The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC74025 - 5/16/74 - 67th & EmersonPLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST File Purge Date: 111201QS FILE INFORMATION Planning Commission Application Number: 74025 PROPERTY INFORMATION Zoning: PLAN REFERENCE Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were consolidated. • Site Plans • Building Plans • Other: FILE REFERENCE Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents. Document Type Date Range Location Agendas: Planning Commission Office Minutes: Planning Commission 511C.1-74 tabled, City Vault c-/4,174 Minutes: City Council 6/q/74 815/74 City Vault Document Type Number Location Resolutions: Planning Commission City Vault Resolutions: City Council City Vault Ordinances: City Council 74-19 (8/5/74) City Vault CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Planning Commission Application Application Noel a_z Street Location of Property Legal Description of Property 6 i ice' Owner%dc,�✓� Address Telephone No,-�i"— Applicant �Address Telephone N:)o Type of Request; X_ Rezoning Subdivision Approval Variance Site .k Bldg, Plans Special Use Other Permit Description and Reason for Requests ,,.G� Fee_ �. Receipt No. Applicant Date PLANNING COM)iMISSION RECOMMENDATION Dates of P.C. Considerations Approved Denied this dayof 19 subject to the following conditions: Chairman CITY COUNCIL ACTION Dates of Council Considerations Approved Denied this day of with the following amendment: 19 Clerk ` PLAMING COMISSION INFORMATION SK-SET �.. Application No. 74025 Applicantt City of Brooklyn Center Location: 67th and Emerson Avenues North Request: Rezoning The application is a City initiated petition for rezoning two parcels from R--5 to R-3. The item was tabled at the May 16, 1974 raeetiag to permits review by the Northeast Neighborhood Advisory Group. The Group has recommended approval of the application per the attached letter from the Chairman. Approval is recor mnended on the basis that the R-3 District is consistent with the Comprehensive Man; is compatible with adjacent land uses; and effectively speaks to the issue of small parcels as remnants of larger multi -residential district tracts. tv C-- 2 O cn Zol�►K T. CmF 9X 5 Ter R-s A ? T. Cd m Pt C*X HIGH 5 C Key► O L.. �Rdp�RTy OR D04 a r f Application No. Applicant-, Locations Request lP'Ak'' 71MG OOVIUSSlON IMPOMATION 5EEZU: 74025 City of Br 6 7 th a nd )eme (Lot 1, Bloc Hi Crest Sgu Rezoning The application is for rezoning from R-5 to R-3 v:hich. ar,; 1.37 acres and 1.67 acres respective) A proposed and denied 1973 R--S apartment proje Parcels such as these are not highly suited to existinq DINximura R-5 densities; the current mo residential construction was initiated on the realization Neighboring property owners submitted a petitii repuesti.ng yezaning to a district of lesser dej more compatible with area development (R-5 on Bch* 0aorthWer ,St, R-A on the north and east) . lyn Center rson Avenues Nortil t 2 and Los'-- 6, Block 1 are Addition) of the two parcels 1. indicated smaller v'e lopmen t at orium on multi. is of this dated July 7, 197:3 ty which would be west,,! C_ 2 to The owner of the parcels, who was the applicant far the denied request, has proposed a development of R-3 type residences, and has nlso requested the rezoning. The R-3 density is 50 per cent of the R-5 msxim . R-3 PTownh us* car: _I n dwelliAsg units) .are more c=patible with neighboring R-1 detached dwellings. Furthermore, an R-3 develorment, with recuired open areas and setbacks, would provide a substa tial intermediate land use- bet'W, -ed existing R-5 and the single fa , ily area. A public hearing has been scheduled. Consistent with Commission policy, the application should be sub- mitted to th:, Northeast Neighborhood Advisory Gr�uo for review. It is reconrnended their report be requested priobr to the June o, 1.974 regular meeting. Lw rM+ j nWr1r P 10%,""I . _ . at ®r. fo7. _....... T sqLry APT', 0 111 cQ Ott r� �40 --- i ( � �� a ;J-7 / w�r� To The Mayor and City Council of Brooklyn Center, we the undersigned, being residents of Brooklyn Center living in the neighborhood, generally bounded on the North by 69th Avenue, on the South by 65th Avenue, on the East by Colfax, and on the West by Humbolt; do hereby petition the City of Brooklyn Center to rezo from R (Multiple Family Residence District) to R-1 (One Family Residence District), the vacant property generally located on the N.E. and N.W. corners of 67th Avenue North and Emerson Avenue North, more commonly known as the property of MORK & ASSOCIATES. We as residents in a predominated single family neighberheed, feel that our request is valid for the following; reasons: 1. The property is three (3) acres in size (total), and is split by a public street with the largest parcel being 1.6 acres (approx.) This small parcel does not warrant a multi -development that would be consistent with planning principles and policies, which hold forth that multi -dwelling complexes provide a reasonable quality family life environment. 2. The surrounding property to the immediate North and immediate East is fully developed with single family residences, most of which are four to eight years old.. We feel this vacant property should be developed in a manner that is �,�. ... yam_. ...._._.._..._ consistent to this neighborhood. This vacant property should be sub -divided into nine or ten single family dwelling lets, so as to insure a safer, more pleasant and more economical environmentfor the existing; residential neigh- berhood. -167/-�S ) = s y CLre' 0j( "a n c ,'YO 4 KC are. A0 AP A&J- -2- In the event the City does not feel that this request for R-1 zoning is not consistent with the Cities development plans, we feel that either duplexes or townhouses could be developed and designed in such a way that it would not deteriorate the residential atmosphere which now exists. We do f eel, however, that the R-1 (Single Family Resident District) would be the best for this property. We thank you for your consideration of this petition. Respectively Submitted, Name 1 � 90� f �7f Address G 70 / u/��b�r ge r Al. �O 7G G arm ?0 (10 (e �� / /a�' eLk(' /%" Dom, OV 1C 36 37 '3� ,�9 y/ Ll 2- Ala 1 6,7 rJ 1�v7 L �j o C�Z«� AN.l 6Y37- �F,� 1197i`l a-P.o, sew'