The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC664045 - 6/9/66 - 5255 Twin Lake BlvdPLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST File Purge Date: 11�Z/g5 FILE INFORMATION Planning Commission Application Number: G(poN5 PROPERTY INFORMATION Zoning: R1 PLAN REFERENCE Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were consolidated. • Site Plans • Building Plans • Other: see upstairs file FILE REFERENCE Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents. Document Tvoe Date Range Location Agendas: Planning- Commission Office Minutes: Planning Commission ��q�� 4�� City Vault Minutes: City Council 10/3/44 City Vault Document Type Number Location Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault Resolutions: City Council City Vault Ordinances: City Council City Vault VILLAGE OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application 66045 Street Location of Property 5255 Twin Lake Boulevard Legal Description of Property Lht 2, Block 4, Twin Lake Woods Addition Owner: Name John A. Greenly Address 5255 E. Twin Lake Blvd. Applicant: Name Same Address Phone KE 7-3791 Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit _ X Variance X Subdivision Approval Other Description of Request Variance from Section 15-104 to allow subdivision without a plat, and approval of the subdivision as proposed on the attached survey including lots substandard in size.,. Reason for Request (Applicant) FEE: $5.00 (020240)�3. (Date Following to be filled in by Village Recommendations of Village Officials Rec'd, Published On P1. Comm Agenda P1. Comm. Action On Council Agenda Council Postponement Council Action Bldg, Dept. Notified _ Applicant Notified Pl. Comm. Post2onement Any official making any comments should sign and date, Use additional sheet comments if necessary attach hereto. Please draw or attach sketch of proposed structure showing the following: 1. Indicate North 6. Dimensions of proposed structure 2. Location on lots 7. Proposed set -backs 3. Adjacent street names 8. State zoning in force in area 4. Location set -backs and use of adjacent existing buildings 5. Distances between any proposed structures and structures on adjacent property. (To Be Filled in By Planning Commission) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS On the `� day of Se 19, the action requested in the fotegoing petition was approved ( ) disapproved (''subject to the o owing conditions. SIN-- A".44! v 4 J C h a i r m a n COUNCIL RECOMMENDATIONS Approved Denied by the Council this day of 19 Approved with following amendment Q X,( /r'1 Clerk: .3 � PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHEET `- Application No. 66045 Applicant: John Greenly Description of Request: Variance from Section 15-104 to allow suh division without a plat„ and approval of the subdivision as proposed on the attached survey including lots substandard in size.. Property: Lot 2, Block 4, Twin Lake Woods Addition (5255 Twin Lake Boulevard) Owner of Property: John Greenly BACKGROLMD ; 1) The Twin Lake Woods Addition was platted in 1947., POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED: 1..) The approximate areas of the divided lots would be as follows., a) northerly lot 6.923 square feet b) middle lot - 9,712 square feet c) southerly lot - 11,200 square feet so that a variance on the northerly substandard lot would be necessary,, The calculations iLclude the Aniet" or marshy area on the north side of the northerly lot, but this would require filling of that area, 2) The width of the lots along the building setback line on the lots would be 70 feet.: instead of the 75 feel; required,, 3) The lots proposed would be "out of character" with the platting of other similar lots in the subdivision which are larger in width, depth.. and area (almost all are in the 16,000 square foot range), STAFF COt+iMENTS : i° The variance to subdivide without a plat is not of too great concatn, as the division proposed is from a previously platted piece of land, 2) Due to the fact that the platting of similar property in the area is of a substantially greater size, and as variances are required from the established standards of the ordinances, it is felt that the division as proposed be denied,, and that a maximum of two lots be produced from the existing lot. To this end, another possible subdivision has been included in the Agenda, This subdivision incorporates line 'A' which crosses the lot diagonally 10 feet (required sideyard setback) from the existing house; the lots so formed are approximately 16,32G square feet (north) and 12,864 square feet (south) By utilizing line "B" as well. 240 square feet can be added to the southerly lot and subtracted from the northerly. The building setback width of the south lot using lines "A" and "B" is approximately 75 ft, which should be verified by survey,