Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC66001 - 2/3/66 - 47th & France AvePLANNING CONEUISSION FILE CHECKLIST FILE INFORMATION File Purge Date: 6�a3 95 Planning Commission Application No. 6�00 PROPERTY INFORMATION Zoning: PLAN REFERENCE Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were consolidated. • Site Plans • Building Plans • Other: FILE REFERENCE Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents. Document Tyne Date Range Location Agenda Cover Sheet: Planning Commission Agenda Book Minutes: Planning Commission Z/3/1olo City Vault Minutes: City Council 21,416 & City Vault Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault Resolutions: City Council City Vault Ordinances: City Council City Vault Historical Photographs: Planning Commission City Archieve io z VILLAGE OF BROOIKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Street Location of Property 47th and France Avenue North 966001 Legal Oescription of Property Parcel 3000 (Tract "A") R. L. S. 1082, and Parcel 2910, Section 10. Izolda Gilles and Owner: Name Nnrm Chazio hddress Applicant: Name Robert L. Baldwin Address 4074 West Broadway PhoneJU 8-9126 Type of Request: X Rezoning X Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval X Other Description of Request Rezoning to B3 or C2. Special Use Permit for a service station on the proper . Approval of site and building plans. Reason for Request (Applica t) FEE: $ 25.00 - Rezoning January 11, 1966 5.00 - Special Use Permit (Date) Following to be filled in by Village Recommendations of Village Officials Chronology Date By Rec'd. Published On P1. Comm. Agenda Pl. Comm. action On Council Agenda Council Postponement Council Action Any official making any comments should Bldg. Dept. Notified sign and date. Use additional sheet Applicant Notified comments if necessary attach hereto. Pl. Comm. Postoonement Please draw or attach sketch of proposed structure showing the following: 1. Indicate North 6. Dimensions of proposed structure 2. Location on lots 7. Proposed set -backs 3. Adjacent street names 8. State zoning in force in area 4. Location set -backs and use of adjacent existing buildings 5. Distances between any proposed structures and structures on adjacent property. (To Be Filled in By Planning Commission) PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMiMENOATIONS On the 3 day of ,�� �, 194 6e action requested in the foregoing petition was approved ( ) disapproved (Y) subject t e following conditions. Chairman COUNCIL RECO[uiiijENDATIONS4 Approved Denied by the Council this „�� day of � 191(. Approved with following amendment Clerk: PLANNING COMMISSION INFORMATION SHEET Application No. 66001 Applicant: Robert Baldwin, Baldwin Realty Description of Request: Rezoning from RB to B3 or C2, Special Use Permit for a service station. Approval of site and building plans, Property: Tract 'A , R. L. S. 41062 and Parcel 2910, Section 10. Owner of Property: Izolda Gilles and Norman Chazin BACKGROUND: 1) This property was zoned RB on May 12. 1959 upon an application by Homedale Builders_ The original application asked for 83 zoning for a combination construction office and warehous the approval was for RB with a variance to allow storage in the bas�ment of the office building, Obviously, the development never took place., POINT TO BE CONSIDERW : 1) Access to the site is proposed from France Avenue North, 2) The intersection of France Avenue and Highway tt1O0 has been recognized as hazardous for some time, and will be signalized in the spring or summer of 1966. It is planned that an interchange will be constructed here in S to 10 years, �) If the rezoning is to be granted, the single gamily dwellings on the west side of France to the south of this property would be buffered from it by a multiple dwelling, as they are from industrial roperties to the northeast. 4) The property is proposed as R5 on the proposed oning map., STAFF CUMMENTS: 1) A business which de;)ends on attraction of autos from a traffic flow., requiring them to make turning movements at an lready troubled inter. - section, seems to be highly unwise, Better tha an RB use be built on this RB zoned property, for its users would have it as a destination rather than a stopover point. Sucl uses are generally not dependent on snatching its customers from passing traffic. 2) Assuming that this property will be acquired by the State for the pro- posed interchange, it would seem better for the taxpaying public if it remained vacant land, It is doubtful that the property lends itself to any use at present other than a service station Thus, it would seem that if the present rezoning is not granted, the pro erty will remain vacant and be available for acquisition at a much lowe cost to the public.. Whether or not the Village can or should concer itself with this aspect of the application is questionable, 3) The plans are in accordance with what the Planning Commission considers adequate for service stations (ive., green strips, screening, parking, etc ) 4) The Engineering Department of the Department of Highways, State of Minnesota. has been notified of this applEcatio . s