMENT MEETS THE EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAWCUT THE FULL DEPTH OF EXISTING PAVEMENT FOR A SMOOTH AND STRAIGHT JOINT AND MATCH THE EXISTING PAVEMENT ELEVATION WITH THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. 18.FIELD DENSITY TESTS SHALL BE TAKEN AT INTERVALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY. IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACT DOCUMENTS AND THE JURISDICTIONAL AGENCY REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT IN AGREEMENT, THE MOST STRINGENT SHALL GOVERN. 19.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ENSURE THAT ISLAND PLANTING AREAS AND OTHER PLANTING AREAS ARE NOT OVER-COMPACTED AND DO NOT CONTAIN ROAD BASE MATERIALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO EXCAVATE AND REMOVE ALL UNDESIRABLE MATERIAL FROM ALL AREAS ON THE SITE TO BE PLANTED AND SHALL BE PROPERLY DISPOSED OF IN A LEGAL MANNER. 20.ALL MATERIALS AND CONSTRUCTION WITHIN THE MNDOT AND HENNEPIN COUNTY RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST MNDOT DESIGN STANDARDS AND LATEST STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION. 21.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO PAVED FINISHED GRADE AT FLOWLINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE NOTES: CONTRACTOR TO ADJUST EXISTING STRUCTURES TO FINAL GRADE. GRADING LEGEND 10" STORM LEADERS AT MIN. 1.0% SLOPE (TYP.) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" THICK INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON ROOF DRAIN PER DETAIL IF LESS THAN 5' OF COVER. REFER TO MEP PLAN FOR INVERT ELEVATIONS AT BUILDING. A APPROXIMATE LIMIT OF PAVEMENT RESTORATION. CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE IN KIND ALL PAVEMENT REMOVED OR DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTAIN EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS. B EXISTING SEARS 5 6 T H A V E N XE R X E S A V E N O R T H BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 FUTURE BUILDING 10 FUTURE BUILDING T FUTURE BUILDING R FUTURE TENANT FFE=852.7 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 F.F.E. = 853.0 F.F.E. = 853.0 F.F.E. = 853.0 F.F.E. = 853.0 F.F.E. = 853.0 F . F . E . = 8 5 3 . 0 F . F . E . = 8 5 3 . 0 F . F . E . = 8 5 3 . 0 F . F . E . = 8 5 3 . 0 F . F . E . = 8 5 3 . 0 F . F . E . = 8 5 3 . 0 850 850 85 1 85 1 8 5 1 851 851 851 851 852 852 852 852 852 853 853 853 853 F.F.E. = 852.60 F.F.E. = 852.0 F.F.E. = 852.0 850 849 85 1 85 1 85 1 85 2 1. 2 6 % 3. 1 9 % 3.92 % 1 . 8 4 % 1.4 2 % 1 . 3 4 % 0.68% 1. 3 7 % 3.1 4 % 1. 6 8 % 2.52 % 4.46 % 1.7 2 % 851 8 5 1 852 852 853 85 2 852 85 1 85 1 8 5 1 85 2 B B B A A 1.09% 1.09% 0.83% 5.3 6 % 6.7 6 % 1.14% 1 . 8 5 % 0. 5 5 % A 1 . 9 5 % 1.5 0 % 2 . 4 2 % 8 5 2 852 85 2 85 2 852 ME:852.05 ME:852.31 ME:852.62 ME:851.29 ME:850.93 ME:851.68 ME:850.61 ME:850.42 ME:850.04 ME:849.30 ME:849.62 ME:849.64 ME:849.86 ME:850.40ME:851.03 ME:851.14 849.86 849.69 849.92 850.46 851.00 851.01 850.71 850.56 850.52 850.54 850.82 850.61 850.54 850.58 850.69 851.77 851.64 851.72 851.80 851.56 851.32 851.43 851.46 849.10 848.96 849.15 849.69 850.07 850.09 850.03 850.88 850.78 850.95 851.07 851.25 851.19 851.81 851.92 851.86851.73 851.77 851.90 850.46 850.57 850.64 850.67 850.45 850.52 850.58 ME:851.35 ME:851.37 ME:851.24 ME:851.99 ME:852.08 ME:852.61 ME:852.25 ME:852.83 852.70 ME:852.64 ME:852.63 852.70 ME:852.60 ME:851.98 ME:852.02 ME:851.94ME:851.92 ME:851.86 ME:851.87 ME:852.48 ME:851.98 ME:852.25 ME:852.70 ME:852.93 ME:853.03 852.65 852.54 852.54 852.70 852.70 852.62 852.62 ME:852.97 851.72 851.68 ME:852.03 851.59 ME:851.67 ME:851.69 ME:851.97 LP:850.05 851.12 851.18 851.16 ME:851.76 ME:851.90 852.70 852.70 ME:852.60 ME:852.61 ME:852.60 ME:852.60 ME:852.60 852.49 852.34 852.98853.00 ME:852.51 ME:851.97 ME:851.80 ME:851.48 ME:851.22 CONTRACTOR TO REPAIR UNDERMINED STRUCTURE AND REPLACE PAVEMENT IN KIND ME:851.92 ME:851.19 ME:851.86 ME:851.99 ME:851.55 ME:851.46 ME:851.03 ME:851.64 ME:850.63 852 1. 7 5 % 4 . 3 7 % 7. 2 7 % 5.32% 1.85% 1.9 5 % 4.55% GR A D I N G & D R A I N A G E PL A N 6051 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H INSET A. SEE SHEET 6052 5 6 T H A V E N 1. 2 6 % 2.0 7 % 1. 6 8 % 1. 7 8 % 2.8 9 % 1. 5 0 % 1.1 3 % 5.3 6 % 6.7 6 % 0.8 6 % 85 1 . 5 851.5 852.0 85 2 . 0 852.5 85 1 . 5 85 2 . 0 85 2 . 5 8 5 2 . 5 8 5 1 . 5 8 5 2 . 0 1 . 5 2 % 1. 3 9 % 4.79% 1. 2 8 % 4.78% 852.65 852.56 852.00 852.69 ME:852.05 852.51 852.46 852.41 852.36 852.63 852.66 852.32 852.33 852.57 852.04 852.38 851.98 ME:852.31 ME:852.62 ME:851.29 ME:852.25 ME:852.83 852.70 ME:852.64 ME:851.98 ME:852.97 ME:852.51 ME:851.97 ME:851.80 ME:851.48 ME:851.22 851.57 851.50 851.39 851.35 ME:851.92 ME:851.26 ME:851.29 ME:851.19 ME:851.86 ME:851.99 ME:851.55 ME:851.46 ME:851.03 ME:851.64 ME:850.63 852.09 852.61 852.54 852.36 852.51 852.49 852.49 852.49 0.6 4 % 0.3 2 % 2.8 9 % 1. 4 0 % 852 . 5 851. 0 851.5 852 . 0 851.89 4. 7 0 % 4 . 7 4 % 1. 7 5 % 0.60% 2. 2 7 % 1.1 9 % 2. 2 5 % 851.34 851.26 851.16 851.01 851.18 851.11 850.74 4.37% 7. 4 2 % 7.1 3 % 5.29% 1.85% 0.76% 2. 2 6 % 6.7 2 % 1 . 9 2 % 851.15 851.48 851.80 851.87 851.73 851.66 851.37 851.26 5.5 6 % 1.10% 851.45 2 . 5 0 % 3 . 3 6 % 1. 1 4 % 6.59% 3. 3 2 % 0 . 7 7 % 11 . 5 8 % 3.31 % 3.13% 3.64% 3 . 4 1 % 2. 3 8 % PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 DE T A I L E D G R A D I N G & DR A I N A G E P L A N 6052 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H INSET A GR A D I N G & D R A I N A G E DE T A I L S 6053 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R LEGEND PROPERTY LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC/POWER UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SANITARY SEWER PIPE PRIVATE WATER PIPING GAS PIPING STORM SEWER PIPE GATE VALVE IN VALVE BOX (MUST BE H20 TRAFFIC RATED IN PAVEMENT AREAS) FIRE HYDRANT REDUCER POST INDICATOR VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CLEAN-OUT STORM SEWER STRUCTURE POWER POLE GAS METER PIPE BOLLARD SEWER/WATER PLUG EXISTING GAS PIPING EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS EXISTING EASEMENT 1. ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY AUTHORITIES INSPECTORS 72 HOURS BEFORE CONNECTING TO ANY EXISTING LINE. 3.SANITARY SEWER PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL BE PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D3034. 4.PRIVATE WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN: 4" TO 12", PVC, AWWA C900 RATED DR 18 CLASS 150 PER ASTM D2241 OR DUCTILE IRON PIPE, PRESSURE CLASS 350 PER AWWA C151. 3" AND SMALLER, EITHER COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" (SOFT) PER ASTM B88 OR PVC, SDR21 RATING, PER AWWA C900 AND ASTM D2241. 5.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 3 FEET ON ALL WATER, SANITARY AND STORM SEWER PIPING, SEE DETAIL SHEET. 6.ALL WATER JOINTS THAT REQUIRE A CHANGE IN DIRECTION ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH THRUST BLOCKING AS CALLED OUT IN SPECIFICATIONS. 7.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE). 8.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-6" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. INSULATION SHALL BE PROVIDED IF THIS IS NOT ACHIEVABLE. 9.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE DUCTILE IRON PIPE WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON BOTH SIDES OF CROSSING, THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE THRUST BLOCKING AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" CLEARANCE. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 10.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED, AS-BUILT LOCATED (IF REQUIRED) AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 11.TOPS OF EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED OR LOWERED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE 6" ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS WITH WATER TIGHT LIDS. 12.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 13.DRAWINGS MAY NOT SHOW ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. 14.ALL WET UTILITY POINTS OF CONNECTION SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO TRENCHING. GRAVITY UTILITY CONNECTIONS SHALL BE POTHOLED OR DIPPED TO VERIFY INVERTS AT POINT OF CONNECTION AND ENSURE DESIGN SLOPES PROVIDED ON THE PLANS CAN BE ACHEIVED. WHERE THERE IS A CONFLICT BETWEEN FIELD CONDITIONS AND THE PLANS, THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIED IMMEDIATELY. 15.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR EXACT TIE-IN LOCATION AND SIZE OF ALL UTILITIES. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE LOCAL AUTHORITIES (CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER) WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES. 17.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 18.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICE. 19.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 20.ALL WATER MAIN AND SANITARY SEWER UTILITY EXTENSIONS, REMOVAL AND RELOCATIONS SHALL MEET THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DESIGN STANDARDS. 21.DEWATERING SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR, IF REQUIRED DUE TO SEASONAL GROUND WATER VARIATIONS, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AND THE MNDNR TEMPORARY WATER APPROPRIATIONS GENERAL PERMIT. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE STORE MANAGER OF OPERATING BUSINESSES, UTILITY COMPANIES AND THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER TO MAINTAIN UTILITY SERVICE TO OPERATING BUSINESSES AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.DIAL BEFORE YOU DIG. CALL 1-800-252-1166 FOR LOCATION OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. IN THE TWIN CITY AREA CALL 651-454-0002. 24.THE SITEWORK CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO ELECTRICAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE LIGHTING WIRE AND CONDUIT DESIGN. SEE PHOTOMETRICS PLAN FOR LIGHT POLE AND BASE INFORMATION. 25.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH. PLANS. 26.ALL UTILITIES ARE PRIVATE UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED AS PUBLIC. 27.ALL UTILITY WORK PERFORMED AND MATERIALS USED SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAILS. 28.ALL WATERMAIN CONNECTIONS TO CITY WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSPECTED BY CITY PERSONNEL. 29.NEW WATERMAIN GATE VALVES SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL CITY WATERMAIN SERVICE LOCATIONS. 30.ALL SANITARY SEWER CONNECTIONS TO CITY MAIN SHALL BE INSPECTED BY CITY PERSONNEL. 31.HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AT 3' FROM BACK OF CURB. 32.NEW INVERTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WHERE CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING PUBLIC SANITARY MANHOLES ARE MADE. 33.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 4" AND LARGER SHALL USE MUELLER CO. STAINLESS STEEL TAPPING SLEEVES MODEL H-304. UTILITY NOTES KEYNOTE LEGEND PROPOSED GAS SERVICEA PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICEB PROPOSED TRANSFORMER CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERC PROPOSED 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE SERVICED PROPOSED 6" FIRE WATER SERVICEE - - NOT USED - -F PROPOSED 45° BENDG PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONH PROPOSED 4" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE @ 2%.I CONNECT SANITARY SERVICE TO EXISTING CLEANOUT. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS ROOF DRAIN, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONSK 8" PVC ROOF DRAIN LEADER @ 1%. SEE SHEET 6051 FOR DETAILL PROPOSED LIGHT POLEM J EXISTING SEARS 5 6 T H A V E N XE R X E S A V E N O R T H BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 FUTURE BUILDING 10 FUTURE BUILDING T FUTURE BUILDING R FUTURE TENANT FFE=852.7 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 M M 175.6 LF OF 8" PVC AT 0.4%MH - 313 IE: 845.10 CONFIRM GAS LOCATION. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE GAS SERVICE RELOCATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDER AS NECESSARY 4" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 4" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 6" FIRE WATER SERVICE 2" WATER SERVICE POWER SERVICE GAS SERVICE CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. CONFIRM INVERT ELEVATION PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION 8" PVC ROOF DRAIN LEADER 8" PVC ROOF DRAIN LEADER TRANSFORMER EXISTING ABANDONED STORM PIPE TO REMAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN PER CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DETAIL CORE DRILL AND CONNECT PROPOSED STORM SEWER TO EXISTING SEWER MAIN. APPROXIMATE IE = 844.35. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT PRIOR TO SEWER INSTALLATION 8" PVC AT 1% MIN. SLOPE UT I L I T Y P L A N 6061 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H INSET A. SEE SHEET 6062 FUTURE TENANT FFE=852.7 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 B C E D H G J I K L CO - 1 IE: 846.51 CONNECT PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER TO EXISTING STUB. APPROXIMATE IE = 845.92. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT PRIOR TO SEWER INSTALLATION CONNECT PROPOSED STORM SEWER TO EXISTING STUB. APPROXIMATE IE = 847.35. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY INVERT PRIOR TO SEWER INSTALLATION G G G G G K A I B B LEGEND PROPERTY LINE UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC/POWER UNDERGROUND CONDUIT SANITARY SEWER PIPE PRIVATE WATER PIPING GAS PIPING STORM SEWER PIPE GATE VALVE IN VALVE BOX (MUST BE H20 TRAFFIC RATED IN PAVEMENT AREAS) FIRE HYDRANT REDUCER POST INDICATOR VALVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE CLEAN-OUT STORM SEWER STRUCTURE POWER POLE GAS METER PIPE BOLLARD SEWER/WATER PLUG EXISTING GAS PIPING EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC EXISTING COMMUNICATIONS EXISTING EASEMENT KEYNOTE LEGEND PROPOSED GAS SERVICEA PROPOSED ELECTRIC SERVICEB PROPOSED TRANSFORMER CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE FINAL LOCATION WITH UTILITY PROVIDERC PROPOSED 2" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE SERVICED PROPOSED 6" FIRE WATER SERVICEE - - NOT USED - -F PROPOSED 45° BENDG PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONH PROPOSED 4" PVC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE @ 2%.I CONNECT SANITARY SERVICE TO EXISTING CLEANOUT. CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS ROOF DRAIN, SEE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONSK 8" PVC ROOF DRAIN LEADER @ 1%. SEE SHEET 6051 FOR DETAILL PROPOSED LIGHT POLEM J DE T A I L E D U T I L I T Y P L A N 6062 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H INSET A UT I L I T Y D E T A I L S 6063 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R X E R X E S A V E N O R T H H A V E N X E R X E S A V E N O R T H GOPHER STATE CALL ONE SITE KEY N.T.S. Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description LLF Lumens/Lamp Arr. Lum. Lumens Arr. Watts 0 BV D180 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 173304 2160 0 BV-3HSS ROTATED 2 IN 90 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 94478 2160 0 FV-3HSS SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 45676 1080 0 KV 3 @ 90 DEGREES GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 259956 3240 11 A SINGLE GB-5-100-CMH-F 16' POLE 0.790 9000 5766 129 1 B 3 @ 90 DEGREES GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 259956 3240 6 C D180 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 173304 2160 0 C-3HSS ROTATED 2 IN 90 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 94478 2160 1 D SINGLE GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 86652 1080 1 D-3HSS SINGLE GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 47239 1080 0 E SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 72875 1080 5 E-3HSS SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 45676 1080 0 F SINGLE GFR-3-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 63036 1080 5 WM-18 SINGLE GBWM-3-400-PSMHR 18' MH 0.750 40000 26912 452 2 WM-14.67 SINGLE GBWM-3-400-PSMHR 14.67' MH 0.750 40000 26912 452 PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: A.CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE BASES WILL BE USED FOR LIGHT POLE BASE FOUNDATIONS. B.SEE SITE DETAILS FOR LIGHT POLE AND BASE DETAIL. C.REFER TO SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLAN BY OTHERS. D.LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE METAL HALIDE. E.LIGHT POLES SHALL BE 39 FEET TALL, ROUND, TAPERED, BLACK, STEEL POLES WITH A FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHT OF 42 FEET. (REF. CUT SHEET) PROPOSED PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHTING EXISTING PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING 1 FC 3 FC 5 FC LIGHT POLE & FIXTURES 10 FC (FOOT CANDLES) NORTH SCALE FEET 0 60 120 P H O T O M E T R I C S P L A N 6081 S H I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R B U I L D I N G 9 ,1 0 ,R ,T 2 - GNK 1 - GNK 5 - GSL 3 - GSL1 - GNK 2 - GNK 2 - ABM 17 - BES 3 - DBH 3 - KFG 3 - GOJ 3 - KFG 3 - DBH 3 - KFG 2 - GOJ 5 - WLC 26 - BES A A A C B A A A A A MODIFY EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS 17 - BES 3 - KFG 3 - GOJ 10 - KKC 4 - ABM B 30 - DAY D B A D B A A A A A A 15 - KFG 10 - POT 2 - GNK 1 - GNK 5 - GSL 3 - GSL1 - GNK 2 - GNK 2 - ABM 17 - BES 3 - DBH 3 - KFG 3 - GOJ 3 - KFG 3 - DBH 3 - KFG 2 - GOJ 5 - WLC 26 - BES A A A C B A A A A A MODIFY EXISTING IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS 17 - BES 3 - KFG 3 - GOJ 10 - KKC 4 - ABM B 30 - DAY D B A D B A A A A A A 15 - KFG 10 - POT EXISTING SEARS 5 6 T H A V E N XE R X E S A V E N O R T H BUILDING 1 BUILDING 2 BUILDING 3 BUILDING 4 BUILDING 5 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 FUTURE BUILDING 10 FUTURE BUILDING T FUTURE BUILDING R FUTURE TENANT FFE=852.7 PROPOSED BUILDING 9 9,653 S.F. FFE= 852.7 A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES SOD (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) EDGER A B C D A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES SOD (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) EDGER A B C D LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE ABM 6 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. GNK 6 GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO TREE B & B 2.5" CAL. GSL 8 TILIA CORDATA `GREENSPIRE`GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE GOJ 8 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE DBH 6 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.3` O.C. POT 10 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `HATCHLISS`BELLA BELLISSIMA POTENTILLA #2 CONT. GRASSES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE KFG 27 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1 CONT 30" OC GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SPACING BES 60 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c. DAY 30 HEMEROCALLIS X `APRICOT SPARKLES`APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILY #1 CONT.15" OC 15" o.c. KKC 10 NEPETA X FAASSENII `KIT KAT`KIT KAT CATMINT #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c. WLC 5 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" OC 30" o.c. PLANT SCHEDULE OVERSTORY TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE ABM 6 ACER X FREEMANII `AUTUMN BLAZE`AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE B & B 2.5" CAL. GNK 6 GINKGO BILOBA `AUTUMN GOLD` TM AUTUMN GOLD GINKGO TREE B & B 2.5" CAL. GSL 8 TILIA CORDATA `GREENSPIRE`GREENSPIRE LITTLELEAF LINDEN B & B 2.5" CAL. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE GOJ 8 JUNIPERUS VIRGINIANA `GREY OWL`GREY OWL JUNIPER #5 CONT.4` O.C. DECIDUOUS SHRUBS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE DBH 6 DIERVILLA LONICERA DWARF BUSH HONEYSUCKLE #5 CONT.3` O.C. POT 10 POTENTILLA FRUTICOSA `HATCHLISS`BELLA BELLISSIMA POTENTILLA #2 CONT. GRASSES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SIZE KFG 27 CALAMAGROSTIS X ACUTIFLORA `KARL FOERSTER`KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS#1 CONT 30" OC GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SIZE SPACING SPACING BES 60 RUDBECKIA FULGIDA `GOLDSTURM`BLACK-EYED SUSAN #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c. DAY 30 HEMEROCALLIS X `APRICOT SPARKLES`APRICOT SPARKLES DAYLILY #1 CONT.15" OC 15" o.c. KKC 10 NEPETA X FAASSENII `KIT KAT`KIT KAT CATMINT #1 CONT 18" OC 18" o.c. WLC 5 NEPETA X FAASSENII `WALKERS LOW`WALKERS LOW CATMINT #1 CONT 30" OC 30" o.c. PLANT SCHEDULE LA N D S C A P E P L A N 6101 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R N O R T H LA N D S C A P E D E T A I L S 6102 SH I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MU N I C I P A L L I Q U O R DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.61021 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.61022 1/ 2 " FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. LAWN SIDE "BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BY VALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO. USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USE KNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDE ANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE 10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHOR STAKES AT 48" O.C., AND AT CHANGES. EACH END. PLASTIC DIVIDER: FINISHED GRADE AT SHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. PLANTING BED 1" POLY EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.61023 SPADED EDGE DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'61024 MULCH AT PLANTING AREA SPADED EDGE "V" SHAPED, 4" WIDTH, 4" DEPTH, MORE VERTICAL ON LAWN SIDE LAWN GRASS FINISHED GRADE BUILDING, EXTERIOR WALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING SPECIFIED ROCK MULCH 2' MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, AS SPECIFIED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. SPECIFIED SOIL MIX FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL SCALE: 1-1/2"=1'61025 4" 1" 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE BUFF LIMESTONE, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO BE SODDED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH AROUND ALL TREES AND SHRUBS. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MN/DOT SPECIFICATIONS. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. LANDSCAPE NOTES X E R X E S A V E N O R T H H A V E N X E R X E S A V E N O R T H GOPHER STATE CALL ONE SITE KEY N.T.S. Luminaire Schedule Symbol Qty Label Arrangement Description LLF Lumens/Lamp Arr. Lum. Lumens Arr. Watts 0 BV D180 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 173304 2160 0 BV-3HSS ROTATED 2 IN 90 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 94478 2160 0 FV-3HSS SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 45676 1080 0 KV 3 @ 90 DEGREES GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 259956 3240 11 A SINGLE GB-5-100-CMH-F 16' POLE 0.790 9000 5766 129 1 B 3 @ 90 DEGREES GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 259956 3240 6 C D180 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 173304 2160 0 C-3HSS ROTATED 2 IN 90 GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 94478 2160 1 D SINGLE GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 86652 1080 1 D-3HSS SINGLE GFR-540-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 47239 1080 0 E SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 72875 1080 5 E-3HSS SINGLE GFR-2-1000-PSMV-F-3HSS 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 45676 1080 0 F SINGLE GFR-3-1000-PSMV-F 39' POLE 3' BASE 0.750 120000 63036 1080 5 WM-18 SINGLE GBWM-3-400-PSMHR 18' MH 0.750 40000 26912 452 2 WM-14.67 SINGLE GBWM-3-400-PSMHR 14.67' MH 0.750 40000 26912 452 PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: A.CAST IN PLACE CONCRETE BASES WILL BE USED FOR LIGHT POLE BASE FOUNDATIONS. B.SEE SITE DETAILS FOR LIGHT POLE AND BASE DETAIL. C.REFER TO SITE LIGHTING ELECTRICAL PLAN BY OTHERS. D.LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE METAL HALIDE. E.LIGHT POLES SHALL BE 39 FEET TALL, ROUND, TAPERED, BLACK, STEEL POLES WITH A FIXTURE MOUNTING HEIGHT OF 42 FEET. (REF. CUT SHEET) PROPOSED PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING EXISTING PARKING LOT LIGHTING EXISTING PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING 1 FC 3 FC 5 FC LIGHT POLE & FIXTURES 10 FC (FOOT CANDLES) NORTH SCALE FEET 0 60 120 P H O T O M E T R I C S P L A N 6081 S H I N G L E C R E E K C R O S S I N G B R O O K L Y N C E N T E R B U I L D I N G 9 ,1 0 ,R ,T Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2019-007 FOR REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION FOR A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL AT 1350 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2019-007 submitted by Nate Reinhardt, Director of Fiscal Resources, of the City of Brooklyn Center (“the Applicant”) requests review and consideration for a site and building plan review of a proposed municipal liquor store on 1350 Shingle Creek Crossing (“the Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota reviewed the application and received a planning report and Assistant City Engineer's memorandum on the proposed Site and Building Plan for the proposed new construction on the approximately 1.42 acre site; and WHEREAS, in light of the staff reports received, and utilizing the guidelines and standards for evaluating site and building plans, as contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Planning Commission considers this Site and Building Plan an appropriate and reasonable improvement to the Subject property, and voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend that the City Council approve this application; and WHEREAS, the on May 28, 2019, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota reviewed the application, and received the Planning Commission’s recommendation and staff reports, and considered the request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating this site and building plan review contained in the City’s Zoning Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota does hereby approve Planning Commission Application No. 2019- 007, for a site and building plan approval, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as amended by the following conditions of approval: 1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’s Review memo, dated May 9th, 2019. 2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 3. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance RESOLUTION NO. of permits. 4. The Applicant shall amend the landscaping plan to come into compliance under the provisions of the Landscape Point System Policy to substitute coniferous and decorative trees for some of the shade trees and shrubs proposed so that the landscaping plan would meet the minimum points required overall and the maximum points allowed for each category. 5. The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding) as part of the development proposal. a. Approval of wall signs is subject to the review and approval of detailed sign plans as part of the City’s building and site plan review process through Planning Commission and City Council. b. All other signage not otherwise approved is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Code of Ordinances and shall be approved under separate sign permits. 6. The Applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines upon completion of the project. 7. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated Development/Site Plan if necessary. May 28, 2019 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. COU N C IL ITEM MEMOR ANDUM DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C ommunity Development Director F R O M:Jane Kans ier, P lanning C onsultant S UBJ EC T:R esolution R egarding P lanning C ommis s ion Applic ation No. 2019-006 for a Development P roposal at 5801 Xerxes Avenue N and F irst R eading of an O rdinance Amending C hapter 35 of the Zoning C ode of O rdinance regarding the Zoning C lassific ation of 5801 Xerxes Avenue N., and S et the S ec ond R eading and P ublic Hearing for June 10, 2019 Requested Council Action: - (i) M otion to a d opt a resolution to a p p rove P lannin g C a se 2019-006 for a P lanned U n it D evelopment (P U D ) with zoning cla ssification of P U D -TO D and development site pla n for a p roposed d evelop men t at 5801 X erxes Aven u e N , based on th e findin g s of fa ct a n d su b mitted p lans, a s a men d ed by the conditions of approval in the resolution - (ii) M otion to approve a first rea d ing of an ordin a n ce a m en d ing C h a p ter 35 of th e Z on ing C ode of O rdinances regardin g th e zonin g cla ssification of 5801 X erxes Avenue N orth, a n d set the secon d reading and public hearing for June 10, 2019 Background: R eal Estate Equities (“R EE”) is requesting review and cons ideration of a P lanned Unit Development (P UD) and s ite plan to allow the development of the property located at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North with two multifamily buildings for senior and workforc e housing. T he propos al also inc ludes an amendment to the Zoning Map to remove the site from the C entral C ommerce O verlay Dis tric t. T he subject property is c urrently owned by the I LEX G roup Inc., and R EE, the developer, plans to ac quire the site and develop 270 senior and workforc e affordable apartments. T he development would c onsist of a mix of 143 affordable independent senior units with a mix of one and two bedrooms and 127 workforc e units with a mix of one, two, and three-bedroom units . T he projec t will have a full-time ons ite management team to manage the property and s ervic e the tenants . T he full May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission report is attached. At the January 28, 2019, C ity C ouncil work session, R EE presented a c onc ept development propos al for the s ubjec t property. T he developer als o presented a c onc ept review for the site to the P lanning C ommission at its April 11, 2019 meeting. Both the C ity C ouncil and the P lanning C ommis s ion provided input on the projec t, inc luding comments about sus tainability, open spac e and c ommunity gathering spac e, and s afety and sec urity. An Affidavit o f P ublic ation was rec eived, confirming pub licatio n o f a pub lic hearing no tic e in the Brooklyn C enter S un P o s t on May 2nd, 2019. No tic es were mailed to property o wners in acc o rd anc e with S ec tion 35- 220 of the Brooklyn C enter Zoning O rd inance. C ity s taff rec eived multiple inquiries and comments regarding the p ro ject includ ing fo ur written c omments and two p hone c alls as o f the date of this memo randum. Written comments were pres ented to the P lanning C o mmis s io n fo r their cons id eration during their review, and are attached to this report. In reviewing the req ues t, C ity s taff determined that residential us es are no t lis ted under the C entral C ommerce O verlay District, which means they are not p ermitted within the d is tric t. As p art of the o ngo ing Zoning C ode update, the C entral C o mmerc e O verlay District will be revis ed or remo ved; ho wever, s inc e that wo rk is no t yet complete, the proposal inc ludes the removal of this property from the overlay district. O n M ay 16th, 2019, the P lanning Commission held a public hearing regarding the request. Seven individuals spoke in opposition to the project. T he nature of the comments generally related to concerns regarding the height of the buildings, too many units, traffic and parking impacts, the location of the building, and the concern about the amount of rental property in the city. F ollowing close of the public hearing, the P lanning Commission deliberated on the project. After an in-depth discussion, the P lanning C ommission ultimately voted in the affirmative (4-2) to recommend C ity C ouncil approval of the requested for a proposed P lanned U nit D evelopment (P U D ) and site plan, and to amendment the Z oning M ap to remove the site from the C entral Commerce O verlay D istrict. T his recommendation was also subject to the Applicant complying with the conditions as outlined in the P lanning C ommission R eport dated M ay 16th, 2019, and associated P lanning C ommission resolution. In addition to the zoning code amendment to remove the subject property from the C entral C ommerce Overlay D istrict, in order to establish a P lanned Unit Development on the subject property, it must ultimately be rezoned from its current C 2 (C ommerce) zoning to a P U D D istrict, per Section 35-355 of the C ity Code. An amendment to C hapter 35 of the City Z oning Code is required to reflect this change in zoning designation. W hile S tate Statute requires the P lanning C ommission to hold a public hearing for all municipal zoning code amendments, the C ity's Charter requires a first and second reading for all zoning code amendments, and past practice has been to hold a second public hearing as part of the second reading. T he first reading motion language is included as part of the requested action this evening, and calls for the second reading and public hearing on J une 10th to adopt the rezoning ordinance. Budget Issues: T here are no budget issues to c onsider. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelopment AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/21/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport - P lan S et 1 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material May 16, 2019, P lanning C ommission R eport 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material P ublic C omments 5/21/2019 Bac kup Material R esolution 5/22/2019 R es olution Letter O rdinance 5/23/2019 O rdinanc e App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: May 16, 2019 Application No. 2019-006 Applicant: Real Estate Equities Location: 5801 Xerxes Avenue N (Former Jerry’s Food Site) Request: Proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow multifamily residential in current C2 zoning district and Amendment to Zoning Map to Remove the Site from the Central Commerce Overlay District Requested Action Real Estate Equities (“REE) is requesting review and consideration of Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow the development of the property located at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North with two multifamily buildings for senior and workforce housing. The proposal also includes an amendment to the Zoning Map to remove the site from the Central Commerce Overlay District. Exhibit A includes a project narrative and plans. As part of the application process, a public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on May 2, 2019, and notices were mailed to owners of property within 350’ of the site (Exhibit B). The City has received one written comment regarding the proposal, which is attached (Exhibit E). Background City staff has been meeting with REE to discuss the development of the former Jerry's Food site (“Subject Property”) at the corner of County Road 10 and Xerxes Ave North. The Subject Property has been vacant since 2003. This location works well for the proposed housing due to its access to the Brooklyn Center Transit Station and the future C-Line BRT, and its proximity to retail and other services. Map 2: 1971 Imagery of Subject Property Source: MHAPO (Minnesota Historical Aerial Photographs Online). • Application Filed: 04/16/2019 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 06/14/2019 • Extension Declared: N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 2 The Subject Property is currently owned by the ILEX Group Inc., and REE, the developer, plans to acquire the site and develop 270 senior and workforce affordable apartments. The 270 affordable senior and workforce apartments will be 100% affordable and will consist of one, two, and three bedrooms apartments. The project will have a full-time onsite management team to manage the property and service the tenants to the best of their ability. Some of the amenities of the project will include: clubroom and fitness center, arts and crafts room, dedicated package storage, and underground parking. On top of these amenities each unit will be furnished with in-unit washer & dryer, solid surface countertops, nine-foot ceilings, and stainless-steel appliances. At the January 28, 2019, City Council work session, REE presented a concept development proposal for the Subject Property. The developer also presented a concept review for the site to the Planning Commission at its April 11, 2019 meeting. Both the City Council and the Planning Commission provided input on the project, including comments about sustainability, open space and community gathering space, and safety and security. Site Data: 2040 Land Use Plan: TOD (Transit Oriented District) Neighborhood: Centennial Current Zoning: C2 (Commerce) and Central Commerce Overlay Site Area: 4.79 Acres Surrounding Area: Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning Existing Land Use North TOD C1A (Service Office) District and Central Commerce Overlay Commercial South TOD C2 (Commerce) District and Central Commerce Overlay Commercial East TOD C2 (Commerce) District and Central Commerce Overlay Commercial West TOD C1A (Service Office) District and Central Commerce Overlay Office App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 3 Map 1: Subject Property Location (5801 Xerxes Ave) Source: Hennepin County GIS Proposal Evaluation Zoning Map Amendment: Overlay districts generally apply an extra level of regulations or development criteria above the standard underlying zoning district. The Central Commerce Overlay District is an area roughly bounded by I-694 on the north, Highway 100 on the south and east, Brooklyn Boulevard on the west, and Shingle Creek on the north. The Central Commerce Overlay District includes a specific list of permitted uses. Residential uses are not listed, which means they are not permitted within the overlay district. As part of the ongoing Zoning Code update, the Central Commerce Overlay District will be revised or removed; however, since that work is not yet complete, the proposal includes the removal of this property from the overlay district. Map 3: Central Commerce Overlay District App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 4 The applicant is requesting an amendment to the Zoning Map to remove the Subject Property from the Central Commerce Overlay District. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property for Transit Oriented Development (TOD) uses. Map 4: 2040 Future Land Use Plan The TOD is a new land use designation, planned for a mix of residential, commercial, office and retail uses generally located within a ½-mile of the Brooklyn Center Transit Station. Density of new residential development in the TOD is expected to be between 31 and 130 units per acre. The proposed development of the Subject Property is consistent with the TOD designation. Planned Unit Development: As part of the ongoing Zoning Code update, new zoning districts will be created included one or more TOD districts, which will conform to the TOD future land use designation in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. However, that work is not yet complete, and there is not an existing zoning district which this project fits within. As such, the Applicant is requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD), which allows flexibility within the zoning code to allow for developments which would not be allowed under the existing regulations. PUDs are often used to achieve a higher quality development, or achieve other City goals, in exchange for zoning flexibility from the City Code. Site Design The proposed development includes two multifamily buildings, containing a total of 270 units. The buildings are arranged on the north and south side of the lots, with a parking lot in the center. There is a dog run, a tot lot, a community herb garden and a shared outdoor grilling area on the site. App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 5 Figure 1: Site Plan The north building is planned for senior independent living, is 5 stories in height, and includes 143 units. The south building is planned for workforce housing, is 4 stories in height and includes 127 units. The buildings consist of a mixture of 1, 2 and 3-bedroom units. All units include washer/dryers, solid surface countertops, stainless steel appliances, and high-quality cabinets. Building amenities include community rooms, rooftop patios, fitness centers, and on-site management team and underground parking. Setbacks The proposed plan identifies a building setback of 15’ on all four sides. At its closest point, the north building is located approximately 22’ from the property line along Northway Drive, and 15’ from the property line on Xerxes Avenue. The south building is located approximately 26’ from the Bass Lake Road right-of-way. Architectural Materials The City’ s Architectural Design Guidelines require at least 50-percent of each elevation (face) of the building be constructed of Class I materials, with the remainder constructed of Class II materials. Each of the buildings are designed with brick, prefinished metal siding and lap siding, which conforms to the Design Guidelines. Access and Parking The Subject Property is bounded by Xerxes Avenue on the east, Northway Drive on the north and west, and Bass Lake Road on the south. Driveway access to the property is proposed from Xerxes Avenue on the west and Northway Drive on the east. The driveways provide access to both the underground garage and surface parking. The driveways and parking aisles meet the minimum 24’ width. There are a total of 270 dwelling units in the two buildings. Section 35-704 of the Zoning Ordinance requires two parking spaces per dwelling unit, indicating the developer would ordinarily need to supply 540 parking spaces to satisfy the Zoning Ordinance. According to the site and floor plans submitted, a total of 340 parking spots, or 1.26 spaces per unit, are proposed. A 2018 survey of available parking spaces at other multi-family rental properties by staff revealed few properties in the City meet the current requirement of two parking spaces per dwelling unit. The lack of App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 6 parking citations issued by the police at apartment complexes with fewer than two parking spaces per unit the City comparable to this proposed development seems to indicate theses complexes are not burdened by a lack of parking. It is anticipated that residents will utilize the nearby transit center, with access to several high frequency lines as well as the new BRT C-Line, which opens on June 8, 2019. Sidewalks are located along Xerxes Avenue and Bass Lake Road, providing access to the transit station and to the retail area south of Bass Lake Road. The front entrance of the senior building, located on the north half of the site, is located on the south side of the building facing the parking lot. It is easily accessible to the adjacent sidewalks. The front entrance to the south building also faces the parking lot, on the north side of the building. It would be beneficial to provide another entrance along the south side of the building, with a pedestrian access to the existing sidewalk on Bass Lake Road. Lighting The Zoning Code requires, “all exterior lighting shall be provided with lenses, reflectors, or shades, so as to concentrate illumination of the property of the owner or operator of said illumination devices.” The submitted photometric plan notes lighting that will be downcast and identifies a total of 24 new fixture locations on the Subject Property. This includes the installation of 13, downcast, wall mounted or recessed lights, 3 bollard lights, and 8, 20’ light poles. Per the City Zoning Code, lighting shall not exceed three (3) foot candles measured at property lines abutting residentially zoned property, or 10 foot candles measured at the property lines abutting the street right-of-way or non-residentially zoned properties. As is specified, no glare shall emanate from or be visible beyond the boundaries of the illuminated premises. The photometric plan indicates the fixtures are consistent with the Zoning Code requirements. Trash Trash facilities will be located in the garage. Containers will be brought up to the drive on pick-up day and returned to the garage soon after pick-up. Screening All ground mounted equipment (e.g., transformers, mechanical) shall be effectively screened from adjacent public rights-of-way and properties by a solid wall or fence constructed of wood, masonry, or other durable materials that are complementary to the materials used on the primary building. Per Chapter 12 (Building Maintenance and Occupancy) of the City Code, roof-mounted equipment shall also be screened from view through use of parapets, wall/ fencing materials, or paint to match surrounding colors when visible from the public right-of-way. Per Section 35-711 (Parking Lot Screening), “All open off-street parking areas having more than six spaces and all off-street loading and unloading spaces shall be effectively screened from any abutting residential lots by a solid wall or opaque fence six feet high, or by such other device as may be approved by the City Council.” The proposed off-street parking is not adjacent to any residential lots. Landscaping The project submittal includes a landscape plan and planting schedule, Although City Code does not have any specific requirements on the species of landscaping, and the City has operated under and held new and redeveloped areas to complying with the City’s adopted Landscape Point System policy, which App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 7 assigns points to a given site based on the acreage of a development. The point system requires multi-family residential sites to provide a specific amount or number of landscaping units, and is based on the maximum percentage of certain materials (i.e., 50% shade trees; 40% coniferous trees; 35% decorative trees; and 25% shrubs). Given a “Multi-Family Residential” use and assuming an approximately 4.79 acre parcel for the proposed development, the property would have to accrue 390 points. (2 acres * 90 + 2.79 acres * 75 = 389.25 points). Planting Type Minimum Size Points Per Planting Maximum Points (%) Points Accrued Shade (Deciduous) Trees 2 ½” diameter 10 50% or 195 points 190 (19 trees * 10 points) Coniferous (Evergreen) Trees 5’ height 6 40% or 156 points 126 (21 trees * 6 points) Decorative (Ornamental) Trees 1” diameter 1.5 35% or 136.5 points 25.5 (17 trees * 1.5 points) Shrubs 12” diameter 0.5 25% or 97.5 points 49 (98 shrubs * .5 points) Total 390.5 points Based on a review of the Landscape Plan, dated April 16. 2019, the plan meets and exceeds the minimum requirements under the Landscape Point System Policy at 390.5 points achieved. The City has engaged a consultant to develop a beautification and public art master plan. One of the outcomes of this work will be recommendations on the role of private development in contributing to public art. In collaboration with that process, and in consideration of flexibility in setbacks and reduced parking, the City’s public art consultant reviewed the proposal and suggests a portion of the landscaping budget go towards creative placemaking that would enhance the pedestrian connection to transit. This could be done through public art or other methods that would enhance safety and walkability. Engineering Review: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer, reviewed plans and provided a comment memo, dated May 10, 2019 (Exhibit D). Most of the comments pertain to the need for plan corrections and additional details. The major comments require the need for sidewalk easements. These state, • Provide a corner clip dedication of ROW at the intersection with Xerxes to preserve adequate sight distance for approaching vehicles at this intersection. • Provide dedication of sidewalk easement along bass Lake Road 3’ from existing sidewalk edge. All engineering comments must be addressed prior to the issuance of any permits for land disturbing activity. Fire Inspection/Building Review: The plans are currently under review. Fire Inspection and Building review comments will be provided to the Planning Commission separately. Police Review: The Applicant met with the Police Chief and the Crime Prevention Officer on May 10, 2019. The Police stressed the need for safety equipment within the building, including access control on entry doors, on- App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 8 site cameras, and on-site security. According to the Police Chief, the presence of on-site security when the buildings first open sets the stage and expectations for the site. It may not be necessary to maintain this presence at all times. The Police Department also recommended the outdoor gathering spaces be located along Northway Drive, or on the west side of the site, rather than along Xerxes Avenue, the busier street. The Police Department also encouraged a perimeter barrier. This barrier could include wrought iron fencing or hostile landscaping (rose bushes or other thorny bushes). SIGNS There are no signs identified on the proposed plans. Any signage must comply with the Sign Code requirements for multiple family dwellings and cluster developments as outlined in Chapter 34 of the City Code. The Applicant will need to apply for and receive issuance of a sign permit to install any new signage. Based on staff findings, staff recommends Planning Commission recommendation of the amendment to the Zoning Map removing the Subject Property from the Central Commerce Overlay District and approval of the anticipated site improvements for the Subject Property located at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North, subject to the Applicant complying with the Approval Conditions as noted below. APPROVAL CONDITIONS Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2019-006 for the Subject Property located at 5801 Xerxes Avenue N: 1. PUD / Site Improvement Review: All requested alterations will need to be approved by City staff with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, and fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. a. Any significant changes or modifications made to this request can only be made by an amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development plans and documents as approved by the City Council. i. The site plan shall be revised to includes a main entry, or a more prominent entry on the south side of the south building. A sidewalk connection shall be provided to the sidewalk along Bass Lake Road. ii. The Applicant shall identify safety features …. b. The Applicant must revise the site and building plans to include a resident exit/entrance along the south side of the south building and a pedestrian access to the sidewalk along Bass Lake Road. c. The Applicant must submit separate applications for any sign permits to the City for review and permits. 2. Agreements: a. The Applicant must enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center. This agreement is to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. b. A Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 9 shall be executed upon any approval of the to-be submitted building permit for site improvements, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications, and standards. c. The Developer shall submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements, and utility service lines prior to release of any Performance Agreement financial guarantee. 3. Engineering Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’ s Review memorandums, dated May 10, 2019(Exhibit D). a. Final grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer for City site and building plan approval and prior to the issuance of permits. b. Provide a corner clip dedication of ROW at the intersection with Xerxes to preserve adequate sight distance for approaching vehicles at this intersection. c. Provide dedication of sidewalk easement along bass Lake Road 3’ from existing sidewalk edge. d. Utility Facilities Easement Agreement is required. 4. Fire Inspector/ Building Official Review: The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval. 5. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 6. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 7. Landscaping: All landscaped areas shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. a. The contractor shall submit irrigation shop drawings for review and approval prior to installation. b. The Applicant shall work with the City’s public art consultant, or similar, to provide a plan for creative placemaking to enhance the pedestrian access to transit. 8. Lighting: The Applicant shall provide a lighting plan that identifies all existing and proposed lighting for the parking lots and building. The lighting plan shall include a site wide photometric plan that is in conformance with the lighting provisions as noted under the City Zoning Ordinance and in consideration of the City’ s Architectural Design Guidelines. Fixture specifications shall be provided prior to issuance of any building permits. 9. Signage: The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding). a. All signage is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Code of Ordinances and shall be approved under separate sign permits. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above-noted findings, staff recommends the following motion: Motion to approve a Resolution recommending that the City Council approve the amendment to the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning Map removing the property at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North from the Central Commerce Overlay District, and approval of the Planned Unit Development plans and documents and approval of the anticipated site improvements for the Subject Property located at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North, based on the submitted plans and findings of fact, as amended by the Conditions of Approval in the May 16, 2019, Planning Commission Report. App. No. 2019-006 PC 05/16/2019 Page 10 Attachments Exhibit A - City Submittal for 5801 Xerxes Avenue North by Real Estate Equities, LLC, dated April 16, 2019 Exhibit B- Public Hearing Notice for, published by Brooklyn Center Sun Post, dated May 2, 2019. Exhibit C- Select City Council Work Session Minutes, dated January 28, 2019. Exhibit D- Review Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, dated May 10, 2019. Exhibit E – Public Comments received. Brooklyn Center Council Presentation Rent Structure: Unit Type Set Aside SF Gross Rent Utility Allowance Net Rent Senior 1 Bed/1 Bath 60% 713 $1,125 $78 $1,047 2 Bed/2 Bath 60% 1,200 $1,350 $95 $1,255 Workforce 1 Bed/1 Bath 60% 712 $1,125 $78 $1,047 2 Bed/2 Bath 60% 1,021 $1,350 $95 $1,255 3 Bed/2 Bath 60% 1,326 $1,560 $113 $1,447 • Residents can also pay $75 for parking stalls as well as an additional $15 for storage. Project Summary: • Continued communication with staff to identify overall project timelines. • Updated project design/renderings. • Braun Intertec completed Phase I, Phase II, and Geo Reports. • Discussing terms with lenders and investors and ready to execute with them once we get approval on TIF to move forward with term sheets. • Traffic Study completed; shows no traffic or parking issues with development. Project Highlights/Amenities: Unit Finishes/Amenities: In Unit washer/dryer, solid surface countertops, 9 ft ceilings, full stainless-steel appliance package, and high-quality cabinetry. Building Amenities: Full on-site management team, secure entrance with Luxor package storage system, community room, rooftop patios, fitness centers, office/conference room, underground parking. As well as a resident community herb garden with gaszebo, dog run, tot lot, and shared outdoor grilling area. Sustainable Aspects/Exterior Materials: Masonry, Concrete Fibor Board, Wood Look CFB, Metal Panel Accents. As well as, solar panels implemented on roof of building, Energy Star Windows, low-flow fixtures/LED lighting, and High Efficiency HVAC. Safety/Security Provisions: REE plans to propose secure entrance/exits with controlled key FOB access. As well as, numerous security cameras, a highly visible/well lit parking area, and a full on -site management team. Project Demand: • Marquette Advisors Report projects 3,078 additional affordable housing units needed by 2020 in Minneapolis/St. Paul first ring suburb submarket. • Vacancy rate in Brooklyn Center is 2.2%. • Market research indicates that Brooklyn Center and surrounding Hennepin and Anoka areas have notable production shortfalls of affordable senior/workforce housing units. Parking Data: • REE West Saint Paul Senior Property (The Winslow) o Price: $65.00 • Senior Affordable Property (The Legends at Silver Lake) o Price: $80.00 • Senior Affordable Property (The Legends of Columbia Heights) o Price: $75.00 Project Investment: • TIF Request $4,601,450 • First Mortgage $34,442,331 • Tax Credit Equity $20,863,865 • Developer Equity (Deferred Developer Fee) $5,579,785 • Total Development Cost $60,885,982 M E M O R A N D U M DATE: May 9, 2019 TO: Jane Kansier, Senior Urban Planner FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan – Brooklyn Center Residential Development Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed Brooklyn Center Residential Development, located at 5801 Xerxes Ave N:  Preliminary Plans dated April 16, 2019 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit. C1-1 – Title Plan 1. Add title sheet. C1-1 – Removals Plan 2. Show all removals needed for existing utilities. C2-1 – Site Plan 3. Use City Detail for City driveway aprons. C3 – Grading Plan 4. All roadway embankment material installed within pavement patching areas of existing roadways shall be placed in lifts not to exceed 8-inches and compacted to a minimum of 100 percent of maximum density regardless of depth below the final pavement surface. The Engineer shall take a minimum of three (3) compaction tests at varying elevations within the pavement patch area. C4-1 – Utility Plan 5. Install sanitary manholes on main in Northway Drive and connect 8” sanitary service into manholes. Use City details. C4-2 – Utility Plan 6. Stormwater from dog run drains directly into storm drain with no treatment. Address steps to prevent waste from entering the storm system. C8-1, 8-2, 8-3 – Detail Sheets 7. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities must conform to the City standard specifications and details. The City’s standard details must be included in the plan. 8. Missing details. Brooklyn Center Residential Development Site Plan Review Memo, May 9 , 2019 Miscellaneous 9. See redlines for additional Site Plan comments. 10. Provide irrigation plan. 11. Provide detailed vehicle turning and tracking movement diagrams for delivery vehicles and garbage trucks demonstrating specific and actual routes. 12. Applicant should address the recommendations of the traffic study, conducted by Spack Consulting dated February 15, 2019. 13. Upon project completion the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all propert y corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the Cit y Engineer. 14. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). 15. The total disturbed area exceeds one acre, an NPDES permit is required. In addition, the total disturbed area is less than five acres; the City of Brooklyn Center will review site using Shingle Creek Watershed Commission rules for stormwater management. Stormwater management plan is incomplete; please submit sub-catchment DA-2p calculations to allow for complete review. 16. Provide a corner clip dedication of ROW at the intersection with Xerxes to preserve adequate sight distance for approaching vehicles at this intersection. 17. Provide dedication of sidewalk easement along bass Lake Road 3’ from existing sidewalk edge. 18. Utility Facilities Easement Agreement is required. Prior to Issuance of a Land Alteration 19. Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended, as required by the City Engineer. 20. A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of 100 percent of the estimated cost as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. 21. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. Please submit a deposit of $2,500 that the City can draw upon on a monthly basis. 22. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility p rovisions, temporar y parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non-compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Brooklyn Center Residential Development Site Plan Review Memo, May 9 , 2019 Anticipated Permitting 23. A City Land Disturbance permit is required. 24. A MPCA NPDES permit is required. 25. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 26. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 27. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined b y the City. Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.1 5.0 7.3 8.0 4.1 7.5 7.5 8.2 5.1 SD_500 3 SD_500 5 SD_500 6 SD_500 4 SD_500 1 SD_500 2 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 7.3 5.0 5.1 8.0 7.5 7.5 4.1 7.5 8.2 7.5 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.1 8.0 7.3 5.0 5.0 4.1 7.5 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 7.3 5.1 5.0 4.1 5.0 7.5 8.0 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.1 5.0 4.1 5.0 8.0 4.1 7.5 7.5 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.0 8.0 5.1 4.1 5.0 8.0 4.1 7.3 7.5 EXTERIOR MATERIAL TAG KEY 5.0 PREFIN MTL SIDING W/ VERTICAL SEAM -COLOR: BLACK 7.3 CFB LAP SIDING -6" AND 4" EXPOSURE -COLOR: TAUPE 5.1 PREFIN MTL SIDING -CORTEN STEEL 7.5 CFB TRIM 5/4 BOARD -COLOR : BLACK MASONRY: METALS: OPENINGS: SIDING: WOOD: 8.0 VINYL WINDOW -COLOR: BLACK 8.2 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING -COLOR: BLACK 6.1 WOOD TRELLIS -COLOR: TBD 4.1 BRICK -COLOR: SAND kaas wilson architects Exterior Elevations 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 1 - N 1b - ENTRY 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 10 - N 1a 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 9 - E 2 3/32" = 1'-0" 5 2 - W 1 3/32" = 1'-0" 6 3 - N 2 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 8 - N 3 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.0 7.3 5.1 7.5 7.5 4.1 8.0 7.5 8.2 6.1 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 8.2 8.0 5.1 7.3 7.5 4.1 7.5 SD_501 3 SD_501 1 SD_501 4 SD_501 2 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 7.3 5.1 5.0 4.1 5.0 5.1 7.5 8.0 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 141'-0 3/4" 5.1 5.0 4.1 8.0 7.5 4.1 5.1 EXTERIOR MATERIAL TAG KEY 5.0 PREFIN MTL SIDING W/ VERTICAL SEAM -COLOR: BLACK 7.3 CFB LAP SIDING -6" AND 4" EXPOSURE -COLOR: TAUPE 5.1 PREFIN MTL SIDING -CORTEN STEEL 7.5 CFB TRIM 5/4 BOARD -COLOR : BLACK MASONRY: METALS: OPENINGS: SIDING: WOOD: 8.0 VINYL WINDOW -COLOR: BLACK 8.2 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING -COLOR: BLACK 6.1 WOOD TRELLIS -COLOR: TBD 4.1 BRICK -COLOR: SAND kaas wilson architects Exterior Elevations 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 5 - S 1a 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 6 - S 1b 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 4 - E 1 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 7 - W 2 Schema 1 Legend 1BR/1BA 2BR/2BA Amenity Core/Stairs Corridor Office N Patio WORKFORCE LIVING 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 276 ft² Stair 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 773 ft² Core 942 ft² Unit 1-2 779 ft² Lounge 772 ft² Unit 1-1 442 ft² Entry 331 ft² Office 697 ft² Fitness 1,074 ft² Clubroom 1,034 ft² Hobby 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 718 ft² Core 772 ft² Unit 1-1 713 ft² Unit 1-0 771 ft² Unit 1-1 1,200 ft² Unit 3-2 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 276 ft² Stair 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 TOT LOT DOG RUN kaas wilson architects Level 1 1" = 30'-0" 1 Level 1 18101 -Unit Mix by Floor Name Unit Type Count Area Level Unit Type Level 1 Unit 1-0 1BR/1BA 1 713 ft² Level 1 1 BR Unit 1-1 1BR/1BA 15 Level 1 1BR Unit 1-2 1BR/1BA 1 942 ft² Level 1 1BR Unit 3-0 2BR/2BA 3 1,049 ft² Level 1 2 BR Unit 3-1 2BR/2BA 4 1,137 ft² Level 1 2 BR Unit 3-2 2BR/2BA 1 1,200 ft² Level 1 2 BR 25 Level 2 Unit 1-0 1BR/1BA 2 713 ft² Level 2 1 BR Unit 1-1 1BR/1BA 17 Level 2 1BR Unit 1-2 1BR/1BA 1 942 ft² Level 2 1BR Unit 3-0 2BR/2BA 5 1,049 ft² Level 2 2 BR Unit 3-1 2BR/2BA 4 1,137 ft² Level 2 2 BR Unit 3-2 2BR/2BA 1 1,200 ft² Level 2 2 BR 30 Level 3 Unit 1-0 1BR/1BA 2 713 ft² Level 3 1 BR Unit 1-1 1BR/1BA 17 Level 3 1BR Unit 1-2 1BR/1BA 1 942 ft² Level 3 1BR Unit 3-0 2BR/2BA 5 1,049 ft² Level 3 2 BR Unit 3-1 2BR/2BA 4 1,137 ft² Level 3 2 BR Unit 3-2 2BR/2BA 1 1,200 ft² Level 3 2 BR 30 Level 4 Unit 1-0 1BR/1BA 2 713 ft² Level 4 1 BR Unit 1-1 1BR/1BA 17 Level 4 1BR Unit 1-2 1BR/1BA 1 942 ft² Level 4 1BR Unit 3-0 2BR/2BA 5 1,049 ft² Level 4 2 BR Unit 3-1 2BR/2BA 4 1,137 ft² Level 4 2 BR Unit 3-2 2BR/2BA 1 1,200 ft² Level 4 2 BR 30 Level 5 Unit 1-0 1BR/1BA 2 713 ft² Level 5 1 BR Unit 1-1 1BR/1BA 15 Level 5 1BR Unit 1-2 1BR/1BA 1 942 ft² Level 5 1BR Unit 3-0 2BR/2BA 5 1,049 ft² Level 5 2 BR Unit 3-1 2BR/2BA 4 1,137 ft² Level 5 2 BR Unit 3-2 2BR/2BA 1 1,200 ft² Level 5 2 BR 28 Grand total 143 18101 -Unit Mix by Type Name Unit Type Count Area Total Area 1BR/1BA Unit 1-0 1BR/1BA 9 713 ft² 6,418 ft² Unit 1-1 1BR/1BA 81 62,496 ft² Unit 1-2 1BR/1BA 5 942 ft² 4,709 ft² 95 73,624 ft² 2BR/2BA Unit 3-0 2BR/2BA 23 1,049 ft² 24,126 ft² Unit 3-1 2BR/2BA 20 1,137 ft² 22,731 ft² Unit 3-2 2BR/2BA 5 1,200 ft² 6,001 ft² 48 52,858 ft² Grand total 143 126,482 ft² Schema 1 Legend Core/Stairs Garage 206 ft² Stair 30,433 ft² Garage 13 3 3 22 14 17 15 Area Well Garage Exhaust Elec./ Mech Bikes & Storage 529 ft² Core 483 ft² Core SD_500 3 Area Well Garage Intake 206 ft² Stair WORKFORCE LIVING kaas wilson architects Level -1 1" = 30'-0" 1 Level -1 Schema 1 Legend 1BR/1BA 2BR/2BA Core/Stairs Corridor 718 ft² Core 1,200 ft² Unit 3-2 276 ft² Stair 771 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 753 ft² Core 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 276 ft² Stair 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 772 ft² Unit 1-1 713 ft² Unit 1-0 713 ft² Unit 1-0 942 ft² Unit 1-2 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 772 ft² Unit 1-1 2,849 ft² Corridor WORKFORCE kaas wilson architects Level 2-4 1" = 30'-0" 1 Level 2 Schema 1 Legend 1BR/1BA 2BR/2BA Amenity Core/Stairs Corridor Patio 722 ft² Club Room 807 ft² Rooftop Patio 718 ft² Core 1,200 ft² Unit 3-2 276 ft² Stair 771 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 753 ft² Core 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 276 ft² Stair 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 1,137 ft² Unit 3-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 772 ft² Unit 1-1 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 1,049 ft² Unit 3-0 713 ft² Unit 1-0 713 ft² Unit 1-0 942 ft² Unit 1-2 772 ft² Unit 1-1 2,843 ft² Corridor WORKFORCE kaas wilson architects Level 5 1" = 30'-0" 1 Level 5 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 151'-8 5/8" Level 5 142'-7 1/2" 7.3 5.1 7.5 7.5 5.1 5.0 4.1 6.1 8.2 8.0 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 151'-8 5/8" Level 5 142'-7 1/2" 8.0 7.3 5.0 8.0 7.3 5.1 7.5 8.2 4.1 SD_500 1 SD_500 2 SD_501 3 SD_500 3 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level -1 89'-4" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 151'-8 5/8" Level 5 142'-7 1/2" 5.1 4.1 7.3 5.0 8.0 7.5 7.5 Level 1 100'-0" Level 2 110'-7 7/8" Level 3 121'-3 3/4" Level 4 131'-11 5/8" Truss Brg. 151'-8 5/8" Level 5 142'-7 1/2" 4.1 5.1 7.3 5.0 8.0 4.1 7.5 EXTERIOR MATERIAL TAG KEY 5.0 PREFIN MTL SIDING W/ VERTICAL SEAM -COLOR: BLACK 7.3 CFB LAP SIDING -6" AND 4" EXPOSURE -COLOR: TAUPE 5.1 PREFIN MTL SIDING -CORTEN STEEL 7.5 CFB TRIM 5/4 BOARD -COLOR : BLACK MASONRY: METALS: OPENINGS: SIDING: WOOD: 8.0 VINYL WINDOW -COLOR: BLACK 8.2 ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING -COLOR: BLACK 6.1 WOOD TRELLIS -COLOR: TBD 4.1 BRICK -COLOR: SAND kaas wilson architects Exterior Elevations 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 1 - S 1 3/32" = 1'-0" 2 2 - SE 1 3/32" = 1'-0" 3 3 - SW 1 3/32" = 1'-0" 4 4 - NW 1 PAGE 1 OF 1 Drawn By: SANDY Date:4/23/2019 Scale: AS NOTED Revisions # Date Comments GE N E R A L N O T E S : A. P U L S E P R O D U C T S D O E S N O T A S S U M E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y FO R T H E I N T E R P R E T A T I O N O F T H I S C A L C U L A T I O N O R CO M P L A I N C E T O T H E L O C A L , S T A T E , O R F E D E R A L LI G H T N G C O D E S O R O R D I N A N C E S . B. L I G H T I N G L A Y O U T I S N O T I N T E N D E D F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N DO C U M E N T S B U T O N L Y T O I L L U S T R A T E T H E P E R F O R M A N C E OF T H E P R O D U C T . C. A L L R E A D I N G S / C A L C U L A T I O N S S H O W N A R E S H O W N O N OB J E C T S / S U R F A C E S . REAL ESTATE EQUITIES BROOKLYN CENTER, MNChecked By: ROSS 0. 9 0 0 LU M A R K P R V - A 6 0 - D - U N V - T 5 - B Z M O U N T O N 2 0 F T P O L E W I T H 2F T B A S E 32 6 19610 2 BB SI N G L E 0. 9 0 0 LU M A R K P R V - A 6 0 - D - U N V - T 4 - B Z M O U N T O N 2 0 F T P O L E W I T H 2F T B A S E 16 3 18935 Lu m i n a i r e S c h e d u l e Sy m b o l Qt y La b e l Ca l c u l a t i o n S u m m a r y La b e l Ca l c T y p e Un i t s Av g Ar r a n g e m e n t LL F De s c r i p t i o n Ar r . W a t t s Lum. Lumens Ma x Mi n Av g / M i n Ma x / M i n SI T E G R O U N D Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 1. 7 6 20 . 9 0. 0 N. A . N. A . PA R K I N G 4 AA 2 BA C K - B A C K 2 CC SI N G L E 0. 9 0 0 LU M A R K P R V - A 6 0 - D - U N V - T 2 - B Z - H S S M O U N T O N 2 0 F T P O L E W IT H 2 F T B A S E 16 3 17424 2 DD SI N G L E 0. 9 0 0 LU M A R K X T O R 3 B W A L L M O U N T A T 1 0 F T 25 . 5 2751 9 FF SI N G L E 0. 6 4 8 AT L A N T I C C O M 6 - S Y L 1 1 - 4 0 K - C L _ 6 C M P R R E C E E S E D A T 9 F T ( L LF A D J U S T F O R 1 2 2 3 L U M E N S ) 9. 9 1707 3 GG SI N G L E 0. 9 0 0 LU M I E R E 3 0 3 - B 1 - L E D B 2 - 4 0 0 0 - U N V - T 2 - D I M 1 0 - B K M O U N T A T 3. 5 F T 15 . 5 1433 2 HH SI N G L E 3. 1 5 0 VO L U M E L I G H T I N G V 6 4 6 - 7 9 W A L L M O U N T A T 7 F T ( L L F A D J U ST F O R 2 5 8 2 L U M E N S ) 47 . 6 735 Il l u m i n a n c e Fc 2. 6 4 5. 1 1. 0 2. 6 4 5. 1 0 Pl a n V i e w Sc a l e : 1 i n c h = 4 0 F t . PR O P O S E D BU I L D I N G 96 1 . 0 0 F . F . E . 95 0 . 0 0 G . F . E . PR O P O S E D BU I L D I N G 96 1 . 0 0 F . F . E . 95 0 . 0 0 G . F . E . AA 2 AA 2 AA 2 AA2 BB BB CC DD DD CC FF FF FF FF FF GG GG GG HH HH FF FF FF FF 2. 8 2. 2 2. 1 2. 3 2. 3 2. 9 3. 1 3. 1 2. 5 2.5 2. 8 3. 0 3. 4 3. 9 4. 0 3. 3 3. 2 3. 1 0.8 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 2. 3 0.6 2.3 0.9 1.1 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.6 3. 0 0.0 3.1 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.3 3. 3 3.2 0.0 2.9 2. 7 2. 3 1. 9 1. 4 1. 3 1. 4 2.9 0. 0 2. 8 2. 4 2. 2 1. 9 1. 6 1. 1 1. 1 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 5 2. 2 11 . 9 2. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 9 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 3. 4 0.0 3. 9 4. 1 4. 0 4. 0 3. 7 3. 4 0. 4 3. 6 0. 6 2. 7 2. 2 1. 9 1. 7 1. 6 1. 3 1.1 3. 4 1. 6 0.9 4. 3 5. 0 4. 2 3. 1 2. 6 2. 4 4. 5 1. 8 5. 1 1. 2 0. 8 0. 5 0. 0 0. 7 0. 0 1. 2 2. 1 3. 2 0. 0 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.0 2. 1 4. 4 2. 3 0.9 4. 5 3. 9 4. 1 4. 2 5. 1 4. 2 4. 1 2. 1 2. 6 1. 4 1. 6 1. 8 1. 9 2. 0 2. 1 0.0 2. 4 1. 3 3. 1 3. 5 3. 5 3. 6 3. 5 3. 3 2. 5 2. 2 3.5 1. 3 0.0 1.2 1.2 1.7 2.1 2.7 1. 3 3.5 1. 2 3.6 3. 6 3. 0 2. 4 1. 9 1. 5 1. 0 3.3 2. 2 1. 9 2. 9 2. 4 2. 2 1. 8 1. 6 1. 5 3.7 1. 9 3.6 2. 3 2. 3 2. 3 2. 3 2. 4 2. 6 2. 9 1. 6 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 3. 4 0.0 1. 3 0.0 1.2 1.7 2.2 2.9 3.6 3.6 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 1. 5 0.0 0.0 1.1 1.2 1.6 2.0 2.5 0. 0 2. 7 3. 2 1. 0 1. 2 1. 4 1. 9 2. 0 2. 3 0. 0 2. 3 1. 1 3. 1 3. 2 3. 0 2. 8 2. 5 2. 1 3.5 2. 3 0. 9 3.2 3. 3 3. 6 3. 5 3. 4 3. 1 2. 4 2. 4 1. 2 2. 3 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1. 8 1. 2 1. 4 3.6 3. 4 2. 8 2. 2 1. 6 1. 3 2. 9 1. 1 3.5 1. 1 1. 2 1. 3 1. 6 1. 8 1. 9 2. 1 1. 2 1. 2 1. 8 0. 9 0. 4 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 1. 3 1. 0 5. 3 1. 0 0. 9 8. 3 4. 1 0. 8 0. 6 3. 4 2. 7 0. 4 3. 1 2. 6 1. 6 1. 0 0. 5 0. 3 0. 1 3. 4 0. 3 5. 5 0. 5 0. 6 1. 0 1. 6 2. 5 3. 8 1. 7 0. 1 1. 1 1. 5 1. 6 1. 4 1. 3 1. 2 1. 2 0. 9 1. 2 1. 5 0. 9 0. 9 0. 9 1. 0 1. 2 1. 8 2. 9 1. 1 0. 1 2. 8 4. 2 5. 9 6. 9 6. 6 5. 5 2. 4 1. 4 0. 2 1. 3 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2. 1 1. 5 1. 3 0. 8 0. 8 0. 2 0. 4 0. 3 0. 2 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 2. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0. 2 0. 2 0. 3 0. 3 0. 3 0. 2 4. 4 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0. 0 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 1 0. 2 0. 1 0. 2 1. 3 0. 5 0. 7 0. 9 1. 5 1. 2 0. 8 0. 3 0. 3 0. 3 1. 4 0. 8 0. 4 0. 4 0. 5 0. 6 6. 2 0. 5 0. 5 1. 3 0. 2 0. 2 0. 2 0. 3 0. 3 0. 3 0. 4 0. 7 0. 3 0. 4 0. 3 0. 2 10 . 6 2. 0 0. 4 0. 2 0. 6 3. 5 1.4 1. 5 2. 1 10 . 9 3. 2 4. 2 1. 3 3. 7 1.0 3. 3 3. 1 3. 1 3. 2 3. 5 3. 8 3. 5 3. 4 0. 0 4. 6 1. 5 1. 2 0. 4 0. 3 0. 4 0. 3 1.2 0. 0 1.1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 2. 1 0. 1 1.4 3. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.8 0. 0 1.2 0. 0 1.5 1.7 1. 8 1. 9 2. 2 3. 0 3. 4 1.1 0. 4 1. 2 1. 7 1. 5 1. 4 1. 4 1. 2 1. 0 0. 0 0. 3 2. 5 1. 0 2. 1 0. 9 0. 1 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 7 1. 6 2. 0 2. 1 2. 1 2. 0 2. 0 2. 0 1. 4 1. 7 8. 8 1. 4 1. 1 1. 0 1. 0 1. 1 1. 3 1. 7 1. 9 0. 0 3. 7 5. 1 2. 7 0. 7 0. 1 0. 0 0. 0 2. 1 0. 0 18 . 4 0. 0 0. 0 8. 9 15 . 9 2. 4 16 . 0 4. 2 0. 0 2. 9 2. 5 2. 7 8. 1 2. 7 2. 7 2. 7 2. 7 5. 1 2. 7 7. 1 2. 7 2. 4 2. 1 1. 7 1. 4 1. 2 1. 2 2. 7 0. 0 7. 1 1. 8 1. 0 0. 3 0. 1 0. 0 0. 0 20 . 9 0. 0 3. 6 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 1.2 1.2 1. 7 4. 5 0. 0 1. 8 3. 5 3. 6 3. 5 3. 2 2. 6 2. 3 0.7 2. 0 2.3 1. 5 1. 4 1. 1 1. 0 0. 9 0.3 3. 4 2. 2 0.5 0. 9 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 1.7 0.9 3. 5 0.6 3. 0 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.1 1.7 0.8 0.7 0.3 2. 0 1. 8 1. 6 1. 4 1. 2 2. 4 0.5 0. 9 3. 3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 3. 0 0.9 0.7 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 2. 4 0.6 2. 9 1.5 2.0 2. 5 2. 8 3. 1 3. 2 1. 1 0.5 2. 9 3. 0 3. 5 3. 6 3. 7 3. 8 3. 8 1. 1 3. 1 1.6 2. 6 2. 5 2. 6 2. 5 2. 2 1. 8 1. 4 3. 3 4.8 1. 0 0. 7 0.0 0.1 0.4 1.0 2.3 2.4 6.2 2.0 3.1 2.0 1.3 1.1 1.1 1.2 1. 0 4.2 2. 5 1. 2 3. 1 3. 6 3. 7 3. 6 3. 6 3. 5 1.9 2. 7 1.3 2. 3 2. 1 2. 0 1. 8 1. 6 1. 3 0.3 2. 9 3.1 1. 0 0. 9 1. 0 0.1 0.3 0.6 1.2 2.4 3.1 1. 1 1.8 1.1 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.8 1.0 2.0 13 . 5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0. 8 0. 7 0. 7 0. 7 0. 6 0. 7 0. 7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.9 0.2 1. 5 1. 7 1. 9 2. 0 1. 9 1. 7 1. 4 0.1 2. 3 1. 2 0.3 1.3 1.6 2. 0 2. 2 2. 4 0.1 2. 6 0.2 1. 9 1. 6 1. 4 1. 2 1. 1 1. 1 1. 0 2. 6 1. 0 1. 2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 1. 0 0. 9 0. 9 1. 0 0. 9 0. 8 0. 7 0. 7 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.9 0.3 1. 0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.1 1. 1 1. 1 1. 4 1. 4 1. 4 1. 3 1. 1 1. 0 0.1 0.0 1. 2 0. 9 0. 7 0. 5 0. 0 0.0 2. 3 0.0 2. 6 1.8 2.5 2.7 2.8 3.0 3.2 3. 1 0.0 2. 8 2.8 2. 5 2. 8 3. 4 3. 5 3. 4 3. 3 1. 6 2. 9 2. 0 2. 8 2. 9 3. 0 3. 1 3. 2 3. 2 2. 5 3. 2 0.0 2. 8 1. 7 1. 3 1. 0 0. 7 0. 6 0. 5 2. 5 0.0 2. 6 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 2.3 2.9 0. 9 0.0 3. 8 2. 3 2. 5 2. 6 2. 6 2. 7 3. 1 3. 5 2. 2 3. 7 2. 6 3. 7 3. 1 2. 8 2. 6 2. 5 2. 5 2. 5 3. 8 2. 9 1.6 2.1 2.8 3.4 3.5 3.8 2. 3 3. 4 0.0 2. 5 2. 4 2. 1 1. 9 1. 9 2. 1 2. 4 3.7 0. 0 0. 1 3. 5 3. 4 3. 1 2. 4 1. 9 1. 4 1.2 14 . 1 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 2. 8 1. 1 2.9 2. 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0. 0 2.5 0. 0 3.2 3.5 3.6 3. 4 2. 9 2. 6 2. 4 1.9 3. 6 2.7 2. 7 2. 7 2. 7 2. 7 2. 9 3. 3 0. 0 3. 6 3. 0 3. 4 2. 9 2. 2 1. 8 1. 4 1. 0 1. 2 3. 6 2. 5 3. 4 3. 4 3. 5 3. 7 3. 6 3. 6 0.0 3. 1 3. 4 2. 1 1. 9 1. 6 1. 5 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 3. 6 2.5 2.9 0.2 1.6 4.2 6.3 7.6 6.0 3. 3 2.9 3. 3 2.3 2.3 2.5 2. 9 3. 4 3. 5 0.0 4.1 3. 2 0. 8 3. 8 3. 8 3. 7 3. 4 3. 4 3. 2 3. 5 3. 1 2. 9 3. 2 2. 8 2. 3 1. 8 1. 6 1. 3 3. 7 3. 1 4.8 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.9 3.2 6.5 3. 8 6.5 0. 7 3.1 1.9 1.5 1.7 1.9 2.1 2.4 6.7 0. 7 2. 2 2. 1 2. 0 2. 0 1. 8 1. 6 0.1 0. 9 3. 0 0. 6 0. 6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1. 2 3. 0 2.8 2.8 2. 9 2. 9 2. 8 2. 7 2. 7 2. 3 2. 9 2. 6 3. 3 3. 7 3. 8 3. 7 3. 8 3. 6 2.1 2. 8 1. 7 0.2 3. 7 3. 7 3. 4 2. 7 2. 4 2. 1 4. 0 1. 8 3. 6 1. 5 1. 3 1. 1 0. 9 0. 8 0.0 0.0 1. 9 2. 9 1. 0 5.0 5.1 3.9 3.1 2.7 2.6 3. 9 2.7 0.7 3. 1 3. 1 2. 9 2. 9 3. 0 3. 2 3. 3 2.6 1 f c 1 f c 1 f c 1 fc 1 fc 1 fc 1 f c 1 f c 1 f c 1 f c 1 f c 0. 5 f c 0. 5 f c 0.5 fc 0.5 fc 0. 5 f c 0. 5 f c 0. 2 5 f c 0.25 fc 0.25 fc 0. 2 5 f c TY P E A A 2 , B B & C C TY P E D D TY P E F F TY P E G G TY P E H H 1 Meg Beekman From:Joseph Hartmann Sent:Tuesday, May 14, 2019 8:03 AM To:Meg Beekman Subject:FW: Jerry's Foods proposal Another public comment. Joe Hartmann | Housing and Code Enforcement Inspector City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org | 763-569-3315 | jhartmann@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us From: Margaret33mary <margaret33mary@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 12:35 AM To: Joseph Hartmann <jhartmann@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us> Subject: Jerry's Foods proposal Dear Mr. Hartmann, Please reconsider the plans for the Jerry's Foods site. Four and five story buildings are just plain not suitable for that property. There are far too many units planned for that space when you consider the parking necessary to accommodate the residents, not to mention their various visitors. Add to that the necessary green space that must be included in the planned site. It would seem far more reasonable to build this project on the Brookdale Ford site which is bigger and would easily fit the needs of both the city and the residents. That land has been empty for far too many years...just waiting for the "right" thing to come along and if ever there was an "opportunity" for this dormant opportunity site, this could be it! I personally object to the scheduling of this public hearing for our neighborhood on the exact same day and time as the previously planned meeting in the park with the police and others. With such a large project that might affect this neighborhood, couldn't someone on city staff do a better job at coordinating things? Margaret Sandberg 6019 Abbott Ave. No. Brooklyn Center 763-566-1581 From:Joseph Hartmann To:Meg Beekman Cc:"Jane Kansier" Subject:FW: Jerry"s Food Site Date:Thursday, May 16, 2019 3:03:37 PM More comments Joe Hartmann | Housing and Code Enforcement Inspector City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org | 763-569-3315 | jhartmann@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us From: MR-BROOKS - <MrBrooks123@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 2:51 PM To: Joseph Hartmann <jhartmann@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us> Subject: Jerry's Food Site Mr. Hartmann, I am totally opposed to the apartment buildings being proposed for the Jerry's Food site. We already have too high of a concentration of apartments in this area. Gateway Commons, with 252 units, sits directly across from the Jerry's site. The Gateway Commons complex sits on 15.22 acres. The Jerry's site is only 4.79 acres and yet the proposal is for 270 units, 18 more units than Gateway Commons. This property is not large enough to handle a development of this scope. There is not enough space, not enough area for parking and it would bring additional congestion to an already congested area. I feel that this development would take on the look and feel of the projects and would negatively affect my home's value. Do you ever drive through this area? There are already so many people milling about the bus stop, walking into traffic without looking, and creating a lot of noise. I thought the City's goal was to improve the image of Brooklyn Center. Certainly this development will not help to meet that goal. I would prefer to see some type of mixed retail on this parcel, not more high-density housing. Also, it seems like a heck of a coincidence that the City chose to schedule this meeting at the same time as our neighborhood meeting. Surely someone should have checked the schedule to see that this was a conflict. Concerned citizens like myself should not have to choose one meeting over the other. The City needs to do better to be sure the needs of the citizens are met. I am also concerned that you told a fellow citizen that the City had no control over when the developer submits plans. However, the City does have control over the scheduling of meetings. It almost seems as if the City does not want citizens to attend the planning meeting so this unpopular proposal can be rammed through with minimum objection. As the City Planner, your job is to do what is best for the City, not what is best for the developer. I realize that Minneapolis' future development plan includes an increase in multifamily housing for every neighborhood. Brooklyn Center is not Minneapolis and doesn't want to be or need to be. Perhaps the mayor and council members should ask themselves if they would welcome this development in their neighborhoods. Please do your job. Please encourage the elected and hired officials of Brooklyn Center to do their jobs by acting in the best interest of the citizens. I would rather look at an empty lot than this unsuitable development. Please recommend that this proposal be denied. Robert Tourville Garden City Neighborhood 612-219-1697 From:Joseph Hartmann To:Meg Beekman Cc:"Jane Kansier" Subject:FW: Zoning Map Amendment for Jerry"s Food site Date:Thursday, May 16, 2019 2:13:59 PM More comments Joe Hartmann | Housing and Code Enforcement Inspector City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org | 763-569-3315 | jhartmann@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us From: JEANNINE PFANN <nene1952@comcast.net> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 1:44 PM To: Joseph Hartmann <jhartmann@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us> Subject: Zoning Map Amendment for Jerry's Food site Mr. Hartmann, I am writing to voice my strong opposition to the two apartment buildings that are being proposed for the Jerry's Food site. As a citizen who lives within 1/2 mile of this property, I believe that the site is not suited and not large enough for a development of this size. 270 units would translate to well over 500 people on this small lot. The additional incoming and outgoing traffic would negatively effect an already congested and unsafe area. I am also concerned about adequate parking and the visual impact of a four-story and five-story building on the site. Also, with 250 apartment units across the street, the high concentration of apartments is too much for the neighborhood. A development of this type would make more sense on the old Brookdale Ford site. I sincerely hope that the Planning Commission will do the right thing for the citizens of Brooklyn Center by recommending denial of the rezoning amendment. Jeannine Pfann 6013 Abbott Ave N Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 763-566-9205 Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION REGARDING DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2019-006 FOR APPROVAL OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITH ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF PUD-TOD AND DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN AT 5801 XERXES AVENUE N. WHEREAS, Planning Commission Application No. 2019-006 was submitted by Real Estate Equities (“the Applicant”) who requests review and consideration for a planned unit development, with zoning classification of PUD-TOD, development site plan, and zoning map amendment for a proposed development project on 5801 Xerxes Avenue N (“the Subject Property”); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is situated in the Central Commerce Overlay District and pursuant to a determination by City staff, this district does not permit residential uses within the District; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the rezoning of the Subject Property to facilitate the planned and future redevelopment of the site with a proposed 270 units of multi- family housing in two buildings, along with associated site improvements, and a Zoning Code amendment to remove the Subject Property from the Central Commerce Overlay District; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property has an identified and guided future land use designation in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan as Transit Oriented Development (TOD), and the proposed PUD-TOD zoning designation comprehended under this application would be consistent with this underlying land use category; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2019, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota reviewed the application and received a planning report on the proposed Planned Unit Development and Zoning Map Amendment for the proposed new construction on the approximately 5 acre site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota held a duly noticed and called public hearing on May 16th, 2019, whereby public testimony regarding the proposal was received. Notice of such public hearing was published in the official newspaper and actual notice was mailed to the applicant and adjacent property owners as required by Section 35-210 of the City Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota considered the Planned Unit Development, site development, and rezoning request in light of the application presented, all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating the requests per City’s Zoning Ordinance, along with the general goals and objectives of the City’s RESOLUTION NO. 2040 Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, based on the findings of fact presented in the May 16, 2019, Staff Report and the submitted plans, as amended by the conditions of approval, the Planning Commission considered this application an appropriate and reasonable improvement to the Subject property, and voted (4-2) to recommend that the City Council approve this application; and WHEREAS, on May 28, 2019, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota reviewed the application, and received the Planning Commission’s recommendation and staff reports, and considered the request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and standards for evaluating this site and building plan review contained in the City’s Zoning Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota does hereby approve Planning Commission Application No. 2019- 006, as submitted by Real Estate Equities, for a planned unit development with a zoning classification of PUD-TOD, a development site plan, and zoning map amendment, based on the findings of fact and submitted plans, as amended by the following conditions of approval: 1. All requested alterations will need to be approved by City staff with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits, and fire related building code items shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Chief. 2. Any significant changes or modifications made to this request can only be made by an amendment to the approved Planned Unit Development plans and documents as approved by the City Council. 3. The site plan shall be revised to include a main entry, or a more prominent entry on the south side of the south building. A sidewalk connection shall be provided to the sidewalk along Bass Lake Road. 4. The Applicant must revise the site and building plans to include a resident exit/entrance along the south side of the south building and a pedestrian access to the sidewalk along Bass Lake Road. 5. The Applicant must submit separate applications for any sign permits to the City for review and permits. 6. Agreements: a. The Applicant must enter into a PUD agreement with the City of Brooklyn Center. This agreement is to be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to the issuance of building permits. The agreement shall further assure compliance with the development plans submitted with this application. b. A Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City shall be executed upon any approval of the to-be submitted building permit for site improvements, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, RESOLUTION NO. developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications, and standards. c. The Developer shall submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements, and utility service lines prior to release of any Performance Agreement financial guarantee. 7. Engineering Review: The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City Engineer’ s Review memorandums, dated May 10, 2019(Exhibit D). a. Final grading, drainage, utility, and erosion control plans and any other site engineering related issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer for City site and building plan approval and prior to the issuance of permits. b. Provide a corner clip dedication of ROW at the intersection with Xerxes to preserve adequate sight distance for approaching vehicles at this intersection. c. Provide dedication of sidewalk easement along bass Lake Road 3’ from existing sidewalk edge. d. Utility Facilities Easement Agreement is required. 8. Fire Inspector/ Building Official Review: The Applicant shall work to ensure all applicable 2015 Minnesota Fire Code requirements have been met as part of any site plan approval. 9. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. 10. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of permits. 11. Landscaping: All landscaped areas shall include approved irrigation systems to facilitate site maintenance. a. The contractor shall submit irrigation shop drawings for review and approval prior to installation. 12. The Applicant shall work with the City’s public art consultant, or similar, to provide a plan for creative placemaking to enhance the pedestrian access to transit. 13. Lighting: The Applicant shall provide a lighting plan that identifies all existing and proposed lighting for the parking lots and building. The lighting plan shall include a site wide photometric plan that is in conformance with the lighting provisions as noted under the City Zoning Ordinance and in consideration of the City’ s Architectural Design Guidelines. Fixture specifications shall be provided prior to issuance of any building permits. 14. Signage: The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g., wall, freestanding). a. All signage is subject to Chapter 34 of the City Code of Ordinances and shall be approved under separate sign permits. RESOLUTION NO. May 28, 2019 Date Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 583218v1BR291-4 CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held on the ____ day of __________, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard at City Hall, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, to consider an Ordinance amending Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances regarding the zoning classification of certain land located at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North Auxiliary aids for handicapped persons are available upon request at least 96 hours in advance. Please notify the City Clerk at 763-569-3306 to make arrangements. ORDINANCE NO. 2019-__ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 35 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES REGARDING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF LAND LOCATED AT 1950 57 TH AVENUE NORTH THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Rezoning. Chapter 35 of the City Ordinances of the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby amended as follows: Section 35-2240. CENTRAL COMMERCE OVERLAY DISTRICT (CC). The following property is hereby removed from the (CC) Central Commerce Overlay District zoning classification: Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1262. Section 35-1240. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PUD). The following property is hereby established as being within a (PUD) Planned Unit Development District Zoning Classification: 11. The following properties are designated as PUD/TOD (Planned Unit Development/Transit Oriented Development): Tract B, Registered Land Survey No. 1262. Section 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective after adoption and upon thirty days following this ordinance’s legal publication. 2 583218v1BR291-4 Adopted this day of , 2019. _____________________________ Mayor ATTEST: City Clerk Date of Publication Effective Date (Note: (Strikeout text indicates matter to be delete, while underline indicates new matter. E conomic Development Authority City Hall - C ouncil Chambers May 28, 2019 AGE NDA 1.C all to Order The C ity Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet, including E D A (Economic Development Authority ), is available to the public . The packet ring binder is located at the entranc e of the council chambers. 2.Roll Call 3.Approval of Consent Agenda The following items are considered to be routine by the Ec onomic Development Authority (E D A ) and will been acted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests, in whic h event the item will be removed from the c onsent agenda and considered at the end of C ommission Consideration I tems. a.A pproval of Minutes - Motion to approve minutes from the May 13, 2019, EDA meeting 4.C ommission C onsideration Items a.Resolution Approving the A cquisition of Certain P roperty L ocated at: 6921 B rooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn C enter, MN - Motion to approve the resoluti on approving the acqui sition of certain property located at 6921 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN. 5.Adjournment ED A ITEM MEMORAN D U M DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Bo ganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Dr. R eggie Ed wards, Deputy C ity Manager F R O M:Barb S uc iu, C ity C lerk S UBJ E C T:Ap p ro val o f Minutes B ackground: S trategic Priorities and Values: O peratio nal Exc ellence AT TAC HME N T S : Desc rip tion Up lo ad Date Typ e 5-13-19 EDA 5/22/2019 Bac kup Material 05/13/19 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION MAY 13, 2019 CITY HALL – COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1. CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Economic Development Authority (EDA) met in Regular Session called to order by President Mike Elliott at 7:39 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL President Mike Elliott and Commissioners Marquita Butler, April Graves, Kris Lawrence- Anderson, and Dan Ryan. Also present were Executive Director Curt Boganey, Deputy Executive Director Reggie Edwards, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, Business and Work Force Development Coordinator Brett Angell, and City Attorney Jason Hill. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Commissioner Ryan moved, and Commissioner Graves seconded to approve the Agenda and Consent Agenda, and the following item was approved: 3a. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. April 8, 2019 – Regular Session Motion passed unanimously. 4. COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ITEMS 4a. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09 APPROVING ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 6234 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN Business and Work Force Development Coordinator Brett Angell reviewed the proposed purchase of property at 6234 Brooklyn Boulevard, a single-family residential property currently zoned R1 with an existing home built in 1946. He added the home is owned by Ms. Karen Brisset. He noted the purchase price of the property is $180,000 and $4,000 moving expenses, for a total of $184,000. 05/13/19 -2- DRAFT Mr. Angell stated an escrow account would be created to allow the seller to remain in the home until June 30, 2019. He added the closing would occur May 14, 2019, at City Hall, and TIF 3 funding would be used for acquisition of the property. He noted the property has redevelopment potential due to its neighboring uses and falls within the Brooklyn Boulevard Redevelopment Corridor as established in the Comprehensive Plan. President Elliott asked whether there is a timeline for the redevelopment of the property. Mr. Angell stated other redevelopment projects are being considered, and demolition would be completed under one project. He added the goal is to reduce access points along Brooklyn Boulevard by acquiring other properties along this corridor. President Elliott asked whether there might be another potential temporary use for this property and other newly acquired properties until they are developed. Mr. Angell stated City Staff could review potential temporary uses. Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated it is the perfect location for a community garden. Mr. Angell stated that it is a possibility. He added access to water on the site would be problematic. Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson stated the purchase price seems high. Mr. Angell stated the purchase price is based on assessed market value, comparable sales, and a 7-8% increase over recent years. Commissioner Ryan stated the 2012-13 Brooklyn Boulevard study identified single-family properties with driveways onto Brooklyn Boulevard an “obsolescent use” due to growing traffic congestion and speeds on Brooklyn Boulevard. He added the policy is consistent with what the City has done in recent years, and areas have been identified in the Comprehensive Plan as Overlay Districts with a better use for opportunities along Brooklyn Boulevard. Commissioner stated she agrees with President Elliott that they may be other temporary uses for the property. She added she is in favor of moving it forward. Commissioner Ryan moved, and Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson seconded to adopt RESOLUTION NO. 2019-09. To Approve Acquisition at 6234 Brooklyn Boulevard. Motion passed unanimously. 4b. RESOLUTION NO. 2019-10 APPROVING THE ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7014 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN Mr. Angell reviewed the proposed purchase of property at 7012 Brooklyn Boulevard, a single- family residential property with an existing home built in 1939. He added the home is owned by 05/13/19 -3- DRAFT Mr. Robert Skiff. He noted the purchase price of the property is $235,000 and $5,000 moving expenses, for a total of $240,000. Mr. Angell stated a $1000 escrow would enable the seller to stay in the home until August 31, 2019, as he has been renting the property for the past few years. He added, if approved, the closing would occur by the end of May 2019, and TIF 3 would be utilized for the acquisition. He noted the property owner was considering the option of moving the house, but it will probably be demolished at the cost of $20,000. Mr. Angell stated City Staff were recently approached by an agent representing the property owner to the east and will continue to work with those parties until the property becomes available. He added this would eliminate a Brooklyn Boulevard access point. Commissioner Ryan asked whether that property is 7015 Kyle Avenue N? Mr. Angell confirmed this. Commissioner Ryan stated it is a great opportunity, and the City should move forward with this purchase. President Elliott asked whether other uses for the home have been considered since it is in good condition. He added another organization might be interested in moving the house, which would reduce costs if the house was not demolished. Mr. Angell stated City Staff could explore other options. Commissioner Graves asked whether the City will act as a landlord if the owner remains on the property, in both of these cases, and what would happen if there were complications. Mr. Angell stated the property owner had given notice to his tenants. He added the property owner is required to make any necessary repairs under Exhibit B in the Purchase Agreement. Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson asked who carries liability insurance on the property. Mr. Angell stated that would fall on the grantee or seller, which in this case is Mr. Skiff. Commissioner Ryan moved, and Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson seconded to Approve RESOLUTION NO. 2019-10 Approving Acquisition of Certain Property Located at 7014 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN. 5. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Lawrence-Anderson moved, and Commissioner Ryan seconded adjournment of the Economic Development Authority meeting at 8:05 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. ED A ITEM MEMORAN D U M DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Bo ganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:Meg Beekman, C o mmunity Development Directo r F R O M:Brett Angell, Busines s and Workfo rce Development S p ec ialis t S UBJ E C T:R es o lutio n Approving the Ac quis ition of C ertain P roperty Loc ated at: 6921 Bro o klyn Boulevard, Bro o klyn C enter, MN B ackground: T he property, loc ated at 6921 Bro o klyn Boulevard , is a s ingle-family res idential p ro p erty with a total ac reage of 0.21. T he p roperty has a wid th of 78 feet and d ep th of 120 feet with d irect ac c es s and frontage onto Bro o klyn Boulevard. T he p rimary s tructure was b uilt in 1953 and the p ro p erty has a 2019 as s es s ed market value of $145,000. Upon review o f the p ro p erty and c omparable p ro p erties, staff believe the assessed market value is b elo w the fair market value for the property. T his property has the lowes t as s es s ed market value o f any res id ential pro p erty on Bro o klyn Boulevard and many comparable p ro p erties , which have had mo re rec ent s ales , have a muc h higher assessed value. Neighb o ring us es to this property inc lude, three EDA owned p ro p erties to the north, S lims R es taurant to the s o uth, single family res idential to the wes t, and c ommerc ial to the eas t. T he EDA p urc hased the three p ro p erties to the north b etween 1994 and 2016. In each c as e, the C ity d emolis hed any s tructures o n each res p ective p roperty after p urc hase and they have s at vac ant since. T he property had been owned b y Mr. Bruce Burkholder, who passed away in January. T he C ity had b een engaged in co nvers ations and negotiations to ac quire the p ro p erty with Mr. Burkho ld er for the past dec ade. P rio r to his pas s ing, Mr. Burkho ld er had vac ated the property and mo ved into an as s is ted living facility. His d aughter, Amy Burkholder, had p o wer o f atto rney over her father's es tate and had nego tiated a p urc hase agreement for the property with the C ity. S everal days before the EDA meeting to ap p ro ve the purchas e agreement, Mr. Burkho ld er passed away without a will, fo rcing the property into p ro b ate. T he p ro p erty has b een vac ant s inc e that point. C onversatio ns with the C ity and Ms . Burkholder c ontinued o nc e the p ro p erty cleared p ro bate and a p urc hase agreement for the property was d rafted and s igned b y Ms. Burkholder. T he to tal acquis itio n cost for the property is $165,000. T he attached purchas e agreement d etails the terms and cond itions of the p ro p erty ac q uisitio n. T he s eller wo uld b e respons ib le for any as s es s ments or taxes that the p ro p erty had ac c umulated p rio r to c lo s ing. T he terms of the purchas e would als o allo w fo r the s ellers to leave b ehind any items that are unwanted. C ity staff have ins p ected the p ro p erty and es timate that the total c o s t to remo ve the belo ngings from the ho me wo uld be ap p ro ximately $4,000 to $5,000. T he family o f Mr. Burkho ld er have went through the p ro p erty and remo ved any items that they would like to keep . Up o n acquis itio n and remo val o f personal belo ngings from the ho me, the C ity wo uld have the s tructures on the p ro p erty demo lis hed. T he estimated cost fo r demolitio n is $15,000. O nc e d emo lis hed, the C ity wo uld look to red evelop this p ro p erty with the ad d itional three EDA-owned p ro p erties to the north. T he c o mb ined acreage o f the fo ur parc els is 0.88. C ity s taff have b een in regular c o mmunicatio ns with the o wners of the neighboring S lims restaurant who have develo p ment interes t in this loc ation. B udget Issues: T I F #3 funds will be utilized for the ac q uisition of this property. S trategic Priorities and Values: Targeted R edevelo p ment AT TAC HME N T S : Desc rip tion Up lo ad Date Typ e R esolution 5/20/2019 R es o lutio n Letter P urchas e Agreement 5/20/2019 Bac kup Material Loc ation Map 5/20/2019 Exhib it Aerial Map 5/20/2019 Exhib it 557965v1 CBR BR305-151 Commissioner __________ introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: EDA RESOLUTION NO. 2019- ___ RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ACQUISTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 6921 BROOKLYN BOULEVARD, BROOKLYN CENTER, MN 55429 BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners (“Board”) of the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (“Authority”) as follows: Section 1. Recitals. 1.01. The Authority is authorized pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 469.090 to 469.1081 (the “EDA Act”), to acquire and convey real property and to undertake certain activities to facilitate the development of real property by private enterprise. 1.02. To facilitate development of certain property in the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (the “City”), the Authority desires to acquire a parcel (PID 27-119-21-33-0014) located at 6921 Brooklyn Boulevard, situated in the State of Minnesota, County of Hennepin, and which is legally described as follows: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Sunset Manor, which lies southwesterly of a line run parallel with and distance 42 feet southwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of Section 27, Township 119 North, Range 21 West distance 1607.8 feet West of the South quarter corner thereof; thence run northwesterly at angle of 53 degrees 20 minutes 37.5 seconds with said South Section line for 800 feet and there terminating. [Torrens Certificate No. 657652] (the “Property”). 1.03. The Authority finds and determines that the acquisition of the Property is in the public interest and will further the objectives of its general plan of economic development. Section 2. Authority Approval; Further Proceedings. 2.01. The Board hereby approves the Agreement in substantially the form presented to the Board, including the acquisition of the Property by the Authority, subject to modifications that do not alter the substance of the transaction and that are approved by the President and Executive Director, provided that execution of the Agreement by those officials shall be conclusive evidence of their approval. 2.02. Authority staff and officials are authorized to take all actions necessary to perform the Authority’s obligations under the Agreement as a whole, including without limitation execution of any documents to which the Authority is a party referenced in or attached to the Agreement, and other documents necessary to convey the Property to the Authority, all as described in the Agreement. 557965v1 CBR BR305-151 2 May 28, 2019 Date President The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Commissioner and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. 1 550921v4BR305-153 PURCHASE AGREEMENT 1. PARTIES. This Purchase Agreement (“Purchase Agreement”) is entered into this ___ day of _______________, 2019, by and between Amy Jean Burkholder as Personal Representative of the Estate of Bruce E. Burkholder, a single person (“Seller”) and the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a public body corporate and politic under the laws of the State of Minnesota (“Buyer”). 2. SALE OF PROPERTY. Seller is the owner of that certain real estate (“Property”) located at 6921 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, MN 55429, Hennepin County, Minnesota and legally described as follows: That part of Lot 4, Block 1, Sunset Manor, which lies southwesterly of a line run parallel with and distance 42 feet southwesterly of the following described line: Beginning at a point on the South line of Section 27, Township 119 North, Range 21 West distance 1607.8 feet West of the South quarter corner thereof; thence run northwesterly at angle of 53 degrees 20 minutes 37.5 seconds with said South Section line for 800 feet and there terminating. [Torrens Certificate No. 657652] 3. OFFER/ACCEPTANCE. In consideration of the mutual agreements herein contained, Buyer offers and agrees to purchase and Seller agrees to sell and hereby grants to Buyer the exclusive right to purchase the Property and all buildings, improvements, and fixtures thereon, together with all appurtenances, including, but not limited to, plant, shrubs, trees, and grass. 4. NO PERSONAL PROPERTY INCLUDED IN SALE: There are no items of personal property or fixtures owned by Seller and currently located on the Property included in the Purchase Price for purposes of this sale. Any personal property remaining on the Property 30 days after at closing will be deemed to be forfeited by Seller and may be disposed of by Buyer. 5. PURCHASE PRICE AND TERMS: A. PURCHASE PRICE: The total Purchase Price (“Purchase Price”) for the Property is One Hundred Sixty Five Thousand and No/100ths Dollars ($165,000.00). B. TERMS: (1) EARNEST MONEY. The sum of Zero Dollars ($0.00) Earnest Money (“Earnest Money”) shall be paid by the Buyer to the Seller. (2) BALANCE DUE SELLER: Buyer agrees to pay by check or wire transfer on the Closing Date (“Closing”) any remaining balance due according to the terms of this Purchase Agreement. 2 550921v4BR305-153 (3) DEED/MARKETABLE TITLE: Subject to performance by Buyer, Seller agrees to execute and deliver a Personal Representative’s Deed conveying marketable title to the Property to Buyer, subject only to the following exceptions: a. Building and zoning laws, ordinances, and state and federal regulations. b. Reservation of minerals or mineral rights to the State of Minnesota, if any. c. Public utility and drainage easements of record which will not interfere with Buyer’s intended use of the Property. d. Title defects waived by Buyer pursuant to paragraph 6 below. 6. CONTINGENCIES. A. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement to the contrary, the parties agree that the purchase of the Property is subject to the following contingencies, which must be accepted or waived before the Date of Closing hereafter defined, unless a shorter period is expressly provided herein: (1) Title to the Property shall be acceptable to Buyer, in its sole discretion. (2) The Property’s environmental condition must be acceptable to Buyer, in its sole discretion. B. Buyer shall satisfy or waive the above contingencies on or before the Date of Closing. On or before the Date of Closing, Buyer shall, by giving written notice to Seller, either: (1) Terminate this Agreement if any one or more of the contingencies above have not been satisfied to the satisfaction of Buyer; or (2) Waive the contingencies listed above and proceed to closing. If Buyer elects to terminate this Agreement under paragraph (B)(1) above, then upon, Seller’s receipt of Buyer’s written notice of termination, this Purchase Agreement shall be null and void, all Earnest Money shall be returned by Seller to Buyer, and neither party shall have any further obligation to the other. 7. DOCUMENTS TO BE DELIVERED AT CLOSING BY SELLER. 3 550921v4BR305-153 A. Personal Representatives Deed free and clear of encumbrances subject only to the exceptions stated in paragraphs 5 (C) (3)(a), (b), (c), and (d) of this Purchase Agreement. B. Standard form Affidavit of Seller. C. Well disclosure certificate, if required. D. Waiver of Relocation Benefits in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. E. Such other documents as may be reasonably required by Buyer’s title examiner or title insurance company. 8. CLOSING DATE. The closing of the sale of the Property shall be on or before _____________________, 2019. The closing shall take place at the offices of Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 (or at such other location as the parties shall agree). 9. DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS . Within seven business days of signing this Purchase Agreement, Seller shall have provided Buyer with copies of all relevant material in Seller’s possession relating to the Property, including but not limited to, title reports, soil reports, environmental studies, surveys, environmental reports, agreements with governmental authorities, or other records of the Property that Seller has in Seller’s possession (collectively, the “ Documents ”). 10. INTENTIALLY OMMITTED . 11. ENVIRONMENTAL INSPECTION. Seller, prior to vacation of the Property, shall remove all substances that, under state or federal law, must be disposed of at an approved disposal facility. This requirement does not apply to hazardous substances integrated into the building improvements (e.g., asbestos) or soil but applies only to movable equipment, supplies and materials that are located or stored on the Property. Buyer and Seller will conduct a joint inspection of the Property at a time to be mutually agreed upon prior to closing for the purpose of identifying materials that must be removed by Seller. 12. LEAD. If the dwelling structure on the Property was constructed prior to 1978, a lead paint disclosure accompanies this Agreement. 13. REAL ESTATE TAXES. A. Seller will pay at or prior to closing all real estate taxes due and payable in 2018 and prior years on the Property, including any delinquent real estate taxes. B. Real estate taxes due and payable in 2019 shall be prorated as of the date of closing between Buyer and Seller. If the amount of real estate taxes due and payable in 2019 is not available on the date of closing, the pro-rated taxes will be based on the amount of real estate taxes due and payable in 2018. 4 550921v4BR305-153 14. SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. A. Seller shall pay on or prior to closing the balance of all special assessments levied for payment in 2018 and prior years. Buyer shall pay all special assessments pending or levied in 2019 and future years. B. Seller shall pay any deferred real estate taxes or special assessments, payment of which is required as a result of the Closing of this sale. C. As of the date of this Purchase Agreement, Seller has not received a notice of hearing for a new public improvement project from any governmental assessing authority, the costs of which project may be assessed against the Property. D. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Seller shall at all times be responsible to pay special assessments, if any, for delinquent sewer or water bills, removal of diseased trees prior to the date of this Purchase Agreement, snow removal, or other current services provided to the Property by the assessing authority while Seller is in possession of the Property. 15. MARKETABILITY OF TITLE. Buyer shall, within a reasonable time after execution of this Purchase Agreement by both parties, obtain a commitment for title insurance or other evidence satisfactory to Buyer (“Title Evidence”) for the Property. Buyer shall have ten (10) business days after receipt of a fully executed purchase agreement and the Title Evidence to examine the same and to deliver written objections to title, if any, to Seller. Seller shall have until the Date of Closing to make title marketable, at Seller’s expense. In the event that title to the Property cannot be made marketable or is not made marketable by Seller by the Date of Closing, then, at the option of Buyer, Buyer may terminate this Purchase Agreement in accordance with paragraph 6 (B)(1) of this Purchase Agreement. 16. CLOSING COSTS AND RELATED ITEMS. Seller will pay: (a) any deed transfer taxes and conservation fees and recording fees for all instruments required to establish marketable title in Seller and to allow Seller to record its deed from Seller; (b) any deed transfer taxes and conservation fees required to enable Buyer to record its deed from Seller under this Purchase Agreement; (c) the cost of the title commitment, title search, name searches, and exam fees; and (d) one-half of the closing fee charged by the title insurance or other closing agent, if any, utilized to close the transaction contemplated by this Purchase Agreement. Buyer shall be responsible for the payment of the following costs: (a) recording fees for deed from Seller under this Purchase Agreement; (b) the title insurance premium, and any endorsements, if any; and (c) one-half of the closing fee charged by the title insurance or other closing agent, if any, utilized to close the transaction contemplated by this Purchase Agreement. Each party shall be responsible for its own attorneys’ fees and costs. 17. POSSESSION . Seller shall deliver possession of the Property on the Closing Date. 5 550921v4BR305-153 18. DISCLOSURE; INDIVIDUAL SEWAGE TREATMENT SYSTEM. Seller discloses that there is not an individual sewage treatment system on or serving the Property. 19. WELL DISCLOSURE. Seller discloses that there is a well on or serving the Property. A well disclosure Certificate accompanies this Purchase Agreement; or Seller does not know of a well on the Property. 20. SELLER’S WARRANTIES. Seller warrants that buildings, if any, are entirely within the boundary lines of the Property. Seller warrants that there is a right of access to the Property from a public right-of-way. Seller warrants that there has been no labor or materials furnished to the Property for which payment has not been made. Seller warrants that there are no present violations of any restrictions relating to the use or improvement of the Property. Seller represents that Seller has good and marketable simple title interest to the Property and no consents or approvals from any third parties are required. Seller represents that there are no third parties in possession of the Property, or any part thereof; and that there are no leases, oral, or written, affecting the Property or any part thereof. Seller agrees that Seller will not enter into a lease for the Property after the date of this Purchase Agreement. Seller agrees to pay all charges for sewer, water, electric, gas, rubbish removal, Internet, cable/satellite television, and any other utility charges incurred prior to closing. These warranties shall survive the Closing of this transaction. 21. RELOCATION BENEFITS. Seller acknowledges that Seller initiated negotiations with Buyer for the transaction contemplated by this Purchase Agreement, and that this transaction is not made under threat of condemnation by Buyer. Seller acknowledges the Property is vacant. Seller agrees to provide to Buyer at closing an executed waiver of relocation benefits in substantially the form of the attached Exhibit A. 22. NO MERGER OF REPRESENTATIONS, WARRANTIES. All representations and warranties contained in this Purchas Agreement shall not be merged into any instruments or conveyance delivered at closing, and the parties shall be bound accordingly. 23. ENTIRE AGREEMENT; AMENDMENTS. This Purchase Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, and no other agreement prior to this Purchase Agreement or contemporaneous herewith shall be effective except as expressly set forth or incorporated herein. Any purported amendment to this Purchase Agreement shall not be effective unless it shall be set forth in writing and executed by both parties or their respective successors or assigns. 24. BINDING EFFECT; ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns. Buyer shall not assign its rights and interest hereunder without notice to Seller. 25. NOTICE. Any notice, demand, request or other communication which may or shall be given or served by the parties shall be deemed to have been given or served on the date the same is 6 550921v4BR305-153 deposited in the United States Mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid and addressed as follows: SELLER: Bruce E. Burkholder c/o Amy Burkholder, Attorney in Fact 17729 Kettering Trail Lakeville, MN 55044-9354 BUYER: Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center Attn: Brett Angell 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2113 AGENT: Kennedy & Graven, Chartered Attn: Troy Gilchrist 470 U.S. Bank Plaza 200 South Sixth Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 26. BROKER COMMISSIONS. Buyer and Seller each represent and warrant to the other that there is no broker involved in this transaction with whom either has negotiated or to whom the representing party has agreed to pay a broker commission or finder’s fee in connection with negotiations for purchase or sale of the Property. Buyer and Seller agree to indemnify, defend, and hold the other party harmless against any and all claims of brokers, finders, or the like, and against the claims of all third parties, claiming any right to commission or compensation by or through acts of the indemnifying party or its partners, agents, or affiliates in connection with this Purchase Agreement. The indemnifying party’s indemnity obligations shall include all damages, losses, costs, liabilities, and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation costs, which may be incurred by the other party. 27. METHAMPHETAMINE DISCLOSURE. To the best of Seller’s knowledge, methamphetamine production has not occurred on the Property. 28. SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. This Purchase Agreement may be specifically enforced by the parties, provided that any action for specific enforcement is brought within six months after the date of the alleged breach. This paragraph is not intended to create an exclusive remedy for breach of this agreement; the parties reserve all other remedies available at law or in equity. 7 550921v4BR305-153 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement as of the date written above. SELLER The Estate of Bruce E. Burkholder By: Amy Jean Burkholder Its: Personal Representative BUYER Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota By: Its: President By: Its: Executive Director 8 550921v4BR305-153 EXHIBIT A FORM OF WAIVER OF RELOCATION BENEFITS I, the undersigned, acknowledge that I met with a representative of the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota (EDA) on _______________, 20__. The representative, _____________________________, explained that in the event that the EDA acquires my property located at 6921 Brooklyn Boulevard, Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, I may be entitled to certain relocation benefits, in addition to the amount of money being paid to me to acquire my property. These benefits may include: 1. Moving Expenses: a. A payment for actual reasonable moving expenses; or b. A fixed payment determined in accordance with the applicable schedule approved by the Federal Highway Administration. 2. Replacement Housing Payment: A 180-day homeowner is eligible to receive a replacement housing payment to cover the following costs: a. If the homeowner must pay more to buy a comparable replacement home than homeowner receives for the property, then homeowner may be compensated for the difference. b. Homeowners may be entitled to compensation for incidental and closing expenses related to the purchase of a decent, safe, and sanitary replacement home, such as recording fees, title insurance, appraisal, and inspection fees. c. If a homeowner must pay a higher interest rate on a mortgage to finance the purchase of a replacement home than the rate on the mortgage of the property, then homeowner may be entitled to compensation for increased mortgage interest costs. 3. Other Relocation Assistance: This includes referrals and other assistance to help the owner(s) relocate to a comparable decent, safe, and sanitary dwelling. These payments and services are required under the regulations of the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The owner(s) cannot be required to move from his/her home unless he/she is given reasonable opportunities to relocate to a comparable decent, safe and sanitary dwelling unit that he/she can afford. 9 550921v4BR305-153 Finally, it was explained to me that the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as amended, entitles me to these relocation benefits; and if I sign this waiver, I will be waiving those relocation benefits. After having these benefits explained to me, I agree to waive them. In signing this waiver, I acknowledge that no threats have been made to me, either expressly or by implication, that my property will be taken from me through condemnation. If after signing this waiver, I attempt to collect relocation benefits, I will have to prove that, contrary to what I am agreeing to in this waiver, my waiver of relocation benefits was not entered into voluntarily. This wavier is conditioned upon the Economic Development Authority of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota purchasing my property for the gross purchase price of $165,000.00. If this commitment to me is not fulfilled, this waiver is null and void. _________________ Date The Estate of Bruce E. Burkholder By: Amy Jean Burkholder Its: Personal Representative WITNESS: So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , G arm in , In te r m ap , i n cr em ent P Co rp ., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, N R CA N, G eo B as e , IGN , K adas te r N L, Or dnance Su rvey, Esri Ja pan, M ET I, EsriChina (H ong Ko ng), (c ) Ope n Str ee tM ap c o ntri bu tors, and the GIS User Co m m u ni ty Loca ti on Map : 69 21 Brookl yn Bl vd Re sid ent ial Labels Ad dr esses Hig hways Str eets Ro ad E dge City Park s Pa rcels 5/2 0/2 019, 4:11:43 PM 1 inch = 18 8 feet So ur ces : Esr i, H ERE , G arm in , In te r m ap , i n cr em ent P Co rp ., GEBCO, USGS, FAO,NPS, N R CA N, G eo B as e , IGN , K adas te r N L, Or dnance Su rvey, Esri Ja pan, M ET I, EsriChina (H ong Ko ng), (c ) Ope n Str ee tM ap c o ntri bu tors, and the GIS User Co m m u ni ty,He n nep in Co u nty Aeria l Ima ge: 692 1 Brookl yn Bl vd Re sid ent ial Labels Ae ria l s 2015 Re d: Ba nd_1 Gre en : Band_2 Blu e: Band_3 5/2 0/2 019, 4:15:44 PM 1 inch = 18 8 feet Council/EDA Work Session City Hall Council Chambers May 28, 2019 AGENDA The City Council requests that attendees turn off cell phones and pagers during the meeting. A copy of the full City Council packet is available to the public. The packet ring binder is located at the entrance of the council chambers. ACTIVE DISCUSSION ITEMS 1.Beautification and Public Art Task Force 2.Liquor License Violation Penalty Discussion PENDING LIST FOR FUTURE WORK SESSIONS 1.Pending Items Cities United Update Livable Wages - 6/10 Liquor Ordinance/Entertainment Permit - 6/10 Liquor Ordinance Updates - 6/10 2020 Elections Update - 7/8 Discussion on Ordinance process - 7/8 Delinquent Utility Penalties Public Subsidy Policy - 6/24 Fire Relief Association Pension Adjustment Opportunity Site Draft Master Plan Discussion Highway 252 Update - 7/29 MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE:5/28/2019 TO:Curt Boganey, City Manager THROUGH:N/A FROM:Dr. Reggie Edwards, Deputy City Manager SUBJECT:Beautification and Public Art Task Force Recommendation: - Consider participating as the Brooklyn Center Beautification & Public Art Task Force and provide consensus regarding meeting as a task force. Background: In 2018, the City Council reached consensus on the directing of staff to initiate the Brooklyn Center Beautification and Public Art Initiative (BCBPAi). In early 2019, the Council received an update and presentation from staff the Mr. Jack Becker, Forecast Public Art (project consultant) on the BCBPAi. The BCBPAi process involves gathering ongoing information and getting feedback from three task force groups (i.e. residents, staff and the City Council) and focus groups to help shape the master plan. The three task force groups will conduct some upfront project work independently of each other. Afterwards, all efforts and input will be collapsed into one as the Beautification and Public Art Master Plan is drafted. We anticipate the task force will meet approximately three to four times over the next three to four months. The meetings will be facilitated by the consultants Jack Becker, Ashlyn Crawford, and Witt Siasoco of Forecast Public Art. Below are proposed dates and a brief description of three Council Task Force work sessions. Monday, June 24, 5:15pm - 6:15pm - Receive updates, aggregated notes from focus group sessions and mapping exerc ises; provide input on program cons iderations, what systems work well in BC, and what success for the Beautification and Public Art Program (in the end) would look like. Monday, August 12, 5:15pm - 6:15pm - Receive update and list of observations, considerations and preliminary recommendations go ing forward, along with draft outline of final plan document, indicating areas of focus. Provide input and comments regard ing the form of the p lan document and how it can be most useful to the many stakeholders involved. Monday, September 23, 5:15pm - 6:15pm (or early October) NO TE: Joint Session with Community Task Force and C ity Leadership Team - Review draft plan (sent in advance), and provide feedback, etc. to help Forecast produce final vers ion by mid-October. Discuss communications strategy for ro lling out the plan with res idents and bus inesses in BC. Policy Issues: 1. Is there a cons ensus among the C ounc il regarding the C ity C ounc il participating as the Brooklyn C enter Beautific ation & P ublic Art Tas k F orce? 2. Is there a cons ensus among the C ounc il regarding tas k force meetings dates and times? S trategic Priorities and Values: Enhanc ed C ommunity Image MEMORANDUM - COUNCIL WORK SESSION DATE:5/28/2019 TO:Curt Boganey, City Manager THROUGH:Dr. Reggie Edwards, Deputy City Manager FROM:Barb Suciu, City Clerk SUBJECT:Liquor License Violation Penalty Discussion Recommendation: - P rovide direction to staff regarding development of a uniform fee structure for establishments that violate the City liquor license ordinance Background: The City Council held a public hearing for an establishment that had violated the City’s liquor license ordinance on January 14, 2019 for sale of alcohol to a person under the age of 21. The City Council directed staff and the City Attorney to provide information on the penalties that the City has previously imposed for liquor license violations (attached) and asked that two resolutions be prepared for its consideration –one imposing a civil penalty and the other not imposing any penalty. The City Council determined a fine for the establishment on January 28, 2019. At the February 25, 2019, Study Session, the City Council further discussed a uniform method for Liquor Compliance Check fines. Staff gathered additional comparison information related to liquor compliance check fines comparisons. Attached are the following: PowerPoint Presentation (4-22-2019) Liquor Violation City Comparisons Past Practices Liquor License Violations Fines On April 22, 2019, the City Council reviewed additional comparison information provided by staff and continued its discussion. The City Council raised two questions for staff to further research including: 1.Do the comparison cities vary their penalties based upon the type violation (i.e. sale of alcohol to a person under the age of 21, operating without a license or failure to apply for a license, etc.)? 2.Do comparison cities maintain data correlating the number of violations in relationship to the level of penalties imposed (i.e. 1st violation, 2nd violation, 3rd violation, etc.)? Research from each of the comparison cities revealed no significant data that supports either of the questions proposed by the Council. Staff is seeking direction from the City Council regarding establishment of uniform method of Liquor Compliance Check fines. Policy Issues: W hat is the C ity C ounc il’s direc tion regarding development of a uniform fee struc ture for es tablishments that violate the C ity liquor lic ense ordinance? S trategic Priorities and Values: S afe, S ecure, S table C ommunity AT TAC HME N T S: Desc ription Upload Date Type P ast P rac tic es Liquor Lic ense Violations F ines 5/21/2019 Bac kup Material Liquor Violation C ity C omparis ons 5/21/2019 C over Memo Liquor Lic ense Violation P owerP oint 4-22-19 5/22/2019 C over Memo Minutes from 2-11-19 5/23/2019 Bac kup Material Minutes from 4-22-19 5/23/2019 Bac kup Material Brooklyn Center Past Practices of Liquor Sale Violation Penalties Occurrence Violation License Penalty Imposed Resolution No. August 2014 Reporting Error Earle Browne Lanes $1,000 2014-173 October 2012 Underage Sun Foods $1,000 2012-133 October 2012 Underage Global Kitchen $1,000 2012-132 July 2011 Underage Scoreboard Pizza $500 / 3-Day Suspension 2011-100 January 2010 Underage Super America $1,000 2010-11 December 2009 Underage American Legion $1,000 2009-159 12 Li q u o r V i o l a t i o n s i n C o m p a r a t i v e C i t i e s Ci t y 1 s t V i o l a t i o n 2 n d V i o l a t i o n 3 r d V i o l a t i o n 4 t h V i o l a t i o n 5 t h V i o la t i o n C o m m e n t s Cr y s t a l $7 5 0 ; 1 d a y su s p e n s i o n $1 , 5 0 0 ; 3 d a y su s p e n s i o n 24 m o n t h s a f t e r 1s t v i o l a t i o n $2 , 0 0 0 ; 1 0 d a y su s p e n s i o n 35 m o n t h s a f t e r 2n d v i o l a t i o n Re v o c a t i o n 26 m o n t h s a f t e r 3 r d vi o l a t i o n Fr i d l e y $ 2 5 0 $ 5 0 0 $ 7 5 0 W i t h i n a 1 2 m o n t h r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d Go l d e n V a l l e y $5 0 0 p l u s 1 d a y su s p e n s i o n $1 , 0 0 0 p l u s 3 d a y su s p e n s i o n $2 , 0 0 0 p l u s 1 0 da y s u s p e n s i o n Re v o c a t i o n Ma p l e w o o d $ 5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 W i t h i n a 2 4 m o n t h r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d Ne w H o p e $2 5 0 3 d a y su s p e n s i o n $7 5 0 1 5 d a y su s p e n s i o n $1 , 5 0 0 3 0 d a y su s p e n s i o n Re v o c a t i o n W i t h i n a 2 4 m o n t h r e p o r t i n g p e r i o d Ri c h f i e l d $1 , 0 0 0 5 d a y s u s p e n s i o n $1 , 7 5 0 p l u s 7 d a y su s p e n s i o n 1 2 mo n t h s a f t e r 1 s t vi o l a t i o n $2 , 0 0 0 p l u s 1 2 da y s u s p e n s i o n 24 m o n t h s a f t e r 2n d v i o l a t i o n $2 , 0 0 0 p l u s 2 4 mo n t h s a f t e r 3 r d vi o l a t i o n * Br o u g h t b e f o r e C i t y Co u n c i l f o r re v o c a t i o n h e a r i n g $2 , 0 0 0 ; I f w i t h i n 2 4 m o n t h s o f th e f o u r t h o f f e n s e , t h e es t a b l i s h m e n t ' s l i c e n s e w i l l b e re v o k e d f o r t h e r e m a i n d e r o f th e l i c e n s e y e a r An e s t a b l i s h m e n t w h o s e l i c e n s e i s re v o k e d i s i n e l i g i b l e f o r a l i c e n s e f o r a pe r i o d o f f i v e ( 5 ) y e a r s f r o m t h e d a t e of r e v o c a t i o n . Ro s e v i l l e $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 R e v o c a t i o n Sh o r e v i e w $5 0 0 $5 0 0 w i t h 3 d a y su s p e n s i o n $1 , 0 0 0 5 d a y su s p e n s i o n $1 , 5 0 0 10 d a y s u s p e n s i o n Li c e n s e R e v o k e d Ea c h v i o l a t i o n h a s o n e ( 1 ) a d d i t i o n a l co m p l i a n c e c h e c k . A l l c o n s e c u t i v e vi o l a t i o n s a r e w i t h i n a 3 6 m o n t h pe r i o d . Wh i t e B e a r L a k e C l a s s A / $ 1 7 5 C l a s s B / $ 2 7 5 Ot h e r C i t i e s Br o o k l y n P a r k $ 5 0 0 $ 7 5 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 1 , 2 5 0 $ 1 , 5 0 0 a n d r e v o k e d Mi n n e a p o l i s $5 0 0 $ 1 , 0 0 0 $ 2 , 0 0 0 Ea c h v i o l a t i o n w i t h i n a 2 4 m o n t h * I f t h e o f f e n s e o c c u r s o u t s i d e o f t w o y e a r s o f a t h i r d o f f e n s e , i t w i l l b e c o n s i d e r e d a t h i r d o f f e n s e . Brooklyn Center Liquor License Violation Penalty Policy Discussion October 8, 2018 Review City Council Meeting, 3/25/19 Request of Action Consider providing direction to staff regarding establishment of a uniform fee structure for establishments that violate the City liquor license ordinance. 22 2 Policy Background •The City Council held a public hearing for an establishment that had violated the City’s liquor license ordinance on January 14, 2019 for sale of alcohol to a person under the age of 21. •The City Council directed staff and the City Attorney to provide information on the penalties the that City has previously imposed for liquor license violations (attached) and asked that two resolutions be prepared for its consideration –one imposing a civil penalty and the other not imposing any penalty. 32 2 Brooklyn Center Past Practices of Liquor Sale Violation Penalties Occurrence Violation License Penalty Imposed Resolution No. August 2014 Reporting Error Earle Browne Lanes $1,000 2014-173 October 2012 Underage Sun Foods $1,000 2012-133 October 2012 Underage Global Kitchen $1,000 2012-132 July 2011 Underage Scoreboard Pizza $500 / 3-Day Suspension 2011-100 January 2010 Underage Super America $1,000 2010-11 December 2009 Underage American Legion $1,000 2009-159 42 Comparable Cities Practices of Liquor Sale To a Person Under 21 Years of Age Violation Penalties Underage Alcohol Sale Violation 1st Violation 2nd Violation 3rd Violation 4th Violation Comments Golden Valley $500 plus 1 day suspension $1,000 plus 3 day suspension $2,000 plus 10 day suspension Revocation 36 Reporting Period Roseville $1,000 $2,000 $2,000 Revocation 36 Reporting Period Fridley $250 $500 $750 12 Reporting Period New Hope $250 plus 3 day suspension $750 plus 15 day suspension $1500 plus 30 day suspension Revocation 24 Reporting Period License Renewal White Bear Class A/$175 Class B/$275 52 Policy Background •The City Council determined a fine for the establishment on January 28, 2019. The fine was a total of $1,000 of which $500 was to be paid immediately. The remaining balance of $500 would be paid only if there was another violation with-in a 12 month period. •On February 25, 2019, Study Session, the Council further discussed a uniform method for Liquor Compliance Check fines. Staff has gathered additional comparison information related to liquor compliance check fines comparisons, which is attached 62 2 Brooklyn Center Tobacco License Violation Penalty Ordinance 2 7 2 2 8 Factors of Good Policy •Fair •Equitable •Consistent •Efficient •Predictable •Rational/Logic •Reasonable 92 2 Policy Issue 1.Is there additional information needed by the Council in order to direct staff in developing a penalty policy for establishments that violate the City liquor license ordinance? 2.If not, what is the Council’s direction regarding developing a penalty policy for establishments that violate the City liquor license ordinance? 10220 MEMOR ANDUM - C OUNCIL WOR K SESSION DAT E:5/28/2019 TO :C urt Boganey, C ity Manager T HR O UG H:N/A F R O M:Barb S uciu S UBJ EC T:P ending Items Recommendation: C ities United Update Livable Wages - 6/10 Liquor O rdinanc e/Entertainment P ermit - 6/10 Liquor O rdinanc e Updates - 6/10 2020 Elec tions Update - 7/8 Dis cus s ion on O rdinanc e proc es s - 7/8 Delinquent Utility P enalties P ublic S ubs idy P olicy - 6/24 F ire R elief Assoc iation P ens ion Adjus tment O pportunity S ite Draft Mas ter P lan Dis cus s ion Highway 252 Update - 7/29 Background: