HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019-080 CCRMember Ryan introduced the following resolution and
moved its adoption:
RESOLUTION NO. 2019-080
RESOLUTION REGARDING THE DISPOSITION OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2019-007 FOR REVIEW AND
CONSIDERATION FOR A SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL AT 1350
SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING
WHEREAS, Planning Cornnrission Application No. 2019-007 submitted by Nate
Reinhardt, Director of Fiscal Resources, of the City of Brooklyn Center ("the Applicant") requests
review and consideration for a site and building plan review of a proposed municipal liquor store
on 1350 Shingle Creels Crossing ("the Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2019, the Planning Connnission of the City of Brooklyn
Center, Minnesota reviewed the application and received a planning report and Assistant City
Engineer's memorandum on the proposed Site and Building Plan for the proposed new construction
on the approximately 1.42 acre site; and
WHEREAS, in light of the staff reports received, and utilizing the guidelines and
standards for evaluating site and building plans, as contained in the City's Zoning Ordinance, along
with .consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan, the Planning
Commission considers this Site and Building Plan an appropriate and reasonable improvement to
the Subject property, and voted unanimously (6-0) to reconnnend that the City Council approve this
application; and
WHEREAS, the on May 28, 2019, the City Council of the City of Brooklyn Center,
Minnesota reviewed the application, and received the Planning Commission's recommendation
and staff reports, and considered the request in light of all testimony received, the guidelines and
standards for evaluating this site and building plan review contained in the City's Zoning
Ordinance, along with consideration of the goals and objectives of the City's Comprehensive Plan;
and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota does hereby approve Planning Commission Application No. 2019-
007, for a site and building plan approval, based on the findings of fact and the submitted plans, as
amended by the following conditions of approval:
1. Developer/Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the City
Engineer's Review memo, dated May 9th, 2019.
2. The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with
respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits.
3. Final grading, drainage, utility and erosion control plans and any other site engineering
elated issues are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer prior to the issuance
of permits.
4. The Applicant shall amend the landscaping plan to come into compliance under the
provisions of the Landscape Point System Policy to substitute, coniferous and decorative
trees for some of the shade trees and shrubs proposed so that the landscaping plan would
meet the minimum points required overall and the maximum points allowed for each
category.
5. The Applicant shall submit a Sign Permit Application for any proposed signage (e.g.,
wall, freestanding) as part of the development proposal.
a. Approval of wall signs is subject to the review and approval of detailed sign plans
as part of the City's building and site plan review process through Planning
Commission and City Council.
b. All other signage not otherwise approved is subject to Chapter 34 of the City
Code of Ordinances and shall be approved under separate sign permits.
6.' The Applicant shall submit an as built survey of the property, improvements and utility
service lines upon completion of the project.
7. Any major changes or modifications made to this PUD Development/Site and Building
Plan can only be made by an amendment to this PUD, which shall include an updated .
Development/Site Plan if necessary.
May 28, 2019
Date
rl., .�J...�!�n 16-m
Mayor
The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member
Graves
and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof:
Butler, Graves, and Ryan
and the following voted against the same;
Elliott
whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.