Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC82012 - 3/11/82 - 7300 Block of Brooklyn BlvdP& ,INNING COMMISSION FILE CK .,;KLIST File Purge Date: FILE INFORMATION Project Number: 8aoi see cz/3o C 7a23 f ools/yn bi d f B�oi/ PROPERTY INFORMATION Zoning: PLAN REFERENCE Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were consolidated. • Site Plans • Building Plans • Other: '/ lascapi�y FILE REFERENCE Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents. Document Tyke Date Range Location Agendas: Planning Commission Office Minutes: Planning Commission City Vault Minutes: City Council City Vault -OW08a Document Type Number Location Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault Resolutions: City Council City Vault Ordinances: City Council City Vault COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PROPERTY FILES CHECKLIST Application No.� 82012 _.._..-' Please Pre„nt _C1 early ar "ape Street Location of Property r%3O0 L�Co�k v1F «�okLy�%• _ ______ Legal Description of Property_'jzF_d,Z:7tjy_Kc s ct,,!:__ -7q`a7 .e* S+, . FjztF Address ,V, Phone No.H/.<- �7,_k6z'- AZD2,c Gsj t -s oc. 3;27, S03 -- - Appl i cant�.s> save F. kE s 7 n ,, s _ .1�ivlstv,��� ���Ee L` :` ��,s Rf I ��4« F,� ZNc Address 677o Ltt, 6CGE.y/o_�,'7k, EYCAN�n r`• 3.;z�a. _Phone No.I SODS �• '��.�© Type of Request: Rezoning -Subdivision Approval _ Variance _ Site & Bldg. Plan Approval Special Use Permit Other: Description of Request: I - CA7'ILtZ�I r--02TIOe3 OF 4a ©6-F S1T4 .6c<95;F— �i -P- (.1 NC ' e'A E. T'o l2 Tfi j'R The at, 1 i cart requests oroce s si r;g of this appl i cation and agrees to pay to the Ci ty of �ii" Ci:�yn trE't�+`^.:', 11�?3iiC S'1`L c?31 �:�,� lays '(i r ma'lijg �r lelivery of the billing stater mient, t.t ::' actual ccos,ts i nc-ur'red by the City for Engi neeril ng, P f arni ng,, and Legal expenses reasonably and necessarily mall i red by the City for ti,` prior ssi ng of the a.ppl i ca "i cn. Such costs hall 1 be 1 n : ':ii t'i J!i t0 the application fee clescri bed herein. 'Wi t!idra',Nd i of th" ap ,lice :i6n shall nar ,,eiieve the applicant of the obligation to pay coatis incurred prior to wi thdravial . Fee $ .Off ApplTcams uiy:5 ETu Receipt No. 57$25 Date: _ Epimlary 95 _�- .._..._.._....,._..._.___.�.__�._.�.`_.._._.PLANiliNG Cuh1itil5SIuN 1"ECG'IMIEii!'1ATl:ON _____._.__.....�......._ __..._.._ Dates of P.C. Consideration: Approved _1—_ Denied following conditions: tiii s __Jj__ day of _Vy1 aAtA_ 19 subject to the n - ----------------------------------------------- CITY COUNCIL. ACTION Dates of Council Consideration: Approved _ Denied this 7 � day of amendment: 19 Kam-, with the following P/1 ForF'-� No, 18 (over }Tease) i Planning Commission Information Sheet Application No. 82012 Applicant: Red Lobster Location: 7227 Brooklyn Blvd. Request: Special Use Permit The applicant seeks special use permit approval to establish an accessory off -site parking lot for the Red Lobster restaurant to be located at 7235 Brooklyn Boulevard. The parking lot will have 63 parking stalls and will be separated from the proposed restaurant by a nonpublic roadway owned by C.E.A.P. The property on which the parking lot is to be located is bounded by this private roadway on the north, by the C.E.A.P. property to the west, by Creek Villas townhouses to the south, and by a proposed vacant Cl property to the east (see plat Application No. 82010). Off -site accessory parking is a special use in the Cl, C2, I-1 and I-2 zoning districts and is permitted on institutional R1 properties as well. Under Section 35-701.3(a) of the Zoning Ordinance, accessory off -site parking cannot occupy land which is located in a more restrictive zoning district than the principal use unless the buffer and setback requirements pertaining to the principal use are met on the site of the accessory parking lot. In this case, a C2 use such as the Red Lobster restaurant must have a 35' buffer strip at its abuttment with R1, R2 or R3 zoned property. The R3 zoned Creek Vi.11as townhouses are buffered from the proposed parking lot by the 100' Shingle Creek right-of-way easement. Therefore, the parking for the restaurant can be authorized on the location proposed. Other requirements pertaining to the off -site accessory parking have been met (i.e. there are more than 20 spaces on the lot; all parking is within 800 feet of the principal use; the parking lot is not separated from the principal use by a major thoroughfare or street; the land is to be owned by Red Lobster and thereby encumbered for its exclusive use). The parking lot is to be paved with hot mix bituminous and bounded by B612 concrete curb and gutter. The lot will drain to the southwest portion of the lot where a 12" storm drain will convey runoff to a 15" storm sewer line beneath the private roadway. A 22" Imperial Honey Locust is proposed at the southeast and southwest corners of the accessory parking lot. Within the greenstrip along the private roadway, five Radiant Crab, three Black Hills Spruce and numerous Maney Juniper are proposed. Junipers are also to be located along the east and west edge of the parking area. A Colorado Blue Spruce is indicated at the west entrance to the parking area. Underground irrigation is indicated in all landscaped areas as per ordinance requirement. The proposed plan appears to meet the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance and it is recommended that the special use permit be approved subject to approval of the site plan application and: 1. The land contained in Lot 2, Block 1 of the Red Lobster Addition shall be legally encumbered to the sole purpose of providing parking for the Red Lobster restaurant located on Lot 2, Block 1 of Piccadilly Pond Addition prior to the issuance of building permits. 3-11-82 TO: Ron Warren, Director of Planning and Inspections FRCM: Jim Grube, Assistant City Engineer Q� ,- DATE: march 19, 1982 RE: Investigation of Motor Vehicle Light Patterns At the direction of the Planning Ccamission, the Fngineering Department has reviewed the need to construct an opaque screen along the south side of the offsite accessory parking lot for the proposed Red Lobster Restaurant (Planning Commission Application 82012). As stated at the March 11., 1982 meeting, auto- mobile headlight glare may be noticeable at the Creek Villa townhouse develop- ment if opaque screening is not installed. In order to assist the City Council in determining a need for such screening, the following information is presented for your review and consideration. 1) The Minnesota Highway Traffic Regulation Act, Section 169.55 states that headlights must project a light visible from a distance of 500 feet. 2) Section 169.60 states that headlight intensity must reveal objects a distance of 350 feet ahead when on high beam and 100 feet ahead when on low beam. 3) Section 169.65 establishes the standard that low beam lamps must be aimed so that the most intense point of the beam is below the center of the lamp. High beam lamps may be aimed so that the most intense point of the beam is at the centerline of the lamp (or horizontal). 4) Autcobile headlights are considered to be 2 feet above ground surface, van headlights are 33 inches above ground, and in no instance may lights be higher than 42 inches above ground. 5) There are no specifications for degree of light beam divergence from. head lamps. 6) The townhouses at 7224 and 7230 Perry Court Fast are closest to the proposed lot, a distance of 170 feet. 7) The finished floor elevation of 7224 and 7230 Perry Court Fast is 2 feet above the south edge of the parking lot, but at the same elevation as the highest point of the lot. 8) Section 35-4.12 of the City Ordinances requires an 8 foot wall or fence be constructed where C2 abuts Rl, R2, or R3 districts. Based upon the information provided, it is evident that persons in the rear yards of 7224 to 7230 Perry Court Fast are susceptible to high beam glare. Trees in full foliage may not adequately diffuse the light because few branches extend below 6 feet. Construction of an 8 foot opaque screen, as required by City Ordinances, would block the most intense portion of the beam and most of diverging light pattern. In addition, the opaque screen would eliminate a parking lot view from the townhouses' main floors. It is therefore recommended the applicant be required to construct opaque screening according to the minimum requirements of Section 35-41.2 of the City Ordinances. , to �-07 r !/ Y ?► T , . * Osb 1 : ,�,, 0 LOB; , \ Cab. �' �' G �m +� ^' � V�!O�nMC' A��• 1 �4! �" .r'� ti 4 � ���a6 � ti Z'� NIP. 9p ly t, n1 _. �S?J ;t j�`, CM o r� 11 J .�; �. b,.d � y:', .• J ✓ � � ,••{ sr . 6� �. o`o ' is o �� .pi• a m r34 g�. 0 4{ • GJ.4!' y, , � •ti,, ,r'Ju�' ;, J1l Z m '2pt �� 5§ s� 6�-� c+'" ,j7 t to d� `� O "' > � � .� `y. �.� a" � �,) j �S ,<<. . 4' 0 ' � o fir, � ,J, �/�` -. :• 4. t? • _ tr nln` Ia (A s ! 1� � ff O O`° •� SI 84 , ,7r4Cv tY ' . tip• t T ti M4 �� )vl"g ,a fr, _ 'ry s�� =y„ s ��" � :o�. ♦QLti � AM T `'ti Q, � '�4 ;� � \9 0 , - ,•+ r a qti \ " u-• � �' /tip •, c =+Nd "'apt' h� v ,a � � , V• oe�)`• 9 v :°� / {'� ("1 96 �• `� a a t �t7 t.. � Ri, w �. 150 100 rn ! .•---� q.. t • J 497OZ-87 14 Al Al ;,'t, � ,+m• a°Oo15a',Y'/ i1�o1 ��f2o2 Sty. r _ _�--^---'` � - ...._ - _ � � �w �� ��-x� •�.�: ` � + p, f N ,,. �� ' Os ��• � u, Nq 4' LA �2 . tlD A �r +p �,'y, •�i' .2 � : "� � � P ' � Doti O � �.: ., �' �E �-�iy�x.' .- s K+"�'-.�'�' :'�'`c' •, .}a` .�'fi'•.i�.� i 'dr,b tip; .�?� � �, o �..:7 �b�'1 ., ✓ 1p; \ (, (1 J�r�t�_\\ gyp'. �y-. ` .. � :T �• 1� � N wM ; f` �- .X' � � �C,Y E a•; `�/ �� J ` ice, � �'.r' 9 ' r z � fid' �'"/ c° 'wy �a45M1.%� a51 ti -''f, `.� •\� �;� 'U.� py u., $. '��jq t"� - � •.. 7,fV Q,• � � � �`' // �� •�.Li ,;� � sa � 0 � -','r "�-t ".F1 ';'' � � F -.-1;�/�' a / �, c��./y, � rj iT� ; r` uY�, �1 (q iil .n r'•.. � � 3 v.,7.� yr $ ,;fa9��r7 -,:f '6�ri'L /... .//✓�q.� o �'� 1rYr3� �.�,; c,�• � - ir