HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC68009 - 3/7/68 - 6219 Osseo RoadPLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
File Purge Date: ` 14 9S
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number: e'l86o9
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning:
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Type Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission 31-71&8 City Vault
Minutes: City Council 3/� �78 City Vault
Document Type Number Location
Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault
Resolutions: City Council City Vault
Ordinances: City Council City Vault
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
Zoning Application
Street Location of Property
6219 Osseo Road
App. No. 68009
Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 1, Ewing Lane
Owner: Name M & E Realty Address 1708 Central Ave. N.E.
Michael Mueller of Telephone
Applicant: Taco Towne of America Address 6219 Osseo Road
Telephone 920-1290
Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit
Variance Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Request Variance from Section 35-330 to permit
erection of a freestanding sign.
Reason for Request
Fee $ 5.00
Receipt No.2�60
Applicant
February 23, 1968
Date
Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration
March 7, 1968 ?March 25, 1968
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On the day of the request represented by
this petition was a¢proved disapproved S07 ect to the
following conditioAa.- ---- -(circle one) /
Chairman
COUNCIL ACTION
Approved Denied this day of
Approved with the following amendment
�Cl
r
PLANING Ca4MISSIODT INFOPUN ATION SHEET
R
Application No.
Applicaut t
Description of Request:
Property:
Owner of Property:
BACKGROUND:
68009
Taco Towne Restaurant
(by Michael Mueller of Taco Towne
of America)
Variance from Section 35--330 to
Permit erection of a freestanding sign.
6219 Osseo Road - Lynn Brook Shopping
Center (Lot 1, Block 1, Ewing 'Lane
Addition)
K & E Realty
1. The freestanding sign presently existing at the .synn
Brook Shopping Center has been the subject of three
variance requests in the past. The most recent of these
variance requests provide for revisions to the sign to
its present status, such approval having been granted
by the Council on March 6, 1967 (Resolution 67--61). The
sign, which was designed with an area of approximately
125 square feet and a height of 20 feet, was approved as
recmest.
POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1. The request contained in this application consists of
another Change to the existing freestanding sign, involving
the installation of a "Taco Towne" sign atop the present
sign, which sign would be more or less of a mirror image
of the present "Kroger" sign. The addition of this new
identification would not change the overall height of the
sign, but would increase the total s'
perimeter measurement technique) approximately 1.60
square feet.
2. Admittedly, there is •a good deal of confusion at this
point as to what sizes of signery will be permitted under
the forthcoming sign ordinance. The Commission is
generally adhering to the January 5, 1967 Draft Sign
Ordinance, and the Council is utilizing a variation of
the provisions of that Draft. It should be noted that
both of these standards being used would permit a larger
sign than the present 125 square feet. The Commission's
Page 2
Application Wo. 68009
"Integrated Commercial Developments criteria would
permit a 200 square foot sign not exmedinr 32 feet in
height (the sign being a function of the 20,120 square
foot gross floor area), and the Councill4s "Graph" would
permit a 200 square foot sign not exceeding 27 feet in height.
STAFF CQMKEMT9.
1. Men first- approached by a representative of Taco Towne
with regard to this freestanding sign, it was suggested
that he discuss the revisions with other tenants of
the Center to determine if they might wish to develop
the sign as a whole, rather than in a piecemeal fashion.
$e later stated that he had done this, and that the others
would like revisions to the sign, but were not prepared
to put out any money to accomplish sang. I mentioned
to him, and also to M & E Realty (owners of the Center)
that if disputes arose in the future regarding allocation
of space on the sign, the resolution of such disputes
would be left to the lessor and lessees,