HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC72040 - 1506 Woodbine LanePLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
File Purge Date:-
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number: 7z4,Vo
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning:
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Type Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission rd n City Vault
�dra
Minutes: City Council City Vault
Document Type Number Location
Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault
Resolutions: City Council City Vault
Ordinances: City Council City Vault
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Zoning Application
Application No.
72040
Stree Location of Property 1506 Woodbine Lane
Legal Description of Property Plat 89070, Parcel 7500, Lot 5,
Block 1, Arvidson Addition
Owner Donald Cheeley Address 1506 Woodbine Lane
Telephone No. 566-7918
Applicant Same Address
Telephone No.
Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit
x variance Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Request Request variance from a five foot easement
to a three foot easement on my west property line.
Reason for Request See attached
Fee $ 10.0
Re c e ip No. 39
Applicant
-7:9-
Date
Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration
PLANNING COMMISSION RFCOMMENLATION
Approved Denied this day of 9.-
subject to the following conditions:
Chairman
COUNCIL ACTION
Approved Denied this day of
with the following amendment
Clerk
PLANNING SS ION rNMY04A'I'1:ON 8X-PM.i'
Application No.
72040
Applicant°
LOca tion a
Description of Request.;
PA Cl<G tOUM a
Dori Cheeley
1506 Woodbine sane
Variance for side yard setback
The applicant seeks to encroach 2 .feet upon a.five foot
utility easement at his eest property line to provide
proper setback for a planned garage.
He has contracted for the erection of the structure, assuming
there was no easement. He states a hardship would b� realized
also because of the looation of the steps at the west side of
his home, in relation to the alignment of the driveway.
ANALYSIS AND RJECOMMEMDATIONS
The applicant has filed several reasons to support his request.
The circumstances, however, are not typical, relative to
setback requirements and variance needs.
The five foot area along the west property line is a formal
ut_llity easement; encroachment by any means would not be legal.
The relief mould be found only in a formal vac:atiag action by
the court.
Thus, the recommendation is for denial.
It appears the structure could be placed further to the north
and east, thus not requiring relief to build on the easement,
retaining the required setback area.
7 2 C)�yLc)
001),aINE L"a-