Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC71017 - 6/3/71 - 6700 Emerson AvePLANNING COMMISSION FILE CHECKLIST File Purge Date: 111719s FILE INFORMATION Planning Commission Application Number: W 7/0/7 PROPERTY INFORMATION Zoning: PLAN REFERENCE Note: If a plan was found in the file during the purge process, it was pulled for consolidation of all plans. Identified below are the types of plans, if any, that were consolidated. • Site Plans • Building Plans • Other: FILE REFERENCE Note: The following documents were purged when this project file became inactive. We have recorded the information necessary to retrieve the documents. Document Type Date Range Location Agendas: Planning Commission Office Minutes: Planning Commission 4/3/? j Minutes: City Council 4,/11/7/ Document Type Number Resolutions: Planning Commission Resolutions: City Council City Vault City Vault Location City Vault City Vault Ordinances: City Council City Vault January 15, 1973 Mr. Randall Lane 4238 Welcome Avenue Minneapolis, Minnesota Re: Planning commission Application No. 71017 Dear Mr. Lane: This is to inform you that the above captioned Planning Commission Application, which was considered and approved by the city council on June 14, 1971, has boon closed due to the considerable lapse of time since approval and the absence of any Diction on the part of the applicant to secure permits based upon the approved site and building plans. This action is taken as a matter of policy in that the Building inspector cannot issue valid permits in light of substantial building code and ordinance changes Ainae the application was last considered. A now application for site and building plan approval may be submitted and will be processed upon receipt of the required site and building plane and other documentation. A letter dated January S. 1973, from Mark and Associates, incorporated, indioates that firm has assumed redponsibility for your other application, Number 71018. This We also has been closed. Questions regarding this matter may be directed to this office. Sincerely, STsil Blair Tremere ces J. Murphey Administrotlive Assistant Building Inspector for Planning cc: file CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER Zoning Application Application No. 71017 Street Location of Property 6700 Emerson Avenue Worth Legal Description of Property Lot 1, Block 2, Hi Crest Square Owner Randall Lane Address 4238 Welcome Avenue Telephone No. 533-5897 Applicant Same Address _ Telephone No. Type of Request: Rezoning Special Use Permit Variance Subdivision Approval x Other Description of Request Site and building plan approval for apartment building Reason for Request Fee $ 10.00 Receipt No. 32555 Appli May 26, 1971 Date Dates of P.C. Consideration Dates of Council Consideration PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION �pproved Denied this day of ,19� ubj to the following conditions Chai a COUNCIL ACTION Approved Denied this day of , 19 %/ , with the following amendment Clerk P%, MMINO MSSXOE INFOit,MATIOR SHEET Application No. 71017 Applicant: Randall Lane Description of Requests Site and building plan ,approval BACKGROUND: The applicant is requesting site and build ncj plan approval for a Lbree story, 26 unit. agar_ ent building for a property located at the northeast in ersection of Emerson. and 67th avenues Yorth. The property is zoned P,.5, contains 73,500 square feet of lot area, and has a maxiuum allowed density of 26 units. ANALYSIS AND PECOi�'OMMATIONa Review of the site plan indicates that •-he following adjustments should be made 1) Curb cuts on Emerson Avenue North and 67th Avenues North must: be adjusted to meet exist" g it place a-krbing and those respective roadways rather than at the property, line as shown on the plan, 2) The internal roadway at the northeast; corner of the proposed building should be adjusted to reflect a 24 foot roadway in lieu of the 20 foot roadway as shown on the plan. 3) Drainage and elevation plans have Sao been submitted for review by the City Engineer and st be submitted for review prier to final action by the City Council,, 4) The landscaping requirements of the ordinance are met, however, it appears that the pl ns for said landscaping are mini.unum at bests It is strongly suggested that the applicant be encourage to a graen: the site plan with additional trees and shrubiE