HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC68014 - 4/4/68 - 5901 Osseo RoadPLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST
File Purge Date:
FILE INFORMATION
Planning Commission Application Number:
PROPERTY INFORMATION
Zoning:
PLAN REFERENCE
Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for
consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were
consolidated.
• Site Plans
• Building Plans
• Other:
FILE REFERENCE
Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We
have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents.
Document Type Date Range Location
Agendas: Planning Commission Office
Minutes: Planning Commission
��,,
City Vault
Minutes: City Council
�s��8,
����
City Vault
Document Type Number Location
Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault
Resolutions: City Council City Vault
Ordinances: City Council City Vault
CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER
zoning Application
Application No. 68014
Street Location of Property 5901 Osseo Road (west side)
Legal Description of Property Parcel 1210, Aud. Sub. No. 216
Owner: Hattie C. Miller Address
Telephone No.
Applicant: Rod Bernu/Darrel Farr Address 3804 Crystal Lake Blvd.
Telephone No. JU.8-9132
Type of Request: X Rezoning Special Use Permit
Variance Subdivision Approval
Other
Description of Request Rezoning from R-1 (Single Family Residence) to
R-B (Residence -Business).
Reason for Request
Fee $ 25.00
Receipt No. 24320
Dates of P.C. Consideration
April 4, 1968
Applicant
March 11, 1968
Date
Dates of Council Consideration
April 15, 1968
May 13, 1968
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
(Approved Denied this day of
subject to the following conditions
Chairman
COUNCIL ACTION
Approved Denied this day of
19lek ,.with the following amendment r
�LF� Clerk
1
PLANNING COM11ISSION INFORMATION SHEET
Application No.
68014
Applicant:
Description of Request:
Property:
Owner of Property:
BACKGROUND:
Rodney Bernu and. Darrel Farr
Rezoning from R-1 (Single Family
Residence) to R-B (Residence -Business)
West side of Osseo Road at 59th
Avenue North (Parcel 1210, .dud.
Sub. No. 216) - the former Miller
Greenhouse property.
Hattie C. Miller
1) This property, as well as the property to its south between
Cross of Glory Church and 58th Avenue, has been designated
as a Planned Development Area in the Comprehensive Plan.
The intention of this designation is to provide coordinated
development of the entire area, if possible, into a "higher"
type of usage such as public buildings, apartments, and
offices. In such a development, the amount of direct access
to the Osseo Road would be encourage to be kept to a
minimum, with joint use of driveways and service drives
where feasible. The zoning proposed by the Commission has
been to the C1 Service -Office type; as the Cl classification
does not yet exist, RB is being requested.
POINTS TO BE CONSIDERED:
1) The applicant's stated intention, supported by his preliminary
plans, is to construct an office building on the property.
The concept which would underly this development would be
a joint use agreement with Cross of Glory Church with
respect to parking lot use, as provided in the Zoning Ordinande:
Mt. 8ernu hGs been making satisfactory progress in doordinating
his preliminary plans with the Church; and the proposed
situation seems to be erne which would be advantageous to
both parties and to the City as well. If this agreement
does not work out, the size of :he proposed building would
have to be changed.
2) One of the ideas underlying the "planned development." is that
the development should take place as a"package". In practice,
we must recognize that this will be extremely difficult in
most cases due to multiple ownerships. In the case of
Bermel-Smaby's proposed office use at 65th and Osseo Road,
fOr example, the "package' did not occur., although the City
:a
Page 2
Application No. 68014
impressed upon all concerned the need for cooperation between
landowners as the area redeveloped. A similar situation
seems to exist at this 59th and Osseo Road location.., and
although the present application does not encompass the
enure area designated for this type of use, it seems
reasonable to assume that one office-ype use will follow
another, and as they do, it will be in the best interests
of all concerned to coordinate their designs with the
recommendations of the City.
OR
LWR