The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC82047 - 12/9/82 - 6300 Shingle Creek Pkwy!✓_ �JING COMMISSION FILE.,... File Purge Date: L7L-75 FILE INFORMATION Project Number: 8a0-v PROPERTY INFORMATION Zoning: PLAN REFERENCE Note: if a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were consolidated. • Site Plans • Building Plans • Other: FILE REFERENCE Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents. Document Type Date Ranae Location Agendas: Planning Commission Office Minutes: Planning Commission City Vault Minutes: City Council �"?�a`'/8 City Vault Document Tyke Number Location Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault Resolutions: City Council City Vault Ordinances: City Council City Vault COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FILES CHECKLIST E rr i i • � APPLJ+�'A'j'011- Application No.-82047 3 s Please Pri ri t Clearl or T,y�e Street Location of Property 6300 Shingle .r ek P-Ar.kloy- Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 2, Brookdale Corporate Center ••x-• • •• 1 : al •�' 1 Address Suite 500, 7401 Metro Blvd., Edina, Minnesota Phone No.835-7990 Applicant same — Address Phone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Variance ' X Special Use Permit Subdivision Approval Site & Bldg. Plan Approval. Other: Description of Request: We are requesting an amendment to our existing special use permit to allow for up to 15,000 square feet of medical office and restaurant use in Brookdale _Corporate Center. The attached proof of parking plan demonstra es he ability tg p yj de___. he parkinq called for by_ordinance. _ The applicant requests processing of this application and agrees to pay to the City of Brooklyn Center, within fifteen (15) days after mailing or deli very of the billing state-- ni.ent, the actual costs incurred by the City for Engineering, Planning and Legal expenses reasonably and necessarily required by the City for the processing of the application. Such costs shall be in addition to the application fee described herein. Withdrawal of the application s;ia i l not relieve the applicant of the obl i ga•ci on 'Lu pay CUs S incurred prior to withd.Aawal. RYAN''VOPE IL ES, �- L Fee $ 50.00 Apjli an�i"'s aign.iure Receipt No. _ 61269 Date: November 24, 1982 T PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Consideration: Poi - 9-Lf Z' Approved Denied following conditions: thi s _9-1 day of 19 ?2L subject to the Dates of Council Consideration: Approved T� _ Denied amendment: ii wjai nnan CITY COUNCIL ACTION i this day of d <�' = 10 , with the following Clerk Pf I For•rn No. 1�) (over please) Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 82047 Applicant: Ryan Construction Company Location: 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway Request: Special Use Permit The applicant requests amendment of the special use permit approval allowing an office use in the I-1 zone to include medical and dental uses as well. The property in question is the Brookdale Corporate Center located at 6300 Shingle Creek Parkway and is bounded by I-94 on the north, by Earle Brown Drive on the east, by vacant I-1 zoned land on the south, and by Shingle Creek Parkway on the west. The reason for the amendment is that the original special use permit comprehended only general office uses which have a lower parking requirement than medical and dental uses. The original approval plan showed no parking (including proof -of -parking) beyond that required for general office use. Staff have, therefore,asked for a new proof - of -parking plan showing additional stalls to accommodate medical and dental space. The parking requirement for general office uses is: Gross Floor Area/[.0005 x Gross Floor Area + 1901, which, in the case of this building of 116,640 sq. ft., is one stall per 248.32 sq. ft. (470 stalls for the entire building). The parking requirement for medical and dental uses is one space per 150 sq. ft. or three spaces for each doctor or dentist plus onespace for every two employees whichever is greater. Using the floor area basis, roughly five (5) stalls are required for medical use where three (3) stalls would be required for general office use. The proposed proof -of -parking plan shows 53 additional stalls for a total of 523. If all these stalls are accepted, the total space devoted to medical/dental uses could be as high as 20,000 sq. ft. as shown below: x/150 + y/248.32 = 523 x(medical space) + y (general office space) = 116,640 1.65547 x + y = 248.32 x 523 1.65547 x + y = 129,871.36 .65547 x = 1,33231.36 (medical/dental use) x = 20,186 sq. ft. (general office use') y = 96,454 sq. ft. Staff recommend that at least three (3) of the new stalls not be accepted on the grounds that they leave insufficient delineation. This would reduce the maximum space devoted to medical uses somewhat. A final calculation can be made when the total number of parking spaces are actually accepted. The 53 additional stalls proposed by the applicant would eliminate a number of large landscaped islands in the parking lot. The stalls would not actually be put in at this time, but would serve as an addition to the proof -of -parking until such time as the stalls may be needed. The applicant presently has one interested dental tenant of approximately 1,200 sq. ft. Since much of the building is vacant, there is no parking problem at this time, but the need for additional parking could arise as the building fills up and includes more medical/dental uses. We recommend approval of the amended special use permit, subject to at least the following conditions: 1. The conditions pertaining to the approval of Application No. 81012 remain in effect. 12-9-82 —1— Application No. 82047 continued 2. Amended permit approval acknowledges additional parking.spaces on the site allowing a maximum of sq. ft. of floor space to be devoted to medical/dental uses, the remainder to be devoted to general office uses. 3. The applicant acknowledges that any or all of the additional stalls shown as proof -of -parking will be installed upon a determination by the City that they are needed. New parking shall be provided first from the greenstrip abutting Earle Brown Drive and the north green - strip. Removal of landscaped parking lot islands shall be utilized last for parking purposes. 12-9-82 -2- 3. The existing shack on Lot 1 shall be removed from the premises and the illegal utility connection between the main house and the shack shall be removed prior to final plat approval. 4. The existing concrete patio slab which extends over the property line between Lot 1 and Lot 2 shall be removed or reduced to meet setback requirements for accessory structures prior to final plat approval. 5. The accessory shed near the northwest corner of Lot 1 shall be removed or relocated to meet setback requirements for accessory structures prior to final plat approval. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. RECESS The Brooklyn Center City Council -recessed at 9:00 p.m. and reconvened at 9:15 p.m. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 82047 SUBMITTED BY RYAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY FOR AMENDED SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO ALLOW MEDICAL AND DENTAL USES IN THE OFFICE BUILDING AT 6300 SHINGLE CREEK PARGlAY WHICH IS ZONED I-1. The Director of Planning & Inspection reviewed the applicant's request including the proof of parking plan. He presented and reviewed for Council members pages 4 through 7 of the December 9, 1982 Planning Commission minutes and also the Planning Commission informat=on sheet prepared for Application No. 82047. He pointed out the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 82047 subject to three conditions which he reviewed for Council members. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated the required notices of this evening's meeting had been sent to all affected property owners and that a representative of the applicant is present this evening. Mayor Nyquist inquired whether any of the other tenants in the building objected to the proposed use. Mr. John Kelly, of Ryan Construction, stated that the other tenants contacted had no objection but that all tenants had not been contacted regarding the proposal. Councilmember Lhotka inquired what amount of space had been rented to date in the building. Mr. Kelly replied that 15% of the space in the building had been rented to date. Mayor Nyquist opened the meeting for the purpose of a public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 82047 and inquired if there was anyone present who wished to speak at the public hearing. No one appeared to speak and he entertained a motion to close the public hearing.. There was a motion by Councilmember Hawes and seconded by Councilmember Theis to close the public hearing on Planning Commission Application No. 82047. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. 12-20-82 -9- There was a motion by Councilmember Lhotka and seconded by Councilmember Theis to approve Application No. 82047 subject to the following conditions: 1. The conditions pertaining to the approval of Application No. 81012 remain in effect. 2. Amended permit approval acknowledge 38 additional parking spaces on the site allowing a maximum of 14,300 square feet of floor space to be devoted to medical/dental uses, the remainder to be devoted to general office uses. 3. The applicant acknowledges that any or all of the additional stalls shown as proof -of -parking will be installed upon a determination by the City that they are needed. New parking shall be provided first from the greenstrip abutting Earle Brown Drive and the north greenstrip. Removal of landscaped parking lot islands shall be utilized last for parking purposes. Voting in favor: Mayor Nyquist, Councilmembers Lhotka, Scott, Hawes, and Theis. Voting against: none. The motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 82048 SUBMITTED BY CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER FOR SITE AND BUILDING PLAN APPROVAL TO CONSTRUCT AN OPAQUE WALL TO SCREEN OUTSIDE STORAGE AND TO BUILD AN ADDITION TO THE SALT STORAGE BUILDING AT 6844"SHINGLE CREEK PARKWAY. The Director of Planning & Inspection reviewed the application and presented and reviewed for Council members pages 7 through 8 of the December 9, 1982 Planning Commission minutes and also the Planning Commission information sheet prepared for Application No. 82048. The Director of Planning & Inspection pointed out that a condition of approval of the Planning Commission was that the landscape plan be provided with the application. The Director of Planning & Inspection proceeded to review the landscape plan presented with the application. He also reviewed the Planning Commission recommendation regarding screening materials to be used. The Director of Planning & Inspection stated the Planning Commission held a public hearing on Application No. 82048 at its December 9, 1982 meeting and that notices had been sent to all affected property owners. He added that the Planning Commission recommended approval of Application No. 82048 subject to ten conditions which he reviewed for Council members. He pointed out condition No. 3 has been met and may be deleted from the conditions. Councilmember Lhotka stated that he is concerned with the specification of materials for the screening wall. He added that the City would be specifying a certain material in this case and that in the past it has been his understanding that the City cannot specify a particular type of material. The City Attorney stated that typically, these types of items are negotiated items between an applicant and the City Council. The Director of Planning & Inspection noted that in the past, applications have stated, by an approved plan, that screening walls must be compatible to the main structure. The Director of Public Works reviewed for Council members four types of wall type in_nn_o� -10- `-�---_I CENTRAL APPLICATION ND. /1 0 82047 - P 0 S EV 0106E S - 1 SUMMIT °j 01 co ti g0� K (VI C 2 ?DAD 10 C Z 0 cr GRANDVI "i PAR K