HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC89007 2-1-89 5415 69th AveCITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application No. 89007
Please Print Clearly or Type
Street Location of Property 5415 - 69th Ave. No.
Legal Description of Property 33-119-21 12
0105
Lot 1 Block 1, Maranatha addition
Owner Maranatha Residence Corporation, dba Maranatha Place
Address 5415 - 69th Ave. No., Brooklyn Center, MN 55429 phone No. 569-4500
Applicant David Viland, Executive Director
Address 5401 - 69th Ave. No.
Phone No. 561-0477
Type of Request: Rezoning Subdivision Approval
x Variance Site & Bldg. Plan Approval
Special Use Permit Other:
Description of Request: Request to attach signage to retaining wall, which is
to be built Spring 1989, for Maranatha Conservative Baptist Homes, Inc (the
nursing home) and Maranatha Place (the retirement apartments)
The applicant requests processing of this application and agrees to pay to the City of
Brooklyn Center, within fifteen (15) days after mailing or delivery of the billing state-
ment, the actual costs incurred by the City for Engineering, Planning and Legal expenses
reasonably and necessarily required by the City for the processing of the application.
Such costs shall be in addition to the application fee described herein. Wi r al of
the application shall not relieve the applicant of the obligation to pay sts ncurred
prior to withdrawal.
Fee $ 50.00
Receipt No. Date: February 1, 1989
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Dates of P.C. Consideration:
piicant's 5igna
Approved Denied this day of 4 19 subject to the
following conditions:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Dates of Council Consideration:
Approved �_ Denied this 2 '- day of
amendment:
with the following
Lie
P/I Form No. 18 (over please)
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, MINNESOTA
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway 55430
PROCEDURES AND REQUIREMENTS FOR FILING APPLICATION FOR SITE AND BUILDING
PLAN APPROVAL
Prior to submission of an application for plan review and approval, prospective
applicants should arrange an informational meeting with the Planning Staff to discuss
preliminary plans and to become familiarized with applicable ordinance and policy
provisions.
Four (4) copies of the following documents and information shall be submitted, at least
14 days prior to the date of the regular Commission meeting, concurrent with fi ing the
application (required documents must be consistent with ordinance and policy provisions
before an application may be accepted):
1. A certified site survey drawing by a registered engineer or land surveyor
showing pertinent existing condition, accurately dimensioned.
2. *An accurately scaled and dimensioned site plan indicating:
a) parking layouts and access provisions, including calculation of
ordinance parking requirements;
b) designations and locations of all proposed buildings and required
setback lines;
c) fences, walls or other screening, including heights and type
of material;
d) outside lighting provisions, type and location (foot candle strength
at property line must be calculated);
e) curbing (B612 curb and gutter is required). Indicate radius measurements;
f) building information, including: gross floor area, type of construction
and occupancy classification.
3. *A landscape plan showing areas to be sodded or seeded, quantity, location,
size and species of trees and shrubbery. (Note: underground irrigation
is required in all landscaped areas in commercial and industrial districts.
Plans must be so noted).
4. *Building floor plans, elevations, sections and specifications, including
materials proposed.
5. *Existing and proposed land elevations, drainage provisions, and utility
provisions, including the diameters of utility lines.
6. Additional drawings, plans or information deemed necessary by the Secretary.
*Must be prepared by a registered architect or person registered with the State
Board of Registration for Architects, Engineers, Landscape Architects and Land
Surveyors, and said drawings/plans shall be so certified.
NOTE: Upon approval of plans by the Council and prior to issuance of permits, a
Performance Agreement as to approved site improvements and a supporting
financial guarantee, in an amount to be determined by tFie City, are required.
Acceptable financial instruments include cash escrow; certificate of deposit;
and performance bond.
Copies of the Zoning Ordinance may be obtained from the Administrative Office.
Questions should be directed to the Planning and Inspection Department.
P/I Form No. 19
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 89007
Applicant: Maranatha Place
Location: 5401/5415 69th Avenue North
Request: Sign Variance
The applicant requests a variance from the Sign Ordinance to have an off -premise
freestanding sign for the Maranatha Place apartment building at 5415 69th Avenue
North. The sign would be located on a retaining wall on the nursing home property to
the east. The property in question is zoned R1 and is bounded on the north by 69th
Avenue North, on the east and south by single-family homes, and on the west by the
Maranatha Place Apartments. Beyond Maranatha Place is a three-story apartment
complex across the city boundary in Brooklyn Park. Off -premise identification or
advertising signs are considered billboards and are prohibited under Section 34-
130.11 of the Sign Ordinance. Also, apartment complexes are only allowed to have
freestanding signs if they are cluster developments with three or more buildings and
36 or more units (Section 34-140.3C.3).
Sign variances are subject to three standards contained in 340-180 (attached). The
standards are similar to those in the Zoning Ordinance. A particular hardship must
be shown if the strict letter of the ordinance is carried out. The conditions upon
which the variance is based must be unique to the parcel of land and not be common
generally in the zoning district. Finally, the granting of the variance will not be
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other property or improvements in
the neighborhood.
The applicant (Mr. David Viland, administrator of the Maranatha Care Center) has
submitted a letter addressing the Standards for a Variance, a rendering of the
proposed sign and a site plan (all attached). The sign itself is proposed to be
located on a brick retaining wall in the northwestern portion of the Maranatha Care
Center site. There would be three sections of the retaining wall, two convex
relative to 69th and a middle section convave. The signs would be located on the
convex sections, Maranatha Care Center on the easterly section and Maranatha Place
on the westerly section. The sign would be located between the entrance serving the
care center and the entrance to the apartment building.
Regarding hardship, Mr. Viland states that the length of their business name makes
it difficult to stay within the size limitation yet making the sign readable from a
distance. Also, the only location for a sign allowed by ordinance would be the
north wall of the apartment building which is very utilitarian in appearance and
function. Staff would agree that a 10 sq. ft. sign is not really sufficient for this
building, considering its bulk and the number of units in it. (It may be that the
Commission will want to evaluate the existing ordinance for possible change.
Nevertheless, we feel the variance can proceed apart from an ordinance change).
There is also some advantage, not only to the applicant, but to the City as well, in
consolidating the identification signery of this complex in a single location. The
fact that the sign would be located across a property line seems immaterial as long
as both properties are under common ownership.
Regarding uniqueness, Mr. Viland states that the conditions are unique because of
the way the two buildings are situated in relationship to each other, the
restrictions on the access driveway location, and the continuum of services which
the two business components together provide. Mr. Viland explains this continuum
2-16-89 -1-
Application No. 89007 continued
of services ranging from completely independent living to a setting where complete
care is provided. He states that the proposed signery effectively portrays to the
community the continuum of services offered. He concludes by noting that, though
the nursing home and apartment building are technically on separate parcels, their
ownership, management and service are singular.
Staff would certainly agree that the continuum of services available at the subject
properties is unique. The arrangement of the two buildings, attached along a
common zoning as well as property line is very unique. The building attachment
serves to indicate that the two entities form a common unit. Unified signery is,
therefore, appropriate.
Regarding potential detriment to the public welfare and injury to other property,
Mr. Viland points out that a single sign monument will eliminate the need for a
separate sign on the Maranatha Place property. He also notes that there are plans
for landscaping around the retaining wall and that the signery will be very subtle
and aesthetic.
Staff agree that the proposed signery is low key and should not pose any detriment to
public welfare or injury to property in the neighborhood.
Recommendation
We believe there is definite merit to this variance request. Approval is
recommended, noting the following findings:
1. Unified signery for the care center/apartment complex is
appropriate and even desirable. Applying the ordinance
literally would prevent such unified signery and would work a
hardship on the applicant.
2. The continuum of services offered in the complex and the
attachment of the buildings across zoning as well as property
lines are unique conditions which are not common generally in
either the R6 or R1 zoning districts.
3. The proposed signery is aesthetically attractive and will have no
greater impact than two separate sign monuments. There should,
therefore, be no detrimental effect on the public welfare, nor
injury to other property in the neighborhood.
4. The proposed retaining wall serves a function in addition to
providing a wall on which to place signery. Sign area,
therefore, need not be computed as the total face of the retaining
wall, but only that area covered by the proposed signery.
5. Variance approval acknowledges one 28 sq. ft. freestanding sign
as proposed on the Maranatha Care Center property. No other
identification signery for Maranatha Place is acknowledged by
this variance approval.
6. The existing identification sign for the care center shall be
removed prior to issuance of the sign permits for the proposed
signs.
2-16-89 -2-