HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC83029 - 6/30/83 - 6044 Brooklyn BlvdPLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
File Purge Date: 4-3 `?5—
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning:
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Type Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission
Minutes: City Council
Document Type
Resolutions: Planning Commission
Resolutions: City Council
,�130�bJ '/a/e3 City Vault
SO
City Vault
Number Location
City Vault
City Vault
Ordinances: City Council City Vault
CITY 'OF BROOKI_Y-N QNTER
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application No.
83029
Please Print Clearly or Type
Street Location of Property 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard
Legal Description of Property Lot 37, Aud . Sub, ' 216
Owner- Standard Oil Co.
Address Phone No.
Applicant Wes Reavely (Wes's Standard)
Address 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard Phone No. 561- 9839
Type of Request: Rezoning
Variance
K Special Use Permit
Description of Request:
Subdivision Approval
Site & Bldg. Plan Approval
Other:
The applicant requests processing -of this application and agrees to pay to the City of
Brooklyn Center, within fifteen (15) days after mailing or delivery of the billing state-
ment, the actual costs incurred by the City for Engineering, Planning and Legal expenses
reasonably and necessarily required by the City for the processing of the application.
Such costs shall be in addition to the application fee described herein. Withdrawal of
the application shall not relieve the applicant of the obligation to pay costs incurred
prior to withdrawal.
Fee $ 50.00
Receipt No.
61132
Date: / s
cant's Signature
PLANNING CO(M�MISSION RECOMMENDATION
Dates of P.C. Consideration: �--30 -93
Approved `'r Denied this day of0�al& 19?3, subject to*the
following conditions:
-
----- -------------------------------- - - - - - -
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
Dates of Council Consideration:
Approved Y. Denied this day of 19 with the following
amendment:
uiem
P/I Form No. 18 (over please)
CITY 'OF RROOKI.YN .CINTEIZ
PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION
Application No.
Please Print Clearly or Type
Street Location of Property''L /��
Legal Description of Property
Owner =At //
Address Phone No.
Applicant? �_ � S-lP� R P - eve l
Address
Type of Request: Rezoning
Variance
Special Use Permit
Phone No.
Subdivision Approval
. Site & Bldg. Plan Approval
Other:
Description of Request: Al LOG- lzP T- 4 i C (,4(P J, oo W 11�120441Z-;,
The applicant requests processing -of this application and agrees to pay to the City of
Brooklyn Center, within fifteen (15) days after mailing or delivery of the billing state-
ment, the actual costs incurred by the City for Engineering, Planning and Legal expenses
reasonably and necessarily required by the City for the processing of the application.
Such costs shall be in addition to the application fee described herein. Withdrawal of
the application shall not relieve the applicant of the obligation to pay costs incurred
prior to withdrawal.
Fee $ {. Applicant's Signature
Receipt No. 2 Date:
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Dates of P.C. Consideration:
Approved Denied this day of
following conditions:
Dates of Council Consideration:
Approved Denied this
amendment:
CITY COUNCIL ACTION
day of
19 , subject to the
Chairman
19 , with the following
P/I Form No. 18 (over please)
Clerk
Planning Commission Information Sheet
Application No. 83029
Applicant: Wes' Standard
Location: 6044 Brooklyn Boulevard
Request: Special Use Permit
The applicant requests special use permit approval to sell items other than fuels,
lubricants or automotive parts and accessories at the service station at 6044
Brooklyn Boulevard. The property in question is zoned C2 and is bounded on the
north, east, and south by R5 zoned property (Brookdale Manor Apartments) and on
the west by Brooklyn Boulevard. This application was reviewed by the Planning
Commission at its June 30, 1983 meeting. At that time, the application was tabled
and the applicant was directed to submit a professionally drawn parking plan to
show that adequate parking can be provided on the site in accordance with Section
35-704, 2(b) and (c) of the Zoning Ordinance. The Commission is referred to the
minutes and information sheet from that meeting (attached) for background on this
application.
The applicant has recently submitted a plan which provides proof -of -parking for
up to 23 parking stalls. Twenty-three (23) stalls is the number required by the
service station (12) and the retail sales operation (11). The applicant does not
intend to put in all of the stalls shown on the plan, but will continue with the
18 existing stalls. He feels that additional parking is unnecessary since most
customers will be parked at the gas pumps while they purchase food or other items.
Staff would acknowledge that this is probably acceptable, but would recommend that
the applicant be required to agree in writing to put in the proof -of -parking stalls
upon a determination by the City that additional stalls are necessary to avoid
traffic congestion in the public streets.
The Assistant City Engineer has reviewed the plan to see that certain turning
movements are possible, given the location of the proposed parking stalls. He is
satisfied that movements into and out of the service bays and car wash should be
unimpeded. There is a driving lane, south of the building, which is indicated to
be 21' wide rather than the normal 24'. This deficiency is offset by the fact
that the stalls adjacent to this driving lane are 19' 6" in depth when only 18'
is required with curb overlap. Taking 1' 6" from each stall adds 3' to the driving
lane to meet the required minimum. Also, a stall in the southeast corner of the
site is labeled as an angle parking stall. However, we feel this stall should more
appropriately be a 90° stall.
It should be noted that Mr. Reavely has proceeded to sell food and other items at
the service station without a special use permit and without a food establishment
license. He has been cited for an ordinance violation and the matter is in court
and has been continued for arraignment until September 6. In the meantime, Mr.
Reavely continues to operate the retail business without the proper license and
special use permit. We believe such a flagrant action cannot be ignored.
It raises serious question regarding whether or not the applicant can meet Stan-
dard (a) for granting special use permits (It should be noted that with the sub-
mitted plan and certain assurances by the applicant, the staff feel the other
standards can be met).
Standard (a) states that "The establishment, maintenance or operation of the
special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be
detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals or comfort "(emphasis
added). Selling food products without the required license certainly has the
potential of endangering the public health and safety and may be indicative of the
applicant's attitude regarding compliance with all applicable codes, ordinances
and regulations.
8-11-83 -1-
Application No. 83029 continued
Further consideration by the Planning Commission and assurances by the applicant is
in order.
We have been contacted by Boyer Palmer, owner of the apartment complex east of the
site, who states that he does not object to the grocery operation at the site, but
has indicated that the screen fence on the Standard siteis in need of painting and
some minor maintenance. We would recommend such a conditionif this application
receives a favorable review by the Commission.
Based on the parking plan submitted and resolution of the Standards for a Special
Use Permit approval can be recommended subject to the following conditions:
1. The permit is subject to all applicable codes, ordinances and
regulations and any violation thereof shall be grounds for
revocation.
2. Permit approval acknowledges proof -of -parking for 5 additional
stalls on the site. The applicant shall agree in writing prior
to the issuance of the permit to install parking spaces in
accordance with the proof -of -parking plan upon a determination
by the City that additional spaces are needed to prevent traffic
congestion in the public streets.
3. The screen fence along the east side of the property shall be
repaired and painted prior to the issuance of permits.
8-11-83
-2-
T
i
Y: •01 b ?. Low_ Sk¢v8; `K t(�4N SHtJBi - 7.
�1� b s o w � L. T "r r c �`�� •� !' '^+�.. �^'_ �ti� frS �,J i
r I
-^ r Ps v , wl y ----- — --- -- - --- - - �rca� �- -- �
Q. 1
AL.
t Len.
5-0
911
li o �.1 — 11jff
INS
u+ VL C T! �¢. t V 6 W �•: ) X.n -�
GAG . »..
I b
f. _ASk- P.v �U 4 — --- fat•ts
1 ` a 1•�• ��.•
r I ^ � F j• t�-V►.ay.\ UUC.ICJt•
_ -� •;t�: - k.. 13{.•1 <: SCi Mawr ds.ai U►aua Qaualo00 Fc.kL
417
NNE
GAr�v�•-
�� C I T Y
SCHOOL •"
' 1
{
? 1]
al
C 2 ,x
a
w
m
'T
63RD
f O 6
O'HENRY ROAQ `
AVE44.
d Ou
F0 R D P�'N
ER::4
Av
jj
II-AW
R N�� _.
Nvt"(