HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC71022 - 7/1/71 - 6001 Vincent AvePLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
r /95
File Purge Date: '/q
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number: 7/022
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning: Iz1
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans ✓ see upstairs 'Flge
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Tyoe Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission
Minutes: City Council
Document Tyoe
Resolutions: Planning Commission
Resolutions: City Council
Ordinances: City Council
11/i/7/, '115171, 815/71 City Vault
q11 3l7/ City Vault
Number Location
City Vault
City Vault
City Vault
10
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Zoning Application
Street Location of Property
Application No. 71022
6001 Vincent Avenue North
Legal Description of Property Lot 2, Block 2, Hipp's 4th
Owner
Merlin C. West
Address 6001 Vincent Avenue
Telephone No. .961-1685
Applicant Same Address
Telephone No.
Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit
X Variance Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Request Six foot fence to enclose swimming pool
16' x 32' in side yard area as shown on attached sheet.
Reason for Request Lack of area due to corner lot.
Pee $ 10.00
Receipt No. 32699
Applicant
6-16-71
Date
Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Approved Denied this /� day ofy UA X ,19 7 1
su to the following conditions �--�
c�
Chai
COUNCIL ACTION
Approved /� Denied this day of
` --
19_,, with the following amendment
Clerk
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
ZonlAAplication
r Application No. /d Z
Street Location of Property Y-11�c,,51yr Q.
Legal Description of Property 4'o r oc
Owner ,,/�� .s� L ,
/'/ ��� UVG-�ST' Address �00 // 7"/ %M
Telephone No. jr
/
Applicant . %N �- FS Address ,boo/ /n/CErALT ;
Telephone No.
Type of Requests Rezoning Special Use Permit
variance Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Request Y
/6x-,�' i-0
A7779 C'r%Q' S'h E-c2Z-19el/Reason for Request oQ,PFi} 4'a6 716 eow�e, /o i`.
Fee $
Receipt No.
Applicant
l 16 `_ 7/
Date
Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Approved Denied this 3 day of _. a4V,57- ,19
to the following conditions
i
COUNCIL ACTION
Approved Denied this day of ,
19 , with the following amendment
Clerk
PsARNIi�:G C..'£YL-krKUSSION
Application No. 11022 (amended.)
Ap_01.i.Cant t +ter-,i n Co vJlc? t
D*?scripti.on of Request t Sideyard setback encroachsiient
--
The applicant nppeared before the Planning C:anzii.ssion oil
July l and July 150 1971a requesting a two foot height
variance to allow construction of a si a: foot fence to provide
screening and protection for a proposed po;:,l to be located
inn the sideyard of a property located at 6001 Vincent..Avenue
moY t_h .
The Planning ing cO&'Sfl? 9sion a Cf:ioD on July 15, 1971, was to
approve 4�he coc�strnet.ir�rs vs a Six foot fence toviditag the
toga. -two feet E-ould be le-ia; open so as aot to obstruct the
vi.,-Iion of drivers of vehicles attetap'ting to bacic out of the
driveway of the p:;:opertry to the north.
However, due to an administrative error, it: ulas not pointed
out try the Commission that the pool constitutes an encroachment:
into tl?e side_ yard and also .regrires a variance. Therefore,
�.. it is the intent of the applicant at this time to request
such a variance to alto-? Construction_ of a pooh. :in said
uideyaru.
AIRMLYSI S AIM
Encyoaclmnvn - of 4he poo".. into the yard setbacX is a more
di.-EA'Ucult problem to deal then -�he prev Cusly discussed
fens r_C-ight variance.
The proposed fence, feet :in weight, has when one
considers is use for pool securi.t-,y ai' d p-ri vacy. in this
instance, zence heignt and location is V. -2NIIICt-ion of pool
placement.
There appears to be two „actors "hich should be weighted and
deteLmired if the yard encroachments variance is warranted.
1. Sight obet-ucti-on -- it could be viewed that
construction of su-;f+ a poo,i Facility voiald serve
Pt anA tag Commission Inso:Taati0J-J
Ap,Prlfeat ion No. 71022 (amended)
Page 2
as an obstruction to visiost for vehicles atterapUag
to back on to Vincent Avenue from ci b.e property to the
north. soevrver:, in view of the ulanna.ang Commiszion
action and reasoning in regar6 to the f::r.ce heIV.-ght
t s �aance; that factor appears to -be ►aegat;ed.
2. Hardship -'brae variance procedure is p-redicated on the
applicant's ability to shout unusual ci nmiustances
that create a hardship for developing n parcel.. It
should be no�Vted that r3ardship is rather difficult to
Justi-y in, t:-his caste because e:xaminatiou ojt,.qe
property indicates, that there are other alternatives
for a ;pool location -ehat would not require variances.
It is recognized that the altermaLe location zaax; not be
as des1rabl a as the one proroned, i?oweve.co the zoning
Ordinance does not reeo5nize Inco►?venie ca as justification
for granting a variance.
it :is therefore recommended that the application be c3enz4�n
bec&U G it does not meet the c7_i, .erica set forth in the
zoning Ordinance for granting such a var.-Lance.
aov.0 va.rrarrwimc• 'eaws�+mnarscrrw'omv�i � � .. weis.wwmvw....
1
�' i
ru