Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020 07-21 HCPAGENDA BROOKLYN CENTER HOUSING COMMISSION July 21, 2020 7:00 p.m. Virtual Webex Meeting Call In Number: 1(312) 535-8110 Meeting number (access code): 133 440 7972 Meeting password: M5sWUQPJm23 Link: Join meeting 1) Call to Order: 7:00 p.m 2) Approval of Agenda 3) Approval of Housing Commission Meeting Minutes from 6/16/2020 4) City Operations Update a) City Hall Remains closed b) City Meetings being Held Virtually 5) New Neighbor Welcome Program a) Delivery Progress b) Future Delivery Dates 6) Fair Housing Policy Discussion a) Review and discuss Richfield Fair Housing Policy b) Areas that should be added or removed 7) City Council Liaison’s Report 8) Chairpersons Report 9) Other Business a) Pending Council Work session related to Housing i) Naturally Occurring Affordable Housing Preservation Program (4D) ii) Inclusionary Housing Policy 10) Adjournment Page 1 MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND STATE OF MINNESOTA REGULAR SESSION JUNE 16, 2020 CALL TO ORDER The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission was called to order by Chairperson Goodell at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. INTRODUCTIONS AND WELCOME NEW COMMISSIONER Chair Goodell welcomed new Commissioner Lindsay Cremona. Chair Goodell stated he has been on the Housing Commission since 2014, and lives in the Evergreen neighborhood. Commissioner Joan Schonning stated she has been on the Housing Commission since 2017. Commissioner Paul Oman stated this is his second year on the Housing Commission. Commissioner Kathie Amdahl stated she has been on the Commission since 2008, and lives near Northview Middle School. Commissioner Tamika Baskin stated she has been on the Housing Commission for 4.5 years. Chair Goodell stated Commissioner Michael Stokes was absent. He added Commissioner Stokes has been on the Housing Commission for 2 years. Deputy Director of Community Development Jesse Anderson stated his role is to manage building inspectors and building officials, administer the rental program, CDBG funding programs, and some involvement with the Economic Development Authority as support to Community Development Director Meg Beekman. APPROVAL OF AGENDA There was a motion by Commissioner Schonning and seconded by Commissioner Amdahl to approve the agenda as submitted. The motion passed. CITY OPERATIONS UPDATE Mr. Anderson stated the City Council recently approved microloans to small businesses and non- profit organizations in Brooklyn Center that have been affected by Covid-19. He added that microloans have been awarded, but there are some funds left. a. City Hall and City Meetings Mr. Anderson stated City Hall remains closed, although it will be required to open for the primary election, and City Staff is working on that plan. He added City operations are functioning remotely, Page 2 except Code and building inspectors are in the field as of last week. He noted virtual inspections are being offered. Mr. Anderson stated City Staff work at City Hall offices in a staggered schedule, to limit the number of people in the building at the same time. He added the “Rec on the Go” program vehicles are being used for meals delivery. He noted events are being scheduled at the Earle Brown Heritage Center (EBHC), but not in the near future. Mr. Anderson stated a committee of City Staff is working through how and when City amenities and services will open. He added the Community Center is not allowed to be open yet. He noted the liquor store is open for business. He added there will be some budget cuts due to decreases in revenue, and seasonal staff and interns were not hired for the summer. Chair Goodell asked how many microloans were given out. Mr. Anderson stated he does not have the exact number of small business loans. He added four microloans awarded to non-profit organizations. Ms. Cremona asked whether funding is still available. Mr. Anderson stated he is unsure of the exact amount, but there is funding available for more microloans. NEW NEIGHBOR WELCOME PROGRAM a. 187 New Neighbors 9/1/2019 – 04/01/2020 Chair Goodell stated, at its last meeting, the Housing Commission discussed distribution of Welcome Packets during the Covid-19 pandemic. He added City Staff’s report showed 187 new residents had moved to Brooklyn Center between September 2019 and April 2020. He requested the Commission’s consideration of upcoming dates to distribute packets. Mr. Anderson stated the new residents’ report has changed, as it was previously entered into the system manually by City Staff but is now produced using Hennepin County records. He added he pulled home sales data from the County website, which is more current and accurate. He confirmed there are 187 new residents that have moved to Brooklyn Center. Commissioner Cremona asked what information is included in the Welcome Packet. Mr. Anderson stated he can get a packet for Commissioner Cremona. He added there is a copy of the most recent City newsletter; a list of City contacts; City regulations and permits; voter registration; School District information; a map of local businesses; and a parks and trails map. Chair Goodell asked what coupons are included in the packet. Mr. Anderson stated there are no new coupons. He added there are coupons for the liquor store, community center, Centerbrook Golf Course, the Rose Garden, and one other business. Chair Goodell stated the current financial environment makes it difficult to ask local businesses to consider doing coupons, but that could be a project for later. Page 3 Chair Goodell asked whether the City is recommending safety-related procedures for distributing packets. Mr. Anderson stated face masks and gloves are recommended, as well as 6 feet for social distancing. Commissioner Amdahl stated the packets are always left on the top step and the Commissioners ring the doorbell and step back. Commissioner Schonning stated delivery of the Welcome Packets are a nice way to make a personal connection with new residents. She added there is always good feedback and response from the new residents. Chair Goodell stated delivering packets is not a requirement for the Commissioners. He added it is not an issue if Commissioners feel uncomfortable delivering packets. b. Delivery Dates Chair Goodell requested suggestions for delivery dates. He added the Commissioners typically go out on weekday evenings during the summer, before it gets dark, and travel in groups for safety reasons. He added, however, this process can be adjusted. Commissioner Schonning recommended a first date of June 23, 2020. Mr. Anderson stated there are between 50-100 packets ready to go. He added additional packets can be assembled and can be picked up at City Hall or delivered to the Commission at their homes. He added he has a current list of new residents. Commissioner Amdahl stated the Commission gets together at City Hall around 6:15 p.m. and disburse with lists and packets at 6:30 pm. She added they usually finish by 8:30 p.m. She added the Commission tries not to deliver packets on weekends in the summer, when many residents and also Commissioners are not home. Chair Goodell stated he would recommend a second delivery date of June 30, 2020, and a third date of July 14, 2020. Commission consensus was reached to schedule Welcome Packet delivery dates on June 23, 30 and July 14, 2020 at 6:15 pm. Chair Goodell asked whether Mr. Anderson has stickers for the Welcome Packets in case there is no one home. He added Commissioner Cremona will need a nametag/ID badge. Mr. Anderson agreed, and requested that Commissioner Cremona send him a recent photo. He noted would check to see if there are any volunteer t-shirts left from the pop-up markets. Chair Goodell asked whether the Welcome Packets have information about the 2020 Census, or the Covid-19 situation. Mr. Anderson stated there is a flyer on the Census included in the packets, but no information about Covid-19. Page 4 Chair Goodell stated it might be good to include a request for mail-in ballot. Mr. Anderson stated voter registration cards are included in the packet. He agreed to look into getting forms for mail-in ballots. CITY COUNCIL’S LIAISON REPORT In the absence of the Council Liaison no report was given. CHAIRPERSONS REPORT Chair Goodell expressed his appreciation for the participation of the Housing Commissioners. OTHER BUSINESS a. Fair Housing Policy Discussion Tentative for July Commission Meeting Mr. Anderson stated a recent City Council Work Session included an open-ended discussion regarding strategies for inclusionary housing policy, and preservation of naturally occurring affordable housing. He added the City Council discussed funding that would help landlords qualify for 4d affordable housing assistance and reviewed a grant program in the City of Minneapolis that helps residents qualify for 4d assistance and receive a tax break. He added a requirement is that they must maintain affordability levels for a specified number of years. Mr. Anderson stated the City Council agreed to consider a fair housing policy to be reviewed and recommended by the Housing Commission. He added he plans to review similar policies at other cities and provide sample language at the next Housing Commission meeting, to begin working toward a policy proposal for review by the City Council. He agreed to provide information to the Commissioners for their review before the next Commission meeting. Commissioner Cremona asked whether the Housing Commission has a budget. Chair Goodell stated there is some money allocated to help with the New Neighbor program, and distribution of Welcome Packets. He added the Commission’s main purpose is to advise the City Council on issues related to housing. He noted there is not a Housing Commission budget for housing-related actions. Commissioner Cremona asked whether there is funding at the City level for rental or mortgage assistance related to Covid-19. She added many people may already have difficulty paying their rent or mortgage, and there will be many foreclosures in the coming months. Mr. Anderson stated the City Council discussed the reallocation of CDBG funds to provide rental assistance. He added Hennepin County administers financial assistance to residents through CEAP from the $15 million stimulus package. He added the City has a down-payment assistance program. Chair Goodell asked how financial assistance through CEAP is communicated to residents. Mr. Anderson stated information has been available on the City website and on Facebook, and on CCX cable news media. He confirmed the financial assistance is for rental assistance, but not mortgage assistance. Page 5 Commissioner Cremona stated a small subset of homeowners can foreclose if their mortgage is federally backed, but many consumer mortgages are regulated in terms of entering workouts. She added she represents smaller commercial lenders, so she is unsure what large banks are doing, but foreclosures are already happening, regardless of the effects of the pandemic. She expressed concern that once the emergency declaration is lifted, evictions will commence and there will be bad times ahead for many residents. She added it would be nice to be able to provide financial support to residents who need it. Chair Goodell stated he was pleasantly surprised by the microloan program for businesses and non- profit organizations. He added he does not believe there is funding at the City level for mortgage assistance. Mr. Anderson stated the rental assistance program was taken over by Hennepin County. He added most of the City’s rental managers are working out payment plans for renters who are unable to pay their rent and spreading payments over a three-month period. b. Planning Commission Appointments Commissioner Oman requested an update on the situation with the Planning Commission. He added he has heard questions and comments and asked whether the Housing Commission will be affected. Mr. Anderson stated some Planning Commissioners’ terms had ended, and they were not re- appointed, but they continued to serve on the Commission for over a year. He added he believes there are some Housing Commissioners that are in the same situation. He agreed to look into that. Commissioner Schonning requested that City Staff provide an update on which, if any, Housing Commission terms have expired. Mr. Anderson stated all but two of the current Planning Commissioners were replaced at the City Council’s May 8, 2020 meeting. He added Commissioners are typically re-appointed every three years, but in this case, Commissioners were not re-appointed. Commissioner Cremona asked whether the new Commissioners that were appointed had applied for the Commission. Mr. Anderson stated, with regard to the Planning Commission, there was a period of over a year when applications were received but not reviewed, and the Mayor decided to replace four Commissioners at the City Council’s May 8, 2020 meeting. He added current Commissioners had re-applied and were included in the pool of applicants but were replaced. Mr. Anderson stated City Staff requested that the new Commissioners not be appointed until after the Planning Commission’s May 11, 2020 meeting, as meeting packets had already been sent out to existing Commissioners. Mr. Anderson stated an application for the Housing Commission was received about a year ago. He agreed to look into that. Page 6 Chair Goodell requested that City Staff provide a list of Housing Commission appointments and terms. Mr. Anderson agreed. Mr. Anderson stated he believes Commissioner Amdahl is the only Commissioner who re-applied for her position and is still pending. Commissioner Amdahl stated she believes the Mayor re- appointed her to her current position in February 2020. Commissioner Schonning stated her term ends in December 2020. Mr. Anderson stated there was a lengthy discussion at the City Council’s May 8, 2020 meeting regarding this issue, under the City Council Consideration Items. He added the Commission appointments were approved by a 3-1 vote. Commissioner Schonning stated her husband was one of the Commissioners who was replaced. She added the Commissioners were notified the night of the Planning Commission meeting that they were being replaced. c. Election Judges Needed Chair Goodell stated the City Clerk has indicated that the city is seeking election judges for the primary and general elections. He added if any Commissioners are interested or know anyone who is interested, they can contact the City Clerk at City Hall. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner Cremona stated she looks forward to meeting everyone next week for Welcome Packet deliveries. Chair Goodell stated, in case of rain on the evenings when the Commission delivers Welcome Packets, he will go to City Hall as planned and the Commission can decide whether to proceed with deliveries. There was a motion by Commissioner Amdahl and seconded by Commissioner Schonning to adjourn the meeting. The motion passed. The Brooklyn Center Housing Commission adjourned at 7:54 p.m. __________________________________ Chairman City of Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority Fair Housing Policy 1. Purpose/Vision Title VIII of the Civil Rights Act establishes federal policy for providing fair housing throughout the United States. The intent of Title VIII is to ensure equal housing opportunities for all citizens. Furthermore, the City of Richfield, as a recipient of federal funds, is obligated to certify that it will affirmatively further fair housing. The City of Richfield strives to advance its commitment to inclusion and equity by developing this Fair Housing Policy to further the goal of creating a community where all residents will thrive. 2. Fair Housing Policy Statement It is the policy and commitment of the City of Richfield to ensure that fair and equal housing opportunities are available to all persons in all housing opportunities and development activities funded by the city regardless of race, color, religion, gender, sexual orientation, marital status, status with regard to public assistances, familial status, national origin, or disability. This is done through external policies to provide meaningful access to fair housing information and referral services for all constituents and through internal practices and procedures that promote fair housing throughout the community. 3. External Practices a. Intake and Referral The City of Richfield has designated the Multi-Family Housing Specialist as the responsible authority for the intake and referral of all fair housing complaints. At a minimum, the Multi-Family Housing Specialist will be familiar with state and federal fair housing laws, the complaint process for filing discrimination complaints, and the state and federal agencies that handle complaints. The date, time, and nature of the fair housing complaint and the referrals and information given will be fully documented. The Multi-Family Housing Specialist will advise the City Council on City programs and policies affecting fair housing and identify issues and concerns where appropriate. b. Meaningful Access i. Online Information. The City of Richfield will display information about fair housing prominently on its website. The website will include links to various fair housing resources, including the Department of Housing and Urban Development, Minnesota Department of Human Rights, Mid- Minnesota Legal Aid, and others, as well as links to state and federal fair housing complaint forms. ii. In-Person Information. The City of Richfield will provide fair housing information to anyone requesting such information at the city offices. Information provided will include: 1. A list of fair housing enforcement agencies; 2. Fair Housing: Equal Opportunity for All information booklet; and 3. Fair housing complaint forms for enforcement agencies. iii. Languages. The City of Richfield is committed to providing information in the native language of its residents. The City will provide information in languages other than English as needed. 4. Internal Practices The City of Richfield commits to the following steps to promote awareness and competency of fair housing issues in all of its government functions. a. Staff and Officials Training. The City will access available training to train its staff and housing officials on fair housing considerations. b. Housing Analysis. The City will review its housing inventory and community needs periodically to examine the availability and affordability of both rental and owner-occupied housing for all residents in order to have such information available for future City actions. c. Code Analysis. The City will review its municipal code periodically, to identify impediments to accessing housing and any potential for disparate impact or treatment. d. Project Planning and Analysis. City planning functions and development review will consider whether potential projects may perpetuate segregation or lead to displacement of protected classes, and will apply the City’s Inclusionary Housing Policy in the case of developments seeking financial assistance from the City. e. Community Engagement. The City will seek community input, particularly from underrepresented populations in the community, with regard to fair housing issues, development, zoning, and land use changes facilitated by the City. f. Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing. As a subrecipient of federal funds, the City will, as requested by Hennepin County as the entitlement jurisdiction, participate in the Regional Analysis of Impediments, as organized by the regional Fair Housing Implementation Council (FHIC), an ad hoc coalition of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) entitlement jurisdictions and others working together to affirmatively further fair housing. The City will review the recommendations from the analysis for potential integration into City planning documents, including the Comprehensive Plan and other applicable documents. Adopted: This day of , 2018 by the Richfield City Council. Mayor Secretary This day of , 2018 by the Richfield Housing and Redevelopment Authority. Chair Secretary This day of , 2019 by the Richfield Economic Development Authority. President Secretary PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER July 9, 2020 1. Call to Order: 7:00 PM 2. Administer Oath of Office (Re-Appointed and Newly Appointed Commissioners) Alexander Koenig, John (Jack) MacMillan, Alfreda Daniels, Sizi Goyah, Kellie Hmong, and Stephanie Jones 3. Roll Call 4. Election of Planning Commission Chairperson for Remainder of 2020 - Motion/Second to Nominate a Commissioner(s) to serve as Chairperson; - Motion/Second to close all nominations; - Conduct election; and - Motion/Second to Accept the Results and Election of Chair for the remainder of 2020 5. Appointment of Vice-Chair for the Remainder of 2020 by Chairperson 6. Approval of Agenda Motion to Approve Planning Commission Meeting Agenda for July 9, 2020 7. Approval of Minutes Motion to Approve the June 11, 2020 Meeting Minutes 8. Chairperson's Explanation The Planning Commission is an advisory body. One of the Commission's functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 9. Planning Items a. Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006 (Public Hearing) Applicant: Matt Durand Project Address: 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of a site and building plan approval and issuance of a Special Use Permit that would allow for the development of an approximately 3,667-square foot standalone car wash and associated site improvements on Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing retail center. b. Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004 (Public Hearing) Applicant: C Alan Homes Project Address: 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (6025, 6031, 6037, and 6045 Brooklyn Boulevard) Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of requests that would allow for four EDA-owned lots to be developed into PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER July 9, 2020 seven (7) triplexes and associated improvements. This request requires the establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), site and building plan, and preliminary and final plat approvals. c. Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005 (Public Hearing) Applicant: C Alan Homes Project Address: 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard (6921, 6927, 6933, and 6939 Brooklyn Boulevard) Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of requests that would allow for four EDA-owned lots to be developed into six (6) triplexes and associated improvements. This request requires the establishment of a Planned Unit Development (PUD), site and building plan, and preliminary and final plat approvals. 10.Discussion Items a)City Council Update 11.Other Business None 12.Adjournment PC Minutes 06-11-20 -1-DRAFT MINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER IN THE COUNTY OF HENNEPIN AND THE STATE OF MINNESOTA JUNE 11, 2020 1.CALL TO ORDER The Planning Commission meeting was called to order by Chair Christensen at 7:00 p.m. The meeting was conducted via Webex. 2.ROLL CALL Chair Randall Christensen, Commissioners Alexander Koenig, Jack MacMillan, Stephen Schonning, Rochelle Sweeney, and Susan Tade were present. Commissioner Peter Omari was not present on the Webex meeting and unexcused. City Planner and Zoning Administrator Ginny McIntosh, Community Development Director Meg Beekman, and City Attorney Troy Gilchrist were also present. 3.APPROVAL OF AGENDA – JUNE 11, 2020 There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner MacMillan, to approve the agenda for the June 11, 2020 meeting as presented. The motion passed 6-0. 4.APPROVAL OF MINUTES – MAY 14, 2020 There was a motion by Commissioner Koenig, seconded by Commissioner Tade, to approve the minutes of the May 14, 2020 meeting as presented. The motion passed unanimously. 5.CHAIR’S EXPLANATION Chair Christensen explained the Planning Commission’s role as an advisory body. One of the Commission’s functions is to hold public hearings. In the matters concerned in these hearings, the Commission makes recommendations to the City Council. The City Council makes all final decisions in these matters. 6.PLANNING ITEMS 6a) Planning Commission Application No. 2020-003 Applicant: Jane Sharkey | Helena Autism Therapy Center Project Location: Site Plan Amendment Summary: The Applicant is requesting review and consideration of a site plan amendment to allow for the re-configuration of the front parking area into a drop-off and installation of a second driveway off Northport Drive. PC Minutes 06-11-20 -2- DRAFT City Planner Ginny McIntosh reviewed a request for a site plan amendment for 5637 Brooklyn Boulevard. This property came before the Planning Commission last year for issuance of a Special Use Permit to operate the autism center and provide an ancillary outdoor playground for clients. She added the application was submitted by Jane Sharkey of Helena Autism Therapy Center for an amendment to the site plan for the property, which was originally developed as a 3- story office building in 1980. She noted the amendment relates to requests to re-configure the front parking area into a drop-off and installation of a second driveway off Northport Drive. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant relocated to Brooklyn Center from their previous location in Fridley. Although site and building plan requests do not require public notification, City staff released notifications to nearby properties due to the request for a second driveway. The area proposed for a second driveway is in proximity to a residential neighborhood and the main parking lot for Northport Park. To date, no comments have been received. Ms. McIntosh stated the Autism Therapy Center serves clients 2 to 7 years of age with a medical diagnoses of Autism Spectrum Disorder, and provides group treatment, music classes, and speech therapy, in addition to other services. The Autism Therapy Center accommodates approximately 20 students for the morning session and 20 students for the afternoon session. She noted there are approximately 32 on-site employees and 10 additional staff who primarily work off-site. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant wants to alter the front parking area and install a second driveway to address safety concerns. She added the front parking spaces would be re-configured to parallel parking spaces to address safety issues during student pickups and drop offs. She noted the second driveway, to be constructed at Northport Drive, is desired to minimize instances of cars having to turn around in the lower parking lot and drive back past the main entrance. The driveway would likely be added later in the summer. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant does not want to add a sidewalk due to the slope of the property. She added City Staff is requiring a 5-foot buffer from the edge of the existing curb out, to allow space for clients to walk to the main entrance upon exiting a vehicle. She noted a buffer on the outer edge of the drive lane is called out, and a minimum 24-foot wide drive aisle would need to be maintained. Ms. McIntosh stated City engineering staff reviewed the site plan and recommended that the proposed 14-foot driveway be narrowed down to 12 feet and signage added indicating that it is a one-way driveway in an effort to prevent cut-through traffic. Ms. McIntosh reviewed the conditions of approval with the Planning Commissioners, including a requirement outlining the preparation and submittal of a re-striping plan. She added the applicant must obtain a driveway permit from the City before installing the second driveway. She noted all the original site and building plan conditions remain in place and if deficiencies exist, such as missing landscaping, they are to be replaced. Ms. McIntosh stated City Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-003, submitted by Jane PC Minutes 06-11-20 -3- DRAFT Sharkey of Helena Autism Therapy Center, for the requested site plan amendment to allow for re-configuration of the front parking area into a drop-off and installation of second driveway entrance off Northport Drive for the subject property located at 5637 Brooklyn Boulevard. This is subject to the conditions outlined in the associated resolution and staff report. Chair Christensen called for questions of City Staff from the Commissioners. Commissioner MacMillan asked whether a stop sign is planned at Northport Drive. Ms. McIntosh stated that this could be discussed with the applicant, as it would be on private property. Chair Christensen asked whether there will be a sign visible from Northport Drive indicating that it is a one-way drive, and the Northport Drive access is an exit only. Ms. McIntosh stated engineering staff requested signage on both sides of the second driveway, indicating no entrance on one side and the one way exit on the other. Commissioner Koenig stated he supports Commissioner MacMillan’s suggestion of a stop sign off Northport Drive. He believes drivers will cut through the parking lot, when they are leaving the nearby park. He noted he understands that is a residual effect that cannot be controlled. Commissioner Koenig also expressed his support of the plans, adding this will increase safety for the center’s operations and its clients. Chair Christensen expressed his support of the plans to widen access to the building, which will also make snow removal easier. Ms. McIntosh stated the applicant, Jane Sharkey, was on the meeting and available for questions from the Commissioners. Commissioner Koenig commended Ms. Sharkey on the excellent work of the Autism Therapy Center. He asked how things are going. Jane Sharkey stated the Center is doing well, having re-opened on Monday June 8, 2020 after being closed for a few months during the COVID-19 pandemic. She added staff are doing health screenings on students and their drivers as they arrive at the building, and the new driveway and drop off will help facilitate that. She noted the students love having the playground. Chair Christensen asked whether there is adequate parking for staff. Ms. Sharkey stated there is ample room in the parking lot to make these changes, and still accommodate staff parking in the upper level parking area. She encouraged the Commissioners to stop in and take a tour. Commissioner Koenig stated he lives in this neighborhood, and he has been impressed with how the building has been enhanced to accommodate the Autism Center. Ms. Sharkey stated the HVAC system in the entire building was recently replaced for approximately $200,000, and the new heating and cooling systems are up and running. PC Minutes 06-11-20 -4- DRAFT ACTION TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2020-003 REGARDING THE RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-003 SUBMITTED BY JANE SHARKEY FOR THE HELENA AUTISM THERAPY CENTER. There was a motion by Commissioner MacMillan, seconded by Commissioner Koenig, to approve Planning Commission RESOLUTION NO. 2020-003 regarding Planning Commission Application No. 2020-003 submitted by Jane Sharkey of Helena Autism Therapy Center, for a requested site plan amendment to allow for re-configuration of the front parking area into a drop- off and installation of second driveway entrance off Northport Drive for the subject property located at 5637 Brooklyn Boulevard, subject to conditions as outlined in the resolution. Voting in favor: Chair Christensen, Commissioners, Koenig, MacMillan, Schonning, Sweeney, and Tade. And the following voted against the same: None The motion passed 6-0. 7. DISCUSSION ITEMS 7a) City Council Update Ms. McIntosh reviewed the Planning Commission items that were discussed at the City Council’s May 8, 2020 meeting, including the Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for Shingle Creek Crossing. She added the amendment was proposed by property owner Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. to remove constraints for restaurant uses only on four of the remaining vacant lots in the PUD, including Building Site E. The amendment further requested changes to the PUD Declarations for certain uses and updates to Building Site E to accommodate a potential standalone car wash. She noted this request was reviewed by the Planning Commission and recommended for City Council approval. Ms. McIntosh added the City Council had a lengthy discussion, similar to that of the Planning Commission, and the request passed on a 3-1 vote, with an opposing vote from Mayor Elliott. She noted the car wash application has been received by City Staff and is scheduled for review at the Planning Commission’s July 2020 meeting. Ms. McIntosh stated there will be focus and attention on this application, as indicated by the questions and concerns related to location and aesthetics. Ms. McIntosh stated the preliminary development agreement for C Alan Homes was scheduled to be discussed at the EDA meeting, but the City Council has a policy to end meetings at 10:00 p.m. unless Council makes a motion to continue, so this item will be addressed at the next City Council meeting. Ms. McIntosh stated the City Council had a lengthy discussion regarding new Commissioners and re-appointments. She added the Mayor appointed four new Planning Commissioners, who PC Minutes 06-11-20 -5- DRAFT were all on tonight’s meeting. She added they are Sizi Goya, Alfreda Daniels, Kellie Hmong, and Stephanie Jones. She noted their terms are set to begin on Monday, June 15, 2020. Ms. McIntosh stated the current Planning Commissioners who were not re-appointed are Steve Schonning, Susan Tade, Rochelle Sweeney, and Randy Christensen. Chair Christensen stated he is surprised that four new Commissioners were appointed all at once. He added the Planning Commission has requested appointments for over a year, and although the Commissioners were not re-appointed, they continued to serve. He added he is disappointed that the current Commissioners were not informed that they were being replaced. He noted he understands the importance of diversity and inclusion on the City’s Commissions. He expressed his disappointment at no longer being able to serve on the Planning Commission. Commissioner Tade stated she was contacted by the Mayor at 6:30 p.m. tonight for the first time. She stated she is fine with the appointment of new Commissioners. She added, when she spoke to the Mayor, she expressed her disappointment that the Planning Commission did not have a full quorum for over a year, and no appointments were made. She noted she is fine with stepping away and applauds the Mayor’s efforts. Commissioner Tade stated she has enjoyed being a part of the Planning Commission and welcomed the new Commissioners. She expressed her concern that the Planning Commission spent an entire year without a quorum. She added she is thrilled that there are four new members who want to serve the City in doing the important work of the Planning Commission. Commissioner Schonning stated he is honored to have served on the Planning Commission for 8 years. He added he is disappointed to be leaving, as it is difficult to walk away with all the changes and important development going on in Brooklyn Center. He noted he feels it will be a challenge going forward without voices that have experience with all that is happening, and has happened in the past few years, including the Opportunity Site. Commissioner Schonning expressed to the new Commissioners the importance of attending every Planning Commission meeting. He added the Planning Commission is an integral part of City operations. He noted the Planning Commission worked on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan for over a year, which is vital to the future development of the City of Brooklyn Center. Commissioner Schonning stated again how important it is to attend every single meeting, to have a quorum, and move the City’s business forward. Commissioner Tade agreed and stressed the importance of having a quorum. She added sometimes the Commission was split down the middle. She noted, for the record, it is vitally important to have a full Planning Commission made up of seven Commissioners. Commissioner Sweeney stated she agrees with the other Commissioner’s sentiments. She added she is fine with stepping aside. She noted her only disappointment is that she does not have the chance to say good-bye to everyone in person. PC Minutes 06-11-20 -6- DRAFT Chair Christensen thanked the Planning Commissioners for their hard work and for their presence and support. He added City Staff have been wonderful to work with. He noted, to the new Commissioners, there will be opportunities to learn, read, and take classes. He asked that City Staff share that information with the new Commissioners. Chair Christensen stated he hopes the new group can come together to create a positive dynamic, make decisions and say what needs to be said. He added he always felt the Planning Commission was extremely successful in that regard. 7b) Next Planning Commission Meeting Ms. McIntosh reviewed the anticipated Agenda Items for the Planning Commission’s next meeting, including three public hearings. She added an application has been submitted for site and building plan approval as well as a Special Use Permit for the proposed car wash in Shingle Creek Crossing. She noted City Council reviewed a concept plan for two sets of triplex projects along two segments of Brooklyn Boulevard from C Alan Homes. They intend to be on for the July Planning Commission meeting and will be requesting approvals for the establishment of a Planned Unit Development, preliminary and final plat, and site and building plan approvals. Chair Christensen stated the July Planning Commission meeting will be a very full Agenda, and there is a large turnover with so many new Commissioners. He encouraged the new Commissioners to rely on City Staff and to ask questions. 8. OTHER BUSINESS None. 9. ADJOURNMENT Commissioner MacMillan expressed his sincere appreciation to Chair Christensen for his years of service to the City of Brooklyn Center. There was a motion by Commissioner Tade, seconded by Commissioner Schonning, to adjourn the Planning Commission meeting. The motion passed 6-0. The meeting adjourned at 7:41 p.m. _______________________________ _______________________________ Ginny McIntosh, Secretary Randall Christensen, Chair App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 1 Planning Commission Report Meeting Date: July 9, 2020 Application No. 2020-006 Applicants: Matt Durand Location: 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing (PID: 02-118-21-23-0030) Requests: (1) Site & Building Plan Approval, (2) Issuance of Special Use Permit REQUESTED ACTION Matt Durand (“the Applicant”) is requesting approval of a site and building plan and issuance of a Special Use Permit to construct a standalone, approximately 3,667-square foot car wash and related site improvements on Building Site E, located at 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing (“the Subject Property”) in the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD)—refer to Exhibit A. As Special Use Permits require a public hearing to be held, a public hearing notice was duly published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post on June 25, 2020 (Exhibit B), and mail notifications were sent to property owners in proximity to the Subject Property. BACKGROUND Map 1. Location of Subject Property (Building Site E) and Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Boundary. Site Data 2040 Land Use Plan: Transit-Oriented Development (TOD) Neighborhood: Centennial Current Zoning: Planned Unit Development - Commerce (PUD-C2) District Site Area: Shingle Creek Crossing PUD: 68.05 Acres |Building Site E: 0.92 Acres • Application Filed: 06/09/2020 • Review Period (60-day) Deadline: 08/08/2020 • Extension Declared: N/A • Extended Review Period Deadline: N/A App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 2 Surrounding Area Direction 2040 Land Use Plan Zoning North TOD C2 (Commerce) District South ROW (Highway 100) Highway 100 East ROW (Highway 100) Highway 100 West TOD C2 (Commerce) District Central Commerce Overlay District In the fall of 2019, the City brought forward a request under Planning Commission Application No. 2019- 014 to adopt certain zoning amendments to the Central Commerce Overlay District, which the Subject Property (Building Site E) is located within. The proposed amendments were intended to provide clarity to the outlined permitted and prohibited uses within the District. City staff recommended several amendments to Section 35-2240 (CC Central Commerce Overlay District) of the Zoning Ordinance to bring the uses permitted in the District closer in alignment to the future land use plans identified in the recently adopted 2040 Comprehensive Plan and remove the least desirable and incompatible uses. Given that the majority of the District is located within the identified “Transit-Oriented Development” future land use designation under the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, certain auto-oriented type uses, outdoor storage and display of materials, and indoor storage establishments were deemed to necessitate greater restrictions. Standalone car (auto) washes were specifically identified at this time as a permitted use within the Central Commerce Overlay District given the desire of the community to have one after closure of the Brookdale Car Wash off Brooklyn Boulevard. Additionally, car washes are permitted in very few areas of the City as the current Zoning Ordinance only allows the use through issuance of a Special Use Permit and so long as the use does not abut R1 (One Family Residence), R2 (One and Two Family Residence), or R3 (Multiple Family Residence) District properties, including abutment at a street line. This essentially precludes the presence of a car wash for the near entirety of Brooklyn Boulevard and many other areas of the City, particularly as the R1 District is the most prevalent District type in the City. Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development The original Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD) was approved on May 23, 2011, and provided for the overall redevelopment of the Brookdale Mall properties. The mall was originally comprised of over 1.1 million square feet of retail space, which was subsequently reduced following the demolition of 760,000 square feet of old mall space, followed by the planned renovation of 123,242 square feet of former food court space; the redevelopment of over 403,000 square feet of new retail commercial and restaurant uses; and approval of the Shingle Creek daylighting. Since 2011, the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD has been amended eight additional times to allow for the physical separation of the food court building from Sears, alterations, removals, and additions to the building sites, changes to the signage allowances, the re-subdivision of certain sites, and amendments to the allowed and prohibited uses within the PUD. Recently, City Staff was approached by Attorney Matthew Wolf (Taft, Stettinius, and Hollister LLP) on behalf of property owner Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. regarding a proposal to bring a standalone car wash to Building Site E, located at the northeast corner of the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD), and between Aspen Dental and the daylit portion of Shingle Creek. In App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 3 order to facilitate marketing and development within the PUD, Mr. Wolf also indicated a desire by Gatlin Development Co. Inc. to amend the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing PUD to delete an “eating establishment” requirement in place under Section 4.A of the Shingle Creek Crossing Declarations and related PUD concepts, revise the list of uses currently allowed within the PUD, update Building Site E to reflect the proposed standalone car wash, and bring the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD and associated Declarations back into synchronization given the number of amendments that have occurred since 2011. Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002 was submitted to the City for consideration of the aforementioned amendments to the PUD, and the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the requested PUD amendment on May 14, 2020. The City Council subsequently approved the request on June 8, 2020 by a 3-1 vote. The approvals included an update to the building and site configuration of Building Site E to accommodate a car wash and amendments to the Declarations to allow for a car wash on Building Site E specifically. See attached for a draft excerpt of the discussion at the June 8, 2020 City Council meeting (Exhibit C). SITE AND BUILDING PLAN Image 1. Site Plan of Proposed Standalone Car Wash (Building Site E, Shingle Creek Crossing PUD). Matt Durand (“the Applicant”) and Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Company Inc. (“the Property Owner”) approached the City regarding a proposal to develop an approximately 3,667-square foot standalone car wash and related site improvements on Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 4 retail shopping center. Section 35-230 (Plan Approval) requires Site and Building Plan approval from the City Council for the construction or major alteration of a structure, with the exception of one (R1 District) and two-family (R2 District) dwellings and buildings accessory thereto. Section 35-355, Subdivision 5.d (Planned Unit Development) requires an amendment to the existing Planned Unit Development any time a submitted plan is not in substantial compliance with the approved development plan. Substantial compliance means that the buildings, parking areas and roads are in essentially the same locations as previously approved; the floor area of nonresidential areas has not been increased or decreased by more than 5 percent; no building has been increased in the number of floors; open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use, and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10 percent. In reviewing the plan set submitted as part of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006, it appears that the submitted site plan is in substantial compliance with the plans submitted under Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, which approved amendments to the building size and site configuration of Building Site E (“the Subject Property”) to accommodate a standalone car wash. Proposed Location Per Property Owner Frank Gatlin (Gatlin Development Co. Inc.), the business model for car washes typically see the use as an outparcel tenant that relies on good visibility and easy access from major roadways. The car wash was initially proposed for construction on the west end of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, off Xerxes Avenue North, and north of the Sears property; however, Sears refused to grant for permission for the use on either Building Sites R or T. The Property Owner attempted to offer incentives to lift the restriction from Sears, but Sears would not agree. Building Sites L, M, O, S, N and Q, located east of Walmart, were also reviewed as potential sites; however, they are all internal to the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center and are outlined as restaurant or traditional retail uses in the approved PUD documentation and master plans with specific building footprints that are intended to work around the Shingle Creek box culvert and day lighted creek. Of additional concern in proposing a car wash on an internal site is traffic circulation. It is for these reasons that Building Site E was determined to be the best identified alternative location due to its visibility from Bass Lake Road (County Road 10) and access on the edge of the PUD shopping center. Building The proposed standalone car wash is approximately 3,667-square feet, with over half of the building comprised of a single car wash tunnel, capable of handling three cars at a time. The remainder of the interior is comprised of two offices, a bathroom, employee area, and large carwash equipment room. The Shingle Creek Crossing Architectural Guidelines require Buildings A through M to provide at least all four sides with at least 50% Class I and remaining 50% Class II materials. As proposed, the building would meet and exceed this threshold. The Applicant intends to utilize a mix of stucco (Class I), glass (Class I), and stacked stone panels (Class I), and insulated architectural metal panels (Class II) as an accent feature and cap along the roofline of the building (Exhibit D and Images 2-5 Below). App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 5 Images 2 and 3. North Elevation (Left) and South Elevation (Right) of Proposed Standalone Car Wash. Image 4. West Elevation of Proposed Standalone Car Wash. Image 5. East Elevation of Proposed Standalone Car Wash. The Shingle Creek Crossing Architectural Guidelines also specify that the maximum building coverage of the overall site shall not exceed 40 percent. As the Subject Property is 0.92 acres (40,075 square feet), the proposed 3,667 square foot building would only comprise 9.2 percent of the Subject Property. The previous iteration of Building Site E reflected a restaurant, which would have comprised 12 percent (4,800 square feet) of the Subject Property. Upon submittal of the initial building renderings, City staff noted that the west elevation featured a large expanse of stucco. City staff is aware a large portion of the west elevation contains an equipment room; therefore, it was suggested that additional stonework or transom windows be incorporated to break up the wall, as the Architectural Guidelines note that, “large expanses of blank and featureless walls facing App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 6 public street frontage shall incorporate architectural elements to mitigate the expanse.” The Guidelines also specify that colorful canopies, roofs and accents, and the use of cornices, ornamental lights, graphics, tenant blade signs, and other architectural details are encouraged. In line with the Architectural Guidelines, the Applicant should consider opportunities to expand the canopy over the entry way on the north end of the building (Image 2 above). Setback-wise, the proposed car wash would be positioned in line with Buildings D and G to the west, at approximately 55 feet from the north property line along Bass Lake Road (County Road 10), 102 feet from the west property line (abutting Building D), 75 feet from the south property line, situated at the centerline of the abutting access road, and 55 feet from the edge of curb. The east property line, which abuts sidewalk along the daylit portion of Shingle Creek, is approximately 8.7 feet from the property line. Access Access would be gained via two primary points off Bass Lake Road (County Road 10). The submitted site plan identifies three stacking lanes to the entrance of the car wash tunnel. The two innermost stacking lanes would provide pay stations, while the third, outermost lane would be reserved for VIP members. This lane would utilize license plate scanning equipment to allow for an express entrance into the car wash. The Applicant anticipates only 10 percent of the total daily users would be VIP users. With an estimated 300 users of the car wash per day (maximum 25 vehicles per hour), as noted in the Traffic Generation and Queuing Summary provided by Kimley-Horn and dated June 30, 2020, it is anticipated that only 30 vehicles would use the outermost lane each day. Peak Demand of Use and Trip Generation Per the Trip Generation & Queuing Summary provided by Kimley-Horn and dated June 30, 2020 (Exhibit E), car washes have the majority of site trips occur during the middle of the day with a peak hour occurring from 2:15 to 3:15 p.m. This peak hour accounts for 10.5 percent of the daily trips at the car wash. Assuming 300 car washes per day, the Summary indicates that this would result in 32 vehicles (64 trips) during the midday peak hour at the car wash. During the traditional commuter PM peak hour, 8.6 percent of the daily trips are anticipated, which would result in 26 vehicles (52 trips), which Kimley-Horn notes is consistent with ITE (Institute of Transportation Engineers) trip generation standards. City staff requested a review by Kimley-Horn of the anticipated queuing needs given the proposed three stacking lanes. Based on their review, and assuming each vehicle takes up 25 feet in length of queuing space, there is stacking for 13 to 14 vehicles before there would be any impacts on the adjacent land use site circulation. In estimating stacking needs during the presumed peak demand hour of 2:15 to 3:15 p.m., Kimley-Horn determined that, assuming a 95th percentile queue (9 vehicles), the Subject Property should have sufficient stacking to accommodate the queue. Fire/Emergency Access Although a minimum of 20 feet is required for fire access, the Fire Inspector indicated that, should fire services ever be needed on the Subject Property, access would be gained via the main drive, which is currently noted as 30 feet in width before narrowing to a 24 foot wide drive aisle. Access to Building D, located to the west, is still available via the front (south), rear (north), and west drive aisle between Buildings D and G. Access to the Fire Control Room and connections would be unaffected by the proposed development of Building Site E as it is located on the north end of the building, along Bass Lake Road (County Road 10). App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 7 Garbage Truck and Delivery Truck (Single Unit Truck) Circulation City staff requested an updated garbage truck turning exhibit (see Exhibit F and Image 6 below) due to concerns on the ability of a typical garbage truck to access the existing trash enclosure at the north end of the Subject Property, between Building Sites D and E. Following review the exhibits provided by Kimley-Horn, City staff is requesting the site plans be updated to taper down and narrow the 4.1 foot wide median separating the two inner stacking queues to the car wash, and to decrease the width of the main parking lot from 26 feet to 24 feet, which is the minimum width required for a two-way drive aisle with 90 degree, perpendicular parking. The tapering of the outermost median may require the relocation of certain landscaping, although City staff recommends maintaining some landscaping in the median as a visual buffer and for aesthetic appeal. It should be noted that, per Shingle Creek Crossing property management company Mid-America, garbage is typically picked up on Fridays in the early to late morning. As noted above, the anticipated peak use for car washes is in the afternoons. Image 6. Garbage Truck Turning Exhibit. Parking The parking needs for a standalone car wash are considerably less than the previously approved use on Building Site E of a restaurant. The information provided to City staff indicate each car wash would take 1.5 minutes per car, with a maximum of three (3) vehicles allowed in the wash tunnel at any one time. It is anticipated that the total time at the car wash only would take approximately three (3) minutes to complete, and the anticipated total time at the car wash, assuming a customer cleans and vacuums their car after, would take approximately 10 to 15 minutes. The car wash would likely have two employees available during their hours of operation. City staff reviewed the site plan and proposed parking assuming a retail use of 4.5 stalls per 1,000 square feet given that there is no outlined parking ratio in the PUD for car washes. Assuming a 3,667 App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 8 square foot building, 17 on-site parking spaces would be required. The updated site plan for Building Site E reflects 17 on-site parking spaces as well as three lines of stacking for the car wash queue. The proposed stacking lanes would impact existing parking along the east side of Building Site D; however, it should be noted that the parking there today is actually located “off-site” on Building Site E. Upon review of the PUD master plans, it appears Building Site D would maintain 48 on-site parking spaces. The minimum identified on-site parking stalls for Building Site D are 50 stalls given its identified retail use (4.46 parking stalls per 1,000 square feet per PUD Master Plans). It appears the shortage stems from the addition of an ADA loading space in the front and additional parking that was not installed per PUD plans on the west side of Building Site D, which appears to be partially located on Building Site G. Following visits to the sites, City Staff is not concerned about a lack in parking given that the parking tends to be communal in the shopping center. Lighting No photometric plan was provided as part of the application submittal; however, the PUD master plans for Shingle Creek Crossing provide a lighting exhibit for the entire PUD. As part of the updates to the master plans under Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, which updated the building size and site orientation of Building Site E (Subject Property) in preparation of this application request, Kimley- Horn and the Applicant shall provide an updated lighting exhibit for the Subject Property and for the overall PUD. All lighting will need to comply with the Shingle Creek Crossing Architectural Guidelines as the Subject Property is located in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Any details not outlined within the Guidelines shall follow Section 35-712 (Lighting) of the City’s Zoning Code. As the submitted architectural renderings show lighting below the roofline, the Applicant will need to ensure the lighting does not cast out and up towards the sky. Noise City staff is requesting that the Applicant submit additional documentation as they relate to noise coming from the car wash tunnel and 17 vacuums. The Applicant will want to confirm with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) that no additional permitting or restrictions are in place for the use and that the business complies with all applicable City ordinances. No outside broadcasting of music or announcements, other than as necessary at pay stations, shall be permitted. Trash | Screening There is an existing trash enclosure located on the northwest corner of the Subject Property. City staff viewed employees from Building D utilizing the trash enclosure on a recent visit to the Subject Property. The Applicant will need to determine if the existing enclosure is sufficient and work with the neighboring users at Building D to ensure trash needs are being met as the two sets of enclosures are attached. In addition, as trash is of concern in the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center, City staff is requesting that the Applicant provide supplemental information concerning plans to provide trash receptacles for users of the vacuuming stations, and plans to empty said trash receptacles and clean up litter. The Applicant should work with Kimley-Horn to identify opportunities to screen or provide landscaping near the utility access door and transformer on the south side of the building. Landscaping App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 9 A landscape plan was submitted as part of the civil sets, prepared by Kimley-Horn and dated June 9, 2020 (Exhibit A). As a landscape exhibit is provided in the PUD master plans for Shingle Creek Crossing, Kimley-Horn will need to update the PUD master plans to reflect the proposed landscaping for the Subject Property and as required under Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002. The Applicant should review the proposed landscaping for opportunities to plant year-round landscaping that might offer better screening of the stacking lanes. This is promoted in the Architectural Design Guidelines for Shingle Creek Crossing. In addition, the Applicant should revisit the east side of the Subject Property and incorporate landscaping that highlights the daylit portion of Shingle Creek, which the Subject Property abuts, and the walking paths along it. Landscaping should also take advantage of opportunities to provide additional stormwater management. The Guidelines also require perennial, shrub planting beds, trees, and turf areas to be irrigated with an automatic irrigation system to provide optimal plant establishment and long-term plant health. Stormwater and Shingle Creek During review of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, which included a request to update the building size and site configuration of the Subject Property (Building Site E), concerns were identified regarding potential impacts to Shingle Creek. The Subject Property is located just west of the daylit portion of Shingle Creek (refer to Image 7 below). “Daylighting” is a term for restoration of an originally open-air watercourse (Shingle Creek in this case) which has been diverted below ground back into an above-ground channel. Daylighting is intended to restore streams to a more natural state so that more stormwater gets absorbed and gradually released by soil and plants. Image 7. Daylit Portion of Shingle Creek—Exhibit provided by Kimley-Horn. App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 10 City Staff requested the Applicant and Kimley-Horn, who prepared the civil plans for the proposed standalone car wash and has been involved in the master planning for Shingle Creek Crossing provide additional documentation on Shingle Creek (Images 7 and 8, and Exhibit G). To provide context, “sanitary water,” sometimes referred to as, “grey water,” is the water that is discharged from toilets, sinks, showers, etc. “Storm water,” is the rain or snow water that falls on roof or other parking lot areas of a site that needs to drain off into a retention pond. The grey water from the car wash operations will be directed to the on-site sanitary sewer which will discharge to a lift station (designed to pump wastewater or sewage from a lower to higher elevation), near LA Fitness before being sent to the public sanitary treatment plant. The storm water runoff from the proposed car wash and parking lot areas will be routed to the existing stormwater management area behind Walmart. Neither system is to directly discharge into Shingle Creek (refer to Image 8 below). Image 8. Storm Sewer Routing from Building Site E (within Shingle Creek Crossing PUD), provided by Kimley-Horn. App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 11 Per Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, in his memorandum dated July 6, 2020 (Exhibit H), it was confirmed that, “all waste water generated by the car wash from within the wash tunnel, is collected by interior drains and directed to the sanitary sewer…the parking areas and drive lanes on the site are surrounded by B612 concrete curb and gutter, where all storm water is directed to the City’s storm water system. The site storm water, which is water from the outside area, is routed through a series of storm water treatment ponds at Centerbrook Golf Course for treatment prior to discharge in Shingle Creek. No stormwater from paved areas on site is directly discharged to the creek. There is a small section of landscaped areas along the east side of the building which may sheet flow into the creek.” Assistant City Engineer Review The Applicant shall comply with all revisions and redline comments as requested by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg in his memorandum dated July 6, 2020 (Exhibit H). Fire Inspector | Building Official Review Per Building Official Dan Grinsteinner, a Sewer Access Charge (SAC) determination is required by the Metropolitan Council. This is typically addressed during the City’s building permit review process. The Applicant will also need to submit plumbing plans, which are to be reviewed by the Minnesota Department of Labor and Industry. The Applicant will also need to comply with any applicable Minnesota Accessibility Code requirements as relating to parking and access (e.g., bathrooms, counters). The Applicant will need to work with Building Official Dan Grinsteinner and Fire Inspector Brandon Gautsch to address any matters as they relate to the Fire Code (Chapter 5 of the City Code). Per Section 503.2.1 (Dimensions), a minimum width of 20 feet is required for fire apparatus access roads, exclusive of shoulders. Per the plans submitted, the main access drive, which provides the closest access to the proposed car wash building, has a 30 foot wide entrance. Assuming the drive aisle is narrowed to 24 feet in width, per City staff comments under Access, this minimum required width would be maintained. During review of the submitted plans, Fire Inspector Gautsch did not express concerns regarding access to Building Site D, located to the west. This is despite plans to alter the existing drive, which is located on Building Site E, to accommodate a series of stacking queues to the car wash. As the fire access control room and connections are located on the north side of Building D, it was expressed that, should fire services be needed, access would be provided via the south main parking lot, the access between Buildings D and G, or from the north drive, which is a one-way. Signage No signage requests were submitted as part of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006. All signage is to comply with the Shingle Creek Crossing Signage Guidelines and requires approval from the Property Owner (Gatlin Development Co. Inc.) and the City prior to installation. Per Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, the approved amendments included a request to relocate one of the existing Shingle Creek Crossing monument signs to provide proper clearance for any proposed improvements to the Subject Property (Building Site E). This relocation is noted as item “P” on Sheet Number C400 (Site Plan) on the submitted plans under Exhibit A. The Applicant and Property Owner should identify opportunities to install additional signage along the access road leading into the proposed car wash as it turns into a one way road towards the eastern edge of the shopping center. In addition, the Property Owner should work with the City to address opportunities to incorporate additional striping on the south extension of Shingle Creek Parkway leading into the shopping center, as cars utilizing the two westbound left turn lanes will often cross over into the App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 12 other lane (and into the path of another vehicle) to access the one way road into the shopping center site. Based on the above-noted findings of fact contained in this report, City staff recommends approval of the site and building plans for the Subject Property, located at 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing; subject to issuance of the Special Use Permit to operate a standalone car wash and complying with the comments as outlined in the Approval Conditions below. SPECIAL USE PERMIT According to Section 35-220 (Special Use Permits) of the City’s Zoning Ordinance, “Special uses are those which may be required for the public welfare in a given district but which are, in some respects, incompatible with the permitted uses in the district. Before a building or premises is devoted to any use classified as a special use by this ordinance, a special use permit must be granted by the City Council.” Section 35-322 (C2 Commerce District) notes that “Gasoline service stations (see section 35-414), motor vehicle repair and auto washes, provided they do not abut an R1, R2, or R3 District property, including abutment at a street line” are permitted in the C2 (Commerce) District by Special Use only. Although the Subject Property is zoned, “Planned Unit Development,” the underlying zoning district is C2 (Commerce) District and is subject to the regulations within that district. Per the Standards of Special Use Permits, a Special Use Permit may be granted by the City Council after demonstration by evidence that all of the following are met (City staff responses are italicized): 1. The establishment, maintenance, or operation of the special use will promote and enhance the general public welfare and will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, morals, or comfort. The intent of the proposal is to provide a convenient and well-maintained car wash that will serve as an amenity to residents and visitors alike and provide additional traffic and visibility to Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center. The Applicant was made aware of concerns relating to traffic and impacts to the daylit portion of Shingle Creek as they were present during the Planning Commission and City Council reviews of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-002, which approved the PUD amendments necessary to allow for updates to the building and site configuration of Building Site E and the use of a car wash within the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Kimley-Horn provided a Trip Generation and Queuing Summary to provide additional insight into the anticipated traffic volumes and users to and from the site. Per their review, the proposed stacking lanes and on-site parking are considered sufficient and are not to result in conflicts between users of Building Site E and D, nor result in backups onto the adjacent interior access road. Kimley-Horn and the City both confirmed that the storm water systems in place will not directly discharge into Shingle Creek and the B612 gutter required to be in place will assist in directing flow away from Shingle Creek. The Applicant will need to work with the City to App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 13 ensure any snow removal is maintained away from the daylit portion of the Creek so as to not sheet flow into the Creek. 2. The special use will not be injurious to the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The Subject Property is currently vacant and has not had success in being developed as originally intended as a restaurant; therefore, City staff is of the sense that development of the Subject Property would obviously increase the value of the Subject Property. It is hoped that the addition of a standalone car wash will provide an amenity to residents and and visitors, and increase foot traffic to neighboring businesses. The Applicant intends to create a substantial investment into the development of the Subject Property. Assuming the property is maintained, City staff feels the use would not substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. 3. The establishment of the special use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding property for uses permitted in the district. Although the proposed development would result in the removal of parking along the east side of neighboring Building D, this parking is located on Building Site E and City staff feels the on-site parking is sufficient for Building D. As car washes are typically found on the outparcels of shopping centers, and as approval was not granted for construction of a car wash on the west side of the Shingle Creek PUD, it is reasonable that Building Site E would be the proposed alternative location for a car wash operation. The eastern edge of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD has yet to be developed and it is hoped that the construction of a standalone car wash will bring additional attention and future development to the remaining vacant parcels within the shopping center, and in particular on the east side. 4. Adequate measurements have been or will be taken to provide ingress, egress, and parking so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets. The Traffic Generation and Queuing Summary provided by Kimley-Horn summarizes that the parking and queuing needs for the car wash operation will be sufficient and will not result in the blocking of circulation to and from proposed Building E or Building D. City staff has recommended that the proposed main drive aisle for the main parking lot be reduced by two (2) feet and the median between the outermost and middle stacking lanes be reduced to provide sufficient turning radius for any garbage trucks or single unit (delivery) trucks that require access to the north end of Building Site D. The Applicant will need to work with Property Owner Shingle Creek LLC/Gatlin Development Co. Inc. to incorporate sufficient signage denoting the eastern end of the main access road as “one way.” Additionally, the Property Owner should address the potential for additional striping along the Shingle Creek Parkway extension leading into the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD to limit the number of cars in the wrong lane when turning into the development from the westbound left turn lanes at Bass Lake Road (County Road 10). App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 14 5. The special use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. As indicated in the staff report, the submitted plans substantially conform to the City’s codes and the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD Architectural Design Guidelines and associated PUD documents. Any deficiencies as outlined within the staff report shall be revised to reflect conformance and be submitted to City staff for review and approval. Based on the above-noted findings of fact contained in this report, City staff recommends issuance of the Special Use Permit to operate a standalone car wash at the Subject Property located at 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing; subject to approval of the site and building plans and complying with the comments as outlined in the Approval Conditions below. APPROVAL CONDITIONS Staff recommends the following conditions be attached to any positive recommendation on the approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006 for the Subject Property located at 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing: 1. Building and Site Plan Review: The building plans are subject to review and approval by the Building Official with respect to applicable codes prior to the issuance of permits. a. The Shingle Creek Crossing Master PUD plan set, Declarations, and documents shall be updated to reflect changes approved under Planning Commission Application Nos. 2020- 002 and 2020-006. An updated master plan set shall be provided for City records and prior to issuance of any building permits for the proposed car wash. i. Update the civil set to reflect requirements and redline comments from the Assistant City Engineer in his memorandum, dated July 6, 2020, and requests to narrow the stacking lane median and main drive aisle. ii. Provide updated landscape and photometric plans that are in agreement with the PUD master plans and per comments addressed in the staff report. iii. An irrigation plan is to be submitted as part of any building permit submittal for the proposed car wash and said system is to be maintained. b. Any major changes or modifications made to this Site and Building Plan can only be made by an amendment to the approved Site and Building Plan as approved by the City Council. 2. Agreements: a. Unless otherwise determined, Property Owner/Applicant shall execute a separate Performance Agreement with supporting financial guarantee approved by the City, which ensures the Subject Property will be constructed, developed, and maintained in conformance with the plans, specifications, and standards comprehended under this Site and Building Plan. b. The Applicant shall submit an as-built survey of the Subject Property, as well as any improvements and utility service lines, prior to the release of the Performance Agreement financial guarantee. 3. Engineering Review: a. The Applicant agrees to comply with all conditions or provisions noted in the Assistant City Engineer’s Review memorandum, dated July 6, 2020. App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 15 4. Construction Standards: a. A pre-construction conference shall be held with City staff and other entities designated by the City prior to issuance of a Building Permit. b. Appropriate erosion and sediment control devices shall be provided on site during construction as approved by the City’s Engineering Division. c. All work performed and materials used for construction of utilities shall conform to the City of Brooklyn Center Standard Specifications and Details. 5. Facilities, Operations, and Equipment: a. Any outside trash disposal facilities or roof top or on ground mechanical building equipment shall be appropriately screened from view. b. The building shall be equipped with automatic fire extinguishing systems meeting NFPA standards and shall be connected to a central monitoring device in accordance with Chapter 5 of the City Ordinances. c. The civil and architectural plans shall meet Minnesota ADA compliance as related to parking, public access, etc. d. The Applicant shall provide additional documentation as relates to anticipated noise levels for car wash equipment and vacuums, and provide a plan for addressing trash and litter on-site. i. The Applicant will conform to any applicable noise standards and any additional permitting needs from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) and adhere to City noise ordinance requirements. e. No outside broadcasting of music or announcements, other than as necessary at pay stations, shall be permitted. 6. Signage a. All signage is to comply with Shingle Creek Crossing Signage Guidelines and Chapter 34 of the City Code, and any new or relocated signage is to be approved by the City by issuance of a sign permit. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined by the City. RECOMMENDATION Based on the above-noted findings, City staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend City Council approval of Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006 for the approval of a site and building plan and issuance of a Special Use Permit to operate an approximately 3,667-square foot standalone car wash and related site improvements on the Subject Property located at 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing and known as Building Site E in the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD. Should the Planning Commission accept this recommendation, the Commission may elect to adopt the resolution which memorializes the findings in granting site and building plan and Special Use Permit approvals, subject to the Applicant complying with the conditions of approval. ATTACHMENTS Exhibit A – Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006, submitted by Matt Durand, and Associated Plans. Exhibit B – Public Hearing Notice, published by Brooklyn Center Sun Post, dated June 25, 2020. App. No. 2020-006 PC 07/09/2020 Page 16 Exhibit C – Draft Excerpt of June 8, 2020 City Council Meeting Minutes Concerning Planning Commission Application No. 2020- 002. Exhibit D – Architectural Renderings and Building Materials Calculations for Proposed Car Wash. Exhibit E – Trip Generation & Queuing Summary, prepared by Kimley-Horn, and dated June 30, 2020. Exhibit F – Garbage and Single Unit (Delivery) Truck Turn Exhibits, prepared by Kimley-Horn, and dated June 26, 2020. Exhibit G – Shingle Creek Storm Sewer Routing and Daylighting Exhibit, prepared by Kimley-Horn, and dated November, 10, 2017. Exhibit H – Review Memorandum, prepared by Assistant City Engineer Andrew Hogg, dated July 6, 2020. f.o O Kt ,-•,,......+ -"='*I-�-C,,,,,,,,.,..E...,.Nrl'ER AT THE CENTER / .. / " For Office Use Only Date Received: Date Application Complete: Letter of Completeness: PC App No. 2020 Planning Commission Application Applicant Information: Name: Matt Durand Address: 4692 159th Street W, Apple Valley, MN 55124 Office Phone:, __________________ Cell: _________________ _ Email: mattdurand@holidayss1.com FAX: ------------------- Property Owner Information* (if different from Applicant): Name: Shingle Creek LLC Property Owner Address: 1301 Riverplace Blvd, #1900, Jacksonville, FL 32201 Office Phone: 904-580-5090 Cell: ---------------------------------------- Email: park@gatlindc.com FAX: _________________ _ Project Information: Provide a general description of your project and request(s): The proposed project is for the construction of a freestanding car wash building with associated driveways, parking, landscaping, and utilities to service the building. Address/Location of Property: 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing, Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Legal Description of Property: Lot 2, Block 1 Shingle Creek Crossing 2nd Addition Application Type (Mark all that Apply) Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,050 It ,w Appeal II Rezoning $1,050 1;;: -, Zoning Code Text Amendment Special/Interim Use Permit $250 ,,,_-., Special/Interim Use Permit Amendment .""'.•:,l ✓Site and Building Plan Review $750 117 Variance 'f'.'"/' Planned Unit Development $1,800 :¥� Planned Unit Development Amendment Preliminary Plat $400 �.r0 Final Plat -·· $200 $500 $150 $200 $700 $200 IMPORTANT: All applications may be subject to additional fees for reimbursement of costs incurred by the City for filing, reviewing, and processing applications in the form of an escrow to the City. Application Fee: $ 750 Escrow Amount: $ 1000 Receipt No: Exhibit A Exhibit B 06/08/20 -5-DRAFT Councilmember Ryan expressed his appreciation for the service of these long-serving employees. He added he greatly admires their commitment to service to the City of Brooklyn Center. He noted he hopes that the City can continue to be a great employer despite the challenges it faces, and continue to encourage and develop its employees, which are a valuable asset. Fire Chief Todd Berg expressed his appreciation for Reggie Smart and Mark Reinking. He added he has had the privilege to work with Mr. Reinking for the past 10 years on a daily basis. He noted these employees will be missed. Mr. Boganey stated, as Mr. Cote mentioned, Mr. Reinking was a union official and he always fought hard for the best interests of the members of the union. He added he has never worked in an organization that had a collective bargaining group as committed to the community and City they served as they were to their members. He noted this was shown frequently at the table and through dispute resolutions, and the City has been fortunate to have this type of union leadership over the years. 8.PUBLIC HEARINGS 8a. ORDINANCE NO. 2020-04 AMENDING CHAPTER 3 OF THE CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES Deputy Community Development Director Jesse Anderson reviewed a proposed Ordinance amendment to bring the City’s building code into alignment with the State of Minnesota building code, amendments to which were adopted in 2020. He added these changes are intended to clarify interpretation of the Code. He reviewed the proposed changes. He noted the amended Code, if adopted, would be effective July 8, 2020. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to open the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. No one appeared to address this item. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson moved and Councilmember Ryan seconded to close the Public Hearing. Motion passed unanimously. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Butler seconded to adopt ORDINANCE NO. 2020-04 Amending Chapter 3 of the City Code of Ordinances Regarding the Administration of the State Building Code. Motion passed unanimously. 9.PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS Exhibit C 06/08/20 -6- DRAFT 9a. PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-002 FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO THE 2011 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT Community Development Director Meg Beekman reviewed a request for an amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development (PUD). She added, if approved, this would be the 9th amendment to the original PUD, which dates back to the original Brookdale Mall. She noted the City Council rezoned most of the property in 1999 from the C-2 district to PUD C-2. The Shingle Creek Crossing PUD was approved in 2011. This included 760,000 square feet of the 1.1 million square foot mall was demolished to pave the way for a new retail center. Since then the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD has been amended eight (8) times for future alterations and demolition of the remaining mail; replatted/revisions to certain building pad sites; and amended to allow for other approved uses within the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center. Ms. Beekman stated City Staff was approached by attorney Matthew Wolf, representing Gatlin Development, the Shingle Creek Crossing LLC property owner, regarding proposed development of a stand-alone car wash on Building Site E. She added to help marking and development of PUD, including proposed car wash, the applicant is requesting PUD amendments to delete Section 4.A of Declarations ad PUD Concepts, which requires 4 SCC lots to be used for eating establishment uses, which included Building Site E; revised list of uses currently allowed within the PUD; and in general, bring the PUD and associated declarations back into sync given numerous amendments that have occurred since 2011. Ms. Beekman stated this amendment would remove a restriction from development of other uses in the PUD, including educational use, day care use, and veterinary clinics. She added removal of these restrictions is proposed to help to bring the PUD into alignment. She added the applicant originally included gasoline service stations in listing of uses to now be allowed in the PUD but after some discussion with staff and looking at the C-2 District, it was removed. Ms. Beekman pointed out that on the application, the applicant included language that referred to the C-1 District but this area is zoned C-2. This is just to that these are allowed within the Central Commerce Overlay District. Also, if this development is approved this evening the developer has indicated he would come forward together with proposed user for building safety that is interested in developing a standalone car wash on that site. The request specifically speaks to the site plan which would allow for reduction in building size and also reduction in the parking size and to re-orient the building and setbacks. Ms. Beekman stated the developer has indicated they would present a proposal for a stand-alone car wash on Site E if the Ordinance amendment is approved. She added the developer is aware that any necessary changes to the building site due to the car wash use would require additional amendments. She noted the developer feels these changes are necessary to simplify the process and accommodate the end user. Ms. Beekman stated Section 35-355 Planned Unit Development requires development plans to be in substantial compliance and require PUD amendments in cases where the number of 06/08/20 -7- DRAFT dwelling unit, if any, has not increased or decreased by more than 5%; the floor area of non- residential areas has not increased or decreased by more than 5%; no building or has been increased in the number of floors; Open space has not been decreased or altered from its original design or use; and lot coverage of any individual building has not been increased or decreased by more than 10%. Ms. Beekman indicated the applicant is requesting these changes now rather than at the time of the application for the proposed car wash in order to streamline the process for the developer of the potential car wash. The applicant, Gatlin Development, and the car wash developer worked together to get the site plan as close to final as possible and recognizes the risk should the plans change. Ms. Beekman stated the current use requirement of eating establishments on Building Site E requires parking ration of 10 parking spaces per 1,000 SF of building. The PUD does not factor parking needs for car washes. Assuming 4.5 parking spaces per 1,000SF (retail use), a minimum of 16.5 on-site parking spaces would be required. The submitted plans reflect 17 parking spaces and two stacking queue and exit lane. The proposed site plan would remove a row of parking along the eastside of Building D (Aspen Dental). Staff reviewed and it appears Building Site D would maintain the minimum 50 on-site parking spaces it requires. The site plan reflect north setback Ms. Beekman stated he Planning Commission held a virtual public hearing on May 14, 2020, of which public notice was given. She added the developer and car wash owner were on the meeting to answer questions. She noted the only comment that City Staff received was from Bank of America, located next to Site E, who asked to be notified when the car wash proposal is received by the City. Ms. Beekman stated the Planning Commissioners had a robust conversation about whether Site E is the right location for a car wash. She added they expressed concerns about design standards. She noted the Planning Commission voted unanimously to recommend City Council approval of the request. Ms. Beekman stated City Staff recommends City Council approval of the proposed amendment to the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD based on the findings of fact and submitted plans based on the. She added the developer and representatives were on the meeting to answer questions. Councilmember Graves stated she is open to discussing the Ordinance amendment but would like to see something different at that site, as that is one of the few places left that has beauty and amenities. She added, however, she would support the car wash use if it is in alignment with other surrounding uses. She noted she feels there is probably a better location in Brooklyn Center for a car wash. Elliott: Are there any Councilmember questions? (1:00:48) Ryan: Meg I appreciate the presentation. I can understand the need to put in more flexibility into this PUD amendment. I have some questions about repurposing these four pads, because one of the things I get the most complaints about from my constituents is why aren’t there more restaurants in Brooklyn Center. Perhaps you, or I understand Mr. 06/08/20 -8- DRAFT Gatlin is with us this evening, perhaps we could hear from you or Mr. Gatlin about marketing efforts and why it is that over such an extended period of time, we have not received more interest in having restaurants located in Shingle Creek Crossing or elsewhere in the city. Gatlin: For over 10 years I have tried and tried and tried, I knew the City and community wanted restaurants, including myself. There’s nobody tried harder than me. Since this project started, September 12, 2012, we started marketing it 10 years ago. we have marketed every national and local restaurant that we could possibly do. I had Mid-America, and recently changed to Upland to get fresh eyes on the project. We have tried for 10 years. If you asked me why, it’s hard for me to answer, because it has all the elements I have been doing for 45 years. Over 75 Wal-marts, very similar to what you have there. I have been very successful in most of them in getting restaurants. The only thing I can tell you is the income levels, they seem to be less than what restaurants are seeking to be able to put the investment they need to put in. I get that thrown at me a lot. But I can promise you one thing. I have not turned down one possible restaurant. Back when I was working with Curt, Meg, and others, we tried to put a Mexican restaurant on the Bank of America pad, and the City was willing to subsidize it, and I tried everything I could and we didn’t get it. Now we have the Bayou Crab restaurant that is getting ready to open next to liquor store, 5,000 square feet, we were able to get. I was thrilled to be able to get that one. What I’m being handicapped by right now is something that is out of my control. We are not by any means with this amendment going to stop trying to get or looking for a restaurant. This just gives me a fair playing field against everyone else in the neighborhood and the community that we will be able to seek others and not be stuck with having to have a restaurant. I have felt confident that if I brought you another tenant, you would approve it if it is a good tenant, and you were okay with it. This has cost me $250,000 a year in taxes on these properties, that’s $2.5 million. Over $500,000 in maintenance, even though they are vacant. Over $2 million in interest for holding the properties. I am now $5 million in dead money trying to get back and break even, just in interests and taxes. One thing that is worse than not having a restaurant, and that’s not having anything at all. And my goal is to finish the project, with whatever the market is. When I came to your city 10 years ago it was a different environment. In the last 3 months, look at what’s happened. In the past 10 years, shopping centers have changed, and I am trying to be able to change with it and successfully fill this development up. The car wash that we are presenting is a multi-million-dollar facility. I have done 10 of them across the country. Just finished several beautiful ones here in Florida. It will compliment that area. This is not a boring building by the side of the road, this is fully automated, and the façade will complement the rest of the development. Something that will fit right in. It is the only lot that it works on. The last time I was there, a year ago, September 2019, in person, and spoke with you all, and I mentioned I had a car wash. We were going to put it by the Sears. Sears turned me down, would not let me put it on 06/08/20 -9- DRAFT parcel T no matter what I did, and I wasted months, tried everything I could. Now we have a new buyer, local here in Brooklyn Center, who wants to put facility up. I’m asking humbly to let us put this parcel into commerce and give the City something it needs. It is definitely lacking a first-class car wash. I have pictures, I think Meg has them, gorgeous projects across Florida. Back to restaurant specifically, for the last 10 years, I have done 20 or so Wal-Mart centers, and put in 60-70 restaurants. It’s not my fault. It’s not your fault. It’s not my broker’s fault. We have given it the best we can. Every broker in the Twin Cities know about Shingle Creek. And yet we have failed. I don’t like failure, and I don’t like to admit failure, but I can’t make something happen that is not there. God knows I have tried, I have put money, time and energy into it. I’m not asking to let it go away, I’m just asking let me have what everyone else has, and try to bring tenants in and turn it into job producing projects that will create income and jobs, and hopefully I will be able to come in with another flex building or two and attract more restaurants. But as far as me being able to get a free-standing restaurant, I have not been successful. If it was 1 or 2 years, I’d say give me more time. But after 10 years, we have to accept reality. I can’t make them do it. When we did get interest (in putting a restaurant on the site), we haven’t had it in 2 years, when we did have it, they passed on us. It wasn’t because I was asking too much. I knew I could come to the City and get some help, because the City wanted restaurants. Ryan: Mr. Gatlin, I appreciate you joining us this evening and sharing what has been your experience. I think it’s essential that you have the opportunity to bring that into the record to explain this challenge. As much as I have gotten that complaint from so many of my constituents, they need to hear what the real conditions are and how you have worked very hard to address that request on the part of so many residents of the City who desire to have a restaurant, like we used to have when Brookdale was thriving and vibrant, in the 1980s and 1990s. As we know, so much has changed. Going forward, there are things that the City can do to address this which is to bring in not just housing for the very lowest income households but a broad spectrum of housing, will bring a diversity of incomes. If we can raise the local median income of our City. As much as I am proud of the diversity of our City, to this point, we are struggling with the fact that diversity has brought lower income (1:11:48). And I think we need to recognize that and that the challenge of affordable housing is a regional challenge that will require a regional solution and cannot be solved simply by the City of Brooklyn Center. So if we brought in, for example, a significant number of market rate apartments across Bass Lake on the opportunity site, that would breathe new life into Shingle Creek Crossing. That’s what I hope we can do. I am very supportive of this proposal. I would imagine your interest in placing it where you want to place it, there is validity in that there will be high visibility that will draw traffic. Is that a fair assessment? Gatlin: That is 100% correct. I don’t know all your plans for across the street, Meg has shared some of it with me, and what I’ve seen in the press. If you all are successful in bringing in an entertainment component such as a movie theater or any type of entertainment, that 06/08/20 -10- DRAFT will make a huge difference for Shingle Creek Crossing. Any type of entertainment that can be brought in and more restaurants, it will always go back to action begets action. If we can get it started, get some residents across the street, and some entertainment, we will have a domino effect. If we can work together and get something like that to happen across the street, or even the Sears building if something would happen where we could come up with a use, that would make a major difference. Ryan: I hope that the City Council will understand that successful redevelopment in a community like ours entails a successful public/private partnership. And I appreciate you being here this evening. Gatlin: As I said to the Commissioners, I just put in permanent financing, a 10-year loan on the project. This has been one of the most challenging developments of my career, but I am committed to it, I am going to see it completed. I want to have good uses for it and get it finished for all of us. Elliott: I do want to comment on my friend Councilmember Ryan’s comments. I hear you say as part of your analysis that diversity brings lower income. Is that correct? Ryan: I am looking at the data. That’s a very extended conversation about how we can bring people out of lower income status, and I think my memory goes back farther than I would like to think about, President Johnson’s War on Poverty. The United States, as well as our region and Statewide, we have not had the greatest success with that. Hope springs eternal. I think there are a number of issues, in the context of what has happened in recent days and the promise of greater reforms, that we can look at a broader spectrum of socio-economic issues and how to address them. But inevitably, as we become more diverse, the data shows we have become by household or individual income, poorer. This is not a problem that Brooklyn Center can solve on its own. These are regional, statewide, national problems that require solutions on that scale. What we have done, with the Coronavirus challenge, we have stepped up and made a commitment to assist our local and minority micro-business, which we should, and I support that. I want to see the level of opportunity that I experienced as a young man, for everyone. And that’s a larger conversation. But as far as the consequences of the City doing financial and real estate redevelopment, we have to look at what will place us strategically in a better place the next 5, 10, 20 years. And that is not something we can really escape. I’m sure the staff will have more focused options available to us as time goes on. I wanted to raise that because we should think about that holistically, while at the same time recognizing that we may have little leverage. Elliott: I wanted to get clarification on what you said. Your premise. It’s important that we have conversations like this but I want to respectfully disagree with your premise. Because I think the facts bear something different out. I don’t think, again respectfully disagree, I don’t think diversity brings poverty, or brings lower income to a community. I honestly sincerely beg to differ. And the federal reserve bank of Minneapolis conducted a study, the African immigrant population alone brought in $2.5 billion in earnings during 2015. Households paid $419 million in federal taxes and $222 million in state and local taxes. 06/08/20 -11- DRAFT We estimated $81 billion in spending power. And that’s despite its relatively small size. That community, according to federal reserve bank makes “significant contributions to Minnesota’s economy”. That particular community, for example, is heavily represented in industries and fields that represent health care, nursing, highly entrepreneurial, so I sincerely disagree with your premise. I don’t think diversity is going to lead to more poverty or lower levels of income. I think that two things happening at the same time, correlation does not equal causality. You may see that perhaps we got more diverse when average incomes went down, when we were hit with the worst recession we have had in 2008. We know we also have struggled economically but it does not mean that minorities are the cause of Brooklyn Center’s struggles financially. And I will say that DEED and the governors have stated repeatedly that they do not believe that increased diversity causes poverty. Now you are saying we need to do what we need to do to make sure that the next 5, 10, 15, 20 years are economically viable for Brooklyn Center. So if we want to do that, according to DEED and the governor, 70% of Minnesota’s economic growth is coming from the State’s people of color, from the diverse communities. So objectively I would submit that if we want to be at the forefront of the economic activity and growth in this state, we need to really invest in the diversity we have and I would submit to you that it is rather an asset rather than a liability. Ryan: I do not question the value of the great contribution that our immigrants bring to us. We are a nation of immigrants. My great grandfather came from Norway as a young man. That whole side of my family were immigrants who struggled but prospered, because of the American dream. The American dream is our contract. Are you saying that the people in Minneapolis who have decried extraordinary racial inequities are wrong? No, we have to acknowledge that. We can address it, we can move past it if we work together and prosper together. Even the example of the Lux, the City’s only luxury apartment building, recently redeveloped by Mr. Soderbergh on Earle Brown Farm, charging very high rents, he was surprised by the diversity of the folks living in that development. Entrepreneurs and IT people working in Minneapolis or around the area like the location. Our diversity has great promise. But at the same time, I was focusing on giving that data that shows the grave racial disparities in terms of household and individual income, that is something that has to be overcome and that is a regional problem that requires a regional solution. And that is really where I was going with that. And that gets to the discussion of diversifying housing products and price points in our housing stock. Shingle Creek Crossing’s success or failure will be reflected in how successfully we are able to move in that direction. In no way would I discount or dismiss or disparage the value of our ethnic and cultural diversity. I think that’s our strength but at the same time it’s the great challenge. When a lot of our folks are starting from a place that’s less than advantageous. That’s why we have the Brooklyn Bridge Alliance and the BrookLink and all the rest of the of it because we have a lot of disadvantaged households in the city. We have to face up to that and try to engage some to address that challenge. And I’m sorry 06/08/20 -12- DRAFT about this week, we got into a broader discussion about this, but I thank you and I appreciate the opportunity to have this discussion here tonight. Councilmember Butler stated she appreciated Mayor Elliott for saying something because she was highly offended by that comment as a person of color, who is highly educated, debt free, a homeowner, coming from private schools. She and her husband grew up in Brooklyn Center and many of her family members still live in Brooklyn Center. We need to be careful out our words especially now after what we have learned in the last two weeks. We are tired, we are tired of the comments, we are tired of the labels, we are tired. I appreciate the commentary, thank you Mayor Elliott for talking back and she would appreciate going forward that we watch ourselves. In a way of not lumping us into one narrative. That is what I will say on that subject. Councilmember Butler stated she will support the car wash if the City Council also supports it. She added the City Council spoke with Mr. Gatlin about keeping Shingle Creek Crossing clean, and were told that the situation would improve, but that has not happened, and in fact, it has gotten worse. She noted it is difficult for her to be amenable to Mr. Gatlin’s requests when the existing development is not being maintained. Mayor Elliott stated he is not sure that a car wash is the best use of that land, and he would like to see other options. Mr. Gatlin humbly requested the City Council’s consideration of this request, as there are no other options. He added he has tried for 10 years and no one has shown interest in the site. He noted the vacant site does not do anyone any good, and the car wash use will bring a lot of activity to this intersection. The car wash developer stated he owns a Holiday Station Store on Bass Lake Road and works in Brooklyn Center. He added he wants to support the community, and he has had many requests from Holiday customers for a car wash. He noted the car wash would be a high end, state of the art express facility. He asked that the City Council put their trust in him and Mr. Gatlin to work together to put something beautiful on Lot E for the City of Brooklyn Center. Mayor Elliott stated he speaks to a lot of residents, and he knows what people want. He added he has not heard that residents want a car wash. He added, at this time, it does not seem to be the best use for that property. Mr. Gatlin asked Mayor Elliott what the right use would be because there is no other use interested in the site. Mayor Elliott stated he does not have an answer as to what would be the right use, but he would like to see other options. Mr. Gatlin stated he visited with the City Council in the fall of 2019, and a City Councilmember indicated that the City needs a car wash. He added he understood the City Council would be interested in having a car wash. 06/08/20 -13- DRAFT Councilmember Ryan stated a few City Councilmembers were amenable to the idea of a car wash. He added there was a family car wash at 55th Avenue and Brooklyn Boulevard that closed, and he has heard many residents say that they miss the car wash. He noted he feels that the product sounds good and would bring traffic and business to the area. He reiterated his support of the Ordinance amendment, and the potential for a car wash on Site E, considering the developer’s challenges in getting other uses for the site. Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson stated she spoke with Mr. Gatlin last year and indicated that the City needed a car wash. She added she believes a car wash will bring traffic and business to Shingle Creek Crossing and will serve the community well. She noted that would not be her first choice for a location, but it will draw traffic and customers to the area. Mr. Boganey stated he can attest to the fact that Gatlin Development has worked tirelessly to pursue restaurants for the City of Brooklyn Center over the years. He added they have not been successful. He noted this is a common problem for Brooklyn Park and Brooklyn Center. Councilmember Graves stated she would have liked to have seen an overall view of the site with surrounding uses, which would give it a broader context. She added she would support entertaining all potential ideas and uses for the site. She added the City Council approved a zoning change recently so that a mosque could move into an industrial area. She noted many small businesses and entrepreneurs are currently renting space in an office building, and it would be preferable for them to have affordable space that is out facing the public. Councilmember Graves stated, considering the City’s larger goals for providing services and resources and promoting economic prosperity, she would not want to be exclusive and unwilling to hear a proposal. She added a car wash is not what she would want to see on that site, but she is open to making a zoning change that would allow flexibility in terms of redevelopment. She noted that should not be considered a vote in favor of a car wash. Councilmember Graves stressed the importance of working collaboratively with the community to determine strategies for finding businesses for the empty spaces in Shingle Creek Crossing. Councilmember Ryan agreed, adding the success of Shingle Creek Crossing will depend upon a successful public/private partnership and favorable market conditions. Councilmember Ryan moved to approve PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-002 for Planned Unit Development Amendment No. 9 to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development. The motion failed for lack of a second. Councilmember Graves requested clarification that this amendment is not an approval of a development plan, but rather an amendment to the PUD language. Ms. Beekman confirmed this amendment does not approve a car wash, but rather amends the PUD to allow a car wash. She 06/08/20 -14- DRAFT added the site and building plan, as well as Special Use Permit, would be reviewed by the City Council. Mayor Elliott asked whether the application can be denied once it becomes a permitted use. Ms. Beekman stated the amendment would allow car washes as an acceptable use in the PUD. She added the PUD does not currently allow car washes. She noted residents asked for a car wash during community engagement activities related to the Central Overlay District amendment. City Attorney Troy Gilchrist stated the City Council’s discretion for denying a use is limited when allowed uses are identified. He added there would generally need to be a health, safety or welfare reason to deny a proposed use that has been identified as an allowed use. He noted the PUD is different, but that is a standard analysis. Councilmember Graves stated the Planning Commission expressed concerns about the site’s proximity to Shingle Creek. She asked whether there is an environmental component to be considered, and whether this type of development would be allowed in the watershed area. The civil engineer for Gatlin Development stated the car wash would be contained entirely within the parcel, and the creek would not be exposed or impacted in any way. He added the car wash drainage route runs behind the Walmart property. He noted there will be no environmental concerns related to this development. Councilmember Graves asked how many staff would be employed by the car wash. The car wash developer stated there would be 7 full-time employees, 1 manager, and two assistance, for a total of 10 employees, including himself and his partner. Councilmember Graves asked whether customers stay inside their car. The developer confirmed this, adding customers pay at a pay station in their lane, and the express car wash takes about 1.5 minutes. He stated customers can utilize vacuums. He noted this express model is new to the area, and they plan to be one of the first of its kind in the State of Minnesota. Councilmember Graves stated she was envisioning a car wash on the site and wishing there could also be an ice cream stand, to make it more of a community car wash. The developer stated their car wash in New Hope has an ice cream truck that frequents the site, as well as a food truck, and they have already asked if they can also come to the new Brooklyn Center location. Councilmember Graves stated she feels very conflicted and unable to make a decision with the information that has been presented. The developer stated he and his partner plan to be around for a long time and remodel the building every 4 years. He added they will be in it for the long haul. He noted local restaurants are often unable to stay in business. 06/08/20 -15- DRAFT Mr. Gatlin stated he would be willing to consider the PUD amendment only for Site E and leave the other sites as they are. He added he hopes that would help the City Council make a decision. Mayor Elliott stated, in terms of how long restaurants last in Brooklyn Center, the 50’s Grill has been around for 35 years. Councilmember Ryan stated the developer as indicated he has invested in the development for another 10 years and has put a lot of effort into Shingle Creek Crossing. He added he is willing to work constructively with the developer. He noted the developer is willing to be flexible and apply the amendment only to Site E and leave the other vacant sites that are committed to restaurant use. Councilmember Graves stated she is willing to move forward with the amendment as it only applies to Site E. She added she hopes that the site design will allow for more community interaction than an express car wash, and she looks forward to getting more information. Mayor Elliott stated he sees potential for the area near Shingle Creek, with its high visibility from the freeway. He added he believes there is a better use for this site than a car wash. He added he does not understand why the City has struggled to attract restaurants. He noted he will pass this up and look for a better opportunity. Mr. Gatlin stated this is the smallest lot that is left to be developed and will not accommodate a larger use. He added he has a use ready for this site, and he can continue to try to attract restaurants for the remaining vacant sites. Councilmember Ryan stated he wished to amend his original motion to apply the PUD amendment to Site E only. Mr. Gilchrist stated the initial motion failed for lack of a second. Councilmember Ryan moved and Councilmember Graves seconded to approve PLANNING COMMISSION APPLICATION NO. 2020-002 for Planned Unit Development Amendment No. 9 to the 2011 Shingle Creek Crossing Planned Unit Development, to be applied to Site E only. Mayor Elliott voted against the same and Councilmember Lawrence-Anderson did not respond. Motion passed. 10. COUNCIL CONSIDERATION ITEMS 10a. APPOINTMENTS TO COMMISSIONS Mayor Elliott stated he intends to appoint new Commissioners to the City’s Commissions. He added the City’s Commissions are not representative of the diversity of Brooklyn Center, and he took pains to ensure that appointments will create Commissions that are diverse and representative of the City’s population, especially against the backdrop of the current global movement toward full inclusion and systemic change. He noted he believes that having Night Renderings of Proposed Car Wash (1080 Shingle Creek Crossing) Exhibit D kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 MEMORANDUM To: Ginny McIntosh City of Brooklyn Center From: Jacob Rojer, P.E. Brian Wurdeman, P.E. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: June 30, 2020 Subject: Trip Generation & Queuing Summary Holiday Station Store Car Wash INTRODUCTION The proposed site is located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Bass Lake Road (County Road 10) & Shingle Creek Drive in Brooklyn Center, Minnesota. The proposed approximately 0.91- acre site is currently undeveloped, and the proposed development includes a single car wash tunnel with 17 vacuum stalls. The proposed site plan is attached. The City has asked for a memorandum to document the anticipated trip generation of the proposed development, the anticipated queueing, and the peak operation times for the car wash. TRIP GENERATION The trip generation for the development was calculated based on information provided by Holiday Station Stores and the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation, 10th Edition. For the proposed car wash, ITE Land Use Code (LUC) 948 (Automated Car Wash) was used. ITE data for automated car washes is limited and only provides PM peak hour data. Table 1 provides the estimated PM peak hour trips for the proposed development based on the ITE Land Use Code 948. Table 1 – Trip Generation Land Use Description ITE Code Intensity / Units Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Automated Car Wash 948 3,667 Sq. Ft. - - - - 26 26 52 Exhibit E Page 2 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 As previously mentioned, additional trip generation information was provided by Holiday Station Stores to supplement what is provided by ITE. The following provides a summary of site-specific information: Average number of daily car washes is expected to be around 300 (600 daily trips). The car wash can accommodate 25 vehicles per hour. It is anticipated that 70% of the car wash users will also utilize the vacuums. The car wash will have 3 entrance lanes with the outside lane near the garbage corrals reserved for VIP unlimited members. This lane is anticipated to account for 10% of the daily trips (30 vehicles per day). In Appendix A of the ITE Trip Generation, 10th Edition, there are hourly distributions provided for each land use. Chart 1 shows the hourly distribution for a car wash land use. The daily trip distribution patterns for a car wash differs from the typical commuter traffic patterns which would have a spike in traffic in the AM peak and in the PM peak. Based on the ITE hourly distribution data, car washes have the majority of the site trips occur during the middle of the day with the peak hour occurring from 2:15 PM to 3:15 PM. This peak hour accounts for 10.5% of the daily trips at the car wash. Using the Holiday Station Store provided data of 300 car washes per day, this results in 32 vehicles (64 trips) during the midday peak hour at the car wash. During the traditional commuter PM peak hour, 8.6% of the daily trips are anticipated. This results in 26 vehicles (52 trips) which is consistent with the ITE trip generation that is shown in Table 1. Chart 2 – Hourly Trip Distribution 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 0:001:002:003:004:005:006:007:008:009:0010:0011:0012:0013:0014:0015:0016:0017:0018:0019:0020:0021:0022:0023:00Percentage of Daily TripsTime of Day Page 3 kimley-horn.com 767 Eustis Street, Suite 100, St. Paul, MN 55114 651-645-4197 CAR WASH VEHICLE QUEUE The car wash vehicle queueing was reviewed based on a request from the City staff. Based on the conceptual site plan, there will be three car wash entry lanes. The two inside lanes provide approximately 100 feet of stacking distance before impacting access to the adjacent land use and the VIP exterior lane provides approximately 40 feet of stacking before it would impact the circulating lane around the adjacent land use. In addition to the stacking prior to payment for the car wash, there is approximately 100 feet of stacking after the payment stations. This results in a total stacking distance of approximately 340 feet. Assuming 25 feet per vehicle, there is stacking for 13-14 vehicles before there are impacts on the adjacent land uses site circulation. The Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Edition 95th percentile queue equation (shown below) was used to determine the anticipated queues during the car wash peak hour (2:15 PM to 3:15 PM). For this calculation, the below values are assumed:  Vx = 32 vehicles per hour anticipated in the peak  Cm,x = 25 vehicles per hour capacity of the car wash  T = 1 hour Using these metrics, the 95th percentile queue would be 8.9 which is rounded to 9 vehicles. During the 95th percentile queue, 5 vehicles would queue past the payment station and 4 vehicles would queue before the payment station. With approximately 10% of the vehicles utilizing the VIP lane, the probability of more than 1 vehicle in the VIP lane queue during the 95 th percentile queue scenario is minimal. The remaining vehicles in the queue would likely be divided equally between the two other entry lanes that are 100 feet in length, sufficient for 4 vehicles in each lane. Therefore, the site will have sufficient stacking to accommodate the anticipated 95 th percentile queue of 9 vehicle queue. CONCLUSION The proposed car wash is anticipated to generate 600 daily trips, with 64 trips generated during the car wash peak hour of 2:15 PM to 3:15 PM. The queue analysis resulted in the maximum queue anticipated to be 9 vehicles. With the proposed site layout providing storage on-site for 13-14 vehicles, the car wash queues are not anticipated to impact operations of adjacent land uses or public streets and it is unlikely that there would be more than 1 vehicle in the VIP lane queue. STOP10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SFR10.0 ' R20. 0' A G G G L L L L L L L L I I I EF K K K K 9 8 NM C C C C C A A B B Q I U 18.0' TYP.12.5'TYP.26.0' 18.0'5.0'2.5'34.7'111.3'12.0'20.7'9.0'2 0 . 0 ' 8 . 5 ' 4 . 0 ' 8 . 5 '24.0'30.0' 12.2' 4.1' 10.0' 2.0' 10.0'30.0'30.0' T G T T J J J J J P 15.0'8.7' R UD S R Q D D SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T O V QJ J J J 15.0'15.6'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC400HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWBUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 39,655 SF (0.91 AC) BUILDING AREA ±3,667 SF (9.25% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING*10 SPACES @ 0.27 RATIO PROPOSED PARKING 17 SPACES @ 0.46 RATIO ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALL / 1 STALL PROPERTY SUMMARY HOLIDAY CAR WASH TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 39,655 SF (0.91 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 27,525 SF (0.63 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 12,130 SF (0.28 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 31,590 SF (0.73 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PUD PROPOSED ZONING PUD PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30" x 30" DO NOT ENTER SIGN MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. DO NOT ENTER SIGN LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PAVEMENT STRIPING ARROW HEATED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) CAR WASHING ORDERING EQUIPMENT CAR WASH GATE ARM TRANSFORMER RELOCATED MONUMENT SIGN ONE WAY SIGN STOP SIGN 16 VACUUM BAYS; REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF VACUUMS RAISED CURBLESS MEDIAN/ SIDEWALK BOLLARD AREA TO BE USED FOR SNOW STORAGE A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:17pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 0.91 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. NORTH *PER AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS: 3 SPACED PER EACH ENCLOSED BAY + 1 SPACE PER EACH DAY-SHIFT EMPLOYEE + A MIN. OF 2 SPACES FOR SERVICE VEHICLES D STOPSTOPSTOPC O N C B I T U M I N O U SCONC CONC RIP RAP METAL COVER CONC 10" WATER PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF STOPSTOPSTOPC O N C B I T U M I N O U SCONC CONC RIP RAP METAL COVER CONC 10" WATER PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D SHINGLE CREEK PKWYRear-Load Garbage Truck35 4.5 20 Rear-Load Garbage Truck Overall Length 35.000ft Overall Width 8.375ft Overall Body Height 10.546ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.000ft Track Width 8.375ft Lock-to-lock time 6.00s Curb to Curb Turning Radius 29.300ft PREPARED FORGARBAGETRUCK TURNINGEXHIBITEX-2HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/26/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/26/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\Truck Turning Exhbit\2020-0625 - Garbage Truck Turning Exhibit.dwg June 26, 2020 - 1:38pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTHExhibit F STOPSTOPSTOPC O N C B I T U M I N O U SCONC CONC RIP RAP METAL COVER CONC 10" WATER PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF STOPSTOPSTOPC O N C B I T U M I N O U SCONC CONC RIP RAP METAL COVER CONC 10" WATER PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D SHINGLE CREEK PKWYSU-30 - Single Unit Truck30 4 20 SU-30 - Single Unit Truck Overall Length 30.000ft Overall Width 8.000ft Overall Body Height 13.500ft Min Body Ground Clearance 1.367ft Track Width 8.000ft Lock-to-lock time 5.00s Max Steering Angle (Virtual)31.80°PREPARED FORSINGLE UNIT BOXTRUCK TURNINGEXHIBITEX-1HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/25/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/26/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWThis document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\Exhibits\Truck Turning Exhbit\2020-0625 - SU BOX TruckTurning Exhibit.dwg June 26, 2020 - 1:42pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONNORTH K EXISTINGSTORMWATER S T O R M W A T E R H 9,500sf 11,200sf 7,500sf M 20,500 sf 7,500sf O 7,400sf S L 11,200 SMALL RETAIL SMALL RETAIL EXISTING APPLEBEE'S 6,000sf Q EXISTING SIGNAL EXISTING SIGNAL N A E 4,800sfG 8,434sf 38,000sf J C 11,200sf 7,322sf B U IL D IN G 1 BUILDING 6 BUILDING 7 BUILDING 8 BUI L DI NG9 D B T B U IL D IN G 4 B U IL D IN G 5 BUI L DI NG10 R B U IL D IN G 2 B U IL D IN G 3 6,673sf Y 96,922sf X 32,870sf F 4,000sf S TA TE H IG H W A Y N O .100CO U NTY ROA D NO.10 E 3 6 "E 1 2 "E 2 4 "E 2 4 "E 1 2 "E10" E 1 2 "E 2 4 "E 2 4 "E 1 2 "E24"PRIVATEDUALEXISTINGE21" E 4 2 "E51"E42" E 2 4 "E12"TO EXISTIN G R EG IO NAL P O ND SE18" E 4 2 "E 2 4 "E15" E15"E24" E 2 4 "E24" E23"x36"E15"E 2 4 "E 2 4 "E 4 8 "E 4 8 "E48" E23"X36"E 3 0 "E12"2x15"E15" E15"E 4 8 "E12" E 1 8 " E 4 8 "E15" 5"E36" E36" CULVERT E15" E18" E15" E18" E18" 2'x4' BOX CULVERT EXISTING STORMCEPTOR EXISTING STORMCEPTOR EXISTING STORMCEPTOR 1 8 "E 1 5 " E 4 8 " E 1 8 "E 2 4 " E18"12'x12'BOXCULVERTE15" E 3 6 "E24" E15" E 4 8 "E48" E48"E15"E 2 4 "E 4 2 "E15" E36" E4 8" E 1 5 " E 2 4 "1 5 "E36"E 4 2 "E 1 5 " E15" E18" E 3 0 "E 1 5 "E 4 2 "E 4 2 "E 4 2 "E 1 8 "E42" 2 4 " E 1 8 " E 1 8 " E15" E 1 8 "E18" E 1 8 "E10" E 1 0 " E 1 0 " E 1 0 " E18" E 1 8 "E18" E8" E15X24" E12" E15" E15"E15" E18" E15" E12" E 1 2 "E12" 15" 15" 15" 12" 15" 12" 12" BIOFILTRATION SYSTEM 12" 12" 12" 24" 12" 24" 24" 18" 12" 18" EXISTING PRIVATE STORM SEWER PROPOSED PRIVATE STORM SEWER EXISTING X-INCH STORM SEWER PROPOSED X-INCH STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE WATER FEATURE/STORMWATER TREATMENT AREA EX" X"PUD AMENDMENT 8CONCEPTUAL PLANSSTORM SEWER EXHIBITSHEET 5 OF 12 NORTH SCALE FEET 0 100 200 SHINGLE CREEK CROSSINGBROOKLYN CENTER, MN 05 LEGEND *ON-SITE STORM SEWER IS PRIVATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE 11/10/2017Exhibit G STOP10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SFR10.0 ' R20. 0' A G G G L L L L L L L L I I I EF K K K K 9 8 NM C C C C C A A B B Q I U 18.0' TYP.12.5'TYP.26.0' 18.0'5.0'2.5'34.7'111.3'12.0'20.7'9.0'2 0 . 0 ' 8 . 5 ' 4 . 0 ' 8 . 5 '24.0'30.0' 12.2' 4.1' 10.0' 2.0' 10.0'30.0'30.0' T G T T J J J J J P 15.0'8.7' R UD S R Q D D SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T O V QJ J J J 15.0'15.6'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC400HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWBUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 39,655 SF (0.91 AC) BUILDING AREA ±3,667 SF (9.25% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING*10 SPACES @ 0.27 RATIO PROPOSED PARKING 17 SPACES @ 0.46 RATIO ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALL / 1 STALL PROPERTY SUMMARY HOLIDAY CAR WASH TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 39,655 SF (0.91 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 27,525 SF (0.63 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 12,130 SF (0.28 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 31,590 SF (0.73 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PUD PROPOSED ZONING PUD PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30" x 30" DO NOT ENTER SIGN MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. DO NOT ENTER SIGN LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PAVEMENT STRIPING ARROW HEATED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) CAR WASHING ORDERING EQUIPMENT CAR WASH GATE ARM TRANSFORMER RELOCATED MONUMENT SIGN ONE WAY SIGN STOP SIGN 16 VACUUM BAYS; REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF VACUUMS RAISED CURBLESS MEDIAN/ SIDEWALK BOLLARD AREA TO BE USED FOR SNOW STORAGE A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:17pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES 1. ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3. ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4. ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5. EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7. SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8. TOTAL LAND AREA IS 0.91 ACRES. 9. PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11. NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12. REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13. REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. NORTH *PER AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS: 3 SPACED PER EACH ENCLOSED BAY + 1 SPACE PER EACH DAY-SHIFT EMPLOYEE + A MIN. OF 2 SPACES FOR SERVICE VEHICLES D From:Matt Durand To:Lokensgard, Arik; Matt Durand; Ginny McIntosh Cc:Wurdeman, Brian; "Park McMillan"; Frank Gatlin (frank@gatlindc.com) Subject:RE: Follow-up: PC Application No. 2020-006 (Car Wash, 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing) Date:Wednesday, July 8, 2020 1:39:05 PM Ginny,   Please see the below answer to the questions you had.   How is the water collected in the tunnel & what type of drain system is there?   Answer:  Water that gets applied to the car will be collected in a large debris pit that runs the length of the tunnel.  This pit will capture all water and debris coming from vehicles.  Once collected, there is a filter system (i.e. settling tanks) that will capture and large debris (i.e. sand, etc.) and what’s left will be fresh water “gray” water (Gray Water – safe, not drinkable).    This fresh gray water then flows into the city’s sanitary sewer system just like what is used for toilets as an example.  The tunnel will be designed so that the floor funnels all water to the center of the pit from all ends (see image below).  All of the water used in our wash will be fresh water and all of the soaps and detergents used are biodegradable and environmentally friendly.   There will be absolutely NO water coming from the car wash that will flow into Shingle Creek, rather it all flows into the city’s sewer system.  To utilize the city’s sewer system, I will be purchasing “Sewer Access Credits” (SAC) at the going rate. This is a fee that the city charges me to access the sewer.   In conclusion, there is no threat of water from our car wash operation running off into Shingle Creek.     Tunnel Floor Draining Slope Example:  This is an example from a previous wash that my car wash manufacturer did last year.     Please reach out with any questions.   Thanks! Matt   From: Lokensgard, Arik <Arik.Lokensgard@kimley-horn.com>  Sent: Wednesday, July 8, 2020 11:55 AM To: Matt Durand <mattdurand@holidayss1.com>; Ginny McIntosh <gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us> Cc: Wurdeman, Brian <Brian.Wurdeman@kimley-horn.com>; 'Park McMillan' <Park@gatlindc.com>; Frank Gatlin (frank@gatlindc.com) <frank@gatlindc.com> Subject: RE: Follow-up: PC Application No. 2020-006 (Car Wash, 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing)   Ginny,   I will also be on the call. Thanks!   Arik   M E M O R A N D U M DATE: July 6 , 2020 TO: Ginny McIntosh, City Planner/Zoning Administrator FROM: Andrew Hogg, Assistant City Engineer SUBJECT: Preliminary Site Plan Review – Holiday Car Wash – 1080 Shingle Creek Crossing Public Works staff reviewed the following documents submitted for review for the proposed Holiday Car Wash (Planning Commission Application No. 2020-006): Preliminary Plans dated 06/18/2020 Subject to final staff Site Plan approval, the referenced plans must be revised in accordance with the following comments/revisions and approved prior to issuance of Land Alteration permit. Title Sheet 1. No Comments C200 – Demo Plan 2.Protect existing public sanitary sewer within easement. C400 – Site Plan 3.Label site trash enclosure. 4. Circulation around Building D should not be impacted. Verify lane width with Building Official and Fire Official. C500 – Grading Plan 5. Add additional spots to grading plan per redlines. C600 – Utility Plan 6.Comment from the Assistant City Engineer – After reviewing the submittals from the developer and engineer, it is clear that all waste water generated by the car wash from within the wash tunnel, is collected by interior drains and directed to the sanitary sewer. This sewer is ultimately conveyed to the Met Council water treatment plant in Saint Paul for final treatment. The parking areas and drive lanes on the site are surrounded by B612 concrete curb and gutter, where all storm water is directed to the City’s storm water system. The site storm water, which is water from the outside area, is routed through a series of storm water treatment ponds at Centerbrook Golf Course for treatment prior to discharge in Shingle Creek. No storm water from paved areas on site is directly discharged to the creek. There is a small section of landscaped areas along the east side of the build which may sheet flow in to the creek. L100 & L101 – Landscaping Plans 7. No Comment Exhibit H Holiday Car Wash Review Memo, July 6, 2020 Miscellaneous 8. See redlines for additional comments. 9. Provide missing SWPPP documents. 10. Provide civil details. 11. Provide irrigation plan. 12. Upon project completion the applicant must submit an as-built survey of the property, improvements and utility service lines and structures; and provide certified record drawings of all project plan sheets depicting any associated private and/or public improvements, revisions and adjustments prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy. The as-built survey must also verify that all property corners have been established and are in place at the completion of the project as determined and directed by the City Engineer. 13. Inspection for the private site improvements must be performed by the developer’s design/project engineer. Upon project completion, the design/project engineer must formally certify through a letter that the project was built in conformance with the approved plans and under the design/project engineer’s immediate and direct supervision. The engineer must be certified in the State of Minnesota and must certify all required as-built drawings (which are separate from the as-built survey). 14. The total disturbed area does not exceed one acre, an NPDES permit is not required. The property was formerly included in the approved overall storm water plan for Shingle Creek Crossing and meets the watershed requirements. However the plan set shall show erosion control measures to prevent sediment from leaving the site. 15. The City has submitted the plans to Hennepin County for review. Applicant must meet requirements from the Hennepin County review. 16. Applicant must apply for a Land Disturbance permit. Prior to Issuance of a Land Alteration 17. Final construction/demolition plans and specifications need to be received and approved by the City Engineer in form and format as determined by the City. The final plan must comply with the approved preliminary plan and/or as amended, as required by the City Engineer. 18. A letter of credit or a cash escrow in the amount of 100 percent of the estimated cost as determined by City staff shall be deposited with the City. 19. During construction of the site improvements and until the permanent turf and plantings are established, the developer will be required to reimburse the City for the administration and engineering inspection efforts. Please submit a deposit of $2,500 that the City can draw upon on a monthly basis. 20. A Construction Management Plan and Agreement is required that addresses general construction activities and management provisions, traffic control provisions, emergency management provisions, storm water pollution prevention plan provisions, tree protection provisions, general public welfare and safety provisions, definition of responsibility p rovisions, temporar y parking provisions, overall site condition provisions and non-compliance provisions. A separate $2,500 deposit will be required as part of the non-compliance provision. Holiday Car Wash Review Memo, July 6, 2020 Anticipated Permitting 21. A City Land Disturbance permit is required. 22. Other permits not listed may be required and is the responsibility of the developer to obtain and warrant. 23. Copies of all required permits must be provided to the City prior to issuance of applicable building and land disturbance permits. 24. A preconstruction conference must be scheduled and held with City staff and other entities designated by the City. The aforementioned comments are provided based on the information submitted by the applicant at the time of this review. Other guarantees and site development conditions may be further prescribed throughout the project as warranted and determined b y the City. PREPARED FORCOVER SHEETC000HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWNORTH VICINITY N.T.S. SITE BROOKLYN CENTER, COUNTY, MN 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONFIRM THAT THE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR THE SITE MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS INCLUDED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2.IF REPRODUCED, THE SCALES SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE BASED ON A 22x34 SHEET. 3.ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICES COMPANIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO ANNOUNCED BUILDING POSSESSION AND THE FINAL CONNECTION OF SERVICES. 4.ALL GENERAL CONTRACTOR WORK TO BE COMPLETED (EARTHWORK, FINAL UTILITIES, AND FINAL GRADING) BY THE MILESTONE DATE IN PROJECT DOCUMENTS. NOTES: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT KIMLEY HORN 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 CONTACT: RYAN HYLLESTAD GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER BRAUN INTERTEC 1826 BUERKLE ROAD SAINT PAUL, MN 55110 TELEPHONE: (651) 487-7026 CONTACT: STEVE MARTIN, PE PROJECT TEAM: SURVEYOR SUNDE LAND SURVERYING, LLC 9001 E. BLOOMINGTON FRWY. SUITE 118 BLOOMINGTON, MN 55420 TELEPHONE: (952) 881-2455 CONTACT: LENNY CARLSON, PLS ENGINEER KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. PREPARED BY: BRIAN M. WURDEMAN 767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100 ST. PAUL, MN 55114 TELEPHONE (651) 645-4197 OWNER / DEVELOPER HOLIDAY STATION STORES 4692 159TH ST. WEST, APPLE VALLEY, MN 55124 TELEPHONE: - CONTACT: MATT DURAND HOLIDAY CAR WASH SECTION 15N, TOWNSHIP 118N, RANGE 21W FOR SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANS Know what'sbelow. before you dig.Call ARCHITECT ARCHITECTURAL CONSORTIUM 901 N 3RD ST, STE. 220 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 TELEPHONE: (612) 436-4031 CONTACT: ELLIOT STENDEL This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C0-COVER SHEET.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:24pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONBASS LAKE RD COU N T Y R D 1 0 0 N O R T HW A Y D R SHINGLE CREEK PKWYXERXES AVE N55TH AVE N 56TH AVE N SHING L E C R E E K P K W Y HOLIDAY CAR WASH SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C000 COVER SHEET C200 DEMO PLAN C400 SITE PLAN C500 GRADING PLAN C600 UTILITY PLAN L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN L101 LANDSCAPE DETAILS STOPC O N C CONC CONC CONC 10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D STOPC O N C CONC CONC CONC 10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE TO REMAIN EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE TO REMAIN REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER REMOVE AND RELOCATE EXISTING MONUMENT SIGN REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER EXISTING WATER STUB TO REMAIN PROTECT EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER PROTECT EXISTING STORM SEWER PROTECT EXISTING STORM MANHOLE REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER PROTECT EXISTING SIDEWALK PROTECT EXISTING TRASH ENCLOSURES PROTECT EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES BASS LAKE RDCOUNTY RD NO 10 PROTECT EXISTING RETAINING WALL PROTECT EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES PROTECT EXISTING TREES PROTECT EXISTING SANITARY PROTECT EXISTING STORM MANHOLE PROTECT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN LIGHT PROTECT EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT REMOVE EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE EXISTING DO NOT ENTER SIGNS. REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED SIGNS REMOVE EXISTING LIGHT POLE PROTECT EXISTING PEDESTRIAN LIGHT SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\gatlin development\brookdale center\CADD\PHASE 3\holiday car wash\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C2-DEMO PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 5:53pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORDEMO PLANC200HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMW1.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DEMOLITION, REMOVAL, AND DISPOSAL (IN A LOCATION APPROVED BY ALL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES) ALL STRUCTURES, PADS, WALLS, FLUMES, FOUNDATIONS, PARKING, DRIVES, DRAINAGE STRUCTURES, UTILITIES, ETC. SUCH THAT THE IMPROVEMENTS ON THE PLANS CAN BE CONSTRUCTED. ALL FACILITIES TO BE REMOVED SHALL BE UNDERCUT TO SUITABLE MATERIAL AND BROUGHT TO GRADE WITH SUITABLE COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 2.THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REMOVING ALL DEBRIS FROM THE SITE AND DISPOSING THE DEBRIS IN A LAWFUL MANNER. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE COPIES OF THE PERMIT AND RECEIPTS OF DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS TO THE OWNER AND OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE. 3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL UTILITY SERVICES TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AT ALL TIMES. UTILITY SERVICES SHALL NOT BE INTERRUPTED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AND COORDINATION WITH THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND/OR THE CITY. 4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH RESPECTIVE UTILITY COMPANIES PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL AND/OR RELOCATION OF UTILITIES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY CONCERNING PORTIONS OF WORK WHICH MAY BE PERFORMED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY'S FORCES AND ANY FEES WHICH ARE TO BE PAID TO THE UTILITY COMPANY FOR THEIR SERVICES. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PAYING ALL FEES AND CHARGES. 5.THE LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLAN HAVE BEEN DETERMINED FROM THE BEST INFORMATION AVAILABLE AND ARE GIVEN FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE CONTRACTOR. THE ENGINEER ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR THEIR ACCURACY. PRIOR TO THE START OF ANY DEMOLITION ACTIVITY, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE UTILITY COMPANIES FOR LOCATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ALL AREAS OF PROPOSED WORK. 6.ALL EXISTING SEWERS, PIPING AND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE NOT TO BE INTERPRETED AS THE EXACT LOCATION, OR AS ANY OBSTACLES THAT MAY OCCUR ON THE SITE. VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND PROCEED WITH CAUTION AROUND ANY ANTICIPATED FEATURES. GIVE NOTICE TO ALL UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING DESTRUCTION AND REMOVAL OF ALL SERVICE LINES AND CAP ALL LINES BEFORE PRECEDING WITH THE WORK. 7.ELECTRICAL, TELEPHONE, CABLE, WATER, FIBER OPTIC, AND/OR GAS LINES NEEDING TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE AFFECTED UTILITY COMPANY. ADEQUATE TIME SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR RELOCATION AND CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE UTILITY COMPANY IS NECESSARY TO PROVIDE A SMOOTH TRANSITION IN UTILITY SERVICE. CONTRACTOR SHALL PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO EXISTING UTILITIES WITHIN ANY ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY DURING CONSTRUCTION. 8.CONTRACTOR MUST PROTECT THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES WITH FENCING, BARRICADES, ENCLOSURES, ETC. (AND OTHER APPROPRIATE BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES) AS APPROVED BY THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE COORDINATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH BROOKLYN CENTER, HENNEPIN COUNTY AND MN/DOT. 9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ACCESS TO ALL ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION, AND SHALL NOTIFY ALL PROPERTIES IF ACCESS WILL BE INTERRUPTED OR ALTERED AT ANY TIME DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10.PRIOR TO DEMOLITION OCCURRING, ALL EROSION CONTROL DEVICES ARE TO BE INSTALLED. 11.CONTRACTOR MAY LIMIT SAW-CUT AND PAVEMENT REMOVAL TO ONLY THOSE AREAS WHERE IT IS REQUIRED AS SHOWN ON THESE CONSTRUCTION PLANS BUT IF ANY DAMAGE IS INCURRED ON ANY OF THE SURROUNDING PAVEMENT, ETC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ITS REMOVAL AND REPAIR. 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WATER MAIN WORK WITH THE FIRE DEPT. AND THE CITY WATER DEPARTMENT TO PLAN PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND TO ENSURE ADEQUATE FIRE PROTECTION IS CONSTANTLY AVAILABLE TO THE SITE THROUGHOUT THIS SPECIFIC WORK AND THROUGH ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION. CONTRACTOR WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ARRANGING/PROVIDING ANY REQUIRED WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WITH THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER MAIN SHUT OFFS WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND NO EXTRA COMPENSATION WILL BE PROVIDED. 13.REFER TO SURVEY FOR ALL EXISTING INVERT AND RIM ELEVATIONS. 14.ALL UTILITIES SHOWN ARE EXISTING UTILITIES. 15.IN THE EVENT A WELL IS FOUND, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY. ALL WELLS SHALL BE SEALED BY A LICENSED WELL CONTRACTOR IN ACCORDANCE WITH ALL STATE OF MN REQUIREMENTS. 16.IN THE EVENT THAT UNKNOWN CONTAINERS OR TANKS ARE ENCOUNTERED, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT THE OWNER AND/OR OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE IMMEDIATELY. ALL CONTAINERS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AT A PERMITTED LANDFILL PER THE PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IF ANY EXISTING DRAINTILE IS ENCOUNTERED ON SITE. NO ACTIVE DRAINTILE SHALL BE REMOVED WITHOUT APPROVAL FROM THE ENGINEER. DEMOLITION PLAN NOTES LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION REMOVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVE CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVE BUILDING REMOVE TREE REMOVE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE UTILITY LINES PROPERTY LINE EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE EXISTING CHAINLINK FENCE EXISTING J-BARRIER EXISTING RETAINING WALL EXISTING SANITARY SEWER EXISTING STORM SEWER EXISTING WATERMAIN EXISTING GAS MAIN EXISTING UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE EXISTING CONTOUR EXISTING SIGN EXISTING FLARED END SECTION EXISTING STORM MANHOLE EXISTING STORM CATCHBASIN EXISTING GAS METER EXISTING POST INDICATOR VALVE EXISTING WELL EXISTING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER EXISTING ROOF DRAIN EXISTING GATE VALVE EXISTING HYDRANT EXISTING METAL COVER EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER EXISTING AIR CONDITIONER EXISTING TELEPHONE MANHOLE EXISTING CABLE BOX EXISTING GUY WIRE EXISTING POWER POLE EXISTING LIGHT POLE EXISTING TREE CLEARING & GRUBBING FILL & ABANDON UTILITY LINES EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER LEGEND FULL DEPTH SAWCUT NORTH STOP10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SFR10.0 ' R20. 0' A G G G L L L L L L L L I I I EF K K K K 9 8 NM C C C C C A A B B Q I U 18.0' TYP.12.5'TYP.26.0' 18.0'5.0'2.5'34.7'111.3'12.0'20.7'9.0'2 0 . 0 ' 8 . 5 ' 4 . 0 ' 8 . 5 '24.0'30.0' 12.2' 4.1' 10.0' 2.0' 10.0'30.0'30.0' T G T T J J J J J P 15.0'8.7' R UD S R Q D D SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T SANI T A R Y S E W E R E A S E M E N T O V QJ J J J 15.0'15.6'PREPARED FORSITE PLANC400HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWBUILDING DATA SUMMARY AREAS PROPOSED PROPERTY 39,655 SF (0.91 AC) BUILDING AREA ±3,667 SF (9.25% OF TOTAL PROPERTY AREA) PARKING REQUIRED PARKING*10 SPACES @ 0.27 RATIO PROPOSED PARKING 17 SPACES @ 0.46 RATIO ADA STALLS REQ'D / PROVIDED 1 STALL / 1 STALL PROPERTY SUMMARY HOLIDAY CAR WASH TOTAL PROPERTY AREA 39,655 SF (0.91 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA 27,525 SF (0.63 AC) PROPOSED PERVIOUS AREA 12,130 SF (0.28 AC) TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 31,590 SF (0.73 AC) ZONING SUMMARY EXISTING ZONING PUD PROPOSED ZONING PUD PROPOSED CURB AND GUTTER PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LINE PROPOSED STANDARD DUTY ASPHALT PROPOSED CONCRETE PAVEMENT PROPOSED CONCRETE SIDEWALK LEGEND PROPOSED HEAVY DUTY ASPHALT KEYNOTE LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK 30" x 30" DO NOT ENTER SIGN MATCH EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT/ CURB & GUTTER ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA STRIPED WITH 4" SYSL @ 45° 2' O.C. DO NOT ENTER SIGN LANDSCAPE AREA - SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS PAVEMENT STRIPING ARROW HEATED HEAVY DUTY CONCRETE PAVEMENT B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) CAR WASHING ORDERING EQUIPMENT CAR WASH GATE ARM TRANSFORMER RELOCATED MONUMENT SIGN ONE WAY SIGN STOP SIGN 16 VACUUM BAYS; REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR LOCATION OF VACUUMS RAISED CURBLESS MEDIAN/ SIDEWALK BOLLARD AREA TO BE USED FOR SNOW STORAGE A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C4-SITE PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:17pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONSITE PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH ALL CITY/COUNTY REGULATIONS AND CODES AND O.S.H.A. STANDARDS. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS OF VESTIBULES, SLOPE PAVING, SIDEWALKS, EXIT PORCHES, TRUCK DOCKS, PRECISE BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND EXACT BUILDING UTILITY ENTRANCE LOCATIONS. 3.ALL INNER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <3'> AND OUTER CURBED RADII ARE TO BE <10'> UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. STRIPED RADII ARE TO BE 5'. 4.ALL DIMENSIONS AND RADII ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.EXISTING STRUCTURES WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ARE TO BE ABANDONED, REMOVED OR RELOCATED AS NECESSARY. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL RELOCATIONS, (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON PLANS) INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ALL UTILITIES, STORM DRAINAGE, SIGNS, TRAFFIC SIGNALS & POLES, ETC. AS REQUIRED. ALL WORK SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNING AUTHORITIES REQUIREMENTS AND PROJECT SITE WORK SPECIFICATIONS AND SHALL BE APPROVED BY SUCH. ALL COST SHALL BE INCLUDED IN BASE BID. 7.SITE BOUNDARY, TOPOGRAPHY, UTILITY AND ROAD INFORMATION TAKEN FROM A SURVEY BY SUNDE LAND SURVEYING, LLC. KIMLEY-HORN ASSUMES NO LIABILITY FOR ANY ERRORS, INACCURACIES, OR OMISSIONS CONTAINED THEREIN. 8.TOTAL LAND AREA IS 0.91 ACRES. 9.PYLON / MONUMENT SIGNS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS. SIGNS ARE SHOWN FOR GRAPHICAL & INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY SIZE, LOCATION AND ANY REQUIRED PERMITS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE PYLON / MONUMENT SIGN. 10.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 11.NO PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SUCH AS TREES OR SHRUBS, ABOVE AND UNDERGROUND STRUCTURES, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS SHALL BE LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED ON PLANS OTHERWISE. 12.REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAILS. 13.REFER TO FINAL PLAT OR ALTA SURVEY FOR EXACT LOT AND PROPERTY BOUNDARY DIMENSIONS. 14.ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT. 15.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST TENTH FOOT. NORTH *PER AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS: 3 SPACED PER EACH ENCLOSED BAY + 1 SPACE PER EACH DAY-SHIFT EMPLOYEE + A MIN. OF 2 SPACES FOR SERVICE VEHICLES D PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF STOPRIP RAP METAL COVER 10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D STOPRIP RAP METAL COVER 10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D 1.71 % 1.87 %1.75%1.68%2.65% 2.82% 3.97% 4.17% 4.04% 3.43% 2.3 6 % 5 . 3 5% 3.8 7 % 3.67 % 2 . 5 0%1.80%2.49% 2.81% 1.71% 1.85% 3. 3 6%1.68%7.88 %11.61%13.38%8.80%7.41% 4.89% 7.15%10.41% 11.81%3.64%2.74%3.65%24.90%3.08%2.42%850850850847848848848849849849849849848848848849848849847848 849849 8498488 4 9 848 849849848847849849849848848D849.00 849.00 849.00 849.00 849.99 850.00 848.10 848.38 848.59 848.45 848.45 848.67 849.00 848.96 849.00 848.96 848.45 848.45 849.00 849.00 848.88 848.79 848.21848.16 848.43848.12 ME:846.84 848.00 848.66 ME:847.57 848.06 849.71 850.00 849.87 ME:850.15 849.86 ME:850.00 849.00 849.00 848.52 848.38 848.00 848.18 848.57 848.45 848.45 847.67 848.04 848.78 848.32 848.86 848.91 849.28 849.00 2.86% 848.72 848.85 ME:847.32 ME:847.48 ME:847.89ME:848.76 STRM-201 CBMH NEENAH R-3067-VB RE:847.70 IE:844.06 W IE:842.50 S STRM-101 MH NEENAH R-1642 RE:848.34 IE:843.45 NE IE:843.45 SE IE:843.45 SW STRM-102 CB NEENAH R-3067-VB RE:847.53 IE:844.03 SW STRM-103 CBMH NEENAH R-2535-A RE:847.51 IE:843.65 E IE:843.65 NW EX-100 CONNECT TO EXISTING STUB IE:843.37 NE 70 LF - 12" SD @ 0.83% 9 LF - 12" SD @ 0.83% 68 LF - 12" SD @ 0.52% 35 LF - 12" SD @ 0.50% 40 LF - 12" SD @ 0.50% FFE: 949.00 STRM-200 CONNECT TO EXISTING STRUCTURE IE:842.30 N 10 LF - 12" SD @ 2.05% STRM-202 CBMH NEENAH R-3067-VB RE:847.92 IE:844.41 W IE:844.41 E 31 LF - 12" SD @ 0.50% STRM-203 CB NEENAH R-3067-VB RE:848.07 IE:844.57 E ADJUST RIM DOWN 0.4 FEET STRM-104 ROOF DRAIN RE:844.93 IE:843.83 W PREPARED FORGRADING PLANC500HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWGRADING PLAN NOTES 1.ALL WORK SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER, SPECIFICATIONS AND BUILDING PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 2.CONTRACTOR TO CALL GOPHER STATE CALL ONE @ <1-800-252-1166> AT LEAST TWO WORKING DAYS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS. 3.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76 HDPE: 0" - 10" PER AASHTO M-252 HDPE: 12" OR GREATER PER ASTM F-2306 PVC SCH. 40 PER ASTM D-3034 STORM SEWER FITTINGS SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: RCP PER ASTM C-76, JOINTS PER ASTM C-361, C-990, AND C-443 HDPE PER ASTM 3212 PVC PER ASTM D-3034, JOINTS PER ASTM D-3212 4.CONTRACTOR TO FIELD VERIFY THE LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OR EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO THE START OF SITE GRADING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE PROJECT ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS. 5.SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EXCAVATION TO HELP OFFSET ANY STABILITY PROBLEMS DUE TO WATER SEEPAGE OR STEEP SLOPES. WHEN PLACING NEW SURFACE MATERIAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING PAVEMENT, THE EXCAVATION SHALL BE BACKFILLED PROMPTLY TO AVOID UNDERMINING OF EXISTING PAVEMENT. 6.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROL. 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE DRAINAGE TRENCHES TO FOLLOW PROPOSED STORM SEWER ALIGNMENTS. 8.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. CONTRACTOR SHALL ROUGH GRADE TO SUBGRADE ELEVATION AND LEAVE STREET READY FOR SUBBASE. 9.ALL EXCESS MATERIAL, BITUMINOUS SURFACING, CONCRETE ITEMS, ANY ABANDONED UTILITY ITEMS, AND OTHER UNSTABLE MATERIALS SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE DISPOSED OF OFF THE CONSTRUCTION SITE. 10.REFER TO THE UTILITY PLAN FOR SANITARY SEWER MAIN, WATER MAIN SERVICE LAYOUT AND ELEVATIONS AND CASTING / STRUCTURE NOTATION. 11.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PAVEMENTS AND CURB AND GUTTER WITH SMOOTH UNIFORM SLOPES TO PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE. 12.INSTALL A MINIMUM OF <4" CLASS 5> AGGREGATE BASE UNDER CURB AND GUTTER AND CONCRETE SIDEWALKS. 13.UPON COMPLETION OF EXCAVATION AND FILLING, CONTRACTOR SHALL RESTORE ALL STREETS AND DISTURBED AREAS ON SITE. ALL DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE RE-VEGETATED WITH A MINIMUM OF <4" OF TOPSOIL>. 14.ALL SPOT ELEVATIONS/CONTOURS ARE TO GUTTER / FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.GRADING FOR ALL SIDEWALKS AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES INCLUDING CROSSING DRIVEWAYS SHALL CONFORM TO CURRENT ADA STATE/NATIONAL STANDARDS. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE RAMP SLOPES EXCEED 1 VERTICAL TO 12 HORIZONTAL. IN NO CASE SHALL SIDEWALK CROSS SLOPES EXCEED 2% . IN NO CASE SHALL LONGITUDINAL SIDEWALK SLOPES EXCEED 5%. IN NO CASE SHALL ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALLS OR AISLES EXCEED 2% (1.5% TARGET) IN ALL DIRECTIONS. SIDEWALK ACCESS TO EXTERNAL BUILDING DOORS AND GATES SHALL BE ADA COMPLIANT. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY IF ADA CRITERIA CANNOT BE MET IN ANY LOCATION PRIOR TO PAVING. NO CONTRACTOR CHANGE ORDERS WILL BE ACCEPTED FOR A.D.A COMPLIANCE ISSUES. 16.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 0.5% GUTTER SLOPE TOWARDS LOW POINTS. 17.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 3" INSULATION BY 5' WIDE CENTERED ON STORM PIPE IF LESS THAN 4' OF COVER IN PAVEMENT AREAS AND LESS THAN 3' OF COVER IN LANDSCAPE AREAS. 18.ROOF DRAIN INVERT CONNECTIONS AT THE BUILDING SHALL BE AT ELEVATION <XXX.XX> OR LOWER UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. REFERENCE MEP PLANS FOR ROOF DRAIN CONNECTION. 19.ALL STORM SEWER CONNECTIONS SHALL BE GASKETED AND WATER TIGHT INCLUDING MANHOLE CONNECTIONS. 20.ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AIR TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT PLUMBING CODE. 21.MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 1.25% SLOPE IN BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AREAS, 0.5% SLOPE IN CONCRETE PAVEMENT AREAS. 22.CONTRACTOR SHALL REVIEW PAVEMENT GRADIENT AND CONSTRUCT "INFALL CURB" WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS TOWARD GUTTER, AND "OUTFALL" CURB WHERE PAVEMENT DRAINS AWAY FROM GUTTER. PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPOSED STORM SEWER PROPERTY LINE EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR925 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION100.00 LEGEND PROPOSED HIGH POINT ELEVATION HP:0.0 PROPOSED LOW POINT ELEVATION PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF CURB ELEVATION PROPOSED FLUSH PAVEMENT ELEVATION LP:0.0 G:0.00 T:0.00 PROPOSED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW T/G:0.0 EOF:0.0 0.0%PROPOSED DRAINAGE DIRECTION 0.00%PROPOSED ADA SLOPE ME:0.0 MATCH EXISTING ELEVATION PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (SOLID CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE (ROUND INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE/ CATCH BASIN (CURB INLET CASTING) PROPOSED STORM SEWER CLENOUT PROPOSED RIPRAP PROPOSED FLARED END SECTION CO D NORTH This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\GATLIN DEVELOPMENT\BROOKDALE CENTER\CADD\PHASE 3\Holiday Car Wash\3 Design\CAD\PlanSheets\C5-GRADING PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 7:51pm©BYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STOPBASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D STOPBASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" SANITARY STUB 6" SANITARY SEWER SERVICE, IE: 844.50 TIE INTO EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES EXISTING SAN MH TOP= 849.0 INV= 844.3 (N) INV= 843.6 (E) INV= 843.1 (S) 45° BEND 6" SAN STUB INV= 843.92 TRANSFORMER 6" DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN STUB EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT NOTE TO CONTRACTOR: CONTRACTOR IS TO REFER TO MEP PLANS FOR WIRING AND SERVICES TO VACUUMS, ORDERING EQUIPMENT, AND GATE ARMS PREPARED FORUTILITY PLANC600HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.BRIAN M. WURDEMAN06/09/202053113DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNBMWAKABMWUTILITY PLAN NOTES 1.ALL FILL MATERIAL IS TO BE IN PLACE, AND COMPACTED BEFORE INSTALLATION OF PROPOSED UTILITIES. 2.SANITARY SEWER PIPE SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 8" PVC SDR35 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES LESS THAN 12' DEEP 8" PVC SDR26 PER ASTM D-3034, FOR PIPES MORE THAN 12' DEEP 6" PVC SCHEDULE 40 PER ASTM D-3034 DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 3.WATER LINES SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS: 6" AND LARGER, PVC C-900 PER ASTM D 2241 CLASS 200 UNDER COUNTY ROADS, OTHERWISE CLASS 150 4" AND LARGER DUCTILE IRON PIPE PER AWWA C150 SMALLER THAN 3" PIPING SHALL BE COPPER TUBE TYPE "K" PER ANSI 816.22 OR PVC, 200 P.S.I., PER ASTM D1784 AND D2241. 4.MINIMUM TRENCH WIDTH SHALL BE 2 FEET. 5.ALL WATER JOINTS ARE TO BE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH RESTRAINTS SUCH AS THRUST BLOCKING, WITH STAINLESS STEEL OR COBALT BLUE BOLTS, OR AS INDICATED IN THE CITY SPECIFICATIONS AND PROJECT DOCUMENTS. 6.ALL UTILITIES SHOULD BE KEPT TEN (10') APART (PARALLEL) OR WHEN CROSSING 18" VERTICAL CLEARANCE (OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE TO OUTSIDE EDGE OF PIPE OR STRUCTURE). 7.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 7'-5" COVER ON ALL WATERLINES. 8.IN THE EVENT OF A VERTICAL CONFLICT BETWEEN WATER LINES, SANITARY LINES, STORM LINES AND GAS LINES, OR ANY OBSTRUCTION (EXISTING AND PROPOSED), THE SANITARY LINE SHALL BE SCH. 40 OR C900 WITH MECHANICAL JOINTS AT LEAST 10 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE CENTER LINE OF THE CROSSING. THE WATER LINE SHALL HAVE MECHANICAL JOINTS WITH APPROPRIATE FASTENERS AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION. MEETING REQUIREMENTS OF ANSI A21.10 OR ANSI 21.11 (AWWA C-151) (CLASS 50). 9.LINES UNDERGROUND SHALL BE INSTALLED, INSPECTED AND APPROVED BEFORE BACKFILLING. 10.TOPS OF MANHOLES SHALL BE RAISED AS NECESSARY TO BE FLUSH WITH PROPOSED PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS, AND TO BE ONE FOOT ABOVE FINISHED GROUND ELEVATIONS, IN GREEN AREAS, WITH WATERTIGHT LIDS. 11.ALL CONCRETE FOR ENCASEMENTS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM 28 DAY COMPRESSION STRENGTH AT 3000 P.S.I. 12.EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE VERIFIED IN FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY NEW LINES. 13.REFER TO INTERIOR PLUMBING DRAWINGS FOR TIE-IN OF ALL UTILITIES. 14.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING TO THE SPECIFICATIONS OF THE CITY OF BROOKLYN CENTER AND/OR STATE OF MN WITH REGARDS TO MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION OF THE WATER AND SEWER LINES. 15.THE CONTRACTOR IS SPECIFICALLY CAUTIONED THAT THE LOCATION AND/OR ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS IS BASED ON RECORDS OF THE VARIOUS UTILITY COMPANIES, AND WHERE POSSIBLE, MEASUREMENTS TAKEN IN THE FIELD. THE INFORMATION IS NOT TO BE RELIED ON AS BEING EXACT OR COMPLETE. THE CONTRACTOR MUST CALL THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANIES AT LEAST 72 HOURS BEFORE ANY EXCAVATION TO REQUEST EXACT FIELD LOCATION OF UTILITIES. IT SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR TO RELOCATE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES WHICH CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. 16.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL NECESSARY INSPECTIONS AND/OR CERTIFICATIONS REQUIRED BY CODES AND/OR UTILITY SERVICE COMPANIES. 17.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES FOR INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS AND SPECIFICATIONS. 18.CONTRACTOR SHALL REFERENCE ARCH / MEP PLANS FOR SITE LIGHTING AND ELECTRICAL PLAN. 19.BACKFLOW DEVICES (DDCV AND PRZ ASSEMBLIES) AND METERS ARE LOCATED IN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING. REF. ARCH / MEP PLANS. 20.ALL ONSITE WATERMAINS AND SANITARY SEWERS SHALL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED. 21.ALL WATERMAIN STUBOUTS SHALL BE MECHANICALLY RESTRAINED WITH REACTION BLOCKING. SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN GATE VALVE HYDRANT TEE REDUCER UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC TELEPHONE GAS MAIN STORM SEWER LEGEND CO SANITARY CLEANOUTCO S EXISTING PROPOSED NORTH This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\gatlin development\brookdale center\CADD\PHASE 3\holiday car wash\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\C6-UTILITY PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:38pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED CAR WASH ±3,667 SF STOPRIP RAP METAL COVER 10" WATER BASS LAKE RD SHINGLE CREEK PKWYCOUNTY RD NO 10 SHINGLE CREEK (COUNTY DITCH NO 13) EXISTING BUILDING D D D D D D D F CD G B A B A E 29 - BOG 26 - RAZ 9 - SGJ 3 - JTL 5 - GLS 4 - ELM 5 - SGJ 20 - BOG 8 - RAZ 6 - RAZ 12 - NWS 5 - NWS C 6 - NWS 4 - RAZ 3 - GLS 4 - RAZ H A LANDSCAPE KEYNOTES EDGER (TYP.) DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (TYP.) ROCK MULCH (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) 1.5' MAINTENANCE STRIP (TYP.) EXISTING OVERSTORY TREE TO REMAIN (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUBS TO REMAIN (TYP.) BOULDER (TYP.) A B C D E LANDSCAPE LEGEND EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREE (TYP.) EXISTING SHRUB (TYP.) EDGER (TYP.) APPROXIMATE LIMITS OF SOD / IRRIGATION, SOD ALL DISTURBED AREAS (TYP.) BOULDER (TYP.) F G H ORNAMENTAL TREE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SPACING JTL 3 Syringa reticulata Japanese Tree Lilac Clump B & B 6` HT,AS SHOWN OVERSTORY TREE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT CAL SPACING ELM 4 Ulmus japonica `Morton` TM Accolade Elm B & B 2.5" CAL.AS SHOWN SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING SGJ 14 Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`Sea Green Juniper #5 CONT.5` O.C. GLS 8 Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`Gro-Low Fragrant Sumac #5 CONT.4` O.C. GRASSES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING NWS 23 Panicum virgatum `North Wind`Northwind Switch Grass #1 CONT.18" O.C. PERENNIALS & GRASSES QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME CONT SPACING SPACING BOG 48 Helictotrichon sempervirens `Saphirsprudel`Saphire Fountain Blue Oat Grass #1 CONT 18" o.c. RAZ 48 Hemerocallis `Red Razzmatazz`Red Razzmatazz Daylily #1 CONT 24" o.c. PLANT SCHEDULE This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\gatlin development\brookdale center\CADD\PHASE 3\holiday car wash\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE PLAN.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:26pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPE PLANL100HOLIDAY CAR WASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYN CENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.RYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA06/09/202053828DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNRAH/SJBSJBRAHNORTH +/-3'MINIMUM 1/3 OF BOULDER BURIED BENEATH FINISH GRADE COMPACTED SUBGRADE UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR MATERIAL GLACIAL TILL BOULDER WITH SMOOTH EDGES (LOCAL STONE SOURCE), SIZE RANGE FROM 36" TO 48" (+) DIAMETER. DO NOT USE CRACKED OR BROKEN BOULDERS. SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR LOCATION. BOULDERS NOT TO BE PLACED CLOSER THAN 2' TO ANY PAVEMENT AND NO FURTHER THAN 3' .This document, together with the concepts and designs presented herein, as an instrument of service, is intended only for the specific purpose and client for which it was prepared. Reuse of and improper reliance on this document without written authorization and adaptation by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. shall be without liability to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc.SHEET NUMBER 2018 KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.767 EUSTIS STREET, SUITE 100, ST. PAUL, MN 55114PHONE: 651-645-4197WWW.KIMLEY-HORN.COMK:\TWC_LDEV\gatlin development\brookdale center\CADD\PHASE 3\holiday car wash\3 Design\CAD\plansheets\L1-LANDSCAPE DETAILS.dwg June 08, 2020 - 4:27pmBYREVISIONSNo.DATEPRELIMINARY - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONPREPARED FORLANDSCAPEDETAILSL101HOLIDAY CARWASHHOLIDAY STATIONSTORESBROOKLYNCENTERMNDATE:I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BYME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONALLANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OFTHE STATE OF MINNESOTA.MNLIC. NO.RYAN A. HYLLESTED, PLA06/09/202053828DATECHECKED BYSCALEDESIGNED BYDRAWN BYKHA PROJECT16019800006/09/2020AS SHOWNRAH/SJBSJBRAHDOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH NOTES: 2X ROOT BALL WIDTH SOD 4" TOPSOIL PREPARED PLANTING BED AND BACKFILL SOIL (THOROUGHLY LOOSENED) NOTES: 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING OF TOP AND ROOT. 3.REMOVE CONTAINER AND SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOIL MASS TO REDIRECT AND PREVENT CIRCLING FIBROUS ROOTS. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 4.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 5.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 6.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 7.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 8.MIX IN 3-4" OF ORGANIC COMPOST. 1.SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. 2.PROCEED WITH CORRECTIVE PRUNING. 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED PLANTING SOIL. INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT. 4.SLIT REMAINING TREATED BURLAP AT 6" INTERVALS. 5.BACKFILL TO WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE TOP OF THE ROOTBALL, THEN WATER PLANT. REMOVE THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO HORIZONTAL RINGS WHICHEVER IS GREATER. REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM THE TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. REMOVE OR CORRECT STEM GIRDLING ROOTS. 6.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL. 7.WATER THOROUGHLY WITHIN 2 HOURS TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL VOIDS. 8.BACK FILL VOIDS AND WATER SECOND TIME. 9.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OF THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE. 10.FINAL LOCATION OF TREE TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER. PLANTING SOIL ON CENTER SPACING AS STATED ON PLAN. EXTEND HOLE EXCAVATION WIDTH A MINIMUM OF 6" BEYOND THE PLANTS ROOT SYSTEM. FINISHED GRADE EDGER, AS SPECIFIED TREE PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1011 SHRUB / PERENNIAL PLANTING DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1012 1/2"FINISHED GRADE AT LAWN, 1/2" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. LAWN SIDE "BLACK DIAMOND" EDGING BY VALEEY VIEW SPECIALTIES CO. USE 20 FT. LENGTHS. USE KNURLED CONNECTOR AT SPLICES, USE CORNER, TEE, VEE, OR WIDE ANBLE CONNECTORS AT ANGLE 10" X 7/8" METAL ANCHOR STAKES AT 48" O.C., AND AT CHANGES. EACH END. PLASTIC DIVIDER: FINISHED GRADE AT SHRUBS/ PERENNIALS, 1" BELOW TOP OF DIVIDER. PLANTING BED 1"POLY EDGER DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L1013 BUILDING, EXTERIOR WALL PROVIDE POSITIVE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING SPECIFIED ROCK MULCH 1.5' MAINTENANCE STRIP EDGER, AS SPECIFIED SOIL MIX TO BE MINIMUM OF 4" BELOW EDGING TOP TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE LIP FOR MULCH. SPECIFIED SOIL MIX FINISH GRADE FOR LAWN MAINTENANCE STRIP DETAIL SCALE: N.T.S.L10144"1"1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 11.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 12.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 13.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST. 14.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. 15.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16.BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH DOUBLE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL AND COLORED RED, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE RIVER ROCK, 1 1/2" TO 3" DIAMETER, AT MINIMUM 3" DEPTH, OR APPROVED EQUAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WITH NO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 18.EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY-VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19.ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. 20.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. MODIFY EXISTING SYSTEM/PROVIDE NEW SYSTEM-VERIFY WITH OWNER/GENERAL CONTRACTOR, RESTORE IRRIGATION OFFSITE PER IMPROVEMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE SHOP DRAWINGS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22.REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. LANDSCAPE NOTES BOULDER SCALE: 3/4"=1'L1015 From:Matt Durand To:Ginny McIntosh Subject:Fwd: Future Holiday Car Wash Date:Tuesday, July 7, 2020 12:32:08 PM Attachments:image001.png Ginny, Please see below from our neighbors at Bank of America. Regards, Matt From: Owusu, Caleb <caleb.owusu@bofa.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 12:30:57 PM To: Matt Durand <mattdurand@holidayss1.com> Subject: Future Holiday Car Wash Matt, It was my pleasure talking to you a couple weeks ago. I just wanted to let you know how excited the employees at the Shingle Creek Crossing Bank of America are for there to potentially a new car wash less than a minute away from us. As we discussed, this is a very good, high traffic, diverse, enriched community we are in and we do not have any major car washes in the area. The car wash would not only good for your business, but also local businesses around and the citizens in the community. I do believe this would be a hot commodity in this area, and I urge anyone else that you have been communicating with to seriously consider opening up the car wash in Brooklyn Center. Thank you for letting me say my piece and if there is anything that we can help our neighbor out let me know! This message, and any attachments, is for the intended recipient(s) only, may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or proprietary and subject to important terms From:Angela Dahl To:Ginny McIntosh Subject:Re: Follow-up to Comments: Proposed Car Wash (PC Application No. 2020-006) Date:Wednesday, July 8, 2020 7:16:33 PM Hi Ginny, Thank you so much for the response with answers to all my questions. It sounds much better than it seemed just looking at location. There will be many downsides to Sears continuing to hold out for planning. Add this to my comments also. Thanks again, Angela Dahl On Wed, Jul 8, 2020, 15:54 Ginny McIntosh <gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us> wrote: Hi Angie, I wanted to follow up with you on the comment you submitted via the Brooklyn Center Request Tracker. I’ve included a copy of the staff report to this email for your information. Since release of the packet, I have also received additional detailing on how water is collected and discharged within the wash tunnel, which will be discussed at the meeting: How is the water collected in the tunnel & what type of drain system is there? Answer: Water that gets applied to the car will be collected in a large debris pit that runs the length of the tunnel. This pit will capture all water and debris coming from vehicles. Once collected, there is a filter system (i.e. settling tanks) that will capture and large debris (i.e. sand, etc.) and what’s left will be fresh water “gray” water (Gray Water – safe, not drinkable). This fresh gray water then flows into the city’s sanitary sewer system just like what is used for toilets as an example. The tunnel will be designed so that the floor funnels all water to the center of the pit from all ends (see image below). All of the water used in our wash will be fresh water and all of the soaps and detergents used are biodegradable and environmentally friendly. There will be absolutely NO water coming from the car wash that will flow into Shingle Creek, rather it all flows into the city’s sewer system. To utilize the city’s sewer system, I will be purchasing “Sewer Access Credits” (SAC) at the going rate. This is a fee that the city charges me to access the sewer. In conclusion, there is no threat of water from our car wash operation running off into Shingle Creek. Tunnel Floor Draining Slope Example: This is an example from a previous wash that my car wash manufacturer did last year. Car washes are permitted in very few areas of the City as the current Zoning Ordinance only allows the use through issuance of a Special Use Permit and so long as the use does not abut R1 (One Family Residence), R2 (One and Two Family Residence), or R3 (Multiple Family Residence) District properties, including abutment at a street line. This essentially precludes the presence of a car wash for the near entirety of Brooklyn Boulevard and many other areas of the City, particularly as the R1 District is the most prevalent District type in the City. Per Property Owner Frank Gatlin (Gatlin Development Co. Inc.), the business model for car washes typically see the use as an outparcel tenant that relies on good visibility and easy access from major roadways. The car wash was initially proposed for construction on the west end of the Shingle Creek Crossing PUD, off Xerxes Avenue North, and north of the Sears property; however, Sears refused to grant for permission for the use on either Building Sites R or T. The Property Owner attempted to offer incentives to lift the restriction from Sears, but Sears would not agree. Building Sites L, M, O, S, N and Q, located east of Walmart, were also reviewed as potential sites; however, they are all internal to the Shingle Creek Crossing shopping center and are outlined as restaurant or traditional retail uses in the approved PUD documentation and master plans with specific building footprints that are intended to work around the Shingle Creek box culvert and day lighted creek. Of additional concern in proposing a car wash on an internal site is traffic circulation. It is for these reasons that Building Site E was determined to be the best identified alternative location due to its visibility from Bass Lake Road (County Road 10) and access on the edge of the PUD shopping center. If you have any other questions, please let me know. I will relay your comments during the meeting tomorrow evening at 7 p.m. via Webex. If you would like to join in on the meeting, you can access by phone of by browser using the following (click the green button if joining by browser and if you don’t have the Webex app, you can click the “Join from your Browser” on the bottom of the page): Meeting number (access code): 133 710 0749 Meeting password: BCPC07092020 Thursday, July 9, 2020 7:00 pm | (UTC-05:00) Central Time (US & Canada) | 2 hrs Start meeting Join by phone Tap to call in from a mobile device (attendees only) +1-312-535-8110 United States Toll (Chicago) +1-415-655-0001 US Toll Thanks, Ginny Ginny McIntosh | City Planner and Zoning Administrator City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199 www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org | 763.569.3319 | gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us From:Lisa Bluemke To:Meg Beekman; Ginny McIntosh; Jimmy Loyd Subject:New Car Wash Complaint Date:Tuesday, June 23, 2020 3:30:16 PM Hi All, A complaint came in on Request Tracker for the following: Car wash should not be allowed on Shingle Creek. There are far too many chemicals and waste discarded at carwashes. This is a terrible location for the carwash. How about over by Sears? Much more visible! I will close the request, but pass along her information for reference: Angela Dahl 3301 Ohenry Rd 612-400-2429 Angiedahl13@gmail.com Thank you! Lisa Bluemke | Administrative Assistant City of Brooklyn Center 6301 Shingle Creek Parkway | Brooklyn Center, MN 55430 Direct: 763-569-3356 | General: 763-569-3330 General Email: communitydevelopment@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us www.cityofbrooklyncenter.org | lbluemke@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us From:Randy C. To:Ginny McIntosh Subject:Planning Commission items 7.9.2020 Date:Wednesday, July 8, 2020 4:48:33 PM Hi Ginny and Commission, I am trying to do input for the public hearings July 9, 2020. Planning application 2020-006 Matt Durand 1080 shingle Creek Crossing I am excited to once again have a full service car wash in Brooklyn Center and only a few blocks from the previous one. I would suggest that the Friday or regular trash day the outer line be closed until trash hauler have removed the trash. I am in favor of the special use permit and the site and building plan. Planning application 2020-004 C Alan Homes 6000 block of BB - Tabled I am excited to see that there is interest by a builder to put in triplexes. I would have liked to seen some type of condo ownership rather than rental. However, this gives another option for rental in BC as market rate and 3 bedroom. I hope the staff, commission and council will review carefully the snow removal and parking as my biggest concerns. I would not want to have parking spill onto the streets and create issues year round, but specifically during snow season. Planning application 2020-005 C Alan Homes 6900 block of BB - Tabled I am excited to see that there is interest by a builder to put in triplexes. I would have liked to seen some type of condo ownership rather than rental. However, this gives another option for rental in BC as market rate and 3 bedroom. I hope the staff, commission and council will review carefully the snow removal and parking as my biggest concerns. I would not want to have parking spill onto the streets and create issues year round, but specifically during snow season. Following the concern for a short cut if there is a curb cut in Brooklyn Blvd. and further issues of snow removal onto or slowing Brooklyn Blvd. Randy Christensen 7001 Regent Ave N July 7, 2020 C Alan Homes Attn: Terry Robertson and Curt Brekke 5215 Terraceview Ln N Plymouth, MN 55446 RE: City of Brooklyn Center, MN Planning Commission Application No. 2020-004 Request for Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals for the 6000 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard Mr. Robertson and Mr. Brekke, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to approve or deny a written request for certain land use actions within sixty (60) days from receipt of an application. Community Development Department records indicate the City received the above-referenced application and documentation on June 15, 2020, which means the City’s 60-day time limit would expire on August 14, 2020. By allowances granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3(f), the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby providing official notice that the review period has been extended an additional sixty (60) days to allow the time necessary for City staff to prepare a resolution, including proposed conditions of approval, for review and action by City Council. The new deadline for completing the review and final action on this application is now October 13, 2020. As the public hearing has already been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the July 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, the intent is to table the public hearing to provide sufficient time for you, the Applicant, to reconcile any adjustments to the site plan as relating to the additional easements necessary for Phase II of the Brooklyn Boulevard reconstruction and modernization project and determine the ability for driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at (763) 569-3319 or email gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us. Sincerely, Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator July 7, 2020 C Alan Homes Attn: Terry Robertson and Curt Brekke 5215 Terraceview Ln N Plymouth, MN 55446 RE: City of Brooklyn Center, MN Planning Commission Application No. 2020-005 Request for Establishment of a Planned Unit Development, Site and Building Plan, Preliminary and Final Plat Approvals for the 6900 Block of Brooklyn Boulevard Mr. Robertson and Mr. Brekke, Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, the City of Brooklyn Center is required to approve or deny a written request for certain land use actions within sixty (60) days from receipt of an application. Community Development Department records indicate the City received the above-referenced application and documentation on June 15, 2020, which means the City’s 60-day time limit would expire on August 14, 2020. By allowances granted under Minnesota Statutes Section 15.99, Subd. 3(f), the City of Brooklyn Center is hereby providing official notice that the review period has been extended an additional sixty (60) days to allow the time necessary for City staff to prepare a resolution, including proposed conditions of approval, for review and action by City Council. The new deadline for completing the review and final action on this application is now October 13, 2020. As the public hearing has already been published in the Brooklyn Center Sun Post for the July 9, 2020 Planning Commission meeting, the intent is to table the public hearing to provide sufficient time for you, the Applicant, to reconcile any adjustments to the site plan as relating to the additional easements necessary and determine the ability for driveway access off Brooklyn Boulevard from Hennepin County. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to call me at (763) 569-3319 or email gmcintosh@ci.brooklyn-center.mn.us. Sincerely, Ginny McIntosh City Planner and Zoning Administrator