Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020 05-14 PCP PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER VIRTUAL MEETING May 14, 2020 Virtual meeting being conducted by electronic means in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 13D.021. Public may access the Webex meeting: Online: logis.webex.com | Meeting Number (Access Code): 802 270 703 Phone: (312) 535-8110 1.Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2.Roll Call Introduction of New Planning Commissioner Peter Omari 3.Approval of Agenda Motion to Approve Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for May 15, 2020 4.Approval of Minutes Motion to Approve the February 13, 2020 Meeting Minutes 5.Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 10.Planning Items a.Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002 (Public Hearing) Applicant: Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister LLP) on behalf of Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. Project Location: Shingle Creek Crossing PUD | Building Site E (1080 Shingle Creek Crossing) Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of the ninth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, which would result in the elimination of certain use restrictions imposed by the original 2011 PUD and Declarations, as well as changes to the building size and site configuration of Building Site E. 11.Discussion Items a)City Updates -Opportunity Site -Small Business Forgivable Loans (Going Live May 15) -Local Non-Profit Grant Program (Applications Due May 25) -Concept by C Alan Homes LLC for Triplexes along Brooklyn Boulevard b)City Council Update 12.Other Business None 13.Adjournment PC Minutes 02-13-20 -1- DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FEBRUARY 13, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Christensen at 7:07 p.m. 2. ROLL CALL OF THE YEAR 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION Chair Randall Christensen, Commissioners Alexander Koenig, Jack MacMillan, Rochelle Sweeney, and Susan Tade were present. Commissioner Stephen Schonning was absent. City Planner and Zoning Administrator and Staff Liaison Ginny McIntosh was also present. 3. APPROVAL OF AGENDA – FEBRUARY 13, 2020 There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney, to approve the agenda for the February 13, 2020 meeting as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES – DECEMBER 12, 2019 There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Koenig, to approve the minutes of the December 12, 2019 meeting as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 5. OFFICIAL ADJOURNMENT OF THE 2019 PLANNING COMMISSION There was a motion by Commissioner Koenig, seconded by Commissioner Sweeney, to adjourn the February 13, 2020 meeting at 7:10 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. 6. ROLL CALL OF THE 2020 PLANNING COMMISSION Commissioners Randall Christensen, Alexander Koenig, Jack MacMillan, Rochelle Sweeney, and Susan Tade were present. Commissioner Stephen Schonning was absent. City Planner and Zoning Administrator and Staff Liaison Ginny McIntosh was also present. 7. ELECTION OF PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON FOR YEAR 2020 Commissioner MacMillan nominated Commissioner Christensen for Planning Commission Chair. Commissioner Sweeney seconded the nomination. Commissioner Koenig nominated himself for Planning Commission Chair, only to express interest, but added he is happy to defer to Commissioner Christensen. Commissioner Tade seconded the nomination. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -2- DRAFT Following discussions, the Commissioners made a determination to proceed in nominating Chair Christensen as chair of the 2020 Planning Commission. There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Koenig, to close all nominations. The motion passed unanimously. There was a motion by Commissioner Koenig, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to Accept the Results and Election of Chair for Year 2020. The motion passed unanimously. 8. APPOINTMENT OF 2020 VICE-CHAIR BY CHAIRPERSON Chair Christensen appointed Commissioner Koenig as 2020 Vice-Chair. 9. CHAIR’S EXPLANATION Chair Christensen explained the Planning Commission’s role as an advisory body. One of the Commission’s functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 10. PLANNING APPLICATION ITEMS 10a) Planning Commission Application No. 2020-001 (Public Hearing) Applicant: Masjid Al-Ansar Islamic Community Center Property Address: 4900 France Avenue North Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration for the issuance of a Special Use Permit and parking variance to operate a mosque and community center at 4900 France Avenue North. Ms. McIntosh reviewed a request for a public hearing related to a Special Use Permit for an Islamic mosque and community center to be located at 4900 France Avenue N. She added a parking variance would also be required as the parking needs for the assembly use exceeds the parking available on-site. She noted the Applicant requested the City consider an amendment that would allow for religious uses within the I-2 District. The requested amendment was presented to the Planning Commission and City Council and was ultimately adopted in late 2019. The amended I-2 District now allows for religious uses on a case-by-case basis through issuance of a Special Use Permit. Ms. McIntosh stated the Applicant was previously located in Brooklyn Center within a C-1 District-zoned office building, which allows religious uses as permitted use, but needed to relocate following a change in ownership. The Applicant wants to stay in Brooklyn Center. The Applicant is seeking issuance of a Special Use Permit and parking variance to operate a worship space, gathering and event space, educational classrooms, and office space. The time and day of the highest recurring use would be from noon to 2:00 p.m. on Fridays, when two 30-minute PC Minutes 02-13-20 -3- DRAFT prayer services would be held. The current attendance on Fridays number anywhere from 120 to 150 attendees, but for the purposes of the traffic study, 150 attendees was utilized. Youth classes and cultural classes would be held on weekends, with occasional use for weddings, meetings, and events during Ramadan. Ms. McIntosh stated the unique property has two buildings, a parking lot, and trash enclosure. The main building, 4900 France Avenue N, is an office building, and the Applicant would move into this building first, although it cannot be occupied until a new Certificate of Occupancy is issued, and building and fire regulations for assembly uses are addressed. The second building, 4902 France Avenue N, would need to meet all building and fire code requirements before it can be occupied. Less is known about this building and the condition of the building would need to be addressed. Ms. McIntosh stated a traffic study was completed by Alliant Engineering, and assumes 32 parking spaces on the site. The Subject Property currently does not have 32 parking spaces and would need to be expanded to accommodate five additional proof of parking spaces. Assuming 32 on-site parking spaces, the study indicates there could be a potential 40-space parking deficiency. Ms. McIntosh stated that a series of potential alternatives were outlined in the traffic study to address the parking deficiencies. One of the proposed alternatives noted that the two Friday prayer services could perhaps be separated further to allow the parking lot to clear out; however, in conversations with the Applicant, it was noted that the prayer services could not be spread out any further as they are held over the typical lunch hour. The Applicant proposed a shuttle service from the nearby K&G parking lot, which would provide transportation for up to 24 attendees or six individuals per each of the four vehicles available. City Staff had not yet received a formal agreement from the Applicant with K&G for parking, but a letter was received today regarding a parking agreement with Brooklyn Christian Center, located at 6030 Xerxes Avenue North in Brooklyn Center. The Christian Center is approximately seven minutes away from the Subject Property. An additional alternative noted that the available on-site parking would have signage indicating “carpool use only”, but the Applicant has not provided a plan for how this would be enforced, other than having a parking attendant. Ms. McIntosh stated another alternative was outlined in the traffic study that requested the City consider allowing that on-street parking along a 200-foot stretch of the dead-end France Avenue North cul-de-sac, which is currently signed “no parking”, as Alliant Engineering noted cars were parked there illegally. She added the Public Works Department has indicated they would not remove the parking restrictions as the roadway is not wide enough to allow parking along the west side of France Avenue North and accommodate the commercial vehicles, including boom and semi-trucks need a wider turn radius to exit the industrial properties located directly north of the Subject Property. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -4- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated the conversion of the buildings would result in a change of use; therefore, additional requirements would need to be met to address Building and Fire Code before the buildings could be occupied. The Applicant would also need to comply with ADA requirements, including re-striping the parking lot, and the potential installation of a lift or elevator. The change of use would also trigger Sewer Accessibility Charge requirements from the Met Council. Ms. McIntosh stated the Applicant has indicated a willingness to follow all the requirements outlined in the staff report, including concerns relating to the proximity of south parking lot to the railroad tracks and electrical substation with no safety barrier, such as fencing. City Staff understands the Applicants’ desire to remaining in the community, but the minimum changes that would be required before a Certificate of Occupancy could be issued for the assembly use. Furthermore, the 4900 France Avenue North building, which the Applicant wishes to occupy first, has been deemed unfit for occupancy due to water damage that occurred in November 2019. The second building, known as 4902 France Avenue North, was constructed back in 1963, and less is known as to the condition of the building as City staff has not been granted access to determine the condition of the building. Ms. McIntosh noted that the Applicant noted that their membership has grown exponentially since they opened in 2015. As the Applicant already faces at least a 40-space deficiency in on- site parking, City staff expressed concerns about their ability to grow in membership and services if their needs already exceed the available on-site parking. The only option to addressing some of the parking deficiency would be to demolish the second building. Ms. McIntosh stated City Staff is unable to provide a recommendation for a motion to be made to approve or deny the request for a Special Use Permit and parking variance and the Public Works Department is unable to accept the traffic study and parking demand management plan as submitted by Alliant Engineering. She added two resolutions have been prepared for the Planning Commission’s consideration: a resolution recommending City Council approval of the Special Use Permit and parking variance of approximately 40 spaces to be accommodated by shuttle service, and a parking plan that would be required; and recommendation of City Council denial of the request for the Special Use Permit and parking variance. OPEN TO PUBLIC COMMENTS – APPLICATION NO. 2020-001 There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Tade, to open the public hearing on Application No. 2020-001, at 7:44 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Imam Dukuly, representing the mosque, thanked the Planning Commission for their consideration. He added the issue of the parking spaces can be solved by using a shuttle to bring community members to the mosque from Brookdale Christian Center. He added K&G could not accommodate the parking request due to corporate policy. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -5- DRAFT He noted the mosque community members are pleased that the Planning Commission and City Council changed the use allowances in the industrial district, so they could move forward with their plans. He asked why they would change the allowances but not approve the plans. He added this would dash the hopes and aspirations of so many people if they were not given approval of the request, and he appealed to the Commissioners to understand that the mosque’s interaction with the City will be beneficial, and many children will be impacted in a positive way. He noted the community wants to stay in Brooklyn Center, which is the city they love. The Applicant stated the mosque community’s needs are far greater than the City’s restrictions. He added the City of Minneapolis, and many other local communities, do not have the on-site parking requirements Brooklyn Center does. He urged the Planning Commission to approve the request so the community members can leave the meeting with happiness and assurances. Amar Kamara, an administrative volunteer at the mosque, stated the new parking arrangement at the Brookdale Christian Center will work out very well. He added his entire community is in Brooklyn Center. He noted if the amendment to allow religious uses in the I-2 District by special use was approved by the City Council then everything else will work out. Dave Bros, 5013 Ewing Avenue, stated he lives in the area near the proposed mosque and he supports them moving into the building which has been vacant for a long time. He added he disagrees that parking is an issue, as France Avenue could be used for on-street parking, as it is a dead-end and does not need to be restricted. He noted there are many empty parking lots around Brooklyn Center, and the City does not need another one. Adja Cava, project coordinator for the mosque, stated the community has been working with City Staff for over a year, and has met every requirement that the City has asked of them. She added the City has been assured by the Applicant that they will comply with all requirements. She noted the City has given them hope by changing the allowances in the I-2 District, and she hopes the mosque will be approved as well, to help keep children occupied and productive, and how to become better citizens. Trevor Morlock stated he is the Applicant’s realtor. He added he supports the group occupying the property, as there is true passion for the property and for keeping their organization within Brooklyn Center. He noted it would mean the world to them to have this approved. Sita Cava stated he and his family moved back to Brooklyn Center recently after living in Philadelphia. He thanked the Planning Commission for changing the zoning code and working with the Applicant on this proposal. Fatumamata Kita stated she appreciates all the hard work of the Planning Commission. She added she has lived in Brooklyn Center for over 10 years and has four children who all go to school in Brooklyn Center. She noted it is important for them to get the support that will be available at the mosque. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -6- DRAFT Fumba Kunjen, a children’s instructor at the mosque, stated his daughter was taught how to behave in the home, and how to become responsible and productive citizen as a member of the mosque and community center. MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENTS (HEARING) There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning, seconded by Commissioner Tade, to close the public hearing on Application No. 2020-001 at 8:07 p.m. The motion passed unanimously. Chair Christensen stated parking accommodations have been made for other local properties that needed it. He added the Applicant indicated there are cities that do not have parking ordinances, like Minneapolis. Ms. McIntosh stated she would need to look into that. She added the parking requirements for religious and assembly uses in Brooklyn Center have not changed as of recent date. Commissioner Koenig asked how many cars could park along one side of France Avenue. Ms. McIntosh stated the available roadway is 210 feet in length according to the traffic study, and the minimum length for parallel parking spots is 24 feet, so that would equate to just under nine cars, or a potential for 24 carpoolers, assuming each car carried three occupants. Ms. McIntosh reminded Commissioner Koenig that City staff had held discussions with the Public Works Department regarding this request and they were not amenable due to need to retain fire access and the turn radius requirements of the adjacent industrial businesses for their commercial trucks. Commissioner Koenig asked whether the second building would be brought up to compliance immediately. Ms. McIntosh stated the Special Use Permit request is for the whole property and does not specify requirements for a building or buildings. Special Use Permits typically run with the land although restrictions can be placed on their use. She added all minimum building and fire requirements would need to be in place, including access and accessibility, before any of the buildings could be occupied. Not much is known about the condition of the second building so City staff is unable to determine what work is required before occupancy could occur. Commissioner Koenig stressed the importance of fencing and separation from the railroad for safety, and to protect the mosque from vandalism and other problems. He added he is in favor of the mosque’s mission, but he is unsure whether all the requirements make it a viable use. He noted the purchase of this property could hinder the growth of the mosque community’s population. Chair Christensen stated there are ways to make the parking limitations work within the community. He inquired as to whether the Applicant could adhere to the parking requirements if a Special Use Permit and parking variance is granted, and if not, whether the Special Use Permit will be revoked. He added, in terms of investment, this could be very problematic for the Applicant, and the City and surrounding properties may not be supportive of the parking requirements of the use and a variance. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -7- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated the Special Use Permit could be revoked if the Applicant is unable to meet the requirements of the parking plan, but it would be a process. She added the Applicant intends to purchase the property with the intent of implementing and remaining in compliance with the requirements, but there are additional implications if the Special Use Permit were to be revoked as the buildings and property could not be used for their purposes anymore. She added, for instance, a condition of approval noted in the approval resolution would be that the majority of on-site parking spaces would be for carpool use only, and parking on France Avenue would be a violation of the parking plan. Commissioner Tade asked whether street parking is available nearby. Ms. McIntosh stated there is street parking on Ewing Avenue and Drew Avenue, along the south side of 50th Avenue North, where there are a series of industrial uses and on-street parking is well utilized due to minimal on-site parking, and a small section of the northern end of France Avenue North. Utilizing almost all of these options would require attendees to walk in the streets as there are no sidewalks. She added all other areas are signed for “no parking”. Chair Christensen stated he drove around the area of the Subject Property and it is confusing where you can and cannot park on the dead-end area of France Avenue. He added there are only a few signs and the cul-de-sac portion of France Avenue North is not plowed up to the curb, so any cars that might park would narrow the street further. Ms. McIntosh agreed, adding there are only a few businesses on the cul-de-sac, and their employees have parked on France Avenue despite the “no parking” signage. Based on discussions with at least one of the neighboring property owners along the France Avenue cul-de-sac, there is a sense that there is not enough on- site parking for their use. Commissioner Koenig stated that area would only accommodate 10 or 12 cars anyway. He added this could cause problems with nearby commercial properties. Ms. McIntosh stated she did not receive any notifications from area businesses for the public hearing, but she has spoken with Horizon Roofing, located just north of the Subject Property, about their parking needs. Commissioner Tade asked whether a shuttle parking agreement is already in place. She asked whether people will actually use it, and whether the safety of attendees and children crossing streets has been considered. The Applicant confirmed there is a parking agreement in place with the Brooklyn Christian Center. Chair Christensen stated there is no sidewalk or curb in this area, and it is difficult to plow and maintain along the cul-de-sac. He added pedestrian safety is a concern. Ms. McIntosh stated Public Works have indicated they will not consider lifting the parking restrictions along the France Avenue North cul-de-sac. She noted the property located to the west of the cul-de-sac is a large substation owned by Xcel Energy. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -8- DRAFT Imam Dukuly stated the community would sit down with their new neighbors and create a relationship with them to address the parking needs. He added it has already been indicated that there will be more than enough parking due to creation of two separate services on Fridays between noon and 2:00 p.m. and the shuttle service. Chair Christensen asked whether the mosque will move on to a bigger facility if they outgrow this space, and whether they would maintain this property as a smaller satellite location. Imam Dukuly stated that could be a possibility. He added he does not believe all that parking will be required. Commissioner Koenig asked whether the special use requirements apply based on the purchase of the property. He added the Applicant is in a vulnerable position, with existing parking and overall site constraints. Ms. McIntosh stated the Special Use Permit is for this use on this property. She added the intent right now is for purchase of the property, and a Special Use Permit would be required whether the Applicant leased the property or purchased the property. Trevor Morlock stated a purchase agreement has already been signed, contingent upon final approvals by the City for the special use. He added, as a note, water damage inside the office building is being mitigated by the current owner after filing an insurance claim. He noted the current owner is working with the Applicant to ensure that the renovations, including the removal of interior walls to accommodate prayer services in the 4900 France Avenue North building, meet the needs of the mosque community. Imam Dukuly stated there are many old folks in the community who do not drive, and they will be carpooling. He added most mosques have one service at 1:00 p.m., but this community will have two services within a two-hour space, of not more than 30 minutes each. Commissioner Koenig stated he lives near the mosque’s former location, which was an office building, and has seen the process over the 2-hour period. He added it is very busy with people directing traffic, but very efficient. Regarding comments from the Applicant and members that they hoped to open their mosque and community center by Ramadan, Chair Christensen stated Ramadan is April 23, 2020, which is a very short time frame. He expressed concern that the City will be forced to remove the Special Use Permit if its requirements are not met. Chair Christensen requested clarification regarding ADA requirements. Ms. McIntosh stated that, regarding parking, there are currently two ADA parking spaces on-site, although one of the loading spaces is too narrow and would need to be re-striped. She added the parking lot would need to be expanded to the east to accommodate the 32 spaces noted in the traffic study, with new bituminous, curb, and gutter, and restriping. She noted an ADA-compliant lift or elevator may also be required if the occupancy in the 4900 France Avenue North building exceeds 30 occupants. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -9- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated all of the building and fire code requirements need to be met before the Building Official will issue a Certificate of Occupancy, as the building is currently unfit for occupancy as the building was previously utilized and will require that even more requirements be met as assembly uses have the strictest standards under the building and fire code. Given the timeframe, and based off conversations regarding the current status of the 4900 France Avenue North building, she does not believe the building and property would be fit for occupancy by Ramadan. Commissioner Koenig asked whether the issue could be tabled or postponed. Ms. McIntosh stated the Planning Commission could table the item if additional information was needed to make a decision, and application review period could be extended, but noted that the Planning Commission currently only meets once per month and the Applicant has a purchase agreement in place. Ms. McIntosh stated that if the Commission makes a recommendation this evening the application would be reviewed at the City Council’s March 9, 2020 meeting. Commissioner Tade stated the Applicant is eager to make this happen, and they have a plan ready to go, so they can move forward with their investment. She added the ball and all risk is in their court. Ms. McIntosh stated another consideration is that of precedent, as any approval would require a parking variance, which the Planning Commission would need to consider should any other religious uses wish to relocate into the I-2 District as a special use. Chair Christensen inquired about the parking variance of 40 spaces. Ms. McIntosh noted that data is based on a traffic study completed by Alliant Engineering. She noted the Applicant is proposing 32 on-site spaces, which assumes three people in every vehicle. There would be a 30- minute window between spaces, but the study assumes overlap between vehicles leaving and entering the site. Assuming no more than 75 attendees were at each prayer service, each vehicle contained three people, and no shuttle service was provided, a minimum of 25 on-site spaces would be required. There is only a 30-minute window between services; therefore, all vehicles would need to clear the site to accommodate the next service. The memorandum provided by the Assistant City Engineer notes that this could only be met under extremely ideal conditions and is not realistic, particularly as the Subject Property is to also function as a community center. Ms. McIntosh further noted that the Subject Property is at odds with the use, as there are two approximately 4,000-square foot buildings on-site, but, at best, only 32 parking spaces. The two buildings can accommodate significantly more than 75 people at a time, and this is noted in the staff report under the estimated occupant loads. Imam Dukuly stated the traffic engineer’s calculations are not correct in that there were upwards of 150 attendees during the engineer’s observations of the Friday prayer service at the Brooklyn PC Minutes 02-13-20 -10- DRAFT Center Community Center, where the mosque has temporarily been meeting, and the presence of 72 vehicles for the prayer service. He noted the community has been praying at the Community Center on Fridays, and it would be difficult to determine which people are there for activities, and which people are there for the mosque. Commissioner Tade stated she will support the recommendation to City Council at the Applicant’s risk. She added the Applicant is willing to move it forward, and they want to invest in their future in Brooklyn Center. She noted the Planning Commission is made up of community volunteers, who have all lived in the City for a long time, and she supports keeping the mosque within the community. Commissioner Koenig stated he is leaning toward denying the request, although he believes firmly in the mosque’s mission. He added he feels it will be problematic to meet all the necessary requirements, especially considering the potential future growth of the mosque community. He noted the application leaves the City in a difficult spot in terms of precedent and compliance. Commissioner Koenig stated it is important to remember that the Planning Commission is an advisory committee, and the City Council makes the final decision. Commissioner Schonning stated there is no appropriate use for the motion for denial, as the only appropriate decision is to approve or disapprove. He added, in his opinion, it was a very poor idea to offer a motion for denial. He noted the Planning Commission should only vote on the approval motion. Chair Christensen stated this could lead to a split vote as there are only 6 Commissioners. Commissioner Tade expressed frustration that the vote would be split, due to the fact that no 7th Commissioner has been appointed in over a years’ time, which is the responsibility of the Mayor and City Council. ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2020-001 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-001 SUBMITTED BY MASJID AL-ANSAR ISLAMIC COMMUNITY CENTER There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to approve Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 2020-001, recommending City Council approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-001 for Special Use Permit and parking variance to operate a mosque and community center at 4900 France Avenue North. Discussion during the motion: Chair Christensen expressed frustration at having two separate motions to choose from. He stated there are many obstacles due to requirements of the Special Use Permit and constraints on the property. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -11- DRAFT Commissioner Schonning expressed concern about the property and the extreme risk to which the mosque community will be exposing themselves, in terms of property and location. He stated he understands the community’s desire to stay within the City of Brooklyn Center. He added he does not believe the building will be ready for occupancy by Ramadan. He noted he wished there was a location within Brooklyn Center that would be more suitable. Commissioner Schonning stated he would love to see the mosque stay in Brooklyn Center, but there are risks which the mosque community will need to take to do so. He added he understands the mosque community are people of faith, willing to go to extreme lengths to make this happen, and he appreciates those aspects of the mosque’s proposal. Commissioner Koenig stated he is surprised that there are no alternative locations in Brooklyn Center that would be a suitable location for the mosque community as a place of worship. Ms. McIntosh stated assembly uses are a permitted use in the C-1 District, which is where they were previously located. Most office buildings are zoned C-1 District, and had such a location been identified with sufficient parking, the Applicant would have not needed to go through this process. Religious uses are also permitted in numerous residential districts by special use so long as the main access is on a collector or arterial street. Chair Christensen stated, with regard to Item 11 of the approval resolution, under the Approval Conditions, the parking shuttle agreement with K&G needs to be deleted or amended. Ms. McIntosh agreed, adding the specific location of the parking can be removed, from Item 11, and the parking location can established under the parking plan. Commissioner Tade accepted the following amendment to the motion: -Under Item 11. Approval, remove “K&G” as the shuttle parking location, and add parking location in the Parking Plan Ms. McIntosh stated it will be necessary to confirm that the Applicant is not affecting minimum parking requirements at whatever shuttle parking location is identified, such as at Brookdale Christian Center. Commissioner Koenig asked whether anything has been decided about a fence separating the parking lot from the railroad and sub-station. Ms. McIntosh stated the Applicant will need to work with the railroad to determine potential restrictions, and she noted concerns relating to the lack of separation between the parking lot and rail line and whether a fence can even be accommodated for. She added Item 8 refers to requirements for fencing. Voting in favor: Commissioners Tade, MacMillan and Schonning. And the following voted against the same: Chair Christensen, Commissioners Sweeney and Koenig. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -12- DRAFT The motion ended on a 3-3 split vote. Ms. McIntosh stated the application will be forwarded to the City Council on a 3-3 split vote, which is viewed as “no recommendation.” 11. DISCUSSION ITEMS a. Presentation and Discussion of City’s Public Art Master Plan (Jack Becker, Forecast Public Art) Jack Becker of Forecast Public Art reviewed the City of Brooklyn Center Beautification and Public Art Plan. The Brooklyn Center 2040 Comprehensive Plan identified a need for civic beautification to reduce unsightly areas and build a sense of identity and character; establish a committee for arts and culture; guide efforts to enhance investment in beautification and public art efforts; and encourage participation from local artists. This provides engagement opportunities with the general public and brings together the various cultures in Brooklyn Center. The Brookdale Library serves as a quasi-cultural center, but there is no arts center in Brooklyn Center currently. Residents have expressed a strong desire to have a cultural center to support the artistic talent that exists in Brooklyn Center. Mr. Becker stated a recommendation is to connect public art education with health, in connection with the goals and objectives the City already has. A public art plan provides opportunities for customizing the story of Brooklyn Center, building civic pride, and helping people feel that they are a part of the community. Recently, street banners were placed around the City featuring community members. This is an example of an easy way that small demonstrations can help an overall program grow. Mr. Becker stated there are a variety of ways to gather people for collaboration and story-telling. He added the City’s “Rec on the Go” vans could incorporate embedded local artists to add value to an existing program. He noted the entrance to the City Hall building is a good place for artistic enhancements, which could be a good example of how a demonstration project can transform a building façade. Mr. Becker stated he is working with developer Real Estate Equities on a new development in Brooklyn Center at 5801 Xerxes Avenue North, which will incorporate a public art component. He added one residential unit has been proposed to be reserved for an artist-in-residence, to run arts programs and events at the residential development. There are many opportunities for arts expression in the City’s schools and parks. Mr. Beck reviewed sample comments taken from hundreds of surveys, asking Brooklyn Center residents what they would like to see in their town. Responses included a healthy Brooklyn Center, and a better place to live; someplace they can be proud of; and a place that announces that they are home. He read an excerpt from the draft Brooklyn Center Public Art Program PC Minutes 02-13-20 -13- DRAFT description, which will be ready for presentation to the City staff team by the end of February 2020. Chair Christensen stated he hopes the Lions Club signage can stay in place. He added the Lions Club pays for the signage. Mr. Becker stated such public and private partnerships are very important. He added, for instance, the Brookdale Library was one of the first libraries to use the Percent for Art Ordinance for arts funding in Hennepin County libraries. He noted there is some great art in the Brookdale Library. Commissioner Koenig stated he attended Mr. Becker’s presentation at a recent CEAP meeting, which was well attended. He asked whether Mr. Becker is gathering feedback, and whether there are patterns in what people are saying. Mr. Becker confirmed these conversations are important. Commissioner Koenig stated functional art is a great idea in a city like Brooklyn Center, where benches, buildings, trash receptacles, and other public amenities can have art on them and become works of art themselves. He added he hopes the City can have a place where its residents can do beautiful art together, reflecting their different cultures and expressing their sense of heritage through art. Chair Christensen stated Brooklyn Center has some secret art places, including a stainless-steel statue of a bear in Cahlander Park, and a 1,500-foot long painting mural on the freeway sound barrier behind Earle Brown Elementary School. He added these artistic places in the City are very valuable. Commissioner Koenig stated there is an old tennis court area in Centennial Park that would make a great sculpture garden. He added that would be a nice amenity to add to Centennial Park, which is a beautiful park. Mr. Becker stated public art should have two to three different functions – for instance, a bench with a work of art on it is still a bench and you can sit on it and relax. The artwork tells a story, so it becomes arts education. And as you move away from it, it becomes a beautiful work of art. Chair Christensen thanked Mr. Becker for his presentation. 12. OTHER BUSINESS Ms. McIntosh stated the Planning Commissioners, and some other City Commission members, have not been re-appointed to their positions. In the case of the Planning Commission, there is still one vacant Commissioner seat, and none of the Planning Commissioners have been re- appointed as of this date. She requested that the City Clerk and City Attorney review this situation and provide feedback and comment on the potential legal implications, particularly for the Planning Commission as they hold public hearings. PC Minutes 02-13-20 -14- DRAFT Ms. McIntosh stated the Planning Commission isn’t the only Commission in this situation. Other City Commissions are in similar situations, but there could be more legal ramifications for the Planning Commission. She added that she cannot tell the Commissioners how to proceed, but as residents, they could speak to members of the Council and put it on their radar. Chair Christensen stated tonight’s 3-3 vote was embarrassing, and there should have been a 7th Commissioner to break the tie. He expressed his frustration that the Commissioners put in countless hours of service to the City but have not been formally appointed. Commissioner Tade stated that, as a Commissioner, she volunteers her time to serve the needs of the City. She added she wished to go on record as saying the situation is ridiculous. Commissioner Schonning expressed concern that not being appointed can create a situation where the Planning Commission is put in legal jeopardy. Commissioner Sweeney asked whether there will be March 12, 2020 meeting. Ms. McIntosh stated there is the potential to review a request for issuance of a Special Use Permit for a new digital sign identifying the City Hall and Community Center campus on Shingle Creek Parkway, but she is unsure whether it needs to go ahead next month or not. 13. ADJOURNMENT There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed unanimously. The meeting adjourned at 9:50 p.m. _______________________________ _______________________________ Ginny McIntosh, Secretary Randall Christensen, Chair App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: May 14, 2020 Application No. 2020-002 Applicant: Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister, LLP) on behalf of Gatlin Development Co. Inc. Request: Planned Unit Development Amendment No. 9 to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD REQUESTED ACTION Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister LLP) on behalf of Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. is requesting amendments to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) that would result in the elimination of certain use restrictions imposed originally by the 2011 PUD and Declarations, as well as changes to the building size and site configuration of Building Site E (Lot 2, Block 1, Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition) that would help prepare the site for a potential standalone car wash. If changes to the building size and site configuration of Building Site E are approved, the developer of said car wash would be required to submit a separate Planning Commission Application to the City for site and building plan and Special Use Permit approvals. A public hearing notice was published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on April 30, 2020 (Exhibit A). Notices were also mailed to surrounding property owners per notification requirements. BACKGROUND Site Data 2040 Land Use Plan: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Neighborhood: Centennial Current Zoning: Planned Unit Development-Commerce (PUD-C2) District Site Area: Shingle Creek Crossing PUD: 68.05 Acres |Building Site E: 0.92 Acres Surrounding Area Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning North TOD C2 (Commerce) District South ROW (Highway 100) Highway 100 East ROW (Highway 100) Highway 100 West TOD C2 (Commerce) District The original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved on May 23, 2011, and provided for the overall redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall properties. The mall was originally comprised of over 1.1 million square feet of retail space, which was subsequently reduced following the • Application Filed: April 21, 2020 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 06/20/2020 • Extension Declared: N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 2 demolition of 760,000 square feet of old mall space, followed by the planned renovation of 123,242 square feet of former food court space; the redevelopment of over 403,000 square feet of new retail commercial and restaurant uses; and approval of the Shingle Creek daylighting. The second PUD amendment was approved a short time later on September 12, 2011, and provided for the physical separation of the food court building from Sears; the renovation and conversion of the food court space from 123,242 square feet to 150,591 square feet; the removal of Building Site N (between Sears and Walmart); and the addition of a new 6,000 square foot commercial pad site located at the southeast corner of the Xerxes Avenue North and 56th Avenue North entrance. The third PUD amendment, adopted on September 24, 2012, provided for the re-platting of certain lots and revisions to certain building pad sites (i.e. Building Site D, Building Site Q, and Building Site O). The fourth amendment, adopted October 14, 2013, approved the removal and replacement of the former Brookdale Mall food court with ten (10) new retail buildings. The fifth PUD amendment was related to various sign allowances granted throughout the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. The sixth PUD amendment was adopted June 9, 2014 and incorporated changes to the food court redevelopment areas, a new 5,400 square foot restaurant pad site (Building Site R); a new 5,500 square foot restaurant pad site (Building Site T); a revised size and layout of Building B from 8,500 square feet to 6,673 square feet; and approval of the Shingle Creek Crossing 5th Addition. The seventh PUD amendment was adopted November 9, 2015 and authorized the re-subdivision of the Kohl’s store property into two separate lots, along with the planned development of a new Building Site X. The eighth PUD amendment was adopted February 13, 2017 and allowed for certain changes to the approved uses under the PUD, certain allowances and the expansion of Building Site Y (HOM Furniture), and certain size allowances for a digital sign on the Building Y property. This request was followed by subsequent requests, adopted on November 13, 2017 to address changes associated with storm water management improvements, and flexibility in the design of commercial/office uses and building placements for Building Sites X and F (Bank of America). PUD AMENDMENT City Staff was approached by Attorney Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister LLP) on behalf of property owner Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. regarding a proposal to bring a standalone car wash to Building Site E, located at the northeast corner of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD), and between Aspen Dental and Shingle Creek. In order to facilitate marketing and development within the PUD, Mr. Wolf also indicated a desire by Gatlin Development Co. Inc. to amend the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD to delete an “eating establishment” requirement in place under Section 4.A of the Shingle Creek Crossing Declarations and related PUD concepts, revise the list of uses currently allowed within the PUD, and bring the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and associated Declarations back into synchronization given the number of amendments that have occurred since 2011. Refer to Exhibit B. App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 3 Amendment to Uses The Applicant is requesting changes to the uses allowed within the PUD that would remove restrictions currently in existence on four of the lots that require them to be reserved for an “eating establishment” use only. One of the lots with this restriction is Building Site E, which has been proposed for use as a standalone car wash. The Applicant has also requested the removal of restrictions on group day care facilities and drop in child care centers (Section 35-322.l.k of City Code), veterinarian offices (but not animal hospitals), educational uses (Section 35-322.l.h of City Code), and gasoline service stations. It should be noted that, while the underlying zoning of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD is C2 (Commerce) District and allows gas stations by Special Use, gas stations are no longer a permitted use within the Central Commerce Overlay District where the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD is located, with the exception of certain auto-oriented businesses in existence prior to October 1, 2019. City staff discussed this with the Applicant. The Applicant has requested the following changes in the Declarations: App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 4 It should further be noted that the above-mentioned Declarations are from 2011 and both the City and Shingle Creek Crossing PUD have had numerous amendments since this time that should be reviewed with any updating of the Declarations to ensure consistency. For instance, “hospitals, medical, and dental laboratories” are listed as a prohibited use within the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Declarations; however, the 8th Amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD (2017) granted an option for Building Site X to be used as a potential medical center. The Applicant has acknowledged that the Declarations and amendments to the PUD have fallen out of sync and would like to work with City staff and the City Attorney to ensure all of the amendments approved since 2011 are accounted for and up- to-date with City regulations. As a final note, Section 4.C makes note that, “notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the permitted uses shall also include those uses listed in Subsection 1(v) and Subsection 3(b) of Section 35- 320,” which is actually the C1 (Service/Office) District. The aforementioned sections referenced are for the drop-in child care center (Subsection 1v) and group day care facility (Subsection 3b) uses. The drop- App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 5 in child care center use is a permitted use within the C2 (Commerce) District under Section 35-322.1.k and the group day care facility use is a special use within the C2 (Commerce) District under Section 35- 322.3.q. As these uses are already addressed under Sections 4.B.6 and 4.B.15 of the above Declarations, this language is likely unnecessary. Amendment to Building Site E Should the above-mentioned amendments be approved, the Applicant is also requesting an amendment to the PUD master plans to update Building Site E’s building size and site configuration in anticipation of a separate Planning Commission Application for site and building plan and Special Use Permit approval for a standalone car wash. Although the intended developer of the car wash could request another PUD amendment at time of their application, property owner and Applicant Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc would like to be pro-active and streamline the process as much as possible by addressing the need to update the size and configuration of Building site E now and to minimize the number of PUD amendments navigating the City’s approval process, as this application would serve as the ninth PUD amendment since 2011. The amendment to the PUD to address Building Site E is required as the City’s Zoning Code states the following under Section 35-355, Subdivision 5.d (Planned Unit Development): The PUD master plans were last updated in 2017 by Kimley-Horn and currently reflect Building Site E as an “eating establishment” use within a 4,800 square foot building and with 48 available on-site parking spaces, which is reflective of the Easements, Covenants, and Restrictions (ECRs) currently recorded against the entire property that outline specific parking restrictions for certain uses. In the case of Building Site E and the “eating establishment” use, a ratio of 10 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building was required. App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 6 Assuming a car wash use receives approval for this location, the parking needs would be substantially less, as the developer interested in Building Site E has indicated that the standalone car wash and business model is designed around the convenience of customers by minimizing wait times. The information provided to City staff indicate each car wash would take 1.5 minutes per car, with a maximum of three (3) vehicles allowed in the wash tunnel at any one time. It is anticipated that the total time at the car wash only would take approximately three (3) minutes to compete, and the anticipated total time at the car wash, assuming a customer cleans and vacuums their car after, would take approximately 10 to 15 minutes. The car wash would likely have two employees available during their hours of operation. Although parking needs will be reviewed in greater detail with any future Planning Commission Application for site and building plan approval, City staff reviewed the site plan and proposed parking assuming a retail use of 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet given that there is no outlined parking ratio in the PUD for car washes. Assuming a 3,667 square foot building, 16.5 on-site parking spaces would be required. The updated site plan for Building Site E reflects 17 on-site parking spaces as well as two lines of stacking for the car wash queue. The proposed new parking lot and circulation would impact parking along the east side of Building Site D; however, upon review of the PUD master plans it appears Building Site D would maintain the minimum 50 parking spaces it requires (refer to Image 1 below). Image 1. Existing 2017 Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plans (PUD Amendment #8) for Building Site E. The Applicant and the proposed developer of the car wash worked with one another to provide as complete of detailing as possible for the proposed car wash, as per Section 35-355 above, the floor area of nonresidential areas cannot increase or decrease by more than 5 percent, and the lot coverage of any App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 7 individual buildings cannot increase or decrease by more than 10 percent. The Applicant and proposed developer of the car wash held an online meeting with City staff to discuss any immediate concerns and the City’s process and timeline for the PUD amendment, and subsequent site and building plan and Special Use Permit approvals. The only other recent example of a standalone car wash in Brooklyn Center existed at 5500 Brooklyn Boulevard and was demolished to facilitate redevelopment of the site into a two-unit retail building with drive thru in 2017. The site of the former car wash (0.82 acres) is of similar size to Building Site E (0.92 acres). In the case of the former car wash on Brooklyn Boulevard, the building was constructed in 1966 and encompassed 8,936 square feet of the property. Kimley-Horn, who has historically updated the master PUD plans for Shingle Creek Crossing, provided an overlay of the proposed 3,667 standalone car wash and revised parking lot in Image 2 below and attached as Exhibit C: Image 2. Proposed Changes to Building Size and Site Configuration of Building Site E (Changes indicated in Red). As proposed, the revised Building Site E building would decrease by 1,133 square feet, and on-site parking would be reduced from 48 to 17 parking spaces and stacking for the car wash tunnel. Per Kimley-Horn, the revised Building Site E would feature 0.08 acres (3,484.8 square feet) more open space than the previous design. The revised site plan would also bring the proposed car wash tunnel more in line with the setbacks for the buildings to the west of Building Site E. App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 8 Although setbacks and dimensions were not indicated on the above site plan, City staff was able to approximate the building setbacks for Building Site E as follows: North Property Line: 57 Feet South Property Line: 69 Feet East Property Line: 7.5 Feet West Property Line: 99 Feet City staff will need to see verified dimensions upon submittal of any application for site and building plan approval. The PUD master plans indicate a 20 foot building setback along Bass Lake Road (North Property Line), which the updated building on Building Site E would meet. The Applicant of the car wash will also need to confirm the setback from the eastern property line as the underlying C2 (Commerce) zoning district typically requires a 10 foot setback and City staff will want to confirm spacing between the trail/sidewalk areas and weir at Shingle Creek. Summary City staff believes a standalone car wash in the area would meet a need that has been expressed by residents since the demolition of the former Brookdale Car Wash at 5500 Brooklyn Boulevard. In late 2019, amendments to the City’s Central Commerce Overlay District were approved by City Council to provide clarity to the permitted and prohibited uses within the District, and specifically auto-oriented uses. While existing auto-oriented uses, such as the Holiday Gas Station at the northwest corner of Xerxes Avenue North and Bass Lake Road, and the auto repair shops located along Xerxes will be allowed to remain as conforming uses so long as they are active businesses, any future auto-oriented uses would not be permitted. The one exception to this is standalone car washes. Other uses not permitted within the Central Commerce Overlay District include sauna and massage establishments, currency exchanges, pawn shops, secondhand goods dealers, indoor storage establishments, and truck and trailer rental establishments. Should the requested amendments to the uses and Building Site E be approved, the Applicant will need to work with City staff and the City Attorney to update the Declarations and provide a fully updated PUD master plan set. City staff will want to ensure all updates to the PUD are recorded at the Hennepin County Recorder’s office as not all amendments have been in the past. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATION Similar to those findings City staff has indicated and provided under previous considerations of amendments to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, the updating and easing of restrictions on uses within the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and revisions to the master plan for Building Site E will allow property owner and Applicant Gatlin Development Co. Inc. more opportunities to appeal to potential tenants and developers, as the PUD has yet to reach full build out. As the request is generally in line with the uses already permitted, either by right or through special use, within the underlying and adjacent C2 (Commerce) District, City staff finds that the proposed PUD amendments can be supported based on the following findings: a) The proposed amendments to the uses allowed within the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD are App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 9 generally in line with the uses allowed by right or special use within the underlying C2 (Commerce) District, and will open up more opportunities for the PUD site to build out; b) The updating of Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD master plans addresses a current need to the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plans as requested by property owner and Applicant Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc.; c) The updating of Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD master plans will not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, but rather take a pro-active approach by facilitating further buildout on the eastern edge of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; d) The updating of Building Site E to reflect a potential car wash will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, nor be detrimental or pose any threat or danger to the public; and e) The updating of Building Site E to reflect a potential car wash will be cognizant of and provide adequate measures to maintain and provide suitable access and parking to the site. Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached Resolution No. 2020-02, which comprehends the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-02, requesting amendments to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development plans and documents (including all subsequent amendments), subject to the following conditions and allowances: 1) The Applicant is allowed to amend and update the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development plans and documents, including the associated Declarations, to reflect all approved amendments approved by City Council since 2011, as well as the following: a. Removal of the “eating establishments” requirement for the four Shingle Creek Crossing PUD lots, as noted under Section 4.A of the PUD Declarations; and b. Allowance of educational uses (Section 35-322.1.h), group day care and drop-in childcare centers (Section 35-322.1.k), and veterinarian’s offices (but not animal hospitals). c. Update Building Site E to reflect a 3,667-square foot building and 17-onsite parking spaces with two stacking lanes, as reflected in the exhibit provided by Kimley-Horn, and dated May 8, 2020 (Exhibit C). d. Relocation of the Shingle Creek Crossing monument sign on Building Site E to facilitate development. 2) No other allowances shall be permitted in the updating of the Shingle Creek Master Plan set, with the exception of any site-specific changes necessary for the site and building plan approval for Building Site E (e.g. landscaping, lighting). Any final changes to the building size and site configuration shall fall within the provisions addressed in Section 35-355, Subdivision 5.d (Planned Unit Development) or require further amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development plans and documents. a. Any development on Building Site E will be required to follow the signage and architectural guidelines for Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. b. Any items not covered by the aforementioned guidelines are subject to approval through City Code requirements. App. No. 2020-002 PC 05/14/2020 Page 10 3) A fully updated master plan set of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development is to be provided to the City as part of any subsequent application for site and building plan approval for Building Site E. 4) Unless amended otherwise or under separate agreement, all existing provisions, standards, and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and any subsequent amendments, shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. 5) Any future amendments to the Planned Unit Development or application requests will require the submittal or adoption (acceptance) of an updated master plan, which shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A— Public Hearing Notice, published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post, dated April 30, 2020. Exhibit B— Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002 Submittal Packet dated April 21, 2020. Exhibit C— Site Plan/PUD Overlay Exhibit for Building Site E, prepared by Kimley-Horn, and dated May 8, 2020. Exhibit A Applicant Information: Name: Address: Office Phone: Cell: Email: FAX: Property Owner Information* (if different from Applicant): Name: Property Owner Address: Office Phone: Cell: Email: FAX: 2020 Planning Commission Application Project Information: Provide a general description of your project and request(s): Address/Location of Property: Legal Description of Property: Application Type (Mark all that Apply) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,050 Appeal $200 Rezoning $1,050 Zoning Code Text Amendment $500 Special/Interim Use Permit $250 Special/Interim Use Permit Amendment $150 Site and Building Plan Review $750 Variance $200 Planned Unit Development $1,800 Planned Unit Development Amendment $700 Preliminary Plat $400 Final Plat $200 IMPORTANT: All applications may be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of costs incurred by the City for filing, reviewing, and processing applications in the form of an escrow to the City. Application Fee: $ Escrow Amount: $ Receipt No: For Office Use Only Date Received: Date Application Complete: Letter of Completeness: PC App No. For Office Use Only Matthew Wolf, Attorney for Applicant (Taft, Stettinius & Hollister LLP) 80 South 8th Street, Suite 2200, Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-977-8557 mwolf@briggs.com Shingle Creek LLC, c/o Gatlin Development Co. Inc. 1301 Riverplace Blvd #1900, Jacksonville, FL 32207 904.379.4774 frank@gatlindc.com Owner is requesting elimination of some use restrictions on the property that were imposed by the original PUD and declaration, and also requests adjustment of the site plan approved under the PUD to allow for a building size (approximately 3500 sqft) and site configuration compatible with a car wash use. 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing, Brooklyn Center, MN Lot 2, Block 1, SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 2ND ADDITION, Hennepin County, Minnesota 700 1000 4 2020-002 04/21/2020 Exhibit B Escrows: All Planning Commission Applications shall be subject to a $1,000 escrow deposit. Costs expended in reviewing and processing an application will be charged against the cash escrow and credited to the City. Charges to the escrow may include attorney and consulting fees and/or mailing and public notice costs. The escrow amount may be reduced or increased by the City Planner on a project by project basis. If at any time a required cash escrow is depleted the applicant shall deposit additional escrow funds as determined by the City. Unused portions of an escrow deposit shall be returned to the Applicant upon successful implementation of an approved application. Complete/Incomplete Applications: A preliminary meeting with City Staff is required prior to the submission of a Planning Commission Application. No application will be considered complete prior to such meeting. Once an application is submitted, City Staff shall have fifteen (15) business days to determine if the application is complete. An incomplete application will delay process of the request. If incomplete, City Staff will notify the Applicant in writing that the application is incomplete and what information is needed in order to make the application complete. Once an application has been deemed complete it will be placed on the next available Planning Commission agenda. Meeting Schedule: The deadline for submittal of Planning Commission Applications is outlined in the below schedule. Failure to submit all application materials, fees, and escrows by 4:30 p.m. on the application submittal deadline may delay the review process. Planning Commission meetings are held the second Thursday of each month at 7:00 p.m. If a recommendation is made by the Planning Commission regarding the application it will typically be placed on the agenda of the next available City Council meeting, which are held the fourth Monday of each month at 7:00 p.m. Meetings are held in the City Council Chambers at Brooklyn Center City Hall. Additional meetings and/or work sessions may be scheduled as necessary for the review of an application. 2020 Application Schedule (subject to change) Application Submittal Deadline (30-Days Prior to Meeting) Planning Commission Meeting Dates City Council Meeting Dates (for application review) December 10 (2019) January 9 January 27 January 14 February 13 February 25 February 11 March 12 April 13 March 10 April 9 April 27 April 14 May 14 June 8 May 12 June 11 July 13 June 9 July 9 July 27 July 14 August 13 September 14 August 11 September 10 September 28 September 8 October 8 October 26 October 13 November 12 December 14 November 10 December 10 January 11 (2021) Note: The above schedule is outlined for those submitting Planning Commission applications and does not outline all City Council meetings scheduled. Please access the City of Brooklyn Center’s website at www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org to receive up to date meeting dates and notices of any changes made to this schedule. Individuals may also review and download meeting agendas and packets from the city website. Meeting Attendance: In order for the Planning Commission and City Council to consider any application, the Applicant or a designated representative must be present at the scheduled meeting(s). If not, the matter may be tabled until the next available agenda. 11111111111111111111 Doc No T4868187 Certified, filed and/or recorded on 6/30/11 12:00 PM Office of the Registrar of Titles Hennepin County, Minnesota Michael H. Cunniff, Registrar of Titles Jill L. Alverson, County Auditor and Treasurer Deputy 45 Pkg 10720776 Doc Name: Declaration Document Recording Fee Attested Copy or Duplicate Original Multiple Certificates Affected Fee Document Total Existing Certs 1337298 1337299 This cover sheet is now a permanent part of the recorded document. New Certs $46.00 $2.00 $20.00 $68.00 Shingle Creek Crossing DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS / TillS DECLARATION made this ~ day of_-=j_l'\'_\,\_~=-) ___ ,2011, by Shingle Creek, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (hereinafter "SC LLC"), and the Economic Development Authority in and for the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, a body politic and corporate under the laws of the State of Minnesota ("EDA") (SC LLC and EDA are hereinafter collectively referred to as "Declarants"). Declarants are executing this Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions to subject their interests in the Subject Property, as defined below, to the terms ofthis Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions ("20 II Declaration"). WHEREAS, SC LLC is the owner of the real property described on Attachment One (hereinafter the "SC LLC Property"). The EDA is the owner of the real property described on Attachment Two (the "EDA Property"). The SC LLC Property and the EDA Property are referred to herein, collectively as the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is subject to certain zoning and land use restrictions imposed by the city of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota ("City") in connection with the rezoning of the Subject Property from the zoning classification C-2 (Commerce) to PUDIC-2 as provided in City Resolution No. 99-37 adopted on March 8, 1999, as amended by Resolution No. 2002-144 adopted on October 14, 2002 (the "Current Zoning"); and WHEREAS, in connection with such rezoning, a portion of the Subject Property was encumbered by an instrument entitled Declaration of Covenants and Restrictions, dated December 9, 1999 and filed in the office of the Hennepin County Registrar of Titles on January 8,2003 as document no. 3659543 (the "1999 Declaration"); and 387723 eLL BR29J-305 Return to: First American Title Insurance Company 1900 Midwest Plaza, 801 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55402 . ~ ~.\ NCS-'-i 3(l~ IcR -MPLS (P5) /roVI tV WHEREAS, SC LLC has applied to the City for an amendment to the planned unit development ("PUD") for the Subject Property; and WHEREAS, the City approved SC LLC's application subject to certain conditions by Resolution No. 2011-85 adopted on June 13,2011; and WHEREAS, the approval of such PUD was based on the determination by the City Council of the City that such amendment was acceptable only by reason of the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of the proposed use of the Subject Property; and that but for the details of the development proposed and the unique land use characteristics of such proposed use, the PUD amendment would not have been approved; and WHEREAS, as a condition of approval of the PUD amendment, the City has required the execution and filing of this Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (hereinafter the "Declaration"); and WHEREAS, to secure the benefits and advantages of the PUD amendment, Declarants desire to subject the Subject Property to the terms hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarants declare that the Subject Property is, and shall be, held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the covenants, conditions, and restrictions, hereinafter set forth. I. Except as otherwise provided herein, the use and development of the Subject Property shall conform to the development plans described in subsections A through N below (the "Development Plans"). The City has approved the Development Plans and full sized originals of the Development Plans are on file with the Business and Development Department of the City: 2 387723 eLL BR291-305 A. Shingle Creek Crossing Master Plan, prepared by Kimley-Horn Associates, Inc. dated May 2011, and attached as Attachment Three B. Development Plan/Site Plan Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. dated May 11,2011, and attached as Attachment Four C. Development Plan/Phasing Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated May 11,2011 and attached as Attachment Five D. Development Plan/Existing Grading Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated May 11, 2011and attached as Attachment Six E. Development Plan/Grading Exhibits prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated May 1 I, 2011 and attached as Attachment Seven F. Development Plan/Storm Sewer Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. dated May 1 I, 201 land attached as Attachment Eight G. Development Plan/Water Utility Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. dated May 11, 2011 and attached as Attachment Nine H. Development Plan/Sanitary Sewer Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated May 11, 2011and attached as Attachment Ten I. Development Plan/Lighting Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated May 11, 2011 and attached as Attachment Eleven 1. Development Plan/Landscaping Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. dated May 1 I, 2011 and attached as Attachment Twelve K. Development Plan/Circulation Exhibit prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. dated May 11, 2011 and attached as Attachment Thirteen 3 387723 CLl. BR291-305 L. Major Access Routes -PUD prepared by Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. dated June 1, 201 land attached as Attachment Fourteen M. Shingle Creek Crossing Sign Program prepared by Architectural Consortium, LLC dated November 4, 2010 and attached as Attachment Fifteen N. Typical building elevations prepared by Architectural Consortium, LLC, dated April 6, 2011 and attached as Attachment Sixteen, along with other typical building elevations prepared by Architectural Consortium, LLC, dated May 13,2011 and attached as Attachment Sixteen O. Architectural design guidelines attached as Attachment Seventeen. The attached Development Plans are expressly made a part hereof. Except as authorized by the City in accordance with this Declaration, no buildings or structures other than those shown on Attachment Four through Seventeen may be erected or maintained on the Subject Property. 2. The approval of the PUD amendment authorizes the following variations from the requirements of the City Code applicable to the zoning classiiication C-2 uses on the Subject Property: A. The setbacks from property lines to parking lot pavement (greenstrip) is reduced from 15 feet to 5 feet in certain locations along Xerxes Ave. and Bass Lake Road, as shown on Attachment Four. B. The setbacks from public right of ways to buildings are reduced from 35 feet to 20 feet for Lots 7,8,9, 12, & 13, Block 1 and 18 feet for Lot 11, Block 1 to offset the dedication of additional right of way for the Twin Lake Regional Trail. 4 387723 eLL BR29 1-305 C. The setbacks from property lines for a side and rear yard setback are reduced from 10 feet to 6 feet for the east and south lot line of Lot 16, Block 1 and from 10 feet to 0 feet for the south lot line of Lot 3, Block 1. D. Required parking for a retail use is reduced from 5.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross floor area to 4.5 spaces per 1000 square feet of gross leasable area. E. Required parking for a restaurant use is reduced from one space per two seats and one space for each employee on a major shift to 10 parking stalls per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross leasable area of the restaurant use. Up to 20% of the gross leasable area in a multi-tenant retail building may be a restaurant use without such additional parking. F. The space between rows of 90 degree parking stalls is reduced from 63 feet to 60 feet and the space between rows of 60 degree parking is reduced from 57 feet to 52.5 feet. G. Two freestanding signs, each up to 350 sq.ft. in area, are allowed along Highway 100, two freestanding signs are allowed along Bass Lake Road up to 140 sq.ft. and two freestanding sign along Xerxes Ave. up to 140 sq.ft. is allowed as development identification signs as illustrated on Attachment Four and Fifteen. Four monument signs up to 140 sq.ft. are allowed along Bass Lake Road, and one monument sign up to 140 sq.ft. is allowed along Xerxes Ave. 3. Site plan details of the Development Plan on a lot may be amended by site plan approval by the City Council without a PUD amendment subject to the following limitations: 5 387723 eLL BR291-305 A. There is no change in the dimensions of the lot, as platted. B. Building square footage on the lot may decrease from the area listed on Attachment Four, but may not increase. C. Development meets the C-2 Commerce District setback standards or as allowed within this Declaration. D. Parking available on each lot for the use and structure on that lot meets the standard specified in paragraph 2. D & E. of this Declaration. E. Parking and traffic circulation on the lot is compatible with parking and circulation plans for adjacent lots within the Subject Property and there is no change to the Major Access Routes shown on Attachment Fourteen. F. The plan does not reduce the landscape points, determined in accordance with City policy, for that lot shown on Attachment Twelve. G. No other development that is inconsistent with the Development Plans is allowed without first securing approval of a PUD amendment or approval of a rezoning, that allows such development. 4. Land uses on the Subject Property shall be as regulated in the C-2 Commerce District, Central Commerce Overlay District and subject to the following additional limitations: A. A minimum of three Lots shall be developed for eating establishments. 387723 eLL BR291-305 Lots 6, 13, and 15, Block 1 may only be developed and used for eating establishments, without an amendment to this Declaration designating a different lot for development and use only as an eating establishment, which amendment may be approved by the City Council upon a 6 determination by the City Council that the alternative lot is an acceptable substitute and is consistent with the spirit and intent of the PUD. B. The following uses are not allowed either as permitted uses or special uses on the Subject Property: 387723 eLL BR291-305 1) Hospitals, medical and dental laboratories, and nursing care homes listed in Brooklyn Center City Code, Section 35-322.1.f. 2) Contractor/construction uses listed in Brooklyn Center City Code, Section 35-322.1.g. 3) Educational uses listed in Brooklyn Center City Code, Section 35- 322.1.h. 4) Places for religious assemblies such as chapels, churches, temples, mosques, and synagogues. 5) Funeral and crematory services. 6) Drop-in child care centers listed in Brooklyn Center City Code, Section 35-322.I.k. 7) Gasoline service stations. 8) The sale of motor vehicles. 9) The out-of-door display or sale of marine craft. 10) Transient lodging. 11) Animal hospitals. 12) Clubrooms and lodges. 13) School bus garage facilities. 14) Automobile and truck rental and leasing. 7 15) Group day care facilities. 16) Normal retail customer parking may occur during night time hours. However, transient overnight parking and/or overnight RV parking is not allowed. C. No uses inconsistent with this section may be established on the Subject Property without first securing approval of a PUD amendment or change in zoning allowing such use. 5. Lot 16, Block I on the Subject Property lies within the 100 year flood plain of the City and accordingly may not be filled or developed without providing approved compensating floodwater storage. 6. The Subject Property may only be developed and used in accordance with Paragraphs I through 5 of these Declarations unless the owner first secures approval by the City Council of an amendment to the planned unit development plan or a rezoning to a zonmg classification that permits such other development and use. 7. Except as provided herein, use of the Subject Property shall conform to the regulations of the City of Brooklyn Center applicable to C-2 (Commerce) District, the CC (Central Commerce Overlay District, and City Council Resolution No. 2011-85 adopted on June 13,2011. 8. The City of Brooklyn Center and SC LLC have agreed in connection with the amendment of the PUD that the entrance to Lot 2, Block 2 of the Subject Property from County Road 10/Bass Lake Road will be closed as soon as it may be done without violating lease rights of the tenant on Lot 2, Block 2, which SC LLC represents will occur no later than the end of the year 2024. Accordingly, at any time after 2024, or at such earlier date that SC LLC notifies the 8 387723 ell BR29J-305 City that such entrance may be closed, the City may close such entrance without violating the rights of, or creating any entitlement to compensation to, the owners of, or any other party with an interest in, the Subject Property. Thereafter, the owners of Lot 2, Block 2 will apply for site plan approval for any change to parking or traffic circulation required because of the closure of such entrance. 9. The obligations and restrictions of this Declaration run with the land of the Subject Property and shall be enforceable against the Declarants, their successors and assigns, by the City acting through its City Council and by no other person or entity. This Declaration may be amended from time to time by a written amendment executed by the City and the owner or owners of the lot or lots within the Subject Property that is or are affected by said amendment. The City, acting through its City Council may release all or any portion of the Subject Property from any or all of the terms of this Declaration at any time. No persons or entities other than the City are intended beneficiaries of this Declaration and no such persons or entities shall have any rights to enforce this Declaration. 10. The City, by signature of its Mayor and City Manager on this Declaration, hereby releases the Subject Property from each of the terms of the 1999 Declaration and acknowledges and agrees that the 1999 Declaration is of no further force or effect with respect to all or any part of the Subject Property. SC LLC and the EDA, by their signatures below, hereby release any and all rights or interests they may have pursuant to the 1999 Declaration with respect to 'the Subject Property. 9 387723 eLL BR29J-305 IN WIlNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned as duly authorized agents, officers or representatives of Dec1arants have hereunto set their hands and seals as of the day and year first above written. STATE OF TENNESSEE ) ) ss. COUNTY OF DICKSON ) SHINGLE CREEK, LLC By: Shingle Creek MM, Inc., a Delaware corporation. Its Managing Member Sole Regular Director The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on June 23, 2011, by Franklin C. Gatlin III, the Sole Regular Director of Shingle Creek ,nc., a Delaware corporation, the Managing Member of SHINGLE CREEK, LLC, a Delaw re Ii ited liability an , on behalf of said limited liability company. We My commission expires: September 24, 2013 387723v4 eLL BR29J-305 10 (SEAL) STATE OF MINNESOTA) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY IN AND FOR THE CITY OF BROOKL YN CENTER :: .. By: cy:;~ U~£V~ Its President The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me ~is aDt~ay of Ju nt , 2011, by -riM V~; \\SD(\ , the \"'res~den·-t-and C lim (\ i IA $" L. B b~4.ne~ , the E )£e(.l)tj\,Je Di (t'l:-\w-for and on behalf of the Economic Development Aut ority m and for the CIty of Brooklyn Center. SHARON L. KNUTSON Notary Public-Minnesota Commission Expires Jan 31,2015 387723 eLL BR291-305 NotaryP~ II APPROVED: CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER ., ~_ )$7 By: d /4fl {~~J::~A.../ Tim Willson, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF HENNEPIN ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 6l0~ay of .::r tA. nP 2011, by Tim Willson and Cornelius L. Boganey, the Mayor and City Manager for the City of Brooklyn Center, a municipal corporation, on behalf of the corporation. SHARON L. KNUTSON) Notary Public-Minnesota My Commission Expires Jan 31, 2016 387723 eLL BR291-305 Notary Public 12 ATTACHMENT ONE SC LLC PROPERTY Lots 1 through 17, Block 1, Lot 2, Block 2 and Outlot A, Shingle Creek Crossing, Hennepin County, Minnesota 387723v4 eLL BR29J-305 ATTACHMENT TWO EDA PROPERTY Lot 1, Block 2, Smngle Creek Crossing, Hennepin County, Minnesota 3S7723v4 eLL BR291-305 i' ~. I"'PRovr~STOSu.MP"'Acnl'l"OTPARTOFnn5PIiONlO SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN MASTER PLAN MAY2011 GfD :J=~ GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. In] !li>ulh~t.;ftS"<'r1 Oi<l ... .,.,T.nM ..... l1b5S TeI;MS.j.I(,.TIII.I F .... GIJ-I~6-1IaJ ATTACHMENT THREE e' H ~l "I Ij :1 ~ r i!" ::1 •• ~ I ;;1 ~ I ~!. § I .. if ,;, i! ~ I )I., ~ i § I ~ ; ~: ~ . ~ , ~ i ~ ~ "",-- ,,,-,,.- -' • Ito ow ; ! "111[ uNOIiu'O u.eh 'IUJL~MI'IIIIO UI[ .... "U"" . .,.. ...... 'OOULN. •• QlCI~lo:n~.'.u.OI .. UUtll.<:.1..S. SYMBOL LEGEND: ;:: -.:--: ..... = c=::::J IL~')':~~;h~l "lICIP[lIrrl~ '1ICPil!nI1,DIT PU.£ (~11 LQIn~(; Pl.AII roll nllVllt Llctt4:1) I'Im~O nu~IlbAH-Ll.vtI. ~""'1IHI;i 1:Kl: LOtmc PI..lH fOil 'OXUT'll[ "'WoOl CARlt;OIt.llJ.l. ''''''.j ~[[. 5I-«TIIQU. "ATtIIHAl\I'lI[/SIOIIII""I't'.11 'lRtATWtw,AIIII:" PIIoPOS(Oc:oNC1I[lt I!llallhHffii!1 ~05aI"'1U"~1R"\. SIGN LEGEND: M IICfNIoIDlT:ilCJI P I'1\ON$ICH FP iii il~ i: ~' j ~ ~E ~l L /' il .. ~~ ". .l1 ~ it;h ~j !!'A h!~~1 ~Im II!!' ~n IS i ~ § ~ ci ~ J. ; ! en Zt-- .....:)0;0 ~o..I"'" ~I-Xu. ~~~~ U::<<(t-- ZQ....JUJ O°"-W U-JW:Z: wt--en >-w'" o (!) ZZ Vi:;'!; Cf)- On: n:W (.)1-~z LULU LU(.) n:Z (.)~ LU~ -'0 ~~ ~ :c CO i? Cf) ';! ~ 05/11/20\1 ~ l~~JJ~~~ 01 ATTACHMENT FOUR Walmart~::: STDREIfl.SS25.00 C·1BOoSGL.NO 181,943 B.P.(APPRQX.) r~~t~~sIIS~E~~= :R~~:;~;E~~ "EOl.IIIED,OMO[ srT 10ElASl ElLVJl.l'ONj ~~~T~~~l~N BE OISTURBE"O OUl~ING 02 ATTACHMENT FIVE NhN(SOTA i 1 ; iI I ~ ~ 8 = CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLANS EXISTING GRADING EXHIBIT SHEET 30F 10 .,~<:' , -L .. " u.,) ACREAGE SUMMAR'!' -PHASE II (rol<t~r~II.l.t:tt.rpw..I:DV"'(IIUI" lQT...,.'IIG./tCI.t.II(A ~'~I1' 1)~I\Ift[()JI['" O'f'-S'ItDCSI\.RB'tIIAIIEA TOTl.I.OCSlUlliltOM[.l{\IUClIoII.It>INCII) IILII(AI'lllU5 U[ .... , UIW'\.(lIt1'1 --------P(II'(QI5,SUtJ[O.lJl(''''C01C'1.t_ SITE FEA ruRES ~ cmtth~rTOYDIU.l/Ono. -+-UIoIl5crcur .... U~,~_'''s~ ~R~05(D UII'ISOI OLSlVAI'lUItt ~ .---- !::: III ~lu:colO'lt.(pM;nNO.l'O"'O"~(' WI ZX ...J:'SUJ o ~ 1\0:0 rOllf At (rUIn NO, 2101~'m'lUI c:(a..(!)"<"" =>I-Zu.. (DS'lUrOSIOltIl~-vr. lOKi(1oIO'ttD f-ZOO [IbSlUIGStollllstll1l1,IOIltIl-'<llo D.W<C"\f [:(;;;:;;::::1 UJ~O:f-~o..C,!)W P.tol>CRD'~St'/lOl oOa W EROSION DETAILS ()U:~t5 c;;::::E::::) § swrv. _111'lI0II SICH'~ DC' .... 5I<{" 60n~ Gj~ Cl O 8.UlUllltL'I'IIOn:C'TItINItO:lltll'ctlNTIIIO\. 0: (stCOtT~SM:II~)gJ fJ 8 OJUDo\Jr~!(ellCH$tOOI.I£JIrCCIIIIICII. a. (5((WI .... ~~T6Ol1) @ IItUOIlWloIIllllolZlf'IIOTlChCl"'SCOI>/tNTQlOITIlo.. <!l ~ I$[(OlIlLSI'tU«I2t) 0 @ nrf("'Dn:ClDolrDrQ!:IS[(oct.lol~SI<I:(I'D19) zz ~ ® ='m~:J.t~::~!f~PlW (j):2 f en -~ _@Ca.5nrvcDO>ltlll'I'trOETu..~'I!~ro) otr trW .,.-. ~ .. -@ g=ts°:Jt'!t~~U .. ~t\Cb~~k~ACJQ ul- IOAJt'r sur 1I'OIIiC. O!VtR"I)'IIOat ;,,::Z n=~i,&c~5=,Wc~O .. ~=,[t<Cm WW e ~at".'Slg;1lD<,"",pI:ucou .. 't'H(cr.o. lJ.Ju tr Z e u~ _ '''-8 PAOPQW II'[JIo::"CI'It.m SI~' me[ W;,,:: -'0 ~9 "HoCOI!:J"vc:to<l~&JflC""\J\I <!lo ~ --o-@ ~tr :cal ~ ~~ 9 f\.O.'DoC SI~' I;UIIrMi en bftlliil I'[IIIIA~[lI' S[tD~CfI,:CO'.llC "" ~9[11~c.ollll"-k"""K[t 05/11/2011 P~o..tC:T 110. @ rtll:>QIIUY VD~p<r .'SlN 1606J3OO1 A @ e SI0~WWlltlllU.ll·COI(1I1 rAcurr 04 ATTACHMENT SEVEN i ! STORL!CE<PTDR -~- ATTACH MENTEIGHT X" ~FI-: :=H EklSToNG W"TEA PIPE PACl"OSED POTABlE WATER PIPE CAI[ YALVE 1111 VAl¥[ BOX {I.IU5T DE I<lO TRm/CiI..tTEOINP/IYEI.I£NTAJiEAS) FIRE I-IYDR.vITllIlH DOL.LARtl PROTECTlON ElUSnHG II_INCH WATER I..tIf. PROPOUU lC_~CH WATER WlE DISTlKOFIlt!HVOI'IANT PROPOSEOFIRI!If'I'DRAHT PUO BOtlNDAR'i' ATTACHMENT NINE 06 [KISTING SANITARY S(W[R PIP( ---.r------PRO",OSED SANITARY S[II'CR PIPE --j .;~-" --PROPOSEO SANITARY SE\~R FORCE MAIN £XISTI.'.!C )(-'t.K:H SMllTAAY SEI'/f.R lll,l( __ .:.~ ___ :::P::::~::':CII SAI,IITARY S£I'~R L~ 'ALL SANITARY SE:\VER AND STRUCTURES loRE PRIVATE UNLESS NOlEO OTHER'h1SE ATT ACHMENT TEN 07 ~ I :"'3 ~ i q 8 I , q H ~ i ~ . ~ f ~ , ~ i ~l ~ I P ~ : ~ i n ii Ii . : a: ~: ~ 1 H 5 I a i ~ i ~ : ~i III olL. __ _ --- os- ,i ---~-~,,~~==~~~~-~~~~--~~~~~;'COUNTY ~;;~~~~~;~~:i~-~~~-=~~~~~~~~~~~~) _______ 0;;;;;.:;;.,: 'co CI ~ '" '" pot •• UII;J'u [,r1l·"KI?CI-pS'Iv·r ,/. 1-r'¥' ·······-T'"~ 1"-r·· .. I:::· Iltr ... ,-,~, .". ,~ .... --.-., """'" ",,." q. ~:'V!;JiijKi I<R pot •• ~/ ~:~~~:E~LE. .-................ ~/ .... _.::--5 FC (FOOT CANDLES) ~LI~::E& .... '/" ,'" ' '\ ....,......-JFC ......... ;' \-1~1FC 10FC(FOOTCANDlEI ,.../ l r ; r 6FC ".",.... \ . .' r a . Fe • / \~// ~1FC /'./ ,,~ ,/'." PARKING LOT LIGHTING PEDESTRIAN TRAIL LlGHITNG PHOTOMETRIC NOTES: .... c,o,sT IIlPV.CECClI.'CAIOI'E OA'5ES \\Iu.. O£ US~D~C1" UOHTPOl!;l\A.$ErOUt.'t1Anot.'S PCl.EIIA~EDE!lGto!I~LBEPAOVIDEDA' EJ::IIUf'fRItIlPI!IUllnr';OSIIoOE. H AeFER10AACH.PI..AII'llFOR:tItElrG.nh.G HKTR.CIU.Pl.oI.IL c. l"Hlfll\'UAESSW.o.:.L~;:"·8,1.lW;lr.J=- ATTACHMENT ELEVEN III .!! ~ t-~i' t · .; ". hi! ~"§ e~!i i:Jlm II!i! ~l ----r.r- ~ W ::;; 0.. f-o COO -' -~ g!(I,)~LL WZ wO CiS(!)co ~Q.~tii ::> f-W f-::C::C 0.. (!)({) ~ :J z o u (9 ~ zz ~ us:a: ~ C/) -• 00:: o::LlJ ()I- :><:Z ttl~ o::Z ()r -' w:><: -'0 (90 i Zo:: :em C/) Ii! ~ 05/11/2011 raOJtcr NO. 160633001 ~ 08 ; I • PRELIMINARY PLANT SCHEDULE SYMBOL -~ ( . ) '---' OVERSTORY DECIOUOUS o ORIIAMEIlTAL DeCIDUOUS EVfRGRfEN ~ ~ OTY I SHRUBI PERErlNIAL <:: C COMMON NAME SWAMP WHITEOAK COMMON HACKBERRY ACCOLADE ELM AU ruMN BlAZE IMPlE QUAJ(INGASPEtI BIRCH (SrNGLESTEM&CLUIllp) IVOR-V5ILKUlAC CRAB,a,PPLE BLACK HILLS SPRUCE REO PINE AUSTRIAN pme vraURNUM DWARF BUSH HOUEVSUCKLE OOGWOOO LIlAC SPIR£..\ DAYLILY KARL FOERSTER BlACK-EYED SUSAN EXIST,"a TREES (TO REMAINI SIZE 2" CAL. 2.~·CAl. 2.5" CAL. '" '" '" '" S'HT S'HT ROOT B&. B.B CONT. CONT. CONT. CONT. .&. B&. CONT. COIIT. CONT. ATTACHMENT TWELVE !z w :;;; t:: "-lila o :C,-~ Xu. >(I)WO WZWm °5"->-..Ja.(3w ~ ~~ h: zen l':j 5 z o (J (!) ZZ iii:;; (/). or<:: r<::W Uf-~Z WW W U r<::Z u~ W~ -'0 ~~ ~ :c CO ~ (/) !I! ~ O~/I\/2011 ~ 160S33OO1 ~ 09 HATCH LEGEND: c::=::J c:=:J l·h;"·:·""~;'1 c::=::J CAA9AC£ TRUI::~ ROUTE (I.IAt;[HU INDICATES TRUCK Boovl wa-~o TRuex ROUTe .... Il-Ill TRUCK ROUn: PAVEMENT HATCH LEGEND: ~ PRW'OSCO IICAY"I' OUrvA!>PIiALT ~ PROI'os(O~"'VYDUTYCONCRCT( ATTACHMENT THIRTEEN ,;f{---YS ~:. SYMBOL LEGEND :.--: :~:::.:.~ "''''JOR VEHICULAR 1-' . .p-...... I REGIONAL TRAIL ACCESS ROUTES . • PEOESTRIAN CONNECTIONS '.\ '. ATTACHMENT FOURTEEN .) SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN PROGRAM A. INTRODUCTION The intent of this sign criteria is to provide the guidelines necessary to achieve a visually coordinated. balanced and appealing sign environment, harmonious with the architecture of the project, while maintaining provisions for individual graphic expression. Submittal drawlng(s) to indicate accurately scaled signage on the elevation shall be required. Performance of this sign criteria shall be rigorously enforced and any nonconforming sign shall be removed by the tenant or his sign contractor at their expense. upon demand by the landlord. Exceptions to these standards shall not be permitted without approval from the landlord and will require approval of a modification to the sign program application by the City. Accordingly, the landlord will retain full rights of approval for any sign used in the center. No sign shall be installed without the written landlord approval and the required City permits. B. GENERAL LANDLORD/TENANT REQUIREMENTS: 1. Each Tenant shall submit to tandtord lor written approval. three (3) copies of the detailed shop drawings of the proposed sign. indicating conformance with the sign criteria herein outlined. 2. The landlord shall delermlne and approve Ihe availability and position of a Tenant name on any ground sign(s). 3. The Tenant shall pay for all signs, related materials and Installation fees including nnallnspectlon costs. 4. The Tenant shatl obtain all necessary permits. 5. The Tenant shall be responsible for fulfillment of atl requirements of this sign criteria. 6. It is the responsibility of the Tenant's sign company to verily all conduit and transformer locations and service access prior to fabrication. 7. Should a sign be removed. it is the Tenant's responsibility to patch all holes, paint surface to match the existing color, and restore sulface to original condition. ARCHITECTURAL GfD CONSORTIUM L.L.C. SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN CRITERIA .. b 90\ Norlh 3rd Slt~~l v.....-.ea:>oIls. WJ>l 55401 612-43G-'103D FIIJI612-692·9960 GAnIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN - SCALE: N.T.S. SC-1.1 ArchltOCIUfliIConsotllum,L.l.C.2Q10 ATTACHMENT FIFTEEN SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN PROGRAM C. GENERAL SIGN CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENT: 1. All signs and their installation shall comply with all tocal building and electrical codes. 2. All electrical signs will be fabricated by a U.L. approved sign company. according to U.L. specifications and bear U.L. Label. 3. Sign company to be fully licensed with the City and State and shall provide proof of full Workman's Compensation and ganaralliability Insurance. 4. All penetrations of building exterior surfaces are to be sealed, waterproof, and In color & finish to match existing exterior. 5. Internal illumination to be 30 milliamp neon, fluorescent tube or LED for storefront elevations and #3500 while neon or LED halo for freeway elevations. Installed and labeled in accordance with the "Nalional Board of Fire Underwriters Specifications". 6. Painted surfaces must have an acrylic polyurethane finish or baked-on finish. 7. Logo and letter heights shall be as specified and shall be determined by measuring the normal capital letter of a type font exclusive of swashes,8scenders and descenders. See diagram on following page. 8. All sign fabrication work shall be of excellent quality. All logo images and Iype-styles shall be accurately reproduced. 9. All lighting must match the exact specification of the approved working drawings. NO EXPOSED CONDUITS OR RACE WAYS WILL BE ALLOWED. 10. Signs must be made of durable rust -Inhibited materials that are appropriate and complimentary to the building. 11. Color coatings shall exactly match the colors specified on the approved plans. 12. Joining of materials le.g .. seamsj shall be finished in such a way as to be unnoticeable. Visible welds shall be continuous and ground smooth. Rlvets,screws, and olher fasteners that extend to visible surfaces shall be nush, filled. and finished so as to be unnoticeable. 13. Finished surfaces of metal sholl be free from canning and warping. All sign finishes shall be free from dust, orange peel, drips, and runs and shall have aunlform surface conforming to the highest slandards of the industry. 14. In no case shall any manufaclurer's label be visible from the street from normal viewing angles. 15. Exposed raceways and conduit are not permitted unless they are Incorporated into the overall sign design. 16. Exposed junction boxes, lamps. tubing or neon crossovers of any type are not permilled. ARCHITECTURAL GfD SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN CRITERIA oStutDO"'· I~'O''''_' CONSORTIUM L.L.C. OOlNOIll'l3rdSlrUI MiM~apDIIs. M~ 55401 61204JQ...o:OJO FilIl612-1192·;goo GATliN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SCALE: N.T.S. SC-1.2 Archl1cclural Cortsonlum, L.L.C. 2010 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN PROGRAM D. SHOP TENANTS SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONS: The intent of this criteria is 10 encourage creativity to ensure the individuality of each tenant sign as opposed to similar sign design. construction, and colors repeated throughout the project. Signs must be architecturally compatible with the en1ire center. The following types of construction will be allowed: Acrylic face channel leUers Through face and halo channel letters Reverse pan channel leUers Skeleton neon behind flat cut out shapes and letters. Open pan channelleUers (Only In an artistic letter style I font) Push Ihru letters and log05 in aluminum cabinets Flat cut out dimensional shapes and accents Metal screen mesh accents Exposed skeleton neon accents The idea of using dissimilar materials and creaUng signs with varying colors, layers and textures will creale an exciUng and appealing relall environment. In order to allow creativity and artistic designs, ascending and descending shapes will be allowed to extend up to 25% beyond the envelope limits provided that the overall allocated square footage Is not exceeded. In other words, these areas have to be calculated individually. Ascender. (The part of the lowercase letters, such as b, d, and h. Ihat extends above Lhe other lowercase letters). Descender: (The part of the lowercase letters, such as g, p, and q, that extends below the other lowercase letters). ARCHITECTURAL CfD CONSORTIUM L.L.C. SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN CRITERIA GAnIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SCALE: N.T.S. SC-1,3 I . L.L.C. 2010 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN PROGRAM E. PROHIBITED SIGNS: 1. Signs constituting a Traffic Hazard No person shall Install or maintain. or cause to be Installed or maintained. any sign which simulates or imitates in size, color, lettering or design any traffic sign or signal, or which makes use of the words "STOP". "LOOK". "DANGER" or any words. phrases, symbols, or characters In such a manner as to interfere with, mislead or confuse traffic. 2. Signs In Proximity to Utility lines: Signs which have less horizontal or vertical clearance from authorized communication or energized electrical power lines that are prescribed by the applclable laws and or code are prohibited. 3. Painted letters will not be permitted. 4. Wall signs may not proiect above the top of a parapet. the roof line at the wall. or roof line. 5. There shall be no signs that are flashing. moving or audible. 6. No sign shall project above or below the sign'able area. The sign-able area is dell ned in the altached Exhibit for major and shop tenants. 7. Vehicle Signs: Signs on or affixed to trucks. automobiles, trailers, or other vehicles which are used to advertise, identify. or provide direction to a use or activity not related to its lawful activity are prohibited. B. Light Bulb Strings: External displays. other than temporary decorative holiday lighting which consists of unshielded light bulbs are prohibited. An exception hereto may be granted upon review and at the sale discretion of the Landlord. 9. Banners. Pennants & Balloons Used for Advertising Purposes: Temporary flags, banners, or pennants, or a combination of same constituting an architectural feature which is an integra! part of the design character of a praieet may be permitled subject to Municipal Code requirements. landlord's. and City approval. IO.Blliboard Signs are not permitted. 11. The use of permanent "sale" sign Is prohibited. The temporary use of these signs are limited to a thirty-day period and is restricted to signs affixed to the Interior 01 windows which do not occupy more that 20% of the window area. Each business is permitted a total of not more than ninety (90) days of temporary window sale signs per calendar year. 12. No cabinet construction only allowed. F. ABANDONMENT OF SIGNS: Any tenant Sign left after thirty (30) days fram vacating premises shall become the property of Landlord. G. INSPECTION: Landlord reserves the right to hire an Independenl electrical engineer at the Tenant's sale expense to inspect the Installation of all Tenant's signs. ARCHITECTURAL GfD SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN CRITERIA CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 Ngrlh3rdS!fll8l GATIIN DEVELOIMOO COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER. MN SCALE: N.T.S. SC-1.4 ArchitoclUral Consonlum, L.L.C. 2010 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN PROGRAM SECTION A NEW SINGLE FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINA.TED LEXAN FACED CHANNEL LETTER DISPLAY USE STANDARD ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION WITH MATHEWS (OR EQUIVALENn SEMI GLOSS ACRYLIC POL VURETHANE fiNISH, FACES USE TRANSLUCENT LEXAN WITH 314" TRIM CAP. IllUMINATE WITH 30 rna NEON OR LED LAMPING WHERE APPROPRIATE. PAINT RETURNS SECTIONS NEW SINGLE FACED ILLUMINATED WALL DISPLAY USE FLAT CUT QUT 0.090 ALUMINUM GRAPHICS WITH NEON OR LED AS APPROPRIATE BEHIND. PAINT ALUMINUM MATIHEWS (OR eQUIVALENT) SEMI GLOSS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE,USE NEON WITH PK TYPE HOUSINGS. SECTIONC NEW SINGLE FACED INTERNALLY IllUMINATED LEXAN FACED CHANNEL LETTER DISPLAY WITH THROUGH FACE AND HALO ILLUMINATION. USE STANDARD ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION WITH MATTHEWS (OR EQUIVALENT) SEMI GLOSS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE FINISH, FACES USE LEXAN WITH 3/4" TRIM CAP, ILLUMINATE WITH 30 rna NEON OR LED WHERE APPROPRIATE THROUGH FACE AND HALO, PAINT RETURNS SECTIOND NEW SINGLE FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINAUD ALUMINUM FACED CHANNEL LETTER DISPLAY WITH THROUGH FACE AND HALO ILLUMINATION. USE STANDARD ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION WITH MATTHEWS (OR EaUIVALENT) SEMi GLOSS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE FINISH. ROUTE OUT WHERE GRAPHICS OCCUR AND BACK UP WITH LEXAN, IL.LUMINATE WITH 30 ma NEON OR LED WHERE APPROPRIATE THROUGH FACE AND HALO. PAINT ALUMINUM FACE AND RETURNS. SECTION E SAME AS "D" EXCEPT ROUTE OUT WHERE GRAPHICS OCCUR AND PUSH THROUGH 1/2~ CLEAR PLEX Willi APPLIED VINYL OVERLAYS. SECTION F NEW SINGLE FACED INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED ACRYLIC FACED CHANNEL LInER DISPLAY USE STANDARD ALUMINUM CONSTRUCTION WITH MATTHEWS (OR EQUIVALENT) SEMI GLOSS ACRYLIC POL. YURETHANE FINISH OR BAKED'ON RNISH, FACES USE TRANSLUCENT ACRYLIC WITH 3/4" TRIM CAP,ILLUMINATEWITH CWHO FLUORESCENT TUBES OR LED, PAINT RETURNS SECTION G NEW SINGLE FACED NON-ILLUMINATED WAL.L DISPLAY USE PLASTIC FORMED GRAPHICS, FLUSH MOUNTED --WI To.r U "",.rwrD 11.'11) Ir'~ UI lun ttJV.N FA~J~~mt~t LETf(1U n·uouOQI .. surAUD ''''1(UIOU1 .. 1I"" .... II~i,~:,:I\~:~ .... C.SIIflOI.,.'HION51I1itD5 ~\fo~~J~~:rflY TUNS'O.MfR DISCOHN[C15wnC'1 (OIlDUIl'WIGTOIlI~ID( SIGItTU II UI U'PROVIO "'O.IUIA I"n (XPOSfDmot'(I..mI AUMNU\\'ACI <MRl/ITS 5"HIOII[~"JI'I'I:(lYIOAllf)tf'~UIIA!1I 8EVIRS( PAN CHMlH[lS THI10UGH FA.CE AND HAlO IUUr.uN&lIOH PUSH THItOUGH GllAI'rilCS .HCHO' aI)UI.uc~fT·~I~1 m l5sv.~\1tI10tOIUllsnIUIOH P""jtli'iG6J:~I~'~ IOt .. 'roeO ...... \ IU10USCllitluDIIIC."..oU>III0 'CII\ItSIClNr.tt-f~~~s'to~~~,'A~:'&.C~I~\1 IlUO~I~(!II'IIGIII"""Sl hUCOIIOUIISM"IfO 'V"hSlflOUSIOIIS,.,O'. IHlnUA.S1UUIOIHIOUOH .. HOC"'UIItIDln~IIUISl"'IL1I '.'WIO'IUM "(I. IS~':I~~~:I~~~~: ,., l;ro~;,Wt',~l~~~·g~.~~~m"~KWI. !IGUTOA:I/I.UI9OY[O&nOI'.~\lI""!1L "(TI2N' w.:mr,e.c:mowlHrLU"TlEJ1:5 ®",SC... 5IGh"0111Jl"""O'Jto .... OIlIlJ:UI!.l~n 1I~'" 'ACE ,6. ... 01110.1.0 llUIMI.':'.llllcrO ... .ul) OI'IIUllD>lOU 1111(0 A~J:~I~~RJf~~~ur£:~ Oh.~HIC5 wr"tlCOII,aDHI5r,'r rr'.3/U·I"',.D[OSIUQ S,.H 10 II U~ &P/'I:O'{lo .l,1f) tl •• 1.1'. IA~II PLAS'l~~ci~rol1'h\~HIa; ARCHITECTURAL CfD SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SIGN CRITERIA I'-""~'" CONSORTIUM L,L,C, 901 Nor1h3rdSlreel M!~ne;lpDiJ.MN55401 612-436-4030 Fa>t612-G92·99S0 GATlIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN CI.C<lI,,-", SCALE: N.T.S. SC-1,5 Arr:hi"'tlural ConsoI11L!m.1...1..,C. 2010 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 NorLh3rdSLreel lIiMeBPOUI.Mi>lSSoIDI 612",,3&040JO fa. 612·692-9950 ~ SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING GAnIN DEVElOPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER. MN o NORTH SCALE: N.T.S. SITE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT I"~""~'" CtlEat ... " SE1.1 ArchiloClUIIIIConllor1ium.L.l.C.2nlO ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM LLC. 001~ctlh3rdSlloel • tAN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692·9QOO b -' ;; 19'-0" TENANT TENANT TENANT BLUE PREFIN. METAL FIN 15'-0· PAD MONUMENT 516N IWTERIClR ILLlIMINA TED 516N PANEl.- TWo-SIDED - IE) SF Sl6N AREA 5- " ""'~=~~~"'!I-~-INTERIOR ILLIMINATED NOTE: CORPORA 1E LOGO /GRAPHIC.S AlLOJo'oED UPON REVIElI'l AND APPROVAL FROM lANDLORD N TENANT' TENANT TENANT MAJOR fREE~AY PYLON 516N CfD GATIlN DEVElOPMENT COMPANY 51&N PANELS - 'MO-SIDED - 912 SF 51GoN AREA ~--1~ ~::~~;:~:~ INTERIOR ILl.1JH1NATED SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN MAJOR PYLON 516N SIGN PANELS - mD-SIDED - 140 SF SI6N AREA SITE SIGNAGE EXHIBIT SCALE: 1/8" ~ 1'-0" SE1,2 ArchUoclurai ConsDnlum, LLC. 2010 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 612-436-4030 F81l!312-692·9900 MAJOR FREE~AY PYLON SIGN rfD GATIIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PAD MONUMENT SIGN = ~ ..... 1],,.,.. t_·1 ~ TENANT ~ TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT TENANT - MAJOR PYLON SIGN -. ~ SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING SITE SIGNAGE RENDERING SCALE: N.T.S. BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SE1.3 Arch1!eclufO)l Consortium. L..t.C. MAXIMUM 90% Ul 1 OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH 1 1-1-00 I ZI W ~~~~r' r------------------------------------, ~~;~ i ANCHOR TENANT i ,,-«cow I I ~~~~L------------------------------------J ;;:;:::~ ~ [2 00 t ANCHOR TENANTS (OVER 90,000 SQUARE FEET) ~ MAXIMIUM 90% I-I-~ r OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH---t ill i3 . ~ I nUl [~~~~~~~~~~~~~J ~g;o~ 0 00 I r--~ ANCHOR TENANT SIGN EXAMPLE ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. GfD SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING 901 NortnlldSIr~cl MlMeaPOlI5.MN5S401 612-436-4030 FuS1Z-692·9960 GATIIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER. MN SIZE: 1.5 SQUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAR FOOT OF LEASeD PREMISES. MAXIMUM OF 750 SQUARE FEET TOTAL PER ELEVATION. MATERIALS: VARIETY OF lYPES PER SIGN CRITERIA, SINGLE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ALLOWED ILLUMINATION: YES COPY: TENANT NAME AND OR LOGO HEIGHT: SEVENTY PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH: NINElY PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE TYPEFACE: CUSTOM LOGO AND TYPE OK COLOR: CUSTOM COLORS OK SECONDARY SIGNS: YES (NOT TO eXCEED 25% OF TOTAL ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA) ONLY ~OR SERVICES I DEPARTMENTS ALLOWED. NO ADVERTISING OR SLOGANS TYPE AND LOCI\TION: AS SHOWN ON AITACHED ELEVATIONS SECONDARY SIGN EXAMPLE ANCHOR TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE SCALE: N.T.S. I :~:~:~" . SE2.1 tvchi!eclut<ll Consortium. L.L.C. 2010 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 Nc:r1h3rdS'fllCI lI;uMlepolis.MN5s.l01 612-436..qOJO Fa. 612-692-9950 SIGN D CfD GAnJN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY A. B. C. D. E. F. G. Sign Walmart Market & Pharma cy Home & Living Outdoor Living Pharmacy Drive-Thru Enter Exit Qty 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER. MN Color Height Illumination Sq Ft Total Sq Ft WhiteNellow 5'·6" Internal 298.00 596.00 White 2'-0" N/A 65.65 65.65 White 2'·0" N/A 46.47 46.47 White 2'·0" N/A 49.43 49.43 White 1'-6" N/A 39.88 39.88 White 1'-0' N/A 3.23 3.23 White 1'-0" N/A 2.34 234 Total Bulldmg Slgnage: B03.00 ANCHOR TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE SCALE: N.T.S. SE2.2 Archllec.ural ConsorUum, L.L.C. 2010 , MAXIMUM 70% , ~ ~ ~ 1 OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH 1 i!!( ~~r i----NfAJO-R--YENANy-----i LL<{WW I I ~~~o L ____________________________________ ~ ~ ~ i MAJOR TENANTS (OVER 10,000 -89,999 SQUARE FEET) MAXIMIUM 70% ~ '"" ~ r OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH ---t W 1'5 . ~ I nUl [~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J ~§5o~ 0 00 :r: ..... ~ MAJOR TENANT SIGN EXAMPLE TYPICAL MAJOR TENANT ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = 1 '-0" ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. D01NOI1h3rdStrCCI 1JI....,t8pDl~.MNS5401 612";3~030 FiLl( GI2-6~2-!1~1iO rfD SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING GATUN DEVELOPMENT COMPANI' BROOKLYN CENTER. MN SIZE: 1.5 saUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAR FOOT OF LEASEi:O PREMISES. MAXIMUM OF 350 SQUARE FEET TOTAL PER ELEVATION. ~ VARIETY OF TYPES PER SIGN CRITERIA, SINGLE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION ALLOWED ILLUMINATION: YES COPY: TENANT NAME AND OR LOGO HEIGHT: SEVENTY PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH: SEVENlY PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE TYPEFACE: CUSTOM LOGO AND TYPE OK COLOR: CUSTOM COLORS OK SECONDARY SIGNS: YES (NOT TO EXCEED 25% OF TOTAL ALLOWABLE SIGN AREA} SECONDARY SIGN EXAMPLE MAJOR TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE SCALE: AS NOTED .. loInIo o.r.~" I'_'''U~ SE3.1 Arc;hlloclural Consortium.l.L.C. 2010 , MAXIMUM 70% Ui 1 OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH ~!i: ~ !II II [~~~~~~~~~!--i~~~~!~~~~~~] ~~ :c ~ TYPICAL SHOP TENANT ELEVATION ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901NDrlh3rdSUl!el ',lInnelpola.MN55401 612-4J6..1l030 FIX 612-692·9960 SHOP TENANTS (UP TO 10,000 SQUARE FEET) 'NOTE: ONE SIGN PER TENANT PER ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = 1'-0" GfD SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING GAnIN DEVEWPMENT COMPANY BROOKLYN CENTER, MN SIZE: FRONT ELEVATION: 1.5 SaUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAR FOOT OF LEASED PREMISES, MAXIMUM OF 150 SQUARE FEET TOTAL. REAR ELEVATION: 75% OF ALLOWABLE FRONT ELEVATION SIGNAGE. VARIETY OF TYPES PER SIGN CRITERIA ILLUMINATION: YES COPY: TENANT NAME AND OR LOGO HEIGHT: SIXTYFIVE PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH: SEVENTY PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE TYPEFACE: CUSTOM LOGO I\ND TYPE OK COLOR: CUSTOM COLORS OK SECONDARY SIGNS: NO SHOP TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE SCALE: AS NOTED SE4,1 ArchUceMaICon,onlum, L.L.C. 2010 MAXIMUM 70% en 1 OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH l' ~~ ff3 i!:[ ~~ i----PA-O---YENANY-----l ~~vw I I ~ ~ gs U L _______________________________ J ~~ :t ~ "NOTE: TYP. ONE SIGN MAX. PER ELEVATION FOR SINGLE USER. OTHERS UPON REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY LANDLORD TYPICAL SIGN EXAMPLE CfD GATIIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER. MN SIZE: 1.5 SQUARE FOOT OF SIGN AREA PER LINEAR FOOT OF LEASED PREMISES, MAXIMUM OF 250 SQUARE FEET TOTAL PER ELEVATION. MATERIALS: VARIETY OF TYPES PER SIGN CRITERIA, SINGLE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION REQUIRED. ILLUMINATION: YES COPY: TENANT NAME AND OR lOGO HEIGHT: SIXTY FIVE PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFACE LENGTH: SEVENlY PERCENT OF ADJACENT SURFAce ~ CUSTOM LOGO AND lYPE OK £QhQ&. CUSTOM COLORS OK SECONDARY SIGNS: NO TYPICAL SIGN EXAMPLE PAD TENANT BUILDING SIGNAGE SCALE: AS NOTED SE5.1 [, 8 =XI~TINS NORTH ELEV"UON o PROPOSED NORTH eLE'/ATlON ' ....... r.., ATTACHMENT SIXTEEN RCHITECTURAL I' ONSORTIUM L .•. C., I COMPANY: I, [--------1 r-H~~~~~~~~EK I BROOKDALE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT ~~~~~~M~ EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 1'""-'-~." ~' ... ~:> ,"",': ,,~~~,:.. '-: .. :.::'" ArchileClural Consortium, L.L.C. 2010 t=r==1_. mr= _______ .-5::::f ··--·'c--'_:Eh:? ==.-.... = .. "" .. "="-... =" .. -.=.~ ='1=~ ====!=I.,~-=r.I=·=======t'1 E~ .J:!:=-L hBl H ••• ...r"1 .t ~,--~ L. 8 E)(ISTl"6 O~LI-EAST eLevAT10~.~ o EXLSTIN5 eAST ELEVp.T10N -o I"'ROPOseD EAST EL.!:VATION 1 I 1 L __ . ____________ . CfD GAnIN DEVEWPMElIT COMPANY Key Plan D Li SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKOALE CENTER REOEVELOPMENT BROOKLYN CENTER. MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ';:.:.: . .::'" ......... _. __ . __ ._-::;.;---- A2 Archl!eclursl Consortium, l..LC. 2010 o TYPlc:.AI.. a.EVATlOt5 -!-'IA.Y.JR ANCHOlt " .... c...,' GfD GA1UN DEVELOPMENrCOMPANY SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING [ BROOKDALE CENTER REDEVELOPMENT BROOKLYN CENTER, MN EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS A3 Archllc<:lural Consortllnl. L.l.C. 2010 (jJ .:.....J C <1.J U cj ..?:-I ~I cDl I !I -c- I ~ I ATTACHMENT SIXTEEN '---"""-"" --" ""---.---:-? I ~,t11Lo I WaJ ~ m.Blli'~ /V1ay 13, 2011 I Brooklyn Center,iVll~ F'cm:;~"'fIC"roScuoQ~ I _____________ ~------~ "----"-----------------------pe"-rs-p-ec-l-;v-es ~i I~ _____ J ,g!Jlk~1 W<aJ~ ~_ial_Ii"_~_·_-----.JI __ M_a_Y_13_, 2 __ 0~ Brooklyn Cenler,MI\j Perspeclives LJ -~-:;--;-:-_-:--I'---------'---------;--------· __ ~t~l~"~_LWaJ~m_aJ_rr_~ ___ ~_Ol_l __ 1 Brooklyn Center.MI\1 Per>peclives I I 1 ___ -' perspe(ti~:l 5] i-ront Elevation HeCir ElevntiOll ~~;< ;;-I --------1--------.,-------------------------,----------------,---------- c=5';"~~6o I WiPl~mi@rr~ I iVlay '13. 20'11 ! BrooklynCenter.MN F·O)." SC,Mt .. /" SCo/t...".../I1 ! ------------,.------------~-. ! i:levations i-I I " i L ___ ~ Right Elevation Left Elevation Sign Qty Color Height illumination 5q.Ft Total Sq.Ft ~almart White 5'-6" Internal ~p.rk Yellow 8'-0" Internal 298,00 596.00 utdoor Living White 2'-6" N/A 77.24 77.24 Market White 2'-6" N/A 28.13 28.13 Home & Pharmacy White 2'-6" N/A 97.53 97.53 Phlum2lcy Drive-Thru Bronze "-6" N/A 39.8B 79,76 Total Building Signage: 878.66 May 13, 2011 Elevations 7 <0 -' "-N ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0" 1116" = 1 '-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - A PROJECT tfUMBER: ISSUEOOATE: 5-13-11 DRAWN OV: ,JrJ CHECKED BY: KA A-301 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 ATTACHMENT SIXTEEN.ONE 18'-8" N ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 20'-0" 20'-0" WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION I. " l , 18'-8" l 1 20'-0" 20'-{)" 1/16"= 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ?E::~:~~ER BROOKLYN CENTER, MN ~c"",",c~,,~o,,"-y, ---""---1 OUTBUILDING - A A-302 Architectural ConsortIum, L.L.C. 2011 ~ ______ ~4~2'-~O"~ ______ ~~ ____________ ~60~CO~" ____________ ~'~i' ________ ~4~2'~-O_"--------~r ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.c. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 EAST ELEVATION 42'-8" SOUTH ELEVATION 1116" = 1'-0" 42'-8" 1116" = 1'-0" INGLE CREEK CROSSI BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING -C C-301 Architectural Consortium, L,L.C. 2011 +-________ ~4~2~'-B~" ________ ~~--------4~2~'-B~"----------+ ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Sireet Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 NORTH ELEVATION I 1/16" = 1'-0" HINGLE CREEK CROSSIN BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING -C C-302 Architectural Consortium, L,L.C. 2011 E.I.F.S. eMU ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Sireet Minneapolis. MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 31'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 33'-8" EAST ELEVATION STONE VENEER 1/16" = 1'-0" 33'-8" 1/16" = 1 '-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - D PROJECT NUMBER: ISSUED DATE: 5-13-11 DRAWN BY: Jr.A CHECKED 8'1': KA 0-301 Architectural Consortium. L.L.C. 2011 E.I.F.S. eMU ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 NORTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION STONE VENEER =~""VU. ALUM. 1/16"= 1·-0" 1/16'· = 1'-0·' I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ~;:~~~~ . .,. ".""., BROOKLYN CENTER, MN ~C~"ECK~E~O'Y,,-, --~-l OUTBUILDING - D 0-302 Architectural Consortium. L.L.C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L. L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-'136-'1030 Fax 612-692-9960 WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION ~~~~~~FROSTED BACK d::~~~~~ LIT GLASS 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - E STONE VENEER PROJECT NUM8ER: ISSU&'OOATE; 5-1:3-1' ORAWNBY: ...... CHECKED 6'1'; KA E-301 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612·692-9960 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 20'·8" ~~~~~jL FROSTED BACK ~~~~~~ LIT GLASS 1/16" = 1'·0" 1/16" = 1'·0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - E VENEER PI'I.OJECTNUMeER: ISSUEOOATE: DRAWN BY; JM CHECl<EOBY; KA E-302 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Sireet Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1"=20'-0" 1"=2D'-0" ~~~~~~FROSTED BACK r:f:'~~~==~ LIT GLASS VENEER PROJECT NUMIlEn: SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ISSUED DATE: 5.':J.ll ORAWNIIV: JM BROOKLYN CENTER, MN I-'C~"E~CH~ED!!,BY; __ ~---l OUTBUILDING - H H-301 Archil.c!ural Consortium, L.L.C, 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM LLC. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis. MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 EAST ELEVATION ~~~~~ FROSTED BACK r-fU"-'-..I.-..l....:.....Iio'±J LIT GLASS 1" = 20'-0" HINGLE CREEK CROSSIN BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - H H-302 Archilectural Consortium, L.L,C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 EAST ELEVATION SOUTH ELEVATION 1/16" = 1'-0" 1/16" = 1'-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING -J PROJECT NUMBER: rssuEOCATE: DRAWi'lBY: CH'ECI<EDElI'; J-301 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 t 20'-0" J. , I ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis. MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692·9960 20'-0" J. 20'-0" WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 20'-0" 20'-0" l 18'-8" l , ,- I I SIGNAGE 1/16"; 1'-0" 1116" ; 1 '-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN J.-!CI<~ECK"",~O'~v, --"""----j OUTBUILDING -J PROJECT NUMBER: ISSUED CAlE: 5-13-11 ORAWNIJY; JM J-302 Architectural Consortium. L.L.C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1"=20'-0" 1" = 20'-0" K-301 I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN J-!C:!!OHECl<""E,,-,O'!'-.~ --~----l OUTBUILDING - K PROJECT NU .... BER: ISSUEDOA1E: 5-13-11 ORAWN!!Y: JM Architectural Consortium, L.L.C, 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 EAST ELEVATION 1"; 20'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION ~~~:;=~iLFROSTED BACK AW~nNG"",,,,~~~~~ LIT GLASS VENEER 1" = 20'-0" SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING g~;~s~~~:~~U~:MBE~", ~:"~M 3 BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - K K-302 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L. L.C. 901 North 3rd Siroet Minneapolis. MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 EAST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 1"=20'-0" 1" = 20'-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ~;:~~~mE" BROOKLYN CENTER, MN ~C:!!,HE~CKE""DB",--" --""--I OUTBUILDING - L L-301 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street MInneapolis, MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 WEST ELEVATION 1"= 20'-0" SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 20'-0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - L PROJECTNU~!lER: ISSUED DATE: DRAWN BY; JM CHECKED BY: KA L-302 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C, 2011 lB'.()" ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.L.C. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis. MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692-9960 20'-0· 20'-0· WEST ELEVATION NORTH ELEVATION 20'-0· 1 20'-0· ILLUMINI}TED SIGNAGE lB'-O· ~~~~~--FI'!OSlED BACK LIT GLASS 1"= 20'-0" 1"= 20'-0" SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - M PROJECT NUMElER: !SWEDO"",1!:: 5.Il-ll CRAWH8'!': .1M CHECi<EOBV: t<A M-301 Architectural Consortium, L.LC_ 2011 16',0" ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM L.LC. 901 North 3rd Street Minneapolis. MN 55401 612-436-4030 Fax 612-692,9960 r 20',0· 20'.()" 20',0· 20'.()" ILLUMIJTEO SIGNAGE 16',0· ~~~~~----FROSTED BACK LIT GLASS VENEER ANOO, ALUM. STOREFRONT ~-- EAST ELEVATION 1" = 20',0" SOUTH ELEVATION 1" = 20',0" I SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING ~;~~g,°fu~~:"="R'=='~"'"~''' BROOKLYN CENTER, MN OUTBUILDING - M M-302 Architectural Consortium, L.L.C. 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Architectural Design Guidelines (Submitted 5/11111) (Modified 5/23/11) Architectural Consortium LLC The overall design concept is to create a cohesive master planned development combining potential uses that may include anchor tenants, small shop retail, restaurants, enclosed mall tenants, as well as open-air tenants. The architecture shall maintain a uniform character and reflect a style that provides for a harmonious retail development within the project. The aesthetics for key design elements shall be an abstraction of Shingle Creek, and be found in the pallet of materials such as masonry, stone, and metal accents that complement the established streetscape on Bass Lake Road/County Road 10. BUILDING ORIENTATION Site planning concept of multiple buildings with a focus inward as well as exposure toward Highway 1 00, Bass Lake Road, and Xerxes Avenue as generally depicted on the 05/1112011 site plan submittal. The orientation of buildings should take advantage of available view sheds of future development sites where possible. Building entrances shall have a direct relationship to convenient parking fields. Buildings along Bass Lake Road shall be located close to the road to create a pedestrian! urban environment with signage on the street and principal entrances and signage facing internal communal parking and entry drives. Anchor tenants along Highway 100 shall take advantage of the highway visibility by backing up to the property lines with loading docks and servicing and may incorporate architectural elements that reflect some components of the front facades such as signage features and raised parapets. Buildings along the day lighted Shingle Creek, as available to restaurants, shall maximize opportunities for outdoor patios, pedestrian relationships and other recreational interactions. Buildings containing restaurants adjacent to water features shall maximize opportunities for outdoor patios and internal views of the water. Buildings along the major entry corridor shall locate in close proximity to the street to form a "main street," pedestrian friendly, environment. Tenants in the enclosed mall shall take advantage of internal shopping traffic as well as external. BUILDING DESIGN Building Mass Varying scale of buildings shall be encouraged. Varying rooflines to create interest in design styles shall be encouraged. Maximum building coverage of the overall site shall not exceed 40%. Large expanses of blank and featureless wall facing public street frontage shall incorporate architectural elements to mitigate the expanse. ATTACHMENT SEVENTEEN Facade Design Colorful canopies, roofs, and accents are encouraged, however controlled to a palette of selected colors pursuant to the color and material board submitted and approved by the city. Architectural character shall be consistently contemporary (non-traditional) with all buildings within master plan. Masonry detailing such as soldier coursing, plane changes, or patterning shall be encouraged. The use of cornices, ornamental lights, graphics, Tenant blade signs, and other architectural details shall be encouraged. Buildings that front Bass Lake Road, Xerxes Avenue, or main entry drives must have four-sided architecture. The architecture shall reflect a two-story appearance with the use of upper windows, roof forms, and undulated skylines. Storefront glass shall dominate each fac;ade. Where true, clear storefront glass is not feasible due to tenant functions, the use of spandrel glass is acceptable. Multi-tenant buildings shall break up the rhythm ofthe fac;ade for individuality of shops to reinforce a "main street" theme of architecture. Elevations facing Highway 100 may incorporate signage features where visible from the highway or not screened from landscaping. Building Materials Materials shall be selected for suitability to the type of buildings and the design in which they are used. Building walls are to be finished in aesthetically acceptable tones and colors to be compatible with tones and colors of the approved palette. Materials shall be of a durable quality. All wood treatment shall be painted and weather proofed. Colors and specifications of masonry and stucco colors should be a consistent range throughout the development Rear of buildings shall be in a color to match predominant front masonry colors. Existing buildings may be renovated to match new construction with the use of paint colors or other applied surface treatments. Buildings A thru M shall have at least all four sides with at least 50% Class I and remaining 50% Class II materials. Building N shall have its northerly and easterly faces with at least 50% of Class I and remaining 50% Class II; with rear and sides of25% Class I and 75% Class II materials. Buildings P & Q shall have their front facades with 50% of Class I and 50% of Class II, with all other faces with at least 25% of Class I and 75% Class II materials. Class I materials shall include brick or acceptable brick-type material; marble, granite, other natural stone or acceptable natural looking stone; textured cement stucco; copper; porcelain; glass; architectural textured concrete pre-cast panels; and other materials including masonry units with enhanced detailing such as patterns, textures, color, dimension, banding, and brick inlay as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council. ATTACHMENT SEVENTEEN Class II materials shall include exposed aggregate concrete panels; burnished concrete block; integral colored split face (rock face) and exposed aggregate concrete block; cast-in-place concrete; artificial stucco (E.I.F.S., Drivit); artificial stone; fiber-reinforced cement board siding with a minimum thickness of 14 inch; canvas or vinyl awnings; prefinished metal; and other materials not listed elsewhere as approved by the City Planning Commission and City Council. Doors and Windows Canopies shall be encouraged at entry ways. Window frame, material, and color to complement architectural style and be consistent in color throughout development. Window openings may be modulated to scale and proportion that is compatible with the architectural style. Maximize storefront and graphic opportunities to avoid long expanses of blank and featureless walls at street fronts. A minimum of 8' clear space shall be provided from sidewalk elevation to the lowest point of a canopy and or suspended sign. Window frames shall be constructed of pre finished metal. Window and doors shall be glazed in clear glass for retail buildings. Mirrored windows shall be discouraged. Where appropriate, the use of spandrel glass may be incorporated to mimic storefront glass. Graphic elements may be incorporated into wall areas to mimic storefronts. SCREENING Loading areas shall be screened from public view with walls similar to adjacent building material, fences, landscaping, or physical distance separation. Service and utility doors to be painted to match, or be compatible with, surrounding colors. Drive -thru or service lanes shall be screened with berming, landscaping or fencing. Rooftop units may be screened by parapets or wall/fencing materials, or paint to match surrounding colors when visible from the public right of way. FRANCHISE DESIGN The requirements of regional and national franchises shall be allowed to maintain their corporate identity and design theme but shall be encouraged to utilize similar materials, scale and style of these architectural standards. ATTACHMENT SEVENTEEN LANDSCAPE AND SITE TREATMENT Landscape design Plant material is to be utilized within the master plan as an aid to provide continuity within the site and provide a recognized definition of its boundaries. Thematic boulders and water elements shall be incorporated to reinforce the branding of Shingle Creek as a site amenity Reference the 2010 Bass Lake Road landscaping as inspiration to both plant varieties and theme. Overstory trees shall be utilized along external and internal roadways to reinforce roadway pattern but, placed so as to not block visibility of commercial signage. Unity of design shall be achieved by repetition of certain plant varieties, planting patterns, and other streetscape materials and by correlation with the approved landscape plan. Entry points into the site are to be specially landscaped and are to be designed with a common theme. Plant materials are to be utilized as a screening element for parking and building utility areas. Plant materials are to be utilized within parking lot islands, grouped massing of landscape is encouraged in parking lots versus individual planting to maximize landscape impact and allow functional snow removal. Some islands may be paved as pedestrian walk areas. Loading, service, utility and outdoor storage areas that are visible from public roadways shall be predominantly screened with fencing, walls, landscaping or berms. When natural materials are used as principal screening, 75% opacity must be achieved year round through the use of evergreen trees. Plant materials shall be selected with regard to its interesting structure, texture, color, seasonal interest, climate zone durability and its ultimate growth characteristics. Where building sites limit planting, the placement of plant materials in planters, pots, or within paved areas is encouraged. PerenniaVshrub planting beds, trees and turf areas shall be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system to provide optimal plant establishment and long-term plant health. Parking When determined appropriate, commercial buildings are to accommodate bicycle/motorcycle parking areas and bike racks. Cross parking between building areas shall be permitted. Parking stalls to be a minimum of 9'x 18' and drive aisles to be 24' (60' bay spacing) for two-way traffic and drive aisles to be 20' (56' bay spacing) for one- way traffic. Parking stalls may be oriented at 60, 75, and 90 degree angles. Major drive aisles or truck routes may have increased aisle widths. Parking lot layout shall include clear, traffic movement for both pedestrian and automobile. ATTACHMENT SEVENTEEN A minimum overall parking ratio of 4.5 11000 shall be maintained Site impervious surface should be minimized to help preserve green space, yet provide the necessary parking amount to support the development regardless of uses. Lighting Lighting shall provide continuity and consistency throughout the area. All parking lot lights shall be metal halide or 2000-4000 kelvin LED and be uniform in style, color, and height. Maximum pole height of 50' in parking areas and 28' in entry drive areas and along property edges. Pedestrian lighting shall be of pedestrian scale height (12'-18') and be uniform in style and color. Light poles, fixtures, and bases shall be a consistent dark color (i.e. bronze, black, or brown). Exterior wall lighting shall be encouraged to enhance the building design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting styles and building fixtures shall be of a design and scale compatible with the building and adjacent areas. Shoe or hat box style fixtures are acceptable for taller parking lot lighting. More detailed ornamental style fixtures shall be encouraged for pedestrian impact. Light levels that promote a safe environment are required. Excessive brightness shall be prohibited. Dark sky and cutoff style fixtures shall be used for safety purposes. Pedestrian Connections Pedestrian connectivity shall be incorporated to link all buildings within the site where feasible. Pedestrian connections shall be made to the existing public sidewalk system. Benches or seating shall be provided at appropriate areas for pedestrians. Striping of crosswalks shall be required at appropriate crossings. Outdoor seating areas and outdoor sales areas shall be incorporated where appropriate. Such areas shall utilize a unified theme and approach to the defining . elements (structural elements, railings, shading, paving, lighting, landscaping) for the creation of these exterior spaces. Bicycle Connections Trail connections shall be maintained and connected to the existing overpass system. Bike parking and resting areas shall be incorporated as an element of the Shingle Creek waterway. The trail shall be designed to allow continuous flow of bicycle traffic as well as areas of refuge. Pedestrian shopping sidewalks shall connect to the trail at appropriate intersections. ATTACHMENT SEVENTEEN E 4,800sfD 11,200sf EXISTING SIGNAL BASS LAKE RD S H I N G L E C R E E K P K W Y E PROPOSED CAR WASH 3,667 SF INSTALL NEW 30' x 30' "DO NOT ENTER" SIGNS "DO NOT ENTER" SIGNS "RIGHT TURN ONLY" SIGN RELOCATED MONUMENT SIGN REMOVE AND RELOCATE MONUMENT SIGN Th i s d o c u m e n t , t o g e t h e r w i t h t h e c o n c e p t s a n d d e s i g n s p r e s e n t e d h e r e i n , a s a n i n s t r u m e n t o f s e r v i c e , i s i n t e n d e d o n l y f o r t h e s p e c i f i c p u r p o s e a n d c l i e n t f o r w h i c h i t w a s p r e p a r e d . R e u s e o f a n d i m p r o p e r r e l i a n c e o n t h i s d o c u m e n t w i t h o u t w r i t t e n a u t h o r i z a t i o n a n d a d a p t a t i o n b y K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . s h a l l b e w i t h o u t l i a b i l i t y t o K i m l e y - H o r n a n d A s s o c i a t e s , I n c . SHEET NUMBER 2 0 1 8 K I M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 76 7 E U S T I S S T R E E T , S U I T E 1 0 0 , S T . P A U L , M N 5 5 1 1 4 PH O N E : 6 5 1 - 6 4 5 - 4 1 9 7 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M K: \ T W C _ L D E V \ G A T L I N D E V E L O P M E N T \ B R O O K D A L E C E N T E R \ C A D D \ P H A S E 3 \ H o l i d a y C a r W a s h \ 3 D e s i g n \ C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ T r u c k T u r n i n g E x h b i t \ 2 0 2 0 - 0 5 0 3 P U D C o m p a r i s o n E x h i b i t . d w g M a y 0 8 , 2 0 2 0 - 3 : 4 8 p m © BY RE V I S I O N S No . DA T E PR E L I M I N A R Y - N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N NORTH PR E P A R E D F O R SI T E P L A N / P U D OV E R L A Y E X H I B I T EX-1 BU I L D I N G E GA T L I N D E V E L O P M E N T CO M P A N Y BR O O K L Y N C E N T E R MN DA T E CH E C K E D B Y SC A L E DE S I G N E D B Y DR A W N B Y KH A P R O J E C T 16 0 1 8 8 0 0 0 05 / 0 8 / 2 0 2 0 AS S H O W N KJ O KJ O BM W Ex h i b i t C Commissioner introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2020-002 RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-002 SUBMITTED BY MATTHEW WOLF (TAFT, STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLP) ON BEHALF OF GATLIN DEVELOPMENT CO. INC. FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota adopted Resolution No. 2011-85, dated June 13, 2011, which is considered the first amendment to the previously approved 1999 Brookdale Mall Planned Unit Development, whereby this amendment approved the establishment of the new Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an approved Development/Master Plan and certain allowances and development standards that would govern over the PUD; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2011-127, dated September 12, 2011, which approved the first amendment to the original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2012-106, dated August 13, 2012, which approved the second amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2012-129, dated September 24, 2012, which approved the third amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2013-124, dated October 14, 2013, which approved the fourth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2013-72, dated July 8, 2013, which approved the fifth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-002 WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2014-75, dated June 9, 2014, which approved the sixth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2015-170, dated November 9, 2015, which approved the seventh amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards; and WHEREAS, the City Council subsequently adopted City Council Resolution No. 2017-25, dated February 13, 2017, which approved the eighth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, and which included an updated Development/Master Plan and provided additional allowances and development standards, and subsequent revisions to the aforementioned amendment under City Council Resolution No. 2017-174, dated November 13, 2017; and WHEREAS, Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister, LLP) on behalf of Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. submitted Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, which is considered the ninth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, by allowing certain changes to the approved 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, the proposal comprehends the elimination of certain use restrictions within the Planned Unit Development that were imposed under the original 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and associated declaration; and WHEREAS, the PUD Amendment also comprehends an amendment to the building size and site configuration of Building Site E (also known as Lot 2, Block 1 of Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a duly called public hearing on May 14, 2020, whereby a staff report and public testimony regarding the amendment to the Planned Unit Development were received and considered by the Planning Commission; and the Planning Commission gave proper consideration of the amendment to the Planned Unit Development request by utilizing the guidelines for evaluating such amendment as contained in Section 35-355 of the City’s Zoning Ordinance and the City’s Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, in light of all testimony received, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota did determine that Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, submitted by Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister, LLP) on behalf of Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc., may be approved based upon the following findings: a) The proposed amendments to the uses allowed within the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD are generally in line with the uses allowed by right or special use within the PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-002 underlying C2 (Commerce) District, and will open up more opportunities for the PUD site to build out; b) The updating of Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD master plans addresses a current need to the overall Shingle Creek Crossing PUD plans as requested by property owner and Applicant Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc.; c) The updating of Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD master plans will not impede the normal orderly development and proposed improvements of this Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, but rather take a pro-active approach by facilitating further buildout on the eastern edge of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development; d) The updating of Building Site E to reflect a potential car wash will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other uses in the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, nor be detrimental or pose any threat or danger to the public; e) The updating of Building Site E to reflect a potential car wash will be cognizant of and provide adequate measures to maintain and provide suitable access and parking to the site; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota, determined that Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, submitted by Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister LLP) on behalf of Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc., requesting approval of a ninth amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development may be approved subject to certain conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Brooklyn Center, Minnesota to recommend to City Council that Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, submitted by Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister LLP) on behalf of Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc., be approved based upon the following conditions and considerations: 1) The Applicant is allowed to amend and update the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development plans and documents, including the associated Declarations, to reflect all approved amendments approved by City Council since 2011, as well as the following: a. Removal of the “eating establishments” requirement for the four Shingle Creek Crossing PUD lots, as noted under Section 4.A of the PUD Declarations; and b. Allowance of educational uses (Section 35-322.1.h), group day care and drop-in childcare centers (Section 35-322.1.k), and veterinarian’s offices (but not animal hospitals). c. Update Building Site E to reflect a 3,667-square foot building and 17-onsite parking spaces with two stacking lanes, as reflected in the exhibit provided by Kimley-Horn, PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-002 and dated May 8, 2020 (Exhibit C). d. Relocation of the Shingle Creek Crossing monument sign on Building Site E to facilitate development. 2) No other allowances shall be permitted in the updating of the Shingle Creek Master Plan set, with the exception of any site-specific changes necessary for the site and building plan approval for Building Site E (e.g. landscaping, lighting). Any final changes to the building size and site configuration shall fall within the provisions addressed in Section 35-355, Subdivision 5.d (Planned Unit Development) or require further amendment to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development plans and documents. a. Any development on Building Site E will be required to follow the signage and architectural guidelines for Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. b. Any items not covered by the aforementioned guidelines are subject to approval through City Code requirements. 3) A fully updated master plan set of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development is to be provided to the City as part of any subsequent application for site and building plan approval for Building Site E. 4) Unless amended otherwise or under separate agreement, all existing provisions, standards, and variations provided under the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development and any subsequent amendments, shall remain in effect for the entire Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. 5) Any future amendments to the Planned Unit Development or application requests will require the submittal or adoption (acceptance) of an updated master plan, which shall govern the planned and future redevelopment areas of this site. PC RESOLUTION NO. 2020-002 May 14, 2020 Date Randall Christensen, Chair ATTEST: Ginny McIntosh, Secretary The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted.