HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC69046 - 7/24/69 - 2501 69th AveL
PLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
File Purge Date:
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number: C-9oyl0
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning:
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Type Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission -7/214/�.9 City Vault
Minutes: City Council City Vault
Document Type Number Location
Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault
Resolutions: City Council City Vault
Ordinances: City Council City Vault
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Zoning Application
Application No, 69046
Street Location of Property 2501 - 69th Avenue North
Legal Description of Property
Owner City of Brooklyn Center Address 7100 Osseo Road
Telephone No.
Applicant
Same
Address
Telephone No.
Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit
Variance Subdivision Approval
_ x Other
Description of Request Site and building Man approval for a
municipal service building (garage)
Reason for Request _
Fee $ Waived
Receipt No. �- r Administrative Assistant
Applicant
Planning Commission Secretary
July 22, 1969
Date
Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration
7- Zq -0
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
A roved Denied this day of �%� ,19
su ject to the following conditions
Ch .an
COUNCIL ACTION
Approved Denied this day of
19 , with the following amendment
Clerk
645-3601
TWIN CITY TESTING AND ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS
ad.wolrrw�r f �� v e r�0
662 Cromwell Avenue- St. Paul, Minn. 55114 ? s
REPORT OF: DENSITY TESTS OF COMPACTED FILL ruts
PROPOSED MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING
PROJECT: BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA DATE: May 11, 1970
City of Brooklyn Center
REPORTED TO: Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429 COPIES TO (1) The Cerny Associates, Inc.
Attention: City Engineer
LABORATORY No. 11-7273
TEST NUMBER:
DATE TAKEN:
UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION:
( Moisture - Density Sample
Number)
LOCATION:
31
May 8, 1970
(SP-SM), silty
sand, dark
brown, mostly
medium, a
little
gravelly (1)
32'W and 32'S
of NE corner
of garage
ELEVATION' OF TEST:. 850'
DEPTH BELOW EXISTING GRADE: 3"
FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION:
32
May 8, 1970
(SP-SM), silty
sand, dark
brown, mostly
medium,
gravelly (1)
80'W and 33'S
of NE corner
of garage
ma
411
0191
May 8, 1970
(SP-SM), silty
sand, dark
brown, mostly
medium,Ysome-
what gravelly
(1)
80'E and 32'S
of NW corner
of garage
850'
311
34
May 8, 1970
(SP-SM), silty
sand, dark
brown, mostly
medium, a
little
gravelly (1)
WE and 32'S
of NW corner
of garage
850'
411
Method
Density
in Place By Sand -Cone Method,
ASTM:D1556-64
(44 Basis)
Dry Density
(pcf)
123
122
117
121
Moisture Content
M
9.3
8.7
9.3
8.7
Plus #4 Material
M
10
30
15
10
LABORATORY MOISTURE -DENSITY RELATION OF SOIL:
Method
ASTM:D698-66T,
Method "A",
(44 Basis)
Maximum Dry Density
(pcf)
117.7
117.7
117.7
117.7
Optimum Moisture
M
12.0
12.0
12.0
12.0
COMPACTION TEST RESULTS:
Relative Density
(%)
105
104
99
103
Specified Density
(%)
95
95
95
95
REMARKS: The above test locations were selected by Twin City Testing and Engineering
Laboratory, Inc. Compaction meets specifications in the above test areas.
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS. THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS. AND AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL
File
P
�U--rp-y
Merilla
Kranz
Flekke
Pierce
April 21, 1970
MEMORANDUM
Re: Brooklyn Center Fire Station
Commission Number 69-9
From: Robert L. Pierce
THE CERNY ASSOCIATES, INC.
RECEIVED
APR 22 1970
City of Brookiyu Center
Please find enclosed Twin City Testing Soil Inspection Report. You will
note that the report indicates some loose fill material around the perimeter
of the building.
It is my understanding that Kranz is now in the process of compacting this
material and I have instructed Kranz to order a minimum of four (4) soil
density tests upon the completion of compaction work.
RIP:spr
Enclosure
- l0 CZ I ' �t� ��` 645-3601
ENGINEERS AND CHEMISTS RECEIVED =y96C
.d�"a % Z
662 Cromwell Avenue - St. Paul, Minn. 55114
REPORT OF: SOIL INSPECTION APR 22 1970 rFy
�PROPOSED FIRE STATION
PROJECT: 65TH AND DUPONT DATE: ApA1`1°l`970149al%
BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
REPORTED TO: Wm. Kranz, Inc. FURNISHED BY:
4038 Lake Road Avenue COPIES TO: 151,
The Cerny Associates, Inc.
Minneapolis, Minnesota 55422 Attn: Mr. Robert Pierce
(1) Village of Brooklyn Center
LABORATORY No. 9-2633 Inspection Department
INTRODUCTION
This report conerns our recent soil inspection performed in certain floor slab areas at
the referenced project. This work was conducted in accordance with a verbal authorization
from Mr. Fink of William Kranz, Inc.
The results of a preliminary soil investigation conducted at this site by Soil Exploration
Company and reported to The Cerny Associates, Inc. on June 20, 1969, were.available for
our use during the inspection. This report.indicated that the generalized soil profile
consisted of about 2' of topsoil overlying sand, which was in turn underlain by sandy
clays.
The purpose of our inspection was to determine if the exposed soils would provide adequate
support for the proposed slab -on -grade.
INSPECTION
On April 9, 1970, a visual inspection was performed of the soils in the garage area of
the northern portion of the building. Several shallow hand auger borings were put down
to aid in evaluating local subsurface soil conditions. Throughout the central portion
of the area, the soil profile consisted of 2 to 3' of black to dark grayish brown silty
sand underlain by brown medium to fine grained sand, all visually estimated as medium
dense. However, very loose sand fill extending from grade to the depth of our hand auger
borings (4') was encountered along the walls of the building.
REMARKS
Based on our visual inspection, hand auger borings and the preliminary soil investigation,
it is our opinion that the soils encountered are adequate for support of the floor slab,
with the exception of the very loose sand fill. The loose sands along the walls should
be thoroughly compacted with a heavy vibratory roller to a minimum density of 95% of
the maximum density as determined by the Standard Proctor Method, ASTM:D698-66T. We
further recommend that several field density tests be performed in order to determine
if adequate compaction of the sand fill is obtained.
TWIN CITY TESTING AND
ENGINEERING LABORATORY, INC.
Norman E. Henning, P.E.
Vice -President, Engineeri
GL:NEH:amc
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PUBLIC AND OURSELVES. ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY OF CLIENTS, AMC) AUTHOR-
IZATION FOR PUBLICATION OF STATEMENTS. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS 15 RESERVED PENDING OUR WRITTEN APPROVAL-
645-3601
TUR CITY
T(STIRG HD (061HRInG LRBOROTORY, Inc.
CHEMICAL & PHYSICAL TESTS • INSPECTIONS • RESEARCH
HOME OFFICE:
662 CROMWELL AVENUE
ST. PAUL, MINN. 55114
BRANCH OFFICES:
BISMARCK, N.D.
MINOT. N.D.
FARGO, N.D.
GRAND FORKS, N.D.
SIOUX FALLS, S.D.
WATERLOO, IOWA
ROCHESTER, MINN.
City of Brooklyn Center
7100 Osseo Road
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota 55429
Attention: Mr. Jim Merila
Gentlemen:
r
CHARLES W. BRITZIUS, P.E.
President
JOHN F. GISLASON, P.E.
Executive Vice President
Z\aw
NORMAN E. HENNING, P.E.
Vice -President Engineering
ALBERT C. HOLLER, F.A.I.C.
Vice -President Chemistry and Metallurgy
CLINTON R. EUE
Secretary •Treasurer
April 24, 1970
Re: Proposed Municipal Services Building
Brooklyn Center, Minnesota
On April 15, 1970, we made a visual inspection of the soil in the floor slab
area at the above referenced project. It was our understanding that the
purpose of the inspection was to determine if a 6" sand cushion had been,
placed in this area. The soil exposed in the area was a silty sand, as
explained in our letter dated April 20, 1970.
On April 23, 1970, we received a call from Mr. Merila concerning these soils.
He stated that there would be some difficulty in removing the top 6" of soil
from this area and wanted an opinion as to the possibility of placing the floor
slab directly on the silty sand.
As per our telephone conversation, we explained that the reason the sand cushion
is placed below a floor slab is to provide a free draining area in case of
underlying frost susceptible soils and/or a high water table.
We understand that the building will be completely enclosed and heated at,all
times. Furthermore, the water table at the time of the original soil borings
was about 10' below floor elevation. In light of this information, it is our
opinion that the floor slab could be placed directly on the exposed soil and
perform satisfactorily.
As indicated in our original inspection report dated October 23, 1969, two tests
in the top l' of fill failed to meet the recommended compaction. One.test was
taken 35' west and 40' south of the northeast corner, and the other was taken
110' east and'50' south of the northwest corner. We recommend that these areas
be recompacted and tested prior to pouring the floor slab.
Zen"
race Hassinger
Geologist-InspectorL�
J
BH/NEH/AMC Norman E.-Henning, P.E.
Laboratory No. 9-2637 Vice -President, Engineer
AS A MUTUAL PROTECTION TO CLIENTS, THE PU8LIC AND OURSELVES, ALL REPORTS ARE SUBMITTED AS THE CONFIDENTIAL PROPERTY ;0FCLIENT8;'ANO NOR•
IZATIONFOR PUBLICATIONOF STATEMENT8. CONCLUSIONS OR EXTRACTS FROM OR REGARDING OUR REPORTS IS RESERVED PENDINWRIEN A PROVAL