HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC65091 - 11/4/65 - 6215 Osseo RoadPLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
File Purge Date: `
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning:
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Type Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission 11/11/e-s City Vault
Minutes: City Council City Vault
Document Type Number Location
Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault
Resolutions: City Council City Vault
Ordinances: City Council City Vault
VILLAGE OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Imina Agglication
Street Location of Property.
6215
Asseo
Road
Legal Description of Property _
Lot 1,
Block 1,
Ewin�ne 444ition
Owner: Name Kraus —Andersen Ine,
Address_501 South 8th St. # Hpis
Applicant: Name Macey
Signs ine.
AddressJ$51 Yilsoa iR Phone331-9446
Type of Request:
_ Rezoning
Special Use Permit
j_ Variance
Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Request
Install_ one
(1) double f aoe pylon sign as an
idantitieati nn A♦
t o= the sAQp
f�Rggenter a` the above looatiou
In aanaxAamas with
the 2XLAt of
the lfirn a8i the 1goat, ion on sits
Reason fo� Request car"r
fik elm t
th_
c*ntgr p ould be identified and the
s,=ii g"
ronid gerZ liltls
yury9s* set back iS to the lot
and it re id create
traffic.prgbleus
within the lot due to the out
ezt this let with regard
-IQ the Parking
of
,gars
maosyc 34 Q'�)_
/,A
-
ppp1 can
John 0. He ter
FEE: $ 0
Z2 October 1265
(Date)
F211owina to be filled
in by Village
Recommendations of Village Officials
Any official making any comments should
sign and date. Use additional sheet
comments if necessary attach hereto.
Please draw or attach sketch of proposed structure showing the following:
1. Indicate North 6. Dimensions of proposed structure
2. Location on lots 7. Proposed set -backs
3. Adjacent street names 8. State zoning in force in area
4. Location set -backs and use of adjacent existing buildings
5. Distances between any proposed structures and structures on adjacent
property.
(To Be Filled in By Planning Commission)
PLANNINS COMMISSION RECOMMENOATIONS
On the day of 19��the action ref es in the foregoing
petitio was approved 'disapproved () subject toe following c9n ns.
Chairmant
WV.VLL ..YVVtV\VV♦\V�iVItV
Approved Denied__ by the Council this day of19
Approved with following amendment
r..
PLANNING COW ISSION INFOFtMA ` :CON SHEET
Application No, 65091
Applicant: Macey Sign Company, 451 Wilson Street N.E.
Description of Request: Variance to install a free standing sign 40
feet south of the 22' wide driveway on Osseo Road,
and 81 from the Osseo Road right-of-way. The
sign is proposed as 11'4" overall, and the sign
itself has a gross surface area of 50 square
feet,
Property: Lot 1, Block 1, Ewing Lane Addition, 6215 Osseo Read
(teener of Property: Kraus, -Anderson, Inc, 501 South 8th Street
BACKCROUND :
1) A, previous application 065066) for a sign for the center was
denied by the Council October 11, 1965, because the sign would
have been an obstruction to driver's vision,
POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1) Bridgeman's was denied s sign adjacent to the Osseo Road (thus
one would he 8 :feet from it), but the fact that this is an
"integrated development", and Bridgeman's is a drive, -in may
have some importance,
2) The frontage along Osseo Road of 396;31 feet allows 712.62
square ,fees; of signing under the present ordinance,
3) Mr. Foss has no objections to this sign at its proposed location,
STAFF COMMENTS:
1) This sign variance seems reasonable enough in view of Uie fact
that the proposed sign ordinance would allow a sit=:. 22 feet in
height and 201 square feet in area. The applicant is ask' ng
only 11'4" height and 52 square feet in area. It mi(jht be
desireable to reconsider the ' iwpec zab of yislibility" section
of the proposed ordinance so that a business might bring its
s inn w.ssane down to s i:c or ; feet (except at corner sites if
the developer so chooses),
2) The height of signs should be tied to "street grade" at a point
perpendicular to the cenL•arline of the street at the location
Of the sign, (street grade means centerline grade which is
often curb grade also if one eXists . )
M
y
OR
LP
-po
10